Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/12/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 31st, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 02:47, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a sketch of the architect Marchenko, about which there is no information. The sketch itself was made in 1888. --Рыцарь поля (talk) 05:31, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 10:51, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France. Captions are copyrighted. — Racconish💬 10:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Captions are unreadable and de minimis. All images in the picture are public domain and faithful reproductions. Léna (talk) 10:34, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion : I blurred the captions myself. — Racconish💬 11:29, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akshay mutthe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 13:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

aucun élément indiquant que le dépositaire est titulaire des droits sur cette photo Pierrette13 (talk) 13:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: recreation of deleted content. --Jcb (talk) 13:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Speedy}} empty file, created unintendently  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 11:50, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. −ebrahimtalk 15:22, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. User blocked indef. for sockpuppetry. --Yann (talk) 14:54, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for either of the two versions. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

source is here Hauptsatzung der SG Harsefeld no more reason for deletion - same Coa than Flecken Harsefeld - look there and here Wappenbeschreibung SG Harsefeld
Ok, that is sufficient support to the first file version. Jcb (talk) 14:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the official version - resolved. --Jcb (talk) 14:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedy|model requested delete}} Tbolttrain (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 14:33, 31 December 2018 Ebrahim (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Adult female soles of feet.jpg (Uploader request)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to the image destroying watermark too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:48, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and COM:DW without permission. --Yann (talk) 17:55, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

טעות בהעלאת התמונה. יש זכויות על התמונה שלא קשורות אליי ג'קי אדרי (talk) 14:51, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: https://www.facebook.com/justnetsanet/photos/a.499481890517906/499481920517903/?type=1&theater. --Yann (talk) 18:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Scud Wiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyvios

— Racconish💬 16:54, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's should be a speedy delete, as it's a clear copyvio, with the originals coming from Batman: Arkham Knight! (the videogame), Sideshow (the collectibles maker), and DC Comics itself. In fact, everything that this person has uploaded on his/her account is copyvio (see his/her talkpage) and he/she certainly does not represent the numerous different (!) actual authors of what he or she has uploaded. --Cold Season (talk) 17:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Scud Wiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Watermarked, no exif, unlikely authorship

— Racconish💬 17:19, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I just deleted everything what the user uploaded so far. Clear copyvios to me, it's highly unlikely to get a permission from the original sources. --Podzemnik (talk) 17:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Veverve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I uploaded those files and forgot to add the source.

Veverve (talk) 14:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected all as duplicates. --JuTa 12:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Veverve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I am the uploader. I uploaded files which were already uploaded.

Veverve (talk) 15:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected most, kept one as no duplicate. --JuTa 00:20, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mayank Mishra 03 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE selfies.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mayank Mishra 03 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:40, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:56, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

under copyright see https://www[dot]tierischehelden[dot]de/bolonka-zwetna.html Anka (talk) 16:17, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ich widerspreche der Löschung. Die Datei ist ordentlich unter CCL 4.0 veröffentlicht, der Link diente nur zur Ansicht einer Referenzquelle, nicht der Veröffentlichung, ich sehe kein Problem? Ich bin Besitzer und Urheber. auch anAnka von Mario — Preceding unsigned comment added by Userm1971 (talk • contribs)


Kept: The picture on https://www.tierischehelden.de/bolonka-zwetna.html is put under a free license. The date, however seems to be incorrect, considering the publication date of the article (1 November 2018). --Leyo 23:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is the educational value around what they call "puntería" in Spanish? (Sorry my English is worse than my Spanish.) E4024 (talk) 07:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep no valid reason for deletion. Punteria means to aim in Spanish so very unsure of user E4024's comment. Educational value is the image of the vulvas, buttocks, feet, and toes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB90:94A7:7153:B02A:3C51:7A69:8A6B (talk • contribs)

Keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.103.66 (talk • contribs)

Keep no valid reason for deletion. Image is correctly categorized as "vulvas", "female buttocks", and "toes". All three of which this image clearly shows. Tbolttrain


Kept: per foregoing. P 1 9 9   20:47, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

model requested delete Tbolttrain (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Ebrahim. --Yann (talk) 17:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, low-quality image with no encyclopedic value. AshFriday (talk) 04:05, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep As mentioned by Davey2010, User has made it known that he/she is on a one man crusade to delete he/she finds offensive which is a clear violation of the Terms of Service.

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:48, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

model requested delete Tbolttrain (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Ebrahim. --Yann (talk) 17:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, low-quality image with no encyclopedic value. AshFriday (talk) 04:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep As mentioned by Davey2010, User has made it known that he/she is on a one man crusade to delete he/she finds offensive which is a clear violation of the Terms of Service.

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

model requested delete Tbolttrain (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Ebrahim. --Yann (talk) 17:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, low-quality image with no encyclopedic value. AshFriday (talk) 04:06, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep As mentioned by Davey2010, User has made it known that he/she is on a one man crusade to delete he/she finds offensive which is a clear violation of the Terms of Service.

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

model requested delete Tbolttrain (talk) 05:27, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now lets say for instance you're having sexual intercourse with your girlfriend - She takes a picture of you and her (or just you) ... now you would assume it was kept for personal use right ? .... You wouldn't expect that person to upload the image to a Commons-licenced website for all to see, share and reuse ....
Purely out of respect for the lass in the pictures I firmly believe this image should be deleted. –Davey2010Talk 22:53, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Striking for now pending others !votes - I'm torn between !keep and !Delete and so would rather sit on the fence for now. –Davey2010Talk 15:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:10, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

model requested delete Tbolttrain (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Ebrahim. --Yann (talk) 17:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 22:22, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the real picture of Jimee Hison Nurbehesht (talk) 10:52, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 07:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deleted for other reasons than above. Thuresson (talk) 00:39, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 17:00, 3 Januar 2019 UTC: PDM - --Krdbot 20:04, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright status issue Mezesandras (talk) 21:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:37, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 17:35, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 05:07, 5 Januar 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) - --Krdbot 08:02, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not active anymore -- Chris Ke (talk) 00:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Ke (talk • contribs) 00:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: renamed user. --JuTa 02:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name: It is Genoni, not Genomi Wuselig (talk) 11:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: bad name, author's request. --Achim (talk) 09:24, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 19:31, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 19:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 1

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Benoît Prieur: If it is not in France, what was it doing in Category:Disneyland Paris? Also, according to the GPS tag on the image, it is in France. Elisfkc (talk) 21:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I did not say it is not in France: I said the topic and what it is represented is not concerned by the lack of FoP. --Benoît Prieur (d) 21:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Dunderklumpen: I would presume so, but that is a better question for someone on French Wikipedia. Elisfkc (talk) 00:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This building has been destroyed in december 2010 and it seems that «The destruction of the work extinguished copyright.» Is that correct? - Dunderklumpen (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, un éventuelle suppression des fichiers est à voir au cas par cas. En effet, certains équipements photographiés ne constituent pas une œuvre de l'esprit originale, lorsqu'il s'agit par exemple de la reproduction de bateaux ou de constructions anciennes. Concernant spécifiquement File:Plaque de rue Auguste-Gusteau à EuroDisney.jpg, il n'y a aucune raison de le supprimer, il s'agit de la simple reproduction à Eurodisney des milliers de plaques de rue qui existent à Paris, il n'y a aucune création originale pour cette plaque. Concernant File:Espace Euro Disney 2008.JPG, je ne vois aucune œuvre de l'esprit du point de vue architecturale à protéger ; à moins que ce soient les droits d'auteurs sur les graffitis qui justifiraient la suppression du fichier. O.Taris (talk) 10:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
J'ajoute que l'Espace Euro Disney a été détruit en 2010 (lire plus haut) et il semblerait que la destruction entraîne l'extinction des droits d'auteur. Cependant, dans l'exemple donné plus haut, il est question de peinture murale et non d'architecture. Merci @Benoît Prieur: d'avoir relevé cette exception. - Dunderklumpen (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,
Je reproduis ce que je viens d'écrire sur le bistro de #WpFr.
Quand le bâtiment est détruit le droit d'auteur ne semble plus s'appliquer et apparemment l'image est acceptable sur Commons :
"The destruction of the work extinguished copyright." => [1] sur un exemple équivalent File:Maison sur friche Bouchayer-Viallet.JPG).
--Benoît Prieur (d) 11:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Destruction of art never ended a copyright on the art itself ! Loreleil (talk) 10:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jebulon: I would rather have open a deletion request in order to facilitate a discussion and decision on such files that may be on the edge than to have them be sitting around and being used by others. Elisfkc (talk) 01:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, kept some. Note that all architecture is covered by copyright, not just unusual architecture. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 2

copyrighted site plans.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to withdraw this, because I would like opinions from others, but I think it is possible that these are, in fact, "own work" as claimed, and not scans or photos of Disney produced maps. They could also be derivative works made from Disney maps. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at them, File:Disneyland Resort Paris Kaart.png looks like there might be a chance that it came from Disney or somewhere else. The other two look like they were done in Paint. Elisfkc (talk) 01:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep it all. The first and the third are the same pictures and they seem to be based on a road map and the real land. There is no derivative work. - Bzh-99 (talk) 22:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep own work, not copyrighted. Multichill (talk) 09:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 13:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 3

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:DLRP schema.png was accidentally included. Withdrawing nomination for that image only. Elisfkc (talk) 17:24, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@O.Taris:
English: The topiary and the fact that there is no FOP in France. Elisfkc (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Français : Le topiaire et le fait qu'il n'y ait pas de FOP en France. Traduit avec Google Translate Elisfkc (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Si on considère que les jardins et plantation sont en général soumis au droit d'auteur, on va devoir supprimer beaucoup de photos de commons... La plantation représentée sur la photo ne me parait pas particulièrement originale pour pouvoir justifier un droit d'auteur. O.Taris (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If we consider that the gardens and plantation are generally subject to copyright, we will have to delete many photos of commons ... The plantation shown in the picture does not seem to me particularly original to be able to justify a copyright. O.Taris (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 4, Kept: 2. --Yann (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 5

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 01:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep 20, 22 et 6 : je ne vois pas d'oeuvre pour laquelle le droit d'auteur serait enfreint, il s'agit de simples photos de rue ou de parking. O.Taris (talk) 06:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion for most of those files. Two of them actually violate FoP. Ruthven (msg) 22:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 6

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep 2, delete the rest. Yann (talk) 18:12, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Boats with artistic designs have previously been deleted, if I remember right. Elisfkc (talk) 19:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
These pictures were not deleted because of "boat of artistic design", but for the other elements of the settings. BTW in only two of them there is a boat. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 7

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, les arbres et autres plantations, les lampadaires quelconques, les bateaux ou les trains dans un paysage ne sont pas des bâtiments soumis au droit d'auteur dans le cadre de la liberté de panorama. On se demande même pourquoi une pauvre guitoune peut-être proposée à la suppression pour une question de droit d'auteur ! En revanche, le respect du droit d'auteur architectural se pose effectivement pour File:Sleeping Beauty's Castle Disneyland Paris - panoramio.jpg et File:Disneyland Paris - panoramio (15).jpg. O.Taris (talk) 21:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as per O.Taris above. Yann (talk) 08:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Topiaries have been found to be copyrightable in the past. I try to nominate files like these to have a precedent set for them later. I would rather nominate 50 files that are fine and have a decision made about them than to have one that is not ok left alone. --Elisfkc (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, not in France, AFAIK. Your practice doesn't help admins. It pass the burden of review to them, and they are already overbooked. It would be much more useful to carefully review your nominations before making them. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Pretty sure Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alice's Curious Labyrinth at Disneyland Paris was an example of topiaries that were deleted because of copyright in France. If not, I remember having another case at some point, I'd just need to find it. --Elisfkc (talk) 20:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Most of them show some copyrightable element, and IMO, File:DLP Maze View.JPG was deleted by error. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Here we go, the example of topiaries in France being deleted that I was thinking of was Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fantasyland at Disneyland Paris. Elisfkc (talk) 22:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per FoP in France, but only the buildings. Kept are the trees, and boats, and non architectural elements of the park. File:Disneyland Paris - panoramio (16).jpg is borderline for me, but was deleted to be coherent with Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alice's Curious Labyrinth at Disneyland Paris. Ruthven (msg) 09:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 8

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 03:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Disneyland - panoramio (3).jpg et File:Disneyland - panoramio (15).jpg : les camions ne sont pas des oeuvres architecturales soumises aux droits d'auteur des constructions,  Keep File:Disneyland - panoramio (18).jpg, l'élément principal est la montagne et le HOLLYWOOD, qui ne sont pas des oeuvres architecturales soumises aux droits d'auteur des constructions. O.Taris (talk) 16:04, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, except 2, as per O.Taris. --Yann (talk) 09:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, partly as out of scope, but one file is  kept, because in my opinion copyrightable details are de minimis. Taivo (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 13

Copyrighted characters

Elisfkc (talk) 00:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Sealle (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 15

No FOP in France. Moving files to correct categories, as this is too high up for most.

Elisfkc (talk) 15:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 16

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 17

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy delete all as derivative work copyright violations ({{France-cv}}). The Flickr photographers and uploaders here did not obtain permission from the architects, sculptors, graphics artists, and other authors of the copyrighted works of Euro Disney. Such permissions must be sent via COM:OTRS. French FOP doesn't suffice Commons standards because it is noncommercial, and thus doesn't adhere with COM:Licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 18

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Tube Disaster cause of non originality. Delete the others. - ~~ Bzh-99 (talk) 18:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted two, kept the other two per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 00:14, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 00:15, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 00:16, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 00:18, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 00:52, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 00:54, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 01:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 01:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 01:23, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 01:29, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 01:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ThatBPengineer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: banner of private site Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:49, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's only a problem with the source, which can be corrected. @Jean-Philippe WMFr: Please state the source of the photograph. Thanks! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:53, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure @Jean-Philippe WMFr: will answer, as he no longer works for WMFr. It looks like the source is a group picture from Wikimania 2014. Though it looks like the source is Wikimania 2014 - London 11.jpg. I'm fixing this in the file. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:39, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@PierreSelim: Awesome! Speedy keep! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 01:51, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:32, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jgutierrezpepe2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:49, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality (pixelated); orphaned, better alternatives in Category:Ethylamine. Leyo 00:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:49, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication this is anything but a copyrighted image Softlavender (talk) 00:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image Softlavender (talk) 00:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 02:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SELFIE, self promotion Ytoyoda (talk) 03:09, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Najiibabdale (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images not useful for Wikipedia, strictly self promotion

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leodulcey1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the Spanish Wikipedia, where the subject's userpage was speedily deleted in May 2018 for violating userpage policy. The file names and the contributor's username suggest self-promotion. Out of project scope.

xplicit 04:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pedro Fernando Ruiz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the Spanish Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in December 2013 as spam. Out of project scope.

xplicit 04:36, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Temposognato (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No apparent use since being uploaded in February 2018. The file names and the contributor's username suggest self-promotion. Out of project scope.

xplicit 04:38, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Vanity. Self promotion Fixertool (talk) 04:51, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete as advertising. This lis a logo for a staffing company very similar to the uploader's name. The company website is stuffed with keywords in the same way the file description is here on Commons. Senator2029 04:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:51, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, low-quality image with no encyclopedic value. AshFriday (talk) 04:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep As mentioned by Davey2010, User has made it known that he/she is on a one man crusade to delete he/she finds offensive which is a clear violation of the Terms of Service.

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

model requested delete Tbolttrain (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per COM:PORN and COM:NUDITY. AshFriday (talk) 03:40, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @AshFriday: , you do understand what those policies mean right? There is a reason why this file was previously kept and the current deletion request has to do with the depicted woman wanting to have this file deleted, not COM:PORN and COM:NUDITY. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:32, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Also, any sysop going to judge this deletion request should also take into consideration that AshFriday has been removing photographs from other Wikimedia projects with basically the same wording as he uses at Wikimedia Commons, see here (reverted), here (reverted), here, here, here, here (reverted), here, here (Reverted), here, here (Reverted), and here (rolledback) removing File:Futanari.png and sometimes a lot more because he himself/she herself stated that the image was non-educational. This user seems to be on a crusade (no pun intended, as their username sounds Christian ⛪) to remove nudity and pornographic images from Wikimedia projects and this file was nominated for deletion earlier by this user and was kept then on the ground that it is educational. It’s odd that this user only seems to post the same comment, that they remove images from Wikipedia’s while stating that if an image is in use that they would refrain from wanting to see it deleted while here they advocate for its deletion despite it being in use. I don't have anything against AshFriday participating in deletion requests, I just hate to see the same non-sense arguments being made that aren’t grounded in any facts but seem to get accepted because everyone hates porn at Wikimedia Commons, every file should be looked at objectively and comments relating to its deletion should actually be relevant, any sysop taking AshFriday’s “vote” into consideration should also understand this context, I’ve attempted to ask them for clarification (Mobile 📱) but they haven’t responded so maybe jn a more public forum such as here they will see more feedback concerning their nonvote “arguments” (or nonargument “votes”). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:05, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - Now I know I !voted Keep above however the nominator is requesting deletion not some randomer - Now whilst the image is in scope I have a very big feeling she was never asked for her pictures to be added here and as such never consented to it,
Now lets say for instance you're having sexual intercourse with your girlfriend - She takes a picture of you and her (or just you) ... now you would assume it was kept for personal use right ? .... You wouldn't expect that person to upload the image to a Commons-licenced website for all to see, share and reuse ....
Purely out of respect for the lass in the pictures I firmly believe this image should be deleted. –Davey2010Talk 22:52, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep - Having gotten more sleep and having properly thought on it I'm changing my mind for 5 reasons:
  • 1) She's had a year to object to this being here and had this been requested near January 2018 it may of been another story (instead it was nominated in January for different reasons by a different editor)
  • 2) Whilst I can understand it probably is distressing to see yourself here we need to bear in mind we have thousands if not millions of photographs of people all of which have no idea they're even here!,
  • 3) This request may be complete BS and the uploader may simply want this deleted because they don't want the picture here anymore (not because model requests it),
  • 4) Although I want to !vote delete we never delete images here and so if we allowed it here we'd be setting a precedent to allow it elsewhere, (it all comes down to she and he had a year to object)
  • 5) She cannot be identified in the pictures - Ofcourse her body is online but she herself cannot be identified.
With all of this (and with Donalds !vote) in mind I cannot continue to !vote delete.
Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:04, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Just a heads up E4024 I've !voted Keep, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:04, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • A very weak  Keep as though these photographs most certainly violate this woman's privacy, I am not sure if this is a violation of "Commons:Personality rights", especially since the woman in this photograph can't be identified and as this photograph qualifies for COM:INUSE. I have had nudes of myself posted to the internet without my permission a couple of years ago, so I can certainly understand how emotionally distressing this could be for the woman in question, but while I now have to live with those photos and videos being online forever this woman has the opportunity to actually see this material being taken down... At least from Wikimedia Commons, the fact still remains that this is a good quality image that is in use and I think that the educational value might outweigh the personal one. This image has been online for quite some time and the model could've objected to it before. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:55, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Donald Trung, I absolutely agree she could've objected nearly a year ago but then again she may of only been told a few days ago .... OR this may be one big lie and the uploader wants to simply have the images deleted,
The other thing that we need to remember is that we have thousands of images of here of people here and they probably have no idea!,
It's a tough one .... –Davey2010Talk 14:39, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per the above, especially the preceding comment. It feels like it is not good to have your intimacy violated. Thanks everybody for not doing it with me. --E4024 (talk) 13:09, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note:I commented after Donald Trung and partly in reference to their contribution but some user changed the place of my edit so now it looks stupid. Giving 10 to 15 minutes of my life to this DR, indeed makes me stupid. Sorry for causing others also to lose their valuable time. Good-bye. --E4024 (talk) 16:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A) E4024 I have a fucking name: Davey, Dave or simply just D will do!,
B) You was not replying to Donald whereas I was! - If you put your comment above mine then it looks like I'm replying to you doesn't it!,
C) Adding a reply takes one a minute so no "valuable time" was spent,
D) No one asked you to spend 10 minutes of your life here and I don't quite understand why you did.....
Davey2010Talk 18:10, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You pinged me and then removed it so I'm assuming the question is to the uploader ? ... Ifso he's only interested in speedydeleting/csding everything so chances of you getting a reply is slim to none lol. –Davey2010Talk 02:15, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The question is addressed to everyone, including the administrators. Commons should not be hosting any sexually explicit material without the model's consent. The dissemination of such material is illegal in a number of states (including California, where the Wikimedia Foundation is currently located). Unless unambiguous permission has been provided by the subject, the image should be removed as soon as possible - regardless of whether the subject can be identified. AshFriday (talk) 03:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's a tough one as there's good points to keeping and deleting, To be completely honest I wouldn't lose sleep over this being deleted considering a few of the uploaders images have already been deleted,
I guess if the uploader could somehow prove the model requests deletion then it might seal the deal for me but currently I'm still on the fence as to what to do for the best. –Davey2010Talk 10:30, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per uploader's request. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:52, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

model requested delete Tbolttrain (talk) 05:27, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader's request. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:52, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Neeraj yadav sanskar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:31, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:33, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Megindokaj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Dzambo94

[edit]

All files transferred from German Wikipedia, uploaded by Dzambo94 are copyvios, because source for all files (seen in original upload log) are various websites without permission.

--Smooth O (talk) 08:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, per nomination. (Original web links have been removed by uploader on de.wp before commons transfer)--Wdwd (talk) 13:08, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyright violation Panek (talk) 08:53, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tahmid Taj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:09, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Md Nahid Islam Neha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:12, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:15, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prashantshakyaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:17, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:18, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rakibalhasanbd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:19, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:21, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shahab laiQue (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:21, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:23, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ananda Wisely (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ullas Perla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RajeshMeshe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:27, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gulzar Mughal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 10:16, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gulzar Mughal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

{{SD|G10. Personal photos by non-contributors. Only contributions are to en.wiki, where account is blocked for spam.

GMGtalk 15:12, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Badrashitiger1212 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE selfies and personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 13:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Jcb (talk) 14:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 14:30, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by George Pintell (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:40, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yellowcorp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Selfies and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Yellowcorp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:00, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:00, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imranbiswas66 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Janith0000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:00, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JoshuaEdwards1991 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nafiz Md. Imtiaz Uddin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:16, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:10, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 匿名001

[edit]

These files are scanning from 『眠流し行事 能代役七夕』(Nemurinagashi Gyoji Noshiro Yakutanabata) which is a book published in 1998 by the government of Noshiro City, Japan. It is glaring infringement of copyright.--掬茶 (talk) 14:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:11, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tapanvnahar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:11, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guido Bonarelli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and coat of arms. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tommysmith007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional photo. Permission by Derek Clark.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 15:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical newspaper. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 18:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 15:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 15:27, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 15:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 15:32, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 15:36, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HILGASdj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 15:44, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:15, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Divshirsat12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:15, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photograph of TV, need information about the license of the film or program being shown. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The name of the photographer watermarked on the photo doesn't seem to match that of the uploader, need clarification of authorship and permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:29, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appear to be stills or components from production of a 1959 Disney film that is presumably non-free. The mouse is quite protective of its creative works. These are at best photos of actual objects at a US exhibition, but no FoP in US for these sorts of work and the Disney-owned parts are certainly not de minimis.

DMacks (talk) 05:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Marianne Casamance as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: mistake of name correct Marianne Casamance (talk) 11:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 00:40, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 17:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 17:40, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Menq enq mer sarery (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very small files without EXIF data, very unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:44, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 17:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 18:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 18:21, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: broken version deleted. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 18:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to me pretty much out o scope. JuTa 20:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a detailed artwork on a copyrighted label. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:16, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen capture of a TV report. Pierre cb (talk) 22:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen capture of a TV report. Pierre cb (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen capture of a TV report. Pierre cb (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal ID not in scope of Commons. Furthermore, it is likely a privacy violation. Pierre cb (talk) 22:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal ID not in scope of Commons. Furthermore, it is likely a privacy violation. Pierre cb (talk) 22:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Verfasser der Seite, der das Digitalisat eines Konskriptionsbogens entnommen worden ist, reklamiert das Urheberrecht, da es seine geschützte Erstveröffentlichung ist. Das war mir beim Hochladen nicht klar. Deshalb bitte ich jetzt darum, die Datei zu löschen. DocNöck (talk) 22:42, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:51, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per the talk page, and per the note added to this file, Elizabeth Wurtzel is very angry about this photograph being on Commons (well, specifically she wanted it taken off 'every Wikipedia page in every language', but that plausibly includes Commons). She feels it is strongly unrepresentative of her appearance, and emphasizes that she never signed a media release. She also went to the trouble of uploading several properly-licensed replacement photos for our benefit. DS (talk) 17:27, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • The copyright status of the file is unclear and permission is clearly needed, as a result I've tagged it as needing permission (I'm not making any assumptions about this DR going in any one direction). Nick (talk) 00:10, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and per missing permission. --Nick (talk) 20:16, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:59, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in UAE

Elisfkc (talk) 21:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, kept skylines. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:11, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Bahrain Elisfkc (talk) 21:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:14, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Toys Elisfkc (talk) 21:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:14, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of commons scope. -★- PlyrStar93 Message me. 17:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, +copyvio (image from facebook). --Wdwd (talk) 13:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 17:27, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valualit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots and small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:29, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo image, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:34, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of Dix' copyrighted work — Racconish💬 15:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:51, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio and hoax. Хоббит (talk) 15:12, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:50, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Хоббит (talk) 15:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:50, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside of project scope Anka (talk) 16:11, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ich würde gern der Löschung widersprechen. Die Datei ist ordentlich unter CCL 4.0 veröffentlicht, das Foto dient zur Personen/Autoren Ansicht, ich sehe kein Problem? Ich bin Besitzer und Urheber. auch an Anka

Bitte um Hilfe zum Vorgehen --Userm1971 (talk) 23:53, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Info See Category:User page images. --Leyo 00:10, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bild wurde als -user page image- gekennzeichnet, danke Leyo --Userm1971 (talk) 02:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, used on user page. --Wdwd (talk) 14:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Anka (talk) 16:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ich Userm1971 widerspreche der Löschung. Die Datei ist ordentlich unter CCL 4.0 veröffentlicht, Bild zeigt Autor, ich sehe kein Problem, Ich bin Besitzer und Urheber, auch an Anka

Begründung war „out of project scope“, ist oben verlinkt, hier auf Deutsch. Ich sehe nicht, welchem edukativen Zweck diese Datei derzeit dienen sollte. Anka (talk) 23:20, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bitte um Hilfe zum Vorgehen --Userm1971 (talk) 23:54, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Info See Category:User page images. --Leyo 00:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bild wurde als -user page image- gekennzeichnet, danke Leyo --Userm1971 (talk) 02:06, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, used on user page. --Wdwd (talk) 14:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 16:16, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: fixed (crop), no reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:42, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 16:22, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 16:33, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:40, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 17:17, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, i am the user who took and uploaded this photo, and used it on my user page. In which sense is this photo damaged? I am more than happy to fix this if necessary.

Kind regards,

Leen


Kept: already fixed, no reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 17:18, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 14:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sachinscreativity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:22, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davidino00 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 14:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, subject is non-notable and pages about them in other Wikimedia projects have been deleted. Out of commons scope. -★- PlyrStar93 Message me. 17:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there are pictures about the chapel which are at least less crowded with tourists and they were made from the same angle Zello (talk) 00:09, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content non default minimus SecretName101 (talk) 00:38, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an unfree screen cap, no source information given beyond an "own work" claim. Mackensen (talk) 04:22, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 15:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Miss Piggy's image is non-free; this is not de minimis of the image, and there's no FoP-US for this sort of creative work. DMacks (talk) 05:14, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright problems: there is no evidence that the website in the source has published the photo with a free license (to be more precise the website in the source does not give any information about the the copyright). Note also that the photo (even if of low quality) it is also present on a website of a photo agency . Civitas13 (talk) 10:33, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 15:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong file format, better use File:Évolution des compagnies de transports en commun de Lille Roubaix Tourcoing.svg Dldwg (talk) 11:12, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, replaced by File:Évolution des compagnies de transports en commun de Lille Roubaix Tourcoing.svg. --Wdwd (talk) 15:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 13:44, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:35, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cette photo ne peut pas être own work : elle a été prise en août 2018, de plus c'est manifestement une photo d'une autre photo, sans respect des droits d'auteur, --Pierrette13 (talk) 06:44, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep contre la suppression, ce serait présumer de la mauvaise foi du contributeur (ce qui est contraire à nos principes) : scan ou photo d'une photo, c'est idem; la photo est sans doute sur un support, style cadre, plus ou moins collée, ce qui empêche de la scanner proprement. Accusation gratuite, parce qu'il n'est pas interdit de dupliquer sa propre photo, c'est toujours own work. Alors, où est le problème ? L'original a été fait dans les années 60 et rien ne dit qu'il y ait un problème de copyright. Ce n'est pas comme ça qu'on procède, il faut du concret quand on met en doute la bonne foi des contributeurs. --34 super héros (talk) 19:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    34 super héros Eh bien on va attendre que le contributeur sorte de son blocage d'une semaine pour violation répétée des droits d'auteur en toute connaissance de cause (en l'occurrence, réintroduction d'une photo supprimée auparavant) pour donner ses explications, mais c'est bien de se montrer vigilant (principe de vérification) avant de faire la morale aux autres, --Pierrette13 (talk) 09:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pour ce fichier, c'est réglé (cf. la PDD du diffuseur) Par contre, pour la photo de Joseph Billioud, c'est énorme : violation des droits d'auteur pour une photo provenant d'anciennes archives familiales datant peut-être de près d'une centaine d'années (je parle bien de cette photo de Joseph Billioud, né en 1888, qui parait ne pas être âgé sur la photo) ! Les droits d'auteur en France ne durent que 70 ans après le décès de l'auteur et on peut présager de la bonne foi du diffuseur, vu la date probable de la réalisation de cette photo de Joseph Billioud. Affirmer gratuitement le contraire, c'est limite... Le propriétaire de la photo a été maladroit et il ne connait pas bien les règles, c'est tout. Il faut se monter vigilant, bien sûr, mais là... Sur sa PDD, le diffuseur dit qu'il a utilisé la bonne licence (Commons), pour tirer ça au clair, il faudrait avoir la date exacte de la photo, mais s'il déclare que l'auteur est décédé depuis plus de 70 ans, c'est suffisant pour que ce soit dans le domaine public. Revenons à la photo qui nous concerne (chanoine Edouard Monier), la date indiquée est de 1962 (pour l'original, c'est ce qu'on peut comprendre) et elle est sous licence Commons, ce qui parait logique si le diffuseur est l'auteur. Sur sa PDD, il dit que c'est une erreur, ce qui ne veut rien dire et il ajoute que le fichier peut être supprimé, donc je ne vais pas être plus royaliste que le roi, mais j'aurais bien aimé avoir le fin mot de l'histoire... --34 super héros (talk) 23:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@34 super héros: IMO you should read COM:AGF more carefully: this guideline is not one-way and "editors should do their best to document the files they upload, and material may be deleted if the documentation is incorrect or inadequate." Besides uploader should explain why he thinks this picture is within COM:SCOPE. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:06, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Désolé, nous sommes entre francophones, donc on va communiquer dans notre belle langue... Je connais parfaitement COM:AGF... Sur la PDD du diffuseur, puisque vous l'empêchez de communiquer ailleurs, il déclare que le fichier peut être supprimé sans trop d'informations, c'est réglé mais j'aurais aimé en savoir plus... Par contre, la photo de Joseph Billioud (qui était utile puisque elle illustrait la page éponyme sur WP), précédemment supprimée un peu rapidement, serait la photo d'un parent et proviendrait d'archives familiales, il serait en possession de l'original, apparemment. Alors, licence libre ou plutôt domaine public ou encore copyright, Il faudrait tirer ça au clair parce que la photo parait très très ancienne (évidemment, je l'ai plus sous les yeux)... --34 super héros (talk) 23:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah d'accord, donc le contributeur dit que l'auteur de la photo est mort depuis plus de 70 ans, ailleurs il possèderait l'original "apparemment" (sic) et ça suffit pour vous ?? Donc rien à vérifier, on est vraiment des pénibles, pleuvent les accusations concernant nos exigences... Ou bien c'est vous qui vous asseyez sur les recommandations de Commons ? Je me demande si vous êtes un familier de Commons, parce que vraiment vos arguments moralisateurs sont très inhabituels, assez surprenants et s'attachent à remplacer les recommandations par des présomptions de bonne foi dont vous n'indiquez pas l'origine (où est-il indiqué sur Commons que la bonne foi remplace les sources concernant l'origine de la photo ???), et que vous répondez à nouveau en parlant de bonne foi là où votre interlocuteur vous indique pour la deuxième fois qu'il faut indiquer la source et les droits et que c'est à la personne qui dépose une photo de le faire préalablement, --Pierrette13 (talk) 14:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @34 super héros: @Pierrette13: Message from uploader: Bonsoir, Il s'agit d'une erreur et ce fichier peut être supprimé. Merci. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:52, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: selon la discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 14:50, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 14:52, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 14:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 14:57, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 14:58, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:40, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Josef Nesázal died in 1950, can be undeleted in 2021. Jcb (talk) 15:16, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blank photo Snowdawg (talk) 16:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: apparently, since the author uploaded the blank version on top of the old one on the same day, this was just a speedy request. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-authorized print from a book Yanguas (talk) 18:48, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hermine25 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en France et il faut une autorisation de l'artiste pour que les images restent sur Commons, voir Commons:OTRS/fr.

Shev123 (talk) 09:16, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Ok thank you. I will send authorization from author and artist to permissions-fr@wikimedia.org

thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hermine25 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2019010110002959 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 19:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: permission OTRS provided for each file. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:54, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The permission is doubted by the OTRS agent. @Krassotkin: please explain the situation.

Jcb (talk) 11:51, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jcb, permission (Ticket:2018102210005857) is revoked at the request of the uploader during the discussion of the ticket:2018102210005795 (OTRS-agents can clarify in Russian #3). These files probably violate the rights of third parties. In my opinion, we should go the way of speedy deletion. --sasha (krassotkin) 12:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no permission. --Krd 11:40, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:23, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content not minimus SecretName101 (talk) 12:53, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:22, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 13:29, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:22, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 13:30, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:21, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. I was unable to track this image back to a federal US government organization with a reverse image search. Jcb (talk) 13:35, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I saw this image and cropped it after reading the Panama Canal Zone. I support this deletion if this image is not in the public domain. --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 20:21, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:21, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. I was unable to track this image back to a federal US government organization with a reverse image search. Jcb (talk) 13:36, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:21, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Per File:Lakshmana Sarma - Father of Nature Cure in India.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:53, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:17, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is blurred Norman.seibert (talk) 14:38, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:12, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong PD; no year given; et cetera Goesseln (talk) 14:47, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:11, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" it is not. Are 1970 pics PD in Iraq? E4024 (talk) 14:54, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Iraq. Life + 50 or publication + 50. Abzeronow (talk) 18:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:11, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient authorship information. No indication that the author would have died before 1949, depicted person died in 1969. Jcb (talk) 15:07, 31 December 2018 (UTC) Ludwig Deichgräber.jpg has been done by a photostudio in Norden, Germany in the 50s. The successor in interest assignee has given his agreement by mail which had been submitted. The form required by Wikipedia was too much work for the successor. Another foto submitted with author as holder of the rights has been omitted (don´t know why). If photo has to be deleted - let it be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kathrin33 (talk • contribs) 18:14, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If there is a valid permission from the copyright holder, they can contact OTRS. That should not be too difficult. It may take some time though, because OTRS has a backlog. Jcb (talk) 20:00, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:10, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author or this cover page would have died before 1949. Jcb (talk) 15:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outdated (from 2006) and superseded by the ribbon device template, which I implemented on en:3rd Battalion, 6th Marines. Ich (talk) 16:09, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:08, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by آگران (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, some from Facebook, last remaining files, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 18:15, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:05, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work: [2] Avron (talk) 18:47, 31 December 2018 (UTC) source error has been corrected: [3] Please rescind Deletion Request because proper source of image has been provided.[[User:U249601|U249601] (talk) 21:14, 01 January 2019[reply]


Kept: a redirect have been created. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ThatBPengineer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Images from Sobhan Yann (talk) 19:19, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:51, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ThatBPengineer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted images from Zenab Ahmed Yann (talk) 19:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:51, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ThatBPengineer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Images taken from Nasr photography Yann (talk) 19:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:52, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ThatBPengineer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.italianhistorical.org/page41.html Probably old enough, but more information needed: author, date, and source. Yann (talk) 19:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:52, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Saudi Arabia Elisfkc (talk) 21:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ThatBPengineer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://artpictures.club/shans-december-30-16.html Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The URL is dead, just a resizing service anyway. Anyone able to track this down? Own work doesn't seem likely. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

George D. Machin illustrations

[edit]

Illustration by George Douglas Machin ("MAC") (1893-1985)[1], not in the PD until 1 Jan 2056.

Files affected:

Fma12 (talk) 03:23, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:37, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use, so out of scope. We have better alternatives at Commons such as File:Anterior view of human female and male, with labels.jpg. Furthermore, the copyright status of the man's photo is unclear. 4nn1l2 (talk) 04:35, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphics shown may be COM:DW. 1989 (talk) 06:11, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: cropped. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphics shown may be COM:DW. 1989 (talk) 06:11, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: cropped. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphics shown may be COM:DW. 1989 (talk) 06:11, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: cropped. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1942. Jcb (talk) 17:47, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Author unknown. License looks OK to me. --Yann (talk) 14:20, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Renominating after consulting with closing admin. 'author unknown' is not listed as a valid rationale in {{PD-Russia-2008}}. We have no information at all on the publication, so that we don't have the slightest indication whether "published anonymously or under a pseudonym" may apply. Closing admin had to admit that we are "left in the dark" about this file. The creation date 1937 is way too recent to assume PD. Closing admin somehow thinks that works created in 1937 are somehow anonymous by default, while there are probably tenthousands of examples to the contrary only on our servers. As long as COM:PCP is an official policy at Wikimedia Commons, we cannot go on wishful thinking. Jcb (talk) 12:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:25, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:BPVonnohSculpt3712.jpg. No permission from the sculptor. I found proof that this sculptor used a copyright notice, see here. Jcb (talk) 14:18, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:32, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:BPVonnohSculpt3712.jpg. No permission from the sculptor. I found proof that this sculptor used a copyright notice, see here. Jcb (talk) 14:18, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:32, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in UAE Elisfkc (talk) 21:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep in mind that this picture shows a skyline of the Maryah Island in Abu Dhabi and includes buildings of Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Rosewood Abu Dhabi, The Galleria (section under the rectangular Cleveland Clinic building), Four seasons Abu Dhabi, among others. The picture does not depict the building of Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi only. Picture shows skyline, Commons:De minimis apply. Wikiemirati (talk) 02:28, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Wikiemirati: So, instead of saying it is a FOP violation for one building, you are basically saying it is one for four or more buildings? --Elisfkc (talk) 15:57, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am saying it is a picture of a skyline in Maryah Island in Abu Dhabi. All individual buildings are DM. Wikiemirati (talk) 16:44, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The buildings are the main subject of the picture, it's really far fetched to argue a de minimis here. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:48, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per PierreSelim. --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:18, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
They are a constellation of buildings, not just a singular building. The picture is the subject of the buildings, does it still consitute a copyright violation if it's more than one building? The picture was taken across from the main Abu Dhabi Island and was intended to show the Maryah Island buildings, not Cleveland clinic Abu Dhabi in particular. Sorry I'm just asking to understand, as I've seen similar images kept under DM and that's why I thought it would be acceptable to upload. Thank you. Wikiemirati (talk) 03:40, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion by Eliskfc. --Green Giant (talk) 23:28, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Saudi Arabia

Elisfkc (talk) 21:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:29, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I highly doubt this is "own work" - I believe it is non-free and without permission. This upload is the only contribution of this user, and the EXIF data leads you a professional food photographer - https://www.studio38c.nl/fotografie/food/ .The company that produces this product has a suspiciously similar photo on their website https://www.kokosbrood.nl/custom/img_cache/page_page_block_img_775_original_FF0000_480x225.jpg . See also several other deletions of this same user for - i presume - the similar reason: see the uploader's talkpage for details. Wittylama (talk) 21:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:29, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a personal interpretation of a bible passage, not supported by any sources, does not add to project. nonnotable file Mercurywoodrose (talk) 23:44, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:30, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nomitated per copyviol but actually licensed with cc-by-4.0 Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

keep. The original source is [[4]] so licensed with CC-BY-4.0 as the license template states--Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You can find here [5]] the picture with the license. Camera.it is an official Italian parliament website--Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Agree but you should have provided the link to the Chamber of Deputies. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:18, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
the file was deleted because it was duplicated by File:Antonio Serena daticamera 2001.jpg --ZioNicco (talk) 10:08, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted and redirected. --Rosenzweig τ 11:44, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrongly licensed. Exif data show copyright info. The file was uploaded during a time when images on mynewsdesk got cc-by by default, this file got the CC-license by someone from the venue Furuvik and not by the copyright holder (Studio Gimli). Vätte (talk) 13:49, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:50, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication about "first published in the Ottoman Empire". Proper licence required. E4024 (talk) 16:30, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

indication about "first published in the Ottoman Empire" was set Georgios86 (talk)

Is this a joke? --E4024 (talk) 12:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Instead of creating a new translated raster file, the translation should have been added to the already switch-translated File:Epicenter Diagram.svg. Basque translations have been added to that file now, so this file is no longer needed. Links to this image on eu.WP have been changed to File:Epicenter Diagram.svg and automatically display the Basque translations due to Wikimedia improvements by WMF's software teams. Glrx (talk) 18:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map was replaced by a new high-quality SVG version. Allice Hunter (talk) 23:47, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:48, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrongly licensed. Has the mark "Icke kommersiell användning" which means "for non-commercial use" (see source: http://www.mynewsdesk.com/se/liseberg/images/magnus-uggla-kommer-till-lotta-paa-liseberg-206637) (it was also uploaded during a time when images on mynewsdesk got cc-by by default, so a lot of photos got a new license without the knowledge or permission from the copyright owner). Vätte (talk) 13:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, it was originally published under a free license. The site Mynewsdesk.com seem to have changed license afterwards, and this probably affects a lot of pictures. Maybe User:Thuresson has some suggestions. /NH 17:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it seems that whoever is responsible has changed the license to a non-Creative Commons one, which seems to underpin the fact that some users of Mynewsdesk do not quite understand photo licensing. On a more general notion, the issue with photos from Mynewsdesk has been discussed before without any clear consensus; see Commons:Village pump/Archive/2016/02#Huge problem with copyright on Mynewsdesk. Thuresson (talk) 17:43, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Then it is not unlikely that the copyright holder (which would probably be the photographer) was not aware of the image being published under a free license. And so we can't keep it, unless permission is received from the copyright holder. So  Delete /NH 19:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It is fair to assume that whoever published the image on Mynewsdesk had the adequate qualifications and mandate to do so. They had the option to select another license or not publish the image at all. An archived version of the page where the image is licensed under CC-BY-3.0 is here. --Bensin (talk) 18:28, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: confirmed licensereview. --JuTa 14:37, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COPYVIO: This image was uploaded during a time when images on mynewsdesk got cc-by by default, so a lot of photos got a new license without the knowledge or permission from the copyright owner. In this case the image in itself is from a studio album released 2011, the photo is taken by the photographer Severus Tenenbaum. The album is marked with copyright and "All rights reserved", you can see the images from the album here, and information about photographer and owning companies here. "Liseberg", as stated as the uploader on mynewsdesk, has nothing to do with either the album or the photographer, it's a venue just promoting bands playing on their stage. Liseberg is certainly not the copyright holder to the image and the CC-license is therefore not valid. Vätte (talk) 21:07, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. --FrankieF (talk) 00:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Adequate evidence has been presented to raise significant doubt that this was effectively license laundered. Only the actual copyright holder can license a work, so the purported CC would be illegitimate. --Эlcobbola talk 18:23, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photograph of 1910 with unknown author and not PD-old-assumed Goesseln (talk) 15:14, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Leider steht mir das Buch, dem ich das Datum entnommen habe, jetzt nicht zur Verfügung. Der dargestellte Walter Bondy, der von 1903 – 1914 in Paris lebte, starb 1940, desgleichen Jules Pascin, der 1930 starb. Das Foto muss also vor 1930 aufgenommen worden sein. Das Bild ist jedenfalls PD-old. Das Foto steht seit 2014 in verschiedenen Sprachversionen in WP. Muss meiner Ansicht nach nicht gelöscht werden. No valid reason for deletion. MoSchle (talk) 19:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{section resolved|MoSchle (talk) 16:38, 14 February 2019 (UTC)} DR are closed by admins only. --тнояsтеn 17:14, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: photopgrapher could have lived pst 1949. --JuTa 14:40, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivatives of a sculpture erected in 1964. No FoP in Russia.

A.Savin 12:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom High Contrast (talk) 17:11, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architecture. No known date of undeletion.

russavia (talk) 18:33, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted as per all above. russavia (talk) 18:35, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Russia for artwork. Abzeronow (talk) 19:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious cases (under review)

[edit]

Possibly de minimis

[edit]
But the photo was taken in Russia. DS (talk) 18:55, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly below ToO

[edit]

Can be cropped and used

[edit]

Other cases

[edit]
  • File:Monument to Tsiolkovsky.jpg Not sure this file is related to this case. Sculptor apparently died in 1952, so a different undeletion date would probably be needed, in any case.

Suggestions of undelections

[edit]

Discussion

[edit]
@Abzeronow: I've been cropping the museum tower out of the images, but if I well understood, if it's part of the building, it's OK under FOP-Russia. Do you know if that tower is a building, as it seems to be? If this is the case,  Keep for all the remaining files (and I'll possible do less aggressive crops in some of the images I've cropped).-- Darwin Ahoy! 04:58, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not an expert, but I think we can  Keep the remaining files. Abzeronow (talk) 05:03, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@DarwIn: , what was the point of trimming the photos like here? Most of the structure is still there, it's still recognizable ("I know it when I see it"), so the bulk of "copyrightable parts" was unchanged. But now the photographer looks like someone who couldn't frame a simple snapshot and the snapshot itself became unusable. So, even if commons policy says that cutting out one small part is enough (does it?), it's worse than deletion. Retired electrician (talk) 11:08, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Retired electrician: The tower seems to be part of the building of the museum, so the only issue would be the spacecraft at the top, which would turn the whole building into a big sculpture, so I tried that approach to keep the file, as the rest of the artworks in that photo seems to be de minimis. the fact is that initially this looked like a clearcut case of no-FoP violation, with a lot of new uploads to clean, and I started doing the task, until I realized that the whole thing is a building, a museum. If this is correct, I believe we must reevaluate not only these pictures, but the ones that were deleted before, since apparently what we are seeing is the tower of a building with a sculpture at the top (possibly de minimis?). Anyay, sorry for the (well intended) mess, I'll start reverting the speedy eliminations. -- Darwin Ahoy! 15:32, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently the tower is indeed a sculpture, and the museum building below is accessory to it, so it can't be kept as architecture. I'll try to separate this DR into the obvious cases that can be deleted without much issue, and the ones that can be evaluated separately as de minimis, that can be saved by cropping out copyrighted parts, etc.-- Darwin Ahoy! 15:46, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: Restored them all, and reverted my crops, so that the people at Wikivoyage can easily transfer them to there. I've also separated the obvious cases from other cases that may be covered by our policies here and kept, and also added some suggestions of files that can be restored and adapted accordingly.-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:35, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: @DarwIn: Is there much point saving them for wikivoyage? because each picture has to be actually illustrated on a page directly related to it in order to be fair use. I'm not saying mine's the best one or anything, but clearly we can't have all of them on wikivoyage, is my reading of the usage protocol there, what do we think? --E.3 (Talk to Dr Peter James Chisholm). I sometimes don't understand rules, and I think abstractly. [7] 06:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what files they wanted to transfer (probably not all), maybe Atsirlin or Ymblanter know more --A.Savin 12:47, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, indeed, we only transfer those which can immediately be used in articles and lists of cultural heritage (typically one per monument, two in exceptional cases if both could be used).--Ymblanter (talk) 12:53, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My suggestion would be to keep the one from the 1970s for wikivoyage, but only because I'm quite clearly a bit of fan of heritage work --E.3 (Talk to Dr Peter James Chisholm). I sometimes don't understand rules, and I think abstractly. [8] 06:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Namely, this one. --E.3 (Talk to Dr Peter James Chisholm). I sometimes don't understand rules, and I think abstractly. [9] 07:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 15:21, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]