Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/06/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Like all of this user's uploads, not their own work; taken from this copyrighted work https://djosephconstruction.com/projects/five-below/ Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 00:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Like all of this user's uploads, not their own work; watermarked and copyrighted image. Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 00:01, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Like all of this user's uploads, not their own work; watermarked and copyrighted Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 00:01, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Like all of this user's uploads, not their own work; taken from here: https://foursquare.com/v/bed-bath--beyond/4bc34650abf49521137ec393 Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 00:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:03, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Whoa! Now that is a nice ass! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:2D86:493A:2F16:7D5B:2F2C 06:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy kept, anon inappropriate comment, not a reason for deletion. (Image is currently in use in multiple projects) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:46, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Hot as fuck! Is she on Tindr?! 😁 2A04:4A43:4CFF:2D86:493A:2F16:7D5B:2F2C 06:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy kept, anon inappropriate comment, not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Holy moly! Look at those melons! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:2D86:493A:2F16:7D5B:2F2C 06:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy kept, anon inappropriate comment, not a reason for deletion. (Image is currently in use) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
--- blanked content --- 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702 13:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
This way beyatch! My cock awaits your mouth! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:2D86:493A:2F16:7D5B:2F2C 06:26, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy kept, anon inappropriate comment, not a reason for deletion. (Image is currently in use) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:41, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Unable to verify copyright ownership of image; image does not appear to exist on Flickr, neither on Funk Dooby's Flickr page, nor at the address given by the Flickr upload bot. Nothing specific suggesting uploader has permission for this image. Suspected unlikely uploader has permission for usage. DeNoel (talk) 07:37, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Keep - The point of the flickr licence check is that it was valid at the time of upload. That the source has deleted is not entirely unsurprising - it was uploaded six years ago. Tineye has one match, but from three years after upload here. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:56, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept the photo is still on Flickr, still under the free license. The "safety" status is set to "restricted" (for nudity; see for Flickr policy), so it may not be visible to non-Flickr users depending on browser settings. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:54, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
This bitch is not real, is she? Worth a boner though! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:2D86:493A:2F16:7D5B:2F2C 06:27, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy kept, anon troll nomination -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:41, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Fixpol (talk) 13:28, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep immediately. Fixpol seems unaware that Commons is not censored and can also illustrate adult topics such as sexuality or eroticism. So the deletion requests s/he launched are probably all invalid and abusive. See Commons:Project scope (and particularly COM:CENSORSHIP) and Commons:Sexual content. Also note that s/he should have launch a mass DR instead of a separate DR for each file. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Per TwoWings. Green Giant (talk) 14:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Porn! I love it. Wikipedia is da best place for free porno! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:2D86:493A:2F16:7D5B:2F2C 06:28, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy kept, anon inappropriate comment, not a reason for deletion. (Image is currently in use) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:39, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Hands in hair, ready to give you a blowjob! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:2D86:493A:2F16:7D5B:2F2C 06:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy kept, anon inappropriate comment, not a reason for deletion. (Image is currently in use in 3 Wikimedia projects.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
--- blanked content --- 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702 13:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:50, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kinky porny baby! Fuck yeah! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:2D86:493A:2F16:7D5B:2F2C 06:30, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy kept, anon inappropriate comment, not a reason for deletion. (Image is currently in use in more than a dozen Wikimedia projects.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
My image Delete now please भगवान्, (talk) 04:43, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- We cannot delete an image while it is being used, sorry. --E4024 (talk) 04:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
But I don't want to use the image I uploaded nowभगवान्, (talk) 04:53, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request, not in use. --Achim (talk) 10:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
H Gabyyrodriguez20 (talk) 06:49, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 10:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
it was a test image Ramuknarik (talk) 08:49, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 10:56, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
non-free image by J.R.R. Tolkien Ælfgar (talk) 12:50, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as rather clear copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 15:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: CSD F10 (personal photos of or by non-contributors)
Uploader challenged speedy deletion at Commons:Undeletion requests. Opening discussion so that uploader can voice their opinion in the proper venue. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:56, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope and possible copyvio as the file has no EXIF info Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per Gbawden and doubtful "own work" status, uploader Salimoff999 is a spammer intent on using WMF projects to promote himself. Please see the discussions already in progress at COM:ANV#Salimoff999 and m:srg#Global lock for Salimoff999. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - image previously published here where it is credited to Alyar Ramazanov, who is, of course, not the uploader (Salimoff999). --Эlcobbola talk 19:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Ho caricato erroneamente un'immagine non di mia proprietà, coperta da copyright Maybealeo93 (talk) 16:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7, as filed by uploader on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 17:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Blonde slut on holiday. Cum and fuck her now! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C 16:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- speedy Keep IP´s and this kind of images are almost connected with either moralistic crusaders or vandals. In this case this is a vandal and no reason as been given to delete this image. Tm (talk) 17:08, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:15, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Blonde bimbo ready to be fucked raw! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:18BD:E1DF:69F1:61D1:B431 16:11, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Ongoing vandalism by a twit from the UK. --Achim (talk) 16:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Blonde slut on holiday. Cum and fuck her now before those motherfuckers do! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C 16:52, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- speedy Keep IP´s and this kind of images are almost connected with either moralistic crusaders or vandals. In this case this is a vandal and no reason as been given to delete this image. Tm (talk) 17:08, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:17, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Blonde bimbo ready to be fucked raw! Touting for business is the little whore! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:18BD:E1DF:69F1:61D1:B431 16:11, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Ongoing vandalism by a twit from the UK. --Achim (talk) 16:48, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Blonde slut on holiday. Cum and fuck her now! Let’s wiiiiiide open! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C 16:53, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- speedy Keep IP´s and this kind of images are almost connected with either moralistic crusaders or vandals. In this case this is a vandal and no reason as been given to delete this image. Tm (talk) 17:08, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Blonde bimbo ready to be fucked raw! @Tm and Achim55: Wassup bitches! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:18BD:E1DF:69F1:61D1:B431 16:11, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: 2A04:4A43:4CFF:18BD:E1DF:69F1:61D1:B431. --Achim (talk) 16:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Blonde slit slut offering her horny body to tourists! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C 16:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- speedy Keep IP´s and this kind of images are almost connected with either moralistic crusaders or vandals. In this case this is a vandal and no reason as been given to delete this image. Tm (talk) 17:08, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Naked blonde bimbo with tight ass and titties, ready to be fucked raw! @Tm and Achim55: Wassup bitches! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:18BD:E1DF:69F1:61D1:B431 16:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Ongoing vandalism by a twit from the UK. --Achim (talk) 16:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Educated blonde slut for sale! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C 16:55, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oh and she is available under a Share-Me license! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C (talk) 16:57, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- speedy Keep IP´s and this kind of images are almost connected with either moralistic crusaders or vandals. In this case this is a vandal and no reason as been given to delete this image. The kind of misogynist and "slut shamming" is even more disgusting. Tm (talk) 17:09, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Naked blonde bimbo with tight ass and titties, ready to be fucked raw! @Tm and Achim55: Wassup bitches! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:18BD:E1DF:69F1:61D1:B431 16:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Ongoing vandalism by a twit from the UK. --Achim (talk) 16:41, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Com:Nudity Elisfkc (talk) 22:56, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not really sure what Wikimedia Commons guidelines are about nude photography anymore. I really thought all the image files listed by User Elisfkc for possible deletion met all Wiki guidelines. I don't think any of them are offensive; I certainly did not intend them to be. I think the human body is a beautiful thing, and all my uploads are good quality photographs. Whether they are of "educational" value needs to be determined by someone more qualified than me. For clarification I request a review by one or more administrators of all my uploads listed by User Elisfkc for deletion. User:M.Aurelius (talk) Keep
- See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by M.Aurelius for the other photos I nominated. Elisfkc (talk) 23:51, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:21, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Blonde slut finds customers! Not quite Debbie Does Dallas but hey! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C 16:56, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Naked blonde bimbo with tight ass and titties, ready to be fucked raw! @Tm and Achim55: Wassup bitches! Check out Tm, pretending he didn’t see the whore! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:18BD:E1DF:69F1:61D1:B431 16:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Ongoing vandalism by a twit from the UK. --Achim (talk) 16:40, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
This is pornography. What educational purpose does it have? The Cleaner (talk) 18:21, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Could you please refraining from nominating more images until you get a result on the ones you've opened so far? Then you can see what the community thinks about it, and act accordingly. There no point in opening dozens of similar requests, when the result is likely to be identical for all of them. –Tryphon☂ 18:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Invalid reason as Commons is not censored. Tabercil (talk) 03:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep As Tryphon and Tabercil. Jacopo Werther (talk) 07:59, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Not pornographic (using european standards), image of a porn actress who, by definition of her job, tends to be a lot naked (so it has intrinsic educational value), and most importantly image was provided with OTRS clearance, so there is not a personality rights (as far i see). Tm (talk) 03:48, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Close as Kept per above; malformed inappropriate nomination. --Infrogmation (talk) 04:02, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
That’s not cream! It’s cum! Yummy! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C 16:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Cum-covered Naked blonde bimbo with tight ass and titties, ready to be fucked raw! @Tm and Achim55: Wassup bitches! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:18BD:E1DF:69F1:61D1:B431 16:13, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Ongoing vandalism by a twit from the UK. --Achim (talk) 16:34, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Nope! Looking at your tits! Fugly butch! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C 16:59, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- speedy Keep IP´s and this kind of images are almost connected with either moralistic crusaders or vandals. In this case this is a vandal and no reason as been given to delete this image. The kind of misogynist and "slut shamming" is even more disgusting. Tm (talk) 17:10, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Says a porn baron! Your momma is sooooo proud of you Timmy. At least that’s what I think she said in between sucking my huge cock! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C 17:27, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Unable to verify copyright ownership of image; image does not appear to exist on Flickr, neither on Funk Dooby's Flickr page, nor at the address given by the Flickr upload bot. Nothing specific suggesting uploader has permission for this image. Suspected unlikely uploader has permission for usage. DeNoel (talk) 07:34, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - The point of the flickr licence check is that it was valid at the time of upload. That the source has deleted is not entirely unsurprising - it was uploaded six years ago. Tineye has no matches. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:55, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- @DeNoel: Valid licence review tag, verified by examining the file history + see mattbuck’s comment. Brianjd (talk) 14:50, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep License reviewed, so license was reviewed. And albeit this user has voted to keep one image of this kind, other comments on similar deletion requests make me wonder what are his possible real reasons to want to have this deletion request as he had in previous, as can be seen in his comment "It does not serve a scientific/social purpose and the reason for its upload is unknown. I suspect this image is in the Wikimedia Commons for titillation alone". Tm (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Tm: Probably voted keep because that file was (and is) in use. Brianjd (talk) 05:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Precisely my point; the file being referring to, I voted to keep, because it was being used legitimately (as visual information regarding the article). The file here that I'm voting to delete, File:Are you looking at my necklace.jpg, is not being used at all, and was likely trawled for the sake of porn (utilizing Commons as a storage depot without purpose). While I would apply that argument File:Silicone Butt Plug.jpg, the fact that image is being used legitimately rather than needlessly occupying storage space, means I have no grounds to nominate it for deletion. DeNoel (talk) 01:55, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- @DeNoel: All you know is that it is not being used on any wiki run by the Wikimedia Foundation. But any wiki running the same software has built-in support for Commons, and Commons files may be used in other places too. Brianjd (talk) 04:32, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Precisely my point; the file being referring to, I voted to keep, because it was being used legitimately (as visual information regarding the article). The file here that I'm voting to delete, File:Are you looking at my necklace.jpg, is not being used at all, and was likely trawled for the sake of porn (utilizing Commons as a storage depot without purpose). While I would apply that argument File:Silicone Butt Plug.jpg, the fact that image is being used legitimately rather than needlessly occupying storage space, means I have no grounds to nominate it for deletion. DeNoel (talk) 01:55, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Tm: Probably voted keep because that file was (and is) in use. Brianjd (talk) 05:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I had presented to DR a few "naked bike riding" images several years ago -when I was rather newer here- and had faced absurd accusations. The event itself may be in scope. OK. We keep enough number of pictures of it, including all those used here or there, and if there is a DR on an unused (and IMHO unnecessary, like this one) image we may vote "delete" without fear of being lynched by the nudism lobby. In the end this is not a hostile place; just to the opposite, a civilized platform. Then why do I feel not comfortable to use the bold letters for delete? Do as you wish. I just wanted to "make a point" (wow, how bad I am :) to make others understand that asking the deletion of a somewhat stupid image is not opening a crusade on anything. It really is not. Thanks. No questions please. E4024 (talk) 02:23, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- There is a point that you see arguments to delete images not being in use only in nudity related images and almost never in other images. Why this double standard exists? If there are hundreds of deletion requests of nudity with the argument that they are not in use, when there are not that many images, when will exist hundreds or thousands deletion requests of the millions of images of airplanes, trains, cats or other kind of imagery? Tm (talk) 03:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- @E4024 and Tm: Actually, there are a lot of files nominated for deletion as “personal photos of non-contributors”, and I’m sure most of them (at least the ones I have seen) don’t show nudity. So I don’t think there is a double standard, as far as images of people are concerned. But for other kinds of images, yes, there is a double standard. We should spend less time arguing about scope and more time dealing with things that matter here. Brianjd (talk) 04:31, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- There is a point that you see arguments to delete images not being in use only in nudity related images and almost never in other images. Why this double standard exists? If there are hundreds of deletion requests of nudity with the argument that they are not in use, when there are not that many images, when will exist hundreds or thousands deletion requests of the millions of images of airplanes, trains, cats or other kind of imagery? Tm (talk) 03:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per previous comments. Tempted to close this, but I think we should let it run a few more days since @DeNoel wanted it deleted for scope reasons. Brianjd (talk) 15:08, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Image is in scope as one of over 200 in Category:World Naked Bike Ride, Brighton (2014) depicting that particular event (see also en:World Naked Bike Ride). The flickr license was checked in 2014; as mattbuck says, that's exactly why we have that process - so that we have proof that a file was available under a free license at the source when it no longer exists there. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:58, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Blonde slut gets a brother hard! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C 17:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- speedy Keep IP´s and this kind of images are almost connected with either moralistic crusaders or vandals. In this case this is a vandal and no reason as been given to delete this image. The kind of misogynist and "slut shamming" is even more disgusting. Tm (talk) 17:11, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Naked blonde bimbo with tight ass and titties, ready to be fucked raw! @Tm and Achim55: Wassup bitches! Check out that Nigga about to get some milk! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:18BD:E1DF:69F1:61D1:B431 16:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Ongoing vandalism by a twit from the UK. --Achim (talk) 16:37, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Beautiful? Fugly more like! She got a nice pussy though! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C 17:01, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- speedy Keep IP´s and this kind of images are almost connected with either moralistic crusaders or vandals. In this case this is a vandal and no reason as been given to delete this image. The kind of misogynist and "slut shamming" is even more disgusting. Tm (talk) 17:11, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Nothing specific suggesting uploader has permission for this image (property of Holger Wirth). Google Images search shows this image on several sex sites. The Flickr account as source for this image has been closed. DeNoel (talk) 06:40, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - The point of the flickr licence check is that it was valid at the time of upload (and the user is Holger-Wirth). That the source has deleted is not entirely unsurprising - it was uploaded six years ago. Tineye has matches but from several years after it was uploaded here. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- @DeNoel: There is something specific: the licence review tag near the bottom. That just leaves the question of whether the Flickr user had permission, which has been addressed by mattbuck. Did any of your Google Images results have evidence that they were before the Commons upload? Brianjd (talk) 14:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep License reviewed, so license was reviewed. And albeit this user has voted to keep one image of this kind, other comments on similar deletion requests make me wonder what are his possible real reasons to want to have this deletion request as he had in previous, as can be seen in his comment "It does not serve a scientific/social purpose and the reason for its upload is unknown. I suspect this image is in the Wikimedia Commons for titillation alone". Tm (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Tm: Probably voted keep because that file was (and is) in use. Brianjd (talk) 05:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Upon reading this reply, I checked, and at this moment, this file is not being used anywhere. The in use displayed is merely a redirect page—a link that loops back on itself. Whatever the decision of the file, that unnecessary redirect should be deleted. DeNoel (talk) 02:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- @DeNoel: Feel free to nominate the redirect for deletion. However, this nomination is for File:Beautiful nude woman.jpg. Do we have any reason to delete this file? Brianjd (talk) 04:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Brianjd (talk) 15:20, 24 June 2020 (UTC) (non-admin close)
The fuck is that?!! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C 17:03, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- speedy Keep IP´s and this kind of images are almost connected with either moralistic crusaders or vandals. In this case this is a vandal and no reason as been given to delete this image. The kind of misogynist and "slut shamming" is even more disgusting. Tm (talk) 17:11, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kinky porny porny, Donald likely like! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C 17:04, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- speedy Keep IP´s and this kind of images are almost connected with either moralistic crusaders or vandals. In this case this is a vandal and no reason as been given to delete this image. The kind of misogynist and "slut shamming" is even more disgusting. Tm (talk) 17:11, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Fixpol (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep immediately. Fixpol seems unaware that Commons is not censored and can also illustrate adult topics such as sexuality or eroticism. So the deletion requests s/he launched are probably all invalid and abusive. See Commons:Project scope (and particularly COM:CENSORSHIP) and Commons:Sexual content. Also note that s/he should have launch a mass DR instead of a separate DR for each file. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:17, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Per TwoWings. Green Giant (talk) 14:49, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
This is pornography!!!! Where can I buy the video, bitches?!?! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C 17:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- speedy Keep IP´s and this kind of images are almost connected with either moralistic crusaders or vandals. In this case this is a vandal and no reason as been given to delete this image. The kind of misogynist and "slut shamming" is even more disgusting. Tm (talk) 17:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:26, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Fixpol (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep immediately. Fixpol seems unaware that Commons is not censored and can also illustrate adult topics such as sexuality or eroticism. So the deletion requests s/he launched are probably all invalid and abusive. See Commons:Project scope (and particularly COM:CENSORSHIP) and Commons:Sexual content. Also note that s/he should have launch a mass DR instead of a separate DR for each file. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Per TwoWings. Green Giant (talk) 14:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
inappropriate content Saadbl (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep immediately. Abuse of DR. See previous attempt. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep For the reasons stated in this and all other previous DR. Deletion requester is a new user that seems to be on a morale crusade. Tm (talk) 16:25, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: censorship or not is not the issue here. This file is not useful for education purposes --> out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 00:41, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
This is pornography!!!! Where can I buy the video, bitches?!?! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:B108:30C:1688:810C 17:06, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- speedy Keep IP´s and this kind of images are almost connected with either moralistic crusaders or vandals. In this case this is a vandal and no reason as been given to delete this image. The kind of misogynist and "slut shamming" is even more disgusting. Tm (talk) 17:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:28, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Low res, no camera EXIF, uploaded by LTA sock all of whose uploads have been copyvios of this person. COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 19:14, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Missed this pre-existing speedy nomination citing same and Facebook EXIF. --Эlcobbola talk 20:04, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused text document of unclear notability. Out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 08:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
First of all, This image contains me and uploaded to this site without my permission and knowledge. I also have copyright claim on this image as it was taken on my device and is my property. Secondly, It's image of personal nature and wikimedia is not Instagram or Facebook where anyone can post personal photography. So, It is requested to administrator to kindly delete this image as soon as possible. Thanks 37.111.137.89 08:46, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, as it seems to be out of scope anyway. --Túrelio (talk) 11:50, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Comment
- Privacy: Not valid, since request made by IP.
- Copyright: Probably not valid, since image clearly not taken by the nominator and it doesn’t matter that it was taken on the nominator’s device.
- Scope: Added Category:Bishandot based on the uploader’s other uploads and this file’s name.
- If it’s decided that any of the above concerns are valid, then we should probably discuss the uploader’s other uploads too. Brianjd (talk) 15:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Actually, one of them has been nominated already. There are more details comments there, also from IP addresses. Brianjd (talk) 15:37, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Sorry from me for the inconvenience caused by me. Today I was personally contacted by the person who requested the deletion process through ip address. I admit that I used some photos on which he has legal claim and copyright claim, without his permission and he has the right to ask for its deletion. Again Sorry.Raja Atizaz Ahmed Kiyani (talk) 19:50, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedoed after uploader admitted upload without permission. --Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
This image is taken by me on my own device and I have copyright claim on it. Also, this media contains picture of my home which is not something I would like to share on wikimedia or wikipedia as it is of personal nature. Again, wikimedia is not Facebook or Instagram where photos of personal nature could be posted. So, It is requested to relevant authorities to delete this image. Thanks 37.111.134.151 08:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- I was notified of this discussion, but my involvement with the image was merely to crop it for a better proportion. The image is in use on Wikipedia in w:Bishandot in a perfectly appropriate way. I don't see how the image is of a personal nature just because it happens to include your house. No people are visible in the image.
- The image was uploaded by w:User:Raja Atizaz Ahmed Kiyani. If you are claiming to be that user, then you need to make the request from that account so we know it is you. The account is blocked on English Wikipedia, but it is not blocked here on Commons. If you are claiming that you are not that person and the image wsa uploaded in breach of your copyright, then you must have posted it elsewhere first for that to happen. Please indicate where it was copied from. SpinningSpark 10:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- This image is showing my house, my car and the cloths hung there. All of them are my personal property and I have every right to decide to make it public or not. This image is in violation of my privacy. I am also not the person you are referring and this image is undoubtedly taken by me and as far as it's usage is concerned, I posted it on my private Instagram account few years ago. So, if you are the relevant authority or can help me somehow, then your help will be highly appreciated. Thanks 37.111.137.99 16:28, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bishandot.jpg, where another IP claims to be the subject as well as the copyright owner. This seems unlikely and, as both files were uploaded by the same user with similar metadata, throws into question any arguments made here. Brianjd (talk) 15:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I uploaded some images two years ago without the permission of its real owner but today I was contacted by its copyright owner asking me to delete them. He already requested its deletion process. So, there has been nothing left for me except to admit that he owns the image and I misused it without his permission.Raja Atizaz Ahmed Kiyani (talk) 20:15, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied after uploader admitted upload without permission. --Túrelio (talk) 20:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE (en:Wilberforce Yaguma). Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:57, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio from https://www.parliament.go.ug/mp_database/uploads/Yaguma%20Wilberforce.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Empty, my typo. Jirka Dl (talk) 09:57, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 00:55, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Kategorie ist Doppel von Category:Gare de Niversac.
Die Erstellung war mein persönliche Fehler. Sorry --Les Meloures (talk) 13:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 00:57, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
I'm the original uploader and this photo was copyrighted and I couldn't change it. So I'll reupload with correct information. ThisWasOssain (talk) 12:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 00:40, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vikram faltankar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:42, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:20, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abou Bakr khalefa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos for non-wikipedian - out of scope
- File:حسين ابو خليفه.jpg
- File:ابو محمد.jpg
- File:ابو حسين.jpg
- File:حسين خليفه.jpg
- File:انجي .jpg
- File:علاء بهيج.jpg
- File:المهندس علاء بهيج .jpg
- File:احمد وانجي .jpg
- File:المهندس.jpg
- File:عيسي.jpg
- File:محمد بكر.jpg
- File:ال خليفه.jpg
- File:بكر.jpg
- File:المرحوم.jpg
- File:ابوبكر الخليفه.jpg
- File:الراحل ابوبكر حسين.jpg
- File:المرحوم ابوبكر وابنه.jpg
- File:ابوبكر خليفه.jpg
--Alaa :)..! 11:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:27, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abou Bakr khalefa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos for non-wikipedian - out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 10:43, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:29, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination or copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE (ru:Шамгунов, Ильдар Габдрахманович)
- File:Шамгунов Ильдар Габдрахманович9.jpg
- File:Шамгунов Ильдар Габдрахманович8.jpg
- File:Шамгунов Ильдар Габдрахманович7.jpg
- File:Шамгунов Ильдар Габдархманович6.jpg
- File:Шамгунов Ильдар Габдрахманович5.jpg
- File:Шамгунов Ильдар Габдрахманович3.jpg
- File:Шамгунов Ильдар Габдрахманович4.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Unknown person receiving awards, OoS, no educational use
- File:Խաչիկ Խաչատրյան և Կիրսան Իլյումժինով.jpg
- File:Խաչիկ Խաչատրյան.jpg
- File:Khachik Khachatryan, Mesrop Khachatryan.jpg
- File:Khachik Khachatryan and Mesrop Khachatryan at the National Quality Award 2016.jpg
- File:Khachik Khachatryan and Mesrop Khachatryan.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:26, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tacgiatranhuyhoang (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from book cover.
- File:Lang nhin cuoc song.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách84.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách83.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách82.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách81.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách80.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách79.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách76.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách77.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách78.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách75.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách74.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách73.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách72.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách71.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách70.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách69.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách68.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách67.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách66.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách65.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách64.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách63.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách62.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách60.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách61.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách59.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách56.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách57.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách58.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách55.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách54.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách52.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách53.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách51.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách48.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách49.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách50.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách47.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách44.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách46.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách45.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách43.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách41.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách40.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách42.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách39.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách38.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách37.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả trần huy hoàng -sách36.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách34.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách35.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách31.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách29.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách23.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách19.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách24.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách18.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách17.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách16.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách15.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách12.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách10.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách09.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách07.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách06.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách04.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách03.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách01.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách33.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - sách08.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống - tác giả Trần Huy Hoàng - đaklak.jpg
- File:Sách nếu chỉ còn một ngày để sống.jpg
- File:Nếu chỉ còn 1 ngày để sống.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:06, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by المتصفح عماد أگناض (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.
- File:صورتي الشخصية التي إلتقطتها عندما كنت أدرس بالخامس إبتدائي.jpg
- File:المدينة التي أسكن فيها و قضيت فيها معظم أوقاتي هي آيت أورير المغرب.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by المتصفح عماد أگناض (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:عماد أگناض في حلة جديدة معكم . 08.jpg
- File:عماد أگناض في حلة جديدة معكم . 09.jpg
- File:عماد أگناض في حلة جديدة معكم . 07.jpg
- File:عماد أگناض في حلة جديدة معكم . 06.jpg
- File:عماد أگناض في حلة جديدة معكم . 05.jpg
- File:عماد أگناض في حلة جديدة معكم . 04.jpg
- File:عماد أگناض في حلة جديدة معكم . 01.jpg
- File:عماد أگناض في حلة جديدة معكم . 02.jpg
- File:عماد أگناض في حلة جديدة معكم . 03.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Historical newspapers. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Ведомости Санкт-Петербургской Городской Полиции, 1849-12-24.pdf
- File:Ведомости Санкт-Петербургской Городской Полиции 1849-12-24 1.jpg
- File:Календарь. Россия, 1710 г..jpg
- File:Похищение Прозерпины, 1795 г..tif
- File:Каразея.jpg
- File:«Биржевые ведомости», 28 апреля (10 мая) 1862 г..tif
- File:Воронежские губернские ведомости 1839-01-28 № 4.jpg
- File:Словарь Академии Российской, 1794.jpg
- File:Сенатские ведомости, 28 авг. 1851.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marcellofran (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused media about fictional state of questionable notability.
- File:Feira organica olambuco.jpg
- File:1ª Feira Nacional de Olambuco.jpg
- File:Vista aérea de Olambuco.jpg
- File:Mapa geográfico Olambuco.jpg
- File:Bandeira Olambuco.jpg
- File:Hino de Olambuco.opus
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:09, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Márcio Fecher (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:O menestrel estreia.jpg
- File:O menestrel.jpg
- File:Severino da gota serena.jpg
- File:ASSIM ME CONTARAM, ASSIM VOU CONTANDO- RJ-2012.jpg
- File:Assim Me Contaram, Assim Vou Contando Cartaz.jpg
- File:ASSIM ME CONTARAM, ASSIM VOU CONTANDO - FOTO Bruna Pernambucana Fotografia. 41.jpg
- File:Severino da gota serena com a Banda Los NEgrones.jpg
- File:Bacurau em cannes kleber mendonça filho.jpg
- File:Bacurau em cannes rubens santos.jpg
- File:Bacurau em cannes vania catani.jpg
- File:Bacurau em cannes juliano dornelles.jpg
- File:Bacurau em cannes rubens e thomas.jpg
- File:H(EU)stória - O TEMPO EM TRANSE- Temporada Arraial-003.jpg
- File:Divulgação o menestrel.jpg
- File:H(EU)stória - O TEMPO EM TRANSE- Ensaio aberto 001.jpg
- File:Bacurau em cannes.jpg
- File:Preparação supermax sem pelos.jpg
- File:Preparação supermax.jpg
- File:Baal em supermax.jpg
- File:Trilogia.jpg
- File:Marcio baal supermax.jpg
- File:Márcio Fecher foto Márcio Antônio no camping dos artistas.jpg
- File:Márcio Fecher foto Márcio Antônio em aldeia.jpg
- File:Márcio Fecher foto Márcio Antônio em aldeia 01.jpg
- File:Márcio Fecher foto Márcio Antônio.jpg
- File:Márcio Fecher foto Maiara Miranda10.jpg
- File:Márcio Fecher foto Maiara Miranda09.jpg
- File:Preparação para supermax.jpg
- File:Márcio Fecher - foto de Hannah Alburqueque 01.jpg
- File:H(eu)stória - o tempo em transe.jpg
- File:Supermax-nonato.jpg
- File:Marcio supermax Baal.jpg
- File:SUPERMAX - BAAL 02.jpg
- File:Márcio foto Caio Tiburtino 3.jpg
- File:Márcio Fecher - foto de Maiara Miranda.jpg
- File:Márcio Fecher - foto de Maiara Miranda 8.jpg
- File:Márcio Fecher – Foto de Caio Tiburtino baixa resolução 01.jpg
- File:Márcio Fecher - foto de Maiara Miranda 3.jpg
- File:Márcio Fecher - Foto Caio Tiburtino04.jpg
- File:Márcio Fecher - Foto Caio Tiburtino 06.jpg
- File:Márcio Fecher - Foto Caio Tiburtino 05.jpg
- File:Márcio Fecher - Foto Caio Tiburtino 02.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Itandeyu.jpg
- File:Artistas en el Mundo.jpg
- File:Artistas Mexicanas.jpg
- File:Artistas Oaxaqueños.jpg
- File:Edith Ortiz en el Lago de Xochimilco.jpg
- File:Edith Ortiz en concierto.jpg
- File:Plantas verdes Edith Ortiz.jpg
- File:Indumentaria de Mujer Xochimilca Edith Ortiz.jpg
- File:SOPRANOS.jpg
- File:Ortiz Edith.jpg
- File:Sopran.jpg
- File:La última palabra.jpg
- File:Edith Ortiz en Televisión.jpg
- File:Tradiciones Mexicanas.jpg
- File:Alondra Mixteca con la naturaleza.jpg
- File:La Alondra Mixteca.jpg
- File:Edith Ortiz Soprano Mixteca.jpg
- File:Edith Ortiz.jpg
- File:Edith Ortiz en Villa Guadalupe Victoria.jpg
- File:Edith Ortiz Soprano Oaxaqueña.jpg
- File:Edith Ortiz Cantante de México.jpg
- File:Madre tierra, naturaleza.jpg
- File:Alondra Mixteca.jpg
- File:Soprano Oaxaqueña.jpg
- File:Edith Ortiz Cantante.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
UPF and OoS, just like the files he uploaded. E4024 (talk) 04:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:03, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 04:17, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:04, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 04:17, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:04, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 04:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:06, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 04:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:06, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 04:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:06, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 01:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:25, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 01:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:26, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. Regrettably. Lovely dog! Wish I had one like that... E4024 (talk) 02:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Horrible. Not used and I hope it will not be used. E4024 (talk) 02:42, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Small file with no EXIF, file name indicates it was downloaded. (Note: this filename should also be salted, as it will always be a bad file name regardless of content.) Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, possible copyvio. COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 18:47, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
According to his attempt at an auto-bio on en.wp, "He is very Beautiful Guy in India." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vishalmishrauliya/sandbox Nick Moreau (talk) 05:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- It's the uploaders second account, abuse filter shows them creating the same stuff VISHAL_RAGHAV_(OFFICIAL) (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) .--BevinKacon (talk) 12:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, not a meaningful contributor. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
According to his attempt at an auto-bio on en.wp, "He is very Beautiful Guy in India." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vishalmishrauliya/sandbox Nick Moreau (talk) 05:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, not a meaningful contributor. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
The quality is so low that we cannot even identify the subject of the photo. I don't think it's realistically usable for an educational purpose. OOS. Basilicofresco (msg) 06:10, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
I don't think it's realistically usable for an educational purpose. OOS. Basilicofresco (msg) 06:11, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
The quality is so low that I don't think it's realistically usable for an educational purpose. OOS. Basilicofresco (msg) 06:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
The quality is so low that I don't think it's realistically usable for an educational purpose. OOS. Basilicofresco (msg) 06:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Which Kayah? Full name, please and COM:SCOPE?
Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:57, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: private photos, unused, oos. --Wdwd (talk) 18:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE? Patrick Rogel (talk) 06:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 18:52, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Same series as File:Khalaf Ahmad Al Habtoor.jpg. Permission of Fares Jammal needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
no useful description, suspicious source, unused, uncategorized Estopedist1 (talk) 07:03, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: private unused photo, oos. --Wdwd (talk) 18:55, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
The file is a screenshot taken from a TV show from RAI Italian National Television, according to information provided in Ticket:2020060910008491, and in which the client of the ticket is not a representative of the TV station mentioned. As a result, the file has no valid permission, and is likely to be copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 07:09, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:57, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
https://m.facebook.com/CizcoJOfficial/photos/a.146403719304725/614065879205171/?type=3
Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Non-free orphan image (company logo). Pafsanias (talk) 07:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- File:More thirsty.jpg - unused, uncategorised, out of scope?
- File:Innesent mom.jpg - personal artwork
- File:More thirsty.jpg
- File:Innesent mom.jpg
Estopedist1 (talk) 07:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
A copy of a standard image from e-shops. E.g. https://www.ozon.ru/context/detail/id/144062024/ or https://www.labirint.ru/books/628627/ . So that the license is wrong. Bilderling (talk) 07:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, copyright violation. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:20, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused text document of unclear notability. Out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 08:48, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 00:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 07:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Unused text document of unclear notability. Out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 08:50, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused text document of unclear notability. The images might not be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 08:52, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused text document of unclear notability. Out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 08:57, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:07, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused text document of unclear notability. Out of project scope.
Although the uploader claims to be the author, this would have to be verified given that this is an article from a printed publication. Also, copyright seems to be claimed by the publisher (see the copyright notice on the first page), so the author might have given up his copyright to the article. Stefan2 (talk) 09:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Don´t see what is wrong with the article. Published by the AICHE remarking its authority. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roberfla (talk • contribs) 19:32, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos, painting, drawing, video. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:48, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:52, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:24, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
low quality, no description, unused, uncategorised Estopedist1 (talk) 19:56, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ag Springer (talk · contribs)
[edit]These do not seem to be own work by the uploader. No evidence of permission. Also unclear if they are in scope.
- File:Brennstoffspiegel 06.2014.pdf
- File:B4B VMM Wirtschaftsverlag Bayerisch-Schwäbische Wirtschaft.pdf
- File:Allgäuer Zeitung 2009.10.29.pdf
- File:Allgäuer Zeitung 2003.07.22.pdf
- File:Handelsregisterauszug KESLAR 2019.09.02.pdf
Stefan2 (talk) 09:15, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Yes, you are right. This is my first contribution and these files were exclusively used for references. I didn't use the right way, because I didn't know how to sign PDF-Files as a reference. Now I try to include the files instead of linking them. So please delete my uploaded PDFs - it was my mistake... I just want to do it for the right way, using reference-pages. Ag Springer (talk) 11:00, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:33, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
File:NelCote Logo.jpg was only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's sandbox was speedily deleted in June 2018 as spam. The remaining two photos were seemingly never put to use. All are out of project scope.
ƏXPLICIT 11:46, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album
- File:DesmondGeoffrey and NelsonJM.jpg
- File:Desmond Geoffrey and Nelson JM.jpg
- File:NelsonJMandCattle.jpg
- File:DesmondandNelsonJM.jpg
- File:Nelson Joseph Mintoh.jpg
—MdsShakil (talk) 03:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person (article deleted on en.wp), out of scope. And also included:
P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:42, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
COM:TOYS, and no FoP in US for artworks. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Legoland Discovery Center Chicago.
- File:Dino Island (769805967).jpg
- File:Dino Island (770679258).jpg
- File:Explorer Island (2170643473).jpg
- File:Lego Birder with Binoculars (16453556906).jpg
- File:Lego Dinosaur (3838126639).jpg
- File:Lego Elephant (3838128641).jpg
- File:Lego elephant (4289596779).jpg
- File:Lego elephant (774270467).jpg
- File:Lego spider DSC 8453 (14501000040).jpg
- File:Lego Stegasaurus (3838132403).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108003607).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108835854).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108835920).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108836208).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5465032177).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5465033229).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5465034521).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5471283863).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5471876562).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5494929854).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5494933016).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5494933108).jpg
- File:Legoland San Diego 4.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:26, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support deletion per above criteria.
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Not a real user. E4024 (talk) 17:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and per SELFIE. –Davey2010Talk 18:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
"My pic" does not bring scope. E4024 (talk) 17:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and per SELFIE. –Davey2010Talk 18:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 17:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and per SELFIE. –Davey2010Talk 18:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Personal photos for non-wikipedian - out of scope --Alaa :)..! 23:49, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:01, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Personal photos for non-wikipedian - out of scope --Alaa :)..! 23:53, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:01, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Koorosh1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Chess GM Maoud Mosadeghpour.jpg
- File:Chess WGM Ghazal Hakimifar.jpg
- File:Chess IM Khalil Mousavi.jpg
- File:Chess GM Shahin Lorpari Zangeneh.jpg
- File:Chess GM Hasan Abbasifar.jpg
- File:Chess IM Arash Tahbaz.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Roji charuvila — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roji Charuvila (talk • contribs) 13:26, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised files. Commons is not private media repository
Estopedist1 (talk) 18:37, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- The file talks about some "the department" but it doesn't say which "the department" it is, so the chart seems useless. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:39, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 08:16, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Uploader says only that it was scanned from a book. Lambtron (talk) 20:33, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:38, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. The uploader says only that the image is scanned from a book. Lambtron (talk) 20:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
I'm not sure, but this might be the source: istockphoto.com Lambtron (talk) 21:03, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:38, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted screenshot Atomicdragon136 (talk) 15:01, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Herbythyme at 13:12, 1 Juli 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 02:01, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
File:HUA-168918-Afbeelding van een strijkspoorstaaf langs een spoorstaaf met golfslijtage in de boog bij Overveen.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: then please request a {{Rename}}. --JuTa 21:59, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
File:HUA-151834-Afbeelding van een electrisch treinstel Plan Y Sprinter van de NS te Den Haag CS.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: then please request a {{Rename}}. --JuTa 22:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: then please request a {{Rename}}. --JuTa 22:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
File:HUA-159706-Afbeelding van de treindienstleider bij het bloktoestel in het NS station Lichtenvoorde Groenlo te Lievelde.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Then please request a {{Rename}}. --JuTa 21:47, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Template:Institution=ADDITIONAL DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF PUBLIC INFORMATION (ADG PI), Indian Army
[edit]This is copyright prose copied from https://indianarmy.nic.in/Site/FormTemplete/frmTempSimple.aspx?MnId=5MwOyzxtNOFziKF427oMnw==&ParentID=pW05+sEUf/YLT/j6Nf+G+A== — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:06, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
book cover. OTRS-permission is needed Estopedist1 (talk) 12:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:09, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, thumbnail, no EXIF-data Estopedist1 (talk) 17:28, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
blurry, unused and uncategorised file. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your concern. However, I requested the concerned person for the image as he is a well-known face in the industry and asked him to publicize on Wiki and he agreed. So I uploaded the image I received. I guess there's nothing wrong with it. --Wikilanemak (talk) 17:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Quakewoody (talk) 18:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not a promotional website and Wikimedia Commons Is not a personal web repository. User has history of cross wiki spam and promotion. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 10:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- Update: the wikipedia articles (in multiple languages) have all been deleted. Quakewoody (talk) 17:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; taken from FB per md. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:YasserZayedMarriott.jpg
- File:تسجيل ألبوم عرب زايد.jpg
- File:Arab Zayed Vol.1 2019.jpg
- File:Yasser Zayed.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:25, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
These seem to have been created by several people, so the uploader can't be the author of all of them. Also, the documents seem to be out of scope.
- File:Diretriz CH DCT-20 NOV 19.pdf
- File:CONCEPÇÃO ESTRATÉGICA DE TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMAÇÃO.pdf
- File:CARTILHA EMERGENCIAL DE SEGURANÇA DE TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMAÇÃO E COMUNICAÇÕES.pdf
Stefan2 (talk) 09:03, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:02, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
A small blurred image of Water buffalo of which there are many better examples on Commons Richard Avery (talk) 20:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:21, 13 Juli 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Izzatul muslimah --Krdbot 13:55, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
A all poorly described, blurred image of water buffalo of which there are many better examples on the Commons Richard Avery (talk) 20:30, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:21, 13 Juli 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Izzatul muslimah --Krdbot 13:55, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:32, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:CHARACTER and similar cases such as Commons:Deletion requests/Donald Duck from Spirit 43. Kaldari (talk) 04:32, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. We're going to have to delete File:LooneyTunesMerrieMelodiesNo125 (cropped).jpg as well, though perhaps in a separate DR. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 19:27, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:33, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Likely above the threshold of originality in Australia ber COM:TOO Australia AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:33, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Pictore of so low quality that the person depicted looks like a blob. It is so pixellised that it's unusable. Won't be used on FRWiki Myloufa (talk) 00:42, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Why are you taking down photos like crazy? No valid reason to take down this one like crazy, and should not be on Wikipedia but should stay on the Wikimedia Commons. -- Bull-Doser (talk)
- @Bull-Doser: I have left a comment on the nominator’s talk page, which is where these sorts of comments belong. As for this file: Keep Appears to be the only image of this subject. Brianjd (talk) 15:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Bull-Doser: I have left a comment on the nominator’s talk page, which is where these sorts of comments belong. As for this file:
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Picture of really low quality. Won't be used on FRWiki Myloufa (talk) 00:43, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Why are you taking down photos like crazy? No valid reason to take down this one like crazy, and should not be on Wikipedia but should stay on the Wikimedia Commons. -- Bull-Doser (talk)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Picture of really low quality. The person depicted is looking like a blob because the picture is too pixellised. It is unusable and won't be used on FRWiki Myloufa (talk) 00:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Per com:PACKAGE. Njzjz (talk) 01:43, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
i dont think that bridge shape is simple geometry, COPYVIO Thespoondragon (talk) 03:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:22, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Original is here. User who uploaded to Commons may not have copyright. Takumiboo (talk) 08:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Created by the American Composites Manufacturers Association, not by the uploader. No evidence of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 08:56, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused text document of unclear notability. Out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 09:01, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused document of unclear notability, possibly an advertisement for the uploader. Out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 09:04, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Çünkü o Saçmalık Mrs.Akchays (talk) 09:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Obvious test upload. --Achim (talk) 18:55, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:24, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
In my opinion this is not a simple logo, because it does not consist of simple geometrical figures. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and COM:TOO China. --Wcam (talk) 15:15, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:27, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in United States. The photo violates sculptor's copyright and text author's copyright as well. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Photo claims to be of a person born in 1912, but the clothing is obviously modern. Plus political claims about the person are unsourced and very serious. At best this is a hoax, but i will delete the page it is used in on EN Wikipedia as an attack. WereSpielChequers (talk) 12:37, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:SCOPE as misdescribed individual of unclear notability. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:29, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:29, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
This is complicated. Follow along:
- This is a screenshot from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-OB7OYI5AI, a Creative Commons marked YouTube video. So far so good.
- However that YouTube page says "I created this video with the YouTube Video Editor (http://www.youtube.com/editor) This video is taken from Jason jude who is the owner of the video and it is under creative Commons license". The video is, in fact, watermarked Jason Jude.
- I went looking for Jason Jude on YouTube, and it looks like the source of this video is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YTmEzhAwMo. (This particular image is probably about 10:38 or so.) This video is, unfortunately not marked Creative Commons. Not only that, that YouTube page says "Lana Del Rey performs at SXSW in Austin Texas at 612 W 4th St. on Friday March 17, 2017. No copyright infringement intended, I do not own the content in this video."
So it looks like our image is a screenshot of an edited copy of a non-free video that wasn't even owned by the person who put it up on YouTube. Not free, and apologies that it's kind of complex. GRuban (talk) 14:27, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Also from the same video:
- File:Lana Del Rey playing Gibson Flying V.png
- File:Lana Del Rey with Gibson Flying V (2).png
--GRuban (talk) 21:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Just another day in the freebooting world we live in. Gikü (talk) 19:43, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: good catch. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:30, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted screenshot Atomicdragon136 (talk) 15:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Low resolution and no EXIF, unlikely to be own work Atomicdragon136 (talk) 15:04, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Bizarre reupload of File:Tom Holland by Gage Skidmore.jpg with no attribution (i.e., not just a duplicate, but a breach of the CC license attribution requirement). Эlcobbola talk 17:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Bizarre reupload of File:Tobey Maguire 2007 Shankbone.jpg with no attribution (i.e., not just a duplicate, but a breach of the CC license attribution requirement). Эlcobbola talk 17:30, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Bizarre reupload of File:Andrew Garfield 2011 CC2011.jpg with no attribution (i.e., not just a duplicate, but a breach of the CC license attribution requirement). Эlcobbola talk 17:30, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
listed license not at source Thespoondragon (talk) 18:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-official flag. Nice4What (talk) 01:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Logo also above COM:TOO. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
non-free model, per COM:TOYS 188.123.231.56 18:14, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Low res, no camera EXIF, user's only other upload a copyvio taken from social media (which this indeed also appears to be). COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 19:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:33, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of being freely licensed Atomicdragon136 (talk) 15:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ali barhe Abn Al-iraq (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:25, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:25, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:25, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:25, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Кулагін Андрій Павлович.jpg Bogdan.paint (talk) 08:11, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping. Green Giant deleted it. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:24, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 22:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:24, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
unknown person Adelfrank (talk) 15:39, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:24, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
2020 Pixabay upload, so can't be redistributed per https://pixabay.com/service/license/. See description in Category:Unreviewed files from Pixabay GRuban (talk) 16:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:23, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Ritrae persone minorenni, la foto non ha niente a che fare con il concorso e non è stata scattata nel luogo dichiarato. Franci civi (talk) 16:15, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:23, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Ritrae persone minorenni, la foto non ha niente a che fare con il concorso e non è stata scattata nel luogo dichiarato. Franci civi (talk) 16:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Io non parlo italiano and I do not have the faintest idea about Sikh religion; but I ask myself if this could be related to something like the "primera comunion" in Roman Catholic religious culture? In that case the image would well be welcome here. Grazie mille. --E4024 (talk) 20:38, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:23, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
It is a photo of me that I don't want to be in public domain. Harsiem (talk) 16:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: In use. So what I did was to edit the photo to remove the face and removed the first version. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:19, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Meaningless redirect CrazyBoy826 (talk) 17:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
aucune autorisation Pierrette13 (talk) 17:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC) bonjour, j'ai beau lire tout ce que je vois passer je ne trouves pas de façon claire comment établir qu'il s'agit d'une photo personnelle ? pouvez vous m'aider ? je crois que je dois signer Drperrot (talk) 19:53, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
pas de droits indiqués Pierrette13 (talk) 17:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
derivative of non-free mural, no FOP for such things in Russia 188.123.231.56 18:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
non-free model, per COM:TOYS 188.123.231.56 18:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:14, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
The image is labeled as own work, when the PITS Global Data Recovery Service has an copyright on their website, "PITS Global Data Recovery Services 2020 © All rights reserved." Phwikimaker12 (talk) 18:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:14, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of existing image: File:StMarys EndicottSt Boston HomansSketches1851.jpg Ergo Sum 18:28, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:14, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Duplication of the pre-existing File:Flag of the Faroe Islands.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:32, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of the pre-existing File:Flag of Åland.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:37, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 19:28, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also some questionable statements on file history. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of video that has been deleted from YouTube and the account terminated for guideline violations (e.g., copyvio). Image did not receive a license review, so there is no means of substantiating this license (thus a COM:L and COM:EVID violation). Note also uploader has uploaded YouTube screenshots that have not been free at the YouTube soruce (e.g,. File:Nicoli Nattrass 2011 Yale - Resistance to HIV treatment.png). COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 20:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:12, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Djibouti. Maybe the photo violates architect's copyright. Who is the architect and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 20:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:12, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
No longer needed SHAHMMM (talk) 21:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Used and even if it were not used it can always be useful. --E4024 (talk) 21:28, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:12, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphan - SHAHMMM (talk) 23:51, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - lovely bird. --E4024 (talk) 13:16, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Pppery (talk) 00:22, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 19:03, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Picture isn’t used SHAHMMM (talk) 21:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- So what? Have you had a look at nude or partially nude women categories? There are many unused files in there. Take some to deletion. What is the obsession with this birdie? --E4024 (talk) 21:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not in use, out of focus. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:11, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mosbatho as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The same image can be found on facebook : here
- Looks like uploader's facebook page. Achim (talk) 21:48, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thank you. new here took me forever to find where to reply. it is my Facebook, of me, taken with my camera, saved on my hard drive.CalebSC55 (talk) 21:50, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, CalebSC55. So you are the copyright holder of this image? --Mosbatho (talk) 23:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Self promotion - out of scope - Caleb is trying to use wiki to raise his profile & enlarge his knowledge box on Google - see Special:Permalink/425578272 which is a copy of the draft deleted from enwiki and Caleb's rationale on en:Special:Diff/962168587. Cabayi (talk) 17:03, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Besides the self-promotion, the individual depicted did not take this photograph and be in it at the same time. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:10, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
I do not know who this person is. Anybody does? Thus we may decide if he is within our scope or not... E4024 (talk) 22:52, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Forgot to note: There are a bunch of his pics by the same uploader here. --E4024 (talk) 22:53, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:08, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:NOTUSED. Not high quality enough to satisfy COM:EDUSE. BriefEdits (talk) 23:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Are you kidding? How come an image with 1,363 × 1,705 dimensions are not high quality. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Hey A1Cafel I guess quality in this case is more subjective than pure pixel size. The photo at hand is an indistinguishable circle of light against a black sky without any discernable details within frame. When compared to the photos at the tagged Category:Lunar eclipse of 2007 August 28, I'd say the "quality" here is evidently "low" and would fall under COM:Redundant, therefore qualify itself for deletion. — BriefEdits (talk) 04:01, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:07, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
No authorization from the author AFP//JONAS ROOSENS Tyseria (d) 13:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per Tyseria. There is no indication that User:Inaps is Jonas Roosens, has obtained permission from Roosens or AFP, or works for AFP with the permission of authorising the usage of this photo. This should be OTRS'd or deleted. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 10:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 22:13, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
COPYVIO, emblazonment is from 2020, and is a work of the New York state government. Works of the New York government are copyrighted. Thespoondragon (talk) 18:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Link?--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 19:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Do you mean a link to the copyright status of works of the New York state government, or a link to this being a work of the New York state government? -Thespoondragon (talk) 14:16, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Link?--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 19:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
The photo isn't own work of uploader. Source - lenta.ru Brateevsky {talk} 08:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as copyvio. Real own work should have EXIF, this photo has no exif and according to google is copyvio from https://lenta.ru/news/2020/06/09/brat/ `A5b (talk) 11:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 00:35, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:ДТП на Смоленской площади.jpg Brateevsky {talk} 08:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as copyvio. Real own work should have EXIF, this photo has no exif and according to google is copyvio from https://lenta.ru/news/2020/06/09/brat/ `A5b (talk) 11:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 00:35, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikas Malpani Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
We need a link to prove it is a NASA photo. It is watermarked space facts at source Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted. Per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 13:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was deleted in August 2017 via deletion discussion, and then speedily deleted in January 2018 as non-notable. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 11:31, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted per nomination. Wikipedia discussion at en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stance E. Thuresson (talk) 13:43, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Questionable licensing. No named photographer who died 70+ years ago as stated by license. Source link redirects to dewiki. Buidhe (talk) 16:03, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Info Linked to an archived page that does not redirect. Ankry (talk) 21:07, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 23:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Taken from the private site. Copyright protected. No evidence of PD status.98.88.92.10 21:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- An absurd nomination. You are generally held on the hyperlink that is specified as a source? Also, File:Somua-am-1938 02.jpg, not File:Fordson Trackson 1922 Japan.jpg. Vade Parvis (talk) 15:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 16:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Not taken by an "unknown French state employee" but by a German photograph. Probably from a German soldier's private collection. Le Petit Chat (talk) 08:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted. Photographer unknown and there is no information regarding any publication more than 70 years ago. Thuresson (talk) 19:06, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I am the copyright holder of this image and I believe it has been wrongly uploaded to the commoms database. You cannot simply harvest pictures from Mynewsdesk without checking the requirements first. I see you have done so multiple times and even have a link to all pictures from Mynewsdesk that you have. This picture was uploaded with the press use in mind. That is that it should be used for articles connected to WaterAid and not intended for use for everything always. There is even a disclaimer added which has been there since 2013. In swedish: OBS! Bilderna upphör som pressbilder den sista augusti 2012 och får då inte längre användas fritt. Hänvisar till: http://www.alamy.com/search/imageresults.aspx?CreativeOn=1&qt=jan+eliasson Datum: 10.06.17 Bild nummer: 2545 You can reach me at daniel.holking@gmail.com if you have questions. Best regards, /Daniel 109.104.5.107 09:37, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Are the images from Alamy? If so, they fall under copyright violation therefore will be deleted. If they aren't, you licensed it as Creative Commons on yur image page. --Atomicdragon136 (talk) 15:33, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This image is from the MynewsDesk page of Water Aid Sweden, who has licensed this image under a Creative Commons CC-BY.30 license. Daniel Holking is founder and communications officer of Water Aid Sweden linkedin. Jan Eliasson, the subject of this photo, was a board member of Water Aid Sweden. A Creative Commons license is irrevocable (FAQ). There is no reason to believe that an official represenative of the copyright owner did not license this image. Thuresson (talk) 11:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Thuresson: 's argument explains why it's legal to use these photos, which it absolutely is. However, I just came across this policy concerning professional photographers. It seems to go beyond the legal requirements by also requiring explicit releases to be submitted to OTRS.
- I have little sympathy for a professional photographers not understanding the license they are using and insinuating others are misinformed. Nor do I understand how commons' use differs from the "use by news media" they are, apparently, ok with. But the policy was made for some reason, and I would want to know what it was before I ignore it. --Matthias Winkelmann (talk) 19:46, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept, per Thuresson. Taivo (talk) 13:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be have been published before 1994 as required by the license. Buidhe (talk) 08:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Buidhe -- thank you for taking a look at this image. I uploaded the image thinking that since it was taken in Poland in the late 1930s, and since the subject is deceased and the photographer is unknown, that this would be permissible. I followed similar licensing as I saw on this image of Rutka Laskier. Would the same not apply to Renia Spiegel's image? Could you help me understand the issues at play, so that we can figure out how the article about Renia Spiegel can be illustrated? -- Cloud atlas (talk) 22:44, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Cloud atlas: Thanks for your comment. There are a lot of incorrectly licensed photographs on Commons and the Rutka Laskier one is another example (I just nominated it for deletion). Both images could be uploaded to enwiki as fair use as allowed by en:Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. Buidhe (talk) 22:58, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- If that is the case, then why are they being nominated for deletion?
- Nihil novi (talk) 06:54, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Commons does not allow fair use. Buidhe (talk) 19:31, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Buidhe: can you help me understand the licensing rules so I don't make the same mistake in the future? Which license is being applied here? Why is it not sufficient that the photograph is this many years old and the photographer seems to be unknown? -- Cloud atlas (talk) 22:24, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Cloud atlas: Copyright is complicated, but the first step is to make sure that all the conditions required by the license template are met (in this case, the photograph was not published before 1994). For this photograph, en:Publication right almost certainly applies, preventing the work from being free in the European Union. In the US it is probably protected for 120 years after creation according to File:PD-US table.png. If you're not sure if a work is copyrighted or not please feel free to post on my talk page and I'll try to figure it out. Buidhe (talk) 22:36, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Buidhe: can you help me understand the licensing rules so I don't make the same mistake in the future? Which license is being applied here? Why is it not sufficient that the photograph is this many years old and the photographer seems to be unknown? -- Cloud atlas (talk) 22:24, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Commons does not allow fair use. Buidhe (talk) 19:31, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. No information about publication history or photographer. Thuresson (talk) 22:49, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
These photographs are claimed to be PD-old as they were found in an album by commandant Karl Otto Koch, who died in 1945. But the copyright status is unclear because the photographs are not necessarily taken by him, in fact one of them shows him and must have been taken by someone else. The source [1] explicitly credits the photos to an archive and does not call them public domain.
- File:Haeftlinge 267437a.jpg
- File:Sachsenhausen - Ein KZ-Insasse kniet vor vier SS-Schergen, darunter Kommandant Karl Otto Koch.jpg
- File:Sachsenhausen - SS-Mann Jacob Weiseborn posiert mit Häftlingen.jpg
- File:SS-Obersturmbannführer Koch 1937 vor der Kommandantur (cropped).jpg
- File:SS-Obersturmbannführer Koch 1937 vor der Kommandantur.jpg
Buidhe (talk) 11:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Compulsory read: Pessach & Shur-Ofry: 'Copyright and the Holocaust'. In: Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 30: 2, Sept. 2018.
- That's just someone's opinion. It is not Commons policy, which is following national law. In this case, German law obviously hasn't negated copyrights related to the Holocaust as the Bavarian government continued to claim copyright on Mein Kampf, among other things. Buidhe (talk) 13:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- No, it's not "just someone's opinion". The article also goes into the history of copyright of material made during the Holocaust, and it clearly states that cases like the retained copyright of Mein Kampf by the State of Bavaria are exemptions ("only a handful of cases" in Germany). In most cases copyright was returned to the original owners after 1962, such as with Triumph des Willens. The answer in this case has to be found in German copyright regarding photographs made by unknown photographers. I have sent an e-mail to the organisers of the exhibition Von der Sachsenburg nach Sachsenhausen, where these photos originate from, to see if they can shed some light on this case. Vysotsky (talk) 13:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- "Returned to the original owners" doesn't mean public domain, does it? Buidhe (talk) 13:55, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- I didn't voice any opinion about that matter, did I? I just gave some facts and information surrounding this case, and will voice my opinion after looking at this particular case and the applicable laws more closely. Vysotsky (talk) 14:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- "Returned to the original owners" doesn't mean public domain, does it? Buidhe (talk) 13:55, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- No, it's not "just someone's opinion". The article also goes into the history of copyright of material made during the Holocaust, and it clearly states that cases like the retained copyright of Mein Kampf by the State of Bavaria are exemptions ("only a handful of cases" in Germany). In most cases copyright was returned to the original owners after 1962, such as with Triumph des Willens. The answer in this case has to be found in German copyright regarding photographs made by unknown photographers. I have sent an e-mail to the organisers of the exhibition Von der Sachsenburg nach Sachsenhausen, where these photos originate from, to see if they can shed some light on this case. Vysotsky (talk) 13:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- That's just someone's opinion. It is not Commons policy, which is following national law. In this case, German law obviously hasn't negated copyrights related to the Holocaust as the Bavarian government continued to claim copyright on Mein Kampf, among other things. Buidhe (talk) 13:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep the author Karl Otto Koch died in 1945, so more than 70 years ago. --Hannolans (talk) 20:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- As stated above, he literally couldn't have been the author since he appears in the photographs. Buidhe (talk) 22:09, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- More precisely: the photo where he appears to be the subject cannot be made by him; but it still can be made by his friend using his camera. Ankry (talk) 21:00, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Für anonyme Werke bestimmt § 66 UrhG, dass das Urheberrecht bereits 70 Jahre nach der Erstveröffentlichung der Aufnahme erlischt (bzw. nach der Erstellung, falls das Werk 70 Jahre lang unveröffentlicht blieb). (Translation: For anonymous works, section 66 UrhG stipulates that copyright expires 70 years after the recording was first published (or after it was created, if the work remained unpublished for 70 years). Vysotsky (talk) 21:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- Except that in the EU there is the concept of en:publication right, IF the original copyright expired before publication, then the first publisher of the work has the 25 years copyright. (see Commons:Transfer of copyright). Buidhe (talk) 16:28, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- More precisely: the photo where he appears to be the subject cannot be made by him; but it still can be made by his friend using his camera. Ankry (talk) 21:00, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- As stated above, he literally couldn't have been the author since he appears in the photographs. Buidhe (talk) 22:09, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep as per Vysotsky, Ecritures (talk) 12:52, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep There is neither data showing that this work is copyrighted nor is there convincing data showing that this work is not copyrighted. Even in the worst case of this being copyrighted, I am convinced that owing to its historical significance and the way it is being used, it qualifies to be used according to the Policy guidelines established in WP:NONFREE --Pavithran (talk) 15:06, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Fair use content is not allowed at commons Buidhe (talk) 16:52, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted, per discussion. Thuresson (talk) 23:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
wrong picture TijmenBlom (talk) 12:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 12:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Comnplex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 23:08, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
This needs discussion. Uploader writes (on the file talk page) "Hey folks, I'm still rather new to Wikipedia but this particular photo was published in a Government Newsletter January 20, 2019. The government Agency is the Romanian Government: Sud Muntenia, Agentia pentru Dezvoltarea Regionala (South Muntenia Chamber of Commerce). The photo can be found on page 7 of the PDF newsletter below.
Link to the PDF is: https://regio.adrmuntenia.ro/download_file/newsletter/2518/info-regional-sud-muntenia-nr-401_0.pdf
ZodiacsLion (talk) 16:27, 10 July 2019 (UTC)"
However:
- 1. I don't think the Romanian Government releases all its works under a free license. If it does, that's great, but we don't seem to document that where I can find.
- 2. Possibly more important, this image on that PDF is watermarked "Sursa foto Mapio.net", so it doesn't seem to be a Romanian Government image.
GRuban (talk) 13:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
@ZodiacsLion and Ytoyoda: Pinging uploader and user who marked it for review earlier. --GRuban (talk) 14:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted. per nomination. See also Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Romania. Thuresson (talk) 23:13, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
obsolete File. File:°-°-Smiley.svg looks similar but is of better quality ("rounder" circle) and is an .svg file. There is no need to keep this low-quality duplicate here. --Œ̷͠²ð·¨´´̢́̕͘³͏¯̞̗ (talk) 14:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- I forgot to mention that I'm also the creator of this file. --Œ̷͠²ð·¨´´̢́̕͘³͏¯̞̗ (talk) 15:03, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted, not in use. Thuresson (talk) 23:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Probably copyright. USHMM doesn't hold this image in its collections, as it does for virtually all free images.[2] USHMM does use it in a publication, where it is attributed to Landesbildstelle Berlin[3] and it is unlikely to be PD (would need to be published 70 years ago as anonymous photograph). Also missing PD-US rationale. Buidhe (talk) 16:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted, 1933 photo without information about photographer. Thuresson (talk) 23:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be original research or synthesis; no items in this flow chart are discussed in the article body, and the relationships between stages need to be verifiable. Also, the image is of very low quality and has typos. JoelleJay (talk) 23:49, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, as nominator. JoelleJay (talk) 18:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment borderline plain text. Wikipedia has enough means to recreate such charts with searchable text in a visually more appealing way. --HyperGaruda (talk) 09:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 23:27, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in US for artworks. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:43, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE (non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills).
- File:Progress and harmony.png
- File:World geopolitical chess.png
- File:Venezuelan disaster.png
- File:Russia cannot into music show.png
- File:Polandball, 10 years.png
- File:Polandball can into coat of arms.png
- File:70 years of a communist clay.png
- File:American nightmare.png
- File:Football trick.png
- File:Face to face.png
- File:USA1942.png
- File:ROM1965.png
- File:NDA1959.png
- File:BUL comunista.png
- File:AUT1804.png
- File:ESP1785.png
- File:World flags 68.png
- File:TDF19.png
- File:Versailles 1919.png
- File:IMF family.png
- File:Juntos (hacia un futuro mejor) - Together (towards a better future).png
- File:Maracanazo.png
- File:Time for action.png
- File:The condition of Puerto Rico.png
- File:Poland is of bully.png
- File:Paint it kebab.png
- File:Irritating Europeans.png
- File:CONMEBOL vs CONCACAF.png
- File:Broken hopes.png
- File:Breaking walls.png
- File:Africa's riches.png
- File:What's wrong with Serbia.png
- File:Freedom spice.png
- File:New clay on the neighborhood.png
- File:Poland and the pool.png
- File:Europe is losing the patience.png
- File:Bolivia can into traffic light.png
- File:Chi nations.png
- File:Los 13 de la fama.png
- File:World in union.png
- File:Street fight.png
- File:Poland is Pac-Man.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
These archives weren't uploaded to "showcase the artist's skills", but because I wanted to share them, without looking for any gain. --Babelia (talk) 19:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
In addition, these archives (and ALL Polandball-style archives) have educational value. Maybe you don't think it, but these comics are useful to spread knowledge about Polandball and how it's used to satirize topics related with nations. --Babelia (talk) 19:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Babelia: It's a showcase of your skills (and perhaps it's satirical) without perspective. Indeed you have no entry on one of our sister project (Wikipedia, Wikinews...) so it's out of COM:SCOPE. It may change the day someone decides to write an article about you on our projects. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Absent a specific rule making Polandball similar to COM:PENIS, I would keep all Polandball comics of reasonably high (read: potentially usable to illustrate a Polandball article on Wikipedia) quality. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- I need to say that the files Progress and harmony.png, World geopolitical chess.png, Venezuelan disaster.png, Russia cannot into music show.png, Polandball can into coat of arms.png, 70 years of a communist clay.png, American nightmare.png, Football trick.png, Face to face.png, USA1942.png, ROM1965.png, NDA1959.png, BUL comunista.png, AUT1804.png, ESP1785.png, Versailles 1919.png, Juntos (hacia un futuro mejor) - Together (towards a better future).png, Maracanazo.png, The condition of Puerto Rico.png, Broken hopes.png, What's wrong with Serbia.png, Freedom spice.png, Europe is losing the patience.png, Los 13 de la fama.png, World in union.png, Street fight.png and Poland is Pac-Man.png were created entirely by me, without any external inspiration. Therefore, should be kept.--Babelia (talk) 19:57, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- My suggestion is that this DR should only focus on scope issues, which is the only common theme tying them together. If we try to get into matters like whether these are derivative of other works, we'll end up with an unmanageable mess like Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Burj Khalifa. So if these images are cleared from a scope perspective, then someone may initial DRs for individual images that they believe to be a derivative work of something else. Note that being inspired by an external idea does not make it derivative from a copyright point of view; it requires being inspired by an external expression of an idea. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:12, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The nomination seems to have no more to it than "I don't like Polandball". Andy Dingley (talk) 01:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Polandball comics, just like everything else in the category Category:Political cartoons, are useful for illustrating topics related to history, political issues and national stereotypes. Because of this, I believe that the Polandball comics are educational and within COM:SCOPE. 193.210.228.246 10:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 23:34, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags ("proposals"); violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".
- File:TPE new 2.0.png
- File:Redesigns for Monaco.png
- File:Rediseño Irlanda del Norte.png
- File:Propuesta NZL.png
- File:Propuesta AUS.png
- File:Propuesta bandera Tratado Antártico.png
- File:New Venetian flags.png
- File:Latinoamérica.png
- File:KSA new.png
GPinkerton (talk) 03:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- User-generated fantasy flags "violate" several policies of Commons. So? There are a lot of these kind of flags in Commons. I think this request is unfair. --Babelia (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- If there are a lot of policy-violating files, then that should be remedied. It's not a justification for abandoning policy. Some people get away with murder, but we don't open the jails and let everyone out. GPinkerton (talk) 20:51, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:00, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
English
[edit]The correct file version of this photo is now uploaded here: File:Katja Christ (2019).jpg
Following characteristics are objectively false:
- Source (correct: https://www.parlament.ch/sitecollectionimages/profil/original/3144.jpg);
- Nature of the photo (selfportrait/Selbstportrait; correct: official portrait);
- Unwarranted appropriation of the autorship (correct: [Swiss] Parliamentary Services);
- Format (correct: .jpg)
- Bad quality (see correct version)
The principal pages on WP have already been modified with the aforementioned file).
--ArkheinVonB (talk) 08:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
French
[edit]La version correcte de cette photo est sous https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Katja_Christ_(2019).jpg
Ce qui est faux dans la description:
- Source (correct: https://www.parlament.ch/sitecollectionimages/profil/original/3144.jpg);
- Nature de la photo (autoportrait/Selbstportrait; correct: portrait officiel);
- Appropriation indue de la qualité d'auteur (correct: Services du Parlament [suisse]);
- Format (correct: .jpg);
- mauvaise qualité (cf. version correcte)
ArkheinVonB (talk) 08:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Les pages principales sur WP ont été modifiées avec le nouveau fichier ci-dessus. --ArkheinVonB (talk) 08:32, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The only part of this nomination that warrants deletion is “Bad quality”. Whilst “bad quality” in itself does not warrant deletion, this appears to be a scaled-down {{Duplicate}}. Brianjd (talk) 15:25, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Previously published at https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.08603.pdf page 4. An OTRS ticket is required. Also applies to File:Fig B003.png. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
I scanned this for the Avedon Foundation's book Performance in 2008. It if fully protected under the copyright of The Richard Avedon Foundation. Please delete it. Avedon Foundation (talk) 14:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
I scanned this for the Avedon Foundation's book Performance in 2008. It if fully protected under the copyright of The Richard Avedon Foundation. Please delete it. Avedon Foundation (talk) 15:04, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- copied from File talk:Avedon-judy.jpg --Achim (talk) 15:26, 11 June 2020 (UTC):
- This is marked with the Free Art License (FAL). The picture was copied from a blog on Wordpress in 2010. That blog does not specify license, as far as I can see. And, I really doubt that the original photographer (Richard Avedon) or his estate (or, current owners) of this rather famous picture, would have given this kind of license, opening up for almost every type of use. So, I am tempted to mark it for deletion. Ketil3 (talk) 07:43, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Done From [4]. Thuresson (talk) 00:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Duplicado exacto del archivo BAP Lima.jpg Zerrano (talk) 01:33, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 00:13, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Por violación de derechos de autor ya que Genio540 no es el verdadero autor de dicho trabajo Zerrano (talk) 16:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 00:13, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
copyrighted content with no permission Albert Horáček (talk) 07:43, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Albert Horáček: Jakým způsobem mám dodat permissions pro uvedený obrázek? --Glomerata (talk) 08:27, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Glomerata: Dobrý den,
- tento obrázek jste označil jako "Vlastní dílo", o které se patrně nejedná. Každý soubor, který je umístěný na Commons, musí být dostupný pod svobodnou licencí. Pokud se nejedná o Vaše dílo (které můžete pod svobodnou licencí uvolnit), je nutné, aby byl autorem soubor uvolněn jako dostupný pod svobodnou licencí. U tohoto screenshotu bude nutné buď uvést odkaz na zdroj, který dokazuje, že je pod danou licencí uvolněn nebo se pokusit získat svolení od vlastníka autorských práv přes systém OTRS. (I pokud je samotné "vyscreenování" obrazovky Váš počin, je nutný souhlas autora mapy, popř. dané aplikace.) Pokud se Vám toto nepodaří zajistit, bude bohužel nutné soubor smazat. --Albert Horáček (talk) 15:06, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 00:17, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ck3141 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: I am the uploader of this file and I want to delete this file because I mistakenly uploaded this image with out of consent and scope. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 08:26, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. In my opinion this is en:Chaudhary Rakesh Singh Chaturvedi. Uploader's request is valid reason for deletion only during first week after upload. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Support Deletion. 𝕃𝐖 (talk) 15:04, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ck3141 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: I am the uploader of this file and I want to delete this file because I mistakenly uploaded this image with out of consent and scope. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 08:26, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Çünkü o Bulanık Mrs.Akchays (talk) 09:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment This file seems to be a (just tiny) cropped version of the original (see top right). The slightly larger version of this image was uploaded to Commons in 2016. Both images are from the same source. Vysotsky (talk) 10:49, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: in use--Achim (talk) 18:59, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is as sharp as the source and is part of a series of files with the same size from the same source. Waterborough (talk) 13:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Category:Wendingen in chronological order is superfluous, as Category:Wendingen is more complete and offers a better choice with a variety of colour, resolution and format (and sometimes also images of the backside of the journal). The image in question was added to Commons 4 years after a nearly identical image. The older image has the brightness and colours of the original. Aside: I'm pretty sure that within considerable time both imges will be superfluous, as a Dutch museum will certainly make all images available in highres. Vysotsky (talk) 18:35, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: The category is by no means superfluous. It shows each picture only one time and not in countless variations. In addition, the small resolution is much cheaper to build the page in wikipedia. For images with a high resolution, it takes an unnecessarily long time to set up the page. It is also more pleasant when viewing the images behind each other that all the images have the same resolution. That is also the reason why I uploaded all these pictures. Waterborough (talk) 20:17, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
I think here is the end of the discussion and most say keep. Waterborough (talk) 23:08, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- Not done, Thuresson (talk) 00:38, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:32, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted, Snuggle the bear. Thuresson (talk) 01:17, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
irrelevant 2A00:23C6:5F0A:4800:CE6:79D6:ACF4:7AB7 11:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- In use. --Achim (talk) 11:50, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Questionable copyright status? (sent through WhatsApp, no metadata) Brianjd (talk) 16:02, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Not done, image is in use. Thuresson (talk) 01:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free content maybe (F3) Batholith (talk) 12:31, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 00:48, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free explanation board (F3) Batholith (talk) 12:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 00:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Автором этой работы являюсь Я. Ни каких прав на фотографию я данному пользователю не передавал. Файл с изображением был украден здесь: https://www.google.ru/maps/contrib/100875412867486336243/photos/@57.6253287,39.8850868,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m7!1e2!3m5!1sAF1QipPf7idegVRkm1CYKjo2pKANtMdvYju6VfVliK64!2e10!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipPf7idegVRkm1CYKjo2pKANtMdvYju6VfVliK64%3Dw390-h260-k-no!7i3000!8i2000!4m3!8m2!3m1!1e2 Ducat 606 (talk) 14:39, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted, uploaded by problem user. Thuresson (talk) 00:55, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
This is a picure of Yixuan, Prince Chun, not Yicong. Yicong has left no picture. Wxmarshall (talk) 15:56, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- This is a crop of File:Emperor Guangxu and Prince Yixuan.jpg. I support a rename of this file to File:Yixuan, Prince Chun.png or something similar. Thuresson (talk) 18:58, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Not done, file name changed. Thuresson (talk) 01:04, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. To be PD-Germany anonymous photograph must have been published at least 70 years ago, for Namibia 50 years ago, but no such publication is shown. Sources do not say the image is PD. Also missing PD-US rationale. Buidhe (talk) 08:49, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Çünkü o Logo Mrs.Akchays (talk) 09:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Info Uploader has not been notified of this request until today. Thuresson (talk) 00:35, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dadashnejad177 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotional ⇨ Links to website soliciting business unrelated to the "arrow/target" image.
Senator2029 13:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Es liegt offensichtlich, dass die Lizenz fehlerhaft ist Lutheraner (talk) 14:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Krithikamanohar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Now-unused and so out of scope. Formerly in w:Manoj Pillai.
- File:Manoj Pillai .jpg
- File:Manoj Pillai receiving the Inspired Indian Foundation award from the Honorable Governor of Karnataka, Dr. H.R Bharadwaj.jpg
- File:Manoj Pillai.jpg
—Cryptic (talk) 16:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Cryptic Could you please advice on why these files have delete requests, and what I can do to improve them so they can stay on? Thank you. Krithikamanohar (talk) 19:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - one is used in Wikidata, but it is small without EXIFs, unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Çünkü o Bulanık, Saçmalık Mrs.Akchays (talk) 09:26, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Info Uploader has not been notified of this request until today. Thuresson (talk) 00:42, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Done Unlikely that uploader owns all these photos from Charles Burrus dated from 1930s to 1990s. Thuresson (talk) 18:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
The fact the uploader does not know who the photographer is does not imply he is anomymous. We would need at least some proof of diligence to find him. This seems to be a postcard. Maybe the copyright owner is stated on the back. — Racconish 💬 16:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Racconish: it's not « the uploader does not know who the photographer » at all, it is « the book where it is published (given in source) does not know who the photographer », isn't it enough proof of diligence? « Maybe the copyright owner is stated on the back. » it's never the case and even if it were, the publisher of the book would had look at the back. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 06:29, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- The postcard bears a mention "Barre edit." (you can see it better here) which likely refers to the postcard publisher Maurice Barré. His postcard publications have been registered (dépôt légal). This source gives 1942-1966 as the publication period. Precisions can likely be found in the Argus Neudin. Moreover there is likely a useful indication on the verso. — Racconish 💬 07:25, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- [This other source] says the publishing house Barré-Dayez was founded in 1925. Anyway the poscard must have been published before 1942 : Irène Némirovsky was deported to Auschwitz in july and her husband in november, and they probably bought the card long before. Marlaguette.
- On further consideration : Barré and Dayez used 'Barday' as their logo. This is another publisher, likely the same as this card. — Racconish 💬 18:20, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- [This other source] says the publishing house Barré-Dayez was founded in 1925. Anyway the poscard must have been published before 1942 : Irène Némirovsky was deported to Auschwitz in july and her husband in november, and they probably bought the card long before. Marlaguette.
- Yes, @Racconish: @VIGNERON: it must be rather this publisher. I did not find any information about him : could it mean that the publishing house disappeared a long time ago ? Anyway, on this card, the photographer's name is stated on the front… Marlaguette
- Deleted Thuresson (talk) 18:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
File:HUA-157518-Afbeelding van reddingswerkers op zoek naar slachtoffers onder het bij de treinramp te Harmelen verongelukte rijtuig A 6544 plan E van de NS.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
File:HUA-168295-Afbeelding van het uitdelen van pakketjes aan de reizigers in de extra trein van Amsterdam naar Hoorn in verband met de Oudhollandse Markt in Hoorn.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
File:HUA-159685-Afbeelding van de treindienstleider bij het NX bedieningstableau in het seinhuis post T van de NS te Eindhoven.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
File:HUA-163883-Gezicht op de in aanleg zijnde perrontunnel van het NS station Tilburg te Tilburg.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
File:HUA-166934-Gezicht op het nieuwe pension voor spoorwegpersoneel De Oase te Rotterdam Zuid slaapzaal.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
File:HUA-167148-Gezicht op de spoorlijn tussen Utrecht en Blauwkapel vanuit het seinhuis bij de Prof Jordanlaan later Eykmanlaan uit het oosten met links op de achter.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
File:HUA-154695-Afbeelding van een dwergsein op het empacement te Amersfoort met links op de achtergrond het nieuwe seinhuis Post T NX post van de NS.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
File:HUA-169669-Detail van de hormachine van de NS tijdens onderhoudswerkzaamheden aan de spoorlijn te Heerhugowaard.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
File:HUA-166702-Gezicht in de perrontunnel van het NS station Driebergen Zeist te Driebergen Rijsenburg.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
File:HUA-155040-Afbeelding van de kop van het electrische treinstel nr 4003 ICM 0 plan Z van de NS langs een perron van het NS station Utrecht CS te Utrecht.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
File:HUA-153844-Afbeelding van de speelkamer van de NS opgesteld in het NS station Maastricht te Maastricht.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
File:HUA-156704-Afbeelding van een wandschildering voorstellende een werkvrouw in de hal van het NS station Amsterdam CS te Amsterdam.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
File:HUA-153260-Afbeelding van een perronpijler op het perron van het NS station Schiedam te Schiedam.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
File:HUA-159939-Afbeelding van een verzendbrief aan een goederenwagen voor een TEEM goederentrein Trans Europ Expres Marchandises .jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
File:HUA-163502-Afbeelding van vrouwelijk personeel van de NS tijdens gymnastiekoefeningenNB Vermoedelijk betreft dit kantoorpersoneel van de NS te Utrecht.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:26, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
File:HUA-169472-Afbeelding van de binnenzijde van een kleine electrische seinsteller van de NS.jpg
[edit]I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:26, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded the wrong image. This images does not represent the description and it's filename. Companje (talk) 10:26, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I am the copyright holder of this image and I believe it has been wrongly uploaded to the commoms database. You cannot simply harvest pictures from Mynewsdesk without checking the requirements first. I see you have done so multiple times and even have a link to all pictures from Mynewsdesk that you have. This picture was uploaded with the press use in mind. That is that it should be used for articles connected to WaterAid and not intended for use for everything always. There is even a disclaimer added which has been there since 2013. In swedish: OBS! Bilderna upphör som pressbilder den sista augusti 2012 och får då inte längre användas fritt. Hänvisar till: http://www.alamy.com/search/imageresults.aspx?CreativeOn=1&qt=jan+eliasson Datum: 10.06.17 Bild nummer: 2545 You can reach me at daniel.holking@gmail.com if you have questions. Best regards, /Daniel 109.104.5.107 09:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This image is from the MynewsDesk page of Water Aid Sweden, who has licensed this image under a Creative Commons CC-BY.30 license. Daniel Holking is founder and communications officer of Water Aid Sweden linkedin. Jan Eliasson, the subject of this photo, was a board member of Water Aid Sweden. A Creative Commons license is irrevocable (FAQ). There is no reason to believe that an official represenative of the copyright owner did not license this image. Thuresson (talk) 11:46, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 13:39, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I am the copyright holder of this image and I believe it has been wrongly uploaded to the commoms database. You cannot simply harvest pictures from Mynewsdesk without checking the requirements first. I see you have done so multiple times and even have a link to all pictures from Mynewsdesk that you have. This picture was uploaded with the press use in mind. That is that it should be used for articles connected to WaterAid and not intended for use for everything always. There is even a disclaimer added which has been there since 2013. In swedish: OBS! Bilderna upphör som pressbilder den sista augusti 2012 och får då inte längre användas fritt. Hänvisar till: http://www.alamy.com/search/imageresults.aspx?CreativeOn=1&qt=jan+eliasson Datum: 10.06.17 Bild nummer: 2545 You can reach me at daniel.holking@gmail.com if you have questions. Best regards, /Daniel 109.104.5.107 09:39, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This image is from the MynewsDesk page of Water Aid Sweden, who has licensed this image under a Creative Commons CC-BY.30 license. Daniel Holking is founder and communications officer of Water Aid Sweden linkedin. Jan Eliasson, the subject of this photo, was a board member of Water Aid Sweden. A Creative Commons license is irrevocable (FAQ). There is no reason to believe that an official represenative of the copyright owner did not license this image. Thuresson (talk) 11:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
![7 File:"Curves" - Mercedes Ambrus at Erotica Tour Millennium 2009 - B&W by Filippo Parisi.jpg](#File:"Curves"_-_Mercedes_Ambrus_at_Erotica_Tour_Millennium_2009_-_B&W_by_Filippo_Parisi.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_2017.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
st%C3%B3ria_-_O_TEMPO_EM_TRANSE-_Temporada_Arraial-003.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
st%C3%B3ria_-_O_TEMPO_EM_TRANSE-_Ensaio_aberto_001.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
st%C3%B3ria_-_o_tempo_em_transe.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2017.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2017.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_2017.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2017.png){kind=link}
_2017.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Together_(towards_a_better_future).png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 13:39, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
We have received a courtesy deletion request from the author in ticket:2021091810003729. While they understand that CC licenses are irrevikable they ask for not hosting this (unused in Wikimedia) photo in Commons. Ankry (talk) 10:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- And pinging @Rubin16 and Thuresson: for an opinion. Ankry (talk) 10:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Oppose The only reason the photo is not used today is because the author removed the photo from various Wikipedias (Global contributions) on September 20. The photo is both in scope and useful. Thuresson (talk) 10:51, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - I've reverted all of their removal edits so now it's officially INUSE. They happily uploaded or gave consent for an image to be uploaded under a CC licence .... if they didn't understand what a CC licence entails then they shouldn't have uploaded/gave consent. I see no valid reason to delete the file. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 11:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Web Archive [5] confirms previously under cc-by-3.0 -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:33, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)