Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/04/26
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-Slavko-Bovan.jpg){kind=link}
Not the uploader's right Horus (talk) 09:53, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; speedied obvious copyright violation. --4nn1l2 (talk) 11:04, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Not a PD image. E4024 (talk) 02:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- I've been in communication with the uploader, who is the Art Director for the magazine North & South. Bauer Media owns the copyright for the image, and Virginia Larson, editor of North & South, has approved release of this image under a public license. Apparently they've been through the OTRS process and a release email has been sent; could somebody check to make sure it's in the queue? I'll add an OTRS tag to the photo. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 04:53, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 13:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
See EXIF, it's copied from facebook. All of this users uploads are copied from facebook. Looks copyvio 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 09:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
See EXIF, it's copied from facebook. All of this users uploads are copied from facebook. Looks copyvio 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 09:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
See EXIF, it's copied from facebook. All of this users uploads are copied from facebook. Looks copyvio 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 09:42, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 13:29, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by STUBLISH KHUPS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Speedy delete Selies! — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:55, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:12, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by STUBLISH KHUPS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 4.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 3.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 2.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS.jpg
Ies (talk) 08:57, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:48, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by STUBLISH KHUPS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 5.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS.png
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 4.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 3.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 2.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:31, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by STUBLISH KHUPS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, reloaded again. User warned. Again
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 16.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 15.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 14.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 13.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 12.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 11.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 9.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 8.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 7.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 6.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by STUBLISH KHUPS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 5 2.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 4 2.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 3 2.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 2 2.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 1 2.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 15.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 14.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 11.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 8.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 7.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 6.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 5.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 4.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 3.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 2.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 1.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 4.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 3.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS 2.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:28, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by STUBLISH KHUPS (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:00, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and blocked. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
This seems to be a good-faith effort for a collage, but "Size of Tau Ceti _ Author: (Collectibles from the Internet)" is not a sufficient source and author information, or evidence for permission from these authors. Vietnamese description translated via Google Translate. GermanJoe (talk) 13:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:38, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Non-free media. Copyright claimed, not the uploader (apparently) Kleuske (talk) 13:05, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- renominated for speedy-deletion as copyvio. Claimed as "own work", but the caption claims otherwise. Kleuske (talk) 13:16, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope spam selfie image. Wikimedia is not a private and personal photo-album. No educational value. Acabashi (talk) 10:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by another admin. --JuTa 16:56, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope spam selfie images. Wikimedia is not a private and personal photo-album. No educational value. Acabashi (talk) 10:56, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by another admin. --JuTa 16:57, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
no permission for public use 2003:E4:D3FC:EB00:205E:C7CF:B90E:D185 14:25, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Picture is found on serveral pages on the internet and so copy vio suspect [1] Brotfried (talk) 19:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oussama 499 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work, no metadata, small files, look familiar.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:49, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oussama 499 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works.
- File:FabriceauRaja.jpg
- File:ArjouneauRaja.jpg
- File:Ouardi contre Tétouan.jpg
- File:Benoun avec la sélection.jpg
- File:Ouardi avec la sélection.jpg
- File:Hafidi avec la sélection.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Delete Per nomination. The uploader has a long history of copyvios. De728631 (talk) 15:44, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Moved from User talk:Oussama 499 - C'est effectivement des fichiers que j'ai importés pour améliorer certains articles relatifs aux joueurs cités ci-dessus. Sachez juste que je n'ai jamais eu l'intention d'importer des fichiers soumis à des droits d'auteur, certains sont récupérés d'Internet et de ce fait, je ne peux guère savoir s'il sont libres de droits ou pas. Cordialement --Oussama 499 (talk) 16:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader admits himself (in his message above) that he uploads random images he finds online without knowing what their licenses are. All his previous uploaded images have been deleted for copyvio. A reverse search on Google shows some of the images above are already published on other non-free websites. And I do not trust this user for the others, which seem cropped from bigger ones. --Titlutin (talk) 17:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Omiloikarakaxas1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work, no meta data, facebook or smaller sizes, no apparent similarity in color, white balance, focus or composition. More likely uploaded from internet.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:42, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Mistake page Sakhalinio (talk) 19:31, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Empty, author's request. --Achim (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it when I was 15 and I don't longer wan't it to be available Soldier of Wasteland (talk) 21:31, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Julo at 17:39, 28 April 2019 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7) --Krdbot 01:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Obvious scan (COM:DW) of existing photograph - needs evidence of permission and uploaded by sock in evasion of block for copyvios Эlcobbola talk 16:56, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedying as COM:NETCOPYVIO - image here. --Эlcobbola talk 21:54, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Ich bin Eigentümer des Hauses und möchte kein Foto meines Hauses im Internet veröffentlicht sehen 88.68.60.103 07:18, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Es gibt keinen Rechtsanspruch darauf, Bilder des eigenen Hauses von öffentlichem Grund aus, zu verbieten. Daher ist der Löschantrag formal abzuweisen.--Karsten11 (talk) 08:35, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 18:14, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:35, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:35, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
誤って投稿してしまったため ほのぼのー (talk) 16:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:05, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 00:05, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 04:16, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bande prasad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not a web host, educationally not useful
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 10:24, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
STUBLISH KHUPS
[edit]- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 1 2.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 1.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 11.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 14.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 15.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 2 2.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 2.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 3 2.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 3.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 4 2.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 4.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 5 2.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 5.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 6.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 7.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS - 8.jpg
- File:STUBLISH KHUPS.jpg
Out of scope spam selfie images. Wikimedia is not a private and personal photo-album. No educational value. A previous block for this behaviour has had no effect, see: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:STUBLISH_KHUPS#Your_account_has_been_blocked --Acabashi (talk) 10:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Yann. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Found as early as 2004 at https://www.writework.com/essay/explain-why-willy-loman-not-tragic-hero, not a work of U.S. Embassy in India. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:51, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Clicking on the image on that page, it refers back to wikipedia as its source. The article text may be 2004, but the images there have been associated with it later. Hohum (talk) 00:08, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Hohum: Very unlikely that Wikipedia is the source of a 70s image... Nevertheless may you tell us what's the name of this Wikipedia file and if you are sure that it hasn't been uploaded there under fair-use. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- The website named in the nomination a) gives Wikipedia as the source for its image; b) that website did not have that image in 2004 as claimed in the nomination. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:37, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Michael Bednarek: As I've said earlier Wikipedia can't be the source of a 70's image because Wikipedia didn't exist back in the 70's (so I don't know why you are insisting again on this point). Nevertheless and although it's not the issue you may find it at different locations before having been posted here (at Amazon, here in 2004 and so on). Hohum says it comes from Wikipedia. First, not every Wikipedia image is suitable for Commons (that's why I asked if it was under fair-use). Second: he must find evidence it comes from Wikipedia. So if a valid link to Wikipedia is not provided a {{subst:nsd}} will be added and the file deleted within a week. Thanks, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:11, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, I finally get your point: Commons ≠ Wikipedia, although I suspect the people at writework.com made the same mistake and meant Wikimedia Commons. Still, I fail to see how that, or the other links you provide, show the image is not from the US embassy in the India. They certainly had a photo of Miller on their website in 2006: https://web.archive.org/web/20060505082409/http://usembassy.state.gov/posts/in1/wwwhspphomayjune10b.html – althought the image itself doesn't seem to have been included in the capture. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:42, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Since the uploader has not given neither the photographer's name nor the date of first publication we may search for a long time without finding the original source. Since we don't have the picture in the capture neither this upload is very problematic indeed. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:40, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, I finally get your point: Commons ≠ Wikipedia, although I suspect the people at writework.com made the same mistake and meant Wikimedia Commons. Still, I fail to see how that, or the other links you provide, show the image is not from the US embassy in the India. They certainly had a photo of Miller on their website in 2006: https://web.archive.org/web/20060505082409/http://usembassy.state.gov/posts/in1/wwwhspphomayjune10b.html – althought the image itself doesn't seem to have been included in the capture. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:42, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Michael Bednarek: As I've said earlier Wikipedia can't be the source of a 70's image because Wikipedia didn't exist back in the 70's (so I don't know why you are insisting again on this point). Nevertheless and although it's not the issue you may find it at different locations before having been posted here (at Amazon, here in 2004 and so on). Hohum says it comes from Wikipedia. First, not every Wikipedia image is suitable for Commons (that's why I asked if it was under fair-use). Second: he must find evidence it comes from Wikipedia. So if a valid link to Wikipedia is not provided a {{subst:nsd}} will be added and the file deleted within a week. Thanks, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:11, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- The website named in the nomination a) gives Wikipedia as the source for its image; b) that website did not have that image in 2004 as claimed in the nomination. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:37, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Hohum: Very unlikely that Wikipedia is the source of a 70s image... Nevertheless may you tell us what's the name of this Wikipedia file and if you are sure that it hasn't been uploaded there under fair-use. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Hohum's explanation, which is supported by that page's version from April 2013: https://web.archive.org/web/20130426062158/https://www.writework.com/essay/explain-why-willy-loman-not-tragic-hero -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:15, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- In addition, the file's EXIF data contain typical Facebook code. Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 19:29, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
not a web host, educationally not useful, photos of non-contributor QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 16:02, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kmsalmanshamil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not a web host + educationally not useful
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 18:25, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
unused personal image (was used only on deleted, out-of-scope, pages) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:22, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
https://www.theindependent.co.zw/2016/04/08/chiwenga-faces-uncertain-future/ копирайт PavelMukhin98 (talk) 19:56, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of our scope (personal images). Vercelas (quæstiones?) 20:01, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
portrait of (notable?) individual, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 21:24, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Notable but copyvio. Not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Derivative w. E4024 (talk) 00:03, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 14:41, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 14:42, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
The user created this to facilitate personal attacks on me in the English Wikipedia. Ymblanter (talk) 14:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- The user was blocked now for 31h on the English Wikipedia for harassment (well, against me)--Ymblanter (talk) 15:28, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom Abzeronow (talk) 15:12, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Victor sunsay (talk) 15:29, 26 April 2019 (UTC) The picture has no any specific information and just a screenshot of Wikipedia user opened data. --Victor sunsay
- Speedy delete per nom. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:09, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Alaa :)..! 14:43, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Poor-quality chemical structure; unused & orphaned. Have File:Diethanolamine.png as equivalent replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The horizontal "NH" is not as clear and the vertically stacked layout because it is not as obvious that the line from the right of it actually goes to the N specifically (not the H, or the NH generally). DMacks (talk) 03:01, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:38, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vickram kumar (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope+ likely copyright issues
Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:21, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Buchner Mechanism B V5.svg by the same uploader. Leyo 08:43, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; unused & redundant file, already replaced by File:Buchner Mechanism B V5.svg by the original uploader. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:59, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 20:18, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Too wide margin, replaced by File:AllylumlagerungRadikalMesomerieV2.svg by the same uploader. Leyo 08:49, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete both per nom. Also opaque (or partially-opaque) bg. DMacks (talk) 20:16, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete unused & technically incorrect SVG files. I support the deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:10, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 20:17, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Buchner Übersicht V2.svg by the same uploader. Leyo 08:53, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination, both files should be deleted since a high-quality SVG file was provided by the same uploader. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:01, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 20:17, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Baburajasariya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional purpose, enwiki contributions did not survive because of the same reason, com is not a web host.
- File:Baburaj Asariya - latest.jpg
- File:Baburaj asariya 02.jpg
- File:Baburaj asariya 01.jpg
- File:Baburaj asariya.jpg
- File:Baburaj Asariya.jpg
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 10:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:22, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 11:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:22, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:25, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bodybgcolor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:25, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by StalkingEvaRose (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:26, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:26, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Dj KingMasterSA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotional + out of scope
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 16:18, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:28, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Already blocked on enwiki for undisclosed paid editing, promotional and not a web host
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 16:23, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:28, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Advertising, out of scope Cjp24 (talk) 16:24, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:27, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Poor quality; replaced by File:Aminoacyl Group Glycine V1.svg and File:Aminoacyl Group Glutamine V1.svg. Leyo 17:04, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; unused & already replaced by proposed high-quality replacements. I see no valid reason for keeping them. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:39, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 20:18, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
artwork by living artist shown in a museum Clemens Stockner (talk) 11:12, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
artwork by living artist shown in a museum Clemens Stockner (talk) 11:13, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (also, exhibition in Belgium, FoP-Belgium is not applicable in museums). --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:36, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
artwork by living artist shown in a museum Clemens Stockner (talk) 11:14, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:37, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
artwork by living artist shown in a museum Clemens Stockner (talk) 11:14, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:38, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
derivative work Mutter Erde (talk) 12:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:38, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
please delete BUNTY GOND (talk) 15:14, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - File on userpage but not a contributing user. --E4024 (talk) 15:32, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per E4024. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:40, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Unfug, keine enzyklopädische Verwendung denkbar Regi51 (talk) 19:31, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (out of COM:SCOPE). --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:41, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Alfred Holler died in 1954, so the image is not in the PD yet and should be deleted. The file can be restored in 2025. Rosenzweig τ 20:10, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (maybe it's possible to upload a higher-resolution version in 2025? This one is extremely small...). --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:43, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- Undeleted Now PD. Abzeronow (talk) 20:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Facebook image. Facebook is not free. Ankry (talk) 07:23, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
This picture is from my property, it doesn't belong to the facebook page thay yoy said, I send the picture to the all news papers to use it. Thanks.--Lpenotti (talk) 13:38, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- If you use a picture that was published on facebook, you need to prove that publication on facebook was with the same free license declaration as you claim here. We have no way to verify on-wiki whether it was published by you or by somebody else. Ankry (talk) 17:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for your replay Ankry! What do you recommend me to do to solve this? Because I still want it to use my photo to put it in my article. Can you helpe me please? --Lpenotti (talk) 17:50, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, after receiving OTRS-permission from photographer the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 13:58, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO - here, etc. --Эlcobbola talk 19:47, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely claims of own work on a bust and two images. Were proper source and author given, it is possible they might be able to be retained.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:15, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Small images without EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Kgosi Sechele's Canon in Mahikeng.jpg
- File:Lost Ancient Tswana City called Kweneng near Johannesburg.jpg
- File:Yarona-country-lodge-kweneng-botswana.jpg
- File:Staywell Hotel in Mogoditshane.jpg
- File:Staywell Hotel Mogoditshane.jpg
- File:Sunbeam Hotel in Mogoditshane.webp
- File:Mogoditshane Senior Secondary School.jpg
- File:Retail Shops in Mogoditshane.jpg
- File:Mogoditshane Street Junction.jpg
- File:Mogoditshane Senior Secondary School Domitories.jpg
- File:New Apartments in Mogoditshane.jpg
- File:The New Bodiba Mall Mogoditshane.jpg
- File:Sechele 1 Museum Tradtional Tswana Hut.jpg
- File:Mafenyatlala Mall.jpg
- File:Kgari sechele senior secondary school.jpg
- File:Mafenyatlala Mall in Molepolole.jpg
- File:Molepolole Sports Complex-football stadium.jpg
- File:Furnmart-store-in-Mafenyetlala-mall-in-Molepolole-.jpg
- File:Lemepe lodge in Molepolole.jpg
- File:Molepolole Sports Complex.jpg
- File:Molepolole Kgotla with old grain silos.jpg
- File:Sekgoma Memorial Hospital Serowe.jpg
- File:Serowe Institute of Health Services.jpg
- File:Serowe Jacaranda road.jpg
- File:Sir Seretse Khama Statue in Serowe.jpg
- File:Boiteko Mall in Serowe.jpg
- File:Royal Cemetry Serowe.jpg
- File:Boiteko Junction Mall in Serowe.jpg
- File:The White Palace Serowe.webp
- File:Serowe Royal Cemetery.jpg
- File:Guest House for accomodation in Serowe.jpg
- File:Southern African Development Community HQ.jpg
- File:Chiefs Camp in the Okavango Delta.jpg
- File:Aerial-view-of-the-okavango-delta-channels-and-landscape.jpg
- File:Okavango Delta-Riding Safari.jpg
- File:The Okavango Delta.jpg
- File:River Cruising in the Okavango Delta.jpg
- File:Girrafes in the Okavango Delta.jpg
- File:LMS Church Serowe - Front.jpg
- File:Gaborone Private Hospital GPH.jpg
- File:LMS Church Serowe.jpg
- File:Gaborone-private-hospital.jpg
- File:Mmadinare Senior Secondary School in Mmadinare Village.jpg
- File:Botswana Innovation Hub Under Construction in Gaborone.jpg
- File:Botswana International University of Science & Technology.jpg
- File:University of Botswana Indoor Arena.jpg
- File:Parliament of Botswana photo from inside.jpg
- File:A young Motswana Girl.jpg
- File:Parliament of Botswana at night.jpg
- File:Silver Arrow Micro-V.jpg
- File:Brigade sergeant major soldier ranks military combat field dress uniforms Botswana army 008.jpg
Yann (talk) 11:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as nominated. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
As previously stated for older uploads by @Yann: : "Small images without EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works."
- File:Francistown Interchange.png
- File:Kaditshwene Tswana Ancient City.png
- File:Ministry of Health Botswana.png
- File:I Towers Gaborone CBD.png
- File:I Tower (Tower 1) Gaborone CBD.png
- File:I Towers at Night Gaborone.png
- File:Gaborone Attorney General's Chamber.png
- File:Gaborone Government Enclave.png
- File:Gaborone Night Skyline.png
- File:Botswana Investment Trade Center in Gaborone.png
- File:Gaborone New CBD at night.png
- File:Commerce Park in Gaborone.png
- File:BITC Tower Gaborone CBD.png
- File:3 Dikgosi Monument.png
- File:Botswana Development Corporation tower Gaborone.png
_Gaborone_CBD.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:34, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 16:21, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 06:28, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with the good admin Taivo and also think that the image is OoS. --E4024 (talk) 21:44, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 06:25, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tasin Sohad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Tasin Sohad 05.jpg
- File:Tasin Sohad 04.jpg
- File:Tasin Sohad 03.jpg
- File:Tasin Sohad 02.jpg
- File:Tasin Sohad 01.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:52, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 06:25, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
The online source is dead and shows nothing. Panda 51 (talk) 11:12, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:36, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
The source is provided but does not comply with the copyright license provided. Panda 51 (talk) 11:20, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:37, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wake me up before you buy some Pabst Blue Ribbon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small sizes without EXIFs, unlikely to be own works
Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:24, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. All files could be found elsewhere online without free licenses. --De728631 (talk) 17:42, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
It's no longer revelant Lauren Kucera (talk) 02:16, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - She looks OoS and probably the file is not an "own work" as announced (small and w/o EXIF). --E4024 (talk) 20:44, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, personal photo used only in own userpages. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marina Melik-Adamyan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Permission of TIGRAN ARAKELYAN needed via COM:OTRS.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Ticket:2019043010008983 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 19:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Since the permission of the author of the works Tigran Arakelyan was sent to OTRS, I would ask to cease the deletion request in order that the aforementioned photographs could be used in favor of Wikipedia. Best regards, --Marina Melik-Adamyan (talk) 21:13, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:10, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Restored: as per Ticket:2019043010008983. I don't see any to believe that the permission is not valid. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:28, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong copy and never completed (since 2010) of Viceroyalty of Peru (orthographic projection).svg Marco M. (talk) 00:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:03, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Appears to be previously published (and rotated) at https://www.instagram.com/torosdetijuana/p/BsL4jqGnqWl/?igshid=y6csw2y531ik Ytoyoda (talk) 00:38, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Es una copia escaneada de un texto escolar Marco M. (talk) 00:38, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Very low resolution, png file (no metadata) Cjp24 (talk) 01:34, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- See also on this webpage published 11 September 2008. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:13, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Graffiti in Mogliano Veneto via Prà dei Roveri 01.jpg. E4024 (talk) 01:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
ːI graffiti del sottopasso ferroviario sono stati commissionati dal Comune di Locate Triulzi. Per informazioni sulla possibilità o meno di riprodurre le immagini si contattare http://www.comune.locateditriulzi.mi.it/comune/comune_action.php?ACTION=tre&cod_dipartimento=100&trova=1&cod_ufficio=188--Mizardellorsa (talk) 14:50, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Mizardellorsa: Se sono stati commissionati dal Comune, allora saranno nel pubblico dominio fra 20 anni. Ruthven (msg) 16:05, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Graffiti in Mogliano Veneto via Prà dei Roveri 01.jpg. E4024 (talk) 01:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: permission gave for WLM. Ruthven (msg) 16:10, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
"Photograph of Stanley Cavell by Vivian Penglase"... E4024 (talk) 02:20, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded this photo at the request of Stanley Cavell's wife, who provided me with Vivian Penglase's photo with the latter's permission. Vivian Penglase took this photo of Cavell at the University of East Anglia in 2009. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aroomintown (talk • contribs) 03:12, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Please read our guidelines to prevent deletion at OTRS. --E4024 (talk) 21:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
This is a logo, and most probably copyrighted. A user with <50 edits to enwiki (only one of them related to the subject) and just 1 edit to Commons claims "i won the copyright", but there is no evidence of this. Utcursch (talk) 03:07, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Logo of non-notable company Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:05, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 16:13, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials and Geotechnical Engineering - TRACE 2018.jpg
[edit]
cover of a paper/essay. Dubious self-work claim or missing evidence of permission FASTILY 07:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: doubts that it is EDUSE (not used in any page/category). Ruthven (msg) 16:14, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Ложные сведения об авторстве: http://market-belogo.ru/bania-po-nauke/teplovoe-vozdeystvie-bani.html -- Tomasina (talk) 08:36, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:14, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Ложные данные об авторстве http://gornilo.ru/Image/_+XT=ind-dec16.jpg -- Tomasina (talk) 08:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:14, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
self-promotional, educationally not useful, not a web host, image was uploaded here to create promotional page on enwiki (marked for deletion already) QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 09:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:14, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
educationally not useful + not a web host QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 10:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: +. Ruthven (msg) 16:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
not a web host, this image was used in a promotional page on enwiki, which is already deleted from enwiki QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 10:13, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
false address DOSTEL29 (talk) 10:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Hello DOSTEL29, this is a picture of the farm at "Beneden Oostdijk 50", isn't it? Another Gemeentelijk monument in Oud-Beijerland. We should keep the pictures, but rename the files. Regards Bardenoki (talk) 06:28, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Bardenoki. Ruthven (msg) 16:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Crop of photo at http://all-likeit.blogspot.com/2012/03/afc-challenge-cup-2012-north-korea-is.html?m=1, authorship is uncertain Ytoyoda (talk) 10:52, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:18, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Cette photo est extraite d'une photo en plan plus large qui a été déjà difusée en 2017 par différents média notamment : https://www.francebleu.fr/infos/politique/legislatives-2017-qui-est-pierre-alain-raphan-le-nouveau-depute-rem-de-l-essonne-1497511336 Il n'y a ici aucune preuve que l'auteur de la photo ait donné son accord pour qu'elle soit versée dans Commons. Et les Exifs de la photos ont été effacés Poudou99 (talk) 11:36, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:18, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Close vantage of purportedly notable person uploaded by sock of user whose only uploads have been copyvios of this subject. Quack/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 20:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Support. Many "Copyvios" photos of this personality were downloaded and then deleted from Comons, while at the same time these photos were simultaneously inserted in the Wp-Fr article by an IP. This IP address proceeding to deletion of important texts at the same time (https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pierre-Alain_Raphan&action=history). --Poudou99 (talk) 20:35, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:18, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:42, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:19, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:43, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:19, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abo Dahash (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of photos, missing permission.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:25, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:19, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
derivative work Mutter Erde (talk) 12:34, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:21, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gino Boccasile
[edit]it:Gino Boccasile (1901-1952), copyright violation
- File:GinoBoccasile̞Perilnuovoordinesocialeperlaciviltà 01.jpg
- File:Manifesto pubblicitario - Musei del cibo - Prosciutto - 0172.tif
- File:Patto Tripartito.jpg
- File:Patto Tripartito (cropped).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Mutter Erde (talk) 12:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Mutter Erde, these cases are quite different and would have been worth discussing separately. On File:Patto Tripartito.jpg, I note the uploader placed {{PD-Italy}}, possibly implying that the poster itself was a Fascist Party work under {{PD-ItalyGov}} (see talk page there for some nuances): did you notice that? On File:Manifesto pubblicitario - Musei del cibo - Prosciutto - 0172.tif, which I uploaded, let me double check. Nemo 14:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- @ File:Patto Tripartito.jpg. You are right. If the uploader changes the current nonsense licence and replaces it with {{PD-ItalyGov}}, he has a good chance that commons will keep this file. But not without a good source as https://stampauctionnetwork.com/jk/jk73308.cfm and its reverse (= No. 6657). Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 19:05, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. To be restored in 2023. Ruthven (msg) 16:33, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
No permission. Needs an OTRS ticket.
- File:PiccoloMondoAnticoOdinBamboleFrancesi.jpg
- File:PiccoloMondoAnticoOdinBamboleGolia retro.jpg
- File:PiccoloMondoAnticoOdinBamboleGolia.jpg
- File:PiccoloMondoAnticoTorrePellice19911993Opuscolo 01.jpg
- File:PiccoloMondoAnticoTorrePellice19911993Opuscolo 02.jpg
- File:PiccoloMondoAnticoTorrePellice19911993Opuscolo 03.jpg
- File:PiccoloMondoAnticoTorrePellice19911993Opuscolo 04.jpg
- File:PiccoloMondoAnticoTorrePellice19911993Opuscolo 05.jpg
- File:PiccoloMondoAnticoTorrePellice19911993Opuscolo 06.jpg
- File:PiccoloMondoAnticoTorrePellice19911993Opuscolo 07.jpg
Mutter Erde (talk) 12:59, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:35, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:35, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:35, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I doubt that even in wiki-text this stuff is EDUSE. Ruthven (msg) 16:36, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danial siavash (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Makouei15.jpg
- File:Makouei12.jpg
- File:Kuche janun.jpg
- File:Mokouei11.jpg
- File:Makouei10.jpg
- File:Makouei9.jpg
- File:Makouei-siavash2.jpg
- File:Makouei7.jpg
- File:Makouei8.jpg
- File:Makouei-siavash1.jpg
- File:Makouei4.jpg
- File:Makouei6.jpg
- File:Makouei5.jpg
- File:Makouei3.jpg
- File:Makouei2.jpg
- File:Negahi Door.jpg
Yann (talk) 14:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:36, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate of File:Sigmund_Freud_1926.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 16:38, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Je veux changer la photo... Kervegan4936 (talk) 14:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 16:38, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
File:นายกรัฐมนตรี และภริยา เฝ้าฯ รับเสด็จ สมเด็จพระเทพรัตนร - Flickr - Abhisit Vejjajiva (11).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate File:Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn 2010-12-7.jpg Thyj (talk) 14:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate File:HRH Princess Sirindhorn 2010-12-5.jpg Thyj (talk) 14:32, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gaja Satrawada (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: There's no indication anywhere on ambarella.com that any of the content hosted on the website (including these logos) has been released under a {{Cc-by-3.0}} license; so, per COM:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS? or COM:OTRS#If you are NOT the copyright holder, OTRS is going to at least need verification from the original copyright holder for these to be kept as licensed.It might be possible for these, however, to be converted to {{PD-textlogo}} if they are deemed to be too simple to be eligible for copyright protection. For that to happen though, the logo is going to have to be considered to be such per not only COM:TOO#United States, but also the country of origin (whichever country that is). From the company's official website (here), it seems to have location in both the United States, Italy, China (including Hong Kong), Japan, Korea and Taiwan. While the US's threshold for originality (TOO) for copyright eligibility is fairly high (in comparison to some other countries) and might consider this logo to "PD-textlogo", some of these other countries seem to have lower TOOs where it's not as clear.Commons doesn't accept any "fair use content" at all per COM:FAIR which mean either OTRS verification for the current licensing is needed or the files need to be converted to PD; otherwise, they cannot be kept per COM:PCP and need to be deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:10, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Self-promotional, out of scope
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:59, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Broueslee
[edit]All the user’s credentials are two simple logos—albeit falsely declared as own works—and the following heterogeneous pictures, most of them looking like digitally processed photographs. May we trust the {{Own}} declaration?
And also. I am about to discard {{no permission since}} by GreenMeansGo boldly – one upload of ten was arbitrarily chosen and received a special treatment not based on any visible distinction. Such irregular actions IMHO only hinder the Commons’ defence against copyvio. Uploads by poor users should be attacked en masse. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:01, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- File:Sundeep M.jpg
- File:Sunder P.jpg
- File:IFANi1.JPG
- File:IFANi2.JPG
- File:IFANi3.JPG
- File:IFANi4.jpg
- File:IFANi5.jpg
- File:IFANi6.jpg
- File:IFANi7.jpg
- File:IFANi8.jpg
- Hmm? I must've gotten distracted with something at the time. Thanks for following up with this. Delete Yes, I find the quality and variety of these highly suspicious. If the user returns and demonstrates ownership then we can always undelete them. But since the author claims to be the subject, "own work" is a no-go, and we need something establishing that they are 1) the individual they claim to be, and 2) had some arrangement where the ownership of these are transferred to them. GMGtalk 16:07, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
This file contains error NazwaNr1 (talk) 16:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chrishanth niranjan cooray (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotional page/personal web page on siwiki, blatant violation of not a web host, + educationally not useful
- File:Krishan fo.jpg
- File:Chrishanth cooray aword.jpg
- File:My brothers sisters.jpg
- File:Kri foto2.jpg
- File:Kri foto 1.jpg
- File:Kri book.jpg
- File:Opac-image-pl1.png
- File:Awasan-parajaya-hamuwe.jpg
- File:Sri lankawe siduwana lama apayojana krishanth niranjan cooray-228x228.jpg
- File:Manawa himikam krishanth niranjan cooray-228x228.jpg
- File:Opac-image-pl.png
- File:Dariwiyo krishanth niranjan cooray-228x228.jpg
- File:Apacharawalata yomu wu sri lankawe lamun krishanth niranjan cooray-228x228.jpg
- File:Lasarus Cooray.jpg
- File:Rosmari.jpg
- File:Niranjan cooray.jpg
- File:Motmer youth.jpg
- File:Chrishanth.jpg
- File:Chrishanth cooray.jpg
- File:Chishanth cooray.jpg
- File:Img chrishanth.jpg
- File:Chrishanth .jpg
- File:DcNUEHBV4AAiH6 .jpg
- File:DXilZpEUMAEpulX.jpg
- File:Chrishanth foto.jpg
- File:Chrishanth Cooray.jpg
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 18:22, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chrishanth niranjan cooray (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
- File:Chri dawod.jpg
- File:Engagemant.jpg
- File:Maha Ge.jpg
- File:Maha gedara.jpg
- File:Untey.jpg
- File:Mother's.jpg
- File:Keterin Fernando.jpg
- File:Cherin 1901.jpg
- File:Mother & Father.jpg
- File:Grand m & f.jpg
- File:Christoper 1889.jpg
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:11, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Strcapitalpartners (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:10, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:19, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal + not in use = out of COM:SCOPE 90.79.65.119 22:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:20, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
derivative work [[User:|Mutter Erde]] (talk) 12:32, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Mutter Erde: I knew the poetess and I have a picture of her from which I created this image declaring it:
- "Own work, from an original photo in my possession"
- That's no good? --Giorgio Pietrocola (talk) 05:56, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- ̹̟̹̟This is not a derivative work. It is the original photo from which some derivative works have been taken. The derivative works on the internet are only part of this original photo. I can also prove it by showing the back of the photo if it can be used.--Giorgio Pietrocola (talk) 08:21, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Question @Giorgio Pietrocola: Who shot the original photograph? --Ruthven (msg) 16:20, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: As can be seen from the back, the photo has been reprinted in several copies by "Giulio foto" of Genoa Pegli (https://www.giuliophoto.it/) on 09/23/2006 when Grazia Raffa was already 75 years old. When, shortly afterwards, she gave me a copy, she told me that the original was taken by her older brother Placido (aka Dino, also a deceased poet), during a family trip in the 70s, on the ship to Spain.--Giorgio Pietrocola (talk) 11:13, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Giorgio Pietrocola: Perfect. Thus, the copyrights belongs to Dino's heirs. We need a permission from them (or from Grazia Raffa's heirs). Please ask them to write to permissions-it
wikimedia.org (in Italian). --Ruthven (msg) 12:39, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: Many thanks. I have already contacted the sole heir who has sent his consent to the address you indicated to me.--Giorgio Pietrocola (talk) 12:11, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Giorgio Pietrocola: Perfect. Thus, the copyrights belongs to Dino's heirs. We need a permission from them (or from Grazia Raffa's heirs). Please ask them to write to permissions-it
- @Ruthven: As can be seen from the back, the photo has been reprinted in several copies by "Giulio foto" of Genoa Pegli (https://www.giuliophoto.it/) on 09/23/2006 when Grazia Raffa was already 75 years old. When, shortly afterwards, she gave me a copy, she told me that the original was taken by her older brother Placido (aka Dino, also a deceased poet), during a family trip in the 70s, on the ship to Spain.--Giorgio Pietrocola (talk) 11:13, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:FOTO̠GRAZIARAFFA.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2019061910004405. Ruthven (msg) 15:09, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:FOTO̠GRAZIARAFFA.jpg” under ticket:2019061910004405. Ruthven (msg) 07:51, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 07:51, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File:Ungarn_September_2015_(21138294115).jpg is taken from https://i0.wp.com/www.theworldincrisis.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/21138294115_db97cefd8e_b.jpg ErreDeRua (talk) 00:15, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No
And what's the cause for your meaning. All the other images from this flickr's album are okay and only this one should it not be? --K@rl (talk) 07:32, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- keep - no reason for deletion -- Centenier (talk) 14:33, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Copy Right violation pic Julianaloaizamaya (talk) 14:31, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- If its written often, so it would be not more true :-( --K@rl (talk) 14:36, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:44, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Gibt es eine Zustimmung von den abgelichteten Personen? Is there a consent from the photographed persons? Bwag (talk) 15:25, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- da fragst du am falschen Platz - das musst in Flickr die Fotografion fragen. --K@rl (talk) 08:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Gibt es eine Zustimmung von den abgelichteten Personen? Is there a consent from the photographed persons? Bwag (talk) 15:25, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
User's other uploads were copyvios. This is also low res, and the PNG format indicates this is a screenshot. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:31, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
The image is a photographic reproduction of a logo of the political party, that is most likely copyrighted. Francesco 13 (talk) 15:32, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per Commons:Deletion requests/File:PiS Teillogo.svg Piotr Bart (talk) 13:17, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete logo with certain threshold of originality (stylised polish eagle and crown). --Fallaner (talk) 17:50, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:32, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
This seems awfully like a color corrected version of a Getty Images photo: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/monument-of-liberty-royalty-free-image/1130533931 Ytoyoda (talk) 16:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I accidentally uploaded it as a separate image. SelfieCity (talk) 16:16, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:33, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Unauthorized collage. E4024 (talk) 17:03, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Very likely it is not original work of the uploader. no proper exif data. first time uploader. photos taken in the same time as the one in this article https://en.prothomalo.com/economy/news/193656/Rubana-Huq-set-to-be-elected-BGMEA-s-first-female Dead.rabbit (talk) 17:34, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Also photo of the same day event was credited to Sumon Yousuf. ref: https://www.prothomalo.com/we-are/article/1566111/রুবানা-হক-একা-এবং-অনেক Dead.rabbit (talk) 18:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:35, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Image not found at source, unable to verify license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Martin.spas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work - no meta, tiny file sizes and the portrait looks like someone rephoto'd a print.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:36, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
mauvaise capture d'image et doublon avec un autre fichier. Cadouf (talk) 22:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Looks OK to me. --Yann (talk) 13:38, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Howareyoutheyus (talk · contribs)
[edit]photos d’œuvres de en:Pierre Kiandjan, non libres. https://www.kiandjan.com/#3 https://www.kiandjan.com/#7
- File:Pierre Kiandjan - wave breaker.jpg
- File:Dusty maths 2.jpg
- File:Pierre Kiandjan - dusty maths.jpg
Habertix (talk) 22:56, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
This is not a photograph, but a drawing. Yann (talk) 19:00, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
wrong PD, unknown author of the 1930s is not pd-old Goesseln (talk) 20:37, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Comment possibly {{PD-anon-70-EU}} or {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:33, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: PD-France + PD-1996. --Yann (talk) 15:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
The picture seems to be an unused self-portrait of the uploader, and his only contribution. There is no evidence of “notability.” WC only supports such pictures for the “User:” pages/namespace of active users. Renardo la vulpo (talk) 21:34, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:41, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Is it photo of a photo? Why only 185 KB? I doubt the uploader(s) have the right to the original picture. E4024 (talk) 13:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Looks like it a scan of a photo. Original uploader might have the rights to it. We need COM:OTRS to confirm. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:00, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
As this is not a "photograph" but a painting or drawing (maybe derivative on a photo) I do not understand the licensing as if it were taken by an official photographer of the US. If I am confused and made a wrong DR please close it speedily. E4024 (talk) 15:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment If this was created by a federal employee in the course of their duties, it would fall under stated license. Source doesn't seem to give any info about who created this or the circumstances in which it was created. So may have to be deleted per COM:PCP. Abzeronow (talk) 16:12, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I re-read the source material. The portrait was first published "by the comic book company Eclipse Enterprises."[2] I'm sorry I missed this text when uploading. Billhpike (talk) 16:51, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:43, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Je l'ai compilé avec d'autres pages dans : File:Hervé le Poitevin - Instructions Vacances dans Essai d'une école chrétienne, 1730.pdf Etienne M (talk) 09:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Je l'ai compilé avec d'autres pages dans : File:Hervé le Poitevin - Instructions Vacances dans Essai d'une école chrétienne, 1730.pdf Etienne M (talk) 09:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Je l'ai compilé avec d'autres pages dans : File:Hervé le Poitevin - Instructions Vacances dans Essai d'une école chrétienne, 1730.pdf Etienne M (talk) 09:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Je l'ai compilé avec d'autres pages dans : File:Hervé le Poitevin - Instructions Vacances dans Essai d'une école chrétienne, 1730.pdf Etienne M (talk) 09:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Je l'ai compilé avec d'autres pages dans : File:Hervé le Poitevin - Instructions Vacances dans Essai d'une école chrétienne, 1730.pdf Etienne M (talk) 09:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Je l'ai compilé avec d'autres pages dans : File:Hervé le Poitevin - Instructions Vacances dans Essai d'une école chrétienne, 1730.pdf Etienne M (talk) 09:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Shot in the U.S.A. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:35, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- But if it's published in Italy, then the license holds. --Ruthven (msg) 16:16, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I doubt this is PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 13:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: doubt alone is not sufficient reason to delete; seems below TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
no permission received for public use obviously 2003:E4:D3FC:EB00:205E:C7CF:B90E:D185 14:13, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]
I'm not entirely sure if this is the right spot to comment on this, but I'm perfectly fine with the file being used publicly and the deletion request to be removed :)! I'd happily accept help to resolve this issue, since I'm not entirely sure what the next appropriate steps would be. --Tikurion (talk) 09:08, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: looks like uploader created file, who released it as PD. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pandabear01 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Painting restoration.jpg
- File:Church restoration.jpg
- File:Gozo - Ghasri Church.jpg
- File:Corpus Christi Parish Church.jpg
Yann (talk) 14:37, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Dubious upload record by this user. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rwunderlich (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:Combat Medical Badge, 1st award.svg.png
- File:Parachutist Badge (Thailand).png
- File:SF Crest.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
I wish this is an "own work" as declared, because it is a very beautiful pic and I would love to have it here. I waited for a day to see if it would be speedied and now DR it with a hope to keep it. Maybe an OTRS would be good because nicknames similar to photographer names do not mean anything at the end of the day. Please, if kept, let's categorize it accordingly. E4024 (talk) 15:03, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion given. Not found elsewhere online using Google Images. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
My article was not allowed so I no longer want to share this image or have other people use it JenPrev (talk) 15:10, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
My article was not allowed so I no longer want to share this image or have other people use it JenPrev (talk) 15:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Analuisaonc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appear to be someone's power point presentation including their resume, seems also to be out of COM:SCOPE, even assuming there are no copyright issues.
- File:Resumo Parcial 2 SE.png
- File:Resumo Parcial 2.png
- File:Resumo Parcial 1.png
- File:Resumo parcial 2.png
- File:Resumo parcial 1.png
- File:Grafico de análise 2.png
- File:Captura de Tela 2017-06-04 às 23.07.00.png
- File:Análise dos pontos de vista.png
- File:Template do problema 4.png
- File:Template do problema 3.png
- File:Template do problema 2.png
- File:Template do problema 1.png
- File:Brainstorming post-its.jpg
- File:Smart cities.gif
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Theinstantmatrix as no permission (No permission since) is one of two by same uploader from same camera. There seems to also be location data, and no apparent reason (google and tineye show nothing) to doubt these images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Theinstantmatrix as no permission (No permission since) ... is one of two by same uploader from same camera. There seems to also be location data, and no apparent reason (google and tineye show nothing) to doubt these images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
This monument was erected in 1984, and is still copyrighted. Photos of it are not allowed on Commons per COM:FOP Lithuania.
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius 01(js).jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz monument in Vilnius.JPG
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius1.JPG
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius2.JPG
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius3.JPG
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius4.JPG
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 01.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Keep This image should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features Bernadine Monastery building behind the Church of St. Francis of Assisi in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz sculpture itself (monument does not appear in this image), and any work associated with it, should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 10:56, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features St. Anne's Church in Vilnius and the Church of St. Francis of Assisi in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz monument itself should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features the towers and mural of the facade of the Church of St. Francis of Assisi in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz monument itself should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features the tower of St. Anne's Church of Assisi in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz monument itself should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features St. Anne's Church in Vilnius and the Church of St. Francis of Assisi in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz monument itself should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features towers of St. Anne's Church in Vilnius and the Church of St. Francis of Assisi in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz monument itself should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features towers of St. Anne's Church in Vilnius and the Church of St. Francis of Assisi in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz monument itself should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features St. Anne's Church in Vilnius and the Church of St. Francis of Assisi in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz monument itself should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This image features the Orthodox Cathedral of the Dormition of the Theotokos in Vilnius and so should not be deleted [COM:L & De minimis]. Also the Adam Mickiewicz monument itself should be governed by allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place' [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 11:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- File:Architectural Detail - Vilnius - Lithuania - 04 (27562871070).jpg
- File:Berdhardiner church, Vilnius.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep This pictures is not about Statue of Adam Mickevicius. It is about the Berdhardiner church. There are impossible take a photo without the anyway very disturbing statue. See File:BernardMonastery.jpg too! This pictures should be acceptable as de minimis Texaner (talk) 15:03, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- File:Mickeviciaus-paminklas.jpg
- File:Pomnik Adama Mickiewicza - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Pomnik Adama Mickiewicza w Wilnie 2.jpg
- File:Senamiestis, Vilnius, Lithuania - panoramio (181).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This photo is about the St. Anna Cathedral and the Berdhardiner church. There are impossible take a photo without the anyway very disturbing statue. This picture should be acceptable as de minimis --Regasterios (talk) 16:53, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This pictures is not about Statue of Adam Mickevicius. It is about the St. Anna Cathedral. There are impossible take a photo without the anyway very disturbing statue. See File:BernardMonastery.jpg too! This pictures should be acceptable as de minimis Texaner (talk) 15:03, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- File:Statue of Adomas Mickevicius (7932205176).jpg
- File:VILNIUS, AB. 044.JPG
- File:VILNIUS, AB. 045.JPG
- File:VILNIUS, AB. 047.JPG
- File:VILNIUS, AB. 048.JPG
- File:Vilnius. Šv.Onos bažnyčia - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep This photo is about the St. Anna Cathedral and the Berdhardiner church. There are impossible take a photo without the anyway very disturbing statue. This picture should be acceptable as de minimis --Regasterios (talk) 16:53, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This photo is about the St. Anna Cathedral and other buildings. There are impossible take a photo without the anyway very disturbing statue. This picture should be acceptable as de minimis --Regasterios (talk) 16:49, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- File:Wilno - pomnik Mickiewicza.JPG
File:Odsłonięcie pomnika Adama Mickiewicza w Wilnie (22-326).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:55, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Last image is related to a different monument. Yarl 💭 13:16, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi Jeff G “Commercial use of reproductions of works of architecture or sculpture in public places is not allowed when ….” but to my knowledge there is no commercial use, or intended commercial use, associated with the images posted by Scotch Mist under CCA-4 and referenced above. Of course should any of the creators of the original works photographed in public spaces indicate (or have indicated) that they wish to have associated images removed from Wikimedia then their wishes should naturally be complied with, but in the meantime it would seem appropriate to leave decisions in these matters to ‘local adminstrators’ who may have direct contact with the creators as well as a more intimate understanding of whether such ‘public works’ should be accessible through Wikimedia and thereby extend appreciation of the talents of local artists and the diversity of ‘public art’ presented throughout Lithuania. Please consider removing the delete tags on these images – thank you …--SM1 (talk) 13:51, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Scotch Mist: Authorization for commercial use is required for the works underlying dws such as these photos, please see COM:L for details. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:12, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Scotch Mist: Where is "allowable exception under Lithuanian copyright as the sculpture is 'made to be located permanently in public place'" which permits commercial use in Lithuanian law? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:55, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: This link COM:FOP Lithuania should take you to the following statement: "It shall be permitted to carry out the following acts without the authorisation of an author or any other owner of copyright and without a remuneration, as long as the source, including the author's name, is indicated, unless this turns out to be impossible: to reproduce and make available to the public works of architecture and sculptures, made to be located permanently in public places, except for the cases where they are displayed in exhibitions and museums". --SM1 (talk)
- @Scotch Mist: You missed the main point there: "
Not OK Commercial use of reproductions of works of architecture or sculpture in public places is not allowed when the work is the main subject and it is used commercially." We require works uploaded here to be allowed to be used commercially, so no (modern, in copyright) architectural works in Lithuania may be featured in works we host unless we have permission from the architects, sculptors, or both (in certain cases you mentioned above). — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:17, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thank you for taking the time to provide more detailed explanation here and I apologize if I am now simply totally confused or my logical faculties are failing me but perhaps something has been ‘lost in translation’. While understanding the requirement that images uploaded to Wikimedia should be free to use commercially, even if authors\uploaders themselves have no intent to use those images commercially, if the interpretation of Lithuanian FOP that you have provided is correct, then the qualifying clause I referenced does not seem to make sense in this context – why state the permission exception “made to be located permanently in public places” if the interpretation applies to all reproductions of works of architecture and sculpture whether they were only created to remain in specific public places (apart from exhibitions and museums) or not? Appreciate your patience on this but as I plan to head back to Lithuania shortly I wish to be certain that I have a clear understanding of what is permissible with regard to taking photographs and uploading the images. Thanks again ... --SM1 (talk) 09:18, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Scotch Mist: That language was added by @Aymatth2 in this edit, and came from Law No. VIII-1185 of 1999, as amended up to Law No. XII-1183 of 2014, Article 28.1.1. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:10, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thank you again for your informative response. It appears that the apparent ‘contradiction’ has arisen with the introduction of the current wording that replaced the clause “Limited freedom of panorama in Lithuania is granted by article 28 ("Limitations to Copyright in Works of Architecture and Sculptures") of the Law Amending the Law on Copyright and Related Rights. This allows a photographer to make and publish pictures of sculptures and works of architecture that are permanently located in public places (excluding works presented in museums and exhibitions), "but they cannot be used commercially in any form”. Therefore as Wikimedia Commons Licensing general conditions (including the commercial stipulation) apply here, along with permissible restrictions, only photographs\images of sculptures permanently located in public spaces in Lithuania where authorization for commercial use has been obtained explicitly from the sculptor may be published (unless seventy years have elapsed since the sculptor’s death). This however does not apply “if the artwork is not the primary content of the image” [COM:L]. --SM1 (talk) 13:46, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thank you for taking the time to provide more detailed explanation here and I apologize if I am now simply totally confused or my logical faculties are failing me but perhaps something has been ‘lost in translation’. While understanding the requirement that images uploaded to Wikimedia should be free to use commercially, even if authors\uploaders themselves have no intent to use those images commercially, if the interpretation of Lithuanian FOP that you have provided is correct, then the qualifying clause I referenced does not seem to make sense in this context – why state the permission exception “made to be located permanently in public places” if the interpretation applies to all reproductions of works of architecture and sculpture whether they were only created to remain in specific public places (apart from exhibitions and museums) or not? Appreciate your patience on this but as I plan to head back to Lithuania shortly I wish to be certain that I have a clear understanding of what is permissible with regard to taking photographs and uploading the images. Thanks again ... --SM1 (talk) 09:18, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Scotch Mist: You missed the main point there: "
- @Jeff G.: This link COM:FOP Lithuania should take you to the following statement: "It shall be permitted to carry out the following acts without the authorisation of an author or any other owner of copyright and without a remuneration, as long as the source, including the author's name, is indicated, unless this turns out to be impossible: to reproduce and make available to the public works of architecture and sculptures, made to be located permanently in public places, except for the cases where they are displayed in exhibitions and museums". --SM1 (talk)
- Delete all picture of the statue. Pictures of the reliefs may remain. WIPO gives both English and Lithuanian versions of the current law here. Section 28.1 says you can take and publish pictures of works of architecture and sculptures "made to be located permanently in public places", which would be true of the church and the monument, but Section 28.2 qualifies that by saying reproductions are not allowed without the copyright holder's permission when the work is the main subject and the copy is for direct or indirect commercial advantage. That rules out these pictures: the monument is the main subject, and pictures uploaded to Commons must be usable for commercial purposes. There is no way that inclusion of the monument in the pictures could be considered "de minimis". A simple test is to ask whether the photograph would be as good or as useful if the monument were to be masked out. If not, inclusion of the monument is not "de minimis". Aymatth2 (talk) 12:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
@Aymatth2: Am disappointed that a decision appears to have been made to delete all of the above photographs, even where clearly “the artwork is not the primary content of the image” [COM:L]. The term ‘primary content’ is generally used in a photograph to reference the main content as defined by relative area covered or by significant focus, or by a combination of both. The test suggested of the quality or usefulness of the photograph is not analogous to this clause although it is conceded that it could be considered analogous to assessing “De minimis”. That said would removal of the name ‘Adam Mickiewicz’ (simply used for a group of files uploaded together) from the filenames of Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 11, 12 and 13, not support removal of the deletion tags associated with those respective images, which action might also be reasonably applied to files: Berdhardiner church, Vilnius; Senamiestis, Vilnius; Lithuania - panoramio (181); St. Anna Cathedral; A. Mickevich monument – panoramio (title also to be edited); VILNIUS, AB. 047; VILNIUS, AB. 048; Vilnius. Šv.Onos bažnyčia - panoramio and Wileńskie kościoły oraz pomnik Adama Mickiewicza przy Maironio gatve - panoramio (title also to be edited)? Retaining half of these images would seem consistent with the reasonable application of Commons Licensing unless the intent is now to apply much stricter publishing conditions to all images containing Lithuanian public artwork, no matter how incidental that artwork may be to the primary content, including images that have existed on Wikimedia for more than a decade. Thank you for your consideration of this proposal --SM1 (talk) 15:01, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- The image to the right would be acceptable, since the monument has been cropped out. The law is annoying, but is unambiguous and we have to comply with it. We cannot publish photos of copyrighted buildings or works or art permanently located in public places where these buildings or works are the main subject of the photo and the photo may be used for commercial purposes. All images on Commons must be free for commercial use. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- To be clear, the restriction only applies to reproductions of work that are protected by copyright. In this case, the statue was made by Gediminas Jokūbonis (1927–2006) and will be covered by copyright until 2076 under current laws. The reliefs by Henryk Kuna (1885–1945) have been out of copyright since 2016. In File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius2.JPG the buildings in the background are presumably out of copyright or could be considered de minimis (could be cropped out without seriously affecting the value of the image). Aymatth2 (talk) 16:11, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
@Aymatth2: Thank you for your clarification – does this mean that you will now remove the deletion tags from File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius2.JPG, File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 03.jpg, and other works where the relief is the only ‘work’ subject to license debate, or is there further action that the authors of these images need to take to avoid inappropriate deletion? Thank you also for taking the time to provide the ‘cropped example’ you have instructively provided although in this instance the work/monument is clearly the ‘primary content’ of the photograph - not only does it take up about a third of the area and is at the centre of the image, it is also the largest object in the photo\image. These conditions do not apply to the images I have proposed be re-assessed (Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 11, 12 and 13, plus images from other contributors), where for example in ‘12’ the monument is barely visible in the foreground of the main subjects of the image being the churches of Sts Anne and Francis (which could not be photographed together in elevation without the monument). Also, you have referred to the sculptor’s ‘category’ (Gediminas Jokūbonis) on Wikimedia but only the work by Adam Mickiewicz is tagged for deletion where clearly in all four of these images (uploads dating back to 2006) his work is the primary content of the image. It would seem regrettable in the laudable cause of generally promoting public Lithuanian art that if now a more rigorous licensing policy (which will discourage future contributions) is now to be applied and that all evidence of the work of this artist on Wikimedia, and presumably the works of other Lithuanian artists, are now to be removed, including those where the work appearing in the image published is clearly not the ‘primary content’. --SM1 (talk) 10:21, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Break1
[edit]It is up to the closing admin to decide which files to delete, and that is not me. I did not realize all the files in the Category:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius had been tagged for deletion, when some of them do not even include the copyrighted statue. I just looked at the seven files from this category that were listed. My vote would be to delete all pictures in the category where the copyrighted statue is featured prominently, but keep the others. Technically, the public domain reliefs could be considered part of the overall monument, a derived work assembled by Gediminas Jokūbonis and still in copyright until 2076. I think we can get away with pictures of the reliefs alone, and with panoramas where the statue could be blacked out without causing any real problem. My list of "must go" would be:
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius 01(js).jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz monument in Vilnius.JPG
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Vilnius1.JPG
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 01.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 02.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 04.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 05.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 06.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 07.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 08.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 09.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Vilnius 10.jpg
- File:Architectural Detail - Vilnius - Lithuania - 04 (27562871070).jpg
- File:Berdhardiner church, Vilnius.jpg
- File:Lithuania Vilnius Maironio gatve2.JPG
- File:Mickeviciaus-paminklas.jpg
- File:Pomnik Adama Mickiewicza - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Pomnik Adama Mickiewicza w Wilnie 2.jpg
- File:Statue of Adomas Mickevicius (7932205176).jpg
- File:VILNIUS, AB. 044.JPG
- File:VILNIUS, AB. 047.JPG
- File:Wilno - pomnik Mickiewicza.JPG}}
This is going to be an ongoing problem though. Aymatth2 (talk) 12:34, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
The statue is not featured prominently and not added to the photo significantly in File:Berdhardiner church, Vilnius.jpg. It depicts the church. --Regasterios (talk) 13:09, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- De minimis does not mean "not the main subject of the picture". It means "trivial and inconsequential use". File:Berdhardiner church, Vilnius.jpg could easily be cropped to reveal a high-resolution image of the statue. Again, a basic test is "would the picture be o.k. if the copyrighted work was blacked out?" If not, the use is not inconsequential. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:43, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Why is problem that the photo has high resolution (anyway 1 206 × 790 is not too high)? You can crop a small copyrighted details from a photo with very high resolution. See File:Louvre at night centered.jpg. This picture is in the table as "OK Very likely" on the page of de minimis: "Copyrighted work X is identifiable, but is a small part of a larger work, so that the larger work cannot easily be shown without showing X. X is a part of the larger work, and its inclusion is unavoidable." Same resolution, same scale. Although the statue is not part of the church but you can't take any photo about the churh from this view without the statue. --Regasterios (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- We tend to err on the side of caution. The copyright protected statue makes it hard to make commercial use of views of the church from this exact angle. The statue could of course be blurred out... Aymatth2 (talk) 16:59, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, kept several as DM. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
The monument was completed in 1984 by Gediminas Jokūbonis (1927–2006) and Vytautas Čekanauskas (1930–2010). There is no freedom of panorama in Lithuania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2081.
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Denkmal, Vilnius, 1983.jpg
- File:Adam Mickiewicz Statue, Vilnius, Lithuania.jpg
- File:Paminklas Adomui Mickevičiui.jpg
- File:Wilno, pomnika Adama Mickiewicza - 2014.09.06.jpg
- File:Wilno, pomnika Adama Mickiewicza - DSCF5976.jpg
- File:Wilno, pomnika Adama Mickiewicza - DSCF5977.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 02:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Done per the first section above. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 22:55, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
File:John Tooze and James D. Watson at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Photo by Dave Micklos 1983.jpg
[edit]
It has too much whitespace on the edges - a cleaner version was put on wikimedia later See: File:John Tooze and Jim Watson.jpg Gilatter (talk) 20:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio: missing permission of original author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
TRansperance pattern on edges by mistake - cleaner version added later see: File:John Tooze and Jim Watson.jpg Gilatter (talk) 20:29, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio: missing permission of original author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Ordinary mullah. Not a leader of anything. Less a "scholar". E4024 (talk) 20:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Auf dem Bild ist Anna Krukover, also wird sie es nicht selber gemacht haben, ist somit nicht Urheber Solomon Dandy (talk) 06:35, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Dubious claim of own work; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
помилкове фото іншої церкви Olga Kulko (talk) 18:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Ukraine for buildings. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
помилка, це церква в Шипинцях Olga Kulko (talk) 18:19, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Ukraine for buildings. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
помилка, це церква в Шипинцях Olga Kulko (talk) 18:18, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Ukraine for buildings. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Видаліть, це помилковий файл, тут церква села Шипинці Olga Kulko (talk) 19:53, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: No fop in ukraine. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: It was build in 1812. It cannot fall under nofop.--Anatoliy (talk) 09:54, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
obsolete version of File:WikiJournal_publishing_instructions_1.webm T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 03:15, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mate-Bolumena (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from music.
- File:MATE BOLUMENA TXIKIPEDIA Grande (1) (convert-video-online.com).webm
- File:MATE BOLUMENA def Grande (1) (convert-video-online.com).webm
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:30, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Permission of State Enterprise "Lviv State Jewelery Factory" must be sent to OTRS. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:35, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
(!!!)Dear Well-Informed Optimist, this order is a Public Domain in Ukraine (listed below), according local laws. Permission to publicate this image was not necessary, it is allowed by law. I ask to remove Nomination for deletion or I will do it myself. Sincerely yours, El nomad (talk) 11:06, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
{{PD-UA-exempt}}
(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) Photographer's permission in needed for photographs of any 3D objects. Even if the objects are in the public domain. And nobody believes the professional photographer's work from https://zoloto.lviv.ua (special:permalink/342567167) is yours (special:diff/362472990). --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:04, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Well-Informed Optimist. I see, you quite clearly trying to accuse me that i am trying to 'steal' this image, ir use it illegal. I do not like discussion in this tone, i found this insulting. I have an e-mail confirmation from factory which allow me to place this image to wiki. And, I am the son of the author of this medal (he died years ago), and I have ALL the rights of his works. Ok, I will waste some time to go through wiki-burocracy-procedures. Pity, that you wasting my and your time for witchhunting. El nomad (talk) 13:13, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: the medal is indeed {{PD-UA-exempt}}, unfortunately we need a proper permission for the photo. This can be sent by the copyright owner via our OTRS system and the image can then be restored. Copyright is unfortunately a complicated matter, and I am sure you had the best intentions when uploading this picture. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:33, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
-Slavko-Bovan.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-Slavko-Bovan.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
By following the links in the template, one learns the artist is still alive. COM:OTRS is required to retain. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
-Slavko-Bovan.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment: Just sent an email for the artist. OTRS members can check Ticket#2019042610007714 to confirm. AhmadTalk 20:05, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: it seems that this was not processed yet. When the OTRS process finished successfully, this image can be restored. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
-Slavko-Bovan.jpg){kind=link}
historical image, unclear copyright status, bogus license Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Picture was made prior to 1919 (person pictured according to byline died 28 April 1918), but no further information available and copyright notice "AFP PHOTO/HISTORICAL ARCHIVES OF SARAJEVO". Hekerui (talk) 12:10, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't think we can safely assume that {{PD-Serbia}} applies. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:37, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:59, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:38, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hernandlucas (talk · contribs)
[edit]A gallery of small images some photos, some drawings, but with no indication of own work. One appears as if it might be old enough to be kept if properly sourced and licensed, but the others appear to be borrowed from the internet without permission.
- File:Caucalières.jpg
- File:La poussarié.jpg
- File:Château de Montaigut sur Save.png
- File:Croquis château Montaigut sur save.jpg
- File:Château de villemur.jpg
- File:Jehan.jpg
- File:Luigi del Col.jpg
- File:Famille del Col.jpg
- File:Famille de Thonel d'Orgeix.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Uploader is French-speaking, hopefully we can help him attain clarity on Copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:32, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Bonjour. Tout d'abord, les images File:Famille del Col.jpg et File:Luigi del Col.jpg sont des photos que j'ai prises à partir d'archives familiales libres de droit, donc ce n'est absolument pas une violation des droits d'auteurs étant donné qu'il n'y en a pas. Pour les photos File:Caucalières.jpg, File:La poussarié.jpg et File:Château de villemur.jpg, j'habite à proximité de ces lieux, donc il m'est arrivé de m'y balader et d'y prendre des photos, dont celles-ci. Les images File:Croquis château Montaigut sur save.jpg et File:Famille de Thonel d'Orgeix.jpg sont tout simplement libres de droits, car anciennes et issue d'archives (la première date d'il y a 500 ans, et la seconde est le blason d'une vieille famille noble). Cordialement --Hernandlucas (talk) 11:00, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: none of the images in question is properly sourced or has a proper date. Therefore their copyright status is unclear. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)