Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/01/22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 22nd, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably not own work Syced (talk) 06:24, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As noted in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Chef Singh Lokendra, this is a blatant copyright violation grabbed from https://www.flickr.com/photos/leitratista/31627276292/. Fraudulent authorship claims by serial copyright violator and sockpuppeteer who appears to be here solely for self promotion. LX (talk, contribs) 12:13, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Clear copyvio so speedy and gone. --Herby talk thyme 12:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Literally just copied from Toyota's website https://www.toyota.com/upcoming-vehicles/gr-supra/section/design-section. Toasted Meter (talk) 01:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 10:59, 22 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: As per the source, taken from Toyotas website --Krdbot 14:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в принадлежности данного логотипа с данным "театром": сайта театра нет, соотнесение данного логотипа с этим "театром" в прессе не связано. Кто создал этот логотип, принадлежит ли официально этот логотип театру-неизвестно. Рекомендуется обращение в OTRS. Dogad75 (talk) 13:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy, per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created the file by mistake instead of just uploading the image Raymondjharari (talk) 06:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. The uploader should not even have been able to load since he skipped all the parameters in the file information box. Leon saudanha (talk) 16:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:47, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG-file of very bad quality – it's not used anymore (several better alternatives in Category:Tripropylamine). Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader agreed with the deletion. --Leyo 00:21, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture originates from the website https://lacqueredlife.com/ which is subject to copyright as per the site's footer. This footer was already present at the date of the upload on wikimedia as per web.archive.org. 178.145.46.49 11:53, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 19:41, 22 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: This picture originates from the website https://lacqueredlife.com/ which is subject to copyright as per the site's footer. This footer was already present at the date of the upload on wikimedia as per web.archive.org. --Krdbot 02:17, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement of Political parties संदेश हिवाळे (talk) 18:44, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 19:31, 22 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: Non free watermarked image --Krdbot 02:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistake in page title, missing colon (punctuation) Jürgen Eissink (talk) 15:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, typo. --Achim (talk) 14:02, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Village pump#How do I "replace the copyvio tag"? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:39, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment OTRS permission needed. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:39, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is our own work, so in this case it should not be removed. We provided it to the Michael Medved Show for their use on his website blog. I was the Communications Director for the Susan Hutchison campaign, and I still have the email message in which I sent (via attachment) our photo to the Michael Medved Show. How do I replace the copyvio tag? I would be glad to forward you the email message in which provided our photo to the Michael Medved Show. - Steve Beren - press@susan4senate.com - (425) 785-2016 SteveBeren-Susan4Senate (talk) 11:17, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from my talk page:

This photo is our own work, so in this case it should not be removed. We provided it to the Michael Medved Show for their use on his website blog. We forwarded documentation to copy-vio@wikimedia.org. I was the Communications Director for the Susan Hutchison campaign, and I still have the email message in which I sent (via attachment) our photo to the Michael Medved Show. How do I replace the copyvio tag? I would be glad to forward you the email message in which provided our photo to the Michael Medved Show. - Steve Beren - press@susan4senate.com - (425) 785-2016 SteveBeren-Susan4Senate (talk) 11:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

@SteveBeren-Susan4Senate: the correct mail address to send permission is permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Photos provided for website blogs, often do not have a sufficient copyright release to include full commercial re-use, which is required here. OTRS will not accept any forwarded e-mails, the copyright holder needs to contact direct. Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:39, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is our own work as an official campaign photo, and it is on the campaign website as an official campaign photo - see https://www.susan4senate.com/photos.html Users Alexis Jazz, RonHJones, and Donald Trung have messaged us about this possibly being a copywright violation. This is our own work, and user Donald Trung wrote as follows: "....you only need to confirm this by sending them (the OTRS team) with an offical e-mail address, also note that there is a backlog of 169 days." We will email OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org to so confirm. - Steve Beren - press@susan4senate.com - (425) 785-2016. SteveBeren-Susan4Senate (talk) 19:36, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Being dealt with by OTRS. -- Darwin Ahoy! 21:25, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OoS= unused personal photo --Alaa :)..! 15:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:16, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, advertising Migebert (talk) 09:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:42, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pancet56 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:12, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

my mistake Joalpe (talk) 13:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, author's request. --Achim (talk) 10:03, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nam man22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational purpose and as the nonsense description and nonsense category show not intended to be useful: Out of project scope. Also apparently a copyvio found with Google.

Ies (talk) 16:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Racconish at 12:57, 26 Januar 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) - --Krdbot 20:12, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sunildamorsd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:36, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:43, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Hafiz Ahadov Shekinskiy Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:40, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 06:11, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) © Marc Beckmann / Ostkreuz Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:55, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ldbsrs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:13, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploaders own work - internet image 94.216.36.67 13:14, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploaders own work - internet image 94.216.36.67 13:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bikas0098 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:16, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploaders own work - internet image 94.216.36.67 13:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - watermark clearly shows not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploaders own work - internet image 94.216.36.67 13:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - copyvio - author galen as per exif. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploaders own work - internet image 94.216.36.67 13:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyviol. Dipralb (talk) 13:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - deleted by another admin. --Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely user's own work. probably grabbed from Facebook page NinjaStrikers «» 14:10, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - taken from FB. --Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Uploaded for promotion Prongs31 14:20, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. Uploaded for promotion Prongs31 14:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rahul Singh Agnihotri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion, out of project scope. By now no contribs to any wm project.

Achim (talk) 14:41, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, in my opinion the photo is out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 15:18, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Delivra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - appears to have been taken from twitter. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:33, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not constructive 2600:1016:B121:303:B27F:6C99:AC22:E76 13:17, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcos.cst (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:20, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcos.cst (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - likely copyvios. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request. Redundant. Hrishikes (talk) 15:42, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mubarak146 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WriterRahul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Msingour (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mukesh K. Prasad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in vanity draft.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - one that was in use kept. --Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Usmanfoji8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rexjafor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rexjafor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No metadata, those pictures are taken from internet

Afifa Afrin (talk) 23:33, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work as claimed. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Falls within scope as good quality illustration of pondering with the Grand Canyon as a highly recognizable backdrop. If we mass purge all photographs with non-notable people in them, then Commons becomes useless as a source of illustrative photographs. -- (talk) 16:03, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There are plenty of media files in Category:Grand Canyon without people. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Per Fæ arguments and per own statements of EugeneZelenko there is none (or almost not one) image of the Grand Canyon with people. Natural monuments also have people and are not merely an empty scenery. Humans visit, meditate, photograph and make other activities in this iconic monuments and still there is not a photo of this activities in Wikimedia Commons, if this DR makes doctrine. Tm (talk) 21:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Derek shuga (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WYCLIFFEE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - probably taken from FB. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:09, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 15:42, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Evgenij Razumnyj/Vedomosti Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:24, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio. No prope license tag. Jahoe (talk) 21:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 18:43, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saleemullah pPasha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 19:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - commons is not a photo album. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 20:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image uploaded by someone who is likely not the copyright holder TAnthony (talk) 20:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - source is visible in the watermark. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently from Facebook https://www.facebook.com/pg/Z%C5%A0-Waldorfsk%C3%A1-121817661429/posts/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:57, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because because Investreport (talk) 22:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© FRANCOIS DABURON Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:03, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samarth yadav official (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:14, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 12:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 12:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:47, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 13:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 13:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 13:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 13:06, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 13:06, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 13:07, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 13:07, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 13:07, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tangjunwen CN: ; What is the specific problem or mistake with it? Ubcule (talk) 13:24, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 13:07, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tangjunwen CN: - wrong what? Not a valid reason to delete. If the title is wrong request the file to be renamed Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: User removed del tag after nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploaders own work - internet image 94.216.36.67 13:10, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploaders own work - internet image 94.216.36.67 13:12, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploaders own work - internet image 94.216.36.67 13:13, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mortojapavel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - likely copyvios. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Ulrike Wieser http://www.ulrikewieser.at Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sehr geehrter Herr Rogel!

Ich habe die persönliche Erlaubnis von Ulrike Wieser, dieses Foto zu veröffentlichen, wenn ich ihren Namen nenne!

Das habe ich getan:

Beschreibung Deutsch: Portrait mit Erlaubnis von Ulrike Wieser, Wien

Datum: 10. Juni 2017

Quelle: Eigenes Werk

Urheber: Wsbartussek

Ich gehe also rechtmäßig davon aus, dass dieses Foto NICHT GELÖSCHT wird!

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

WSBartussek


P.S:

Hier der Schriftverkehr mit Frau Wieser:

Am 16.09.2017 um 12:34 schrieb Ulrike Wieser:

Lieber Samuel!

Herzlichen Dank für dein Mail! Es freut mich, dass dir die Fotos gefallen!

Du kannst das Foto sehr gerne verwenden. Das Veröffentlichungshonorar kostet 40,00 € inkl. Ust, du bekommst das Foto als Datei in 13x18 und kannst es online und für Print verwenden. Bitte sende mir dein ok, dann sende ich dir das Foto und die Honorarnote.

Herzliche Grüße, Ulrike

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Ulrike Wieser - Fotostudio und Porträts on location Neulerchenfelder Straße 52/R1, 1160 Wien uwieser@dasfoto.info 0650 494 81 43 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wsbartussek (talk • contribs) 23:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wsbartussek (talk) 14:06, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi @Wsbartussek: Ulrike Wieser must send directly a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:40, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Fotographer Ulrike Wieser will send copyright permission per email via COM:OTRS - please wait! Thanks, WSBartussek — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wsbartussek (talk • contribs) 13:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fotographer Ulrike Wieser will send copyright permission per email via COM:OTRS - please wait! Thanks, WSBartussek Wsbartussek (talk) 14:06, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 10:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and low-res. Has no clear scientific value (just an unused logo) and File:Polymers Logo.svg is clearly superior for that context (higher res, transparent bg, where that bg detail was a part of a COM:DR-inspired cleanup of the SVG). DMacks (talk) 04:18, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 13:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, replaced with File:Fyzikálně-chemický pahýl.svg DMacks (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 13:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly-cropped and -aligned logo of organization with no article (no COM:EDUSE) DMacks (talk) 04:41, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 13:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

©Poser Photobooth Co. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know why this file is flagged for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lambdeb (talk • contribs) 00:50, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File can be found at https://aaja18.sched.com/list/descriptions/ and is copyrighted. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by another admin. --Gbawden (talk) 13:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as author, I mis-drew this structure Smokefoot (talk) 00:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Digonto Ahmed Emon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SpbKontakt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. (No category)

Ies (talk) 07:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, Les! Useful descriptions i've already added. All photos are not private stuff. I have no idea how to add as a category the value "Member of the militant terrorist group". I'm a newbie, so I ask you to help me with this issue. Have a nice day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpbKontakt (talk • contribs) 13:26, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - also no evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 16:33, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rks291999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photo, out of scope. commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saurabh2394 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MD HABIB SIKDER (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bascon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of contemporary artworks and historical photos claimed as own works.

Sealle (talk) 09:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mgb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claimed as own work but they were sent via whatsapp - we need permission from original authors

Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from the book "A Museum Miracle: the Story of Buddha Memorial Center" (ISBN 978-9868344648) Solomon203 (talk) 12:01, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Selim Shaikh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Selim Shaikh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, commons isn't photo hosting service. Out of project scope. Articles and Wikidata items about this person have been deleted several times elsewhere for being cross-wiki spam.

আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 18:33, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 18:02, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:UA, copyrights of two-dimensional representation of copyrighted 3D objects belong to the owners/designers. These photos either show just the trophy/trophies, are used to represent the Vince Lombardi Trophy on Wikipedia, or are artistic representations of the trophy/trophies.

Ytoyoda (talk) 20:36, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IF indeed this image is from the 1840s, copyright is not a problem. However a source is needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erasmo de Havilland (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Despite claim of "own work" on each of these images, many are obviously rephotographed from unattributed originals. At least one appears to be reproduced from a book. Proper sources & dates are needed for license considerations.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:53, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gaurav karamchandani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:01, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Which educational use? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source not valid 91.253.116.183 00:03, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: LicenseReview template valid. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing an N atom on the imido ligand Smokefoot (talk) 00:31, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: File is in use on et:Alkeenide metatees, nl:Organomolybdeenchemie, and zh:烯烃复分解反应. Under COM:INUSE, that renders it immune from deletion on accuracy grounds. Either its use on those pages should be replaced, or a new (corrected) version should be uploaded here. In the meantime, I've tagged it with {{Disputed chem}}. --bjh21 (talk) 11:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. @Bjh21: All uses of this file have now been replaced with a correct version, File:SchrockCatalyst.svg. Ed (Edgar181) 14:20, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant. I now have no objection to deletion. --bjh21 (talk) 17:41, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zn(Me2dtc)2Improved.png is a better image, both submitted by me Smokefoot (talk) 00:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This and all other files of the uploader require OTRS permissions, IMHO. E4024 (talk) 01:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license Yilku1 (talk) 01:42, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:11, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be screenshot from non-free video Trivialist (talk) 02:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Video seems to be marked Creative Commons Attribution on YouTube, see COM: WHERE LICENSE. --GRuban (talk) 10:44, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Video comes from the official MTV International YouTube channel, it has the Creative Commons attribution license, many videos from that channel has that free license, it could be withdraw this nomination, please? The Salvator (talk) 15:20, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:11, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

above threshold of originality Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 02:57, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused derivative image uploaded as "own work". E4024 (talk) 03:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work, improper license. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image, not used on any page on any project Risker (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image, not used on any project or page, and not likely to be useful Risker (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image, not used on any page or project, and not likely to be useful. Risker (talk) 05:39, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 10:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 10:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like downloaded from https://www.facebook.com/ImranKhanTigar/ and not own work Migebert (talk) 10:03, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 10:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 10:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work Migebert (talk) 10:06, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Venkatesh Tanniru Mym (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Wvdp (talk) 10:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Wvdp (talk) 10:40, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, in my opinion the photo is out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:scope Wvdp (talk) 11:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:scope Wvdp (talk) 11:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality. Out of scope. Nv8200p (talk) 12:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used.Too blurred to be of use. Nv8200p (talk) 13:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete A better example already exists anyway. Ubcule (talk) 13:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical text. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:26, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Uploaded for promotion. Prongs31 15:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OoS = unused personal photo --Alaa :)..! 15:35, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Look likes a selfie so not uploader's work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo 100.38.165.114 19:24, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped version of this bigger photo. Not sure if the uploader has the rights on this picture. Please send an authorization to OTRS. See (in french) : Commons:Messages type/Déclaration de consentement Titlutin (talk) 01:48, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same picture already uploaded by same user and deleted 2 months ago (see here).--Titlutin (talk) 01:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:50, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely not own work, the description reads It was taken from a newspaper, The Sun in 1969. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:20, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licence: «Youtube Standard License». ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 07:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Should be wikitable if needed. Castillo blanco (talk) 07:40, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mkhaldi60 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no exif, no camera, unlikely to be own work.

— Racconish💬 07:55, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elias.et (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational purpose and as the nonsense description shows not intended to be useful: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational purpose and as the nonsense description and nonsense category show not intended to be useful: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Timothycrice (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, artworks without obvious educational use

BrightRaven (talk) 08:23, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FENUTSAA DIGNIDAD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official documents. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eluane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source why is public domain Yilku1 (talk) 22:24, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Screenshot of a 1993 video. Unlikely to be under public domain. Unlikely to be own work. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 18:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep in scope. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Alexis Jazz. Ruthven (msg) 11:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW, photographs of trophies that are under copyright are considered derivative works.

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:36, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:DW, photographs of trophies that are under copyright are considered derivative works.

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Right, for the files that you mentioned, I thought the trophy was prominent enough but I realize mileage may vary. As for the copyright status, any version of the trophy from 2000 should be under copyright since it was designed in 1999. The older one was a 1967 design, and I’m assuming it’s been less than 40 years since the designer’s death. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; kept a couple which are arguably de minimis. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most recent version of the trophy is copyrighted, photographs are considered derivative work.

The following are used on en-wiki to illustrate the trophy.

Ytoyoda (talk) 05:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. This trophy is under copyright. COM:De minimis doesn't apply here as the trophy is the main subject of these pictures. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no categories, no description, left side blurred Syced (talk) 06:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 16:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept, INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 06:30, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es un model austriaco, es un caso de auto-bombo. 191.125.18.66 01:32, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 17:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Buckaroo bob 91 as no source (No source since). But {{PD-old-assumed}} should apply here. Ankry (talk) 06:42, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this photo. If memory serves, it was one of many old photos I borrowed about 18 years ago to scan for an old City website. The photo was supposedly taken in 1860, which is consistent with the roof design in that period. The building was burned during the Civil War, but only the roof was destroyed(the rest of the building is 2-foot thick granite). Thank you for your input and advice. --BobiusPrime (talk) 20:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have changed the license as @Ankry suggested, along with putting other information. --BobiusPrime (talk) 06:06, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Ez nem a szabadban elhelyezett emléktábla, így az emléktábla készítőjének az engedélye is szükséges a szabad licenc alatti használathoz. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 08:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A készítője Melocco Miklós szobrász... tőle kell az engedély, vagy a megrendelő-tulajdonostól, aki ezért fizetett, az iskolától? Vagy mindkettőtől? Mitől lesz az engedely hiteles? Üdv. Thaler Tamás a fotós

Elvileg a szerzőtől, azaz Melocco Miklóstól, de ez természetesen attól is függ, hogy milyen szerződést kötöttek. Előfordulhat, hogy mindkét féltől kell, de lehet, hogy elég csaj a megrendelőtől. Az OTRS címére kell elküldenie az engedélyt, amely az engedélyezési sablonszövegeket listázó lapon található. Azt megfelelően ki kell tölteni, és aláírva megküldeni. Ha kérdése van, az OTRS-kezelők szívesen segítenek. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 09:45, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indoor artwork, need permission. The artist is Melocco Miklós. --Regasterios (talk) 16:14, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушено авторское право (http://autompv.ru/new-auto/15224-hyundai-tucson-2016.html) Barbarian (talk) 08:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marcel Wolfers died in 1976. His works will enter the public domain in Belgium in 2047.

BrightRaven (talk) 09:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:57, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wmimex (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wmimex (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:23, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo; does not belong in Commons Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raúl Gómez González (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Useless files uploaded by an es.wikipedia vandalism-only account. Out of scope.

LuisH (talk) 17:57, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mpanagia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:17, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a 72 year old photo is unlikely {{PD-old}} cause its author unlikely died within 2 years after creation of the image. JuTa 18:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictive flag without a credible source Moumou82 (talk) 19:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader’s request. No more use. Cangjie6 (talk) 19:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader’s request. No more use. Cangjie6 (talk) 19:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quite dubious "own work" by a single-file-uploader. E4024 (talk) 19:23, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no photographer, wrong PD Goesseln (talk) 20:12, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work, not only this, but probably other uploads of the same user also. E4024 (talk) 20:16, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work, not only this, but probably also the other uploads of the same user. Please read the watermark also. E4024 (talk) 20:18, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this image, derived from or copied from World of Warcraft (game). Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While I do not disagree that this was taken by Gage Skidmore, the statue would appear to have copyright which Mr. Skidmore cannot release. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its been a teeshirt at Deviant Art for many years, no indication that the uploader is the Deviant Artist, nor that this is own work. https://www.deviantart.com/masterstshirts/art/Hearthstone-s-Deathwing-Tshirt-Design-531682056 Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is titled "as pictured in the Warcraft2 Manual" at source https://wow.gamepedia.com/Deathwing, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:40, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The center focus of this image is another image, I don't think it's deminimus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:45, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a copy of an advertisement, but also does not appear to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The tiny size and low quality of this image highly suggest it was culled from somewhere else, and is not own work of the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:47, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is #9 at http://www.cuvantul-ortodox.ro/recomandari/siteuri-ortodoxe/ierarhi-romani/ps-justinian-al-maramuresului/, which is older than this upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The bit of picture frame at lower left is a dead giveaway this is a photo of an unattributed original, also see https://www.idnes.cz/pardubice/zpravy/pribehy-sidlist-dukla-pardubice-serial.A170103_2296165_pardubice-zpravy_jah/foto/JAH686812_Dukla4.jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:55, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duck copyvio - low res, no camera EXIF, uploaded in batch of copyvios of similar subject matter (see uploader talk/deleted contribs). Quack/COM:PRP Эlcobbola talk 23:53, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Este é o logotipo oficial de Smartwork ©. Esta imagem tem os direitps de autor de Nuno Miguel da Silva Almeida. (CC0) Licença não liberada conforme frase O revolucionário aliado (talk) 22:29, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The watermark claims that the image is free licensed but there is no source and no permission - being claimed as own work on the original image. We need proof of the license Gbawden (talk) 11:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - here before Commons upload, for example. --Эlcobbola talk 16:19, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have pressed «abort» in video2commons, it told me that it has aborted and now I see that it still uploaded. How is this possible? ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 16:35, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:57, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This one also seems to have been uploaded from that batch. I am pretty sure now, that others were stopped. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 15:36, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 10:51, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. The specific problem about this file is name problem and picture problem.Tangjunwen CN (talk) 11:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Wvdp (talk) 11:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from the book A Museum Miracle: the Story of Buddha Memorial Center (ISBN 978-9868344648) Solomon203 (talk) 11:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The watermark claims that the image is free licensed but there is no source and no permission - being claimed as own work on the original image. We need proof of the license Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola at 16:20, 1 Februar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maria C. Freire, Ph.D., President and Executive Director, FNIH.jpg --Krdbot 19:58, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This image is much darker (taken at night?) than
Hjart (talk) 11:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Not a reason to delete. This image has a good exposure, another angle and more focused on this statue and the other one. Tm (talk) 21:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per Tm. Strakhov (talk) 22:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded to add it on a page but then the subject rejected for page creation. So this should be deleted. Jainmadhur1 (talk) 10:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo, out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 11:23, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 11:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept already. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 11:30, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept already. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 11:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept already. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 11:33, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 11:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept already. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 11:35, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept already. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 11:36, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept already. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 11:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept already. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 11:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept already. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too dark, useless, redundant to many pictures of much more better quality in Category:Choir loft (St. Vitus Cathedral). Daniel Baránek (talk) 11:39, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. No objective arguments for deletion. --Interfase (talk) 14:47, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No valid reason for deletion. --Mehman 97 15:13, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are no evidences can be found from the source show that this pic licensed with CCBYSA. AlexLeeCN (talk) 16:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete copyvio & promo. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 21:14, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not the work of the uploader - a TAI publicity image refer http://www.defenseworld.net/news/21531/Turkey_Details_Official_Specifications_of_Next_gen_Fighter_TFX MilborneOne (talk) 09:23, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 10:27, 14 Februar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1): Commons:Deletion requests/File:TAI TFX C100.jpg: Clearly not the work of the uploader - a TAI publicity image refer http://www.defenseworld.net/news/21531/Turkey_Details_Official_Specifications_of_Next_gen_Fighter_TFX --Krdbot 13:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but as the sculptor of this statue died only in 1966, it's still in copyright. As neither Italy has FoP exception for public works nor has the U.S. for such works, the image violates Commons' policy and needs to be deleted (though can be undeleted in 18 years). -- Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, will be undeleted in 2037. Taivo (talk) 19:27, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. We have several other images of the same subject, such as File:Norgesporten, Kastellet, København (02).jpg Hjart (talk) 09:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not redundant. This photo is way better to understand the moat and earthworks of this fortress. Tm (talk) 21:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand that. Almost all other photos in the category, from the same direction are better.--Hjart (talk) 22:24, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, the photo has normal quality and it is clearly different from proposed replacement photo. I see educational use for the photo. No very similar photos in the category. Taivo (talk) 19:32, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Jay Cossey/Biodiversity Institute of Ontario. All rights reserved Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. Given the clear assertion of ownership in the EXIF data by the photographer, Jay Cossey, I suggest that at the very least we request his confirmation that this was in fact a work for hire. Secondly, the OTRS correspondent does not have demonstrable authority to release anything that the university owns. Ping Arthur Crbz, who has been (very capably!) handling the ticket. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - no OTRS permission for 30 days. --Jcb (talk) 13:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not the work of the uploader - other uploaded image from same user was clearly a copyright violation and this looks like a crop from an official IRNA image, a similar IRNA image from the same event at https://i.redd.it/hexpzolmn6ty.jpg MilborneOne (talk) 09:31, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Huntster (t @ c) 05:04, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.mobile-university.de/fernhochschule/hochschulteam/hochschulleitung/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

woodcut by w:Hans Richter (artist) (1888-1976), not free in home country Mutter Erde (talk) 11:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

improved image was submitted by me, the author Smokefoot (talk) 00:35, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - that may be, but you must tell us its name. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:00, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged PD-old (defined as prior to January 1, 1924) and sourced to an archive that includes much older material, but these specific files are clearly not that old. The en:Mapparium was not built until the 1930s. It is the product of a corporate entity (architecture firm) so "author's life plus 70 years" does not seem applicable.

DMacks (talk) 03:33, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • The architect was Chester Lindsay Churchill, who was born in 1891 based on the records I can find. The Mapparium has a creation date of 1935. So far, I have been unable to find a published date of death. Were the IP owned solely by a 'corporate entity', then copyright would be calculated as 70 years from creation, rather than anyone's date of death. I do find a republished claim [1] that the map itself is copyright of Rand McNally. It may be that the map drawing itself is out of copyright, a question that could be easier to answer. -- (talk) 09:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
License changed to PD-US-not renewed. -- (talk) 20:01, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. "Not renewed" is hard to understand -- without a date for the map, you can't do a search for the renewal and I have to believe that Rand McNally is careful about their copyright renewals. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:02, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of non-free artwork (1935 in US) DMacks (talk) 03:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

likewise. DMacks (talk) 03:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: "Not renewed" is hard to understand -- without a date for the map, you can't do a search for the renewal and I have to believe that Rand McNally is careful about their copyright renewals. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject is not the copyright owner. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:20, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:05, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Draft article including th eimage is pending on WP:EN. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DarwIn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ies: Hmm.. Cant the advertisement be cropped out and they still be useful to illustrate marriage clothing/uses in India?-- Darwin Ahoy! 12:18, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Darvin: The images were clearly created and published for advertising reasons as you can learn from their descriptions. This is a perfect reason for a speedy delition. See Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion#General reasons#10. -- Ies (talk) 13:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to me that pertains to content uploaded to promote goods and services. I see no reason to delete these images. Chico Venancio (talk) 15:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ies: I believe that what matters to Commons is the usefulness of the files, not the motive why they were created. If they are useful and educative, the files should be kept indeed (with the adv. cropped out, of course).-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:04, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changing description and cropping seems to be enough.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:55, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The delition rule (linked above) says "This includes only content uploaded to promote goods and services, outside our project scope". So it's the motivation to promote goods and services that here counts primarily, not the usefullness. The current case doesn't differ from the advertisement for drugs and other stuff that is uploaded to Commons again and again. Also these images were useful - if the images were cropped and if the advertising watermarks were retouched and if the advertising texts were removed etc. However, this never happens. The advertising images always get deleted acc. to the Commons policies and so the story ends. I really can't understand why you now make a big difference between advertisement and advertisement. -- Ies (talk) 06:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is why we can upload a cropped version with no promotional content or motivation. If we remove the watermarks - which are the promotional content -, the promotion claim doesn't prevail. We can't remove valid content only because someone wanted to make a promotion of it at first place, even though there is no promotion anymore.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 15:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The rule speaks to content uploaded to promote. DarwIn certainly did not upload these to promote an Indian photographer. Neither did I create a tool to import photos from 500px to promote that. The rule is there as a proxy for out of scope images, and I don't see how you're citing a speedy deletion rule in a deletion request, it seems not even you believe the rule applies.
It is better if we crop the promotion and edit the descriptions, but deleting these seem counter productive to our mission. Chico Venancio (talk) 15:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvios -- they come from 500pix.com where there is no free license. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:08, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

4 files restored as per [2]. Yann (talk) 18:51, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DarwIn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Those photos are transferred from flickr. Almost every photo is already uploaded by active editor User:NahidHossain Those photos are duplicate.

Afifa Afrin (talk) 17:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, no valid reason for deletion was presented. @Afifa Afrin: Please use {{Dupe}} where appropriate.-- Darwin Ahoy! 17:36, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please @Afifa Afrin: , use {{Dupe}} when appropiate. COM:DR is not the proper venue for managing duplicates. --Strakhov (talk) 08:43, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This one is unfortunate. The United States Copyright Office initially ruled this uncopyrightable here, saying it was just below the line. The logo was then accordingly moved to Commons. It looks like American Airlines sent them a higher-resolution version of the logo, and based on that, the USCO changed their mind, and decided it was just above the line. They mention it is a thin protection, preventing for the most part just identical copying, but that is of course what we have here. So it would appear as though American Airlines has a valid registered copyright on this logo now, meaning it is non-free. Carl Lindberg (talk) 08:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:09, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raakeshmp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Raakes uploaded these images from different Unsplash authors as {{Own}}, and User:Fæ later uploaded duplicates with proper citations. Fæ's uploads have EXIF data that aren't in these.

Deevayy (talk) 08:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete In terms of process, these can be deleted using {{duplicate}} rather than a deletion request, which is a simpler way of going about it. Even CC0 files need good sourcing and metadata to avoid any doubt for their release. These duplicates are not digitally identical, so the built in checksum based detection fails to flag these when new files are uploaded. -- (talk) 08:57, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:09, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: I saw you deleted these, so I redirected them to the duplicates, but then you deleted the duplicates. Could you fix this please? Deevayy (talk) 20:23, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Deevayy -- actually, what happened is that I deleted the five files on the left yesterday. There was trouble with the delreqhandler API calls, so I rechecked yesterday's work today, saw that the the five files were blue, assumed that the API had failed to delete them, and the second deletions went through the redirects. ✓ Done .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the actual author of the picture, if the author claims that he is standing inside? Geralt Riv (*talk) 09:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • The owner of the photo and it's rights is the man in the middle (Ja Fryta). The one who took the picture simply served as a living tripod.

Artur Andrzej (talk) 08:10, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The "living tripod" argument is incorrect. The person who actually took the picture holds the copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:10, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With source internet, author unknown and date of 2015, the license cannot possibly be correct. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:03, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

[edit]

The foto must have been made very shortly after the construction of the building (indicator: fresh tree plantations). So it was a little after 1920 or even late 1920 (the construction date is a historical fact). The "date of 2015" means the upload. --L-scriptor (talk) 09:55, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination 1920 is far too recent to assume the author has been dead for 70 years. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:13, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{NoFoP-Morocco}} — Racconish💬 09:39, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jameslwoodward at 20:10, 13 März 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:La façade du siège de la société TGCC-Casablanca-Maroc.jpg --Krdbot 01:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My work, because File:Ambigram_boy_and_girl.png is of higher resolution and better quality (PNG). Redirection possible. Basile Morin (talk) 10:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Done already. --E4024 (talk) 02:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Registered logo of an institution uploaded without evidence of CC licensing, also mutilated by "R" watermark. Similar logo used at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RVCE_New_Logo.JPG is licensed under fair use terms. A Poor Historian (talk) 09:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Photograph made between 1930 (date on a poster in the background) and 1976 (death of the subject at 90). The name of the photographer or the publication history should be disclosed to check if it is in the public domain. BrightRaven (talk) 09:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

front focused Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 10:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is merely a cropped version of thumb Hjart (talk) 11:10, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But it's not actually in use and anyone wanting a cropped version could easily crop it themselves, right?--Hjart (talk) 13:10, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Not in use is not a reason to delete and as you say there is already a copped image (this one) so there is no need of making duplicate work. Tm (talk) 21:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Wvdp (talk) 11:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is used on User:Zacknoor123 so maybe it is ok. -- Wvdp (talk) 13:10, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly no person of encyclopaedic relevance. All other contributions by same user are plain holiday snaps. --2001:A61:356C:4901:332E:5E32:57C2:9A8F 14:33, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was testing an upload since they weren't working on Wikipedia. I tried uploading them on Wikimedia Commons. You can delete the rest. This one image is connected to my User:Zacknoor123.


Deleted: copyvio - @2018 - coinpublish.com. All Right Reserved. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file has a wrong. Tangjunwen CN (talk) 11:40, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from Fo Guang Shan Buddha Museum. Solomon203 (talk) 11:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from Fo Guang Shan Buddha Museum. Solomon203 (talk) 11:57, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from Fo Guang Shan Buddha Museum. Solomon203 (talk) 11:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from Fo Guang Shan Buddha Museum. Solomon203 (talk) 11:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality. Not used. More self promotional than educational. Nv8200p (talk) 12:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Its the only image we have of her and she is an artist so this may realistically be used. Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Gbawden. --E4024 (talk) 01:33, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The OTRS license covers the photograph but not the work of art. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploaders own work - internet image 94.216.36.67 13:10, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is practically the same image as File:Ribe Dom St. Marien Front 2.JPG Hjart (talk) 13:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a reason to delete. This image has a angle than the other one. Not a duplicate. Tm (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Both of them are old and quite low quality and are not being used anyway. If I thought they were duplicates, I would have used the Duplicate template. --Hjart (talk) 22:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free picture Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:57, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

La imagen ni es libre ni tiene copyright, en sencillamente una imagen creada por mi en Photoshop CS6, tomando eso si como referencia una imagen de la persona, obviamente no puedo pintar el retrato de alguien que no he visto, pero pintada pixel a pixel que tiempo me ha llevado hacerlo, es decir una creación mía. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidpfol (talk • contribs) 16:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then, we are talking about a derivated work of a non free picture, and that is not allowed.
Entonces, estamos hablando de una obra derivada de una imagen que no es libre, lo cual no está permitido. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:44, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is freedom of panorama in USA for architecture, but not for text. The text copyright belongs to Nebraska State Historical Society and/or Paragon Cemetery Association and the photo violates their copyright. Taivo (talk) 15:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Uzbekistan. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This template is no longer used, as all the files it was created for have been deleted. — Sam Wilson ( TalkContribs ) … 16:18, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadate contain FBMD.Which means it was grabbed from Facebook. AlexLeeCN (talk) 16:23, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insignificant person. The photograph used for creating PR-articles about yourself GAndy (talk) 16:24, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use on WP:RU. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentally Cropped/Duplicate file —— Eric Liu留言中維用戶頁 16:30, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By mistake I selected 'own work'. I would like to correct it or get these deleted and re-upload with corrections. Mayur aries (talk) 16:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mayur aries: You can correct this by using the "Edit" button at the top of File:Prabhasakshi-logo.png and correction (at least) the "source=" and "author=" lines and replacing {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} with something more appropriate (maybe {{PD-textlogo}}?). --bjh21 (talk) 17:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bjh21 - Thanks! How do I remove the deletion request? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayur aries (talk • contribs) 02:29, 23 January 2019‎ (UTC)[reply]

Probably best to just leave it until an administrator gets around to closing it. In particular, others might have opinions on whether {{PD-textlogo}} is appropriate. --bjh21 (talk) 18:20, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:01, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A similar image of this car was uploaded on Wikipedia on 12 December 2008. The Flickr image was uploaded on 12 September 2009. The Wikipedia image says it is copyrighted but never cites the source. Tbhotch 16:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is SpaceX's logo for CRS-16 and not free to use, NASA's logo is this one! Ras67 (talk) 18:14, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The NASA insignia is not official and is not used in any of the mission materials, nor was it shown at the press conferences before, during, or after the mission. I recommend keeping the image, which is the property of both NASA and SpaceX and is free to use2604:2000:1304:C028:9554:842C:284A:DE48 02:29, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It may be the official logo from SpaceX, but it is the property of them and not free to use. We can use only NASA's version! --Ras67 (talk) 12:53, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SS Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:42, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader’s request. Wrong shape. No more use. Cangjie6 (talk) 18:55, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader’s request. Wrong shape. No more use. Cangjie6 (talk) 18:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader’s request. Wrong shape. No more use. Cangjie6 (talk) 18:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader’s request. Wrong shape. No more use. Cangjie6 (talk) 18:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader’s request. Wrong shape. No more use. Cangjie6 (talk) 18:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader’s request. Wrong shape. No more use. Cangjie6 (talk) 18:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"I have Tempest's permission to use this image." Believe me I believe you. Regrettably the relation between you and "Tempest" does not make a file PD. E4024 (talk) 19:20, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tempest is the model, not the photographer. The relevant text is "This image is from my personal archive. I made this photo" // Liftarn (talk) 07:32, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. Then let me add the complete and exact description here: "This image is from my personal archive. I made this photo of Tempest (Gothic bellydancer) while working with her on a joint project. I have Tempest's permission to use this image." --E4024 (talk) 15:36, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's the model release thingy. It don't have anything to do with copyright. // Liftarn (talk) 15:42, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too many changes. uploaded a new version. Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 19:35, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader's request. Wrong name. Cangjie6 (talk) 20:06, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader's request. Wrong name. Cangjie6 (talk) 20:06, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs focus on 2D representations of copyrighted 3D objects, see COM:DW

Ytoyoda (talk) 20:12, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:UA, copyrights of two-dimensional representation of copyrighted 3D objects belong to the owners/designers. These photos primarily show trophies.

Ytoyoda (talk) 20:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep File:The National Football League's Most Valuable Player trophy, engraved with the names of past recipients, at the 2012 Pro Bowl in Honolulu Jan 120129-M-DX861-226.jpg because fotographed object is under TOO. Habitator terrae 🌍 11:21, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - The claim that the one is under the ToO is incorrect. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be own work or to date from 2019. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:41, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be own work or to date from 2019. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:42, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This photo was made in 1935 year in Poland by anonymous person. It presents my grandfather Andrzej Gurdak (officer of polish army), in the lead of soldier formation on the parade in a small town. All those orignal photos are hold by my father in family photo album and it is a miracle that this collection survived War World II. There is no additional information on the back of the photo, that could give a slight tip about author. Best regards, Wojciech.Gurdak (talk) 07:01, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Far too recent to assume the author has been dead for 70 years. Unless it was published, it cannot be kept. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be own work or to date from 2019. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:42, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From Discussion Page: This photo was made in 1932 year in Poland by anonymous person. It presents my grandfather Andrzej Gurdak (officer of polish army) after graduating from oficer school. This oficer school was destroyed during World War 2 and there is zero chance to gather any information about author of this photo.

All those orignal photos are hold by my father in family photo album and it is a miracle that this collection survived War World II. There is no additional information on the back of the photo, that could give a slight tip about author.

Best regards, Wojciech.Gurdak (talk) 06:53, 25 January 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was found on another page http://www.tridapardubice.cz/pardubice .... Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - no free license at source. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Without a source other than "web" how do we know the rest of this is correct? Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to Ellin

Hallo Ellin,

please look to the enclosed postcard which is since years already part of Wiki Commons: File:Picard - LONGWY-Bas - Place Giraud.JPG.

Obviously, this is a comparable case of what you are just complaining about. So my recent upload should be recognized as justified ...


But to come to terms: What "source" nomination should be standard in these cases? - File in hand of the uploading member? Or the web adress of the antiquity shop? Or should we all purchase the postcards or objects and then write "personal belongings"? - I think all should be practical and not too dogmatic. And "web" should be tolerated (may be - and now you could come - in addition with some further going explanation).


What is completely sure: the snapshot is more than 100 years old (WW I). - Or do you doubt this? - Then please exlain it to you me ...

--L-scriptor (talk) 07:22, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You say you copied it from the web. Then the source to write is the url of the webpage from where you copied it. The webpage with the information and context about the image, not just the webpage of the image file. In this case https://ansichtskarten-lexikon.de/ak-64959.html For an image of that period, you can't say at the same time that you don't know who the author is and that you know that the author has been dead for more than 70 years. Also, please categorize the file. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:37, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With source "internet" and date of 2015, unknown author, this image cannot be retained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With source "internet", author unknown and a date of 2015, this cannot be retained with this license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no author, this license cannot be applied. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no author, this license cannot be applied. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:01, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no author, this license cannot be applied. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:01, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The summary says this is from a 1996 book. Unfortunately without additional information, the licensing is not possible as a 1996 book author cannot be dead for 70 years/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

[edit]

The foto must have been made very shortly after the construction of the building (indicators: the Kaiserreich dresses and the new furniture and equipment). So it was a little after 1905 (the construction date is a historical fact). The "date of 2015" means the scan and upload. The author of the book used himself copyright-free materials. --L-scriptor (talk) 10:11, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The image is from after 1905, which makes it too recent to assume that the author has been dead for 70 years. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the source book was published in 1996, the license is incorrect. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Objection

[edit]

The foto must have been made very shortly after the construction of the building (indicators: the Kaiserreich dresses and the new furniture and equipment). So it was a little after 1905 (the construction date is a historical fact). The "date of 2015" means the scan and upload. The author of the book used himself copyright-free materials. --L-scriptor (talk) 10:10, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - The image is from after 1905, which makes it too recent to assume that the author has been dead for 70 years. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]