Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/08/17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 17th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier inutile NicoTFC31 (talk) 10:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 10:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Milanruzic2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. Images taken from various sources without source and permission.

Smooth O (talk) 11:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible non-free file. Duplicate of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_Labour_Party.svg, which is nonfree. Auric (talk) 17:23, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:33, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Labour Party UK logo.svg. Jonteemil (talk) 17:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete With respect, this should have been deleted when @Gbawden: deleted File:Labour Party UK logo.svg on closing Commons:Deletion requests/File:Labour Party UK logo.svg, but wasn't. Gbawden, could you delete this one too please? Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 18:14, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hammersoft: My error. Thanks for letting me know Gbawden (talk) 18:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I wanted to upload a new version for file:Guidepost Huben Wirt.jpg and Huber was a spelling error Andreas Binder (talk) 18:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

122226 و 213.6.214.230 14:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 21:48, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image from https://facebook.com/103478201383122/photos/a.103478231383119/105225314541744/ Captain Calm (talk) 05:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotional spam 89.249.2.54 11:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 13:50, 17 August 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 02:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Almanacwow1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. Random internet images taken without permission.

Smooth O (talk) 11:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC) -- Acaalexaca (talk) 13:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 16:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Almanacwow1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Additional files.

Smooth O (talk) 14:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Copyvios. --Regasterios (talk) 16:08, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright; uploader listed it under CC but the original source linked is from original website Lullabying (talk) 07:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:30, 21 August 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 02:30, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request. Cjp24 (talk) 22:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 05:13, 22 August 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 08:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Flickr source appears to be a flickrwashing account for architectural renderings from https://diadans.ua/

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:50, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Then ENSO must give permission via OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 16:41, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious licence. Picture of uploader and not "own work" Pugilist (talk) 16:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Storkk at 10:36, 23 August 2020 UTC: Likely copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS. --Krdbot 14:27, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious licence. Picture of uploader and not "own work" Pugilist (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Storkk at 10:36, 23 August 2020 UTC: Likely copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS. --Krdbot 14:27, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rugby Bratislava (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Needs permission

Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giovanni De Luca 1964 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photos, paintings, etc, claimed as own work.

Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:58, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos, need permission

Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:11, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos, need permission to be kept

Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a screenshot, PCP Gbawden (talk) 13:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:15, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rockie Da Poet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fpds1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright holder © Ben Blossom per exif, needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 13:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nicojaba2780 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:06, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from IMDB and widely found on the web, not own work Gbawden (talk) 14:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atifimtiazsh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

one Taken from IMDB, dubious claims of own work, no meaningful exif

Gbawden (talk) 14:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maqurtlu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All claimed as own work but some from Insta, others credited to other people. Nuke - PCP

Gbawden (talk) 14:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

From my TP - "Hello sir, please delete only the images I copied from Instagram and do not delete the images I created myself. Thank you"
The problem is how do we know which is which
@Maqurtlu: Please comment here Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Javaidrahi1970 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:07, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lydia lol (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work

Gbawden (talk) 14:54, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:09, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Azimi789 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work, at least one has photographer name in exif

Gbawden (talk) 15:03, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:11, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ar Rahman Haj service (talk · contribs)

[edit]

3 unused personal out of scope images with contradictory titles and assertions of copyright in the metadata

Cabayi (talk) 15:14, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:11, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DrGatsby (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, appears to be derived from video games (like https://www.roblox.com/users/35271455/friends#!/friends or https://www.roblox.com/games/186642106/USA-United-States-Capitol-Building for File:CapitolRBX.png). Uploaded in a row between 04.—07.05.2016.

Gunnex (talk) 09:11, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, com:pcp. --Wdwd (talk) 13:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DrGatsby (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Incoherent personal files, only used in abandoned 4-year old subpages. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of COM:SCOPE.

Kissa21782 (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M.Ehsan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files, not in use, out of project scope.

Kissa21782 (talk) 20:20, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ABB827a6 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Game screenshots, unusably low quality, possibly copyvios too, no realistic use.

Kissa21782 (talk) 20:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:14, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Search Macer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising, out of scope.

Kissa21782 (talk) 20:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:14, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, taken from FB per MD, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs permission from painter Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WPVJS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:09, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WPVJS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:14, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from IMDB and widely found on the web, not own work Gbawden (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, stained glass windows are artworks from 2010, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:26, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Venuuvce51 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files, out of scope

Kissa21782 (talk) 20:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Technicalifornia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Lack of camera data suggests these are obtained brim elsewhere, but the are claimed as Own Work. Quality is poor, so are likely out ion scope anyway. At the very least Permission is required, but these are probable copyright violations

Timtrent (talk) 22:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pinkamena14 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused and uncategorised files. Looks like some sort of personal artwork.

Estopedist1 (talk) 20:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Google finds it on FB. Probably OoS as well Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 19:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich erreiche den Fotografen Matthias Buchholz im Moment nicht! Eudsonne (talk) 08:49, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --JuTa 20:08, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 19:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File that do not contribute anything that is not already provided by the information available on the subject. It is of low quality. Camino del Puerto (talk) 00:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Archivo que no aporta nada que no sea ya aportado por la información disponible del tema. Es de baja calidad. Camino del Puerto (talk) 00:48, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: This may well be a copyright violation as well. It certainly looks like a bad copy of an existing map. --bjh21 (talk) 17:00, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Not used, uploader's request. --Ahmadtalk 21:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:18, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and possibly out of COM:SCOPE. --Ahmadtalk 21:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio , Trade (talk) 07:49, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; it's a copyrighted character (Michael De Santa) from the video game GTA V. --Ahmadtalk 21:39, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree: self promotion and/or out of scope - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 23:35, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion - out of scope & sockpuppetry, this version uploaded by 655, the last version by 65 Cabayi (talk) 15:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; out of COM:SCOPE. --Ahmadtalk 21:42, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unreasonable reaction. Using H2O alone would do nothing; and using a catalyst would give a different product (noted by User:Chem Sim 2001). To get this product, a totally different set of reagents would have to be used. I don't see anything like this reaction discussed in en:2-Methyl-1-butanol or other languages I can semi-read. DMacks (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File that do not contribute anything that is not already provided by the information available on the subject. It is of low quality. Camino del Puerto (talk) 00:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Archivo que no aporta nada que no sea ya aportado por la información disponible del tema. Es de baja calidad. Camino del Puerto (talk) 00:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: This may well be a copyright violation. It certainly looks like an annotated copy of an existing map. --bjh21 (talk) 17:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per bjh21; does not look like a wholly original work and source of original map not given. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused tiny photo without meaningful explanation of significance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 14:27, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of the image and I deleted it from Flickr Apedrosch (talk) 17:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Antonio, that is no valid reason for deletion. The given license cc-by-sa-2.0 cannot be revoked. --Achim (talk) 21:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:22, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

15 KB small file; does not look like "own work" as claimed. E4024 (talk) 19:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: apart from the questionability of "own work", it's also unused and of very low quality. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hasley as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10

Speedy deletion was challenged at UDR. Opening regular discussion as a result. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:14, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: No contributions to any project except self-promotion. All edits on Wikidata are deleted as being spam, user is indeffed on en:wikisource for spamming. This is not the right place to promote one's carreer. --Achim (talk) 22:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Human suffering.jpg John.lackey1 (talk) 22:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file contains the colors of the LGBT flag, which contradicts the Egyptian constitution, which states that Islamic law is the primary source of legislation, which in turn does not allow homosexuality under the constitution. Omda4wady (talk) 11:03, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Neither Islam nor the Egyptian Constitution has any say over images hosted in the United States. Egyptian users may not be able to use this image but others may with impuunity. Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:26, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep LGBT people exist in Egypt, regardless of the constitution or islam. This file can be used to demonstrate that, which is educational use, and falls well within COM:SCOPE. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 14:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: The file is in use on cs:LGBT práva v Egyptě and nl:Homoseksualiteit in Egypte. That means it's deemed to be of educational use. The fact that it can be used to represent arguably-illegal activity doesn't mean that the file itself is illegal, and even if it were, Commons generally pays only scant attention to non-US law in areas other the copyright. --bjh21 (talk) 17:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. (non-admin closure) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio GHMF (talk) 05:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, wrong tool use. Obvious case for speedy deletion. GHMF (talk) 05:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:Ferric oxide does not have this structure. It is not an exact O-Fe-O-Fe-O unit nd Fe does not lose all its electrons. DMacks (talk) 05:23, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 12:30, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Typo in mathematical formula: red "*" should be "+" in top line. Replaced by File:Clorato de calcio (Arreglado).jpg by same uploader. DMacks (talk) 05:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 12:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Large whitespace and a stray bond at lower-right; also missing stereochemistry where the hydroxyethyl is attached to the ring. File:Asperlactone skeletal.png is replacement DMacks (talk) 07:54, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 12:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two friends, both OoS. E4024 (talk) 20:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Malcolma as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Darwin Ahoy! 10:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no consensus for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie, personal image Migebert (talk) 19:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:16, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already a consensus to delete has been reached at Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/06/24#File:Abhishek_Kapdi.jpg श्रीमान २००२ (talk) 08:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING, OTRS-permission from producing company is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, uploader seems not to be the photographer (see Exif), social media linking Migebert (talk) 13:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo outside of project scope, not used on Wikipedia Ytoyoda (talk) 18:56, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violation minor age Suhanya Gamaarachchi (talk) 08:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Suhanya Gamaarachchi: How old are you?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 09:06, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suhanya Gamaarachchi (talk • contribs) 09:15, 17 August 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]

@Suhanya Gamaarachchi: Thank you. And Surangi Kasturirathne? How do you know that person?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 09:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination the redirect. --JuTa 20:58, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ineligible license, law refers to personality rights, not copyright DHN (talk) 18:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DHN: Might have a little benefit to say it a COM:NCR tag? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226: This is not a real "license". It's just citing some law that refers to personality rights. It says nothing about copyright. DHN (talk) 23:40, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 21:30, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i found the same image from https://ewc.wy.edu/buchanan-to-speak-at-ewc-commencement/ from 2018 no evidence that this is the uploader's work 47.223.78.205 22:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:04, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file goes unused, and if one searches "new pansexual flag" on google, the first and only relevant result is indeed this file. Apologies if this DR isn't correct, i'm not familiar with Common's operating methods. For clarification, this is not the real pan flag. Moonythedwarf (talk) 01:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment This feels like an attempt to mix pansexual and bisexual pride flags... perhaps. Take a look at this photo for example. I would really like to hear from the initial uploader where they got this from, and if it is just their own idea or there really exists a group of people that use this flag. From the pattern of their edits (only two things, creation of this file and then adding a link from another file to theirs) I do not have high hopes, but perhaps this is just a new user's mistake in a lack of communication. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 14:23, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • The flag was made by a bisexual bigot who tried to force pan people to use this flag because of an opinion the original flag creator has — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.65.62.19 (talk • contribs) 2020-08-17T23:00:01 (UTC)
      • I do not know how much to believe an IP editor who has left the accusation of bigotry against the uploader. However, if these occusations are correct, and then there was some sort of contraversy, and it would be educational to show this contraversy. I am, however, not ready to vote keep, because of my lack of ability to assess the validity of the statement above. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 06:10, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This flag is the flag of Kochi aka Cochin which is a city in India. Please make up your own original idea for your biphobic and transphobic flag. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 174.80.181.16 (talk) 14:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Commons is not a place to propose new flags. --bjh21 (talk) 16:57, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

the original flag was made by a bigot who believes in the existence that you can be both a bisexual and a lesbian at the same time. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.92.123.201 (talk) 20:48, 19 August 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment That is a difference of opinions and not bigotry. Regardless, even if a file is created by a bigot, that is not a reason for deletion, many content creators here are people I would not enjoy talking to in real life, we judge the content on its own merrits. So please stop commenting like that on here. Having said that I do not know if the file is useful. I do think that it may eventually become useful, but then it can be easily recreated as SVG. That's not a vote, just thinking in writing. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 03:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I can see no proofs that this flag is actually in use besides some discussions on Twitter. Consequently, this picture is out of scope of the project. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Soy la persona que tomó y subió la foto. Me olvidé de tapar la placa patente del autobús. Juampayo Escorpio (talk) 01:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:23, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover Gbawden (talk) 12:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyrighted: https://www.peterlang.com/view/9781454192572/back1.html OTRS needed. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:47, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brück_ is a spelling error and I uploaded a newer picture version without spelling error https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Guidepost_Br%C3%BCcke_B%C3%A4rbichl.jpg Andreas Binder (talk) 18:48, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the same object is now pictured with much better quality by the same uploader. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:00, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this person in scope? E4024 (talk) 20:20, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Probably not, no notability. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a pink graffiti on the wall on the right using explicit language. I realised its meaning only after I uploaded the picture. Some people may find it offensive. George E. Koronaios (talk) 21:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:09, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personnal image, out of scope Gyrostat (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo is the main subject. 4nn1l2 (talk) 22:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 14:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

professional portrait image of an individual, dubious self-work claim. NinjaStrikers «» 03:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:41, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The background is problematic. The photo can be cropped, but it may lose its value entirely and fall out of project scope. The depicted person is most probably non-notable. 4nn1l2 (talk) 22:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On second though, cropping is enough. The photo is in use now at a fawiki article.  I withdraw my nomination 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:56, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"My niece" can be a good "source" in case the niece gives you a large file with EXIF, not this one; IMHO. E4024 (talk) 14:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 11:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:18, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, only used for advertisement purposes Redalert2fan (talk) 18:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

154 KB w/o camera EXIF, but with transmission code, does not seem to be an "own work" as claimed. E4024 (talk) 19:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Same image as File:Celalozdemir1.jpg which was from Facebook. FBMD01000abe030000fc090000f50f0000e6100000d31100008e1300004e1b0000e91c0000471e0000a31f00008c2d0000 Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:08, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

21 KB small file with tr code; dubious ow. E4024 (talk) 13:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, not used anymore, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:30, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who drew this map? Any indication they died 60+ years ago? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:34, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The Survey of India is part of the Indian government, so this map had sixty years' copyright from its publication in the 1920s. That's long expired. --bjh21 (talk) 17:50, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: the map scale 1:63,360 (1 inch to 1 mile) indicates that this dates from before metrication in India and was probably published before 1960. It would be useful to know the exact publication date or the survey date, which are probably printed elsewhere on the map. The WorldCat listing is inconclusive.[3] Verbcatcher (talk) 13:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn, looks like this is Crown copyright or it passed to the government of India, after which it would have expired. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not an "own work" as claimed but a newspaper cutting. Could it be PD for old? E4024 (talk) 14:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; need more info to determine PD status. --Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo can be found in Internet since 2012. Bigger version exists in Twitter and https://en.notrecinema.com/communaute/stars/stars.php3?staridx=285321 . I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a selfie as claimed. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

found here. --Minoraxtalk 06:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

along with [[File:Yoel_Freue_Gym.jpg]], someone is lacking permission, and on other projects they have attempted to hijack articles for someone of the same name Quakewoody (talk) 15:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

along with [[File:Marcos Yoel Freue.jpg]], someone is lacking permission, and on other projects they have attempted to hijack articles for someone of the same name Quakewoody (talk) 15:59, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture found on the internet, e.g. https://www.danskhr.dk/traefpunkt-hr/konferenceprogram/keynotes/ Pugilist (talk) 16:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hej, det er altså mig selv, dvs. ASH, der har lagt billedet på Wiki, da det jo er - et foto af mig.

Hi Anna: Being on the picture does not give you the copyright to the picture. The copyright and the right to release the photo belongs to the photographer unless you have acquired these rights. --Pugilist (talk) 16:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from television production, not free content Pugilist (talk) 16:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, contemporary artworks (stained glass windows), no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 16:57, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 16:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Phonographic cover art belonging to the recorder Dirty Hit, for which the artist who recorded it works. Leon saudanha (talk) 17:23, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Phonographic cover art belonging to the recorder Dirty Hit, for which the artist who recorded it works. Leon saudanha (talk) 17:26, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a personal work AwkwardChester (talk) 17:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Cropped from https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/actress-yara-martinez-of-my-own-worst-enemy-speaks-during-news-photo/82026998?irgwc=1&esource=AFF_GI_IR_TinEye_77643&asid=TinEye&cid=GI&utm_medium=affiliate&utm_source=TinEye&utm_content=77643. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo isn't in source provided and wrong license Ezarateesteban 17:59, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://www.facebook.com/egtotofficial/photos/a.830808740460192/1353038438237217 Ytoyoda (talk) 15:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 11:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very blurry photos, out of the scope, unidentifiable location

— Draceane talkcontrib. 10:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 16:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation. Phonographic work cover, therefore the rights are reserved to the record company that produced it, not to the uploader. Leon saudanha (talk) 16:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nominator. --EVinente (talk) 16:11, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked own work but available here: https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/hip-hop/9434797/first-beat-drake-nas-trey-songz Larry Hockett (talk) 16:49, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, artist of stained glass windows György Lehoczky died in 1979, no freedo of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 16:54, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced a new one. Key Mîrza (talk) 19:27, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A new one uploaded Key Mîrza (talk) 19:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A new one uploaded Key Mîrza (talk) 19:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A new one uploaded Key Mîrza (talk) 19:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same photo in the official website. [4] [5] No evidence of free use. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The website is on Wix, suggesting that they're a small, independent band. If they were represented by a music label, they would not be hosted on a free website.
The upload of the image of the website is a .webp image, not a .jpg. I downloaded the image, and it has no camera metadata. The upload on Wikimedia Commons has camera metadata.
Even if the .webp copy on the website had camera metadata, it would loose this information when being resaved as .jpg.
This is the only upload by the account, suggesting narrow interest. -- Nick Moreau (talk) 00:04, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Zanimum: Aren't "camera metadata" editable by using a Windows 7/8/10 computer, right click an image and click Property(R) -> details? And even for jpg and webp? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Tend to  Delete since the camera metadata may be fake here. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious ow from 1956. E4024 (talk) 14:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image is used in https://he.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%90%D7%93%D7%9D_%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%96%D7%95%D7%9F which is the Hebrew page for Adam Simonson. Adam was an important figure in Israel's education scene. We are his family, we plan to write an English page soon. The image is totally free and of course it shouldnt be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yotamabramson (talk • contribs) 04:36, 18 August 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]

@Yotamabramson: You say that the picture is free, but why is it free? Did Daniaans take this picture themself 64 years ago? --bjh21 (talk) 17:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious ow. E4024 (talk) 14:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Possibly in scope but FB in MD so PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Own work due to taken from one of my friends. He sent me through the FB messenger. So I made it through my work, as he is not involving for Wikipedia . So for the easiness, I have upload as my own work. Otherwise, I have to upload it under taken from Permission tag. Gihan Jayaweera (talk) 19:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. PCP - whoever took the photo needs to provide OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be out of project scope; (hard to tell, strange description and categories, not used anywhere). Mormegil (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; would need permission if in scope. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work claim. Lacks author and publication information. ƏXPLICIT 01:56, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 23:20, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file contains texts sacred to Muslims that contradict homosexuality. The existence of these LGBT colours causes pain to the feelings of a billion Muslims Omda4wady (talk) 10:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Commons is not censored to protect your feelings. This file is in use on cs:LGBT práva v Saúdské Arábii and on pt:Direitos LGBT na Arábia Saudita, and that means that under COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV it must be kept on Commons even if it offends people. --bjh21 (talk) 17:12, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Certainly the flag is in use. Still I have a strong impression that this flag was originally invented by the uploader and never used by any gay activists (in fact there are no gay activists in Saudi Arabia where homosexuality is punishable with death penalty). If the contrary would not be proven, I'd rather delete the image both from the two aforementioned wikis and from Commons. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Flags evoke feeling and certainly some people may be provoked by changing a national flag. Still Wikicommons need first to consider an image's usefulness to provide educational value to the Wikimedia projects. Thuresson (talk) 23:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded incorrect file. Will upload correct one in its place. Thank you. TuesdaysWithMe (talk) 02:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Does not look like an own work as declared; therefore will be deleted all the same. Next time please upload your own work with a larger file and let us be able to see the camera EXIF. (The best is to use a cellphone BTW.) --E4024 (talk) 02:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination but please do not upload unfree files. --Green Giant (talk) 21:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think that this is a great video if we can keep it. However, there are two factors that force me to nominate it for deletion. Currently the source says that it is not available for viewing. And at this moment the site itself states that all text and media is under non-commercial licence. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 05:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination unfortunately. It is possible it might have been available under a freer license but no license review was carried out. --Green Giant (talk) 21:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, logo of en-WP श्रीमान २००२ (talk) 08:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

en-WP logo is creative commons CC-BY-SA which permits me to remix it. I've changed its bit depth and rendered it within an emulator, then released my adaptation under CC-BY-SA and stated in the description that it's the Wikipedia logo and what changes I made to it. Though this could be a misuse under trademark law, I don't see how it could possibly be a misuse under copyright law.Gravislizard (talk) 15:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have added in the Source field "Own work based on File:Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg".Gravislizard (talk) 19:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The original is now attributed, which is part of the license requirements. --Green Giant (talk) 22:17, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a common Uzbek notary, uploaded for spam article in ruwiki. Out of project scope. See also the rest of Special:Contributions/I.zaynutdinov. Wikisaurus (talk) 21:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Also deleted four more similar uploads by same user. --Green Giant (talk) 22:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has been replaced by another file with the same information David Eric Ffell (talk) 08:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. OP presumably means File:Ffellonic Forms Collection.svg Thuresson (talk) 23:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to small size I do not believe own work. Real author, real source and real license are needed. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. The 280x160 px size makes it impossible to see the pattern anyway. Thuresson (talk) 23:33, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Profile photo of a user with an insignificant number of edits in the wikimedia projects. Thuresson (talk) 22:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file w/o camera EXIF claimed as "own work"; dubious. E4024 (talk) 14:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

canybody can use a camera, please elaborate what you imply.Abbasquadir (talk) 18:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
w/o means without. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted per nomination. Problematic uploader. Thuresson (talk) 23:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file w/o camera EXIF claimed as "own work"; dubious. E4024 (talk) 14:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

taken from a phone camera, cant be?! Abbasquadir (talk) 18:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
They also have EXIF. --E4024 (talk) 19:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted per nomination. Problematic uploader. Thuresson (talk) 23:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source website is licensed with CC Аttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Serbia, not acceptable here. Not sure that this photo falls into Template:PD-SerbiaGov. Smooth O (talk) 16:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. The Serbian government web site is the source and is licensed under a noncommercial license. See also Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Serbia. Thuresson (talk) 23:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file with tr code; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 19:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published promotional photo, see https://www.theprp.com/2020/07/09/news/ascension-of-the-watchers-fear-factory-to-release-apocrypha-in-october/ Ytoyoda (talk) 16:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:16, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation, widely published before upload here.[6][7] Verbcatcher (talk) 00:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Senseless artwork, photoshopped version of File:Remiz pendulinus nest in Greece.jpg. Out of COM:SCOPE. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 04:27, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:08, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this image long ago but its useless. श्रीमान २००२ (talk) 07:57, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without camera data, the user's last remaining upload. Uploader has problems with copyright. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:10, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exxtracted from https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?vanity=sanghmitramauryabjp&set=a.598534460666824 श्रीमान २००२ (talk) 09:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:26, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Français : Violation supposée des droits d'auteur. Pas de preuve que les travaux photographiques de Philippe RENAULT publiés sur le site de Ouest-France soient sous libre licence ou autre licence compatible avec Commons ; le cas échéant, l'autorisation de réutilisation doit impérativement être communiquée. Si jamais il a cédé ses travaux au journal Ouest-France dans le cas présent, la licence n'est pas non plus compatible d'après les mentions légales : « L'éditeur n'autorise qu'un usage strictement personnel des données, informations ou contenus auxquels vous accédez ».
English: Copyvio. No evidence of free licence. Credits to Philippe RENAULT and the newspaper Ouest-France.
- Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 10:49, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I can confirm that Philippe Renault's work is copyrighted and published by Ouest-France, and not released under CC-BY-SA-4.0. Gyrostat (talk) 11:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:30, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

YouTube video doesn't bear the Creative Commons Attribution mark now. I went to the Internet Archive link, and there the description said "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License." That was as of April 18, th day it was uploaded here. We can't use NonCommercial. Sorry. GRuban (talk) 11:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:31, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious license. Uploader has uploaded other non-free material, and it seem rather unlikly that this picture is in fact taken by the uploader. Pugilist (talk) 16:13, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Igen, tak for opmærksomheden, men det er fotos af mig, som også ejes af mig.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by ASHDK (talk • contribs) 16:14, 17 August 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]

Google Translate: "Again, thanks for the attention, but these are photos of me that are also owned by me." Thuresson (talk) 23:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. We need OTRS permission if released in good faith by the copyright holder, see COM:OTRS. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:32, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious licence. Picture of uploader and not "own work" Pugilist (talk) 16:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. We need OTRS permission if released in good faith by the copyright holder, see COM:OTRS. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 16:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No CC mentioned at https://www.breizhgo.bzh/mentions-legales. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:34, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is copyright and sourced directly from official website Lullabying (talk) 18:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:35, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copie d'écran d'un site web de présentation du RER NG (il s'agit là d'un dessin de type "maquette") Poudou99 (talk) 14:27, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

bonjours , Oui il s'agit bien d'une maquette que la SNCF a transmis à la presse pour présenter le nouveau matériel type rer NG je souhaite la partager sur Wikipédia mais apparemment je n'ai pas le droit de transmettre ce genre de choses car d'autres sites sont les mêmes éléments que moi !
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Le cheminots (talk • contribs) 17 août 2020 à 16:32 (UTC)
Bonjour @Le cheminots:
Je crois que vous n'avez pas bien compris les règles d'importation de fichiers dans Commons. Vous ne pouvez importer dans Commons
  • que des photos dont vous êtes l'auteur ;
  • que des photos dont vous n'êtes pas l'auteur mais qui sont libres de droits d'auteur ;
  • que des photos dont vous n'êtes pas l'auteur mais pour lesquelles l'auteur ou ses ayants droit vous ont donné personnellement leur autorisation de publication ;
  • que des photos ne montrant pas des œuvres (sculptures, édifices, objet d'art,...) dont l'image est encore protégée par le droit d'auteur.
Les photos/images du RER NG que vous avez importées ne rentrent pas dans ces cas-là, toutes ces photos/images sont soumises au droit d'auteur. On ne peut importer que des images qui sont sous licence libre (ce sont les règles de Commons, qu'importe ce que font les autres sites). Ce n'est pas apparemment ce que vous avez fait, pour cette image et pour toutes celles que vous avez importez aujourd'hui et qui sont proposées à la suppression. --Poudou99 (talk) 15:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Malgré ce qu'il affirme sur la page de description du fichier, il n'y a pas de preuve convaincante que l'utilisateur «Le cheminots» soit le créateur de cette maquette ni qu'il soit le propriétaire des droits d'auteur sur cette maquette. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    En plus de sa réponse ci-dessus, la personne (@Le cheminots: ) qui a importé cette image (ainsi qu'une autre image de l'extérieur du futur train RER NG qui a été supprimée : File:RER NG 2021.png ) a aussi recconnu dans un commentaire de modification dans WP-fr [10] que « cette capture d’écran vient d'un document Remis à la presse lors de la présentation du nouveau matériel par la sncf ». Il y a là manifestement un Copyvio. --Poudou99 (talk) 17:49, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image; contains a depiction of the trophy, so exceeds "simple geometric shapes or text". Wjemather (talk) 15:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - above ToO in UK. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:33, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work and CC is doubtful: https://www.deastudio.al/author/admin-dea/page/2/ Albinfo (talk) 16:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:34, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from https://www.intoalbania.com/attraction/national-museum-medieval-art/ – probably not CC Albinfo (talk) 16:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: anyway unlikely to be own work, all other uploads deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

another contribution of this user with very doubtful license Albinfo (talk) 16:23, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France Hektor (talk) 18:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

supprimer --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 09:55, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, since the creator died in 1964, this image will be ok in 2035 and can be reinstated then. These applies to most of images of Maison Picassiette. 2A01:CB0C:66E:EC00:E1E3:D405:E27A:671B 06:42, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

68 KB small file; does not look like "own work" as claimed. E4024 (talk) 19:00, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:40, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphical data is 10 years out of date, and has been superseded by Vector file "Leeds United AFC League Performance.svg", which is up to date Chappy84 (talk) 19:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want the picture to be available any longer. On the Christ Pavilion page it must also be removed. Please comply with my request Min Son (talk) 19:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Whereas we would normally courtesy delete images at authors' requests, a Creative Commons licence is irrevocable and in any case after ten years, we don't know who has relied upon that licence to use the file elsewhere. So I'd say sorry, but it should stay. Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I understand. Is it possible to remove the link to my user account and to shorten the last name with K.?--Min Son (talk) 08:37, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nothing we can do, though you may be interested by meta:Changing username. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:56, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

13 KB false ow by a one time visitor. E4024 (talk) 20:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:59, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, copyrighted label Kissa21782 (talk) 20:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:59, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS or similar, even if own work Kissa21782 (talk) 20:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this one of those screenshots that are OK to upload here? I doubt. E4024 (talk) 14:00, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Well, that it's a screenshot isn't a problem, but we could do with better information about its origin. On en:Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, it's claimed that the picture dates from the 1970s, but 666himself claims to have taken it himself in 2020. I think some clarification from 666himself is needed. --bjh21 (talk) 17:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Just came across this. The source is - https://borilib.com/repository/gallery, which can be added to metadata. The picture is from 1933. The user seems to be new as they mentioned - own work - may be by mistake. Work may be considered as PD in India, anonymous. --सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 13:49, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:42, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

87 KB w/o camera EXIF, does not seem to be an "own work" as claimed. E4024 (talk) 19:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:43, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Latvia and the photo violates author's copyright. Creator is Romualds Gibovskis (born 1962, still living). Taivo (talk) 10:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:31, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:34, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While the photograph of meat is a copyrighted image, would the logo itself qualify for copyright? It includes Chinese text, English text, and a traditional border. Does it surpass a threshold of originality? It seems less original than many items in Category:SVG logos of companies by country. -- Nick Moreau (talk) 23:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete@Zanimum: Please read COM:TOO HK or eventually COM:TOO UK, very rare logos can be "too simple to be copyrighted" in those former British colony areas. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be taken from https://rodrigogarciabasketball.blogspot.com/2019/09/historico-de-basqueteiro-arthur-pecos.html Ytoyoda (talk) 20:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This photo of Arthur Pecos is my creative property. I have the legal rights to upload it here. Pecos himself post it on his instagram account and the blog took it from there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vendofusca86 (talk • contribs) 17:43, August 17, 2020‎ (UTC)
@Vendofusca86: Thanks for responding. Whatever the case, previously published photos require COM:OTRS verification. Please follow the links for the steps you should follow. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:27, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:55, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this is a basic wordtype, there is a selection of 3D positioning (lights and shadows) in addition to the use of a glitter effect within the letters that would establish creativity far beyond the threshold or originality. Masem (talk) 06:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I did ask at the Teahouse before uploading and two other users also thought it was in the PD is the US. Heartfox (talk) 17:48, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was already there under other name Dosseman (talk) 11:53, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dosseman: what's the "other file" with the different name but is exactly the same subject as this? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:55, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: The other picture is Hazreti Süleyman Mosque 2712.jpg . Thanks to the suggestion to not ask for deletion but for a name change I have managed to get many pictures right now, but have possibly caused some disturbance. I do think I've learned my lesson, though I may occasionally make errors. Thanks again for your troubles. Dosseman (talk) 18:27, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion or I didn't get it. If you have a duplicate, you can use {{Duplicate}}. --rubin16 (talk) 10:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

West-Riding Consolidated Naturalists' Society

[edit]

The IA metadata uses the first date of journal publication, however later volumes cannot be considered automatically public domain. There may be a rationale based on 'copyright not renewed' for some of these earlier volumes. This list was created by searching for volume numbers of 2 digits or more.

Because VFC messes up the creation of mass DRs when using a regex search, the DR notices are poorly formed. However the temporary category Category:Deletion requests West-Riding Consolidated Naturalists' Society shows the 43 PDFs affected. Putting that category through Petscan gives the table:

Title Page ID Namespace Size (bytes) Last change
The naturalist (IA natural10010219751977west).pdf 91892747 6 1804 20200817121416
The naturalist (IA natural10310419781979west).pdf 91892832 6 1887 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA natural10510619801981west).pdf 91892851 6 1897 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA natural10710819821983west).pdf 91892883 6 1781 20200817121417
The naturalist (IA natural11411519891990west).pdf 91893022 6 1815 20200817121417
The naturalist (IA natural11611719911992west).pdf 91893189 6 1815 20200817121416
The naturalist (IA natural12412519992000west).pdf 91893229 6 1878 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA natural12612720012002west).pdf 91893324 6 1815 20200817121417
The naturalist (IA natural13213320072008west).pdf 91893380 6 1815 20200817121417
The naturalist (IA natural13813920132014west).pdf 91893398 6 1882 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA naturalist1091984970west).pdf 91894102 6 1896 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA naturalist1101985972west).pdf 91894113 6 1895 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA naturalist1101985973west).pdf 91894128 6 1828 20200817121417
The naturalist (IA naturalist1101985974west).pdf 91894138 6 1829 20200817121417
The naturalist (IA naturalist1101985975west).pdf 91894150 6 1890 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA naturalist11819931004west).pdf 91894160 6 1810 20200817121416
The naturalist (IA naturalist11819931005west).pdf 91894170 6 1897 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA naturalist11819931006west).pdf 91894176 6 1912 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA naturalist11819931007west).pdf 91894187 6 1834 20200817121439
The naturalist (IA naturalist12019951012west).pdf 91894196 6 1824 20200817121416
The naturalist (IA naturalist12219971022west).pdf 91894199 6 1828 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA naturalist13420091068west).pdf 91894205 6 1810 20200817121416
The naturalist (IA naturalist13420091069west).pdf 91894208 6 1897 20200817121339
The naturalist (IA naturalist13420091070west).pdf 91894215 6 1835 20200817121416
The naturalist (IA naturalist13420091071west).pdf 91894219 6 1897 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA naturalist13520101072west).pdf 91894221 6 1824 20200817121417
The naturalist (IA naturalist13520101073west).pdf 91894226 6 1897 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA naturalist13520101074west).pdf 91894235 6 1835 20200817121416
The naturalist (IA naturalist13520101075west).pdf 91894248 6 1897 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA naturalist13620111076west).pdf 91894257 6 1878 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA naturalist13620111077west).pdf 91894267 6 1800 20200817121416
The naturalist (IA naturalist13620111078west).pdf 91894283 6 1787 20200817121416
The naturalist (IA naturalist13720121079west).pdf 91894293 6 1858 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA naturalist13720121080west).pdf 91894299 6 1795 20200817121416
The naturalist (IA naturalist1401090west).pdf 91894309 6 1801 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA naturalist14020151088west).pdf 91894322 6 1859 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA naturalist14020151089west).pdf 91894332 6 1795 20200817121417
The naturalist (IA naturalist141west).pdf 91894339 6 1834 20200817121339
The naturalist (IA naturalist141westa).pdf 91894351 6 1825 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA naturalist141westb).pdf 91894364 6 1762 20200817121417
The naturalist (IA naturalist142west).pdf 91894374 6 1747 20200817121416
The naturalist (IA naturalist142westa).pdf 91894383 6 1829 20200817121340
The naturalist (IA naturalist142westb).pdf 91894391 6 1829 20200817121340

This DR is an exemplar at IA_books#Exemplar_deletion_requests. -- (talk) 12:20, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:43, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quand j'ai téléversé ce fichier depuis Internet Archive, il n'était pas possible de le téléversé au format .djvu. Je l'ai donc téléverser au format .pdf mais cela rend l'OCR difficile à obtenir sur Wikisource. Il est maintenant possible de le téléverser au format .djvu depuis IA mais pour cela, il faudrait supprimer le fichier .pdf de Commons. Serait-ce possible ? Merci d'avance.

When I uploaded this fils from Internet Archive, it was impossible to upload it in .djvu format. I had to upload it in .pdf format but as a result, it is difficult to get OCR text on Wikisource. It is now possible to upload it in .djvu format from IA but the file on Commons needs to be deleted first. Would it be possible to do it? Thanks in advance. Aziliz Breizh (talk) 12:56, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't suppress... I'm making the OCR on this file to fix the problem. --Ernest-Mtl (talk) 12:35, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OCR made. No need to suppress the file.--Aziliz Breizh (talk) 13:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 10:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
the current Boosey & Hawkes logo

Complex logo from the UK where the TOO is extremely low: COM:TOO UK.

Wcam (talk) 13:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

a number of ampersands
If I am not mistaken, this DR alleges that the ampersand in the B&H logo passes the threshold of originality. Looking at the plethora of available ampersand specimens, I don't think that can hold true. --Gnom (talk) 13:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But also including Hal Leonard logo in the US, it does meet COM:TOO. --122.2.10.69 11:39, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --rubin16 (talk) 10:45, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ぷりぷり娘 as Speedy (SpeedyDelete) and the most recent rationale was: ノーソースの画像に対するFileImporterの誤用 The file has really no source, but it has been 15 years in Commons and it deserves a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 19:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:46, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who drew this poster? Any indication they died 60+ years ago? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I haven't found any information about the author of the poster. If the work is anonymous, it is PD after 60 years from the publication date. --rubin16 (talk) 10:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who drew this poster? Any indication they died 60+ years ago? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I haven't found any information about the author of the poster. If the work is anonymous, it is PD after 60 years from the publication date. --rubin16 (talk) 10:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: one of the users correctly mentioned that the image isn't in PD in US. It became PD in 1999 but we need to have it free at 1996 for {{PD-1996}}. rubin16 (talk) 11:56, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who drew this map? Any indication they died 60+ years ago? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:23, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: At first glance this looks anonymous, so it would be out of copyright 60 years after publication. A complete copy of the leaflet would be good to make sure, though. --bjh21 (talk) 17:44, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is a complete copy of the map here and there's no author named on this side of the paper, but there is unknown information on the other side of the paper.
 Question Why wasn't the entire map uploaded to Commons? What's the point in having a cropped map? --Stefan2 (talk) 19:57, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: The image was first uploaded by me, along-with other Tata airlines images on en.wiki, if you see that page you'll find appropriate licensing info and that there has been no attempt to hide the source of the file. Regarding crop, now I don't remember the reason, but I don't see any apart from some error or mistake, the image should be replaced with full-version.--Faizhaider (talk) 23:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: 60 years from publication for anonymous works. --rubin16 (talk) 10:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who drew this poster? Any indication they died 60+ years ago? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: 60 years for anonymous works. --rubin16 (talk) 10:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who drew this poster? Any indication they died 60+ years ago? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: 60 years for anonymous works. --rubin16 (talk) 10:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who drew this poster? Any indication they died 60+ years ago? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: 60 years for anonymous works. --rubin16 (talk) 10:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who drew this poster? Any indication they died 60+ years ago? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Not a poster, but the front cover of a timetable. The full timetable is at http://www.timetableimages.com/ttimages/il33c.htm and doesn't credit the artist, so I think this is an anonymous work that entered the public domain 60 years after publication (i.e. around 1993). --bjh21 (talk) 17:47, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: The image was first uploaded by me, along-with other Tata airlines images on en.wiki, if you see that page you'll find appropriate licensing info and that there has been no attempt to hide the source of the file.--Faizhaider (talk) 23:29, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: 60 years for anonymous works. --rubin16 (talk) 10:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]