Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/04/29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 29th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jan Ozeveren (talk) 08:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 08:54, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright does not allow for usage on Wikimedia Commons Blackfalcon501 (talk) 11:49, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 12:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 05:31, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ahmad252 at 08:14, 29 April 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1) --Krdbot 13:38, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free image. Venzz (talk) 21:13, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy, per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:28, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free photo by Joshua Benjamin Ali, as said in Metadata. Copyright holder joshuaaliphotography Venzz (talk) 13:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gabriella. DeSantis 64.88.8.254 17:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mijn zoontje heeft de afbeelding per ongeluk geupload daarom zou ik graag zien dat deze verwijderd wordt Betermaker (talk) 19:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:47, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong image Thepointstoryline (talk) 13:56, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 16:07, 29 April 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 19:56, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RLvikbeta05 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST - unused images of non-notable person(s) and various COM:NETCOPYVIOs

Эlcobbola talk 16:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 01:48, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is taken from www.poczet.com without permission; there's watermark on the file; if you think it's free picture, then find your own one! This file is made from photography made by me in Racibórz Museum. 87.205.187.30 19:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 01:19, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken form my website www.poczet.com - picture has even my watermark... 87.205.143.38 21:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep. As I said above, photographs of flat works of art do not have their own copyright, so you have no right to stop anyone from using this image for any purpose. If you post another DR on this image you will be blocked from editing on Commons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture taken from my webiste www.poczet.com without permission and with cut watermark... 77.253.188.193 20:33, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The official position by the Wikimedia Foundation is: faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain. This nom doesn't offer any different deletion rationale from the other noms above, which has already been debunked, so I don't see any reason on prolonging this DR. pandakekok9 03:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:04, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom and copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not the uploader's "own work". Jauerback (talk) 17:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Storkk at 09:39, 30 April 2020 UTC: Likely copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS. --Krdbot 13:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not the uploader's "own work". Looks like a screenshot. Jauerback (talk) 17:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Storkk at 09:39, 30 April 2020 UTC: Likely copyright violation; see COM:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS. --Krdbot 13:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 06:20, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:40, 30 April 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 19:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fotografie je obrácená chyba při nahrávání Jaromír Petřek (talk) 17:26, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Na tom nezáleží. Toto bude opraveno automaticky. --Achim (talk) 17:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Dobře neodstraňovat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaromír Petřek (talk • contribs) 11:41, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn, image has been rotated. --Achim (talk) 11:47, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 07:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation and incorrect license. This Images copyright is owned by "John Lamparski / Stringer" via Getty: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/pewdiepie-signs-copies-of-his-new-book-this-book-loves-you-news-photo/494848194 Vistadan 09:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 1989 at 23:27, 4 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 07:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation and incorrect license. This Images copyright is owned by "Frazer Harrison / Staff" via Getty: https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/diplo-attends-the-62nd-annual-grammy-awards-at-staples-news-photo/1202172084 Vistadan 09:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 1989 at 23:27, 4 Mai 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 07:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
 Delete. Obviously we can change the description if necessary, but if we don't know where this was actually first published then we can't tell if it's in the public domain. --bjh21 (talk) 12:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph was produced by the AP. https://nypost.com/2015/07/30/i-owe-my-marriage-to-free-marketeer-milton-friedman/ RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 02:56, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:09, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious NETCOPYVIO, Stolen Photos, Copyright violations, no permission, no exif, not own-work, copycat and stealing photos from:

I Nyoman Gede Anila (talk) 12:12, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 03:23, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Namahabharata (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some information: these files were uploaded to Wikipedia for a self-promotion article for a mystical guru/healer that has been repeatedly deleted there (details on user talk page). The certificate is likely copyright to the lab that user asked to test their formula for "a solution against acid attacks" (the test result file, File:New Doc 2020-01-24 18.27.49.pdf has already been speedily deleted), which is essentially just bleach. The other two files are portraits of the uploader, as far as I can tell. There is no chance these will ever be used on Wikipedia, very unlikely the uploader intends to use them anywhere else - and less likely that there'd be a valid use if they tried. Amedee123 (talk) 19:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AKiwiJoker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:34, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maxmarwiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, maps, paintings, etc. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maxmarwiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images in wrong PDF format, all unused and unusable. Many photos of existing photos, DW copyvio.

P 1 9 9   17:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:30, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable musician, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:56, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational use, out of scope. Tiny image, likely screengrab. P 1 9 9   17:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational use, out of scope. Tiny image, likely screengrab. P 1 9 9   17:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use and not notable people, not identifiable Ezarateesteban 17:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal doc, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:27, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Viswajanani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos or DW, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:27, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Geumbagi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

1) COM:NOTHOST/self promotion; 2) Previously appeared here; 3) To the extent uploader purports to be subject, photographer would be the original copyright holder-no evidence of transfer; 4) Duplicates

Эlcobbola talk 18:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:26, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erikdavidjones (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promotional photos and logos, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:25, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monkeylowe71 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:08, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:25, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:10, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:25, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:22, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:25, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Nahid Hossain (talk) 04:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Nahid Hossain (talk) 04:53, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PenguinTechno (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused, uncategorized. Seems to be related to not notable company/organization

Estopedist1 (talk) 13:28, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:29, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:33, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:33, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nandopc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:44, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ricardo Fariña Kiese (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious NETCOPYVIO, Stolen Photos, Copyright violations, no permission, no exif, not own-work, copycat and stealing photos from:

I Nyoman Gede Anila (talk) 12:12, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Could you please review the source first before nominating the photo for deletion? The author published it on his Flickr account under a valid license. If it is being used in social media or any other platform, that is because the author allowed the reuse and modification of the image. Do not jump off the gun.

Thedarkknightjc (talk) 10:59, 01 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The flickr license is valid and doesn't appear to be flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 10:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisment no educational use Perumalism (talk) 19:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used only in now-deleted spam page at enwiki. Out of scope. Images are also likely derivative works of fair use video stills. Kinu (talk) 00:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used only in now-deleted spam page at enwiki. Out of scope. Kinu (talk) 00:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

contains severe mistakes, request by the uploader Stilfehler (talk) 13:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at MD (and not in use BTW). E4024 (talk) 01:31, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file of minimally formatted plain text Vahurzpu (talk) 03:00, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file of minimally formatted plain text Vahurzpu (talk) 03:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. https://digitalcollections.hoover.org/objects/64145 RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 03:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image claims to be CC licensed allowing remixes but Flick page says (CC BY-ND 2.0) ND= no remix. Delete may be necessary but update and clarification on Talk page could be all that is needed. 109.76.215.105 03:07, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: CC license is irrevocable. --Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. pandakekok9 03:35, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT Nahid Hossain (talk) 04:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 07:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable self-work, no EXIF data. Given the subject's getup, I suspect that this is a screenshot of a Running Man episode. ƏXPLICIT 07:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 08:28, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 08:34, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DavideArte (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 09:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably movie poster. Unlikely to be own work. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:22, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; OTRS permission needed. --Ahmadtalk 09:27, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davidkadlcik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Clearly from same set as image on company's press kit page here. Additional evidence of permission needed, especially as uploader has numerous copyright issues and purports to upload on behalf of "clients"; COM:PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 18:24, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, self promotional content Ezarateesteban 18:38, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 09:27, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of higher-resolution Bekonscot October 1988.jpg Blythwood (talk) 20:38, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. @Blythwood: Note that you can tag exact or scaled-down duplicates like this with {{Duplicate}} to save the need for a full deletion request. --bjh21 (talk) 12:59, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:52, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a free image 2A01:E35:2F0F:8080:C430:830F:CD29:F88B 21:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional photo published before upload to Commons: https://usa.inquirer.net/4866/pal-rolls-tri-class-a330-new-premium-economy Ytoyoda (talk) 21:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:36, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[1] Gyrostat (talk) 21:13, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE 양념파닭 (talk) 21:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; found on web in 2016. Probably not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in-use picture of an unknown person. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 22:31, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:36, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie Benchebenchebenn (talk) 03:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 12:34, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality no educational value Perumalism (talk) 15:13, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:09, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:10, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Perumalism (talk) 16:07, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:09, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chan kian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://media.viralcham.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/12173255/raubgoodfood18.jpg

--Wright Streetdeck 04:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; OTRS permission needed. --Ahmadtalk 23:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chan kian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from billboards

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 08:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect structure (no covalent bond between N and Br); replaced by File:ML-154.svg. Leyo 20:25, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datei ist irrtümlich zu gross mit 10,11 MB. Wird durch komprimierte Datei ersetzt vom Autor TREM-RRRR. TREM-RRRR (talk) 11:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Question @TREM-RRRR: "Zu grosse" Dateien gibt es auf Commons im Grunde nicht, wir haben kein Problem mit der Dateigrösse und kleinere Vorschaubilder werden automatisch generiert. Eigentlich sind möglichst grosse, unkomprimierte Dateien sogar erwünscht. Möchtest du die Datei trotzdem gelöscht haben? Wenn ja, können wir das gemäss COM:CSD#G7 trotzdem ohne weitere Begründung machen, da du den Wunsch nach Löschung gleich nach dem Hochladen geäussert hattest. Gestumblindi (talk) 00:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:CSD#G7 as uploader has now confirmed on the talk page of this DR that they would like to have this picture deleted, and G7 would have been applicable at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fantasy diagram, out of project scope : not an external hosting tool for cybernations ; https://cybernations.fandom.com/wiki/Great_Lakes_Union Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:36, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A different crop of this photo appears at https://www.johnniecooper.com/biography - when right clicked, it says "This photo is Copyright © 2019 Johnnie Cooper. All rights reserved." Lord Belbury (talk) 15:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This PDF contains a number of images in the later pages, which do not have licensing information. They are clearly not the work of the uploader. FredWalsh (talk) 08:53, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are three images in the PDF, one each on Page #5, #6, and #7. It's true that they are not my original work. As is evident from the title of the file, these images are (screenshots) taken on a p0rnographic site. The PDF is part of published research work and is intended for public awareness and public education regarding the illegal act of capturing and distributing non-consensual sexually explicit images. The website from which these images were captured contains a vast trove of such illegal images. Attributing the images on the Wikimedia Commons would essentially draw attention (and visitors) to an privacy-invading website that hosts a vast amount of illegal content. Because this PDF is meant and has been previously used for public education (see page 1 of the PDF), I would suppose the images would amount to fair use. -- Rohini (talk) 09:24, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Rohini: Then it seems you have not understood the purpose of Commons. Every file must have either a reuse license or be in the public domain. However, fair use is not accepted on Commons under any circumstances. FredWalsh (talk) 11:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would be immensely grateful if you could direct me to the relevant policy or documentation that states that fair use is prohibited in all circumstances. -- Rohini (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Rohini: the relevant policy is located here. AshFriday (talk) 00:06, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Contains above-COM:DM content that does not meet our license requirements. --DMacks (talk) 13:43, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Russellkieboom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, painting, drawing, video. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

Estopedist1 (talk) 11:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:21, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't depict title 1.129.107.164 13:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The black borders and lack of metadata make me suspect this is a screenshot, deleting per COM:PRP. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:44, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An image whose sole purpose is vandalism & harassment of a public figure. The uploader has been engaging in vandalism of ko:안젤리나 다닐로바 on kowiki with this image. Ellpicre (talk) 13:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retracting request: File obviously meets speedy deletion criterion G3 - Content intended as vandalism, threat, or attack. Ellpicre (talk) 04:07, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:19, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Internet photo, no license, no permission

Wcam (talk) 14:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:19, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong caption G3Sasi (talk) 18:15, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no such file. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:20, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shadowssettle as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clear crop/section of Royal Holloway official logo. Coats of arms in the UK are generally not copyright, but their renditions are Pjposullivan (talk) 18:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the issue here that the original work this image is based on File:Small_Royal_Holloway_logo.jpg is tagged as CCSA. Without an official disclaimer, logos and the like are not free use, and as no disclaimer exists, it would seem this is a copyright violation under COM:TOO UK. I might be wrong, but this same logic has been applied before many times on coats of arms that now exist on Wikipedia and not commons: for example en:File:Imperial_College_London_crest.svg was on Commons for a while. It would've seemed to be fine for speedy deletion under COM:CSD F3. Shadowssettle (talk) 18:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:20, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi, and thanks for your consideration. I do not mind that there are photos of me online, i feel that this image is unflattering and would like to see if we could remove completely or if i can submit an image to replace it. Thank you in advance for your help and consideration NVolk97 (talk) 02:34, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Speedy  Keep Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nathalie Volk (34308971563).jpg. No proof that this is the depicted person and, per the other DR and comments of Bidgee, this could be an sockpuppet of an banned sockmaster, in particular to get revenge for having an IP banned yesterday for sockpuppetry. Tm (talk) 11:37, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is not a sock, the linked DR shows that this image "this is a private photo - i wish to have it deleted". Now this user tries to argument that this image is unflattering. If this this the depicted person and wants to submit a photo, this user can use Commons:OTRS, but should know that there is no reason to delete this photo, as this photo is clearly in scope, with zero personality rights and with no other problems.
If this indeed the person depicted, i have to say that this is you cant say that you did not know that this particular photographer was photographing you, as you were clearly possing for this photographer, the same minute this photo was taken, have an derivative photo on your DE Wikipedia page, one photographer part of an wide photographic coverage of an public event called "Circus Roncalli Gala Premiere In Hamburg", as can be seen by the extensive photographic coverage made by Getty Images, in Gallery One, where you appear not once, but twice. or on Gallery Two, where you appear one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen times. And in several of this images you are clearly posing and surrounded by several persons, on a public event, so the reasoning of this being a "private photo" or unflattering is either a genuine but mislead assumption or a patient falsehood with unknown intents. Either way, there is no reason to delete. Tm (talk) 11:37, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep She looks gorgeous! I doubt the words "i feel that this image is unflattering" come from her, I believe that sounds more like a mocking of some previous recommendation. :) E4024 (talk) 22:51, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:23, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yomeo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work of uploader as claimed

NinjaStrikers «» 10:35, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:21, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:07, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a Commons category but something like a Wikipedia article. Something appears to have gone wrong. Cf. fragments of deletion request in the first revision of this document. Zv0486~commonswiki (talk) 21:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it looks like a Wikipedia article because it was one. Before deletion i made a copy to the commons. Now it shall be deleted here. So i made another copy in my user space. I hope it will be safe there. LoKiLeCh (talk)

Deleted: per nomination, now to be found at de:Benutzer:LoKiLeCh/Vandalenschutzreservat/Niederschlagsdiagramm (Deutschland). --Achim (talk) 18:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Hypixel logo looks eligible for copyright in United States and Canada (origin). 67.184.0.138 18:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 19:03, 29 Juli 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: https://m.facebook.com/Hypixel/ --Krdbot 06:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Esta foto no me pertenece, ni es trabajo mio, la subí por error y ahora quiero que lo eliminen porfavor, ToxicFree (talk) 06:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The URL suggests that the file was uploaded there in 2018, but it was not uploaded to Commons until 2020. The Commons copy has higher resolution, but our copy is cropped compared to the expreso.com.pe copy. Likely copyvio. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:21, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Also see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ToxicFree. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:50, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover with no indication that uploader is copyright holder. Sam-2727 (talk) 17:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. – Kwj2772 (talk) 13:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible as well. Taivo (talk) 08:49, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Property of VASAVA for Atletico de Madrid https://www.vasava.es/portfolio/atletico-de-madrid-visual-identity Brgesto (talk) 13:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Press Photo: https://www.apotea.se/apotea-i-media#/images/par-1603865, No CC, No Derivatives allowed Skivsamlare (talk) 13:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mj%C3%B8sa_mot_Stange_med_Sundvika.jpg Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 14:08, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion recommended due to tghere being many better quality images of this species currently uploaded, lack of image sharpness and very low resolutioin of original. GRDN711 (talk) 15:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes delete. Dendrofil (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Perumalism (talk) 15:07, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value + Advertisment Perumalism (talk) 15:10, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recommended for deletion as there are sharper, higher resolution, better quality images of dead birds of this species. GRDN711 (talk) 15:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Perumalism (talk) 15:15, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Taken from FB per MD, not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a fictional logo of a fictional company. No such company can be identified. Thus, no encyclopedical value. Zv0486~commonswiki (talk) 15:33, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hscherb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Frascaroli Giuseppe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art and promo photos. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Procedural listing. This file was tagged for deletion with the same rationale, but never included in the nomination above. ƏXPLICIT 12:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio [2] Munf (talk) 17:13, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Perumalism (talk) 17:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned by the uploader DZwarrior1 (talk) 18:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Scope?. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not an own work, scanned photo. No source provided Ezarateesteban 18:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC) si es una foto scaneada que la suministro el estudio de arquitectura de hardoy — Preceding unsigned comment added by NelidaAzul (talk • contribs) 04:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not an own work, scanned photo, no source provided Ezarateesteban 18:20, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a properly encoded SVG graphic, and is a duplication of File:Finland road sign 381.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in PD in Argentina, in 2024 we can restore it Ezarateesteban 18:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and:


not in PD in Argentina, author is yet live Ezarateesteban 18:31, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in PD in Argentina, in 2024 we may restore it Ezarateesteban 18:51, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. https://www.hoover.org/research/romance-economics RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 18:53, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license, not an own work, scanned photo Ezarateesteban 18:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; might be PD but we need more info. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't seem very likely that he took the photos. RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 19:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made it for English Wikipedia but it is not needed there so I would like to delete it. I am the author of the file. CookieMonster755 (talk) 19:14, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a notable organization, and from uploader's username, it is likely uploaded for advertisement. 67.184.0.138 19:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where is a criterium of notability for Wikimedia Commons? --ŠJů (talk) 22:08, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:54, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source may be accurate, but there is no indication that this image is really released under CC-BY-SA-4.0. Also look at the other uploads of this user D-Kuru (talk) 20:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:22, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; copyvio, photo of photo. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quelle nicht nachvollziehbar, "Urheber Wikia" definitiv falsch Ralf Roletschek 20:35, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need the permission from the photograph, as it appeared from it.wiki discussions that the uploader is also the person in the photo trying to advert himself. Ruthven (msg) 20:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not covered by the OTRS ticket on the file description page. See Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Category:Night_Phoenix_Press_characters. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:51, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

badly loaded, author intends to redo Librarian lena (talk) 15:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely that this image with the college's logo already superimposed is original work owned and licensed by the uploader ElKevbo (talk) 16:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a properly encoded SVG graphic, and is a duplication of File:Finland road sign 382.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:22, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a properly encoded SVG graphic, and is a duplication of File:Finland road sign 372.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a properly encoded SVG graphic, and is a duplication of File:Finland road sign 371.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:24, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a properly encoded SVG graphic, and is a duplication of File:Finland road sign 511.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:25, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a properly encoded SVG graphic, and is a duplication of File:Finland road sign 421.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:25, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of unfree content -- too prominent placement of advertising images IMO, no permission by the original author. A.Savin 18:26, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is beimgb used to hack my accounys and identity 2603:6000:8E43:3800:ADBC:9ED9:C6DD:F7CB 18:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

they are involved in the hacking of my accounts and credit bank info identity theft 2603:6000:8E43:3800:ADBC:9ED9:C6DD:F7CB 19:04, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you clarify who you are and what information you need removed? If you need personal information removed and want avoid giving specifics publicly you can email the Commons oversight team.  MorganKevinJ(talk) 19:26, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to TaronjaSatsuma (talk · contribs), who started this proposal, the file is "Not PD, not public display". The proposal has been also requested as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Franco JoséSegrelles Detail MusHistMili-Valencia 20191204.jpg. I fixed it on behalf of the user. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 22:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A low quality "conceptual diagram" with wrong proportions and not an accurate depiction of the scene. Also a derivative work of a no longer existing file. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 23:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyright violation: Source article does not mention the image being released under the stated license. Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly (talk) 04:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no evidence image was released under a free license. Huntster (t @ c) 18:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely above ToO, no permission. Sealle (talk) 12:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ventile sind beim Erhitzen geschmolzen. Niemand soll auf die Idee kommen, das nachzumachen. Die Dinger sind schweineteuer. Außerdem kann es sein, dass der Besitzer eine geringfügige Verformung des Ventils nicht bemerkt. Ob das Gewebe von FFP2-Masken ohne Ventil beim Erhitzen dicht bleibt, muss ich noch herausfinden. Falls ja mache ich ein Foto davon. Sciencia58 (talk) 07:09, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte löscht doch dieses blöde Foto. Niemand hat Einspruch erhoben. Sciencia58 (talk) 13:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: kein Löschgrund angegeben, Bild wird verwendet. --Krd 17:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious NETCOPYVIO, Stolen Photos, Copyright violations, no permission, no exif, not own-work, copycat and stealing photos from:

I Nyoman Gede Anila (talk) 12:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Nominator has gotten carried away just a bit. (See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Venus Raj at the CPFW in Toronto, Canda, March 2014.jpg.) The file does have EXIF, as can be clearly seen on the page. The EXIF says "Author NOSLIV", which is very similar to the uploader's user name, User:NoslivRage. The EXIF also says "Date and time of data generation 17:43, 11 March 2017", and the file was only uploaded here 14 March 2017, so uploader would have had to have been pretty fast to have grabbed it from any other source. Pretty clearly all the other sources got it from here, not the other way around: many of them are cropped to just the head, or even explicitly link to Wikipedia. If that weren't enough, the file has the same camera and style and camera location and almost the same timestamp (3 minutes difference) as another image from the same user uploaded here File:Ariella Arida.jpg. Uploader has been uploading well photographed images here since 2013, each a few days after photographing them, just like this one. --GRuban (talk) 16:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:GRuban. --P 1 9 9   21:30, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality doctored image Perumalism (talk) 19:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 02:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Original photograph has unknown copyright status. Buidhe (talk) 03:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file of minimally formatted plain text Vahurzpu (talk) 03:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Text-only image, should be in wikitable format if needed. --P 1 9 9   21:26, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising or self-promotion. (COM:ADVERT) Nahid Hossain (talk) 04:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screen A1Cafel (talk) 06:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo is OK. See here: Commons:De_minimis#Israel. TaBaZzz (talk) 11:27, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to me that photo is ok and in accordance with De minimis as mentioned by TaBaZzz. Arielinson (talk) 11:43, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please keep this photo. I do not see any reason to delete. Laliv g (talk) 11:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DM per above. --P 1 9 9   21:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screen A1Cafel (talk) 06:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo is OK. See here: Commons:De_minimis#Israel. TaBaZzz (talk) 11:20, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to me that photo is ok and in accordance with De minimis as mentioned by TaBaZzz Arielinson (talk) 11:43, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DM per above. --P 1 9 9   21:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I contest whether these are simple shapes only. Pretty complex shape and colouring, Masur (talk) 06:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work, no EXIF data. The user's other three uploads were non-free images, unlikely for this file to be any different. COM:PCP should be employed. ƏXPLICIT 08:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is one of two that was supplied by mistake to me in a batch of portraits to upload; the copyright holder is not Massey University, so it has not been released under an open license. I'd appreciate it is somebody could delete it. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 08:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is one of two that was supplied by mistake to me in a batch of portraits to upload; the copyright holder is not Massey University, so it has not been released under an open license. I'd appreciate it is somebody could delete it. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 08:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation Veverve (talk) 10:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unclear/unknown source. --P 1 9 9   21:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused inaccurate map with low educational value — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some information in the file is incorrect. This picture hasn't an encyclopedic value for Wikipedia or Commons. Uğurkent (talk) 11:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wolkenbild, Ortschaft nicht identifizierbar ETH-Bibliothek (talk) 12:13, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion not necessary anymore, image was identified ETH-Bibliothek (talk) 09:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9   21:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

better PNG version File:Irish plate specification.png — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

此文件有问题,而且已无用 Cryberghost (talk) 12:31, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello, this image has been published by INED (PDF source: Population & Sociétés, 568(2), INED, 2019), under a CC-BY-ND license (see last page of the PDF source). ContributorQ (talk) 13:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello, this image has been published by INED (PDF source: Population & Sociétés, 568(2), INED, 2019), under a CC-BY-ND license (see last page of the PDF source). ContributorQ (talk) 13:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright reason: This file is from a different author and it's shown as own work JTE Dimandix (talk) 13:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: weak nomination, but other upload by this user was confirmed copyvio. This one looked like screengrab too. --P 1 9 9   21:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This train would be buildt 1954, year 1950 at the picture is wrong - wrong licence. Mef.ellingen (talk) 14:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   21:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from the 60's by unknown photographer, no reason to believe it was released under free license Tournesol (talk) 14:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded the picture according to these rules: "Om det gäller vanliga fotografier, så skiljer man på "fotografisk bild" och "fotografiskt verk", och den övervägande delen av alla foton torde klassas som bild. För "bild" gäller i Sverige sedan 1 juli 1994 att den är skyddad i 50 år från framställningsåret, medan ett "verk" är skyddat i 70 år efter fotografens död (ganska betydande skillnad, med andra ord). Lagen som gällde före 1994 sa att samtliga foton var bilder, och de var skyddade i 25 år från framställningsåret, eller 50 år om de hade konstnärligt eller vetenskapligt värde. När den nya lagen infördes fastslog man att den inte skulle gälla retroaktivt annat än för verk; de fotografiska bilder som förlorat sitt skydd fick inte skydd av den nya lagen. Det betyder i praktiken att de flesta bilder som 1994 var 25 år eller äldre, d.v.s. vanliga svenska fotografier tagna före den 1 januari 1969 är oskyddade och därmed fria att använda." The picture was taken 1967, well before 1 Januari 1969 MvhVerywellander (talk) 15:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am still awaiting response to my answer to the complaint about the upload of the mentioned picture, which I claim is done according to valid rules. Verywellander (talk) 17:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: appears to qualify for {{PD-Sweden-photo}}. --P 1 9 9   21:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Torba17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, documents, maps. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some of those may qualify for Template:Anonymous-EU. We are now 75+ years since those photos were taken. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. It is up to uploader to provide the missing info to see if they qualify for Anonymous-EU. --P 1 9 9   20:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright protected content of Pashtriku.org: Të gjitha të drejtat e rezervuara Albinfo (talk) 16:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing author, date, permission. --P 1 9 9   20:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo, not {{PD-ROC-exempt}}. Wcam (talk) 19:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment But maybe this is simple logo, that case permission is not needed? Taivo (talk) 10:55, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Taiwan's copyright law protects work with "minimal creativity" (COM:TOO Taiwan) and I think this logo is protected. --Wcam (talk) 12:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This LOGO's copyright belongs to Governential authorities in Taiwan (which the Chiayi Art Museum belongs to Cultural Affair Bureau of Chiayi City Government), also this LOGO is published official by Chiayi Art Museum. Therefore this LOGO complies with Subparagraph 2, Paragraph 1, Article 9 of Copyright Act of the Republic of China (Taiwan). (in Chinese: 本標誌之版權係屬中華民國行政機關所有(嘉義市立美術館為嘉義市政府文化局轄下文化場館),且本標誌係由嘉義市立美術館正式公佈,故符合中華民國著作權法第 9 條第 1 項第 2 款之規定。) --Jrthsr700tmax (talk) 14:53, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No. A museum is not a government agency. In the past an argument that public schools in Taiwan are part of the government therefore their logos are exempt did not fly. --Wcam (talk) 04:42, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
According to "Organic Regulations of Chiayi Art Museum" and its staffing table (Only in Chinese Language), it's true that Chiayi Art Museum is a agency belongs to Cultural Affairs Bureau of Chiayi City Government, which is it fits the scope of the government department of the Republic of China (Taiwan). (in Chinese: 依「嘉義市立美術館組織規程」之規定及其編制表(僅中文),嘉義市立美術館實屬嘉義市政府文化局之下轄機關,故符合廣義中華民國政府部門之範疇。) --Jrthsr700tmax (talk)
The regulation makes no reference to that Chiayi Art Museum is considered a government agency. I tend to delete it since the museum has released a monochrome logo thereof under GWOIA.--Larryasou (talk) 08:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9   20:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by User:ケンサカグチ

[edit]

Copies of commercial products. Copyvio. --aokomoriuta (talk) 19:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Is there evidence to support that they are copyright violations? whym (talk) 13:45, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • File:K×伸.jpg - While https://onigirimedia.com/2020/01/26/sakaguchiken1/ has the same photo with an earlier timestamp, the Commons version seems more likely to be original (or at least a copy of the original) in that it doesn't have the watermark/caption. For the same reason, it is likely that the uploader is closely associated with its original creator (or is its original creator). That doesn't mean all the files, each of which might be created by different people, should be kept, but it makes me think they should be decided individually, not in bulk like this. whym (talk) 13:45, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per COM:EVID: "In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained to demonstrate that as far as can reasonably be determined: the file is in the public domain or is properly licensed." (underline added) It is not the duty of anyone "to support that they are copyright violations," but rather the uploader must demonstrate a valid free license. We require evidence, not idle speculation about what might be. In this case, all, or nearly all, appeared elsewhere prior to upload to Commons; per COM:OTRS, the "file has been previously published without a free license on a medium I can't alter" is a circumstance when "you must send an email to the OTRS system." (underline added) For example, taking only the first five:

This exercise can, of course, be done for the others and indicates the group are properly treated together and indeed that there exists significant doubt. --Эlcobbola talk 23:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Megantheee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some not found at URL, others unfree screenshots from music videos.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:02, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Megantheee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fonts seems have copyright.

轻语者 (talk) 03:53, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Font is not to be conflated with typeface. Fonts are copyrightable because they are computer software; typefaces, however, the visual output thereof, cannot be protected by copyright in the United States. These images, of course, are not font files (e.g., PostScript Type 1, TrueType, etc.), but merely text. --Эlcobbola talk 18:30, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Megantheee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Above COM:TOO

Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 06:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image looks to be taken from Natasia Demetriou's social media, uploader seems to have made account just for this image Elisfkc (talk) 04:31, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Natasia_Demetriou,_What_We_Do_in_The_Shadows,_2019.jpg, Natasia Demetriou uploaded the image herself. Bodney (talk) 10:04, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Image appeared here (and numerous other places) before Commons upload. As no verification or credential is required to create a given user name, we lack the ability to know the true identity of the account operator. Indeed, fans of notable persons not infrequently create such "role" accounts; the account name of Natasia demetriou thus means absolutely nothing. It is precisely for this reason that COM:OTRS identifies previous publication as a scenario for which "you must send an email to the OTRS system." (underline added). --Эlcobbola talk 18:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logotype outdated. New version available as of 2020-04-29. Nossnahoj17 (talk) 06:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As presented, this is not adequate. We generally maintain historical logos (e.g., for uses of illustrating discussion of company history, evolution of corporate identity, etc.) For COM:SCOPE based deletions, explanation of a lack of educational utility is needed. That a new logo exists is perhaps a rationale for replacement at a sister project, but not in and of itself a reason for deletion here. --Эlcobbola talk 18:08, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logotype outdated. New version available as of 2020-04-29. Nossnahoj17 (talk) 07:00, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As presented, this is not adequate. We generally maintain historical logos (e.g., for uses of illustrating discussion of company history, evolution of corporate identity, etc.) For COM:SCOPE based deletions, explanation of a lack of educational utility is needed. That a new logo exists is perhaps a rationale for replacement at a sister project, but not in and of itself a reason for deletion here. --Эlcobbola talk 18:08, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist died in 1953. Her works are not in the public domain yet in France. OTRS permission of the legal successors is necessary.

BrightRaven (talk) 08:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS received, we need time to check it. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 21:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Kvardek du: Please move the ticket to a permissions queue. Storkk (talk) 09:10, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: for now, leaving it to the OTRS process. --Jcb (talk) 15:42, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nori Malo-Renault died in 1953. No OTRS.

Chassipress (talk) 15:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
Please try to contact the uploader: these are obviously coming from his family's ressources.
He's probably not able to prepare an OTRS, and it would be more constructive to help him with that.
Regards, --Daehan (talk) 20:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Monsieur Chassipress,
Pouvez-vous donner, s'il vous plait, la traduction en français de tout le texte concernant la suppression des fichiers listés ci-dessus.
Remarque : cette suppression aurait pour conséquence irrémédiable la "fermeture" de la page Wikipédia Nori Malo-Renault (1871-1953).
De plus il existe déjà un avertissement par un bandeau que: l'on ne doit pas (ou ne peut pas ?) copier ces fichiers à partir de ce "Commons", est-ce insuffisant?
Cordialement.--François Malo-Renault (talk) 04:50, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour. Pour publier ces œuvres sur Commons et sur Wikipédia en français, il faut que les ayant-droit de Nori Malo-Renault donnent leur autorisation pour une publication sous une licence compatible. Cette autorisation doit nous parvenir via cette procédure : COM:OTRS/fr. Si vous n'avez pas l'autorisation des ayant droit, il n'est pas possible de publier ces images ici. Cordialement, BrightRaven (talk) 11:23, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prints by Nori Malo-Renault (died in 1953). No OTRS.

Chassipress (talk) 21:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the reproduction of a 2D work does not entitle to a new copyright. Ruthven (msg) 12:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I re-nominate these 3 files, because the previous decision is wrong imho. These are not photographs or scans of artworks (which, in some cases, do not create new copyright), but engravings and etchings, which are derivative works (see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Engravings) and generate new copyright. So these artworks will enter the PD in France in 2024.

BrightRaven (talk) 08:24, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: BrightRaven is correct. The notion that "reproduction of a 2D work does not entitle to a new copyright" misses two related points: 1) it is the slavish reproduction of a two-dimensional work that does not create a new copyright and 2) the court decision that serves as the basis of this notion, Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp., found no copyright in the photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional public-domain work of art, for lack of originality. Indeed, engravings are not photographic reproductions and are not generally slavish. As Nori Malo-Renault died in 1953, this would not be PD in France until 01.01.2024 (1953 + 70 + 1) and would not be PD in the US until 95 years after publication date (which has not been provided). --Эlcobbola talk 17:27, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nori Malo-Renault died in 1953. No OTRS.

Chassipress (talk) 20:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As Nori Malo-Renault died in 1953, these would not be PD in France until 01.01.2024 (1953 + 70 + 1) and would not be PD in the US until 95 years after publication date (which has not been provided). --Эlcobbola talk 17:28, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Public domain only in 2024, as the author died in 1953.

Yann (talk) 10:41, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*File:Le Chateau des Merveilles 1893, décor-couv lamé par Nori MR.jpg also/aussi. Abzeronow (talk) 17:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,@Yann@Abzeronow,
statut des droits d'auteur du créateur
droits d'auteurs ne pouvant plus être enfreints
ressort territorial
pays avec 70 ans PMA ou plus court François Malo-Renault (talk) 07:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
En France, tous les droits d'auteur des auteurs décédés en 1953 expirent le 1er janvier 2024. Abzeronow (talk) 16:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonsoir @Yann, j'aimerai avoir l'article de loi qui s'applique précisément. François Malo-Renault (talk) 17:40, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Voyez Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/France/fr et {{PD-France}} qui a des liens vers les textes de lois. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
L123-1 C.p.i.. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
== Article L123-1 ==
@Abzeronow@Asclepias@Yann
====== Version en vigueur depuis le 01 juillet 1995 ======
Modifié par Loi n°97-283 du 27 mars 1997 - art. 5 () JORF 28 mars 1997 en vigueur le 1er juillet 1995
L'auteur jouit, sa vie durant, du droit exclusif d'exploiter son oeuvre sous quelque forme que ce soit et d'en tirer un profit pécuniaire.
Au décès de l'auteur, ce droit persiste au bénéfice de ses ayants droit pendant l'année civile en cours et les soixante-dix années qui suivent.] François Malo-Renault (talk) 18:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oui, ce qui est important ici est pendant l'année civile en cours, c'est-à-dire jusqu'au 31 décembre. Yann (talk) 17:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BONJOUR; dans le droit français l'oeuvre de Nori Malo-Renault est das le domaine public depuis.le 29 janvier 2023. Voir le Code de la propriété intellectuelle : Chapitre III : Durée de la protection https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000006278937--François Malo-Renault (talk) 06:17, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non. Voir Article 21 : Au décès de l'auteur, ce droit persiste au bénéfice de ses ayants droit pendant l'année civile en cours et les cinquante années qui suivent. Les 50 ans ont été allongés à 70 ans en 1992, mais le reste est inchangé. Yann (talk) 17:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour @Yann,
Donc je ne numérise plus d’œuvre de Nori Malo-Renault pour les télécharger à partir de maintenant sur https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Nori_Malo-Renault?uselang=fret pour au moins 10 mois, également les 2 pages https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nori_Malo-Renault et https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nori_Malo-Renault vont se dégrader et je sais pas si je pourrait les restaurer un jour.... François Malo-Renault (talk) 05:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Donc encore 300 jours environ.... François Malo-Renault (talk) 08:39, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pour info j'ai noté deux fichiers en cc-zero qui sont d’ailleurs dans des collections muséalesː Musée de Bretagne et Musée des Beaux arts de Quimper..
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salom%C3%A9_eau-forte_de_Nori_Malo_Renault_sign%C3%A9.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Marie-Annick_e-f_originale_Nori_MR,_version_coul.jpg
Cordialement François Malo-Renault (talk) 13:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, Par sa nature même, une déclaration CC0 de renonciation volontaire à ses droits d'auteur ne peut être émise que par le titulaire de ces droits d'auteur. Donc, à moins d'une preuve vérifiable que le titulaire des droits d'auteur sur ces oeuvres de Nori Malo-Renault a émis une déclaration CC0 de renonciation volontaire à ses droits d'auteur sur ces oeuvres, personne ne peut appliquer une étiquette CC0 à ces oeuvres. Si un photographe fait une reproduction photographique d'une oeuvre dont il n'est pas le titulaire des droits d'auteur, ce photographe ne peut émettre une déclaration CC0 de renoncement seulement qu'à l'égard de son propre travail de photographe, déclaration qui pourrait s'appliquer dans des juridictions où de telles reproductions photographiques pourraient générer des droits d'auteur distincts de ceux de l'oeuvre photographiée. Mais une déclaration CC0 par ce photographe ne peut pas s'appliquer à l'oeuvre photographiée. Pour qu'une reproduction photographique d'une oeuvre d'art puisse être hébergée sur Wikimedia Commons, il faut que l'oeuvre d'art photographiée soit libre (ou au moins que le titulaire des droits d'auteur sur l'oeuvre photographiée autorise explicitement que cette reproduction photographique particulière soit libre). On peut distinguer trois types de situations. A- Si l'oeuvre d'art photographiée est libre et que le photographe-téléverseur sur Comons ne prétend pas avoir de droits d'auteur sur le travail de reproduction photographique, alors l'image peut être hébergée sur Commons. B- Si l'oeuvre d'art photographiée est libre et que la reproduction photographique provient d'une source sans lien avec Wikimedia, alors l'image peut être hébergée sur Commons avec l'addition d'un bandeau d'avertissement dans les cas où il existe une possibilité que le travail de reproduction photographique ne soit pas libre dans certains pays. C- Si l'oeuvre photographiée n'est pas déjà elle-même libre, alors l'image de la reproduction photographique ne peut de toutes façons pas être hébergée sur Commons, quel que puisse être le statut du travail du photographe. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:50, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,Asclepias@Yann
Merci pour vos explications précises et détaillées, j’ hésite à utiliser une déclaration CC0 qui m’obligerait à prouver que je suis ayant droit. Les admin de Wikipédia n’ont pas remarqué la documentation et les fichiers que j'ai fourni pour Émile et Nori.(Cf user Daehan) Le plus simple c’est d’attendre, mois de 300 jours.
Une question toutefois qu'elle est la différence pour le droit moral sur les œuvres (estampe, pastel ...) entrées dans le domaine public par (70 ans+1) ou CC-0 ? Et que permet le droit moral?
Merci.
user François Malo-Renault (talk) 06:09, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Les droits moraux sont décrits dans les lois des différents pays. Ainsi, leur nature et leur durée peut différer selon les pays. Par exemple, au Canada, ils sont décrits à l'article 14.1 de la Loi sur le droit d'auteur et ils ont la même durée que les droits patrimoniaux. En France, ils sont décrits aux articles L121-1 à L121-9 du C.p.i., certains de ces droits y subsistent après l'expiration des droits patrimoniaux et certains y sont inaliénables (art. L121-1). Par une déclaration CC0, le déclarant renonce à ses droits d'auteur, patrimoniaux et moraux, dans toute la mesure où cela ne contrevient pas aux lois applicables. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:12, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merci beaucoup@Asclepias;
Votre réponse est précise et bien documentées, les articles L121-1 à L121-9 sont clairs et donc mon choix est simple pas domaine public (avec CC-0), il suffit de donner du temps au temps (PD-France).
PS je vais vérifier si je n'ai pas mis par ignorance quelques œuvre Émile Malo-Renault en CC0.
Cordialement François Malo-Renault (talk) 16:46, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merci @Asclepias; copie @Yann,
Votre réponse sur les Droit Moraux en France est claire, articles L121-1 à L121-9, c'est ça l’important donc le choix est simple pas domaine public par CC-zéro, mais attendre le 31 décembre 2023 pour PD-France. Cordialement. François Malo-Renault (talk) 15:13, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: several, per nomination and Asclepias (one had already deleted by Krd as missing permission, probably because of an aborted VRT attempt). The nomination of 4 files had already been withdrawn. The files can be restored in 2024; apparently none of them has an URAA problem as the works are pre-1929. --Rosenzweig τ 08:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted except for duplicate files and images stored as PDFs. holly {chat} 05:41, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation Veverve (talk) 10:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Version of the image appeared here in 2010, well before 2013 Commons upload. Previously published works require COM:OTRS evidence of permission. --Эlcobbola talk 16:43, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Turkey does not have such an official coat of arms. This file is misleads people. Turkey's national emblem is the symbols on the Turkish flag: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Emblem_of_Turkey.svg Felecita (talk) 13:47, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This file appears to have one use in mainspace (along with an awful lot in other namespaces), on wikt:az:Ana Səhifə. Under COM:INUSE, that should be removed before the file is deleted. --bjh21 (talk) 12:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Turkmen: please remove the file from wikt:az:Ana Səhifə. - Felecita (talk) 11:11, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I will not be able to help you because I am no longer the admin of that project. Please contact local admin.--Turkmen talk 19:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: Hi. Can you replace the file "A coat of arms design for Turkey.svg" to the file "Emblem of the Republic of Turkey.svg" in all Wiki projects via Filemover? - Felecita (talk) 09:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Felecita: Sorry, I can't edit it either. @Araz Yaquboglu and Təhqir süzgəci: kömək etmək??? —Justin (koavf)TCM 09:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Visnelma: ve @Dakmor Tojira: dosyanın silinmesi için desteğinizi rica ediyorum. (Uzun zamandır beklemede.) Türkiye'nin böyle bir arması yok. Daha doğrusu belli bir arması yok. Bayrağımızdaki ay-yıldız ulusal simge olarak kullanılıyor ve pasaport, kimlik vs. üzerinde yer alıyor. - Felecita (talk) 10:55, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Felecita is probably right. I am a Turkish citizen and I have never seen this "coat of arms design" being used. --Visnelma (talk) 16:00, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per COM:NPOV, "A file that is in good faith use on another Wikimedia project is, by that very fact, considered useful for an educational purpose and is not liable to deletion on the grounds that it is 'wrong' in some way." As this file is in use on multiple projects, COM:INUSE precludes its deletion for the reason represented. The path to deletion is thus: 1) approach the projects currently using this image and persuade them to discontinue that use and 2) open a DR with a new rationale that the file is not used and that its having been universally removed is evidence of being so flawed as not to be useful for an educational purpose. --Эlcobbola talk 16:37, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1945 photograph claimed as own work. Unclear copyright status. Buidhe (talk) 02:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:43, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; lower quality version of File:Hitler and Stalin poster in comparison2.jpg Buidhe (talk) 03:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't make sense. The "lower quality version" is actually the source of the (obviously) higher quality version. Therefore this needs to be kept as the source, or both need to be deleted as out of scope. And how is this out of scope? Maybe both are copyvios? But the DR doesn't say so. --84.180.23.51 07:13, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

According to categories the poster was designed by Ludwig Hohlwein, who died in 1949. His works are life + 70 years in Germany which means they were still copyrighted on the URAA date. That means that the following works by him are still copyrighted in US:

(Rest are pre-1925 and probably expired in US by publication) Buidhe (talk) 09:23, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per COM:L, works must be free (here, PD) in both the United States and country of origin. Per COM:HIRTLE, works "solely published abroad, without compliance with US formalities or republication in the US, and not in the public domain in its home country as of URAA date" have a United States term of 95 years from publication. As the oldest of these images is 1936, these would be understood not to be PD in the US in the "best" case until 01.01.2032 (1936 + 95 + 1). --Эlcobbola talk 18:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't believe this image is in the public domain due to its age. The book is only 50 years old and no details are given about the artist. Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 02:00, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader appears to have conflated the author of the text (author field is "William Shakespeare (1564-1616)") with the author of the cover illustration. These are entirely sperate works, and the Shakespeare has nothing whatsoever to do with the latter. --Эlcobbola talk 19:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be lifted from this source, dated a year earlier. Buidhe (talk) 02:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:47, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]