Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/08/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Files uploaded by Southernsky97 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work - small size - no EXIF - missing evidence of permission.
- File:Wrhnabjkw`.jpg
- File:Air astabnklaemblka.jpg
- File:Etihadgqohnabl.jpg
- File:Gkjnegak.jpg
- File:Tse uzgeh.jpg
- File:Vjnsbn`wahgw.jpg
- File:Twse fag.jpg
- File:Wshehb.jpg
- File:Bsenj2.jpg
- File:Ogkwohk.jpg
- File:Imagebhjb.jpg
- File:Gaj`ls`.jpg
- File:Ahufihoigw.jpg
- File:Whjzwjah`.jpg
- File:`hnzn.jpg
- File:Air astanafw.jpg
- File:Airbus 320.jpg
- File:767-oi7y8.jpg
- File:A 321- airas.jpg
- File:757air.jpg
- File:IHJOIGA 43231.jpg
- File:Kov GWAILGHJW.jpg
- File:Ай3полт.jpg
- File:F3jugiojoi3g Loefwjgpofiq3jgio.jpg
- File:Ajeroporlkejhigm JHNuheu.jpg
- File:Kok eljrmgjer.jpg
- File:Kokshetau jknjknk.jpg
- File:LmnlkImage.jpg
- File:Kokshetau.jpg
- File:Kokshetau airport 2.jpg
- File:Kokshetau airport.jpg
— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 05:46, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom, deleted as speedy as a number where found on other sites. --Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
unused redirect — Redboston 04:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: 30 August by Túrelio. --Achim (talk) 09:34, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Old & unused chemical structural formula; superseded by File:Structural formula of n-pentyl acetate.svg with better file name & high-quality as well. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 07:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
this file is useless ,there are many similar files with same content which are being used on wiki DZwarrior1 (talk) 11:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: inconsistent request. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 11:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
this file is useless ,there are many similar files with same content which are being used on wiki DZwarrior1 (talk) 11:20, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: inconsistent request. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 11:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
All low quality exhibitionism. Out of scope.
- File:Naked male circumcised relaxing.jpg
- File:Naked circumcised male relaxing.jpg
- File:Naked male relaxing.jpg
- File:Nude male relaxing.jpg
- File:0ko4apn - Imgur.jpg
- File:1545848631-B8ibTpbkpEynwvka filename IMG 20180517 192110.jpg
GMGtalk 12:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 13:57, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Collection of personal images of non-contributor.
- File:Peter Naked 002.jpg
- File:British male nude.jpg
- File:British male naked.jpg
- File:British male with small penis.jpg
- File:Male with large testicles.jpg
- File:Peter Naked 001.jpg
- File:1545848631-B8ibTpbkpEynwvka filename IMG 20180517 192110.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 11:39, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Hystiff (talk) 07:11, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 12:58, 30 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 19:24, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
{{Copyvio}} ZG 90 (talk) 14:12, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:26, 30 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Non-trivial logo --Krdbot 19:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Amateur pornography with no educational use. Commons is not an amateur porn site. Hiàn (talk) 23:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 00:25, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio : https://www.discogs.com/fr/artist/5940485-Stefano-Ianne#images/29867256 Supertoff (talk) 18:10, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 01:25, 31 August 2019 UTC: Copyvio : https://www.discogs.com/fr/artist/5940485-Stefano-Ianne#images/29867256 --Krdbot 07:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Temporary upload due to problems with chunked upload when overwriting file. Duplicate of File:Once a Week, Series 1, Volume II Dec 1859 to June 1860.pdf. Xover (talk) 20:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 11:50, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) To give a chance to the author, NickK, to confirm the license. Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- I don't recall taking this one. File:Робота під час Вікіманії 2019.jpg is clearly mine but this one does not seem to be mine. Judging from the timestamp, I should have been in Montalcini on Growth at that time, and this is... Curie I think? Probably the session on images clustering which I clearly did not attend — NickK (talk) 18:06, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, Nicholas and the discussion participants. I have authored authorship because of the large number of photos and the lack of time.
Author of this photo Mcoffsky --Андрій Гриценко (talk) 19:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hi! I really took this photo at the request of Andrew at one of the sessions of Wikimania. --Mcoffsky (talk) 09:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: I added the permission to the file. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Not used, low quality with scratches 38.91.107.23 19:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 10:47, 31 August 2019 UTC: no educational value --Krdbot 19:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lanoisseforptrepxe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.
- File:Jko 20170617 yugh.jpg
- File:Iiojn IMG 20170513 JOIU.jpg
- File:AFFECT.jpg
- File:STONE .jpg
- File:Lanoisseforp.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lanoisseforptrepxe (talk · contribs)
[edit]
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Self-promotion of another famous artist, out of project scope. No contributions to any wm project. Lanoisseforptrepxe is another account of Chamaari scherzinger.
- File:Date of holy.jpg
- File:Diplomat imagae from home today.jpg
- File:Img of heart 20170523 135457.jpg
- File:City of heart from delhi.jpg
- User:Lanoisseforptrepxe
Achim (talk) 09:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:06, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lanoisseforptrepxe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.
- File:(ytpo).jpg
- File:TrepxeInShot .jpg
- File:Jo.centre65.jpg
- File:G 20190921 151444J.jpg
- File:.fo.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 06:03, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom. Already stored in Commons memory, no need to wait for a week. --E4024 (talk) 18:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Only used for repeated inappropriate page creation by sock accounts on enwiki. Ed (Edgar181) 11:50, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
wrong namespace created. Bodhisattwa (talk) 20:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 20:49, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Désolé mais cette image n'est pas intéressante pour une encyclopédie Prehistoricplanes (talk) 15:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- This file is used on en:Apex predator, fr:Spinosaurus, and fr:Giganotosaurus. Under COM:INUSE, that means it's not eligible for deletion just for being uninteresting. --bjh21 (talk) 18:12, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Keep very clearly in use. No grounds whatsoever for deletion. AshFriday (talk) 00:46, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Désolé mais cette image n'est pas intéressante pour une encyclopédie Prehistoricplanes (talk) 08:53, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is still in use on en:Apex predator. So long as English Wikipedia finds the file interesting, Commons does too. See COM:INUSE for details. --bjh21 (talk) 12:18, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Speedy kept per above. (Note pending separate DW concern on image page.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
useless image, mediocre quality Gower (talk) 18:03, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
see https://www.wcl.american.edu/community/faculty/profile/goldman/bio if this is own work, needs more explanation Sphilbrick (talk) 19:54, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is corrupted or the uploaded was wrong. Ganímedes (talk) 22:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Gbawden at 07:31, 5 September 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jardín (1044347743).jpg --Krdbot 13:17, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 19:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Seems like the uploader munged the original authorship information, and Ogre-bot helped, though it's preserved in the fine print and history. It says: "Зображення |Назва=Борисоглібський собор в Чернігові. |Опис=Дореволюційне фото. В 1960-і рр. собору були повернуті давньоруські форми. |Автор, the relevant part of which is "Pre-revolutionary photo." The Russian Revolution was vaguely 1917-1923, but in any case easily PD-Old. --GRuban (talk) 21:40, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- @GRuban: Can you help getting the Russian text into the information fields? Pre-revolution is not necessarily old enough for PD-old, but PD-RusEmpire should work. Jcb (talk) 21:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- Ukrainian, actually; I put the text in the description field, but don't know the author or specific date. --GRuban (talk) 16:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, unknown is fine if the file is PD anyway. Thanks! Jcb (talk) 17:43, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Ukrainian, actually; I put the text in the description field, but don't know the author or specific date. --GRuban (talk) 16:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- @GRuban: Can you help getting the Russian text into the information fields? Pre-revolution is not necessarily old enough for PD-old, but PD-RusEmpire should work. Jcb (talk) 21:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 17:43, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 94rain as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10. The logo is used, so it's in scope. What about copyright? In my opinion this is not a simple logo, but acrually this is borderline case and we can allow one week for discussion. Taivo (talk) 07:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry that I considered the licensing section as advertisements but according to translation it is actually a "Logo Usage Guide".
Rough translation of the licensing section
|
|---|
|
1. A third party may use it without obtaining permission only if they are in AMED system / used for materials or goods produced in AMED-related work upon request or commission from AMED / AMED logo is included when reprinting materials published by AMED. |
It is clearly not free licensed.--94rain Talk 08:00, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Because the information is false 2001:E68:5400:964F:EC8A:EE35:DBD9:653D 09:52, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:11, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Wrong perosn and the picture is not allowed to be used and it is displaying false information Mathewanderson7232 (talk) 09:54, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:11, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in self-promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in unapproved draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:04, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:55, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Poor-quality chemical structure; unused/orphaned & opaque (white) background, there is also a chemical mistake in the center of the molecule (should be CH2 instead of CH3), hence the file is incorrect. Have File:Methyl isobutyl ketone V.1.svg as well as File:4-methylpentan-2-one 200.svg as high-quality vector replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 17:24, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete for chemical mistake, and {{BadJPG}} with better replacements so not worth fixing in this image. DMacks (talk) 17:48, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Advertisement. See File:Aug Copyright mohammed.png. Solomon203 (talk) 00:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope for Commons per COM:PORN Alex Cohn (talk) 03:05, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Very low quality. --Achim (talk) 09:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 00:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Teles. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Low quality amateur porn Dronebogus (talk) 14:20, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kritzolina (talk) 19:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hedayet Ullah Pathan (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). Unused.
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:58, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
"failed" version of File:Google fuchsia3.svg. Not needed. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
No longer used Gcd822 (talk) 07:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 07:24, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: No contribs to any project. en:User:BradleyPeckOfficial has been deleted. --Achim (talk) 09:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 07:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
I doubt, that commons can copy pics from this website Mutter Erde (talk) 07:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from photographer L. E. Perez (look description) is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
copyright violence 158.169.40.6 08:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nathanielmg (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
- File:Ohs shortage at grocery store.jpg
- File:Ohs avalanche angle3 nathanielmg.jpg
- File:Ohs avalanche angle2 nathanielmg.jpg
- File:Ohs avalanche nathanielmg.jpg
- File:Ohs stacked 3x3 nathanielmg.jpg
- File:Ohs monolith stacked 7x3 nathanielmg.jpg
ƏXPLICIT 09:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ƏXPLICIT 09:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Food boxes
[edit]COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
- File:2019-02-07 19 47 07 A box of Domino's stuffed cheesy bread in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
- File:2019-02-15 02 54 45 A box of Apple Jacks in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
- File:2019-02-15 02 59 14 A box of Frosted Mini-Wheats in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
- File:2019-02-15 03 03 51 A box of Kellogg's Honey Smacks in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
- File:2019-02-15 03 08 47 A box of Cap'N Crunch in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
- File:2019-02-15 03 12 31 A box of General Mills Golden Grahams in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
- File:2019-02-15 03 16 30 A box of Cinnamon Toast Crunch in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
- File:2019-02-15 03 19 57 A box of Corn Pops in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
- File:2019-02-15 03 24 33 A box of Lucky Charms in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
- File:2019-02-15 03 29 04 A box of Cinnamon Life cereal in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
- File:2019-02-15 03 32 50 A box of Wheaties in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
- File:2019-02-15 03 38 05 A box of Special K cereal in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg
ƏXPLICIT 09:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Advertising or self-promotion. (COM:ADVERT) Déjà vu • ✉ 10:17, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Advertising or self-promotion. (COM:ADVERT) Déjà vu • ✉ 10:17, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Advertising or self-promotion. (COM:ADVERT) Déjà vu • ✉ 10:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Advertising or self-promotion. (COM:ADVERT) Déjà vu • ✉ 10:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
cette Eglise Notre dame des Labours n'est pas à Norrey en Bessin mais à Manvieu norrey sous le même nom!!! je transmets la bonne photo 86.249.17.134 10:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC).
- Saint-Manvieu-Norrey est le résultat de la fusion de Saint-Manvieu et Norrey-en-Bessin en 1972. Ce n'est de toute façon pas un motif de suppression.--- Ikmo-ned (talk) 10:52, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is widely used, from en:Saint-Manvieu-Norrey to Église Notre-Dame-des-Labours de Saint-Manvieu-Norrey (Q3580374). Under COM:NPOV, this means it should not be deleted even if the description is inaccurate. --bjh21 (talk) 18:16, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Renaming is possible if needed. Trizek from FR 11:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan, we need the permission from the memorial's creator to publish this work under a free licence! Commercial use must be possible.
Ras67 (talk) 10:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
It is image of M Monsur Ali Desertsniper87 (talk) 10:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your concern. Mistakenly I have miss matched the names between AHM Kamarujjaman and M Monsur Ali. Now the photos are interchanged. Hopefully everything is okay now.--Rocky Masum (talk) 10:48, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Dubious own work. Very low resolution. Le Petit Chat (talk) 11:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Account has uploaded press photos of TomTom that are low res and are missing their exif data. Account had also uploaded a lower resolution version of File:TomTom, Amsterdam.JPG with the claim that it was their own work.
Vera (talk) 11:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused file. Seems to be a random collection of object. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 11:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possibly COM:OOS 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
It is no longer licensed under CC Jakub Michankow (talk) 12:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: Creative Commons licences are irrevocable, and this was reviewed by a bot. --bjh21 (talk) 18:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per bjh21. Once a CC licence has been reviewed at Commons, the file will stay even if the licence is no longer visible at the source page. De728631 (talk) 15:48, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
User's other two uploads appear to have been taken from online. These are thematically consistent and also lack any meta data whatsoever. These do not show up on a reverse image search, but given the full context, I'm not sure that we can trust they are authentically own work without additional information.
GMGtalk 12:55, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- The second is watermarked twice, one of them a photocredit. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:17, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Clear copyvio, Low resolution image taken from https://www.collegesearch.in/university/shiv-nadar-university-noida/faculty Bodhisattwa (talk) 13:20, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, the person concerned is my PhD supervisor, and the photo has been used with her consent from her personal files. Please refrain from deleting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mxdartist (talk • contribs) 13:55, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Cette photo est issue d'une vidéo de la Librairie Mollat. Nina Bouraoui a refusé que cette vidéo soit diffusée, et que son image soit utilisée contre sa volonté. Elle propose en photo, en remplacement, une photo prise par elle-même (selfie). . Eliselattes (talk) 13:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Machine translation: "This photo is from a video from the Mollat Bookstore. Nina Bouraoui refused to have the video broadcast, and that her image be used against her will. She offers a photo, as a replacement, a photo taken by herself (selfie)".
- @Eliselattes: Can she send the replacement(s) to OTRS? I find the story a bit strange. She sat down for the interview and she never wondered what the camera was for? The video is offline though.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:52, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Published on Facebook - not free Sammyday (talk) 13:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sachin M V (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small. Low res. No metadata. Unlikely to be own work.
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sachin M V (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution, no camera EXIF, visual characteristics suggest screenshots, all other user uploads copyvios of footballers. Quack.
Эlcobbola talk 14:00, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; rabbit; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Taken from https://www.facebook.com/bfc1909official/photos/a.266398446812309/2302941613157972/?type=3&theater so the applied license is not appropriate and not a legitimate upload Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; feel free to tag SD|F4 next time. --Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
I agree, I had not understood that Wikimedia Commons was only for media files. I apologize You can delete the file. Sorry. JIDEVE (The author)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by USfelderhof (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by USfelderhof (talk · contribs)
[edit]Title cards/Poster, permission needed.
- File:Series premiere poster - 11.06.2019.png
- File:Ep. 1 Sir. Richard Branson - Kamp Solutions season 1 - 11.06.2019.png
- File:Ep. 9 Sir. Richard Branson - Kamp Solutions season 1 - 12.25.2019.png
- File:Ep. 6 Peter Barnes - Kamp Solutions season 1 - 12.11.2019.png
- File:Jurriaan Kamp (host) - series press poster.png
- File:Ep. 5 Jonathan Foley - Kamp Solutions season 1 - 12.04.2019.png
- File:Ep. 7 Bill Joy - Kamp Solutions season 1 - 12.18.2019.png
- File:Ep. 9 Deepak Chopra - Kamp Solutions season 1 - 01.01.2020.png
- File:Ep. 3 Rosamund Stone Zander - Kamp Solutions season 1 - 11.20.2019.png
- File:Ep. 4 Johan Rockström - Kamp Solutions season 1 - 11.27.2019.png
- File:Ep. 10 Greg Steltenpohl - Kamp Solutions season 1- 01.08.2020.png
- File:Mosaic logo KSS1.png
- File:Ep. 2 Amory Lovins - Kamp Solutions season 1 - 11.13.2019.png
_-_series_press_poster.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:04, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 08:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MFitzGerald1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos and advertisement. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:USS-Phoenix-CL-46.jpg
- File:Chatham Blanketeers 2.jpg
- File:Chatham Studebaker Ad.jpg
- File:Chatham Blanket.jpg
- File:Chatham Blankets.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Possibly from this website (as stated in description). If so, file is copyvio. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Elcobbola. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
my creation and its a duplicate Victuallers (talk) 17:11, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Looks like official portrait, so not taken by uploader himself, so copyvio. And image is only used in a purely promotional article, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
No OTRS permission from the author. Jcb (talk) 18:28, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned by the uploader DZwarrior1 (talk) 19:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: inconsistent request, the source (Soccer.ru) was correctly mentioned at the upload's time, and then verified by OTRS system. There's no one valid reason for deletion — danyele 23:50, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep First, what Dany said, the link is a perfectly fine way to express the source. Second, even if you for some reason suspect the uploader of fraud, the image is trivially available from the source, at https://www.soccer.ru/players/galery/173516/photo/412776, just search for the player, click under photos. We can't delete all our images every time their sources move. Bad nomination. --GRuban (talk) 18:03, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned by the uploader DZwarrior1 (talk) 19:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: the source (Soccer.ru) was correctly mentioned at the upload's time, and then verified by OTRS system. There's no one valid reason for deletion; inconsistent request by @DZwarrior1: — danyele 22:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
very low quality DZwarrior1 (talk) 19:49, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: inconsistent request, no better or with free-licence pictures are currently available — danyele 23:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
very low quality DZwarrior1 (talk) 19:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: inconsistent request, no better or with free-licence pictures are currently available — danyele 23:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
very low quality DZwarrior1 (talk) 19:51, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: inconsistent request, no better or with free-licence pictures are currently available — danyele 23:48, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- also file:Arbv-t81.jpg
The files are taken from site of Venezuela Navy and claimed to be in public domain. But the licenses are never reviewed, now (13 years later) source links are dead and source site has unfree license "Copyright © 2018. Armada Bolivariana. Todos los derechos reservados." In my opinion the files have never been freely licensed and they violate Venezuela Navy copyright. Taivo (talk) 20:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is on here because it's sourced from Listal, but I don't think Listal being the source of this photo is plausible. It appears to be a professional headshot, and anyone can upload to Listal. Very unlikely this is PD. (Should be noted the uploader of this image appears to have had several copyright violations on Commons in the past) Nohomersryan (talk) 21:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
copies without permission from https://www.imerir.com/department/bac5-intelligence-artificielle/ and other pages of same site
- File:Développeur de Solutions Mobiles et Connectées.jpg
- File:MSIR Intelligence Artificielle.jpg
- File:MSIR Internet des Objets et Cloud.jpg
- File:MSIR Cybersécurité.jpg
- File:MSIR Robotique d'innovation.jpg
- File:IMERIR.png
Hab'rtix (talk) 21:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Small, with in-image caption text. Have separate high-quality files of all of these compounds in Category:Perfluorocarbons—I replaced this image with a gallery of them at en:Perfluorocycloalkene DMacks (talk) 15:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; image caption prohibits re-use on other Wikipedia projects; the three files were replaced by File:Hexafluorocyclobutene.png, File:Octafluorocyclopentene.png and File:Decafluorocyclohexene.png. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 20:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 13:44, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AsetFerzeliyev (talk · contribs)
[edit]Needs permission from the artist
- File:Habiba7777.jpg
- File:Habiba99.jpg
- File:Habiba8.png
- File:Habiba6.png
- File:Habiba15.jpg
- File:Habiba14.jpg
- File:Habiba13.jpg
- File:Habiba12.jpg
- File:Habiba 4.jpg
- File:Habiba2.jpg
- File:Habiba1.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:28, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:29, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Secretmissionpassion (talk · contribs)
[edit]Probably by "Secret Story" and not by the user
- File:Plan de SECRET STORY 1.png
- File:Plan de secret story 6.png
- File:Plan de la maison des secrets saison 3.jpg
- File:Carré-viiip-maison.jpg
- File:Plandelamaisonlorsdela2.jpg
- File:Secret Story 4 - Maison des secrets.jpg
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:10, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sealedcourtrecordname Assault Battery (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability.
- File:Cynthia Ore —Order of Court Sealed Name Change Assault Battery Case No. 52090FL .jpg
- File:Cynthia Ore—Order of Court Sealed Name Change Assault Battery Case No. 52090FL .jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
VK is not a valid source. Even if permission is given, account is private so it is not verifiable. Tagging File:Юлия Герко из Клипа "Осень".jpg & File:Юлия Герко из клипа "Осень".jpg too as the seem to be DW.
- File:Юлия Герко из клипа "Осень".jpg
- File:Юлия Герко из Клипа "Осень".jpg
- File:Юлия Герко. Украинская певица.jpg
- File:Юлия Герко. Певица. Украина. Кременчуг.jpg
- File:Юлия Герко, украинская певица.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 18:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
meaningless logo DZwarrior1 (talk) 18:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OOS +per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
this file is useless ,there are many similar files with same content which are being used on wiki DZwarrior1 (talk) 11:17, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- @DZwarrior1: File is INUSE - what should it be replaced with if at all? Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell all of the remaining uses are outside of mainspace, so technically COM:INUSE doesn't apply. Nonetheless, DZwarrior1, if you're going to claim that a file is redundant because of other files with the same content, you really need to indicate which other files you're talking about. None of the other files in Category:Fantasy football flags of Italy (this file's only topic category) is remotely similar. --bjh21 (talk) 11:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 06:38, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
{{Duplicate |file=600px pentasection vertical Black HEX-0753CB.svg|reason=Exists with the same format already.|user=DZwarrior1}} DZwarrior1 (talk) 13:22, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 13:58, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Same image has just been deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:L39NG Rollout 02.jpg still no evidence of release MilborneOne (talk) 15:52, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:05, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Same image that has jsut been deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Motor l-39ng.jpg but now claimed as not the work of the uploader but no evidence of release MilborneOne (talk) 15:54, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:05, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Same image has just been deleted as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kokpit-l-39ng.jpg - now claimed as the wrok of others but still no evidence MilborneOne (talk) 15:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:06, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The image in not suitable for illustrating any article. Ghirlandajo (talk) 01:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I cropped it. -- Geagea (talk) 07:09, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept Cropped version seems unobjectionable and of possible use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Désolé mais cette image n'est pas intéressante pour une encyclopédie Prehistoricplanes (talk) 10:34, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per prompt uploader request. Was not in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
this logo already exists on commons DZwarrior1 (talk) 11:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted orphan, bogus license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:31, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
this logo already exist: File:JSEBEl Biar.png DZwarrior1 (talk) 11:28, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:32, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
This logo already exists: File:JSEBEl Biar.png DZwarrior1 (talk) 11:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Unused, bogus license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:33, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
this logo is not the official and he was never used in reality DZwarrior1 (talk) 11:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
very low quality logo DZwarrior1 (talk) 11:59, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use on en:Tala Athmane. Under COM:INUSE, if its quality is good enough for Wikipedia, it's good enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 18:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted False license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted characters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:37, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
file in copyviol, not a free or creative-commons logo. 82.57.120.238 22:12, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted per nom; false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
The image is not suitable for illustrating any article. Ghirlandajo (talk) 01:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Silhouette seems unobjectionable; some may prefer such an effect in some context. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:27, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: ok, as per Infrogmation of New Orleans. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:47, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Logo might be a complex one per COM:TOO China, cropping might be ok. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:46, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. The map may be much too recent for PD-old, the map itself may even date from less than 70 years ago. Jcb (talk) 09:05, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:42, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Ad Meskens as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: image without clear subject. But I see the subject. We can discuss educational value of the photo for a week. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:43, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Ad Meskens as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: image without clear subject. I see the fish. We can discuss educational value of the photo for a week. Maybe illustrates waves in pond? Taivo (talk) 09:20, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:44, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:DW of copyrighted poster or advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:49, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:41, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
{{Copyvio}} ZG 90 (talk) 13:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:41, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
No authorship information. Without a date we don't know whether PD-Italy could apply or not. Jcb (talk) 14:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
RESPONSE: SVG image for Andover Radio added. Permissions received. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prometheusradio (talk • contribs) 16:05, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.
- File:Cantine Cerrato Particolare.jpg
- File:Cantine Cerrato Pilastri 3.jpg
- File:Cantine Cerrato Ambiente A.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:48, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
I'm not sure if this is a valid authority control ID or not, but if it is then it should be created as a property on Wikidata rather than as a template here. Mike Peel (talk) 18:55, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, a whole bunch of unwanted side-effects. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
This file was explicitly marked as do not transfer to Commons since there are concerns that is copyrightable in the UK, which allows even simple typesets and colors to be copyrighted. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:10, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
British logo, see COM:CRT/United Kingdom#Threshold of originality. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:11, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
This is not a state symbol or sign. Maxinvestigator (talk) 06:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:11, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JimPercy as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Editor at Commons says to delete due to copyright issue, though I am the owner & uploader. The file is not eligible for speedy deletion. Two things are to consider. At first copyright. Current license seems plausible, in addition {{PD-USGov}} is possible as well. At second educational value. One week for discussion is allowed. Taivo (talk) 07:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete It's not PD-USGov; National Committee on Federal Legislation on Birth Control was a lobbying group, not a governmental organization. It's an upublished work, and therefore it's copyright for life+70, in this case to the end of 2036.--Prosfilaes (talk) 12:59, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I went to Commons' Talk Page a few days ago, only wanting to properly tag my upload (not to have it deleted). I'm the owner of the letter, though its copyright seemingly belongs to Sanger's heirs, whoever they might be. It's very generic in nature, and serves solely to back up a credit (& small icon pic) in a WP article, that a certain billboard was prominently featured outdoors in 1931 (incl. Manhattan). Perhaps, it could be saved (even if iffy) by adding on that suggested tag {{PD-USGov}}. She was at the very least, deeply involved with Congressional legislation, over a long period of time. JimPercy (talk) 15:09, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Add on. I did some quick research. There's a WP article titled, "Alexander C. Sanger." He's the grandson, and likely overseer of the "Sanger family estate." I'd rather this upload just be deleted, rather than getting approval (too much trouble), if that's what it would take to save. It could just stay as-is, as there are certainly others in this questionable tagged range. But not if any vital legality issue is involved. JimPercy (talk) 16:04, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Sanger's heirs would own the copyright, if there wqere one, but there isn;t. As noted in the file, it is PD-no notice. Silly as it may seem, At the time this was written, for the letter to have a copyright, it would have to include a copyright notice. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:14, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted: Prosfilaes pointed out to me that until this was published, it did not require notice, and that simply mailing a private letter does not publish it. Therefore, unless it can be shown that it was actually published without notice before 1989, it is still under copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
File looks like an obvious copyright infringement and seems to be sourced from here. The author information mentions Alan von Lützau as the creator and on the talk page the uploader of the current version of the file claimed to have contacted the author about specific licensing information after the last time the file was marked for deletion. However, there's no OTRS permission information or any other proof that the file is actually freely licensed. With this deletion nomination, the uploader will have a chance to fix the situation instead of simply removing the copyvio template, which they did last time deletion was suggested. -- Veikk0.ma (talk) 10:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Veikk0.ma,
- first of al this is not an copyright infringement, this file was published first in 2006. dizzyfrinks.com was published 2010, so it is the other way round. Yes I removed copyvio in 2012, but I asked the creator and added a new licence 6 days later. But I did not send the mail from the creator to Commons:OTRS, I have done this now with 2019090310009121. vanGore (talk) 18:39, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The e-mail at the cited OTRS ticket comes from the uploader. Valid OTRS license must come directly from the copyright holder. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:20, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: looks like you forgot to delete it? :) Max Semenik (talk) 23:14, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: The images is still here, looks like havent deleted yet... Encik Tekateki (talk) 03:19, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
this file is useless ,there are many similar files with same content which are being used on wiki DZwarrior1 (talk) 11:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - the file is in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:20, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
this file is useless ,there are many similar files with same content which are being used on wiki DZwarrior1 (talk) 11:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: the file is widely in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:21, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
this file is useless and meaningless DZwarrior1 (talk) 11:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Comment Seems to be in use in ar:W -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:21, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
This logo already exists DZwarrior1 (talk) 12:05, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: File is in use on cs:MC Oran, en:MC Oran, and fr:Mouloudia Club oranais. It's not identical to any of the other files in Category:Logos of MC Oran. As such, I think it's immune from deletion under COM:INUSE. --18:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, no real source is mentioned by the uploader DZwarrior1 (talk) 22:26, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: The file does not exists, this file represent the 1990s period when the date of creation "1946" is not mentionned. The file has been reverted to a false version in many times, what should not be done. --Faycal.09 (talk) 20:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 11:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
This logo is a fake that has never existed in the club's history DZwarrior1 (talk) 12:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use on ar:اتحاد بلعباس, en:USM Bel Abbès, es:USM Bel-Abbès, fr:Union sportive madinet Bel Abbès, and ru:УСМ Бел-Аббес. Under COM:NPOV, if it's accurate enough for them, it's accurate enough for us. --bjh21 (talk) 18:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
no real source is mentioned by the uploader DZwarrior1 (talk) 22:35, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:09, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
per COM:TOYS 12.187.140.126 17:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:28, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
"Own work" of a 60 year old studio image, by a user whose other images have been deleted because of copyright? 92.213.11.224 22:57, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:29, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Seems like a derivative work. No source. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
This logo already exists: USM Blida (logo1).png DZwarrior1 (talk) 11:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
low res, unlikely to be own work. Also, no EXIF 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Not found elsewhere online using Google Images. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, updated. Deletionism is going a bit far: when interacting with an active editor w/ other uploads, why not ask before filing deletion requests? --SJ+ 14:01, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- Your failure to properly provide information on upload does not mean that the people cleaning up after you are delitionists. Anyway, the information you added is not helpful at all. The link you added is not publicly accessible and the main page says "© 2012–2019 edX Inc.", so based on what you added, this will still result in a Delete. Jcb (talk) 14:08, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- Your failure to properly provide information on upload does not mean that the people cleaning up after you are delitionists. Anyway, the information you added is not helpful at all. The link you added is not publicly accessible and the main page says "© 2012–2019 edX Inc.", so based on what you added, this will still result in a
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Afbeelding niet geschikt voor publiekelijk gebruik jegens melding van auteursrecht van kunstenaar. BE42DE98 (talk) 15:17, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 18:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: very likely own work by a new user unfamiliar with the process. But no context, little educational value, therefore out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
This image depicts not the true appearance from this object, see here and the other images in that category. Therefor it falls out of project scope. The text on the vertical obelisk differs slightly and the horizontal obelisk's text is lorem ipsum! I believe that we don't need this falsification. The origin is also questionable, is Smiless--xo and Glynis Minors the same person? COM:PCP
Ras67 (talk) 11:24, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 17:48, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
The color photograph could not have been made more than 75 years ago. Ghirlandajo (talk) 17:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 14:40, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This logo is a duplicate of this one: 
DZwarrior1 (talk) 18:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:43, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Angelegt mit falschen Lebensdaten. Die Datei mit richtigen Lebensdaten existiert: (1812-1877) Elbstein (talk) 22:49, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: If the file is misnamed then I suggest renaming it - deletion is not appropriate. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:42, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
gezeigtes Werk, nicht dauerhaft im öffentlichen Raum Ralf Roletschek 19:58, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Hallo Ralf Roletschek, hab gerade nachgeschaut, gerade in jüngeren Jahren sind häufig Wahlplakatfotografien zu finden, die unter dieselbe Begründung fallen müssten. Gilt nicht eine Sonderregelung für Wahlplakate gerade unter historisch-relevanten Aspekten?
Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 20:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Nein, die abgebildeten Fotos stammen von Fotografen, die selbst oder deren Erben Rechte daran halten. Ob "Die Partei" das Recht hat, das zu veröffentlichen, ist für uns unerheblich. Selbst wenn sie das beachtet haben, greift die Panoramafreiheit nicht. Ich persönlich würde argumentieren, daß die verlangte "Veröffentlichung auf Lebenszeit" hier gegeben ist, da das Leben von Wahlkampfplakaten ja ziemlich klar vorgegeben ist, wie auch bei Eis- oder Sandskulpturen. Diese Einschätzung wird hier und von einem Gericht jedoch nicht geteilt. Grundlage dafür ist der Justizirrtum zum verhüllten Reichstag von Christo. Das ist leider die aktuelle Rechtssprechung. --Ralf Roletschek 21:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, danke für die Information.
--PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 08:30, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
This is not the original version of the logo (there are some differences), The original and official logo of the channel is already available on commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Int_Now_logo.jpg DZwarrior1 (talk) 18:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "not the original"? I took it from the website of Inter so it is original and official. --Tohaomg (talk) 19:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)--Tohaomg (talk) 19:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 10:44, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
File derived from and inferior to 2007 File:Jumping_spider_vision_David_Hill.png. PNG is a better format than JPEG (SVG would be better) Glrx (talk) 15:59, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: not the same (other language). P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:28, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
This is not the original version of the logo (there are some differences), The original and official logo of the channel is already available on commons: File:Третий логотип канала Интер.gif DZwarrior1 (talk) 18:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:26, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
This logo is a fake that has never existed in reality DZwarrior1 (talk) 12:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This file is in use on ar:الوفاق الرياضي سوق أهراس, en:ES Souk Ahras, fr:Souk Ahras, and fr:Entente sportive de Souk Ahras. While they are still using it, it should not be deleted from Commons for inaccuracy, as explained in COM:NPOV. --bjh21 (talk) 18:24, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- I highly doubt that this is an own work (judging by high number of DR notices and SD notices). This doesn't seem like eligible for {{PD-logo}}. It is possible copyrignt violation IMO. So Delete. It doesn't really matter where this logo is being used. Masum Reza📞 21:07, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: regardless of the image's authenticity or the uploader's claim of own work, this is above the threshold of originality. --ƏXPLICIT 02:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
