Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/12/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 27th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File's sole purpose was for vandalism on en-wiki [1] funplussmart (talk) 03:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:23, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright problems: strange metadata; picture already found in other websites (here for example on June 4, 2017) Civitas13 (talk) 09:03, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:29, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly uploaded the biography as a pdf file to Wikimedia when it should have been uploaded to Wikipedia biography. Juan R. Sanchez-Ramos (talk) 15:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content and out of COM:SCOPE. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://de.pokernews.com/neuigkeiten/2011/11/on-london-von-stephan-kalhamer-9841.htm This is not the source. File has EXIF data, so a proper DR is a better way. Yann (talk) 16:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:47, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded this graphic new in svg format for a better quality! This file can be deleted! The new file can be found here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Strukturformel_von_Propargylalkohol.svg Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:18, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As requested by the uploader as this diagram has been superseded by File:Strukturformel von Propargylalkohol.svg. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:13, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is the "own work" here? The photograph or the supposed work of art? E4024 (talk) 20:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio, artist still alive. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:03, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not suitable for the article Masalli qasimli (talk) 14:29, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 01:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not suitable for the article Masalli qasimli (talk) 14:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 01:42, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not suitable for the article Masalli qasimli (talk) 14:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 01:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not suitable for the article Masalli qasimli (talk) 14:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 01:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no license ComputerHotline (talk) 17:38, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, no free license at source. --Jcb (talk) 02:01, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken source link. No evidence to suggest file was released under cc-by-sa-4.0. Per uploader's other uploads, it can be reasonably assumed this is likely a copyvio. Hiàn (talk) 22:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 02:06, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work from diploma. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 02:21, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prince parassala Prince Parassala (talk) 19:00, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 02:24, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porn content Ilzhabimantara (talk) 22:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 04:53, 28 Dezember 2018 UTC: Content intended as Vandalism, threat, or attack (G3) - --Krdbot 08:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porn content Ilzhabimantara (talk) 22:20, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 04:53, 28 Dezember 2018 UTC: Content intended as Vandalism, threat, or attack (G3) - --Krdbot 08:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porn content Ilzhabimantara (talk) 22:21, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 04:53, 28 Dezember 2018 UTC: Content intended as Vandalism, threat, or attack (G3) - --Krdbot 08:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:36, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have integrated this graphic in another (svg format) graphic! This file can be deleted! The new file can be found here: File:Synthese von 2-Ethylbutan-1-ol.svg Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As requested by the uploader as this has been superseded by File:Synthese von 2-Ethylbutan-1-ol.svg. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have integrated this graphic in another (svg format) graphic! This file can be deleted! The new file can be found here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aldolkondensation_von_Butyraldehyd_mit_Acetaldehyd_und_nachfolgender_Hydrierung_zu_2-Ethylbutan-1-ol.svg Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As requested by the uploader as this diagram has been superseded by File:Aldolkondensation von Butyraldehyd mit Acetaldehyd und nachfolgender Hydrierung zu 2-Ethylbutan-1-ol.svg. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have integrated this graphic in another (svg format) graphic! This file can be deleted! The new file can be found here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aldolkondensation_von_Butyraldehyd_mit_Acetaldehyd_und_nachfolgender_Hydrierung_zu_2-Ethylbutan-1-ol.svg Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As requested by the uploader as this has been superseded by File:Aldolkondensation von Butyraldehyd mit Acetaldehyd und nachfolgender Hydrierung zu 2-Ethylbutan-1-ol.svg. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have integrated this graphic in another (svg format) graphic! This file can be deleted! The new file can be found here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aldolkondensation_von_Butyraldehyd_mit_Acetaldehyd_und_nachfolgender_Hydrierung_zu_2-Ethylbutan-1-ol.svg Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As requested by the uploader as this has been superseded by File:Aldolkondensation von Butyraldehyd mit Acetaldehyd und nachfolgender Hydrierung zu 2-Ethylbutan-1-ol.svg. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:44, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a Category:Fake_SVG and is superseeded by File:Ceska-suverenita-logo-velke.png

This file has been superseded by Ceska-suverenita-logo-velke.png. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file

— Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 12:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JoKalliauer: This logo was sent with the OTRS permission, we got permission for this. Bencemac (talk) 12:15, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Bencemac: I extracted the PNG and uploaded it to File:Ceska-suverenita-logo-velke.png, therfore it has also the OTRS Permission since it is based on this version.
You should not upload PNGs as SVG. Please ask for a proper vectorisation, but fake SVG are undesirable.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 12:20, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, no problem! MagentaGreen (talk) 14:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@MagentaGreen: Thank you very much! I did not noticed that the attached SVG is fake, my computer showed it perfectly. Bencemac (talk) 18:28, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Bencemac, thanks again, that's why we are here! MagentaGreen (talk) 19:25, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Nick (talk) 19:28, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can not recognize the meaning of such a map. It does not make sense to depict such fiction on such a map of the world - you just do not see anything specific. In addition, I question the general meaning of such a map in Wikimedia projects (facts, not fiction). Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:08, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That seems a pretty mundane and irrelevant reason to delete this file. By your logic, we should also delete all the other files in this category. --Altermoray (talk) 15:56, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a viable reason to delete this file. It seems a very interesting alternate history, and besides, there are many other maps of alternate histories on Wikimedia. Should we delete those too? My point exactly, this file shouldn't be deleted for some stupid reason. --ImhotepBallZ Jack Gaines Illslidia (talk) 02:30, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I wasn't done with this map, yet, of course it looked like nonsense! --98.183.198.113 22:43, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and an upload by an LTA. Noting above comments are LTA in various forms.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:56, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused nonsense. Was this deleted before? E4024 (talk) 20:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I WASN'T DONE WITH MY MAP, YET, OF CORSE IT LOOKED LIKE NONSENSE! --KelseyBelmonteBass (talk) 01:12, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strangely enough, wherever my DR notification has gone, they (the "various" users) have already been blocked or even banned... I think this should be closed and the file deleted speedily. --E4024 (talk) 13:22, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted and protected against recreation, KelseyBelmonteBass is globally locked. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Schlechter Dateiname, erneut hochgeladen als aurachtalbruecken_emskirchen_2017.jpg Bertramrupprecht (talk) 15:57, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 11:31, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ersetzt durch Johannes Cappeller, Ariadne.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 17:13, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: but redirected the other one. --JuTa 23:07, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PicMonkies (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The image is still copyrighted in the source country, the UK, because the photographer, Walter Stoneman, died in 1958, which is less than 70 years ago.

--Rrburke (talk) 17:01, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment. On further review, Walter Stoneman's photographs were commissioned by the National Portrait Gallery for their National Photographic Record project.[2] As the gallery is a non-departmental public body of the UK government, the works are probably subject to Crown copyright, meaning that their UK copyrights expired 50 years after their creation. In that case, the photographs are all out of copyright in the UK. Additionally, since their copyrights had expired as of the URAA date of January 1, 1996, they are in the public domain in the United States as well. I think the files should be kept. Nevertheless I think the deletion discussion should proceed in case others have more to add. --Rrburke (talk) 13:16, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep (as nominator): subject to Crown copyright, so out of copyright in the UK; all copyrights had expired as of the URAA date, so PD in the US as well. --Rrburke (talk) 13:16, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I take that as withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 07:48, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Leonard Reeves (talk) 22:57, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please, remove it. I don't want to view this person. Banana19208 (talk) 10:29, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

je pošodovana 89.143.76.149 21:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged phpoto Snowdawg (talk) 19:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:27, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file or uploading error ~Moheen (keep talking) 19:30, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:46, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:50, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:25, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:25, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:59, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 20:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 20:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is no longer used on Wikipedia, and it is not representative of the current situation anymore, which is why I uploaded the photo in the first place. There are better quality and more up-to-date photos from this angle available. Philiphagen (talk) 20:20, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 00:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a commercial photo by commercial photographer Ryan Pfluger (http://www.ryanpfluger.com/), see http://whiteairwolf.tumblr.com/post/131102751660/interview-with-mozhan-marnò-by-prutha-s-patel where it is used inside More TV Magazine. Unless user claims to be Ryan Pfluger, this is a copyright violation. GRuban (talk) 20:28, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 20:34, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, https://www.alt.kp.ru/daily/26864/3907209/ MisterXS (talk) 20:35, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:21, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 20:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:21, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 20:46, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:21, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work. If my suspicion is unfounded I apologize. E4024 (talk) 20:50, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 20:53, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:00, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:00, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:17, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:20, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:17, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:21, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:17, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:23, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:17, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:23, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:15, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:00, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:15, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:25, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:25, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:13, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:28, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:13, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:28, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:13, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:28, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:13, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:31, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:12, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:12, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:12, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:12, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:12, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:12, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:12, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:11, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:26, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:11, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:11, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:11, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

xplicit 23:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

xplicit 23:53, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of an artwork, possibly protected A.Savin 13:53, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which is mine E.3 (talk) 13:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per author request. --AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 09:49, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Germany for interiors of buildings, the Reichstags Dome is contemporary architecture A.Savin 13:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC) Yes pls delete thx E.3 (talk)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted because of copyvio. --AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 09:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Germany for interiors of buildings, the Reichstags Dome is contemporary architecture A.Savin 13:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC) Yes didnt realise please go ahead and delete E.3 (talk) 12:55, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted because of copyvio. --AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 09:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This book cover is out of project scope. The book does not seem to be notable or noteworthy. It has most probably been published by a vanity publisher. There may be copyright concerns regarding the calligraphy as well. Furthermore, the cover designer is Masoumeh Amiri, but the uploader's username, which resembles a real name in Persian, is Hossein Tayyebi. So I doubut that the user is even allowed to release the rights.

Also File:Nadali tayebi book2.jpg

4nn1l2 (talk) 00:15, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:28, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:BOOK 1989 (talk) 05:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:32, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The work depicted is possibly copyrighted. This picture was taken by and uploaded by me, but I realize that although the art is visible from the street, there is possibly applicable copyright, so I propose this file be deleted. ChromeGames923 (talk) 05:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are no sources for the images that were used in the collage. Rapsar (talk) 06:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of a non-notable book(?) of a non-notable author. Out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 06:35, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 06:36, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 06:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 06:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 06:49, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Rapsar (talk) 06:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. Rapsar (talk) 06:53, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and non-encyclopedic personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 06:57, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the Spanish Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in April 2015 as non-notable. Out of project scope. xplicit 06:57, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and non-encyclopedic personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 06:58, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and non-encyclopedic personal image, out of project scope. Rapsar (talk) 06:58, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harry Kushwah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Turkmen talk 07:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source is "© Royal Society of Chemistry", not PD shizhao (talk) 08:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StefanovicPFK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Фото, сделаны не сотрудниками сайта и подлежат удалению

Mitte27 (talk) 08:54, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I do not see a free license at the source. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 09:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.comlib.org/events/category/main-library-events/2014-07-24/ --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio (per TinyEye). --PierreSelim (talk) 19:34, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SantoPennestri3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images (it:Santo Pennestrì).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:34, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mielanjel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical newspapers. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 19:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Turkmen talk 07:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 17:04, 3 Januar 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SantoPennestri3 --Krdbot 19:56, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like an advert. E4024 (talk) 18:25, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Racconish at 10:38, 4 Januar 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) - --Krdbot 13:56, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect structure, cf. File:Ilikonapyrone.svg and its source. Wostr (talk) 21:56, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 14:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:Metallocene compound group 4.svg. Leyo 22:13, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 14:35, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:27, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:53, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 18:53, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not a personal photo, but out of scope anyway. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:25, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:53, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:25, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iswina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these are uploaded to create hoax or vandalism pages in English Wikipedia and have no educational value. Uploader is blocked indefinitely at enwiki for not here to contribute, and it's unlikely these will get used ever again.

-★- PlyrStar93 Message me. 19:05, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most likely none of the images is own work. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:23, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:30, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:22, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor picture quality (blurry) / schlechte Bildqualität (verschwommen) Maesi64 (talk) 19:36, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:20, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:15, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:56, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Snowdawg: Oh, it definitely was fine for a while. Should I upload it again from my archive as a new photo? Or there's a way to update the old one? Thank you for noticing the issue! 185.43.148.2 12:54, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you have another copy you should upload it. There's an option under the details section for the image to upload a new version. That way you don't need to rename and provide licensing information again. Snowdawg (talk) 12:57, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file is blurry GeorgDerReisende (talk) 22:01, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this photo has a watermark, the same photo without the watermark is file:Jajpur, Odisha, India - panoramio - Deepak das (1).jpg. --GeorgDerReisende (talk) 21:22, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 23:22, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriately rendered SVG; replaced by File:Schlotterbeck Übersichtsreaktion V1.svg. Leyo 22:23, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 21:22, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriately rendered SVG; orphaned/replaced by File:Swarts-Reaktion Übersichtsreaktion V1.svg. Leyo 22:26, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 21:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriately rendered SVG; orphaned/replaced by File:Swarts-Reaktion_Reaktionsmechanismus_V2.svg. Leyo 22:29, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 21:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriately rendered SVG; orphaned/replaced by File:Schlotterbeck Reaktionsmechanismus B V1.svg. Leyo 22:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 21:22, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriately rendered SVG; orphaned/replaced by File:Schlotterbeck Reaktionsmechanismus A V1.svg. Leyo 22:34, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 21:22, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriately rendered SVG; orphaned/replaced by File:Schlotterbeck Beispielreaktion A V2.svg. Leyo 22:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 21:22, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriately rendered SVG; orphaned/replaced by File:Schlotterbeck Beispielreaktion A V2.svg. Leyo 22:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 21:23, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to File:Gonave.jpg but lower quality. --ghouston (talk) 01:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In particular, it's just an alternative processing of the same original satellite photo, with low resolution. --ghouston (talk) 01:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Poor quality and out of COM:SCOPE. --Mhhossein talk 04:04, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is too dark, unable to see the object clearly B dash (talk) 02:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

[edit]

In this era of climate change, greenhouse gas emissions, and folks trying to support environmental initiatives and create dark sky preserves, the picture supports these ideals. Saskatoon with a population 246,375 (2016) showed grand support for earth day. The actual protest listed above by B Dash does not stop to recognize the actual phenomenal success which the Saskatoon neighbourhoods and employment sectors employed to turn off their lights to celebrate and honour Earth Day. The intent of the picture is supposed to be dark. According to EarthDay.Org, "Earth Day is now a global event each year, and we believe that more than 1 billion people in 192 countries now take part in what is the largest civic-focused day of action in the world. It is a day of political action and civic participation. Earth Day is the World’s Largest Environmental Movement to end plastic pollution, to protect endangered species, and to broaden, educate, and activate the environmental movement across the globe. " I, am quite personally, proud of my home city, the city of Saskatoon to be able to take a photo which is dark. There are many, many photographs of the river and the city with all the lights on, however, this one honours Earth Day, and being that the city is dark, and approaches the lighting of a rural area, is quite awesome in this day of age. IMHO, there should be quite a few more images of cities on Earth Day, and their commitment to the environment, and perhaps, there should be more than one day committed as Earth Day, as we see what is happening to our Flora and Fauna internationally. So, as far as a photographic masterpiece which folks are quite used to seeing on the cover of perhaps architectural magazines, this picture, is indeed different. This picture is not so much a picture to show a lighted up city, it is a photograph to show just how black a city can become on Earth Day!!! Isn't it wonderful that it is dark, and one cannot see the city lights glaring? That is my opinion about the deletion comment. I support environmental efforts for the planet, indeed. SriMesh | talk 19:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 04:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a duplicate of File:Educación_abierta.png WQL (talk) 05:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Mhhossein talk 04:06, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This not-in-use image, presented as a logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 07:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 04:07, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file stated that "除维基项目内部使用外,其他地方严禁无授权使用。"in Chinese, which means that "The file should not be used in other places without permission except for Wikimedia projects", which is a non-free file and does not fulfill the "free file" requirement of Wikimedia Commons 廣九直通車 (talk) 09:30, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment You are the author and you are the person who uploaded the photo, so how could it have been stolen? --jdx Re: 10:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jdx: This photo was used as a social networking site avatar, so I added a watermark.--Thyj (talk) 13:39, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted to the first version. Do not add watermarks. Be aware that the free license is irrevocable, so once you publish a file here, it is for ever. We may occasionally delete files on request, but you need a good reason. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Then delete it.--Thyj (talk) 04:35, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, as already the first uploaded version[3] carried the above cited restriction in Chinese. Thereby, the uploader had never the intent to release it under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 04:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter? Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The image is from 1955, maybe replace Template:PD-AR-Photo with Template:PD-AR-Anonymous? --Yilku1 (talk) 19:41, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Yilku1: It's a B&W photo of a painting: first template is intended for photos and not for drawings or other pieces of art. Besides we are not sure artwork is anonymous or dated 1955. I would like to hear @Regions: . --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:58, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Yilku1: This artwork is anonymous and dated 1955 and was posted at the Casa de Gobierno de Misiones in a public site. --Regions (talk) 13:41, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Regions: There's a confusion: there's no freedom of panorama in Argentina for such works so the fact that it's exhibited in a public place is irrelevant here. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:58, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Yilku1: On. In that case, please delete it. Thank you. --Regions (talk) 14:30, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 04:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: promotional 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

این عکس مشمول قانون کپی رایت نمی شود — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tayebihosein (talk • contribs) 13:56, 27 December 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 04:09, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, personal unsed. Steinsplitter (talk) 13:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 04:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 04:11, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il ne représente aucun intéret. Il s'agit de ma photo, mise en ligne il y a plusieurs années pour accompagner mon profil de contributeur wikipédia PVen102785 (talk) 15:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Il ne représente aucun intéret. Il s'agit de ma photo, mise en ligne il y a plusieurs années pour accompagner mon profil de contributeur wikipédia 2A02:8420:61AC:CC01:E4D6:684D:FE2A:B5E8 22:15, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rayna Vasileva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The EXIF data for these three images credits "Dmitriy Galyov Photography". In order to accept these images, we would need the permission from "Dmitriy Galyov Photography".

B (talk) 03:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Quartertoten (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Licenses to these images do not appear valid. Aside from the Scrooge screenshot, the image description pages all credit "Allan Esler Smith" so an appropriate license would need to be received from the copyright holder to accept them.

B (talk) 04:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed the necessary licence to allow usage and therefore believe the files should not be deleted. Help would be appreciated to explain what specifically should be done instead referring to the specific image as they improve and assist the knowledge of the community. I have also placed this comment on the relevant pages. Quartertoten (talk) 09:39, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Quartertoten: Wikimedia Commons only accepts images where the copyright holder has explicitly published the image under the terms of a free license, such as the "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0" license. In order to accept these images, we would need to have statements on file from the PHOTOGRAPHER (and, for File:TITG marketing 2.jpg and File:TITG crop.jpg) from the AUTHOR OF THE BOOK. COM:CONSENT has a sample statement of permission that can be submitted to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Of all of these images, an email has been sent only for File:TITG marketing 2.jpg, but this email does not contain any sort of statement of permission - it only acknowledges that fair use exists. (And even on the English Wikipedia, a marketing image like this would not qualify for fair use under our rules - we would only use a simple scan of the book cover, and then only in the article about the book itself.) --B (talk) 12:56, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:47, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has come to light that this is not a still image from the film named, but a separate later one, which would not be free of copyright Kingsif (talk) 05:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 21:24, 25 Januar 2019 UTC: It has come to light that this is not a still image from the film named, but a separate later one, which would not be free of copyright --Krdbot 01:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate. File:E-y Curve.jpg Gcd822 (talk) 01:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:47, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work B dash (talk) 02:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:48, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's unfortunate that I need to nominate this image for deletion, but it makes sense. Currently, this is the free image of Bézier which is used on most Wikipedia pages about him. It is somewhat suspect that the only free file would be a recent original drawing (putting aside the quality of this drawing as an artistic depiction). Were a photograph available, we would surely use that, yes? So it's not stunning that this drawing is obviously copied from this photo: https://patrimoine.gadz.org/img/gadz/bezier.jpg. If the photo is free, then we should be using it; if the photo is not free, the drawing is disallowed as an unlicensed derivative work. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 05:25, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If necessary, you can proceed to delete this file. This drawing is based on that photo but i'm not sure the link you posted leads exactly to the photo I used to create this drawing (in terms of original source). At the time of creation of the drawing I sincerely didn't know about the concept of "unlicensed derivative work". So, if you have to delete it, do it. --Davi.trip (talk) 11:02, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Too much resemblance, sorry. --DaB. (talk) 14:49, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 06:46, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1967 isn't old enough for it to be out of copyright MPF (talk) 20:39, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But please - this is what everyone else has written concidering SWEDISH photos. Otherwise I would not have uploaded the image. Since the 1967 "magical year" has been eledged in several other matters before, I humbly must wonder if You are aware of pictures from Sweden ? The 70 year limit doesn't apply to Swedish photos - I don't know why. But like I've stated, atleast 3 other Commons-specialists have teached me this. One Dutch guy, one Swedish and one other. Boeing720 (talk) 01:56, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Have to admit, I'd not seen the Swedish exception, thanks for pointing it out! - MPF (talk) 21:49, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome ! I'm no expert at all reguarding these troublesome matters. But like I stated, someone else has already enlightened me about "the magical year 1967", so to speak. It was some years ago and I cannot remember who told me this or even what it was about. But I did put the year 1967 into my memory. Thanks for Your efforts by the way. Boeing720 (talk) 21:20, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:06, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication why this photo of a book page should be CC licenced. If there is some special Swedish PD case, state it clearly, with the correct tags. Now there is not even proof of the date. FunkMonk (talk) 06:49, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image, presented as a logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 07:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:52, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Persoanl image, out of scope Podzemnik (talk) 08:18, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Used on user-(talk-)page of an active author. --DaB. (talk) 14:55, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The dominating "installation" in the background is likely a new work and thereby still copyrighted. Freedom-of-panorama is not applicable here, due to being indoors. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful - private "theory" from that user, no way this could ever enter an article mfb (talk) 09:59, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, see website at the top mfb (talk) 10:01, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, see website at the top mfb (talk) 10:01, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scope unclear, looks more like a selfie. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution professional shot stamped FHM, only user upload, seriously doubt they have rights to this image. GRuban (talk) 12:36, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image one of several only used for recreating previously speedy-deleted content on en: The Anome (talk) 13:09, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

previously deleted. file not in use. all pages related to D-Ploy records and the artist J-Pimp have been repeatedly deleted as spam. Lazypub (talk) 12:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom. Clear case cross-wiki spam with no potential educational use. Please also note that this is spam by the Prince-au-Léogâne LTA. Hiàn (talk) 22:50, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, because the user is long term cross-wiki spammer (using sock accounts and ip addresses), can we add his name(s) to the filter list to prevent future additions of his entities?:Lazypub (talk)
Note: We have a confirmed OTRS release. --JuTa 08:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@User:JuTa. Sorry, I don't know the lingo. What is OTRS?Lazypub (talk)
@Lazypub: see Commons:OTRS. --JuTa 14:32, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not that I fully understand that link, but let me explain better. The image, I believe, was posted by the owner/creator. That is not the problem. The problem is that entries associated with D-Ploy Records/J-Pimp/Daniel South/Joél Célestin Filsaime/Nesley Filsaime are all non-notable entities which have been deleted numerous times in numerous countries for numerous years, and the user is now a globally blocked sock puppet.
I know that on EN Wikipedia, if a word or phrase becomes a problem, it can be added to the filter list which will prevent future instances from occurring. Also, on EN Wikipedia, I have seen some article titles being blocked from being made again. That is what I am wondering if we can do here. Lazypub (talk)
but the file is totally useless. It serves one purposes - self-promotion by a non-notable entity. Who, as I previously pointed out, is a globally blocked sock-puppet. Lazypub (talk) 18:31, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
See what I mean about the sock puppets Lazypub (talk)

Deleted: Out of scope. --DaB. (talk) 15:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE / private photoalbum low quality, unidentifiable content A.Savin 13:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yep yet again when I try to give wikipedia my images they just get deleted. Bit sick of it guys, you especially Mr Savin are not very nice about it. I have tens of thousands of images and I just don't know when they're good or not. Cheers E.3 (talk) 13:54, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of Com:PS. Hanooz 13:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the source page, this portrait dates from 1955, not the "1940s" as claimed. As such it is still under copyright in the UK until after 2025. --Rrburke (talk) 14:18, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:03, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source page dates this portrait "circa 1950", not "1940s" as claimed. Even if we can assume the author is unknown, 1950 is less than 70 years ago. Rrburke (talk) 14:25, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:03, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Yuanga (talk) 16:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Yuanga (talk) 16:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, Adrian Piper, am the owner (and subject) of this image, and wish to withdraw it from Wikimedia Commons. 77.191.90.73 16:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The image is in use on several other projects and has a valid OTRS ticket. Sender to OTRS is not identical to Adrain Piper. The subject on the photograph clearly approved having her picture taken. No valid reason for deletion stated. Speedy keep. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Agree with above. If an OTRS agent sees a problem with the ticket, they should bring it up here; in the absence of that, I see no reason for deletion. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 02:41, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DaB. (talk) 15:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Adam Kimberley as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image is the sole property of Adrian Piper, who has not given permission for it to be used on Wikimedia Commons and niether has she given permission to any OTRS agent to use the image. OTRS ticket appears valid,  Keep unless OTRS says otherwise. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 18:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted painting, cannot be released under CC by anonymous editor. Randykitty (talk) 18:33, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 02:04, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, Adrian Piper, am the owner of this image, and wish to withdraw it from Wikimedia Commons. 77.191.90.73 16:39, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The image is in use on several other projects and has a valid OTRS ticket. No valid reason for deletion stated. Speedy keep. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Agree with above. If an OTRS agent sees a problem with the ticket, they should bring it up here; in the absence of that, I see no reason for deletion. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 02:41, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DaB. (talk) 15:10, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Adam Kimberley as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image is the sole property of Adrian Piper, who has not given permission for it to be used on Wikimedia Commons and niether has she given permission to any OTRS agent to use the image. OTRS ticket appears valid,  Keep unless OTRS says otherwise. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:15, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 10:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted painting, cannot be released under CC by anonymous editor. Randykitty (talk) 18:35, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 02:04, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, Adrian Piper, am the owner of this image, and wish to withdraw it from Wikimedia Commons. 77.191.90.73 16:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment If an OTRS agent sees a problem with the ticket, they should bring it up here; in the absence of that, I see no reason for deletion. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 02:43, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DaB. (talk) 15:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Adam Kimberley as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image is the sole property of Adrian Piper, who has not given permission for it to be used on Wikimedia Commons and niether has she given permission to any OTRS agent to use the image. OTRS ticket appears valid,  Keep unless OTRS says otherwise. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 10:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted artwork, cannot be released under CC by anonymous editor. Randykitty (talk) 18:35, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 02:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, Adrian Piper, am the owner of this image, and wish to withdraw it from Wikimedia Commons. 77.191.90.73 16:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The image is in use on several other projects and has a valid OTRS ticket. No valid reason for deletion stated. Speedy keep. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:15, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Agree with above. If an OTRS agent sees a problem with the ticket, they should bring it up here; in the absence of that, I see no reason for deletion. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 02:37, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DaB. (talk) 15:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Adam Kimberley as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image is the sole property of Adrian Piper, who has not given permission for it to be used on Wikimedia Commons and niether has she given permission to any OTRS agent to use the image. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 06:06, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission received, tag removed  Docu  at 12:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Same image as on http://www.adrianpiper.com/vs/sound_conwill.shtml but with better resolution. Seems legitimate to me, but I also left a note of this DR at en:User talk:New apra wiki master. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Even if the uploader is her (or authorized by her), it still needs an OTRS tag (it's a fairly recent upload).  Docu  at 12:20, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am the uploader and i am authorized by Adrian Piper herself to upload this image and use it in her personal article. That is true for all images used in the article Adrian Piper. If i have made a mistake or forgot something (like the OTSR tag (i don't know what it is)) let me know what to do, so that there are no further problems with the images. Thanks for your help. New apra wiki master (talk) 13:16, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It should not be really necessary, but this image will be safer on Commons if you could send permission of a valid license to COM:OTRS from an email in the adrianpiper.com domain. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 06:09, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, AGF on uploaders behalf, added {{OTRS pending}}. Kameraad Pjotr 12:05, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted painting, cannot be released under CC by anonymous editor. Randykitty (talk) 18:35, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 02:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, Adrian Piper, am the owner of this image, and wish to withdraw it from Wikimedia Commons. 77.191.90.73 16:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The image is in use on several other projects and has a valid OTRS ticket. No valid reason for deletion stated. Speedy keep. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Agree with above. If an OTRS agent sees a problem with the ticket, they should bring it up here; in the absence of that, I see no reason for deletion. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 02:41, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DaB. (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Adam Kimberley as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image is the sole property of Adrian Piper, who has not given permission for it to be used on Wikimedia Commons and niether has she given permission to any OTRS agent to use the image. OTRS ticket appears valid,  Keep unless OTRS says otherwise. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I asked if a OTRS-volunteer can check the permission, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard&oldid=571128956#Deletion_request_work_by_Adrian_Piper . Elly (talk) 21:17, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: has been kept by another admin. --JuTa 15:05, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:14, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:14, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted artwork, cannot be released under CC by anonymous editor. Randykitty (talk) 18:37, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 02:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, Adrian Piper, am the owner of this image, and wish to withdraw it from Wikimedia Commons. 77.191.90.73 16:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The image is in use on several other projects and has a valid OTRS ticket. No valid reason for deletion stated. Speedy keep. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DaB. (talk) 15:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Adam Kimberley as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image is the sole property of Adrian Piper, who has not given permission for it to be used on Wikimedia Commons and niether has she given permission to any OTRS agent to use the image. OTRS ticket appears valid,  Keep unless OTRS says otherwise. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:15, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 10:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, Adrian Piper, am the owner of this image, and wish to withdraw it from Wikimedia Commons. 77.191.90.73 16:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The image is in use on several other projects and has a valid OTRS ticket. No valid reason for deletion stated. Speedy keep. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DaB. (talk) 15:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Randykitty as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image is the sole property of Adrian Piper, who has not given permission for it to be used on Wikimedia Commons and niether has she given permission to any OTRS agent to use the image. OTRS ticket appears valid,  Keep unless OTRS says otherwise. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:14, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 10:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by John Ferne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, Adrian Piper, am the owner of this image, and wish to withdraw it from Wikimedia Commons. 77.191.90.73 16:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The image is in use on several other projects and has a valid OTRS ticket. No valid reason for deletion stated. Speedy keep. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:18, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DaB. (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Randykitty as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image is the sole property of Adrian Piper, who has not given permission for it to be used on Wikimedia Commons and niether has she given permission to any OTRS agent to use the image. OTRS ticket appears valid,  Keep unless OTRS says otherwise. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:15, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 10:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:17, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:17, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, Adrian Piper, am the owner of this image, and wish to withdraw it from Wikimedia Commons. 77.191.90.73 16:46, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The image is in use on several other projects and has a valid OTRS ticket. No valid reason for deletion stated. Speedy keep. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johny Ripper (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JorgeQuinteroD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author - no self. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:54, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from the web (Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/XhamiaEEpermeShipkovice/photos/a.186902378135848/186902381469181/?type=1&theater ) Albinfo (talk) 17:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 17:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 17:53, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged as no source by Magog the Ogre. It has a source. Photo is copyrighted per source "Photo (C) RMN-Grand Palais (Château de Versailles) / Gérard Blot" Abzeronow (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Foto of a 3d-art-work. --DaB. (talk) 15:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:03, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:30, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:33, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:33, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:33, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad upload Ciobyk (talk) 18:18, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Double. --DaB. (talk) 15:34, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:18, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:22, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an own work. Is it? E4024 (talk) 18:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an own work. E4024 (talk) 18:28, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:28, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:28, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:29, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:30, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an own work. E4024 (talk) 18:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--Masalli qasimli (talk) 10:44, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Author is now clear. --DaB. (talk) 15:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blank photo Snowdawg (talk) 20:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a rendering issue, the svg isn't blank. --Didym (talk) 00:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The SVG looks good. --DaB. (talk) 15:40, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.gettyimages.dk/detail/news-photo/danzig-nazis-accorded-a-tremendous-welcome-to-the-german-news-photo/90759216 Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:59, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fenders / mudguards not original. Have been altered and are from an SK not NG MrCatfluf (talk) 21:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: File is in use on en:Mercedes-Benz NG and uk:Mercedes-Benz NG, so by COM:INUSE it is not eligible for deletion on quality or accuracy grounds. See also COM:NPOV. You can, of course, update the description as appropriate. --bjh21 (talk) 18:54, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Bjh21.--AutomobilePassion (talk) 18:55, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DaB. (talk) 15:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to https://www.ulysses-network.eu/profiles/individual/26133/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:13, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t delete this file. I am Yury Medianik and I fully own copyright for this image. It has been uploaded on Flickr with the Creative Commons license since I wanted to make it publicly available. The link mentioned above is a profile created by me, where I used the same image. I have sent a related request to OTRS team to state that this image can be used under the Creative Commons license. Please advise on the next steps. --Ymedianik (talk) 09:05, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2018122810002283 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS-receivment. --DaB. (talk) 15:43, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative photo of a non-free sculpture. Freedom of panorama exists for the interior of public buildings in the Netherlands, but the "public" criterion requires free access without being charged an entrance fee. Madame Tussaud's would certainly not fall into this category. De728631 (talk) 21:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:43, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos from a sockpuppet account (see w:ikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stmarksmissionary/Archive). Vanjagenije (talk) 21:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:44, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Structure of zirconocene.svg. Leyo 21:57, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:45, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced in en:Rosenthal's reagent and de:Rosenthal-Reagenz. Leyo 22:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 16:46, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced in en:Rosenthal's reagent and de:Rosenthal-Reagenz. Leyo 22:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 16:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced in en:Rosenthal's reagent and de:Rosenthal-Reagenz. Leyo 22:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 16:52, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned. Leyo 22:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (slightly poorer than File:Electrontransfermechanismjonesgroup1.jpg). --DMacks (talk) 18:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/probably replaced by a better alternative. Leyo 22:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (Reaction of zirconocene dichloride with n-BuLi.svg is the replacment). --DMacks (talk) 17:30, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Turkmen talk 07:46, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - taken from https://www.i-group.de/ueber-uns/team.html. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JochSejo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Not own work, author Christer Johansson as per exif. --Gbawden (talk) 12:01, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/probably replaced by a better alternative. Leyo 22:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 13:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical map without a source. Rapsar (talk) 06:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:52, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical battle formation with no source. Also, the drawing is so amateur, doesn't have any encyclopedic value. Rapsar (talk) 06:54, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:52, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical map with no source. Rapsar (talk) 06:56, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:52, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was marked as {{Copyvio}} but Per COM:Currency, the copyright on this Italian lira is very likely expired. Abzeronow (talk) 15:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: {{PD-old-100-expired}}. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Evgeniy Yakubovski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 24 July 2019 (UTC) Конечно, мне бы хотелось чтобы мои уничтоженные файлы восстановили. Их качество соответствует опубликованным двум статьям по гидродинамике. Но как мне кажется что это невозможно.[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:39, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Waztok44 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LX as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Just another non-free image from the Internet. See Commons:Image casebook#Internet images. Not sure it comes from an official Facebook account. So not sure it can be considered under PD. Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:30, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why would appearing on Facebook make it "considered under PD" (whatever that means)? Nothing in Canadian copyright laws places recent government works into the public domain unless explicitly released. The comment on the file description that "Photo was placed on Facebook using the 'Public' setting" has no bearing on its copyright status. Accessible by the public ≠ in the public domain. LX (talk, contribs) 12:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Canadian military images are not PD. --Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, nonsense Ymblanter (talk) 16:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image SpockKaty68 (talk) 03:34, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 18:05, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not load correctly Ciobyk (talk) 18:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

please delete. --Thiotrix (talk) 21:51, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The file was moved from ro-wp – was it damaged there too? --DaB. (talk) 15:32, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: F7. --Gbawden (talk) 11:50, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce blason est raté et incohérent. Warinhari (talk) 19:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete fictionnal, not in use => out of scope Kathisma (talk) 14:07, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:48, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Turkmen talk 07:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 01:16, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could not be identified on german Wikipedia identification help page, and there are many identified Ichneumoniodae and ~500 photos of unidentified Ichneumonidae, most of them in better quality. So this image isn't useful at all in Wikimedia projects. (Uploader request) Biodehio (talk) 08:50, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 01:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, and could not be identified on german Wikipedia identification help page. Uploader request. Biodehio (talk) 08:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 01:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Author died in 1972: http://es.biblioteca-virtual.wikia.com/wiki/Marcelo_Fox Smooth O (talk) 10:29, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 01:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked as {{Copyvio}} but this Polish bank note from 1936 is PD. Abzeronow (talk) 15:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: file is public domain. --Mates (talk) 01:30, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in declined draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 01:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Quynhmaito (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 01:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm unable to update my file. ชาวไทย (talk) 09:00, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid deletion reason. Uploader has uploaded newer versions and removed DE text from file summary without updating this page. --Green Giant (talk) 13:20, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not finished Gmarru (talk) 12:58, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gmarru: Hello. Would you consider solving it by uploading a new version after you finish it? --Mates (talk) 01:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This could quite easily be represented using a wikitable. --Green Giant (talk) 13:21, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:22, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RuinarteUK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdNZSBjz8S6fVq1jXIXrimg

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:00, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:24, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is taken from this website. The uploader probably has the rights to the image, but since it can be found on the internet, the permission needs to go through OTRS Mbch331 (talk) 21:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:26, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

since its my work and I do not want anyone to use it. 69.157.127.186 21:58, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: If you are the author, please send evidence to OTRS. --Green Giant (talk) 13:39, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the same file is uploaded at de:File:Döberle.png there is "Ondřej Vašata Muzeum Podkrkonoší Trutnov" given as author with a creationdate around 1940. So this isn't a photo from uploader and permission is needed Quedel (talk) 11:23, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:44, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

неправильное перенаправление Панн (talk) 18:35, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused redirect to File:Velokort, Kiev.jpg. — putnik 15:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate picture Xaruf2 (talk) 19:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaruf2: Duplicate of what file? 11:50, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:16, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete duplicated file, It's calvinist church, not cathlolic: see File:Szentgyörgyvölgy reftemplom szemből.JPG Iulius Aegidius (talk) 20:39, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE, deletion tag already removed. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be now redundant to File:Strait of dover STS106-718-28.jpg, which has had similar adjustments applied at higher resolution. --ghouston (talk) 23:47, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE - will tag as duplicate instead. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at the MD. See TP (both, of the user and of the file) and other uploads by this person also. E4024 (talk) 18:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:22, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MD not clear. I asked the uploader about this file but received no information. Dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 18:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:22, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to still be in copyright in Russia. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:09, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is still copyrighted in the source country, the UK, because the photographer, Walter Stoneman, died in 1958, which is less than 70 years ago. Rrburke (talk) 16:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment. On further review, Walter Stoneman's photographs were commissioned by the National Portrait Gallery for their National Photographic Record project.[4] As the gallery is a non-departmental public body of the UK government, the works are probably subject to Crown copyright, meaning that their UK copyrights expired 50 years after their creation. In that case, the photographs are all out of copyright in the UK. Additionally, since their copyrights had expired as of the URAA date of January 1, 1996, they are in the public domain in the United States as well. I think the files should be kept. Nevertheless I think the deletion discussion should proceed in case others have more to add. --Rrburke (talk) 13:17, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep (as nominator): subject to Crown copyright, so out of copyright in the UK; all copyrights had expired as of the URAA date, so PD in the US as well. --Rrburke (talk) 13:17, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I've updated the copyright tag accordingly. However I would note that NDPBs like the NPG are not part of the Crown; indeed, the Museums and Galleries Act 1992 explicitly states that it's not part of the Crown. I suspect, though, that before 1992 the NPG was part of the Crown, so Crown Copyright might plausibly have applied in this case. --bjh21 (talk) 18:07, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: looks OK now. --JuTa 17:39, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]