Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/03/17
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_of_the_reign_of_Islam_Karimov_in_Tashkent_(Uzbekistan).jpg){kind=link}
_main_protease_in_complex_with_an_inhibitor.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.before.1948.gif){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-Meme.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Файл провокативний Jackie 1Star (talk) 09:10, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 09:16, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
LTA / gloabally locked user uploaded. See uploader SUL. Spam. F10 for the image.
_my_family.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 11:28, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
blank screen IAmGouri (talk) 10:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm first edit by that user. Can he be blocked? Benh (talk) 10:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pinging @A.Savin, Christian Ferrer, and Yann: - Benh (talk) 10:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:44, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
misspelled. Real name is William Allan Neilson Mutter Erde (talk) 14:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy keep: Why delete? Just move it to the right place. -- CptViraj (📧) 14:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: speedily kept.; renamed. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Cause I don't want this here. (I am in the photo) *•.¸♡ ℍ𝕒𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕣𝕤𝕙𝕒𝕟 𝔹𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕡𝕒𝕝 ♡¸.•*𝕋𝕒𝕝𝕜 14:26, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 16:41, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reconvensys (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Reconvensys.jpg
- File:Refurbished Laptop, Mobile Sales in Bangalore.jpg
- File:Best IT services in Malleshwaram Bangalore.jpg
- File:Best Consulting Services in Malleshwaram Bangalore.jpg
- File:Manpower consultancy services in Malleshwaram Bangalore.jpg
- File:Data Recovery Services in Malleshwaram Bangalore.jpg
- File:Servers maintenance services in Malleshwaram Bangalore.jpg
- File:Computer, Mobile, Laptop Repair Best Services in Bangalore.jpg
- File:Best CCTV installation services with Reconvensys, Computer.jpg
- File:Servers Installation and Maintenance services in Bangalore.jpg
- File:Home and office networking Support and Services Bangalore.jpg
- File:Mobile, Desktop & Laptop Hard Drive Data Recovery in Malleshwaram Bangalore.jpg
- File:All type of Data Recovery Best Services in Bangalore.jpg
- File:Manpower consultancy services in Bangalore.jpg
- File:Hard Disc Data Recovery in Malleshwaram Bangalore.jpg
- File:Best Consulting Services in Bangalore.jpg
- File:Best IT services in Bangalore.jpg
- File:Reconvensys, Reconvensys Bangalore.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:56, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader indefinitely as spam-only-user. Taivo (talk) 17:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Screenshots of non-free software.
GMGtalk 16:26, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: F3. --1989 (talk) 18:11, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
We should not be including fake and harmful content. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:17, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - this is not the documentation of some existing poster; it is merely an editor's attempt to get unsourced medical claims into articles. Serves no encyclopedic purpose, and false medical information is a danger. --NatGertler (talk) 17:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:33, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
We should not be including fake and harmful content Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:18, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Covid-19 disinformation. Deleted by 1Veertje. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Fake and harmful content Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Fake and harmful content Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Fake and harmful content Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:20, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of the project scope. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
False and harmful content Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:21, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Deleteper aboveVictorgrigas (talk) 17:27, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- I've deleted it just to be sure it doesn't cause any harm while the discussion is open. If it closes 'keep', we can undelete it.--ragesoss (talk) 17:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: I speedydeleted the remaining uploads. Covid-19 disinformation. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:34, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User-l'alba34 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Walter Baldessarini, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Walter Baldessarini Capri 60x104cm 2007.jpg
- File:Walter Baldessarini Iris 60x100cm 2016.jpg
- File:Walter Baldessarini .jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (easy enough to undelete if OTRS permission is received). --DMacks (talk) 01:40, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Looks like selfie, not uploader's own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Why is this a DR? --Fæ (talk) 15:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:1989 for violating copyright. GFJ (talk) 13:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
promo content for deleted article Khinkali (talk) 19:15, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Свидетельство_о_регестрации_СМИ_Информационного_агентства_Репорт-Информ.jpg” under ticket:2020031610009249. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:07, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- This document was issued by state, it was not created by company, so OTRS from company is irrelevant. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:23, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Official document. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi,
I am sorry but you wrote:
"Official document. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (обсуждение) 14:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC)" What tag I must use or where I can look for the list of tags? I tried to search in wikimedia but didn't find :(
It is in category "Documents Official"
Thank you for assistance.
Petunpetun32 (talk) 15:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC)petunpetun32
- Thank you. I found tags regarding to official STATE document:
|
This work is not an object of copyright according to article 1259 of Book IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation No. 230-FZ of December 18, 2006.
Shall not be objects of copyright:
|
 |
|
Comment – This license tag is also applicable to official documents, state symbols and signs of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (union level[1]).
Warning – This license tag is not applicable to drafts of official documents, proposed official symbols and signs, which can be copyrighted. Warning – This Russian official document, state symbol or sign (postage stamps, coins and banknotes mainly) may incorporate one or more works that can be copyrightable if separated from this document, symbol or sign. In such a case, this work is not an object of copyright if reused in its entirety but, at the same time, extracting specific portions from this work could constitute copyright infringement. For example, the denomination and country name must be preserved on postage stamps.
|
for State emblems and official signs (flags, armorial bearings, decorations, monetary signs and other State symbols and official signs) of Russian Federation
I changed tag. Is it correct?
Thank you for assistance.
Regards,
Petunpetun32 (talk) 18:27, 17 March 2020 (UTC)petunpetun32
Kept: License/source were fixed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
copyvio: https://eu.steinway.com/de/pianos/fluegel-pianos/b-211/ Rennrigor (talk) 23:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:45, 18 März 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Advertisement --Krdbot 20:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
https://www.flickr.com/people/187461952@N04/ appears to be a Flickrwashing account Ytoyoda (talk) 13:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Comment The uploader informed me that the image originally comes from http://www.prevale.net/gallery.html, which appears to have a CC license and seems to be legit. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:52, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Multitude of reasons, including COM:CSD and COM:PRP, certain of which are as follows:
- This is a recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4)--see, at least, File:Carlo Prevale - 2016.png--and thus needs to be presented at UDR if there is new evidence it is free;
- http://www.prevale.net/gallery.html says both "All content on this page is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license" and " Copyright © 2016 Prevale.Net All Rights Reserved"--these are mutually exclusive statements that must be reconciled;
- That website purports to belong to (thus be controlled by) the subject and thus representations there are subject to COM:LL concerns; copyright would belong to the photographer and evidence of a formal transfer would be needed (this changes if a selfie, but that clarification would be needed); and
- While technical details are stale, the particular images this user has uploaded are serendipitously the ones that were a primary focus of socks Kodymix and Lamanudamilano; it is thus not unlikely this user is another sock (i.e., an addition layer of doubt should apply to all statements and representations). --Эlcobbola talk 14:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- In german: Einspruch gegen SLA von @Rots61: Der Benutzer Rots61 schlug meine File:Maximilian Janisch.jpg für schnelles Löschen vor, da sie angeblich eine Urheberrechtsverletzung darstellt.[1] Ein Hinweis auf einen Benutzeraccount von mir selber bei Askubuntu,[2] bei dem ich dasselbe Bild als Profilbild verwende, wurde gegeben. Ich bin jetzt äusserst verwirrt: Denn es kann doch nicht sein, dass ich gegen ein Urheberrecht von mir selber verstosse, oder?
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Maximilian_Janisch.jpg&diff=404873227&oldid=404851484){kind=link}
- English translation: Objection to speedy deletion from Rots61: The user Rots61 suggested my File:Maximilian Janisch.jpg for quick deletion, as it supposedly constitutes a copyright infringement.[3] A reference to a user account of myself on Askubuntu, [4] where I use the same picture as my profile picture, was given. I am now extremely confused: Because it can't be that I violate a copyright of myself, can it?
--Maximilian Janisch (talk) 21:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
EDIT: The User:Achim55 was so kind to explain what my violation was[5] (it is of formal nature since I need to perform an OTRS process), I will see what I should do asap. --Maximilian Janisch (talk) 22:26, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
EDIT 2: I have now requested an approval according to OTRS by mail and marked the file with {{subst:OP}}. --Maximilian Janisch (talk) 23:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Maximilian_Janisch.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020031710008221. --Ww2censor (talk) 23:10, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Maximilian_Janisch.jpg” under ticket:2020031710008221. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS passed. --Achim (talk) 21:05, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused image of unidentified building. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 10:03, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Keep The quality is low, but the building is identifiable. It is Imamzade Zayd ibn Ali, Pirabad Village, Dorud County, Lorestan Province, Iran. [6] 4nn1l2 (talk) 04:21, 21 March 2020 (UTC)- As the building is now identified the deletion request can be withdrawn.Malcolma (talk) 11:24, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --4nn1l2 (talk) 13:43, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted image by Binus University. Ivan Humphrey (talk) 15:24, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- It is an announcement. While I agreed that the picture is copyrighted, it is of "interest of the public". However, as the picture is not pertinent to the discussion anyway I would remove it anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SunDawn (talk • contribs) 00:59, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 20:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FitrianiHasbullah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:03, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Floraarena (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Luisa Stella.jpg
- File:Luisa ritratto.jpg
- File:Luisa ritratto, Sandro Scimemi 1995.jpg
- File:"Luisa" , Sandro Scimemi, 1995.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md Zaan Islam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:147uipjipuiop5933887926-01.jpg
- File:Kdhkd87606950 853382268422517 1217798428721938432 n.jpg
- File:8jhhklajdhladhlkasjhdaljfdy0617545 80593543983386 2158021861361844224 n.jpg
- File:800ghahdiadidbjadhoad75960 791998484560896 1067212812285116416 n.jpg
- File:SquareGrid 20190725 14261722.jpg
- File:6hquiodyho;wyufowyhof7849701 690406631386749 5893190266826784768 n.jpg
- File:IMGr234r252353r353 20190110 113237-01.jpg
- File:IMqdwqwerqr2rwaedfewr2G 20180317 122229-01.jpg
- File:IMG23er23rwerwer3rwerfw3w3w3 20170324 165838.jpg
- File:IMG gegedgetytg4tgrt20171013 164308.jpg
- File:IMGsdgerterte54ty4ty4yg 20171001 113752.jpg
- File:IMGadcsaddwqeedqwrqfd2 20171226 161041-01.jpg
- File:IMGeqewqerwqedwqqeewdwq 20170913 101944.jpg
- File:IMG hdhtergertrewerwerwgerhfghrtshr20170414 172012.jpg
- File:IMrw2er32rt3tG 20170324 171157.jpg
- File:IMG 2adwedfwfwerfwerf0161024 103647.jpg
- File:IMG 2vb dvsdferwfew0170302 094236.jpg
- File:IMG 2dcwefwrwrt30170207 154355-01.jpg
- File:IMG 2asdsdwqdfwedf0170221 112915.jpg
- File:IMG daddfwdwqed201609sfgsvsfs14 093352.jpg
- File:IMGwerwrfwerfwert 20161217 144024.jpg
- File:IMGAITZIaiustoiqd 20160708 163325.jpg
- File:810hdlkasdhadyoafjalfoiadfyh38178 712564906154666 891849877410021376 n.jpg
- File:66801638 6bgxakjiuaydioydfowfo 83977378696341 2981192535944200192 n.jpg
- File:Hdkjlqyd;iqohdplq74472666 757485021345576 538489655109091328 n.jpg
- File:6hqehrjlhjdyqowdhqlkdkjq7292069 693234714437274 1468967781184569344 n.jpg
- File:IMG mlldsflfkl;kf;'wkf20180216 171643.jpg
- File:66792631 6hihdkjqehkldqodoq84743531953059 3847394011123810304 n.jpg
- File:IMG gbjkhul;kl;iooip09ip;lk;20160708.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:09, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy F10?Rots61 (talk) 16:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo and personal photo, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:41, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused text images, no context/educational value, out of scope. Should be in wiki markup if needed.
- File:IFPic3.JPG
- File:IFPic1.JPG
- File:IFPic2.JPG
- File:IFChart1.JPG
- File:IFChart2.JPG
- File:IFChart3.JPG
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:42, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:14, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused low quality photo, no context, no educational value, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Federine~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:DACH und HOLZ Logo.jpg
- File:Iba 2015 Logo.jpg
- File:Garten München Logo.jpg
- File:Internationale Handwerksmesse Logo.jpg
- File:Logo FoodLife 4c.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BrittanyScott44 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low-quality logo and promotional photo, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable event, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, out of scope. And above TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- By all means delete this. I have no idea what that image is nor why I uploaded it. Shabidoo (talk) 12:17, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juliana Espinosa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos and graphics, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.
- File:Tupras.jpg
- File:Ihk.jpg
- File:Capitalismo consciente.jpg
- File:Stakeholders.jpg
- File:Marcas negras.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:59, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal writing, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:56, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:59, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal doodle, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:56, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
False license Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:26, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete appears to be a non free logo, not created by a Commons or Wikipedia contributor. Buidhe (talk) 02:14, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, non-free logo that shouldn't be on Commons Salavat (talk) 00:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 06:10, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
The unused file. Commons is not the private media repository Estopedist1 (talk) 11:33, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:48, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sonegillis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:49, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:49, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:28, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saddam Hassan Ssenyonga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE images of non notable people.
- File:Me and my beautiful friend.jpg
- File:Saddam Hassan Ssenyonga.jpg
- File:Waking up with a smile 2017.09.10.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:33, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ruliaririnsafitri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:16, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; dubious license claim as well. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:23, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- File:Voncavallar.jpg
- File:Boldogfai Farkas Dénes.jpg
- File:Boldogfai Farkas Tibor.jpg
- File:Farkas Endre és Farkas Ákos a venezuelai magyar házban.jpg
- File:Udvardy Jenő.jpg
- File:Fangler Béla és Farkas Zsófia.jpg
- File:Fangler Béla (cropped).jpg
- File:Boldogfaifarkassándorszobrász.jpg
- File:Farkas Bandi01.jpg
- File:Farkas istván és sándor.jpg
- File:Wilhelm Cavallar von Grabensprung.png
- File:B.farkas Sandor másolata.jpg
- File:ForintosGyorgy(1935-2005).jpg
- File:Lenz József00.JPG
- File:Topits Klára és Lenz József.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Historical photos, unlikely to be own works. Regasterios (talk) 15:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Images ranging from 1936 to 1995: not the same person's work. Please explain. Probably COM:OOS too (fr:Manécanterie des Petits Chanteurs de Lannion).
- File:Portrait de l'abbé Arthur Goasdoué.jpg
- File:Les Petits Chanteurs de Lannion en 1993.jpg
- File:Les Petits Chanteurs de Lannion en 1995.jpg
- File:Les Petits Chanteurs de Lannion.jpg
- File:Manécanterie des Petits Chanteurs de Lannion.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:17, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. If uploader is the original photographer, they should confirm via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 14:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Vintage images ranging from 1964 to 2019, unlikely to be the same photographer's work. Probably COM:OOS too (fr:Manécanterie des Petits Chanteurs de Lannion).
- File:Affiche de concert.jpg
- File:L'abbé Yves Bocher.jpg
- File:Arthur Goasdoué.jpg
- File:Fête de la musique 2001.jpg
- File:Pardon de la Saint Yves 2019.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:17, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. If uploader is the original photographer, they should confirm via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 14:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos, posters, music sheets. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Tantum ergo - Arthur Goasdoué.jpg
- File:Angelus sul fask - Arthur Goasdoué.jpg
- File:Manécanterie des Petits Chanteurs de Lannion 2.jpg
- File:Manécanterie des Petits Chanteurs de Lannion 3.jpg
- File:Affiche de concert des Petits Chanteurs.jpg
- File:Les Petits Chanteurs dans les années 50.jpg
- File:La Manécanterie des Petits Chanteurs de Lannion.jpg
- File:Les Petits Chanteurs sur la scène du Festival de la Saint-Loup ( Guingamp ) en juillet 2015 avec le musicien espagnol Carlos Nunez.jpg
- File:Jean-Marc Kernin.jpg
- File:Goasdoue-5.jpg
- File:Bocher.jpg
- File:Les Petits Chanteurs de la Manécanterie de Lannion en 1996.jpg
- File:Les Petits Chanteurs à Lourdes.jpg
- File:La première génération de jeunes musiciens à Saint Joseph.jpg
- File:Congrès Pueri Cantores 1947.jpg
- File:Répétition du choeur de garçons de l'Institution Saint Joseph - Lannion.jpg
_en_juillet_2015_avec_le_musicien_espagnol_Carlos_Nunez.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
COM:OOS (fr:Manécanterie des Petits Chanteurs de Lannion)
- File:Les Petits Chanteurs de Lannion en concert à la Cathédrale de Tréguier en décembre 2018.jpg
- File:Les Petits Chanteurs de la Manécanterie de Lannion en 1993.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:09, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
"Appalachia" is not an existing independent country as of today, fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
"Appalachia" is not an existing independent country as of today, fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Not cc-by-sa 4.0. Copyvio possible. Rots61 (talk) 16:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Seems to be a selfie, not uploader's own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:08, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:13, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Irma violense (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some from Instagram already put on SD, others need permission of NATALIA RANDLE/NATALIA M/NATALIA GOLOVANOVA (!) via COM:OTRS.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- File:Katrin Gajndr Vintage3.jpg
- File:Katrin Gajndr Vintage2.jpg
- File:Katrin Gajndr Fetish Model.jpg
- File:Katrin Gajndr Vintage1.jpg
- File:Katrin Gajndr 2015.jpg
- File:Katrin Gajndr in Champagne Glass.jpg
- File:Katrin Gajndr in her Champagne Glass.jpg
- File:Katrin Gajndr Burlesque Festival.jpg
- File:Katrin Gajndr Fetish.jpg
--C.Suthorn (talk) 23:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted obvious copyvios, suggest deletion of others if OTRS not received. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:13, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Not own work, this is a picture of Adolf Hitler. Rots61 (talk) 16:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Козленко Євген (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works. please explain why images are public domain in the respective countries of first publication.
- File:2828617ва.jpg
- File:54395570 Bogatir IvanIvan.jpg
- File:Cb1ecWrKf IoKM0SKlpr8AIerAVO4e-L6Z2lzbIkrj4.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Book covers are protected with copyright. OTRS-permission from cover artist is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:DW - screenshots of MS Windows UI
- File:ქართული კლავიატურის დაყენება windows 10-ზე 8.PNG
- File:ქართული კლავიატურის დაყენება windows 10-ზე 7.PNG
- File:ქართული კლავიატურის დაყენება windows 10-ზე 6.PNG
- File:ქართული კლავიატურის დაყენება windows 10-ზე 4.PNG
- File:ქართული კლავიატურის დაყენება windows 10-ზე 5.PNG
- File:ქართული კლავიატურის დაყენება windows 10-ზე 3.PNG
- File:ქართული კლავიატურის დაყენება windows 10-ზე 2.png
- File:ქართული კლავიატურის დაყენება windows 10-ზე 1.PNG
Эlcobbola talk 17:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:04, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Bogus PD claim. Image purports to be "middle of the 20th century." Date is "unknown date" (creation) and no date of author death is provided (Georgia is pma + 70). If, for example, the photographer took this image in 1950 ("middle of the 20th century") and died immediately afterward (an absurdity), it would still not be PD until 01.01.2021 (1950 + 70 + 1) Эlcobbola talk 17:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:04, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Image credited to Jean-Francois Hamelin in metadata, does not allow reuse without permission Ytoyoda (talk) 17:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:03, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
COM:PRP - low res, no camera EXIF, close vantage of notable person by serial copyvio uploader (see user talk). Quack? Эlcobbola talk 17:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- also file:Deportivo Oriental.jpg
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 19:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 19:06, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. Non-notable person - spam IWI (talk) 13:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: was deleted already. --Elly (talk) 16:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 19:06, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation. I think we need some proof that WikiCulturaGeberal is the copyright holder Headlock0225 (talk) 19:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
not own work since it's from external source, no OTRS PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:46, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:59, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Porn.... Rots61 (talk) 19:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete No educational value.--運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 14:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:57, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
I am sorry, but since we have no permission to use this photo from the photographer, this photo is a copyright violation. Gnom (talk) 21:10, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:50, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
I am sorry, but since we do not have the rights to use this image, it is a copyright violation. Gnom (talk) 22:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
I am sorry, but since we do not have the rights to use this image, it is a copyright violation. Gnom (talk) 22:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I am sorry, but since we do not have the rights to use this image, it is a copyright violation. Gnom (talk) 22:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I am sorry, but since we do not have the rights to use this image, it is a copyright violation. Gnom (talk) 22:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
I am sorry, but since we do not have the rights to use this image, it is a copyright violation. Gnom (talk) 22:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be properly licensed. Similar photo appears as this Twitter account's profile photo. Even if the uploader is Mr. Bajpal that doesn't mean they own the copyright. The photographer does. Majora (talk) 22:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:45, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Looks like scan of professional photo. The uploader has been blocked for uploading copyvios.
Cjp24 (talk) 23:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, possibly speedy delete based on users upload history.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:44, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:44, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:26, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
the uploader claimes all filles as cc self. Some are old, some seems to be proffessinal, some have a different watermark. Maybe the user scanned/downloaded self, but in most cases he is not the author.
- File:The Times of Ceylon building, Colombo c.1907.jpg
- File:Mask dancers of Ambalangoda c.1960s.jpg
- File:Kandy Lamissi Gemtone record.jpg
- File:Shrine of Our Lady of Matara c.1940s.jpg
- File:Sinhalese family with a traditional drum c.1910.jpg
- File:Veddahs c.1890s.jpg
- File:Mask carving-amba.jpg
- File:Inscribed Stone on the Dutch Courthouse.jpg
- File:Dutch Court Building.jpg
- File:Inscription stone on the Dutch courthouse.jpg
- File:Ceylon Rix Dollar in 1821.jpg
- File:Portuguese Map of Colombo from the mid 17th Century.jpg
- File:Reclining image of Buddha in the Rock Temples of Mulkirigala c. 1736.jpg
- File:George Wall.jpg
- File:A 17th Century Kastane.jpg
- File:Lt. Gen Hay Macdowall, the Fort's namesake .jpg
- File:The Doric Bungalow, as it stands in 2019.jpg
- File:The Doric Bungalow in 1807.jpg
- File:Times of Ceylon nameplate.jpg
Avron (talk) 08:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:41, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as a part of a Spanish Wikipedia article that was deleted. ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 08:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:39, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:39, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused image of icon without meaningful explanation. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 09:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused image of icon without meaningful explanation. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 09:50, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Personal usage. Out of scope. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 10:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused private profile icon. Out of scope. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 10:11, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
A low-quality image without metadata (2017 year), it is unlikely that it was made by uploader (see also his contribution). More like a frame from a video. — Ирука13 11:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
The unused file. Commons is not the private media repository Estopedist1 (talk) 11:34, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
this is a selfi Flanoz (talk) 11:37, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --Didym (talk) 18:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, contemporary artworks, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 11:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Hopelessly out of focus. Perhaps, may illustrate the subject of bokeh. You decide, Retired electrician (talk) 12:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
"FBMD" in metadata indicates photo was published on Facebook or Instagram first Ytoyoda (talk) 12:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:34, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:XimenaRod
[edit]
First pages of magazines. To be hosted on Commons the permission by the publisher of the magazines is needed (via Commons:OTRS) --Civitas13 (talk) 13:59, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:33, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright Violations BlinxTheKitty (talk) 14:11, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:32, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright Violation BlinxTheKitty (talk) 14:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
This screenshot falls under fair-use. The nature of the work is not an a copyrightable idea. It is used for educational purposes.
Cslewisster (talk) 23:12 17 March 2020 (EST)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:32, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright Violation BlinxTheKitty (talk) 14:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
This screenshot falls under fair-use. The nature of the work is not an a copyrightable idea. It is used for educational purposes.
Cslewisster (talk) 23:12 17 March 2020 (EST)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:32, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright Violations BlinxTheKitty (talk) 14:14, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
This screenshot falls under fair-use. The nature of the work is not an a copyrightable idea. It is used for educational purposes.
Cslewisster (talk) 23:12 17 March 2020 (EST)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:32, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 14:14, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:32, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Scope? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 14:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Metadata says Instagram, unlikely to be own work Ytoyoda (talk) 14:39, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be from https://xn--80aacdgla3egkf.xn--p1ai/player3125/matches/ Ytoyoda (talk) 14:41, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, appears to be own photo superimposed on top of photo at https://www.gov.spb.ru/gov/admin/kirillov-vladimir-vladimirovich/news/170332/ Ytoyoda (talk) 14:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Likely from http://www.hac-foot.com/equipe/mazire-soula.html Ytoyoda (talk) 14:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be the subject's Facebook profile photo: https://www.facebook.com/eldor27/ Ytoyoda (talk) 14:44, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AlessandroFrongia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Communiqué Gouvernement Fermeture anticipée Etalissements d'enseignement scolaire universitaire Burkina Faso.pdf
[edit]Official document. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:28, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Official document. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
book cover is probably protected Albinfo (talk) 00:09, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Gov. Wolf, Sec. of Health Outline COVID-19 Mitigation Guidance for Montgomery County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania - 49652638063.jpg
[edit]
Derivative work of a copyrighted poster (front) and a copyrighted screen (back) A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:44, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot, not original work Ytoyoda (talk) 03:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:44, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
isn't own work, fake permission Vareloco (talk) 04:50, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Metadata says this is a screenshot, no information on source photo given Ytoyoda (talk) 05:38, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete User has a history of copyright violations. Own-work claims by this user cannot be trusted without providing further information. 4nn1l2 (talk) 05:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
잘못 올려진 이미지 입니다. Vitswell (talk) 06:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 18:42, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MikonAtoum (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional logos and images, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:IFriend Background.jpg
- File:IFriend Cover.jpg
- File:IFriend Cover2.jpg
- File:IFriend Ad2.png
- File:IFriend Logo.png
- File:IFriend Ad.png
- File:IFriend.png Note:I have tried to delete this file and it just wont delete. Shows an error, can another admin have a look Thank you. @P199: . - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:25, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 03:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
The uploader claims that this photo is an US Navy serviceman‘s work but there is no evidence for that! 188.110.51.74 14:20, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep the picture comes from this book, where the author claims that this photo is from the US Navy. --Cody escouade delta (d) 16:03, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This picture is one of multishot. I have one of them, taken literally a half second later, from a little bit different angle, as the aircraft was flying around the sub. Even water falling from the conning tower - visible on disputed picture - is still on its way down to the ocean. This is definitely US Navy photo, according to the description. Matrek (talk) 01:38, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:01, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Auliaramadanih (talk · contribs)
[edit]
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:39, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE applies. This DR should not have been raised for in-use files. --Fæ (talk) 15:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept/Deleted: Kept the first file per COM:INUSE, deleted the other as it seems to be personal user image and was not in use. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:05, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
very bad quality useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 19:06, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 14:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
very bad quality useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 19:07, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 14:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 14:18, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Taivo (talk) 14:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
User:William11002 claims this is his work, used without his permission. If this is true, it casts significant doubt on other drawings claimed to be by User:Plixsterism. Jmabel ! talk 15:03, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
BEGIN Copied from Commons:Help Desk:
== Copyright issue ==
Hello,
Regarding the image found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_Thurber#/media/File:Lucy_Thurber.jpeg
I see somebody posted a drawing of mine (of Lucy Thurber) without permission. (I have the original.) I’d like it removed. Can you please tell me how to go about doing that? I had posted an image of it elsewhere (privately and also on an illustration website) — but it was captioned “all rights reserved”.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by William11002 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Plixsterism: you claimed this as your own work. Care to comment? - Jmabel ! talk 20:35, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Convenience link: File:Lucy Thurber.jpeg. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:20, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Thank you to anyone who is considering this, but no one has answered my question yet. William11002 (talk) 11:37, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
END Copied from Commons:Help Desk - Jmabel ! talk 15:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Can some action be taken on this, please? No one has responded at all since this was posted here, and the first posting on the help desk page was three weeks ago. Thanks. William11002 (talk) 16:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- @William11002: would you please send confidential correspondence to the OTRS team, where you can present your evidence without having to be any more public than you wish to be about your full name, etc.? Then someone from the OTRS team can weigh in here (give them a link to this page) so that they can say whether you've satisfied them. Looks like User:Plixsterism hasn't been active in a few years, so we are not going to get their side of the story beyond their prior claim.
- Until that happens, all I have is two conflicting claims of authorship, and no way to weigh them. - Jmabel ! talk 19:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
OTRS member note We have received an email from William11002 regarding this delete nomination. This case is currently being looked at. Thank you, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Well, Martin was faster. Delete this one. I see no similar problem with other uploads of this user, however. Ankry (talk) 17:41, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Given Ankry expressed his opinion, I should say I share it. However, it seems fair to wait reasonable time for the user to respond to my message at their talk page, since I posted it. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:54, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Martin Urbanec: If by "the user" you mean Plixsterism, that account hasn't edited in years and has been ignoring my pings on this for over 2 weeks. - Jmabel ! talk 22:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Saw that. I'm happy to confirm that the complainer has presented enough evidence for me to believe they are the true author. If Plixsterism doesn't present stronger evidence, we have no other choice but to delete. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 23:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Martin Urbanec: May I presume that if/when you are satisfied that enough time has passed without a response from Plixsterism, you will ask a non-involved admin to close this discussion so we can delete the image? - Jmabel ! talk 15:49, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Certainly. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Martin Urbanec: If by "the user" you mean Plixsterism, that account hasn't edited in years and has been ignoring my pings on this for over 2 weeks. - Jmabel ! talk 22:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Given Ankry expressed his opinion, I should say I share it. However, it seems fair to wait reasonable time for the user to respond to my message at their talk page, since I posted it. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:54, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
_of_the_reign_of_Islam_Karimov_in_Tashkent_(Uzbekistan).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_of_the_reign_of_Islam_Karimov_in_Tashkent_(Uzbekistan).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
_of_the_reign_of_Islam_Karimov_in_Tashkent_(Uzbekistan).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
_of_the_reign_of_Islam_Karimov_in_Tashkent_(Uzbekistan).jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Всеволод0303 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:P1e3l65jkl1bnp1hqcal74dnb0o4-26.jpg
- File:P1e3l65jkl1bnp1hqcal74dnb0o4-10.jpg
- File:P1e3l65jkl1bnp1hqcal74dnb0o4-0.jpg
Didym (talk) 23:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
copyvio: https://www.young-classic.eu/cache/images/4463.jpg Rennrigor (talk) 23:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Possibly below COM:TOO depending on country. Converting from {{Copyvio}}. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:57, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 13:02, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
_main_protease_in_complex_with_an_inhibitor.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_main_protease_in_complex_with_an_inhibitor.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work, considering this is the account's normal image Elisfkc (talk) 19:04, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
_main_protease_in_complex_with_an_inhibitor.jpg){kind=link}
- Meant to say it is the account's only image. --Elisfkc (talk) 18:41, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: It's indeed not the uploader's own work but that was never claimed - it's an image from flickr where it is licensed as CC-BY 2.0. Uploader made a mistake by uploading it as CC-BY-SA 4.0, but the (verified) CC-BY license is also Commons-compatible. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:11, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
_main_protease_in_complex_with_an_inhibitor.jpg){kind=link}
_main_protease_in_complex_with_an_inhibitor.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
I just closed a deletion request for this file with a decision to keep it, but now it seems to me that I misunderstood the reasoning of nominator Elisfkc. I thought they were referring to the Commons account with "the account's only image", but in fact this user (Ifwest) has uploaded quite a lot, and I assume now that Elisfkc meant the original source, flickr account "Zwitterio Cromenale", where this is indeed the only image - which I also find rather suspicious. So I'm re-opening the request and leave it for another admin to decide. Gestumblindi (talk) 00:22, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: Yep, that's what I meant. Sorry for not clarifying. Elisfkc (talk) 00:26, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. Seems like the Flickr user cannot be trusted. Taivo (talk) 13:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Image not used anywhere and it's unclear the license status is right as the website is not working anymore — Dudek1337 (talk) 20:28, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:23, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
this redirect is not needed after the person has been identified to be Edith, not Maria Wanted (talk) 21:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:32, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Poster template/design (although simple, falls under Australia's restrictive threshold of originality) and the text (wording) is considered copyrightable and freedom of panorama does not give any exemptions for text based work.
DR posted on behalf of Bidgee due to cascading protection. Per request. Majora (talk) 23:10, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: text above ToO, and FoP not relevant for non permanant works. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:29, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
doubtful license (at source) – picture take in 1985 in Albania 5 days before the dictator's death? Albinfo (talk) 00:11, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The source link is so vague, without mentioning how they acquired the image, that I'm tempted to suggest licence laundering. Buidhe (talk) 02:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Bell_X-1-3_being_mated_with_the_motherplane.jpg and File:X-1-3 Being Mated To EB-50A Superfortress - GPN-2000-000131.jpg Kees08 (talk) 00:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
https://www.google.com/search?tbs=simg:CAQStAIJ5TlLp6mTKqcaqAILELCMpwgaYgpgCAMSKI4Q2Rn3BIwF-A_10BMUCpR29GZ0H7yTBOqEuwjruJMQ6nC6gLo8ukS4aMJ-GMPdk2pvu8hoB7JpQ-WkbLkkRkP1SEkZ4TpVIk13bNMs8n3MqRvRWz1ka7ajkNyAEDAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIE5Dh00gwLEJ3twQkaoAEKHQoKbW9ub2Nocm9tZdqliPYDCwoJL20vMDFtd2tmChwKCWdlbnRsZW1hbtqliPYDCwoJL20vMDE5cDVxCiQKEHRpbnRzIGFuZCBzaGFkZXPapYj2AwwKCi9tLzAycV9iZmcKGQoHZ2xhc3Nlc9qliPYDCgoIL20vMGp5ZmcKIAoNbm8gZXhwcmVzc2lvbtqliPYDCwoJL2ovOV9iaHBuDA&q=james+oliver+huberty&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwicgdXeraDoAhXMwsQBHWibDJ4Q2A4oAXoECA8QJw&biw=1280&bih=613&dpr=1.5 Copyvio Trade (talk) 01:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 07:06, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Artist died en 1960 Daehan (talk) 08:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Not "simple geometric shapes or text" Jonteemil (talk) 09:07, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Not "simple geometric shapes or text" Jonteemil (talk) 09:07, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'd suggest reading the file description. It is text written in a freely available public domain font. m( 89.15.238.51 09:24, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- My bad, Keep,Jonteemil (talk) 02:14, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- I really hope you're working with quite some more diligence in your future deletion requests. Reading the informations in the file description before submitting should be an absolute requirement! —הגות414 19:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Viciarg: You're not wrong. I guess it looked so unlikely to be PD-textlogo so I skipped that part unfortunately...Jonteemil (talk) 09:51, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- I really hope you're working with quite some more diligence in your future deletion requests. Reading the informations in the file description before submitting should be an absolute requirement! —הגות414 19:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- My bad,
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia. — Ирука13 11:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
damaged. — Ирука13 13:08, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
NoFoP for monuments in Russia // 176.59.33.33 13:20, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
NoFoP for monuments in Russia // 176.59.33.33 13:21, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
NoFoP for monuments in Russia // 176.59.33.33 13:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
NoFoP for monuments in Russia // 176.59.33.33 13:23, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
NoFoP for monuments in Russia // 176.59.33.33 13:24, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
It is impossible to say without a publication date when the provision of the public domain came into force. And whether it entered at all. — Ирука13 13:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Dubious that the intention of the YouTube uploader was to release the entire video under CC-BY. The end of the video has a notice that the music is under CC-BY, but the photos themselves "all rights reserved". Even if the photos are also intended to be CC-BY, they should be uploaded individually, not as a video. Tokfo (talk) 16:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep the video A person has a right to release only a part of their work or a specific version of their work under a free licence. However, I believe that we do need to remove the audio, since it appears to be distributed under Art Libre, and thus the composite cannot be licenced under the stated licence. It is perfectly fine for a photographer to say "Hey, I will upload one video under a free licence to increase my exposure." We do not require that all of ther personal intellectual property is freely licenced. Also this is not a new video that I have snatched up before the person has had time to notice what is happening, it is rather a video from 2014, and that needs to be taken into account as well. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, the video that is on the same channel right before this one is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXH94IcugcY It is also under CC-BY, but the music is stated to be under a non-commercial licence. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: While the audio is CC-BY, the images are clearly ARR. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
has no use FleurDeOdile (talk) 16:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Bogus PD claim - 1) source website says "© Copyright www.gardaqmna.ucoz.com. All Right Reserved" and 2) even if source said otherwise, image looks to be a scan and thus such a claim would be license laundering. Эlcobbola talk 17:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
.before.1948.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.before.1948.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Probable copyright violation. Source link credits photo to "Total HelpArt T.H.A.". It would not be public domain unless we can document a publication in Czechoslovakia before 1946 per {{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}}. Buidhe (talk) 17:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
.before.1948.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
.before.1948.gif){kind=link}
Head is so fuzzy. Sorry. ComputerHotline (talk) 20:35, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- but body is perfectly clear. Do you delete all files with a part fuzzy?90.23.225.197 22:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)=
Deleted: per nomination - unused, very poor quality -- we have any that are much better. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as Unfree Flickr file (Unfree Flickr file) and the most recent rationale was: Unfree The ARR license is not relevant if the postcard is PD due to age. We should decide that first. MGA73 (talk) 20:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - author Lotte Jacobi (1896-1990). . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:33, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
out of scope? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 21:59, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
File is far too compex for pd-text/pd-shape. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:59, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
File is far too compex for pd-text/pd-shape. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:59, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
잘못 올려진 사진입니다. Vitswell (talk) 06:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: coutesy deletion of unused image with no educational value. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
This photo belongs to Jonathan Mello, who was with me when we took different photos in Makunduchi Alyusuph (talk) 09:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:27, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Unused duplicate of file:Pneiyehoshua.jpg Sije (talk) 18:50, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicated. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:34, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
donot want it to display 125.99.176.69 14:15, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 16:28, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Image has no source Hunan201p (talk) 02:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Unless the 18th century date is in any doubt, "source" is not relevant to free status as it PD in any case. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Put it another way, the image *does* have a source, as the uploader stated back in 2008: The source is a 1790s Kangra style miniature painting from the Punjab Hills. (Who scanned/digitized it does not affect copyright status per Commons policies.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- That is not a source, friend. A source is the name of the individual(s) who created the work and the publication it is printed in. Without that, we have no idea who created it or when. - Hunan201p (talk) 03:36, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We don't have the name of the individuals who create the work or the publication there of for many works. That does not prevent us in many cases of knowing when it was created.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:24, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 14:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
duplicate Vimorgan (talk) 12:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- The file this is a duplicate of is File:Relevance Model of PTSD and OCD.jpg. However, as File:Lacauseduptsd.jpg seems to be a bit sharper, I would suggest to keep and rename File:Lacauseduptsd.jpg and delete the other one. GFJ (talk) 13:47, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: kept this version, deleted the other version and moved this version to the better name, per GFJ. --Storkk (talk) 13:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Cute, but has a watermark of stock photo site https://www.123rf.com/ so presumably the mask image used is not free. the wub "?!" 13:39, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- 123rf can sod right off, that's Wikipedia logo, they can't put a copyright over it. However, the mask comes from pngtree.com, and I can neither find a license there, not the mask itself. Gikü (talk) 18:50, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- It was changed the sources. I bought both of the patterns. You can check them.Khanhnamnguyen03 (talk)
Deleted: The mask is "royalty free" on Shutterstock, but that does not clearly grant the right to modify or relicense the file. See COM:L for what is required. If you were granted a commons compatible license, please forward the details to OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 13:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
It is impossible to say without a publication date when the provision of the public domain came into force. And whether it entered at all. — Ирука13 13:56, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- This is one of a series of photos which were published in Yang Cheng-fu's book Essence and Applications of Taijiquan (Taijiquan Tiyong Quanshu) ; the original date of publication was 1934, so the PD tag is correct. Yunshui (talk) please ping me when replying; I'm rarely on Commons 16:10, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Since the author of the picture is unknown, we cannot find out the date of his death. We can’t count 70 years from his death either. And we can’t use the {{PD-old}} either. — Ирука13 17:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- upd: {{PD-old}} --> {{PD-CN}}. — Ирука13 13:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: PD-CN and would have been PD at the URAA date. --Storkk (talk) 14:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is impossible to say without a publication date when the provision of the public domain came into force. And whether it entered at all. — Ирука13 13:56, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- See my comment at the parent file's deletion page. Yunshui (talk) please ping me when replying; I'm rarely on Commons 16:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Similarly. — Ирука13 17:17, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yang-single.jpg. --Storkk (talk) 14:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Same photo session as File:Roberta de Matthaeis.jpg, no permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:28, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Why is this a DR? --Fæ (talk) 15:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 14:01, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Dust dots on the sky, better image already uploaded Tomulus1975 (talk) 15:59, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion with no objection. Clearly superseded by File:Beach_of_Bonne_Brise,_Marseille,_France.jpg. Unused. --Storkk (talk) 14:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Photo by Edwin Olaf, photographer's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- See also the discussion in the Village pump. Beireke1 (talk) 11:27, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Ticket:2020050510004501 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 19:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation yet. --JuTa 20:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Photo of en:Draft:Tony Castro (author) (born 1946). Uploaders copyright information for en:File:AUTHOR-TONYCASTRO-BIO-PHOTO.jpg suggest that he or she do not have complete knowledge of the concept of "own work" as far as Wikimedia is concerned. Uploader must submit documented evidence of who the photographer is and copyright status. Thuresson (talk) 17:14, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
--
To Whom It May Concern:
I am fairly recent to Wikipedia. I am not even certain if I am responding to this issue in the proper forum. My name is Ashley Chase. I am a literary agent. For a number of years I have had a personal relationship with Tony Castro, the writer and subject of this photograph. We both live in Los Angeles, and we have known each other since the mid-1970s. I took this photograph of Tony during one of our trips to San Francisco. This is my photograph. I am not a professional photographer. I have a great number of photographs of Tony, but this is one of is favorites. He likely will use it as a cover photograph for a future book that will include many of his columns and his journalism. He likes it so much that he asked to use it on the promotions of some of his books and speaking appearances, as well as on some of his social media accounts. If you check those, you will see the photograph:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/tonycastrojr/ https://www.facebook.com/TonyCastro.Author/ https://twitter.com/Tony_Castro https://www.amazon.com/Tony-Castro/e/B001K8N184/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1439846083&sr=8-1
Contrary to the person who raised an issue about the copyright of this photograph, I work in an industry where one has to be knowlegeable about copyrights on intellectual properties, including photographs. In fact, I spoke to my attorney this evening about this issue, and he assures me that as the person who snapped this photograph, I am the rightful holder of the copyright.
As such, I uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons agreeing to share it with anyone who wishes to use it.
Kindly let me know if this response is not sufficient to clear up this matter.
Ashley Chase Ashley@AshleyChaseLiterary.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashleymchase (talk • contribs) 06:30, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Out of COM:SCOPE: Draft refused on English Wikipedia. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep He's an established journalist. He's notable enough for Commons and should have a Wikidata entry. Abzeronow (talk) 17:43, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Info This contributor uploaded File:AUTHOR-TONYCASTRO-BIO-PHOTO.jpg on March 15 as own work. The next day same contributor requested undeletion of that photo with the following information: "This photograph was shot by Ryan LaSalle-Castro, a son of the proposed Wikipedia entry subject Tony Castro". For this reasons claims of own work by this contributor are questionable. Thuresson (talk) 20:22, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus on COM:SCOPE. Making prose statements is quite different from filling out a form; such a detailed statement appears believable to me, and it appears to be a film photo so we can't ask for EXIF. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Heart Truth photos
[edit]These pictures came from a now blacklisted Flickr account.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_cropped.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_crop.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
QTHCCAN (talk) 19:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- [7] @Rillke and Clindberg: Keep and remove from blacklist. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. That a reason for blacklisting The Heart Truth? Alrofficial (talk) 20:07, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Here the talk about the blacklisting. Commons talk:Questionable Flickr images/Archive 3#The_Heart_Truth. I agree with @Alexis Jazz: about removing the account from the blacklist if the files are kept. QTHCCAN (talk) 20:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Given all of the recent image descriptions on Flickr say "Photo by Getty Images for Heart Truth" I'm sceptical that those images and these images belong to the government or the employees,
- Anyway I don't believe someone related to the company or gov photographed these images and I don't believe the photographer knowingly donated these under a CC licence (Maybe there was an agreement to use them in a campaign?),
So IMHO these should all be deleted, Unless ofcourse they reply back to Rillke with some proof that all is legit. –Davey2010Talk 21:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)- @Davey2010: it's called "work for hire" and the images are PD-USGov, not CC. And considering this is Getty, the photographer doesn't have much of a say in the matter anyway. And Getty knows when the US government contracts them. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:05, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Having read Copyright status of works by the federal government of the United States I've obviously misunderstood the licence, Blacklisting is irrelevant to any DR so therefore there's now no valid reason to delete. –Davey2010Talk 19:14, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep and remove from blacklist. The The Heart Truth's images are clearly marked United States government work on Flickr, the hyperlink confirming they are effectively PD. --John B123 (talk) 22:16, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- @John B123r: , of course but the US Department of State Flickr account itself have been recently blacklisted--QTHCCAN (talk) 23:02, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. The Man with the Iron Fists montage is self-made, so not every picture in it will be blacklisted, the answer would be to modify that image not delete it AND the complex rationale made for it. This is using a saw instead of a scalpel. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:37, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. After reading the image descriptions on Flickr, I believe this was a "work for hire" for the US National Institutes of Health. Materialscientist (talk) 06:46, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete A work for hire is not PD-USGov. One has to be an employee of the US Fed Gov to have this copyright exemption apply. Photographers may have given usage rights of these images to this government agency but they will retain their copyright.--Denniss (talk) 23:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Denniss: no, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chairman McWatters Official Headshot.jpg where Clindberg quoted this from the legislative notes for 17 USC 105: "it can be assumed that, where a Government agency commissions a work for its own use merely as an alternative to having one of its own employees prepare the work, the right to secure a private copyright would be withheld." - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry but that argumentation is garbage. Since when are assumtions base for copyright issues? Either we know such a copyright transfer was made or we don't. If we don't then we can't assume the claimed license is valid especially if the original authorship claims are retained in Exif. --Denniss (talk) 20:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Denniss: so you are calling the Copyright Law Revision (House Report No. 94-1476) from the United States House of Representatives garbage? Well, I guess that ends the conversation. You consider it garbage, I don't. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:41, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- As a counterpoint, File:U.S. Copyright Office circular 30.pdf says that only certain types of works can be considered made for hire (photographs do not appear to be among them), though it doesn't delve into the specifics regarding works made on behalf of the US government. The aforementioned notes of 17 USC 105 essentially say that works made under contract to the US government may or may not enjoy copyright protection depending on the circumstances and purpose of the works. I would lean towards keeping these photos, since they fall under the assumption Clindberg mentioned at the Chairman McWatters deletion discussion and because they're marked as US government works on Flickr, but I recognize that even US government agencies are capable of ticking the wrong box when uploading pictures to the Internet, so I'll reserve my final judgement for now. clpo13(talk) 02:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Denniss: so you are calling the Copyright Law Revision (House Report No. 94-1476) from the United States House of Representatives garbage? Well, I guess that ends the conversation. You consider it garbage, I don't. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:41, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry but that argumentation is garbage. Since when are assumtions base for copyright issues? Either we know such a copyright transfer was made or we don't. If we don't then we can't assume the claimed license is valid especially if the original authorship claims are retained in Exif. --Denniss (talk) 20:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Denniss: no, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chairman McWatters Official Headshot.jpg where Clindberg quoted this from the legislative notes for 17 USC 105: "it can be assumed that, where a Government agency commissions a work for its own use merely as an alternative to having one of its own employees prepare the work, the right to secure a private copyright would be withheld." - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- We make assumptions all the time. We assume country of origin (most times no way to prove something wasn't published earlier in another country), we often have to assume publication, we most certainly assume good faith on the vast majority of our uploads (i.e. we don't require OTRS on all of them), and so on. There are very few absolutes when it comes to copyright -- you can make theoretical arguments against lots of uploads. That all said, I don't think these fall under the legislative note above -- that would apply when a work is essentially a work for hire, even if just a contractor instead of an employee (in other words, a work that could have just as easily been done by an employee but they chose to use a contractor instead). Works where they need outside expertise would be different, and photography like this most likely falls under that latter case.
- I'm a bit torn on these. I did find a note on this photographer linkedin page which mentions the "Images are then distributed for use by the US Dept of Health and Human Services (HHS), the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and sponsors [...]". So, it would appear there is some sort of special contract in place. Whether that contract specifies that the photos are effectively public domain (much like works by NASA collaborators, where we use the PD-USGov-NASA tag), I'm not sure. They have had that license for years and years on Flickr. It's possible the photographers have some rights initially (thus the EXIF), but the photos are eventually allowed to be effectively PD and posted to Flickr. Or it could be that they aren't fully PD, and the license is incorrect. But I hate to second-guess the license on Flickr -- it's not like these are a handful of exceptions to otherwise obviously PD-USGov images, but rather they seem to be the primary content on that Flickr account, and the person making that tag there should presumably know what they were doing. And they have been there for 15+ years (some of them), with no evidence of a copyright issue. It does not seem as though any of the above images have been deleted from Flickr due to complaints with spot checks, and it does not appear that we've ever gotten any DMCA notices on them -- even from Getty. If they were effectively PD, I'm sure Getty would have no problem also hosting them under "rights managed" and not mention their free or virtually-free status. The only DRs have been over doubt raised by Wikimedians, not an actual complaint from Getty or a photographer. Given the lack of problem of these images over the years, and the number of them, I think I'd lean Keep and remove that account from the blacklist. Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:45, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: as user that requested blacklist in 2012 but has not added their view.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:41, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, from what I've seen of some of these files they are in the public domain and educationally useful, I do not see how the "blacklist" status of the original account is relevant to the license. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The assertion above that if the Federal Government commissions a work, that it is automatically PD-USGOV, is incorrect. While it is certainly possible for the geovernment to buy the copyright (technically to buy an exclusive license), it is usually not done. That is well established in a variety of contexts on Commons, ranging from the Korean War and Martin Luther King memorials to the Sacagawea dollar to presidential portrait paintings in the White House. For a comprehensive discussion of this, see https://cendi.gov/publications/04-8copyright.html#41 . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Clindberg and others. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:20, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Materialscientist's reasons stated above. Mitchellhobbs (talk) 19:18, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per consensus above. The account will be removed from the blacklist. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:09, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia. — Ирука13 11:03, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia. — Ирука13 11:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:48, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low-re images, no metadata: unlikely to be own works.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:20, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Permission from each photographer (Anny Robert, Gweneira...) needed via COM:OTRS.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:23, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Henrich_Akomolafe.png” but not processed yet, ticket:2020031710008239. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 23:11, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Temitope_Ogunsemo.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020031710008239. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 23:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Henrich_Akomolafe.png” under ticket:2020031710008239. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 15:30, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Temitope_Ogunsemo.jpg” under ticket:2020031710008239. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 15:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Permissions was received. --Anatoliy (talk) 17:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 15:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. First date of publication is unknown. Fadeyev (in center) died in 1943.
Maxinvestigator (talk) 04:17, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:00, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. The file has no EXIF. Person on photo died in 1998.
Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:42, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:01, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
-Meme.jpg){kind=link}
-Meme.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Scope? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 14:16, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
I don't think so. This image shows how Memes work and shows it with an exact example. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:34, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
-Meme.jpg){kind=link}
-Meme.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no consensus to delete. --ƏXPLICIT 01:03, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
-Meme.jpg){kind=link}
Historical photos and illustrations. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Musa Yuldashevich Saidjanov (1893-1937).png
- File:Yuldash Akhunbabayev.jpg
- File:The largest ethnic groups on the territory of modern Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan in the early 20th century.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:49, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gambo7 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7
Converted by me to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, the person has an article on WP. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as Unfree Flickr file (Unfree Flickr file) and the most recent rationale was: Unfree The license on Flickr is not relevant if the file is PD due to age. We need to find that out first. MGA73 (talk) 21:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: I think that we can claim that it is PD. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Original image created by Popular Mobilization Forces, not in the public domain in the home country Iraq, only PD in United States due to Iraq not being a party to the Berne Convention Thespoondragon (talk) 15:17, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:28, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of https://s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/desingel-media/a1ib000000AIB7bAAH.jpg, permission of photographer Guy Delahaye needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- See also the discussion in the Village pump. Beireke1 (talk) 11:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:28, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Remaining files in Category:Files by User:Veverve with incorrect 2D license
[edit]Are those 2D images or 3D images? If these are 2D images in the current version, the older versions need to be deleted. If the current version is still to be considered as a 3D image, additional cropping is required. Also including files from the now closed DRs Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Charles XII Bible and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gustav II Adolfs bibel in order to keep the discussion at one place.
- File:1583 edition of the Leuven Vulgate - Isaiah ch. 1-2.jpg
- File:1583 edition of the Leuven Vulgate - map of Palestine.jpg
- File:Alfred Rahlfs' edition of the Septuagint, 2 vol., 1935 (2) (cropped).jpg
- File:Alfred Rahlfs' edition of the Septuagint, 2 vol., 1935 (2).jpg
- File:Beginning of the Gospel of Matthew - Sixto-Clementine Vulgate (1592).jpg
- File:Bellarmine's Disputationes, volume 2, 2nd edition, 1591.jpg
- File:Bible de Louvain 1550 4.jpg
- File:Biblia Sacra, quid in hac editione a theologis Lovaniensibus praestitum sit, eorum praefatio indicat. Antwerp - Christophe Plantin, 1583; Exodus XXVIII.jpg
- File:Charles XII Bible (1709) - 2 Kings ch. 16-17.jpg
- File:Charles XII Bible (1709) - Book of Revelation ch. 21-22.jpg
- File:Charles XII Bible (1709) - New Testament title page.jpg
- File:Charles XII Bible (1709) - The Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children and Prayer of Manassee.jpg
- File:Frontispiece of the Sixto-Clementine Vulgate (1592) 2.jpg
- File:Gustav II Adolfs bibel 1618 - 2 Kings ch. 10-12.jpg
- File:Gustav II Adolfs bibel 1618 - II Esra (Book of Nehemiah), ch. 2-3 - text.jpg
- File:Gustav II Adolfs bibel 1618 - II Esra (Book of Nehemiah), ch. 2-3.jpg
- File:Gustav II Adolfs bibel 1618 - Song of Solomon ch. 8 + Major Prophets and Minor Prophets title page.jpg
- File:Gustav Vasas bibel 1541 - Lukas.jpg
- File:Gustav Vasas bibel 1541 - Markus.jpg
- File:Præfatio ad lectorem + Canons of the council of Trent, fourth session - Sixto-Clementine Vulgate (1592).jpg
- File:Sixto-Clementine Vulgate (1592) 2.jpg
- File:Sixto-Clementine Vulgate (1598) - Old Testament table of content.jpg
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_2_Kings_ch._16-17.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Book_of_Revelation_ch._21-22.jpg){kind=link}
_-_New_Testament_title_page.jpg){kind=link}
_-_The_Prayer_of_Azariah_and_Song_of_the_Three_Holy_Children_and_Prayer_of_Manassee.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
,_ch._2-3_-_text.jpg){kind=link}
,_ch._2-3.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Old_Testament_table_of_content.jpg){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 21:04, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Kept for now - most of these look as close as possible to scans. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:40, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
The original, apparently, is in public domain by old age. What about the translation? — Ирука13 11:23, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:50, 12 November 2020 (UTC)