Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/01/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 7th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The "signature" comes from a later reproduction and was potentially put here and on Wikipedia to have someone think it is authentic i.e. produced before 1928 when Celine Lepage died. This is NOT her signature. Sschmidt23 (talk) 17:54, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no indication whatsoever (not too mention proof) that the piece of which the signature has been cropped from is not authentic. → [1]. Neither can I relate to the suggested "sinister motives" for uploading the file. --Dr-Victor-von-Doom (talk) 01:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Fact disputed}} instead. P 1 9 9   14:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not her signature Sschmidt23 (talk) 18:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This file is used on de:Céline Lepage and Céline Lepage (Q28600804). Until such time as German Wikipedia and Wikidata permanently cease using the file, it should be kept on Commons under COM:INUSE. --bjh21 (talk) 19:52, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Assertion without substance. --Dr-Victor-von-Doom (talk) 03:50, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Apparently Celine Lepage did not use a single style to sign her works but employed various methods: There are handwritten signatures [2], the name written in block letters [3][4], or just a simple monogram [5][6]. De728631 (talk) 19:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: do not reopen DRs without new arguments. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:30, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not her signature 151.248.190.216 15:27, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedily per above. --Achim (talk) 16:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Propagande Raciste 2A01:E34:EF68:F480:51D5:C7F7:5F73:2745 21:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion but a permission must be provided by the artist (no FOP in France and recent artwork). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:35, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Web source page says "I am Maria Zverintseva professional photographer from Prague that provides photography services in Europe along with my young, artistic, and friendly team." No evidence of a free license. Leoboudv (talk) 01:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leoboudv, free license added. --Goo3 (talk) 08:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: Maria Zverintseva Never licensed her images freely. She is a professional photographer. The uploader's talkpage is filled with copyright warnings. --Leoboudv (talk) 10:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: as the nominator. When I used the Google Chrome browser, I could not see the license notice but when I use Firefox, then only can I see the license notice: "All materials featured on this site are is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International". Image reviewed. I WITHDRAW my nomination. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as withdrawm by nominator. --Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it breaks copyright laws AddiVF (talk) 08:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; obvious screenshot. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:54, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)"[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from original DRs:

Commons:Deletion requests/File:RenPy001.png:
AshFriday's userpage states "Fighting a never-ending battle against copyright vios and smut." This DR is clearly biased. I doubt he has the ability to distinguish between educational and non-educational illustrations. I don't care whether these images are uploaded by a banned user or not as they look clearly educational to me.  Speedy keep. AshFriday please explain why do you think it's "educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant". Did you even looked where it's being used? Do you have any idea how hard it is to get "free" anime illustrations on Commons? This is NOT porn. STOP trying to censor Commons. Masum Reza📞 04:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Deletion requests/File:YukiClip2A.gif:
Hello AshFriday,
I understand your reasons to delete this image, but it comes from a Flickr file which is in the public domain. No copyright being infringed, why deleting it? Also, it is the only animated GIF depicting the concept of limited animation in many languages. And the poor quality you refer to is precisely the subject of this type of animation. So, I wouldn't delete it since it breaks no copyright laws and has its purpose.
All the best:Tatvam (talk) 20:57, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kogalcensored.png:
Automatic keep as in use on 8 projects, as highlighted in the other DR open at the same time as this one. -- (talk) 11:14, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Deletion requests/Files created by User:Midnight68:
Expanded rationale: all of these images were created by a banned user and likely uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. All of them are lacking in educational value, many are redundant (we already have numerous examples of anime/manga style art) and others were previously deleted in a 2010 DR. Commons is not a hosting service for amateur cartoonists; consequently, these badly-drawn, poorly executed "illustrations" (for lack of a better word) have no place on this project. Delete them all without exception. AshFriday (talk) 02:20, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • AshFriday's userpage states "Fighting a never-ending battle against copyright vios and smut." This DR is clearly biased. I doubt he has the ability to distinguish between educational and non-educational illustrations. I don't care whether these images are uploaded by a banned user or not as they look clearly educational to me. Symbol  Speedy keep. AshFriday please explain why do you think it's "educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant". Did you even looked where it's being used? Do you have any idea how hard it is to get "free" anime illustrations on Commons? This is NOT porn. STOP trying to censor Commons. Masum Reza📞 04:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File Usage
File:Aki1.png 2
File:Akibachan001b.png 3
File:Backstage.png 4
File:BitterSweet005.png 1
File:CapAward.png 5
File:ColoringBook002.png 4
File:Freshly.png 2
File:GimpScanlation001.png 2
File:GimpScreenshotBeforeAfter.png 3
File:GloryBeaFuntimeComics.png 2
File:HolyMoley001.png 1
File:JeanBackstage002.png 7
File:Keiko005.jpg 2
File:KnickerFlasher000.png 2
File:KodomoBitterSweet.png 4
File:KodomoCensored.png 5
File:KodomoNiabot.png 1
File:KodomoNoSaori.png 4
File:KodomoPress004.jpg 2
File:Kogal005.png 6
File:Kogalcensored.png 8
File:NeicesKnickers.png 4
File:Netball001.png 2
File:NightRemember.png 6
File:RenPy001.png 10
File:SaoriCover000.png 3
File:TimelyShield2.png 2
File:TimelyShield3.png 5
File:WikiReader015.png 2
File:WikiReader018.png 4
File:WikiReader023.png 1
File:WikiReader024.png 4
File:WikiReaderYuusei.png 2
File:YukiClip2A.gif 8
File:YuuseiShonenPanel.jpg 4
-- (talk) 16:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@: I was still busy, just minutes away from importing your table. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Lots of images are in use, which proves that these images are generally in scope. If you think these images contain illegal material, please contact the WMF. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:31, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sagardina Bara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE images of non notable people.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nomination. Note that some of the images are photographs of paintings (derivative works). They should also be deleted if no evidence of free license is provided. It seems some of the images has only been uploaded for promotional purposes. Masum Reza📞 03:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LiL Teslo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:49, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Login5566 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted by Netflix and Backgrid.

~Cybularny Speak? 16:25, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stalinjeet Brar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder of these files. The copyright holder is "Kala Kalwanu". Uploader is "Stalinjeet Singh". Evidence of permission should be sent to our support team. Otherwise delete per our longstanding precautionary principle.

T CellsTalk 11:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Not own work, Copyright violation. No permission from copyright holder "Kala Kalwanu". - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:45, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per OTRS permission. --Krd 15:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Angemichael75 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 12:18, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andul roushan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Itsvaibhavpopli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotion only account, Out of scope images.

‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:32, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not belong in Commons -Abhilasha Singh - Hair & Makeup Artist (talk) 00:52, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Personal image, uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 14:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Alaa :)..! 23:10, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Montage of non-free photos. Looks like a temporary poster which would not count under freedom of panorama. Buidhe (talk) 06:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:57, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gaby2807 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No sources / Dubious "own"works

Mutter Erde (talk) 09:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:57, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gray background and misplaced (per drawing standard) pi bonds "outside" of ring edges. Have File:Kekulene.svg as high quality version DMacks (talk) 23:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low graphical quality. Have multiple 3D versions in Category:Visualizations of nicotine molecules, including File:Nicotine molecule ball from xtal.png that as a bonus has verifiable geometry. DMacks (talk) 23:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 14:42, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused diagram without meaningful explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 14:20, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   22:19, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion. Out of scope Fixertool (talk) 03:51, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 09:49, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Also, please note https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arima&diff=prev&oldid=934542418 Grueslayer (talk) 05:27, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 09:50, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOO Iran says: "The level of originality required for copyright protection in Iran seems very low." In my opinion this is complex logo by Iranian laws and needs OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 09:52, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pohled 111 (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

If these are the work of the uploader, then they are personal art and are out of scope. If they are not the work of the uploader, then they infringe on the copyright of the creator and require a free license from him.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Pohled 111 (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

These are apparently two outdoor plaques. Even if they are in a location that would qualify for Czech FOP, the text has a copyright and is not covered by Czech FOP. Also, the qulity is very bad and they are probably not usable for any purpose.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment/Very weak keep the first one: Those are apparently not outdoor plaques, but both sides of a paper invitation to a border guard ceremony for the soldiers’ parents. I seriously doubt any copyrightability of such a simple factual text. (“Dear parents, there will be a ceremony where/when, you are invited.”) It

might have some historical value, even the quality is far from perfect. The second one has a bit more of the copyvio claim with the photograph. --Mormegil (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Pohled 111 (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

These are scans from printed works. They are both unusably poor quality and copyvios.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:33, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pohled 111 (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Extremely low quality&resolution (mostly old Nokia phone photos taken in late/early hours or inside - too dark to be useful)

TFerenczy (talk) 02:09, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:59, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pohled 111 (talk · contribs) 5

[edit]

False dates, scans from a book, any reason it's public domain.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:36, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • The dates and the licences at the file pages are completely wrong.
  • The images are from several sources, sources are properly mentioned but the first one whithout the year of publication.
    • Havlíčkobrodsko v národním odboji 1914-1918, 1938-1945 : sborník, published in 1946 [7] → anonymous works are free under PD-anon-70. However, it is needed to check whether authors of the photos are really not mentioned in the book.
    • The images related to Czechoslovak Legions are from paperbacks from 1928. As seems, they were published already in 1922–1926 in books. [8] If the photos where published really as anonymous, they can be free under PD-anon-70. --ŠJů (talk) 13:13, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Legionáři. Datum zde na první stránce. Legionářská literatura - publikace v sešitovém vydání z roku 1928. ZA SVOBODU.Obrázková kronika ČS. Revoluční hnutí na Rusi (1914 - 1920). Sešit Březen 1928 - Čís 24. Legionářská literatura - publikace v sešitovém vydání z roku 1928. ZA SVOBODU.Obrázková kronika ČS. Revoluční hnutí na Rusi (1914 - 1920). Sešit Červen 1928 - Čís 28 29. Legionářská literatura - publikace v sešitovém vydání z roku 1928. ZA SVOBODU.Obrázková kronika ČS. Revoluční hnutí na Rusi (1914 - 1920). Sešit Duben 1928 - Čís 25 - 26. Oprava File:Sešity ZA SVOBODU (obrázková kronika ČS z Rusi) 07.jpg File:Sešity ZA SVOBODU (obrázková kronika ČS z Rusi) 02.jpg File:Sešity ZA SVOBODU (obrázková kronika ČS z Rusi) 08.jpg Datum 1928 a měsíc je na obálce sešitu březen,červen a duben. Zde je datum. Jiné nemám. Kompletní skupinově opravu datumu a licence nedokáži udělat. A licence pořádně neznám našel jsem je pod stejným dílem. Ale legionáře budit nebudu.Jak poznat zda je dílo volné nepoznám. Asi jen podle datumu. Když můžeš Šjů datum a licenci předělat já to nedokáži(skupinovou opravu). Datum sborníku File:Vydáno v Havlíčkově Brodě 1946.jpg S pozdravem pohled 111 Mám rád týmovou práci jako ve skautu. Nabyl jsem dojmu že je to tu skupinové dílo, ale asi ne. Děkuji Ti za pomoc Šjů. S pozdravem pohled 111 ŠJů, Patrick RogelPohled 111--Pohled 111 (diskuse) 14:30, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination - Creative Commons licenses are bogus licenses here. Unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:00, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pohled 111 (talk · contribs) 6

[edit]

Photographs of product packages. I have only went through the most recent 1000 uploads, there can be more. I kept some photographs of the backs with no intricate design that have only products' contents which I don't think is copyrightable. There are some simplistic designs among the nominated files that may be below Czech TOO. But I believe the bulk falls under Commons:PACKAGING.

TFerenczy (talk) 10:48, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (except 3 kept). --Tomer T (talk) 10:08, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ángel 22905 Olivares (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery of Not Own Work, as shown by drawing, photos of self - not selfies, sizes & transmission data on other photos.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I blocked the uploader indefinitely as sockpuppet and copyvio-only user. Taivo (talk) 21:43, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ben ganon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Sofia Kisslov (d. 2018), permission from her heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:26, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, No permission from Sofia Kisslov heirs. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:55, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sshreshtha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No exif-data, low-res, unlikely own work. Beside that user have an history of self promo.

‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Self promo personal photos out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iranjournal12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:27, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Federico Fabi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:43, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Surajamr4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:48, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miskie London (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:57, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outdated photo Derelict808 (talk) 22:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requested by subject Sphilbrick (talk) 16:54, 7 January 2020 (UTC) The subject wrote to Wikimedia, originally to request the deletion of an article about them, but also regarding images of him:ticket:2020010610007479 He asserts that these photos were taken from him without permission. They are claimed to be "own work" by Derelict808. The subject does not know the editor by that name. I note that two of these were proposed for deletion by Derelict808 in the past, but the deletion was declined because the reason wasn't particularly convincing.[reply]

I picked the first entry in the category, but all photos in this category:

Category:Marc Broude should be treated the same way.--Sphilbrick (talk) 16:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ticket:2020010610007479. ~riley (talk) 07:33, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:50, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 20:06, 27 Januar 2020 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 01:39, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sandesh9822 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative of copyrighted artwork, you just took the picture but you do not have permission to release them freely.

Eatcha (talk) 13:30, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:00, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PENIS - low quality lNeverCry 06:55, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS + NOPenis Eatcha (talk) 14:20, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. – Kwj2772 (talk) 14:57, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. CptViraj (📧) 14:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Over-exposed and unusable AvyaktaShashi (talk) 02:32, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Over-exposed and unusable AvyaktaShashi (talk) 02:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced as “from private archive”. Not own work, not PD. VLu (talk) 02:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced as “from private archive”. Not own work, not PD, because no indication of the first legal publication as required to fit PD-Russia. VLu (talk) 02:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:02, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a famous, presumably copyrighted photo from 1987, not 1988. the uploader used a pseudonym and misidentified the year taken so i'm comfortable nominating this as copyrighted material 173.85.193.229 05:06, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:02, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot without authorization of Commercial Radio Hong Kong (https://www.google.com/search?q=2019%E5%B9%B4%E5%BA%A6%E5%8F%B1%E5%92%A4%E6%A8%82%E5%A3%87%E6%B5%81%E8%A1%8C%E6%A6%9C%E9%A0%92%E7%8D%8E%E5%85%B8%E7%A6%AE+%E6%9E%97%E5%AE%B6%E8%AC%99&sxsrf=ACYBGNQrLoOpmnSAq6mpS7KGZBt3azKyag:1578374316058&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj9kbnD3vDmAhWMFIgKHbKMCmUQ_AUoAnoECAsQBA&biw=1280&bih=610) 42.98.137.124 05:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:03, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable licensing. Author is unkown, but death of author is claimed. No publication information that would indicate {{PD-Polish}} status. Buidhe (talk) 07:49, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:05, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a duplicate of this fileː Kyle Busch April 30, 2010.jpg TaurusEmerald (talk) 07:50, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9   19:06, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The portrait to the right is fake. The body is of the german chemist Justus von Liebig but the face pasted over it is of a research assistant (James Dornbush) at an american university. The fake pic was used on the Wikipedia article about the Gabriel Synthesis and is obviously a prank/vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A07:A880:4601:1012:DFBD:FD9A:5EAD:E756 (talk) 07:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the real portrait that was used for the fake: https://www.alamy.com/justus-von-liebig-german-chemist-1866-artist-unknown-image8384101.html — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A07:A880:4601:1012:DFBD:FD9A:5EAD:E756 (talk) 07:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Obvious fake/hoax/nonsense/joke. --Achim (talk) 09:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: per above. -- Deadstar (msg) 11:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:09, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Most probably sports strip but no indication of which team or even which sport. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused signature of uploader, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:12, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused so-called selfie, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:12, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:22, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Copy of strange message about education in Ethiopia. OUt of scope. Malcolma (talk) 10:22, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:22, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dawid99871 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small pictures with FBDM in EXIF data.

~Cybularny Speak? 10:51, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:12, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 11:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Unexplained screenshot of no obvious educational value. Malcolma (talk) 11:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:00, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Unexplained screenshot of no obvious educational value. Malcolma (talk) 11:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Coppivo violation 82.208.100.61 13:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBM" Possible copyright violation. Permission should be sent to COM:OTRS T CellsTalk 13:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure if this is a roof with tiles and some garbage. It seems to have no educational value. We do not know anything more about it. Ketil3 (talk) 15:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 16:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 16:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Agora as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.gemakkelijk.nl - in use, thus not eligible for speedy. Achim (talk) 17:12, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   19:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 18:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:17, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, low quality duplicate of File:Sofía Vergara 2009.jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9   19:17, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 COM:CSD#F10, Personal photos of or by non-contributors. Not a selfie. Subject could be notable enough for Commons: https://socialspacemag.org/the-beat-goes-on-arthur-choo/ Abzeronow (talk) 18:45, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I think that the subject is probably sufficiently notable -- see the numerous Google hits. However, I wonder about the status of this image -- it is small and has no EXIF. I would be happier if the uploader replaced it with a version that was full camera resolution and had full EXIF. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not sure I'd call 1000x1500 "small". Google and Tineye find no hits for it. Does look a bit like a publicity photo though. EXIF was basically wiped by whatever image editing program was used. Uploader has responded on talk page, but did not address the above question (only the notability one). Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:21, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not address the copyright status of the image, and begging to keep it is not a "keep" reason. --P 1 9 9   19:21, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:21, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mila-san (talk · contribs)

[edit]

So many pictures, all from different cameras (2 from same only), or having transmission metadata, or overprinting or other indication that not own work. The uploader is not "AZAFT" from whom most of these pictures seem to refer.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RAmpofo (WMF) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:29, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:16, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:29, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marian Buštík (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, drawings, coats of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marian Buštík (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Lokalita Nádražní a Chelčického, bývalá Krausova kolonie v 2011.png not own work, thesis, pic on page 22

AloisJarnotReichswald.jpg – source&author provided but no CC compatible license in source

Vodní tvrz Velké Albrechtice03.jpg – not own work, per License Agreement user-uploaded pics to mapy.cz also aren't released under CC license

JaseníPotok.jpg – source&author provided but no CC compatible license in source

Blücherův dvůr.png – not own work, cropped watermark

Zámekpustejovportal.jpg – probably not own work (in source "Photo: Oldřich Usvald's archive")

Vodní tvrz Velké Albrechtice.png – not own work, cropped watermark

TFerenczy (talk) 19:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:33, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marian Buštík (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical images (you can't claim PD-old-70 if the author or the date of the author's death is unknown!). and images that are not own works, but clearly stated "source from internet" or taken from Facebook ("FBMD" in EXIF data).

P 1 9 9   15:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 19:38, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. OTRS permission is required from the copyright holder in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. OTRS permission is required from the copyright holder in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. OTRS permission is required from the copyright holder in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. OTRS permission is required from the copyright holder in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

画像の内容とファイル名が異なるため。 Ten-nen 13:45, 7 January 2020 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, try {{Rename}} instead. ファイル名が正しくないだけであれば {{Rename}} をお使いください. --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

画像の内容とファイル名が異なるため。 Ten-nen 13:45, 7 January 2020 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, try {{Rename}} instead. ファイル名が正しくないだけであれば {{Rename}} をお使いください. --Yasu (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image, no EXIF, only upload of this new editor. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; also out of COM:SCOPE and can be found on the web using Google search by image. --Ahmadtalk 21:39, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chainwit. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Japan.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:29, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:01, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1970 Martin Sg. (talk) 19:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:04, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random images of non notable people.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

удаляйте это фото Template:RPA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Александр Поселёнов (talk • contribs) 14:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and questionable copyright status. Some persoanl photos are allowed to be stored for active contributors on projects, so if any photos were selfies (with good copyright status) there are ok to be undeleted by any admin following a request on COM:UNDEL. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:25, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nathalie Brocker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not selfies. Permission from each photographer needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:08, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fotograf möchte das Bild nicht mehr online haben. Persönliche Gründe. 2003:C5:5F34:9900:9483:4879:56C0:2506 10:25, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This image has a valid OTRS permission, which is irrevocable. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fotograf möchte Bild gelöscht haben! 2003:C5:5F34:9900:9483:4879:56C0:2506 10:30, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Such requests must be made through our OTRS system to verify the author's identity. But even then since these are freely licensed, useful, and good photos, I don't think we should delete them. This photo is also in use. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:52, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fotograf möchte Bild gelöscht haben! 2003:C5:5F34:9900:9483:4879:56C0:2506 10:31, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Such requests must be made through our OTRS system to verify the author's identity. But even then since these are freely licensed, useful, and good photos, I don't think we should delete them. This photo is also in use. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; per Sebari. --Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fotograf möchte Bild gelöscht haben! 2003:C5:5F34:9900:9483:4879:56C0:2506 10:32, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Such requests must be made through our OTRS system to verify the author's identity. But even then since these are freely licensed, useful, and good photos, I don't think we should delete them. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 11:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ketil3 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: This person may not want to have his picture on Wikipedia (consent lacking). The picture has no educational value, it is of rather low "artistic" quality, and should be deleted.
Converted by me to regular DR, as image has been on Commons since 2011, though nominator's rationale has merits. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1966 Martin Sg. (talk) 19:48, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1966 Martin Sg. (talk) 19:49, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1984 Martin Sg. (talk) 19:50, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1984 Martin Sg. (talk) 19:50, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1967 Martin Sg. (talk) 19:52, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1967 Martin Sg. (talk) 19:52, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1975 Martin Sg. (talk) 19:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1975 Martin Sg. (talk) 19:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1964 Martin Sg. (talk) 19:55, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1964 Martin Sg. (talk) 19:56, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, contemp. artwork Martin Sg. (talk) 19:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1970 Martin Sg. (talk) 19:58, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1970 Martin Sg. (talk) 20:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1970 Martin Sg. (talk) 20:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1971 Martin Sg. (talk) 20:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1971 Martin Sg. (talk) 20:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1980 Martin Sg. (talk) 20:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1980 Martin Sg. (talk) 20:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1968 Martin Sg. (talk) 20:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1978 Martin Sg. (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1953 Martin Sg. (talk) 20:06, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Copyright has now expired. Abzeronow (talk) 01:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1953 Martin Sg. (talk) 20:06, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1951 Martin Sg. (talk) 20:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1951 Martin Sg. (talk) 20:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Child nudity 2605:6001:E7C4:1E00:9974:D779:87CB:8547 20:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per nonsense. --Achim (talk) 18:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Section 313.6(C)(1) of the Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices, stamps are not works of the U.S. Government and thus are not in the public domain. Thus, this image is lacking a free license and should be deleted. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not CC tag present on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Something strange here. An account with more than 5000 subscribers that is still active, but has made all the videos invisible (or deleted?) Most likely we need to delete, unless we can find something out. Sad... just sad. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 05:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:26, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not CC tag present on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:26, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:12, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 11:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:14, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 11:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:14, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 11:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:14, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC found at source URL Eatcha (talk) 11:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:15, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC Tag Not found at the original source Eatcha (talk) 11:16, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:16, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC Tag Not found at the original source Eatcha (talk) 11:16, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:18, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC Tag Not found at the original source Eatcha (talk) 11:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:19, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC Tag Not found at the original source Eatcha (talk) 11:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:19, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC Tag Not found at the original source Eatcha (talk) 11:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:09, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC Tag Not found at the original source Eatcha (talk) 11:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:20, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posters are usually copyrighted. The poster is derivative work of multiple photos with unknown origin. OTRS-permission from poster creator is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:23, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC Tag Not found at the original source Eatcha (talk) 11:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:22, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC Tag Not found at the original source Eatcha (talk) 11:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:23, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author and copyright information is needed for each image in the collage. At present we don't have that. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:08, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Buidhe (talk) 15:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: insufficient author information. --ƏXPLICIT 01:07, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 17:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:06, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/Kobe Luminarie and other Kobe Luminarie-related deletion requests. These are reproductions of copyrighted works of art and under Japanese copyright law and pre request of the organizers/creator, these photographs are considered copyright infringements.

Ytoyoda (talk) 21:54, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, I’ve struck it out and I’ll take off the template. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:04, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, particular angle makes this unlikely to be own work. Also found online three years before uploaded: http://googlebliss.blogspot.com/2007/07/cellular-jail-terrible-word-from.html. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:01, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong focus, the background is sharp... bad quality Gegensystem (talk) 19:42, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per consensus George Chernilevsky talk 10:50, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, not used in any project, doesn't add anything new to the already-existing files. Kostas20142 (talk) 23:48, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:00, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC license available on source Eatcha (talk) 07:36, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:33, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC license available on source Eatcha (talk) 07:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, shit, what can I say? It was there, now it's gone. Guess we gotta delete it, and the thousands of other videos that weren't reviewed in time. Oh well! --Animalparty (talk) 07:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC license available on source Eatcha (talk) 07:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC license available on source Eatcha (talk) 07:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:35, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not CC tag present on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:27, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC tag Not present on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:48, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:27, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:28, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:54, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:54, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:54, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:31, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:55, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:31, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:55, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:31, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:56, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:32, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:32, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is a file scanned by the owner of better quality, see File:Projet d'installation d'un service central des P.T.T. à Lyon à l’empalement de l'ancien hôpital de l’hôtel-Dieu (pl49).jpg Gnrc (talk) 10:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ce fichier de moindre qualité est en double avec File:Planche 49. — Bureau des téléphones Vaudrey.jpg qui est scanné en plus haute résolution Gnrc (talk) 15:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Unless they are exact duplicates, we can keep both. --Green Giant (talk) 18:00, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fotograf möchte Bild gelöscht haben! 2003:C5:5F34:9900:9483:4879:56C0:2506 10:30, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 12:25, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fotograf möchte Bild gelöscht haben! 2003:C5:5F34:9900:9483:4879:56C0:2506 10:32, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 12:25, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fotograf möchte Bild gelöscht haben! 2003:C5:5F34:9900:9483:4879:56C0:2506 10:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 12:25, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Would guess User:Rhysthomas2000 was a fan uploading a copyrighted press shot or screenshot, than Rhys Thomas himself releasing such an image under a CC licence without crediting the photographer. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears on other website. See here for example. Evidence of permission should be sent to our support team T CellsTalk 11:52, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably grabbed from facebook, see EXIF and https://pt-br.facebook.com/Winnslet/photos/a.308448325909254/1559337000820374/, also on twitter https://twitter.com/Winnslet. en:WINNSLET has been deleted several times. Achim (talk) 12:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio https://www.ja-fuer-erlangen.de RoBri (talk) 15:20, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Impressum Verantwortlich für den Inhalt nach § 55 Abs. 2 RStV Dieter Rosner Vorsitzender des SPD-Kreisverbands Erlangen-Stadt Friedrich-List-Straße 5 91054 Erlangen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerdiros (talk • contribs) 17:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ich darf darauf hinweisen, daß es sich bei "Nerdiros" um Dieter Rosner, SPD Erlangen, handelt, den ich um ein vernünftiges Bild seines Parteigenossen und Oberbürgermeisters Florian Janik gebeten hatte. Er kennt sich allerdings mit den Namensräumen nicht aus. Vielleicht also dauert es etwas, bis er alle Formalien auf die Reihe gekriegt hat.--heiner (talk) 23:11, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Buidhe (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio d'une revue Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 18:32, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Je suis rédacteur à ce magazine, et possède les accréditations concernant cette copie pour diffusion de la direction Du Nouveau Messager. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Towiman (talk • contribs) 13:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio d'une revue Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 18:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio d'une revue Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 18:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work, all other uploads were copies from web or screenshots Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obiviously not own work, and failed flickr review/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a drawing, rendering or something else, not own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not taken by the uploader. Lack of EXIF information and seems like a capture from a video. Momocalbee (talk) 19:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:18, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused bad quality video, superior similar ones exist Kostas20142 (talk) 23:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:18, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus licensing, authors died in 1963 (Vissarion Shebalin) and in 2009 (Sergey Mikhalkov). Not PD in Russia until 2084. VLu (talk) 03:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:23, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

completely replaced by File:Vacov CZ flag.svg — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:35, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Multiple issues with this image. Beksiński is not the photographer if he is in the photograph. It can't be both PD and CC-licensed. No evidence, OTRS or link, for CC status, and no publication information that would confirm PD status. Buidhe (talk) 07:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 03:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

miserable poor-quality picture with historical inaccuracies, a better vector version already exists Dragovit (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent quality, no other version exists. RM vandalism by user:Dragovit, note the Wikihounding and Personal Attacks. User makes no substantive contributions, but spent their last 500 edits attacking and Wikihounding the community and vandalizing random pages. Request permanent ban for Dragovit. Q douglasii (talk) 03:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Stop removing your discussion page with our conversation, that's tricky and deceptive behavior, you've done much damage to Wikipedia and Wikimedia by overhelming by inaccurate and ugly pictures and by starting editing wars. Replacing accurate files by your inaccurate and fictional ones is vandalization of Wikipedia. It is so indecent, selfish, mean and superior to replace the various files created by the members of community by own failed/amateur creations. Dragovit 10:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

fake-fictitious miserable-graphic amateur poor-quality image, by which the author replaces better and more accurate files, which mean reducing the level of information on Wikipedia or simply I call it - vandalization of Wikipedia! 194.213.41.2 09:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC) File:Albrecht Altdorfer 044.jpg[reply]

 Keep. @Dragovit and Q douglasii: Please sort this out on en:Talk:Holy Roman Empire, not here. Under COM:NPOV, Commons should not delete files that are in use on Wikipedia, and this file is currently in use on en:Holy Roman Empire. If Wikipedia decides not to use this image, then we can consider deleting it. --bjh21 (talk) 14:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTUSED. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 03:06, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright on Youtube, with unreliable source. 79.118.16.10 23:49, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:09, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PermaLiv_Magnus_Johansen_Dahl_07-01-20.jpg Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 12:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:58, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Malcolma as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10. Not uploaded by a non-contributor. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sanandros (talk) 21:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No publication information given to justify PD status. {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} only applies 70 years after publication, not creation. Buidhe (talk) 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 21:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately we did not get to this fast enough. The video is not unavailable on Youtube. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 06:27, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

However, I guarantee you it was uploaded and licensed as indicated when I uploaded it here. And the fact that many other videos were uploaded by him with similar likely serves to bolster the credibility of my assertion.SecretName101 (talk) 07:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, but while it is a reasonable assumption I have never seen an admin close something like that as keep. Archive.org does not do Youtube and there is no way to confirm. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 07:47, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: while source removed from Youtube, the remainder of videos are licensed as CC, no reason to doubt this one was not the same.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the video is not available. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:29, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr's PDM 1.0 is not a legal notice and needs permission from the copyright holder. See this RFC

A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:24, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

notability? No article even in itwiki. Same problem with Wikidata entry (wikidata:Q57201976) Estopedist1 (talk) 08:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You guys are impossible. Seriously evaluating to leave the project entirely. Ogoorcs (talk) 18:58, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:44, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Judging from the source, the first publication of this image may have occurred in a recent French publication. No publication is given early enough to make this a PD image. Probably copyrighted. Buidhe (talk) 15:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:24, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No publication information given to justify PD status. {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} only applies 70 years after publication, not creation. Buidhe (talk) 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:24, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No publication information given to justify PD status. {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} only applies 70 years after publication, not creation. Buidhe (talk) 15:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:24, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No publication information given to justify PD status. {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} only applies 70 years after publication, not creation. Buidhe (talk) 15:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:24, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No publication information given to justify PD status. {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} only applies 70 years after publication, not creation. Buidhe (talk) 15:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:25, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Underlying board is probably copyrighted. I don't think this meets {{FoP-Poland}} because the copyrighted object is being shown for the original purpose (informing on the history) and is not incidental. Buidhe (talk) 07:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 22:01, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable PD status. Published in 2004 book would still be under copyright unless there was an earlier publication. {{PD-SlovakGov}} probably does not cover photographs by military personnel. Buidhe (talk) 07:54, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 22:02, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://booksandideas.net/Analytic-Marxism-and-Real-Utopias.html
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as external image is a bit smaller than our version. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see [9]--shizhao (talk) 13:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and speedy. --Green Giant (talk) 22:03, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, considering age, not 120 years old for Template:PD-old-assumed, and no information on author. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 14:27, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne sais pas comment répondre, alors je modifie l'article. Cette photo m'a été adressée par son petit-neveu. C'est une portrait de famille. Il n'est pas daté. En comparant avec d'autres photos, nous avons estimé qu'elle a du être prise autour de 1908. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helene1912 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Helene1912: Please put this sort of information within the template, or on the talk page, and then chose the appropriate template to use from copyright tags > Copyright tags/Country-specific tags. Suggest an EU unknown author template. The information is meant to reflect the reality of the source, and the author, not the information that you have entered.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:37, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce fichier de moindre qualité est en double avec File:Planche 50. — Bureau des téléphones rue Vaudrey, coupe et élévation.jpg qui est scanné en plus haute résolution Gnrc (talk) 15:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce fichier de moindre qualité est en double avec thumb qui est scanné en plus haute résolution Gnrc (talk) 15:08, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No publication information given, so copyright status cannot be determined. If the photo is really anonymous, PD-EU applies 70 years after publication not when the picture was taken. Buidhe (talk) 15:27, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The picture was published in the Slovenské krídla (Slovak Wings) magazine in 1941.--Andrej-airliner (talk) 15:35, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Andrej-airliner: Do you know what issue and page so it can be verified? Buidhe (talk) 15:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closing admin: If the picture was indeed published without author disclosure in (Czecho)slovakia in 1941, it would be {{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}} and also PD-US. But I don't think a difficult to verify claim that it was published in a certain magazine would count for establishing publication dates, not if verifiability applies similarly on Commons as enwp. Cheers, Buidhe (talk) 16:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No publication information given, so copyright status cannot be determined. If the photo is really anonymous, PD-EU applies 70 years after publication not when the picture was taken. Buidhe (talk) 15:27, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The picture was published in the Slovenské krídla magazine in 1941.--Andrej-airliner (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Andrej-airliner: Do you know what issue and page so it can be verified? Buidhe (talk) 15:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Come to Slovakia and check the pictures, personally....--Andrej-airliner (talk) 15:54, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
With all these deletion requests, you do more harm than good. Wise guy... --Andrej-airliner (talk) 16:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closing admin: If the picture was indeed published without author disclosure in (Czecho)slovakia in 1941, it would be {{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}} and also PD-US. But I don't think a difficult to verify claim that it was published in a certain magazine would count for establishing publication dates, not if verifiability applies similarly on Commons as enwp. Cheers, Buidhe (talk) 16:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]