Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/07/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_YRX_sedan_(front).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![196 File:"Киске Өфө" һәм "Шоңҡар" әйтеше еңеүселәре һәм ойоштороусылар, 2014, Салауат районы.jpg](#File:"Киске_Өфө"_һәм_"Шоңҡар"_әйтеше_еңеүселәре_һәм_ойоштороусылар,_2014,_Салауат_районы.jpg){kind=link}
_Size_Chart.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
I would rather the metawiki user page came up EubieDrew (talk) 01:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Own ns, user page now from meta. --Achim (talk) 07:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sea Life (Gardaland)
[edit]No FOP in Italy.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:28, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:I Corsari
[edit]No FOP in Italy.
- File:HFW Villach Ausflug 2013 Gardasee (83 von 137) (9894767824).jpg
- File:HFW Villach Ausflug 2013 Gardasee (84 von 137) (9894727435).jpg
_(9894767824).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(9894727435).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:27, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Lac au sable 2001:56B:BC54:D400:D18A:B8A7:A4F:4343 01:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- ??? Looks like a sandbox test. Sting (talk) 08:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - no policy-based grounds for deletion presented - file is in use.Nigel Ish (talk) 09:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy kept. No reason presented. Probable mistake. (non-admin closure) -- Asclepias (talk) 14:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
{{Autotranslate|1=|2=|base=Copyvio}}<n/owiki>{{Nuke|[[COM:L|Copyright violation]]: }}[[Category:Copyright violations|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}} ]]<!-- -->{{X-To-DR | regexp =<nowiki>/\{\{\s*(?:Template:)?(Copyviol?|Copyright(?:ed)?|Screenshot|Icon|Logo|Logo-Germany|(?:Non-free video |DVD )?Cover|Db-f9|db-copyvio|Vio(?:lation)?)\s*(?:\|\s*(?:(?:1|source)\=)?)?([^}]*)\}\}/i
| templateName =Copyvio | declineReason =Not a [[Commons:Copyright|copyright]] violation. If you disagree, nominate for deletion.
}} A. Shohag 10:17, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio from Instagram. --Túrelio (talk) 15:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
неполное фото Keybeq (talk) 19:56, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Reuploading from the article. AharonGrama (talk) 00:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 20:50, 5 Juli 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 08:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion of our original logo, which we did not want to license under cc-by-sa. Juwelier Wagner (talk) 12:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 06:46, 8 Juli 2020 UTC: We did not want to license our original logo under cc-by-sa, although this was a few years ago. Many thanks for your understanding, Juwelier Wagner (Diskussion) 12:54, 7 July 2020 (UTC) --Krdbot 14:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion of our original logo, which we did not want to license under cc-by-sa. Juwelier Wagner (talk) 12:16, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcornelius at 00:53, 9 Juli 2020 UTC: We did not want to license our original logo under cc-by-sa, although this was a few years ago. Many thanks for your understanding, Juwelier Wagner (Diskussion) 12:54, 7 July 2020 (UTC) --Krdbot 08:36, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Santara Clinics
[edit]Hospital in Vilnius, Lithuania opened in 1980. Lithuania does not have freedom of panorama for architectural works.
- File:Akuserijos korpusas.JPG
- File:Santariškių klinikos.JPG
- File:Vilniaus universiteto ligoninės Santariškių klinikos.jpeg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (102).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (103).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (105).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (107).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (109).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (115).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (116).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (118).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (119).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (120).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (121).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (124).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (129).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (141).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (145).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (146).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (147).jpg
- File:Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (99).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Whpq (talk) 01:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Italia in Miniatura
[edit]No FOP in Italy.
- File:Apatosauro dell'italia in miniatura.jpg
- File:Dimetrodonte Italia in miniatura.jpg
- File:Stegosauro Italia in miniatura.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:56, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete No FOP in Italy. AshFriday (talk) 00:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Italia in Miniatura
[edit]No FOP in Italy.
- File:La balena di Pinocchio.jpg
- File:Pinocchio e Geppetto Italia in miniatura 01.jpg
- File:Pinocchio e Geppetto Italia in miniatura 02.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:40, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ecomuseum with aquarium, Rousse
[edit]No FOP in Bulgaria.
- File:Mammoth 2.jpg
- File:Mammoth 3.jpg
- File:Mammoth 4.jpg
- File:Mammoth behind.jpg
- File:Mammoth trunk.jpg
- File:Prirodonauchen-muzei-ruse2.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:49, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
COM:TOYS, and No FoP in US for artworks. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:LEGO sculptures in Legoland California.
- File:Along the Enchanted walk.jpg
- File:Castle Hill (2170544795).jpg
- File:Castle Hill (2170545495).jpg
- File:Castle Hill (2170549069).jpg
- File:Castle Hill (2170550361).jpg
- File:Castle Hill (769644029).jpg
- File:Getting Fresh w Lego Knight (3838051207).jpg
- File:Lego duck and ducklings (8292674428).jpg
- File:Lego Owl Family (16477864691).jpg
- File:Legoland (775158640).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5473690911).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5473694423).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5473694969).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5473696603).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5474287818).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5474288810).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5474292026).jpg
- File:Royal Joust ride.jpg
- File:Sleeping on the job (8293188552).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:53, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support deletion - thanks. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 14:27, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ruben Städter (talk · contribs)
[edit]hese simply seem like a collection of personal images and unlikely to be of use to the overall project. Equally please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Maggy Chvatal. Not certain what is going on however we are not a hosting platform. Thanks
Herby talk thyme 11:53, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:38, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rodrigowiese123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on these files. Four logos, and four architecturals; no useful metadata although some "original transmission ID" numbers suggestive of facebook or instagram.
- File:The Wine Society Logo.jpg
- File:Historia-BSFI.jpg
- File:Hall Principal - BSFI.jpg
- File:Galeria de Presidentes - BSFI.png
- File:Fachada-BSFI.jpg
- File:YCA Logo.jpg
- File:Country Club La Planicie.jpg
- File:Country Club Villa Logo.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:37, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:44, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
No useful metadata on these small files. Portrait is smaller than facebook, others appear to be above COM:TOO.
- File:2019SudamericanoSub15.png
- File:PeruOlympicLogo.png
- File:Sudamericano Sub 17 Ecuador 2011.png
- File:Sudamericano Sub 20 Venezuela 2009.png
- File:BradDaw.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
No sources for the images of the collage. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:57, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:57, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:00, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:00, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
No sources for the images in the collage. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Does not look like an own work. E4024 (talk) 20:30, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:22, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Same reason as other deletion. TotoroAndFriends12 (talk) 02:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Which one? I see no other DR opened by you... --E4024 (talk) 03:37, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation: https://www.wired.com/2013/09/health-startups-target-the-massive-money-behind-real-pain/. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:49, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
There is no evidence of any nation, or group of people, even micronation called "Niam". Centralismo (talk) 03:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- That is the sound when some babies want to be fed with something tasty: Niam niam. :) I am sick and bored of the tolerance shown to "invented flags". Delete --E4024 (talk) 04:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: They tried: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_micronations&diff=prev&oldid=392769013 — but vanished. No notability, out of scope of the project. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:44, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 08:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: a person of notability, the uploader is banned at wikidata for promoting this guy. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Personal photos for non-wikipedian - out of scope --Alaa :)..! 11:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:17, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in unapproved draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no notability. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Commons:Derivative works from poster. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 22:08, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination and the Facebook ID in the EXIF. Even if the uploader is the photographer, it would be a derivative work, needing permission from the artist via COM:OTRS. FredWalsh (talk) 16:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 22:20, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: a football journalist from Spain, might be needed. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:34, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
out of scope, private selfie Adelfrank (talk) 22:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:37, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Not a very active user indeed. E4024 (talk) 23:11, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no contribution but self-promotion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:39, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Dubious own work, too small and with transmission code. E4024 (talk) 02:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Nick at 11:38, 12 Juli 2020 UTC: sockpuppetry - uploading copyright violations --Krdbot 02:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
34 KB dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 02:53, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Nick at 11:38, 12 Juli 2020 UTC: sockpuppetry - uploading copyright violations --Krdbot 02:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Facebook image. E4024 (talk) 02:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Nick at 11:38, 12 Juli 2020 UTC: sockpuppetry - uploading copyright violations --Krdbot 02:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Taken from Facebook per MD. E4024 (talk) 02:55, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Nick at 11:38, 12 Juli 2020 UTC: sockpuppetry - uploading copyright violations --Krdbot 02:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Is this not a screenshot? Is it acceptable? E4024 (talk) 02:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Nick at 11:37, 12 Juli 2020 UTC: sockpuppetry - uploading copyright violations --Krdbot 02:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CaptainNews (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Armanalikhademi2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of the scope of the project (the group of unknown people). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of the scope of the project (the group of unknown people). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of the scope of the project (the group of unknown people). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:09, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of the scope of the project (the group of unknown people). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:09, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of the scope of the project (the group of unknown people). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Photo on big screen cannot be own work, even if the image is. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. FredWalsh (talk) 21:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Personal photos for non-wikipedian - out of scope --Alaa :)..! 21:17, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
I am really sorry. Surely, that this woman is a great musician! But is this image of an educational value? By now it is not used on any Wikimedia project and it seems to be a promotional piece. Sorry, Commons may not be the right place to store such images. May some social network would be much more convenient for that woman. Mosbatho (talk) 21:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
File:0x0-15-temmuz-siirleri-sozleri-kisa-uzun-anlamli-siirler-48-kitalik-15-temmuz-siirleri-1562686580917.jpg
[edit]
Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 22:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Is she in scope? E4024 (talk) 22:05, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Is she in scope? Is it free to upload this image to Commons? E4024 (talk) 22:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
The source is copyrighted. E4024 (talk) 22:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:22, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 22:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 22:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 22:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
The watermark on the image gives the source of it. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:37, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
The source doesn't release its content as a public domain. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:40, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
The YouTube channel is not the original creator of the video, thereby the content of the video can't be considered as public domain. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:44, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:46, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:48, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:48, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:49, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
These files are highly compressed, and look like they might be screenshots from a video recording, potentially from TV. As such, it is unlikely that they are the uploader's work, and they are probably copyright violations.
Mike Peel (talk) 10:01, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- I haven't checked through the user's older uploads in detail, but a number of them also look suspect... Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:23, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SeasSoul
[edit]I doubt that the user ever uploaded an own work to Commons, and the following files are certainly above the threshold. Why was this authorship forger never warned explicitly? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:37, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- File:HL.jpg
- File:Peking2018.jpg
- File:DomPedro.jpg
- File:RoofMuseum.jpg
- File:MuseuNacional'.jpg
- File:U27BrasilMedal.jpg
- File:1803PaçoSãoCristóvão.jpg
- File:3DSkull.png
- File:Luzia.jpg
- File:LuziaRecomposition.jpg
- File:Quinta Boa Vista.jpg
- File:Airport Guarulhos.jpg
- File:MeteoriteAngraDosReis.png
- File:Luzia Face.jpg
- File:LuziaCave.jpg
- File:MNPhases.jpg
- File:Luzia.png
- File:B737.jpg
- File:ProjectFOR.jpg
- File:1862PalácioSãoCristóvão.jpg
- File:NotreDameArchitecture.jpg
- Support Deletion Some of the images are blatantly false creations while the breadth of the subjects covered in the others is far too great for them to all belong to the uploader. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 04:36, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:04, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work, see also deleted uploads
- File:AirportFortaleza-325.jpg
- File:AirportFortaleza-340.jpg
- File:Notre-Dame de Paris after.jpg
- File:Domestic Check-in Airport Fortaleza.jpg
- File:Airport Fortaleza.webm
- File:Facade of Paço de São Cristóvão.jpg
- File:Avianca Brasil Stored.jpg
- File:PellaSietasDredger.jpg
- File:ERJ190Globalia.png
- File:Avianca.jpg
- File:BoeingBrasil.png
Didym (talk) 21:51, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
- File:Oil Spill.jpg
- File:AIRFOR.jpg
- File:Al Nour Mosque.jpg
- File:Preview New Lighthouse.jpg
- File:Ex Blankenese Lighthouse.jpg
Didym (talk) 23:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. The uploader already has lots of deleted copyright violations.
- File:2023World'sFastestTrains-01.jpg
- File:1998FortalezaAirport-01.jpg
- File:2013DaciaSanderoEssentiel-01.jpg
- File:1985CongonhasAirport-01.jpg
- File:BalthazarMartinot-02.jpg
- File:BalthazarMartinot-01.jpg
- File:2023ObjectsDestruction-01.jpg
- File:Fortaleza Airport.jpg
- File:Horizonte-01.jpg
- File:U27Coin.jpg
- File:PP-CBJ.jpg
Didym (talk) 18:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support Deletion In the Wikiproject Airports we know well SeasSoul and the troubles caused by him. BTW this is just one of the many aliases used by this person. (Brunoptsem (talk) 17:27, 30 March 2023 (UTC))
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
own work? copyright? * https://www.wonderlandmagazine.com/2020/01/02/alex-lawther-winter-interview/ Adelfrank (talk) 09:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:17, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to be own work Faisal talk 00:00, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Alaa :)..! 19:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to be own work Faisal talk 00:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Alaa :)..! 19:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
out of scope - personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 03:49, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 19:56, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rana Abdul Rehman Official (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion, out of project scope. Commons is not your personal free web host.
- File:Rehmanrajputtofficalpicture.jpg
- File:Rehmanofficial.jpg
- File:Rehmanofficialphoto.jpg
- User:Rana Abdul Rehman Official
Achim (talk) 10:22, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom (user page gone) --Herby talk thyme 11:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 19:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
No permission أمين (talk) 07:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; possible copyvio. --Ahmadtalk 18:47, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
no permission أمين (talk) 10:27, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- The "own work" claim sounds quite dubious to me. Can the uploader provide a copy with camera EXIF? --E4024 (talk) 17:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; possible copyvio. --Alaa :)..! 19:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
_YRX_sedan_(front).jpg){kind=link}
_YRX_sedan_(front).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
כיוון שזה מטושטש זיוה המושלמת (talk) 08:47, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
_YRX_sedan_(front).jpg){kind=link}
Keep It's image from Flickr. I cropped it. Alex Neman 05.43, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:44, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
_YRX_sedan_(front).jpg){kind=link}
this file is not valid. this file is outdated 89.81.216.8 13:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Nonsense. Keep as a historical image. Upload a more recent image if you have a properly-licensed one. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:46, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
this picture was taken and published without authorization of lcl DURAN. There is not any historical interest of any kind since the post has been canceled. 2001:861:4D80:DFE0:B0E5:8F6E:524:4867 18:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Kept: per COM:INUSE Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 04:22, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
This is the default desktop image from earlier versions of MacOS. As such, Apple would own the copyright, not the uploader, and we would need a licensing statement from them (sent via COM:OTRS). Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Vandalism only account - gone. --Herby talk thyme 11:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Pronunciation is for an outdated word, see German Wiktionary: anschrieest. Jeuwre (talk) 22:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: "outdated word" is not a reason for deletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Pronunciation is for an outdated word, see German Wiktionary: anschrieet. Jeuwre (talk) 22:02, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: "outdated word" is not a reason for deletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Pronunciation is for an outdated word, see German Wiktionary: anspieen. Jeuwre (talk) 22:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: "outdated word" is not a reason for deletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Pronunciation is for an outdated word, see German Wiktionary: anspieest. Jeuwre (talk) 22:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: "outdated word" is not a reason for deletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Pronunciation is for an outdated word, see German Wiktionary: anspieet. Jeuwre (talk) 22:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: "outdated word" is not a reason for deletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Pronunciation is for an outdated word, see German Wiktionary: aufschrieest. Jeuwre (talk) 22:11, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see a reason why it matters Germartin1 (talk) 20:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: "outdated word" is not a reason for deletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:44, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Pronunciation is for an outdated word, see German Wiktionary: anschrieet. Jeuwre (talk) 22:11, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: "outdated word" is not a reason for deletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:44, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Pronunciation is for an outdated word, see German Wiktionary: beschrieen. Jeuwre (talk) 22:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: "outdated word" is not a reason for deletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
We have three copies of the same image: This one (1), File:Turkey. Young woman. Dame Virique.jpg (2) and File:Turkey. Young woman. Dame Virique - Dumas. LCCN2004670414.jpg (3). I guess deleting two of them and keeping only one would be correct. I leave to the admin to decide which one to keep, as I have little understanding of "tif", "jpg", "svg" etc. Thanks. E4024 (talk) 23:19, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- (1) can be deleted as a duplicate as it is a magnitude smaller than the others. The other jpeg and the TIFF should be kept, as the jpeg renders well as a thumbnail in articles while due to an unsolved bug TIFFs render badly. We keep TIFFs and jpegs of the same object when the TIFF is the original high resolution scan, and may be a significantly larger file size, as the jpeg is not a lossless compression version of the TIFF and is normally much easier for reusers to handle, in this case 2MB versus 42MB to download. Summary: delete one, keep the other two. --Fæ (talk) 08:05, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- I agree with Fæ. --MGA73 (talk) 08:52, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Fæ, deleted the unused small copy File:Turkey. Young woman. Dame Virique.jpg, kept the larger JPEG and the original TIFF. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:32, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fantasy Kingdom (Gardaland)
[edit]No FOP in Italy.
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NightFire19 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zlinkeykey (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gardaland
[edit]No FOP in Italy.
- File:Alessandro Petrelli a Gardaland.jpg
- File:Gardaland The Spectacular 4D Adventure'.JPG
- File:PoGardaland.jpg
- File:Prezzemolo.Maskottchen.Gardaland.JPG
- File:Statua di tirannosauro a Gardaland.jpg
- File:Unicorni di Gardaland.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete No FOP in Italy. AshFriday (talk) 00:10, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:04, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gardaland
[edit]No FOP in Italy.
- File:137GardalandFontanaPrezzemolo.JPG
- File:FontanaMagoPrezzemolo.jpg
- File:Gardaland 041118 05.jpg
- File:HFW Villach Ausflug 2013 Gardasee (101 von 137) (9894718314).jpg
_(9894718314).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:16, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Sengoku2501
[edit]- File:MAGG SecurityUnit.jpg
- File:JMSDF MaizuruＨｅａｄｑｕａｒｔｅｒｓ.jpg
- File:JMSDF Gun Salutes.jpg
- File:JMSDF Gathering information necessary to ensure the safety of Japanese vessels Exercise on diagram.jpg
- File:JMSDF campaigning for fishermen off Somalia.jpg
- File:JMSDF M.I.T Approach.jpg
- File:JMSDF M.I.T Clearing.jpg
- File:JMSDF M.I.T Deployment.jpg
- File:JMSDF M.I.T Neutralization.jpg
Uploader claims these files are licensed as CC-BY 4.0 ({{GJSTU-2.0}}), however the CC-BY license is valid on governmental websites only; files posted on Twitter or Facebook don't fall on this line. Yasu (talk) 14:55, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:27, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
One of these is sourced to another, the other two are claimed as "own work". One or the other of those is likely true, but the licenses are still wrong.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:16, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Looks like it belongs in this series https://royalbluestaipei.weebly.com/the-royal-team.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:17, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work, looks like it came from a website. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:17, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wilsonmatts (talk · contribs)
[edit]One is a crop from the other. Neither has useful metadata, the larger is smaller than Facebook. Seems like a personal image, especially since the name changes on the two files.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:17, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AlexandrIvanovich0990 (talk · contribs)
[edit]spam-only account
- File:CDI United International;.jpg
- File:CDI Creative Commons;.jpg
- File:CDI Foundation.jpg
- File:CDI United International.jpg
- File:CDI Creative Commons.jpg
- File:CDI Industries Inc.png
Aranya (talk) 23:46, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:19, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, likely out of COM:SCOPE. (Note: the Wikidata item does not meet d:Wikidata:Notability. Ankry (talk) 08:46, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 20:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Derivative works of copyrighted photographs.
- File:Shinozaki Ai on the cover.jpg
- File:Shinozaki Ai in red.jpg
- File:Shinozaki Ai on the cover (cropped).jpg
- File:Cookin' Idol Ai! Mai! Main! (cropped).jpg
- File:Grab von Sexy Cora Carolin Wosnitza(cropped)4.png
- File:Grab von Sexy Cora Carolin Wosnitza(cropped)5.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
4.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
5.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:41, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:36, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sokhna.hdk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work, work of an artist, autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr
- File:Boubou Design en processus .png
- File:Beyoncé par Boubou Design.png
- File:Boubou Design et son Oeuvre de Nelson Mandela.png
- File:Beyoncé par Boubou.png
- File:Boubou Design.png
Shev123 (talk) 15:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:29, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Несвободные изображения
Barbarian (talk) 19:16, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep File:Тамга Леймой.png > faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. Macuser (talk) 20:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
derivative work of non-free content (COM:DW) Wutsje 00:22, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
je me suis tromper Adossyukim (talk) 01:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Uploader's request. -- Asclepias (talk) 12:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted sign A1Cafel (talk) 02:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, is seems to be permanent but it lacks of FoP for this kind of case. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, is seems to be permanent but it lacks of FoP for this kind of case. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, is seems to be permanent but it lacks of FoP for this kind of case. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, is seems to be permanent but it lacks of FoP for this kind of case. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, is seems to be permanent but it lacks of FoP for this kind of case. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, is seems to be permanent but it lacks of FoP for this kind of case. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, is seems to be permanent but it lacks of FoP for this kind of case. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, is seems to be permanent but it lacks of FoP for this kind of case. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, is seems to be permanent but it lacks of FoP for this kind of case. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, is seems to be permanent but it lacks of FoP for this kind of case. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
own work? I do'nt believe - Foto: Niki Byrne - copyright? * https://www.latribunadecuenca.es/Noticia/ZD2A1E6AD-BA31-29EC-7A004BE48BAEF4EA/202006/Firme-y-decidido Adelfrank (talk) 09:43, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
own work? I do'nt believe - copyright? * https://gramho.com/media/2020694899525337307 Adelfrank (talk) 09:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
own work? I do'nt believe - copyright? * https://www.vibuk.com/perfil-publico/pedro-almagro Adelfrank (talk) 10:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
What is the scope of this image? E4024 (talk) 03:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
I see no OTRS permission and little scope if any. Please see the other files by this uploader, they all have camera EXIF. This one, no. E4024 (talk) 04:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 1996. No Permission from the sculptor Р. Романович. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation from facebook source *angys* (talk) 07:16, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Unclear photo. Not sure what we are seeing in the photo. COM:OOS. -- Geagea (talk) 12:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
no indication of free licence. (pic from subject's instagram) Horus (talk) 12:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Seems like doodle art, not in use, not educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Source Own work - false information, company logo. Violation of non Gbielcunha rights O revolucionário aliado (talk) 20:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete. Non-free logo; it can be viewed at Philco's official website. --Francisco (talk) 22:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)- Keep Corrected licensing, does not meet COM:TOO#Brazil. JGHowes talk 14:32, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy keep too simple.--RZuo (talk) 17:24, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Too Simple. --Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Have added to the file's description that this is the logo and trademark of PHILCO ELETRÔNICOS S.A. in Brazil, which has an article on pt-wiki and may be useful there. Non-svg format is no reason to delete. Instead, have added {{Svg}} tag. JGHowes talk 15:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per JGHowes. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:39, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Source Own work - false information, company logo. Violation of non Gbielcunha rights O revolucionário aliado (talk) 20:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
It is not his own work, the image is all over the web, without valid licenses and with dates prior to the upload in Commons. JOAN ~ (Questions?) 20:41, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
not own work 190.183.99.247 21:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Not own work 190.183.99.247 22:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
not own work 190.183.99.247 22:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
COM:Redundant because File:Ambassador Markus Leitner, Interview with FNA - 30 April 2018 05.jpg exists. Also, this one doesn't have any attribution. - Harsh 20:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC) Sorry I didn't see it thanks. --Zaschid (talk) 20:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Отсутствует разрешение на свободные лицензия от автора икон. No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 13:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:35, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Будем ждать, пока изменят закон о свободе панорамы... ~ Чръный человек (talk) 09:49, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:27, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Photo previously published at https://www.ferrum.edu/blog/nate-daniels-99-to-speak-at-new-student-convocation-on-sunday-august-26/ Ytoyoda (talk) 05:44, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: I'm a new user, so I hope this message gets to you. While yes, this image is on the Ferrum blog post, we took the photo and own all rights to the image. We shared it with Ferrum for the blog post article that they wrote about Nate Daniels for the convocation. Ced16 (talk) 15:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Ced16: Thanks for responding. If you took the photo, you can follow the steps described at COM:OTRS to verify that you own the rights. Also, I recommend uploading the JPEG file from the camera (with the EXIF metadata intact) instead of a PNG. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Gampe as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Low quality, out of scope
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:11, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Low quality, out of scope, no usage --Gampe (talk) 08:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Subal45dutta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Presumed-nonfree logo/title-art DMacks (talk) 03:34, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:37, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
The person shown in the photo cannot be its author. This is not a selfie AleUst (talk) 09:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC) Добрый день !
Я Александр Сверчинский, и это фото является фотографией из моего личного архива. Я хотел бы использовать данное фото на главной странице с информацией о моей личности.
Заранее благодарен ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by АлексСверч (talk • contribs) 09:25, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Close again. Page not archiving properly. --Minoraxtalk 07:38, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hartmut Bonk Martin Sg. (talk) 10:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:39, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Desculpe, esta foto não é interessante para uma enciclopédia VanderGomes (talk) 12:26, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; scope?. --Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
A la demande de la personne ayant importé le fichier Esteljj15 (talk) 13:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
A la demande de la personne ayant importé le fichier Esteljj15 (talk) 13:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
A la demande de la personne ayant importé le fichier Esteljj15 (talk) 13:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
A la demande de la personne ayant importé le fichier Esteljj15 (talk) 13:22, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Looks to be a professional photoshoot background. Only evidence of photoshop, not a camera. Copyright probably not owned by the uploader. Timtrent (talk) 14:02, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
De sérieux doutes sur la provenance de cette photo : pas de métadonnées, et le lieu de prise de vue (Jardin des Deux-Rives) indiqué en légende est faux, puisque cette photo est prise sur la passerelle de la Citadelle. Le verseur de cette photo est prié au minimum de fournir les métadonnées de cette photo. Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 14:57, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP, no exif, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
copyvio. news capture. ChongDae (talk) 15:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Teemeah as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: based on uploads from this user, unlikely to be own photo
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no external hits found. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Teemeah as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: based on uploads from this user, unlikely to be own photo
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no external hits found. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Teemeah as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: based on other uploads from uploader, looks unlikely to be own photo
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no external hits found. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: the uploader probably got some of the photos from Coe himself, as there is a w:Draft:Boyer Coe draft in enwiki without sources, that looks like a commissioned article. That still doesn't mean uploader holds copyright to all of these photos, especially that there are photos from 1970s as well, that cearly look like newspaper scans. Teemeah (talk) 16:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
This looks like a pro-photo shoot picture, no camera data. Pictures of the uploader, even in the age of selfies, are rarely by the uploader, so I presume copyvio Timtrent (talk) 16:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eatcha as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10. Not sure, so let’s start a regular DR. DaB. (talk) 12:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- in scope. 朝の挨拶運動 looks like a legit thing based on google results.
- but this came from https://www.instagram.com/p/CBzzhnWFvzx/ so we need permission from the school.--RZuo (talk) 11:55, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. Likely take from Insta. --Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Redundant and low-quality version of File:Kroketten aan de lopende band Weeknummer, 73-36 - Open Beelden - 13318.ogv Timk70 (talk) 01:25, 5 July 2020 (
Redundant and low-quality but its need full i think Rajuiu (talk) 15:39, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:10, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Either amateur art, then no scope, or an artwork then we need OTRS. E4024 (talk) 03:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Лοπαδοτεμαχοσελαχογαλεοκρανιολειψανοδριμυποτριμματοσιλφιοκαραβομελιτοκατακεχυμενοκιχλεπικοσσυφοφαττο...νοπτερύγων.jpg
[edit]
This is a photograph of 2 pages from a Greek-Italian dictionary published in 2002, presumably copyrighted. Moreover, it appears to be out of scope, consisting entirely of text for non-historical reasons. Deacon Vorbis (talk) 16:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Please delete just the first revision of the file, timestamped 20200705171725. It was an accidental upload of an image of the wrong person. Nick Number (talk) 17:29, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:17, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted text Nanahuatl (talk) 20:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:19, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted text Nanahuatl (talk) 20:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:19, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Source Own work - false information, company logo. Violation of non Gbielcunha rights O revolucionário aliado (talk) 20:40, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:20, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Source Own work - false information, company logo. Violation of non Gbielcunha rights O revolucionário aliado (talk) 20:40, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:20, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Source Own work - false information, company logo. Violation of non Gbielcunha rights O revolucionário aliado (talk) 20:41, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:20, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
I am really sorry. Surely, that this woman is a great musician! But is this image of an educational value? By now it is not used on any Wikimedia project and it seems to be a promotional piece. Sorry, Commons may not be the right place to store such images. May some social network would be much more convenient for that woman. Mosbatho (talk) 21:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:20, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Eu fiz um upload da imagem errada e não sou o verdadeiro autor desta imagem. Tiago aparecido rangel de barros (talk) 23:17, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:22, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Coppivo coppivo 85.140.5.18 14:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, by Sealle due to licensing problems. Taivo (talk) 21:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, имеется в Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад http://kiskeufa.ru/index.php?dn=news&to=art&id=2619 Dogad75 (talk) 18:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: the phographer's permission is needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:37, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Shared By Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi , but the image is taken by anybody who is present their during the interaction. so the image license seem to be controversial. My mistake again but I upload in good faith. I'm sorry. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 02:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep though with a little uncertainty - I suspect that since it is on Narendra Modi's official Linkedin page, it would have been taken by an official Government photographer accompanying him. So the licence is very probably valid. But I don't know the fine details of Indian law so I can't give an accurate assessment. - MPF (talk) 17:29, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per MPF. --4nn1l2 (talk) 13:19, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
http://978111.blogspot.com/p/1-1.html?m=1 coppivo 85.140.5.18 14:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- This file is in the public domain. I changed the license. --Krylowicz (talk) 13:00, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Sealle. --Minoraxtalk 02:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ентусиастъ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Ген.-лейтенант Асен Николов -портретна фотография.jpg
- File:Ген.-лейтенант Асен Николов.jpg
- File:Ниш 1944.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: The source for the last two files i.e. Ген.-лейтенант Асен Николов.jpg and Ниш 1944.jpg is mentioned in their respective file description section. As mentioned there, their author can not be determinated, therefore the removal of the said files is inappropriate and unnecessarily. Ентусиастъ (talk) 16:29, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- License tags are definitely wrong. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:14, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. All uploads in the past month have been copyvios. They are probably all so. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:19, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:30, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ентусиастъ (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]All uploads in the past month have been copyvios. They are probably all so.
- File:Funeral of Valko Chervenkov.jpg
- File:Stamboliyski statue.jpg
- File:Stamboliyski Last Cabinet.jpg
- File:Session of the People's Court.jpg
- File:In front of Sofia University during the sessions of the People's Court, 1945.jpg
- File:Bogdan Filov, Prince Kiril, gen. Nikola Mihov in front of the People's Court. Sofia, 1945.jpg
- File:Nikola Petkov Witness 1945.jpg
- File:Nikola Petkov Miting 1946.jpg
- File:Nikola Petkov.jpg
- File:Trial against Nikola Petkov 1947.jpg
- File:Депутати от XXI Обикновено народно събрание 9 декември 1923 - 15 април 1927 г.jpg
- File:Hristo nestorov.jpg
- File:Bulgarian National Bank in Skopje Bulgarian National Bank in Skopje, occupied Yugoslavia.jpg
- File:Георги Заркин (Georgi Zarkin).png
- File:Ivrogozarov.jpg
- File:Uputvane za obsht pravopis.png
- File:BG Army Yugoslavia 1945.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:17, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:30, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Because the seal is no longer in use anymore and it belongs to the Sudanese National Intelligence and Security Service, which has been restructured and reorganized with a new composition under the name "General Intelligence Service" . Addition to that the image violates the copyrights as it is not an own work and is subject to the ownership of the Sudanese Government and can not be used in any condition and it is prohibited from circulation only with prior permission. Mr. James Dimsey (talk) 12:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks James. I think PD-Sudan-exempt applies here (It is ineligible for protection because it is an official government document, state emblem, or seal) - so should not be deleted. I have added this now to the image. MrPenguin21 (talk) 17:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, derivative work imo. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:58, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for"graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Adelfrank (talk) 17:57, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Old pics are difficult to replace. Early era working women, of course it is in scope. E4024 (talk) 01:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, it will be good in an article. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Look at the fair-use rationale of w:File:Atlantis Docked to Mir.jpg, which is identical to the nominated image. It says, "Non-replaceable, as all images of this kind were taken from Russian Soyuz spacecraft during the Shuttle-Mir programme, with ISS flight rules not permitting any similar images. In addition, Mir was deorbited in 2001." Therefore, it is non-free. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 05:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- NASA's image gallery entry says credit goes to NASA. The NASA on The Commons listing says there are no known copyright restrictions. The original listing on GRIN linked to the standard copyright notice that "photographs are not protected by copyright unless noted". A Wired article has an image credit of "Nikolai Budarin, Russian Space Research Institute, NASA". The other uses I found with Google Image Search credit NASA. – Adrignola talk 12:02, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- It looks like the 'fair use condition' on the linked w:File:Atlantis Docked to Mir.jpg is incorrect and unnecessary. The archived version of the GRIN server confirms that these images are published by NASA, and are therefore not copyright protected, unless noted. The original posting of the image on GRIN, archived does not have a copyright notice applied to the image. The delete request should probably be put on w:File:Atlantis Docked to Mir.jpg as a low quality duplicate of this one with incorrect documentation.--Cincotta1 (talk) 13:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion is withdrawn. The non-free image is actually a free image. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 05:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
SVG version is superior and has correct colors Centralismo (talk) 06:22, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Replace with the file "File:California independence flag 2.svg" Centralismo (talk) 07:16, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Possibly not own work, but this poster (including all artworks) by Hans Schweitzer (d. 1980) are still copyrighted. ZmeytheDragon16 (talk) 07:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- The Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek, a reputable organization run by the German government, states that it is available under a CC-BY-SA 3.0 license, as it says clearly in the image description [1], apparently released as such by the Staatsarchiv Freiburg. Own work is not claimed. This is no different than the many Bundesarchiv images which have a known creator. Buidhe (talk) 18:49, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Buidhe. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
This is a work by Hans Schweitzer aka Mjölnir and still protected by copyright until the end of 2050. This poster (or one copy of it) is apparently part of a poster collection of the state archive at Freiburg, which digitized that whole collection in 2006 for preservation purposes. If you go to the entry for the poster at https://www.landesarchiv-bw.de/plink/?f=5-196945-1, you will see that there is no image online there. Apparently the digitized posters were accessible online some time ago, and because of a blanket CC license they have for their online collections found its way to the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek (which simply automatically harvested other websites) because of this.
That the state archive has since removed the posters says they made a mistake and have corrected it. I also don't see how a regional state archive in the Southwest of Germany could hold the necessary copyrights for the works of this well-known Nazi propaganda artist, as they would need to in order to put that image under a CC license. The major difference to the Bundesarchiv images that were mentioned is a) that it is far more plausible that the German federal archive holds rights to certain military propaganda images (and others) and b) that those images that were uploaded here by an agreement were explicitly said to be put under a free license, while here there's only some blanket clause, making it necessary to also apply some plausibility criteria if some work is not specifically mentioned as being put under a free license.
tl;dr: This image is not under a free license, there was a mistake. It is still protected by copyright and should be deleted. The file can be restored in 2051. Rosenzweig τ 15:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- It's not possibly under copyright. The work is commissioned by Nazi Government of The Third Reich which doesn't exist anymore and the Federal Republic of Germany founded after WW2 is not a successor but a completely new state.--Comrade-yutyo (talk) 10:42, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- What does that have to do with copyright? That it was possibly commissioned by the state does not mean that the state owns the copyright or that it expired or whatever you are trying to imply. That's not how German Urheberrecht (copyright law) works. --Rosenzweig τ 13:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:38, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: NOT a simple logo. Still under copyrights by its rightful owner. Please provide link to copyright statement and support the below COM:TOO statement. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep borderline, but I think this is below the COM:TOO US. The text, of course, is not copyrightable, so the only concern is the three pentagons. They combine to represent a soccer-ball like pattern. I think that this fails the requirement of "independent creation" (as it is copied) and is a "familiar symbol [or] design" not subject to copyright. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Mdaniels5757. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted calligraphy, above COM:TOO Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:55, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Photograph of a dead Algerian soldier taken in a restricted area only patrolled by French soldiers, certainly under French copyright Le Petit Chat (talk) 19:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. The French patrolled only the Algerian side of the fence. The Tunisian side, from which the photograph appears to have been taken, was where the ALN was based. M.Bitton (talk) 21:26, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Tunisian copyright law: creation + 25 years. Algerian copyright law: creation + 50 years. --Lubiesque (talk) 14:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. @M.Bitton and Lubiesque: you are right, I forgot to consider the side of the fence.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:56, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Selbst kopiert ist noch lange nicht selbst erstellt; es handelt sich um ein Druckwerk, für das üblicherweise keine Freigabe erfolgt H7 (talk) 17:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Also:
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:33, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- I have blurred the "graphic work". Please check whether it is acceptable. --Ceeseven (talk) 09:11, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Ceeseven: Why not instead upload a separate file for your blurred version? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Regardless, it's now cropped, but the original edition should be revision deleted. Contact an Oversighter for this way or not? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --MB-one (talk) 09:54, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:46, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This artwork is not clearly to show and the focus point in this picture is the access, artwork is not the identifiable object . --Wpcpey (talk) 11:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
I would rather say Delete, @Wpcpey: aren't those Graffities and simply beyond their very low TOO? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:25, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
I blur the picture already and it is not clear enough.--Wpcpey (talk) 08:40, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- OK so changed to Keep, but the original edition has therefore to be revision deleted, though. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Kept. Original version deleted. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:38, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
The user has uploaded several different language versions of this poster as "own work". Is this not a DW? If deleted please do so for all versions. E4024 (talk) 03:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Biggestkartal: Please can you write, how this can be your work? We need a written permission via Commons:OTRS nevertheless. If we don't get one: delete. --Emha (talk) 23:06, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No OTRS permission, hashtag in Twitter dated in 2019 [2]. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:05, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia and the photo violates architect's copyright. The architect en:Alar Kotli died in 1963 and the photo can be restored after copyright expiration in 2034 (70+1 years after death). Taivo (talk) 10:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. File added to undeletions in 2034. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:15, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW scans of photos/documents with bogus self and/or PD claims; e.g. self claim for photo dated 1924 is dubious at best; File:Risto Buyankin better1а.jpg purports to have been first published in the US, but is of a Bulgarian revolutionary and attributed to a firm with a Slavic name - i.e. US publication also dubious at best; File:Cover of Drenoveni The Life and Demise of a Macedonian Village.jpg is just a scan of a book cover, etc.
- File:Buf Banquet 1949.jpg
- File:Zhelevo Picnic 1924 medium Best.jpg
- File:Kosinets Bulgarian School 2а.jpg
- File:Armensko Makedono-Odrinsko Opulchenie 1B.jpg
- File:Armensko Makedono-Odrinsko Opulchenie 1а.jpg
- File:Armensko Makedono-Odrinsko Opulchenie 1.jpg
- File:Makedono-Odrinsko Opulchenie Armensko, Lerinsko.jpg
- File:Cover of Drenoveni The Life and Demise of a Macedonian Village.jpg
- File:Risto Buyankin better1а.jpg
- File:Dren Dono final larger.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 14:47, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Comment Эlcobbola, could I please ask that Drenowe is temporarily unblocked—on the condition that he will only participate in this discussion? I totally understand how this looks like the typical case of reckless and stubborn copyvio and I'm sorry that it has happened, but it is indeed just a matter of inexperience and confusion. Drenowe is in fact Larry Koroloff—a notable historian with exceptional contributions to the preservation of the national and cultural identity of the Bulgarian emigrants in Canada and the US. He is the editor-in-chief of MACEDONIAN TRIBUNE, ‘the oldest Macedonian newspaper in the world published continuously since February 10, 1927’,[3] and the author of that very book. Mr. Koroloff hasn't meant to infringe anyone's copyright and most certainly has not intended to harm the project. He is an elderly person and I kindly ask to forgive him for not being that savvy with the procedures here or, indeed, with how Commons works in general.
- It'll definitely be better if Mr. Koroloff is given himself the opportunity to explain, but from what I understand, most if not everything that he has been uploading here was from the archive of his late father, Lazar Koroloff—himself one of the most prominent Bulgarian émigrés in Canada. If I got it correctly, at least some (not sure if all) of the photos in that archive had been taken by his father, who died in 2002, so the copyright holder today is Mr. Koroloff. Of course, the proper way to publish those would have been to send the appropriate letter to OTRS, and the supplied information for the files was badly inadequate, to put it mildly—but considering the real situation, I'd like to again ask for understanding.
- Commons can only benefit if we help Mr. Koroloff, who has access to invaluable materials, rather than simply punishing him. I guess that some of the materials in his possession may indeed be problematic—those, for which he may not know the author and thus the copyright status—but let's indeed help him sort that out. I think not only he does deserve our help as a person, but our very goals—to make as much as possible of the human knowledge freely available—dictate it.
— Luchesar • T/C/U 14:58, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment By the way, as I learned that Mr. Koroloff is attending a funeral today, could I please also ask to give him a few days before he joins here.
— Luchesar • T/C/U 15:52, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Just two more notes: the archive is that of Mr. Koroloff's father and grandfather. Also, many of the photos have been published in the aforementioned book—which has received praise from the scientific community as a serious, thorough, and in many ways unique study of the history, linguistics and ethnography of the covered region. Given all this, I don't know if it wouldn't be more comfortable to us if Mr. Koroloff simply gives a permission to use the reproductions from the book.
— Luchesar • T/C/U 21:50, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment @Elcobbola: , I took the freedom to unblock Drenowe as he is a respected good faith editor in Bulgarian Wikipedia, and as Iliev mentioned, a notable historian himself contributing to our projects (the barnstar on his user page is just a humble recognition for his numerous contributions to Macedonia-related articles). I am sure that he will take part in this discussion, clarifying the situation with each of the photos in question and they will all prove to be harmless in terms of copyright problems for Wikimedia Commons. :) →Spiritia 14:00, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment
- File:Dren Dono final larger.jpg and File:Risto Buyankin better1а.jpg These photos are cropped from a photo taken in Granite City, USA, in 1912 by my maternal grandfather, as a memento before heading off to Macedonia to fight in the Bulgarian army in the First Balkan War. The original photo has advertising in the upper left in English to show it is taken in the USA. I inherited the photo from my grandfather and it is in my archives. The photo appears in my book "Drenoveni: The life and Demise of a Macedonian Village" on p. 75. I give permission for the photos derived from it to be used.
- File:Cover of Drenoveni The Life and Demise of a Macedonian Village.jpg Since I am the author of the book, what is the problem?
- File:Kosinets Bulgarian School 2а.jpg I inherited this photo from my paternal grandmother whose younger sister, my great aunt, was a pupil at the school when the photo was taken. The photo dates back to 1905-1906. Тhe original is in my archives.
- File:Zhelevo Picnic 1924 medium Best.jpg Since arriving in Toronto, my father photographed many events. The Zhelevo picnic is one of them.
- File:Armensko Makedono-Odrinsko Opulchenie 1B.jpg This was entrusted to my late father by the late Anastas Lazaroff.
- File:Buf Banquet 1949.jpg The Buf Banquet photo may be problematic. It was entrusted to me by my brother in law's father, a native of Buf. Drenowe (talk) 11:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment The SMAC Certificate as official document of the Bulgarian military authorities falls under the {{PD-BulgarianGov}} licence. Of course we should keep only one copy.--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 08:39, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment
- File:Makedono-Odrinsko Opulchenie Armensko, Lerinsko.jpg
- I've corrected the source, author (now we have special template {{Author-MAVC}}) and license information.
- File:Dren Dono final larger.jpg, File:Risto Buyankin better1а.jpg, File:Cover of Drenoveni The Life and Demise of a Macedonian Village.jpg, File:Zhelevo Picnic 1924 medium Best.jpg
- File:Kosinets Bulgarian School 2а.jpg, File:Buf Banquet 1949.jpg
- These two will apparently require further investigation. Technically, we could publish the former under {{PD-old-assumed}}, but, alas, only after 2026.
- File:Makedono-Odrinsko Opulchenie Armensko, Lerinsko.jpg
- Mr. Koroloff, as the above OTRS procedure makes uploading more complex, I'm also thinking about an alternative to sending individual permissions for each file:
- you could send a message to the OTRS team ‘clearly stating’ that this Commons account is authorized to license the works (photos, documents, etc.) for which you're the copyright holder, or
- perhaps you could publish the images on some website, which would clearly state that they are released under a free (and compatible with Commons) license; this could even be Flickr, but it may as well be some site specifically dedicated to your ancestry; e.g. it can be a blog, like the Bulgarian Wikipedia's one (I'd also be glad to help if any assistance would be needed).
— Luchesar • T/C/U 10:03, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Summary
[edit]- File:Cover of Drenoveni The Life and Demise of a Macedonian Village.jpg
- File:Zhelevo Picnic 1924 medium Best.jpg
- File:Risto Buyankin better1а.jpg
- File:Dren Dono final larger.jpg
- Permission sent by email to OTRS for the above four. It also authorizes Drenowe (Mr. Koroloff's own account), Мико, Алиса Селезньова, and Iliev (yours truly) to release under the same license all photographs from Mr. Koroloff's book “
| Koroloff, Larry (2016) Drenòveni: The Life and Demise of a Macedonian Village, Pickering, ON: Britannia Printers, pp. 342 ISBN: 978-177-1363-92-1. |
The photographs published in the book come from the personal family photo archive of the author, Larry Koroloff / User:Drenowe. Most of the photos have been taken by members of his family or have otherwise had their rights arranged for publication in the book and the subsequent republication under a free license. Some of the photos are with unknown author, but are produced before 1903 and are covered by {{PD-old-assumed}}. See the author information and the copyright template for details about the specific image.
This source information has been transcluded from {{Koroloff-Drenoveni}}.”. They will be be marked with {{Koroloff-Drenoveni}} for source and {{Koroloff permission}} for permissions/license.
- File:Kosinets Bulgarian School 2а.jpg
- We discussed this photo with Mr. Koroloff. As explained earlier, Mr. Koroloff's great aunt—his paternal grandmother's younger sister—was a pupil at the school when the photo was taken. She couldn't have been older than 12 at the time (and has likely been even younger), which puts the date of the photo well before 1897, so it makes {{PD-old-assumed}} appropriate. If further information is found, we'll update to a more specific license template.
- File:Armensko Makedono-Odrinsko Opulchenie 1B.jpg
- File:Armensko Makedono-Odrinsko Opulchenie 1а.jpg
- File:Armensko Makedono-Odrinsko Opulchenie 1.jpg
- File:Makedono-Odrinsko Opulchenie Armensko, Lerinsko.jpg
- These are just different versions of the same photograph of a certificate, issued by Macedonian-Adrianopolitan Volunteer Corps (Q407408), a historical division of the Bulgarian Army. According to the Bulgarian law, the normative and individual acts (a certificate being such an individual act) of government bodies “shall not be considered objects of copyright”. I've only updated the information on the last file, which seems to have the best quality; the rest can be deleted as duplicates.
- File:Buf Banquet 1949.jpg
- Unfortunately, for this one currently there is no reliable information to confirm whether it can be released under a free license, so the best thing may indeed be to delete it.
— Luchesar • T/C/U 13:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also closed several OTRS tickets with false authorship claims. --Jcb (talk) 21:10, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Z zhelevo picnic.jpg
- File:ZBuf 1.jpg
- File:Bulgarian School, Kosinets, Kostur district, circa 1908.jpg
- File:Drenoveni men in Granite City, Ill. USA.jpg
- File:Risto Buyankin.jpg
- File:Dono Kirkov Доно Кирков.jpg
- File:Drenoveni.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- I see proper copyrights status specified in each photo - they are all from the family archive to which the uploader is the heir, author and date duly noted in the image details. What is this nonsense really about? I start to think very seriously of reopening discussion for local upload of images in BG Wikipedia because this is getting borderline absurd - someone is trying to contribute with invaluable images from personal family archive with clearly no violation of copyrights (I can't stress enough "inavluable images") and the response in Commons is mass deletion??--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 17:49, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko, I absolutely agree with you that the photos should've been much better annotated, especially in terms of their origins and possible copyright status. We must respect Commons and its requirements—there are very solid reasons to have them in place—and protecting the project should always be our top priority. There's no question about that.
- At the same time, I'd like to call for a well-balanced approach here.
- User:Drenowe is Larry Koroloff—a well respected researcher of the Aegean Macedonia, who possesses truly invaluable photos, many of which he has inherited from his father, Lazar Koroloff. Mr. Koroloff has published most of these photos in his book—the cover of which, by the way, here is also proposed for deletion. So, we're definitely not talking about a malevolent user, and quite certainly not talking about some random clueless person, who simply uploads photos they've found somewhere on the internet.
- While I agree that every reasonable effort should be made to prevent anybody's copyright from being infringed, let's also be realistic. We're talking about photos that had been taken at the end of XIX and the beginning of XX century. Those photos were in the personal archive of Mr. Koroloff's father. They were published in Mr. Koroloff's book, which, by the way, was very well-received by the scientific community and the general public interested in the topic. The latter also means that the book had drawn enough attention that if anybody felt their copyright infringed, it's very likely that they would've voiced it already.
- Let's, indeed, discuss this: how large do we think is the risk that copyright claims may be filed here and is that risk worth the value of the photos.
- My opinion is that, again, realistically speaking, the risk is likely rather low—I wouldn't say zero, but likely close to it—while the value of photos is, as Alisa also noted, extremely high. Let me emphasize this again: Mr. Koroloff's book has been lauded by the scientific community as a source of “unique ethnographic, linguistic, and historical information”, which “greatly enhances our understanding of the history, ethnology, and the language of the southwesternmost parts of Macedonia”.
- My proposal would be: let's work with Mr. Koroloff/User:Drenowe to properly tag all the photos. If necessary, Mr. Koroloff can again send a letter to OTRS with permission to use the photos, which may be particularly relevant to the cover of his book.
- Thanks,
— Luchesar • T/C/U 20:44, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Per COM:EVID, "In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader [...] to demonstrate that as far as can reasonably be determined: the file is in the public domain or is properly licensed" (underline added) and per COM:L descriptions should "contain information sufficient for others to verify the license status". None of this is on offer. The uploader's source of "Belonged to the late Lazar Koroloff" is 1) not verifiable to us and 2) meaningless as ownership of a physical photograph is entirely distinct from ownership of intellectual property rights. The subsequent and bizarre creation and addition of {{Koroloff-Drenoveni}} is utter nonsense; it is imprecise ("Most of the photos", "Some of the photos", etc.), speculative, and relates to a self-published book (!!!) that thereby suffers the infirmities of uploader's (author's) amply demonstrated failure to understand copyright (i.e., even if the book contains the purported statements, it would effectively be license laundering.) If the purported releases and permission to relicense exist, they can be provided to COM:OTRS. --Эlcobbola talk 21:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Does it fulfill f) daily news criteria? 182.239.87.215 17:02, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Why should it have to? This is Commons and the image has other potential uses. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:14, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per similar DR like Commons:Deletion requests/File:东方明珠塔亮起法兰西色向巴黎表达哀思.jpg. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - No policy-based reason for deletion given. Image has many potential uses, and is within the purpose of Commons. Beyond My Ken (talk) 15:55, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Question Which criteria of {{PD-SlovakGov}} does this meet? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: The image source says "© Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs of the Slovak Republic" and its conditions of use say "The content of the webpages may be reprinted or reproduced at other websites or elsewhere only with prior consent by the provider" which is an unacceptable condition. This is not a scope-based request ("This is Commons and the image has other potential uses" and "Image has many potential uses, and is within the purpose of Commons" are entirely unresponsive), but one of copyright. This photograph does not appear to meet any condition of {{PD-SlovakGov}} and, indeed, no one has answered that very question in over seven months. --Эlcobbola talk 21:46, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
_Size_Chart.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Size_Chart.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image made of a smorgasboard of silhoutettes derived from copyrighted images, including an image explicitly under a no derivative license https://collections.tepapa.govt.nz/object/713143 Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
_Size_Chart.png){kind=link}
The coastal moa image follows the rights statement of CC BY 4.0, which permits the usage for adaptation as defined as "remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially". The derived nature of the size chart should not outweigh the general improved accuracy and more consistent presentation. The image should not be deleted and should be used over the article's current moa size chart, as it includes more species and is generally more up-to-date. --2607:FEA8:2900:713:6856:4104:727:8FAB 19:12, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
_Size_Chart.png){kind=link}
- The licensing was changed after the deletion request was made, it clearly said NC at the time I made the post. As was noted at the discussion at Wikipedia:Wikipedia:WikiProject_Palaeontology/Paleoart_review/Archive_12#Moa_size_comparison many of the other source images remain copyrighted under incompatible licenses so the validity of the deletion request still holds. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:49, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: This is a derivative work of several underlying images, and thus appropriate reference and attribution needs to be provided for all underlying works (e.g., per COM:L, descriptions should "contain information sufficient for others to verify the license status") both to evidence a free license and to meet the terms thereof (i.e., the "by" in the (revised) "cc-by-4.0" license for the referenced image means attribution is required. This image attributes none of the authors of the underlying images and is thus in breach of even that license.). --Эlcobbola talk 22:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
_Size_Chart.png){kind=link}
bessere Version mit transparentem Hintergrund File:Signatur Johann Gottwerth Müller.PNG erstellt Hedwig Storch (talk) 18:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 22:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Juneteenth
[edit]According to ticket:2020070210008634 there was a copyright claim concerning Juneteenth flag, directed to a third party. If the flag design is over US ToU, then it is copyrighted. So I am starting a discussion on whether we can and/or should keep the flag image here.
- File:2020 AfroCROWD & Women in Red - Juneteenth at Wikipedia.pdf
- File:American Flags of Freedom.png
- File:Juneteenth Flag.svg
Ankry (talk) 09:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Juneteenth Flag is simple geometric shapes and the SVG can be created purely based on text description. That is, this is simple enough that copyright should not apply. --Nafsadh (talk) 09:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Nafsadh: , I agree with your statement. Can anyone with more knowledge about copyright law speak about this? Cheers! Nadzik (talk) 11:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- This would be a good place to start, regarding WP policy.[4] See also this current case.[5] -JasonAQuest (talk) 17:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- There is another very important argument to be made about flags representing communities. I don't know if there is any ruling about this. But, one can argue that, "all preexisting flags are in public domain thus far. In extension to that, any flag cannot be copyrighted." But this is something that may be resolved by copyright courts or something.
- One thing I also want to add is that, for copyright to be enforced, replication has to be exact replica. But my rendition is original because, the curve, the ratio of the flag and ratio of flag to star etc. all are my original thinking. Thus, this flag is my original work. I have released it to public domain. --Nafsadh (talk) 23:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- I think that last argument would fall under derivative work. Alanscottwalker (talk) 21:58, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- This would be a good place to start, regarding WP policy.[4] See also this current case.[5] -JasonAQuest (talk) 17:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Nafsadh: , I agree with your statement. Can anyone with more knowledge about copyright law speak about this? Cheers! Nadzik (talk) 11:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Juneteenth Flag is not copyrightable: simple shape. Ruthven (msg) 10:13, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not own work, source is the book Tout l'or de Byzance (p. 120) Veverve (talk) 11:44, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I've changed licensing and source information. I took the photo of the illustration in that book, that's why I consider it my own work. By any standard, it's an old-enough fresco to be in public domain, I don't see any reason why it would be deleted. Uriel1022 (talk) 22:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-old. Ruthven (msg) 10:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Weil diese Datei nur zur Beantwortung einer Recherche hochgeladen wurde Nina Eger (talk) 12:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This is a nice sample of Kurrent handwriting which is still in use, albeit not in article space (see here). Why should we delete it? This is within COM:SCOPE. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:07, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per AFBorchert. Ruthven (msg) 10:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination + out of SCOPE. Ruthven (msg) 10:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Another non-free image taken by Russians. See w:File:Atlantis Docked to Mir.jpg. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm confused, you seem to contradict yourself here versus the deletion discussion you linked (which seems to have been intended to defer hosting to Commons, than for copylaw reasons). Which of the following statements are true, and which support the hypothesis that this is a public-domain file versus the hypothesis that this is an image in copyright (presumably by the Federal Republic of Russia)? Arlo James Barnes 22:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- NASA's image gallery entry says credit goes to NASA.
- The NASA on The Commons listing says there are no known copyright restrictions.
- The archived version of the GRIN server confirms that these images are published by NASA, and are therefore not copyright protected, unless noted.
- The original
postingposting of the image on GRIN, archived does not have a copyright notice applied to the image. - A Wired article has an image credit of "Nikolai Budarin (Q641389), Russian Space Research Institute (Q1433237), NASA".
- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arlo Barnes (talk • contribs) 17:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed link to the original posting on GRIN. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:17, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per abovev. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Нет разрешения автора на свободную лицензию барельефа. Dogad75 (talk) 13:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- This monument was designed by Antonio Adamini, who died in 1846. [6] It is in Public domain. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 19:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep PD-old. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:01, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Фотографии дореволюционного обелиска сохранились. напр.1 напр. 2напр. 3, но по ним трудно судить о степени тождества старого и нового барельефа. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 20:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- The entire project of restoration of this monument was made strictly in accordance with the author's drawings, which were available to the restorers. See Фисенко Л. А. воссоздание главного монумента и восстановление могилы П. И. Багратиона на батарее Раевского в документах Музея-заповедника «Бородинское поле» (к 30-летию событий) // ОТЕЧЕСТВЕННАЯ ВОЙНА 1812 ГОДА. ИСТОЧНИКИ. ПАМЯТНИКИ. ПРОБЛЕМЫ. 2018. - C. 144-150: "В 1970-е годы в фондах ЦГИА Ленинграда были обнаружены подлинные авторские чертежи Главного монумента, которые легли в основу проекта его воссоздания. <...> В проекте воссоздания Главного монумента и надгробия Багратиона (март 1984 г.) говорится, что архивные документы дали достаточный материал по рассматриваемым объектам, нет никаких осложнений в поиске внешних форм и точных размеров монумента и надгробия" ~ Чръный человек (talk) 17:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. ✗plicit 01:36, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Another contributor nominated this image for speedy deletion [7], because there is an image of Mickey Mouse on the Ferris Wheel. That image uses up about 2 percent of the image's real estate. So de minimis applies. The instructions for challenging the speedy deletion call on me to initiate a full deletion discussion - even though I do not think the image should be deleted. Geo Swan (talk) 15:25, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ferris_Wheel_(6935940944).jpg&diff=431022792&oldid=417992877){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete The Mickey Mouse face is a copyright image. It is not de minimis because the photo is about the Ferris Wheel, not the surroundings. De minimis would be where the copyright work was a peripheral and unimportant part of the overall photo. If the face was cropped out, it would draw attention to it, showing it was not minimal. This photo fits into example 7 of the guidelines. FredWalsh (talk) 15:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- FredWalsh, I checked the wording of example 7, "Copyrighted work X is the central part of the subject (e.g. it is the reason for taking the photo). Removing it would make the derivative work useless."
- I am extremely puzzled as to why you think it applies. What makes you think the stylized picture of Mickey Mouse was, to quote from the example, "the reason for taking the photo"?
- Surely, if it were the reason for taking the photo the photographer would have zoomed in, so it took up a much larger amount of the photo's real estate? Why don't you think this falls under the allowable classes of example 1, or 2, or 3?
- I didn't even notice Mickey, when I uploaded it, which I suggests erodes your claim Mickey was central.
- I left the following comment on the image's flickr page. Geo Swan (talk) 02:35, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- I uploaded this fine image you released under a CC license, to the wikipedia's sibling site, for images. Thanks! https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ferris_Wheel_(6935940944).jpg
- Another contributor is arguing I should not have done so, because the picture of Mickey Mouse is under its own copyright.
- The fellow contributor who is challenging the image claims that you took the photo because of the image of Mickey Mouse, not because you thought the Ferris Wheel was an interesting subject for a photo, in and of itself.
- Can you confirm or refute this for us? Your intent was to capture the ferris wheel, not the image of Mickey, correct?
- Thanks!
.jpg){kind=link}
- Since you have put so many questions, I have quoted them below:
| “ | I am extremely puzzled as to why you think it applies. What makes you think the stylized picture of Mickey Mouse was, to quote from the example, "the reason for taking the photo"? | ” |
- Example 7 applies because Mickey's face is in the center of the Ferris wheel. Not nearby or peripheral, but central. The reason for taking the photo would appear to be that it is a Ferris wheel with a well known Disney characters face. I’ve been to plenty of fairgrounds and have not seen such a Ferris wheel before.
| “ | Surely, if it were the reason for taking the photo the photographer would have zoomed in, so it took up a much larger amount of the photo's real estate? Why don't you think this falls under the allowable classes of example 1, or 2, or 3? | ” |
- There is nothing to suggest the photographer did not take photos zooming in on the face. If you look at their Flickr stream, there are photos that are less focussed on the Ferris wheel e.g. this one, which would be de minimis because Mickey is a smaller part of the photo than the one in question here.
- The photo does not fit example 1 because it says "Copyrighted work X is visible, but not identifiable." Mickey is very much identifiable and is not obscured by anything in the way.
- The photo does not fit example 2 because it says "Copyrighted work X is identifiable, but is an unwanted intrusion to the image subject which unfortunately cannot easily be removed." In the example photo, there is an immovable billboard which intrudes into the photo. In the photo in question here, the face of Mickey is an integral part of the Ferris wheel and is not an unwanted intrusion.
- The photo does not fit example 3 because it says "Copyrighted work X is identifiable, but is a small part of a larger work, so that the larger work cannot easily be shown without showing X. X is a part of the larger work, and its inclusion is unavoidable." The face of Mickey is not a small part of the larger work (the wheel); it is a significant part of it. Take the Louvre pyramid example from the guidelines. If you removed the sky and the foreground, the pyramid is still a small and less noticeable part of the Louvre building as a whole. In contrast Mickey is beaming out of the wheel and cannot be missed.
- I’m not sure how you can assert you didn’t notice Mickey - it is pretty much the focus of the photo. I noticed Mickey whilst browsing the category. I’d say it is pretty obvious.
- I’m not at all happy with the wording used to ask the photographer because you begin by praising the work and finish on a leading question i.e. "Your intent was to capture the ferris wheel, not the image of Mickey, correct?" It would have been better to ask them a simple, neutral question like "what motivated you to take this photo?" If they then said "the Ferris wheel but not Mickey" that would have refuted my assertion. FredWalsh (talk) 16:49, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- You acknowledge that example 3 says when "Copyrighted work X is identifiable, but is a small part of a larger work, so that the larger work cannot easily be shown without showing X. X is a part of the larger work, and its inclusion is unavoidable". Mickey, once you recognize he is there, is very clearly part of the larger work of the ferris wheel itself.
- You write "I’m not sure how you can assert you didn’t notice Mickey." I can assert this as I always tell the truth, following the advice of the famous wise man who said if you know you always tell the truth you never have the problem of keeping track of your lies. I think I need to warn you, if you made this comment to someone with less ability to assume good faith, you would face the problem of having someone think you were calling them a liar.
You write: "...it is pretty much the focus of the photo." No. The round outer ring of the Ferris wheel, and passenger cabs, hanging from it, is the prominent feature of the photo. Mickey takes up a tiny portion of the photo's real estate, and the contrast on the mickey portion of the image are low.
- I'm sorry you don't like my note to Genevieve, the flickr contributor, who graciously releases her images under a free license. You do realize that only a small fraction of flickr contributors do this? I always thank flickr contributors, because I want to encourage them to keep uploading their images under free licenses. There is absolutely nothing sneaky about me thanking her. You realize we have uploaded well over 2,000 images from her flickrstream?
If you don't like my note I have a perfect solution for you. Supplement it with a note of your own. If you do leave your own note, please bear in mind you are basically accusing her of being a copyright violator. Geo Swan (talk) 15:48, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, per FredWalsh. Taivo (talk) 17:08, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}