Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/09/02
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![74 File:"Cordillera Freedom Monument".png](#File:"Cordillera_Freedom_Monument".png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_close-up.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![169 File:"No Child Left Behind" sculpture (close up) - Flickr - StrangeInterlude.jpg](#File:"No_Child_Left_Behind"_sculpture_(close_up)_-_Flickr_-_StrangeInterlude.jpg){kind=link}
![170 File:"No Child Left Behind" sculpture (wide shot) - Flickr - StrangeInterlude.jpg](#File:"No_Child_Left_Behind"_sculpture_(wide_shot)_-_Flickr_-_StrangeInterlude.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Bestanddeelnr_929-9074_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![228 File:"Translated Vase Nine Dragons in Wonderland" de Yee Sookyung (Biennale de Venise 2017) - Flickr - dalbera.jpg](#File:"Translated_Vase_Nine_Dragons_in_Wonderland"_de_Yee_Sookyung_(Biennale_de_Venise_2017)_-_Flickr_-_dalbera.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
verletzt religiöse Gefühle von Milliarden ! hurt religious sentiments of billions! Wikinger wiki (talk) 03:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
- Against this deletion request, just an another attempt at religious censorship.--Chrono1084 (talk) 19:48, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Kept. No valid deletion reason. --Martin H. (talk) 07:46, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Muhammad face is Secret 110.136.47.75 01:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 08:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
TWICE &TWICE Repackage album cover (Regular Ed.).png Nikolai Boyanov (talk) 08:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 08:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Already exist on wikimedia Chaziz (talk) 09:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 09:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
{{speedy|[[COM:CSD#F10|F10]]: [[COM:WEBHOST|Personal photo]] by non-contributors}} O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
No compatible copyright is provided at source so this appears to be a clear copyright violation. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- I retract my nomination as there is a https://aviewfrommyseat.com/legal/ page that applies to all works, and it lists all photos use the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Not licensed Lcm00 (talk) 15:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 15:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
own work? - I do'nt believe: 1. Juni 2015 https://www.facebook.com/Bontskates/photos/the-hustler-is-bonts-most-iconic-boot-it-was-the-first-boot-on-the-market-that-w/10153314975018162/ Adelfrank (talk) 16:03, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, It was an admin rename requesting, wait for you... AichiWikiFixer (talk) 11:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7. --Túrelio (talk) 18:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW
- File:流星之絆的Hayashi rice (3253007002).jpg
- File:カップ麺の棚 (6194953019).jpg
- File:献花台 (5071132931).jpg
- File:Secret Message Tatande-kurete-Arigato by KAGOME (5190166806).jpg
- File:CUPNOODLE CURRY (4829292704).jpg
- File:下痢止め (1205969566).jpg
- File:Takarakuji Asakusa 2006 (2243959669).jpg
- File:MORINAGA ICE CREAM (2244540884).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Josve05a (talk) 12:50, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Keep Definitely, These photo are close-shot. But... --Benzoyl (talk) 01:43, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:流星之絆的Hayashi rice (3253007002).jpg - "front package" (under left) is COM:De minimis. I think "the text on upside" is in a normal arrangement.
- File:下痢止め (1205969566).jpg - It is a kind of POP広告. Is it (handwritten letters) too COM:DW ?
- File:CUPNOODLE CURRY (4829292704).jpg - Please See also COM:TOO#Japan (CUPNOODLE)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. @Benzoyl: Please transfer more selectively and sort out entirely personal photos.
File:Awesome socks (4970225709).jpg- File:こたつ (3251928073).jpg
- File:The New Kat House (6129019347).jpg
- File:Eating Cup 'O Noodles on a camping trip (992692498).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
FDMS 4 15:10, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep File:Awesome socks (4970225709).jpg as in scope of Toe socks, not many photos, therefore the more the merrier. Josve05a (talk) 17:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Indeed. FDMS 4 19:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep all. Personally, incomprehensible request... --Benzoyl (talk) 01:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- File:こたつ (3251928073).jpg
- Kotatsu, Timber framing, Hotel bedrooms etc
- What's the difference? - (similar image) Kotatsu-tastefulTN.jpg --Benzoyl (talk) 02:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- File:The New Kat House (6129019347).jpg
- File:Eating Cup 'O Noodles on a camping trip (992692498).jpg
- An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a gallery page or in a category on Commons (policy) – while the photos contain the mentioned objects, they do not illustrate them and and are therefore unlikely to be reused by someone looking for pictures of said objects, especially given that many non-blurry alternatives are available on Commons. FDMS 4 16:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Done: The cathouse is a lil' bit of a stretch but... All in scope (except someone deleted (or ate) the cup'o noodles) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:24, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
помилкове завантаження файлу IGuban (talk) 15:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7. --Túrelio (talk) 18:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Image depicts the front page of a newspaper. FunnyMath (talk) 04:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:10, 2 September 2020 UTC: Commons:Derivative work: newspaper/magazine --Krdbot 21:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Image depicts the front page of a newspaper. FunnyMath (talk) 04:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:10, 2 September 2020 UTC: Commons:Derivative work: newspaper/magazine --Krdbot 21:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 07:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 15:24, 2 September 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 21:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Protected logo and uploaded by accident under CC licence Harakiri Eleison (talk) 08:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 15:02, 2 September 2020 UTC: Protected logo and uploaded by accident under CC licence --Krdbot 21:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nakshatra Bose (talk · contribs)
[edit]All are copyvio images collected from different websites and uploaded on Commons.
- File:Image 74fgfhg.jpg
- File:Image 73gfhfgh.jpg
- File:Image 72fgfh.jpg
- File:Image 69fgfg.jpg
- File:Image 65gfhfg.jpg
- File:Image 64fhvhfghg.jpg
- File:Image 62fgfgf.jpg
- File:Image 63fffhgff.jpg
- File:Image 60fgfgf.jpg
- File:Image 59gfgfgg.webp
- File:Image 58fgfgfg.jpg
- File:Image 55gfgfgf.jpg
- File:Image 53fggfg.webp
- File:Image 51fgffgfg.jpg
- File:Image 50fgfg.jpg
- File:Image 49fgfgg.jpg
- File:Image 48fgfgffg.jpg
- File:Image 44gfdggf.jpg
- File:Image 43fggfgf.jpg
- File:Image 40fgf.jpg
- File:Image 38gfgfgfg.jpg
- File:Image 35gfgf.webp
- File:Image 34fgfg.jpg
- File:Image 33gfg.jpg
- File:Image 32gfxgf.jpg
- File:Image 31fgfg.jpg
- File:Image 29fgfg.jpg
- File:Image 28fgfgf.jpg
- File:Image 26fgfgf.jpg
- File:Image 25fgfgf.jpg
- File:Image 24fgfgfg.jpg
- File:Image 20fggfg.jpg
- File:Image 19fgfgfg.jpg
- File:Image 18fgfgf.jpg
- File:Image 17gfggf.jpg
- File:Image 10fgfgf.jpg
- File:Image 9fgfg.jpg
- File:Image 8gfgf.jpg
- File:Image 7gfgfg.jpg
- File:Image 2grgggf.jpg
- File:Image 3fgfggh.jpg
- File:Image 39dgfhg.jpg
- File:Image 1fdgfgf.jpg
- File:Hghjhjvb.jpg
Bodhisattwa (talk) 05:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 10:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and "copyrighted. No free license. See: https://www.neudesic.com/". --Túrelio (talk) 10:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Wrong upload by author Wumingbai (talk) 22:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- CSD G7: Own work, within a week. ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 07:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 12:07, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Strona stworzona przez pomyłkę Jaroslaw.L (talk) 21:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Weak delete: normally we don't delete user talk pages, but given as the only thing there is the welcome bot, don't see what harm this would do. ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 07:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: user talk pages dont get deleted. --JuTa 21:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Does not depict a notable person. Especially this is not the chess player Emre Can, who can be seen here. Steak (talk) 08:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:50, 3 September 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 09:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Does not depict a notable person. Especially this is not the chess player Emre Can, who can be seen here. Steak (talk) 08:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:50, 3 September 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 09:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
This file needs to be in Wikipedia not in commons since it is a copyright work and can be use fairly in Youth Against Rape page. Pratyush.shrivastava (talk) 21:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Explicit at 12:34, 3 September 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Non-free logo above threshold of originality (F1) --Krdbot 09:03, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Photo non libre: les informations détaillées montrent / Non-free image, metadata shows : (c) HOC-CDC 2019 Cortomaltais (talk) 21:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Sreejithk2000 at 04:00, 4 September 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: HoC photos are not free. [1] --Krdbot 09:03, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 23:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 01:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate SecretName101 (talk) 23:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 01:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 23:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 02:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 23:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 01:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 23:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 02:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Personal image not in use, out of scope Darwin Ahoy! 00:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Personal image not in use, out of scope Darwin Ahoy! 00:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE. User has never been active. – GeMet [talk] 03:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE. User has never been active. – GeMet [talk] 03:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE. User has never been active. – GeMet [talk] 03:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Image depicts the front page of a newspaper. Similar newspapers can be found by using Google Image with this image as the search query. FunnyMath (talk) 04:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Minoraxtalk 02:09, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Image depicts the front page of a newspaper. Similar newspapers can be found by using Google Image with this image as the search query. FunnyMath (talk) 04:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Minoraxtalk 02:09, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Image depicts the front page of a newspaper. FunnyMath (talk) 04:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Minoraxtalk 02:09, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Irrelevant (Personal Photo) photo uploaded part of WLM 2020 IndrajitDas 05:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:37, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Irrelevant (Personal Photo) photo uploaded part of WLM 2020 - IndrajitDas 05:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:37, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 05:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Someone's private picture and a rather bad one at that. JIP (talk) 22:15, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:37, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo, low quality — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MOHIT MISHRA PAYASI (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal group photos
— Draceane talkcontrib. 09:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Geoasher023 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work
Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RandomTyke (talk · contribs)
[edit]I have had discussions with the uploader about one of these images however they have taken the discussions no further for a while. I tagged one as a copyright violation being a book cover. The user stated that surviving relatives had given permission for the use of these images and I asked that this be confirmed via COM:OTRS however nothing seems to have happened. The books author died less than 70 years ago (so copyright would prevail) however equally the artwork would probably not have been the author's. There is a valid en wp page on the person.
- File:Scan North York Moors Title Page crop.jpg
- File:Cover Early AJ BRown Poems compiled by John White b.jpg
- File:Cover John White Book AJBrown Biography.jpg
- File:AJBrown Fair North Riding dust cover.jpg
Herby talk thyme 12:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- File:Chemin de Croix de la Cathédrale Saint-Vincent de Saint-Malo 10.jpg
- File:Chemin de Croix de la Cathédrale Saint-Vincent de Saint-Malo 11.jpg
- File:Chemin de Croix de la Cathédrale Saint-Vincent de Saint-Malo 12.jpg
- File:Chemin de Croix de la Cathédrale Saint-Vincent de Saint-Malo 13.jpg
- File:Chemin de Croix de la Cathédrale Saint-Vincent de Saint-Malo 5.jpg
- File:Chemin de Croix de la Cathédrale Saint-Vincent de Saint-Malo 6.jpg
- File:Chemin de Croix de la Cathédrale Saint-Vincent de Saint-Malo 7.jpg
- File:Chemin de Croix de la Cathédrale Saint-Vincent de Saint-Malo 8.jpg
- File:Chemin de Croix de la Cathédrale Saint-Vincent de Saint-Malo 9.jpg
- File:Saint-Malo (France).jpg
- File:Saint-Malo Chemin de croix 2.jpg
- File:Saint-Malo chemin de croix 3.jpg
- File:Saint-Malo chemin de croix 4.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
VIGNERON (talk) 13:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:28, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Uniqueasad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a personal photo album. Out of scope.
- File:Asadsalah.jpg
- File:Asad Salah SAE.jpg
- File:Asad Salah.jpg
- File:Asad Salah Pics.jpg
- File:Asad Salah photos.jpg
Minoraxtalk 14:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fsanchez1801 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work
Gbawden (talk) 14:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lighthouse Ministries (talk · contribs)
[edit]Book covers, need permission
Gbawden (talk) 14:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blackbetarecords (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, + FB code. --Túrelio (talk) 06:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Recessed-lighting-raine-sqaure-perth.jpg
- File:FX-Track-2-Unios-Wallwasher.jpg
- File:Unios-Portal-Pendant-Light.jpg
- File:Mx-track-series-unios.jpg
- File:Demolition Waste Swan Recycling.jpg
- File:Treasury-building-demolition-focus-demolition.jpg
- File:Annies landing artwork.jpg
- File:Banksia grove entry statement.jpg
- File:Hbf stadium art.jpg
- File:Charles Street Artwork.jpg
- File:The Corner by Lorenna Grant.jpg
- File:The Healers.jpg
- File:7th-ave-bridge-focus-demolition.jpg
- File:Xfusion-apartments-IMGL1738.jpg.pagespeed.ic.zjlttBVSD-.jpg
- File:Aurelia, South Perth 2018.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by André Latgé 1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Dinho ao lado de Zico.jpg
- File:Dinho chorando em discurso.jpg
- File:Dinho ao lado de Luciano Hulk.jpg
- File:Dinho em discurso.jpg
- File:Reabertura do Getulinho.jpg
- File:Dinho distribuindo panfletos.jpg
- File:Dinho no Parque da Cidade de Niterói.jpg
- File:Dinho na reinauguração do Getulinho ao lado do prefeito Rodrigo Neves..jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
license template recently removed by uploader, potentially a screenshot of a non-free tv program. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zakhir shakh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Zoxirjon akramxonov zohirjon -uz.jpg
- File:Zoxirjon akramxonov zohir -jako.jpg
- File:Zohirbek-Jako presentation.jpg
- File:Zoxirjon Akramxonov -pics.jpg
- File:Zoxirjon Akramxonov - nnpics.jpg
- File:Zoxirjon akramxonov uzbekistan football pfl.jpg
- File:Akramxonov zoxirjon -zohirbek lokomotiv.jpg
- File:Zohirbek akramoxnov pc.jpg
- File:Akramxonov Zoxirjon seminarda.jpg
- File:Zoxirjon akramoxnov uzb.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arifur Rahman Official (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Personal image not in use, out of scope Darwin Ahoy! 19:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:49, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Small resolution without metadata. The user has uploaded files from Google Street view (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Demecser.jpg). For example below: File:Derecske.jpg.
- File:Smokvica Krmpotska.jpg
- File:Starigrad Zengg.jpg
- File:View of Érd.jpg
- File:Državna cesta D512.jpg
- File:Sibinj Krmpotski.jpg
- File:Popovača.jpg
- File:Lasinja.jpg
- File:Žaborić.jpg
- File:Gyönk.jpg
- File:Sajóbábony.jpg
- File:Sásd.jpg
- File:Nagybajom.jpg
- File:M1- Exit 94, Bábolna, Ács.jpg
- File:Medgyesegyháza.jpg
- File:Dombrád- Pátrohai út.jpg
- File:Dunavecse2, József Attila utca.jpg
- File:Körösladány Kossuth Lajos utca.jpg
- File:Kemecse.jpg
- File:Nyírmada.jpg
- File:Onga.jpg
- File:Onga2.jpg
- File:Mezőhegyes.jpg
- File:Mezőhegyes2.jpg
- File:Hejő.jpg
- File:Újkígyós.jpg
- File:Sándorfalva.jpg
- File:Derecske.jpg
- File:Nemesgörzsöny.jpg
Regasterios (talk) 20:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Soohorang and Bandabi
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters. No FoP in South Korea for artistic works.
- File:2018 Winter Olympic & Paralympic Promotion material 01.jpg
- File:2018 Winter Olympic & Paralympic Promotion material 04.jpg
- File:2018 Winter Olympic & Paralympic Promotion material 06.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
File:WG Yates hosts safety stand-down at a parking garage construction project at the University of Mississippi. WG Yates created a poster for the event. (14220310529).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP for artworks in the US - ie the banner Gbawden (talk) 11:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Benteecrazy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not the best quality, no EDUSE
Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asif Iqbal1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by YGR Network (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Khaled (talk) 08:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as image uploader wants it deleted. JIP (talk) 22:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --CptViraj (talk) 14:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the uploader's own work. they were just blocked on en.wp for undisclosed paid editing, but they would have us belive they took this professional-grade headshot 6 years before they started spamming on this person's behalf? That doesn't hold up. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- I did actually manange to find it on this person's Amazon page, so it is apparently a copyvio and I have now nominated it for speedy deletion.Beeblebrox (talk) 20:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Sreejithk2000. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is the poster for a film. Source: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisZNxHO-07X0bU_1_1IHkV0GeYROjN1nYLjUKhfVuQjeFXgOL9Sv5xu7hzVTSfw7i7ODj3vnvZ3LewcAL8nRNTn0XX2WLXl3M_1srkMkQymNiI9YKi2TQcWbYokQB6OLriDoq-LFdAN4gj6tMt_1A55PE1VwS6t100MG86mSeEtUgGcv7YKxdwxqolA55CPG7g-ZloqYQnp6wm8eIZkGPP7QtqWhP1j_12S4muhjTxq7o9XNdMXB7Y1mbuFwW0ZdwJUig2FdjA8qONTByFy6oJf5JZV7hPvj48rH2RT2Sv5Gh0dg3CelaI3bvT9mVIruDTxX5v8fFajDQV3rI2o7h9YNDn0jKTP4Ug NeoMeesje (talk) 10:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I created a copy of the file with another extension. Ivan Pchelin (talk) 15:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader requested. --Sealle (talk) 05:33, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RVFA as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Yo el autor de este archivo solicito inmediatamente la eliminación rápida.
Converted to regular DR, as images does not qualify for G7-speedy deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:25, 11 September 2020 UTC: Yo el autor de este archivo solicito inmediatamente la eliminación rápida. --Krdbot 20:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RVFA as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Yo el autor de este archivo solicito inmediatamente la eliminación rápida.
Converted to regular DR, as images does not qualify for G7-speedy deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:25, 11 September 2020 UTC: Yo el autor de este archivo solicito inmediatamente la eliminación rápida. --Krdbot 20:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP for artworks in the US Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
https://toymimao.com/artwork/2527722.html a work by Toym Imao and was inaugurated in 2002. Photos of it infringe his copyrights according to Philippine copyright law. No freedom of panorama that shields said restriction Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
![17:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/09/02#c-Mrcl_lxmna-2020-09-02T17:14:00.000Z-File:"Cordillera_Freedom_Monument".png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
![00:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/09/02#c-Explicit-2020-09-13T00:33:00.000Z-File:"Cordillera_Freedom_Monument".png){kind=link}
Shema - punkt.jpg Nikolai Boyanov (talk) 08:15, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --JuTa 14:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Found elsewhere on the Internet. https://historycouncilnsw.org.au/event/missed-in-history-wikipedia-edit-a-thon/ Copyright status of the three images on the right must be made clear to make sure this is not a copyvio. FunnyMath (talk) 15:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 16:56, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
unused slide from a presentation — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. JIP (talk) 22:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:09, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
possible imagevio, no usage, no cats, promo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted image that can be found here attributed to Mikkel AalandJauerbackdude?/dude. 19:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- For reference, obvious copyright violations are eligible for Commons:Speedy deletion. From Hill To Shore (talk) 21:12, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close: already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This image is useless. It is far too small and doesn't represent anything identifiable. This looks like someone just randomly splashed paint around. JIP (talk) 22:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Apparent copyvio. Source page states, ". © 2020 Genies Inc. All rights reserved." No indication here that there has been any OTRS release. RoySmith (talk) 20:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:15, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 13:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SpinnerLaserz as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author's request AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Please delete it immediately. I uploaded it as a testrun for my use of Inkscape and to upload newer version the map where the main characters came from. SpinnerLaserz (talk) 15:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 14:20, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SpinnerLaserz as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Request by the author AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Please delete it immediately, the file was a test that I uploaded and I was going to upload a map where PreCure had aired. SpinnerLaserz (talk) 15:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 14:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Image uploaded by globally blocked spam account Roboandroid Monster Iestyn (talk) 20:06, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --4nn1l2 (talk) 03:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Picture originates from Facebook, an COM:OTRS is needed. Larryasou (talk) 15:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Uploader did not create 3D object depicted. Created after 1990. No Permission. Nik Deleter (talk) 17:30, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. No Permission from the sculptor Борис Рудий. Created 2002. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
File:The artist Janko de Beer works in his Cape Town studio, Photograph by Ian Glass, National Geographic Magazine.png
[edit]
No permission Gbawden (talk) 11:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation yet. --JuTa 05:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:11, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:11, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:11, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
News and photo on the display. These are copyrighted. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:23, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- A little tend to Keep since this looks doesn't like a proper news, but rather a somewhat statement from Japan government, for other "copyrighted works", either okay per COM:DM, or you can try to crop them. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Comment News and photo by ja:共同通信社 (en:Kyodo News). Copyrighted. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:52, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. --Yasu (talk) 15:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No evidence that this is own work of uploader 'IvanEComposer' or that he holds copyright. This is a press release of an event featuring a certain 'Ivan Rodriguez' - looks like an attempt at selfpromotion. An article on Ivan Rodrigues by "IvanEComposer" was deleted in an AfD on Wikipedia where conflict of interest was also raised. Smerus (talk) 07:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- The article 'Iván Enrique Rodríguez', the only Wikipedia article to use this image, has been deleted.--Smerus (talk) 18:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Also the author name at the info section and the one at the MD are different; therefore this is more a delete. (The person may or may not be in scope. He has not added a CR thingy to his internet page, but that does not change the fact that the author is there and we do not have "his" permission.) --E4024 (talk) 14:29, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Author Axel Sauerwein needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused photo, probably imagevio — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused promo photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused promo photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unclear source, low resolution — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- maybe Keep, Mitch Garber exists. — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:47, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
probably imagevio, unclear source, low resolution — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
слишко большой размер фото Ana Bondari (talk) 08:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 08:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Does not depict a notable person. Especially this is not the chess player Emre Can, who can be seen here. Steak (talk) 08:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Does not depict a notable person. Especially this is not the chess player Emre Can, who can be seen here. Steak (talk) 08:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Does not depict a notable person. Especially this is not the chess player Emre Can, who can be seen here. Steak (talk) 08:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Does not depict a notable person. Especially this is not the chess player Emre Can, who can be seen here. Steak (talk) 08:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- This and the other pictures uploaded show Emre Yılmaz, OoS youngster from Samsun. Delete all. --E4024 (talk) 01:08, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MishelSpiru (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal photos
— Draceane talkcontrib. 09:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:15, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unclear source, imagevio? — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused promo photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
very low resolution; I know that the file is used on itwiki, but I doubt benefit of such small image — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE so keep until we get a better one. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
only text — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
out of scope — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
personal photo by inactive user with only 3 edits on his userpage — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
possible imagevio, no usage, no cats, promo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Caleb Sequilán (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused promo photos
— Draceane talkcontrib. 09:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Does not look like own work, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 11:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
_in_close-up.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_close-up.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low-quality depiction of nudity (COM:NUDITY) AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 05:07, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
_in_close-up.png){kind=link}
- Delete Low-quality depiction of nudity 71.209.176.185 17:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete No problem with nudity, but the quality of this image is just terrible. JIP (talk) 22:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Weak delete Low quality, but does give the age, while most similar files do not. Brianjd (talk) 02:09, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Small file w/o Metadata. No other arguments needed. COM:PCP requires its deletion. --E4024 (talk) 01:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:11, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
_in_close-up.png){kind=link}
Not own work. Found elsewhere on the Internet. https://ancashaldia.com/historia-asi-fue-la-reincorporacion-de-tacna-al-peru-hace-87-anos-video/ FunnyMath (talk) 17:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:11, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Found elsewhere on the Internet. https://www.connuestroperu.com/index2.php?option=com_content&task=emailform&id=13594 FunnyMath (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be taken from Twitter, here. Unlikely to be uploader's own work. Ajmint (talk) 21:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
What's the point of bringing this up? I know rules are rules, but there is only a remote chance the copyright holder would even care. There are bigger issues to deal with on Wikipedia than this time-waste --174.91.48.251 13:13, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Copyright owner has not provided permission for free use. – Rhain ☔ 10:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Clearly not the author's "own work." Jarhill (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. FunnyMath (talk) 14:03, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 10:34, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- File:Невский,28 Дом книги.JPG
- File:The Невский (2) - panoramio.jpg
- File:Зингер, дом.jpg
- File:Дом компании Зингер 2014.jpg
- File:St. Petersburg31.jpg
- File:Zinger's house.jpg
- File:Дом книги - panoramio.jpg
- File:Дом компании Singer.jpg
- File:Памятник в Питере))).jpg
- File:2. Торговый дом компании "ЗингерЪ".JPG
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
)).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Low-quality pictures of one of the most fotographed places in Saint Petersburg. They have no educational value in such condition and there are many alternative images to illustrate articles. --Красный wanna talk? 00:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
And also:
- File:David Duke em 1978 (cropped).jpg
- File:David Duke em 1978 (cropped)2.jpg
- File:David Duke em 1978 (cropped)3.jpg
- File:David Duke em 1978 (cropped 4).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by FunnyMath as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source link says image is taken by Associated Press: [2]. I highly doubt the Associated Press would not put a copyright notice on their images. If they have not put a copyright notice, we need more evidence (such as showing the front and back side of the photo itself). AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete for all of them, per nom. -Mardus /talk 23:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:45, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:OTRS must be used instead. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:53, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in sandbox. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:53, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
needs proof that own work. Photos of photos
Estopedist1 (talk) 17:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't want this image to be public Raviosterno (talk) 19:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't want this image to be public Raviosterno (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't want this image to be public Raviosterno (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't want this image to be public Raviosterno (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't want this image to be public Raviosterno (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't want this image to be public Raviosterno (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't want this image to be public Raviosterno (talk) 19:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't want this image to be public Raviosterno (talk) 19:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't want this image to be public Raviosterno (talk) 19:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't want this image to be public Raviosterno (talk) 19:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't want this image to be public Raviosterno (talk) 19:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is a screenshot from Google Street View. Regasterios (talk) 20:12, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Guliolopez as Logo (above threshold of originality)
Irish company, COM:TOO Ireland is "uncertain". AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Logo with copyright Yogwi21 (talk) 02:12, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 23:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
I'm not sure about this media's copyright status. ELTISAFE (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted logo. --ƏXPLICIT 23:46, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
I'm not sure about this media's copyright status. ELTISAFE (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted logo. --ƏXPLICIT 23:46, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Delete Copyright violation. No indication at the source that this logo is available under a cc-by-4.0 license, nor any evidence to indicate the uploader is an authorized copyright representative of the organization. Hammersoft (talk) 13:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
This is a logo of an Indian organization. [3] COM:TOO India says India has a TOO similar to the US. I am unsure whether this logo passes the US TOO or not because of the design of the letter R. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 15:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Low-quality picture of a magazine cover with probably an unfree photograph. QTHCCAN (talk) 15:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Mało wyraźne zdjęcie Grzeczny (talk) 15:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Small file w/o camera EXIF, dubious own work. COM:PCP. --E4024 (talk) 02:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 00:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
_-_Flickr_-_StrangeInterlude.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Flickr_-_StrangeInterlude.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama for artworks such as this in United States William Avery (talk) 16:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
![16:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/09/02#c-William_Avery-2020-09-02T16:32:00.000Z-File:"No_Child_Left_Behind"_sculpture_(close_up)_-_Flickr_-_StrangeInterlude.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 23:44, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
![23:44, 8 October 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/09/02#c-Explicit-2020-10-08T23:44:00.000Z-File:"No_Child_Left_Behind"_sculpture_(close_up)_-_Flickr_-_StrangeInterlude.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Flickr_-_StrangeInterlude.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Flickr_-_StrangeInterlude.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama for artworks such as this in United States William Avery (talk) 16:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 23:45, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work with unknown source. Likely screenshotted from a social media app. Atomicdragon136 (talk) 17:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Image was created by/for the university and thus is copyrighted by the university and cannot be the work of the uploader as is claimed. Bluepjs23 (talk) 19:23, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 23:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Looks like an advertisement GeorgHH • talk 19:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
It's highly unlikely that a college has licensed its seal under a CC license; we need proof of this extraordinary claim. ElKevbo (talk) 20:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
The file is copyrighted as a logo and is not free or proprietary, the license is false AleUst (talk) 11:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 04:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hmmm... Well, I'd say it is in scope (w:en:Matthew Christopher), but I'm concerned about the copyright. The photo was uploaded in 2013, so Google search by image/TinEye are not effective. It also contains EXIF, but it's small and is also a rather professional photo.
{{Weak delete}}, perhaps.Ahmadtalk 01:17, 9 September 2020 (UTC)- The same uploader also uploaded File:Fashion Designer Matthew Christopher, mc2016.jpg. This one has OTRS permission. Considering all this, then weak Keep. Ahmadtalk 01:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- The same uploader also uploaded File:Fashion Designer Matthew Christopher, mc2016.jpg. This one has OTRS permission. Considering all this, then weak
Deleted: as copyvio. It doesn't look right: in the EXIF data of this file it says "Jacklyn Greenberg; Copyright holder 2008 JAGstudios". This doesn't match the credit given at File:Fashion Designer Matthew Christopher, mc2016.jpg, which has OTRS permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built in the 1957. No Permission from the architects І. Михайленко, В. Новиков, Д. Чорновол. Микола Василечко (talk) 13:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:36, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
A low-quality upload (see cropping, summary, categorisation) with no global usage and no real potential for usage as a company's logo for which an SVG version exists Bernat Tortajada (talk) 19:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Generally complex logos need OTRS-permission. But maybe this is very old logo – how old is it actually? Taivo (talk) 19:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination until age/PD status can be determined. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: scanned version of a picture per the format AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: scanned version of a picture per the format AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; user already uploaded a file from Facebook as own work. Dubious all. E4024 (talk) 00:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF; user already uploaded a file from Facebook as own work. Dubious own work and also dubious scope. E4024 (talk) 00:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Low quality & blurry, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, flag of non-notable micronation tagged for speedy deletion on eswiki Spicy (talk) 01:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Previously published in Facebook + quite a self promo included. E4024 (talk) 03:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; scope?. --Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Note the watermark and the lack of EXIF data. FunnyMath (talk) 04:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
No evidence that this is own work of uploader 'IvanEComposer' or that he holds copyright. The upload in fact saysa that the photo is by 'Alex Sergeant'. As the photo is of 'Ivan Rodriguez' this looks like an attempt at selfpromotion. An article on Ivan Rodriguez by "IvanEComposer" was deleted in an AfD on Wikipedia where conflict of interest was also raised. Smerus (talk) 07:23, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- The article 'Iván Enrique Rodríguez', the only Wikipedia article to use this image, has been deleted.--Smerus (talk) 18:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
No evidence that this is own work of uploader 'IvanEComposer' or that he holds copyright. This appears to be a press release photo from an event featuring 'Ivan Rodriguez' - looks like an attempt at selfpromotion. An article on Ivan Rodrigues by "IvanEComposer" was deleted in an AfD on Wikipedia where conflict of interest was also raised. Smerus (talk) 07:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- The article 'Iván Enrique Rodríguez', the only Wikipedia article to use this image, has been deleted.--Smerus (talk) 18:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
No evidence that this is own work of uploader 'IvanEComposer' or that he holds copyright. This appears to be a press release photo of an event featuring Ivan Rodriguez - looks like an attempt at selfpromotion. An article on Ivan Rodrigues by "IvanEComposer" was deleted in an AfD on Wikipedia where conflict of interest was also raised. Smerus (talk) 07:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- The article 'Iván Enrique Rodríguez', the only Wikipedia article to use this image, has been deleted.--Smerus (talk) 18:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
A Google reverse search reveals that this image is used on a lot of wallpaper websites where there is not stated that this is the uploader's own work. https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiuEdQf5ELXy4j4rAWl2cPxN7hjKHM65rshtScFQY5TgYb5jycCYE2UpUg4RgPr7jn1NgYoWbTEA1MYtdY2Fan9Flg_1YHnhDSvFba1v0jWzEVYi7G062BLmp9F2N9FHaoYO2GPoBt7GeqWT_1NWRopJknz6o2RDXy4Tffkvt-TYMzwAquQ9sD8QcPO59LOe8wGNCv6p3iPDi3rwjq2t3WDZNm1UJNSXw6A0BmPgJ9QjACkLDcCvDIK8DAmju0O5k1szhC-ACPUVx-QpMFpI3qHmAw14AOBT0FIr3H60vjkxizjYnlJ44H7Amt1k8pfL6LvL50JmVlCgSnCsjj4wEGAepnNPUOuQ&sxsrf=ALeKk02zJqIpy9ZFNWH9LB8P__imuiI1wg:1599051084999&ei=TJVPX8bJPJCUsAe7lbDAAw&start=0&sa=N&ved=2ahUKEwjGn5i_wcrrAhUQCuwKHbsKDDg4FBDy0wN6BAgLEC4&biw=1440&bih=766 NeoMeesje (talk) 12:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Painting made by painter Josip Babogredac (died 1989). No permission. Smooth O (talk) 14:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Most likely not own work. Image has no EXIF data. FunnyMath (talk) 14:23, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Image seems to be screenshot. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Permission link provided implies the icons in the image cannot be used for commercial purposes: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/graphic.shtml This violates Wikimedia Commons and should be deleted. FunnyMath (talk) 14:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Permission link provided implies the icons in the image cannot be used for commercial purposes: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/graphic.shtml This violates Wikimedia Commons and should be deleted. FunnyMath (talk) 14:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Permission link provided implies the icons in the image cannot be used for commercial purposes: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/graphic.shtml This violates Wikimedia Commons and should be deleted. FunnyMath (talk) 14:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 17:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Image has no EXIF data. FunnyMath (talk) 14:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Clear case. E4024 (talk) 03:11, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
It seems likely that this image may originate from https://www.skinlueur.com/ based on the en wp (draft) article). The website has a clear copyright statement so COM:OTRS permission would be necessary to host this image. Herby talk thyme 11:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 10:35, 10 November 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chomeley Ardaniel CEO.jpg --Krdbot 14:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
,_Bestanddeelnr_929-9074_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Bestanddeelnr_929-9074_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Rossel44 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Auteursrechthebbende: © Auteursrechthebbende onbekend |source=https://www.nationaalarchief.nl/onderzoeken/fotocollectie/acbc1420-d0b4-102d-bcf8-003048976d84 AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
,_Bestanddeelnr_929-9074_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination and as a derivative work of File:Paus Johannes Paulus I (kop), Bestanddeelnr 929-9074.jpg, which was deleted as a copyvio on 30 August 2020. JGHowes talk 16:22, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
,_Bestanddeelnr_929-9074.jpg){kind=link}
,_Bestanddeelnr_929-9074_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Die Strukturformel ist offensichtlich falsch. Das Lactamstickstoffatom ist falsch positioniert, es muss dort stehen, wo in der angegebenen Formel die Methylengruppe abgebildet ist. Die korrekte Formel kann anhand des folgenden systematischen Namens leicht erzeugt werden:9-Brom-7,12-dihydrobenzo[2,3]azepino[4,5-b]indol-6(5H)-on. Klymatrism (talk) 13:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Moin, moin, Klymatrism, auch diese Formel ist falsch, kann also gelöscht werden. Ich habe eben in den Artikel eine korrigierte Strukturformel eingefügt. Viele Grüße --Jue (talk) 16:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This file was superseded by File:Kenpaullon Structural Formula V2.svg as corrected version by the same uploader. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:39, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Die Strukturformel ist offensichtlich falsch. Das Lactamstickstoffatom ist falsch positioniert, es muss dort stehen, wo in der angegebenen Formel die Methylengruppe abgebildet ist. Die korrekte Formel kann anhand des folgenden systematischen Namens leicht erzeugt werden: 7,12-Dihydrobenzo[2,3]azepino[4,5-b]indol-6(5H)-on. Klymatrism (talk) 13:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Moin, moin, Klymatrism, stimmt, die Formel ist falsch, kann also gelöscht werden. Ich habe eben in den Artikel Paullone eine korrigiert Formel eingefügt. MfG --Jue (talk) 16:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Chemically incorrect file which was superseded by File:Paullone General Formula V3.svg by the same uploader. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF presented as "own work". Uploader's camera info can be seen at File:View from the top of Padrão dos Descobrimentos in Belem, Lisbon.jpg E4024 (talk) 23:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:39, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The file consists data from Picasa, a software of photo editing. The initial photo may have been cropped or otherwise edited. An original shot with a CC license proof may be needed instead of that forgery. 178.120.62.11 20:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Sealle (talk) 07:49, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Quakewoody as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, en:Tharaka Mahesh was twice deleted due to promotion. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Speedy was objected to by another user, without notifying me and without creating the discussion himself. So, now, here I am, creating this discussion. Speedy was tagged as F10 - personal photos by non-contributors. Also worth nothing, the person who is in the photo has been deleted across all projects. Quakewoody (talk) 17:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete this and File:Tharaka mahesh.jpg too --Sreejith K (talk) 05:23, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, en:Tharaka Mahesh was twice deleted due to promotion. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
необходимо обсудить, нарушение авторских прав отсутствует Aleksandr Ger (talk) 16:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:23, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
No licence from photographer Bahnmoeller (talk) 16:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:24, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Image has no EXIF data. Image is similar to copyvios uploaded by the uploader. FunnyMath (talk) 18:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
unused, wrong format. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of a Jeff Koons artwork (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Jackson_and_Bubbles) William Avery (talk) 16:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Koons is still living and the sculpture is from 1988. This version is located in a museum in Oslo, and there is no freedom of panorama in Norway for any type of art (interior or exterior). clpo13(talk) 16:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
следует обсудить и оставить файл так как нарушения нет, скан был сделан с разрешения обладателя фото Aleksandr Ger (talk) 16:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission is needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Следует обсудить, так ка нарушения нет скан был сделан с разрешения правообладателя Aleksandr Ger (talk) 16:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission is needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
следует обсудить, так как этот скан был сделан с разрешения правообладателя и не нарушает авторских прав Aleksandr Ger (talk) 17:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission is needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor quality. There are lots of good photos of this place. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
следует обсудить так как этот скан был сделан с разрешения правообладателя и не нарушает авторских прав Aleksandr Ger (talk) 17:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission is needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Image has no EXIF data. Similar images found elsewhere on the Internet. https://twitter.com/valu8899/status/1004599966906683392 FunnyMath (talk) 03:03, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FunnyMath as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image has no EXIF data. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. Very similar image found in a Twitter video. |source=[4], go to 0:17
Uploader is blocked for persistent copyvio, however the image does not match the potential source. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:08, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
The owner states at https://www.eso.org/public/outreach/copyright/ that "If an image includes a picture of an identifiable person, using that image for commercial purposes is not permitted." Since the file (for example, at t=52s) contains an image of an identifiable person, the video is not compliant with Commons copyright policies which implies availiability for commercial purposes. Mercy11 (talk) 04:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Author UN Photo/Manuel Elias - not own work. Needs source or evidence that this is PD to keep Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
File:"Translated Vase Nine Dragons in Wonderland" de Yee Sookyung (Biennale de Venise 2017) - Flickr - dalbera.jpg
[edit]_-_Flickr_-_dalbera.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Flickr_-_dalbera.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work with no evidence of release by the original artist William Avery (talk) 16:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Invalid licence: uploader falsely claimed to own the image JasonAQuest (talk) 16:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Other speedy deletions
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Originally tagged speedy by Silent Wind of Doom with the rationale: "Images of sports uniforms have been ruled fair use as per this discussion." The images appear to be original works, but derivative of the actual uniforms worn by the players. Some of these uniform designs appear to consist solely of common property shapes (regular clothing and simple geometry), colors, and text. Others may have more complicated designs and should be considered for deletion.
Guanaco (talk) 09:08, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: none of the uniforms here strike me as above the COM:TOO. Just fancy text, plain colors and a stripe or two. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:52, 25 August 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope pictures.
Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 16 January 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by BrunoBernardino as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: <G7> The limit has been way past 7 days, not eligible for speedy.
1989 (talk) 01:52, 25 February 2019 (UTC) Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 11:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Kontrollstellekundl as Speedy (sla) and the most recent rationale was: Outdated maps of districts of Styria, Fake SVGs by Kontrollstelle Kundl
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus. --ƏXPLICIT 00:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These files were initially tagged by Davey2010 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: author req
CptViraj (talk) 16:59, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Kept 3 as requested. --Minoraxtalk 07:03, 6 November 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Sturm as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: No inside pictures are / were allowed. Per COM:FOP Brazil this should be fine, definitely no speedy deletion case.
GPSLeo (talk) 20:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:30, 16 November 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Imagesdomainepublic[edit]Uploader request well after 7 days, all unused. To be clear, I am not the uploader, I just converted to DR after the uploader tagged for speedy deletion.
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
User:Dairokkan9's COM:CSD#G7 requests[edit]Speedy deletion was requested per COM:CSD#G7, but these are too old, so converting to DR.
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC) Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Other speedy deletions[edit]Out of scope as excluded educational content.
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 07:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Other speedy deletions[edit]Converted from speedy deletion requests. These are all a few-month-old 20px by 20px images, requested for deletion by the author, and in use on template pages created by the author. These logos are so low-resolution to prevent their educational use, and are therefore out of COM:SCOPE, so they should be deleted.
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Other speedy deletions[edit]Converted from User:Atcovi's speedy request. Too old for COM:CSD#G7, reason for deletion?
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 18:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC) |
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
,_Chatham_Bus_Station,_19_December_2017.jpg){kind=link}
,_31_October_2018_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Waterfront_Way_(Chatham_Bus_Station),_19_December_2017.jpg){kind=link}
,_31_October_2018.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Chatham_Bus_Station,_17_January_2018.jpg){kind=link}
,_Chatham_Bus_Station,_17_January_2018_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_rear_view.jpg){kind=link}
_front_view.jpg){kind=link}
_front_view.jpg){kind=link}
_rear_view.jpg){kind=link}
_CRDi_(India)_rear_view.jpg){kind=link}
_CRDi_(India)_front_view.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Other speedy deletions
[edit]Nominated G7 by uploader, but ineligible due to age. These are high quality, hand drawn works and could be within scope, so kicking them to DR.
- File:Theophilus the Wolf (separated) (without shading variant).png
- File:Harvett Fox (2021 version) (separated) (without shading and shadow variant).png
- File:Fox (Silvio B.) - Happy Fox Pop Day (separated) (without shading variant).png
_(without_shading_variant).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(separated)_(without_shading_and_shadow_variant).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Happy_Fox_Pop_Day_(separated)_(without_shading_variant).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete all because those variants are unnecessary. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 10:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC); edited: 10:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: These are high quality works, I commend the uploader for their artistry, courtesy deletion is granted. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by E4024 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
Converting to DR due to age. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Well, as she has declared herself a duchess and nobody objected in such a long time, I could use a tin medal for discovering the abuse of Commons. :) Delete. --E4024 (talk) 16:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Екатерина Борисова (talk · contribs)
[edit]No COM:FOP in Russia.
- File:Москва, пер. Достоевского, батальное полотно 04 (фрагмент).jpg
- File:Москва, пер. Достоевского, батальное полотно 01.jpg
- File:Москва, пер. Достоевского, батальное полотно 03 (фрагмент).jpg
- File:Москва, пер. Достоевского, батальное полотно 02 (фрагмент).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:42, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 00:22, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Екатерина Борисова (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works as claimed by the uploader, but derivatives of non-free (due to their age) sculptures. No FoP in Russia and Ukraine for such artworks.
- File:Ermilovo. War memorial 02.jpg
- File:Ermilovo. War memorial 01.jpg
- File:Manola. War memorial 01.jpg
- File:Manola. War memorial 02.jpg
- File:Парк Победы. Шахматно-шашечный павильон. Скульптура Фронт.jpg
- File:Парк Победы. Шахматно-шашечный павильон. Скульптура Тыл.jpg
- File:Кингисепп. Мемориал в Роще 500 02.jpg
- File:Кингисепп. Мемориал в Роще 500 03.jpg
- File:Приозерск. Ленин в Разливе 01.jpg
- File:Приозерск. Ленин в Разливе 02.jpg
- File:Приозерск. Памятник Ленину 01.jpg
- File:Приозерск. Памятник Ленину 02.jpg
- File:Пушкин. Памятник Тельману 4.jpg
- File:Пушкин. Памятник Тельману 2.jpg
- File:Кингисепп. Скорбященская церковь 02.jpg
- File:Кингисепп. Памятник партизанам.jpg
- File:Москва, Спиридоновка, памятник Блоку.jpg
- File:Москва, Преображенская площадь. Памятник С. Л. Бухвостову 2.jpg
- File:Москва, Преображенская площадь. Памятник С. Л. Бухвостову.jpg
- File:Усадьба Измайлово. Памятник Петру.jpg
- File:Колпино. Ленин.jpg
- File:Приморский парк Победы, памятник Кирову04.jpg
- File:Приморский парк Победы, памятник Кирову03.jpg
- File:Приморский парк Победы, памятник Кирову01.jpg
- File:Приморский парк Победы, памятник Кирову02.jpg
- File:Каменноостровский, 14 05.jpg kept
- File:Каменноостровский, 14 04.jpg kept
- Качество и размер не позволяют полноценно увидеть барельефы на этой и предыдущей фотографиях, дабы оно хоть как-то вышло за De minimis. Сами доски при этом тривиальны и состоят только из текста. Красный wanna talk? 21:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- File:Измайловский сад. Ангел Петербурга.jpg
- File:Московский парк Победы. Гречко.jpg
- File:Остров Декабристов. Братская могила рабочих завода имени Калинина 02.jpg
- File:Мартышкинский мемориал. Южная часть. Тимченко.jpg
- File:Мартышкинский мемориал. Южная часть. Андреев.jpg
- File:Мартышкинский мемориал. Южная часть. Щербаков.jpg
- File:Мартышкинский мемориал. Южная часть02.jpg
- File:Мартышкинский мемориал. Северная часть 02.jpg
- File:Мартышкинский мемориал. Северная часть 03.jpg
- File:Стрельна. Мемориал на Стрельнинском кладбище 04.jpg
- File:Стрельна. Мемориал на Стрельнинском кладбище 03.jpg
- File:Красное Село. Бюст Можайского.jpg
- File:Всеволожск. Мемориал 'Румболовская гора'.jpg
- File:Усадьба Измайлово. Собор Покрова Пресвятой Богородицы, мем. доска.jpg
- File:Мясницкая 21. доска 1980 года.jpg kept
- Ну, если въедаться, то конкретно эта доска является производной работой от известной картины и портрета, оба на момент создания мемориальной доски уже находились в общественном достоянии. Красный wanna talk? 19:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- File:Гагарина 27, Гастелло 30.jpg
- File:Гагарина 21, Фрунзе 29.jpg
- File:Памятник Калинину на пл. Калинина02.jpg
- File:Памятник Калинину на пл. Калинина03.jpg
- File:Памятник Калинину на пл. Калинина01.jpg
- File:Крупская у ДК Крупской04.jpg
- File:Крупская у ДК Крупской03.jpg
- File:Ленин у Невского завода03.jpg kept
- File:Ленин у Невского завода04.jpg kept
- File:Ленин у Невского завода02dif.jpg kept
- Ленин у Невского завода изготовлен в 1926 году, автор умер в 1930 году. Сделала соответствующие добавления в описаниях фотографий и в категории памятника. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 20:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- File:Памятник Володарскому03.jpg
- File:Памятник Володарскому01.jpg
- File:Памятник Володарскому02.jpg
- File:Памятник Героическому комсомолу04.jpg
- File:Памятник Героическому комсомолу03.jpg
- File:Памятник Героическому комсомолу02.jpg
- File:Памятник Кирову01.jpg
- File:Памятник Кирову02.jpg
- File:Пушкин. Памятник Тельману.jpg
- File:Кобона, воинский мемориал, памятник02.jpg
- File:Кобона, воинский мемориал, памятник03.jpg
- File:Лысьва. Церковно-приходская школа (ул. Мира 6)01.jpg
- File:Лысьва. Памятник погибшим за Советскую власть на Урале01.jpg
- File:Onezhskaya Embankment, Victory Park & Fishermen sculpture01.jpg
- File:Onezhskaya Embankment, Victory Park & Fishermen sculpture03.jpg
- File:Onezhskaya Embankment, Victory Park & Fishermen sculpture02.jpg
- File:Памятник П. Ф. Виноградову, Троицкий пр. 02.jpg
- File:Памятник П. Ф. Виноградову, Троицкий пр. 01.jpg
- File:Ржевская улица, знак Ржевский коридор03.jpg
- File:Ржевская улица, знак Ржевский коридор02.jpg
- File:Литовская 2И 02.jpg
- File:Крупская у ДК Крупской02.jpg
- File:Крупская у ДК Крупской01.jpg
- File:Московская площадь. Ленин02.jpg
- File:Московская площадь. Ленин03.jpg
- File:Московская площадь. Ленин01.jpg
- File:Обелиск Севера08.jpg
- File:Обелиск Севера07.jpg
- File:Обелиск Севера06.jpg
- File:Обелиск Севера05.jpg
- File:Обелиск Севера04.jpg
- File:Обелиск Севера02.jpg
- File:Обелиск Севера03.jpg
- File:Обелиск Севера01.jpg
- File:Segezha07 2.jpg
- File:Сквер Андрея Петрова.jpg
- File:Страстной б-р, памятник Твардовскому.JPG
- File:Сретенский бульвар, памятник Шухову.JPG
- File:Б. Никитская 13. Памятник Чайковскому.JPG
- File:Арсенальная, памятник Саше Кондратьеву.jpg
- File:Дусьево.jpg
- File:Лагерный сад.Монумент славы.jpg
- File:Nikita7549.JPG
- File:Kiev3169.JPG
- File:Kiev3168.JPG
- File:Парк Победы.Мальчик06.JPG
- File:Парк Победы.Мальчик05.JPG
- File:Парк Победы.Мальчик04.JPG
- File:Парк Победы.Физк01.JPG
- File:Парк Победы.Зоя02.JPG
- File:Парк Победы.Зоя01.JPG
- File:Парк Победы.Мальчик03.JPG
- File:Segezha07.JPG
- File:Segezha02.jpg
01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
VLu (talk) 07:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Судя по вашей странице обсуждения, вам можно писать по-русски. Я понимаю суть проблемы, однако впервые сталкиваюсь с формулировкой "Not own works as claimed by the uploader". Обычно пишут "No FoP in Russia" и этого достаточно для обозначения сути претензии. Поэтому прежде всего возникает вопрос: должна ли я дополнительно доказывать, что фотографии сделаны именно мною, или все-таки будем обсуждать свободу панорамы (или ее отсутствие) для того или иного снимка? То, что не я сама сотворила все изображенные памятники, надеюсь, обсуждать не требуется. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 16:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Екатерина Борисова, если вы это понимаете, удивительно, что в описании этих фотографий, равно как и фото других объектов, срок охраны АП которых истёк согласно законам стран происхождения, вы, имея целый набор флагов, которые должны демонстрировать уважение к авторским правам и понимание необходимости их соблюдения в данном проекте, не указываете ни авторов, ни даты создания оригинальных произведений, ни статус ваших фотографий как производных работ. Для этого имеется, в частности, удобный шаблон {{Copyright information}}. --VLu (talk) 17:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Я прошу прощения, но мне не менее удивительно, что вы не обратили никакого внимания на описания фотографий, большинство из которых загружено на конкурс Wiki Loves Monuments и снабжены соответствующим шаблоном объекта культурного наследия России (cultural heritage object in Russia) с номером объекта. По клику на номер можно получить карточку с полным описанием объекта, а по клику на описание шаблона (guidelines) - исчерпывающее объяснение, каким образом загружаются подобные снимки. Это всё используется много лет и, казалось бы, должна выработаться уже определенная схема взаимодействия между всеми участниками процесса, но, тем не менее, находятся люди, которые не считают нужным ничего читать. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ваша попытка перехода в атаку крайне неуместна. Если я правильно понял эту тираду, вы загружали эти изображения, заведомо зная, что они грубо нарушают авторские права создателей и правила Commons. Это, знаете ли, очень плохо сочетается с наличием у вашей учётной записи нескольких флагов. --VLu (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- У меня нет ни малейшего желания кого-либо атаковать, однако я все-таки настоятельно прошу вас изучить шаблон культурного наследия России, который создавался, в числе прочего, еще и для того, чтобы не приходилось вступать в такого рода дискуссии. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 17:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ваша попытка перехода в атаку крайне неуместна. Если я правильно понял эту тираду, вы загружали эти изображения, заведомо зная, что они грубо нарушают авторские права создателей и правила Commons. Это, знаете ли, очень плохо сочетается с наличием у вашей учётной записи нескольких флагов. --VLu (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Я прошу прощения, но мне не менее удивительно, что вы не обратили никакого внимания на описания фотографий, большинство из которых загружено на конкурс Wiki Loves Monuments и снабжены соответствующим шаблоном объекта культурного наследия России (cultural heritage object in Russia) с номером объекта. По клику на номер можно получить карточку с полным описанием объекта, а по клику на описание шаблона (guidelines) - исчерпывающее объяснение, каким образом загружаются подобные снимки. Это всё используется много лет и, казалось бы, должна выработаться уже определенная схема взаимодействия между всеми участниками процесса, но, тем не менее, находятся люди, которые не считают нужным ничего читать. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Екатерина Борисова, если вы это понимаете, удивительно, что в описании этих фотографий, равно как и фото других объектов, срок охраны АП которых истёк согласно законам стран происхождения, вы, имея целый набор флагов, которые должны демонстрировать уважение к авторским правам и понимание необходимости их соблюдения в данном проекте, не указываете ни авторов, ни даты создания оригинальных произведений, ни статус ваших фотографий как производных работ. Для этого имеется, в частности, удобный шаблон {{Copyright information}}. --VLu (talk) 17:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
@VLu: Хотя формально вы правы насчёт несвободы панорамы, следует всё-таки воздерживаться от таких утверждений, как "Not own works". Фотографии сделаны Екатериной и являются её работой с соответствующими правами, другое дело, что согласно политике Викисклада их нельзя сюда выкладывать. --A.Savin 19:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: com:FOP. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work,found on the web with google images Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the philippines Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Info According to this article by Lakbay ng Lakan, its designer was classical artist and sculptor Tomas Fernandez Concepcion (1933–2012). But nevertheless, this should not be closed or deleted until this discussion is concluded with finality. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
I disagree. It is still a copyrighted work. Photos of it cant be used freely unless your country becomes compliant with commercial friendly freedom of panorama Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:42, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- The two-month long discussion at CRT/Philippines has concluded. No FOP in the Philippines still for most artistic works. Sadly, Delete. Undelete when FOP is introduced in the Philippines (if ever the subject of this file qualifies for the future Philippine FOP), just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:43, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the philippines Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
http://iloilobusinesspark.com.ph/megaworld-formally-unveils-iconic-delgado-monument-iloilo-business-park/ says it was unveiled in Jan 2019, by Megaworld. The sculptor is named: Gines Serran-Pagan. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 13:05, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete sadly. Still, no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Undeletion is possible, once FOP is introduced in the Philippines just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. Nevertheless, IPOPHL has indicated in a November 2020 email reply to Higad Rail Fan that they are open for a dialogue with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to FOP matter. When will this dialogue (to be initiated by WMF according to the email-reply) occur is yet to be seen, but hopefully sooner than later. Despite this, per COM:PCP (see this 2017 deletion request to a Dubai building) deletion first is the right way, in respect of the architects' and/or sculptors' copyrights. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:11, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the philippines. Unknown means assumed they are not ok as sculptures are copyrighted for 50 yrs after the death of its creator Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- https://ph.news.yahoo.com/amphtml/blogs/the-inbox/antique-celebrated-evelio-javier-day-145325733.html ---- statue is design by Napoleon Abueva ---- Quote In the morning, the Capitol organized the requisite wreath-laying led by Governor Exequiel Javier, brother of Evelio, before the EBJ monument, a life-size bronze statue by National Artist Napoleon Abueva, which has been designated by the Historical Institute as a national historical monument. END quote --- Mrcel lxmba
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of pano in phils. No adeqate info about its creator but considering its from 1960s or 70s and a sculpture, not a building, it is copyright Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete sadly. Still, no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Undeletion is possible, once FOP is introduced in the Philippines just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. Nevertheless, IPOPHL has indicated in a November 2020 email reply to Higad Rail Fan that they are open for a dialogue with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to FOP matter. When will this dialogue (to be initiated by WMF according to the email-reply) occur is yet to be seen, but hopefully sooner than later. Despite this, per COM:PCP (see this 2017 deletion request to a Dubai building) deletion first is the right way, in respect of the architects' and/or sculptors' copyrights. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:07, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by আফতাবুজ্জামান as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copy from facebook. The string "FBMD" in the metadata suggests this was copied from Facebook, though it appears unique according to GIS and TinEye.
To the uploader: if this is actually your own photo, please upload the original file instead of one copied from Facebook. Alternatively, you can provide a link to where it was originally published along with a statement at the location saying you agree to license the photo under a free license (more info about this can be found at COM:OTRS). clpo13(talk) 16:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- uploaders voice: I am Ruhan who uploaded this photo. I know this picture was published in facebook. But the picture is not copied. Now, I'm requesting you not to delete it, but change the licence (if needed) and add the link of facebook where it was published first. I want your help to change the licence and add the facebook link or do other procedure to make this photo fit into commons. Wiki Ruhan (talk) 17:15, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Wiki Ruhan: you can copy the Facebook link here. If you're the person who took the photo and uploaded it to Facebook, you can edit the description there to say you're making it available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 license. However, if you did not take the photo, then the person who did needs to provide that permission. COM:OTRS has information on that process. clpo13(talk) 18:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I decided to keep as I see no other copies anywhere and seems that the uploader isn't a massive copyright abuser. --rubin16 (talk) 15:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Dreams_Manila - 2014 bldg so no freedom of pano for phils bldgs after 1972 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
:
Withdrawing my vote keep. I concede that there is no Commons-acceptable FoP in the Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:22, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Keep. The so-called no FoP in the Philippines is just based on guesses and very literal reading of our copyright law. The lack of mention of FoP in the Philippines, plus the lack of actual cases do not signify that people are faced with stringent copyright restrictions in terms of photography and in manners of usage (people are free to photographs such subjects here). And take note, the longstanding no FoP in the Philippines claim is being dealt with at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#New discussion on PHL FoP, so IMO no deletions should be made. My response is mirrored from my responses of other DR's that are pending as of this writing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:56, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- The Urban Roamer speaks of "the first few weeks of 2015" (perhaps the opening date). No mention who is the architect or what firm designed this, yet it is very elegant and impressive indeed (as supported by the grandiloquent description of this building). So unfortunately, Delete until FOP is introduced in the Philippines. Undelete in ... 2065/6? (Should FOP be not yet introduced) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Dreams_Manila - 2014 bldg so no freedom of pano for phils bldgs after 1972 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- The Urban Roamer speaks of "the first few weeks of 2015" (perhaps the opening date). No mention who is the architect or what firm designed this, yet it is very elegant and impressive indeed (as supported by the grandiloquent description of this building). So unfortunately, Delete until FOP is introduced in the Philippines. Undelete in ... 2065/6? (Should FOP be not yet introduced) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Dreams_Manila - 2014 bldg so no freedom of pano for phils bldgs after 1972 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- The Urban Roamer speaks of "the first few weeks of 2015" (perhaps the opening date). No mention who is the architect or what firm designed this, yet it is very elegant and impressive indeed (as supported by the grandiloquent description of this building). The buildings here actually fall "de minimis with each other", but as part of the same complex, Weak delete. That is until FOP is introduced in the Philippines. Undelete in ... 2065/6? (Should FOP be not yet introduced) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Dreams_Manila - 2014 bldg so no freedom of pano for phils bldgs after 1972 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- The Urban Roamer speaks of "the first few weeks of 2015" (perhaps the opening date). No mention who is the architect or what firm designed this, yet it is very elegant and impressive indeed (as supported by the grandiloquent description of this building). So unfortunately, Delete until FOP is introduced in the Philippines. Image fails COM:De minimis. Undelete in ... 2065/6? (Should FOP be not yet introduced) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the philippines. Crwator is eduardo castrillo deceased since 2016 Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sadly, Delete. The Intellectual Property Office (IPO) affirmed this copyright protection at their official FB account: https://www.facebook.com/127939977254449/posts/2741678659213888/ (post dated Feb. 24, 2020). This persistence by IPOPHIL seems to signify that this monument is NOT OK even in Wikipedias. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:34, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Info Castrillo died in 2016, so PD in the Philippines by 2067 50+1 years). But, due to COM:URAA, undelete in 2089 (95+1 years from creation year of 1993). Unless if FOP is introduced in the Philippines (if ever the subject of this file qualifies for the future Philippine FOP), just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:43, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
https://business.inquirer.net/60971/sm’s-two-e-com-named-best-office-dev’t-in-philippines/ - completed in dec 2012. No freedom of pano in phils for post 1972 bldgs as well as sculptures Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the philippines. 1997 bldg and architect is jorge ramos Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete sadly. Still, no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Without tangible evidence of a formal copyright-transfer contract between Jorge Ramos and the government, it is safe (per COM:PCP) to assume that the architect's heirs still hold the copyright, per provisions under R.A.8293. Jorge Ramos died in 2015. Undeletion is possible, once FOP is introduced in the Philippines just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. Nevertheless, IPOPHL has indicated in a November 2020 email reply to Higad Rail Fan that they are open for a dialogue with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to FOP matter. When will this dialogue (to be initiated by WMF according to the email-reply) occur is yet to be seen, but hopefully sooner than later. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:07, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the philippines. 1997 bldg and architect is jorge ramos Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete sadly. Still, no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Without tangible evidence of a formal copyright-transfer contract between Jorge Ramos and the government, it is safe (per COM:PCP) to assume that the architect's heirs still hold the copyright, per provisions under R.A.8293. Jorge Ramos died in 2015. Undeletion is possible, once FOP is introduced in the Philippines just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. Nevertheless, IPOPHL has indicated in a November 2020 email reply to Higad Rail Fan that they are open for a dialogue with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to FOP matter. When will this dialogue (to be initiated by WMF according to the email-reply) occur is yet to be seen, but hopefully sooner than later. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the philippines. 1978 bldg and architect is felipe mendoza Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sad to say, Delete until freedom of panorama is finally introduced in our country. Still no FOP for majority of architectural and artistic (sculptures etc.) works in the Philippines, even after this two-month long discussion of Sept.–Nov.. While there may be a potential for a dialogue between IPOPHL and Wikimedia Foundation reps, per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle (as mentioned at this 2017 deletion request to a Dubai building, in a kingdom that has no total FOP), "deletion first is the right approach", even during active forums, as Commons always respects the rights of the artists and architects, even if the general public of the work's country of origin (the Philippines for this case) does not. File/s can be undeleted once FOP exists or is introduced here—perhaps via COM:UNDEL or a COM:Village pump/COM:Administrators' noticeboard motion or announcement just like the cases of images of Armenian and Belgian architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in Armenia in 2013 and Belgium in 2016. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the philippines. 1978 bldg and architect is felipe mendoza Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sad to say, Delete until freedom of panorama is finally introduced in our country. Still no FOP for majority of architectural and artistic (sculptures etc.) works in the Philippines, even after this two-month long discussion of Sept.–Nov.. While there may be a potential for a dialogue between IPOPHL and Wikimedia Foundation reps, per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle (as mentioned at this 2017 deletion request to a Dubai building, in a kingdom that has no total FOP), "deletion first is the right approach", even during active forums, as Commons always respects the rights of the artists and architects, even if the general public of the work's country of origin (the Philippines for this case) does not. File/s can be undeleted (perhaps via COM:UNDEL or a COM:Village pump/COM:Administrators' noticeboard motion or announcement just like the cases of images of Armenian and Belgian architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in Armenia in 2013 and Belgium in 2016) once FOP exists or is introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:01, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
1985 building, pls read http://donboscobatulao.org/pdf/ORIENTATION.pdf no freedom of panoram in the phils Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete sadly. I accept the deletion of my file, as it has no equivalent articles on enwiki (making FoP-USonly useless, as enwiki is supposedly not a place to host freely-licensed images indefinitely). Still, no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Undeletion is possible, once FOP is introduced in the Philippines just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. Nevertheless, IPOPHL has indicated in a November 2020 email reply to Higad Rail Fan that they are open for a dialogue with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to FOP matter. When will this dialogue (to be initiated by WMF according to the email-reply) occur is yet to be seen, but hopefully sooner than later. Despite this, per COM:PCP (see this 2017 deletion request to a Dubai building) deletion first is the right way, in respect of the architects' and/or sculptors' copyrights. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
https://www.lobiengroup.com/properties/sm-three-e-com-center-bayshore-tower - bldg completed in 2018. No freedom of panorama in the phils for post 1972 bldgs. Evidence is https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaire_Resort_%26_Casino - 2013 bldg so no freedom of pano for phils bldgs after 1972 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Addition. This bldg was designed by architect Paul steelman acc to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaire_Resort_%26_Casino. He is still alive. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 01:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Delete substantial architecture of the entrance shown. The building was designed by Steelman Partners, with the world-famous Paul Steelman as the principal architect of the hotel & casino's Phase 1. Can be undeleted once FOP is introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:41, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Small file without camera EXIF presented as "own work". Uploader's camera EXIF can be seen at File:View from the Praia da Rainha (Beach) in Cascais, Portugal.jpg. E4024 (talk) 23:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
_in_Cascais,_Portugal.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
A 1992 building and no freedom of panorama in phils Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. The so-called no FoP in the Philippines is just based on guesses and very literal reading of our copyright law. The lack of mention of FoP in the Philippines, plus the lack of actual cases do not signify that people are faced with stringent copyright restrictions in terms of photography and in manners of usage (people are free to photographs such subjects here). And take note, the longstanding no FoP in the Philippines claim is being dealt with at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#New discussion on PHL FoP, so IMO no deletions should be made. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Withdrawing my vote keep. I concede that there is no Commons-acceptable FoP in the Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:45, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete sadly. The mall complex dates to 1990s (oldest is 1991) per enwiki article. Still, no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Undelete when FOP is introduced in the Philippines (if ever the subject of this file qualifies for the future Philippine FOP), just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. Nevertheless, IPOPHL has indicated in a November 2020 email reply to Higad Rail Fan that they are open for a dialogue with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to FOP matter. When will this dialogue (to be initiated by WMF according to the email-reply) occur is yet to be seen, but hopefully sooner than later. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:45, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:01, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Nobfreedom of panorma in the phils. Opened in 2001 Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete sadly. Certainly a modern building (dates to either late 1990s or early 2000s). Still, no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Undelete when FOP is introduced in the Philippines (if ever the subject of this file qualifies for the future Philippine FOP), just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. Nevertheless, IPOPHL has indicated in a November 2020 email reply to Higad Rail Fan that they are open for a dialogue with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to FOP matter. When will this dialogue (to be initiated by WMF according to the email-reply) occur is yet to be seen, but hopefully sooner than later. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:24, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the philippines. Creator is napoleon abueva who died in Feb 2018. Copyrighted sculptur Mrcl lxmna (talk) 16:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep if Judgefloro's rationale at church-owned properties is legally binding in the Philippines: by operation of Canon Law vis-a-vis Copyright Law, all the rights of the Sculptors are tranferred to the Diocesan administrator Auxiliary bishop of Manila as Titular, from the moment of its creation and after payment of the art fees or after signing the Deed of Donation by the Sculptors tranferring in fee (https://www.lra.gov.ph/mediafiles/pdf%20forms/Sample%20Forms/deedofdonation1.pdf) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Slashed my input, as it appears the so-called Deed of Donation only transfers physical ownership of the statue. Nowhere in the fourth part of the copyright law (Law on Copyright) has mentioned the applicability of the said canon law of the deed on the waiving of economic rights of the sculptor to the church (and church in fact is a non-profit organization/community that has no economic intentions from religious artworks of any sort that they physically own). Also, the consensus at the discussion at COM:CRT/Philippines (Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#Comment with Query) is that there is still no freedom of panorama in the country, unless a law change or amendment occurs. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete sadly. Still, no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Undelete when FOP is introduced in the Philippines (if ever the subject of this file qualifies for the future Philippine FOP), just like the cases of Armenian (2013) and Belgian (2016) architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in both countries. Nevertheless, IPOPHL has indicated in a November 2020 email reply to Higad Rail Fan that they are open for a dialogue with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to FOP matter. When will this dialogue (to be initiated by WMF according to the email-reply) occur is yet to be seen, but hopefully sooner than later. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaire_Resort_%26_Casino - 2013 bldg so no freedom of pano for phils bldgs after 1972 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Addition. This bldg was designed by architect Paul steelman acc to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaire_Resort_%26_Casino. He is still alive. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 01:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Speedy keep all Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully
4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos and of User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions
[edit]
- I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ... respectfully Judgefloro (talk)
Delete unfortunately. The building was designed by Steelman Partners, with the world-famous Paul Steelman as the principal architect of the hotel & casino's Phase 1. Can be undeleted once FOP is introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:43, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Should be speedy deleted, but the data namespace is a bit weird... This page has been superceded by Data:Population FR Q204388.tab. Thanks. -Zolo (talk) 13:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 11:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD, sourcing insufficient PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Original file was deleted. --Anatoliy (talk) 11:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Manila Film Center
[edit]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manila_Film_Center - 1982 bldg so no freedom of pano for phils bldgs after 1972 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama
- File:Manila Film Center at Dusk.JPG - Weak delete aerial view with the film center as the most prominent JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC) (the following polls are also done by me after thorough review)
- File:Manila Film Center at Sunset.JPG - Weak keep. Seen are columns, but I don't know if COM:PCP has a say on this.
- File:Manila film center.jpg - Delete sadly.
- File:MetroManilajf0040 01.JPG - Keep per Howhontanozaz (I will refer to them as "How" to make things short) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.)
- File:MetroManilajf0040 02.JPG - Delete
- File:MFCjf0021 01.JPG - Delete down to just above unsure
- File:MFCjf0021 09.JPG
- File:MFCjf0021 10.JPG
- File:MFCjf0021 11.JPG
- File:MFCjf0021 12.JPG
- File:MFCjf0021 13.JPG
- File:MFCjf0021 14.JPG
- File:MFCjf0021 17.JPG
- File:MFCjf0021 18.JPG
- File:MFCjf0021 19.JPG
- File:MFCjf0021 20.JPG - Delete
- File:MFCjf0021 21.JPG -
Unsure borderline between COM:De minimis and main fo cus - File:MFCjf0021 22.JPG - Delete
- File:MFCjf0021 23.JPG - Weak keep perhaps COM:De Minimis.
- File:MFCjf0021 24.JPG - Delete up to before unsure
- File:MFCjf0021 25.JPG
- File:MFCjf0021 26.JPG
- File:MFCjf0021 27.JPG
- File:MFCjf0021 28.JPG
- File:MFCjf0021 29.JPG
- File:MFCjf0021 30.JPG
- File:MFCjf0021 31.JPG
- File:MFCjf0054 01.JPG
- File:MFCjf0054 02.JPG
- File:MFCjf0054 03.JPG - Delete
- File:MFCjf0054 04.JPG - Unsure borderline "de minimis" vs. main focus but leaning towards weak delete.
- File:MFCjf0054 05.JPG - Delete up to before keep
- File:MFCjf0054 06.JPG
- File:MFCjf0054 07.JPG
- File:MFCjf0054 08.JPG
- File:MFCjf0054 09.JPG - Delete
- File:MFCjf0054 11.JPG - Keep as no copyrightable elements seen here
- File:MFCjf0054 12.JPG - Keep per How
- File:MFCjf0054 13.JPG - Keep per How
- File:MFCjf0054 14.JPG - Weak keep COM:De minimis?
- File:MFCjf0054 15.JPG - Keep per How
- File:MFCjf0054 16.JPG - Weak delete "borderline bet. de minimis and main focus"
- File:MFCjf0054 20.JPG Delete
- File:MFCjf0054 21.JPG Delete
- File:MFCjf0054 22.JPG Delete
- File:MFCjf0054 23.JPG - Keep per How
- File:MFCjf0054 24.JPG
- File:MFCjf0054 25.JPG - Weak keep perhaps De Minimis too?
- File:MFCjf0054 26.JPG - Delete
- File:MFCjf0054 27.JPG - Delete
- File:MFCjf0054 28.JPG - Unsure borderline de minimis and main focus but leaning towards weak keep
- File:MFCjf0054 29.JPG - Delete up to just before keep
- File:MFCjf0054 30.JPG
- File:MFCjf0054 31.JPG
- File:MFCjf0054 32.JPG
- File:MFCjf0054 33.JPG - Delete
- File:MFCjf0054 34.JPG - Weak keep de minimis???
- File:MFCjf0054 35.JPG - Weak delete borderline bet. de minimis and main focus
- File:MFCjf0054 36.JPG Delete
- File:MFCjf0054 37.JPG Delete
- File:MFCjf0054 38.JPG - Unsure another borderline case
- File:MFCjf0093 04.JPG - Keep per How
- File:MFCjf0093 05.JPG - Weak keep de minimis???
- File:MFCjf0093 06.JPG - Keep per How
- File:MFCjf0093 07.JPG - Keep per How
- File:Pasayjf9974 14.JPG - Weak keep perhaps de minimis
- File:Pasayjf9974 15.JPG - Weak keep de minimis?
- File:Pasayjf9974 17.JPG Weak keep de minimis?
- File:Pasayjf9974 18.JPG - Weak keep perhaps de minimis
- File:Pasayjf9974 29.JPG - Keep per How
- File:Pasayjf9974 30.JPG - Delete sadly.
- File:Pasayjf9974 37.JPG - Delete
- File:Pasayjf9974 38.JPG - Delete
- File:Pasayjf9974 43.JPG - Delete
- File:Pasayjf9974 44.JPG - Keep per How
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I would argue that this building is Template:PD-PhilippinesGov. Delete photos of the building per JWilz12345. Howhontanozaz (talk) 09:05, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- Also, the following images are not even images of the building:
- -Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment to @Howhontanozaz: the {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} itself is also under discussion as a consequence of the recent memorandum from IPO that steers clear some of the ambiguity but also tightened restrictions (e.g. wording that makes prior permission "mandatory" for usage of works "for profit," i.e., for commercial purposes). The only thing that doesn't need restrictions is "of statutes, rules and regulations, and speeches, lectures, sermons, addresses, and dissertations, pronounced, read or rendered in courts of justice, before administrative agencies, in deliberative assemblies and in meetings of public character." The Commons:FOP Philippines situation itself is also in discussion in light of sudden massive DR's made by this new user.JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep erstmal die simplen Bauwerke aussortieren, die keine Kunstwerke sind. Ist hier schon wieder ein "neuer" Benutzer, der nur Löschanträge stellt? --Ralf Roletschek 08:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment, the architect was Froilan Hong (born Oct. 5, 1939 according to https://united-architects.org/assets/files/media-files/Hong.pdf ). No source found denoting his death, so assumed to be still living. But, FOP in the Philippines discussion exists at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#New discussion on PHL FoP, so DR's like this should be put on hold until a conclusion has been reached. No delete, but maybe keep. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:18, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Counterinh howhantanozas's government work rationale, even the government is not obliged to force the creators to waive their moral rights to them. And assume the government owns this bldg even the moral rights, in spite of saying "no copyright shall subsist......", a provision on the RA8293 limits everyone's ability to use government works:
"CHAPTER VIII.
LIMITATIONS ON COPYRIGHT
SEC. 184. Limitations on Copyright. - 184.1. Notwithstanding the provisions of Chapter V, the following acts shall not constitute infringement of copyright: ....
(h) The use made of a work by or under the direction or control of the Government, by the National Library or by educational, scientific or professional institutions where such use is in the public interest and is compatible with fair use; ...."
Wikimedia commons passes public interest but it doesnt accept fair use as jeff g one of your moderators said at village pump before. So howhantanazos' government works rationale is invalid. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 01:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep all Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully
- 4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos and of User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions
- I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ... respectfully Judgefloro (talk)
- Sad to say, Delete most until freedom of panorama is finally introduced in our country. Keep and Weak keep some as probably de minimis. The architect, Froilan Hong, appears to be living (April 2019 FB post of UAP Makati chapter's FB page, in which the speaker and awardee, Arch. Philip Recto, addresses Hong without "late") Still no FOP for majority of architectural and artistic (sculptures etc.) works in the Philippines, even after this two-month long discussion of Sept.–Nov.. IPOPHL also responded to a query on their November 30, 2020 post that "the fact that the government owns a work does not necessarily mean that it is not covered by copyright law. Section 176.3 of the IP Code states that, 'the Government is not precluded from receiving and holding copyrights transferred to it x x x x.' In other words, while Government works do not enjoy copyright protection, it may enjoy copyright protection over works transferred to it. Section 178.4 of the IP Code provides that copyright over commissioned works remains with the author/creator but the work itself shall be owned by the person or entity who commissioned the work."
- While there may be a potential for a dialogue between IPOPHL and Wikimedia Foundation reps, per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle (as mentioned at this 2017 deletion request to a Dubai building, in a kingdom that has no total FOP), "deletion first is the right approach", even during active forums, as Commons always respects the rights of the artists and architects, even if the general public of the work's country of origin (the Philippines for this case) does not. @Howhontanozaz and Judgefloro: , file/s can be undeleted once FOP exists or is introduced here—perhaps via COM:UNDEL or a COM:Village pump/COM:Administrators' noticeboard motion or announcement just like the cases of images of Armenian and Belgian architecture and artistic works, when FOP was introduced in Armenia in 2013 and Belgium in 2016. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per en:WP:TRAINWRECK, different cases, please renominate as separate DRs. --Anatoliy (talk) 11:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:TriNoma
[edit]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TriNoma - 2007 bldg so no freedom of pano for phils bldgs after 1972 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama
- File:01285jfNorth Avenue Trinoma Quezon Cityfvf 01.JPG
- File:01285jfNorth Avenue Trinoma Quezon Cityfvf 02.JPG
- File:01285jfNorth Avenue Trinoma Quezon Cityfvf 04.JPG
- File:01285jfNorth Avenue Trinoma Quezon Cityfvf 07.JPG
- File:01285jfNorth Avenue Trinoma Quezon Cityfvf 11.JPG
- File:01285jfNorth Avenue Trinoma Quezon Cityfvf 16.JPG
- File:01285jfNorth Avenue Trinoma Quezon Cityfvf 22.JPG
- File:01285jfNorth Avenue Trinoma Quezon Cityfvf 29.JPG
- File:01295jfNorth Avenue SM West Trinoma Quezon Cityfvf 01.JPG
- File:02202jfNorth Avenue Quezon Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:02202jfNorth Avenue Quezon Cityfvf 08.jpg
- File:02202jfNorth Avenue Quezon Cityfvf 10.jpg
- File:02202jfNorth Avenue Quezon Cityfvf 12.jpg
- File:03634jfSbarro products restaurants in the Philippinesfvf 07.jpg
- File:03634jfSbarro products restaurants in the Philippinesfvf 08.jpg
- File:0541jfQuezon City West North Footbridge SM North EDSA Avenuefvf 04.jpg
- File:0541jfQuezon City West North Footbridge SM North EDSA Avenuefvf 05.jpg
- File:0541jfQuezon City West North Footbridge SM North EDSA Avenuefvf 06.jpg
- File:09906jfBarangay Bagong Pag-asa North Avenue SM TriNoma Quezon Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:09906jfBarangay Bagong Pag-asa North Avenue SM TriNoma Quezon Cityfvf 08.jpg
- File:09906jfBarangay Bagong Pag-asa North Avenue SM TriNoma Quezon Cityfvf 09.jpg
- File:09906jfBarangay Bagong Pag-asa North Avenue SM TriNoma Quezon Cityfvf 10.jpg
- File:09906jfBarangay Bagong Pag-asa North Avenue SM TriNoma Quezon Cityfvf 11.jpg
- File:09906jfBarangay Bagong Pag-asa North Avenue SM TriNoma Quezon Cityfvf 12.jpg
- File:09906jfBarangay Bagong Pag-asa North Avenue SM TriNoma Quezon Cityfvf 13.jpg
- File:09906jfBarangay Bagong Pag-asa North Avenue SM TriNoma Quezon Cityfvf 14.jpg
- File:09906jfBarangay Bagong Pag-asa North Avenue SM TriNoma Quezon Cityfvf 15.jpg
- File:09906jfBarangay Bagong Pag-asa North Avenue SM TriNoma Quezon Cityfvf 18.jpg
- File:09906jfBarangay Bagong Pag-asa North Avenue SM TriNoma Quezon Cityfvf 19.jpg
- File:09906jfBarangay Bagong Pag-asa North Avenue SM TriNoma Quezon Cityfvf 20.jpg
- File:09926jfBarangay Bagong Pag-asa North Avenue SM TriNoma Quezon Cityfvf 01.jpg
- File:09926jfBarangay Bagong Pag-asa North Avenue SM TriNoma Quezon Cityfvf 12.jpg
- File:09926jfBarangay Bagong Pag-asa North Avenue SM TriNoma Quezon Cityfvf 13.jpg
- File:09926jfBarangay Bagong Pag-asa North Avenue SM TriNoma Quezon Cityfvf 14.jpg
- File:MetroManilajf7543 25.JPG
- File:MetroManilajf7543 26.JPG
- File:MetroManilajf7543 27.JPG
- File:MetroManilajf7543 28.JPG
- File:MetroManilajf7543 29.JPG
- File:MetroManilajf7543 30.JPG
- File:MetroManilajf7543 31.JPG
- File:MetroManilajf7543 32.JPG
- File:MetroManilajf7543 33.JPG
- File:MetroManilajf7543 34.JPG
- File:MetroManilajf7543 35.JPG
- File:MetroManilajf7543 36.JPG
- File:MetroManilajf7543 37.JPG
- File:TriNoma 010.jpg
- File:Trinomajf367e.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; by way of Reply please allow me to state that a) I was granted permission by the Tourism Offices and b) I talked to the lawyers and legal officers of the Category:Intellectual Property Center IP PHL both under Category:Ricardo R. Blancaflor and Category:Intellectual Property Center IP PHL and his successor Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) as evidenced by i) Category:Letter (Receipt-Appropriate Action-Feedback) of the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (Marou Eduarte - of Josephine Rima-Santiago to Florentino Floro and ii) Category:Letter to Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) and iii) Letter to Director Blancaflor Receipt; sad to say there is no Ruling, Directive or any Reply on my FOP request for Definitive Ruling due to the fact that the matter is very Grey under Philippine Jurisprudence and no Appellate or Lower Court ruling has been issued on any justiciable controvery ever; what I hold are verbal but authoritative opinions of both the Lawyers of the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines and the Tourism Authority offices; with all these, I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons as I remain very truly yours Judgefloro (talk) 05:10, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Keep: building is utilitarian and functioned as a mall, perhaps like the case of File:Sm megamall.jpg, fall under low COM:TOO. Ref: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sm megamall.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Smmarilaojf.JPG. If no FOP applies, then low TOO can apply. Why such buildings easily replicated, despite the so-called copyright protection supposedly for all buildings in the Philippines, perhaps including our very, plain houses which we photograph and post on social media sites with commercial-like third use on building photos? Because there's de facto low TOO for architecture. And I assume most (if not all) mall buildings have low TOO. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Added response: The so-called no FoP in the Philippines is just based on guesses and very literal reading of our copyright law. The lack of mention of FoP in the Philippines, plus the lack of actual cases do not signify that people are faced with stringent copyright restrictions in terms of photography and in manners of usage (people are free to photographs such subjects here). And take note, the longstanding no FoP in the Philippines claim is being dealt with at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#New discussion on PHL FoP, so IMO no deletions should be made. My response is mirrored from my responses of other DR's that are pending as of this writing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:57, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Keep File:TriNoma 010.jpg does not hold copyright because 1) The complainant did not provide proof that the structure photographed has a patent in the Philippine IPO (citing PH Supreme Court G.R. No. 195835) and had not proven its originality (citing PH Supreme Court G.R. No. 161295, G.R. No. 108946) 2) it is De minimis, it did not show the whole; 3) the pond serves more of an utilitarian function than an artistic creation (citing PH Supreme Court G.R. No. 195835). --exec8 (talk) 09:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC) Exec8 (talk) 08:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
There is no local (Philippines);jurispudence or court records that ruled on FOP nor any copyright protection on landscape, architectural works in relation to photography. The intent of the law is protection on the reproduction of architectural plans and physical reproduction of finished works and NOT landscape photography. exec8 (talk) 01:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Exec8: I forwarded this matter at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Comment two previous DRs regarding two photos of this structure (one from TheCoffee and the other by Lawrence ruiz) exist at Commons:Deletion requests/File:TriNoma.jpg. But assuming this mall passes low TOO, those photos should be restored as well (but naming issue may arise because they are eponymous - File:TriNoma.jpg). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Also keep both File:03634jfSbarro products restaurants in the Philippinesfvf 07.jpg and File:03634jfSbarro products restaurants in the Philippinesfvf 08.jpg. The main subjects are the people and not th building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Countering the plainness arguments is one deletion req i recently digested and researched. At https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Bank_of_the_Philippine_Islands, your moderator jim once said: - """""Exactly half of the 122 countries that we have information on (including the Philippines) do not have any FOP. It is important to remember that FOP is an exception to ordinary copyright which prohibits the reproduction in any form of copyrighted works, so the absense of any provision for FOP cannot be unclear -- it simply isn't there. As for the"plainness" argument, The Philippine law says:
"172.1 Works are protected by the sole fact of their creation, irrespective of their mode or form of expression, as well as of their content, quality and purpose."
That is similar to the law in other countries.""""" Mrcl lxmna (talk) 00:46, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
The fact that the defense side led by User:Lawrence ruiz at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:TriNoma.jpg failed to convince the moderators proves that this mall bldg is a copyrighted work of art. And plainness, no orginality, is overwritten by the point of 172.2. To repeat: """Works are protected by the sole fact of their creation, irrespective of their mode or form of expression, as well as of their content, quality and purpose.""" Copyright starts at creation and not by registration. All of this is a good point for the deletion of the photos of this mall bldg.Mrcl lxmna (talk) 06:48, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
New Comment While I previously defended photos of Philippine malls on the basis of the threshold of originality (using past precedence like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sm megamall.jpg), the higher number of case pages of Philippine mall buildings that resulted to deletion and the debatable TOO status here seems to weaken the TOO defense. Just days ago I accessed this Philippine Star article about SM mall designs, and it seems to imply the creativity of the designers of the SM malls, from Henry Sy who actually came up with the shoebox concept of the first SM Malls (e.g. SM Megamall and SM City Santa Mesa) to the people of SM's Engineering, Design and Development which provided for "out-of-the-box" architectural concept. About the FoP situation in the Philippines, the IPOPHL said that freedom of panorama provision "is one of the proposed amendments to our IP code currently being discussed at the present", according to our fellow Pinoy Wikipedian Higad Rail Fan who attended the IPOPHL webinar on copyrights last October 15. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime * (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 08:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- New Comment (mirrored from my comment on another pending Philippine FOP case) the discussion at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#Comment with Query (the latest thread in that discussion forum that has started from September this year) reached a conclusion that none of the "near-FOP" limitations enumerated at Section 184 could be applied. While elcobbola mentioned the clause (j): "Public display of the original or a copy of the work not made by means of a film, slide, television image or otherwise on screen or by means of any other device or process: Provided, That either the work has been published, or, that the original or the copy displayed has been sold, given away or otherwise transferred to another person by the author or his successor in title." According to Clindberg it sounds like "you own a physical copy of an already-published work, you're allowed to publicly display it, but not make further copies." Clause (d) in the same section is only applicable to "reporting of current events," and clause (e) is limited to "teaching purposes," both are of fair use-type and not free enough for Commons (take note, Commons:Fair use insists Commons does not accept fair use licensing). So sadly, there is no Commons-applicable freedom of panorama in the Philippines (the current position of Commons:FOP Philippines). Only a potential meeting or dialogue between the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) and the Wikimedia Foundation (with freedom of panorama as the principal agenda, as based on IPOPHL's reply to the latest email sent by Higad Rail Fan) will help prevent these and more deletions. When will this meeting / dialogue happen is not certain, however, and I don't know if it is acceptable to leave FOP deletion requests open for weeks or months, considering that FOP won't be implemented instantly (just because of this meeting), but that it will only come into fruition when Republic Act No. 8293 is amended (hopefully). However, when will this amendment come, I cannot say yet, since there's no meeting / dialogue as of this writing yet. I will also leave the final decision to admins in closing this and all other pending nominations at Category:Philippine FOP cases/pending. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:16, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep all Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully
4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos and of User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions
- I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ... respectfully Judgefloro (talk)
Deleted: per nomination, except 11 de minimis cases. ƏXPLICIT 00:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Tacsipacsi (talk) 17:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi there! @Tacsipacsi, we use the logo because we participate in the Eduroam initiative. We are part of this roaming service, so we can use it. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CSUCinfo (talk • contribs) 06:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- @CSUCinfo: Thanks for clarifying it! Unfortunately, “we can use it” is not enough here. In order to upload a file to Commons, the copyright owner (which is not you, but probably GÉANT) needs to give a perpetual, irrevocable license to everyone that allows the use of the logo for any—even for-profit—purpose, including the right to create derivative works, with only a few limitations (like the requirement for attributing the creator of the logo or for releasing the derivative works under the same license) allowed; exact conditions allowed are listed at freedomdefined:. Trademark laws are unaffected (that is, if this logo is a trademark of GÉANT, trademark laws still limit its use), but copyright laws aren’t. I don’t think the copyright owner will agree on such conditions, but if they do, they should send the permission directly to Commons’ permission handlers as described at Commons:OTRS. In any case, please don’t select “this is my own work” when you are not the creator of the file, that’s simply not true. Thanks for your consideration, —Tacsipacsi (talk) 00:17, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I finally removed CSUC from the author field, so that Géant appears both in source and author fields. This should be OK because as a participant in the Eduroam initiative, under the umbrella of Géant, we CSUC have the right to use the Eduroam logo when talking about the initiative. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CSUCinfo (talk • contribs) 07:37, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- @CSUCinfo: Having the right to use it and having the right to give this right away are two entirely different things. According to your agreement, you may have the right to use the logo on your website, in your printed materials etc., but by uploading to Commons, you state that anyone in the world has the right to do so, for any purpose—not only when talking about the initiative—, which is unlikely to be allowed by your agreement. And even if it is, you need to prove it in an email sent to OTRS from your official email address. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 18:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
OK, fine. You can delete the logo.
- @CSUCinfo: Since you are allowed to use the logo, if you can contact and request the organization (GÉANT) sending the OTRS mail to Wikimedia commons from one their official mail id's. This image can be denominated from deletion.--iMahesh (talk) 03:39, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 16:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Basco Lighthouse
[edit]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basco_Lighthouse - 2003 structure so no freedom of pano for phils https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama
- File:Basco Batanes Lighthouse.png
- File:Basco Lighthouse - Flickr.jpg
- File:Basco Lighthouse, Day Photo.jpg
- File:BascoLighthouse2.jpg
- File:Batanes Ligth House.jpg
- File:Gloomy Sky Over the Lighthouse.png
- File:Lighthouse, Batanes Island, Philippines.JPG
- File:Naidi Lighthouse.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Philippine lighthouses like this is not copyrightable: COM:UA and low COM:TOO. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Also, another possibility would be Template:PD-PhilippinesGov. Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Post-1951 buildings are not freely photographable per COM:FOP Philippines, but these were apparently by (or work-for-hire by) government, which makes them free. --DMacks (talk) 16:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Zdjęcie zawiera mój wizerunek Jaroslaw.L (talk) 21:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Does anybody understand why the file should be deleted? --E4024 (talk) 21:30, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept, free licenses are irrevocable. Taivo (talk) 06:52, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Accuracy issues raised on talk page. File:A map of the most inhabited part of New England (2674889207).jpg better depicts boundaries and settlements at the time. Beland (talk) 15:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Beland: Message text. Different maps with varying levels of detail can exists at the same time to serve different purpose. There are many USA and world maps with bit high and low levels of detail, but they are not deleted to have only one of each. Diogenes99 (talk) 12:23, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- It's not a matter of the level of detail, but of accuracy. Since I replaced it with a more accurate map, this one is no longer used. -- Beland (talk) 17:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, use {{Fact disputed}} instead. Moreover, this map is not from 1774 but from 1911. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by David Ll L as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: reason= exite otra imagen de mejor calidad ya en uso que la sustituye. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant to File:Estandarte de la Cofradía del Santísimo Cristo de la Paz de Genicera.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD, sourcing insufficient PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- I replaced the copyright tag with a more appropriate one. Parishan (talk) 02:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter. Still no evidence of early enough PUBLICATION in Azerbaijan to be public domain. 21st century website isn't early enough.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:58, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:26, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
As stated by uploader, this is a derived work by Renato Biasutti who died in 1965.
The map is not a chart of measurements, as highlighted much of this was made up by Biasutti rather than based on survey data. Consequently this must be considered a work of art and COM:PRP applies to this derived work and similar derived works. Fæ (talk) 15:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The discussion about its deletion was already closed in 2016 (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files on skin colour).--Maulucioni (talk) 15:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- That DR said nothing about copyright, possibly because nobody bothered to look up the creator's date of death, so is irrelevant. --Fæ (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:30, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
