Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/12/21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 21st, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original photo here. Subwaymuncher (talk) 00:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted copyviol/false information -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:40, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Voidxor as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free logo said to be from "Sam's Club", but no fair-use rational is provided (and even if it was, the image would belong on Wikipedia and not Wikimedia Commons). An embedded SVG is used on SamsClub.com, and the likely source of this rendered PNG.|source=https://www.samsclub.com/ Hammersoft (talk) 00:57, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted false source claims, false license claims -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:45, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of TV series, and thus copyrighted material. Igordebraga (talk) 02:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted copyviol/false information -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:46, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo has no encyclopedic value and non-nude photos exist of the same person, see Commons:Nudity.--NL19931993 (talk) 02:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy keep In heavy use in:

be.wikipedia.org Стрыптыз

de.wiktionary.org striptease

en.wikipedia.org Erotic photography

fr.wikibooks.org Photographie/Thèmes/Le nu

ja.wikipedia.org ストリップ (性風俗)

ro.wikipedia.org Strip-tease

sr.wikipedia.org Портал:Еротика и порнографија/Слика 14 2015 Портал:Еротика и порнографија/Слика 2015.

sv.wikipedia.org Striptease

tl.wikipedia.org Sayaw ng paghuhubo't hubad

zh-yue.wikipedia.org 脫衣舞

So arguments of "Photo has no encyclopedic value" is plainly and clearly not true and the fact that "non-nude photos exist of the same person" are irrelevant, in particular in this case as per en:Prinzzess (one of 10 articles on different wikipedias), the depicted person is "an American pornographic actress and Penthouse Pet", per all cases this kind of work involves usual nudity, so another reason for this image to be in scope. Tm (talk) 03:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the second obviously incorrect nomination for deletion. The photo has huge educational value about the depicted person and for striptease. It's used even in portal pages! Taivo (talk) 10:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1A…?.ass.SK”sss.s 24.239.213.169 16:39, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:29, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Данный файл более не нужен. С. А. И. (talk) 11:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Данный файл более не нужен. С. А. И. (talk) 11:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As file is missing all EXIF data and in consideration of the upload-history of this user, likely not on work. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:55, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I blocked the uploader for a week due to uploading copyvios after warnings and will delete all his/her uploads. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. Minorax (talk) 11:56, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong delete. Used only by sockpuppeteer for abuse purposes and probably a copyvio just like all of their other uploads. The uploader is a confirmed sockuppet of an abusive user at enwiki. --Kinu (talk) 15:52, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says FBMD, indicating the image is a Facebook download. Requires an OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 12:32, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://ctrls.biz/?page_id=4051 Déjà vu 19:07, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Reuploaded copyvio - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 13:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake Kuu67 (talk) 14:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on creation day. Taivo (talk) 18:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

העליתי בטעות Idro10 (talk) 23:54, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   19:58, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

an otherwise identical .svg is at Commons Smokefoot (talk) 22:58, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate. --Amada44  talk to me 09:01, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

BH permission does not extend to:


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:17, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

BH permission does not extend to:


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 09:07, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Projectwiki 2016

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Projetwiki 2016 (talk · contribs):

Unused files, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Unused files, out of project scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 15:33, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Subash05102001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:CUR Algeria

Ahmadtalk 20:55, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination COM:CUR Algeria. - FitIndia Talk Mail 19:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Subash05102001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:CUR Angola

Ahmadtalk 20:58, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:CUR Angola. - FitIndia Talk Mail 19:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Subash05102001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader claims to be the copyright holder. I cannot believe that any one person would hold the copyright of the design of coins and banknotes from a bunch of disparate nations and territories.

Hoary (talk) 11:50, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subash05102001 seems to have been uploading similar files of coins and banknotes claiming "own work" ever since their account was created and their Talk Page archive is full of deletion notifications. It may be time to ban this editor. Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 11:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A few of this type of file do apparently have valid PD licenses, where country-specific rules apply. See this example for one that appears OK. However, no such license tags have been placed on the majority of these uploads. FYI the User has been inactive since December 2019. Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 11:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've no reason to think that the list above is exhaustive. For all I know Subash05102001 may claim that the designs of yet more coins and bills are his/her own. -- Hoary (talk) 12:28, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:IDENT; out of project scope: this image can not reasonably be used for any educational purpose; Commons is not an amateur porn site (and we have images of much better quality about this subject) Wutsje 18:05, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See also the external link in the source code of this section. Wutsje 02:37, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 03:53, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: this image can not reasonably be used for any educational purpose; Commons is not an amateur porn site (and we have images of much better quality about this subject) Wutsje 18:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Educationally worthless, poor quality, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:12, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is an appropriate picture of educational value of the subject of the article Twinks, it is a good example of a twink and what the article describes. There is nothing wrong with the human body. Twink is a gay slang term describing a young or young-looking gay man with a slender, ectomorph build, little or no body hair, and no facial hair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanadrianhart (talk • contribs) 06:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 03:52, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khemono (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:29, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:08, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abomaher4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:08, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ravi kawlecha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:09, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use). Unclear speedy deletion rationale. Uploader claims this to be own work and I can't see any obvious reason to doubt that. Please clarify. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:43, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Sebari. Plausibly own work; high resolution, full Exif data... don't see any grounds for suspicion. And the depicted object is a plant. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:42, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Adolf Reich (1887 – 1963) was a German-Austrian painter, so a life+50 license doesn't apply. Nor would PD-1996 apply even if it was first published in a life+50 nation. Prosfilaes (talk) 15:45, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No explanation why this is supposed to be public domain. The source (Sotheby's) also doesn't claim it to be PD, as far as I can see. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:56, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

我错误地上传了它 Chihuazhang (talk) 14:39, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (uploader request). --whym (talk) 13:52, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the UK per COM:FOP United Kingdom which makes this a COM:DW. This means that although the person (i.e. the file uploader) who took this photo can release their photo under a free license, they would also need the permission of the creator of the poster/mural as well for Commons to accept this as 100% free. This was discussed at COM:VPC#File:Aeroflot banner infront of ManUtd stadium.jpg and confirmed to be the case by another editor. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:12, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Tomer T (talk) 13:47, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality PNG structure, not used, many alt. in Category:L-Histidine. Wostr (talk) 08:47, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 02:34, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vandalismo/autopromoción/Bulos Aitorembe (talk) 09:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Tomer T (talk) 12:42, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was designed by company en:Wolff Olins and launched in 1986 according to https://www.prudentialplc.com/about-us/our-history/the-face-of-prudence , so this can be undeleted in 2082 maybe.--Roy17 (talk) 23:21, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: above threshold of originality. Tomer T (talk) 12:46, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Ahmadtalk 12:12, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Tomer T (talk) 12:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine for buildings. COM:FOP Ukraine. Regasterios (talk) 13:49, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Tomer T (talk) 12:55, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was captured in 1970's 8th March (in the 39th convocation of Dhaka University); before 1970 there was convocation in 1964, no convocation was arranged after 1964 and before 1970. 87.239.255.104 06:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. This photo was shot in 1974, the year when the Dhaka University observed Honoris Causa of eight persons, they were awarded honourable degree, the persons were Prof. Satyendranath Bose (awarded posthumous) was awarded Doctor of Scienc, Dr Md Shahidullah was awarded Doctor of literature (posthumous), Poet Kazi Nazrul Islam, Ustad Ali Akbar Khan and Prof Abul Fazal was also awarded the Doctor of literature awarded, while Dr Hiralal De, Dr Md Qudrat-e-Khuda and Dr Qazi Motahar Hossain was given Doctor of Science. The person who has been shown in this photo told in an interview which was published as a book. This photo can't fall in the category of Public Domain Pakistan as 1974 was the year when Bangladesh was not a part of Pakistan (East Pakistan seceded as Bangladesh in 1971). 37.111.234.21 12:46, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, shot in 1974 when the person (Humayun Azad) returned from Scotland to attend the convocation ceremony (aftee getting a friend's letter). 37.111.234.21 12:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, Azad passed honours in 1968 but no Convocation was arranged after 1960, the convocation was arranged in 74 (after 14 years when East Pakistan seceded as Banglades). Dhaka University's Convocation had been gapped for several years, old passed out students joined convocations some years later. 37.111.234.21 13:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, fake logic are given against this picture. CloggerMe (talk) 06:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good faith deletion request/proposal. StanelyD (talk) 06:39, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Must be kept, logic against this photo are bogus. N.N Lista (talk) 06:40, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak keep, The name must be changed as there is no strong reference that this photo was captured in 1968, as there is no strong proof of it's year of photography the name should be 'Humayun Azad in Dhaka University's Convocation Ceremony; @Wikitanvir: , please say something. স বিশাল (talk) 11:34, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Socks of a LTA. Masum Reza📞 21:42, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, according to convocation.du.ac.bd this photo was captured in 1969, the photo should be renamed as Humayun Azad in 1969. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 116.58.203.208 (talk) 06:02, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Socks of a LTA. ~riley (talk) 22:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No Dhaka University related website shows that this photo was captured in 1974, it was of 1960s, and yes of course there was convocation in 1960s, read it, at least you can be assured that Dhaka University held convocation in 1964 (1960s), yes, convocation was held after 1960 and before 1974, please read this also, it is saying that Dhaka University arranged it's last convocation in the Pakistan-era in 1970. The photo must be kept, the deletion proposal is ridiculous. No one and never it has told in any book that the person in this photo is in 1974, Dhaka University's 39th convocation was in 1970 and 40th was to be held 1975 but due to the country's President's murder the convocation was cancelled, no convocation was held in 1974, just honorable degrees were given to some people in 1974, no convocation was held, in 1969 38th convocation was held; in 2019 total 52nd convocation has been held, read this and this also, Dhaka University arranged it's first convocation in 1923 after two years of it's official establishment. ShomPorbo (talk) 06:28, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Socks of a LTA, account locked. ~riley (talk) 22:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak keep per ShomPorbo. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The main image was uploaded by a known vandal (account is currently globally locked). I made my points there. — T. 21:47, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above, per Wikitanvir. ~riley (talk) 22:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was captured in 1970's 8th March (in the 39th convocation of Dhaka University); the last convocation before 1970 was in 1964, there was no arrangement of convocation after 1964 and before 1970. 87.239.255.104 06:19, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. This photo was shot in 1974, the year when the Dhaka University observed Honoris Causa of eight persons, they were awarded honourable degree, the persons were Prof. Satyendranath Bose (awarded posthumous) was awarded Doctor of Scienc, Dr Md Shahidullah was awarded Doctor of literature (posthumous), Poet Kazi Nazrul Islam, Ustad Ali Akbar Khan and Prof Abul Fazal was also awarded the Doctor of literature awarded, while Dr Hiralal De, Dr Md Qudrat-e-Khuda and Dr Qazi Motahar Hossain was given Doctor of Science. The person who has been shown in this photo told in an interview which was published as a book. This photo can't fall in the category of Public Domain Pakistan as 1974 was the year when Bangladesh was not a part of Pakistan (East Pakistan seceded as Bangladesh in 1971). 37.111.234.21 12:48, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete the person (Humayun Azad) returned from Scotland in 1974 to attend the convocation ceremony (a letter sent to him by his friend in Britain informing him). 37.111.234.21 12:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, Humayun Azad passed honours in 1968 and he cathed the convocation ceremony of 1974. 37.111.248.28 13:17, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The photo was captured in 1969. CloggerMe (talk) 06:35, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Must be kept. StanelyD (talk) 06:38, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This photo was taken in 1969, it is a public domain of Pakistan (Bangladesh was then known as East Pakistan), details information have been included in it's cropped version. N.N Lista (talk) 06:37, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Globally locked accounts. ~riley (talk) 22:03, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, according to convocation.du.ac.bd this photo was captured in 1969, the photo should be renamed as Humayun Azad in 1969. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 116.58.203.208 (talk) 06:02, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This good faith deletion request/proposal must be speedily closed, the photo was of 1969, no English reference can't be found but it was definitely in 1969 and public domain of Pakistan, the source from facebook may not be true, but it was obviously in 1969. Must be kept. ShomPorbo (talk) 06:19, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No Dhaka University related website shows that this photo was captured in 1974, it was of 1960s, and yes of course there was convocation in 1960s, read it, at least you can be assured that Dhaka University held convocation in 1964 (1960s), yes, convocation was held after 1960 and before 1974, please read this also, it is saying that Dhaka University arranged it's last convocation in the Pakistan-era in 1970. The photo must be kept, the deletion proposal is ridiculous. No one and never it has told in any book that the person in this photo is in 1974, Dhaka University's 39th convocation was in 1970 and 40th was to be held 1975 but due to the country's President's murder the convocation was cancelled, no convocation was held in 1974, just honorable degrees were given to some people in 1974, no convocation was held, in 1969 38th convocation was held; in 2019 total 52nd convocation has been held, read this and this also, Dhaka University arranged it's first convocation in 1923 after two years of it's official establishment. Tobrez Sham (talk) 06:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Globally locked accounts. ~riley (talk) 22:03, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The photo was uploaded by a sockpuppet of a known long-term vandal. The uploader's account itself is currently globally locked (and hundreds more). I wouldn't put much trust in the information provided by a known vandal. The source link (which links to a Facebook page) doesn't provide much credible informataion I can verify. Another of the sock's vandal commended on a related deletion request (see here). — T. 21:45, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above, per Wikitanvir. ~riley (talk) 22:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was shot in 1971's February. 87.239.255.104 06:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC) [reply]

 Delete, Facebook's reference is not strong and reliable. CloggerMe (talk) 06:09, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, no strong reference. StanelyD (talk) 13:29, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, facebook reference in Bengali can't tell the actual year when it was captured. N.N Lista (talk) 13:36, 29 December 2019 (UTC) - socks of a LTA. Masum Reza📞 21:49, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
While Facebook's reference may not be reliable, I do not believe one word from LTA's mouth. I am inclined to vote  Delete unless the uploader provides more information about it's origin and publishing date. Masum Reza📞 22:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Nominator+voters+uploader=LTA, See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Humayun Azad in 1968.jpg. ~ Nahid Talk 22:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality structure, not used, many alt. in Category:L-Proline. Wostr (talk) 08:59, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wostr: let me know if you would like to do that and need administrative/process help. DMacks (talk) 13:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, very small space-filling model, not used. Wostr (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:46, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown copyright status, unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 05:53, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:33, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation Shanze1 (talk) 08:07, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, text is too small to be readable, deleted as out of scope. Taivo (talk) 15:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the owner of the image and would like to have it removed from wikimedia. Sounny (talk) 09:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Free licenses are irrevocable. Uploader's request is valid reason only during first week after upload, here 4 years have passed. The photo is used in en.wiki in an article, which was created by Sounny 4 years ago and recently nominated for deletion by Sounny – the article was kept. Taivo (talk) 15:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fehlerhaftes Schema; ausführlich diskutiert unter: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Furfurylalkohol Ple210 (talk) 11:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, unused file. Courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 16:02, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pughnests (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Selfies of Umair Ahmad, permission needed.

Minorax (talk) 11:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:04, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Minorax as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10. Actually a good quality photo of a runner. As such educational useful. But most likely not own work. But let's give it seven days. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:29, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyright violation, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of F. Kavaja

[edit]

F. Kavaja (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:29, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Petercampbell144

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Petercampbell44 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:30, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:30, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Linocutsandprints

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of Linocutsandprints (talk · contribs):

Unused art of non-notable artist, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Personenwaage fcm.jpg is original (https://web.archive.org/web/20130814033739/http%3A//pixabay.com%3A80/en/horizontal-bathroom-scale-weight-162952/, see comment), but worse quality;
and original is under CC BY-SA 4, this is CC 0;
move this better image into original and delete.Iruka13 (talk) 09:50, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: redirect now. --P 1 9 9   19:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jaideep Tuli

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Jaideep Tuli (talk · contribs):

If camera data exist, then usually different. I suspect different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Sokna Choeun

[edit]

Here are last remaining photos, uploaded by Sokna Choeun (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos without camera data. Uploader is indefinitely blocked for copyvios. Probably these files are not exceptions. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Sofiane Zaoui

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Sofiane zaoui (talk · contribs):

Camera data are usually different. I suspect not own work, but different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Saolide

[edit]

Saolide (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Small photos without metadata, probably not own photos, but real photographers' copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:07, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CoachGodzup

[edit]

CoachGodzup (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: inferior images as marked above; Kept 3 without sufficient deletion reason (2 out of copyright, and last one not found elsewhere online). --P 1 9 9   20:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Diego Garcia Luces

[edit]

Diego garcía luces (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 10:58, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At least the files Bilite, Trilite, and Truss would be quite useful if they were available as SVG or at least in a better quality bitmap format than they are. Perhaps Diego Garcia could supply better ones? Theosch (talk) 16:34, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; Kept 1 in use. --P 1 9 9   20:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Dramo.es

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Dramo.es (talk · contribs):

I suspect different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Erniep1972

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Erniep1972 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unreliable uploader with history of copyvios. --P 1 9 9   20:38, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Oneil mckenson

[edit]

Here are both contributions of Oneil mckenson (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ottokarius

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Ottokarius (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: insufficient reason for deletion - I see no other clues for copyvio. --P 1 9 9   20:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Original author unknown. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:00, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, dubious source, author, date. --P 1 9 9   20:44, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i'd like to see proof of the uploader being the copyright holder, this is an image found on the web Quakewoody (talk) 13:35, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:44, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

il n'appartient pas à Nada_Azhari Abdelouahed azhari (talk) 13:35, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

il n'appartient pas à Nada_Azhari Abdelouahed azhari (talk) 13:36, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 15:30, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: 國民黨中央黨部門前壁壘森嚴預防抗議事件.jpg. Not an exact duplicate, cropped version. But  Delete as unused, unneeded. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:36, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9   20:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope! Ras67 (talk) 16:22, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope! Ras67 (talk) 16:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope Habertix (talk) 16:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ciaurlec (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:57, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello. I didn't fully comprehend the site's essentiality when I started my activity here. This is why some of files that I have uploaded are problematic and I want them to rechecked. I encountered them today when I was checking my contributiobs and I opened this discussion.

Files with source issues

[edit]

The sources of these files have not been fully added. That is why I think they should be deleted. Because there is no link to proof the reliability of the given source. And I could not find the links, as I uploaded them a long time ago.

Files uploaded via AzWiki

[edit]

I uploaded these files from AzWiki. There was a template for adding files to Commons and I uploaded them like how they were in the first place. Of course, there are issues in its source and licence. That is why I believe that they should be deleted.

Portraits and statues

[edit]

I'm author of the pictures depicting portraits and statues. But I know nothing about their authors. I'm irresolute when it comes to these files. But I still think that they should be rechecked.

Discussion

[edit]

 Delete --Turkmen talk 17:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless image Vysotsky (talk) 20:36, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. (en:User:Lyricist Ramesh Dahal/sandbox) Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:30, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is my own photo having full copy right on me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyricist Ramesh Dahal (talk • contribs)
@Lyricist Ramesh Dahal: Nobody says it's not an image of you. This image is COM:SCOPE here because your draft on English Wikipedia (en:User:Lyricist Ramesh Dahal/sandbox) has been deleted. Please solve this issue on Wikipedia before uploading more images of you here. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:46, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, uploadr is to see on image. Photographer is named in Watermark Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:39, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Seems to be a copyvio. ––Apalsola tc 00:27, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of this. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 13:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 08:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Roblespepe

[edit]

Roblespepe (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

There is freedom of panorama in Argentina for architecture, but not for other kind of art and the photos violate artists' copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not art. It's a banner during political protest.--Roblespepe (talk) 21:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'd still consider this art. Tomer T (talk) 12:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; As Tomer T points out, that is art. --Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of KataMaren

[edit]

KataMaren (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

I take photos taken with Olympus Digital Camera as own work, but these photos remain. Different size, camera data is usually missing. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It does not feel ok to be suspected of copyright violation without any hints on how to prove otherwise. I have taken all of these photos myself. I used to have an iPhone, several of these are taken with the mentioned Olympus camera which I earlier used for portrait photos in a lamp studio (all of the ones with white background, for example). One is a screenshot (the most blurry one). How can i prove that these are my photos? I am not a proper archivist nor an expert in Wikimedia commons. I may have done something wrong when I uploaded these, I guess. But how can I prove these things, it will only be word against word? --KataMaren (talk) 19:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@KataMaren: Can you upload bigger versions with EXIF data? After that I will believe own work. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:39, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Saeunexpovrb

[edit]

Here are both contributions of Saeunexpovrb (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Gabriel Peredo

[edit]

Gabriel Peredo (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of YuriiVO

[edit]

YuriiVO (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination unfort. --Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ciaurlec (talk) 17:41, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I agree with Wutsje that its INSCOPE but likely copyvio - see https://www.flickr.com/photos/acharles_photography/2621934785 where it is (C) ARR. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: this image can not reasonably be used for any educational purpose; Commons is not an amateur porn site (and we have images of much better quality about this subject) Wutsje 18:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See also the external link in the source code of this section. Wutsje 02:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Educationally worthless, poor quality, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:12, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is an appropriate picture of educational value of the subject of the article Twinks, it is a good example of a twink and what the article describes. There is nothing wrong with the human body. Twink is a gay slang term describing a young or young-looking gay man with a slender, ectomorph build, little or no body hair, and no facial hair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanadrianhart (talk • contribs) 06:43, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There are enough similar pics on commons. --Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May be copyvio; out of project scope: this image can not reasonably be used for any educational purpose; Commons is not an amateur porn site (and we have images of much better quality about this subject) Wutsje 18:07, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Educationally worthless, poor quality, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is an appropriate picture of educational value of the subject of the article Twinks, it is a good example of a twink and what the article describes. There is nothing wrong with the human body. Twink is a gay slang term describing a young or young-looking gay man with a slender, ectomorph build, little or no body hair, and no facial hair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanadrianhart (talk • contribs) 06:44, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I agree that we can keep photos of Twinks, but this is just out of scope, due to the text and black borders. And the pose is pretty mundane - better photos are on commons already. --Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture taken from my website www.poczet.com without my permission; this is my own work! 77.253.171.152 18:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I didn't know that these images from your site were protected...I should have been more careful. It won't happen again. Maybe it's better to eliminate it. Mhmrodrigues (talk) 20:41, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the photo is credited by "Società Sportiva Calcio Napoli", but there isn't any indication about a free use or release under the Creative Commons licence by the club... — danyele 18:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Arthur Crbz. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:16, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from book covers.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:00, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Signatures in Taiwan are considered as calligraphic work and copyright protected. There has been a court ruling that handwriting showing unique characteristics and the creator's creativity is subject to copyright protection.

This government regulation lists handwriting and calligraphy as examples of artistic works that are subject to copyright protection.

Wcam (talk) 10:52, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wcam: Are these all recent? No expired copyright? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:50, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: Yes these are all recent living people (no more than life+50 years which is copyright duration in Taiwan). --Wcam (talk) 22:19, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep
properly released by the people who signed.--Roy17 (talk) 16:19, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My bad. Scratched. --Wcam (talk) 22:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- all but the two. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:37, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is on picture, so he's not the photographer. Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:40, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:49, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems like a snapshot from this YouTube video. BTW, the YouTube channel's content is copyrighted – see here. NitinMlk (talk) 22:51, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:49, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Роман Коротенко

[edit]

Роман Коротенко (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' copyright. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1. The Kombat monument was erected in 1980, during the Soviet Union. Sculptor Chumak, Ivan Mikhailovich died in 2004 https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A7%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BA,_%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87

2. Both monuments are located on the territory that is not controlled by Ukraine.


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:33, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of pre-1946 publication required to be PD in US+Russia PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:35, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:36, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly named (it's *not* "L"...but rather undefined as L vs D). Category:Proline has comparable structural forms/level of detail with non-overspecific name File:Proline.png and many different forms that are clearly "L". Well, it's L if it's considered a poorly-aligned Fisher projection (in which case the direct alt I mention is D rather than equivalent generic). Seems un-necessarily confusing given the clearer alternatives that are more distinctly L. DMacks (talk) 17:59, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 12:48, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality structure with undefined configuration (filename indicates it should be L-isomer); not used, many alt. in Category:L-Proline. Wostr (talk) 09:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I create this file to have the complete serie of natural amimoacids in this type of representation means Fischer projection like File:L-Aspartate.png , File:L-Glutamate.png and so on - to see the full serie of the 20, see fr:Utilisateur:Tpa2067/2004-#structure or in Category:Natural aminoacid in Fischer projection I just created. Then  Keep Titou (talk) 07:51, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see too Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/02/Category:Natural aminoacid in Fischer projection and about the remarks of Leyo, I agree, it's all 20 files that should be converted to svg format. Titou (talk) 04:57, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: consensus to keep. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://esu.com.ua/search_articles.php?id=38121. Old image, linked page is not the source (smaller, with watermark). Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:39, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete That said, considering this has no usable EXIF data, is fairly small and the user's only global contribution, a copyright violation is quite likely. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:40, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © 2018 Jay Mallin. Source has valid license. Conflicting copyright information is not a "clear" copyright violation. Please file a regular DR in the future. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:44, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DejaVu as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No indication of publication under a free license at source. Unclear speedy deletion rationale. Source is {{Own}}. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright and scope issues. likely copyright violation. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS to clear up copyright issues, and it should also be confirmed how the file is in scope. --Storkk (talk) 09:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: almost certainly modern. --Storkk (talk) 09:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False (= no) date, must be taken around the 1960s, so never ever free, siurce link did not work. Marcus Cyron (talk) 17:31, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Likely copyright violation. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is from Hungarian Wikipedia and it was deleted there. Mizser Attila is not the copyright holder. Regasterios (talk) 15:31, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"More free photos from thousands of users."

Unknown source, unknown author. Pinging @Leoboudv.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The user profile states these were mirrored from unsplash. Using this information I was able to locate the original author of File:Trowel.jpg: https://unsplash.com/photos/BduDcrySLKM
However it's unclear to me whether the unsplash license is allowed here. As far as I can tell the unsplash license is essentially pd... except it specifies that you can't mirror them en masse for a competing service; which seems to me to be exactly what the user free-photos-242387 has done on pixabay :/. I'll update Trowel.jpg but if unsplash license aren't allowed on commons then it should be deleted. However it seems to be okay because there's a category for it? Category:Images_from_Unsplash. Mvolz (talk) 15:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A ha. Unsplash was PD before 2017: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Unsplash_images_uploaded_from_other_sites. So Trowel is okay because it was uploaded November 25, 2014. The other ones will may may need to be checked for this. Mvolz (talk) 15:34, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I had searched for File:Blue BMW car parked on side of street.jpg, but it's so widely spread I couldn't track down the source. According to https://www.vice.com/de_ch/article/mv4mev/es-ist-armselig-dass-nun-autos-vaeter-dazu-bringen-sollen-unterhalt-zu-zahlen it's from Pexels, but I couldn't find it there. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:40, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In that case it's almost certainly PD? The funny thing with PD is strictly speaking no attribution is required, therefore we technically don't need an author or a source, although of course it's good to have so we can confident it is PD. Mvolz (talk) 15:45, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Mvolz: per Commons policy (which isn't law), we generally do need to attribute content, even if it's PD. Except when the work is so old the copyright (almost) certainly has expired (including the case of copyright having expired due to the author being unknown), or the work is too simple for copyright protection. All these are likely PD, but without a proper source we'd have to take "free-photos-242387"'s word for it. https://www.thedailybeast.com/cool-ride-what-top-entertainers-cars-tell-us-about-them attributed it to Zan Ilic, which doesn't appear to be the source. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:59, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I found sources for two more, the jellyfish one seems to not be uploaded by original author, but the snowy mountain one seems legit; the author claims to be a photographer located in France, all the photos are geotagged somewhere in France. I'll update the metadata for mountain one. Mvolz (talk) 10:06, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, but kept the two ID'd by Mvolz. --Storkk (talk) 10:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear copyright status of the text displayed, and of the screenshot in general Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:10, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

→The text displayed was taken from the Ben Yehuda project's site at https://benyehuda.org/read/208#

The text is part of Bialik's short tale "Yom Shishi Hakatzar". Bialik passed away more than 70 years ago and all his heritage considered as free for the common public.

The scrrenshot was taken by myself and therfor there is no violation of any copyright.Carmelra (talk) 23:16, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: EPUBReader license is not compatible with Commons. --Storkk (talk) 10:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: crop of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Robert William Fisher- FBI Most Wanted Poster.png. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment moved here from the file talk page by User:Srittau:
== KEEP ==
The uncropped version was deleted because the first two photos are photos that are not FBI work, but the next 2 photos are FBI work. --Gindomarlo (talk) 20:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Nat. --Storkk (talk) 10:51, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

an otherwise identical .svg is available on commons Smokefoot (talk) 22:58, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Unneeded file, author-requested, no objections. --Storkk (talk) 11:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file this redirects to is being renamed per Criterion 3 (erroneous name). This should be simply deleted as the name is erroneous/misleading! Cherkash (talk) 19:53, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you please describe exactly what is "erroneous/misleading". --oSeveno (User talk) 11:54, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@OSeveno: The file it redirects to used to be named incorrectly. This particular redirect was just the same incorrect name, which was also misspelled. So there is no need to maintain this redirect and it should simply be deleted. Cherkash (talk) 12:35, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Cherkash: Thanks for the explanation. No objections here. --oSeveno (User talk) 00:45, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

an otherwise identical .svg is available on commons Smokefoot (talk) 22:59, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Unneeded file, author-requested, no objections. --Storkk (talk) 11:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

an otherwise identical .svg is available on commons Smokefoot (talk) 23:00, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Unneeded file, author-requested, no objections. --Storkk (talk) 11:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Praxidicae as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.collegedekho.com/colleges/pictures-grt-institute-of-engineering-and-technology. Linked page is not the file source. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:41, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Appears to be the architect, no evidence she is the photographer. --King of ♥ 17:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image de mauvaise qualité (découpage imparfait), semble copiée quelque part sans indication de la source Pierrette13 (talk) 07:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

La source est: "Armorial général", auteur Jean Baptiste Rietstap, éditions Gouda G. B. van Goor Zonen, tome 2, page 848.

La description du blason est: "Coupé, au 1 d'azur au lion passant d'or, accompagné de deux couronnes en chef au-dessus de la tête et de la queue, et au 2 d'un palé d'argent et d'azur de six pièces". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dcolliot (talk • contribs) 16:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dcolliot: Ce n'est pas ici qu'il faut indiquer la source de toute façon et la photo copiée/collée est de piètre qualité, pas au niveau des attentes WM... --Pierrette13 (talk) 10:59, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Clearly not own work and the alleged source ("Armorial général") only contains text and no images, and therefore is not the source for this image. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 05:51, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This postcard is not made in 1904, much later. You can see here. Made by Barasits aka János Barasits and his wife (in Hungarian Barasits Jánosné, her maiden name is Kornélia Borbála Pichler). According to my searching the husband died in about 1935, however the wife lived yet in 1950. We know that she was born (baptism) in 1870 (nr. 1398). I don't know when she died. I think this file will be undeleteable at the latest in 2041. Regasterios (talk) 13:29, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 05:54, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

il n'appartient pas à Nada_Azhari Abdelouahed azhari (talk) 13:31, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Abdelouahed azhari: English translation: "it does not belong to Nada_Azhari". It is for real? Please see the file description page. Did I, as the uploader, wrote Nada_Azhari as the work's creator? ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 07:48, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. {{PD-IDGov}}. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 05:56, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is illustrator? EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EugeneZelenko, the ilustrator is unknown too. Very litle is known about this project of the Greek Communist Perty activists in Romania during the late 1940s. Jingiby (talk)

Deleted: While most likely in PD currently in Romania, it was on 1 Jan 1996, and, therefore, COM:URAA and US copyright law apply. The earliest it could possibly be undeleted is on 1 Jan 2045. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 06:06, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maintenance DR. This is a Pixabay photoshopper. File:Obesity.jpg was a color corrected version of File:Personenwaage fcm.jpg. File:Cross-2713356.jpg is https://pixabay.com/photos/sky-clouds-sunlight-dark-690293/ with crosses drawn onto it. geralt leaves comments on his image on Pixabay to indicate the source, so it's best to check those first.

Deletion may not be needed, but at least the source may need to be fixed for various files.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:57, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Iruka13 who found Obesity.jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, according to comments on Pixabay https://pixabay.com/photos/sky-clouds-sunlight-dark-690293/ was actually taken from Unsplash where it is no longer found. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:08, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Karl432: that one's actually COM:INUSE on w:fr:Niels Bohr and w:fr:Modèle de Bohr. There is no comment at Pixabay and it was plausibly made from scratch, so I'm leaning towards keep for that one. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:41, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination except for the three specified files. howcheng {chat} 16:39, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]