Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/11/21
![]() |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
![]() |
|
|
Files in Category:Araujo Arenas family
[edit]I would call most, if not all, of them as out of scope.
- File:8 years ago (II) (16974094157).jpg
- File:8 years ago... (16561327743).jpg
- File:A day in the beach... (20365485903).jpg
- File:A day in the pool... (20365685253).jpg
- File:Documento escaneado (14024992895).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoII (14001870216).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoIIII (14001867906).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoV (14021797811).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoVI (14021796491).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoVII (14024985305).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoVIII (14024984215).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoVIIII (14021775972).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoX (14044984623).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXI (14025429004).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXIII (14044981723).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXIIII (14024977685).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXV (14021786431).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXVI (14025027795).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXVII (14001905766).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXVIII (14025075375).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXVIIII (14025519964).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXX (14021909821).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXI (14025613374).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXII (14045171033).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXIII (14002137726).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXIIII (14022065891).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXV (14025729674).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXVI (14025728314).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXVII (14025378315).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXVIII (14025854984).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXVIIII (14045520843).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXX (14022310052).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXXI (14022412082).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXXII (14022422721).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXXIII (14025612415).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXXIIII (14026173444).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXXV (14045869383).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXXVI (14022699231).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXXVII (14046032313).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXXVIII (14046030443).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXXVIIII (14023527291).jpg
- File:Documento escaneadoXXXX (14026720825).jpg
- File:En la universidad... (III) (12664963135).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas 20 07 2015 (19711194210).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas 20 07 2015 (19899211995).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas 2014-11-29 15.53.52 (19891931312).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas 2014-12-23 23.01.47 (19276702944).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas 2014-12-23 23.01.53 (19276701044).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas 2014-12-28 23.14.25 (19904371401).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas 2014-12-28 23.14.32 (19873081006).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas 2014-12-28 23.14.59 (19276654224).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas 2014-12-28 23.15.17 (19712622139).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas 2014-12-29 21.00.36 (19899272905).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas 2014-12-29 21.00.39 (19712602929).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas 2015-08-30 15.38.54 (20904977529).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas 2015-08-30 15.38.57 (21065589886).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas 2015-09-26 00.48.46 (21302455454).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas 2015-09-26 00.49.03 (21737356128).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas A day in the pool... (20365685253).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas A selfie of 2 years ago... (13129360704).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas Another old selfie... (13153409543).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas Another selfie (II) (13790014043).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas Another selfie (III) (13790349214).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas Days of future past... (16030368752).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC0865 (15094940636).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC1606 (15536818421).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC1972 (11821835505).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC1989 (15353361788).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC2655 (15536825611).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC2830 (15515805016).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC4768 (15354008470).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC4769 (15536947751).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC4770 (15515936596).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC4777 (14919467873).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC5075 (15515946456).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC5657 (12092027366).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC5660 (15353553390).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC7651 (12223727343).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC7738II (12332658254).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC7740II (12332126355).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC8088 (13491340074).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC9329II (14474336762).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC9331II (14475642545).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas GEDC9332II (14472265781).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas I don´t want to see... (13153568964).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas IMG 20150803 132131 (20077619110).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas IMG 20150803 132227 (19644665363).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas IMG 20150803 132320 (20271490971).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas Just one selfie of today... (12918291173).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas My favourite self-portrait (16530197160).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas My lovely sun... (I) (15060074742).jpg
- File:Fotos viejas My lovely sun... (II) (15057397021).jpg
- File:GEDC3859 (15539323805).jpg
- File:Hair and waves.jpg
- File:Time lapse... (I) (18658321914).jpg
JuTa 01:36, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:12, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kushal Bastakotiraj (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artworks by non-notable artist, without any particular educational or historic value
- File:San Francisco, SPOT LIGHT.jpg
- File:Boston, Graphing.jpg
- File:1993 dallas downtown.jpg
- File:Himalayan.jpg
- File:New York, Live.jpg
- File:Fort Worth Stock Yards.jpg
- File:Kushal Bastakoti.jpg
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Artworks by non-notable artist, without any particular educational or historic value. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:10, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
로고 변경으로 인해 해원이 (talk) 21:46, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Self-promotion of another famous entrepreneur. Already filed @ his sock account, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Wikimanabc and en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adityarbs.
- File:Yukesh Chaudhary @Kuwait Conference travel.jpg
- File:Yukesh Chaudhary @ Vacation in Kuwait.jpg
- File:Yukesh Chaudhary @ Beach in kuwait.jpg
- File:Yukesh Chaudhary taking selfie.jpg
- File:Yukesh Chaudhary @ Workplace.jpg
- File:Yukesh Chaudhary public domain.jpg
- Yukesh chaudhary
A week ago I asked him to have a try on social media sites. Achim (talk) 14:34, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per, Self-promotion CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:10, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
실수로 업로드했습니다 마인드 (talk) 09:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio: Fair use is not allowed on Commons
out of scope
- File:Photographie de Amir devant des partenariats.png
- File:Photographie retrouvée sur la page officielle du Festival Mawazine.png
- File:Photo issue l’Instagram de Amir.png
- File:Photographie prise lorsque Amir était en tournage.png
- File:Photo de Amir donnant un court discours.png
- File:Photo de l’Instagram de Amir.png
- File:Vidéo publicitaire de Orange MAROC.jpg
- File:Spot publicitaire de Orange MAROC.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言) 15:24, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, CSD F10 out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 19:30, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Provide source link doesn't work. Searching for the author on Flickr gives this message: "Andre Forget hasn't made any photos public yet." P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- P199, I made a mistake when originally posting the link. It should be fine now, I've corrected the mistake, so can the deletion request be rescinded since the mistake is gone? - MikkelJSmith2 (talk) 18:37, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- P199 by the way , to see Andre Forget's name click on show EXIF on the picture's page - MikkelJSmith2 (talk) 18:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: resolved and withdrawn. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:03, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Please provide a reason and sign it with Isradelquiroz (talk) 05:41, 21 November 2019 (UTC) Isradelquiroz (talk) 05:41, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by {{Túrelio}}. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
wrong metadata Tryin-to-edit (talk) 20:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by {{Túrelio}}. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
недопустимый материал Igouros (talk) 21:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
недопустимый материал Igouros (talk) 20:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
{{SD|G7}} Mg.uoc (talk) 23:36, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as it was file on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
{{SD|G7}} Mg.uoc (talk) 23:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as it was file on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 07:24, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
{{SD|G7}} Mg.uoc (talk) 23:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as it was file on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Porque no tiene la calidad que esperaba, en cuanto a su resolución. Ángel Martínez Niubó (talk) 21:27, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's req on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 13:26, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Incorrect geometry; poor mix of two images. Wostr (talk) 19:34, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 14:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Mix of two images; different size of atoms of the same element; not used. Wostr (talk) 19:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 14:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Obvious composite of uncited originals. This is against Commons policy, as uploader should well know by now but obviously doesn't care. See also en:WP:CIR DMacks (talk) 22:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- The file is chemically correct, and at most it must be substituted, and never deleted. The file is necessary and deleting files we will not help Wikipedia. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 11:04, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: This image is not chemically correct. This image is constructed from at least two other files which use different styles for the chemical elements. The use of inconsistent sizes and colors for the same elements inaccurately depicts them as different in a way that they are not. Also, deriving this image from other images without attribution and calling it "own work" is a licensing violation. Ed (Edgar181) 14:26, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Repeated 80.28.66.89 19:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "repeated"? --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 19:12, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Repeated 80.28.66.89 19:10, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "repeated"? --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 19:13, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Identical duplicate of File:Cairns Birdwing 6 (8623138366).jpg. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 20:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
One of the photos in the montage was copyrighted and deleted A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Derivative in part of non-free content. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:10, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
No referential integrity (uploaded by mistake) Therewillbehotcake (talk) 09:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
No referential integrity (uploaded by mistake) Therewillbehotcake (talk) 09:03, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
No referential integrity (uploaded by mistake) Therewillbehotcake (talk) 09:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:21, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
No referential integrity (uploaded by mistake) Therewillbehotcake (talk) 09:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:27, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
No referential integrity (uploaded by mistake) Therewillbehotcake (talk) 09:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:26, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
No referential integrity (uploaded by mistake) Therewillbehotcake (talk) 09:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:24, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
No referential integrity (uploaded by mistake) Therewillbehotcake (talk) 09:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted uploader request; unused, out of scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:22, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
No referential integrity (uploaded by mistake) Therewillbehotcake (talk) 09:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:23, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
No referential integrity (uploaded by mistake) Therewillbehotcake (talk) 09:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:25, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
No referential integrity (uploaded by mistake) Therewillbehotcake (talk) 09:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:24, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
No referential integrity (uploaded by mistake) Therewillbehotcake (talk) 09:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:31, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
No referential integrity (uploaded by mistake) Therewillbehotcake (talk) 09:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:31, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
EXIF says: "Photo by Diego M. Radzinschi/THE NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL." This is not work of US government. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. The National Law Journal is not a US Federal Government publication; not free licensed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:36, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 12:19, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted unused uncat glitch upload. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:37, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 13:10, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - It's not acceptable for FoP in Hong Kong also because the "Umbrella Man statue" is not permanently fixed at the location. STSC (talk) 15:28, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This is ridiculous – it's a display, not a panorama! --Ohconfucius (talk) 15:32, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; see Commons:DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted false source/license claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:50, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pluswyllie (talk · contribs)
[edit]These photographs are claimed to be own work but they rather seem to be still images from videos.
Le Petit Chat (talk) 21:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:21, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
The image infringes on the copyright for the image shown. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:11, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley at 10:40, 25 November 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 13:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of the file with the same name Vitold Muratov (talk) 11:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment You seem to have uploaded two versions of the same file under the same title. Not really a problem. Do you prefer the first (smaller) or second/current (larger) deleted? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:34, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- I prefer to remove the first option Vitold Muratov 03ː54,25 November 2019 (UTC)
Done Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
reinstall Mi.anand (talk) 21:08, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as dupe. --JuTa 07:38, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, no license. Ahmadtalk 19:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 02:39, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://twitter.com/orlvndoa Jamez42 (talk) 23:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. OTRS permission required. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 02:37, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Blurred and unused image, no educational value A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nom; useless blur -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:17, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational purpose, only used for vandalism on english wikipedia Pippobuono (talk) 08:43, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sweet Living Room (talk · contribs)
[edit]advertising, out of scope
Pippobuono (talk) 08:44, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Non sense, no exif, not educational ... Eatcha (talk) 09:30, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
Created per diff. --Fæ (talk) 11:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete First, this person does not appear to be notable. There is no WP article and are no obvious Google hits. Second, this does not appear to be a selfie, so the claim that the author is the subject is probably not correct and we will need a free license from the actual photographer via OTRS to keep it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete per Woodward. Masum Reza📞 18:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Ipoustéguy died in 2006. No freedom of panorama in France.
- File:A la santé de la Révolution @ Jean-Robert Ipousteguy @ Parc départemental Jean-Moulin les Guilands @ Bagnolet @ Paris (30638041453).jpg
- File:A la santé de la Révolution @ Jean-Robert Ipousteguy @ Parc départemental Jean-Moulin les Guilands @ Bagnolet @ Paris (30638043313).jpg
- File:A la santé de la Révolution @ Jean-Robert Ipousteguy @ Parc départemental Jean-Moulin les Guilands @ Bagnolet @ Paris (31300791442).jpg
- File:A la santé de la Révolution @ Jean-Robert Ipousteguy @ Parc départemental Jean-Moulin les Guilands @ Bagnolet @ Paris (31300795822).jpg
- File:A la santé de la Révolution @ Jean-Robert Ipousteguy @ Parc départemental Jean-Moulin les Guilands @ Bagnolet @ Paris (31330368921).jpg
- File:Ipoustéguy - Hydrophage.jpg
- File:L'Homme aux semelles devant.jpg
Chassipress (talk) 21:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juan Carlos Maestro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Frase de Felicacia de Juan Carlos Maestro.jpg
- File:EQUILIBRIO DE LA FELICACIA.jpg
- File:FELICACIA (2).jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Low quality out of project scope A.Savin 21:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Maurice Rapin died in 2000. Copyright violation. 86.249.245.100 21:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dejarongs Sang Penemu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:DEJARONG Sang Penemu.jpg
- File:DEJARONGS Sang Penemu - Owner.png
- File:DEJARONGS Sang Penemu - STEALTH DIGGERS INDONESIA.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work or COM:DW of copyrighted work by Hom Nguyen, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Oeuvre de Hom Nguyen - Edith Piaf - Oeuvre permanente Hôpital Tenon 2018.jpg
- File:Oeuvre de Hom Nguyen -Edith Piaf- 2018.jpg
- File:Oeuvre de Hom Nguyen - Napoléon Bonaparte - 2019.jpg
- File:Oeuvre de Hom Nguyen -Portrait de Légionnaire.jpg
- File:Hom Nguyen, Monsieur le Président de la République François Hollande, Paris Art Fair 2016 , Grand Palais.png
- File:Hom Nguyen dans son atelier.jpg
- File:Oeuvre de Hom Nguyen - Michèle Obama.png
- File:Portrait Edith Piaf par Hom Nguyen.jpg
- File:Hom Nguyen.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Hong Kong for posters, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:10, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nerea Torres (talk · contribs)
[edit]Doesn't look like selfies.
- File:Nerea Torres.jpg
- File:Nerea Torres Egüén.jpg
- File:Nerea-Torres-2018-4-Siemens.jpg
- File:Nerea-Torres-2018-3.jpg
- File:Nerea-Torres-2018-2.jpg
- File:Nerea-Torres-2018-1.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:28, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Very unlikely that Sandalwood Screen is the copyright holder. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:36, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Very unlikely that News In Town is the copyright holder. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete Agreed - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:41, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
potentially personality and copyright issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 19:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jayamala bio for wiki(2).jpg, thx, Roland zh (talk) 19:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Found on Facebook. — Racconish 💬 17:41, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Very unlikely that News In Town is the copyright holder. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete Agreed - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:42, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/insource:18JRV5bpc5Y
[edit]Very unlikely that News in town is the copyright holder. Pinging @Patrick Rogel
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:43, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/insource:"Sandalwood Screen"
[edit]Sandalwood Screen does not appear to be the copyright holder.
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:47, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Pinging @Patrick Rogel - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Per ref cited at en:Xenon nitrate, this is chemical nonsense. The named compound would be covalent. DMacks (talk) 22:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 01:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nomination; unused & incorrect chemical structure in poor-quality! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 06:54, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. And screenshots from the link http://www.bhagavad-gita.org/Gita/chapter-18.html are in questionable copyright.
Ref: Ticket#2019021110008076
- File:PKB37.jpg
- File:PKB36.jpg
- File:PKB35.jpg
- File:PKB34.jpg
- File:PKB33.jpg
- File:PKB32.jpg
- File:PKB31.jpg
- File:PKB30.jpg
- File:PKB28.jpg
- File:PKB27.jpg
- File:PKB26.jpg
- File:PKB25.jpg
- File:PKB24.jpg
- File:PKB23.jpg
- File:PKB22.jpg
- File:PKB21.jpg
- File:PKB19.jpg
- File:PKB20.jpg
- File:PKB18.jpg
- File:PKB17.png
- File:PKB16.png
- File:PKB15.jpg
- File:PKB13.jpg
- File:PKB14.jpg
- File:PKB12.jpg
- File:PKB11.jpg
- File:PKB10.jpg
- File:PKB9.jpg
- File:PKB8.jpg
- File:PKB7.jpg
- File:PKB6.jpg
- File:PKB5.jpg
- File:PKB4.jpg
- File:PKB2.jpg
- File:PKB3.jpg
- File:Maruthi Suzuki Colors of Youth Season 7 in 2018.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 18.MokshaUpadeshaYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 17.SraddhatrayaVibhagaYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 16.DaivasuraSampadVibhagaYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 15.PurusottamaYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 14.GunatrayaVibhgaYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 13.KsetraKsetrajnaVibhagaYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 12.BhaktiYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 11.VishvarupaDarshanaYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 10.VibhutiVistaraYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 9.RajaVidyaGuhyaYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 8.AksaraParabrahmanYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 7.ParamahamsaVijananaYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh BhagavadGita 6.AbhyasaYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 5.KarmaVairagyaYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 4.JnanaYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 3.KarmaYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 2.SankhyaYoga.jpg
- File:Srimadh Bhagavad Gita 1.VishadaYoga.jpg
~Moheen (keep talking) 12:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:54, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Missing EXIF informations at Flickr. Besides it's very unlykely that the person pictured is the photographer.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 04:01, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Very unlikely that thse You Tube accounts are the copyright holders.
- File:Sudha Rani.jpg
- File:S. Mahendar.jpg
- File:Shruti (Kannada actress).jpg
- File:Prema (Kannada actress).jpg
- File:Prajwal Devaraj.jpg
- File:Sriimurali.jpg
- File:Dhruva Sarja (2).jpg
- File:Rakshit Shetty.jpg
- File:Ganesh (Kannada actor).jpg
- File:Yash (Kannada actor).jpg
- File:Shiva Rajkumar.jpg
- File:V. Ravichandran.jpg
- File:Dhruva Sarja.jpg
- File:Gayatri Jayaraman and Darshan.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Per File:Robert Landarsky.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:03, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; (C) per watermark before cropping. --Gbawden (talk) 08:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Not taken by the user, found on the internet: http://www.ballylandersgaa.ie/frank-b-dineen Smirkybec (talk) 23:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Possibly copyright violation. It would be an advert published by the company in the 1980s-90s. No source nor no permission. Darklanlan (talk) 23:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Perhaps copyvio of "Novaya Gazeta" (cropped). If the Uploader is the author of the photo Vlad Dokshin, it is necessary to issue a permit Commons:OTRS/ru. GAndy (talk) 00:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
According to EXIF the image is copyrighted by Vitaly Gubin. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:28, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
According to EXIF the image is copyrighted by 74HOCKEY.RU. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:29, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
According to EXIF the image is copyrighted by Vitaly Gubin. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:57, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MORALESMARESMARIAGUADALUPE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:MoralesMaresMaria Guadalupe Ejercicio 3.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMaria Guadalupe Ejercicio 1.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMaria Guadalupe Ejercicio 2.pdf
- File:MoralesMares MariaGuadalupe Ejercicioo 6.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 08:54, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MORALESMARESMARIAGUADALUPE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:MoralesMaresMariaGuadlupe ejercicio 3 mapa Proceso Administraivo.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMariaGuadalupe Ejercicio 3 Proceos Administrativo 3.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMariaGuadalupe Ejercicio 3 Proceos Administrativo4.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMariaGuadalupe Ejercico 3 PAPlaneación.pdf
- File:MoralesMaresMariaGudalupe Ejercicioo 6.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:34, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MORALESMARESMARIAGUADALUPE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:GENERALIDADES DE LA EVALUACIÓN EN LA PROGRAMACIÓN DIDACTICA.pdf
- File:Generalidad de la Evaluacion Educativa.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:24, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MORALESMARESMARIAGUADALUPE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:12, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daniel Jeandot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Palm beach Cannes 1979.jpg
- File:Visite de Notre Dame.jpg
- File:La Nuit du Théâtre à la Comédie Française.jpg
- File:Centenaire de Raymond Duncan.jpg
- File:Marc de la Roche au théâtre des Champs Elysées.jpg
- File:L'affaire du collier de la reine.jpg
- File:Association Polytechnique.jpg
- File:Maxim's conférence par Marc de la Roche.jpg
- File:MAXIM'S 1.pdf
- File:Récital de poésies.jpg
- File:Programme du Club de France.jpg
- File:Comédie Française.jpg
- File:Marc de la Roche fin des années 70 par Daniel Jeandot.jpg
- File:Prière pour la France - Marc de la Roche.jpg
- File:La passion - Marc de la Roche.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 08:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Official symbol and logo. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:Договор МАДИ-1 страница-с отметкой.jpg
- File:Справка МАДИ.jpg
- File:Акт о внедрении ПНИПУ.jpg
- File:Акт о внедрении Минтранс.jpg
- File:Акт о внедрении Адм. города.jpg
- File:Диплом член РАТ Якимов М.Р..pdf
- File:Договор с МАДИ Якимов М.Р..pdf
- File:Диплом доктора Якимов М.Р..jpg
- File:Российская Академия Транспорта.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- How is it possible to delete these files? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roadperm (talk • contribs) 15:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 08:54, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juliotorres11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:Gadp San Carlos escudo.jpg
- File:GADP Bandera San Carlos.jpg
- File:Himno de la Parroquia San Carlos.jpg
- File:Escudo de la Parroquia San Carlos.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 08:54, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Girassol Pri and Wind 1574260950754.ogg
- File:Mc And G 1574198203709.ogg
- File:Snuff Sli 1574356557963.ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 08:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Tox Sys 1576757754768.ogg
- File:Paixão Errad 1576757036204.ogg
- File:Pais e Flhos 1576757036202.ogg
- File:Para Pens Volt 1576757036201.ogg
- File:Divina Comed 1576757036203.ogg
- File:Dois Eng 1576593475988.ogg
- File:Os Mais 1574865946440.ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete There's also issues of COM:SCOPE. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:58, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --jdx Re: 15:47, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 08:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hari2totle (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Su 01.1.jpg
- File:G misbun.jpg
- File:Melayu Boleh Rashid Sidek.jpg
- File:G jalani.jpg
- File:Razif Sidek.jpg
- File:MisbunSidek.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete Images appear elsewhere online spread across a variety of sites, some from up to a decade ago. Own work seems doubtful. --Alex Cohn (talk) 18:29, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 08:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Baba Ali 333 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:تظاهرات ضد الارهاب الحكومي.jpg
- File:المرجع مع الجماهير.jpg
- File:المرجع في رمضان.jpg
- File:اطفال في زيارة للسيد.jpg
- File:الحسني في مكتبه.jpg
- File:المرجع ليلة عاشوراء.jpg
- File:السيد الصرخي وزارة الداخلية.jpg
- File:المرجع في كربلاء.jpg
- File:مع السادة ال صرخة.jpg
- File:الصرخي مع اطفال العراق ١.jpg
- File:الصرخي محاضرة ١.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 08:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Baba Ali 333 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re images: unlikely to be own works.
- File:المرجع الحسني الصرخي محاضرة.jpg
- File:اوقفوا سفك الدماء.jpg
- File:تعذيب انصار السيد الصرخي.jpg
- File:المرجع الحسني الصرخي ليلة عاشوراء طبخ.jpg
- File:المرجع الصرخي في ليلة العاشر من محرم.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:43, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 08:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 19:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antoniozevs (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
Mitte27 (talk) 19:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:37, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
re-uploaded Микола Василечко (talk) 20:59, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- It is not the same file as the one which was deleted with the same name. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:58, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: false CC license claim. --Sealle (talk) 10:04, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:42, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:44, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:45, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). Also out of Commons:Project scope. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in self-promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal image of no educational value, was used for advertising on en-wiki where user is now blocked. O Still Small Voice of Clam 19:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Published elsewhere (Facebook) [1]. Possible copyvio, permission from original photographer needed. Htm (talk) 04:42, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, OTRS-permission is needed to restore the photo. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
This is not an accurate representation of the bonding in w:en:Hematite. There are no discrete O-Fe-O-Fe-O units, the oxygen atoms shouldn't have two different types of bonding, etc. ChemNerd (talk) 18:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete chemical nonsense. Wostr (talk) 19:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- The uploader has replaced the image with a new one, but it is still an inaccurate representation of the chemical bonding in hematite. ChemNerd (talk) 14:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:46, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
This structure is inconsistent with other images in Category:Octafluoroxenate ion. ChemNerd (talk) 18:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- File:Nitrosonium-octafluoroxenate(VI)-3D-Model.png. This file has the same issue. ChemNerd (talk) 18:24, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete both files; per nom. Wostr (talk) 20:08, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete both per nomination; unused & incorrect depiction of the chemical structures. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 06:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted both per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 12:31, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 13:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted, considering other deletion requests of this contributor's uploads, Commons:Deletion requests/File:CaitlinC.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:AQD 7360.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 20:53, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Screenshots of google maps
Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 06:15, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of the file with the same name Vitold Muratov (talk) 11:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Explain, what is the duplicate file? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:56, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Keep While Commons has many images of nude women, the vast majority are of a small number of age ranges and body types; this fills an underrepresented gap. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:56, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no duplicate provided. Per Infrogmation of New Orleans. --Strakhov (talk) 06:16, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 18:10, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Not a selfie. --Strakhov (talk) 06:19, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Smug Pepe is not free image. An uncropped version of this image, was kept before, but this focuses on the copyrighted Pepe sign. This is very unlikely to satisfy, Commons:De minimis guidelines. I recomend Pepe be censored. —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 21:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- I predict this will be uploaded once again within the next couple of months. --Trade (talk) 22:26, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete Keep File:Donald Trump supporter mocks protesters (32912615810).jpg as de minimis, but cropping to the sign alone is too much. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Andy Dingley. --Strakhov (talk) 06:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Striped bass.jpg
- File:Trout caught in Mountains.jpg
- File:Eagle scout.jpg
- File:Grass dance competition regalia.jpg
- File:Green Bench.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- "Weak Keep' File:Eagle scout.jpg - there aren't a lot of photos of Eagle Scouts in uniform Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: "Eagle scout,jpg" states as file description the following: "It is me". I would say it is not a selfie so these files are most likely "not own work". --Strakhov (talk) 06:24, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
This is not an accurate representation of the bonding in w:en:Magnetite. There are no discrete units with this circular arrangement. ChemNerd (talk) 18:13, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 20:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete as obviously incorrect and with no reasonable COM:EDUSE. DMacks (talk) 22:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- The uploader has replaced the image with a new one, but it is still an inaccurate representation of the chemical bonding in magnetite. ChemNerd (talk) 14:04, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Same situation for:
DMacks (talk) 19:28, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete both files per nomination; poor & low-quality files. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 22:25, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:37, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
The overlapping spheres implies a covalent bond that doesn't exist in this ionic compound. ChemNerd (talk) 18:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete another 3d model of a molecule of a salt... Wostr (talk) 20:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nomination & argumentation of Wostr. Ionic compounds like salts can not be depicted as a covalently bonded molecule. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 20:00, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
The overlapping spheres implies a covalent bond that doesn't exist in this ionic compound. ChemNerd (talk) 18:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 20:08, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nomination; ionic compounds like salts can not be depicted as a covalently bonded molecule. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 22:25, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
This is not an accurate representation of the bonding in w:en:Malachite. Incorrect are oxygen atoms alternatively with one, two, or three bonds; carbon atom with only three covalent bonds, etc. ChemNerd (talk) 18:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete chemical nonsense. Wostr (talk) 20:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nomination; low-quality & opaque background. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 19:57, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 10:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
reproduction d'un article, pas une illustration Arroser (talk) 11:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:25, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
rien ne permet d'autentifier ce courrier et la reproduction dun courrier est-elle compatible avec la licence de WP ? Arroser (talk) 11:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:25, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
photo d'un livre Arroser (talk) 11:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:23, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
reproduction d'une revue Arroser (talk) 11:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:24, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
File:COURRIER de remerciement du directeur de l'IMA Eric Delpond pour le don du Fonds culturel de l'Ermitage.pdf
[edit]reproduction d'un courrier Arroser (talk) 11:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:24, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
reproduction d'un document officiel Arroser (talk) 11:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:25, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
copie d'un document officiel ou d'un courrier Arroser (talk) 11:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:24, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tableau livre (talk · contribs)
[edit]Permission of each painter needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Salaueu 12.jpg
- File:Salaueu 11.jpg
- File:Salaueu 10.jpg
- File:Salaueu 9.jpg
- File:Salaueu 8.jpg
- File:Salaueu 7.jpg
- File:Salaueu 6.jpg
- File:Salaueu 5.jpg
- File:Salaueu 4.jpg
- File:Salaueu 3.jpg
- File:Alex Salaueu Costume 2.jpg
- File:Alex Salaueu "Theater backstage".jpg
- File:Alex Salaueu "Shape of you".jpg
- File:Alex Salaueu "Forest".jpg
- File:Alex Salaueu Angel 35x25см oil&mixed media on canvas .jpg.jpg
- File:Alex Salaueu Muse .jpg
- File:Alex Salaueu drawing on paper 60x42cm .jpg
- File:Vladimir Korolkov "Autumn".jpg
- File:Vladimir Korolkov Voyageur.jpg
- File:Vladimir Korolkov .jpg
- File:Sunrise in winter.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Ticket:2019112210003186 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 07:00, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 14:36, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tableau livre (talk · contribs)
[edit]not own work. Permission is needed
- File:Juri Kikka (1946 - 2020) Vana Tartu, 1968 75x102 cm.jpg
- File:Juri Kikka (1946 - 2020) Kalevi poeg, 1968 72x99cm.jpg
- File:Juri Kikka (1946 - 2020) Campagne, 1968 63x83 cm.jpg
- File:Juri Kikka (1946 - 2020) Tartu motiv, 1968 73x60cm.jpg
- File:Juri Kikka (1946 - 2020) At the cafe,1968 60x80 cm.jpg
- File:Oleg Kroshkin (1950 - 2020) Queue, 2001 90x100 cm.jpg
- File:Oleg Kroshkin (1950 - 2020) Old Town,1990 100x75cm.jpg
- File:Oleg Kroshkin (1950 - 2020) Greenery, 2000 90x100cm.jpg
Estopedist1 (talk) 06:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 04:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tableau livre (talk · contribs)
[edit]problematic images:
File:Nikolai Kormašov Eestimaa Teed 1986.jpg - permission from the artist is needed
Other images are thumbnails, unlike that own work. Deletion per COM:PCP
- File:Nikolai Kormašov Eestimaa Teed 1986.jpg
- File:Fedor-kiselev.jpg
- File:Rein Tammik.jpg
- File:Juri Kikka.jpg
Estopedist1 (talk) 16:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 00:43, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:40, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:40, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:40, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
No copyright info or fair use claim Davidelit (talk) 05:37, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:40, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hazel Hannell
[edit]The artist died in 2002
- File:Edge of Swamp with Label.jpg
- File:Self Portrait with label.jpg
- File:Still Life with Sunflowers with label.jpg
- File:Woodlands with label.jpg
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:40, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 10:37, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:41, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:41, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:41, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:42, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sanjay Jha (Speaker) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshots.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:12, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:38, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pati Hill
[edit]The artist died in 2014
- File:Detail of Pati Hill's work "50 Common Objects".jpg
- File:Pati Hill 1.jpg
- File:Pati Hill publication.jpg
- File:Pati Hill.jpg
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:38, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
bad upload and duplicate of Comerica Bank Building, San Jose.jpg Mjrmtg (talk) 12:14, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
out of scope 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 12:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 12:54, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Keep 960×720 isn't "small". Nor is "delete anything without EXIF" policy.
- If you're claiming that this is a copyvio, say "I think this is a copyvio" and show some evidence that it is, not just an unfounded suspicion. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + fb transmission data. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:34, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 12:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 12:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Boscoe Holder
[edit]The artist died in 2007
- File:Boscoe Holder Official First Day Cover Trinidad & Tobago Stamp Issue.jpg
- File:Boscoe Holder Trinidad & Tobago Souvenir Sheet.jpg
- File:Caribbean Beauty in White by Boscoe Holder.jpg
- File:Sill Life Orchids, Trinidad 1937 oil painting by Boscoe Holder.jpg
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: files deleted by other admin. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 12:58, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 13:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 13:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:34, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Recently uploaded PNG that is redundant to File:Flag of India.svg 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 13:26, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
The specified Author is wrong. It was my mistake. PCU1998 (talk) 14:10, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Also the source is completly wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by PCU1998 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation https://www.daisybeautyprofessional.com/artiklar/apotea-borjar-aret-med-rekord/ EPIC (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Tugaliza only exists on nationstates.net, fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Tugaliza only exists on nationstates.net, fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Tugaliza only exists on nationstates.net, fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Красноармейцы пустили на корм лошадям трофейные эрзац-валенки Сталинград, СССР Зима 1942 1943 Наталья Боде.jpg
[edit]Photographer is Natalya Bode, hence clearly not "own work" of uploader PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Obviously just a joke, has no purpose Helloimahumanbeing (talk) 16:17, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Agree. Sorry but they started the WSC2019 sitenotice the second week instead of the third week of November as requested, it's not the optimal moment for me to perform regular and quick clean up. I would have started the deletion request myself right now.--Alexmar983 (talk) 15:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Because it was Neža Cerinšek (talk) 17:13, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
I am new on this page and I do not have a lot of knowledge on how to use it. I did not want to upload this documente on this page. Neža Cerinšek (talk) 17:15, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
This is the painting "Mona Lisa" from the Colombian artist "Fernando Botero", which is copyrighted material. As the photo subject is a full exclusive image of the entire painting with no other subjects, then is in clear violation of the artist's copyright. 83.42.246.238 18:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
this is a photo of a photo that is widely used (and within copyright unless released by the real photographer), one use is at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ietCF1XAVyQ Flickr account doesn't own the original image, clearly —SpacemanSpiff 19:34, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- I am just the uploader. Therefore, I shouldn't be held responsible for copyfraud. Delete it if it looks suspicious. I have requested speedy deletion.— Vaibhavafro 💬 03:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied previously. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
this is a photo of a photo that is widely used (and within copyright unless released by the real photographer), one use is at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ietCF1XAVyQ Flickr account doesn't own the original image, clearly —SpacemanSpiff 19:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Relax. I have requested speedy deletion. I can't be held responsible for a Flickr fraud.— Vaibhavafro 💬 03:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied previously. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
No evidence that the blog author is the photographer at the blog site C.Fred (talk) 02:28, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:47, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
User who uploaded the map said here that is not his own work and he uploaded as if it is. I asked him to put the author's name and license, but nothing happened. Renato de carvalho ferreira (talk) 20:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
This image has been updated and replaced with the current version that was published to the MWSG-37 Wikipedia website. This image is no longer accurate. Pjammer14 (talk) 20:24, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Base layer of map is clearly lifted from Google Maps SounderBruce 20:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Agreed. This image has been lifted from the detailed project report prepared by CMRL which in turn has appeared to use google maps to mark the stations. Vadapalani (talk) 12:33, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:28, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Unused NC or ND license page, violate COM:LICENSE, ND has no way and no reason to keep on any WMF wikis except Italian Wikipedia. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- You keep saying "except on Italian Wikipedia". So why don't we keep these to make it easier for those Italian folks? Also, just out of curiosity, how did you discover these templates that I made? —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:22, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Kestreltail: Please read foundation:Terms of Use again and again before your next commenting-back. I will not comment you anymore if you don't do so. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: Do you think I enjoy replying to you? It's like talking into a dead phone! I have told you that I have already read the Terms of Use, and I have made appropriate counterarguments. I won't tell you again, and, as you said to me, "don't say I didn't tell it before" (which, by the way, isn't correct English grammar. I don't mean to be offensive, but I think you should consider yourself at an en-3 level and not en-4.). —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:18, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Kestreltail: If you think that enwiki article has grammar wrong on their title, talk this problem at en:Talk:Don't say we didn't tell it before, Commons has nothing to do with that article. Now let's follow the correct topic here, why do you think that such nd templates are acceptable, required and useful on Commons? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:20, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: I believe that "Don't say we didn't tell it before" is the commonly accepted English translation of a Chinese propaganda/government phrase, and it therefore doesn't matter that it is grammatically incorrect. I was referring to your grammatical errors in your own words. I feel like en-3 would be more accurate, and en-4 is slightly deceptive. But you're right, let's get back to the topic now.
—Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: I believe that "Don't say we didn't tell it before" is the commonly accepted English translation of a Chinese propaganda/government phrase, and it therefore doesn't matter that it is grammatically incorrect. I was referring to your grammatical errors in your own words. I feel like en-3 would be more accurate, and en-4 is slightly deceptive. But you're right, let's get back to the topic now.
- @Kestreltail: If you think that enwiki article has grammar wrong on their title, talk this problem at en:Talk:Don't say we didn't tell it before, Commons has nothing to do with that article. Now let's follow the correct topic here, why do you think that such nd templates are acceptable, required and useful on Commons? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:20, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: Do you think I enjoy replying to you? It's like talking into a dead phone! I have told you that I have already read the Terms of Use, and I have made appropriate counterarguments. I won't tell you again, and, as you said to me, "don't say I didn't tell it before" (which, by the way, isn't correct English grammar. I don't mean to be offensive, but I think you should consider yourself at an en-3 level and not en-4.). —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:18, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Kestreltail: Please read foundation:Terms of Use again and again before your next commenting-back. I will not comment you anymore if you don't do so. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: We are not here to decide whether or not it is required. Nothing is "required" on Wikimedia Commons. Some people may find it useful. I am not entirely familiar with different complicated copyright situations, but some creators might want this template to be available to them. And it is certainly acceptable, since users are allowed to use any license as long as they also include a free license. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:30, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, dual-licensing is allowed, just with at least a proper free license (the reason why I said "proper" here can be found at Template:No more GFDL). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- As I said, I am not an expert on copyright licenses, but what you said about incompatible licenses makes sense. But that isn't really relevant here. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:43, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- So we should keep such templates just because of those "dual-licensing" fans? So they can't create templates that look like Template:GFDL or cc-by-nc-sa-2.0, e.g. they can't create Template:GPLv2 or cc-by-nc-sa-2.0...? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:13, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, you're on the right track here. Your arguments are starting to make sense (not being sarcastic here, to be clear). Well, these single non-free licenses are a lot more versatile than those "combined" templates, as for different combinations a completely different template would have to be made. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:19, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- So we should keep such templates just because of those "dual-licensing" fans? So they can't create templates that look like Template:GFDL or cc-by-nc-sa-2.0, e.g. they can't create Template:GPLv2 or cc-by-nc-sa-2.0...? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:13, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- As I said, I am not an expert on copyright licenses, but what you said about incompatible licenses makes sense. But that isn't really relevant here. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:43, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, dual-licensing is allowed, just with at least a proper free license (the reason why I said "proper" here can be found at Template:No more GFDL). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment That said, as any pages that are inserted this template, are fall under COM:CSD#F4, then Why don't we redirect it to Template:Noncommercial. @Kestreltail: the actual problem is that having such templates may lead to confusion by less experienced users, as @Infrogmation: said on another ongoing RFD. --117.136.54.121 21:29, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- @117.136.54.121: Could you link to that RFD? Thanks. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:22, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Multi-licensing should only be allowed to give more freedom to reusers. But multi-licensing with ND does not give any more freedom, but only makes confusions. – Kwj2772 (talk) 18:26, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
superfluous redirect • • hugarheimur 10:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, remains of a move. --Achim (talk) 18:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
weapons aren't allowed now all my files have to be deleted :( Parabellum09 (talk) 10:44, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Other files:
- File:Parabellum09.stl
- File:Parabellum09v2.stl
- File:45acp.stl
- File:5.56 nato.stl
- File:Ejectorexplanation.stl
- File:Ejectgerman.stl
I have moved all the files into one deletion request, converted the others to redirects and have removed the redirects from the list so that the discussion can be does on one page. --D-Kuru (talk) 18:02, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Question /
Comment @Parabellum09: So why aren't weapons allowed? If you just did copy the files from some website without caring about licencing, it has nothing to do with weapons. If you have created these files, you can licence them as you like. --D-Kuru (talk) 18:02, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Keep I don't see any reason to delete them.--Sanandros (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44 talk to me 10:43, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 05:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Very funny and very out of scope. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment Free licensed, and political satire and caricatures seem to be within Commons scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:16, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: well I won't mind if this is kept then. I didn't think non-professional photoshop would be in scope, but maybe I'm wrong. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:04, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: OOoooh can I upload Trump with small hands can I can I? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete minimum effort, to me of no discernable value. Hekerui (talk) 13:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete First, we don't keep art by non-notable artists. Second, purely technical, but real. The only license here is for the underlying photograph. The alteration created a new copyright, but the uploader has not licensed it freely. This is probably an oversight, but could be an intentional "gotcha" -- anyone who uses the image could have to pay for it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- I wonder if that would hold up in court. The filename says "public domain". And yes, the license is PD-USGov, but for a re-user who can't be expected to be a copyright expert: who says "Concord hioz" isn't a USGov employee? I know, that's not how that works, but that's the tag they used! So I suspect a copyright may be difficult to enforce like this. Seems like a rather poorly thought out "gotcha" scheme.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:58, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- The idea is not very original btw.. [2] [3] [4] [5]. Commondreams seems to be the source. The file here follows this very closely.. maybe too close. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 05:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates, focus too much on the Address Downtown Dubai A1Cafel (talk) 05:13, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 05:35, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates, focus too much on the Dubai Mall A1Cafel (talk) 05:13, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 05:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 13:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 05:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 13:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 05:32, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:56, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lutheraner as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Urheber und Rechteinhaber offensichtlich nicht mit Hochlader identisch
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image is on-wiki since 2011. I've asked the original uploader over on :en for clarification (either identity or permission). -- Túrelio (talk) 08:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unfortunalty missed evidence of permission. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:17, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
unused, Wikimedia Commons also doesn't accept NC or ND licenses Calvinkulit • t • c 07:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
It does, when multi-licensed with a free license. Percival Kestreltail (talk) 12:29, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Kestreltail: No. Commons does not accept NC or ND licenses entirely now. Calvinkulit • t • c 23:19, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
WHAT?! Well, I'll be! This is absolutely ridiculous! Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:14, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
In that case, would you care to explain this: "You can offer as many licenses for a file as you want as long as at least one of them meets the criteria for free licenses above" (Commons:Licensing). Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:16, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Kestreltail: NC/ND licenses are marked as "NOT OK" here. Calvinkulit • t • c 07:42, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nom. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure the "NOT OK" means that you can't license an image under only an NC or ND license, but it is ok when you also license it with a free license. The page has been like that for as long as I can remember. Percival Kestreltail (talk) 12:26, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
- Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses Calvinkulit • t • c 00:09, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Calvinkulit: "You can offer as many licenses for a file as you want as long as at least one of them meets the criteria for free licenses above. For example, files may be licensed with both Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (meets the criteria) and Attribution-NonCommercial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kestreltail (talk • contribs) 15:50, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ok,
I withdraw my nomination. Calvinkulit • t • c 03:02, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'm glad we could reach an agreement!
—Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 04:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Unused NC or ND license page, violate COM:LICENSE, ND has no way and no reason to keep on any WMF wikis except Italian Wikipedia. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Just note that unlike the first TFD above, I will never withdraw, and there are no reasons to let me withdraw, there must have a sane consensus. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- I see no reason to keep this template except when multi-licensing a file with a free license and this license. This template and other NC-ND templates created by Percival should clearly state that "This template should not be used alone". And it should detect when a user is using this template without another free license and automatically mark them for speedy deletion. Until that happens, my vote would be to
Delete this template. Masum Reza📞 15:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Just remember that an admin has already decided to keep this page on the grounds that there is "no valid reason for deletion". —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:21, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Kestreltail: Whether the reason is valid or not, it's clearly-than-god that, the foundation:Terms of Use said that:
“ | 7. Licensing of Content To grow the commons of free knowledge and free culture, all users contributing to the Projects are required to grant broad permissions to the general public to re-distribute and re-use their contributions freely, so long as that use is properly attributed and the same freedom to re-use and re-distribute is granted to any derivative works. In keeping with our goal of providing free information to the widest possible audience, we require that when necessary all submitted content be licensed so that it is freely reusable by anyone who cares to access it. |
” |
--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:05, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: I never licensed any of my files in a way that it would not be "freely reusable by anyone who cares to access it", nor I have encouraged others to do so. As such, I cannot see how your above comment is at all relevant. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- So under your claim, the "so long as that use is properly attributed and the same freedom to re-use and re-distribute is granted to any derivative works" isn't a proper policy term. Isn't that? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:50, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- Of course, it is a proper policy term. Don't be a Juror 3 please. I never said that it isn't a proper policy term. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:20, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- So under your claim, the "so long as that use is properly attributed and the same freedom to re-use and re-distribute is granted to any derivative works" isn't a proper policy term. Isn't that? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:50, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: I never licensed any of my files in a way that it would not be "freely reusable by anyone who cares to access it", nor I have encouraged others to do so. As such, I cannot see how your above comment is at all relevant. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete template not in use. I agree with the above point that authors may agree to share their work under alternative additional terms in addition to a Commons accepted free license - but I see no reason that we need to have templates for additional non-free licenses which someone might *hypothetically* use (they could type in or copy & paste additional alternative terms if they insist). Also, having the template may lead to confusion by less experienced users. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:47, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Infrogmation: Thank you for finally bringing some logic to the table! Please elaborate on "confusion by less experienced users". I think specific examples would help your case. Also, even if there is "no reason" to have something on Commons, that doesn't mean that it should be deleted. There isn't really a reason for this template either, if you argue that one could just combine the templates for each of those licenses. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Kestreltail: You are the actual man who is making confusions now, is there any users plan to delete Template:Cc-by-sa-4.0,3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0? clearly no. And what means your "even if there is "no reason" to have something on Commons"? Anyway, please avoid using Emojis here, such Emojis are copyrighted by Unicode. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Are you sure? I was using the Template:Smiley. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 12:16, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete It's very simple, Cc-by-nc-nd is not allowed on Commons in anytime, under any cases. --223.104.7.116 00:40, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- Please get your facts straight before commenting. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: "You can offer as many licenses for a file as you want as long as at least one of them meets the criteria for free licenses above" (Commons:Licensing). —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 22:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Comment
Neutral This user (I mean, the Kestreltail) seems to challange our process for all non-free CC licensing (i.e. with -NC and/or -ND), @Wcam, Ankry, Jameslwoodward, Abzeronow, Well-Informed Optimist, and Rxy: how should we consider this circumstance? If there are guarantees that such licenses won't be able to directly used as the only license, then things like {{Noncommercial}} and {{Nonderivative}} should and will not be applied. I may consider keeping such templates if and only if there are code modifications or bots to automatically mark files that only used -NC and/or -ND licenses for speedy deletions. ---117.136.55.121 23:38, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete While this is a valid secondary license, I see no reason to keep id as it is unused for 10 months. It may mislead users. If somebody wishes to use it in future, they can request undeletion (as another license is still required, lack of this one does not prevent any upload). Ankry (talk) 07:08, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete per Ankry. --Wcam (talk) 12:37, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete The several strong assertions above that this template could never be validly used on Commons are incorrect. As was clearly pointed out above, it would be entirely within our rules to license a file with CC-BY-NC-ND and CC-BY-SA -- that is, commercial and derivative uses would have to be SA, but NC and ND users could omit the SA. Thus, this template could be validly used. However, this template has AU on the end, and is unused, so it appears that there are no Australian users who want to use this. I can't see any reason to keep it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete per Jim. Abzeronow (talk) 16:28, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Redirected to {{Cc-non-compliant}}. We should not keep individual licensing templates for licenses which are not by themself supported. They should use the already established template/wrapper. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:22, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of the file with the same name Vitold Muratov (talk) 11:47, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 18:03, 22 Februar 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vitold Muratov --Krdbot 19:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of the file with the same name Vitold Muratov (talk) 11:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 18:02, 22 Februar 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vitold Muratov --Krdbot 19:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of the file with the same name Vitold Muratov (talk) 11:54, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Non-admin closure. Deleted by Sealle on February 22, 2020 as part of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vitold Muratov
Useless gallery, see Category:Waldensian Church (Florence) DnaX (talk) 12:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:22, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
An SVG version exists. A. Gharbeia أحمد غربية (talk) 20:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:23, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marocainwiker (talk · contribs)
[edit]copie de https://www.leconomiste.com/article/998880-centrale-danone-en-quelques-recettes
Habertix (talk) 00:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marocainwiker (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical images, not own works and bogus CC license. Unclear copyright status
Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:45, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Comment File:Centrale Laitière à Centrale Danone.jpg can be sourced here, c. 1936, could be PD in France. - Fma12 (talk) 19:23, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, it is not clear whether these images have been published and are now in PD. --Ellywa (talk) 22:14, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marocainwiker (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos of questionables notability: out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:47, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
The video in youtube had been blocked and the photo is come from [6] which means is copyvio. AT (talk) 10:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:02, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Similar to https://utopix.imgix.net/sites/default/files/public/uploads/fields/pictures/field-pp-pictures-18/p980/utopix.io-ef9df8564395d5f4ca1799377a545e2ae639054ap980.jpg?fit=max&h=800&mark=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.utopix.io%2Fsites%2Fall%2Fthemes%2Fcustom%2Fpix%2Fassets%2Fimages%2Flogos%2Flogo-watermark.png&markpad=20&markscale=20&q=100&trim=auto&s=acf73558c932e388028bf3a7c15314af Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:03, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Bild stammt von https://www.fairpack-umzug.de/ wird aber vom Uploader als eigenes Werk deklariert. Mogelzahn (talk) 15:10, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Presenta información desactualizada sobre la entidad de la que se está hablando. This page displays outdated information about the company in mention. 201.131.78.7 19:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --ƏXPLICIT 01:08, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Theatrical Performance in the Open Air by Matthijs Naiveu Rijksmuseum Amsterdam SK-A-1323.jpg. Same source, but lacking full color information. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 21:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:09, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Planche 48. — Projet d’installation d’un service central des postes, télégraphes et téléphones à Lyon à l’emplacement de l’ancien Hôtel-Dieu.jpg
[edit]there is a file scanned by the owner of better quality, see File:P.T.T. view of Wilson Bridge (pl48) .jpg Gnrc (talk) 10:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Alternative file does not exist on Commons. --Green Giant (talk) 17:59, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
there is a file scanned by the owner of better quality, see File:Projet d'installation d'un service central des P.T.T. à Lyon à l’empalement de l'ancien hôpital de l’hôtel-Dieu (pl49).jpg Gnrc (talk) 10:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Ce fichier de moindre qualité est en double avec File:Planche 49. — Bureau des téléphones Vaudrey.jpg qui est scanné en plus haute résolution Gnrc (talk) 15:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Unless they are exact duplicates, we can keep both. --Green Giant (talk) 18:00, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of the file with the same name Vitold Muratov (talk) 11:54, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request within seven days of upload. --Green Giant (talk) 18:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of the file with the same name Vitold Muratov (talk) 11:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request within seven days of upload. --Green Giant (talk) 18:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of the file with the same name Vitold Muratov (talk) 11:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Green Giant (talk) 18:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment The "Mr. Peanut" character image dates from 1906; wouldn't this make the work this is derivative PD-US? I've added {{Trademark}} to the image page. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:13, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- I speculate the can is probably what's causing the problem. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 15:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The can is definitely the problem as the design is new. COM:PACKAGING. --Majora (talk) 21:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Per impedirne il download non autorizzato Matteo sartorio (talk) 14:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 21:24, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
J'aimerais l'importer bien, avec les métadonnées. Schweiz41 (talk) 18:26, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
J'aimerais importer une nouvelle photo, meilleure. Schweiz41 (talk) 18:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Lack of metadata is not a reason to delete something and although you mentioned you'd like to upload one with that data you have failed to do so. This is also in use. So keep. --Majora (talk) 21:46, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Aztec
[edit]First question -- are these in Scope? We generally do not allow encyclopedic material on Commons. On the other hand, the annotations appear to be useful.
Second question -- only the second gives a source for the underlying photograph. The images are very similar, but the usernames are all different. Are we to believe that these similar images were all made by the uploaders, as claimed.
Third question -- An IP check tells me that the various uploaders are all closely related. I would like an explanation. That could come confidentially by e-mail from User:Jameslwoodward or be made here. Without an explanation, I will block all but the oldest as abuse of multiple accounts.
- File:Annotation of a Brazier with Image of a Dead Warrior.jpg
- File:Aztec Standard Bearer Iconography.pdf
- File:Diagram of a Coatlicue annotation.jpg
- File:Coronation Stone of Motecuhzoma II, Unknown Aztec artist, c. 1503 - 1504.jpg
- File:Huehueteotl Sculpture.jpg
- File:Liam Otero - Spider Monkey Sculpture.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
The following is copied from User talk:Jameslwoodward:
- Hello Jim,
- I am writing to ask that you do not nominate File:Liam Otero - Spider Monkey Sculpture.jpg image for deletion, as it is pertinent for a class that I am taking, and would affect my grade.
- Thank you.
- Best,
- Lotero3" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lotero3 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
This answers my third question -- the various contributors are related -- as students in the same class and are not sock puppets. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Keep Why ever would they not be in scope? Aren't they actually good examples of what we're supposed to be here for? Andy Dingley (talk) 16:27, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Andy, as I tried to say above, I'm looking for reactions. My question arises from the fact that Commons is fairly aggressive about not allowing encyclopedic content, particularly when it is unsourced as it is here. On the other hand, as you say, they look very useful. You didn't comment on the second question -- what about the unsourced images? . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- They're recently created and the creators are presumably still active and one has already been in touch. Yes, we need to track the constituent source images so that we can both check they're suitably available and also to record any attribution needed. But the solution to that is to get in touch by email, not to start out by deleting them. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:25, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Each of them has received a notice on their user talk page. We have a seven week backlog of DRs -- there is no way in the world the dozen Commons Admins that do most of the work have time to send individual emails. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- They're recently created and the creators are presumably still active and one has already been in touch. Yes, we need to track the constituent source images so that we can both check they're suitably available and also to record any attribution needed. But the solution to that is to get in touch by email, not to start out by deleting them. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:25, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Andy, as I tried to say above, I'm looking for reactions. My question arises from the fact that Commons is fairly aggressive about not allowing encyclopedic content, particularly when it is unsourced as it is here. On the other hand, as you say, they look very useful. You didn't comment on the second question -- what about the unsourced images? . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Keep Thank you for the warning. The image File:Huehueteotl Sculpture.jpg caption should include the location of the sculpture, Museo Templo Mayor, Tenochtitlán, Mexico City, as documented on page 379 of the Whitman Encyclopedia of Mexican Money Volume 2 ISBN 0794839541. I will download the image and attribution promptly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MiguelDelRio7735 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This DR cannot be kept open indefinitely. It has been a month since attributions were to be corrected. That has not been done. If and when such information is available, you can use the COM:UDR process to request restoration. --Green Giant (talk) 23:35, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Eatcha as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F10, Personal photos by non-contributors. The user has legitimate edits in en.wiki, so the photo is in scope. But is it really own work as claimed? Maybe real photographer's copyright violation? Taivo (talk) 16:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:37, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
inexactitude de ce visuel. L'actualité de Korloff a changé. QuentinDupont (talk) 20:36, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Green Giant (talk) 23:43, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Stepan Fiodorovitch Kolesnikov (d. 1955), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:Copyright rules by territory/Serbia. --Green Giant (talk) 23:51, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Piotr Kontchalovski (d. 1956), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:15, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:53, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
imho copvio Martin Sg. (talk) 15:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
copyvio, photgrapher?? Martin Sg. (talk) 15:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Why USA law is applied to postcard from France? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Keep as {{PD-France}} since there appears to be no author disclosure and publication was more than 70 years ago. Buidhe (talk) 02:04, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Keep as {{PD-France}} Obviously around the 1910s. No photograph nor editor. Rc1959 (talk) 09:01, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Keep. I agree that it looks like a 1910s postcard. Abzeronow (talk) 16:41, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 15:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- and File:Entierro Gral Orozco Chih Dolores 1 dic 1925.png, a higher-quality version of above
Assuming the 1925-12-1 date in the photo is correct, this is still covered by copyright in the US for another month and a half. Also see File:Entierro Gral Orozco Chih Dolores 1 dic 1925.png, which appears to be the same image. Alex Cohn (talk) 18:37, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Krd 15:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Logo above COM:TOO, imo --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:47, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Is this freely licensed? Haven't checked, but know OpenIndiana is open sources at least. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for your message. I am the author of this logo. It was created on GIMP from scratch and was contributed to the OpenIndiana project without any restriction. --Jollyd (talk) 10:50, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment Hi @Jollyd: , as OpenIndiana doesnt have any info on the logos, i think to avoid potential DR in future, provide COM:OTRS (provided you have the correspondences to the Openindiana maintainer) to avoid any issues Encik Tekateki (talk) 12:10, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Very unlikely to be VOA's work. This is a screenshot of a video received by VOA and other sources, and it is unlikely for VOA to send one of its reporters to take a video from Iran fuel protests. Ahmadtalk 11:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Such allegations should be supported by links to specific evidence. As far as I know, VOA works with local journalists in the field. They often pay for this work, ultimately from the US budget. And they transfer their works under this license. Those that I know for sure (in Russian): 1, 2, 3, 4 etc. --sasha (krassotkin) 12:45, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- I couldn't find this exact video in Persian VOA's video section, but all other videos from protests are titled as "ویدیو ارسالی شما", means "Videos sent by you" in English. People sending these videos don't normally sign anything and are not paid by the US government, so they don't necessarily agree to publish their video under the public domain license. Ahmadtalk 14:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- We can blame someone when we have evidence. We must not do this without them. --sasha (krassotkin) 18:19, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- I don't actually "blame" anyone here, I have just nominated a file for deletion. Besides, we have COM:PRP, and we need evidence that this video is taken by VOA employees. To confirm this, the least thing we need is a link to the video's page in VOA, not another website. Ahmadtalk 19:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- We must not prove it. Now the Copyright Statement of VOA does not contain an indication of employees or the federal government of US. I have been working with them for many years and lately have not noticed their attribution errors. Above, you also say that they correctly attribute video on Persian side. So what's the problem? We are discussing a specific image here that is marked by VOA. You claim that they deceived us or made a mistake. This requires serious evidence. --sasha (krassotkin) 12:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- I don't actually "blame" anyone here, I have just nominated a file for deletion. Besides, we have COM:PRP, and we need evidence that this video is taken by VOA employees. To confirm this, the least thing we need is a link to the video's page in VOA, not another website. Ahmadtalk 19:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- I couldn't find this exact video in Persian VOA's video section, but all other videos from protests are titled as "ویدیو ارسالی شما", means "Videos sent by you" in English. People sending these videos don't normally sign anything and are not paid by the US government, so they don't necessarily agree to publish their video under the public domain license. Ahmadtalk 14:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: reasonable nomination, but kept per sasha. --Krd 18:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
not indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:34, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Опубликовано в СССР до 1941 года Bogdanov-62 (talk) 19:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- In what? What newspaper or magazine? What issue? You can't just assume it was published, exact source must be provided - source type, source name, and issue date. (ex, Newspaper "Red Star", 19 September 1945 or Magazine "Ogonyok" issue #10 of 1941)--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:43, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- На фотографии отсутствуют все полученные им во время Великой Отечественной войны Награды, фото датируется ранее июня 1941 года--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 06:04, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Здесь датирована 1938 годом Bogdanov-62 (talk) 08:00, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:52, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Why USA law is applied to book published in Yugoslavia? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- I used the PD-EdictGov because it covers government released material both domestic and foreign: "This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign." Isn't that appropriate? This book is released by the State secretariat of Education, Science and Culture of Republic of Macedonia in 1965. GStojanov (talk) 20:52, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Books seems to be collection of historical documents and not necessarily legal ones. It also contain photos. See also Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:06, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- The book is explicitly released for public use by the publisher. It contains legal, statistical, economic and other historic documents. GStojanov (talk) 19:48, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- I think you are asking me to add a tag that this work is in public domain. I just added PD-North Macedonia-exempt. Can we now remove the delete tag? GStojanov (talk) 16:51, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- I think I responded to your request. Can you, please, remove the delete flag from this file? GStojanov (talk) 17:41, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- @GStojanov: Can you provide evidence for "The book is explicitly released for public use by the publisher"? --Krd 18:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, on page two of the document it is clearly stated that (my translation from Macedonian to English): "With a decision of the State secretariat for education, science and culture No. 09-534/1 from 3.7.1965 this book is released for public use." GStojanov (talk) 18:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- I think "released for public use" is a different thing than "release to public domain", as use is different from republish and commercial use. Please elaborate. --Krd 08:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- I concur with Krd. I know it might seem strange, but something put out there for the public to use does not imply that it can be used for commercial and/or derivative purposes. For Commons, we need evidence that a file such as this is in fact in the public domain or available under a license compatible with Commons. See Commons:Licensing. "Public use" isn't a license. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, on page two of the document it is clearly stated that (my translation from Macedonian to English): "With a decision of the State secretariat for education, science and culture No. 09-534/1 from 3.7.1965 this book is released for public use." GStojanov (talk) 18:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- @GStojanov: Can you provide evidence for "The book is explicitly released for public use by the publisher"? --Krd 18:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- I think I responded to your request. Can you, please, remove the delete flag from this file? GStojanov (talk) 17:41, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- I think you are asking me to add a tag that this work is in public domain. I just added PD-North Macedonia-exempt. Can we now remove the delete tag? GStojanov (talk) 16:51, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- The book is explicitly released for public use by the publisher. It contains legal, statistical, economic and other historic documents. GStojanov (talk) 19:48, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- Books seems to be collection of historical documents and not necessarily legal ones. It also contain photos. See also Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:06, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:06, 19 April 2020 (UTC)