Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/12/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 24th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Press photo Mcelison (talk) 13:18, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio from 2016 copyrighted https://khudancukhangan.com No real indication that this user has the right to license this on Wikimedia. Acabashi (talk) 13:38, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 14:21, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file belongs to me I had clicked the photograph and uploaded on googlemaps in the month of Nov'2016. 103.232.224.224 13:58, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; wrong place. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its mine image Gauravselenagomez (talk) 13:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Mistaken nomination. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Annulation de la bio, donc suppression de la photo que j'ai mise en ligne Iamaarondaavy (talk) 10:05, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as before. --Rosenzweig τ 10:41, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmed chudahry (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some out of scope as commons is not a photo album. Some copyvio as he is in the photo and couldn't have taken the photo

Gbawden (talk) 10:16, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. (Talk/留言) 01:43, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:34, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmed chudahry (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work (uploader is pictured in), COM:SCOPE?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:39, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by FitIndia. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:Romania Passport Mariana Peroutoma.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong format Finou20 (talk) 11:21, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur du titre VERCEIL (talk) 01:11, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 10:48, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gladdenschools (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional photos and userpage, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:49, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:17, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, no meaningful contributions by this user, only self promotion on en.wp. P 1 9 9   18:53, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:16, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Awaz Maharashtrachaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused advertising/screenshots, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 20:28, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Unused personal image. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sihper (talk · contribs)

[edit]

cross-wiki spammy garbage by a persistent hoaxer

Praxidicae (talk) 20:48, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Unused personal images. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:09, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright SmartWTF (talk) 13:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. --Didym (talk) 00:26, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mitterrand c'est fini VERCEIL (talk) 14:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 00:25, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random photo of wall, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:24, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:25, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random photo of wall, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:24, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:24, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random photo of wall, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:24, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:23, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I see the symbol © (letter C in a circle) by "Brown & Bigelow" in image Tibet Nation (talk) 14:44, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyviol, cf. Classic-trader.com. — danyele 15:40, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyviol, cf. Google Images. — danyele 15:53, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sourav Nil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical books pages and cover. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 9masum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 9masum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works.--Kai3952 (talk) 16:15, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works.--Kai3952 (talk) 16:15, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works.--Kai3952 (talk) 16:15, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:15, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:58, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:13, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:02, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:13, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Montenegro. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:41, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:11, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol da qui http://www.scuolamacondo.it/1480-2/ Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 18:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:11, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Damarta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text-only table and equations, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:08, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:10, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vinclaunay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused charts and text equations, no context, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:10, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:16, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional graphic, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:17, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asprandus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused fictional calendar pages, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:19, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kampoengus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused screenshots and logo, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:08, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:24, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:08, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only table, should be in wikitable markup in articles, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:31, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused credit card example, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:36, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused tiny and very low quality map, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:38, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Also likely copyright problems, as this obviously is not a selfie. Randykitty (talk) 18:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:06, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, looks like taken from the internet, and missing EXIF data unlike their other uploads of this person. P 1 9 9   18:58, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:06, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Also likely copyright problems as this obviously is not a selfie. Randykitty (talk) 18:59, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Also likely copyright problems as this obviously is not a selfie. Randykitty (talk) 19:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Cjp24 (talk) 20:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:00, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: "Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills". 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:32, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:00, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, vandalistic user Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 20:33, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteLikely not copyvio but self-promotion per pt:Zukirs. --Achim (talk) 20:21, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:59, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not simple enough for pd-shape SecretName101 (talk) 10:52, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not simple enough for pd-shape SecretName101 (talk) 10:52, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not simple enough for pd-shape SecretName101 (talk) 10:53, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Widely available online, including here (direct link) at a significantly higher resolution (1000 × 1254) than the Commons copy. COM:PCP. ƏXPLICIT 11:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:27, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a copiright-free photo Alexander Roumega (talk) 12:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. OTRS permission is required from the copyright holder in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 08:51, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 03:09, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Out of scope" Private image collection / selfie Meinstaa (talk) 04:31, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: used in a Wikipedia article. --Tomer T (talk) 15:23, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. ~Cybularny Speak? 07:41, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bobdayyy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission found at source. More specific source needed, all four files have the same exact source which just leads to the main user page of 漆培鑫.

Minorax (talk) 14:01, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:42, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio; description notes it comes from Google Street View, which is nonfree Vahurzpu (talk) 03:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:18, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in project scope due to overlay text Vahurzpu (talk) 04:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope (note the clear text overlay near the top of the image); created for use in vandalism Vahurzpu (talk) 04:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "own work" - taken from copyrighted website - https://www.transparenthands.org/ Jmcgnh (talk) 06:09, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:15, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 06:11, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:15, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 06:17, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:14, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 06:18, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:13, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 06:19, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:13, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VERCEIL (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:50, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:45, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VERCEIL (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

A mess of photos of copyrighted books, photos of photos and scans of old photos. no permission

Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VERCEIL (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VERCEIL (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:20, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VERCEIL (talk · contribs) 5

[edit]

No COM:FOP in France.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:22, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VERCEIL (talk · contribs) 6

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST - unused, low quality, nonsense personal photos primarily of random place settings at cafes. User indef'ed on Commons and fr.wiki for NOTHERE/scope issues.

Эlcobbola talk 16:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a free license. According to source: "This music was performed by its copyright holders, the National Symphony Orchestra of Taiwan and the National Taiwan Choir, who have granted permission for it to be downloaded and used for non-profit purposes only." Wcam (talk) 15:16, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also see this Taiwanese legal expert opinion: [1]. --Wcam (talk) 15:17, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:55, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

combination of non-free corporate logos, see https://www.marmoremena.com/ Dl2000 (talk) 00:16, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and put of scope. --P 1 9 9   17:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not by uploader Victorgrigas (talk) 03:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:55, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: From Twitter, flickr-washing file SecretName101 (talk) 03:49, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph clearly was unlikely to have been authored by Charles Jensen, he is a subject of the photo. Just because he posted a copy of it to his Twitter does not indicate him being the copyright holder. SecretName101 (talk) 03:50, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And @Gage: is a BEYOND trustworthy/reliable uploader (and I am really underselling him). Flickr-washing is not in his DNA. He is a true pro at this. SecretName101 (talk) 20:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Everything in this album is the property of Charles Jensen. It should be deleted from Wikimedia for that reason. Anything else from that album should probably be deleted as well. Gage (talk) 03:27, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This album is the only one on my Flickr that includes photos not taken by me. Everything else is released under the Creative Commons license, and I am the sole creator of the images. That one album is the exception. Just want to make that clear. Gage (talk) 13:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:56, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The very low resolution and watermark across the front disqualify this image. There are also much better quality images of this moth species. GRDN711 (talk) 04:06, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screenshot A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: ✓ Done cropped - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --P 1 9 9   17:59, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted screenshot A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: DM: the background is so out-of-focus that those images are not reusable - similar to blurring out copyrightable elements. --P 1 9 9   18:01, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted sofdtware screenshot Drakosh (talk) 05:55, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted sofdtware screenshot Drakosh (talk) 05:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted sofdtware screenshot Drakosh (talk) 05:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted sofdtware screenshot Drakosh (talk) 05:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted sofdtware screenshot Drakosh (talk) 05:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted sofdtware screenshot Drakosh (talk) 05:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted sofdtware screenshot Drakosh (talk) 05:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted sofdtware logo Drakosh (talk) 05:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:WHERE LICENSE No free license Leoboudv (talk) 10:34, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Cataldo01 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: opera propria che non utilizzo più
Converted by me to regular DR, as image does not qualify for speedy. Courtesy-deletion might be considered. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:34, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion (Google translate: "own work that I no longer use"). --P 1 9 9   18:10, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:WHERE LICENSE No free license Leoboudv (talk) 10:34, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ライセンスに間違い Crtf216 (talk) 14:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I Andrew Litten uploaded this image but now withdraw permission for this image to be used. Please could this image be deleted Akeleytree (talk) 16:49, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9   18:13, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per File:Lauren Debrou.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:21, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: DW. --P 1 9 9   18:16, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free logo Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 18:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:16, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere [social networks and messaging apps including Telegram] and the background is problematic too. 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:38, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:16, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This copy of passport is mine and I don’t know whom took the right to upload the pic of my passport in this website. Please I would like a further action about this. Thanks . 2001:8F8:1621:5141:80A1:23F0:9400:FD9 22:01, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted to protect personal info. --P 1 9 9   18:18, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Personal work, non-notable people of Argentina. - Fma12 (talk) 22:11, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:18, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lifestyle11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal artworks and photo, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:22, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:42, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Bulgaria MPF (talk) 23:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by MPF at 10:55, 30 Januar 2020 UTC: Derivative work of non-free content (F3): No freedom of panorama in Bulgaria --Krdbot 13:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by It9cvi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Interesting images, some of which may be free of copyright but which are not "own work" as claimed with recent dates in their templates. More information is needed to retain images, as actual source, actual date of creation and valid license.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by It9cvi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:05, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:01, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused clipart, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:35, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Part of scout uniform, can be used. --Gbawden (talk) 13:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random photos of walls, low quality and no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   14:33, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I dispute that these photos are out of scope. We live in an artificial world, surrounded by infrastructure, some of which we are oblivious to. Nevertheless, that we are currently oblivious to that infrastructure does not make it out of scope. There is lots of infrastructure that people were once oblivious to, which was not recorded. And now? Now historians don't know how ordinary people lived, not in detail. The details of how ordinary people lived, what they ate? Not recorded.

    Some decades ago I attended a conference, and went to a presentation I expected to be boring, but which turned out to be fascinating. The guy giving the talk spent a few minutes describing how little historians knew of the lives of ordinary people - because it had seemed, literally, to be beneath notice. But he and his colleagues had found a rich source of information on one otherwise ordinary village. That village had become home to a group of heretics. And, when the Inquisition arrived, the inquisitors who tortured the villagers made them describe every single thing about their lives, including all those valuable details normally not recorded as beneath notice. And every detail wrung from the suspected heretics, by the Inquisition's torturers, was faithfully transcribed by the Inquisition's scribes.

    P199 may regard emergency tunnels as beneath notice, and I would say I think this shows, well, no offense, a failure of imagination.

    Even in our lifetimes there are infrastructure items that have disappeared, or are disappearing. Payphones, once ubiquitous, are disappearing. Coin style parking meters? Once ubiquitous, now non-existent.

    Emergency tunnels, like this one, are crucial technology. We take them for granted, until the first time we have to use them.

    So, yes, obviously in scope.

    The Eaton's Centre, the biggest mall in Toronto, right downtown, had a set of emergency escape tunnels, parallel to the subway exit. The emergency exit's stairs were very wide. Wide enough for a crush of people, in an emergency, with one terrible design feature. The final doors, that exited to the street? Locked. They were all locked, except for the leftmost door. And, unlike most emergency exits, they were not equipped with crash-bar handles. The one door that wasn't locked had a handle that had to be twisted, on its left-hand side. Crazy, since most people exiting would be right-handed.

    If there was a fire, hundreds of panicked people would be charging up those stairs, only for most of them to be crushed, at the top.

    Let me repeat, emergency exits are obviously in scope. Geo Swan (talk) 20:48, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia's "List of largest shopping malls in Canada", the Eaton Centre isn't the biggest mall in Toronto or even the second biggest. It is the fourth largest mall in Toronto. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:50, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, nowhere did I say that emergency exits are out of scope, nor is anything that User:Geo Swan says above actually relevant to the nominated images. Maybe he didn't even see them. These really are random images of plain walls, no possible educational use. Rest assured that any images of this tunnel that are somewhat useful, I didn't nominate. Just run the search again and you'll find many more images of this tunnel. --P 1 9 9   00:27, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: kept 2, deleted remainder per nomination; there was no clear educational functional to the nominated and deleted iages. Descriptive text wasof no value to put context to images, and the images had no clear demonstration of representative value.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Excerpt from old movie. May be PD-old or similar, but i don't know the source. For sure not "own work". Jahobr (talk) 15:05, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It's George McFarland 'Spanky' from "The Little Rascals Mama's Little Pirate (1934)"

--no clue if it is PD-old or similar Jahobr (talk) 18:00, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monkey In Space Records (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As páginas dos artistas foram apagadas mas temos total direitos de imagens das mesmas usadas no artigo. As paginas foram criadas pela a gravadora para tramistir informações verdadeiras do nossos artista.

Queria resolver isso o mais rapido possivel e voltar com as paginas no ar — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 189.75.110.61 (talk) 14:04, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently not by uploader Victorgrigas (talk) 03:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: attributed to "Chicago Central Area Transit Planning Study, Volume 1", requires COM:OTRS. --ƏXPLICIT 00:39, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is COM:DW and we do not have permission for the poster. Per COM:FOP Canada, FOP in Canada "does not apply to typical two-dimensional works such as paintings, murals, advertising hoardings, maps, posters or signs." --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 06:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have you attempted OTRS?--User19004 (talk) 03:46, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:37, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

トリミング無しで投稿しましたので削除をお願いします。 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 07:41, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 00:36, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Beautiful image, but the "Evidence" link shows that the credited author chose "CC-by-nc-sa-4.0" as the license, which is not compatible with Commons. Huntster (t @ c) 08:16, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 09:37, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Professional Assassin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted paintings by Hossein Sheikh (1910-1991).

Hanooz 00:55, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

+

Hanooz 00:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: даты жизни писателя 1933-2916, автор фото, скорее всего, неизвестно, оцифровано в наше время Dogad75 (talk) 21:45, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:20, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Загружено не верное фото Aldohin (talk) 09:25, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 11:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image fails COM:WHERE LICENSE with no free license and is copyrighted to 'HAAWK for a 3rd Party; HAAWK Publishing, and 1 Music Rights Societies'. This needs COM:OTRS permission or a license change at the Youtube source. Leoboudv (talk) 10:13, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was tagged with creative common license on youtube back when i upload it but since no admin or reviewer check or review it even after I tagged it, here we are. And those copyright license you mentioned are for the music in the video I think. Lulusword (talk) 11:17, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also, my theory is that between when I upload the picture and now, the music used in the vid copyright claim the vid, so it became license under those music production you mention. Lulusword (talk) 11:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:28, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I noticed Pythoncoder removed the no permissions tag, but is {{PD-USGov}} really the correct license? While Paul Manafort was a federal prisoner, the mugshot was taken when he was booked in a City of Alexandria facility by the Alexandria Sheriff’s Office, neither of which is the federal government. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:31, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ytoyoda I thought that the pd tag meant it was settled, but i see it isn’t, so feel free to put the tag back. — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 17:48, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ytoyoda,Pythoncoder Code of Virginia, Virginia Freedom of Information Act, § 2.2-3700, passed by the General Assembly in 2013, says law enforcement agencies must provide booking photos, unless doing so would jeopardize an ongoing felony investigation. http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-nws-va-ag-opinion-mug-20150212-story.html The Attorney General legal opinion quotes the law, Section 2.2-3706(A)-(A)(I)(b) (emphasis added); 2013 Va. Acts ch. 695, https://www.oag.state.va.us/files/Opinions/2015/14-063_OSullivan.pdf, "All public bodies engaged in criminal law-enforcement activities shall provide .. . [a}dult arrestee photographs taken during the initial intake following the arrest and as part of the routine booking procedure, except when necessary to avoid jeopardizing an investigation in felony cases until such time as the release of the photograph will no longer jeopardize the investigation ..." Therefore, it is in the public domain. I hope this helps. P37307 (talk) 19:48, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:09, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alexandria Sheriff’s Office says "© 1995–2019 City of Alexandria, VA and others" at https://www.alexandriava.gov/Sheriff it is does not say it is PD-USGov. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept - please see previous discussion in which keep was the concensus. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improper claim of public domain. The claim only applies to works of the U.S. federal government not to the works of any individual state (Virginia) or its subdivision (Alexandria County) Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:34, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To answer the previous argument, photos that are released to the public for viewing (put in the public record)[2] are different than photos put in the public domain with respect to copyright. There is a difference. Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:38, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Virginia is not a state that disclaims copyright for governmental works. See en:Copyright_status_of_works_by_subnational_governments_of_the_United_States. A mug shot may be required to be published (per P3707's citation in the original DR), but that does not free it from copyright. --Storkk (talk) 12:52, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer is not unknown. His full name is János Bálint (eastern name order: Bálint János, see here). He was a photographer for Tolnai Világlapja. Sources are needed to prove that he has not lived 70 years ago. Regasterios (talk) 10:08, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that it is an established fact that the photo was made by the photographer, János Bálint who was active in the 1910s. The only information that Tolnai has given is that "Bálint felv." which refers to a photographer with the surname Bálint who easily could have been somebody else. With the lack of any further information in the source I think we can still assume that the photographer is unknown and there is no way to determine his identity. There was one published work of Bálint János in Tolnai Világlapja but this was in the same period of activity in 1910s, the photographer "Bálint" in the 1920s could have been him or somebody else. Otherwise it is not very probable for an adult photographer working in the 1910s to be still living in 1950 even if this is biologically possible.Zello (talk) 11:34, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the only one photo by him you can find in Tolnai Világlapja. See here or here or here (Bálint János felvétele=Photo by János Bálint). In addition, his photos have appeared in many other newspapers and books, see here. It is a mistake to believe that easily somebody else could have taken this photo: if there had been two photographers with same surname and regularly publishing at the time, they would have been distinguished. Every photographers are sensitive to this issue. But let's say it's another photographer. We cannot claim that he is an unknown author in this case. I was trying unsuccessfully to find out when he died. This photo was published in 1926: COM:PCP. --Regasterios (talk) 12:34, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I realize that one of your links gives the attribution as "Bálint felvétele" and it refers to photographs from 1913 and 1914, I haven't found them before, but they are a stong indication indeed that all the later "Bálint felv." pictures truly belong to János Bálint and yes, we can accept him as the author with an unknown death date. I still think that it is improbable for a photographer owing a studio in the 1910s to be still living after 1950 while all of his professional activity stopped around 1930. It is a realistic assumption that the unknowable death date of the author can be well outside the time of copyright protection and the photo is simply PD-old. Zello (talk) 13:34, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete {{PD-old-assumed}} gives us the general assumption that non-anonymous works by authors with unknown death dates have copyrights of no more than 120 years from creation. It doesn't seem at all improbable that someone would retire, either fully or from photography, in 1930, and still be living after 1950; that's only 20 years of retirement, living to 85 or 90, and if they merely retired from photographer, perhaps went to managing or teaching photography, they might be as young as 60 in 1950.--Prosfilaes (talk) 10:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & Prosfilaes. --Storkk (talk) 12:54, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original uploader is not the author, the depicted person is not as well. Photographer's permission required. Venzz (talk) 15:46, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by آرین زرتاری (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical sound recordings, photos, album and book covers. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:54, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept File:حسن عمید.jpg, Deleted the rest including File:قمر الملوک وزیری.jpg which lacks a first date of publication (which might be after the death of the artist). --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:45, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Regasterios as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://sites.google.com/site/tollforgatomuveszetilap/alkotoink-nevsora/polnai-gabor-alkotasai. Old file, no date is mentionned on the website. Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:32, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment the uploader is Gábor Polnai, he is on the photo. Currently there is a deletion discussion on the article about him on huwiki: hu:Wikipédia:Törlésre javasolt lapok/Polnai Gábor (második jelölés). --Regasterios (talk) 17:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleting as OoS. Can be undeleted should this change. --Gbawden (talk) 15:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information about the copyrighted artwork. Same thing for File:Paris picture.jpg. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:01, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedied as derivative work of non-free content (F3). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 06:51, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alan Davison is UK scientist https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-signature_tag#United_Kingdom Alexander Roumega (talk) 11:46, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 06:53, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently not by author Victorgrigas (talk) 02:58, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently not by author Victorgrigas (talk) 02:59, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently not by author Victorgrigas (talk) 02:59, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently not by author Victorgrigas (talk) 02:59, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I found this drawing on Internet Archive. Isn't it in public domain? Hanooz 12:49, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Link says possible Government publication but not explicit. This is more likely a Chicago city publication rather than a GOV document. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Castellgalie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:12, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The symbols aren't official, but in use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Castellgalie (talk • contribs) 15:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permission from the copyright holder via OTRS it's needed, IMHO. If not,  Delete --Ganímedes (talk) 19:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Source and attribution have been fixed. Not an official symbol. --Kaldari (talk) 18:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]