Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/07/18
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![60 File:Книга "Сестромам" Евгении Некрасовой. Стамбул. Акция "практики чтения" Библиотеки Некрасова.jpg](#File:Книга_"Сестромам"_Евгении_Некрасовой._Стамбул._Акция_"практики_чтения"_Библиотеки_Некрасова.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![97 File:"The first duty in life is to be as artificial as possible." - Flickr - JD Hancock.jpg](#File:"The_first_duty_in_life_is_to_be_as_artificial_as_possible."_-_Flickr_-_JD_Hancock.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Rock_and_Goldberg_stare_each_other_down.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_поле.jpg){kind=link}
,_трибуны.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
It should be deleted because i am the person in this photo and i would like to have this deleted Dr dunglechalk (talk) 00:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope. --E4024 (talk) 04:10, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:05, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Not appropriate to post personal picture Naquℹssa (talk) 04:53, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyright concerned 2601:1C2:4E00:7:8124:801D:8E74:7CC6 05:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 09:59, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:120923 경주 한류 드림콘서트 씨스타 01.jpg 46.132.187.104 13:57, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate, wrong template used (delete and redirect to File:120923 경주 한류 드림콘서트 씨스타 01.jpg) -Killarnee (C•T•U) 14:03, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
It was mistake it was meant for an article I was writing. Incognitoray (talk) 16:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 16:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Attack image. Falsely attributed, not in webpage link. Chuka Chief (talk) 19:29, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily: Vandalism, insulting/offending. --Achim (talk) 19:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
https://z-aya.ru/index.php/b/berber-zoya coppivo Слезантий2 (talk) 18:33, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deletion, evident copyright violation, the photograph is promo picture from the personal blog https://vk.com/zberber?z=photo8945993_382768447%2Fphotos8945993 (2015). --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:47, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
copyvio (not own work) - many other suspicious uploads by this user as well Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It's most probably a work by ISNA, which doesn't release its content under a free license. Mashregh is no different in that regard. --Ahmadtalk 08:14, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
عکس شخص مورد دارد شادی1373 (talk) 08:20, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:SS. --4nn1l2 (talk) 14:45, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
a similar (?) image already deleted, please send OTRS or refrain from uploading the image again and again Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:01, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work of non-free content (F3) - e.g., [1]. --Эlcobbola talk 17:12, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
![[1]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ENMYtA9U8AEHvpY.jpg){kind=link}
My renaming request was granted per Criterion 5 (violation of policies or guidelines): Advertises mail address admin@greenswitc.hnl, suggests copyright claim for a PD work (made around 1900) — bertux 12:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
The request is not about the image but about this redirect — bertux 16:03, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: useless as a redirect, image is identical to File:Enamel_billboard_Theemelange_Merk_R._De_Gekroonde_R.jpg. --Wutsje 03:44, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Logo Helios (talk) 10:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 14:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Boba Fett
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:Star Wars and the Power of Costume July 2018 28 (Boba Fett's costume, helmet, and jetpack from Episode VI).jpg
- File:SWCA - Boba Fett statue (17015356640).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:51, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:52, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Boba Fett
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted character. COM:COSTUME says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted.". These are based on existing character design. So, these photos are not permitted.
- File:Star Wars A Galaxy Far, Far Away Boba Fett 1.jpg
- File:Star Wars A Galaxy Far, Far Away Boba Fett 2.jpg
- File:Star Wars A Galaxy Far, Far Away Boba Fett 3.jpg
- File:Star Wars A Galaxy Far, Far Away Boba Fett 4.jpg
- File:Star Wars A Galaxy Far, Far Away Boba Fett 5.jpg
- File:Star Wars A Galaxy Far, Far Away Boba Fett 6.jpg
- File:Star Wars A Galaxy Far, Far Away Boba Fett 7.jpg
- File:Star Wars A Galaxy Far, Far Away Boba Fett 8.jpg
- File:Star Wars A Galaxy Far, Far Away Boba Fett 9.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:08, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:52, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Wrong license; not photos but screenshots taken from the movie La Patagonia Rebelde (1974), still copyrighted in its country of origin (Argentina). All the images indicate the same source (see here - Youtube link. Besides, {{PD-AR-Movie}} is only valid for filmst where at least 50 years have passed after the death of the script writer, producer and director of this movie (Law 11.723, Article 34).
Files affected:
- File:Jaramillo era.jpg
- File:Jaramillo into.jpg
- File:Deseado ferro.jpg
- File:Deseado_pont.jpg
- File:Hola tehuelches.jpg
- File:Tehuelches costa.jpg
- File:Tehuelche into.jpg
- File:Tehuelches infra.jpg
- File:Tehuelches recuerdo.jpg
Fma12 (talk) 14:20, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
No FOP in Argentina for sculptures.
- File:Piatnitzkysaurus floresi sarmiento.JPG
- File:Parque paleo sarmiento.JPG
- File:Notohypsilophodon.JPG
- File:Megaraptor sarmiento.JPG
- File:Epachthosaurus sarmiento.JPG
- File:Aniksosaurus darwini.JPG
Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:57, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:53, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
No FOP in Mongolia. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:10, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:56, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for 3D artworks. Abzeronow (talk) 21:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
No FOP in Indonesia. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:16, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:56, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues in Arizona
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for artworks.
- File:Dinosaur statutes outside of the Indian Rock Shop in Holbrook Arizona.jpg
- File:Holbrook Dinosaur (43392554454).jpg
- File:The Rainbow or Indian Rock Shop in Holbrook, AZ.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:59, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:15, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Timon (Disney character)
[edit]COM:DW of a copyrighted character. COM:COSTUME says "If the costume is a completely original design (not based on any existing character design), and the designer has released it under a free license, it is permitted.". These are based on existing character design. So, These photos are not permitted.
- File:Disney-Animal-Kingdom-Lion-King-Timon-8435.jpg
- File:Hong Kong Disneyland 1429.JPG
- File:Timon Disneys Animal Kingdom.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:15, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fun Town (Legoland California)
[edit]COM:TOYS, and No FoP in US for artworks. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:LEGO sculptures in Legoland California.
- File:Lego flowers (4289866655).jpg
- File:Lego Mario or Fireman...? (3108838362).jpg
- File:Lego Tourist (3838138635).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108013787).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108838950).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108842336).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108846036).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108846426).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108847138).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108847808).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108848144).jpg
- File:Legoland (6016600009).jpg
- File:Legoland (6016612427).jpg
- File:Legoland (6017152292).jpg
- File:Legoland (6017156370).jpg
- File:Legoland (6017162626).jpg
- File:Legoland (6017165616).jpg
- File:Legoland (6017167012).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5476470707).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5476472529).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5476478165).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5476479489).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5476501731).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5476520037).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5476524671).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5477081208).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5494931620).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Support deletion based on above criteria. Thanks! Mliu92 (talk) 14:46, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:30, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:42, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 12:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:56, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
COM:TOYS, and No FoP in US for artworks. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:LEGO sculptures in Legoland California.
- File:Lego Mariachi Band (16477839701).jpg
- File:LEGO service (33223441813).jpg
- File:LEGO Utensil server (33223440293).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5476483895).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5476514311).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5476514833).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5476515465).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5476516503).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5476517813).jpg
- File:Legoland San Diego 5.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support deletion based on above criteria. Thanks! Mliu92 (talk) 14:46, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:43, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
COM:TOYS, and No FoP in US for artworks. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:LEGO sculptures in Legoland California.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support deletion based on above criteria. Thanks! Mliu92 (talk) 14:47, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:13, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KarschtiHB (talk · contribs)
[edit]Blatant self-promotion of a nudist model, out of project scope. No contribs to any wm project.
- File:Karsten.de.Beek.jpg
- File:Karsten--Bremen.jpg
- File:Karsten-aus-Bremen.jpg
- File:Aktmodell Karsten de Beek.jpg
- File:Karsten de Beek.jpg
- File:Nudist-Karsten.JPG
- File:Geiler Karsten.jpg
Achim (talk) 13:05, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:44, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Museum of the Rockies
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works. FoP in US allows buildings only. These are not buildings.
- File:Deinonychus attacks Tenontosaurus - model - Museum of the Rockies - 2013-07-08.jpg
- File:Deinonychus attacks Tenontosaurus - model and fossil - Museum of the Rockies - 2013-07-08.jpg
- File:Diorama of Mississippian fossil fish - Stethacanthus (31828333408).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:06, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
The EXIF shows the author is "Jonas Charway" and the copyright holder is "Romedia Studios". Are these photos really the work of the uploader?
- File:Achimota School Dormitory.jpg
- File:Happy Young People.jpg
- File:Social Media Tool.jpg
- File:Smile is free.jpg
- File:Project Basic Education 4.jpg
- File:Project Basic Education 3.jpg
- File:Project Basic Education 2.jpg
- File:Project Basic Education 1.jpg
- File:Project Basic Education.jpg
Green Giant (talk) 13:43, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:00, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ordinary japanese (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, see Com:Scope and Com:Nudity
- File:Japanese erect penis naked man male nude model-2.jpg
- File:Japanese erect penis naked man male nude model-3.jpg
- File:Japanese erect penis naked man male nude model-1.jpg
- File:Japanese erect penis naked man male nude model.jpg
- File:Naked Japanese in general.jpg
- File:General japanese nudity.jpg
- File:Japanese-erect-penis-naked-man-male-nude-model-Naked-man-masturbation-ejaculation.ogv
- File:Japanese erect penis naked man male nude model Naked man ejaculation-middle-aged-couple-handjob.ogv
- File:Japanese erect penis naked man male nude model Naked man masturbation ejaculation.ogv
-Killarnee (C•T•U) 13:55, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ordinary japanese
[edit]Out of scope, see Com:Scope and Com:Nudity NairobiPapel (talk) 20:32, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:45, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paulo Metalingüística (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:La Conquista de la Tostada Desarrollo y Madurez Ideologica del RobertSotismo.pdf
- File:Manifiesto RobertSotista.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:04, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paulo Metalingüística (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:04, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:57, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:57, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:57, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Indoor painting in Hungary, not to be covered by COM:FOP Hungary. Regasterios (talk) 14:54, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:57, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Euwesleypaul (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:03, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by الملك القادر (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:احمد التايب صحفى.jpg
- File:أحمد التايب.jpg
- File:أحمد التايب كاتب وصحفى.jpg
- File:أحمد التايب الكاتب الصحفى.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:03, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lubangakene (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Otto Elizabeth McNair Scholars.jpg
- File:Daniel Otto - Lincoln Literacy.jpg
- File:Daniel Otto - University of Nebraska Cross Country.jpg
- File:Peter Jok, Daniel Otto, Warol Gatdit - South Sudan Unite conference (2019) in Minneapolis.jpg
- File:Daniel Otto - Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge.jpg
_in_Minneapolis.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:03, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos, map, book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags
- File:Місцева бригада прокладає колії. Велике Колодно..jpg
- File:Місцева бригада будує колії. Велике Колодно..jpg
- File:Залізнична станція с. Велике Колодно.jpg
- File:Меморіал пам'яті полеглих односельчан в Другій світовій війні с.Велике Колодно.jpg
- File:Церква Воздвиження Чесного Хреста ПЦУ (1902р.) с.Велике Колодно.jpg
- File:Костел Воздвиження Чесного Хреста с.Велике Колодно.jpg
- File:Gorpin-Ikona-Kostel.jpg
- File:Перв'ятичі на карті.png
- File:Батькова рука.jpg
- File:Church Vyrov 2.tif
- File:Church Vyrov 1.tif
- File:Olexander Sodomora 1.tif
- File:Olexander Sodomora.tif
- File:Tserkva Pervyatuchi.jpg
_%D1%81.%D0%92%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B5_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%BE.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:05, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Лесь Бабський-“Сергій” – поручник СБ ОУН.jpg
- File:Лукань Калина Дмитрівна 2.jpg
- File:Лукань Калина Дмитрівна.jpg
- File:Драмгурток села Кобаки. Зима, 1942 .jpg
- File:Калина Лукань "Галина".jpg
- File:Миклашів 2.jpg
- File:Миклашів.jpg
- File:Село Миклаші́в, 1906 р. Фото- Фріц Вільгельм фон Ессен.jpg
- File:Село Миклаші́в Пустомитівському районі Львівської області. 1906 р. Фото- Фріц Вільгельм фон Ессен.jpg
- File:Українські святкові вбрання в Калуші, початок ХХ ст..png
- File:Гуцул грає на дуді.png
- File:1937р., Вирів. "Союз Українок" (в центрі - Софія Содомора).tif
- File:1937р., Вирів. Отець Олександр Содомора з прихожанами під час будівництва нової церкви.tif
- File:Церква Преображення Господнього (1765) та дзвіниця в с.Вирів.jpg
_%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%B4%D0%B7%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8F_%D0%B2_%D1%81.%D0%92%D0%B8%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:06, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Лукань Калина Дмитрівна - "Галина".jpg
- File:Лукань Калина - "Галина".jpg
- File:Калина Лукань — "Галина".jpg
- File:Лесь Бабський - "Сергій" - поручник Служби Безпеки ОУН(р).jpg
- File:Андрейчук Іван Федорович.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RomanVR
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. RomanVR (talk) 11:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:14, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Hanna Al-Sheikh Cup.jpg
- File:Al-Minaa team 1962.jpg
- File:Al-Minaa team 1954.jpg
- File:Jalil Hanoon.jpg
- File:Al-Minaa SC team 5.jpg
- File:Al-Minaa SC team 4.jpg
- File:Al-Minaa SC team 3.jpg
- File:Al-Minaa vs Al-Quwa Al-Jawyia.jpg
- File:Al-Minaa vs Al-Rasheed.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:08, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- FBMD, could be speedied. --E4024 (talk) 22:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:HAL Tejas
[edit]There is no consensus on whether files from official Twitter handles of Indian government organisations can be safely uploaded under {{GODL-India}}. Please see Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2018/06#Extent_of_Template:GODL-India for more information.
- File:LCA (N) MK1 undertaking maiden Take-Off from INS Vikramaditya (1).jpg
- File:LCA (N) MK1 undertaking maiden Take-Off from INS Vikramaditya (2).jpg
- File:LCA (N) MK1 undertaking maiden Take-Off from INS Vikramaditya (3).jpg
- File:LCA (N) MK1 undertaking maiden Take-Off from INS Vikramaditya (4).jpg
_MK1_undertaking_maiden_Take-Off_from_INS_Vikramaditya_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_MK1_undertaking_maiden_Take-Off_from_INS_Vikramaditya_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_MK1_undertaking_maiden_Take-Off_from_INS_Vikramaditya_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_MK1_undertaking_maiden_Take-Off_from_INS_Vikramaditya_(4).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Vaibhavafro 💬 16:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: I am the uploader of the above files.— Vaibhavafro 💬 16:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:46, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:50, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:19, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Prehistoric Park (Peccioli)
[edit]No FOP in Italy.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 19:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:09, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
No FOP in Argentina for sculptures.
- File:Cueva de las Manos, MEF 01.JPG
- File:Cueva de las Manos, MEF 02.JPG
- File:Cueva de las Manos, MEF 03.JPG
- File:Museo Egidio Feruglio 004.JPG
- File:Museo Egidio Feruglio 005.JPG
- File:Museo Egidio Feruglio 020.JPG
- File:Trelew Airport 02.JPG
Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:09, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Natural Bridge State Park
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted statues. No FoP in US for artworks.
- File:Natural Bridge VA - panoramio - john049 (2).jpg
- File:Natural Bridge VA - panoramio - john049 (3).jpg
- File:Natural Bridge VA - panoramio - john049.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:10, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Random photo from internet Helios (talk) 09:20, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 08:48, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie Helios (talk) 10:11, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Keep: This file is in use on es:Natalia Ruiz Zelmanovitch and Natalia Ruiz Zelmanovitch (Q97148201). Under COM:INUSE that means it should be kept even if its quality is poor. --bjh21 (talk) 13:29, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: The file is in use. --PierreSelim (talk) 08:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This person has made herself an "article" at userpage in EN:WP, around this image. I have proposed the deletion of this kind of images used to create so-called "semi-articles" in English, Hindi, Bahasa Indonesia and other language Wikipedias, some of which have rare names for me to be able to remember, and they were all deleted. For the first time in this process the person who has made herself a self-service article in a Wikipedia is not carrying clothes (well, except some footwear). I am all ears to objections as I gather being naked is taken as some sort of "basis" for scope in Commons by quite a number of people. What is the difference of this use (or abuse) of Commons from the article Kumar Patel Cheevat makes for himself in userspace, and as some of the best computer people come from the Subcontinent, makes it better (and still gets deleted)? E4024 (talk) 04:05, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep There is no article. There is a user page. Very different. Nothing wrong with nudity unless your mind is evil. As for other "articles", please read en:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and en:WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Rodhullandemu (talk) 06:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Admin Rodhullandemu, make sure I read more that you can imagine. Having said that, possibly you did not read very carefully what I wrote: I was speaking about "so-called self-made articles in userpage", something very common. Certainly you did not close my DRs on similar cases, then ask other admins, User:Turelio or User:Taivo perhaps... When I said "I do not even remember the names of (Wikipedias)" I was referring to a concrete case where many young people opened a "userpage" with their pictures. Except one, who had made several other edits here and there, they were all deleted. I continue to DR and get deleted "this" kind of images used for vanity. The people in the images being dressed up, naked or "partially nude" (something I could never understand) is not of importance to me. Everybody is free to wear what they wish, some may go around only in shoes or eye-glasses if they so wish. This user has also made edits and many more than the youngster I referred above; so the closing admin may choose to keep the file. I will not mind. Anyhow, to make it clear again, what I object to is vanity and not nudity; examples are too many. BTW your reference to "evil mind" is a personal attack. If you continued to be an admin and someone told me something like that, I would expect an administrative action from you towards that user... I regret this situation in Commons. Maybe I should not have returned. --E4024 (talk) 16:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- I am no longer an Admin, for some strange reason. However, I did read your request very carefully, as I always do, despite the difficulty I had in understanding your somewhat discursive argument and disentangling the relevant from the irrelevant. I followed the links, as I always do, to see where and how the file is being used. I find it inoffensive. That's my taste. Yours obviously differs. I wasn't calling you evil. Rationally, there should be nothing wrong with a nude person, but some people see some religious objection, despite, say, the Sistine Chapel being festooned with paintings of naked children. As for vanity, it may be deprecated in some places, but we tolerate images of contributors on their own pages. By all means complain if you think a general comment applies to you personally. Of course by doing that, you accept it and admit to being intolerant of nudity, but that is not my problem, nor, in my experience, anyone else's. Evening. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Regular users can have personal photos on their userpage. Raquel Baranow is an established user in en.wiki, she participates in talkpage discussions, she reverts vandalism and so on. The file is used and in scope. Taivo (talk) 14:44, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- I am no longer an Admin, for some strange reason. However, I did read your request very carefully, as I always do, despite the difficulty I had in understanding your somewhat discursive argument and disentangling the relevant from the irrelevant. I followed the links, as I always do, to see where and how the file is being used. I find it inoffensive. That's my taste. Yours obviously differs. I wasn't calling you evil. Rationally, there should be nothing wrong with a nude person, but some people see some religious objection, despite, say, the Sistine Chapel being festooned with paintings of naked children. As for vanity, it may be deprecated in some places, but we tolerate images of contributors on their own pages. By all means complain if you think a general comment applies to you personally. Of course by doing that, you accept it and admit to being intolerant of nudity, but that is not my problem, nor, in my experience, anyone else's. Evening. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Admin Rodhullandemu, make sure I read more that you can imagine. Having said that, possibly you did not read very carefully what I wrote: I was speaking about "so-called self-made articles in userpage", something very common. Certainly you did not close my DRs on similar cases, then ask other admins, User:Turelio or User:Taivo perhaps... When I said "I do not even remember the names of (Wikipedias)" I was referring to a concrete case where many young people opened a "userpage" with their pictures. Except one, who had made several other edits here and there, they were all deleted. I continue to DR and get deleted "this" kind of images used for vanity. The people in the images being dressed up, naked or "partially nude" (something I could never understand) is not of importance to me. Everybody is free to wear what they wish, some may go around only in shoes or eye-glasses if they so wish. This user has also made edits and many more than the youngster I referred above; so the closing admin may choose to keep the file. I will not mind. Anyhow, to make it clear again, what I object to is vanity and not nudity; examples are too many. BTW your reference to "evil mind" is a personal attack. If you continued to be an admin and someone told me something like that, I would expect an administrative action from you towards that user... I regret this situation in Commons. Maybe I should not have returned. --E4024 (talk) 16:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: as long as the user is active enough in en.wiki (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Raquel_Baranow), she can have a nude picture of herself at her userpage if she wants so. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
It says the image is from India but the description says Istanbul (it's not Istanbul). Low resolution, no EXIF date, possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:00, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: too small and unclear for a possible educational use. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:22, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal file. Out of scope. Code (talk) 07:03, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: user's self portrait upon his own request. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's not possible to see anything, useless (and it's not being used). Nanahuatl (talk) 07:54, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: too poor quality, no foreseeable educational use. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:26, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Useless image, it's not possible to see anything nor use the image. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: too poor quality, no foreseeable educational use. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:27, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Книга "Сестромам" Евгении Некрасовой. Стамбул. Акция "практики чтения" Библиотеки Некрасова.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted cover of a book, it wouldn't become a public domain if we just take a picture of a copyrighted object. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: book cover, copyright violation. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:28, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because it is Nonsense Helios (talk) 10:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: it's not nonsense, just a poster for presidential elections in Poland. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:30, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This image is already on Wikipedia. File:Kim Yugyeom on December 24, 2017.jpg. which is higher definition and explains source and why it is cc 4.0. Headlock0225 (talk) 11:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:43, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 13:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:49, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
non encyclopaedic image; found multiple times on the internet: [2], a user's single upload, no useful title and no useful description, categories missing, .... Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:51, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope of the project. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:52, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Coppivo coppivo Слезантий2 (talk) 18:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I see no proves for this claim. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:12, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Jate-9
[edit]- File:Jasper terho performing his solo.png
- File:Jasper.png
- File:Jasper2.jpg (duplicate of first image)
The first file was used for vandalism in fiwiki, the other two haven't been used anywhere. All of them have nonsense descriptions and it's likely that these files are not own work as claimed. In addition, the images contain an identifiable person with his name in title and I don't think that a consent has been obtained to upload these files to Commons. --01miki10 (talk) 23:50, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope of the project, pictures of a not notable person. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:06, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
A picture of user Artem Kulyk, presumably taking by himself (almost surely not), and Artem Kulyk does not seem to be notable. I looked for footballers with this name (Кулик Артем) and could not find anyone playing or having played for Shakhtar Donetsk (uniform) or Karpaty Lviv (stadium and trophy) at any level (incl. youth and amateur). Thus this picture basically has no educational value. NickK (talk) 21:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Indeed this upload is the only global contribution of the said user, as I see their fistful of edits in some WP have been deleted. --E4024 (talk) 21:16, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: might be notable enpugh (for some reason the description labels him as a football player but in fact he plays rugby). --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:00, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
11 KB false own work. E4024 (talk) 01:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Used in failed draft. E4024 (talk) 04:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio, no reason to be a public domain image. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:06, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused image of a non-encyclopedic website, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:30, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; copyrighted screenshot. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, no useful categories or description, apparently a selfie by a user. Till (talk) 06:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Taken from the organization's website, copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Generali logo
[edit]- File:Logo-Generali-Wikipedia.jpg
- File:Logo Generali osiguranje dd.png
- File:Zavarovalnica Generali.png
- File:GeneraliEcuador.png
- File:Logo GČP.svg
- File:GD Grafik THSN Logo.jpg
- File:Logo GCP 400x110px.png
Above COM:TOO. Missing permission for claimed CC licenses. --85.212.188.225 06:51, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
This file vandalizes the logo of the TV show, EVERYBODY LOVES RAYMOND, which is available as "Everybody Loves Raymond logo.png" (note different capitalization). The uploader is using this file to vandalize the EVERYBODY LOVES RAYMOND article. Jeremy Butler (talk) 11:41, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- A discussion of the file has been begun on the talk page]] for Everybody Loves Raymond on the English-language Wikipedia.[3] --Jeremy Butler (talk) 11:44, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
This image has nothing wrong with it. The image in fact has a higher pixel quality than any other logo of Everybody Loves Raymond on Wikipedia. The deletion request for this file is only from the people who are jealous of how good my image is. It also follows Wikipedia's rules on copyright so in conclusion, this deletion request is a fraudulent and nonsensical attempt to silence contributors to Wikipedia and the image MUST STAY ON WIKIPEDIA!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CannedCurry (talk • contribs) 11:47, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Nick. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Non free logo Banfield - Amenazas aquí 15:44, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
non free logo Banfield - Amenazas aquí 15:48, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 20:33, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
After learning about Freedom of Panorama it appears that the photo would not be allowed on Commons. Sculpture was installed after the 70s. Mr. Satterly (talk) 21:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
After learning about Freedom of Panorama it appears that the photo would not be allowed on Commons. Sculpture was installed after the 70s. Mr. Satterly (talk) 21:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Foto non pubblicata dal vero autore, verrà ricaricata. 82.51.143.221 12:10, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Sono d'accordo con la Vs scelta di ricaricarla. Per mio errore ho pubblicato una foto non scattata da me. Grazie per la Vs collaborazione--Andrea.maggiani (talk) 08:59, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|<Autore della foto non corrispondente a chi l'ha caricata>}}
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:DW. Copyrighted character.
- File:2019-03-02 09-30-16 ILCE-6500 DSC05377 (46573254424).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-30-19 ILCE-6500 DSC05378 (46573255864).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-30-20 ILCE-6500 DSC05379 (46381712025).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:14, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:DW. Copyrighted works.
- File:2019-03-02 09-20-39 ILCE-6500 DSC05332 (47296355881).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-20-41 ILCE-6500 DSC05333 (46381666785).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-21 ILCE-6500 DSC05463 (47296452371).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-21 ILCE-6500 DSC05463 DxO (47458849391).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:49, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters.
- File:2019-03-03 14-47-18 ILCE-6500 DSC01481 (47305249181).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-47-19 ILCE-6500 DSC01482 (47305249731).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-48-43 ILCE-6500 DSC01483 (33429495838).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-48-43 ILCE-6500 DSC01483 DxO (32535116497).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-48-44 ILCE-6500 DSC01484 (47305251871).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-48-45 ILCE-6500 DSC01485 (46581980904).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-48-46 ILCE-6500 DSC01486 (33429498628).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-49-03 ILCE-6500 DSC01487 (47305254911).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-49-03 ILCE-6500 DSC01487 DxO (46753681194).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-49-12 ILCE-6500 DSC01488 (46581982584).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-13 ILCE-6500 DSC02312 (46582882464).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-14 ILCE-6500 DSC02313 (46582883024).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-14 ILCE-6500 DSC02313 DxO (46753719844).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-24 ILCE-6500 DSC02314 (33430422688).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-25 ILCE-6500 DSC02315 (47306139081).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-26 ILCE-6500 DSC02316 (33430424848).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-26 ILCE-6500 DSC02316 DxO (46753720294).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-28 ILCE-6500 DSC02317 (46582886594).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 16-34-29 ILCE-6500 DSC02318 (33430426388).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:39, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2019-03-02 09-17-49 ILCE-6500 DSC05292 (47244112392).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-17-49 ILCE-6500 DSC05292 DxO (46735822654).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-18-06 ILCE-6500 DSC05294 (46573173154).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-18-06 ILCE-6500 DSC05294 DxO (46735825104).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-18-06 ILCE-6500 DSC05294 DxO-EFFECTS (46640099165).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-18-18 ILCE-6500 DSC05295 (33420627998).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-18-33 ILCE-6500 DSC05300 (33420634258).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-18-45 ILCE-6500 DSC05301 (40331796823).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-19-42 ILCE-6500 DSC05314 (46573193824).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-19-44 ILCE-6500 DSC05315 (47296333321).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-19-45 ILCE-6500 DSC05316 (46573196434).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-20-07 ILCE-6500 DSC05322 (40331823023).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-20-08 ILCE-6500 DSC05323 (47244145652).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-20-08 ILCE-6500 DSC05323 DxO (47458838121).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-20-09 ILCE-6500 DSC05324 (46381658855).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-22-37 ILCE-6500 DSC05343 (46381678735).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-22-38 ILCE-6500 DSC05344 (46573219824).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-29-56 ILCE-6500 DSC05375 (46573251034).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-29-56 ILCE-6500 DSC05375 DxO (47458845241).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-29-57 ILCE-6500 DSC05376 (46381708035).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-34-17 ILCE-6500 DSC05396 (32354735057).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-34-18 ILCE-6500 DSC05397 (33420734828).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-34-19 ILCE-6500 DSC05398 (33420735768).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-34-19 ILCE-6500 DSC05398 DxO (46543632325).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-40-35 ILCE-6500 DSC05428 (46381755315).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-40-36 ILCE-6500 DSC05429 (46381756135).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-40-43 ILCE-6500 DSC05430 (46573296734).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-40-43 ILCE-6500 DSC05430 DxO (47458848621).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-40-44 ILCE-6500 DSC05431 (46381761095).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-41-03 ILCE-6500 DSC05434 (46381765555).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-41-04 ILCE-6500 DSC05435 (47296432261).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-41-16 ILCE-6500 DSC05436 (46573302604).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-05 ILCE-6500 DSC05457 (47296448661).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-09 ILCE-6500 DSC05458 (32354783977).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-10 ILCE-6500 DSC05459 (47296450191).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-10 ILCE-6500 DSC05459 DxO (33582600978).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]- File:2019-03-02 09-45-25 ILCE-6500 DSC05451 (46381779255).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-45-26 ILCE-6500 DSC05452 (40331942253).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-45-32 ILCE-6500 DSC05453 (47244244752).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-45-35 ILCE-6500 DSC05454 (46381780435).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:21, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:51, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-12 ILCE-6500 DSC05481 (46573343064).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-13 ILCE-6500 DSC05482 (46381801675).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-13 ILCE-6500 DSC05482 DxO (46543636825).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]- File:2019-03-02 15-25-10 ILCE-6500 DSC08445 (32358437567).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 15-25-13 ILCE-6500 DSC08446 (46577036074).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:TOYS and COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2019-03-02 09-23-56 ILCE-6500 DSC05353 (47244175392).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-23-56 ILCE-6500 DSC05354 (47244174832).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-12 ILCE-6500 DSC05460 (47244251892).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-15 ILCE-6500 DSC05461 (32354785657).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-46-16 ILCE-6500 DSC05462 (33420794818).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-23 ILCE-6500 DSC05464 (33420795358).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-28 ILCE-6500 DSC05465 (47296454731).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-29 ILCE-6500 DSC05466 (33420797518).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-31 ILCE-6500 DSC05467 (33420798378).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-31 ILCE-6500 DSC05467 DxO (47458851411).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-32 ILCE-6500 DSC05468 (47296457751).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-39 ILCE-6500 DSC05469 (33420799318).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-45 ILCE-6500 DSC05470 (47296459991).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-48 ILCE-6500 DSC05471 (47244261372).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-50 ILCE-6500 DSC05472 (33420801638).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-53 ILCE-6500 DSC05473 DxO (47458851931).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-54 ILCE-6500 DSC05474 (47244263442).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-47-58 ILCE-6500 DSC05475 (46573338034).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-00 ILCE-6500 DSC05476 (33420804518).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-01 ILCE-6500 DSC05477 (47244266032).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-01 ILCE-6500 DSC05477 DxO (40492803643).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-03 ILCE-6500 DSC05478 (40331959013).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-05 ILCE-6500 DSC05479 (46573340614).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-08 ILCE-6500 DSC05480 (40331960423).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-19 ILCE-6500 DSC05485 (46381804315).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-20 ILCE-6500 DSC05486 (32354799707).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-27 ILCE-6500 DSC05487 (46573346334).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-28 ILCE-6500 DSC05488 (32354801367).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-41 ILCE-6500 DSC05489 (47244277312).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-43 ILCE-6500 DSC05490 (32354802937).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-45 ILCE-6500 DSC05491 (47244282682).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 09-48-46 ILCE-6500 DSC05492 (32354806737).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:11, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:41, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2019-03-02 12-41-43 ILCE-6500 DSC07158 (47246217032).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 12-41-44 ILCE-6500 DSC07159 (33422773378).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-26 ILCE-6500 DSC01021 (32362966437).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-27 ILCE-6500 DSC01022 (47304739411).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-30 ILCE-6500 DSC01023 (47252243922).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-32 ILCE-6500 DSC01024 (32362968407).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-41 ILCE-6500 DSC01025 (47304741411).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-43 ILCE-6500 DSC01026 (33428943968).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-44 ILCE-6500 DSC01027 (47304744401).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-52 ILCE-6500 DSC01028 (47252249132).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-54 ILCE-6500 DSC01029 (46581437324).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-55-56 ILCE-6500 DSC01030 (47252251552).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-56-00 ILCE-6500 DSC01031 (47304747881).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-56-02 ILCE-6500 DSC01032 (46581440754).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-56-07 ILCE-6500 DSC01033 (46389750715).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-56-22 ILCE-6500 DSC01034 (46389751945).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-56-23 ILCE-6500 DSC01035 (40339886923).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-56-25 ILCE-6500 DSC01036 (47304753951).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-56-33 ILCE-6500 DSC01037 (46389753725).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-56-34 ILCE-6500 DSC01038 (47304755871).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-05 ILCE-6500 DSC01041 (47252274452).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-06 ILCE-6500 DSC01042 (47252277052).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-07 ILCE-6500 DSC01043 (46389761285).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-07 ILCE-6500 DSC01043 DxO (33600471498).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-31 ILCE-6500 DSC01044 (47252280562).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-32 ILCE-6500 DSC01045 (46581457404).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-34 ILCE-6500 DSC01046 (40339898923).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-52 ILCE-6500 DSC01047 (47304765581).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-57 ILCE-6500 DSC01048 (40339902473).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-57-59 ILCE-6500 DSC01049 (46581460204).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-01 ILCE-6500 DSC01050 (47304768561).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-07 ILCE-6500 DSC01051 (33428974308).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-08 ILCE-6500 DSC01052 (40339905503).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-14 ILCE-6500 DSC01053 (47304772541).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-16 ILCE-6500 DSC01054 (33428977688).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-17 ILCE-6500 DSC01055 (40339912213).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-19 ILCE-6500 DSC01056 (47252290092).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-24 ILCE-6500 DSC01057 (40339916963).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-25 ILCE-6500 DSC01058 (46389776325).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-32 ILCE-6500 DSC01059 (47252294822).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-32 ILCE-6500 DSC01059 DxO (32535089537).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-33 ILCE-6500 DSC01060 (46389779925).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-34 ILCE-6500 DSC01061 (47304778091).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-41 ILCE-6500 DSC01062 (46389783145).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-41 ILCE-6500 DSC01062 DxO (33600471988).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-45 ILCE-6500 DSC01063 (47252297712).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-57 ILCE-6500 DSC01064 (33428991818).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-58-58 ILCE-6500 DSC01065 (46581472784).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-59-02 ILCE-6500 DSC01066 (47252299352).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-59-03 ILCE-6500 DSC01067 (33428994358).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-59-19 ILCE-6500 DSC01070 (47252303792).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 12-59-23 ILCE-6500 DSC01071 (32363016187).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 13-00-12 ILCE-6500 DSC01075 (46581488724).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 13-00-13 ILCE-6500 DSC01076 (33429009028).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 13-00-15 ILCE-6500 DSC01077 (32363028487).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 13-00-15 ILCE-6500 DSC01078 (47252311502).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 13-00-25 ILCE-6500 DSC01079 (32363031247).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 13-00-40 ILCE-6500 DSC01080 (46389805425).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 13-00-41 ILCE-6500 DSC01081 (32363035227).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-53-37 ILCE-6500 DSC01522 (47305295461).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-53-40 ILCE-6500 DSC01523 (47305296781).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-53-40 ILCE-6500 DSC01524 (46390377765).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-53-40 ILCE-6500 DSC01524 DxO (32535119247).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-53-41 ILCE-6500 DSC01525 (47305297811).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-53-49 ILCE-6500 DSC01526 (47305298861).jpg
- File:2019-03-03 14-53-50 ILCE-6500 DSC01527 (46390380535).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:44, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Brussels Comic Con 2019
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2019-03-02 13-12-59 ILCE-6500 DSC07357 (47298690911).jpg
- File:2019-03-02 13-13-00 ILCE-6500 DSC07358 (32357028777).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Advanced numerical methods for simulating nonlinear multirate lumped parameter models. (IA advancednumerica00doer).pdf
[edit]Copyright notice on page 5 and no exmpetions listed there. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --De728631 (talk) 17:34, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Accuracy control risk management of modular submarine hull construction (IA accuracycontrolr00brou).pdf
[edit]Copyright notice on Page 5. Exceptions grnated would not apply for Commons purposes. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by De728631 at 17:28, 2 August 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): ©1999 William J. Brougham. All rights reserved. --Krdbot 02:22, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
This looks like a screenshot of non-free media of some kind, rather than a photo taken by the uploader (note the diagonal overlayed line bottom-right, which suggests some sort of shaped text box overlay that's been incompletely cropped out). YorkshireLad (talk) 16:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
C-3PO action figure. COM:TOYS and COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989talk 20:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
obviously not truely own work given it's from 1940's PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:30, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 10:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Who is Laura Guillaume? Why do we have a cat for her? Why are the parent cats of her treat dress colour, smiling, etc? Those are cats for images, not intended for people's cats. In short: Is she in scope or not? If the two similar files of hers are not deleted please make a "conventional" categorization for the lady with birth year and place, profession, nationality etc. E4024 (talk) 03:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- She is a business coach, see https://lauraguillaume.com/ In my wiki I would delete her as not notable but here maybe she might be kept, just in case? Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, I had seen that already. That is why I opened this DR instead of asking an F10 speedy. I have no problems with her BTW. --E4024 (talk) 17:41, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted 28 July 2020 by Gbawden. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:25, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
The file was uploaded by mistake. Gemthum (talk) 03:44, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (own work). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:26, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
From exif can know original is Facebook, seems not uploader's own work. 轻语者 (talk) 03:57, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Please next time propose speedy deletion for Facebook files, DRs are already backlogged and FB files are considered copyvio. --E4024 (talk) 04:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:27, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Obviously has exceeded the copyright threshold. 轻语者 (talk) 04:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 07:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
عکس بی کیفیت شادی1373 (talk) 08:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:30, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Contributor wrote "From Ustream" at description. Batholith (talk) 09:04, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because it is Blurry Helios (talk) 10:11, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Lego minifigures. per COM:TOYS. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lego minifigures. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:30, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Upload by new user seems to have no permission by the author. Clemens (talk) 11:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
http://npzem.ru/%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0-%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3/ coppivo Слезантий2 (talk) 12:00, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Wrong licence Каракорум (talk) 12:08, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Either a screenshot of Google Streetview or a picture from Google user Taco Petri (see source link). Eissink (talk) 12:56, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:33, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Hollywood Earthquake Fault Zone within the Norma Triangle Neighborhood of The City of West Hollywood.png
[edit]
"to which all have access" is not "public domain". Page is marked copyright protected. No evidence of free licensing or author permission. A loose necktie (talk) 13:06, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:33, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
The image may protected by copyright law. Based on COM:PCP, the file should be deleted. SCP-2000 13:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- I feel like I have misused the template. I should've putten it under fair use, I guess. Is there a way that the tag be changed to "fair use" or something? Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 13:50, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Gerald Waldo Luis: Sorry, Wikimedia Commons disallow uploading of the non-free license file. I recommend you can upload the file to Wikipedia. Thank you. --SCP-2000 15:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- @SCP-2000: That can be done. So how will this page here in Commons be? Deleted? Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 15:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Gerald Waldo Luis: Yes, the file will be deleted by admin. --SCP-2000 15:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- @SCP-2000: That can be done. So how will this page here in Commons be? Deleted? Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 15:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Gerald Waldo Luis: Sorry, Wikimedia Commons disallow uploading of the non-free license file. I recommend you can upload the file to Wikipedia. Thank you. --SCP-2000 15:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:34, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:120923 경주 한류 드림콘서트 씨스타 04.jpg 46.132.187.104 13:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Similar pictures, but not duplicates. ƏXPLICIT 23:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:35, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from movie poster. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
The poster in the background is a poster I have full copyright to, as I created. Nothing about this photo is a valid reason for deletion. (Kelly 23421 (talk) 15:55, 18 July 2020 (UTC))
@EugeneZelenko and EugeneZelenko:
Please find proof, I can publish directly from the original source, per Mr. Abbas' website. https://samabbasfilms.com/WikiPosterRelease.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelly 23421 (talk • contribs) 22:27, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
@EugeneZelenko and EugeneZelenko: Please find proof, I can publish directly from the original source, per Mr. Abbas' website. https://samabbasfilms.com/WikiPosterRelease.pdf (Kelly 23421 (talk))
Deleted: Out of COM:SCOPE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:35, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
This seems to be way more complex than its licensing suggest per COM:TOO United States; moreover, it looks like it's possibly either a COM:SCREENSHOT or graphic art or some kind. I don't think there's anyway this can be kept without the COM:CONSENT of the person who created it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- I think its best to close this discussion, so that I can upload it to the enWiki under fair use. Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 05:48, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- You don't really need to wait for this discussion to be closed, if you want the file to be deleted so that you can re-upload it to English Wikipedia. However, before you do that, you should check en:WP:FILMSCORE/en:MOS:TVPRODUCTION and en:WP:NFC#cite_note-3 because even as non-free the way the file is being used in en:Timelapse of the Future#Soundtrack would not meet en:WP:NFCCP and the file would be quickly prodded for deletion. Soundtrack album cover art is generally allowed to be uploaded and used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about the soundtrack albums, but it's pretty much never allowed for "Soundtrack" type sections in articles about the corresponding films or TV programs that the album is the soundtrack for. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:00, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Note (as I should): An OTRS pending template has been placed, as the copyright holder has emailed his consent to OTRS. Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 14:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Gerald Waldo Luis: . Why did you upload this again as File:The Arrow of Time artwork.jpg? All you really needed to do was add the {{OTRS pending}} template to this file. — Marchjuly (talk) 14:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- The file I referred to the owner was that file, not this. So I feel like its best to head over there and let this file here alone. Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 14:43, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- The new version of the cover art you uploaded is missing a copyright license. You probably just forgot to add one. That is why the file was flagged for possible deletion by a bot. You should add a license to that file's page because files without copyright licenses will be deleted. You should try and add the same license the copyright holder agreed to in their email to OTRS if you know what it is. If, however, you add the wrong license by mistake, don't worry since the right license will be added by the OTRS volunteer reviewing the file if the email checks out. It might be a good idea to refrain from uploading any new files at least until the issues with the ones you've already uploaded have been resolved. Once everything has been sorted out, things should be fine; if, however, you keep uploading more files which need to be sorted out, then other editors or bots are going to keep finding them and bringing them up for discussion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- The file I referred to the owner was that file, not this. So I feel like its best to head over there and let this file here alone. Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 14:43, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:35, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If this is a COM:SCREENSHOT for en:Timelapse of the Future, then I don't believe can be treated as "simple geometry and cannot be kept without the COM:CONSENT of the production company that released the film. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:26, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Can it be treated as fair use? Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 14:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Commons doesn't accept any type of fair use per COM:FAIR. Some Wikipedia projects like English Wikipedia do allow certain types of fair use to be uploaded and use, but their policies vary and some like English Wikipedias are quite restrictive. -- Marchjuly (talk) 15:00, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
doubtful to be own work given how old it is; not permitted with own work tag on Commons since it was previously published outside Commons in 2014 PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
This seems too complex to be considered {{PD-simple}} per COM:TOO United States; moreover, if it's a screenshot from the film en:Timelapse of the Future, then it also probably falls under COM:SCREENSHOT. This could probably be uploaded locally to English Wikipedia as non-free content under the license en:Template:Non-free television screenshot or something similar since it's being used much in the same way as an intertitle screenshot would be used in the main infobox of an article about a TV series. --Marchjuly (talk) 14:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed with suggestion above. Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 14:49, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:37, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of a copyrighted sculpture. No FoP in US for artworks. Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:23, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
This looks more like the photo of a photo, rather than "own work". E4024 (talk) 22:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- This is a photo I took years ago. I can show hundreds of photos from this same event at the same angle, it is definitely not a photo of a photo. - Galatz (talk) 01:51, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:24, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
_Rock_and_Goldberg_stare_each_other_down.jpg){kind=link}
_Rock_and_Goldberg_stare_each_other_down.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This looks more like the photo of a photo, rather than "own work". E4024 (talk) 22:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
_Rock_and_Goldberg_stare_each_other_down.jpg){kind=link}
- This is a photo I took years ago. I can show hundreds of photos from this same event at the same angle, it is definitely not a photo of a photo. - Galatz (talk) 01:51, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:24, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
_Rock_and_Goldberg_stare_each_other_down.jpg){kind=link}
Despite the uploader's assertions in reversing a copyvio tag, the drawings on the screen are copyright works to which the photographer does not hold the rights. We will need OTRS confirmation from the artist in order to keep this file on Commons. FredWalsh (talk) 23:02, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:24, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Camera location shows that this photo was taken in Chad. FOP Chad excludes commercial use. Therefore, this photo is not acceptable. Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:05, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete It is unlikely the uploader is the copyright holder of this film poster of an upcoming film, and no evidence has been provided to indicate that. It is also unlikely that a company holding the rights to an upcoming film would release rights to this poster under a free license.. Hammersoft (talk) 17:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, fair use is not permitted on Commons. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unfortunately a case of Commons:License laundering. Bodriy is known for copyright violations on Wikimapia (e.g. this thread). This specific photo is stolen from ultras.org.ua where it is available in higher resolution NickK (talk) 16:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 10:15, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
,_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unfortunately a case of Commons:License laundering. Catosaric666137 was previously accused of copyright violations here, he stated that he uploaded his own picture from then Panoramio (it was a pic by Michael Fox). This specific pic is from another author: rostovnaobi, and it was not available on Panoramio under a free license. Thus it is unfortunately a copyright violation on Wikimania, and we should not copy it here NickK (talk) 19:04, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
,_поле.jpg){kind=link}
We cannot be held responsible for other people's violations. If the file is not under a free license, delete. However, if the wonders of investigation have been shown, can you find a free replacement for him?--Трифонов Андрей (talk) 19:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
,_поле.jpg){kind=link}
- @Трифонов Андрей: Unfortunately I tried and so far I failed. I remember that I uploaded this very file as File:Armyansk Khimik Stadium 1.jpg and quickly found out that it was a copyright violation from then Panoramio and requested to delete it myself. A couple of years ago I uploaded to Commons all photos of notable Ukrainian stadia from both Panoramio and Wikimapia, I remember well that I have seen these photos on Wikimapia but found that they were copyright violations and did not upload them. It is sad but unfortunately I did not find free photos of this stadium yet — NickK (talk) 19:20, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your attention. Delete and we will not drag out the question--Трифонов Андрей (talk) 19:22, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
,_поле.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 10:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
,_поле.jpg){kind=link}
Maps are not covered by COM:FOP Hungary. Regasterios (talk) 19:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Probably same File:Privat Lodging map. - Tihany.JPG - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 19:27, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
More same or similar outdoor information board file with maps: File:Sights, museums, information. Map of Tihany. - Hungary.JPG
File:Tihany Historical Places Art memorials. Map. - Hungary.JPG?
'Balatonfüred - Always fun'. Town map. - Balatonfüred
Town map. Center. 'Reform Age Part' - Balatonfüred
Map of Öreghegy neighborhood. - Zsolnai Rd., Öreghegy, Székesfehérvár, Fejér county, Hungary
Széchenyi Zsigmond Vadászati Múzeumpark, tábla, 2017 Hatvan
Map of Komárom. - Jókai square, Komárom-Esztergom County, Hungary
Map of Komárom. - Komárom-Esztergom County, Hungary
City map. - Lovarda Square, Komárom, Hungary
Map of Ister-Granum Euroregion, Esztergom, Hungary
Wine Route in Tolna County. - Pincehely
'Stations and sights' A. - Vác, Hungary
Map of Gyömrő in the Central Park, Gyömrő, Pest County, Hungary
Map of Budajenő. - Kossuth St., Budajenő, Hungary
Map of Biatorbágy at the Viaduct. - Torbágy
Walking Route. Map. - Széchenyi Street, Vác
City map. - Szabadság Sq., Cegléd,
Leisure Center map. - Cegléd, Hungary
City Map. - Fő St., Budakeszi, Hungary
'Szentendre. Let your mobile phone be your guide'. Map. - Szentendre train station area
Budai Tájvédelmi Körzet térkép. - Budapest, Normafa
File:BUD MOL.Bike.Points.JPG (without street name)
File:Tourist information board, 2016 Rákoshegy.jpg partly map
File:Map of The Autonomous Orthodox Jewish Community of Budapest (Pest) with attractions, opening hours and contact information. Loc. at outer yard. .35, Dob Street, District VII,.JPG - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 11:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
_with_attractions,_opening_hours_and_contact_information._Loc._at_outer_yard._.35,_Dob_Street,_District_VII,.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: DWs of unfree works. --Anatoliy (talk) 10:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
,_%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%BD%D1%8B.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%BD%D1%8B.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unfortunately a case of Commons:License laundering. Bodriy is known for copyright violations on Wikimapia (e.g. this thread). This specific photo is stolen from FC Tytan Vkontakte page where it is available uncropped but with some sort of watermark: it was uploaded there in 2010 (as depicted on the banner on the picture), well before Bodriy uploaded it in 2012. Unfortunately there is no evidence of permission from FC Tytan. NickK (talk) 19:10, 18 July 2020 (UTC) Удалять все, уже обсудили--Трифонов Андрей (talk) 17:05, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
,_трибуны.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 10:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
,_трибуны.jpg){kind=link}
Copyvio, no reason that the image is a public domain. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:08, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Definetly copyvio for one of two reasons. Thy Hertiage has a 2018 upload if you click their photo, which predates the 2020 Commons upload. It has a credited author as well. Otherwise, this would not pass PD-Turkey for anonyomous works. If we assume this was taken in 1964 based on thy-heritage, or 1960 based on Herkes icin Havacilik, it'd still be in the 70 year range of copyright. But since this photo was linked to a 1964 airplane crash in the file description, I persume that year should be used instead. Therefore, this photo can be undeleted in 2035, unless an author is found beforehand. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:11, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:54, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 19:32, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Template:OTRS ticket has been received which suggests that the individual in this photo may not be who it is claimed. OTRS volutneers have been unsucessful at contacting either the original uploader, or the editor who added it to an En article. As steps to verify identity have been exhausted, I propose deletion. Darren-M (talk) 01:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- I can verify that this is the Rebbe of Boston: Levi Yitzchak Horowitz https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levi_Yitzchak_Horowitz. 77.243.31.39 17:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 09:49, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Unnecessary crop used only in Commons and not indispensable because if we have anything abundant here those are the naked people images. E4024 (talk) 03:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:51, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
UK rules on Freedom of Panorama do not apply: "the freedom provided by Section 62 does not apply to graphic works - such as a mural or poster - even if they are permanently located in a public place". As well, examining the lower right corner of the artwork seems to show that it's not a mural, but a poster, and thus not *permanently* located in a public place. As such, I argue that the photographer did not have the right to release this image per any of the Creative Commons licenses. DS (talk) 04:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:52, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
False license, the Interstate Aviation Committee isn't a Russia's state government agency. VLu (talk) 04:13, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- KeepThis license also includes documents from international organizations. Interstate Aviation Committe is Russian international organization. So this license is valid.NORECH (talk) 07:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per comment in discussion. --rubin16 (talk) 10:05, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
This document is from Hong Kong Government Gazette, which is not in PD. Considering to upload a cropped version, which only contains the text of HKNSL itself. 听风吹过的声音 (talk) 08:30, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Crop out the preamble I'm afraid that the preamble itself may be too much for Hong Kong government copyright.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:06, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Perhaps this shouldn't be deleted. But it all comes down to one question: Are A. Jannin's works out of copyright in France? Here's what we know. The earliest work I can find by A. Jannin is https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b9009197r.r=Jannin%20Affiche?rk=42918;4 from 1864, he disappears from posters after 1872 or so, with [4] and [5] but there's several score covers after that, with 1877 being the latest I can find, e.g. [6] [7]
There is also an H. Jannin, who appears to be a different person, making works mostly around the late 1840s- mid 1850s e.g. [8] or [9] - Gallica gives his dates as 17..-18.. though he has a few works in 1870.
There's also an unspecified "Jannin", e.g. [10] who seems to correspond with H. Jannin's time period more.
So, basically, A. Jannin worked in France. He may have been a relative of H. Jannin. His earliest known work is a rather good poster from 1864, his last works are from 1877, and he disappears from the record after that.
What do we think? If we use the earliest date, we can calculate back. 2020-70= 1950. So he needs to have died by 1950 to be out of copyright. 1950-1864= 86. If we presume he was at least 16 when he got his first solo credit, we can ask: Is it safe to assume he died by the age of 86+16= 102 (or whatever calculation you get if you assume more than 16 for his first solo work)
Is A. Jannin safe for Commons? Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:04, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- When you upload something to commons you have to indicate that "This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1925"which is definitely was. Since the operetta this is a poster for was premiered in 1869, it seems very unlikely that the artist died after 1950.Smeat75 (talk) 22:26, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- True, but it also needs to be out of copyright in its home country, and that's where the problem arises: The difference between provable and highly likely. Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This very much seems to fall under {{PD-old-assumed}} given that there doesn't seem to be a death date for A. Jannin and this poster is over 120 years old. Abzeronow (talk) 18:14, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: keeping as PD-old-assumed. --rubin16 (talk) 10:08, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Huntster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source https://images.nasa.gov/details-KSC-2011-8118 specifically credits United Launch Alliance for the image. Ras67 (talk) 13:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep KSC's mediaarchive says both: Image credit: United Launch Alliance and explicitly PHOTO CREDIT: NASA or National Aeronautics and Space Administration! Underneath of that it is written "No copyright protection is asserted for this photograph." --Ras67 (talk) 13:56, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not aware of any recent image in the KSC Media Archive (after they got things standardised) that doesn't include "PHOTO CREDIT: NASA or National Aeronautics and Space Administration". Even still, we have a policy on Commons that covers this: Commons:Precautionary Principle. We have conflicting information about who owns the copyright of this file, and it is not up to us to unilaterally declare that it is in the public domain because we want it to be. — Huntster (t @ c) 04:36, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, probably not free as other credit present. --rubin16 (talk) 10:11, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:The Bank of Westminster and Hyland Park construction contracts as engineering student classroom projects-construction phase. (IA bankofwestminste00boss).pdf
[edit]While it may be PD-USGov as an assignment of a Navy officer, this document contains a copyrighted software manual by a third party (p. 93 ff.). De728631 (talk) 14:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- True, that manual has separate copyright; but there is no notice, and there was no subsequent registration, so
PD-US-1978-89applies, and the whole should be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 21:57, 9 March 2021 (UTC). - Delete per De728631. Mere inclusion in a PD-USGov work does not invalidate a third-party copyright, and the software manual referenced was not first published in this work. --Xover (talk) 11:05, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Xover: The manual appears to be reprinted in full in this work; as such, I was basing my claim on the fact that the manual as reprinted does not include a copyright notice, and thus, there would be no third-party copyright to invalidate. If it is still problematic, the manual can be removed, but I do think that necessary. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- @TE(æ)A,ea.: Your assumptions are probably correct, but we just don't have the information available to determine its copyright status to the level of certainty that I would be comfortable with. Others may of course disagree. If the facsimile of the manual is redacted the work as such would obviously be fine. Xover (talk) 13:48, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Xover: The manual appears to be reprinted in full in this work; as such, I was basing my claim on the fact that the manual as reprinted does not include a copyright notice, and thus, there would be no third-party copyright to invalidate. If it is still problematic, the manual can be removed, but I do think that necessary. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: let's be on a safe side as we lack information about the manual publication. --rubin16 (talk) 10:10, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Very confusing copyright situation - please check: photographed in 1985 by Esther Friedman, copyright holder according to metadata: Staatliche Museen zu Berlin - Kunstbibliothek, repro photographer: Dietmar Katz, uploader: "Snake Sophie". 91.34.36.220 15:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- The photograph was digitalized for an exhibition at the Kunstbibliothek, but the copyright owner is Esther Friedman and the owner of the polaroid itself is Claudia Skoda. Both Skoda and Friedman have agreed that the image can be uploaded under Creative Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snake Sophie (talk • contribs) 15:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Snake Sophie, thanks for giving us the background. I assume that you will have to send proof of Friedman's and Skoda's consent to Wikimedia Commons. Maybe someone will chime in to help you with the procedure; I can't find the link right now.
- I personally don't see how the Kunstbibliothek would be the copyright owner simply by digitizing the picture (no Schöpfungshöhe/ Threshold of originality to speak of), so as far as my non-lawyer legal understanding goes, I think we can neglect that. --91.34.36.220 17:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: we need permission here. --rubin16 (talk) 10:13, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Maps and photos are not covered by COM:FOP Hungary. Regasterios (talk) 15:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Similar DR: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Information boards in Hungary. --Regasterios (talk) 15:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:08, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
This is a painting by the artist Ludwig Burgel, but the uploader has credited it as his own work. Netherzone (talk) 17:16, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Changed license from self to cc-by-sa-4.0 and author as Ludwig Bürgel.--Greg Henderson (talk) 18:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Netherzone withdrew the delete request of a similiar painting by the same artist (St Vincent Church.jpg) because of my update to the licnese. He then decided to retract his comment as he thinks that permission might be necessary from the Estate of the artist. I have been in contact with the estate of the artist and so far he has said: "I cannot say anything about these two pictures, I do not know them." --Greg Henderson (talk) 20:40, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Good grief, you are NOT the copyrightholder. This is not your work. You cannot grant that license on behalf of someone else. Copyright in Austria extends to 70 years after the death of the author, so not until 2050. Vexations (talk) 18:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Changed from self to photograph of an original painting that I own by Ludwig Bürgel, ca. 1950 and at The Artprice website. --Greg Henderson (talk) 19:25, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Owning a print (even an original) or photographing a copy does not grant ownership of copyright, just as I can't relicense Star Wars because I own it on VHS. No credible evidence the work is in the public domain or otherwise freely licensed, as standard copyright law of Austria grants protections for 70 years following death of artist. --Animalparty (talk) 01:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
This is a painting by the artist Ludwig Burgel, but the uploader has credited it as his own work. Netherzone (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Keep Changed license from self to cc-by-sa-4.0 and author as Ludwig Bürgel.--Greg Henderson (talk) 18:13, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Netherzone withdrew the delete request because of my update to the licnese. He then decided to retract his comment as he thinks that permission might be necessary from the Estate of the artist. I have been in contact with the estate of the artist and so far he has said: "I cannot say anything about these two pictures, I do not know them." --Greg Henderson (talk) 20:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:23, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Delete this page, uploader! 2603:9000:E504:C100:A1B8:8899:421:CC04 18:14, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- No valid reason for deletion. If you are User:Springfulutopia login please. --Achim (talk) 18:19, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- No reason for deletion is provided; Achim, thank you for your attention to this. Is there some other action that I as the contributor of this image should be taking? Springfulutopia (talk) 22:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Springfulutopia
- Uploaded 2 years ago, not in use on wm projects. Might be deleted by courtesy, a similar photo is File:Las Vegas (Nevada, USA), Fabulous Las Vegas -- 2012 -- 6260.jpg which can be used instead. --Achim (talk) 07:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- No reason for deletion is provided; Achim, thank you for your attention to this. Is there some other action that I as the contributor of this image should be taking? Springfulutopia (talk) 22:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Springfulutopia
,_Fabulous_Las_Vegas_--_2012_--_6260.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 10:23, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
no metadata (digital camera should have one?) Horus (talk) 18:19, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Not sure about this one. The file is in PNG format, which explains the lack of metadata (though should be in JPG). Google Image Search doesn't reveal copies elsewhere, but the uploader has two earlier deleted uploads and no others. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 10:24, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Construction Process- a course of study for construction managers. (IA alternativedispu00mort).pdf
[edit]Appendices A and B contain copyrighted and non-free text by third parties. Apart from that, {{PD-US-1978-89}} should be used rather than PD-USGov because this was not published by a US government institution and there is no evidence that the author was a federal employee. De728631 (talk) 18:43, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Appendix B is a court opinion, which is in the public domain in the U.S. by
PD-EdictGov. As for Appendix A, there is no copyright notice given, and no subsequent registration apparent, soPD-US-1978-89would also apply to that work. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 22:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC). - Delete per De728631. Mere inclusion in a PD-USGov work does not invalidate a third-party copyright. Lack of individual notice here only matters if the text was first published here, which there is no reason to assume. --Xover (talk) 11:12, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Xover: I don’t believe that the Appendix A is copyrighted, but I also believe that there is some doubt as to that fact. Thus, the four pages containing such content can be removed. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:46, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:24, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Allocation of risk through construction contract provisions and practice. (IA allocationofrisk00mccl).pdf
[edit]This was written at the University of Washington, and there is no indication that it is a US Federal Government work. Publications from 1996 of works created in that same year are therefore automatically copyrighted. De728631 (talk) 18:51, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Xover (talk) 11:13, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:25, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Aszófő
[edit]Maps are not covered by COM:FOP Hungary.
- File:Aszófő and Tihany tourist paths at Aszófő train station. - Hungary.JPG
- File:Village map. - Aszófő, Hungary.JPG
Regasterios (talk) 18:56, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Similar DR: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Information boards in Hungary. --Regasterios (talk) 18:56, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- +1 Similar just not in Aszófő, Térkép - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 09:19, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:25, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
File:A Marshall Plan for the 21st Century- Addressing Climate Change in the Asia-Pacific Through Diplomacy, Development, & Defense (IA amarshallplforst1094563185).pdf
[edit]Written by LT Adam Rollins, US Navy, so the licence template is correct. However, this document contains 2 non-free maps from third parties (Fig. 3 and 6). Fig. 7 for that matter is not a problem as maps from mapchart.net come with a CC by SA 4.0 licence. Given the volume of the entire document, figures 3 and 6 might fall under de minimis. If not though, I suggest we upload a new version of the file with these controversial images redacted. De728631 (talk) 19:02, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- I believe those maps would be de minimis; they could easily be replaced with free alternatives, if that is too concerning, as there are public-domain maps, and the lists of members are not copyrighted. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 22:10, 9 March 2021 (UTC).
- Delete de minimis applies to the included work, not the including work. If the whole map is used then it is not de minimis no matter how many pages are added around it. If the third-party copyrighted portions are redacted the remainder can be kept per nom. --Xover (talk) 11:24, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- I have now uploaded a redacted version, so I think we should only delete the first revision. De728631 (talk) 13:47, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 10:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
License review failed, not freely license as per the YouTube link Eatcha (talk) 19:06, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for spotting this. You will see all his other Catullus videos are freely licenced – I expect this is an oversight on his part so I will ask if he can edit and change. Please pause on deletion while I ask. JimKillock (talk) 19:10, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- This has been updated so I believe this can be closed. I've added the {{Licensereview}} call in case the bot can update the info. JimKillock (talk) 20:51, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- I withdraw the nomination. // Eatcha (talk) 05:32, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- This has been updated so I believe this can be closed. I've added the {{Licensereview}} call in case the bot can update the info. JimKillock (talk) 20:51, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per prp, as I am not sure that the framed images on the wall behind the speaker also have free licenses. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:46, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, the framed art is clearly incidental background noise (COM:DM). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:49, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, I hope; I agree the artworks ought to be considered as background noise. However I note there doesn't seem to be a Wikimedia copyright advice page on "incidental inclusion" except relating to freedom of panorama. The topic is just as important. Cases like this are extremely common – people film themselves at home or at work without thinking about the copyright in any artworks in their environment. Furthermore, copyrighted sounds such as music frequently drift into recordings; in most circumstances this won't infringe copyright due to it being incidental use. There will be limits however, and it is another complex topic, so Wikimedia needs to explain where those limits are likely to be found. JimKillock (talk) 07:18, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Following the link given by User:King of Hearts, the COM:DM (de minimis) page does in fact cover much or most of the "incidental use" question, but I would say not all aspects and in particular not relating to sounds. JimKillock (talk) 07:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- As a further point, the sound here isn't contested, only the background, so an alternative approach may be to edit the video, if guidance shows this crosses any line with incidental use.JimKillock (talk) 07:28, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- This one probably falls under scenario 4 of COM:DM. We do try to make simple edits when possible (e.g. cropping out copyrighted portions), but it's not a requirement for DM compliance unless the copyrighted element is very prominent and could plausibly be used to illustrate an article on it. Because it's a video, we can't crop without destroying the 16:9 aspect ratio. Blacking out copyrighted portions in an obvious manner is generally not done because it is unnecessary and makes the result look ugly; if someone can make it appear as if there was a blank wall behind him, be my guest, but it's going to be very tedious. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:49, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed, it would be sub optimal. I would probably replace the video with something else entirely; either illustrative or the words in Latin. But is it work I can do without! JimKillock (talk) 10:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- This one probably falls under scenario 4 of COM:DM. We do try to make simple edits when possible (e.g. cropping out copyrighted portions), but it's not a requirement for DM compliance unless the copyrighted element is very prominent and could plausibly be used to illustrate an article on it. Because it's a video, we can't crop without destroying the 16:9 aspect ratio. Blacking out copyrighted portions in an obvious manner is generally not done because it is unnecessary and makes the result look ugly; if someone can make it appear as if there was a blank wall behind him, be my guest, but it's going to be very tedious. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:49, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
To summarize where we are: the licensing issue for the video as such is resolved by a change of license at YouTube, and has been reviewed. There continues to be apparent disagreement whether the pictures on the wall are de minimis or make this video a derivative work. Can we please continue the discussion, focused on that latter issue in the section following? - Jmabel ! talk 15:53, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Are the pictures in the background acceptably de minimis?
[edit]- Keep I for one think those images are de minimis. - Jmabel ! talk 15:53, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Eatcha, JimKillock, and Jeff G.:
- Keep Noticeable, but not the focus (unless the man is talking about them; he's probably not). -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 15:10, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete These are borderline for de minimis, and fall on the wrong side of the line for me. You could conceivably crop these out of the full-res video and sell a passable print of the result. They also occupy a lot of the frame and are in perfect focus; and they are in-frame for the entire video. The full images are visible for most of them, not just a part of it. It also seems likely that the videographer has placed these pictures there specifically to create a pleasing background for their video. Greater distance (smaller), out of focus, only on screen in part of the video, only parts of each image visible, and not so conspicuously placed and I would have been inclined to fall down on the opposite side of that line. --Xover (talk) 11:34, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note that being able to make a crop of a copyrighted element does not imply that a work fails DM, e.g. File:Louvre Courtyard, Looking West.jpg. This particular restriction on an otherwise unfettered COM:DW is one that we have long accepted. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:37, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- It does not automatically imply that, no, but in this particular case it crosses the line for me, especially in combination with the other factors. The essence of de minimis in copyright is that the use is so trifling as to be irrelevant. Since copyright functions primarily as a commercial right (a monopoly on commercial exploitation of the creative work), whether the use infringes the author's ability to exploit the work commercially is an essential factor to consider (similarly to the fourth factor in the fair use test). If only a part of the work (top left corner, say) is visible, and only for parts of the time (as the person in the foreground moves around), the possibility that it could be exploited in a way that harms the author's rights falls dramatically. But being entirely visible, in good lighting, in a perfect (flat) angle, from a stationary camera (technically indistinguishable from a scanner), throughout the video means it could easily be used to create art prints that compete with (and hurt the market for) the original author's work. The main reason it is borderline and not bright-line here is that the video resolution isn't quite high enough for any cropped screengrab to be acceptable quality for much more than postcard sized prints (if that), and the video itself cannot easily hurt the authors' rights (beyond a straightforward single instance of infringement).The Louvre Pyramid example is most likely not sufficiently trivial to fall under de minimis. Pei's copyrighted work is front and center and an essential part of the composition. Compare it with the exemplum from COM:DM: File:Louvre at night centered.jpg. The pyramid is visually toned down and melds into the non-copyrighted building in the background (it is of a similar colour and light intensity to the building behind it, and is entirely framed by that building). The photo composition is clearly trying to capture the entire Louvre courtyard and buildings, and the pyramid's inclusion is incidental to that. In the Western view you linked the factors are turned on their head: now the copyrighted pyramid is the central focus of the image, and this is emphasised by the contrast between it and the background (the dark sky), the lines of the buildings that draw the eye to it, the fact it is lit up, etc. This image composition clearly revolves around the pyramid and would not exist without it: the image is spectacular because the pyramid is there.Also compare the images in example #5 (the "Maybe" example) on COM:DM. File:Museu Valencià de la Il·lustració i la Modernitat, interior.jpg may (or may not) be acceptable under de minimis due to the copyrighted photographs being small, unclear, and at an angle. This is a situation with some rough analogues to the video under discussion, but where the included copyright portions are relatively large, in clear focus and lighting, and captured from a perfect 90 degree angle. They are not the central focus of the video, and the video could absolutely exist without the included images, but neither are they "visible, but not identifiable", "an unwanted intrusion to the image subject which unfortunately cannot easily be removed", or "a part of the larger work, and its inclusion is unavoidable". The videographer deliberately placed the subject in front of these pictures, presumably because they are an aesthetically pleasing background, and there is nothing inherent in the reading of one of Catullus' less ribald poems that necessitates the presence of these images.For comparison, see File:Catullus 16.webm (but don't look up the translation, and turn off the sound if you speak Latin; this is not one of Catullus less ribald poems!). There are tons of copyrighted works visible in this video, but except for the copy of Catullus' Works the subject is waving around they are all very small, only partially displayed, in the background, at an angle, not the focus of the video, and very obviously are incidentally included. The copy of Catullus being waved around isn't as obviously safe under de minimis but has other factors going for it (TOO, based on PD drawing, etc.). --Xover (talk) 09:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Your example of File:Catullus 16.webm further goes to show that the author is just making videos in random places around his house. Intent matters a lot for DM, and there is no evidence that he placed the artwork for the purpose of making a pleasing background to his video; it appears that he placed them to enhance his TV viewing experience. And you keep on going off about art prints, but the resolution is far too small for that.
- As for the Louvre, if the pyramid weren't there, then it would be the cityscape of Paris in the background. The composition shows leading lines from the wings towards whatever is in the center; it would have been reasonable to take such a shot even if the pyramid weren't there, so the pyramid is not essential to the image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:16, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- It does not automatically imply that, no, but in this particular case it crosses the line for me, especially in combination with the other factors. The essence of de minimis in copyright is that the use is so trifling as to be irrelevant. Since copyright functions primarily as a commercial right (a monopoly on commercial exploitation of the creative work), whether the use infringes the author's ability to exploit the work commercially is an essential factor to consider (similarly to the fourth factor in the fair use test). If only a part of the work (top left corner, say) is visible, and only for parts of the time (as the person in the foreground moves around), the possibility that it could be exploited in a way that harms the author's rights falls dramatically. But being entirely visible, in good lighting, in a perfect (flat) angle, from a stationary camera (technically indistinguishable from a scanner), throughout the video means it could easily be used to create art prints that compete with (and hurt the market for) the original author's work. The main reason it is borderline and not bright-line here is that the video resolution isn't quite high enough for any cropped screengrab to be acceptable quality for much more than postcard sized prints (if that), and the video itself cannot easily hurt the authors' rights (beyond a straightforward single instance of infringement).The Louvre Pyramid example is most likely not sufficiently trivial to fall under de minimis. Pei's copyrighted work is front and center and an essential part of the composition. Compare it with the exemplum from COM:DM: File:Louvre at night centered.jpg. The pyramid is visually toned down and melds into the non-copyrighted building in the background (it is of a similar colour and light intensity to the building behind it, and is entirely framed by that building). The photo composition is clearly trying to capture the entire Louvre courtyard and buildings, and the pyramid's inclusion is incidental to that. In the Western view you linked the factors are turned on their head: now the copyrighted pyramid is the central focus of the image, and this is emphasised by the contrast between it and the background (the dark sky), the lines of the buildings that draw the eye to it, the fact it is lit up, etc. This image composition clearly revolves around the pyramid and would not exist without it: the image is spectacular because the pyramid is there.Also compare the images in example #5 (the "Maybe" example) on COM:DM. File:Museu Valencià de la Il·lustració i la Modernitat, interior.jpg may (or may not) be acceptable under de minimis due to the copyrighted photographs being small, unclear, and at an angle. This is a situation with some rough analogues to the video under discussion, but where the included copyright portions are relatively large, in clear focus and lighting, and captured from a perfect 90 degree angle. They are not the central focus of the video, and the video could absolutely exist without the included images, but neither are they "visible, but not identifiable", "an unwanted intrusion to the image subject which unfortunately cannot easily be removed", or "a part of the larger work, and its inclusion is unavoidable". The videographer deliberately placed the subject in front of these pictures, presumably because they are an aesthetically pleasing background, and there is nothing inherent in the reading of one of Catullus' less ribald poems that necessitates the presence of these images.For comparison, see File:Catullus 16.webm (but don't look up the translation, and turn off the sound if you speak Latin; this is not one of Catullus less ribald poems!). There are tons of copyrighted works visible in this video, but except for the copy of Catullus' Works the subject is waving around they are all very small, only partially displayed, in the background, at an angle, not the focus of the video, and very obviously are incidentally included. The copy of Catullus being waved around isn't as obviously safe under de minimis but has other factors going for it (TOO, based on PD drawing, etc.). --Xover (talk) 09:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note that being able to make a crop of a copyrighted element does not imply that a work fails DM, e.g. File:Louvre Courtyard, Looking West.jpg. This particular restriction on an otherwise unfettered COM:DW is one that we have long accepted. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:37, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yes. Your claim, Xover, that one “could conceivably crop [the pictures] out of the full-res video and sell a passable print of the result,” is false, as is evidenced by the maximum-resolution JPG preview image available here. Even when enlarging the images to fit my (smaller) screen, the quality is so reduced as to be entirely unfit to replace the originals; and by enlarging them to the size of wall prints, the quality would only deteriorate further. This situation is not indistinguishable from a scanner, owing to the glare of the lighting on a number of the prints, and, of course, the low quality of the images. As for the other video, the only copyrightable image is that on the cover of the book he holds; the spines of the other books are not eligible for copyright. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 00:11, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I believe it is DM case anyway, not a main object of the photo, lower quality, included non-intentionally. --rubin16 (talk) 10:29, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:14, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:29, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Academic interface at the new University of Florida water reclamation facility. (IA academicinterfac00pugl).pdf
[edit]Included data sheets at rear which are still copyright, and there is no obvious indication of Fedeal Status in the work. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The third-party manual in Appendix B may or may not be in copyright, depending on date of first publication and presence or absence of copyright notice, but with currently available information it is impossible to determine with certainty so COM:PRP means we cannot keep this as it stands even if the rest of it were found to be public domain. --Xover (talk) 14:47, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:30, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
non è di pertinenza di questo parco per favore cancellatela . Carla Fusco (talk) 22:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Per favore cancellate la foto .
grazie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carla Fusco (talk • contribs) 22:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 10:30, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:2013 Artists Assemble!
[edit]The image of Batman is copyright, forms a significant portion of the photo, and is not de minimis.
- File:2.2.13CosplayersbyLuigiNovi10.jpg
- File:2.2.13CosplayersbyLuigiNovi7.jpg
- File:2.2.13CosplayersbyLuigiNovi8.jpg
- File:2.2.13CosplayersbyLuigiNovi9.jpg
FredWalsh (talk) 23:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
The Batman image is a small part of a larger image of which the greater focus is the two cosplayers (and in one of the photos, the boy, which actually obscures the Batman image). For this reason, these images should remain. Nightscream (talk) 02:47, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- I’m not sure why you keep saying this but the Batman image is not a minimal part of the photos. If the focus was the cosplayers, the photos could have been taken without the Batman image. Please have a look at COM:DM#Guidelines and tell us which example you think these photos fall under. I think they fall under #6 and #7. FredWalsh (talk) 09:57, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- The cosplayers took the photo with it because they wanted to. It's a minimal, or partial of the larger image. Nightscream (talk) 23:38, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- If the photo could not have been taken without the Batman image, then you could argue it being possibly minimal. Since you seem to agree with me that the photo could have been taken without the Batman image, that removes the possibility of it being minimal. They took it there because they wanted Batman to be part of the photo. That is fine if this is going to be a personal photo. For Commons purposes, you are effectively publishing the Batman image by uploading it here. Have you obtained permission from the copyright owner of the Batman image? What I find strange is that you went to the length of adding clear licensing notices to your photos to ensure your copyright is protected. However, you do not seem to care about the copyright of others, as evidenced by your point blank refusal to accept that any of your photos contain copyright elements that do not belong to you. FredWalsh (talk) 06:41, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Batman is a significant object of the photo, placed in the center with people around. Not a DM case for me. --rubin16 (talk) 10:32, 8 June 2021 (UTC)