Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/10/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 4th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

yes Lacurile de la Ciurila (talk) 04:40, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Hong Kong#Freedom of panorama in Hong Kong for posters or maps in public places. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:36, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Redirect to File:2019-09-08 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protest 25.jpg--A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GloSit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be from a restricted location, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:38, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 22:58, 7 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation --Krdbot 01:06, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 22:43, 7 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 01:06, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Adamwyszynsky (talk) 10:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: File is in use on en:Lysergamides. Under COM:INUSE, files in use on other projects are considered to be of educational use, even if they are "Other". --bjh21 (talk) 13:00, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Not a valid reason for deletion, in addition to reasons listed by bjh21. Flickerd (talk) 05:25, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 13:24, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error saving file Beesfund (talk) 00:11, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Now fixed. ~riley (talk) 02:26, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:26, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be of any use MPF (talk) 00:24, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:26, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abel Cofrades 2019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size images, with metadata indicating transmission numbers, or no useful metadata at all. Files appear to have been culled from Facebook and other internet sources.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:12, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:26, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a professional head shot not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be artwork and not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:19, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently historical image, unlikely to date from 2019 or be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tahsin Ahnav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely claims of own work, one of the tank pictures is a painting, the other one is from Bangladeshi army page.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:22, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claims of own work on artwork and posters.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this apparently professional portrait of performer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opionons are asked : potentially personality and copyright issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 00:23, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Padma Shri Giriraj Kishore.jpg, thx, Roland zh (talk) 00:25, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. P 1 9 9   18:13, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I realize this was kept for in use, but if you look at the image carefully you can see it is a rephotograph because you can see the photographer reflected in the glass. This would make it not own work, and COM:COPYVIO even if it is in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:31, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The reflections are in the glass behind the subjects. I can't see any reflections in front of the subjects. --bjh21 (talk) 12:41, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
At Facebook size (720x and 72dpi) it's really hard to tell. How about a better copy of the original? As owner & creator, the uploader should have no difficulty doing that. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Agree with Ellin. ~riley (talk) 02:28, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You can see reflection from the glass which covers the original image rephotographed here. Notice the print quality is clearer in the dark parts. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:32, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:29, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file size, low quality. Unlikely own work (see user log) and more likely rephotographed or copied from another source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:29, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rawal Bishal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work, sizes, quality, letterboxing, and the one large picture looks professional.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is a note on the talk page. Please leave all comments here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:21, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:29, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Advertisment But I don't see what is being advertised here, rocks? water? there is a watermark but that only confirms own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:35, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 02:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rynkaterynka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work, small file sizes, transmission data, no useful meta except for one image, and then the second image of that group doesn't have it.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Me di cuenta que es malo para mi privacidad Yungelita (talk) 05:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Me di cuenta que es malo para mi privacidad Yungelita (talk) 05:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Me di cuenta que es malo para mi privacidad Yungelita (talk) 05:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep (again it was nominated before but kept). Not sure what above means, but it is part of a human body. --Hannolans (talk) 06:35, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The exif indicates that this image is from Facebook and may not be the uploader's own work Catherine Laurence (discussion) 05:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No description, no encyclopedic value. Till (talk) 05:59, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:00, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus source, file seems to be a screenshot of a video. + source claims photo sources are from the internet (Nguồn ảnh: Internet). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:09, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:33, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a webhost + promotional QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 06:12, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:33, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a webhost + promotional QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 06:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:33, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope + promotional QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 06:16, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:34, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope + promotional QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 06:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:34, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a webhost + promotional QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 06:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:QueerEcofeminist Im so sorry, i didnt realise i couldnt post external links. if i could please have access back i will remove the links. Thanks, Andy Perkins Andy Perkins (talk) 23:11, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No grounds for deletion. ~riley (talk) 02:35, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong name : catgory instead of category Tangopaso (talk) 07:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:35, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless test file, c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:03, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:35, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work'

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Everything by user is copyvio.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:49, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 08:57, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-used personal image Denniss (talk) 09:00, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 09:09, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 09:12, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 09:13, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 09:16, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 09:59, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. ~riley (talk) 02:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. ~riley (talk) 02:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:03, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. ~riley (talk) 02:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:03, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. ~riley (talk) 02:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notification and opportunity to comment. Yes, since the original article that this picture was attached to, was not accepted in December 2018, and flagged as spam in June before being deleted, this picture serves no purpose. It should be deleted as well.

Please refer to my talk page for related apology, statement of WP:COI understanding and acceptance, and second request for unblocking. Thank you once again. Dtwinlauser (talk) 01:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused. ~riley (talk) 02:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Adamwyszynsky (talk) 10:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 02:39, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DUSKtopia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:09, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:39, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:21, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. File additionally in use. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:22, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. File additionally in use. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. File additionally in use. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:25, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. File additionally in use. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:27, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. File additionally in use. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:29, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. File additionally in use. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:31, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. File additionally in use. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. File additionally in use. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:36, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. File additionally in use. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. File additionally in use. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. File additionally in use. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. File additionally in use. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:46, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:48, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. File additionally in use. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:50, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. File additionally in use. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion is requested because Wikimedia Commons no longer has the rights and authorization to display images made by Manuel Canales Q. CanalesQuintanilla (talk) 10:51, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - copyright owner cannot revoke freedoms per Creative Commons. File additionally in use. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:24, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:39, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FarrPoint is a British company, diamonds in the logo is above TOO due to the different tones used in it. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:31, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs a source or author information to confirm PD status Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gbawden: plz watch the video till the end. it's white house production.--Roy17 (talk) 20:55, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn per Roy17 Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. ~riley (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rhieya17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:49, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:41, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image of poor resolution and unclear purpose Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:16, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:41, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gbp190 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Martashes (talk · contribs) claims copyright for files from www.martirosyanphoto.com too.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:42, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by La bible du cheval (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Quality images with no exif, PCP

Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:42, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2014 Adrianne Bottrell; needs OTRS to prove authorship Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:42, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantasy diagram, does not correspond to an existing country or year Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:03, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:42, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused simple logo of non-notable singer, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:42, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cirillo747 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, maps, postcard. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:50, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cirillo747 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:51, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perghhh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Stills from unfree video.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:16, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perghhh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unable to confirm whether Yu Dae-gil (유대길) is part of the team or gave the permission to AJUTV. + watermarked Star Log, while account name is AJUTV. Archived source. See also, Commons:Deletion requests/File:김소현 (Kim Sohyun), 인스타그램 커뮤니티 기자간담회 스타로그 01.png

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:50, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perghhh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derived from a k drama (en:The Tale of Nokdu), thus youtube license is invalid.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:50, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perghhh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perghhh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly fair use.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:48, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HannaGillPiatek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:50, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:53, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:50, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:49, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image with no editorial value Badzil (talk) 16:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:50, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie, dubious own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Created on personal device, physically taken with the help of camera tripod. ShamrockUA (talk) 16:32, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. Unlikely. ~riley (talk) 02:49, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, screenshot or photo of photo. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of fair use file on en and possibly files deleted after commons discussion. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:01, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reduced resolution copy of File:Cárdenas Parque Independencia 2.jpg Keith Edkins (talk) 17:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No publication information makes it impossible to determine copyright Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No publication information makes it impossible to determine copyright Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not public domain, is not created soley by NASA. Image credit: NASA/SWRI/MSSS/Gerald Eichstadt/Sean Doran Image license CC NC SA (https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA21645)108.179.40.35 17:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW - *entirely* ok with me to remove the image (esp if not PD) of course - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 17:44, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Unfortunately some of the JunoCam derivative images have had unfree copyrights placed against them. Thankfully, many others are freely licensed or no derivative copyright was claimed. Huntster (t @ c) 18:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS; COM:NOTUSED. Pbrks (talk) 18:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Techaflagua does not exist as far as I can find out. Only one hit except Commons with Google with the sentence "Thinking back to the time Kaitlin and I Deadass made up a country called Techaflagua to trick online people... ". So not meaningful. It is the only contribution of the user. Wouter (talk) 18:16, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Even if the hoax/lies in the description are removed, we would be left with a rather low quality image of a mundane subject at an unknown location; therefore, there is no plausible use for the image. PCock (talk) 20:13, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is to old and not relevant any more. 79.179.237.219 18:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I am represent Nora and this image is not up to date. She will very happy if you can remove this photo. Thank you Galmesika (talk) 18:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Being old and out of date isn't a sufficient justification for deletion. There is no reason that Commons shouldn't host images of an individual at different times in their life. If the nominator would like to upload a properly licensed photo that is more up to date, that would give Wikipedia editors options to choose from. PCock (talk) 20:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 02:47, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publiée sans autorisation de Nora Arnezeder Maylisp33 (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 04:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

le sujet ne désire pas que cette photo apparaisse sur sa page Can10v (talk) 13:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"I don't like it" is no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 13:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept. This is not a reason to deleted the file. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For VRTS traceability purpose

[edit]

Ticket#2022060810003439. No action. JohnNewton8 (talk) 10:12, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by Boltzens

[edit]

These photos of the same individual were taken from 1925 through 2014. All are claimed to be "own work" by Boltzens (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log). It cannot be true that all these photos were taken by one person. --PCock (talk) 18:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:47, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Looks like personal artwork. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 19:21, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:47, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jannie95 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably fair use images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 19:29, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Probably. ~riley (talk) 02:47, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Edelseider (talk) 19:32, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. La cathédrale est l'oeuvre de l'architecte Mario Botta. --Poudou99 (talk) 22:10, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:46, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to be fairly out of scope JuTa 19:42, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:46, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Large amount of potentially copyrightable text. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:06, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:46, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Large amount of potentially copyrightable text. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:12, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:46, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error ortográfico. Categoría correcta: Category:Road vehicles in the Land of Valencia. JT Curses (talk) 21:10, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:46, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Large amount of copyrightable text. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:46, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the UK. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:46, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sammm2000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unhelpful files and may be non-free

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 21:42, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:46, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement Signimu (talk) 22:41, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source and author, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 22:42, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copie de https://lejournaldeleco.fr/le-ceser-renouvelle-son-assemblee/ Habertix (talk) 22:53, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation - original picture http://phototrans.pl/14,345146,0,Mercedes_Benz_O405N2_618.html Wanted (talk) 23:01, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicates File:Francois Hollande 2015 (cropped).jpeg. Cheep (talk) 23:56, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is memorial marker of Luis Dato, not a fire truck and not a description of the baao fire station. Stephentalla (talk) 13:11, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Still a valid file. ~riley (talk) 02:57, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see discussion page : deletion is requested by the creator Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:56, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 13:31, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:56, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution among copyright violations. I suspect again copyvio. Taivo (talk) 13:36, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:57, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission here + UK logo that is possibly above TOO. Permission needed via OTRS. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:57, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filename means in Croatian language "Test image". Maybe we should delete it, because the test worked correctly. Taivo (talk) 13:40, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:57, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

can be replaced by superior image File:Yttervinkel2.svg? Jochen Burghardt (talk) 13:40, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:57, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:46, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:57, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 先従隗始 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images of aircrafts taken with various cameras models from different brands (Canon, Nikon, SLT, Coolpix, etc.) Some photos were taken from Flickr (but with unfree license, e.g. File:North American P-51D-30-NA Mustang ‘JR - B’ “Lady B” (N151FT) (23480741569).jpg from [1] /File:Goodyear FG-1D Corsair ‘523’ (N700G) (27629805437).jpg from [2] or from Reddit (e.g. File:Brewster F3A-1 ‘L69’ (N4634) (38542517896).jpg), even the eventual watermarks were cropped. Possibly only the files taken with an ANE-LX2J Huawei (not included in this DR) really are from 先従隗始, but all the rest seems taken from somewhere on the Net without permission.

Ruthven (msg) 13:47, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but all the images pointed out were taken from the folder of what my father took. (I'm sorry, this comment is made by translation) - 先従隗始 22:57, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@先従隗始: What we have to understand here is if your father was the photographer, or he just took the images from Internet. Can you explain? --Ruthven (msg) 14:32, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My father died two years ago so I can't hear what it really is. - 先従隗始 09:37, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@先従隗始: I am sorry to read that. Very probably, there were photos taken from elsewhere on the Net, or scanned from magazines. We don't have the rights to publish them here. --Ruthven (msg) 11:13, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Dubious copyright ownership - unable to verify. ~riley (talk) 02:56, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dzsano (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Response: I've just uploaded in high resolution to show, that I've got the original pictures Dzsano


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:54, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently photographed from a book, while license says "own work"; purpose is unclear, anyway Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have already emailed the management team of the artist, Keian Knight and via email they have granted me permission to use the media press release to validate and verify facts about the artist and the release of his album tracks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabrsmith (talk • contribs)

Deleted: as above. OTRS required. ~riley (talk) 02:53, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kajo2019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo, newspapers. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kajo2019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kajo2019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vesel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical postcards and photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:51, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vesel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:51, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too bad quality to be useful ; unclear origin Skimel (talk) 08:48, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution, not yet nominated for deletion. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:52, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree Should be nuked if we don't receive a good reply. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:41, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published here allready in 2017, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 22:46, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Chart without meaningful explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 08:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died 1974, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 08:47, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:02, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died 1974, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 08:48, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:04, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Usage rights Caelum1 (talk) 08:57, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:06, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a memorial marker of Luis Dato. Stephentalla (talk) 14:55, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, it is still valid file. Taivo (talk) 07:33, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Company logo without font for Self Work by Loader O revolucionário aliado (talk) 02:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:40, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata suggests it came from Facebook Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:43, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jenner Feijoo (talk) Lo descargué de la página de facebook del proyecto, pero la fotografía es de mi autoría. Sino la siguiente imagen muestra el mismo espacio pero durante una actividad:

Charla en Comunidad "El Progreso"
— Preceding unsigned comment added by DIGITALMULTIMETER (talk • contribs) 10:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - please upload original photos in full resolution, or send a permission to com:OTRS. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:50, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded the file assuming the Flickr-OP was the creator of the illustration, but I might be wrong. Eissink (talk) 08:40, 4 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:51, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for graphic works in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 06:29, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:51, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Taras Shevchenko Memorial - inscription.jpg is a superior image of the same subject, with a higher resolution. I uploaded this image as part of a batch upload from Flickr a few moments ago, but I consider it redundant to the existing image. Ham II (talk) 07:13, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from commercial website http://www.appcontrol.be/ - unclear if this logo is free from copyrights. Erik Wannee 07:46, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, As technical director of Appcontrol vzw, i can assure that the logo is free of copywrights. I would like to give permission to have this logo posted on Wikipedia.

Kind regards

Vincent Verhasselt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dendermondenaar (talk • contribs) 09:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:53, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an Indian work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:58, 4 October 2019 (UTC) This picture was taken by a non-Indian photographer in India that too in 1946. I have also provided the necessary source for your convenience. [3]--Vrishchik (talk) 15:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vrishchik: Your source is not the original 1946 source. Besides the question is not where it has been shot but where first published and it's the U.S.A. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:51, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:55, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not Indian work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:59, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:13, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an Indian work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:01, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:13, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found as early as 2006 at http://swi9.vip-blog.com/vip/article/1885368,the-moon-the-stars-theflowrs-allthot--s--dated----there--is-abubbing-flower.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I have already mentioned in the summary that this image was originally taken in 2001. I have mentioned 28 May 2016 as the image was uploaded on the given source at that time. I was unaware of the fact that it was also used previously. However I am quite sure regarding the license used in the summary.--Vrishchik (talk) 15:21, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Vrishchik: Where's the permission? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:55, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Included also this. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:57, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - quite unclear. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:20, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Russia. Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:18, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:21, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image prise d'internet (cf. avis 92 bien) et non travail personnel comme indiqué Olivier Tanguy (talk) 09:24, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unable to confirm whether Yu Dae-gil (유대길) is part of the team or gave the permission to AJUTV. + watermarked Star Log, while account name is AJUTV. Archived source (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unclear. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:24, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the sequence of math symbols appears nonsensical: real numbers are connected by logical junctors (line 1), c, s, n, \theta don't appear anywhere in the image, nor in the description Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: seems out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source and no OTRS-Ticket Alinea (talk) 13:03, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This pictures was taken at the Ariane Lachenal / Garbade Wedding in Geneva on the 28th of september 1946 and i have the copyright as familymember. You can see it on garbade website at the photography section.garbade website--Mirazeichner (talk) 17:05, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - "as familymember" is too vague to determine the copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:29, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:51, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:32, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laddo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Laddo (talk) 22:35, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - kept the two that have been cropped from files with permissions. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was painted by en:Henry Ward (artist) in 2016. I see no evidence that it has been released into the public domain. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:35, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture of Yevgeny Vuchetich who died in 1974. Unfortunately, no FoP in Russia and also copyrighted in the U.S. Excluded some pics which are de minimis, stamps, coins etc.

A.Savin 15:57, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, no se si es aqui donde se vota para la permanencia de la imagen, pero considero que puede quedarse porque solo es un recorte de una imagen que ya esta en Commons y la recorté para hacer enfasis en la estatua solamente. Me he leido lo que dicen sobre la Libertad de Panorama y ciertamente la veo muy ambigua en algunos conceptos, pero si estamos luchando por un internet mas libre (sin SOPA ni nada de esas leyes) deberían ser mas tolerantes con una fotografía que ha sido tomada en publico como las de esta estatua. Acabo de ver la plantilla "FOP", que honestamente no se para que funsione o si puede ayudar a que los archivos se mantengan.--AnelGTR (talk) 02:31, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This would mean that either RIAN has become a CC-BY-SA release from Vuchetich's heirs, or RIAN has bought the whole copyright on the monument. Both cases seem rather unlikely to me, apart from that, there are not only RIAN photographs in this category. A.Savin 16:55, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, but the opposite cannot be verified as well. We should ask RIAN directly if there was a special permission provided by the heirs or somebody else who was/is authorized to to so. --High Contrast (talk) 19:10, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I am deleting all of the images with the exception of the RIA Novosti images, as it is possible that RIAN has obtained the necessary permissions. The issues related to those 2 RIAN photos need to be taken up with those collaborating with RIAN, and they will need to report back to us as to the outcome. The other photos are plainly covered by COM:FOP#Russia and have to be deleted. russavia (talk) 01:38, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Russia: sculpture of Yevgeny Vuchetich who died in 1974.

Eleassar (t/p) 09:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per File:The Motherland Calls - Mamayev Kurgan in Volgograd, Russia - July 2012.jpg and File:Концерт «На Главной Высоте России»-1.jpg, De minimis in my opinion. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 09:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Per RIA Novosti images I agree with Russavia as the previous deletion request. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 09:59, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"The monument is in the center and the point of line convergence" same for this copyrighted work that is hosted on Commons: File:Louvre at night centered.jpg (also File:Vue de la pyramide, Louvre.jpg)! Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 10:16, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's not the same at all, because in the latter case, the intent was to reproduce the courtyard, whereas the pyramid is of secondary importance. Here, the intent is to reproduce the promenade and the statue that it leads towards. Not withstanding this, what can a case from France tell us about the Russian copyright law in any case? --Eleassar (t/p) 10:26, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
About law: no FoP in France and no FoP in Russia, so it's the same. About de minimis IMHO it's. The statue is really huge, the figure itself measures 52 metres (170 feet) and the sword 33 metres (108 feet), 87 metres (279 feet) from the tip of its sword to the top of the plinth (from en.Wiki). So compared to its real size the image of the statue in the photo is small. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 14:00, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment about File:The Motherland Calls - Dmitry Medvedev.jpg: that's an image in silhouette of the statue. I can see a very similar image in File:Height comparison of notable statues (vector).svg that, as statement by the author, is a derivative work of File:Flag of Volgograd Oblast.svg and Commons also hosted File:Coat of Arms of Volgograd oblast.svg. The question is: Volgograd Oblast and or the Russian Federation, have the right to reproduce the monument (and or the silhouette), and also they have the right to transfer the copyright on its reproductions to third parties? Another question: is a silhouette of a copyright work, covered by copyright? Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 14:50, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See e.g. [4] --Eleassar (t/p) 23:46, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment What about File:Mamayev Kurgan.jpg? Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 20:38, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The monument is an important part of the composition of the photograph. --Eleassar (t/p) 23:46, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, you are right, but also in File:Dmitry Medvedev in Volgograd Oblast, March 2010-2.JPG the monument is an important part of the composition of the photograph. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 01:02, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's why both have been proposed for deletion. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:53, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure? File:Mamayev Kurgan.jpg has not been proposed for deletion! Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 09:18, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you're correct. I've added it to the list now. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:44, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no FOP in Russia -FASTILY 23:06, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for sculpture in Russia, see also: Category:Russian FOP cases/The Motherland Calls.

A.Savin 15:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to deletion for the file I uploaded File:Journey of Discovery - Welcome to Volgograd (6877277406).jpg. Nick (talk) 19:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. INeverCry 00:29, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for artwork including sculptures. Copyright expires in 2045.

Off-shell (talk) 07:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:24, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for sculptures in Russia. Author died in 1974.

Kulmalukko (talk) 14:04, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support in general. Perhaps some pictures might be kept as de minimis:
--Off-shell (talk) 21:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reason as previously: No FOP for sculptures in Russia. Author (E.Vuchetich) died in 1974.

A.Savin 22:36, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: my turn. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another batch of derivatives (please note that OTRS permissions, if any, are from photographers, not from sculptors).

VLu (talk) 06:38, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:The Motherland Calls (2019).jpg. This is a photograph of an object under restoration(author=duma.gov.ru). --Semenov.m7 (talk) 09:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- note that the fact that the work is surrounded by scaffolding does not somehow make it not copyrighted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP Russia — the last-living sculptor died in 1974 (see the enwiki article), and still within the posthumous copyrigh term. Russian FOP is limited to architecture and garden designs only. Unless another copyright law change/reform will occur soon.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See previous nominations. A copyrighted public work that was unveiled in 1967. Its authors: Yevgeny Vuchetich (1908–1974) and Nikolay Nikitin (1907–1973). Russian freedom of panorama for works of art (sculptures, monuments, murals etc.) is noncommercial, thus unacceptable. COM:VRT authorization from the heirs of the sculptors is required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:59, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:09, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violating FoP rules of Russia (Category:Russian FOP cases/The Motherland Calls); de minimis not applicable

— Draceane talkcontrib. 11:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Missvain. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:04, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

according to wp.de and wikidata the artist died in 1953 Mutter Erde (talk) 08:43, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are sources for both 1953 and 1940. 1940:
And the IP that added 1953 wasn't entirely sure either. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There is no cite for the 1953 date -- all of the cites below say 1940. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:06, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

questionable own work claim, looks like color-altered version of Pro-photos available via Zimbio/Getty Denniss (talk) 09:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have a release from the photographer to use this work on HIC's Wikipage. I can't seem to find a way to submit that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A70eezchild (talk • contribs) 16:21, 5 October 2019 (UTC)A70eezchild (talk) 02:57, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have obtained a Copyright Release From from the original photographer. I would like to delete the current image and reupload the updated version he sent me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A70eezchild (talk • contribs) 23:54, 5 October 2019 (UTC)A70eezchild (talk) 02:55, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination In order to keep an image on Commons, the actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS. You may not forward an e-mail from the photographer -- it must come from him or her. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:08, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per File:Pedro Rodríguez Exposició del Ninot 2013.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:10, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The author is the owner of the website sourced, so he is the author. I'll teach him to send an OTRS e-mail.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 15:35, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@TaronjaSatsuma: It will be nice if uploader replies here instead of contacting a third party and if he/she adds {{subst:OP}} on the file description because Administrators or OTRS agents may not be aware of his/her move. Nevertheless file can't be kept if uploader hasn't sent an OTRS permission yet. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:52, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep @Patrick Rogel: , I'm the author of the picture (I'm the creator of Malalt de Falles]]. I made a mistake and I uploaded the first version, instead of the cropped square one. Please, don't delete the square one. The first version should be deleted, but I didn't know how to do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Javixu (talk • contribs)
@Javixu: As explained here please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:06, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - needs license via otrs. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:08, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphaned file, not being used anywhere. Further currency may be subject to copyright laws in the country of origin, thus the CC license may be invalid. Wekeepwhatwekill (talk) 14:27, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The cited file was deleted in 2015. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Seeff is not even dead and I can't find a hint that he put his work under CC license 92.213.11.232 14:32, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:11, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not match COM:FOP Belarus Catherine Laurence (discussion) 14:53, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:11, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechte auf die Installation streunerich 16:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Streunerich (talk • contribs) 16:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I do understand that Streunerich is afraid of violating Freedom of Panorama, as this is not a permanent but just a temporarily installation (Freedom of Panorama in Austria includes just permanent installations). But it seems that the artist has no problem with photos: House rule for the presentation of For Forest Installation (paragraph 26) explicitly allows taking photos. --Niki.L (talk) 22:32, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Permission to take a poto is not the issue -- the permission says nothing about freely licensing the copyright for the artwork. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:13, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe this image is copyrighted. The source is described as [5]. On checking it, I found the website's TOS [6] which mentions that copyright may be applicable. The author/specific source of this image is mentioned as IANS [7] where I wasn't able to find any information about copyright or releasing it on a creative commons licence. In general, images/text from news agencies are almost always copyrighted, and I believe this is same for this case. DreamLinker (talk) 16:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechte könnten verletzt werden streunerich 16:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Streunerich (talk • contribs) 16:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechte könnten verletzt sein streunerich 16:42, 4 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Streunerich (talk • contribs) 16:42, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I do understand that Streunerich is afraid of violating Freedom of Panorama, as this is not a permanent but just a temporarily installation (Freedom of Panorama in Austria includes just permanent installations). But it seems that the artist has no problem with photos: House rule for the presentation of For Forest Installation (paragraph 26) explicitly allows taking photos. --Niki.L (talk) 22:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechte könnten verletzt sein streunerich 16:43, 4 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Streunerich (talk • contribs) 16:43, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I do understand that Streunerich is afraid of violating Freedom of Panorama, as this is not a permanent but just a temporarily installation (Freedom of Panorama in Austria includes just permanent installations). But it seems that the artist has no problem with photos: House rule for the presentation of For Forest Installation (paragraph 26) explicitly allows taking photos. --Niki.L (talk) 22:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechte könnten verletztsein streunerich 16:44, 4 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Streunerich (talk • contribs) 16:44, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I do understand that Streunerich is afraid of violating Freedom of Panorama, as this is not a permanent but just a temporarily installation (Freedom of Panorama in Austria includes just permanent installations). But it seems that the artist has no problem with photos: House rule for the presentation of For Forest Installation (paragraph 26) explicitly allows taking photos. --Niki.L (talk) 22:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Désolé mais cette image n'est pas intéressante pour une encyclopédie Prehistoricplanes (talk) 18:59, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

J'ai changé d'avis, je ne désire plus qu'il soit visible publiquement Prehistoricplanes (talk) 18:59, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The license is irrevocable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

J'ai changé d'avis, je ne désire plus qu'il soit visible publiquement Prehistoricplanes (talk) 19:00, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The license is irrevocable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very strange image overlaying three views of Kensington Palace meaning you can't see any single view coherently. Commons is not for user-created artwork. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:13, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Large amount of copyrightable text. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:19, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted fabric design Hetty Pangel (talk) 21:50, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted fabric design Hetty Pangel (talk) 21:50, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted fabric design Hetty Pangel (talk) 21:51, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was previously kept with {{PD-Austria-1932}}, but since that template is now invalid (Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-Austria-1932), I'm renominating it:

This photo is said to be from 1929 and claimed to be in the PD. But there is no rationale why it should be PD. It's most likely Austrian (as is the person shown), which would mean its photographer (= author) must be dead for at least 70 years for it to be in the PD. The photographer of a 1929 image could well have lived beyond 1948, which would mean the image is still protected by copyright. The file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 22:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

None of these shots meet the criteria of the "Please do not upload photographs or scans of works by this artist, unless they meet one of the following exceptions:" warning at the top of the Category:La Pyramide Inversée page.

Lord Belbury (talk) 22:03, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:24, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. Architect I. M. Pei died in 2019, still within the 70 p.m.a. of the country

A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete 20 upper 09:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:39, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plik chroniony prawami autorskimi, osoba która go umieściła nie jest jego autorem. Togamek (talk) 16:41, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright Tomasz Gąsior/Muzeum Miejskie Wrocławia, all rights reserved. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:01, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jag tvivlar på att detta är "eget arbete". Det är Kramfors-Alliansens officiella logga. Se http://www.kramforsalliansen.se/ Machatjkala (talk) 20:56, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Long since established sports club; license should be verifed through OTRS. Uploaded under fair use here Thuresson (talk) 22:56, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jag tvivlar på att detta är "eget arbete". Det är Kramfors-Alliansens officiella logga. Se http://www.kramforsalliansen.se/ Machatjkala (talk) 20:57, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Long since established sports club; license should be verifed through OTRS. Uploaded under fair use here Thuresson (talk) 22:58, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Pipimurphy

[edit]
File:Fragment of kanga with Swahili text MIMI NI PWEZA MAMBO YANGU HUTOYAWEZA 9780.jpg
File:Kanga with Swahili text MIMI NA WANGU WEWE NA WAKO CHUKI YA NINI 9772.jpg
File:Kanga with Swahili text NIMECHAGUA MWENYEWE 9716.jpg

I'm afraid all files uploaded by User:Pipimurphy, except the first one (a painting in public domain as the painter died in 1944) are copyrighted. It are fabric designs from Africa which are probably copyrighted by the designer or the textile manufacturer. Kind regards, Hetty Pangel (talk) 21:57, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Hetty Pangel: a kanga is an East African garnment. According to the Wikimedia Commons Page, copyright rules by subject matter, images illustrating clothing are normally acceptable. One must be indeed be carefull not to infringe the copyright of any design that may appear on the clothing's surface, such as copyrighted cartoon characters. Most of the kanga’s uploaded by Pipimurphy do not depict special graphics. They depict proverbs and sayings which are not subject of copyright rules. I would vey much much appreciate if you could reconsider your decision to nominate the pictures for deletion. Please note that some photographs only depict fragments of the kanga (focusing on the proverbs and sayings) and others depict dresses made of kangas. Thanks in advance and kind regards, Walkuraxx (talk) 10:03, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Walkuraxx, these are not clothing, but most are images of textiles showing artistic designs. Some examples are shown. According to our precautionary principles these should be deleted because we have no permission of the designer. I do not object to show proverbs, assuming these are not copyrighted (which I do not know for certain however). Regards, Hetty Pangel (talk) 17:20, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Hetty Pangel. Eissink (talk) 17:31, 5 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Kangas are garments, worn around the waist, the chest, the shoulders or over the head, even though some people use them as towels, bed sheets or table cloths. Just like towels are things for drying oneself or for wiping objects dry, even though some people wrap them around their head or waist, or sleep on them in the sand! Pipimurphy (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep Dozens of these kangas are made in India. You can even see labels or stamps, see e.g. this kanga and this kanga where the label “India” is clearly visible (bottom left). Thus Indian copyright prevails. India has no copyright on mass production articles, see par. 15. Special provision regarding Copyright in designs registered or capable of being registered under the Designs Act, 2000: (1) Copyright shall not subsist under this Act in any design which is registered under the Designs Act, 2000 (16 of 2000). (2) Copyright in any design, which is capable of being registered under the Designs Act, 2000 (16 of 2000) but which has not been so registered, shall cease as soon as any article to which the design has been applied has been reproduced more than fifty times by an industrial process by the owner of the copyright or, with his licence, by any other person. Sources: WIPO, (Designs Act : IP India, and Delhi University Journal. At a quick glance I already identified more than 20 kangas made in India. My proposal: remove mass deletion request and only request deletion for kangas who are effected by copyright rules from other countries. Vysotsky (talk) 21:22, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vlisco textiles: made in the Netherlands, sold in West-Africa from 1876 onwards. African copyirght?
The design may well be African and yet printed in India, in which case I don't think Indian copyright prevails. Besides: records of, say, the Stones that are printed in India, including their covers, do not fall under the Special provision that you mention, I would say. So, unless you know for sure that the design is Indian – which I doubt – I don't think your argument holds. Eissink (talk) 22:36, 10 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]
 Comment 1. On the right I added a photograph of a sample of Vlisco textile. This one was made in Holland, and Vlisco exported these textiles to several West-African countries -from the 1870s onwards. Copyright of the design wasn't transferred to Ghana, Ivory Coast or any other country. The same goes for these Indian garments, some of which even feature Indian motives and patterns. 2. Kangas are garments -clothing. "The copyrightability of fashion varies by country." As I stated before, India has no copyright on mass production articles. Vysotsky (talk) 21:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete While clothing does not have a copyright in most countries, printed fabric designs have copyright in the USA and most other countries. Therefore, while the fabrics may be free of copyright in India, they are copyrighted in the USA and cannot be kept on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:09, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 19:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violation vie privée cimetière familial Manaisnais (talk) 19:15, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Bonsoir, l'image dont je demande la suppression concerne le caveau de ma famille. Je ne trouve pas très décent qu'une photo de ce lieu très personnel soit disponible avec mention des familles concernées. Il s'agit d'une sépulture pas d'un monument communal.

J'espère que vous comprendrez ma réaction et aurez la gentillesse de m'aider à faire supprimer cette photo.

Bien cordialement Manaisnais (talk) 19:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Les articles 226-1 à 226-8 du Code civil précisent que « tout individu jouit d’un droit au respect de sa vie privée ainsi que d’un droit à l’image. Les héritiers d’une personne décédée héritent de son droit à l’image et peuvent donc s’opposer à la publication de documents la concernant s’ils estiment que les images portent atteinte à sa dignité ou qu’ils ne appliquent pas le respect dû aux morts.

Par ailleurs, une desindexation de votre photo vient d'être demandée à Google.

D'autre part, je vous rappelle qu'il ne s'agit pas une concession mais d'une propriété privée...

17:45, 5 October 2019 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manaisnais (talk • contribs) 17:46, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Image apparently taken legally. The cited law extends to persons, not buildings and applies only if "if they consider that the images undermine his dignity or that they do not apply the respect due to the dead." There is no disrespect here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Será sustituido por otro de mejor calidad, duplicado. Jalcaire (talk) 21:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - If the new image is simply a better quality, upload it over this. If not, upload it somewhere else, but this cannot be deleted until the new image is available. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copie de https://psychanalyse-map.org/2019/08/19/sc-colloque-2019-psychiatrie-en-crise-et-autisme-par-jean-claude-maleval/ Habertix (talk) 21:57, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Bonjour File:Jean-Claude Maleval.jpg ma photo supprimée à ma demande sur https://psychanalyse-map.org/2019/08/19/sc-colloque-2019-psychiatrie-en-crise-et-autisme-par-jean-claude-maleval Cordialement Math.Tanguy --Math.Tanguy (talk) 13:19, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Very small image, no EXIF, single upload account. If this is actually your work, please upload it at full camera resolution. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Artlaver (talk) 20:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: DR by vandal. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Artlaver (talk) 20:29, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: DR by vandal. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:21, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]