Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/02/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 12th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google Doodles are copyrighted. Ixfd64 (talk) 04:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jon Kolbert (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Invalid OTRS permission template added by non-OTRS member.

Majora (talk) 02:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have verified the permission with an OTRS member in #wikimedia-otrs before uploading anything. They are valid. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:21, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jon Kolbert: Please accept my sincere apologies. The first time I read the ticket my mind completely glossed over the "all" part of it. I removed the notices on the page. Sorry about that. --Majora (talk) 17:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Nomination withdrawn. --Majora (talk) 17:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jon Kolbert (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:04, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:31, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.ukko.fi/yrittajatarina-digitaalista-markkinointia-ja-palvelumuotoilua/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --1989 (talk) 21:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infr Zer0sand1nes (talk) 20:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:32, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyrighted picture that was lifted from here: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/tennessee-titans-tight-end-taylor-thompson-during-the-nfl-news-photo/579062188 Jeffrey Beall (talk) 21:00, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --1989 (talk) 21:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhi chaudhary(maafia) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sameerchauhan234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 10:45, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The other upload by this editor:
is in use at en:Draft:Sameer chauhan, which was declined as being an unsuitable topic for an article (but instead appears to me to be self-promotion, failing COM:SPAM). DMacks (talk) 04:35, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, inuse file already kept. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sameerchauhan234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 2ne2magenta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality penis picture, nothing new. COM:PENIS

Ies (talk) 14:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krishnasoni123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:00, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bekiirceliik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This a copyrighted picture that was lifted from here: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/tennessee-titans-tight-end-taylor-thompson-during-the-nfl-news-photo/579062188 Jeffrey Beall (talk) 23:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Reupload of copyvio. --1989 (talk) 00:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a German mining engineer. Source rotted, template is wrong. Need more info on photograph to keep. Abzeronow (talk) 16:34, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Picture from 19th century. {{PD-old-70-expired}} Yann (talk) 16:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I guess the source works now. Yeah, 1880s photo creation sounds right.  I withdraw my nomination Abzeronow (talk) 16:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 06:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is 404. Uploader is active and has got at least one week to find the suitable licence, if it exists. E4024 (talk) 20:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: what are you talking about? thats an old image for a person who ruled from 1913 till 1915? Its eaither {{PD-old}} or {{PD-Ottoman Empire}}باسم (talk) 21:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:08, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just Axel Pérez 502 (talk) 01:52, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by another admin. --Gbawden (talk) 13:36, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pbroks13 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo owned by Insurance Arena; see https://www.insurance-arena.com/ 1989 (talk) 17:31, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 17:36, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gfjkdl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense upload of apparently copyrighted images. Note the nonsense descriptions, authors and sources. Not realitically useful for an educational: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gfjkdl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational purpose and as the nonsense description, source and author show not intended to be useful: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:37, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:18, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 03:57, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 04:19, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo- OoS --Alaa :)..! 04:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:27, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All of the image versions seem to be professional photos, uploaded by inexperienced new contributors. None of them has sufficient source and author information, or some credible evidence of permission. I wasn't able to locate the originals, but all of them should be deleted per COM:PCP, unless their origin and a free license can be verified. GermanJoe (talk) 05:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 09:08, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by fault Sai1820680 (talk) 13:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: Seems to refer to File:Sai1820680.jpg. --Achim (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More TICS spam Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:32, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: unfree stock image 1989 (talk) 21:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --1989 (talk) 20:37, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falling stars appear to be derivate work, for example https://www.desktopbackground.org/wallpaper/meteor-shower-background-wallpaper-jpg-15465. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This version of the project is old and retired, it was renewed and not needed anymore. I don't care if the community decides to delete it, however on the website with the stars, there is no specific requirements of citation and anything else, so I made a remix with my own work. Sorry if I am being wrong. Sincerely, 00:18, 12 February 2019|Daniel 1807


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:16, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not likely to be an own work - no EXIF, badly cropped/photoshopped image, the uploader only uploaded this image and nothing else. A poster with the same person can be found here, published a couple of days before this image was uploaded. TechyanTalk01:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:18, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally created this not knowing File:en-us-airport.ogg already existed, are I made the realization I also concluded that this file provides no additional value that en-us-airport.ogg doesn't already provide and so therefore should be deleted. The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 01:42, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OoS. We do not need self promotion. Has a "fake" article in TR:WP. I just added one image to the category "Imams from Turkey" and will find more. E4024 (talk) 02:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More TICS spam Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:31, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Himmat Menariya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos of no encyclopedic value, uploaded by an user with no edits outside user space.

Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 06:12, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 05:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is copyright material by Google Street View. OsmHydrant (talk) 06:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is copyright material by Google Street View. OsmHydrant (talk) 06:30, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello to the team. I recently check this file and i notice that i have uploaded the wrong image. This file is not on public domain, is other one. Thank you for the support WKPDeditor (talk) 07:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, showing a non-free object is not allowed 158.182.178.60 07:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Photographier l'usage d'un objet artistique n'est pas une simple reproduction de celui-ci. Cette photographie illustre notamment l'engagement des femmes dans le mouvement des Gilets Jaunes. Par son cadrage, l'image révèle plusieurs symboles nationaux (drapeau en plus de la Mariane), prise à quelques minutes d’intervalles, les conditions météorologiques soulignent l'engagement des manifestant-E-s, malgré ce contexte. Les "V'Lilles" sur la gauche du cliché permettent de figurer la localisation géographique de la photographie sans nécessité de méta-donnée. Je souligne que ce n'est pas la seule attaque en suppression du genre. CF "Commons:Deletion requests/File:GJ Lille 20181208 154419.jpg"

--RP87 (talk) 09:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --1989 (talk) 05:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published by Times of India here. File description page says source is "internet" —teb728 t c 07:44, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I question the own work. It is a crop of a higher resolution image that can be found for example here. It is the only contribution of the user and there are no meta data. Wouter (talk) 08:06, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:37, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ankur Tailor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; one kept (COM:INUSE). --1989 (talk) 05:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmed Annos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:54, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Orai Editor Hindi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:31, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Orai Editor Hindi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:14, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Orai Editor Hindi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:44, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW. --1989 (talk) 05:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mritchie20 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:38, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower quality duplicate of File:Matt Moniz.JPG Andre Engels (talk) 09:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo. out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 09:57, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder is "ronan lechat". Permission to OTRS is needed T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 10:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:45, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Nv8200p (talk) 11:03, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:45, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free. Duplicate of File:International Surrey Company (emblem).jpg on Wikipedia Nv8200p (talk) 11:07, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational uses Nv8200p (talk) 11:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality content that does not add value beyond our existing coverage of the same topic Nv8200p (talk) 11:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality unused group photo Nv8200p (talk) 11:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sonakshisubh bhanadri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aaj Tak Gudanal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 05:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Donald myenjwa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:34, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW. --1989 (talk) 05:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. permission is needed T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lilmozat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photo. Out of scope

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:54, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder is "SKHALLO PHOTOGRAPHY". Permission is required T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:58, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image with no educational value, and thus out of the project scope. Apalsola tc 13:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete In addition, the image is a derivative work of File:Lihapiirakka.jpg and an unknown photograph of Olli Lindholm (Q11885437), with no reference to either of the original works. File:Lihapiirakka.jpg is licensed under PD, so its usage is not a copyright violation, but that is not the case of the photograph of Lindholm unless the uploader has taken the photograph himself/herself. ––Apalsola tc 13:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) University of Tartu, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:09, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:03, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently a copyrighted image, there are no "own work" satellite images.

Ies (talk) 13:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:04, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asiarav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos from two different authors but with no permission.

~Cybularny Speak? 13:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to https://twitter.com/HildeTonne Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:30, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality duplicate of File:Konesprezna tramvaj Praha 1876.png Harold (talk) 13:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:07, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, unlikely to be own work (like user's other uploads). Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Herman Bieling (d. 1964), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Encycloon: Yes, it's strange. Even if donated to the museum the copyright remains... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:56, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, then the file can be deleted. Encycloon (talk) 18:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Túrelio. --1989 (talk) 06:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake insigna. This is not an Egyptian place. See File:F16 SCANG InFlight.jpg and Commons:Village pump#Digitally manipulated photographs. Yann (talk) 14:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Also misleading description and filename. --Túrelio (talk) 14:52, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
COMMENT - It resembles this scheme exactly Egyptian F-16 - FOX 52 (talk) 15:34, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LibTSATU (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works, bogus license, no permission.

Yann (talk) 20:19, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ellini (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See watermark, unlikely Own work. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: low quality photo of domesticated cat. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:18, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anlly Gonzales (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:18, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prateek2708 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PrashanttGuptha1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vaddi prasanth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prince Raju 234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Princeuduakpedro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:01, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WILNA PENERA ESPEJON (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sarahtse1216 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Siddhartha Chakravarty (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by P.V.Moyo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Md Seraj Anwar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook photo according to matadata. ~Cybularny Speak? 16:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright problems: on the website used as a source it is not possible to find the photo. Instead it is written "Pallacanestro Fulgor Fidenza 2014 - Copyright © 2014. All Rights Reserved." so t is unlikely that the photo in question was published with a Creative Commons license. Civitas13 (talk) 16:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Db-author}} Preethi.d.c1810340 (talk) 16:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 17:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Palauenc05 (talk) 18:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Palauenc05 (talk) 18:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright is owned by J Farley Photography Theroadislong (talk) 18:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

attribution is clear on image and caption. J Farley Photography is our contracted photographer. --Wssymphony (talk) 19:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my own work and I no longer wish it to be shared on Wikimedia Commons Faradinaaquino (talk) 19:34, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Sabine Wunderlin, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:43, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The design is most likely not the uploader's own work, and it is original enough to be copyrighted and non-free. De728631 (talk) 19:54, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the public logo for the Washington Campus that has been updated. The old logo is inaccurate and needed to be changed. I work for this organization and needed to update the artwork here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kgasaway (talk • contribs) 20:09, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you work for the campus, please send a permission by email from your professional account. We have no means to verify your identity through your Wikimedia account, and this has been published before without a free licence. Please see COM:OTRS for instructions. Alternatively you could release the logo under a free licence at the website of Washington Campus. This would be a much faster solution. De728631 (talk) 20:16, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Danilov Aleksandr, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Danilov Aleksandr, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If the author is unknown, it cannot be published under a Creative Commons licence by the uploader. The original photo is either not copyrighted (anonymous), or in case of a self-portrait it is still copyrighted to McBride's heirs. De728631 (talk) 20:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:43, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"2014 © Agos Yayıncılık Basın Hiz. San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti. | Tüm Hakları Saklıdır" - Any admin that reads Turkish? E4024 (talk) 20:21, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:45, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need source information and licensing for each image in the collage, and at present we don't have that. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


this shouldnt be deleted, because thee images are not copyrighted and are all included individually in the wikimedia images page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghalibrev (talk • contribs) 17:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What you need to do is make a list on the file description where you got each image. Here is an example of one that is correctly done. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:09, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was on the net 2 years before upload: http://boon.am/marc-nichanian/ E4024 (talk) 20:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not wish to show my nude body no more on this site. Freespirit85w (talk) 20:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not wish to show my nude body no more on this site. Freespirit85w (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not wish to show my nude body no more on this site. Freespirit85w (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not wish to show my nude body no more on this site. Freespirit85w (talk) 20:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not wish to show my nude body no more on this site. Freespirit85w (talk) 20:37, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not wish to show my nude body no more on this site. Freespirit85w (talk) 20:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not wish to show my nude body no more on this site. Freespirit85w (talk) 20:43, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not wish to show my nude body no more on this site. Freespirit85w (talk) 20:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not wish to show my nude body no more on this site. Freespirit85w (talk) 20:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:50, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not wish to show my nude body no more on this site. Freespirit85w (talk) 20:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not wish to show my nude body no more on this site. Freespirit85w (talk) 20:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:50, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not wish to show my nude body no more on this site. Freespirit85w (talk) 20:42, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:50, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 21:43, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 21:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused probably personal photo, possibly sensitive content, unclear authorship — Draceane talkcontrib. 21:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot of personal message — Draceane talkcontrib. 21:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, sensitive content — Draceane talkcontrib. 21:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Majedalali13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unknown location ; Personal images ; No notability ; No use ; generic categories (Images, people...) ; the user has uploaded only these photos whose the subject is himself or friend.

Civa (talk) 22:03, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Ixfd64 (talk) 02:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry, no clear description given, not related to WLE-India Oo91 (talk) 22:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry, no clear description given, not related to WLE-India Oo91 (talk) 22:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a copyright violation because it looks like a screenshot. See w:Draft:Typist Computer Assistant Smart Guide pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:58, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality content that does not add value beyond our existing coverage of the same topic Nv8200p (talk) 01:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder is "Jonathan Lekwot". Send permission to OTRS T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS received. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zinpla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Old Polish car (8020450223).jpg wrong information is a german car not polish 73.145.48.21 18:30, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So fix the page. -- (talk) 18:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The previous name presumably referred to the location rather than the country of origin; to compensate for the elision of “Polish” I’ve put the file into Automobiles in Warsaw.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Andrew Fosker/ PinPep Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Andrew Fosker/ PinPep Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image of a computer-related table, useless without context and information, out of scope. Te750iv (talk) 23:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Andrew Fosker/ PinPep Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Andrew Fosker/ PinPep Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: EdWard Ortiz, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:21, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: EdWard Ortiz, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:22, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) James Farley, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

©2014 Ken Bennett, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) G. Allen Aycock, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) G. Allen Aycock, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) G. Allen Aycock, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Henrik Juhlin, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:03, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission, similar to https://www.eleicoes2018.com/cezinha-de-madureira/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:03, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to https://www.researchgate.net/figure/John-L-Moll_fig1_50392752 Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:03, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jonathanchuang1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (:en:Draft:Oksana Kononets).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution crop, no usage — Draceane talkcontrib. 22:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be corrupted, not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 04:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 1989 at 06:58, 19 Februar 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Majedalali13 --Krdbot 13:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be corrupted, not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 04:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 1989 at 06:58, 19 Februar 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Majedalali13 --Krdbot 13:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own upload, where in think that I was wrong with my assessment about the TOO. combination could be protected Habitator terrae 🌍 15:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:MotoF-ka

[edit]

Reason for deletion request: unlikely to be own work of the uploader. In the EXIF metadata of photo 1 it is written that the author is "Daniel Ostrowski" while in the metada of the photo 2 it is written that the author is "Maciej Komorowski" (and the same information it is written in a small watermark near to the bottom left corner). Photos 5 and 6 are corrupted versions of photo 2 and, apart from the copyright problem, they should be deleted anyway because only half of the image it is visible. Photo 3 can be found here (2 November 2018 so before the upload on Commons). I was not able to found photo 4 on the web but it does not have metadata and this is souspicius. --Civitas13 (talk) 17:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely derivative work 1989 (talk) 17:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:45, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos are the photos of a family and friends of no notable people. With descriptions such as mon neveu (=My nephew), C mon petit frère (=It is my young brother), C'est moi et mon ami (=its me and my friend), Je suis le meilleur (=I am the best), mon BB d'amour (=My beloved baby) ; But Commons is not a private photo album. Use Flickr or Facebook. I did not put DR on user page images such as File:Abdou le petit.jpg

Civa (talk) 21:12, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YoungGodfather1979 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most likely derivative work

1989 (talk) 06:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Looka.decarli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and brochures. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kkmurray as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © 2009 American Institute of Physics |source=http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3266177 J. Appl. Phys. 106, 113526 2009 - part of Fig 3 (d and b) 1989 (talk) 01:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by the Author

[edit]

This image file has been created by the Author (myself) for the purpose of publishing on Wikipedia. It is distinct in layout from the figure presented in my scientific publication, the cited reference. Although it is based on the same, own experimental data and own-designed layout, therefore the resemblance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdliss (talk • contribs) 10:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the AIP for advice on re-using my data here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdliss (talk • contribs) 12:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Dear Dr. Liss:

Thank you for contacting us for clarification of the copyright status of the material that you wish to include on Wikimedia Commons.

Since the article in which the material appears was published in 2009 when AIP Publishing required a full transfer of copyright for all material published as part of the article, the copyright belongs to us as publisher. As a result, you don't possess the necessary rights to assign a Creative Commons license to the image.

Even though you have not used the original in its entirety, the portion of the image used is clearly derived from the original, and copyright does attach to it.

All that said, if you wish to include the image on Wikimedia Commons, we'll are fine with granting permission for that, but the credit line needs to reflect that fact.

Something such as;

"Permission to include this file under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license has been granted by the copyright holder, AIP Publishing. Please credit the original source as K.-D. Liss, T. Schmoelzer, K. Yan, M. Reid, M. Peel, R. Dippenaar, H. Clemens: “In-situ study of dynamic recrystallization and hot deformation behavior of a multi-phase titanium aluminide alloy”, Journal of Applied Physics, 106/11 (2009), p 113526-(1-6), doi/10.1063/1.3266177. doi:10.1063/1.3266177."


If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks very much. Sincerely,

Susann Brailey Manager, Rights & Permissions

AIP Publishing 1305 Walt Whitman Road │ Suite 300 | Melville NY 11747-4300 │ USA t +1.516.576.2268 rights@aip.org │ publishing.aip.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdliss (talk • contribs) 11:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by the Author

[edit]

I have added to the page of the image file" "Permission to include this file under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license has been granted by the copyright holder, AIP Publishing. Please credit the original source as K.-D. Liss, T. Schmoelzer, K. Yan, M. Reid, M. Peel, R. Dippenaar, H. Clemens: “In-situ study of dynamic recrystallization and hot deformation behavior of a multi-phase titanium aluminide alloy”, Journal of Applied Physics, 106/11 (2009), p 113526-(1-6), doi/10.1063/1.3266177. doi:10.1063/1.3266177."

please help to enter the text at the right location. thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdliss (talk • contribs) 12:06, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


The image file has been updated to show the source reference in the pixel graphics. {{Kdliss (talk) 12:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)|12:48, 15 February 2019|Kdliss}}[reply]


Kept: copyright issues solved. --Platonides (talk) 23:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requested by uploader Huji (talk) 01:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 23:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, we deleted it on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 10:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And so? Only notable topic should be on wikimedia commons? i can publish on commons an ant but not a pianist? (PenelopeRam (talk) 11:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC))[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Platonides (talk) 23:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation de copyright Paulinemuséesbeaune (talk) 12:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request for recent image, G7. --Platonides (talk) 00:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

problème de copyright Paulinemuséesbeaune (talk) 12:46, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request for recent image, G7. --Platonides (talk) 00:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

problème de droits Paulinemuséesbeaune (talk) 12:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request for recent image, G7. --Platonides (talk) 00:04, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

problème de droits Paulinemuséesbeaune (talk) 12:50, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request for recent image, G7. --Platonides (talk) 00:04, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

problème de droits Paulinemuséesbeaune (talk) 12:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request for recent image, G7. --Platonides (talk) 00:04, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

problème de droits Paulinemuséesbeaune (talk) 12:52, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request for recent image, G7. --Platonides (talk) 00:04, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

problème de droits Paulinemuséesbeaune (talk) 12:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request for recent image, G7. --Platonides (talk) 00:04, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pbroks13 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo owned by Insurance Arena; see https://www.insurance-arena.com/ 1989 (talk) 17:31, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Insurance-arena logo.png The image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text and I think it should be kept. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insurance arena (talk • contribs) 10:26, 13 February 2019 (UTC) Insurance arena (talk) 11:34, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, if the company wishes to release it they can contact Commons:OTRS. --Platonides (talk) 00:10, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per COM:UDR discussion: simple logo. Ankry (talk) 18:11, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fma12 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.rosariocentral.com/ 1989 (talk) 17:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The original file (PD-textlogo) had been overwritten with a logo which is above the threshold of originality. That's what I marked as copyvio. - Fma12 (talk) 23:56, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: reverted and hidden problematic new upload. --Platonides (talk) 00:12, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La imagen es un crop de esta, usada en varios sitios web. Luisalvaz (talk) 23:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 00:21, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused / low quality chemical formula! Very thin lines & font! Have File:Strukturformel von Essigsäure-2-ethylhexylester.svg as high-quality replacement! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:34, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:48, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Offensichtlich 1:1 von website cilag.ch RoBri (talk) 09:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:26, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a recent sculpture, which is still in copyright by the sculptor. Regrettably, there is no FoP exemption in France. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Datei sollte nur ein Anhang (Thumb) zu einem Wiederherstellungsantrag sein. Sie ist nicht für die öffentliche Verwendung vorgesehen und leider irrtümlich im Wikimedia Commons gespeichert worden. Chancy Squire (talk) 19:12, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:05, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Freddy eduardo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.facebook.com/mariasolcorral/photos/a.146642095372449/1970093586360615/?type=1&theater 1989 (talk) 21:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:01, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Grand Central Station Main Concourse Jan 2006.jpg with minor color edit and bad autorship. This file should be merged. Harold (talk) 14:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC) And with a photoshopped little man at the right side of the picture (above the woman with baby carriage). --Harold (talk) 14:52, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 01:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Széchenyi Gyógyfürdő thermal spa in Budapest 011.JPG with minor color edit, bad autorship, and a photoshopped little man at the right side of the picture. Harold (talk) 14:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 01:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Lattakia, 8 March street.jpg with minor color edit a bad autorship. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Madarskelazne vetsirozliseni.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nadrazi new york.jpg (uploaded by the same user with hidden vandalism). Harold (talk) 14:59, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 01:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to support the claim that this photograph was created more than 50 years ago. The uploader made a similar claim about a photograph apparently created in 1988. LX (talk, contribs) 06:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

30 or 35, which is it, and where's the evidence? If he was 35 in the photo, then it was taken on or after 28 February 1970, which is less than 50 years ago, so aside from the lack of evidence, your numbers just don't add up. Also, I'm no fashion history expert, but those glasses don't look like they're from the 60s to me. LX (talk, contribs) 14:08, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Don't see any source where it's stated that the logo is CC-BY-SA. Wostr (talk) 09:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-resolution image. There is more quality version - File:Flag_of_Volokolamsk.svg. 83.220.239.43 12:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

adding:

Too young to be safe PD. The argumentation of a anonymous work doesn't fit, as there is no evidence of a publication (§66 german copyright law says, that a anonymous work is copyrighted 70 years after first publication or 70 years after creation if it never be publushed. As there is no source, nether publication nor non-publication nor evidence for a anonoymous work is given. Too young for 120-years. Quedel (talk) 12:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is freedom of panorama in Canada for 3-dimensional art, but not for 2-dimensional art like logos. The photograph violates logo owner's (Saddle Hill county?) copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weird Canada FoP. I wonder if this may be {{PD-Canada}}, though. The design of the County logo might be quite old. Platonides (talk) 23:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is stated to be "self made", which obviously isn't the case SchroCat (talk) 12:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - textes used as slogan are very likely complex enough to be copyrightable. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is freedom of panorama in Canada for 3-dimensional, but not for 2-dimensional art. Maybe the photo violates logo owner.s (Dene Tha'?) copyright. In my opinion this is 2-dimensional and not 3-dimensional art. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: , As you know turkish and there are writing to "Temsili". If channel is release we can upload. I didn't see any official news from TRT. Regards, Sakhalinio (talk) 18:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@E4024: , where is the official information. After 4 days channel will be online but no official news from TRT! Sakhalinio (talk) 04:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sakhalinio explained me more on my TP. I understand the news (that TRT2 is coming back) has not been officially confirmed yet by the Turkish Radio and Television Corp. (TRT); therefore no official logo yet. I am sure as soon as the channel opens again (it was closed since several years) they will disclose the logo. TRT generally uses simple (text) logos. The one here is made as a similar to TRT1, but of course, I understand, it is the choice of the people at the only link I could find (above). In short, this logo can be deleted, no big deal, when we have it officially Sakhalinio would certainly upload it. Thanks for your care to visit me. --E4024 (talk) 01:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:23, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file Jelican9 (talk) 18:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not a deletion rationale. We keep files so that people may use them. If we delete them without a justification, when people need to use them they will not be able to find them. Please do not propose files for deletion only because they are not being used. The practice is more like, "hey, this file must be deleted for x reason, and don't worry, it is not used, either". IMHO. --E4024 (talk) 18:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Insufficient reasoning. Fry1989 eh? 19:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:04, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found identical copy here -> https://twitter.com/traveltolanka/status/1082882084534857728/photo/1. Please upload higher resolution copy of the image to prove that you are the copyright owner. Sreejith K (talk) 17:07, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - I found a bigger one in the web. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license, false own work claim. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:26, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

made a new version Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 17:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Roy17 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: sculptor zh:蘇軒賓 still alive 1989 (talk) 17:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: derivative work issue. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:32, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sarahboa0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I'm concerned about the legality of the licensing of these images. The link to the source of the larger image does take you to a licensed image on Flickr. However the few other similar images on the person's feed there are all "All rights reserved". Equally speaking the majority lack any real EXIF information. The odd one that does have good information does not match the claim on the user page that the camera used is a Canon SD700.

Herby talk thyme 17:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Herby, thanks so much for the feedback. I may have to delete what I uploaded as I'm not sure how to proceed. Helpfully though, I do in fact own this photograph and it was taken by me personally in December 2018. I am, however, lacking in knowledge of how to further prove this to match Wikipedia's standards. Any advice is welcomed!

I am quite new to Wikipedia and indeed the Creative Commons license process. I thought I'd start by answering your questions and then asking for further advice. In the last few days I uploaded a number of pictures I took last year (December 2018) from various events in London, and was told I would be able to share those that were originally captured by myself. In that spirit, I recently created a Flickr account and uploaded several photographs I captured during the 'Women in Film Festival', to use on Wikipedia, specifically, for Hayley Atwell, and potentially Eddie Redmayne, who both attended the event - for which I also attended as an attendee for my PR company. In any case, I can confirm, however, that I captured and own 12 of the photographs that I recently uploaded to my Flickr profile, using a Canon SD700, including this particular photograph of Hayley Atwell. I have only altered the licensing of a handful of photographs I chose to upload on Flickr, the rest I have not amended whatsoever. I am unsure about EXIF data and other metadata with regards to the images (sorry!)- it was really my intention to show an updated image of these individuals that I had taken and stored. I don't want to cause further admin for the editors on Wikipedia, so again, any advice is welcomed - I am happy to delete the photos I uploaded, but any further advice to empirically prove these were taken by me; at least digitally, is most welcomed. Sorry for being a newbie. Thanks!

N.B. My intention for uploading the images was specifically: Atwell, as she now has pink hair since 2019, and Eddie as he seems to have died his hair blonde. I was very much trying to help users see the most recent versions of these celebrities, particularly as the pictures on these profiles see rather outdated and rather inaccurate!

Thanks so much.

Sarah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahboa0 (talk • contribs) 03:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding here and I will do what I can to assist you. We are always pleased to have freely licensed quality images here and so would like to be able to resolve this. However we must be quite certain that we protect copyright holders.
Looking at your Flickr feed I'm finding it hard to find a chain of evidence proving copyright. I have looked at various images however I will use a couple to illustrate my problem. You have an image partly called "Demure_The_Quantum_of_Solace_actress" (Gemma Arterton) taken at the same event. This would appear to originate from the Daily Mail newspaper. The image in you Flickr feed of Michelle Collins at that event seems to have come from Zimbo website. Other images seem to have similarly diverse sources. This makes it very difficult to be sure of copyright authenticity.
The best way you could be sure of us hosting your images on Commons so that they are available for use on Wikipedia etc would be to upload a version of the original image. As the copyright holder you will have (or have access to) the original file. This will be complete with valid EXIF information. This would allow us a chain of evidence of authenticity. I'm sorry to appear difficult however I would assure you that this is simply to ensure that you, the copyright holder, is protected. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 12:41, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: If you want to keep control of the original image, then send it to info-commons@wikimedia.org and add a link to this page in the e-mail. Then only the OTRS agents will see the full image and it will not be uploaded here. Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:21, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, all, for your feedback. I have copies of the original images, so I will look to upload those shortly with likely the EXIF data attached. I hear you with regards to protecting me under copyright, so thank you again for alerting me to those possibilities etc.

Lastly, that cropped version of the original image, on second glance, has substantially lowered in quality, perhaps as it is PNG, rather than JPG. In future it is probably best for that to be deleted in all circumstances. In any case, I will look to upload the original image again.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahboa0 (talk • contribs) 10:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:39, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 1278 of September 1st, 2008 (see PDF from Russian Border Guard Service's official website), "the ratio of the white border of the diagonal cross to the width of the diagonal cross is one to two ("отношение белой каймы диагонального креста к ширине диагонального креста - один к двум"). Obviously this file does not meet the requirements. There is a more accurate version - File:Russia, Flag of border service 2008.svg. Needing to remove this duplicate and make redirect. 91.193.179.152 17:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:40, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an old version of this image. A new version has been uploaded independently Maurissauro (talk) 18:52, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ok, uploader request. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File replaced with a better version (see File:Syrian Argentines). Argenaureo (talk) 19:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:47, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably imagevio of Google Maps — Draceane talkcontrib. 21:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:47, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF, doubtful own-work. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:47, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image does not accurately represent Larry Weinstein. It is not a neutral or scholarly image. The CFC (source of the image) has removed the image from their Flickr account. Acedmonds2 (talk) 21:57, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep in use Subject was at a public event. Should be kept until a picture of higher quality is found under a suitably free license to replace this. If the subject wishes to provide a better photo with a suitably free license, then that could replace this one. The fact that the source of image has removed the image is irrelevant. CC licenses are not revocable. Once a work is published under a CC license, licensees may continue using the work according to the license terms for the duration of copyright protection. The image in question, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on 27 November 2016 by the administrator or reviewer 1989, who confirmed that it was available on Flickr under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license on that date. Mjeromee (talk) 18:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source Own work, an official image. Not credibility in the image. No sources // Origem Obra do próprio, uma imagem oficial. Não a credibilidade na imagem. Sem fontes O revolucionário aliado (talk) 02:22, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, self-promotion ARR8 (talk) 00:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2019021210000965: Awaiting for proper permission. Platonides (talk) 23:50, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no OTRS permission for 30 days. --Jcb (talk) 19:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image, superseded by File:Russia,_Flag_FSB_commander_1993_chief.svg. 91.193.179.152 17:56, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to http://ethicsinsports.ch/speakers/2nd-wsels-mr-bjorn-berge/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; dubious claim of own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken svg, there is better version File:Flag of Federal security service.svg 91.193.179.152 17:59, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And what is broken?--Sanandros (talk) 13:19, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Better version available. --Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation? This picture comes out of a brochure of cd&v Wingene (Oktober 2018). Can the uploader prove that he is the photographer? DirkVE (talk) 13:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:50, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Iceland, for non-commercial use only B dash (talk) 16:06, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + bad quality picture/out of scope because unusable. Ruthven (msg) 05:54, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1932 American sheet music cover. Song is very likely still under copyright. Undelete in 2028 Abzeronow (talk) 17:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:54, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Each and every upload of the concerned user is "own work", but as they have been taken in quite different years and places, I think we need something more concrete than their self declaration. E4024 (talk) 18:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:55, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ReaderofthePack as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.brandtasmania.com/research-stories/?item=1571 1989 (talk) 21:42, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Platonides. Ruthven (msg) 05:55, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please read file source: "Gray, Christopher. "An Architect's Evocative Legacy of Fantasy and Drama", New York Times, 14 November 2004". I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 09:20, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also File:Храм святого Димитрія Солунського 1911р..jpg, File:Храм святого Димитрія Солунського 1998р..jpg

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license, false own work claim. Three different cameras: NIKON COOLPIX S3100, BenQ Corporation GH65X and samsung SM-A730F. It is very doubtful that the user has them. And the scanned file is also downloaded. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:21, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 09:21, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of the File:Gerb_fsb.png. 91.193.179.152 18:00, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The file has diffrent color. The yellow in the gif is darker while grey color is lighter than in the png file.--Sanandros (talk) 13:22, 13 February 2019 (UTC)  Comment Sanandros, I see no color difference at all between both files. Platonides (talk) 00:15, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You need to compare them side by side.--Sanandros (talk) 05:50, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Redundant, GIF is lower quality format. --Stifle (talk) 09:21, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outdated color scheme (enwiki), not in mainspaces. Prefer not to spread this version. DePiep (talk) 23:42, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 09:21, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wiki is don use this file. pls delete file Like2187900 (talk) 03:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But they may want to use it in the future... Why do you want to delete the only file you have in Commons? --E4024 (talk) 03:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   14:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of the File:Border2.png. Needing delete and make redirect. 91.193.179.152 18:03, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They have different greyscales.--Sanandros (talk) 13:50, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete no use of two such similar versions.Kathisma (talk) 02:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above, and redirected. P 1 9 9   14:11, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This 1934 German photo does not meet the rather narrow criteria for the license tag that was used ({{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}}), and there is not enough information to ascertain if it is perhaps in the PD or free for another reason. So it should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 18:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then help me, please. What license is appropriate for a photo whose author is unknown and has certainly been dead for decades? The photo also comes from public (municipal) archival material. It is a scan of an image from a public domain, historical documentation / chronicle and was created for exactly this purpose: Contemporary historical enlightenment and documentation.--DeBukkIt (talk) 20:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The answer to "What license is appropriate for a photo whose author is unknown and has certainly been dead for decades?" is: None. There is not enough information to determine if this image is gemeinfrei (German) / in the public domain (US). That is roughly the case in Germany if the author (here: the photographer) died at least 70 years ago, in the US (assuming this is an image from Germany) if the image was published before 1924. Since we do not even know the author, we won't be able to make that determination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:51, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uses 2008 enwiki color scheme, now outdated. Also uses secondary colors (headers) that are not helpful. Replace by: File:Simple Periodic Table Chart-en.svg DePiep (talk) 23:54, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If it's obselete or using inaccurate schema DeleteShakespeareFan00 (talk) 04:34, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. P 1 9 9   14:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Speedy keep" is an argument? -DePiep (talk) 23:20, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]