Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/07/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
ottooptptp[t]t]t\]t;t'//. 49.151.255.131 10:43, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep Nonsense reason. Tm (talk) 10:46, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:49, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation Alen Štigmond (talk) 10:31, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyright violation. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
I don't need this page anymore (false installation) Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 18:27, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Christian Ferrer. --JuTa 01:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no license (No license since) : Can we use {{PD-textlogo}} and {{Trademarked}}? — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 05:28, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-textlogo}} {{Trademarked}}. --Yann (talk) 12:41, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted file Thats Just Great (talk) 18:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:35, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Image seems to be under the copyright of the "The World Famous Comedy Store" and is from their Flickr account Thats Just Great (talk) 18:55, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This is not the same image as the previous one of this name which was deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept Yes, it from their Flickr account, as the description clearly states that this is the source, and they have shared the photo under a free license. I see nothing amiss with license and credit. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:47, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded by blocked sockpuppet with history of uploading copyvios, no metadata. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:37, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MorganKevinJ(talk) 17:25, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
The Circus is a program on Showtime. I have visited their YouTube site and went to the Portal for the program. Once there, I found the program the image was taken from. On the upper right on both pages, they're selling copies of the programme(s). While this looks like it's the official YouTube channel for the show, I see nothing on either page saying they've released anything under a CC license.Here's their official website. At the bottom of the home page it says "© 2019 Showtime Networks Inc. and Showtime Digital Inc. All rights reserved." Therefore I have deduced that the programme is under copyright. Nowhere does it say that they've given anything from it a CC license. YouTube allows users to mark videos with various CC licenses, but there's none on this one. I have watched the entire 2 minutes + clip and there's absolutely nothing about CC licenses on it either. I have therefore deleted the image and will shortly mark it for deletion using this rationale. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassianto (talk • contribs) July 12, 2019 (UTC)
Keep. The proponent did not even read the license indicated by the uploader in the YouTube video. What irresponsibility. Anyway, there it is clearly written that the content is under Creative Commons licence: "License: Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)".
As I have said at other moments, The Circus is a program produced by Showtime. Weekly the program features episodes about politics, mostly covering elections and the Trump administration. On their YouTube channel, they publish a summary of these episodes. It's not too hard to know that this YouTube account, as well as the creative commons license, was chosen by the creators of the image: for example, one of the program's producers, Alex Wagner, cites this YouTube account. Therefore, I have no doubt that the image complies with the indicated license ({{YouTube CC-BY}}).
And, more importantly, there are several images like this (see Category:Media from The Circus: Inside the Greatest Political Show on Earth) and other sysops have concluded that it is not copyvio (precedents: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kamala Harris announcing her candidacy for presidency.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Michael Cohen in 2019.png). Érico (talk) 14:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
| regrettable off topic bickering collapsed. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:32, 14 July 2019 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. |
|
Keep. The license is hidden on the initial, default view when you look at the YouTube page.
However, if you click on "SHOW MORE", you can see that it says: "License Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)"
Obviously the videos that SHOWTIME is charging money to view are under copyright, but these are promotional videos that they have uploaded, for the purpose of drawing more traffic to watch their pay-per-view stuff, I presume. Wbm1058 (talk) 12:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep Difficult to see how a user could be so wrong, while so utterly convinced they were right. For his egregious abuse of Érico on two projects, I have requested a global block for Cassianto. BarkingAtTheMoon (talk) 15:46, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Finally. After three removals, ignoring four different users, insulting not one but two Administrators, he eventually accepts he was wrong. No apology, of course. The very antithesis of a Wikipedian. Also even tried to remove my vote, an extremely hypocritical act given his attacks on Érico for supposedly acting improperly by defending his image, which he 100% knew was not a copyright violation, and said so as a Commons Administrator, a position Cassianto thinks is so worthless it is acceptable to assume that just because they don't speak English as a first language, they must be liars or incompetent. BarkingAtTheMoon (talk) 00:36, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: CC license is definitely valid. Nominator has withdraw nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:28, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Low quality structure with not-acceptable font and colouring; cf. File:4-Bromoanisole.svg as an alternative. Wostr (talk) 14:26, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: File is in use on eo:Bromo-anizolo. Under COM:INUSE, used files should not be deleted for being ugly. Also alternative is in a vertical rather than a horizontal orientation. --bjh21 (talk) 12:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Original author has uploaded a new version of the file which removes bad font & useless colouring. The file should be kept now in order to provide a possible alternative with vertical alignment! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 15:21, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yep, structure has been fixed, so there is no reason for deleting this file now. Wostr (talk) 15:42, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: as per discussion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:17, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:38, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tulsi Bhagat as no license (No license since). The map is claimed to be from 1895. Is it possibly PD? Green Giant (talk) 20:00, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no license for 7 days. --Jcb (talk) 16:07, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photos
Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:21, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:53, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Long-tagged as having ambiguous stereochemistry. It's true...depending if the meaning is for the O on the ring to be distinctly up vs down gives two didfferent chemicals, one of which is not called "bornyl acetate". Category:Bornyl acetate has multiple options (including SVG and high-quality PNG) that have well-defined geometry at this location. DMacks (talk) 05:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 10:18, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Poor quality of the "OH" group. It has an opaque background (vs rest of image being transparent)--same problem as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ethyl cinnamate.svg. The two letters also render inconsistently (and sometimes poorly) at different sizes and mediawiki contexts (sometimes the letters touch/overlap). Category:Butan-1-ol has lots of replacements, including various color-codings, orientations, and levels of detail. DMacks (talk) 05:21, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nomination & reasoning of DMacks. I would suggest File:1-Butanol.svg as appropriate replacement, since the structure has the same orientation & also a highlighted (blue coloured) "OH" group. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 11:39, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 10:20, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Hand-drawn (MSPaint-like), replaceable by File:AminoacidCondensation.svg DMacks (talk) 05:29, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; inferior chemical structure (hand drawn with Paint). Proposed replacement is of high-quality & created with an official program for drawing chemical structures and equations! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 11:02, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 10:21, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Tagged as missing a stereochemical detail, and it's also generally low graphical quality (pixelated). Have File:Taraxerol.svg DMacks (talk) 05:34, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; unused & poor-quality chemical structure, also opaque. Proposed replacement is of high quality & fixed missing stereochemistry issue! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 09:34, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 10:22, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Not author's work, invalid licence claimed Andy Dingley (talk) 21:32, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Morgankevinj at 03:31, 19 Juli 2019 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Pak-Egale --Krdbot 13:14, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Ball-and-stick model of a salt with covalently bonded sodium cation (BTW why draw such model for salt instead of a crystal structure etc., since such model is fundamentally incorrect, as it cannot exist in reality?). Wostr (talk) 13:48, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Original author has uploaded a corrected version with transparent background, ionic structure & improved quality. We should keep the file! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 16:06, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- The major problem has been solved. The question remains is depicting a salt as an anion+cation in 3D model correct? This is a convention used in graphical representation of structures, not in 3D models. Until recently, we had crystal structures of salts, not simple anion+cation unrealistic models. I won't oppose keeping this file now, but this is the question we should answer, because we have more and more poor models like this one, which are misleading for readers. Wostr (talk) 16:58, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Wostr: I completely agree with you in this point. Generally, salt compounds are always ionic and have a large (infinite) 3D mesh out of corresponding cations & anions. (@Claudio Pistilli: Please take this into consideration when creating a 3d ball-and-stick model, sometimes it's better to visualize the compound with a crystal structure such as File:NaCl polyhedra.png. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 17:24, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for you opinions. I agree that the crystal structure is important to show the aggregation state of matter, but when I need to make a single reaction I need the molecule alone, and I miss inorganic files of singles molecules in Commons. Don't you agree?Claudio Pistilli (talk) 10:25, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- No, I don't know why anybody would want to show a reaction using molecules instead of chemical structures (is it an encyclopaedia or a reading book for children?), but that's a problem of your local wiki. The problem here is simple: you've uploaded a lot of files that are not chemically correct — some readers will know it, but most won't, hence you're doing more harm than good. Wostr (talk) 14:23, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for you opinions. I agree that the crystal structure is important to show the aggregation state of matter, but when I need to make a single reaction I need the molecule alone, and I miss inorganic files of singles molecules in Commons. Don't you agree?Claudio Pistilli (talk) 10:25, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Wostr: I completely agree with you in this point. Generally, salt compounds are always ionic and have a large (infinite) 3D mesh out of corresponding cations & anions. (@Claudio Pistilli: Please take this into consideration when creating a 3d ball-and-stick model, sometimes it's better to visualize the compound with a crystal structure such as File:NaCl polyhedra.png. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 17:24, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- The major problem has been solved. The question remains is depicting a salt as an anion+cation in 3D model correct? This is a convention used in graphical representation of structures, not in 3D models. Until recently, we had crystal structures of salts, not simple anion+cation unrealistic models. I won't oppose keeping this file now, but this is the question we should answer, because we have more and more poor models like this one, which are misleading for readers. Wostr (talk) 16:58, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: File is in use on eo:Natria deoksokoleato, so by COM:INUSE it should not be deleted just because its quality is poor. --bjh21 (talk) 12:24, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep seems like most of these files simple need to be improved like this one. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:33, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept per discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work : https://tineye.com/search/eba5aa6b8b5638ee1be3e09d67f890999f6e2daa?extension_ver=chrome-1.3.0&page=1 TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:02, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake Arghya1999 (talk) 07:35, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted per uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - clearly OOS. Hiàn (talk) 21:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Self-promotion. --Achim (talk) 22:02, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Info: Uploader User:OfficialSirFrost now continues self-promotion using another account User:Jahmai Purcell. --Achim (talk) 13:29, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
if you aint going to help just go away! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jahmai Purcell (talk • contribs) 13:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- In case you didn't notice: This is not facebook. --Achim (talk) 13:35, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:30, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10. Seems to be a larger brand. As such possibly inside our project scope. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:30, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, this was spam uploaded to beautify copyvio advert article en:Kandos Chocolate, which was deleted under three separate speedy deletion criteria. Also, the filename does not match the content. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:17, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:00, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. No educational value. Not used. Not a logo of notable organisation Headlock0225 (talk) 18:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, should not have reused name. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:05, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:28, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
© 2019 - La Estrella de Panamá - Todos los derechos reservados. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Delete: Clearly copyvio. Taichi (talk) 03:36, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted False license; not free licensed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. Sealle (talk) 22:18, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:19, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Although the recording/camerawork may be public domain (and the lyrics may also be public domain), The Blind Boys of Alabama aren't employees of the United States government, so their music performance is still copyrighted. See, for example, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bob Dylan performs The Times they are a Changin' at the White House.ogv. Kaldari (talk) 22:59, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per my concerns at FSC: Recording rights are PD-USGov, but everything else is at least unclear. Lyrics and original melody of this traditional may be PD due to age, but we don't know. Arrangement/interpretation/performance rights belong at least partially to the performers and have not been released under a free license. For example, the bass line does certainly sound modern and the piano solo at 1:20 was probably improvised … --El Grafo (talk) 12:22, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted In such cases *all* elements need to be free licensed: The authorship of the media file (PD-Gov), the composition performed (undetermined), and the performance by the artists (no indication nor reason to think it is). Unless the Blind Boys of Alabama have specifically free licensed their performance (in which case we would need specific statement to that effect), this is derivative work and thus not free licensed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Baltakatei (talk) 23:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted DW; prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Font and style not-acceptable according to IUPAC recommendations. Cf. File:Citronellyl oxalate.svg. Wostr (talk) 12:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep why not fix rather than delete? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:31, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete It is fixed via upload at a different name, as nom mentions. The nom'ed file is now-replaceable poorer quality. DMacks (talk) 04:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; low-quality chemical structure with strange colouring of atom groups. Have File:Citronellyl oxalate.svg as harmonious, high-quality vector replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 07:44, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:08, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Different sizes of atoms, most likely the graphic was created using two different ball-and-sticks models. Wostr (talk) 13:14, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- The file NEVER must be deleted, because its structure is correct. In Commons there is a culture of deleting right configurated files which, at most must be substituted, and NEVER deleted, because they are necessary. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 14:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- So tell my, why this right configurated file have hydrogen atoms of different size? Has it some physical explanation? Wostr (talk) 20:24, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- To put a sharper statement, its structure is not correct because atoms of the same element are not the same size. DMacks (talk) 04:51, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yes the different sizes for the same molecules definitely need fixing. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:32, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- The file NEVER must be deleted, because its structure is correct. In Commons there is a culture of deleting right configurated files which, at most must be substituted, and NEVER deleted, because they are necessary. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 14:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Incorrect chemical 3D model; combined out of two different ball-and-stick models, hence the atoms have different sizes, which is factual incorrect. I have uploaded File:Isobutyl butyrate 3D ball.png as high-quality replacement (created with an official software). Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 20:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:30, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Font and style not-acceptable according to IUPAC rules. Cf. File:Buttersäureisobutylester.svg. Wostr (talk) 13:15, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Poor-quality chemical structure; not drawn according to IUPAC guidelines, also partly blurried (the whole structure does not fit together somehow). Proposed replacement is of high-quality & fixes everything! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 20:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
image says "photo not available" Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:27, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Calliopejen1: thanks for pointing this out. I thought I deleted them all, but looks like this one was still hiding in some dark corner of Commons. Multichill (talk) 22:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Someone fantasy about non-existent subway in small city. Not an official project. MBH 16:33, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- See also another files from user uploads - it's fantasy schemes of non-existent rapid tram too. MBH 16:36, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Low quality structure with cropped terminal bonds; cf. File:Hexyl propionate.svg as an alternative. Wostr (talk) 20:12, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: File is in use on fr:Propanoate d'hexyle and pt:Propanoato de hexila. Under COM:INUSE, used files should not be deleted for quality reasons. Proposed replacement is left-right reversed, so not a drop-in replacement. --bjh21 (talk) 12:35, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep:this simple structure don't need high quality! why put the terminal methyl groups and not those of CH2, like in File:Hexyl propionate.svg? if you want quality is the best = w:fr:formule développée. File:Hexyl propanoate.svg is depicted in normal w:Skeletal formula in which terminal CH3 are not represented. --Titou (talk) 16:01, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- cropped = terminal bonds have different length than the rest; why put the terminal methyl groups and not those of CH2 = that's how IUPAC recommends to draw structures, but that's not the argument here, no CH3 label is acceptable Wostr (talk) 19:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:36, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete Agreed. Personal snapshot of no educational value. De728631 (talk) 20:44, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low resolution, no metadata, watermark. Cjp24 (talk) 21:36, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Image is misleading nonsense Deku-shrub (talk) 21:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Deku-shrub: Could you elaborate on the above statement in more detail? Why do you consider this image to be "misleading"? AshFriday (talk) 01:17, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Deku-shrub: Why is this infographic misleading? Panopticon.exe (talk) 01:27, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
--Panopticon.exe (talk) 15:27, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Panopticon.exe: Are you Casey Botticello? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:21, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Yes, this is Casey Botticello Panopticon.exe (talk) 02:22, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Useful image. AshFriday (talk) 00:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- In what way it is useful? Deku-shrub (talk) 11:30, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- It illustrates the subject matter. AshFriday (talk) 22:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- In what way it is useful? Deku-shrub (talk) 11:30, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Panopticon may work for Black Edge but items created by him for them are going to be Copyright 2019 © Black Edge Consulting as per their website. We need evidence that Black Edge have released this. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Coins of Chile
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
Discasto talk 21:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:1 peso chileno 1976-A (31366241784).jpg, was uploaded by the Central Bank of Chile (titleholder of the copyrights above the Chilean currency) under a CC license in Flickr. --Warko (talk) 02:44, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete File:100 escudos reverso.jpg, uploader does not have the rights for this derivative work. --Warko (talk) 02:44, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Warko: You're completely right. I misses the authorship and license claim. --Discasto talk 08:18, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: One kept one deleted per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Coins of Chile
[edit]Per COM:CUR Chile, currencies of Chile are copyrighted unless they have published for 70 years.
- File:1 peso chileno 1976-A (31366241784).jpg
- File:1 peso chileno 1976-R (32207590515).jpg
- File:1-chilean-pesos-coin-obverse-1.jpg
- File:1-chilean-pesos-coin-obverse-1a.jpg
- File:10-chilean-pesos-coin-obverse-1.jpg
- File:10-chilean-pesos-coin-obverse-1a.jpg
- File:100 Chilean Pesos (51636114).jpeg
- File:100 escudos frente.jpg
- File:100-chilean-pesos-coin-obverse-1.jpg
- File:100-chilean-pesos-coin-reverse-1.jpg
- File:10CLC.jpg
- File:5-chilean-pesos-coin-obverse-1.jpg
- File:5-chilean-pesos-coin-obverse-1b.jpg
- File:50 chilean cent coin.jpg
- File:50-chilean-pesos-coin-obverse-1.jpg
- File:50-chilean-pesos-coin-reverse-1.jpg
- File:500-chilean-pesos-coin-obverse-1.jpg
- File:500-chilean-pesos-coin-obverse-1a.jpg
- File:Chilean cents.png
- File:CLP 0.01 1975.svg
- File:CLP 0.05 1975.svg
- File:CLP 0.05 1976.svg
- File:CLP 0.10 1975.svg
- File:CLP 0.10 1976.svg
- File:CLP 0.50 1975.svg
- File:CLP 0.50 1978.svg
- File:CLP 1 1975.svg
- File:CLP 1 1978.svg
- File:CLP 1 1992.svg
- File:CLP 10 010.svg
- File:CLP 10 1976.svg
- File:CLP 100 1984.svg
- File:CLP 100 2001.svg
- File:CLP 5 1976.svg
- File:CLP 5 1981.svg
- File:CLP 5 1992.svg
- File:CLP 50 1981.svg
- File:CLP 500 2000.svg
- File:EscudosE°1971-1974.jpg
- File:Moneda 10 pesos.png
- File:Moneda SAldea.jpg
- File:MonedasE°1971-1974(2).jpg
- File:Old chile peso.jpg
- File:Peso de la Provincia de Coquimbo.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Keep File:100 Chilean Pesos (51636114).jpeg. there's nothing copyrightable there.-- Darwin Ahoy! 02:59, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Keep It is true that coins are not by itself part of the public domain and such the copyright belongs to the Central Bank. But they have the same rules (in fact, there is no particular law regarding to the coins or banknotes design, it's just regular law applied to that). As such, old coins are under public domain according to PD-Chile so old coins like this are under PD. Also, simple designs are also under public domain because they are simple designs: the mockups that don't even use the exact design or typography (it's just numbers with a generic laurel wreath) but also this could apply to this type of simple coins. Even some coins with artistic designs above the threshold of originality are mostly under PD: the effigy of O'Higgins appears at least since 1942.
The only ones I could say that are clearly copyrighted are the reverse of the 500 and 100 pesos, because the artistic design are clearly new and not under PD.--B1mbo (talk) 01:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- btw, some files were even released by the alleged copyright holder with a CC-by-sa license, so they shouldn't be on the list even. --B1mbo (talk) 01:07, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, kept old coins and 1 peso (its image was released into PD by the Central Bank), the arguments about low originalilty don't hold for coin design. --Materialscientist (talk) 13:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
2019 © Петербургский государственный университет путей сообщения Императора Александра I Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oksana Poksi (talk · contribs)
[edit]2019 © Петербургский государственный университет путей сообщения Императора Александра I
- File:20170116 Презентация ПГУПС ENGL.pdf
- File:Выпуск-2019 год, 2019 человек.jpg
- File:Студенческий отряд проводников ПГУПС.jpg
- File:Дипломы.jpg
- File:День выпускника в Исаакиевском соборе.jpg
- File:Встреча с индийской делегацией. ПГУПС.jpg
- File:Общежития ПГУПС.jpg
- File:Элтранс-2019.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright © 2019. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:19, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Outshine2016 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:BROWN EYES OUTSHINE RECORDS PRESENTS.jpg
- File:OUTSHINE RECORDS PRESENTS.jpg
- File:Billi aakh OUTSHINE RECORDS PRESENTS.jpg
- File:Future OUTSHINE RECORDS PRESENTS.jpg
- File:Bewafaiyan OUTSHINE RECORDS PRESENTS.jpg
- File:Outshine Resorde Presents.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:34, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Possibly in scope but look like movie posters or adverts that need permission. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by StanleySiele (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:58, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Personal promotional images for wiki content which is consistently deleted (Special:CentralAuth/Pervinmov, Special:CentralAuth/Parvinmammadov).
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:27, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. 4nn1l2 (talk) 02:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:49, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:16, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by M ABDULSALAM (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:58, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Please send Edber Vallejo Heredia's permission via COM:OTRS. Roy17 (talk) 08:26, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Agneya Sanjay (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.
- File:PSX 20190701 202002.jpg
- File:PSX 20190705 144802.jpg
- File:B612 20190516 114841 862.jpg
- File:B612 20190702 094346 460.jpg
- File:B612 20190520 153217 764.jpg
- File:B612 20190518 191709 175.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:10, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
full size is here File:Jaffa, Alhambra Cinema. Arab cinema in Jaffa, 'Alhambra' LOC matpc.00267.jpg Roy17 (talk) 11:49, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by 1989. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:16, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
File:Samuel David Lujan waiting with his grandparents getting ready for his Plane flight to Paris.png
[edit]
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:16, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-encyclopedic, no location, no description. Till (talk) 15:15, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:33, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright at source
- Please contact our volunteer response team and provide them with credible evidence that you are indeed the photographer. Natuur12 (talk) 15:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- The source given on the image states that the website holds copyright. It is quite simple. --Herby talk thyme 15:45, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- It states: "our website". Natuur12 (talk) 12:52, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- The source given on the image states that the website holds copyright. It is quite simple. --Herby talk thyme 15:45, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; The website says Copyright © 2018 Lotus Eye Hospital and Institute. Please send permission to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mo3taz3zzat (talk · contribs)
[edit]https://alolabor.org/?page_id=15423
- File:Tayeb-Al-Hadairy DG 1.jpg
- File:Elhashimy-Elbanany DG 2.jpg
- File:Bakr Rasol DG 3.jpg
- File:Ibrahim-Qwaider DG 4.jpg
- File:Ahmad Luqman DG 5.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:14, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Tayeb-Al-Hadairy_DG_1.jpg” under ticket:2019071410001595. --廣九直通車 (talk) 13:27, 14 July 2019 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Elhashimy-Elbanany_DG_2.jpg” under ticket:2019071410001595. --廣九直通車 (talk) 13:27, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Bakr_Rasol_DG_3.jpg” under ticket:2019071410001595. --廣九直通車 (talk) 13:28, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Ibrahim-Qwaider_DG_4.jpg” under ticket:2019071410001595. --廣九直通車 (talk) 13:28, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Ahmad_Luqman_DG_5.jpg” under ticket:2019071410001595. --廣九直通車 (talk) 13:28, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Официальный сайт MIKKY © 2018-2019. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:17, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Slickman14 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Официальный сайт MIKKY © 2018-2019.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:16, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Structure of sodium salt with sodium cation covalently bonded to the deoxycholate anion + different fonts of anion and cation. Wostr (talk) 13:49, 13 July 2019 (UTC) PS File:Sodium deoxycholate.svg. Wostr (talk) 00:29, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: In use on eo:Natria deoksokoleato. Under COM:NPOV, used files are not eligible for deletion for inaccuracy. --bjh21 (talk) 12:26, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Bjh21: I have replaced its uses with the proposed replacement, hence the file is unused & ready for deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 08:00, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Poor-quality chemical structure; opaque (white background) & factual mistake (not ionic structure!), also bad quality of fonts. Proposed replacement fixes all these problems! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 08:00, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:33, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Low res structure with off-white background; cf. File:Taurocholic acid structure.png or File:Taurocholsäure.svg as an alternatives. Wostr (talk) 13:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Poor-quality chemical structure; unused & orphaned, also opaque & jagged. Have File:Taurocholsäure.svg as high-quality vector replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 16:09, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:32, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Low quality structure + off-white background + incorrectly depicted salt (sodium cation covalently bonded to an anion). Wostr (talk) 13:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC) PS File:Sodium taurocholate.svg. Wostr (talk) 00:29, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: Used on eo:Natria taŭrokoleato. Under COM:NPOV, used files should not be deleted for inaccuracy. --bjh21 (talk) 12:28, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Bjh21: I have replaced its use on eo:Natria taŭrokoleato. The file is still chemically incorrect, hence it gets deleted since an appropriate replacement has been provided by User:Wostr. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 13:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Poor-quality chemical structure; opaque & unused, also factual chemical mistake (compound is not depicted ionic as it should be). Have File:Sodium taurocholate.svg as correct, high-quality replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 13:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:32, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Low quality structure with not-acceptable font and colouring; cf. alternatives in Category:Anisole. Wostr (talk) 14:21, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Poor-quality chemical structure; strange usage of colour for atom or atom groups with partly poor resolution (the whole structure doesn't fit together somehow). Have File:Anisole 200.svg as appropriate, high-quality vector replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 15:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:31, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 1974, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 10:18, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Ich bin Christof Bucherer, der Enkel von Max Bucherer, der Sohn von Wilhelmine Bucherer, Tochter von Max und Else Bucherer. Als Inhaber des Urheberrechts der Werke meines Grossvaters, genehmige ich die Widergabe der besagten Abblidung Hans Hindermann 1907 in der Wikipedia. Die Homepage von Max Bucherer wurde von mir geschrieben. http://buchererpianos.ch/MaxBucherer.html Christof Bucherer http://buchererpianos.ch
- Dank an Herrn Bucherer für die Freigabe der Bildwiedergabe des Hindermann-Exlibris seines Großvaters Max Bucherer. @Martin Sg., können wir's damit also bewenden lassen und deine Deletion request zu den Akten legen? Danke.--Markus Wolter (talk) 16:05, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Es geht alleine mit einem gültigen OTRS-Ticket. --Martin Sg. (talk) 16:50, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Wenn du denn schon päpstlicher als der Papst sein willst, könntest du dann auch vielleicht so freundlich sein und Herrn Bucherer erklären, was das ist und ihn darum bitten? Danke.--Markus Wolter (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Da dies offenbar zu viel von Dir verlangt war, habe ich Herrn Bucherer selbst darüber informiert und ihn gebeten, diese Einverständniserklärung auszufüllen und zu schicken.--Markus Wolter (talk) 12:05, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Wenn du denn schon päpstlicher als der Papst sein willst, könntest du dann auch vielleicht so freundlich sein und Herrn Bucherer erklären, was das ist und ihn darum bitten? Danke.--Markus Wolter (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Es geht alleine mit einem gültigen OTRS-Ticket. --Martin Sg. (talk) 16:50, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Dank an Herrn Bucherer für die Freigabe der Bildwiedergabe des Hindermann-Exlibris seines Großvaters Max Bucherer. @Martin Sg., können wir's damit also bewenden lassen und deine Deletion request zu den Akten legen? Danke.--Markus Wolter (talk) 16:05, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 15:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted book covers. Sealle (talk) 22:32, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted materials. – Kwj2772 (talk) 03:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Font and style not-acceptable according to IUPAC standards. Wostr (talk) 17:26, 13 July 2019 (UTC) PS File:Diethyl disulfide.svg. Wostr (talk) 00:26, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- I don't mean to be the owner of all Wikipedia chemical structures, but whenever the file is substituted, I will agree. Thank you all and let's make Wikipedia the greatest encyclopedia of knowledge.Claudio Pistilli (talk) 12:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Poor-quality chemical structure; different mixture of font & styles. Have File:Diethyl disulfide.svg as uniform, high-quality vector replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 18:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:29, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Low quality + white background, not in use; cf. File:Ethyl acrylate.png and File:Ethyl acrylate 200.svg as an alternatives. Wostr (talk) 17:32, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Poor-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & unused file, also too wide margins. Have File:Ethyl acrylate 200.svg as high-quality vector replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 19:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:29, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Style and font not-acceptable according to IUPAC rules; cf. File:Butyl acetoacetate.svg as an alternative. Wostr (talk) 20:06, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Low-quality chemical structure; unused & different usage of styles and font. Have File:Butyl acetoacetate.svg as uniform, high-quality replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 06:50, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:30, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Font and style not-acceptable according to IUPAC rules; cf. File:Dibutyl adipate.svg as an alternative. Wostr (talk) 20:08, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Poor-quality chemical structure; not drawn with an appropriate program, different & strange mixture of styles and fonts. Have File:Dibutyl adipate.svg as uniform, high-quality vector replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 13:02, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:30, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Structure with very thin lines, not in use; cf. File:4-Bromoanisole.svg as an alternative. Wostr (talk) 14:28, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Poor-quality chemical structure; very thin lines & too wide margins. Have File:P-bromo-anisole.png as high-quality replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 18:11, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 13:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Structure of eugenyl cinnamate being probably a mix of two different files, hence the rotated labels and displaced bond. Wostr (talk) 14:45, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Please, let's be reasonable. The structure is correct and the file should not be deleted because the colors don't agree the eyes of the requester. At most, it must be SUBSTITUTED. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 15:27, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Claudio Pistilli: , please... read the IUPAC recommendations first, then draw your structures correctly. Wostr (talk) 16:14, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Please, let's be reasonable. The structure is correct and the file should not be deleted because the colors don't agree the eyes of the requester. At most, it must be SUBSTITUTED. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 15:27, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Alternative structure: File:Eugenyl cinnamate.svg. Wostr (talk) 00:27, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Low-quality chemical structure; combined out of two different drawings; also strange rotation of structure parts. Have File:Eugenyl cinnamate.svg as uniform, correct & high-quality replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 11:11, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 13:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Again a mix of two different files, hence the differences in sizes of atoms (four hydrogens are bigger than the rest...). Wostr (talk) 17:00, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Don't delete. At most it could be substituted. Be reasonable. Wikipedia needs this file and I think we all want to contribute.Claudio Pistilli (talk) 11:57, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Incorrect chemical ball-and-stick model; mixture of two different files (with different atom sizes and style). That's why some hydrogen atoms are bigger than others which is factual incorrect! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 06:57, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 13:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Font and style not-acceptable according to IUPAC rules; cf. File:Isopropyl acetoacetate.svg as an alternative. Wostr (talk) 20:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Low-quality chemical structure; unused & very strange colouring/style. Have File:Isopropyl acetoacetate.svg as uniform, high-quality replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 12:56, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 13:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Font and style not-acceptable according to IUPAC rules; cf. File:Sodium cinnamate.svg as an alternative. Wostr (talk) 20:18, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Low-quality chemical structural formula; strange usage of colouring & weird style (not drawn with an appropriate program). Have File:Sodium cinnamate.svg as correct, high-quality replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 12:55, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 13:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Low quality structure being a mix of two files with different resolution; cf. File:Furfuryl pentanoate.svg as an alternative. Wostr (talk) 20:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Poor-quality chemical structure (unused); mixture of two different structures with different resolutions (furfuryl alcohol part has a good resolution, valeric acid part however has a really bad, blurried resolution). Have File:Furfuryl pentanoate.svg as harmonious, high-quality replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 07:38, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 13:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Different sizes of atoms in cinnamate and in eugenyl part of the molecule; IMHO incorrect configuration (seems quite planar and carboxylate =O atom is too close to oxygen in methoxy group). Wostr (talk) 16:49, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Incorrect chemical structure; also unused; some hydrogen atoms are bigger than others, hence the whole file is factual incorrect! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 13:10, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 22:24, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicolas cueva (talk · contribs)
[edit]No FoP in Costa Rica or in Argentina and these fall under COM:CB#Murals
Majora (talk) 04:22, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:45, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
3D model with incorrect geometry + different sizes of atoms. Wostr (talk) 23:19, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment This, as with many of this uploader's 3D images, are composites (possibly from uncited third parties) and hand-creations or tweaks using graphical editors rather than using a molecular modeling package to generate a reasonable result of the molecule itself. The result is therefore a mixture of styles, sizes, and other graphical choices. In this case, it was clearly composed of one eugenyl group from one source and a carboxyl from another source, then cloning and mirroring to get the other half of the molecule. The result is total geometric nonsense regardless of the additional poor matching of atom sizes and/or chemical reasonableness of the conformation. The more pretty one makes something that is false, the more dangerous it is because someone might believe it. COM:EDUSE makes a strong statement that it's not for commons to judge the truthfulness of images, but instead it's up to other wikis' editors and site policies about using it, and we keep it if they use it. However, there's established precedent from commons-chemistry and other working groups that really bad nonsense (not just hoaxes and vandalism) is sometimes deletable even if in-use. And editors who continually upload nonsense on commons or conceal underlying sources, after repeated warnings, often get blocked here without second thought. DMacks (talk) 03:41, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the opinion of all. All are right and defend what they think right. But I, as creator of the files, must say that chemically they are correct (some of you said they are false just to delete them, this is not cooperation, this is lack of respect to other works), and I am poor and don't have a graphical software to help me with the structures. So I use a graphical editor to build the structures. As I said, I don't want to be the only owner to create structures in Wikipedia and I'm not hurt if someone substitutes the files I have created with much love. But what I can't agree is the simple deletion because the color does not satisfy the ego of a certain individual. The chemical structures serves as visual effect for the articles created and they enrich our encylopedia. Instead of taking hasty decisions, let us make a cold evalutaion of what is best for all of us in our hearts and not take hasty actions. Let's unite our hearts to make Wikipedia a great encyclopedia.Claudio Pistilli (talk) 12:29, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- No, these images are not correct. Please, refer to the matter and don't tell sentimental stories here. Wostr (talk) 14:18, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the opinion of all. All are right and defend what they think right. But I, as creator of the files, must say that chemically they are correct (some of you said they are false just to delete them, this is not cooperation, this is lack of respect to other works), and I am poor and don't have a graphical software to help me with the structures. So I use a graphical editor to build the structures. As I said, I don't want to be the only owner to create structures in Wikipedia and I'm not hurt if someone substitutes the files I have created with much love. But what I can't agree is the simple deletion because the color does not satisfy the ego of a certain individual. The chemical structures serves as visual effect for the articles created and they enrich our encylopedia. Instead of taking hasty decisions, let us make a cold evalutaion of what is best for all of us in our hearts and not take hasty actions. Let's unite our hearts to make Wikipedia a great encyclopedia.Claudio Pistilli (talk) 12:29, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep just tag them all like this until fixed.[1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:34, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Factual incorrect chemical ball-and-stick model; some atoms are bigger than others (combination of several different files), hence the file is chemically incorrect! Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 08:44, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bornyl_acetate_synthesis.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:35, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Because I（contributor） want to delate this file. 篠𠩤 和 (talk) 01:08, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:14, 27 Juli 2019 UTC: 投稿者が本名を使用しており、インターネット上で検索した結果この写真が挙がるため個人を特定でき、不適切なため --Krdbot 13:05, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
No evidence that this is freely licensed. Saucy (talk) 07:16, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
I can't see, why this image should be free, on the page where it comes from I don't see a cc0 hint. And this image is definetly not taken in 2014, is much older, a scanned analog photo, probably of the 1960s. Marcus Cyron (talk) 13:16, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:16, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Self-promotion, out of project scope. No contribs to any project. Achim (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: out of scope - per nomination Commons:Deletion requests/File:London Denez Locked In.jpg
Out of scope, random person Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:08, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru - out of scope - per nomination Commons:Deletion requests/File:Devyn headshot for wikipedia.jpg
copyvio, artist died 2019, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 21:15, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:31, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki (and probably copyviol) Melquíades (msg) 21:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:28, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Promocional; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:49, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation. Reverse image search shows this photo at several places over the internet including stock photo sites; unlikely to be own work. Nickw25 (talk) 02:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:49, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Encik Tekateki as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Out of Scope, Unused
Assuming they clicked the wrong button. No evidence of copyvio but definitely out of scope (which isn't a valid speedy deletion criterion). Majora (talk) 03:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:49, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:57, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- I am currently working on an article about Kevin Roster in my wikipedia sandbox. This is the picture I plan on using for that article. I reached out to him and told him I was working on an article and asked him if he had a picture that was either in the public domain or for which he owned the copyright, and he sent me several, including this one. Some of the others appeared in various news articles and so I wasn't actually sure who technically owned those. It isn't clear to me how I'm violating either policy, so I'm not sure what else to say in opposition to the deletion request. PStrait (talk) 18:51, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- @PStrait: I shall withdraw my deletion request as it is in use and can’t be deleted. However, you claiming that he sent you the pictures isn’t going to work too, is it possible that you ask his wife to send a permission to COM:OTRS? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:03, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- I don't have contact info for his wife and he died on Friday. I could provide screenshots of our conversation though, would that work?PStrait (talk) 04:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- @PStrait: I’m not quite sure, you can bring this to the Help Desk. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:29, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- I don't have contact info for his wife and he died on Friday. I could provide screenshots of our conversation though, would that work?PStrait (talk) 04:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- @PStrait: I shall withdraw my deletion request as it is in use and can’t be deleted. However, you claiming that he sent you the pictures isn’t going to work too, is it possible that you ask his wife to send a permission to COM:OTRS? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:03, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:48, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm doubtful about this one. It has no EXIF and uploader has dubious files. Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 04:57, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- The only files I can see (as not being administrator) is a series about these cable cars, which is not likely to have been published commercially. They are of different size, but that could be due to cropping. Can the files be found on the net? Some people routinely strip EXIF information, so that alone does not seem a reason to delete. If the user's images are going to be routinely deleted because of user history, that should be based on policy. --LPfi (talk) 07:15, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:46, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Possibly a derivative work. no source 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:58, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:45, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of copyrighted materials. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:00, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:45, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
this might be a copyright violation, since it's a book cover ƒringio · ✉ 07:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:44, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Not Public Domain yet. James Ensor passed away in 1949. Undelete in 2020. Spinster (talk) 08:46, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete and added the missing Category:Undelete in 2020 to this deletion request so we won't forget the next public domain day. Multichill (talk) 09:50, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Please make sure to mark them with noinclude so the main DR page doesn't get the category.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not Public Domain yet. James Ensor passed away in 1949. Undelete in 2020. Spinster (talk) 08:48, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete and added the missing Category:Undelete in 2020 to this deletion request so we won't forget the next public domain day. Multichill (talk) 09:50, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Please make sure to mark them with noinclude so the main DR page doesn't get the category.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This work by James Ensor is not Public Domain yet. James Ensor passed away in 1949. Undelete in 2020. Spinster (talk) 08:49, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete and added the missing Category:Undelete in 2020 to this deletion request so we won't forget the next public domain day. Multichill (talk) 09:50, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Please make sure to mark them with noinclude so the main DR page doesn't get the category.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
This work by James Ensor is not Public Domain yet. James Ensor passed away in 1949. Undelete in 2020. Spinster (talk) 08:49, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete and added the missing Category:Undelete in 2020 to this deletion request so we won't forget the next public domain day. Multichill (talk) 10:08, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Please make sure to mark them with noinclude so the main DR page doesn't get the category.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
This work by James Ensor is not Public Domain yet. James Ensor passed away in 1949. Undelete in 2020. Spinster (talk) 08:50, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete and added the missing Category:Undelete in 2020 to this deletion request so we won't forget the next public domain day. Multichill (talk) 10:08, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Please make sure to mark them with noinclude so the main DR page doesn't get the category.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Owner does not want it online anymore 212.239.191.97 08:50, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
authors request 212.239.191.97 08:53, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --Didym (talk) 15:41, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
This work by James Ensor is not Public Domain yet. James Ensor passed away in 1949. Undelete in 2020. Spinster (talk) 08:50, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete and added the missing Category:Undelete in 2020 to this deletion request so we won't forget the next public domain day. Multichill (talk) 10:08, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Please make sure to mark them with noinclude so the main DR page doesn't get the category.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:40, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
This picture is cropped and photoshopped from the picture on this page and most probably violates copyright. - Ochs (talk) 10:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:40, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
ungeklärtes Urheberrecht. Die gesamte verlinkte VVN-Broschüre scheint mir davon betroffen zu sein. Verum (talk) 10:27, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:39, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:42, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 大诺史 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Tagged non-free on en.wiki (see en:File:Augsburg Airways-logo.png)
- Needs to be discussed via a deletion request. Natuur12 (talk) 15:23, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep below Commons:Threshold_of_originality#Germany (otherwise I could crop it) — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 16:46, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 15:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:39, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:36, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Magnificentman (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal images : out of scope
- File:Performing kirtan.jpg
- File:4 Corner Kirtan 2.jpg
- File:Nitin Volume 11 2.jpg
- File:Nitin Nilesh Prakash.jpg
- File:Nitin .jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Magnificentman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Everything by this user is copyvio, professional shots, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Liberato Cacace.jpg
- File:WPX VS MEL RD 19.jpg
- File:Roy Krishna WPX RD 7.jpg
- File:Callum McCowatt.jpg
- File:McCowatt with the Steve Sumner Trophy.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:35, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation 85.132.110.61 17:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:35, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status is questionable. Uploader claims that they are the holder of the copyright, but the file name indicates the photographer was Bharat Pawar, who would presumably hold the copyright. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:34, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
According to the description this picture shows a model drinking a beer. The filename suggests that the picture is part of advertising. No information is given other than "own work", but the filename, description ánd the style of the picture make it more than likely that there is some kind of copyright involved. Maartenschrijft (talk) 18:59, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:34, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
very low quality, better File:Biagio d'Antonio - Ritratto di un ragazzo.jpg Oursana (talk) 02:39, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Originally nominated for speedy deletion under {{Fair use delete}} by Estopedist1 with the rationale: No FoP in Estonia.
That's not a valid speedy deletion rationale and there are quite a few projects where investigation of fair use uploads should be undertaken. Statue was created in 1976 per the source so it would still be under copyright. Majora (talk) 04:36, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- what is the easiest way to move this picture to the etwiki?--Estopedist1 (talk) 05:00, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- notice to the user:Pikne also--Estopedist1 (talk) 05:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Estopedist1: Download it to your computer and then reupload it locally. Right click on [2] and select "save image as..." on windows computers (your operating system may vary). Then give it name, save it somewhere, and upload it locally to whatever project you want where it follows their fair use rules. --Majora (talk) 18:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- I hoped that any easier mechanism to do it. But uploaded to etwiki (et:Fail:Johann Köler monument from Commons.JPG)--Estopedist1 (talk) 06:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Estopedist1: Download it to your computer and then reupload it locally. Right click on [2] and select "save image as..." on windows computers (your operating system may vary). Then give it name, save it somewhere, and upload it locally to whatever project you want where it follows their fair use rules. --Majora (talk) 18:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
![[2]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5e/Johann_K%C3%B6ler_monument.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
From twitter. although tagged as PD, I can't seem to find the section that explicitly says so. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, photos taken by an employee from VOA, nothing wrong regarding to the license. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Indeed. Work from @CarolynVOA. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:39, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
per COM:OOS. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:04, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I think COM:OOS deserves a little more explanation. Do we have any other pictures of such grillz?--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:39, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in scope of Category:Grills (jewellery). P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
I accidentally uploaded an arabic version over the original one. please delete the arabic version Twilight Magic (talk) 06:18, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- No need for deleting the whole page - just a matter of reverting to the earlier version (for which there is a one-click link on the page). So: thanks for alerting me, matter closed. Markus Pössel (talk) 07:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Oddly floating blue "H" on blue "N". Have File:Arginine 10.svg by same uploader (naming suggests they were trying a bunch of options and this was their final result).
- File:Arginine 10 svg final.png
- File:Arginine 9.svg
- File:Arginine 8.svg
- File:Arginine 7.svg
- File:Arginine 5.svg
- File:Arginine 4.svg
DMacks (talk) 07:21, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
sharpening was added to wrong layer Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Flickr description said Courtesy photo, which means the file is not come from National Guard A1Cafel (talk) 10:58, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep: https://www.flickr.com/photos/thenationalguard/albums/72157709597658801 says "by The National Guard" with the photo included in the album. Derpdadoodle (talk) 18:57, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- No, do you know the meaning of "courtesy"? This means that the file is not originally come from National Guard. The staffs may repost photos from other authorities, so the PD license can't be applied. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:28, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Hurricane Noah (talk) 02:14, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment: The descriptions for other photos in the album don't say "Courtesy photo", they say something like "U.S. Army National Guard photo by Staff Sgt. Garrett L. Dipuma". -- John Broughton (talk) 22:29, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
I doubt that "BMW AG" a) agrred to publish this image on Commons b) this image is really licenced under a free licence. I know we can not care about this, but these are actually the only images of the charging standard Combined charging system type 1 (or short CCS Type 1). So it would be nice if we could actually get a permission of some sort. --D-Kuru (talk) 11:34, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
May also has to be deleted with this image:
- File:Connector Type 1.png
- File:Plug Combo 1.png
- File:Plug Type 1.png
- File:CCS Type2 Plug.png
- File:CCS Type2 Connector.png
- File:CCS Combo2 Plug.png
- File:CCS Combo2 Connector.png
- File:CCS 1&2.jpg - derivative work of them
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
No indication that this image was really published under a free licence. Since this is actually a pretty good image we should consider recreating it with free images we already have D-Kuru (talk) 11:41, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
I dont think Greg Gordon Smith has the right to release the PSA video. Roy17 (talk) 12:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: original source at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-dO1u6H5Ik (note the GG Smith is only the music composer). No free license there. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Een betere afbeelding komt hierna Michiel8020 (talk) 13:14, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Slechte afbeelding Michiel8020 (talk) 13:14, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BandageGirl (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Weissgerber-Blockflöten.pdf
- File:Richard Jacob in eigener Werkstatt.pdf
- File:Windharmonika.jpg
- File:Gartentor vom Harlangrundstück.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
2005 monument (as shown on the plaque). Not in PD, thus not covered by COM:FOP#Japan. Yasu (talk) 15:16, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete no fop.--Roy17 (talk) 17:55, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:00, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 15:32, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion.
- @Didym: As an admin, you know how much work is involved closing a DN. So you should know better than to nominate files with such short rationale and leave it for other admins to figure it out. Feel free to renominate if you have more grounds to suspect copyvio. Thanks. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
il fait double emploi avec "Histoire de Turenne-Armagnac-1883 chez Mame-06" François GOGLINS (talk) 15:43, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Source unknown, is not CC BY-SA NewDataB (talk) 15:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Possibly above the threshold of originality in its home country COM:TOO#Common law countries. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:29, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: simple rainbow and text, seems below TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:10, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 大诺史 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: tagged non-free on zh.wiki (see en:File:TAM Airlines Logo.svg)
I believe that the marking as "non-free" on zhwiki may be a mistake. Brazil has a higher TOO than the US. I would doubt this would meet TOO in the US so it should also be ok in Brazil. For due diligence purposes though, I'm putting it to DR for other opinions. Majora (talk) 19:10, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep local wikis get it wrong all the time. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:36, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- I doubt this is above COM:TOO Brazil, so a assume it can be keep, but I'm definitly not expert in this field. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:41, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, below TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry Picture Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The picture might be worth keeping if the name of the species of bird could be added to the description and to the file name. Nigel David Allen (talk) 07:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Not blurry and usefull image of an Ardea cinerea and of an european river in 1990, well before the mass use of digital photos. Tm (talk) 14:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Tm. --INeverCry 00:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
poor quality, useless Joschi71 (talk) 19:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Poor quality photo of unidentified location in unidentified country. Only possible in scope usefulness I can see would be the bird; but we already have a category for images of that type of bird standing in water with many much superior images. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No context, no educational value. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry Picture Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:02, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Usefull image of an european river in 1990, well before the mass use of digital photos. Tm (talk) 14:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Tm. --INeverCry 00:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
poor quality, useless Joschi71 (talk) 19:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Poor quality image of unidentified location in unidentified country. I don't see any compensating possible usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Tamanho errado Silas Rodrigues Cidade (talk) 22:42, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Se indica un autor pero no aparece el permiso enlace a la imagen https://m.facebook.com/dayalexayala/photos/a.493580324310455/630666227268530/?type=3 Andresperalta (talk) 20:42, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Martin H. (talk) 17:16, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Picture of a coin is only free if the photographer releases the copyright. PD-SerbiaGov doesn't apply to photographs. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:18, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 大诺史 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Same file tagged fair use on en.wiki. (Diff version also tagged on zh.wiki)
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for a discussion to solve the discrepancy whether this logo/image is ineligible or is not (as its fair-use state on :en suggests). -- Túrelio (talk) 10:22, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I would say that the tailfin is the non-free portion. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:25, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:03, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
COM:FOP New Zealand (FOP doesn't apply to signs) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:15, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:06, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Non-free, see COM:TOO United Kingdom. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello i'm one of the copyright holder of this photo. I would like to delete this image from wikipedia because of personal reasons which is very complex to explain. Thanks in advance for the deletion.
INDY (talk) 08:25, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello i'm one of the copyright holder of this photo. I would like to delete this image from wikipedia because of personal reasons which is very complex to explain. Thanks in advance for the deletion. INDY (talk) 08:26, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- @INDY: This file is in use on O’Neil Bürgi (Q992332), so I think a slightly better explanation is in order. --bjh21 (talk) 12:20, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: In use and OTRS ticket. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:56, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work. Also, it is a stamp, which is classified as a work of art under French laws (as seen from COM:FRANCE#Stamps) and uploader claims the date to be in 2002. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:34, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 17:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Haukurth as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The information given here about this photograph showing pages from a 1992 book is totally insufficient to establish that this is a free image. Who actually drew these zodiac images? They look as though they might be old but we can't just assume that without some actual information. Natuur12 (talk) 15:10, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for nominating. Maybe someone can figure out the ultimate source here. If not, I think we'll have to delete. Haukurth (talk) 15:21, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- I agree that we need more info. The uploader is an experienced and recently active editor. Perhaps he/she can provide some background information. Natuur12 (talk) 15:24, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- Indeed. I was a bit trigger-happy with the speedy tag there. Let's see if we can sort this out. Haukurth (talk) 15:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- I own a copy of this book (Chinese-language edition), it says in the "List of Illustrations" section that these images are extracted from a late 15th-century book of hours once belonged to Antoine de Navarre; thus, I believe they are in the public domain. Uriel1022 (talk) 22:18, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 17:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
File:The China Fish in the pond in front of the Shuren Tecahing Building, Shanghai Qibao High School.jpg
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by WQL as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not pernament sculptures, which is not meeting FoP according to past judgement in Zigong, Sichuan, China. Natuur12 (talk) 15:15, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 17:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
modern stamps still under copyright Philafrenzy (talk) 17:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 17:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Tagged fair use on some wiki. See file on zh.wiki, en.wiki. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:32, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear TOO in Egypt, COM:PCP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Fair use. See zh:File:LOT Polish Airlines.svg 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:37, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- I assume it is below TOO? — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:59, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe not. It's all about the propeller (that's what it is, isn't it?) in the O which has at least some detail. It's debatable. COM:TOO has nothing on Poland specifically. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:09, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: I have found something on Polish TOO, which I have added to COM:TOO. According to this, the threshold is fairly low in Poland. COM:PCP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:27, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stepkaboom999 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical sound recordings and TV broadcast. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:51, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Missing Infos, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 08:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stepkaboom999 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:PoLand anthem.ogg
- File:Chechnya Anthem.ogg
- File:Boze cos polske.ogg
- File:South ossetia anthem.ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: very unlikely to be own work. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:28, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Borys-Anatoly (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Студентський квиток Шоломянцева-Терського Олега Саватійовича.jpg
- File:Описи винаходів до авторських свідоцтв.pdf
- File:XLII Звіт дирекції державної гімназії ім. Ю. Коженьовського у Бродах за 1932-33 навчальний рік. Броди 1933.pdf
- File:Шоломянцев-Tерський Олег Саватійович (1940).jpg
- File:Посвідчення про нагородження державною спортивною відзнакою Шоломянцева-Tерського Олега Саватійовича (1936).jpg
- File:Батьки Шоломянцева-Tерського Олега Саватійовича (1915-1916).jpg
- File:Шоломянцев-Tерський Олег Саватійович.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko, I'm going to help the uploader correct the problems if these files (to the extent that they can be corrected). I have a question - since I'm not very familiar with the procedures and approaches regarding historic photographs, I'm wondering if there are some general guidelines regarding these types of files? Is there a certain date that is considered to be PD-safe for photographs whose author is unknown? Best regards, Yuriy Bulka (talk) 16:44, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant countries. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:08, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- 1-3, 5) Maybe {{PD-UAGovDoc}} 4) for {{PD-Ukraine}} or {{PD-old-70}} need publication? I don't know examples of files from family archives... --Чорний Кіт (talk) 11:32, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- There are Soviet and Polish documents too, so Ukrainians tags should not be used blindly. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:45, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- and {{PD-Polishsymbol}}, too. 3) + {{PD-RU-exempt}} --Чорний Кіт (talk) 03:08, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- 2) delete, the author died in 1987 >-< 3) COM:POL General #3.--Чорний Кіт (talk) 08:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- There are Soviet and Polish documents too, so Ukrainians tags should not be used blindly. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:45, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: first file has been speedied by User:Raccoonish, others now have proper licenses. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:30, 24 November 2019 (UTC)