Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/09/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 28th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Tahsin Sayem (talk) 07:18, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense nomination, speedy kept. --jdx Re: 07:42, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Tahsin Sayem (talk) 07:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose:nonresonable deletion requests--Wpcpey (talk) 07:27, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense nomination, speedy kept. --jdx Re: 07:45, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Tahsin Sayem (talk) 07:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense nomination, speedy kept. --jdx Re: 07:48, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Undelete in 2023

Vera (talk) 08:53, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Vera (talk) 08:56, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncorrect image Shadowzpaev (talk) 17:10, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per fairly prompt uploader request; not used. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't seem to be simple enough to not attract copyright. Can be locally uploaded at wiki.pt, if needed Darwin Ahoy! 17:14, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted false license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally uploaded same image twice; essentially identical to File:Rio Blanco at Blanco Diversion Dam.jpg Dicklyon (talk) 18:20, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:14, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too many changes. made a better version using nik collection. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 18:21, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:13, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely not the own work of the uploader, per EXIF‌ data, so a copyright violation. However, {{Mehr}} publishes its content under a free license. I could find [1] which contains the pic with Mehr watermark, but no photographer has been named. According to my experince, images from Iranian news agencies which are not attributed to an in-house photogtrapher are suspicious. 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:27, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted False source & license claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:12, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

while may be a black market/ripoff, the cover includes copyrighted elements so cannot be treated as free Masem (talk) 18:46, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Certainly contains significant copyrighted DW elements. Unused, uncat. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:09, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo (as reason for unauthorised verson) via COM:COPYVIO 119.94.160.171 03:43, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:33, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license claim. Yogwi21 (talk) 06:36, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license claim. Yogwi21 (talk) 06:55, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:32, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Non-free illustration in Japan. Batholith (talk) 09:10, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Clear DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 11:07, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:19, 28 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 19:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 11:10, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:19, 28 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 19:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 11:14, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:26, 28 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 19:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 11:18, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:26, 28 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 19:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 11:21, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:26, 28 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 19:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 11:26, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:25, 28 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 19:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 11:29, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:25, 28 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 19:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 11:32, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:25, 28 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 19:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 11:35, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:25, 28 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 19:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:20, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW by Flickr photographer of copyrighted work-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 15:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 16:47, 28 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 19:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 15:53, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 16:48, 28 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 19:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 15:56, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 16:47, 28 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 19:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 15:59, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 16:47, 28 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 19:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name and image may infringe Italian copyright Lankyrider (talk) 16:02, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 16:47, 28 September 2019 UTC: file name and image may infringe Italian copyright --Krdbot 19:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work (photograph of a painting), no evidence that the original work (the painting) is public domain or freely licensed. Tacsipacsi (talk) 16:04, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted clear DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:18, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Biography of a non-notable person. Out of com:PS. Hanooz 22:24, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: recreation of preivously deleted content. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:13, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright on image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:22, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted apparent upload mistake or carelessness in Archive's Flickr stream. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:23, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

errore caricamento Maria Grazia Marano (talk) 22:34, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy closed, own talk page. (User also tagged Commons:Help desk for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:16, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Beliag29 (talk) 07:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could you elaborate on the deletion reason? This is one simple commemorating plaque. Romainbehar (talk) 07:48, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Otourly (talk) 18:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low res. Seems to be photo of photo. DW. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:46, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:49, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low res. Seems to be photo of photo. DW. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:49, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tito Laca Kevin Alex (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:53, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:48, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:25, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:51, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ioggggggggggggggfdfrd 66.207.201.110 09:36, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jianhui67 TC 04:16, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sanjeevveer775 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:48, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per F10. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:55, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:16, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Viennhu2008 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Likely from Facebook products and 2 files kept because of EXIF, clicked from same phone. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:05, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Viennhu2008 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Those photos re taken from four different cameras. The {{Own}} claims cannot be verified.

Mys_721tx (talk) 04:47, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The {{tl|own}} claims have also not been disproven. In dubio pro reo. Keep. --Zenwort (talk) 19:43, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please take a minute and look at the previous DR, or the user's talk page. Fair amount of {{Own}} claims have been disproven. -Mys_721tx (talk) 02:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violations. Photographer(s) should confirm authorship and license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Copyvio}} Sidowpknbkhihj (talk) 05:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 19:10, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет авторитетных источников. К ареал расселение искаженное. 109.252.73.152 05:22, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This is no reason for a deletion at Commons. This diagram is in COM:SCOPE as it is in use in multiple projects (examples: fr:Touran, ru:Тюрки). At Commons we do not decide whether a diagram is factual correct. As long as it is used in the main space of one of the Wikimedia projects, we will keep it. You are free, however, to elaborate your criticism using the talk page of the diagram. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:52, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 07:10, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, the lady is too prominent for an educational use of the photo, I'd say. Jcornelius (talk) 13:41, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The lady is not prominent. The main subject is the telephone booth. Tm (talk) 14:13, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Tm. --Strakhov (talk) 07:13, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, the lady is too prominent for an educational use of the photo, I'd say. Jcornelius (talk) 13:41, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The lady is not prominent. The main subject is the telephone booth. Tm (talk) 14:13, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Also, the lady provides a sense of scale. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:18, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 07:13, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as no recognizable use. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:29, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 07:17, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outdated and confusing version of Visa requirements for Ukrainian citizens.png (not in use anymore) Andrei (talk) 20:07, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:08, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as above -- sarang사랑 12:32, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Multichill. --Strakhov (talk) 07:21, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Grandjouan french illustrator deads 1968 ; not public domain ; always the same use of "PD in USA" that 's a falsification Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 01:30, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 15:50, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:FOP Iran.

Roy17 (talk) 10:10, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 05:34, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hard to see how this could be used. Jmabel ! talk 04:14, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:02, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Katana213 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep
Undoubtedly {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}} and before 1924, since Meiji era ended in 1912.--Roy17 (talk) 15:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Roy17. Deleted the other 2 files. Ruthven (msg) 16:15, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Katana213 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own works

Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:58, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

組織名義で作成された著作物のため Gohachiyasu1214 (talk) 16:04, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Non-free illustration in Japan. Batholith (talk) 09:13, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That file is a printing material from brochures.
These are brochures of Japanese railway company made in 1978. --Batholith (talk) 00:59, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Alqhaderi Aliffianiko

[edit]

All uploads are my own work. No EXIFs after I replaced these files with the newer version. So, I reupload these files with new names and EXIFs.--Alqhaderi AliffianikoTalk 11:24, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fouri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Falmses dates, low-re images: unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fouri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Inamraja

[edit]
  1. File:Inamraja Acrylic on paper 1999.png
  2. File:Inam Raja.png
  3. File:Inam Raja 2.png
  4. File:Bithal.png
  5. File:Inamraja 1.jpg
  6. File:Inamraja Icon.jpg
  7. File:Inam raj pen & ink (1).JPG
  8. File:Inam raj pen & ink (2).JPG
  9. File:6253 1125397613963 336998 n.jpg

unused and uncategorised images. Commons is not a private photo album. Seems like non-notable painter --Estopedist1 (talk) 11:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by uploader. Subsequent research has revealed errors in the map. The replacement file is noted in the Description. SCHolar44 (talk) 14:29, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore 2401:4900:1719:737B:D95:A152:92DB:8BF8 14:38, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Burma_Israel_Locator.svg Andrei (talk) 20:43, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. matanya talk 21:40, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. @Matanya: why did you speedy delete this file? Multichill (talk) 14:05, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded it, seems unused. I have no strong sentiment either way. matanya talk 15:29, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:04, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC) hello, i made the video. The music is from youtube audio library Jeremy Blake- a revelation and its free to use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bogdan geu (talk • contribs) 10:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where could term of use be found? Sun information must be always provided in description. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, DW audio; no evidence of free licensed status of audio offered. (If you shot the video, feel free to reupload silent.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:04, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shaw Edward S (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not used and unhelpful

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:01, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:52, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shaw Edward S (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not used and unhelpful

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:00, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:52, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has not consented to the license, which was added by another editor (Special:Diff/368463845). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:18, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

:@Magog the Ogre: In this case, I support this deletion with no opposition.JWilz12345 (talk) 03:59, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep please. Crossposting my comments from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cape Bojeador Lighthouse.JPG: These were uploaded in 2007 by an inexperienced but good-faith user who had difficulties with the license tagging, but made it quite clear he wanted to freely share his photos. His language in stating this wasn't specific to a particular license, but it could in fact be read as a public-domain dedication ("I do give all my rights up" [2]). I don't know what current policies about such cases are on Commons, but personally I'd find it quite regrettable if good-faith and valuable encyclopedic contributions from more than ten years ago were to be suddenly nullified now. Fut.Perf. 16:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Future Perfect at Sunrise: : After seeing your insight regarding this - and accessing the Wikipedia url you had given ( https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Quadell&diff=prev&oldid=143949559#Page_Burgos_Ilocos_Norte ), I have changed my vote. Seeing Schrijverh's assertions that these are his own work, and that he might have been a "newbie" then, I change my vote here to keep.JWilz12345 (talk) 17:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the uploader's statement indicated a PD dedication.  JGHowes  talk 03:17, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has not consented to the license, which was added by another editor (Special:Diff/368460890). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

:@Magog the Ogre: In this case, I support this deletion with no opposition.JWilz12345 (talk) 03:59, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep please. These were uploaded in 2007 by an inexperienced but good-faith user who had difficulties with the license tagging, but made it quite clear he wanted to freely share his photos. His language in stating this wasn't specific to a particular license, but it could in fact be read as a public-domain dedication ("I do give all my rights up" [3]). I don't know what current policies about such cases are on Commons, but personally I'd find it quite regrettable if good-faith and valuable encyclopedic contributions from more than ten years ago were to be suddenly nullified now. Fut.Perf. 16:47, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Future Perfect at Sunrise: : After seeing your insight regarding this - and accessing the Wikipedia url you had given ( https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Quadell&diff=prev&oldid=143949559#Page_Burgos_Ilocos_Norte ), I have changed my vote. Seeing Schrijverh's assertions that these are his own work, and that he might have been a "newbie" then, I change my vote here to keep.JWilz12345 (talk) 17:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the uploader's statement indicated a PD dedication.  JGHowes  talk 03:11, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has not consented to the license, which was added by another editor (Special:Diff/368463321). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:20, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

:@Magog the Ogre: In this case, I support this deletion with no opposition.JWilz12345 (talk) 03:58, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep please. Crossposting my comments from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cape Bojeador Lighthouse.JPG: These were uploaded in 2007 by an inexperienced but good-faith user who had difficulties with the license tagging, but made it quite clear he wanted to freely share his photos. His language in stating this wasn't specific to a particular license, but it could in fact be read as a public-domain dedication ("I do give all my rights up" [4]). I don't know what current policies about such cases are on Commons, but personally I'd find it quite regrettable if good-faith and valuable encyclopedic contributions from more than ten years ago were to be suddenly nullified now, against the assurances given to the local uploader by the local administrators who vetted and accepted them back then. Fut.Perf. 16:53, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Future Perfect at Sunrise: : After seeing your insight regarding this - and accessing the Wikipedia url you had given ( https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Quadell&diff=prev&oldid=143949559#Page_Burgos_Ilocos_Norte ), I have changed my vote. Seeing Schrijverh's assertions that these are his own work, and that he might have been a "newbie" then, I change my vote here to keep.JWilz12345 (talk) 17:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the uploader's statement indicated a PD dedication.  JGHowes  talk 03:19, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I didn't realize I would be handing over the rights to my image when I agreed and want to keep the rights. GabbieTanella (talk) 01:48, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination prompt request. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a non-free promotional image. No evidence to show that the uploader has permission to release this image under a Creative Commons license. feminist (talk) 03:02, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same name of an object (see article inclusion, though this can be deleted as well) and uploader, and not a selfie - meaning false "own work". Plus a bad quality badly retouched image Tatewaki (talk) 03:07, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very probably not own work Frodar (talk) 04:30, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very probably not own work Frodar (talk) 04:30, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very probably not own work Frodar (talk) 04:30, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of Wechat (non-free software) COM:SS Larryasou (talk) 05:14, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:52, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gramateus5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIFs, unlikely to be own works

Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:52, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Beliag29 (talk) 07:12, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Beliag29 (talk) 07:14, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:00, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no Freedom of panorama in France Cheep (talk) 20:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: The puzzling presence of a ticket from an anonymous author is sort of explained on this user talk page, but it should really be explained on the description page or on the talk page of the file itself, so readers who notice the problem will not need to ask the same question. (Not sure though how the volunteer could be sure that the correspondent is really the anonymous author, but anyway.) -- Asclepias (talk) 02:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The author is declared via the OTRS procedure... Is it not enough?
Erwan Corre (talk) 19:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I was not suggesting that the name be on the page, I was suggesting that what is mentioned on your talk page should be mentioned on the file's page, to be easier to find, because currently it is predictable that other readers will be puzzled by this unexplained ticket, like the nominator was. -- Asclepias (talk) 02:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: OTRS permission from the copyright holder. Ruthven (msg) 15:42, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in correct category. Bglazar (talk) 08:13, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The exif indicates that this image is from Instagram and may not be the uploader's own work. Catherine Laurence (discussion) 08:42, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject did not give any permission Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 08:58, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was uploaded on Facebook in June 2013. It's one of many pictures of German voice actors by this Commons user which can be found on different Facebook profiles of voice actors, publishers and radio play projects. King Rk (talk) 09:06, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Non-free illustration in Japan. Batholith (talk) 09:12, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information about the identity or context of image. No obvious educative value. Richard Avery (talk) 10:49, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:55, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Unsplash image in the montage was posted after 5 June 2017, no longer under CC0 license A1Cafel (talk) 10:52, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:22, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

band without notability, deleted at pt.wiki Stanglavine (talk) 12:35, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paco Mestre Moltó (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Titrisol (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

-- Explanations -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Titrisol (talk • contribs) 16:18, 28 September 2019 (UTC) Jaime Rivadeneira was my grand father, the picture form the 1960s was taken by my father, it's a family picture which I have digitized, cropped and cleaned spots and scratches, it is not under copyright as it was not a publishable or work-for hire[reply]

Jaime Rivadeneira frente al microscopio was taken before 1935 and the photographer is uknown, the picture was in a photo album and it's about 2x2" and has no markings to identify the author. According to Ecuadorean copyright laws, it is under public domain now since it's been more than 70 yrs and the author is unknown (art 80 http://www.sice.oas.org/int_prop/nat_leg/Ecuador/L320c.asp#l1t1c1s6p2.2 states: "La obra anónima cuyo autor no se diere a conocer en el plazo de setenta años a partir de la fecha de la primera publicación pasará al dominio público. Si antes de transcurrido ese plazo se revelare el nombre del autor, se estará a lo dispuesto en el inciso primero de este artículo.")

Changed licenceses to reflect the ecuadorean law Titrisol (talk) 16:46, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Ecos de Guayllabamaba was the parish bulletin, purposely made to remember Jaime and to remind people that there used to be malaria in that valley; It was intended for educational purposes and I have asked the Parish office for authorization — Preceding unsigned comment added by Titrisol (talk • contribs) 16:12, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As of 10/18/19 I have received authorization from the parish office to use the bulletin for educational purposes, I don't know where to upload that letter --Titrisol (talk) 13:36, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: two, kept one.

  1. The parish office must send a free license using OTRS. In order for the image to be kept here, it must be clear that all of the text in the image and the photo was paid work for hire or that the creators have licensed the copyrights in writing.
  2. The image from the 1960s is certainly still under copyright. If the uploader's father, the photographer, is still living, then he must send a free license using OTRS. However, I have assumed that the father has passed on and that uploader is their father's heir, so the uploader has the right to freely license the image.
  3. The law quoted above says that for anonymous works, the copyright lasts for 70 years after first publication, not 70 years after creation. According to the description above, the first publication of the photo album image was when it was uploaded to Commons, so the copyright will expire on 1/1/2090.
.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:59, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:OTRS should be used instead. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by howto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No licensing info on museum's website, "source: archive, author: museum" is not sufficient.

TFerenczy (talk) 15:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:11, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:11, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 15:20, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted figure A1Cafel (talk) 15:33, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no Freedom of Panorama in Estonia WikedKentaur (talk) 15:34, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:53, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in South Korea, the photo already shows most of the permanent exterior architecture, which is subject to copyright A1Cafel (talk) 16:03, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 16:04, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in South Korea, the photo already shows most of the permanent exterior architecture, which is subject to copyright A1Cafel (talk) 16:04, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in South Korea, the photo already shows most of the permanent exterior architecture, which is subject to copyright A1Cafel (talk) 16:05, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 16:08, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 16:08, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in South Korea, the photo already shows most of the permanent exterior architecture, which is subject to copyright A1Cafel (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in South Korea, the photo already shows most of the permanent exterior architecture, which is subject to copyright A1Cafel (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of paronama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of paronama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 16:13, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of the photos in the source was deleted A1Cafel (talk) 16:14, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:20, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 16:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:20, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 16:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:20, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in South Korea, the photo already shows most of the permanent exterior architecture, which is subject to copyright A1Cafel (talk) 16:21, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:20, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in South Korea, the photo already shows most of the permanent exterior architecture, which is subject to copyright A1Cafel (talk) 16:21, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain where the difference is between this and the previous picture from 2018? I just wanted to contribute to this page and wasn't aware of FOP because there is no such regulation in Germany. Because the building was still under construction i saw no problem in uploading this picture.__Lucas.lango (talk) 09:12, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - In most countries, including both South Korea and Germany, architectural works are copyrighted. In Germany, there is a special rule, which we call Freedom of Panorama, which allows photos of certain created works, including architecture, provided (in Germany) that they are permanently displayed and can be photographed from a public road. No such exception exists in South Korea (and about half of all countries), so this image infringes on the architect's copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:24, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The buildings is completed in 2019 by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. Permission from the architectural firm is required. A1Cafel (talk) 01:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think one could reasonably argue that the buildings are de minimis in this picture which mainly shows the beach: notice that the original Flickr photo was titled "La plage Haeundae". Of course, I wasn't aware that SK has no FoP when I uploaded this, hence the less desirable name used on Commons. But if others think this should be deleted, I'll be happy to upload it to Wikipedia instead. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted. Main object is the buildings. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file size and resolution of this image as well as the metadata suggest very strongly it was copied from an online source and is not the own work of the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted. In addition, the depicted object itself is protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 16:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is cropped version of File:Haeundae Beach and Haeundae LCT The Sharp.jpg. Although original image can be applied de minimis, main objects of this cropped image are copyrighted buildings, so this image cannot be applied de minimis. There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. 221.133.172.75 17:28, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in South Korea, the photo already shows most of the permanent exterior architecture, which is subject to copyright A1Cafel (talk) 16:21, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:25, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 16:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:25, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 16:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in South Korea, the photo already shows most of the permanent exterior architecture, which is subject to copyright A1Cafel (talk) 16:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in South Korea, the photo already shows most of the permanent exterior architecture, which is subject to copyright A1Cafel (talk) 16:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 16:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 16:24, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 16:25, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is taken from the book, it is written in the description of the file. the person who uploaded the image is not the author of the photo, he scanned it from the book GAndy (talk) 18:42, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The image was not taken from the book. It was kindly given to me by the author - Dmitry Danilov. The quality of the photo is much better then any scanner could do. If any conformation of this information needed, I can provide it - please explain how it can be done.--DrDragomanov (talk) 19:59, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@DrDragomanov: фотография сделана не вами, а другим человеком, поэтому необходимо получить от него подтверждение по процедуре, описанной Commons:OTRS/ru, иначе нет уверенности, что он действительно согласен на использование фотографии по указанной лицензии. GAndy (talk) 11:18, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:27, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Strange artifacts, maybe taken from Google street view? Uploader made other false "own work" statements of yoinked images. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:58, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:30, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of unidentified building in unidentified place. Text "description" unhelpfully mentions 7 different cities in 3 different countries. No apparent use without location information. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:03, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a criteria for deletion.
-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 06:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The criteria is Out Of Scope. My text above details why. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:06, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So, you are saying that a photo of building that could illustrate a type of architecture
A building that could be identify by a volunteer and serve as a illustration for it.
...
Is not in our scope, because you couldn't identify it?
You know that we have categories as: Category:Doors, Category:Balconies, Category:Windows...
Pleas, do read this: Commons:Project scope. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 12:32, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I certainly think it would be much more likely to have in scope usefulness if the photographer, uploader, or someone else reveled where the building is. If you think it is in scope as an illustration of architectural style or elements regardless of what country or city it is in, feel free to categorize the photo accordingly. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:48, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So go talk to the photographer. The link is at the description, you are the one that want this information, I can not go after all the information that volunteers requir ; this is a wiki, a collaborative space, the energy that you spent here you could already had acquire this information contacting the photographer.
Have a greater information is always useful, the lack of information is not a reason to delete.
I do not have anything more to add here. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 02:28, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am not a member of that website, without which I see no way to message the photographer, otherwise I would have done so as well. We'll see if anyone else has any feedback. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:57, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:31, 1 November 2019 (UTC) Restored per UnDR today .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by John2265 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

dubious own work claims. File:Sultan Ibrahim IV.jpg died in 1960. is the uploader over 80 years old now?

Roy17 (talk) 19:35, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@John2265: thank you for your contribution! Please follow COM:ET or COM:OTRS to prove the permission.--Roy17 (talk) 15:40, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:32, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:11, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:32, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used, copy of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Albania_Ukraine_Locator.svg Andrei (talk) 20:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The png file is the original. The svg is a copy. Aquintero82, (talk); 18:20, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, breaks source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:08, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep the png is the original one. The map of png covers european eastern regions that make Ukraine not appear in one extreme of the file, as the svg file does, meanwhile Albania is at central point of the pic.-- Fobos | ¿algo que decirme? 17:02, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:32, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded by File:Georgia Ukraine Locator.svg. Andrei (talk) 20:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:08, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Croatia_Ukraine_Locator.svg. usage in en wiki is automated. Andrei (talk) 20:22, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:08, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bulgaria_Ukraine_Locator.svg Andrei (talk) 20:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:European_Union_Ukraine_Locator.svg Andrei (talk) 20:24, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ireland Ukraine Locator.png → File:Ireland Ukraine Locator.svg Andrei (talk) 20:26, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Saudi_Arabia_Ukraine_Locator.svg Andrei (talk) 20:29, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Israel_South_Sudan.svg Andrei (talk) 20:33, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Israel_Russia_Locator.svg Andrei (talk) 20:34, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Israel_Niger_Locator.svg Andrei (talk) 20:35, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Israel_Nepal_locator.svg Andrei (talk) 20:36, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Israel_Micronesia_Locator.png Andrei (talk) 20:36, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:06, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Israel_Brazil_Locator.svg Andrei (talk) 20:38, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:06, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iraq_Israel_Locator.svg Andrei (talk) 20:39, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:06, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:India_Israel_Locator.svg Andrei (talk) 20:39, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:06, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ghana_Israel_Locator.svg Andrei (talk) 20:41, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 14:06, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:China_Israel_Locator.svg Andrei (talk) 20:44, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:05, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Belarus_Israel_Locator.svg Andrei (talk) 20:44, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:04, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Armenia_Israel_Locator.png (where israel is no cropped) Andrei (talk) 20:45, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:04, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Israel_USA_Locator.svg Andrei (talk) 20:47, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:04, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded by File:2017 gubernatorial races.svg. Andrei (talk) 20:48, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:04, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded by File:7eleven map.svg. Andrei (talk) 20:48, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:04, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded by File:AXA Group Global Locations.svg. Andrei (talk) 20:49, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:03, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded by File:Flag of Cabo Rojo.svg. Andrei (talk) 20:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:03, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded by File:Flag of Cabo Rojo.svg. Andrei (talk) 20:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:03, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded by File:Belarus United Kingdom Locator.svg. Andrei (talk) 20:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:03, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded by File:Belarus France Locator.svg. Andrei (talk) 20:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:03, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded by File:Coat of Arms of Chernihiv.svg. unused. Andrei (talk) 20:52, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:03, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep There are so many other things to do if you are that bored, such as assign things to correct categories. --Ilyaroz (talk) 20:26, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded by POL gmina Jastrząb COA.svg. Andrei (talk) 20:52, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:02, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Raster images are not usually deleted just because an SVG has been uploaded. Sometimes a low-quality raster is deleted, but that's a separate issue... AnonMoos (talk) 09:35, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep The raster imgage is a good drawing and gives another impression. No reason to delete it! -- sarang사랑 12:27, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded. Unused. Andrei (talk) 20:54, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:02, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded. Unused. Andrei (talk) 20:55, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:02, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded. Unused. Andrei (talk) 20:55, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:02, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded. Unused. Andrei (talk) 20:56, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:02, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded. Unused. Andrei (talk) 20:56, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded. Unused. Andrei (talk) 20:57, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject did not give any permission Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 08:46, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject did not give any permission Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 08:46, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject did not give any permission Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 08:57, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:14, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality, 'birds' are shapeless blobs, unidentifiable; out of Commons scope as of no educational value MPF (talk) 23:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per request. Thuresson (talk) 04:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this picture by mistake. I have already upload it in black and white contrast on my personal account. George E. Koronaios (talk) 01:40, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   02:19, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded a newer image of myself for my personal page in Wikimedia Commons (File:George E. Koronaios (2022).jpg). I think this one should be deleted as obsolete. My apologies for the inconvenience. George E. Koronaios (talk) 00:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:02, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#EDUSE O revolucionário aliado (talk) 05:39, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Beliag29 (talk) 07:26, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate, exactly same image with higher resolution exist -- sarang사랑 16:07, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quintenas voûte 1.jpg Quintenas rue voûtée.jpg


Deleted: per nomination and redirected. P 1 9 9   02:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promo image MiguelAlanCS (talk) 16:21, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promo image MiguelAlanCS (talk) 16:22, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:06, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. The uploader has a very peculiar understanding of the term "own work" ([5]). Thuresson (talk) 22:32, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyviol, cf. metadata (Stuart MacFarlane / 2014 The Arsenal Football Club Plc). — danyele 15:47, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Stuart MacFarlane is the photographer for Arsenal and his Arsenal photos on Flickr are not freely licensed. Uploader has been given the chance to explain; it seems unlikely that MacFarlane would restrict his activities on Wikipedia to editing the Albanian language Wikipedia. All uploads of this contributor have hereby been deleted. Thuresson (talk) 22:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not copyright appropriate for commons Shadowzpaev (talk) 21:05, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted No Creative Commons license found at source or at archive link. Thuresson (talk) 12:48, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Near duplicate of File:E-17 conning tower IMG 9661.jpg uploaded in error Broichmore (talk) 22:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Request by uploader; duplicate of File:E-17 conning tower IMG 9661.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 13:15, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fixertool as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: https://red.novagob.org/wp-content/uploads/avatars/867/d371c9099b74e218bb1288f93b6460a0-bpfull.jpg
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as external hit has far lower resolution than our image. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:59, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: External search of Google Images, Tineye, Getty and Facebook does not show a higher resolution image. --Green Giant (talk) 21:11, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, OoS. E4024 (talk) 05:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:42, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrectly licenced, unclear origin Beevil (talk) 17:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, it looks to be based on en:File:KCL Coat of Arms.jpg which has been released as public domain. (likewise Commons:Deletion requests/File:KCLCoatOfArmsTransparent.png. Beevil (talk) 17:47, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn by nominate. Although the actual logo is from 1985 and not PD, this is based on a photo of the logo at the public entrance to the main college building, and is covered by FOP. --Green Giant (talk) 21:18, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrectly licenced, unclear origin Beevil (talk) 17:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, it looks to be based on en:File:KCL Coat of Arms.jpg which has been released as public domain. (likewise Commons:Deletion_requests/File:KCLCoatOfArms.jpg. Beevil (talk) 17:46, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn by nominate. Although the actual logo is from 1985 and not PD, this is based on a photo of the logo at the public entrance to the main college building, and is covered by FOP. --Green Giant (talk) 21:18, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is copyrighted by a university.
Not "laws; regulations; resolutions, decisions and orders of State organs; other documents of a legislative, administrative or judicial nature; and their official translations" AlexLeeCN (talk) 12:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: (Edited) In former precedent of Seal of Peking University, the seal of a public university in China, which is a kind of so-called pubilc institution, is belonging to public domain. So I amended the permission to PD-ineligible, identical to Seal of Peking University. Now this picture can be properly kept. --Indigo Luo/ 02:47, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-textlogo}}. --Yann (talk) 16:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appealing the previous decision, since we never discussed the fact that China has a low threshold of originality. This is higher than the Gang Heng logo mentioned at Commons:CRT/China#Threshold of originality. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:44, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 21:20, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as uploader Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 18:00, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Normally an uploader has a seven day window to get a file deleted. However this request is several weeks later. Licenses are irrevocable and therefore such files cannot be deleted. Green Giant (talk) 02:12, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and will not be used. see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine%E2%80%93European_Union_Association_Agreement#Ratification Andrei (talk) 20:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We have numerous files which will probably never be used elsewhere. The crucial aspect of the criteria at COM:EDUSE is not that it is being used but that it could be used. --Green Giant (talk) 21:22, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and superseded by better-quality File:War Ensign of Germany 1933-1935.svg. Alkari (?), 3 April 2014, 05:59 UTC 05:59, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Krd has a point Natuur12 (talk) 16:57, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded. Unused. Andrei (talk) 20:57, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not delete files simply because they have been superseded. Please tag them with the {{Superseded}} template. --Green Giant (talk) 21:26, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded. Unused. Andrei (talk) 20:58, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We do not delete files simply because they have been superseded. Please tag them with the {{Superseded}} template. --Green Giant (talk) 21:26, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded. Unused. Andrei (talk) 20:58, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We do not delete files simply because they have been superseded. Please tag them with the {{Superseded}} template. --Green Giant (talk) 21:26, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded. Unused. Andrei (talk) 20:59, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We do not delete files simply because they have been superseded. Please tag them with the {{Superseded}} template. --Green Giant (talk) 21:26, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded. Unused. Andrei (talk) 20:59, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep There is absolutely no reason to delete superseded images, specially when this file was the actual original file used by the Government, and has historical value. The other, though similar or identical, is a recreation. --Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 21:48, 28 September 2019 (UTC) (Please note uploader El Pichilemino is my alternate account, although unused for years).[reply]
 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We do not delete files simply because they have been superseded. Please tag them with the {{Superseded}} template. --Green Giant (talk) 21:27, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded. Unused. Andrei (talk) 20:59, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. This nomination seems to be part of a mass nomination of files tagged with {{Superseded}}. Multichill (talk) 14:00, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We do not delete files simply because they have been superseded. Please tag them with the {{Superseded}} template. --Green Giant (talk) 21:27, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:Patch of Lutsk Patrol Police.svg PsichoPuzo (talk) 19:32, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded. Unused. Andrei (talk) 21:00, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not delete files simply because they have been superseded. Please tag them with the {{Superseded}} template. --Green Giant (talk) 21:27, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded. Unused. Andrei (talk) 21:02, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by what? Please provide a link. And 'unused' is not a reason for deletion. Ciell (talk) 22:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 13:58, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We do not delete files simply because they have been superseded. Please tag them with the {{Superseded}} template. --Green Giant (talk) 21:28, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded. Unused. Andrei (talk) 21:02, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pointless deletion request, it's not like this saves disk space. Might be used outside of Commons, might break source chain. Multichill (talk) 13:59, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We do not delete files simply because they have been superseded. Please tag them with the {{Superseded}} template. --Green Giant (talk) 21:28, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is an svg version of that file, and we should have only one version of such a map, because it makes maintaing them more easily Antemister (talk) 18:56, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: existence of vector file is per policy not a valid reason for deletion of a raster file Jcb (talk) 10:10, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been superseded. Unused. Andrei (talk) 21:03, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide additional reasons for deletion such as scope, technical errors or not updated with the latest data. Thuresson (talk) 13:26, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We do not delete files simply because they have been superseded. Please tag them with the {{Superseded}} template. --Green Giant (talk) 21:29, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ש.ר.ב (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Rina Ben-Menahem (d. 2004), permission of her heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:22, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Patrick Rogel, Thank you for approaching me on this matter. The only heir of the paintings and jewellery of Rina Ben-Menahem is me, her sister, Tamara Barnea (ש.ר.ב.). I hold all the relevant documentation.85.250.236.225 05:47, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please read COM:OTRS. --Green Giant (talk) 21:32, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ש.ר.ב (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Rina Ben-Menahem (d. 2004), permission of her heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:08, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Patrick Rogel, I am answering you again. My name is Tamara Barnea (ש.ר.ב - S.R.B), Rina Ben Menahem's sister. I am the only heir of the paintings and jewellery and photos of Rina Ben Menahem. I hold all the relevant documents approving it. The above listed photos are a selection of tens of paintings which I hold. Nevertheless, I don't intend to place in Wikipedia additional items created by Rina Ben Menahem.--ש.ר.ב (talk) 12:39, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ש.ר.ב: As requested till September Rina Ben Menahem has to send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please read COM:OTRS. --Green Giant (talk) 21:32, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restored File:Rina Ben-Menahem 4.png - {{PD-Israel}}. -- Geagea (talk) 23:52, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ошибка в идентификации здания, прошу удалить Masha Linnik (talk) 09:24, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: if there is an error, please fix it. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:36, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mal redactada la informacion y el archivo de datos Cineaste Maudit (talk) 20:30, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

¿Por qué nominar tu propio archivo? El cambio de nombre no está permitido si algo está nominado para su eliminación.
en: Why nominate your own file? Files, nominated for deletion, must be declined for renaming. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 01:48, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. @Cineaste Maudit: si quieres cambiar la información, cámbiala. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:21, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure if our pic is older or this is older. So who copied who. Sanandros (talk) 20:49, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Both the pics are free-licensed. The website, which the latter pic comes from, is owned by the Italian municipality (Comune) of Ariano Irpino with no license (Note legali) provided. So, its content is open data by default, as stated in the Italian decree (p. 84) cited in the template {{Italy-CAD-OBD}}. Whoever the copyright owner is, the image does meet the free content licensing requirements for Commons: even if the latter pic is older, only the attribution has to be switched (or added) in accordance with the above-mentioned decree.--3knolls (talk) 08:14, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License on the source site explicitly states cc-by-sa. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure if flight accident reports in Portugal are PD ore not. Sanandros (talk) 21:07, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Info From [6]: "Reproduction in whole or in part of all texts published on this site is authorized provided that their source is acknowledged." Texts by public authorities appear to be not protected according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Portugal but I can't find any public domain license tag for Portugal at Category:License tags of Portugal. Thuresson (talk) 13:10, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Thuresson. I've added a template. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:32, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Copyvio}} Sidowpknbkhihj (talk) 05:55, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 121.102.42.235 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo above threshold of originality|source=https://tokyo2020.org/jp/news/sponsor/20190222-01.html I think PD-textlogo is possible, at least it's not so clear cut that it qualifies speedy deletion. Please debate. whym (talk) 13:19, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

 Keep: According to Mike Godwin about costume: “I do not see a legal justification for removing the images we are discussing here. It is common for photographers to take pictures of people in costumes of copyrighted and/or trademarked characters. In general, such photographs are understood as lawful.
I believe the deletion of the photographs you were talking about was unnecessary, and that this represents a too-conservative worldview with regard to the applicability of copyright and other intellectual property theory.
Feel free to reproduce this e-mail on-wiki” [7]
And: “Suppose someone dresses up as, say, Spider-Man, and has a photo taken. The photo is neither a copyright violation nor a trademark violation.” (and spider-man costume has a mask) [8]
--Cody escadron delta (d) 14:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: De minimis. What's on the background is hard to read, it is not what the picture shows. --Cody escadron delta (d) 14:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: De minimis. What's on the background is hard to read, it is not what the picture shows. --Cody escadron delta (d) 14:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: De minimis. What the picture shows is the people who are playing, not the image in the center which is not clear and the text is not easy to read. --Cody escadron delta (d) 14:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: De minimis. What the picture shows is a shop, not a particular object. --Cody escadron delta (d) 14:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: De minimis. What's on the background is hard to read, it is not what the picture shows. --Cody escadron delta (d) 14:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:45, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First: avoid copyright paranoia!
Second: Stop doing “mass deletion request” it is meaningless and not correctly done.
--Cody escadron delta (d) 14:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for MASS deletion. If there are specific pictures with specific problems, I would not oppose individual nominations. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]