Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/01/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Ibanez.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(soviet).png){kind=link}
Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 09:16, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Randykitty: In scope. Already tagged as "no permission" by Patrick Rogel. This DR is a waste of time. Please {{Withdraw}} it, I'll close it for you. (or you close it yourself if you know how) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- And how is this in scope? And permission can be added any time, so I don't see a problem with this DR. If it gets deleted because of "no permission" then this can be withdrawn. --Randykitty (talk) 10:56, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: in scope, but let's wait that the "no permission" time ends. Ruthven (msg) 11:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 09:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Keep @Randykitty: Bullshit. I refuse to waste more words on this. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:28, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Pray enlighten me. How does this fit into the scope here, it's a portrait that's unused in any article on any other project. (There was an article on enWP, but that got deleted as not-notable, with some remarking that it was promotional cruft). --Randykitty (talk) 10:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Dear God. I really need to write a "Commons is not Wikipedia" essay. In the meantime, go read your "project scope" link. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:35, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Pray enlighten me. How does this fit into the scope here, it's a portrait that's unused in any article on any other project. (There was an article on enWP, but that got deleted as not-notable, with some remarking that it was promotional cruft). --Randykitty (talk) 10:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
There is an OTRS email received for “File:Andrew_Collins,_the_Mailman_Group_Office,_Jul_2009.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2012071810002054. Ruthven (msg) 11:18, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: let's wait for OTRS. BTW, subject in scope. Ruthven (msg) 11:18, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
(c) Michele Fortmann Photography, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:26, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Crédit Photo Brokerslink.com, https://bougna.net/2018/10/23/contact/brokerslink-sassocie-au-courtier-independant-generalia-assurances-pour-sinstaller-au-cameroun/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:41, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
(c) Martina Root, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:58, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:01, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
(c) Piotr Piatrouski, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:42, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Unambiguous copyvios may use {{Copyvio}}. --Эlcobbola talk 17:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Chronus as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Chronus ([[User talk:Chronus|{{int:Talkpagelinktext
- Please properly explain why you believe this file should be deleted. Natuur12 (talk) 16:13, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
The file have no free license Reagan neocon (talk) 16:22, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested. Thanks for being honest with us!. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:52, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope - very poor quality selfie with no educational value O Still Small Voice of Clam 06:37, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Wdwd at 13:16, 30 Januar 2019 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Krdbot 20:13, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Total copyright violation. Fair use argument could be made at a local Wiki, but not suitable for Commons. A loose noose (talk) 08:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy delete copyvio. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:16, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sushmita infotech (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 13:02, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sushmita infotech (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 13:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy - advertising. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:17, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sushmita infotech (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 12:14, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 01:40, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope.
- File:Video Poker Strategy And Rules Explained By Quid Slots.jpg
- File:Video Poker Strategy And Rules Explained By Quid Slots.pdf
Ies (talk) 13:11, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy Deleted by Gbawden as spam. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:42, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
I removed a CC license from this file, since it seemed bogus. I think it may be a copyrightable logo of a US company, since it's not a simple geometric shape. --ghouston (talk) 10:55, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:39, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:28, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lucaluke17 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Unused or used in promotional Wikidata item.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:27, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
помилково завантажений Mira.te.ua (talk) 08:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 11:15, 1 Februar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Copyright violation: Source is Facebook © 2019 --Krdbot 20:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 04:59, 1 Februar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 20:10, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Created wrong by myself: created as a page accidentally and not as a category as intended Fons den Dekker (talk) 18:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: should have been a category. --Achim (talk) 09:29, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CHETAN4884 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope. Commons is not a photo album
Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:42, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CHETAN4884 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 13:29, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Delete files recreated. Have warned user. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
More UVU brain homework\ Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:01, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Potential copyright stock image at source: [1] [2] XAtsukex (talk) 01:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 16:09, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, F7. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Cody Cutter, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; F7. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Cody Cutter, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; F7. --Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Promotional. Out of scope.
- File:Manikganj.jpg
- File:Singair Upazila.jpg
- File:Parvez Ali.jpeg
- File:Parvez Ali.jpg
- File:Manikganj 2.jpg
- File:Joymontop.jpg
- File:Parvez Ali 2.jpg
~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:27, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Personal images, out of project scope. Not is use.
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:53, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:14, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Unused personal image.
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:ParvezAli.jpg
- File:Dhaka Division.jpg
- File:Singair Upazila.jpg
- File:ঢাকা.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশ.jpg
- File:Joymontop High School.jpg
- File:Manikganj.jpg
Ies (talk) 15:21, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 15:23, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 15:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low resolution photo of domesticated cat. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Naeemrana2k (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
The Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale is owned by the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University. The Institute holds the copyright and did not give permission for the scale to be made available through Wikipedia’s Creative Commons. Please remove the scale. 129.79.70.216 16:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Fair use?
Does this not fall under fair use? Does the institute hold the copyright on the medium used, or on the concept of the Rating scale? If the latter, then having an encyclopedic article about it surely constitutes fair use.
Aethalides (talk) 17:39, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Fair use is not allowed here on Commons but if it is eligible for use under free use rules, it might be possible to reupload it on a wiki that permits fair use. --Krenair (talk • contribs) 18:07, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Originality?
What about the threshold of originality here? Does the image qualify for copyright? It is a very simple graph SVG... On the other hand the idea depicted may be original, but I don't know if that could be copyrighted? --Krenair (talk • contribs) 18:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- If this is based directly on the image from the original report, that'd be one thing (is it?), but it really feels like this would be either PD-simple or PD-ineligible. If this comes down, it'd be trivial to make a fresh one - and, ultimately, isn't that what 'simple' and 'ineligible' are all about? DS (talk) 18:31, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Says who?
"The Institute holds the copyright and did not give permission for the scale to be made available through Wikipedia’s Creative Commons." Signed with an IP address located at Indiana University.
Is this request from an official representative of the Kinsey Institute? If so, then why has it been made anonymously?
May I suggest that before any Wikipedian gets caught up in one of the many Sturm und Drangs that befall Wikipedia over whatevs, that this request be confirmed as coming from the Kinsey Institute. If it isn't ... ignore, ignore, ignore. Pyxis Solitary (talk) 08:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The image is a simple chart, in fact little more than a straight line between two points, so falls under the standard {{PD-shape}}. --Fæ (talk) 17:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep as Fæ says, the graph is too simple for copyright (see COM:TOO). Additionally, if it's the concept of the scale that the Kinsey Institute claims to hold the copyright to, then I regret to inform them that ideas can't be copyrighted. clpo13(talk) 17:37, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Fæ. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:45, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Kept as per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio as well. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 16:15, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; F7. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Navin-patney (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used or used in vanity draft.
- File:Patson NewLogo Final.jpg
- File:DalmationLogoseries.jpg
- File:PDHLogo.png
- File:Dalmationlogo.jpg
- File:Tinku Navin.jpg
- File:NavinPatney.jpg
- File:Navin full.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Private pic, here out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:47, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.flickr.com/photos/155885426@N08/46052043864/in/dateposted-public/
- Source is cc-zero. Natuur12 (talk) 16:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Opps correct. Thought hev seen sth. different. But the costume or the depicted comic character seems to be copyrighted. --JuTa 16:52, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by INeverCry. --Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This picture is more about the girl than about the river JopkeB (talk) 17:02, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: personal photo, out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Due to Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Theory_and_event_logo.tif, file has been undeleted and a deletion request is launched to establish if this logo is under COM:TOO and if {{PD-logo}} can be used as license. Arthur Crbz (talk) 18:21, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Comment @Alexis Jazz, De728631, Jcb, Clpo13, Abzeronow, and Ankry: --Arthur Crbz (talk) 18:22, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep the arguably most complex part of this, the drop shadow behind the ampersand, can be added with very minimal effort in most word processors or desktop publishing programs, so I don't think that shows enough creative input to put this above the threshold of originality in the United States. The rest is just text and simple shapes (an oval and two lines). Compare similar cases at COM:TOO#United States, such as the Geek Squad logo or the Discover card design, where the shading was held to be insufficiently creative for copyright protection. It's unlikely to be the uploader's own work, though, so that should be fixed and a proper source given. clpo13(talk) 18:28, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Added the information. Pinging @Moheen. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:57, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep as clpo13 explained, clicking "Effects → Drop Shadow → OK" a copyright does not make. If this had been a logo from the UK it would be debatable, but it's from the US, so an obvious keep. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:46, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep clpo13 makes a convincing case that this is below TOO in the United States. Abzeronow (talk) 16:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per clpo13. De728631 (talk) 13:39, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Kept as per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyright 2015 Thierry de Becker, autorisation de l'auteur nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 20:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio, scan of book Ciacho5 (talk) 20:38, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Portrait of non relevante person Stego (talk) 20:38, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Same as File:Dunkin' logo.svg, not used 162.251.61.139 20:56, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Túrelio (talk · contributions · Statistics). --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Official mocking (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal Photos, unused, out of scope
- File:Mockingvbhvhhvb.jpg
- File:Mocking19.jpg
- File:Mocking18.png
- File:Mocking17.jpg
- File:Mocking16.jpg
- File:Mocking15.jpg
- File:Mocking14.jpg
- File:Mocking13.png
- File:Mocking12.png
- File:Mocking11.jpg
- File:Mocking10.jpg
- File:Mocking9.jpg
- File:Mocking8.jpg
- File:Mocking5.jpg
- File:Mocking7.jpg
- File:Mocking4.jpg
- File:Mocking1.jpg
- File:Official cloth.jpg
- File:Official.jpg
- File:Official mocking.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 19:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Official mocking (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope, personal photos. warned before.
Roy17 (talk) 21:10, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Official mocking (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:NOTHOST - unused, low quality images of non-notable person. Some duplicates of images uploaded by user's sock - see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Aashish jaatav.
- File:Mocking 102.jpg
- File:Holi 2019.jpg
- File:Mocking 188.png
- File:Mocking 99.jpg
- File:Mocking 66.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 22:26, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Technofreeq1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]I've blocked this user on en.wiki for advertising. These files are all claimed as their own work when that is extremely unlikely.
- File:Jasmina Susak 1.webp
- File:ViktoriiaVlasenko.jpg
- File:Eric-Signature-logo-2-300x75.png
- File:EricLeopardi.webp
- File:Lunden De'Leon.jpg
Smartse (talk) 21:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hadi khazaee asl (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:816234023 73295محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:816233095 32656محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:816202251 33044محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:815903591 33345محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:814724275 74237محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:814501469 107659محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:814417213 108620محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:814422229 107669محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:812827769 3586محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:812825742 133252محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:810615627 38074محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:438719899 62565محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:438717668 237177محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:438718809 208880محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:438716427 91665محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:429828351 72977محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:429802717 259648محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:421303185 78252محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:20180225 102909poمحمد عسگری.jpg
- File:20180225 103008poمحمد عسگری.jpg
- File:۲۰۱۷۰۳۱۳ ۱۲۳۱۴۰محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:۲۰۱۵۰۹۳۰ ۱۱۴۸۰۴محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:۲۰۱۵۰۹۳۰ ۱۱۳۳۳۸محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:1779822 588699047879424 1512744200 nمحمد عسگری.jpg
- File:۲۰۱۵-۱۲-۲۲ ۲۰.۳۹.۰۷محمد عسگری.png
- File:۲۰۱۵-۱۱-۲۳ ۱۹.۴۹.۲۵محمد عسگری.png
- File:۲۰۱۵-۱۱-۱۸ ۱۸.۲۴.۴۴محمد عسگری.png
- File:۲۰۱۵-۱۱-۲۳ ۱۹.۴۷.۵۶محمد عسگری.png
- File:۲۰۱۵-۱۱-۱۸ ۱۷.۵۹.۰۸محمد عسگری.png
- File:۴۵۹۸۶۷۴۹۵۶۷محمد عسگری.png
- File:۲۰۱۵-۱۱-۱۸ ۱۷.۴۳.۳۱محمد عسگری.png
- File:پوستر فیلم محمد رسول الله.png
- File:۲۰۱۵-۰۸-۳۱ ۱۸.۴۵.۰۲محمد عسگری.png
- File:۲۰۱۵-۰۲-۱۴ ۰۴.۱۰.۵۸محمد عسگری.png
- File:4 344818524486631820محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:4 319163263193448720محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:4 319163263193448719محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:4 319163263193448694محمد عسگری ابولهب.jpg
- File:4 319163263193448699محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:4 319163263193448696محمد عسگری.jpg
- File:IMG-20170529-WA0015.jpg
- File:محمد عسگری 20170529040623.jpg
- File:20170529 040949مجید مجیدی و محمد عسگری.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:29, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Irobertson34 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Found elsewhere, not own work.
- File:Katharine-towne-imagecollect.png
- File:317947 v9 ba.jpg
- File:306361 v9 ca.jpg
- File:MV5BMTMzNDcxNDE5NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNTMxMzMyNg@@. V1 UX214 CR0,0,214,317 AL .jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:43, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; author clearly visible in one or two exifs. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
This is an otherwise identical but faulty version of File:Universitatea „Dunărea de Jos”.jpg. Mihai (talk) 23:31, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shadesofheroin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Cindy Yessenia Favela Neferneferuaten Nefertiti Mery-Aten Maria 3.jpg
- File:Cindy Yessenia Favela Neferneferuaten Nefertiti Mery-Aten Maria 2.jpg
- File:Cindy Yessenia Favela Neferneferuaten Nefertiti Mery-Aten Maria 1.jpg
- File:Cindy Yessenia Favela Neferneferuaten Nefertiti Mery-Aten Maria.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:32, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
(c) Don Aka Drluv eyesofluvphotography Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:38, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Cody Cutter, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:38, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Cody Cutter, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:39, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 23:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Personal document; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats\ Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:53, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Own work it's not. Is it? E4024 (talk) 02:39, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Very low quality, no educational or informative value as there are much good images of the same theme Stegop (talk) 02:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE, you would need to replace the usage on a large number of pages first. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
The contest wiki loves earth 2017 was over and it was not selected Prasun2017 (talk) 04:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
The contest wiki loves earth 2017 was over and it was not selected Prasun2017 (talk) 04:21, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Keep - its in use and actually a good photo. --Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
copy right issue Muzaffar Ali Muzaffar (talk) 05:07, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
copy right issue Muzaffar Ali Muzaffar (talk) 05:15, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by another admin. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by another admin. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 05:55, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
According to RIAN, the authors is most likely Pavel Troshkin (1909-1944) [1], a Crimean photographer who worked in Moscow. Hence the source country is Soviet Union (Russia), and the image is copyrighted. Materialscientist (talk) 07:53, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-Russia}}, p.1. Alex Spade (talk) 18:15, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Withdrawing my request. {{PD-Russia}} applies. Materialscientist (talk) 23:36, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image, like dozens of other pictures of this same dog transferred from Flickr by the same person, does not appear to have any educational value. Most/ all of them should probably be deleted, this is just one example (see all files with the word "Milo" in the file name). See COM:PARTYPICS. A loose noose (talk) 08:22, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Received Template:OTRS ticket email. However, the statement is not valid. (Forward statement) We haven't heard from them even after three months. KCVelaga (talk · mail) 08:26, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; needs to submit valid permission to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
loaded by mistake Keren - WMIL (talk) 08:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyright notice in the image reads t.clarte AT balloide-photo.com. It is unclear that uploader is this person. -- Deadstar (msg) 09:31, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; needs permission if the uploader is the copyright holder. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 10:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep no valid reason for deletion. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Then please explain how this is within scope... --Randykitty (talk) 10:45, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Speedy keep A musical performance of a possibly notable singer. --Ruthven (msg) 11:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted from enWP for not being notable. --Randykitty (talk) 11:11, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Not out of scope IMO. Although not notable enough for WP (yet?) a google search finds enough mention of her to make her somewhat notable. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
non-notable person; personal image 1989 (talk) 11:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete – “monstros do cinema” are likely copyrighted. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:32, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:46, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
(c) Bernhard Schramm, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:20, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_Inholland.jpg Tukka (talk) 12:31, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
(c) LARS LANDMANN, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, oos. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:18, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
_-_Ibanez.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Ibanez.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:52, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Only picture we have showing this person, so keep until we have a better picture. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 12:53, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- speedy keep: in use. Rama (talk) 17:07, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 12:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: One kept as INUSE, other deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Slightly blurred low resolution image that is not used. Nv8200p (talk) 12:57, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]They looking all fairly out of scope to me.
- File:Belandūr Tank 14.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 13.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 12.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 11.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 7.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 10.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 6.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 5.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 9.jpg
- File:CV Raman Nagar.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 4.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 3.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 7.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 6.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 5.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 4.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 3.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 2.jpg
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:31, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted as recreation of already-deleted material. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:33, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]All these images are either out of scope or displaying copyrighted product packaging.
- File:Test 8.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 2.jpg
- File:QSt.John's National Academy of Health Sciences.jpg
- File:Sondekoppa 2.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank 2.jpg
- File:Sondekoppa.jpg
- File:Sri Chamrājendra Reservoir 2.jpg
- File:Sri Chamrājendra Reservoir.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences.jpg
- File:Belandūr Tank.jpg
JuTa 13:02, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality nonsense / test uploads. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:National Public School, Indiranagar.jpg
- File:Indian Airlines Flight 605.jpg
- File:Wikidata edit test upload.jpg
- File:Test blurred image.jpg
- File:St.John's National Academy of Health Sciences 2.jpg
- File:Hello world 2.jpg
- File:Hello world.jpg
- File:Test 11.jpg
- File:Multiple uploads 2.jpg
- File:Multiple uploads.jpg
- File:Iterm terminal.jpg
Ies (talk) 13:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Test uploads, out of scope. The uploader has a long list of such uploads (misleading titles and descriptions, testing, out of scope), some of which they nominated for deletion themselves, others were later recreated. What is it that they keep testing I don't know.
- File:Harrison Middleton University 5.jpg
- File:Harrison Middleton University 4.jpg
- File:Harrison Middleton University 3.jpg
- File:Harrison Middleton University.png
- File:Test 8.jpg
- File:Test image .jpg
TFerenczy (talk) 11:29, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Testmaskara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
- File:Test 11.jpg
- File:Test 10.jpg
- File:The New School for the Arts and Academics 2.jpg
- File:The New School for the Arts and Academics.jpg
- File:Vivi.jpeg
- File:University Theatre.png
Minoraxtalk 12:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
you cant see anything senseful Carl Ha (talk) 13:20, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SHAHAHAD80 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Shah ahad point.jpg
- File:SHAH AHAD SWABI.jpg
- File:SHAH AHAD ISLAMABAD FAMOUS BOY .jpg
- File:SHAH AHAD QAU ISLAMABAD.jpg
- File:Shah ahad.jpg
- File:SHAH AHAD.jpg
- File:STREEM SHAH AHAD.jpg
- File:SHAHAHAD.jpg
Ies (talk) 13:28, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
A meaningless chart that lacks title, legend, source, and description. Not used by any Wikimedia Project. Senator2029 14:28, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
no encyclopedic value - no useful use of this in any article thinkable Doldenhonigkönig (talk) 15:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Keep Was used to illustrate a discussion on ruWP, and may still be needed to make sense of the related comments. (I don’t understand much Russian myself.) Harmless otherwise.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 23:57, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Keep This map fragment illustrates one of the spellings of the capital of Brazil in Russian. A hot controversy erupted around the writing of Brasilia’s encyclopedic article. Deleting a key illustration that demonstrates the spelling variant advocated by the participant will lead to a logical failure and the loss of the essence of the controversy. — Alexey Tourbaevsky, cheloVechek / talk 09:52, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: As per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Singer and song writer, biography and image File:GUILLE BAREA.jpg. Queeg (talk) 08:57, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Why are you raising this at DR? If you are going to nominate files, please give a reason that makes sense. --Fæ (talk) 04:05, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 11:54, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope, text contribution. Jespinos (talk) 23:37, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:43, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Surajoffice (talk · contribs)
[edit]Songs and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s)
- File:Mere ras qumar(Suraj Kumar Maurya)2019 hits.wav
- File:Tere sang yara(Suraj Kumar Murya) hits 2019.wav
- File:Ek ladki ko dekha (Suraj Kumar Maurya) 2019 hits.wav
- File:Suraj Kumar Maurya (Singer).jpg
- File:Suraj Kumar Maurya.jpg
- File:Suraj kumar maurya.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Surajoffice (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:58, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:07, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Very low quality, no educational value Stegop (talk) 00:34, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope UVU brain homework Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:18, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amourmourant (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused fantasy election results
- File:AU 2018 Elections.svg
- File:Senate 2015 A.U..svg
- File:Senateupdated.svg
- File:Assembly.svg
- File:2016 Assembly Cassiopean.svg
- File:2015 Cassiopean Senate.svg
Cabayi (talk) 09:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
out of scope - unused fantasy flag with a description which does not facilitate any reuse Cabayi (talk) 09:07, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable product. Out of project scope. De728631 (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Just for further clarification: the relevant Wikipedia page was deleted a few years ago. --HyperGaruda (talk) 19:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JALALSEPASEH (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete homework, useless. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:25, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:04, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thalles Carvalho (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Amazon Maker - Thalles Carvalho 4.png
- File:Amazon Maker - Thalles Carvalho 1.png
- File:Amazon Maker - Thalles Carvalho 3.png
- File:Amazon Maker - Thalles Carvalho 2.png
- File:Amazon Maker - Thalles Carvalho.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope, not used. Old quote, written in French. Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Louisewikimania (talk · contribs)
[edit]I'm not sure why this user used non free images when so many were free on Commons but all of these were taken from the web
- File:Ubuntu City 1.jpg
- File:Cape Winelands.png
- File:Cape Wildfire Safari.png
- File:Cape Whale.png
- File:Cape Peninsula Wow Tours.png
- File:Cape Town City-Table Mountain-Robben Island.png
Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:54, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Todd Janavis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality, exif shows copyright 2009. Only uploads of this new user, likely copyvio
- File:Carbridge Perth's MAN 18.320 HOCL-R-NL (CVL1913) (65).jpg
- File:Carbridge Perth's MAN 18.320 HOCL-R-NL-MCV Elite C130 (65-CVL1913).jpg
_(65).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation: copied from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2016.09.006 Michał Sobkowski (talk) 13:25, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 07:14, 6 Februar 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Schemat działania lunazyny.jpg --Krdbot 13:55, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pasquale Cicirelli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, paintings and publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:SAIRA società rivestimenti artistici.jpg
- File:SAIRA società anonima industria rivestimenti artistici.jpg
- File:Movimento Nuovo - gennaio 1946 - Sommario.jpg
- File:Filiberto Sbardella.jpg
- File:Tre figure di donna.png
- File:Convalescente - Filiberto Sbardella.jpg
- File:Filiberto Sbardella - mosaico - Cinematografo Reposi - Savona.jpg
- File:Filiberto Sbardella .png
- File:I bitumatori - Filiberto Sbardella.jpg
- File:Filiberto Sbardella - Mostra di Pesaro 1934.jpg
- File:VII Triennale.jpg
- File:Clima fascista- VI triennale.jpg
- File:VII triennale Milano.jpg
- File:Resistenza al campo.jpg
- File:Murale - VI Triennale .jpg
- File:La risaia - Museo Sandro Pertini di Savona.jpg
- File:Bandiera Rossa.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:53, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
no license Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
no idea Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:57, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:57, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:57, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:57, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:57, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not licenced Madhusudana reddy Singana (talk) 19:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Artworks designed by Iranian artist fa:طاها ذاکر. Needs permission from the artist.
- File:Memorial Igor stravinsky Design By Taha Zaker(طاها ذاکر).jpg
- File:Memorial For Anton Webern.jpg
- File:Memorial For Stokhasun.jpg
- File:Remembrance For Anton Bruckner Design By Taha Zaker.jpg
- File:John Cage.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hanooz 08:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:45, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Screenshot, as mentioned in the file's details - not a free file. As such, it has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 20:36, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
The contest wiki loves earth 2017 was over and it was not selected Prasun2017 (talk) 04:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept. No valid reason for deletion. Strakhov (talk) 02:38, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
The contest wiki loves earth 2017 was over and it was not selected Prasun2017 (talk) 04:20, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept. No valid reason for deletion. Strakhov (talk) 02:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
The contest wiki loves earth 2017 was over and it was not selected Prasun2017 (talk) 04:21, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept. No valid reason for deletion. Strakhov (talk) 02:40, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Very low quality, no educational or informative value Stegop (talk) 00:46, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: No other images with this exact perspective in Category:Views of Leh from the Leh Palace and Namgyal Tsemo Monastery hills and the quality is rather low, but not abysmal. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Artwork created in 1970, no COM:FOP in France. See [2] (in French). Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:15, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kristos Kinkgdom 2019 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
I own ALL of these images. What would be an evidence for permission? I really don't get it. --Kristos Kinkgdom 2019 (talk) 15:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Kristos Kinkgdom 2019: You need to send permissions to OTRS - you have been notified on your talk page Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:35, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
This bad PNG-file can be deleted! It's not in use anymore and File:3-methylbutan-1-ol 200.svg can replace it! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment In principle, I agree. However, I would like to note that there is no other image in Category:3-Methyl-1-butanol that has the same orientation. Who knows, maybe someone will look for exactly this orientation e.g. to display a homologous series of branched alcohols or so. --Leyo 17:53, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I created & uploaded a good replacement for this file which has the same orientation and is equivalent! File:Strukturformel von 3-Methylbutan-1-ol.svg. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:30, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as we now have a high quality 1:1 replacement. --Leyo 22:34, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 17:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
I accidentally uploaded it 136.159.213.13 00:37, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 00:42, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Aavitus as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader/Owner request (me). Demande du propriétaire. Je souhaite récupérer mon image. I wish to recover my legal possession/file. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- I only and simply want to recover my photography as the owner I am. That's my propery. --Aavitus (talk) 11:46, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Aavitus: I'm aware about your request and I perfectly understand it, however uploader/owner request must be within one week after the upload and could be tagged as speedy delete if it's not used. But your nice photo is uploaded since 2017, so it has to be a regular DR. Regards, --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- DeleteThank you for your message. I indeed upload this image a long time ago but I would like to recover despite this time. I did not know the way to get it back. --Aavitus (talk) 12:35, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Aavitus: I'm aware about your request and I perfectly understand it, however uploader/owner request must be within one week after the upload and could be tagged as speedy delete if it's not used. But your nice photo is uploaded since 2017, so it has to be a regular DR. Regards, --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Same as this DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abbatiale d'Évaux-les-Bains.jpg.--Wdwd (talk) 10:02, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --1989 (talk) 17:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Aavitus as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader/Owner request (me). Demande du propriétaire. Je souhaite récupérer mon image. I wish to recover my legal possession/file. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:13, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload. Here 1½ years have passed. The file is beautiful and has educational value. Taivo (talk) 07:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- DeleteThank you for your message. I indeed upload this image a long time ago and for these reasons. But I would like to recover despite this time (for my own researches).--Aavitus (talk) 12:35, 31 January 2019 (UTC).
- Keep, per Taivo. @Aavitus: Please see Commons:License revocation.--Wdwd (talk) 09:58, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --1989 (talk) 17:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Uploader states that this photo is own work taken at a genealogy research event in Salt Lake City. However the photo appears on http://merovingiandynasty.org/details.php?id=meetings where it's stated that Richardson was guest speaker at City Tavern Club in Washington, DC in 2011 - based on the photo's background compared to others on that page, it was obviously snapped there. The Merovingian Dynasty website states its content is copyrighted. Smalljim (talk) 12:35, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- The objector states that the file is copyrighted, however, the objector should be made aware that this individual file is not copyrighted. While a similar file was used at http://merovingiandynasty.org/details.php?id=meetings, the file itself is not copyrighted and used at https://sites.google.com/site/saltlakechristmastour/home/the-tour-staff/professional---Douglas-Richardson, among others. Additionally, the said file has been used at many genealogical events in many different cities, of which no copyright infringements have taken place. It is not the copyrighted material of any one entity or person. The file has been released and used by various genealogical societies and individuals. —Lionheart0317 (talk) 13:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- (1) If you didn't take the photo, you can't claim it as your own work, see Commons:Own work. (2) The fact that others have used the image doesn't affect its copyright - where is the evidence that it is not copyrighted? Smalljim (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- (3) Prove that it is a copyrighted picture! The only thing copyrighted is the organization's name, 'The Order of the Merovingian Dynasty'. Many pictures were taken at this event by attendees and the public. Some pictures were donated by members to the organization to use and others were not. Many pictures were taken when guests were doing book signings. The pictures themselves are not subject to copyright laws. —Lionheart0317 (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Copyright can be complex so I can understand your confusion, but for a simple case like this there's a helpful graphic explanation of our policy at Commons:Licensing. Incidentally, though it's not relevant here, the event at which this photo was taken was not open to the public. Smalljim (talk) 11:11, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- Excuse me, but you seem to be the individual who is confused and assuredly not a copyright attorney in any country. Your assertion is what's not relevant here. The event (as you want to phrase it), was not a private party as some attendees were from the public. All statements mentioned previously are verifiable. Besides, you have still not proven that the image is copyrighted at all. Once again, the image is neither copyrighted nor licensed, only the name of the organization. It seems YOU are resorting to your old hounding tactics once again. —Lionheart0317 (talk) 02:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Copyright can be complex so I can understand your confusion, but for a simple case like this there's a helpful graphic explanation of our policy at Commons:Licensing. Incidentally, though it's not relevant here, the event at which this photo was taken was not open to the public. Smalljim (talk) 11:11, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- (3) Prove that it is a copyrighted picture! The only thing copyrighted is the organization's name, 'The Order of the Merovingian Dynasty'. Many pictures were taken at this event by attendees and the public. Some pictures were donated by members to the organization to use and others were not. Many pictures were taken when guests were doing book signings. The pictures themselves are not subject to copyright laws. —Lionheart0317 (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: @Lionheart0317: In the United States, copyright belongs to the creator of the photograph at the moment of creation or publication: per section 102: "Copyright protection subsists, in accordance with this title, in original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, now known or later developed, from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device." Per section 104: works "when published, are subject to protection under this title if—
- (1) on the date of first publication, one or more of the authors is a national or domiciliary of the United States, or is a national, domiciliary, or sovereign authority of a treaty party, or is a stateless person, wherever that person may be domiciled; or
- (2) the work is first published in the United States or in a foreign nation that, on the date of first publication, is a treaty party"
- Furthermore, per section 302a: In General.—Copyright in a work created on or after January 1, 1978, subsists from its creation and, except as provided by the following subsections, endures for a term consisting of the life of the author and 70 years after the author's death.
- Please also see Commons:Project scope/Evidence especially: "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence." If you are not the copyright holder (i.e if you did not personally take the picture), the burden of evidence is on you to demonstrate the file is freely licensed. If you are the photographer, please submit permission by following the instructions at COM:OTRS.--Animalparty (talk) 03:26, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees now to delete the image (nominated the file for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 14:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
(c) TOBIAS METZ, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Sorry, I will send permission to the support team. Please allow them a few days to check. -- Wörwag Pharma (talk) 08:19, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Gerhard_Mayer_hi_res.jpg” under ticket:2019020410002148. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 09:29, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission received. --Rosenzweig τ 13:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Auteur Mikal Sveen, autorisation de l'auteur nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 21:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019013110002947 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No Freedom of Panorama for memorials in the USA. This memorial is from 1947, so unlikely that the sculptor has been dead for 70 years JopkeB (talk) 16:53, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment per COM:HIRTLE, the copyright status of this memorial depends on whether a copyright notice was given or if copyright was renewed. Life+70 only applies to more recent American works (post-1978, in most cases). clpo13(talk) 17:07, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- How could one find out about such a renewal? For ordinary people from other countries, like me (The Netherlands), American copyright law is too complicated. JopkeB (talk) 17:55, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- American copyright is indeed complicated. Looking up copyright status for works like this requires knowing the official title of the piece or the name of the author in order to check registration records. For records from 1978 to the present, those can be found online at the US Copyright Office website. Older records can only be found in physical volumes at the Copyright Office or in scans of them, such as those listed here. It's an intensive task for anyone, and it won't always provide answers, though it's often worth a quick look.
- In this case, the work was apparently published in 1947, so its copyright needed to be renewed in either 1974 or 1975 (28th year of copyright). I did a bit of research on possible names and artists, but I didn't find anything conclusive. Without knowing for sure who the sculptor was or what the piece is called, it's impossible to know for sure if it fulfilled the required copyright formalities. I'd say Delete per the precautionary principle. clpo13(talk) 18:11, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- OK, I agree. Thanks for the research. Good to know that this is the policy. JopkeB (talk) 08:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 19:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Kamanin and Schmidt in 1934.jpg
[edit]
- File:Kamanin and Schmidt in 1934.jpg
- Also its derivative image File:Kamanin and Schmidt in 1934 (cropped).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
According to RIAN, the author is Ivan Shagin (1904-1982). Hence the image is copyrighted and will remain so for many decades ahead. Materialscientist (talk) 07:29, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:09, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Source http://colway.pl/en/informations/news/505-niezwykla-historia-polskiej-lunazyny is marked with "Copyright © 2015 Colway" Michał Sobkowski (talk) 12:51, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019020710005283 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- The agreement seems to be valid, but I have mixed feeling what this picture really shows, and I am afraid that it is a kind of fake. According to the scientific sources - en:Lunasin is a en:polypetide o molecular weight 5,5 kDA consisting of at least 44 peptide units. [3] What we see in this picture - is a different molecule. Assuming that the code of colours of atoms is traditional: i.e: grey - carbon and hydrogen, red - oxygen, blue - nitrogen, yellow - sulphur - what we see is not a peptide at all (no peptide bonds) and molecular weight less than 1 kDa. Bearing in mind - that the picture is from promotional page of company aggressively promoting products claimed to contain lunasin, a use to be new "miracle medicine" - I can't see any educational value in it. Polimerek (talk) 12:05, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- And the uploader of this file explained in OTRS queue that this picture was created according to the general company instructions by a graphic designer with no knowledge of chemistry, so he also does not know if it is valid lunasin structure ;-) Polimerek (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Samsonov Anatoly Vasilievich (d. 1994), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Samsonov Anatoly Vasilievich (d. 1994), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Publication history not provided so copyright cannot be determined. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:41, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Geschichte des Schiffes bekannt, zur Not von Wikipedia
- Beschädigung erhalten am 12. Dezember 1914
- Standort der Werft zum Aufnahme Zeitpunkt britische Kolonie
= > Egro alles richtig
Deleted: Therer is no proof this is a UK government image. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Very low quality, no educational or informative value as thre are much good images of the same themes Stegop (talk) 00:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Very low quality, no educational or informative value as thre are much good images of the same theme Stegop (talk) 00:57, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Very low quality, no educational or informative value as thre are much good images of the same theme Stegop (talk) 00:57, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Very low quality, no educational or informative value as thre are much good images of the same theme Stegop (talk) 00:57, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No educational value Stegop (talk) 01:23, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete or not; but the derivative is a beautiful view of Leh. Jee 02:43, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Weak keep Seems like wrong deletion reason. Some people think it is educational to read the bible. IMO should have been "personal picture", but then users have some rights to keep some personal pictures as well. Anyway, for 425 kb... it is better to move on, to something that actually contravenes copyright or moral issues. Keep - users rigts to keep a limited number of personal pictures. Keep - waste of Administrators backlogged duites to delete such a picture. Keep - if derivative is kept, maybe orig should be kept as well. --Janwikifoto (talk) 20:43, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: unused personal image. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Very low quality, no educational or informative value as thre are much good images of the same theme Stegop (talk) 01:26, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a non-free artwork B dash (talk) 02:21, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Interestingly, it could be said of any photography capturing an art-work. So any 'protest sign' 'flag' shot by a photographer could fall under such an argument as yours. I stress out the point that for photographically produced w:Œuvre_dérivée in France "la jurisprudence semble encore contradictoire sur le sujet."
- I consider the picture is not "reproducing" the artwork but making a picture of it "in use" (as for all the the photo in category Category:Relevés de gilets jaunes I produced).
- This particular picture interest me for a few details I'd like de debate about (producing 'investigation report' on wikinews or a research on wikiversité).
- File:GJ Lille 20181208 154419.jpg (enlarge to look at the described details).
- Here are my unpublished (yet) Notes about it.
- The manuscript modification on the date by the corner. Its a "8" over a two digit number (probably 17 as for November 17th). But the wearer seems to want to express the longer inclusion in the movement as possible (the picture is taken on December the 8th, making it a full month). In a lots of "tour de parole" (speaking-times) speakers start by claiming being in the movement from the beginning.
- The man holds a 'klaxon', two fingers are slightly visible... not gloved. The 'artwork' is under a blister. Water is visible on the picture protection and indicates the weather conditions during the protest.
- But
- As frequently as the crowd allows me (hard with the bike, but usually when I can't the conditions for a readable picture are hardly meet), I ask for taking the pictures (Out of "courtoisie". I stand on public ways and avoid the face when focusing on someone. Sometime even if she/he agrees to 'pose'.). I even remember asking this particular guy to stop walking because the previous shot was a blur ;-) (yeah, not a professional as you can see from the pictures).
- But making this 'deletion request' useful for something, I'd like your opinions:
- How would you introduce (in a few words) the licenses and wikimedia topics when doing such field work ? The media treatment of the yellow vest protestant in France may open eyes and wishes to a wider population ...
- BR --RP87 (talk) 16:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: "Interestingly, it could be said of any photography capturing an art-work. So any 'protest sign' 'flag' shot by a photographer could fall under such an argument as yours." This is quite true and should not surprise anyone. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for graphic works in UK B dash (talk) 02:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Very low quality, no educational or informative value as thre are much good images of the same theme Stegop (talk) 02:39, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Very nice historical picture, probably PD by now. It is not an "own work" as stated and must be licenced correctly. E4024 (talk) 02:42, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. Is it PD? E4024 (talk) 03:21, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. Free image? E4024 (talk) 03:22, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. Is this a PD file? E4024 (talk) 03:23, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted software, deriative of non-free content. Hiàn (talk) 05:24, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted software, derivative of non-free content. Hiàn (talk) 05:28, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work - author of video don't have rights to release rights to music. 89.71.222.65 06:20, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
wrong Content Utkarsh2003 Bhar (talk) 07:15, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to belong to the uploader. No proof that this image is free of rights. -Antonin n (talk) 07:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Source page clearly states (in Vietnamese): "All rights reserved". Unless there is a tag that releases all works of the North Vietnam governmenmt into the public domain, this image and all others derived from this site are copyright protected. A loose noose (talk) 08:10, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
mistake MS Vishnu 369 (talk) 08:48, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Which mistake? Writing "musuem" instead of "museum"? That is easy to correct. --E4024 (talk) 23:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
I am not sure about the copyright status Shaul greenstein (talk) 10:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
I am not sure about the copyright Shaul greenstein (talk) 11:22, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Is there any reason to believe that the user "Tazzou" (with just one upload) is Ariel Rebel herself? Slomox (talk) 12:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
(c) ITA NSE CMC GAROFALO Francesco RESOLUTE SUPPORT HQ, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:34, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for artworks. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Uploader's other contributions are obvious copyright violations taken from online. This one is just older and more difficult to verify. For a low resolution thumbnail with no meta data, I see no reason to trust that this is somehow the one legitimate file. GMGtalk 14:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by N.donzelli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Historical book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Please hold on! This book is definitely a rare and antique book first published in 1892 in India and reprinted in 1921. The book is very clearly in public domain. This upload was made by a new and much promising user while she is being trained on how to proceed each step to contribute in Wikisource project. If any corrections are needed in the licensing template, please hold on until it will be done soon. Please try not to look too rude to a new user! Thanks. ViswaPrabha (വിശ്വപ്രഭ) (talk) 01:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Details on the page has been translated. Let me know if any further details are needed. --Sreejith K (talk) 00:47, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also we do not keep PDFs of photos. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Video screen not de minimus. Photo could be reupload with video screen blurred to save it, as the image itself is useful. SecretName101 (talk) 15:32, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- KEEP: Image has been re-uploaded to blur our video screen image.
Deleted: It's still a copyvio. If it is blurred enough to make it not a copyvio, there wioll be nothing left that is in SCOPE. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Video screen not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 15:34, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by AlejandroPorfirio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:SS Maceió.jpg
- File:Brasiloide.png
- File:Vapor Macau1917.jpg
- File:Vapor Paraná.jpg
- File:José Lotina Abrisqueta.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AlejandroPorfirio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Navio-Macau-Afundando.jpg
- File:O-Comandante-Saturnino-Furtado-de-Mendonça.jpg
- File:Baependy Ship.png
- File:Vapor Longships(Paraná).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Essai raté Paulinemuséesbeaune (talk) 15:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
problème de droits Paulinemuséesbeaune (talk) 13:57, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia JopkeB (talk) 15:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Donald Trump President-elect portrait.jpg was copyrighted and deleted B dash (talk) 15:58, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted toy. FunkMonk (talk) 16:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
This is just a toy, what's the problem of deleting it? I mean it is not the best, but is it necesary? Turbo-Dino Rex (talk) 17:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- The problem is that toys are copyrighted, Turbo-Dino Rex, meaning that unless you were the creator of them, you cannot upload them here or release pictures of them under a free license without permission from the copyright owners. It's not about the quality of the models, but their legal status. Slate Weasel (talk) 22:14, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
I understand it, sorry. Turbo-Dino Rex (talk) 07:37, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted toys. FunkMonk (talk) 16:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want, I will not upload these type of files. They are toys and I've put them in combat, but I think it is not so necesary to delete it? Turbo-Dino Rex (talk) 17:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted toys. FunkMonk (talk) 16:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Like in my other files like this, you requested them to be deleted. I still don't understand why, they are just toys. I not saying that they're the best, but is it necesary? Turbo-Dino Rex (talk) 17:45, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted sticker. FunkMonk (talk) 16:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
This file won't be so important for me, so if you want you can delete it. I still think it's not that awful, but it's up to you this time. Turbo-Dino Rex (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted toy. FunkMonk (talk) 16:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Why is it needed to be deleted? It is just an example of Beyblade toys. I'm not saying that it is the best, bur why is it necesary? Turbo-Dino Rex (talk) 17:36, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted toy. FunkMonk (talk) 16:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
These were examples of the realistic toy Beyblades from the Beyblade Burst series (visit English Wikipedia). Because there were no images of real toy Beyblades, I've uploaded some. I was just about to put this and the other images of Beyblades (not all) to be examples. Turbo-Dino Rex (talk) 17:25, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted toy. FunkMonk (talk) 16:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
They are just examples of Beyblade Burst toys, from the series. I mean they are not so for deletion, but I don't understand why it is needed to be deleted. Turbo-Dino Rex (talk) 17:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I have already explained why here and in the other DRs, it is copyrighted. FunkMonk (talk) 09:48, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Appears to be a random, copyrighted picture that can be found all over the web. FunkMonk (talk) 16:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Sure, this is not an awful image, but is it necesary to be deleted? It is not the best of course, but I just like this image of my favourite dinosaur:Argentinosaurus. Turbo-Dino Rex (talk) 17:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- The issue isn't the quality, but that you dodn't create it. FunkMonk (talk) 09:49, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Photo of a book. FunkMonk (talk) 16:09, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
I understand that it would not function, I was just confused when I've uploaded this file (or image). It is from a book, but I know understand that it won't be a good example. --Turbo-Dino Rex (talk) 17:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- The problem is that you don't own the copyright. FunkMonk (talk) 10:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work; but of course I have no idea if the original is copyrighted. Is that important? E4024 (talk) 16:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 189.244.9.170 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work.
- DR material. Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unlikely to be own work Ymblanter (talk) 16:16, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Low resolution. Metadata indicates that it was sourced from Facebook
- Uploader is an experienced editor. I would like to give him/her a change to explain. Natuur12 (talk) 16:18, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Apparently a scan of an old cover or poster, so it is quite likely not the uploader's own original work, but a derivative. In this case, the CC licence would be invalid. De728631 (talk) 16:43, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Is this a new form of spamming? Andy Dingley (talk) 17:25, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
photoshopped to include nazi symbols not present on actual statue EdwardUK (talk) 18:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
This is a test Jbgiard (talk) 18:14, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
SVG version more up-to-date: "File:Production_Electricite_France_1980-2017.svg" Gwen5484 (talk) 18:41, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - we generally keep files like this for historical reasons. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope: made-up logo. 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:18, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Spam, very low quality. jdx Re: 20:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Comment It's in use in Spanish Wikipedia (for more than a year now) and usually we don't delete images that are in use (except for copyright reasons), so I suppose you should first try to find out in Spanish Wikipedia whether they think this image (which is indeed of a resolution so low that you hardly can recognize something) is really useful for their project. There might be a copyright concern, but then, the extremely low resolution also makes it hard to make out anything that could be copyrightable. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:33, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
no educational use (please make a proper screenshot) — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:58, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. TinEye shows the star [4], and considering the shades, I would say this is the same picture, although cropped and rotated. If this is indeed your own work, please upload the original picture with high resolution. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:16, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Perpignan train station
[edit]Recent building, no COM:FOP in France
- File:130609-Perpignan-06.jpg
- File:Gare de Perpignan (5829052121).jpg
- File:Gare de Perpignan (5829063159).jpg
- File:Gare de Perpignan (5829622832).jpg
- File:Projet BIPV - Gare TGV de Perpignan.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:10, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Also:
- File:Медаль «Николай Рубцов» на колодке.png
- File:Настольная медаль «Николай Рубцов».png
- File:Удостоверение к медали «Николай Рубцов».png
- File:Диплом имени Николая Рубцова.png
This is not state symbol (or symbol of municipal formations). This is public award and not PD-RU-exempt. Alex Spade (talk) 22:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Это не фотография, а рисунок награды. Никто не запрещал размещать здесь свои рисунки. Георгий Долгопский (talk) 14:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- COM:DW - redrawing of copyrighted work do not create independent work. Alex Spade (talk) 17:32, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I need to change the filename. It contains a period which has caused trouble with some colleagues when clicking on a link. When deleted I'll re-upload it under a different name. SCHolar44 (talk) 22:15, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- This is a completely uncontroversial request for deletion, related only to the problem of the inadvertent period / full stop that causes difficulties with the URL. I would appreciate the image being deleted as soon as possible so that I can replace the image with another using a different filename. SCHolar44 (talk) 01:51, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- we don't delete for this kind of reason, we simply rename te file. In the future, please us {{Rename}}. I have removed the period from this. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Scan from a book. The French Legion Etrangere is not known to have released documents into public domain. Le Petit Chat (talk) 22:24, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- For information, this picture appears (at least) in the book "Les enfants de Loyada" (Loyada's children) written by Jean-Luc Riva about the hostage situation that happened there in 1976 (see GIGN Operations). In the book's photo album, it is credited to Gen. André Soubirou, then a captain commanding a French Foreign Legion company that was direcly involved in the assault. Soubirou also wrote the books preface (or foreword). The label says : "Coll. A. Soubirou" (A. Soubirou private collection?). The same photo appears in another book co-written by C. Prouteau (GIGN's first commander) and the same Jean-Luc Riva : "GIGN Nous étions les premiers" (GIGN, we were (the) first (members)), this time wihout credit. Both books are edited by Nimrod, a Paris editor. I suspect this means the picture IS NOT public domain but it might be worth contacting the editor in order to check if this could be done. Rgds, --Domenjod (talk) 10:10, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Created for hoax on the English Wikipedia funplussmart (talk) 23:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Question, was this hoax something that was first created on the Englosh Wikipedia or on another website? Otherwise this could then qualify as a fictitious flag. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 23:25, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- A google search revealed nothing except this file. Even if it orginated on another website (which I doubt), this flag should be an SVG and not a JPG. It has absolutely no potential legitimate use. funplussmart (talk) 15:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- While I agree that it would be useless if it's a hoax, I'd like to remind you that it's never acceptable to delete a file purely for its file type if there are no alternatives available, maybe this would br an acceptable reason for deletion at Wikipedia, but if the only file of a legitimate flag would be JPG it would be better to keep this than to delete it only because people don't like the file type, it's better to have too much and not need it than to have nothing and need something. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:36, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- The fact that this was made to support a hoax matters more than the file type. I was just giving another reason why this file is pointless to keep. funplussmart (talk) 20:14, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe it's not a hoax per se but just a non-notable micronation (of which there are many), this Ecosia search returns this MicroWiki entry for the "Federal Republic of New Potato Land" which links to this "npl_official" account on Instagram which links to the official website of the Federal Republic of New Potato Land. I can't find press coverage related to Josiah Welch, which could mean that this is either an elaborate prank or just another unrecognised and non-notable micronation like Guido den Broeder's Paraduin. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:47, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- Just for context, Paraduin related files are on Wikimedia Commons, but there is at least some independent coverage of it, but it's very rare, I can't say the same about the Federal Republic of New Potato Land. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:49, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- The fact that this was made to support a hoax matters more than the file type. I was just giving another reason why this file is pointless to keep. funplussmart (talk) 20:14, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- While I agree that it would be useless if it's a hoax, I'd like to remind you that it's never acceptable to delete a file purely for its file type if there are no alternatives available, maybe this would br an acceptable reason for deletion at Wikipedia, but if the only file of a legitimate flag would be JPG it would be better to keep this than to delete it only because people don't like the file type, it's better to have too much and not need it than to have nothing and need something. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:36, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- A google search revealed nothing except this file. Even if it orginated on another website (which I doubt), this flag should be an SVG and not a JPG. It has absolutely no potential legitimate use. funplussmart (talk) 15:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Redundant to high quality images uploaded into Category:A General History for Colleges and High Schools (Myers). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:23, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
I believe that we should temporarily delete this yet-nonfree image (copyright status unclear, photographer permission unavailable, photo not old enough to be in the public domain), and we should restore it as soon as it is clearly in the public domain. There's a category for that, if I remember correctly. We should find the correct year and put it into that category. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:35, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Here are the facts behind the photo at issue and why it should qualify for use. This is an original photo that was owned by Andrew P. Solt, and was part of his memorabilia that was inherited by his nephew Andrew W. Solt who has provided the photo and given permission for its use on Wikipedia in the entry on his uncle. The picture was taken by a house photographer for Chasen's restaurant, some time in the 1950's. There is not and never was any credit attached , and nothing to indicate it was used for publicity. There are no reproductions to be found. The name of the photographer is not known since it wasn't on the photograph and he is probably long deceased, as are the three people in the photograph, Andrew P. Solt, Ginger Rogers and James Mason. And Chasen's, located in West Hollywood and a favorite of celebrities, no longer exists. It closed its doors in 1995--over 20 years ago. It was common practice at that time for top restaurants to have house photographers to take photos of celebrity guests, often providing them to the subject who paid a tip or fee. That's how it came into the possession of Andrew P. Solt who owned it. There are no Wikipedia tags I could find that cover this kind of photo that is made available by the person who owns it. There are no credit, copyright or licensing issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob Simon Egan (talk • contribs) 02:35, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- "The name of the photographer is not known", that is exactly the issue. This is indeed a copyright problem. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:11, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Owning a digital or paper copy of a photograph does not give one the right to freely license it -- that right almost always remains with the photographer and his heirs. In this case, it is probably a work for hire and therefore the copyright may belong to whoever owns Chasen's Intellectual Property. In either case, this appears to be a copyright orphan, and therefore means that it can kept on Commons -- see PRP #4. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Already deleted as File:Julien Bobroff.jpg Gbawden (talk) 13:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Converted to DR so the uploader can submit to OTRS Gbawden (talk) 13:55, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Julien_Bobroff_Portrait.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2019013010018941. --AntonierCH (d) 14:18, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Julien_Bobroff_Portrait.jpg” under ticket:2019013010018941. --AntonierCH (d) 14:24, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Please Keep accordingly. Best, --AntonierCH (d) 14:26, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission now added. --Rosenzweig τ 22:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Boskapsskötsel i ladugården. Kvinna sitter och mjölkar en mager ko medan barfota flicka mockar - Nordiska museet - NMA.0043102.jpg
[edit]
unintended duplicate of File:Boskapsskötsel i ladugården. Mangskogs socken, Värmland, 1911 - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0043102.jpg Ambrosiani (talk) 14:01, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- I will upload the hi-res version to the previous upload once this one is deleted. (Same with the five other files marked the same way). We have published higher resolution versions since these images were last uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and our upload script didn't catch the duplicates. Ambrosiani (talk) 12:55, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:28, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Knäckebrödsbakning. Kvinna stansar hål ur degen med ett brödmått - Nordiska museet - NMA.0033934.jpg
[edit]
unintended duplicate of File:Knäckebrödsbakning. Bjurbäcken, Manskogs socken, Värmland - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0033934.jpg Ambrosiani (talk) 14:02, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- I will upload the hi-res version to the previous upload once this one is deleted. (Same with the five other files marked the same way). We have published higher resolution versions since these images were last uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and our upload script didn't catch the duplicates. Ambrosiani (talk) 12:55, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:28, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Påsättning av en grissula. Avser att hindra grisen från att tvinga sig igenom gärdesgård - Nordiska museet - NMA.0043108.jpg
[edit]
Unintended duplicate of File:Påsättning av en grissula. Värmland, Jösse hd, Mangskogs sn - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0043108.jpg Ambrosiani (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- I will upload the hi-res version to the previous upload once this one is deleted. (Same with the five other files marked the same way). We have published higher resolution versions since these images were last uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and our upload script didn't catch the duplicates. Ambrosiani (talk) 12:55, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:28, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Råskalning av potatis till pannkaka . Två kvinnor sitter och skalar potatis med hink mellan sig - Nordiska museet - NMA.0052834.jpg
[edit]
Unintended duplicate of File:Råskalning av potatis till pannkaka - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0052834.jpg Ambrosiani (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- I will upload the hi-res version to the previous upload once this one is deleted. (Same with the five other files marked the same way). We have published higher resolution versions since these images were last uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and our upload script didn't catch the duplicates. Ambrosiani (talk) 12:54, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:26, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Fyra flickor med långa kjolar och hucklen på huvudet dansar skäggiloppa , en sorts parodisk dans - Nordiska museet - NMA.0059007.jpg
[edit]
Unintended duplicate of File:Fyra flickor med långa kjolar och hucklen på huvudet dansar skäggiloppa - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0059007.jpg Ambrosiani (talk) 14:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- no. This image have more resolution (but needs cropping) than https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fyra_flickor_med_l%C3%A5nga_kjolar_och_hucklen_p%C3%A5_huvudet_dansar_sk%C3%A4ggiloppa_-_Nordiska_Museet_-_NMA.0059007.jpg --Andrez1 (talk) 20:39, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- I will upload the hi-res version to the previous upload once this one is deleted. (Same with the five other files marked the same way). We have published higher resolution versions since these images were last uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and our upload script didn't catch the duplicates. Ambrosiani (talk) 13:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- OK. Then no objektion. (given your user page and me happy to see Nils Keyland on commons. Thanks.) --Andrez1 (talk) 21:32, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- I will upload the hi-res version to the previous upload once this one is deleted. (Same with the five other files marked the same way). We have published higher resolution versions since these images were last uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and our upload script didn't catch the duplicates. Ambrosiani (talk) 13:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:27, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Unintended duplicate of File:Barn tillverkar vispar - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0052058.jpg Ambrosiani (talk) 14:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- I will upload the hi-res version to the previous upload once this one is deleted. (Same with the five other files marked the same way). We have published higher resolution versions since these images were last uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and our upload script didn't catch the duplicates. Ambrosiani (talk) 12:55, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:26, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Tre män på bänk tvinnar metrev och flätar näverkorg. Jösse härad, Mangskogs socken, Värmland - Nordiska museet - NMA.0036533.jpg
[edit]
Unintended duplicate of File:Tre män på bänk tvinnar metrev och flätar näverkorg. Jösse härad, Mangskogs socken, Värmland - Nordiska Museet - NMA.0036533.jpg Ambrosiani (talk) 14:09, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:27, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahadev Raut (talk · contribs)
[edit]Already deleted.
- File:--ज्ञानसूर्य --.jpg
- File:-असे आपले मामा -.jpg
- File:महाराष्ट्राचे शिल्पकार.jpg
- File:समाजवादाचे पुरस्कर्ते .jpg
- File:शैक्षणिक तत्त्वज्ञान .jpg
- File:ज्ञानतपस्वी .jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:42, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Appear to be INUSE - We need a valid reason for deletion Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4) - File:समाजवादाचे पुरस्कर्ते .jpg = File:समाजवादाचे पुरस्कर्ते कर्मवीर डॉ. मामासाहेब जगदाळे .jpg. --Эlcobbola talk 16:10, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Very low quality photo. Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 10:02, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep in scope, no higher quality alternatives provided. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:43, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- And exactly how does this fit in our scope? --Randykitty (talk) 10:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- From COM:PS: "For example, the fact that an unused blurred photograph could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Common mistakes in photography" does not mean that we should keep all blurred photographs." --Randykitty (talk) 11:32, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Randykitty: so that applies to a photo for which hundreds of alternatives exist. I can't even find a good example of such a thing right now that isn't intentionally blurry. This is an image of a supermarket in Shizuoka, which is not a random blurry photo of nothing. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Only image of that particular supermarket, and the only one in its category at night. I think we can keep until a better photo comes along. Abzeronow (talk) 17:20, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept per Alexis Jazz and Abzeronow. A unique photo of a supermarket in Japan is in scope. There might be even no replacement. Try googling "スーパーユウキ". The supermarket seems to be refurbished.--Roy17 (talk) 16:00, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
see [5]: "本網站上之資訊(「立法院珍藏館」內圖片除外)，可為個人或家庭非營利之目的而重製。" shizhao (talk) 02:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- 「⋯⋯所有資料與素材，其得受著作權保護之範圍，以無償、非專屬，得再授權之方式提供公眾使用，使用者得不限時間及地域，重製、改作、編輯、公開傳輸或為其他方式之利用，開發各種產品或服務⋯⋯」？—— Eric Liu（留言．中維用戶頁） 02:59, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:44, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
En: This award do not have small en:Service ribbons (http://www.kvvidkus1782.ru/szagn/7.htm see point 6). Ru: Данная награда не имеет лент на планках ("Правила ношения орденов и медалей СССР...", п.6) Alex Spade (talk) 08:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no source. --JuTa 14:42, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
_(soviet).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(soviet).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
В источнике, откуда был загружен файл (https://vector-images.com/image.php?epsid=1159), в описании к файлу, а также на сайте Геральдика.ру (http://www.heraldicum.ru/russia/subjects/towns/kislovod.htm) указано, что это изображение - "проект советского герба" (proposed soviet coat of arms). Таким образом, оно не является официальным символом и, соответственно, не может не охраняться авторским правом. Александр Танчугин (talk) 09:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
_(soviet).png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:39, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
_(soviet).png){kind=link}
These two characters are beyond the threshold for copyright protection, c.f. the "LY" company logo examples on the page COM:TOO China. Wcam (talk) 11:37, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep There is no visible characters in the logo, just simple geometry, which is still in the threshold of COM:TOO China. VulpesVulpes825 (talk) 18:37, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 14:40, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
The previous DR failed to compare this logo with the copyrighted examples in COM:TOO China properly. The LY logo consists of only a simple ellipse and the letters L and Y; the Gang Heng logo contains only partial ellipses and simple letters. The logo in question is apparently a more complex geometric shape and shows more creative elements than the aforementioned two examples. Wcam (talk) 12:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 08:05, 5 June 2020 (UTC)