Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/01/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 26th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake 27.34.104.250 04:56, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 12:29, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake 27.34.104.4 03:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake 27.34.104.4 03:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:13, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Portada de la revista la gaceta ilustrada.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:17, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:17, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:19, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ngek-ngok (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Already deleted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:47, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy close -- none of these have a license from the artist. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons incompatible CC-BY-NC license (but see discussion here). — Racconish💬 08:08, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: you have to missed the point of the linked discussion. The file is available under the {{GFDL-1.2}} and was uploaded 4 September 2017. The license is not allowed for new uploads, but perfectly valid for uploads prior to 15 October 2018. Multichill (talk) 19:58, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination — Racconish💬 21:40, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 21:41, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images in Commons must allow commercial use. Strakhov (talk) 09:42, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 20:03, 27 Januar 2020 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 02:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 20:03, 27 Januar 2020 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 02:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 20:03, 27 Januar 2020 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 02:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 20:04, 27 Januar 2020 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 02:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 20:04, 27 Januar 2020 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 02:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 20:04, 27 Januar 2020 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 02:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 20:04, 27 Januar 2020 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 02:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 20:04, 27 Januar 2020 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 02:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 20:03, 27 Januar 2020 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 02:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 20:04, 27 Januar 2020 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 02:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 20:04, 27 Januar 2020 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 02:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial image copyrighted by Gareth Fuller - WPA Pool/Getty Images. Beginning (talk) 10:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 00:22, 28 Januar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 08:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photos primarily featuring non-notable people. Unlikely to have any educational or historical value.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:55, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:A Sunny Day (89818341).jpeg, which is obviously useful, depicting Green str. crossing Columbus ave. in San Francisco, with the Art Deco building of Bank of America in the corner and the usual road traffic going around.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:16, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Bondage (208001947).jpeg - which has nothing to do with people. It's a religious statue of obvious historical value.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepFile:Life Is Heavy (90825663).jpeg which features primarily an architectural structure of obvious interest, not people.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:20, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:San Francisco - Pier 43 Crabs "Two, Just For You." (1065638343).jpg featuring a vendor holding 2 crabs, of obvious educational value.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:21, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Best Hat (5219248557).jpg which features an alligator costume in a gift shop in Alcatraz. Of educational value.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Cassie And The Bay (140376113).jpeg Person cropped out, now a perfectly useful and educational photo.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Me at Golden Gate (5219956580).jpg] Person cropped out, now useful and educational.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:San Francisco Firefighters (5535345037).jpg. Completely nonsense nomination of a photo featuring congresswoman Nancy Pelosi discussing the importance of preserving public safety funding with firefighters from San Francisco Local 798 and Los Angeles.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:36, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:San Francisco Food Trucks (6681618961).jpg Useful and educational photo of a street food vendor in San Francisco (documents that activity).-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Noah And Monica (140376119).jpeg Useful photo of Point Bonita Lighthouse. The subjects are turned back, and do not interfere significantly with the photo.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:42, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:San Francisco Friends School (5622447659).jpg Nonsense nomination of obviously notable and historical photo: Congresswoman Pelosi welcomes 8th grade students from the San Francisco Friends School to Washington, D.C.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Sunset and Dancing Shadows (108687609).jpg - Useful photo of Ocean Beach at sunset.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:47, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Taking a photo of a movie - panoramio.jpg Picture of an old women with a walker and a group of people filming a prop. UFO with the Golden gate Bridge on the back. Of self evident and obvious educational value.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:51, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Taking Pictures Of San Francisco (91040461).jpeg Valuable cityscape of San Francisco with subject taking a photo of it in an non intrusive and educational way. Of obvious interest and educational value.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:55, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:US-CA - San Francisco - 2007-07-28 (4889300377).jpg Useful for category: Lawns in the United States and people with umbrellas. Not the most useful image, but still not out of scope.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:57, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the proponent should read Commons:Deletion policy.
First, why this files are all together? There are not even close to each other. Is very hard to evaluate like that, you are creating problems to other volunteers.
"non-notable people" is not a criteria for deletion.
 Keep:
This File:A Sunny Day (89818341).jpeg illustrate a street at San Francisco, car, buses, houses, signs...
This: File:Bondage (208001947).jpeg is not even a person, is a statue, very likely to be part of church.
File:Life Is Heavy (90825663).jpeg the person, unfortunately illustrate a social condition, and also gives perspective to the photo.
File:Noah And Monica (140376119).jpeg also scale, but for me is grey.
File:San Francisco - Pier 43 Crabs "Two, Just For You." (1065638343).jpg, illustration of crab sale man. As far I know, typical for the area.
File:San Francisco Food Trucks (6681618961).jpg similar as before.
File:Taking a photo of a movie - panoramio.jpg this one can illustrate how to include objectives in a scene, is not a selfie or something.
File:Taking Pictures Of San Francisco (91040461).jpeg a photo of the skyline.
Just to be clear, I just uploaded the statue photo. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 01:24, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I fully agree that Pi.1415926535 nomination was not helpful at all. My general feeling for this kind of messed up deletion nominations, is supporting  Keep everything, and then suggest the OP to nominate the images individually according to their characteristics. One of the nominations do not even feature any people at all, others feature Nancy Pelosi historical photos in events! Please be more careful when nominating images for deletion, people have a lot to do here, and don't really need to waste precious volunteer time with this.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:27, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This "non-notable people", "unlikely to have any educational or historical value" is St. Mary statue at the facade of the 170 year old former Roman Catholic Cathedral of San Francisco, a Designated San Francisco Landmark. That's how absurd this nomination was.-- Darwin Ahoy! 02:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Francisco Firefighters (5535345037).jpg, File:San Francisco Food Trucks (6681618961).jpg, File:San Francisco Friends School (5622447659).jpg are all photos of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the exact opposite of a "non-notable" person. And the first and last, particularly, are bizarre to have been nominated. Pelosi greeting children at the capitol and meeting with firefighters does not strike me as "personal photos" SecretName101 (talk) 21:06, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I withdraw the mass request. I will take these comments into consideration and file separate DRs for any images that I'm still convinced should be deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:49, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No online free source given for this image. Leoboudv (talk) 06:42, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawned. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:37, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is from Ms. Rotinsulu's Instagram account; uploader is also a proven sockpuppeteer and has been blocked from Wikipedia. Image also appears on website PeoplePill, so there is no way this is a copyright-free or license-free image. Please delete as soon as possible. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 00:29, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:04, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image is from Ms. Rotinsulu's Instagram account; uploader is also a proven sockpuppeteer and has been blocked from Wikipedia. Image also appears on website PeoplePill, so there is no way this is a copyright-free or license-free image. Please delete as soon as possible. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 17:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is from Ms. Rotinsulu's Instagram account; uploader is also a proven sockpuppeteer and has been blocked from Wikipedia. Image also appears on website PeoplePill, so there is no way this is a copyright-free or license-free image. Please delete as soon as possible. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 00:30, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image is from Ms. Rotinsulu's Instagram account; uploader is also a proven sockpuppeteer and has been blocked from Wikipedia. Image also appears on website PeoplePill, so there is no way this is a copyright-free or license-free image. Please delete as soon as possible. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is from Ms. Rotinsulu's Instagram account; uploader is also a proven sockpuppeteer and has been blocked from Wikipedia. Image also appears on website PeoplePill, so there is no way this is a copyright-free or license-free image. Please delete as soon as possible. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 00:30, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader AlbanGeller (talk · contribs) contacted me on my user talkpage and wished to delete the image, because it is not in public domain in USA due to URAA. I agree with that. But the file is not eligible for speedy deletion, because it survived a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 22:19, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, after discussion with AlbanGeller on my talkpage I decided to withdraw the request. The photo was created anonymously by studio Bassano Ltd, which has since ceased to exist without known heir. The copyright on source country UK has expired. The photo is copyrighted in USA until 2035, but it is unknown, who can claim copyright. After discussion with AlbanGeller I will hide older versions of the file – they are identical to last versions, difference is in size. Taivo (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RyanDBaird (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Miscellaneous personal photos - mostly family photos. Highly unlikely to have any educational or historical value.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:05, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work - its a photo of a professional photographer and no permission documented 109.40.130.98 00:03, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader seems to be the depicted person. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:34, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Copyrighted movie poster, incompatible with Commons licensing requirements. Hammersoft (talk) 00:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wale Film Poster.jpg is an image created by Barnaby Blackburn for Dark Glass Films in order to promote the film Wale. The image is publicly available on the IMdB website page for the film, and I have written permission from the creator himself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beanbagman (talk • contribs) 20:50, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. @Beanbagman: IMdB files are not released under a free license. The copyright holder needs to send a permission statement. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:35, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely blurry. Unlikely to have any educational or historical value. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:35, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: poor quality; not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:36, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LexICon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright holder=Gerd Seidel; is "own work Rob Irgendwer". Ra Boe watt?? 00:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at all pictures of Rob, in the exif data you can always find his name. -- Ra Boe watt?? 01:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ralf is right. The more "recent" pictures include both names: real name and username. Example: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2620ri_-CDU,_Josef_Hovenj%C3%BCrgen.jpg.
This is also true for the speedy-del-request in
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CPOV_2010_-_20100925-DSC_5225_DxO.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CPOV_2010_-_20100925-DSC_5226_DxO.jpg
For the record: I sent a mail at permissions for all the pictures recently questioned: Ticket#2020012610002687
No need to argue ;)
Best wishes, —Rob Irgendwer – (talk) 13:54, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: file has an OTRS permission. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:36, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aesthetically nice, but lacking any educational or historical value. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It depicts the Massachusetts Avenue, a Room & Board, storm clouds, Boston signs... I not even a person from USA and could identify all this... -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 01:45, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for describing the subject of the image. However, there is a large gap between merely showing something, and actually being useful to illustrate it. My allegation is that this photo is only in the former category. Can you identify a likely situation in which this photo would be of actual use to illustrate a Wikipedia article or other historical or educational use? If so, can you explain why you did not add a description or categories that would allow it to be found for that purpose, and why you did not correct the coordinates (which you clearly have the skills to determine are incorrect)? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"why you did not correct the coordinates" - 01:59, 26 January 2020
Revision as of 01:42, 26 January 2020
"illustrate a Wikipedia article" is not a criteria.
Black and white photos of Boston, storm clouds, how was that corner at September 2015...
-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 02:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:37, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weirdly angled and badly filtered. We have dozens of far better images of this building. Unlikely to have any educational or historical value. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:50, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of Category:John Hancock Tower. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:40, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tourist photos lacking useful filenames, descriptions, or categories. Unlikely to have any educational or historical value.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:51, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I completely agree that the description of some of the files should be changed, but other than that the fact that they were taken during the tourist trip does not diminish their value. We are not talking about photos where individuals themselves appear in the photo and take up a large portion of the photograph or evn a small portion but with the focus on them, here we have a tourist who is photographing places of interest. Places of interest are definitely in scope. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 02:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep These are decsent photos and the rationale for their deletion does nor persuade. Farragutful (talk) 13:14, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:40, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent, and thus still copyrighted, murals. Unfortunately, the United States does not have freedom of panorama for artworks.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Although this nomination has little to do with the fact of it being California, these four files require FoP in the United States. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 07:38, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:01, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif metà data and no source defined. Copyrighted content so needs to be deleted - IndrajitDas 10:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete. The author let me take it use a copy from his facebook page, [1], which removes the exif data. In the past he's given me copies stored on Flickr which have public licenses, like File:Lunar eclipse September 27 2015 greatest Alfredo Garcia Jr.jpg. I can ask him to upload a copy to Flickr [2], and I can replace this Facebook copy with his flickr copy. Will that work? Tomruen (talk) 11:44, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The author uploaded it to his Flickr account under public domain. [3] Tomruen (talk) 00:50, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per this RfC. Flickr's PDM 1.0 license is not a legal notice, official permission is needed 219.79.96.60 02:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is required? Author is here [4] on Facebook. Should he change the Flickr setting to something else? Tomruen (talk) 05:10, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, author should change Flickr license to cc-zero if they intend to make the photograph public domain. Abzeronow (talk) 17:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: Public Domain Mark 1.0 images cannot be hosted unless they are {{PD-old}} or {{PD-USGov}}. I don't know this two years before. Sorry for any inconvenience. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not a free license; PDM 1.0 is not accepted on Commons as it used to identify pictures that might be under public domain. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:42, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous behavior! Tomruen (talk) 05:56, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tomruen: Restored as per updated COM:PDM--A1Cafel (talk) 06:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This video is copyrighted and does not pass COM:WHERE LICENSE under 'show more'. Leoboudv (talk) 02:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Aranya (talk) 03:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not free license. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This BBC Persian video is copyrighted and does not pass COM:WHERE LICENSE under 'show more'. It is Not free this like other BBC Persian Video Leoboudv (talk) 02:51, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Aranya (talk) 03:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not free license. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:44, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This BBC Persian video is copyrighted and does not pass COM:WHERE LICENSE under 'show more'. It is Not free like this other BBC Persian Video Leoboudv (talk) 02:52, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Aranya (talk) 03:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not free license. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:44, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; not found elsewhere on the internet. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:45, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and unused image, can be replaced A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:46, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and unused image, can be replaced A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:46, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement from[5] Gahukuro (talk) 03:03, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:47, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement from [6] Gahukuro (talk) 03:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:47, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern stamps in Ecuador are generally copyrighted, see Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Ecuador. Kaldari (talk) 03:40, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:47, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was created using a copyrighted image that was later altered with the aid of Adobe Photoshop to ridicule the person originally depicted in such photo. 201.20.166.0 04:13, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy: See also https://xvideos.proxy1.xyz/profiles/ajleebranded: A lot of different images all photoshopped adding the same mole snippet. In addition, User:Afrwwe looks like a SPA. --Achim (talk) 13:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:48, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW, a photograph that prominently shows a copyrighted logo Ytoyoda (talk) 05:24, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted logo. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:49, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there are two problems with this image. Firstly, although the Reddit user who took the image responded positively to the question, "Do you mind if I put this on Wikipedia?", they did not explicitly release the image under a legal copyright license compatible with Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Commons. Secondly, even if the Reddit user released the image under such a license, because it nontrivially depicts the Sonic movie poster, it is a derivative work of the poster, so we need the permission of the movie poster copyright holder as well. Mz7 (talk) 07:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; per COM:DW of a copyrighted movie poster. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:50, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a downsized professional photo, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. VLu (talk) 07:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:51, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is derived from the character "Harry Potter", the rights to which belong to J.K. Rowling / Bloomsbury Publishing / Warner Bros., therefore it is not free. Iruka13 (talk) 07:38, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is a fan art representing a boy with a scar and round glasses. We see a coat of arms with an eagle... There is no valid reason for deleting it, IMHO. Moreover, he stands in a position that is not very representative of the original character or the original story. Suzelfe (talk) 10:23, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What character does this boy-with-the-lightning-style-scar represent in an article fr:Harry Potter et les Méthodes de la rationalité?--Iruka13 (talk) 16:22, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mistaken nomination. — Ирука13 09:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; fan art. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:52, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied by mistake copyvio source=https://amudanan.co.il/#!wiki=P694615 IsraelHikingMap (talk) 07:42, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:52, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessariness — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exj (talk • contribs) 2020-01-20T11:23:06‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination; out of scope. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

row image quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exj (talk • contribs) 2020-01-20T11:23:52‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination; out of scope. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessariness — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exj (talk • contribs) 2020-01-20T11:24:45‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination; out of scope. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

row image quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exj (talk • contribs) 2020-01-20T11:22:04‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination; poor quality; not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has no purpose and is not being used in any articles. Kj1595 (talk) 08:38, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a proper reason for deletion. Reject the request for deletion. Keep this picture in WP. BR, Asurnipal (talk) 15:55, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What is your problem? Just because you are not happy how this file should be categorized, you are know requesting deletion?
This image was created for a purpose: awarding users who are actively working on the improvement of articles about Albania in German Wikipedia. This is good enough – as Asurnipal said: no valid reason for deletion. --Albinfo (talk) 16:55, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:56, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Parce que j'ai fait deux fautes sur le titre dans le dessin: à platre et plat...J'ai donc remplacé le dessin de la page du 25 01 2020 par celle du 26 01 2020, il faut donc supprimer celle du 25 01 2020. Désolé pour mon étourderie et ma sale maladie de ne vérifier que partiellement...Bonne année 2020 à toute votre équipe. Bien respectueusement. Gérard Rondeau GRDROND (talk) 08:41, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; uploader request. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:57, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although according to the source the author is unknown I've found another poster about this film designed by László Muskovszky. See here. This poster likely was made by him, too. He was born in 1902, year of death is unknown. Regasterios (talk) 08:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PCP. The date mentioned in the file description is not justified in the source. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:58, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sumathi sowmia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolutions, no meta data, mixed resolutions \ quality, unlikely own works.

BevinKacon (talk) 09:38, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:06, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personla photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 09:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:06, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://it.todocoleccion.net/collezionismo-riviste-giornali/el-hogar-moda-marzo-1948-revista-moda~x99443495#sobre_el_lote; Warner Bros. image, no permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Date of publication is 1948. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not public domain in Spain yet. Illustrator's (or his heirs') permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; per COM:PCP. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.facebook.com/HayagitaranHayastan/photos/a.560732590628318/2826044264097128/?type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:15, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Noki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:13, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Noki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Vintage Images. please explain why public domain in Armenia.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:40, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:14, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rebru-di (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 23:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; out of scope. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:13, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cəfərzadə Ləman.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:46, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely to be a screenshot (no metadata, cropped file). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:13, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Chasemp (talk) 23:46, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:11, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Chasemp (talk) 23:47, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:11, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MegaBlast313 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 23:47, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unused; out of scope. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:11, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Chasemp (talk) 23:47, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; used on multiple pages. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:10, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Linda Jean B (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:52, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; out of scope; unused. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dimalovekaf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 23:57, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; out of scope. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:08, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No need, File:FA Lebanon logo.png is already present. Nehme1499 (talk) 23:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unused. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:08, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iqbals.aulya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promo on id.wiki.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freigabe nicht ersichtlich 2003:CC:3BC7:A607:5429:9F83:5BEA:26D8 08:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC) Es ist mein Foto! (Erwin Hilbert alias Eduard Kratzfuss) http://www.himmelscafe.de — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eduard Kratzfuss (talk • contribs) 04:50, 23 October 2018 (UTC) Da ich alle meine Aktaufnahmem aus dem Netz genommen habe bitte ich um Löschung des Fotos. Es könnte evtl. religiöse Gefühle verletzen... Ich entziehe aus diesen Gründen Wikipedia die Rechte auf mein Foto und bitte nochmals um Löschung. Danke! Eduard Kratzfuss alias Erwin Hilbert[reply]


Kept: Image uploaded and released by author. --MB-one (talk) 09:59, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is now requesting deletion. [7] Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:55, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Commons:Courtesy deletions. --Hanooz 15:36, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:57, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 15:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 15:03, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:17, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyright violation from here. Encycloon (talk) 21:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: already deleted by Túrelio. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:35, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:28, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete – as with the prior deletion request, the primary purpose of uploading these photographs was to get images of Seibu-en into Commons from flickr; in performing the uploads, I must have selected these images that show copyrighted Sanrio characters. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 23:24, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete — Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 05:49, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright statement watermarked on the image itself. Unlikely to be "own work". Huntster (t @ c) 15:21, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the image is from the Chinese CDC: http://nmdc.cn/#/nCoV --Olivier LG (talk) 14:12, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: procedural close, File already deleted by Túrelio. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:37, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Najybb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close, Files already deleted by Arthur Crbz. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:45, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bharathimanivasagam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eltiguere300 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, found online. --P 1 9 9   17:54, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.narodnopozoriste.rs/en/vujic-ivana Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Anyway © Schmidt-Mechau Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:31, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sofia lehlou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:31, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Potentially inscope but needs permission from artist. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I do have a total permission from artist, here is txt email sent by the artist for this purpose I Imane Kamal Idrissi, Herbely certify that I give Sofia Lehlou my Director, my permisson to crop and use the pictures of my art work, and that it is not a violation of copyrights. I request as a copyright holder canceling deletation of these files " — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sofia lehlou (talk • contribs) 14:54, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

the copyright holder of the work and media's written permission was sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org 

regarding all files, I kindly request for the files to not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sofia lehlou (talk • contribs) 16:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 18:46, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 19:14, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:57, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 19:16, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. please explain why public domain in Republican Republic. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:38, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 07:15, 3 Februar 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Eltiguere300 --Krdbot 14:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:40, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 19:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty, content moved to Category:River Plate line-ups - Fma12 (talk) 12:50, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, author's request. --Achim (talk) 21:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image, presented as a logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the Ldorfman (talk) 11:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   03:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in-use picture of an office containing the company's logo (on the wall). The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 11:20, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of a group of people. Purpose of meeting is unclear. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:47, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Personal art work. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 12:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no own work Gunofficial1998 (talk) 12:10, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo form facebook Gunofficial1998 (talk) 12:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:43, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no need as image Iruka13 (talk) 12:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   03:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no need as image Iruka13 (talk) 12:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   03:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no need as image Iruka13 (talk) 12:50, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   03:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty, content moved to Category:Teams of Estudiantes de La Plata - Fma12 (talk) 12:52, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The unused and uncategorised file. Out of the project scope? The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:45, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meaningless image Jjw (talk) 13:15, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   03:45, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file without meaningful description. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 14:11, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:45, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, promotional picture of a not enough famous actor 5.170.243.91 14:14, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: it:Rocky Alvarez has been deleted. --Achim (talk) 14:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:45, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file with no explanation. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 15:00, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:19, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ДиркСтруан (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:31, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EGMpedia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:47, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The unused and uncategorised file. Out of the project scope? The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:47, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The unused and uncategorised file. Out of the project scope? The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:47, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused JPG file suppressed by SVG file A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree — File:Periodensystem der "March for Science"-Orte in Deutschland.svg is more useful. I just noticed there is also File:March for Science Periodensystem (33362418663).jpg. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 05:35, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo promocional; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted banners A1Cafel (talk) 16:09, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9   03:50, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 조준우1950 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. --P 1 9 9   03:58, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:50, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FN9986 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work, permission needed.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 16:28, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:50, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screenshot A1Cafel (talk) 16:36, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:50, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alphonse Séché died in 1964. Undelete in 2035. Since this is from before 1925, it can be locally hosted on English Wikipedia Abzeronow (talk) 16:40, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 15:04, 27 January 2020, by Arthur Crbz. --P 1 9 9   03:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Some sort of personal artwork.Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 16:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from photo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by María02121982 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:55, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:52, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:57, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:52, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   03:53, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No description. The unused and uncategorised file. Out of the project scope? The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:00, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:53, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie UygarMert (talk) 17:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   03:53, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anokhatechfest (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:06, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:54, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons is not a place for non-encyclopedic casual tourist snapshots and personal photos. Missvain (talk) 17:31, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:55, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused copyright movie poster Sakhalinio (talk) 18:51, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:56, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JillianAllen20 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Permission "for use" is not sufficient for Commons. Photographer's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:23, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:57, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright to TAP Airlines according to metadata, not own work Gyrostat (talk) 11:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:05, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want this redirect. LionEdits (talk) 11:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:05, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want this redirect. LionEdits (talk) 11:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:05, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

invalid audio file. No sound. Probably uploaded again (see [8]) Estopedist1 (talk) 12:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: works for me. --P 1 9 9   04:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality. Entirely replaced by File:2019-nCoV Outbreak World Map.svg. Uses borders that are obsolete for the time of the outbreak (2019-2020). Redundant file. Ratherous (talk) 11:11, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I also invite infographic editors and map-makers to participate in this discussion. —hueman1 (talk uploads) 12:55, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication this source has a free license. FunkMonk (talk) 14:09, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. Микола Василечко (talk) 14:29, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without camera data, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: invalid deletion reason. But non-notable person, no entry in wp or wikidata, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   14:08, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superceded by File:2019-nCoV Outbreak World Map.svg and no longer used or updated. Redundant file. Ratherous (talk) 11:13, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Could be deleted. --Furfur Diskussion 11:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:09, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage, sources of the components have not been provided Ymblanter (talk) 11:40, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:09, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: screenshot from unknown source. 176.59.44.238 12:51, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:11, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to go uploaders work as it appears to be a media photo of actor Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:08, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, per EXIF data: Author Mark Bruce. --P 1 9 9   14:13, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence this is the uploader's own work (what happened to the tools for searching for images on the web?) Bbb23 (talk) 17:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: published online before uploaded to Commons. --P 1 9 9   14:17, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted material Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 18:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: below TOO. --P 1 9 9   14:18, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonfree photo of slide Victorgrigas (talk) 19:10, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:25, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of photos, missing permission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:11, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of claimed licence at source link MPF (talk) 22:13, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:31, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright owner changed mind about this upload Rich Baldwin (talk) 23:05, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   14:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright owner has changed his mind about this upload Rich Baldwin (talk) 23:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   14:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright owner has changed his mind about this upload Rich Baldwin (talk) 23:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   14:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright owner has changed his mind about this upload Rich Baldwin (talk) 23:08, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   14:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright owner has changed his mind about this upload Rich Baldwin (talk) 23:09, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   14:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright owner has changed his mind about this upload Rich Baldwin (talk) 23:10, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   14:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright owner has changed his mind about this upload Rich Baldwin (talk) 23:11, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   14:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright owner has changed his mind about this upload Rich Baldwin (talk) 23:11, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   14:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olivier 92200 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All Second Life screenshots, but no evidence uploader created the models and textures.

BevinKacon (talk) 09:22, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Uploader only uploaded screenshots of Second Life. Likely to be a player and creator of content. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:05, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Except the few images in use, all are personal artwork with little educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   14:38, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. No evidence provided the uploader is the copyright holder for any of these images, even the "in-use" ones. --Green Giant (talk) 21:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Cherkash as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Anatomy of the Human Ear.svg  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 10:53, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Controlversal, since User:Túrelio undid the {{Duplicate}}, with the argument: differently lettered, but in my point of view the labels are just positoned differently, but however it's a different file format, and might be kept, see Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 10:57, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Anatomy of the Human Ear.svg predates this file and the raster SVG it came from, so deletion is fine with me. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:42, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per Alexis  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:39, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 21:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jmoss chud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for sculptures and 2D works.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 21:10, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

enwp article declined. no other use. Quakewoody (talk) 15:53, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 21:10, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from award. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 21:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DanielleTH as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Signatures of UK citizens are copyrighted, see Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-signature_tag#United_Kingdom. Since this is in use by over 10 different projects, I converted to a regular DR. UK does copyright signatures so this would require OTRS by the musician to keep. Abzeronow (talk) 17:21, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 21:13, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for outdoor 2D artwork in Taiwan.--Kai3952 (talk) 09:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:56, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See this Village Pump/Copyright discussion. Latest correspondences from Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) reaffirmed that the non-commercial restriction for Taiwanese non-architecture extends to photographic reproductions like this image file. Since this photo shows the artwork intentionally, this cannot benefit from Taiwanese de minimis (in which the artwork must be incidental or at background). Correspondences in Chinese: [9] and [10]. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The artist indicated is 林玉山, who is probably the artist of this work. If so, the artist died in 2004 and the 2D work in this nominated photo is still unfree. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:33, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 1993. No Permission from the sculptor І. Сонсядло. Микола Василечко (talk) 14:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also File:Пам'ятник Осипу Дякову Горновому (восени).jpg

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 1997. No Permission from the sculptor І.Козлик. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 1997. No Permission from the sculptor І. Сонсядло. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:00, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:00, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2006. No Permission from the sculptor. Павло Подобєд is not the author of the monument! Микола Василечко (talk) 18:19, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: permission template cites Ivan Muliarchuk as the author. --ƏXPLICIT 11:05, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low resolution, bad quality, better File:Charles V and Empress Isabella of Portugal, by Peter Paul Rubens.jpg, File:Peter Paul Rubens - Charles V and the Empress Isabella - WGA20379.jpg Oursana (talk) 19:08, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:08, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo probably comes from this page and its description is not correct. Wiktoryn (talk) 13:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: EXIF shows author Andrzej Nowak, requires COM:OTRS permission. --ƏXPLICIT 07:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted book cover A1Cafel (talk) 16:06, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When uploading this, I had presumed De minimis, but I can see the argument. I have just uploaded a new version which has the copyrighted book cover blurred out of the picture, which probably makes it now ok. RickMorais (talk) 17:06, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: original revision deleted. --ƏXPLICIT 07:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical magazine cover. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-resolution photo without metadata: unlikely to be own work. 176.59.32.168 19:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Это собственная работа файл 1280 × 853 пикселя, нет причин для удаления --Leobraverman (talk) 09:11, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I honestly doubt this is any truth to this. Greater east Asia refers to an area of japanese nationalism. Most likely hoax Artix Kreiger (talk) 20:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I know about your perspective about Japanese nationalism. That's said, this map is a valid historical fact about the influence of East Asian culture.


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: in use, please discuss in Wikipedia or in the file talk page. --Yann (talk) 06:36, 12 February 2018 (UTC) I honestly doubt this is any truth to this. Most likely hoax. Poorly done map including parts of India and half of Bhutan. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 01:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: The statement has been made that, "this map is a valid historical fact about the influence of East Asian culture." That statement MUST be proven with respect to all areas colored light blue, for instance, Chukotka and Yamalia in Siberia. What is the foundation for these claims? --Geographyinitiative (talk) 21:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, There is already a {{Fact disputed}} tag. Since this file is used on one Wikimedia project, there is no reason for deletion, even if the facts are disputed. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:19, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:05, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, the file is derived from a MathWorld file which can be shown to have existed since nearly two years before this file's upload. See this WebArchive link for evidence. Further, artefacts can be seen in the GIF implying that the paths of the points were manually removed from the original MathWorld file in order to hide the fact it is the source. The terms of service for Mathworld explicitly disallow the content from being "copied, mirrored, redistributed, printed, or reproduced in bulk without permission", evidence of permission has not be provided and so the burden of proof is not met. The file File:Problema dei topi n=6 animazione.gif is being co-nominated for deletion with the same reason. —The Editor's Apprentice (Talk) 18:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: A movement which is defined by a mathematical formula is {{PD-ineligible}}. --King of ♥ 06:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, the file is derived from a MathWorld file which can be shown to have existed since nearly two years before this file's upload. See this WebArchive link for evidence. Further, artefacts can be seen in the GIF implying that the paths of the points were manually removed from the original MathWorld file in order to hide the fact it is the source. The terms of service for Mathworld explicitly disallow the content from being "copied, mirrored, redistributed, printed, or reproduced in bulk without permission", evidence of permission has not be provided and so the burden of proof is not met. The file File:Problema dei topi n=3 animazione.gif is being co-nominated for deletion with the same reason. —The Editor's Apprentice (Talk) 18:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: A movement which is defined by a mathematical formula is {{PD-ineligible}}. --King of ♥ 06:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete version of File:Examples of háčky 2.png including a misleading example, retired in the improved version. Should have been uploaded as a replacement, not as a new file. If really necessary to document the “delevopment” of this file, then this version could be interspersed in the other’s history. -- Tuválkin 22:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unklare Rechtesituation - Hochlder offensichtlich nicht identisch mit angegebenem Rechteinhaber, aber auch ob dieser wirklich der Rechteinhaber ist, bleibt zweifelhaft, da es sich bei dem Foto wohl nicht um ein "Selfie" handelt Lutheraner (talk) 12:54, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --ƏXPLICIT 00:20, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture corresponds to an infographic of a 2010 miniseries set in Barcelona in the 1920s. - P4K1T0 (talk) 10:18, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment@P4K1T0: Could you be more specific? Which miniserie? --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:53, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ull per ull (Ojo por ojo in Spanish), a two-chapter Spanish miniseries aired on TVE in 2010. --P4K1T0 (talk) 11:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not a historical graphic, but from a modern TV series. howcheng {chat} 00:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for outdoor 2D artwork in Taiwan.--Kai3952 (talk) 09:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Filedesc & License-header replaced --ZephyrChen (talk) 09:18, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-China applies. howcheng {chat} 00:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be the most recent and only in file uploaded in 2017, which is from a serial copyvio uploader, see - Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_82#User:Marianne_Casamance_2016_uploads for background. Photo is scaled up. BevinKacon (talk) 10:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)+[reply]

First of all, I did a full photo report on the show on January 29th, with almost 100 photos, including around thirty charge in Commons the next day. The show took place in Montpellier from January 29 to 31, 2017[1]! Secondely, explain to me how could i have loaded in 2017, a more recent photo from 2018 or 2019? technically speaking, I'm not that good. Stop seeing a problem or there is none. it turns to harassment, your action.
@1989, De728631, Alexis Jazz, Masumrezarock100, Thibaut120094, Jules78120, VIGNERON, Hexasoft, Marc Mongenet, and Hsarrazin: What to do, when you upload your own photos, without reworking them, to prove your honest, against its type of individual?
If you share your account with a serial copyvio uploader, every upload under your account that matches their modus operandi will be subject to deletion.--BevinKacon (talk) 17:46, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Who can you understand that THIS IS NOT COPYVIO but my own work! Marianne Casamance (talk) 06:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So you are now saying you did use a Canon to take a single photo? As you said you didn't here. It's the only Canon photo in Category:Vinisud 2017, funny that.--BevinKacon (talk) 22:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. A Canon is not in the list of cameras that Marianne says she used. howcheng {chat} 00:51, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screenshot A1Cafel (talk) 15:27, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The screenshot is not the subject of the photograph, but perhaps in good faith you could crop some of that out, Cmglee. howcheng {chat} 00:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadonnées montrent que l'auteur n'est pas le contributeur et que la photo appartient à la Ville d'Allonnes. Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 19:22, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs)

[edit]

TV screenshots

Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:40, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User joined in 2008. Still uploaded copyvios in 2015. That's... uh. DarkoNeko 14:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance Jan 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, January 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 17:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @BevinKacon: what do you mean « not matching camera models given » ? (and why « models » plural, all photos come from the same model a Canon PowerShot SX110 IS, except one from a Canon EOS 400D DIGITAL) I see nothing wrong with these pictures (and certainly nothing like the distorted copyvios by Varaine). It's ok to take precaution but here it seems a bit overkill. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 08:41, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As per the linked discussion, the uploader never used a Canon - "Few year ago, i had a " KODAK EASYSHARE Z950 DIGITAL CAMERA " and a "PENTAX Optio M50". actualy, i use a "NIKON D3100" and, sometime my mobil phone "Blackview A10". So these uploads are from Varaine.--BevinKacon (talk) 22:24, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@BevinKacon: « So these uploads are from Varaine » is wrong on so many level, there is no way to achieve this conclusion. Do you realize how ridicoulous it sounds? The most logical conclusion is that Marianne Casamance forgot to list some of the camera she used (and I can't blame her, I have no idea what cameras I used last year, let alone in 2016). Anyway, after taking some times I indeed found a few suspicious : File:Euphorbe de Loiseleur (Euphorbia seguieriana subsp. loiseleurii).jpg, File:Euphorbe de Loiseleur (Euphorbia loiseleuri).jpg, File:Lunetière à tige courte (Biscutella brevicaulis).jpg, File:Saucissons de taureau de Camargue.jpg, File:Saucissons secs d'Arles.jpg, File:Poupeton de bouillabaisse en préparation.jpg, File:Grémil à pédoncule épais (Lypostérium incrassatum).JPG, these one can be deleted (typical Varaine-style low-res/artfacty probably-copyvio); all the others should be kept unless there is some proof or at least serious suspicion. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:12, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Did you review them all? I don't think so as you missed File:IGP coteaux du Cher et de l'Arnon jeunes vignes du côté de Reuilly.JPG. COM:PCP has been met. I notify @De728631, Masumrezarock100, and VIGNERON: at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_82#User:Marianne_Casamance_2016_uploads you say nothing, but vote Keep here still with no solution.--BevinKacon (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:IGP coteaux du Cher et de l'Arnon jeunes vignes du côté de Reuilly.JPG does indeed look like an upload by Varaine, but as has been said multiple times in this discussion, mass deleting all uploads by Marianne Casamance is not a desirable solution since it would cause too much collateral damage. De728631 (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. You are the one who initiated this DR, so feel free to review them individually. I am not going to volunteer because I don't have enough time because of real life. Most of these files are in use and of high quality as I said. Mass-deleting all of them blindly won't solve anything. Masum Reza📞 00:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some of them are in use, and most of the images are of high quality. We don't have any proof that all of the files uploaded by her are copyvio. They should be judged on an individual basis, and should not be mass-nominated blindly. I agree that precaution is better than cure, but this seems to be a bit overkill. Unless concrete and satisfactory evidence of each file listed here being copyvio is provided, I am inclined to vote  Keep. Masum Reza📞 09:44, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @KevinBacon: I am pretty sure those files were not deleted blindly. Volunteer reviewers checked each one of them, one by one. Or did I read the discussion wrong? If I recall correctly, Alexis Jazz was the one who did the most of the work. His opinion here would be helpful here since he is quite familiar with Varaine's work. Masum Reza📞 00:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Alexis Jazz and Masumrezarock100: indeed, we didn't check them one by one but we didn't deleted them blindly either. We checked a lot of them one by one and almost all where copyvios, so then we safely assumed that if in the sample most where copyvio then the same ratio would apply for the whole. This is very different from the situatio here where almost none of Marianne Casamance upload are copyvio. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 09:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @VIGNERON: the ratio was a fair bit higher, but not "almost all" of Varaine's uploads were copyvio. A substantial number were though, and the longer we looked the more we found. The degree of misdirection made it impossible to determine what was really his own work, but I guess that anywhere from 0% to 80% was own work. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete @De728631 and VIGNERON: If Marianne Casamance says she didn't use a PowerShot SX110, she didn't. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexis Jazz: this peremptory assumption make no sense to me. Do you really think that someone can perfectly recall what models where used 4 years ago? (I know I clearly can't for myself). As I said supra, « The most logical conclusion is that Marianne Casamance forgot to list some of the camera she used ». Marianne Casamance could you confirm or infirm? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 09:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was loaned a camera, during the breakdown of one of my camera at the time. I am completely unable to tell you which model it is, probably cannon. I forgot it, not being one of my devices. Marianne Casamance (talk) 09:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Marianne Casamance: but you also can't remember a single picture you definitely took with it? @VIGNERON: I could. Okay, maybe I'd forget something I took less than 5 pictures with, but any camera I took 242 pictures with I'd definitely be able to recall. (if not the exact model number at least the brand) And deleting those really suspect images now is a bad idea. If Marianne Casamance indeed did use a PowerShot SX110, we'll have a much harder time now to identify which photos were taken (or "taken") by Varaine. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Marianne Casamance: there have to multiple photos in this list that you would be able to recall or strongly suspect having taken yourself ("that's the kind of building I would take a photo of", "that's the angle I would pick") or can confirm not having taken yourself ("I'd never take a photo out of focus like that", "I never ate that dish, why would I have a photo of it?"). Please confirm for as many as you can that are likely or unlikely to be your own work. From there we could try to analyze what was your work and what wasn't. Here's a gallery.- Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to sort them out for you, but my work schedule requires me to have a little time. real life is also time consuming. Marianne Casamance (talk) 07:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Jan 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Jan 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Feb 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Feb 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Mar 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Mar 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Apr 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Apr 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) May 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, May 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Jun 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Jun 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:00, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Jul 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Jul 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Aug 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Aug 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:05, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Sep 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Sep 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marianne Casamance (talk · contribs) Oct 2016

[edit]

According to uploaders own description Here, they shared their account with this user that uploaded them, so cannot be trusted at all per COM:PCP. All licensed as own work, not matching camera models given, pd olds excluded, Oct 2016 uploads only.

BevinKacon (talk) 14:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I believe that deleting all contributions of the user made in 2016 is an overkill here. For example, in Varaine case we had a more thorough review to select which one to keep or not. The uploader has a history of own uploads before and she claims that possible copyvios are in the Category:Files may uploaded by JPS68 with Marianne Casamance account. I will close all discussions and I don't think we can proceed with them till we have a clear consensus on some village pump, for example. --rubin16 (talk) 13:26, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I believe that deleting all contributions of the user made in 2016 is an overkill here. For example, in Varaine case we had a more thorough review to select which one to keep or not. The uploader has a history of own uploads before and she claims that possible copyvios are in the Category:Files may uploaded by JPS68 with Marianne Casamance account. I will close all discussions and I don't think we can proceed with them till we have a clear consensus on some village pump, for example. --rubin16 (talk) 13:34, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I believe that deleting all contributions of the user made in 2016 is an overkill here. For example, in Varaine case we had a more thorough review to select which one to keep or not. The uploader has a history of own uploads before and she claims that possible copyvios are in the Category:Files may uploaded by JPS68 with Marianne Casamance account. I will close all discussions and I don't think we can proceed with them till we have a clear consensus on some village pump, for example. --rubin16 (talk) 13:35, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I honestly doubt this is any truth to this. Greater east Asia refers to an area of japanese nationalism. Most likely hoax Artix Kreiger (talk) 20:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I know about your perspective about Japanese nationalism. That's said, this map is a valid historical fact about the influence of East Asian culture.


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: in use, please discuss in Wikipedia or in the file talk page. --Yann (talk) 06:36, 12 February 2018 (UTC) I honestly doubt this is any truth to this. Most likely hoax. Poorly done map including parts of India and half of Bhutan. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 01:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: The statement has been made that, "this map is a valid historical fact about the influence of East Asian culture." That statement MUST be proven with respect to all areas colored light blue, for instance, Chukotka and Yamalia in Siberia. What is the foundation for these claims? --Geographyinitiative (talk) 21:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, There is already a {{Fact disputed}} tag. Since this file is used on one Wikimedia project, there is no reason for deletion, even if the facts are disputed. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:19, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete for privacy 屈原蟲 (talk) 12:08, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: Could you tell me how to ask for deletion due to privacy reasons? --Super Wang (talk) 13:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Super Wang: you can't, unless you are that woman. The photo does not depict her in any bad way. If the issue is that the photo is too yellow, I can fix that. @蟲蟲飛: you are the uploader (I think.. you signed with "屈原蟲", but your username is "蟲蟲飛". My system is not Chinese, I can't see either) Is that what you want? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:19, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: Well, I suppose that you've explained enough. Thanks. And please be clear that though I'm not a woman I still have rights to ask you questions. Anyway, 屈原蟲 signed a username change hours ago, and now her new username is 蟲蟲飛. --Super Wang (talk) 22:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Super Wang: this may be a translation error, but I said you would have to be that woman (the woman in the picture), not a woman. And yes, you can ask anything you want. But there is no way to ask for "deletion due to privacy reasons" that would result in actual deletion, unless you are the woman in the picture. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Super Wang: can you ask 蟲蟲飛 in Chinese if the yellow color is the problem? I can fix that. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:57, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: I will relay that. And I don't need a translation app or something like that in such a simple conversation. XD/ --Super Wang (talk) 00:01, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment File has OTRS permission. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I've improved the colors (asked the uploader first if the new version was good). Comment from the uploader and nominator:

The new version of the photo is very good. Thank you for your help.

So I think everyone is happy to keep now. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes yes, we can "speedy keep" it now. You happy? So am I. --Super Wang (talk) 23:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --whym (talk) 12:46, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:蟲蟲飛 nominated the file for deletion with the rationale: "This is my private photo which is uploaded by me(屈原蟲is my old user name), someone uploaded it to other web sites, I am worried that privacy will leak." They accidentally appended that to an existing DR rather than creating a new DR, so I'm creating the DR for them. Since this appears to be a personal photo for their userpage, I'm not opposed to a courtesy deletion. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@蟲蟲飛: "someone uploaded it to other web sites"
Plural? All I can find is (link removed by Alexis Jazz). - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:19, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting photo about spiral wooden stairs. Taivo (talk) 22:22, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am very shocked. Someone uploaded my photos to (link removed by Alexis Jazz). Not only this website, but also many people often download this photo and then discuss my true identity in the QQ group. As I am an active administrator on zhwiki, I am afraid that my true identity will be exposed in the end, so please delete the photo for me; if you cannot delete it, please delete any infomation on the photo that are associated with my account, thank you﹗--蟲蟲飛 (talk) 00:36, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@蟲蟲飛: Are you that woman in the photo?--Kai3952 (talk) 04:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
For those not in the know, w:Tencent QQ is instant messaging software. Chinese Whatsapp/Skype/XMPP/etc if you will. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:51, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have not used the photo on my userpage for many months, but still so many users find it from my user page past edit history, uploaded my photos to (link removed by Alexis Jazz), so I think it is better to delete it. In addition, I nominated deletion for my user page yesterday, so that the photo is useless in the future. So please delete the photo for privacy reason. Thanks!--蟲蟲飛 (talk) 12:08, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
For your information: I have just deleted and Oversighted this file as falling in the purview of the Oversight policy. This is not a comment on the procedure on this page on way or another. Regards, Rama (talk) 06:11, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Rama: in light of Taivo's comment I was planning on removing 蟲蟲飛 from the photo, that should still be OK, right? What's confusing right now is that File:旅行生活照_國外親友爬山記_2017年10月1日.jpg seems to have never existed unless you look at [11]. (there's no red bar with deletion rationale, presumably the result of oversighting) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:18, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: Considering that the stairs were a very secondary feature of the image and that we have an entire category of much better images of spiral wooden stairs (Category:Spiral wooden stairs) and even more for wooden stairs in general (Category:Wooden stairs), it did not strike me as vitally important to Commons (for instance File:Veilchentreppe.jpg, File:Uetliberg stairs.JPG or File:Termopylen sola pyynikki.jpg are close to what we see on the image, and show the subjet — stairs — more clearly). Furthermore, a cropped or obscured version of the image could still be used to confirm a link with the image on QQ, and possibly even to establish the links, from the identical background. Thus, I see a security risk and little benefit in keeping the image at all. Cheers! Rama (talk) 09:56, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted and oversighted by Rama. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rama: thanks for explaining. I'm glad I didn't spend any time obscuring her. Considering your argument, I think you should also oversight the revisions of this DR that include the link to the website that includes the image. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent point, I have oversighted the revisions in question. Thank you and good continuation! Rama (talk) 13:13, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Rama: You missed some, the first revision to include the link was [12]. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:34, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ah yes, thank you. I had only noticed the link given by 蟲蟲飛 herself. Should be sorted out now. Rama (talk) 14:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manuel Thoma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical drawing, photo, paintinng. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I adapted the license of

and

The following picture already has got the right license as you can see here: https://www2.landesarchiv-bw.de/ofs21/bild_zoom/zoom.php?bestand=24121&id=7148284&gewaehlteSeite=04_0001872522_0001_4-1872522-1.jpg&leo=1&screenbreite=1536&screenhoehe=864

Proper information for authors was already supplied. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manuel Thoma (talk • contribs) 00:51, 30 January 2020 (UTC) --Manuel Thoma 00:55, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Manuel Thoma: Sorry, I don't know German, but {{CC-0}} is applicable only for digitization. Work itself should have proper public domain tag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr. Linum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:53, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Diese beiden Listen wurden von einem Mitarbeiter des Stadtarchivs Schwäbisch Gmünd aus dienstlichen Gründen ca. 1940 angefertigt. Sie sind damit mit einem Findbuch oder sogar mit einer verwaltungsinternen Sachakte vergleichbar. Eine schützenswerte Schöpfungshöhe kann ich hierbei nicht erkennen. Beste Grüße --Dr. Linum (talk) 20:40, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. --Achim (talk) 21:50, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • We have here two scans of typed texts of the Stadtarchiv Schwäbisch Gmünd which, as it appears, strive to provide a comprehensive listing of all published works by Anton Nägele (1876–1947). The first scan, File:Schriftenverzeichnis Anton Naegele 1 (Lebenswerk).pdf begins with an introduction (two and a half pages) about the necessity of such a bibliography and a brief CV, followed by the bibliography of scholarly works. The second scan, File:Schriftenverzeichnis Anton Naegele 2 (Arbeiten).pdf consists just of a bibliography of publications in newspapers. The first bibliography of scholarly works appears to have been compiled for the 60th birthday of Anton Nägele in 1936 (quote from the introduction: “der Jubilar”). The bibliography was continued in the following years (apparently by other hands) until 1941. Many corrections and renumberings have been applied in handwriting.
There is an interesting handwritten notice at the end of the introduction which possibly gives a hint regarding the author of the first bibliography: “A. Pfeffer, Rottenburger Monatsschrift 19, 1935/6 S. 151-178”, followed by “a.n. Ergänzungen u. Nachträge 1936-40”. (I have opened a request at the desk for library requests at de:wp to research this.)
A comprehensive bibliography as we find in these two documents (quote: “tunlichst lückenlose Nennung der Aufsätze und sonstigen Publikationen”) leaves no room for creativity, as there is no selection, and as there are no comments within the bibliography. Both lists are sorted strictly by the date of the corresponding publications. Such non-literary works without creativity are not protected by German copyright law, see BGH, 10.10.1991 - I ZR 147/89, section 25 (quote: “Die Urheberrechtsschutzfähigkeit erfordert bei Gebrauchszwecken dienendem Schriftgut grundsätzlich ein deutliches Überragen des Alltäglichen, des Handwerksmäßigen, der mechanisch-technischen Aneinanderreihung des Materials”). The use of the license tag {{PD-ineligible}} is thereby justified, {{PD-text}} would however be a better fit.
Just the two and a half page introduction in File:Schriftenverzeichnis Anton Naegele 1 (Lebenswerk).pdf could be seen as a problem. But I do not see much originality in them either. The introduction just stresses the importance of a comprehensive bibliography for such a prolific author, it provides a brief summary of the main topics, and closes with a very short CV. It appears doubtful if this raises to the level of an original work which is covered by German copyright law. But I suggest to wait at least for the result of the opened library research as this could help us to identify the author. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC) Another quote added. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:22, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to Goesseln I received a scan of following publication: Anton Pfeffer, Rottenburg a. N.: Um das Lebenswerk eines schwäbischen Kulturhistorikers. Zum 60. Geburtstag von Professor Dr. Anton Nägele in Ellwangen. In: Rottenburger Monatschrift für praktische Theologie 19, 1935/1936, pp. 151–156, 178–181. The typescript File:Schriftenverzeichnis Anton Naegele 1 (Lebenswerk).pdf in its original form without the later additions appears to predate the published article which has entries up to “171) Die Homilien des hl. Joh. Chrystostomus zu den Briefen des hl. Apostels Paulus an Timotheus und Titus. Aus dem Griechischen übersetzt.“, followed by an appendix that includes additional publications from 1932, some concluding remarks, and a list of abbreviations which are not part of the typescript. This publication does not include the second bibliography of newspaper publications but refers to it (quote: “Noch ist zu erwähnen, daß nachstehend vor allen die in Zeitschriften erschienenen Aufsätze und die sonstigen Publikationen, Zeitungsaufsätze aber nur ausnahmsweise verzeichnet sind. Letztere sollen an anderem Orte zusammengefaßt werden.“ I have updated the file description of File:Schriftenverzeichnis Anton Naegele 1 (Lebenswerk).pdf accordingly.
As elaborated above, bibliographies which strive for completeness are not eligible for copyright in Germany. However, the introduction in File:Schriftenverzeichnis Anton Naegele 1 (Lebenswerk).pdf could be seen as a border case. The author has now been identified as Anton Pfeffer (Q84158878) who died in 1961 (see DNB and Bundesarchiv).
In summary:
*  Keep File:Schriftenverzeichnis Anton Naegele 1 (Lebenswerk).pdf. While I think that even the introduction could be kept (see my analysis above) it is also possible to upload a stripped PDF where pp. 2–4 are removed and to delete the full version which could then be restored in 2032 per pma70.
*  Keep File:Schriftenverzeichnis Anton Naegele 2 (Arbeiten).pdf without any reservations as this includes just a bibliography.
--AFBorchert (talk) 17:23, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Simply Keep. This is an bibliography and no creative work. Maybe there is a little bit of creativitiy in the first 2 1/2 pages, but not enough for a a copyright, most of it is a type of enumeration. --Jörgens.Mi Talk 15:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:23, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr. Linum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical book pages. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


With the exception of the very first file these are publications by Anton Nägele (1876–1947) whose works are already in the public domain. Unfortunately, the uploads carried the license tag {{Cc-zero}} which does not apply for obvious reasons. I've replaced this by {{PD-old-auto|deathyear=1947}}. A problem could be the title page of the Gmünder Heimatblätter with a drawing of Schwäbisch Gmünd's skyline including the famous Holy Cross Minster. This should be either resolved or removed from the PDFs. This concerns following files:

Unfortunately, a number of these scans include sections from other unrelated articles. They need either to be removed or their copyright status to be clarified. Some of these publications include photographs or drawings whose copyright status needs to be clarified as well. Examples:

In case of File:N.N. (1936) 60. Geburtstag Anton Naegele.pdf we have a bibliography which, according to its introduction, is restricted to works that are related to Schwäbisch Gmünd. The bibliography appears to have strived for completeness („Arbeiten kleinerer und größerer Art“) without any further selection. Such bibliographies are not eligible for copyright (see my reasoning above in the first deletion request). --AFBorchert (talk) 21:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ist das jetzt unser größtes Problem? Die übertriebene Genauigkeit wegen ein paar alten Bildern und meistens nicht schutzfähigen Aufsatzresten bei eindeutig gemeinfreiem Kontext?? schnellbehalten und gerade auch mal 5 grade sein lassen. #corona --Historiograf (talk) 16:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also,verstehe ich das richtig: Wenn die Scans der Aufsätze teilw. geschwärzt werden, können sie bleiben? Bsp. die überarbeitete Datei bei File:Nägele (1937) Gmünder Studentenstreiche.pdf. Danke, AFBorchert, für die Korrektur der Lizenz. --Dr. Linum (talk) 20:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Genau, das ist das einzige Problem, das ich hier sehe. Die neu hochgeladenen Fassungen bei File:Nägele (1936) Weidenfeldhof bei Wasseralfingen.pdf und File:Nägele (1936-1937) Ahnentafel Köhler-Insam.pdf lösen das Problem. In beiden Fällen habe ich die zuerst hochgeladene Fassung bereits versteckt. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, besten Dank. Dann will ich versuchen, in der kommenden Woche die Dateien entsprechend zu überarbeiten, bis zum Ende des nächsten Wochenendes (So, 29.03.) sollte das klappen. Könntest Du dann bitte die zuerst hochgeladenen Fassungen ebenfalls verstecken? Besten Dank --Dr. Linum (talk) 21:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, bei File:Nägele (1937) Gmünder Studentenstreiche.pdf habe ich ebenfalls die ursprüngliche Fassung versteckt. Solange noch keine zweite Fassung Wenn das in den übrigen Fällen bis zum nächsten Wochenende erledigt wird, ist das aus meiner Sicht vollkommen erledigt. Die übrigen Erstfassungen werde ich verstecken, sobald jeweils die neue Fassung zur Verfügung steht. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jetzt sollten alle kritischen Stellen geschwärzt sein. Bei

habe ich allerdings nicht erkennen können, was problematisch sein sollte. Beste Grüße --Dr. Linum (talk) 22:53, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank, das ist sehr hilfreich. Ich habe jeweils die ursprüngliche Fassung versteckt. Es bleiben noch einige Fotos innerhalb der Artikel – liegt da jeweils die Annahme zugrunde, dass die ebenfalls von Anton Nägele stammen? --AFBorchert (talk) 07:26, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bei File:N.N. (1936) 60. Geburtstag Anton Naegele.pdf fehlte noch die Lizenz-Vorlage. Hier habe ich {{PD-text}} (siehe auch Hinweise dazu weiter oben) eingesetzt. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:36, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für die Ergänzung der fehlenden Lizenz bei File:N.N. (1936) 60. Geburtstag Anton Naegele.pdf. Ja, hinsichtlich der noch vorhandenen Abbildungen gehe ich davon aus, dass diese von Nägele stammen; leider fehlen in den Gmünder Heimatblättern jedoch sämtliche Abbildungsnachweise, sodass ein gewisses Risiko bestehen bleibt. Dies ist m.E. jedoch vertretbar. Noch einen schönen Sonntag wünscht --Dr. Linum (talk) 12:26, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stripar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Found elsewhere than http://www.rastko.rs. Creative Commons claim to be checked.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:16, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding files from http://www.rastko.rs, same files are available elsewhere under an unfree license. An Administratot has to check them to determine whose has been published first. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:15, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Rastko.rs has e-mails by copyright holders which testify that, from the moment of publishing at Rastko.rs, images are deffinitelly under CC 4.0 status. What would be further procedure to clear this thing for good? Stripar (talk) 12:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Rastko.rs has to send these permissions via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:51, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stripar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparently Non Commercial: http://www.rankomunitic.org/sr-yu/ranko/foto-galerija

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AFAIK (because we were in this situation), all these images at Project Rastko clearly labeled with CC 4.0 license are obtained by persons depicted themselves, or by their families if they are deceased, with documented e-mails trail which testifies every single permissions. You can additionally check with them: info at rastko dot net. Also, all Munitić's images with CC 4.0 license are free to use beacause of the will of his widow Zorica Jevremović who runs his estate. Stripar (talk) 09:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's written Creative Commons: Attribution-Share Alike Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 at http://www.rankomunitic.org/sr-yu/ranko/foto-galerija but the logo says Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (which is not a valid license). Website owner will likely be asked to change the license. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If I understand you properly, they should remove the logo which contradicts the CC 4.0 license? Stripar (talk) 14:29, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Stripar: Yes they should. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The text and link say CC-BY-SA 4.0. --Anatoliy (talk) 11:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. [file:///C:/Users/vrouchka/Downloads/VINISUD_2017_CPsalon_FR%20(1).pdf check this, at the end]