Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/10/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 24th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Radheysolarenergy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:33, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:37, 24 Oktober 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://twitter.com/sehnaz_ates --Krdbot 19:11, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pommier_aux_fruits_rouges,1902,huile_sur_toile,85,1_x_118,7cm.jpg, which I didn't see before I uploaded it. Chialynn (talk) 13:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:25, 24 Oktober 2018 UTC: duplicate --Krdbot 19:11, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Requests Immediate Deletion. Permission for photography inside museum not asked for. Author only found out after uploading the photographs that special permission is required to take photographs inside the museum. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 15:48, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 16:07, 24 Oktober 2018 UTC: Derivative work of non-free content (F3): Author Requests Immediate Deletion. --Krdbot 19:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a screenshot of copyrighted software, and cannot be licensed as claimed here ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:26, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy delete copyright violation. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:49, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: vandalism is deleted on sight. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replacing the copyvio tag as instructed FiveStudiosInteractive (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy for copyvio anyway. --Jcb (talk) 23:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Origem (source) = google / Autor (author) = nao sei infelizmente (I do not know unfortunately) ? internet copy O revolucionário aliado (talk) 20:53, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jdx at 01:54, 25 Oktober 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Grabbed from the Web, e.g. https://papodehomem.com.br/as-35-cidades-onde-ha-mais-excluidos-no-brasil/ --Krdbot 07:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same JPG file exists (File:BelangerSite.jpg), no PDF needed Joschi71 (talk) 17:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete. Another reupload of a previously deleted image. See the user's logs and the deleted pages and [1]. Also, it's a photo of a former politician that the user keeps inserting out of context in fr- and en- Wikipedia articles about an apparently unrelated topic. May be some strange case of vandalism. -- Asclepias (talk) 02:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:51, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wdajcz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

7 book covers, I doubt about whether they are in scope, besides that I wonder if the artwork is own work or a derivative of others work (we'd need permission)

Basvb (talk) 19:27, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment the images seem to come from Commons (although not sourced), see e.g. File:Clematis tangutica (zaadpluis) 01.JPG for File:Okładka VII.png. Jcb (talk) 19:30, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Then let's focus mainly on the scope question, if they are in scope some minor effort can be made to find the originals. Basvb (talk) 13:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wdajcz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Delete all files uploaded by this user. Probably uploaded by Włodzimierz Dajcz in order to promote his books [2]. Images in small resolution, not in use

Traumrune (talk) 21:37, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission since 17 October 2018. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:28, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ali ir960 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Book covers and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:51, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:37, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely {{Own}} authorship Discasto talk 18:47, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: obvious copyvio. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:16, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Higher quality version at File:A. K. Antony at the Bi-annual Naval Commanders' Conference 2013 in New Delhi on May 14, 2013. The Defence Secretary, Shri Shashikant Sharma and the Chief of Naval Staff, Admiral D.K. Joshi are also seen.jpg duplicate|1=File:A. K. Antony at the Bi-annual Naval Commanders' Conference 2013 in New Delhi on May 14, 2013. The Defence Secretary, Shri Shashikant Sharma and the Chief of Naval Staff, Admiral D.K. Joshi are also seen.jpg|3=Sarvatra}} —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 07:55, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate-processed per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:43, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - used previously here + here --Alaa :)..! 16:36, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 19:21, 25 Oktober 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file --Krdbot 07:06, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems unlikely to be "own work" Larry Hockett (talk) 13:50, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:42, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original image was uploaded to Wikipedia in 2016, but it matches the picture on the cover of Carolyn Wyman's book Better Than Homemade that was published in 2014. This may be a copyright violation and should be deleted under the precautionary principle. xplicit 01:33, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personally Obaidur Rahaman Mondal (talk) 01:36, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:59, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ayushthakur2000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:14, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging; the details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative works.

xplicit 06:39, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:15, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging; the details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative works.

xplicit 06:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:15, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging; the details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative works.

xplicit 06:45, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:15, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:15, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lennybd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:15, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:16, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcelo Núñez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 11:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:16, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Midas King (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personall photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 11:41, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:16, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:44, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:17, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muraad Barakat Al-Amoody (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This is no social media site like facebook nor a private photo album. No contributions to any wm project.

Achim (talk) 14:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:17, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:18, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:18, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only half a photo; not well updated JopkeB (talk) 04:44, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:36, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only half a picture JopkeB (talk) 06:17, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only half a picture JopkeB (talk) 06:18, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only half a picture JopkeB (talk) 06:19, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only half a picture JopkeB (talk) 06:19, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 06:41, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:38, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project wscope. Article was deleted in en.wiki due to non-notability. Taivo (talk) 09:27, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:39, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:23, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope self promotion Perumalism (talk) 11:59, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:42, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sibtain 007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. Out of scope.

Castillo blanco (talk) 12:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:43, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:41, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:44, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:48, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – serves no educational purpose. This isn't an actual logo of Apple Inc.; this is just the word "Apple" rendered in 3D. IagoQnsi (talk) 13:55, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:47, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:47, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ernacius (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial flags of questionable notability. Unused or used in fictitious draft.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:48, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LuanLoud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by LuanLoud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:49, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LuanLoud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused out of scope election materials

Cabayi (talk) 12:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LuanLoud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Almost small sizes without EXIFs, unlikely to be own works, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Al_kapone.jpg has "FBMD" in the EXIFs

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:29, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LuanLoud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST - unused, low quality images of non-notable person. Descriptions of "larouchedddddddddddddddddddddd" and "ddddddddddddddd" also possibly telling.

Эlcobbola talk 22:23, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nevermind - images speedied per above. --Эlcobbola talk 22:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bastian St Claire (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:56, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:57, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BaskyM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:59, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:59, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:59, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Basant Nayak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:00, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:01, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:01, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license detected on the artist page, no permission provided either Sleeps-Darkly (talk) 05:18, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:07, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from various websites (maybe mirrored image), and here with in-image watermark...obvious promotional rather than COM:EDUSE DMacks (talk) 05:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As I took the photo out back in my warehouse its impossible that this image appears on various websites.... I'm the one who took it! I had no idea that the community was so sensitive to watermarking, I will gladly remove the watermark. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valvsourceamerica (talk • contribs) 12:08, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that explains why it matches the image at [3]. Yes, please do remove the COM:WATERMARK to enable more re-usability of this image. Withdrawn. DMacks (talk) 18:23, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Sealle (talk) 16:08, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License at source says CC BY-NC-SA -- incorrectly licensed. Lymantria (talk) 09:22, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:08, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafael mz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:45, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:10, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged for Speedy Delete by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio and the most recent rationale was: Found everywhere such as http://www.vervepics.com/american. On Flickr, the photo is listed as "Taken on January 9, 2011" with a free cc-by-sa 2.0 license. However, this file is small and not a hi-res original as one would expect from the copyright owner. Also, it was found elsewhere on the Web as early as  Nov 18, 2010‎, in the newspaper theaustralian.com.au online, thus suspected as a Flickr license wash. ‎  JGHowes  talk 13:45, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have very little experience at dealing with copyright issues, so I could neither support nor oppose this request. All I can say is that this image must have been taken in the 80s, as Hicks died in 1994. I don't know what this date on Flickr could be referring to. I can see why you are concerned about possible copyvio issues with this file. The only reason I brought it to your attention is because I wanted to know if there is a way to know for sure that this file is problematic. Radiphus (talk) 15:50, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:12, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:47, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Linseedoil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from modern art.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:13, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kikka Regna92 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 16:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WilliamsS.wu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:14, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Minhazkhanraper Devid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotion of another rapper, out of project scope. No contribs to any wm project.

Achim (talk) 14:36, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:14, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Be sunf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:02, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Selvam HYm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only 16 photos whose for 13 of them, the subject is himself and friends

Civa (talk) 08:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Selvam HYm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:07, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:09, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:09, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:11, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:12, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:12, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:09, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Best stylish mumbai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:13, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:14, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:14, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:14, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:14, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bigg-Lyte64 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:20, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:21, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:21, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mors maku (talk · contribs)

[edit]

likely copyright violations. web-quality, no EXIF.

Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:21, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:17, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mors maku (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:28, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:54, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, accidentally uploaded in batch Flickr upload Mindmatrix 18:02, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional map, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:23, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional upload, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:22, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Míša Krausová 2010.jpg. E4024 (talk) 18:58, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:20, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:59, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pure prank @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 19:35, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Only used in user's sandbox on en.wiki and in their declined autobiography at en:Draft:Tipusam. Sam Sailor 20:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:18, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope personal image. Jayantanth (talk) 20:43, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:17, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only half a picture, upload was not completee JopkeB (talk) 20:48, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:17, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and not in use. Editor's only edits on en.wiki has been to promote himself in his declined autobiography at en:Draft:Tipusam. Sam Sailor 21:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:16, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not original photographs, derivative works of copyrighted broadcasts.

Ytoyoda (talk) 00:19, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete photos of images on jumbotrons and similar screens. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:39, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:57, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging; the details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.

xplicit 03:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, and thanks for your message and concern; actually these are gifts to me from my sibbling as just remembrance of affection, I have no objection to the deletion and very sincerely yours, Judgefloro 03:18, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small, better alternatives available SecretName101 (talk) 05:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear importance SecretName101 (talk) 09:23, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:50, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, blurred and unused image, out of scope B dash (talk) 09:38, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 13:15, 31 Oktober 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Leo%Skyboy.jpg --Krdbot 19:55, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nahfudbacar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MahbubPathan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:19, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Felypearaujo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work Ymblanter (talk) 14:44, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: with {{PD-textlogo}}. --Jcb (talk) 22:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vinod r gupta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from posters. Should be blanked to keep.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magicianpandey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lesvieuxlongwy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works, dubious licensing.

Sealle (talk) 16:30, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inadequate license SecretName101 (talk) 18:07, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:26, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is unclear why this photo should be in the public domain in Canada. The relevant term for expiration of copyright is 50 years either from the year of first publication or from the death of the author. Since the author is unknown and the image is from 1969, it cannot be free until 2020. De728631 (talk) 02:58, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zamknięcie dzialalności 95.51.26.113 09:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Reason translated from Polish by Google: "Closing the business" - that's not grounds for deletion, on the contrary, might be interesting in the future as a "historical" image of Włókiennicza Street in Białystok. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:07, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, spider is not identified Papuass (talk) 09:06, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use on a Wikidata user page. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:10, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Dw no source since (dw no source since) MB-one (talk) 21:38, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as COM:Deminimis. --MB-one (talk) 21:39, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Besides no COM:FOP in France. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:45, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: i don't think, FOP is relevant here at all. --MB-one (talk) 06:52, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The large and prominent photo of a car in this image doesn't qualify as COM:DM. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:16, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 16:08, 1 November 2018 UTC: No permission since 24 October 2018 - --Krdbot 19:53, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation? Joschi71 (talk) 17:18, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:25, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:22, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this guy is a relatively well-known researcher. For this reason I added his image. I linked it with the Wikidata entry. DD063520 — Preceding unsigned comment added by DD063520 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Didym (talk) 17:56, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:55, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Seite wurde versehentlich von mir angelegt. Ich wollte eigentlich eine Kategorie anlegen. JoeHard (talk) 18:43, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. --Didym (talk) 17:55, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No date of creation is given, Octover 24st 2018 is definetly untrue. But thereÄs also no hint, that this image is already 60 years old Marcus Cyron (talk) 03:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright held by Paul Anderson SecretName101 (talk) 06:30, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:54, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 06:41, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:54, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work as stated Plrk (talk) 07:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar file, with lower resolution in same Category 'Douglas, Alaska' Gillfoto 20:11, 24 October 2018 (UTC)


Kept: I'm not able to see that "Similar file". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably grabbed from the web. very low resolution, no meta data. in https://www.tripmondo.com/albania/qarku-i-vlores/shale/#images-13 it says that it is originally from gazment skendaj on panoramio.com. Can also be found on other websites Albinfo (talk) 20:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:44, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

most probably grabbed from the web, see https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/116584181/ - no educational value Albinfo (talk) 20:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:43, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found at https://www.morgagni-prizes.com/morgagni-prizes-2010-winners/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:42, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad source information, no evidence for the cc license 94.216.33.212 20:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad source information, no evidence for the cc license 94.216.33.212 20:43, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La licencia CC como autor no corresponde con la descripción donde se indic que el autor es otro distinto a quién la ha subido. Nachosan (talk) 21:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - no permission - all permissions must be sent to OTRS. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found at https://www.morgagni-prizes.com/morgagni-prizes-2010-winners/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:11, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:37, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:348A4596-Edit.jpg - here, with the photographer's signature on it. Please delete this one and leave the other. Ldorfman (talk) 21:40, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:32, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

About a Policy Olecranon11 (talk) 16:31, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:37, 4 Dezember 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion an hour after uploading - this image seems to be a copyright violation --Krdbot 19:38, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Double exemplaire Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 14:48, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Déposer par accident Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 13:35, 13 December 2018 (UTC)


Deleted: duplicate. --Amada44  talk to me 11:57, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Double exemplaire Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 14:53, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Déposer par accident Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 13:44, 13 December 2018 (UTC)


Deleted: duplicate. --Amada44  talk to me 11:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from medal. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 17:38, 14 Januar 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:Glenn Curtiss Medal awarded to David H. McCulloch.jpg --Krdbot 19:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a photograph of a copyrighted graphic Catrìona (talk) 11:47, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Its an official document of people killed by the Nazis. There is no copyright on Nazi documents.--Partynia (talk) 12:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There is a "copyright on Nazi documents", but this particular graphic is too simple to be copyrightable. --Rosenzweig τ 18:21, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source from the original satellite, may be copyrighted B dash (talk) 08:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope commons Is not a social media site. Creation of promotional content on userpage ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:19, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep In use (WP user page selfie). If you think it shouldn't be in use, then take that up with WP. However, AIUI, such images are permissible on en:WP user pages, and they are acceptable to Commons, rather than local hosting on a single WP (mostly to avoid having to duplicate them across multiple WPs). Andy Dingley (talk) 16:30, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio- see here --Alaa :)..! 16:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS permission received. --Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE (es:Fernando Algaba). Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:17, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep In use (WP user page selfie). If you think it shouldn't be in use, then take that up with WP. However, AIUI, such images are permissible on WP user pages, and they are acceptable to Commons, rather than local hosting on a single WP (mostly to avoid having to duplicate them across multiple WPs). Andy Dingley (talk) 00:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. no longer is use. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded incorrect file which has writings on it Today Testing (talk) 19:53, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is slightly twisted. Not used in Wikipedia. Roderich Kahn (talk) 09:49, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted per COM:CSD#G7 as it's an uploader's request a few days after the image was uploaded (uploader could have used a speedy deletion request for quicker processing). --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:04, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:37, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a cropping (derivative work) from http://www.ziemiamyslenicka.pl/media/photo/17003 --WTM (talk) 16:44, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:37, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book design by Alexander Rodchenko (d. 1956), not free yet. Retired electrician (talk) 17:27, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-portrait by Alexander Rodchenko (d. 1956) - not free yet. Retired electrician (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Left: Self-portrait by Alexander Rodchenko (d. 1956) - not free yet. The photo on the right is free (File:1935-alexander rodschenko.jpg). Retired electrician (talk) 17:53, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are various issues with this recreation of a number plate. The biggest problems are:

Since this image conveys incorrect information and we have other, correct images, I don't think this image is educationally useful. -- Universalamateur (talk) 16:04, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The picture is is use on ja:欧州連合のナンバープレート, pt:Placas de identificação de veículos na União Europeia, ru:Автомобильные номерные знаки Европейского союза, sr:Регистарске ознаке у Европи, uk:Реєстраційні знаки транспортних засобів Європейського Союзу, and zh:欧盟车辆号牌. Per COM:INUSE it is thus presumed to be of educational use. Commons should not delete files that other projects are depending on just because we think they're inaccurate. --bjh21 (talk) 10:41, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
All pages that used the picture are translations of either en:Vehicle registration plates of the European Union or en:Vehicle registration plates of Europe. I replaced the picture by everywhere. The only usage left is ca:User:Lalpino/proves/Plaques de matrícula de la UE. --Universalamateur (talk) 15:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Right. So long as those changes don't get reverted, I have no objection to deletion. --bjh21 (talk) 22:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:17, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is not BY John Thomas Serres - it is by an unknown artist. A (possibly optimistic) auctioneer has described it as being by an artist 'in the circle of' John Thomas Serres. It should not be the work illustrated on the Wikipedia page for John Thomas Serres. 86.183.166.167 20:11, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why should the picture be deleted, what is the reason? Why do you not give a reference for your information? What should be on Wikipedia or not, you have to clarify there. --Trzęsacz (talk) 20:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep None of these is a reason for deletion. If the filename is wrong, ask for it to be corrected. If the attribution is wrong, edit it. If the image is misused on a Wikipedia, correct that Wikipedia. --bjh21 (talk) 10:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
agree with @Bjh21, the picture is used on several pages; by all means update the artist name, but do not delete the file. Somej (talk) 06:49, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COPYRIGHTED WORK BY Yuyanapaq Lum Carlos Domínguez (d. 1968), missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:05, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COM:LL, permission of painter needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 00:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 11:11, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Extremely old drawings do not have unlimited copyright regardless of their status. No valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 23:57, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 11:11, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Extremely old drawings do not have unlimited copyright regardless of their status. No valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 23:57, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 11:11, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Extremely old drawings do not have unlimited copyright regardless of their status. No valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 23:58, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 11:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Extremely old drawings do not have unlimited copyright regardless of their status. No valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 23:58, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 11:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Non-copyright restriction. See COM:FOP Italy. --Majora (talk) 23:58, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 11:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Non-copyright restriction. No valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 23:59, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 11:21, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Non-copyright restriction. Nothing copyrightable in that photo anyways. No valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 11:21, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Non-copyright restriction of a very old device whose creator is long dead. No valid reason to delete this in use photo. --Majora (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D. Lgs. 42/2004 Fabrizioberloco (talk) 13:54, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Extremely old drawings do not have unlimited copyright regardless of their status. No valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 00:01, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a {{Tasnim}} work. No attribution to any of their in-house photographers. Therefore, {{Tasnim}} license conditions are not satisfied. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:25, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • This file is a tasnim work.See here:

https://www.tasnimnews.com/ar/news/2017/03/06/1347348/%D8%A2%DB%8C%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87-%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF-%D8%B3%D8%B9%DB%8C%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AD%DA%A9%DB%8C%D9%85-%D9%86%D8%AD%D9%86-%D9%81%DB%8C-%D8%A3%D8%B4%D8%AF%D9%91-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%82%D9%84%D9%82-%D8%B9%D9%84%DB%8C%DA%A9%D9%85 Tasnimnew news is liscened under CC by 4.0 so therefore this image can be used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tubi719 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not. If it were, it would have Tasnim logo and the usual black credit line with the photographer's name on it. Launched in 2012, Tasnim is a rather young news agency. But the photo seems to be old. Logically, the photo cannot be a Tasnim work. Please read the content of Template:Tasnim. Thank you. 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:32, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Doesn't appear to be a Tasnim work. --Majora (talk) 00:02, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior-quality reupload of File:Skype logo.svg IagoQnsi (talk) 16:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:12, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not the current Thai highway route shield. (That route is highway not motorway) Boyz 1412 (talk) 16:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It not being current is not a valid reason for deletion. It could be potentially useful to show the changes that have been made over time. --Majora (talk) 00:42, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not the current Thai highway route shield. (That route is highway not motorway) Boyz 1412 (talk) 16:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It not being current is not a valid reason for deletion. It could be potentially useful to show the changes that have been made over time. --Majora (talk) 00:42, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not the current Thai highway route shield. (That route is highway not motorway) Boyz 1412 (talk) 16:15, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It not being current is not a valid reason for deletion. It could be potentially useful to show the changes that have been made over time. --Majora (talk) 00:43, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not the current Thai highway route shield. (That route is highway not motorway) Boyz 1412 (talk) 16:16, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It not being current is not a valid reason for deletion. It could be potentially useful to show the changes that have been made over time. --Majora (talk) 00:43, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 10:36, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-art. --Majora (talk) 20:08, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 10:36, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Extremely old material like this does not maintain copyright indefinitely. The law you cite is a non-copyright restriction anyways. --Majora (talk) 20:10, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 10:38, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in Italy. Explaination and artwork around it would be new enough to still be in copyright. --Majora (talk) 20:11, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 10:47, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Extremely old material like this does not maintain copyright indefinitely. The law you cite is a non-copyright restriction anyways. --Majora (talk) 20:04, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 10:47, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-art. --Majora (talk) 20:05, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 10:48, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Extremely old material like this does not maintain copyright indefinitely. The law you cite is a non-copyright restriction anyways. --Majora (talk) 20:07, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 10:48, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Extremely old material like this does not maintain copyright indefinitely. The law you cite is a non-copyright restriction anyways. --Majora (talk) 20:07, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 10:51, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Extremely old material like this does not maintain copyright indefinitely. The law you cite is a non-copyright restriction anyways. --Majora (talk) 20:07, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad "duplicate" of File:Agropit9.svg Hystrix (talk) 10:55, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. OTRS permission tag has been applied to the other image. --Majora (talk) 19:57, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not linked by any articles, and superceded by File:Window function and frequency response - Confined Gaussian (sigma t = 0.1).svg Bob K (talk) 14:52, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nothing wrong with having two different versions of something. Superseded is not a sufficient reason for deletion in most cases. --Majora (talk) 19:56, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not linked by any articles, and superceded by File:Window function and frequency response - Approximate confined Gaussian (sigma t = 0.1).svg Bob K (talk) 14:57, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nothing wrong with having two different versions of something. Superseded is not a sufficient reason for deletion in most cases. --Majora (talk) 19:56, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the same image from the source, unknown copyright status. B dash (talk) 08:56, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It is just a color shifted version of the original. I updated the source link on the file page to the original source as well. --Majora (talk) 03:30, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

if this is a photo of a postcard it is the image on the postcard that needs to show that the original photographer has released it for use and not the photo of the probably copyrighted image. Domdeparis (talk) 15:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Derivative work. --Majora (talk) 04:35, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inaccurate image created by myself. I want to eliminate it. Levi bernardo 04:07, 24 October 2018 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The person who created this image is listed as Paleonychus. --Majora (talk) 02:46, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Дагиров Умар as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: No source. Link No to the original map. This fake. The file has been 5 years in Commons and it is used in multiple projects. Source "own work" exists. Maybe it is really own work? Taivo (talk) 09:39, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Seems plausible that this is actually own work. --Majora (talk) 00:44, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Файл изобилует неточностями. 1. В 1934 г. Ингушская и Чеченская АО были объединены в один субъект, следовательно о периоде по 1944 г. не может быть и речи, карта может быть представлена только по 1934 г. 2.ВП: Нейтральность: - Незаконно отторгнутые земли. 3. Земли были "отторгнуты" не от Ингушетии, а от ЧИАССР в 1944 г. 3. Сунженский район (на карте под номером 3) и станица Вознесенская в период с 1924 по 1934 г. в состав Ингушской АО не входили, в 1929 г. Сунженский округ (позже район) был включен в состав Чеченской АО Serzh Ignashevich (talk) 08:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is in use on azb:اینقوشتیا, ru:Ингушетия, ru:Галашкинский район, and Q4132285. COM:NPOV says that files that are used on other projects should not be deleted merely for being inaccurate. --bjh21 (talk) 12:03, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:39, 24 October 2018 (UTC) The photo was supplied by Stewart Hersey, the son of Michael Hersey, from their historical records of the Hersey business. As such we believe that the copyright is known as the source is genuine. What's more, the image is rare as it shows the method of spinning silver into candlesticks, wine coasters and Armada dishes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iano07976 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The copyright holder of a photographer is the photographer. We would need permission directly from them or their heirs if they are deceased. If you wish to do this please see COM:OTRS. --Majora (talk) 02:53, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Backlit, low quality image of a random field and path. Name appears completely made up, and was used for this purpose on enwiki. Home Lander (talk) 03:23, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Majora (talk) 19:59, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 10:37, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nomination is irrelevant since that is a non-copyright restriction but reproduction is undated so copyright of that cannot be confirmed. --Majora (talk) 19:57, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:1&1 logo.svg, which was uploaded several years earlier. This logo has a lot of unnecessary whitespace around it, but otherwise appears identical to the other one. Having two of essentially the same file is confusing. IagoQnsi (talk) 15:25, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:1&1 logo.svg is not the correct 1&1 logo, as it is not a square. The whitespace is mandatory according to 1&1's corporate styleguide which can be downloaded here. --Amaurer ui (talk) 08:55, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 19:55, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With no source for verification and a terminus ante quem of 1923, this lacks a copyright rationale to host on Commons, certainly not {{PD-old-assumed}}.

This was an interwiki transfer from en.wp by OgreBot. -- (talk) 15:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Improper use of "assumed" template and not enough information to confirm license. --Majora (talk) 19:55, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 10:38, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Cited law is a non-copyright restriction. However, the case the finger is might hold its own copyright and there is no information on when that was created or by whom. So there is insufficient information to keep it. --Majora (talk) 19:07, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 10:38, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The law cited is a non-copyright restriction. The description of this cloak, which can be seen here File:Murat's Cloak - Diocesan Museum of Altamura - Explanation.jpg (since deleted for other reasons), shows that it has existed since at least the 1700s. Copyright is not a perpetual thing and anything that old would be public domain by now. There is nothing in this photo that would still have copyright attached to it. --Majora (talk) 19:10, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 10:38, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Cited law is a non-copyright restriction but there is no information on who made the box and when on the file information template so there is insufficient information to keep it. --Majora (talk) 19:05, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 10:39, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Law cited is a non-copyright restriction. However, there is not enough information on who created this and when to confirm that the arms have fallen out of copyright. --Majora (talk) 19:12, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may not be compatible with Italian law D.lgs 42/2004 artt. 107-108 It can be released only for non-commercial purposes Fabrizioberloco (talk) 10:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Cited law is a non-copyright restriction. Per en:Gioacchino de Gemmis the object dates to, at the very latest, 1822 so it would have fallen out of copyright by now. Nothing copyrightable in this photo that merits deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:13, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gilatter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gilatter I have uploaded 4 images so far and I feel that none of them have copyright issues but I am not sure where to post the explanation. Can you help me?

  • Comment - If I read the tags correctly, File:Young David H. McCulloch with hunting dogs.jpg was taken in 1890. According to a conversation I had with Gilatter in the IRC help channel, it was taken in the US and wasn't published. Thus it would fall under "70 years PMA or, if the photographer is unknown, 120 years after creation". That one is "safe" if the creator is known and died before 1948 or if the creator is unknown.
File:David Hugh McCulloch flying an early Curtiss plane.jpg would only be "safe" if the creator is known and died before 1948; otherwise we'd have to wait until 2030 for copyright to expire.
File:David Hugh McCulloch Early Aviator -Dec 14 1917 Navy ID photo for First Transatlantic Crossing.jpg looks like (a scan of) a work of the Department of the Navy (the stamp is somewhat difficult to read). If they also took the portrait, it would be in the public domain as a work of the federal government. Huon (talk) 18:42, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the first two. Kept: the last one. The first one of him as a child cannot have been taken in 1890. Per the article the photo is being used on he was born in 1890. That's not a photo of an infant. I would say he is at most a preteen, probably younger. I'm assuming 10. So I added that photo to Category:Undelete in 2021. The second one would fall out of copyright in 2031 (not 2030 since it goes to the end of the 120th year). So I added that one to Category:Undelete in 2031 --Majora (talk) 23:55, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

web-quality, unlikely to be own work (see user's other uploads) Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:18, 24 October 2018 (UTC) Esa foto la tomé yo. Tengo la foto original, la fecha y todo lo necesario para acreditar que esa foto fue tomada por mi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Volviotucruz (talk • contribs) 18:54, 24 October 2018 (UTC) Dígame qué tengo que hacer para acreditar que esa foto es mía y yo la cedo para se utilice en la biografía que redacté para wikipedia. Gracias.[reply]


Kept: Full sized photo, with metadata, and I cannot find it present anywhere prior to being uploaded here. Looks like a photo taken at a concert. Their other uploads aside it is reasonable to believe that this is actually their own work. --Majora (talk) 23:45, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Need location and date to be sure that there is no FoP issue. The category suggests it is in Romania - Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Romania, however a search shows it is probably either in Rome (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/animalia/wp/2016/02/25/why-goats-used-to-breastfeed-human-babies/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f4f9dc944dae) - but I think the hands if the left infant are not quite right, and there appears to be another version in Georgia (http://romegeorgia.com/capwolf.html) Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:31, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This looks to me like a pretty slavish copy of the original en:Capitoline Wolf. Thus I don't think there's any originality here to be protected by copyright. --bjh21 (talk) 10:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per bjh21. Appears to be an exact copy of an already PD work. Not enough there to earn a new copyright. --Majora (talk) 23:43, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]