Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/10/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 13:08, 15 Oktober 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.facebook.com/PittyBrasill/photos/a.718225695031023/901390186714572/?type=1&theater --Krdbot 19:08, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation 淺藍雪❉ 15:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:53, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Copywrite image from web Jinoytommanjaly (talk) 19:55, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 20:03, 15 Oktober 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.lifestorybreking.com/2018/10/who-is-pandit-lachhu-maharaj.html --Krdbot 01:08, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 00:14, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Promedi isn't mentioned in en.wiki. In addition, complex logos need OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
está mal escrito Kimmiriam (talk) 01:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete no source, maybe a copyvio. --Taichi (talk) 19:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Comment Also File:BTS Foto grupal.jpg. --Taichi (talk) 19:45, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:49, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. No contribution in any Wikimedia project: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Makkad675 Yann (talk) 05:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:02, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
crop of a now deleted image ("no permission") Magnus (talk) 06:34, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, cropped from file:Julia Shaw 2017.jpg. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Rong Musthafa.ak (talk) 08:00, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
accidental upload HappeJ (talk) 08:08, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
I can't seem to find any media related to this band, but as this gallery might be under construction I will let it for what it is until its creator will add more images of the band to the gallery, otherwise it should be moved to a category. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 17:38, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Typical misuse of Commons to host Wikipedia-like content, for which Commons galleries are prime real estate. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G3 - Attempted encyclopedia article. --Эlcobbola talk 22:56, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sealle as no permission, but I cannot find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 17:29, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- What permission are we talking about? Someone uploaded a photo for Wiki Loves Monuments, and this photo is nominated for deletion just randomly, without any reason. Moreover, the nominating admin says that they can't even find a rationale for the deletion. Lodewijk, Lily, this is yet another illustration for the gravity of the situation with the harassment of WLM participants on Commons. --Alexander (talk) 07:21, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Atsirlin: I also did a reverse image search and can't find other options that closely resemble this photo. @Sealle: can you expand on the reason the photo should be deleted based on? --LilyOfTheWest (talk) 03:22, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: tagged mistakenly. --Sealle (talk) 04:48, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sealle as no permission. Maybe a russian COM:FOP case. JuTa 17:31, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: tagged mistakenly. --Sealle (talk) 04:50, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
unclear treshold/lizense (maybe better delete it) — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 09:48, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. I agree: this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
unclear treshold/lizense (maybe better delete it) — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 10:07, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. This is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
unclear treshold/lizense (maybe better delete it) — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 10:08, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. This is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Garian sambo (talk · contribs)
[edit]probably not own work, no metadata, low quality, alphanumeric filenames, probably taken from facebook or elsewhere.
- File:Xl3rS8F0Qd4.jpg
- File:TRrcDO1GbMY.jpg
- File:3y0fAP0az c.jpg
- File:DhELiMwnk7I.jpg
- File:Wll-ghsE1SQ — копия.jpg
Triplecaña (talk) 10:30, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, not own work. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Results-of-magnetron-sputtering-process-free-from-damage-target-after-the-preliminary-sputtering-test-a-nontransparent-T.jpg
[edit]
wrong description HappeJ (talk) 11:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, description can be changed, but ... uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
wrong description HappeJ (talk) 11:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, description can be corrected, but ... uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
This file is not useful --J. Ansari Talk 11:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, photo depicts uploader himself. Courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
It's not gg by 2.0 anynore 2A00:F41:388D:4921:934:9D6D:99B2:B9A0 11:55, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept, free licenses are irrevocable. The photo was reviewed by FlickrReviewer bot during upload and it was then free. If the Flickr user changed license, then it does not affect Commons. See {{Change-of-license}} for more. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Picture is no longer cc 2.0 please delete Im the owner of this picture 77.65.88.228 16:01, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. It had a valid cc 2.0 license and as previous DR said, that's irrevocable on Commons Abzeronow (talk) 16:15, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 03:43, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Personal artwork. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 12:25, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Slclyrics (talk · contribs) is self-promotion-only user. Singer Spobo isn't mentioned in en.wiki. I'll delete all his contributions due to that reason and I nominated his userpage in en.wiki for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
not the right picture Syramonwer (talk) 12:47, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SELFIE, low quality holiday snap of no educational value. Zenwort (talk) 13:05, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep cropped it - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:59, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept, the cropped version has even educational value. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SELFIE, no person of encyclopaedic relevance pictured. Zenwort (talk) 13:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep we don't have a lot of photos of men wearing headscarves for protection. And Commons is not an encyclopedia. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:26, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept, per Alexis Jazz. Taivo (talk) 12:03, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Verifiquei que as tomografias estavam espelhadas/invertidas. Arrumei o problema e preparei um novo video - que ja foi carregado no commons. Strauss MAE-USP (talk) 14:26, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:35, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Verifiquei que as tomografias estavam espelhadas/invertidas. Arrumei o problema e preparei um novo video - que ja foi carregado no commons. Strauss MAE-USP (talk) 14:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:42, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Copied from https://sungroup.hanoi.vn/tap-doan-sun-group/le-viet-lam/ AlleinStein (talk) 14:42, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The creator wants to delete it Minhngoc25a (talk) 14:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 16:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Crm.fusion (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope.
Willy1018(talk) 14:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, due to too small size, but the biggest is kept, because there exists an article en:Perficient, where we can use the logo. This is textlogo, so company permission isn't needed. Taivo (talk) 16:53, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate of File:Pershing streetwall - by Payton Chung.jpg SecretName101 (talk) 22:48, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 17:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, en:Adam O'Hara was deleted due to non-notability. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, unused selfie, the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, en:Abdallah Abdul Ghaffar was deleted due to promotionality. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. John Darque isn't mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Probably mixed up by me in 2012 while sharing photo's with someone else, there is a new picture made by me. I made a picture like this one in 2010/2011, but because the possibility exists that it isn't mine, I want it to be deleted. I already had a discussion on Facebook about this picture a few years ago, so (also if it is mine) it better can be deleted) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:00, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:00, 14 October 2018 (UTC) (I'm the nominator)
Deleted, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 12:50, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Facebook according to FBMD string on Exif data. User has a history of copyright violation. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:18, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:01, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious flag of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete screenshot of a tweet, used by Latin American teenagers about a non-sense war in SNS about K-pop singers. --Taichi (talk) 18:05, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious flag of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:16, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
The portrayed person doesn't allow this image Outilmail (talk) 05:13, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Although I recognize that the conditions (location and lighting) were far from ideal, the concert was free and open access. Photos were not prohibited. The subject's agreement was not necessary (public personality promoting her work...). And since these are the only photos we have of the subject, unless she provides high quality photos under a free license, I prefer to oppose their deletion. Okki (talk) 14:21, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:42, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
This artist doesn't work anylonger using this name and prefers keeping her identity privated. All her albums from these period (2006 - 2008) were taken down the stores and digital platformes. She hasn't worked as public artist since 2014, and has any social profiles or website anymore. This decision to have right to her private life has to be respected, specially when this artist hasn't any support of her label and the record deal was broken by them. So, there's no reason to keep these images. Outilmail (talk) 21:00, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep She may have changed her artist name (so it's better to ask for a renaming and not a deletion), but her albums are still available on Spotify with the name Aline de Lima and she still has a career in music. It should be noted that there were five Wikipedia articles under the name Aline de Lima, before you renamed it yourself a few days ago. It's not Wikimedia's role to hide factual elements to protect a person from possible aggression. Justice is there for that. Okki (talk) 07:20, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept, this is reason for renaming, not for deletion. Taivo (talk) 16:44, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The portrayed person doesn't allow this image Outilmail (talk) 05:14, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Although I recognize that the conditions (location and lighting) were far from ideal, the concert was free and open access. Photos were not prohibited. The subject's agreement was not necessary (public personality promoting her work...). And since these are the only photos we have of the subject, unless she provides high quality photos under a free license, I prefer to oppose their deletion. Okki (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:42, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
This artist doesn't work anylonger using this name and prefers keeping her identity privated. All her albums from these period (2006 - 2008) were taken down off the stores and digital platformes. She hasn't worked as public artist since 2014, and has any social profiles or website anymore. This decision to have right to her private life has to be respected, specially when this artist hasn't any support of her label and the record deal was broken by them. So, there's no reason to keep these images. Outilmail (talk) 21:01, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep She may have changed her artist name (so it's better to ask for a renaming and not a deletion), but her albums are still available on Spotify with the name Aline de Lima and she still has a career in music. It should be noted that there were five Wikipedia articles under the name Aline de Lima, before you renamed it yourself a few days ago. It's not Wikimedia's role to hide factual elements to protect a person from possible aggression. Justice is there for that. Okki (talk) 07:21, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept, this is reason for renaming, not for deletion. Taivo (talk) 16:48, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The portrayed person doesn't allow this image Outilmail (talk) 05:14, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Although I recognize that the conditions (location and lighting) were far from ideal, the concert was free and open access. Photos were not prohibited. The subject's agreement was not necessary (public personality promoting her work...). And since these are the only photos we have of the subject, unless she provides high quality photos under a free license, I prefer to oppose their deletion. Okki (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:42, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
This artist doesn't work anylonger using this name and prefers keeping her identity privated. All her albums from these period (2006 - 2008) were taken down off the stores and digital platformes. She hasn't worked as public artist since 2014, and has any social profiles or website anymore. This decision to have right to her private life has to be respected, specially when this artist hasn't any support from the label and the record deal was broken by them. So, there's no reason to keep these images. Outilmail (talk) 21:05, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep She may have changed her artist name (so it's better to ask for a renaming and not a deletion), but her albums are still available on Spotify with the name Aline de Lima and she still has a career in music. It should be noted that there were five Wikipedia articles under the name Aline de Lima, before you renamed it yourself a few days ago. It's not Wikimedia's role to hide factual elements to protect a person from possible aggression. Justice is there for that. Okki (talk) 07:22, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept, this is reason for renaming, not for deletion. Taivo (talk) 16:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The portrayed person doesn't allow this image Outilmail (talk) 05:15, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Although I recognize that the conditions (location and lighting) were far from ideal, the concert was free and open access. Photos were not prohibited. The subject's agreement was not necessary (public personality promoting her work...). And since these are the only photos we have of the subject, unless she provides high quality photos under a free license, I prefer to oppose their deletion. Okki (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:42, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
This artist doesn't work anylonger using this name and prefers keeping her identity privated. All her albums from these period (2006 - 2008) were taken down off the stores and digital platformes. She hasn't worked as public artist since 2014, and has any social profiles or website anymore. This decision to have right to her private life has to be respected, specially when this artist hasn't any support from the label and the record deal was broken by them. So, there's no reason to keep these images. Outilmail (talk) 21:03, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep She may have changed her artist name (so it's better to ask for a renaming and not a deletion), but her albums are still available on Spotify with the name Aline de Lima and she still has a career in music. It should be noted that there were five Wikipedia articles under the name Aline de Lima, before you renamed it yourself a few days ago. It's not Wikimedia's role to hide factual elements to protect a person from possible aggression. Justice is there for that. Okki (talk) 07:21, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept, this is reason for renaming, not for deletion. Taivo (talk) 16:53, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The portrayed person doesn't allow this image Outilmail (talk) 05:15, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Although I recognize that the conditions (location and lighting) were far from ideal, the concert was free and open access. Photos were not prohibited. The subject's agreement was not necessary (public personality promoting her work...). And since these are the only photos we have of the subject, unless she provides high quality photos under a free license, I prefer to oppose their deletion. Okki (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:42, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
This artist doesn't work anylonger using this name and prefers keeping her identity privated. All her albums from these period (2006 - 2008) were taken down off the stores and digital platformes. She hasn't worked as public artist since 2014, and has any social profiles or website anymore. This decision to have right to her private life has to be respected, specially when this artist hasn't any support from the label and the record deal was broken by them. So, there's no reason to keep these images. Outilmail (talk) 21:04, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep She may have changed her artist name (so it's better to ask for a renaming and not a deletion), but her albums are still available on Spotify with the name Aline de Lima and she still has a career in music. It should be noted that there were five Wikipedia articles under the name Aline de Lima, before you renamed it yourself a few days ago. It's not Wikimedia's role to hide factual elements to protect a person from possible aggression. Justice is there for that. Okki (talk) 07:21, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept, this is reason for renaming, not for deletion. Taivo (talk) 16:51, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The portrayed person doesn't allow this image Outilmail (talk) 05:16, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Although I recognize that the conditions (location and lighting) were far from ideal, the concert was free and open access. Photos were not prohibited. The subject's agreement was not necessary (public personality promoting her work...). And since these are the only photos we have of the subject, unless she provides high quality photos under a free license, I prefer to oppose their deletion. Okki (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:42, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
This artist doesn't work anylonger using this name and prefers keeping her identity privated. All her albums from these period (2006 - 2008) were taken down off the stores and digital platformes. She hasn't worked as public artist since 2014, and has any social profiles or website anymore. This decision to have right to her private life has to be respected, specially when this artist hasn't any support from the label and the record deal was broken by them. So, there's no reason to keep these images. Outilmail (talk) 21:05, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep She may have changed her artist name (so it's better to ask for a renaming and not a deletion), but her albums are still available on Spotify with the name Aline de Lima and she still has a career in music. It should be noted that there were five Wikipedia articles under the name Aline de Lima, before you renamed it yourself a few days ago. It's not Wikimedia's role to hide factual elements to protect a person from possible aggression. Justice is there for that. Okki (talk) 07:21, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept, this is reason for renaming, not for deletion. Taivo (talk) 16:55, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The portrayed person doesn't allow this image Outilmail (talk) 05:16, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Although I recognize that the conditions (location and lighting) were far from ideal, the concert was free and open access. Photos were not prohibited. The subject's agreement was not necessary (public personality promoting her work...). And since these are the only photos we have of the subject, unless she provides high quality photos under a free license, I prefer to oppose their deletion. Okki (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:42, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
This artist doesn't work anylonger using this name and prefers keeping her identity privated. All her albums from these period (2006 - 2008) were taken down off the stores and digital platformes. She hasn't worked as public artist since 2014, and has any social profiles or website anymore. This decision to have right to her private life has to be respected, specially when this artist hasn't any support from the label and the record deal was broken by them. So, there's no reason to keep these images. Outilmail (talk) 21:05, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep She may have changed her artist name (so it's better to ask for a renaming and not a deletion), but her albums are still available on Spotify with the name Aline de Lima and she still has a career in music. It should be noted that there were five Wikipedia articles under the name Aline de Lima, before you renamed it yourself a few days ago. It's not Wikimedia's role to hide factual elements to protect a person from possible aggression. Justice is there for that. Okki (talk) 07:21, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept, this is reason for renaming, not for deletion. Taivo (talk) 16:59, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The portrayed person doesn't allow this image Outilmail (talk) 05:18, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Although I recognize that the conditions (location and lighting) were far from ideal, the concert was free and open access. Photos were not prohibited. The subject's agreement was not necessary (public personality promoting her work...). And since these are the only photos we have of the subject, unless she provides high quality photos under a free license, I prefer to oppose their deletion. Okki (talk) 14:23, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:42, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
This artist doesn't work anylonger using this name and prefers keeping her identity privated. All her albums from these period (2006 - 2008) were taken down off the stores and digital platformes. She hasn't worked as public artist since 2014, and has any social profiles or website anymore. This decision to have right to her private life has to be respected, specially when this artist hasn't any support from the label and the record deal was broken by them. So, there's no reason to keep these images. Outilmail (talk) 21:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep She may have changed her artist name (so it's better to ask for a renaming and not a deletion), but her albums are still available on Spotify with the name Aline de Lima and she still has a career in music. It should be noted that there were five Wikipedia articles under the name Aline de Lima, before you renamed it yourself a few days ago. It's not Wikimedia's role to hide factual elements to protect a person from possible aggression. Justice is there for that. Okki (talk) 07:22, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept, this is reason for renaming, not for deletion. Taivo (talk) 17:02, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The portrayed person doesn't allow this image Outilmail (talk) 05:18, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Although I recognize that the conditions (location and lighting) were far from ideal, the concert was free and open access. Photos were not prohibited. The subject's agreement was not necessary (public personality promoting her work...). And since these are the only photos we have of the subject, unless she provides high quality photos under a free license, I prefer to oppose their deletion. Okki (talk) 14:23, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:42, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
This artist doesn't work anylonger using this name and prefers keeping her identity privated. All her albums from these period (2006 - 2008) were taken down off the stores and digital platformes. She hasn't worked as public artist since 2014, and has any social profiles or website anymore. This decision to have right to her private life has to be respected, specially when this artist hasn't any support from the label and the record deal was broken by them. So, there's no reason to keep these images. Outilmail (talk) 21:07, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep She may have changed her artist name (so it's better to ask for a renaming and not a deletion), but her albums are still available on Spotify with the name Aline de Lima and she still has a career in music. It should be noted that there were five Wikipedia articles under the name Aline de Lima, before you renamed it yourself a few days ago. It's not Wikimedia's role to hide factual elements to protect a person from possible aggression. Justice is there for that. Okki (talk) 07:22, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept, this is reason for renaming, not for deletion. Taivo (talk) 17:04, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The portrayed person doesn't allow this image Outilmail (talk) 05:17, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Although I recognize that the conditions (location and lighting) were far from ideal, the concert was free and open access. Photos were not prohibited. The subject's agreement was not necessary (public personality promoting her work...). And since these are the only photos we have of the subject, unless she provides high quality photos under a free license, I prefer to oppose their deletion. Okki (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:42, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
This artist doesn't work anylonger using this name and prefers keeping her identity privated. All her albums from these period (2006 - 2008) were taken down off the stores and digital platformes. She hasn't worked as public artist since 2014, and has any social profiles or website anymore. This decision to have right to her private life has to be respected, specially when this artist hasn't any support from the label and the record deal was broken by them. So, there's no reason to keep these images. Outilmail (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep She may have changed her artist name (so it's better to ask for a renaming and not a deletion), but her albums are still available on Spotify with the name Aline de Lima and she still has a career in music. It should be noted that there were five Wikipedia articles under the name Aline de Lima, before you renamed it yourself a few days ago. It's not Wikimedia's role to hide factual elements to protect a person from possible aggression. Justice is there for that. Okki (talk) 07:22, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept, this is reason for renaming, not for deletion. Taivo (talk) 17:01, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The portrayed person doesn't allow this image Outilmail (talk) 05:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Although I recognize that the conditions (location and lighting) were far from ideal, the concert was free and open access. Photos were not prohibited. The subject's agreement was not necessary (public personality promoting her work...). And since these are the only photos we have of the subject, unless she provides high quality photos under a free license, I prefer to oppose their deletion. Okki (talk) 14:23, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:42, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
This artist doesn't work anylonger using this name and prefers keeping her identity privated. All her albums from these period (2006 - 2008) were taken down off the stores and digital platformes. She hasn't worked as public artist since 2014, and has any social profiles or website anymore. This decision to have right to her private life has to be respected, specially when this artist hasn't any support from the label and the record deal was broken by them. So, there's no reason to keep these images. Outilmail (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep She may have changed her artist name (so it's better to ask for a renaming and not a deletion), but her albums are still available on Spotify with the name Aline de Lima and she still has a career in music. It should be noted that there were five Wikipedia articles under the name Aline de Lima, before you renamed it yourself a few days ago. It's not Wikimedia's role to hide factual elements to protect a person from possible aggression. Justice is there for that. Okki (talk) 07:22, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept, this is reason for renaming, not for deletion. Taivo (talk) 17:06, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Unused file, requesting deletion as author. ― Gerifalte Del Sabana 01:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Uploader's request is valid reason for deletion during first week after upload; here 10 days have passed. Photo is beautiful. Nevertheless, in my opinion we can give courtesy deletion, because there's enough crow heads in category:Corvus splendens. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:49, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Probably copyvio. Socking uploader with loads of copyvios. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:44, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:49, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
This is not the correct flag of the fransaskois, this one is. The file description itself claim to be a bad imitation of the flag. However, in its 12 years of existence, this flag has caused a lot of confusing over the true nature of fransaskois flag. Consensus was achieved on the Fransaskois page that the second flag is the correct one, as newspapers from the time it was adopted can attest. It is time to delete this fake flag once and for all. Emass100 (talk) 03:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. An SVG should not be deleted in favour of a JPEG. It should be updated to reflect the accurate design. Fry1989 eh? 17:18, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Same reason. Of course I have no issue with replacing this image with a more accurate one, but if you want to delete this flag, you first have to make sure the substitute is available in SVG format. Or at the very least in PNG format, so the colours don't smudge into eachother. JPEG is not an acceptable format for a flag. Also, I don't understand what you mean with "consensus was achieved on the Fransaskois page". I went there and found no discussion about this subject at all. As for the JPEG image you want to replace this SVG image with, when you compare it to this photograph, it is obvious the colours are much too pale. Even with light shining through the flag, as in this photograph, the colours are more vibrant than in the JPEG image, which means the colours in the SVG image you want to delete are actually the correct ones (though of course the shape of the lily is wrong). Ieneach fan 'e Esk (talk) 22:01, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. As suggested by User:Fry1989, I found an alternative version of the flag in svg format. As nominator, I am no more advocating for the deletion of this file. Emass100 (talk) 01:13, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment
That’s not a vector drawing, but a raster image (my guess is the JPEG linked above) in an SVG wrapper. Please don’t disguise raster images this way; people expect an SVG to be resolution-independent.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 02:12, 16 October 2018 (UTC)- Odysseus1479 You're wrong. Take a closer look, this is definitely a vector image. Here is the file on Google Drive. Emass100 (talk) 02:50, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Emass100: please accept my sincere apologies: I must have downloaded the preview or something. Whatever I did, it was embarassingly careless of me to jump to conclusions. And thanks for finding the replacement.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:13, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Odysseus1479 You're wrong. Take a closer look, this is definitely a vector image. Here is the file on Google Drive. Emass100 (talk) 02:50, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:50, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- also file:Tudoemdia.png
cópia de https://www.tudoemdia.com/ - sem comprovação de autoria, de permissão (copy https://www.tudoemdia.com/ - without proof of authorship, permission) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:57, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. I add another version for deletion. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:50, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Nahid Hossain (talk) 05:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:51, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Nahid Hossain (talk) 05:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:51, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:51, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:51, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. I added some categories, for example category:Wooden fences in Florida. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:52, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:52, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:52, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 06:05, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Cpnnabingovnp (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:53, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The label is copyrighted דגש חזק (talk) 08:02, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:53, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files of Rebenava7
[edit]Rebenava7 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 08:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files of Fabriziolorini
[edit]Fabriziolorini (talk · contribs) uploaded these logos:
Unused logos of non-notable entities (not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mirjamcarroli
[edit]Here are all contributions of Mirjamcarroli (talk · contribs):
- File:MencucciFiorentina1.JPG (533×800)
- File:Sandro mencucci ceo.jpg (260×235)
- File:Sandro mencucci football.JPG (800×567)
Small photos without camera data. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mdslater100
[edit]Mdslater100 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Meskita Brides.jpg (1920×1920)
- File:Meskita FW 2014 Runway MBFW.jpg (620×350)
- File:Meskita SS 2014.jpg (450×450)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Masumasu11
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Masumasu11 (talk · contribs):
- File:Chionia School.jpg (480×270, Facebook file)
- File:Z A Chowdhury Bulding.jpg (960×720)
Small photos without camera data, one is taken from Facebook, deciding by FBMD... in beginning of special instructions field of metadata. Probably not own works, but copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files of Elpilin
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Elpilin (talk · contribs):
- File:Alain Baroja.png (556×614)
- File:AristeguietaPuebloNuevo.png (420×406)
- File:CastellinBrigido.png (564×564)
- File:Debut Estudiantes.png (594×490)
- File:LaGuairaLuqueño.png (476×479)
- File:Otero celebrando.jpg (640×640)
- File:PanoramicaCaracasTachira.jpg (636×125)
- File:Rey La Salle.png (476×445)
- File:SedeSocial.jpg (1280×853)
- File:Zamora Clausura.jpg (640×640)
- File:Wuilker Fariñez.jpg (640×640)
- File:Yaquino Celli.png (324×341)
- File:Yustiz.png (633×423)
Small photos without metadata. Uploader has problems with copyright (simply look his talkpage). I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:23, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Files of Elpilin
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Elpilin (talk · contribs):
- File:CaracasvsZulia2016.jpg (641×469)
- File:CaracasvsTáchira2017.jpg (641×888)
- File:Olímpico en Caracas-Monagas.png (1262×326)
Small photos without metadata, probably all copyright violations. Elpilin has been blocked for uploading copyvios. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:56, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Logo of non-notable company. Draft in en.wiki was rejected in March and should be deleted soon. Taivo (talk) 10:20, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:56, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:56, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 11:02, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:56, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:56, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Personal picture of not-noticeable person, not useful for educational purposes (uses Commons as hosting) L736E (talk) 12:07, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:56, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 12:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete No educational value. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:57, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted poster. Solomon203 (talk) 12:30, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:57, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted poster. Solomon203 (talk) 12:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:57, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted poster. Solomon203 (talk) 12:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:57, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope, and superseded by File:Execulink-Logo-Web.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:56, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. There exists en:Execulink Telecom, where the logo can be used, so potentially in scope, but complex logos need OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:57, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- File:Fisher-Price Car 2825-92669.jpg
- File:Fisher-Price Car 2825-92668.jpg
- File:Fisher-Price Car 2825-92666.jpg
GMGtalk 13:05, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:57, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
promo MiguelAlanCS (talk) 13:19, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Comment @MiguelAlanCS: You mean copyright violation, don't you? --Discasto talk 21:44, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- Yes... and promo too MiguelAlanCS (talk) 21:56, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:58, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
promo, non-free MiguelAlanCS (talk) 13:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Delete Per copyright violation. "Promo" is not a valid reason. --Discasto talk 21:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:58, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Flickr washing: this is a screenshot of MS Flight Simulator 2004 (as per comments on Flickr). P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:58, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio- Book cover --Alaa :)..! 14:05, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:58, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Personal picture, not in use. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:59, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ΑΡΗΣ ΒΑΦΙΑΣ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:(c) O TΡΟΠΟΣ ΕΠΙΤΕΥΞΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΟΡΘΗΣ ΠΡΟΦΟΡΑΣ ΤΗΣ ΚΟΙΝΗΣ ΝΕΟΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗΣ-ΑΡΗΣ ΒΑΦΙΑΣ.pdf
- File:(C) Η ΠΡΟΦΟΡΑ ΤΗΣ ΚΟΙΝΗΣ ΝΕΟΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗΣ ΓΛΩΣΣΑΣ, ΕΙΣΗΓΗΣΗ-ΥΠΟΜΝΗΜΑ ΑΡΗ ΒΑΦΙΑ.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:59, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:59, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Angela Elisa (talk · contribs)
[edit]All of the user's uploads appear to be promoting Romilly Wilde, their current skin care product line, and their founder Susie Willis in violation of COM:ADVERT. Furthermore, in File:Susie Willis Romilly Wilde.jpg, the uploader presents the copyrighted work of Barbara Leatham Photography as her own. Also, filenames here are case-sensitive, and using ALL CAPS looks like one is shouting and is discouraged. In addition, 50% (6/12) of the user's uploads have already been deleted.
- File:IDLE EAU DE PARFUM.jpg
- File:ROMILLY WILDE'S NIGHT DUTY FACE CREAM AND EYE BELIEVE EYE SERUM.jpg
- File:Romilly Wilde products.jpg
- File:Romilly wilde full skincare line.jpg
- File:Susie Willis Romilly Wilde.jpg
- File:Romilly Wilde logo.png
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:59, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:00, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahsan Shahbaz 19 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:00, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:00, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 15:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:00, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rakeshskymall (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PACKAGING: "Generally product packaging carrying original printed designs cannot be uploaded to Commons, even if you personally own the physical object and even if you took the photograph yourself."
- File:Tvm teleshopping.jpg
- File:Slim up Oil - TvM Teleshopping.png
- File:Sweat Slim Belt - TvM Teleshopping.png
- File:Glow Black Shampoo- TvM Teleshopping.png
- File:Hair Remover pads- Glowy Soft - TvM Teleshopping.png
- File:Growth On Powder - TvM Teleshopping.png
- File:Fat Cutter - TvM Teleshopping.png
- File:Fair Look - TvM Teleshopping.png
- File:Easy Slim Tea - TvM Teleshopping.png
- File:Bodybuildo - TvM Teleshopping.png
- File:Biolif Hair gro therapy - TvM Teleshopping.png
- File:Slim Shaper Pants - TvM Teleshopping.png
4nn1l2 (talk) 16:14, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:01, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Promotional file, out of scope. Godric ki Kothritalk to me 18:01, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Vanity. Self promotion Fixertool (talk) 20:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Vanity. Self promotion Fixertool (talk) 20:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
not exst this person JTHARIKH (talk) 22:18, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:13, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Personal images, apparently of the user's cat, uploaded for use on an article deleted from EN Wikipedia as non-constructive. Out of scope since there is no details on breed or other aspects of the cat that could allow it to serve an educational purpose. RA0808 (talk) 22:25, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
jtharikh.jpg JTHARIKH (talk) 22:30, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:14, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
uploader isn't owner of copyright, wrong license Ezarateesteban 22:44, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:13, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
This might have a Flickr license, but they look like copyrighted characters to me. Suspect Flickr owner does not own that copyright Ronhjones (Talk) 23:42, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Content that should be on Wikipedia. Xiplus (talk) 23:58, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files of Atlassign
[edit]Here are all contributions of Atlassign (talk · contribs):
- File:3D Acrylic Sign.jpg (3648×2736, camera Ricoh CX3)
- File:3D Aluminium Powder Coating Sign.jpg (1280×960, camera Panasonic DMC-FZ50)
- File:3D Aluminium Sign.jpg (4096×2304, camera Lenovo S850)
- File:3D Brand Sign.jpg (3264×2448, camera Canon PowerShot SX100 IS)
- File:3D Channelume Sign.jpg (3872×2592, camera NIKON D80)
- File:3D Cladding Sign.jpg (4096×2304, camera Lenovo S850)
- File:3D Facelit Sign.jpg (520×347, copyright holder © SuperStock)
- File:3D Flex Face Box Sign.jpg (1280×960)
- File:3D Flex Face Digital Printing Sign.jpg (1280×960)
- File:3D Frontlit Sign.jpg (1024×768)
- File:3D Gold Plating Sign.jpg (1620×1080, camera Panasonic DMC-TZ20)
- File:3D L.E.D Acrylic Box Push Thru Sign.jpg (1280×960)
- File:3D L.E.D Brand Restaurant Sign.jpg (3264×2448)
- File:3D L.E.D Brand Shop Sign.jpg (1280×960)
- File:3D L.E.D Building Entrance Sign.jpg (600×600)
- File:3D L.E.D Cafeteria Sign.jpg (1280×960)
- File:3D L.E.D Chanies Restaurant Sign.jpg (1024×709)
- File:3D L.E.D Hospitality Sign.jpg (1280×960)
- File:3D L.E.D Hotel Entrance Sign.jpg (338×450)
- File:3D L.E.D Hotel Sign.jpg (1094×656)
- File:3D L.E.D Kid Toys Sign.jpg (1280×720)
- File:3D L.E.D Mobile Shop Sign.jpg (1280×720)
- File:3D L.E.D Pharmacy Sign.jpg (1040×780)
- File:3D L.E.D Push Thru Sign.jpg (4096×2304)
- File:3D L.E.D Rent A CAR Sign.jpg (1280×720)
- File:3D L.E.D Restaurant Sign.jpg (2708×1686)
- File:3D L.E.D Restaurant with Cladding Background Sign.jpg (1094×656)
- File:3D L.E.D Shop Front Brand Sign.jpg (1024×610)
- File:3D L.E.D Shop Front Cladding Sign.jpg (467×601)
- File:3D L.E.D Shop Front Sign.jpg (1280×720)
- File:3D L.E.D Shopping Center Sign.jpg (1032×774)
- File:3D L.E.D Showroom Sign.jpg (1280×960)
- File:3D L.E.D Sign.jpg (1438×959)
- File:3D L.E.D Signboard.jpg (550×412)
- File:3D L.E.D Sign with Cladding Background.jpg (1032×581)
- File:3D L.E.D Supermarket Sign.jpg (1200×800)
- File:3D L.E.D Two Sided Shop Sign.jpg (1280×720)
- File:3D L.E.D Wall Mounted Sign.jpg (960×1280)
- File:3D Neon and L.E.D Sign.jpg (720×900, author and copyright holder Felix Odell)
- File:3D Neon Sign.jpg (1024×768)
- File:3D Outdoor Shop Front Sign.jpg (1314×923, camera NIKON D40)
- File:3D Push Thru Sign.jpg (864×648)
- File:3D Restaurant Sign.jpg (675×900)
- File:3D Shop Sign.jpg (800×600, camera Olympus X600, D630, FE5500)
- File:3D Sign.jpg (736×552)
- File:3D Solid Acrylic Sign.jpg (2048×1536, camera Canon EOS 5DS R, author and copyright holder Gerry O'Leary)
- File:3D Stainless Steel Sign.jpg (1600×1200)
- File:3D Totem Sign.jpg (1024×683)
- File:Sign,Printing,Exhibition,Advertising+971 50 4737382.jpg (816×612)
Mostly small photos without metadata. If camera data exist, then mostly different. Some photos are credited to different authors. I suspect not own work, but different photographers' copyright violation. Description is always the same and promotional. Taivo (talk) 13:22, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:22, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files of Coalcoman.mich
[edit]Coalcoman.mich (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:AMANDO OSEGUERA ALVAREZ.jpg (1052×1503)
- File:ESTHER MARTINEZ.png (90×111, historical photo)
- File:Ing. Rafael Garcia Zamora.jpg (728×940)
- File:Jardines de la Higuera.png (506×316)
- File:Manuel Cuevas.png (453×254)
- File:MANUEL MARTINEZ VALLADARES.jpg (612×612, historical photo)
- File:MISAEL GONZALEZ FERNANDEZ.png (97×113)
- File:Nacimiento del niño Jesús.png (501×352)
- File:Posada en Coalcomán.png (625×417)
- File:ULISES GUTIERREZ.png (87×103)
- File:Vázquez Pallares y el General Cárdenas en Coalcomán..png (355×290)
Photos without metadata, sometimes very small. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:21, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files of Department4
[edit]Department4 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Daisy chain (electrical engineering).jpg (560×290)
- File:DB connectors.jpg (486×349)
- File:Denial of Service attack .jpg (960×679, author Nazmi Ismayilov)
- File:Disc driver.jpg (500×500)
- File:Drive bay.jpg (900×530, camera Canon EOS 1100D)
- File:Drive bay black.jpg (640×480, camera Olympus X-2, C-50Z)
- File:Drive bay grey.jpg (450×450)
- File:Signature prosses.jpg (400×347)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Small photos and mostly without metadata. If camera data exist, then always different. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:13, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:21, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Clearly derivative works, without proper source and permission.
- File:The year of decision.JPG
- File:Modernization.JPG
- File:Early History 2.JPG
- File:1980's.JPG
- File:First Telephone Office.JPG
P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:52, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- also file:2013 - 14.1 - Woodstock Office.jpg – small photo without camera data, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Probably not own photo. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:24, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete all. I added another version for deletion. This is self-promotion-only user. Sanegon isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in fr.wiki. Taivo (talk) 12:39, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:04, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Truck advertisements
[edit]As per Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/03/Category:Truck advertisements, the uploader has suggested that many of these are copyright violations. I believe I've only tagged images in the category uploaded by Artix Kreiger.
- File:1929 International (2306923730).jpg
- File:1958 Ranchero (4201486838).jpg
- File:1966 Travelall (2305981732).jpg
- File:1968 ZIL 130 (8352756946).jpg
- File:1976 Aussie International (23909597401).jpg
- File:1976 Dodge (4397003065).jpg
- File:1976 International (4397005693).jpg
- File:1976 International with Email refrigeration (4397004785).jpg
- File:1977 F-100 Ranger (15831308864).jpg
- File:1977 M-B L 914 chassis cab (30293577743).jpg
- File:1977 M-B L 914 chassis cab (31100119415).jpg
- File:1978 brochure (16603176948).jpg
- File:1979 GMC Vandura Street Sedan (23779872443).jpg
- File:1979 Grumett fiberglass Chevette for Uruguay (31078039040).jpg
- File:1979 Li'l Hustler (8170414459).jpg
- File:1980 Mercedes-Benz in Argentina (31203615205).jpg
- File:1980 Salesperson's Study Guide (5997054664).jpg
- File:1981 Falcon Panel Van (16460194075).jpg
- File:1981 GMC Caballero (24343264722).jpg
- File:1981 GMC Vans (23779855833).jpg
- File:1981 Holden Rodeo (16789232176).jpg
- File:1981 Holden Rodeo (16813997592).jpg
- File:1981 Jeep J10 brochure (35306301014).jpg
- File:1981 Jeep J10 pickup truck (36012829501).jpg
- File:1981 Jeep J10 specifications (36012829341).jpg
- File:1981 Renault Rodeo (4630149853).jpg
- File:1982 Competitive Comparisons (5997054418).jpg
- File:1982 Datsun (8170416101).jpg
- File:1983 for Canada (32064653185).jpg
- File:1983 GMC S-15 (31959065952).jpg
- File:1984 Atkinson (8363866712).jpg
- File:1984 F-150 Explorer from Mexico (4492163047).jpg
- File:1984 Sisu brochure (26315423245).jpg
- File:1984 Sisu truck (26271750906).jpg
- File:1984 Unimog (26222988232).jpg
- File:1984 Unimog brochure (8359527428).jpg
- File:1985 Chevette Pickup from Brazil (4182380775).jpg
- File:1985 Holden Rodeo (16789211786).jpg
- File:1985 Volkswagen trucks (7483460168).jpg
- File:1988 Isuzu pickup for USA (31639481650).jpg
- File:1990 Pegaso camiones (26024824240).jpg
- File:1992 AM General Hummer (8363865474).jpg
- File:1996 Mazda Proceed Marvie in Japan (4485239378).jpg
- File:1997 Mahindra Jeep (7834799860).jpg
- File:1999 Lincoln Blackwood (15837669154).jpg
- File:2001 Holden Rodeo (16814018611).jpg
- File:2001 Holden Rodeo Turbo Diesel (16815097445).jpg
- File:2008 Hyundai (4630146189).jpg
- File:A Little Pick Me Up (7483456610).jpg
- File:Agrale TX (8363868726).jpg
- File:Armored Vehicles (2306123664).jpg
- File:Asquith (23604096219).jpg
- File:Australian Bedford 1978 (4098042519).jpg
- File:Balkancar (2306215068).jpg
- File:Bronco, first generation (4201500832).jpg
- File:Chrysler Fevre Argentina (7611902694).jpg
- File:Commercial Long Life Vehicle (24155971740).jpg
- File:Conte (2306098438).jpg
- File:Courier (4200745523).jpg
- File:DAF in Africa (2305251177).jpg
- File:Demec Double Cabin Pickup (4182376373).jpg
- File:Diesel F-1000 (29405581384).jpg
- File:Diesel Pickup (7483462508).jpg
- File:El Camino (4097632918).jpg
- File:F-100 Brazil (15833737073).jpg
- File:F-150, F-250 4X4 brochure (29739362880).jpg
- File:F-350 for 1962 in Argentina (4489001324).jpg
- File:Falcon Ranchero (4200734419).jpg
- File:Falcon Ute and Van (4201492728).jpg
- File:Fargo (4097628584).jpg
- File:FIAT Argentina (2306123674).jpg
- File:French Electric Utility Machine (4630748724).jpg
- File:General Dynamics MOWAG (7834794390).jpg
- File:Grosspal (30484554194).jpg
- File:Grosspal (30498715473).jpg
- File:Heil Gitsham (4396675170).jpg
- File:Honker (23971989945).jpg
- File:India's Tata (23363996614).jpg
- File:Isuzu Kai concept truck 1997 (4098044701).jpg
- File:Jeep J10 (36012829411).jpg
- File:Jeep J10 advertising (36012829441).jpg
- File:Jeep J10 brochure from 1981 (35306300984).jpg
- File:Jeep J10 pickup (36012829371).jpg
- File:Jeepney (4098881076).jpg
- File:Leader (4396673298).jpg
- File:LuAZ 969 or Volin in Italy (2305215617).jpg
- File:LUAZ 969M (4630744018).jpg
- File:LUAZ 969M (8351692861).jpg
- File:LUV around the world (4098125565).jpg
- File:Mahindra Commander (7834805388).jpg
- File:MAN (2306123662).jpg
- File:Mazda (4201496150).jpg
- File:Mercedes Benz in Argentina (2305981754).jpg
- File:Mercedes-Benz in Argentina (31089675911).jpg
- File:Mercedes-Benz in Argentina, 1980 (31060196672).jpg
- File:Mexican built C-15 (16168441204).jpg
- File:Mitai (5997053684).jpg
- File:Mitai (5997054094).jpg
- File:Mitai Factory (5996499727).jpg
- File:Mitai Pickup (5996499285).jpg
- File:Morris J2 minibus (27164681181).jpg
- File:Plymouth Voyager 1982 (17010286297).jpg
- File:Poland's Honker (23343773614).jpg
- File:Rastrojero (2305981738).jpg
- File:Rastrojero Frontal (8363867564).jpg
- File:Renault 4 (Quatrelle) Furgoneta (4630154473).jpg
- File:Renault Farma (4630750050).jpg
- File:Renault Farma (4630751026).jpg
- File:RFW All Wheel Drive Trucks (4395907109).jpg
- File:Seddon Atkinson (2306098426).jpg
- File:Sisu of Finland (2305251185).jpg
- File:Snow Plow Advertising (8359530906).jpg
- File:Tempo (7834814046).jpg
- File:Terradyne 2000 (4098800302).jpg
- File:Thames 800 (16274302397).jpg
- File:Tilt Cab 1960 (4098797780).jpg
- File:Tradesman (16597527923).jpg
- File:Tuner G-Wagen (8359525088).jpg
- File:UAZ 469B (4630742946).jpg
- File:UMM Alter (23624315869).jpg
- File:UMM Alter 4X4 (2305251163).jpg
- File:Unimog (2305215601).jpg
- File:Utilmaster Aeromate (2306215076).jpg
- File:Vauxhall - Bedford Chevette Van (4182379175).jpg
- File:XC Falcon panel van (4201489730).jpg
- File:XC Falcon Sundowner Panel Van (4200737313).jpg
- File:Yue Loong pickup (8170446536).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Furgoneta_(4630154473).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Themightyquill (talk) 16:30, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:31, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Christophe Lartige, permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Anne Roumanoff en 2018.jpg
- File:Anne Roumanoff - crédit Christophe Lartige.png
- File:Anne Roumanoff - Tout va bien.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:00, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Scan of a non-free source (doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2000.tb02200.x). The facts and COM:EDUSE could be covered by drawing a similar diagram from scratch (or maybe even in wikitext?) to be completely free even if the content here is mostly text (phone book less free than rewriting a list of phone numbers). DMacks (talk) 17:03, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:28, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Images cited to vk.me (en:VKontakte), a social-media/file-sharing site. The links are to the images themselves, not to a page that has any info about them, so we don't have any licensing or sourcing verifiability.
DMacks (talk) 17:09, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
"A rare and old signature of Mr. Ismail Azhari."
The sock(master?) claims own work, so this is useless. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:58, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Salman of Saudi Arabia signature.png.jpg
"King Salman bin Abdulaziz signature", also own work. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in France for architectural works. The bridge is the dominent subject. 68.193.211.254 01:20, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. Should be deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
And also
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2006, opening 2007. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:11, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Пам'ятник провіднику Організації українських націоналістів Бандері Степану у Бережанах.jpg
[edit]
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2005. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:34, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files of Kos500
[edit]Here are last remaining uploads of Kos500 (talk · contribs):
1951 photos are unlikely own work. I suspect real photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:22, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:30, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
no es de mi autoría Sancarre (talk) 20:26, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:20, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Sibelius-monumentti Helsinki (Töölö), kuvanveistäjä Eila Hiltunen 1967 (Passio Musicae), haponkestävä teräs.tif
[edit]The photograph is a derivative work of the Sibelius Monument (Q2584017), a 1967 sculpture by Eila Hiltunen (1922–2003; Q460402), located in Helsinki, Finland. The Sibelius Monument is still under copyright and thus not in public domain. FOP in Finland is for buildings only. Apalsola t • c 21:17, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Related cases:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Helsinki. Sibelius-monumentti. Valokuva Victor Belousov. - panoramio.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius Monument - Helsinki, Finland - panoramio.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:SIBELIUS MONUMENT, HELSINKI, FINLAND.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 2
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 3
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 4
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 5
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 6
- Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Sibelius Monument 7
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jean Sibelius (100505764).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibeliuksenpääsibeliuspuistossa.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius monument 2.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius monument Helsinki.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius Monument in Helsinki.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius monument.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibeliusmonumentti2005.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Sibelius Monument (100484627).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius park3.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Helsinki. Sibelius-monumentti. Valokuva Victor Belousov. - panoramio.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument a Jean Sibelius - Sibelius-monumentti, Helsinki (febrer 2012) - panoramio.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jean Sibelius, finnischer Komponist.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hammond Slides Unidentified 07.jpg
- ––Apalsola t • c 21:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:12, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Likey to be a case of laundering through Flickr SchroCat (talk) 21:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence that the Flickr account owns the copyright Ronhjones (Talk) 19:18, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:12, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
No evidence this is free to use in the US; no evidence this photo was taken in '47 (the previous deletion request was withdrawn after someone "presumed" the date. Regardless of whether '47 is correct, this photograph has previously been published and therefore w:publication rights take priority, meaning it's still protected. SchroCat (talk) 07:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Per [1] White Horse Lodge was chartered in 1996. Therefore this flap is copyrighted and this scan is a derivative work of the copyrighted flap.. B (talk) 15:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The site of origin does not report that your content is licensed under the license presented by uploader of file image. Leon saudanha (talk) 15:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. I add another version for deletion due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This photo was posted, and my name tagged without my permission. Siiwiid (talk) 16:29, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The photo shows the musician Eva Böcker as part of a public gig in the Palmengarten Frankfurt on 2018-07-05 with the Ensemble Modern & Fossile3. Neither the photo nor the naming is debasing or demeaning. I think under these circumstances I don't need any explicit permission from the artist to publish her photo or her name. gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 17:14, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, per Frank C. Müller. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:11, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:49, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Dw no source since. I guess we need a release for the depicted "poster" and its content. JuTa 17:08, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Dw no source since. I guess we need a release for the depicted "poster". JuTa 17:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Dw no source since. I guess we would need a release of the depicted photos. JuTa 17:11, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sealle as no permission. Maybe a russian COM:FOP case. JuTa 17:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Should be deleted due to missing sculptor's permission. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sealle as no permission. Maybe a russian COM:FOP case. JuTa 17:32, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Should be deleted due to missing sculptor's permission. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:45, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
My upload, but I'm not sure it adds anything to the story Chris j wood (talk) 18:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, finger trouble. I requested wrong thing. -- Chris j wood (talk) 09:12, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is not owned by the Flickr uploader, and is far older than the flickr upload. copyrighted from https://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/vida-publica/comandante-do-exercito-demite-general-que-pediu-despertar-de-luta-patriotica-6zv36ke4kvkjx26fwdkdewalx/ Paladinum2 (talk) 18:20, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:40, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
copyright in meta data Ariam (talk) 18:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:39, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
This image, presented as a logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 19:37, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:37, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Files of Fgarridomartinez
[edit]Here are all contributions of Fgarridomartinez (talk · contribs):
- File:01 lafamilia.jpg
- File:03 lafamilia.jpg
- File:05 elpartidounico.jpg
- File:06 elabrazo.jpg
- File:07 dirigente.jpg
- File:Cachacumbele.jpg
- File:CARACAS-SANGRANTE.jpg
- File:El gato felix.jpg
- File:La pieta.jpg
- File:La virgen del Linchamiento.jpg
- File:Missvenezuela.jpg
- File:Retrato-por-Alberto-García-Alix.jpg
Source site isn't published under free license. OTRS-permission from photographer(s) is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:08, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Files of GuilhermeSM
[edit]GuilhermeSM (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Banda Calypso (Final de 1999).jpg (1169×1220)
- File:Gravação DVD Avante (ORIGINAL).jpg (1009×1600)
- File:Gravação DVD Joelma.jpg (495×855)
- File:Joelma em Petrolina 2018.jpg (1080×1761)
- File:Joelma Jandira 2016.jpg (1264×1869)
- File:Joelma na Banda Calypso (2000).jpg (1004×1652)
- File:Joelma no início da carreira.jpg (1083×1835)
- File:Logotipo Calypso Vest.jpg (complex logo)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Small photos without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:55, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:25, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Files of GuilhermeSM
[edit]GuilhermeSM (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Almeirim Pará Letreiro.jpg (2014)
- File:Banda Calypso - Joelma 2007.jpg (2007)
- File:Banda Calypso Olympia 2005.jpg (2005)
- File:Banda Calypso Show 2007.jpg (2007)
- File:Calypso em João Pessoa.jpg (2002)
Flickr user Amores do Calypso uploaded 6 old images about famous singer and 5 of them were uploaded into Commons. They are viewed less than 10 times. Probably the Flickr user has no right to upload them under any licence and this is Flickrwashing. Taivo (talk) 09:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:09, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ytrewq17
[edit]Ytrewq17 (talk · contribs) uploaded these images:
- File:2015 Hybrid Prototype.jpg (977×617, author Harini V)
- File:2015 Hybrid Team.jpg (977×617, author Harini V)
- File:2018 Combustion Prototype.jpg (672×353, Facebook file)
- File:2018 Hybrid Prototype.jpg (1334×890)
- File:2018 Hybrid Team, Ashwa Racing.jpg (1334×890)
- File:Ashwa Racing Combustion Prototype 2005.jpg (912×577, author Harini V)
- File:Ashwa Racing Combustion Prototype 2006.jpg (1144×617, author Harini V)
- File:Ashwa Racing Combustion Prototype 2007.jpg (1016×650, author Harini V)
- File:Ashwa Racing Combustion Prototype 2008.jpg (719×482, author Harini V)
- File:Ashwa Racing Combustion Prototype 2009.jpg (938×676, author Harini V)
- File:Ashwa Racing Combustion Prototype 2010.jpg (905×524, author Harini V)
- File:Ashwa Racing Combustion Prototype 2012.jpg (1129×627, author Harini V)
- File:Ashwa Racing Combustion Prototype 2014.jpg (1080×752, Facebook file)
- File:Ashwa Racing Combustion Prototype 2015.jpg (3264×2448, camera Apple iPhone 4S)
- File:Ashwa Racing Combustion Prototype 2016.jpg (4272×2848, camera Canon EOS REBEL T3)
- File:Ashwa Racing Combustion Prototype 2017.jpg (947×624, author Harini V)
- File:Ashwa Racing Hybrid Prototype 2016.jpg (2048×1402, author and copyright holder © Upendra B A)
- File:Ashwa Racing Hybrid Prototype 2017.jpg (4608×3456, camera COOLPIX P600)
Mostly small photos without camera data. If camera data exist, then always different. Some files come from Facebook, some are credited to different people, whose names do not match username. In my opinion they are all copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:10, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Similar to https://seashepherd.org/2008_news_080902_1_3_s6301088/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Minhvule226 (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Duykhanh012.jpg
- File:Duykhanh111.jpg
- File:Duykhanh121.jpg
- File:Duykhanh13.jpg
- File:Duykhanh1.jpg
- File:Duykhanh12.jpg
- File:Duykhanhzhouzhou.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:48, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:10, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
1975 is too recent for PD-old, as for Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ancilotti_Scarab_250_FH_1979.jpg --ghouston (talk) 06:59, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Seven Pandas (talk) 01:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
1980 is too recent for PD-old, as for Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ancilotti_Scarab_250_FH_1979.jpg. --ghouston (talk) 07:04, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Seven Pandas (talk) 01:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:46, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Photographs of identifiable people#Moral issues. The photo can be considered as unfllattering. Fiona (talk) 09:35, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- It's not one of our best pictures on commons, but one of the few of Anetta Kahane. In my opinion it's not harmful at all. If we delete normal pictures like this, then PR-photos from the portrayed persons are the only thing that will be left for us. Keep --Mirer (talk) 13:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- It ist harmful and you know it. It was you who to made the image section. This photo serves as the template for anti-Semitic cartoons of Anetta Karhane on the internet.--Fiona (talk) 16:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Please stop telling me what I know! What I think of the picture is stated above. Of course it was me who made the crop (it was done to offer a better one than the one who was critized on the german talk page) of the image - everyone can see it in version history and you made a deletion request on this crop so I make my statement here. There is nothing wrong with that. Indeed the system is thought to work that way.
- Please stop telling me what criminals do on the internet. I have nothing to do with that. There is no need to to mention antisemitism next to my name. I expect an admin to delete this - it is only mentioned to harm me. Stop it! --Mirer (talk) 17:17, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- "Moral issues" refers to Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights ("attack upon honour and reputation"), which is a serious accusation. You have to show that the photo violates "Common decency" and the "respect for human dignity". Those were celebrities, on a stage, in a public event after all. Alexpl (talk) 20:37, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- The image section is not a portrait and I doubt the license to such a manipulation. The photo does not comply with good practice in Wikipedia. It should be deleted because of its low quality and usability due to unfavorable facial expression. As I mentioned: this image section is used for the anti-Semitic agitation against Anetta Kahane.--Fiona (talk) 05:55, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: I agree with Fiona. This picture is widely used by right wing extremists in Germany for antisemtic campaign. It is obvious why they choose this picture. --KarlV (talk) 07:18, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: It's against our regulations that a picture is deleted because a user thinks it shows a "unfavorable facial expression". Technically there is nothing wrong with this picture. --Gugerell (talk) 14:09, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The photo is used in multiple projects and cannot be deleted due to any other reason except copyright violation, but here's no copyright problem. This is short answer, but here's clearly a long answer also needed. Mirer is correct. Commons and Commons users have nothing to do with what some stupid criminals do outside Commons. Every Commons image can be used in bad way – and Commons license allows that. If the photo is used for crime, then you must immediately contact police. But the photo itself is normal. "The photo can be considered as unfllattering" – that's wrong. "It is harmful" – that's also wrong. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree with mirer, Alexpl, Gugerell and Taivo. --Pass3456 (talk) 21:55, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 21:44, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Files of HEZavala
[edit]Here are all photos, uploaded by HEZavala (talk · contribs):
- File:Edificio A (UTM).jpg (300×200)
- File:Edificios B y C (UTM).jpg (640×360)
- File:Entrada de la UTM.jpg (500×375)
- File:Laboratorios (UTM).jpg (900×700)
- File:Servicio Comunitario UTM.jpg (540×280)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Small photos without camera data, different resolution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:42, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Selbst kopiert statt selbst erstellt, d.h. also Urheberrechtsverletzung von dieser Seite! H7 (talk) 13:37, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:39, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Not own work, http://quemfazhistoria.com.br/verbetes_brasil/principal.asp?envialetra=I Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:37, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
KeepThere's no replacement linked for evaliation, this file is used in multiple articles. --Denniss (talk) 18:48, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 02:03, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- and that is irrelevant + invalid if the file is in use. --Denniss (talk) 08:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 21:36, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
chicken ppop 216.48.134.11 17:01, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 21:35, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Dw no source since. I guess we need a release for the photo depicted. JuTa 17:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:35, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Dw no source since. I guess we need a release for the depicted "poster". JuTa 17:15, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:35, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Likely not own work Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Would most likely qualify under PD-Saudi Arabia. Fry1989 eh? 20:30, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Fry. --lNeverCry 01:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
This is not the official logo for the ministry, I work for MOI KSA and I can update the logo as per the one used in the ministry's website 95.184.45.222 07:39, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- This does not seem to be about deleting anything, and so should not have been put into the form of a deletion nomination... AnonMoos (talk) 14:09, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, empty-worded allegations by an anonymous user. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:00, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 07:57, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Files of Fabien LOTHIER
[edit]Fabien GOTHIER (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
There is no freedom of panorama in France. Maybe the photos violate sculptors' copyright. Who are the sculptors and when they died? Taivo (talk) 09:05, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Gouvy - IMG 7338 WD.jpg was broken, but the other files are photos of sculptures in the public domain (e.g. Anatole de Vasselot died in 1904). Ruthven (msg) 08:00, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
2. Unused and implausible redirect, obviously different objects, this is the name of a country in German, the other is a serbian named castle. Burumbátor (talk) 09:34, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete many issues Seven Pandas (talk) 18:38, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: recent redirect of file created in 2012. We cannot say which page links this one for the photo. Ruthven (msg) 08:11, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Benedict dyson as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <uploader's request>
Converted by me to DR, as file does not qualify for SD. However, a courtesy-deletion might be o.k. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per Turelio. Ruthven (msg) 08:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Benedict dyson as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <uploader's own request>
Converted by me to DR, as file does not qualify for SD. However, a courtesy-deletion might be o.k. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per Turelio + unused file. Ruthven (msg) 08:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
https://outside-thebox.ch/intelligente-baume/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Patrick Rogel: For such cases, please use {{Copyvio}} next time, not a DR. Ruthven (msg) 08:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:39, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 18:39, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: dark image. Ruthven (msg) 08:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:39, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request. Seven Pandas (talk) 18:39, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- Invalid DR + image in use --Denniss (talk) 07:29, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Denniss. Ruthven (msg) 08:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I, as the author of this image, wish to nominate it for deletion, because this image is not being used in any wiki and therefore I have already uploaded another one equal to this image JulianVilla26 (talk) 00:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zuni Roldan (talk · contribs)
[edit]http://carpenaclaudia.blogspot.com/2013/01/mi-carrera.html
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 01:58, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 08:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I, as the author of this image, wish to nominate it for deletion, because this image is not being used on any wiki and therefore I see it completely unnecessary. JulianVilla26 (talk) 00:47, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 01:58, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 08:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I, as the author of this image, wish to nominate it for deletion, because this image is not being used on any wiki and therefore I see it completely unnecessary. JulianVilla26 (talk) 00:47, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 01:58, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:42, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- comment: JulianVilla26, please would you give us a link to the better one you've uploaded. I've looked around, and cannot find one. Rwendland (talk) 16:37, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete still an uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 01:59, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: better angle? Logo in use. Ruthven (msg) 08:04, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:45, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 01:59, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate of File:Anafiotika.JPG. Ruthven (msg) 08:04, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:47, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 01:59, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2013 and in use. Ruthven (msg) 08:05, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:47, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 01:59, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2013 and in use. Ruthven (msg) 08:05, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 02:00, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2015 and in use. Ruthven (msg) 08:05, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 02:00, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: blank screen, not used. Ruthven (msg) 08:06, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 02:00, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:TOY. Ruthven (msg) 08:06, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 02:00, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: not useful. Ruthven (msg) 08:06, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 02:00, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:07, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 02:01, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: blurry. Ruthven (msg) 08:07, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 02:01, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: blurry. Ruthven (msg) 08:07, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 02:01, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: blurry. Ruthven (msg) 08:07, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:52, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 02:01, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: blurry. Ruthven (msg) 08:07, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:52, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 02:02, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014. Ruthven (msg) 08:08, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to delete this photo because I have already uploaded another one with a better angle JulianVilla26 (talk) 16:52, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete uploader request Seven Pandas (talk) 02:03, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: uploaded in 2014, no reasons for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:08, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Entirely unreferenced. Doesn't explain where the data, this graph is built on, comes from 193.34.160.162 17:45, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Please delete, I found much better ways to draw plots here. Katkov Yury (talk) 22:04, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 08:08, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, similar to http://partiaslaska.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Mercik-580-388.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:18, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
The bottom of the source page says "© 2018 Śląska Partia Regionalna. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone" and I cannot see any free license. Uploader has few images on Commons. Leoboudv (talk) 18:17, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment An image with the same title was deleted in April 2018. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (it's different from the previously deleted file). Ruthven (msg) 08:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy. FunkMonk (talk) 23:13, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran, permission from artist needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:41, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in France for architectural works. The bridge is still recconizable at this angle. 68.193.211.254 01:19, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- I would say Keep, as {{Deminimis}}, and also below ToO. What is visible of the bridge is a very common kind of structure (there are dozens exactly like that here in Portugal).-- Darwin Ahoy! 08:47, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment It cannot be de minimis; bridge is clearly main object of the photo. But maybe it's below threshold of originality? Taivo (talk) 09:53, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per DarwIn. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Logo was created by a sockpuppet of a banned user (See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bertrand101) Zzrocket (talk) 02:21, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. This is not a reason to delete. For example, a banned user Russavia has uploaded hundreds of thousands of photos and most of them are still here. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Logo was created by a sockpuppet of a banned user (See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bertrand101 Zzrocket (talk) 02:29, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. This is not a reason to delete. For example, a banned user Russavia has uploaded tens of thousands of photos and most of them are still here. There exists article en:DZOR, where the logo can be used. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Logo was created by a sockpuppet of a banned user (See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bertrand101 Zzrocket (talk) 02:30, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. This is not a reason to delete. For example, a banned user Russavia has uploaded tens of thousands of photos and most of them are still here. There exists en:Monster Radio, where the logo can be used. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Logo was created by a sockpuppet of a banned user (See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bertrand101 Zzrocket (talk) 02:30, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. This is not a reason to delete. For example, a banned user Russavia has uploaded tens of thousands of photos and most of them are still here. There exists en:DZME, where the logo can be used. Taivo (talk) 10:39, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Distribution range of H. auropunctatus added with H. javanicus. The Eastern part is H. javanicus. The Western part, Iran, isn't either one or another. See here: https://newredlist.iucnredlist.org/es/species/70204120/70204139 DPC (talk) 07:28, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The file cannot be deleted due to that reason, because it is heavily used. You can create a new and better map and after replacing all occurrencies we can delete the old map. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- So, it is better to give a wrong information than not giving any? DPC (talk) 14:28, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Commons generally does not take position in such complex questions like where some species lives and where it doesn't live. General rule is: it doesn't matter, how wrong, erroneous and misleading the file is; if it is used in some project, then it's in scope. If the file is used only in one project, then you must discuss the file in that project, but here number of projects is very big, so this is impossible. I do not see any other possibility to delete the file than creating a better, correctly sourced map. Taivo (talk) 16:12, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- So, it is better to give a wrong information than not giving any? DPC (talk) 14:28, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Per Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view. --4nn1l2 (talk) 23:20, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Masbesh
[edit]Masbesh (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
There's no freedom of panorama in Iran. The photos violate architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 23:22, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There may be a copyright violation. Google image search finds this image on several sources including gettyimages and art.com. There seems to be more of this kind from the same panoramio ID. See here for gettyimages and Category:Photos from Panoramio ID 774641. Andreas Stiasny (talk) 23:07, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, small photo without metadata, copyright violation is likely. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:The Great Council of The Confrerie du Sabre d'Or in front of Chantilly Castle in France.jpg
[edit]
Image already imported on this site under copyright Mel22 (talk) 19:25, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 21:31, 7 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Image already on this site under copyright --Krdbot 01:40, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyrighted still for 2 more years Thetechwizard21 (talk) 01:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep The Alice Comedies are public domain in the United States as their copyrights expired when they were not renewed. Abzeronow (talk) 02:29, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: PD. — Racconish 💬 14:14, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Herzi Pinki as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.kunstradln.at/portfolio-item/06-lindenhof-gallerie/ unlikely to be own work, user did not react to talk page entry
- Keep by user Leontari1 copied from file description to here:
- Ich habe am 20. April 2018, als ich zur Vorbereitung des "Kunstradln in Millstatt" vor Ort war, den Lindenhof fotografiert, und das dann darauf beruhende und so in Wikimedia Commons veröffentlichte Foto in meinen Files entsprechend als mein Werk abgespeichert (ich weiß nicht, ob andere Fotos des Lindenhofs Millstatt vom selben Standort und zu einem vergleichbaren Datum existieren, und habe mich bisher auch nicht darum gekümmert bzw. kümmern können).
- Und (an Herzi Pinki, Löschanträger): ich speichere Fotos zumeist nicht als "high quality fotos", sondern bewusst mit geringer Auflösung, um deren Verwendung nur als Illustration im Wikipedia vorzusehen, denn Fotos in Wikipedia müssen in Wikimedia Commons veröffentlicht sein, um verwendet werden zu können. Dies entspricht offensichtlich nicht Deiner Philosophie für Fotos in Wikimedia Commons, da Du forderst, dass immer nur Fotos mit höchster Qualität hochgeladen werden sollen. Für Fotos, die ausschließlich der Illustration von Artikeln in Wikipedia dienen sollen, sehe ich diese "high quality" Anforderung jedoch nicht, und diese meine Sichtweise ist gemäß den Richtlinien von Wikimedia Commons auch nicht explizit verboten, sondern durchaus möglich.
- Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:08, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Die Verwertungsrechte (gebundene Lizenz) für das Foto hatten der Verein KUNSTradln in Millstatt und die Lindenhof-Galerie in Millstatt, die beide das Foto auch auf ihren Webseiten und auf Drucksorten verwenden. Für die Veröffentlichung auf Wikimedia Commons mit freier Lizenz hatte ich als Urheber zunächst nur die Genehmigung für eine niedrig auflösende Version (die ich am 8. Mai etwas bearbeitet hochlud). Nach Rücksprache mit den Copyrigth-Inhabern habe ich nun auch die Genehmigung, die hoch auflösende Original-Version hochzuladen. Das habe ich gemacht. Wenn dieses Foto nun trotzdem gelöscht werden sollte, schneidet sich Wikimedia Commons ins eigene Fleisch: ein frei zugängliches Foto würde ohne triftigen Grund aus dem pool entfernt.Leontari1 (talk) 22:18, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Keep and withdraw: User proved that she is the copyright owner by uploading a full sized version. My doubts have gone. best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:45, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. — Racconish 💬 14:15, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
The uploader may have been paid by the company (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Deliverr), but where is the evidence he is the copyright holder? Adam9007 (talk) 20:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Adam9007, I work for the company as a product marketing specialist and have been authorised to use the logo for the purposes as such. You may contact the Founder & Ceo Birju Patel at birjup@deliverr.ca for confirmation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishin Chatterjee (talk • contribs) 20:55, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- 'authorised to use the logo for the purposes as such' - But the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International licence allows anyone to use it for any purpose. I don't know what the procedures are here for this sort of thing, but we need confirmation from the rightsholder about this. Adam9007 (talk) 21:30, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission. — Racconish 💬 14:18, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Album cover photo... see particularly https://www.legacyandalchemy.com/single-post/2018/02/20/Robert-Hebert-and-Alexandra-Jackson-bring-together-American-and-Brazilian-Musical-Traditions-in-%E2%80%9CAlexandra-Jackson-Legacy-Alchemy%E2%80%9D as part of a slideshow. The photo came from the use of a web capture app, so no reliable indication that the uploader is the owner of the photo. This photo has been added to a (failed) draft article for Wikipedia, so this use is not viable. The quality of this image (capture) is of lower quality (probably a screenshot) than others offered on the web, and probably had any album or other lettering cloned out. Acabashi (talk) 22:33, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- I work at Legacy and Alchemy and I also administer the website. The photo was on our file. We use these photos for press releases, blog posts, and many other media related stuff.
- Please don’t delete the photo.
- Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lmange (talk • contribs) 22:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- It may be the case that you own the image, or have permission from the photographer to release this to Creative Commons, but you will probably need to send an email to Wikimedia Foundation showing this. Acabashi (talk) 22:58, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission. — Racconish 💬 14:17, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate of File:Palatial - by Payton Chung.jpgSecretName101 (talk) 22:37, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 15:42, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Previously deleted + used since Sep-2018 --Alaa :)..! 14:02, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 11:36, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
I believe that this patch is S20.8 from http://www.oaimages.com/65a.shtml, which was published in 1990, and thus copyrighted. B (talk) 15:00, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
This image was captured by me, and the patch is in my personal collection. It is not a violation of copyright and is definitely not the same image seen on the OAImages.com site. shadle (talk) 20:18, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to say that you had copied the OAImages scan - I was just identifying which patch this was. If it was published in 1990, then the patch itself is copyrighted and your scan is a derivative work of that copyrighted patch. --B (talk) 21:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
I support the deletion nomination as the Wikimedia Commons is not a place for Fair Use --Mrwoogi010 (talk) 03:57, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by another admin. --Gbawden (talk) 11:35, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files of Bagmet V.I.
[edit]Bagmet V.I. (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
File:Пам’ятний знак воїнам-визволителям м. Ніжина.jpg (after WWII)keptFile:Пам’ятний знак воїнам-визволителям м. Ніжина (танк Т-34-85).jpg (after WWII)keptFile:Пам’ятний знак «Остання дорога Кобзаря».jpgkept- File:Пам’ятний знак на честь земляків воїнів-інтернаціоналістів.jpg (after WWII)
- File:Пам'ятник Безбородьку.jpg
- File:Пам’ятник Б. Хмельницькому.jpg
- File:Пам’ятник Б. Хмельницькому, Ніжин.jpg
- File:Пам’ятник Гоголю М.В..jpg
- File:Пам'ятник князю І.А. Безбородьку.jpg
- File:Пам’ятник льотчиці Л.М. Губиній.jpg (after WWII)
- File:Пам’ятник М. Бернесу.jpg (after 1969)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the sculptures look like modern. Sculptors' names and death years are needed. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Пам’ятник гетьману Б. Хмельницькому роботи скульптора Ковальова О.О. (1915-1991). Macuser (talk) 16:48, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- Пам’ятний знак воїнам-визволителям м. Ніжина - two first are no sculptures, this is a tank from WWII. The construction used to lift the tank over roundabout is a simple ramp of local material. Macuser (talk) 16:48, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, non-copyrightable is kept. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of Omelanalibr
[edit]Omelanalibr (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Будинок культури с. Омеляна.JPG
- File:IВеликоомелянська сільська рада.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник воїнам - односельчанам,які загинули в період II світової війни.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник односельчанам с. Омеляна.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The photos violates sculptor's and architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:54, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
File was rasterized from https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/e/ee/20181015120357%21Caves_in_Pskov-Caves_Monastery.svg with few additions, now incorporated into vector original. Macuser (talk) 12:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Hier wurde einfach der Löwe aus dem Landeswappen von Rheinland-Pfalz (1948 von Joseph Decku entworfen) genommen. Dieser Löwe existiert in dieser Darstellung nur im Landeswappen und hat seine spezielle Form auch nur durch die eingebogene Spitze im Landeswappen. Das Wappen Rheindürkheims wurde weder von Joseph Decku gezeichnet, noch gibt die Anordnung des Löwen im Wappen Anlass, ihn genauso zu zeichnen, wie Decku es beim Landeswappen tat. Die vorliegende Grafik ist ein Sammelsurium diverser Wappenelemente, eine Art Patchwork. Die drei Adler mögen zwar noch unter der Creative Commons-Lizenz stehen, beim genannten Löwen darf dies bezweifelt werden. Fränsmer (talk) 21:05, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, mongrel coa. --Rosenzweig τ 19:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LMLM as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Cropped from http://masgranada.es/nonosrendiremos/
Converted to DR, as uploader claims to have evidence to support his ownership-claim. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:13, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, after receiving OTRS-permission from photographer the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Files of Robertmedinar
[edit]Robertmedinar (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Avenidad Las Industrias VDLP.jpg (553×315)
- File:Av. Romulo Gallegos VDLP.jpg (740×560)
First group. Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation.
Where the base maps come from? I suspect copyright violation again. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Deleted per PCP. First batch no exif, 2nd looks like taken from Google maps. --Gbawden (talk) 12:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Files of UAWS
[edit]UAWS (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
First group. Historical photos, maybe copyright violations.
- File:Barvinok 1.jpg (640×480)
- File:Barvinok 2.jpg (1280×960)
- File:Barvinok 3.jpg (489×640)
- File:Barvinok 4.jpg (480×640)
- File:Barvinok 5.jpg (2149×2836, camera NIKON D90)
Second group. Mostly small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation again. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @Taivo: This is a misunderstanding. Your presumption of copyright violation is incorrect. I'll lay out the facts before you:
- A few years back, I was asked by a board member of UAWS to create an article about this organization as a personal favor. (My family has Ukrainian heritage.)
- During my meeting with UAWS, they shared with me their archives, and a senior UAWS photographer has shared his vast array of pictures.
- I explained the tricky Wikipedia policies pertinent to images, and we separated the pictures that I wanted to use into three categories:
- Those that were not taken by the UAWS photographer and were not free.
- Those that were taken by UAWS photographer and he and UAWS were okay to share them under Wikipedia license.
- Those that were not taken by UAWS photographer, but were free for other reasons.
- I subsequently uploaded category 1 as fair-use on en-wiki and category 3 into Commons.
- I explained to the photographer that since he technically owned the copyright to category 2 pictures, it would be best if he were to upload those himself.
- And this is exactly what the photographer did. Preferring to stay anonymous, he created UAWS account the next day and uploaded the pictures from his archive.
- As you can see, there is no copyright violation here. On the contrary, everything was uploaded with strict adherence to Commons polices. Please close the deletion nomination, 凰兰时罗 (talk) 19:02, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- @凰兰时罗: The organisation will have to give permission via OTRS Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; please send permission to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rebestalic (talk · contribs)
[edit]- I withdrawn the nomination. Hddty. (talk) 02:41, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Probably not the uploader's own work. Those files could be found at Google Images with "search by images" (Bear's imagePie's image).
- File:Pie smaller.png
- File:Pie small.png
- File:Heliograph of Bear Bear Bear Bear Bear Bear Bear Bear Bear Bear Bear Bear Bear .png
Hddty. (talk) 11:47, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello Hddty. I am Rebestalic.
I'll explain.
The two "Pie" images derive from the "Pie" article from Wikipedia. The reason that there are two of them is that I found a mistake in my userbox template and thought it was something to do with the picture size. It turned out that it was a bad line of code. Am I not allowed to use Wikipedia resources in my own Wikipedia page? If so, my bad. Meanwhile, the "heliograph" of "Bear..." derives from "pexels.com". I have read their license and they have said that I am free to copy it and edit it, attribution optional. The "Bear" picture has such a long title because that is my supposed "real name" on Wikipedia.
If my actions have caused offense to you, I sincerely apologize.
Thank you Rebestalic (talk) 19:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Rebestalic: There's no need to apologize, deletion process is a very normal thing in Commons and Wikipedia. I have fixed the file description. It seems that the bear image isn't from pexels.com since this page at pexels.com listed pixabay.com as source. Those images are not your "own work", you can instead put url on the "source" description. The pie image is from File:Chicken Pie.JPG, you can use it rather than uploading a new image (put
[[File:Chicken Pie.JPG|60px]]on your user page). Also the original image of the file that you uploaded: File:Padlock-blue.svg and File:Wikipedia extended confirmed.svg (alternatively, you can use en:Template:User wikipedia/Extended confirmed, see en:Wikipedia:Userboxes for more information).
- Yes the license says that it is optional to put atributon, but on Wikimedia Commons you have to put a link to source to verify that the media is truly allowed here. Per Commons:Licensing: "The license that applies to an image or media file must be indicated clearly on the file description page using a copyright tag. All information required by that license must be provided on the description page. The information given on the description page should be sufficient to allow others to verify the license status. It would be best to do this immediately in the summary field on the upload form." Hddty. (talk) 02:41, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you.
- - Rebestalic (talk) 05:49, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Nom withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Morocco, permission from artist needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:54, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ℯxplicit 06:15, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, after half of year still without license. Taivo (talk) 16:47, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Obra do próprio? (Own work?) Fontes? (Sources?) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 17:38, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Doesn't really matter. PD-simple. --Majora (talk) 15:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Emblema Buenos Aires 2018 youth olympic games.svg and File:Emblema Buenos Aires 2018 youth olympic games.png
[edit]
This is a logo of the Olympic Games, and is protected by copyright, not property of Buenos Aires gov. 186.125.68.9 01:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- If it get deleted you might also start a DeletionRequest on
- Just pinging for information
- — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 06:48, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Does this meet the treshold of originality? The logo is mainly text and common shapes (rectangles, circles). Skimel (talk) 08:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Skimel:
- How can a picture below the treshold be a Commons:Valued images? Thats in my opinion a contradiction. You can't value something without treshold.
- — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 08:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer: I voted for this image because the logo in itself seemed valuable. The treshold of originality is a concept in copyright that determines wether a logo can be copyrighted or not. It does not determine the intrinsic quality of the image. Skimel (talk) 08:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Skimel: I see that differently. F.e. @MB-one: declined this picture as a Quality Image, because it was not created by an Wikipedian. I know Value Images have different rules, but a picture that is below the treshold, there can hardly be anthing that is value. (But I'm shure you know the rules, and how they are handeld, better than me.)
- However the lizense is wrong and has to be changed. f.e. to {{PD-shape}} or {{PD-logo}}, otherwhise it does not have a valid lizense and has to be deleted.
- — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 09:13, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer: I voted for this image because the logo in itself seemed valuable. The treshold of originality is a concept in copyright that determines wether a logo can be copyrighted or not. It does not determine the intrinsic quality of the image. Skimel (talk) 08:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Does this meet the treshold of originality? The logo is mainly text and common shapes (rectangles, circles). Skimel (talk) 08:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep both under {{CC-AR-GCBA}}, but encourage use of File:Emblema_Buenos_Aires_2018_youth_olympic_games_v2.svg instead due to svg scaling, better cropping, and better colors. Also, no copyright holder has been claimed, other than the government of Buenos Aires. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:59, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: Trademark below threshold of originality. Mapep (talk) 18:55, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Look this video about the originality, for me is not a simple typeface. Acording the w:Template:Non-free Olympics media, and with this case, even if this was a design of the Buenos Aires government, the logos is under by copyright for the IOC, are a IOC trademark, not under CC-AR-GCBA. --181.105.111.181 19:47, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Fonts are not copyrighteable in the US, and I haven't heard of any case in Argentina, see here. You are quoting a template from the english wikipedia, about fair use applied to certain logos, which for sure have be more complex than this one (i.e. including a mascot). The Tokyo Olympics case was about a similar trademark, it had nothing to do with copyright. The IOC does not uphold copyright even for the olypmic rings, there's an entire category of them here in Commons.[2] The trademark for this logo is registered by the Argentine Olympic Comittee,[3] This only means it has commercial rights over the logo. But it has not copyright protection at all, actually it doesn't matter who designed it. Mapep (talk) 14:35, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Look this video about the originality, for me is not a simple typeface. Acording the w:Template:Non-free Olympics media, and with this case, even if this was a design of the Buenos Aires government, the logos is under by copyright for the IOC, are a IOC trademark, not under CC-AR-GCBA. --181.105.111.181 19:47, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: Created and published by the Buenos Aires Goverment, and under {{CC-AR-GCBA}} as they always do. Trademark has nothing to do with Creative Commons Licenses or Copyright in this case, that why the notice.--Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 22:58, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: I remember another deletion request about Buenos Aires 2018 logo, the Olympics logos (as like FIFA World Cup logos) are always IOC's trademarks: the duty to do the logo are by the host but then the copyright is by IOC.--Danistone26 (talk) 23:29, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Question do we know for a fact, that the government of Buenos Aires is the copyright holder of the event logo? --MB-one (talk) 09:16, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- @MB-one: It says "Los contenidos de Gobierno de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires están licenciados bajo Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License" (The contents by the government of the autonomous city of Buenos Aires are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Argentina license.) at the very bottom of the original source. Based on this, it seems like CC-AR-GCBA is indeed the correct license tag for these images. Technically the copyright for the SVGs would be shared between the GCBA (as owner of the design) and myself (as creator of the files), but I simply didn't ask for any additional licensing conditions. I'm not 100% sure that this isn't a case of {{PD-logo}}, but uploading a public domain image under a CC license is perfectly valid. So far nobody has linked a source with contradicting copyright information. (Trademark and copyright are not the same thing.) TilmannR (talk) 12:17, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
- @TilmannR: , thanks fur the additional explanation. But it still doesn't answer my question. If the City of Buenos Aires grants CC licenses for their content, we still need some type of confirmation, that they are indeed owner of he copyright. Because another reasonable assumption could be, that the IOC is the copyright owner.
- --MB-one (talk) 15:06, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
- @MB-one: That's interesting. I would have assumed that its presence on the GCBA's website without any statement that it doesn't belong to the GCBA would have been sufficient to assume ownership by the GCBA. Especially since nobody in this discussion has demonstrated that the IOC owns the copyright to any of the Olympic logos.
- After doing some more research: I didn't find any additional information about the copyright status of this logo, but official information about the Tokyo 2020 logo was easy to find: Brand Protection Guidelines. It quotes the Olympic Charter, Section 7.4, which states that "All rights to any and all Olympic properties, as well as all rights to the use thereof, belong exclusively to the IOC". If that is true, since the term "Olympic properties" includes the rings, the entire Category:Olympic rings has to be deleted. But I don't think it can be true, because the rings are in the public domain and therefore can be used wherever they don't infringe on the IOC's trademarks. So maybe "all rights" means "all rights related to trademark" in this context, which means that we can keep the Olympic rings, but haven't learnt anything about the copyright status of Olympic logos. Considering that there are plenty of Olympic rings and logos in the Commons, it might be a good idea for the WMF to have some actual copyright lawyers look into this. (E.g. Youth Olympic Logo.png, PyeongChang 2018 Winter Olympics.svg, YOG logo std RGB L pos.png and dozens more) TilmannR (talk) 17:01, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
- I'm pretty certain, that the rings logos aren't a copyright problem due to their simple design. --MB-one (talk) 17:11, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
- That's exactly my point: The rings are definitely in the public domain, but the IOC claims that you're not allowed to use them without a written permission.
- To summarize: There are three possibilities.
- Owned by the GCBA (The logo's presence on the GCBA's website implies (but doesn't 100% guarantee) their ownership of the copyright.)
- Owned by the IOC (The IOC claims to own all the rights to all Olympic logos, but "all rights" might not include copyright.)
- Public domain (It's debatable whether the image falls below the threshold of originality for consisting entirely of text and simple geometric shapes.)
- The GCBA and the public domain would allow the file to remain on Commons, but the IOC would certainly require a deletion. Is that enough for the precautionary principle to kick in? I honestly have no idea. "Do we know for a fact, that the government of Buenos Aires is the copyright holder of the event logo?" Maybe not? Depends on how much certainty you need before you call something a fact. But we also do not know for a fact that the IOC owns the copyright. So how are we going to get that information? TilmannR (talk) 00:17, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- I'm pretty certain, that the rings logos aren't a copyright problem due to their simple design. --MB-one (talk) 17:11, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
- @MB-one: It says "Los contenidos de Gobierno de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires están licenciados bajo Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License" (The contents by the government of the autonomous city of Buenos Aires are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Argentina license.) at the very bottom of the original source. Based on this, it seems like CC-AR-GCBA is indeed the correct license tag for these images. Technically the copyright for the SVGs would be shared between the GCBA (as owner of the design) and myself (as creator of the files), but I simply didn't ask for any additional licensing conditions. I'm not 100% sure that this isn't a case of {{PD-logo}}, but uploading a public domain image under a CC license is perfectly valid. So far nobody has linked a source with contradicting copyright information. (Trademark and copyright are not the same thing.) TilmannR (talk) 12:17, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
- i asked the GCBA about it (through a freedom of information request)...the only response was that they transferred the trademark (Industrial Property) of the logos to de IOC after the event, they just ignored the part about copyright i asked...In Argentina they are under this law: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/es/ar/ar010es.pdf which only refers to de Trademark law and not the Copyright ones. --Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 20:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: No evidence was found to support the claim than anyone but the government of Buenos Aires owns the copyright to these images. TilmannR (talk) 14:33, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: The logos do not meet the threshold of originality in either the US or Brazil. It doesn't really matter about trademarks and who owns those and QI images can have any status. --Majora (talk) 17:51, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Dw no source since. Uploader changed source and license to {{PD-VenezuelaGov}}. Is his a valid license in this case? JuTa 23:59, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: The way I read that template and what we have on Venezuela, no it is not a valid license. That is neither a flag or coat of arms but a logo. So normal copyright rules would apply. --Majora (talk) 04:08, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This probably doesn't have to be deleted, but there are some issues:
- File was uploaded by a sock(master), so it can't inherently be trusted. (is it authentic?)
- The file has no source. (it can be found online, but where does it really come from?)
- The {{PD-Sudan}} license does not appear to apply. This is a template issue, Copyright does not extend to state emblems and symbols or official documents. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:22, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete I'm not going to bother clearing up a mess left by a sockmaster and it's an unused image at any rate so potentially out of scope. Finnusertop (talk) 04:26, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Not just because it was a sockmaster but because I am really concerned the document is fake. And if it is fake then PD-Sudan really wouldn't apply since it wouldn't be the real official document. It looks like a simple scan but of what exactly (where did it really come from)? All this together, and the fact that it is unused on any projects makes it easier to fall on the side of caution here. The numerous copyvios and lack of any trust in the uploader just raises too many doubts in my mind. --Majora (talk) 02:56, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Motivational speakers
[edit]The only uploader's contribution (2014), available throughout the Web [4] [5] since at least 18th January 2011: [6]. According to metadata, shot in 2007. Likely to be copyvio.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sealle (talk) 19:47, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Weak Keep All copies are crops or smaller, and this is quite big and has full EXIF. Yann (talk) 07:55, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP delete. It being present for many years before being uploaded here is of great concern. The full size with metadata could just be because they got it from a site that does not strip those things. The author section is also clearly wrong so we don't know who the proper copyright holder is. --Majora (talk) 21:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Referral to a DR, as a request for localisation to English Wikisource. Whilst these are PD in the US. There's not enough information provided to clearly determine if PD-70 applies, with respect to their copyright outside the US. They should be localised to English Wikisource until that can be adequately determined.
- File:Report of the Second Norwegian Arctic Expedition in the "Fram," 1898-1902 (volume 3).djvu
- File:Report of the Second Norwegian Arctic Expedition in the "Fram," 1898-1902 (volume 4).djvu
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:08, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It seems to me, that {{PD-Norway70}} applies. Anonymous work, isn't it? Taivo (talk) 15:30, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- It's not, Components have identifiable authors.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:56, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unclear copyright status -> precautionary principle. This DR has been open for over 6 months, apparently no files were transferred to en.wikisource. The project there seems to have stalled anyway, so apparently the files are not urgently needed. If the files are needed at some point for transfer to en.wikisource, please request temporary undeletion. --Rosenzweig τ 00:27, 25 April 2019 (UTC)