Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/09/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 12th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 09:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted as copyvio. -- Geagea (talk) 13:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

удалить1111 Dragon19971121 (talk) 14:08, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Загружен по ошибке Strumskaya ella (talk) 11:48, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closed fastly. Vandalism.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:32, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fdelay91 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional, out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy delete - advert. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author request, G1, accidental creation Fractaler (talk) 08:08, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User requested deletion in own user space. --Achim (talk) 20:12, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author request, G1, test page Fractaler (talk) 08:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User requested deletion in own user space. --Achim (talk) 20:14, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. Kanisfluh (talk) 11:34, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola at 17:51, 12 September 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 01:20, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is being used for vandalism on en-wiki. Funplussmart (talk) 14:43, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete User has been blocked for continuous vandalism. The image was used in the Wikipedia article Beijing for vandalism. Rosalina2427 (talk) 14:54, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Might be used for LTA documentation on enwiki but otherwise serves no purpose. Aspening (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The uploader of the image has been globally locked. It would probably be best to speedy delete this picture instead. Funplussmart (talk) 22:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:17, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its very doubtfull this is really own work. Looks to much like a press photo. Quality also indicates its taken from the internet. Father of Lies (talk) 04:53, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This photo is not the own work of the uploader. It is a rights-managed photo by Andreas Rentz, Getty Images ID #81514791. —RP88 (talk) 08:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedily deleted by Túrelio per COM:CSD#F1. —RP88 (talk) 03:11, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EMK2020 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files claimed as own work but without any compelling appearance thereof: small sizes, low resolutions, a collage, historical figures, blurry historical figures, modern hip hop artist, etc. Unlikely that anyone but a professional photographer would have this kind of access and produce such low quality images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:31, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:53, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EMK2020 (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Almost every upload by this user is copyvio, and it's hard to take any of the self-made claim seriously. Fortunately, none of these images are used on Wikipedia.

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:52, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by EMK2020 (talk · contribs) 5

[edit]

Please include these in the discussion above. Lack of sourcing, description or categories make these images useless for Wikipedia.

Ytoyoda (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by EMK2020 (talk · contribs) 6

[edit]

Unused maps.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by EMK2020 (talk · contribs) 7

[edit]

Probable copyvios, given the uploader's history and prior DRs above.

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:22, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio (see google results) Kanisfluh (talk) 09:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann at 12:35, 17 September 2018 UTC: per COM:SPEEDY: No permission --Krdbot 01:10, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann at 05:52, 18 September 2018 UTC: per COM:SPEEDY: No permission / copvyio --Krdbot 13:10, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no category -hanabi1983 (talk) 09:30, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 17:22, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo; the logo may be copyrighted. Gikü (talk) 10:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:50, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kacperjuraszek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope logos.

~Cybularny Speak? 10:51, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:40, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook download; please provide link to the original Ytoyoda (talk) 12:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:50, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nknowlwes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nknowlwes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

We have blocked this user on en: for mis-use of Wikipedia as a free host and the same applies here. All of these files are useless. Even the photos at the end of the list - they have no location or other useful information.

RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 13:53, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: out of scope / likely copyvio. --Sealle (talk) 08:42, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is spam. -- Kaganer (talk) 15:32, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:51, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlbusTheWhite (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False dates, unlikely to be own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:58, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 22:56, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlbusTheWhite (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work. Any files with low resolution, all without metadata.

Hystrix (talk) 23:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:53, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by R7777n (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As COM:Nudity = I think we have enough naked ladies, no need for more. All unused.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by R7777n (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As COM:Nudity, There are plenty of naked ladies already.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:47, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:55, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, Commons is not your web host

Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover designed by Charlotte Strick in 2008, copyright violation. 90.43.35.117 20:12, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 08:29, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pascal Convert is born in 1957. No freedom of panorama in France. 90.43.35.117 22:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 08:31, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo; No Fairuse on Commons Father of Lies (talk) 09:13, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete file:Caffeinopolis svg logo.svg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a collection of copyrighted content physically pasted into someones equivalent of a journal. Chrissymad (talk) 19:13, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:16, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:IRL N1.svg and similarly named shields. These shields have the wrong size for the digits, see spec here. Also see past discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:N60 national IE.jpg and similar discussions at COM:HWY/P.

Rschen7754 02:05, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Morgan23rose (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works but grabbed from a social media : small/middle sizes without EXIFs

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:53, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:54, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:54, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non educational media. Joke of childrens on a fake article in fr.wiki Hercule (talk) 08:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:54, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non educational media. Joke of childrens on a fake article in fr.wiki Hercule (talk) 08:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:54, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non educational media. Joke of childrens on a fake article in fr.wiki Hercule (talk) 08:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:54, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non educational media. Joke of childrens on a fake article in fr.wiki Hercule (talk) 08:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:54, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. see google-results Kanisfluh (talk) 10:27, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:27, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – low quality unused image of non-notable writer/poet. Uploaded solely for the purpose of promotion. Hiàn (talk) 00:04, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:27, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free album covers. The Mozart portrait is out of copyright, but the blue images don't seem to be. De728631 (talk) 01:17, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. This is a screenshot. אלי גודין (talk) 01:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and that is the problem. The content shown on the screen doesn't seem be free, so even if you made the screenshot it cannot be published without consent of the original copyright holders. Please read some background information about screenshots. --De728631 (talk) 18:08, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:28, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Klucis was rehabilitated in 1956, PD starts 2026 Carl Ha (talk) 07:46, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:29, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no COM:FOP for statues in Russia. Leoboudv (talk) 09:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrectly named with incorrect date. i own it but i want to re upload the file with accurate name date taken information. please remove it urgently. SeniorN (talk) 09:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep You can rename it at Commons:File renaming Greetings --Kanisfluh (talk) 09:37, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:33, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Upload not correct. Kanisfluh (talk) 09:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:35, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 09:50, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:36, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Kanisfluh (talk) 09:24, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. private image. Kanisfluh (talk) 09:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. private image. Kanisfluh (talk) 09:26, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. personal image. Kanisfluh (talk) 09:26, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. personal image. Kanisfluh (talk) 09:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. personal image. Kanisfluh (talk) 09:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. personal image. Kanisfluh (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. personal image. Kanisfluh (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. private image. Kanisfluh (talk) 09:34, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. personal image. Kanisfluh (talk) 09:34, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too small, blurred etc. out of project scope. Kanisfluh (talk) 09:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

modern stamp probably still under copyright Philafrenzy (talk) 21:05, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think he's right, I thought it was a Romanian stamp when I transferred it, wrong licensing.Ionutzmovie (talk) 21:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

modern stamps probably still under copyright. Appear to be under an incorrect licence as Guyana, not Russia. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:06, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free media / Promotional material under copyright Andycyca (talk) 23:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La pyramide du Louvre est protégée par le droit d'auteur. VIGNERON (talk) 06:50, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; Should use real text and clickable link Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:02, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:57, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

other reason Ravi MorKal (talk) 14:58, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope. personal image. Kanisfluh (talk) 09:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. out of scope Commons:PS Kanisfluh (talk) 09:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 09:43, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 09:43, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused poster of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:59, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:31, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note, this is not the same PDF as the previously deleted one; all three files with that generic name "Hypothalamus.pdf" deleted so far were different from each other, but all had basically the same issues. "Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images", as in EugeneZelenko's previous nominations, applies to this one as well. The photo of a sleeping woman looks like a stock photo. I suggest that, after deleting this PDF, this file name should be blocked for future uploads, as the name is too generic and seems to attract content that is out of scope / unsuitable for Commons. Gestumblindi (talk) 17:47, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:26, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:59, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:00, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image illustrates nothing educationally useful. Unused personal images of non-notable actors. Hiàn (talk) 00:09, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement Dalgial (talk) 06:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JJBers|talk 21:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Hystrix. --Sealle (talk) 21:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JaimeMG94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image, out of Scope

Migebert (talk) 21:26, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of Scope Migebert (talk) 21:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, out of Commons project scope Migebert (talk) 21:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not CC license, licensing "Användning i media", means "used in media", therefore no permission B dash (talk) 08:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not CC license, actually the comments on the license imply a no-Derivative use restriction, which is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. Note the words "provided that the Content is unchanged and used in its entirety." B dash (talk) 08:52, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:21, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 09:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 09:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 09:50, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 09:51, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 09:54, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot. copyvio. Kanisfluh (talk) 09:55, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 09:55, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. screenshot. Kanisfluh (talk) 10:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. screenshot. Kanisfluh (talk) 09:57, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 10:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope copyvio. Kanisfluh (talk) 10:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 10:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:19, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 10:19, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 10:19, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:26, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:26, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from mobile device (musical.ly) Copyvio. Kanisfluh (talk) 10:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 10:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:33, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope --Kanisfluh (talk) 10:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC) Kanisfluh (talk) 10:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:42, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Aswick .jpg
Love Hacker
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aswick Rio (talk • contribs) 03:08, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 10:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:42, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aswick 1.jpg
Love Hacker

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aswick Rio (talk • contribs) 03:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 10:29, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:46, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope Kanisfluh (talk) 10:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:44, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No useful page, probably a Test Page. Regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 10:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work, design by Marianne Brandt, who died in 1983. Thus still protected h-stt !? 10:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Soweit ich weiß, wurden diese Medien bzw. Fotographien, z.B. das Teekännchen hier, vom Smart Museum of Art über WMCH Commons unter CC-by-sa-3.0 zur Verfügung gestellt. Doc Taxon (talk) 11:29, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright does not apply to pictures of utilitarian objects like this (and furniture, cars, industrial design...). Se cases like this, this and pages linked from there. Thank you --Sailko (talk) 11:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
this is not so much an utilitarian object but a piece of artistic design. Mariann Brandt was a professor at the world renowned Bauhaus academy and museums all over the world exhibit her works. Sorry, but we can't keep this and similar works. --h-stt !? 21:16, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

in my opinion it falls under COM:TOO, design could't be protected. Habitator terrae (talk) 12:57, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For persons being able to read German: de:WP:UF#Bauhaus 2019

This is the correct guideline --Sailko (talk) 13:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We already had a decision a few years ago: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Marianne_brandt,_teiere,_1924_(cropped).JPG --Artmax (talk) 20:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that was correct and we should request undeletion. We have a few possibilities to hold free images of modern/contemporary items, so we should defend them. I tag user:Clindberg for help on this issue, and this. Thank you. --Sailko (talk) 06:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
German law does protect applied art with copyright. It's not always clear that such works get the same derivative work treatment that other works do, at least for things like photographs (the protection is usually more to protect from too-similar competing designs). But there was a Swedish case where a photograph of designer chairs was ruled derivative, I think. Furthermore, this may be complicated if the teapots were marketed in the United States, where this copy is and where the photograph is from, and where applied art is not protected through copyright (rather design patents) and therefore there is no derivative issue on photographs. The photo is fine for the U.S. (and could at least be moved to en-wiki); whether we consider German law as matter of Commons policy is a bit more gray. It could be analogous to freedom of panorama if the teapots were knowingly sold in the U.S., but if this was a German example brought to the museum it may not be as clear. I'm also not sure we have been making a habit of deleting photos of German applied art (i.e. utilitarian works), though Swedish ones we have. Not sure on this one. Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:30, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: utilitarian object. --Yann (talk) 11:50, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work, design by Marianne Brandt, who died in 1983. Thus still protected. h-stt !? 10:45, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright does not apply to pictures of utilitarian objects like this (and furniture, cars, industrial design...). Se cases like this, this and pages linked from there. Thank you --Sailko (talk) 11:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See also the description of File:Two jars by Marianne Brandt, 1 of 2, Metallwarenfabrik Ruppel, Gotha, Germany, 1930, lacquered sheet iron - Museum für Angewandte Kunst Köln - Cologne, Germany - DSC09494.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 12:54, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
this is not so much an utilitarian object but a piece of artistic design. Mariann Brandt was a professor at the world renowned Bauhaus academy and museums all over the world exhibit her works. Sorry, but we can't keep this and similar works. --h-stt !? 21:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Info see also this related DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Marianne brandt, teiere, 1924 (cropped).JPG.--Wdwd (talk) 08:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: utilitarian object. --Yann (talk) 11:51, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work, Frank Llyod Wright died in 1959, thus still protected. h-stt !? 10:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright does not apply to utilitarian objects like this (and furniture, cars, industrial design...). Se cases like this and pages linked from there. Thank you --Sailko (talk) 11:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
this is not so much an utilitarian object but a piece of artistic design and exhibited precisely for that. Sorry, but we can't keep this and similar works. --h-stt !? 21:21, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You should refer to policies of Commons, not just to your opinion. I already linked similar cases. I ask for User:Clindberg to clarify (again) this matter, please. Thank you. --Sailko (talk) 06:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The U.S. does not protect industrial design (or "applied art") through copyright (unlike some other countries). A couple of the patterns may be separable, but they are de minimis here and they probably don't qualify for copyright anyways. From the House report on the 1976 act: On the other hand, although the shape of an industrial product may be aesthetically satisfying and valuable, the Committee’s intention is not to offer it copyright protection under the bill. Unless the shape of an automobile, airplane, ladies’ dress, food processor, television set, or any other industrial product contains some element that, physically or conceptually, can be identified as separable from the utilitarian aspects of that article, the design would not be copyrighted under the bill. For U.S. copyright, the table and chairs are utilitarian objects and are not copyrightable, regardless of design. Only separable works can carry a copyright. For one example (a sculpture used as a base for a lamp, which is separable) there is Mazer v. Stein, and a counterexample (a sculpture altered to make a cool-looking bike rack) is Brandir v. Cascade, which was not copyrightable. Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: utilitarian object, as per Carl. --Yann (talk) 11:52, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work, Frank Llyod Wright died in 1959, thus still protected. h-stt !? 10:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright does not apply to utilitarian objects like this (and furniture, cars, industrial design...). Se cases like this and pages linked from there. Thank you --Sailko (talk) 11:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
this is not so much an utilitarian object but a piece of artistic design and exhibited precisely for that. Sorry, but we can't keep this and similar works. --h-stt !? 21:21, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Industrial design is not protected by copyright in the U.S. Anything separable here may not be copyrightable (it's a pretty standard geometrical pattern) and would be PD-1923 even if it was. Author's lifetime does not matter for the U.S. Carl Lindberg (talk) 09:04, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: utilitarian object, as per Carl. --Yann (talk) 11:52, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work, Frank Llyod Wright died in 1959, thus still protected. h-stt !? 10:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright does not apply to pictures of utilitarian objects like this (and furniture, cars, industrial design...). Se cases like this, this and pages linked from there. Thank you --Sailko (talk) 11:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
By the way we have an entire category of Furniture by Frank Lloyd Wright, I don't understand why you had to pick my files only, you should have checked the commons policy about furniture design before. --Sailko (talk) 11:51, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
this is not so much an utilitarian object but a piece of artistic design and exhibited precisely for that. Sorry, but we can't keep this and similar works. --h-stt !? 21:21, 14 September 2018 (UTC) PS: I came to this issue by the Marianne Brandt designs and checked only image from the same museum category. And yes, I don't think we can keep any piece of furniture by FLW.[reply]
 Keep Industrial design is not protected by copyright in the U.S.; regardless even if it was it would be PD-1923 as U.S. copyright terms before 1978 are not based on the author's lifetime. Carl Lindberg (talk) 09:01, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: utilitarian object, as per Carl. --Yann (talk) 11:53, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work, Frank Llyod Wright died in 1959, thus still protected. h-stt !? 10:48, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright does not apply to pictures of utilitarian objects like this (and furniture, cars, industrial design...). Se cases like this, this and pages linked from there. Thank you --Sailko (talk) 11:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
this is not so much an utilitarian object but a piece of artistic design and exhibited precisely for that. Sorry, but we can't keep this and similar works. --h-stt !? 21:19, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This is the type of thing which could be separable, but it's still close to the non-copyrightable edge for the U.S. On the other hand, what does the author's year of death have to do with anything? U.S. terms are based on year of publication, and the author's lifetime has nothing to do with it (only stuff published since 1978). It's PD-1923 regardless. Carl Lindberg (talk) 09:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: utilitarian object, as per Carl. --Yann (talk) 11:53, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accoding to the page it's used on it's "used by kind permission", which contradicts the "own work" bit and invalidates the license (not copyright holder) Kleuske (talk) 11:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:54, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Updated with dubious source claim by User:OberRanks, known for serial source falsifications (now banned on en-wp). As in multiple other cases of images claimed to be from NARA, claimed archival source doesn't match publicly available descriptions [1] of the records in question. According to the catalog/finding aid, "T608, roll 7" contains copies of the 1940/41 volumes of a periodical, Nauticus, Jahrbuch für Deutschlands Seeinteressen, and as such couldn't possibly contain a photo claimed to be from 1944. Fut.Perf. 11:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:55, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no EXIF data, Doubtfull as own work. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:56, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. Kanisfluh (talk) 11:57, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kanisfluh: Hi, how's it a copyvio? --Mhhossein talk 02:55, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mhhossein: Hey, It's a copyvio because it's a painting. And the painter was born in the 1980ies, the person on the right side in the painting (chancellor Sebastian Kurz) was born in 1986. So it's not 100 years old, and the painter isn't dead for 70 years yet. --Kanisfluh (talk) 08:50, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Its an artwork and not a photography. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 11:57, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 11:57, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 11:57, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 11:58, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 11:58, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 11:59, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 11:58, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 11:59, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 11:58, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 11:59, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 12:01, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:01, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:02, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:01, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:02, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:04, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:04, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:05, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:08, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:09, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:06, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 11:59, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:12, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 11:59, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 12:12, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 11:59, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Patrick Roger, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:19, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:02, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear photo Rudolphous (talk) 12:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope. --Yann (talk) 12:03, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freedom of panorama Kanisfluh (talk) 13:04, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 12:03, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. Kanisfluh (talk) 13:06, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 12:03, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 13:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 12:04, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. Kanisfluh (talk) 13:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 12:04, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

paintings in this picture are copyrighted and not free Kanisfluh (talk) 13:05, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 12:04, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Admin Racconish has undeleted but the OTRS thingy is not on the page. Does it exist and cover "all" the paintings here? E4024 (talk) 00:39, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: License on souce-page is cc-by-sa-4.0. No OTRS tag needed in this case. --Wdwd (talk) 15:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 13:09, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:08, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. Kanisfluh (talk) 13:09, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 13:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 13:14, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 13:15, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 13:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 13:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. no copyleft possible Kanisfluh (talk) 13:32, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 13:32, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 13:37, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this image! I am the artist, photograph and uploader. Matthias Laurenz Gräff --Donald1972 (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep:
    • The organization NQT is obviously relevant and well known in France, and this image shows its logo as shown in their website, quoted in the file page.
    • While SVG is ideal for most logos, the lack thereof does not justify asking for the deletion of its JPEG version.
(It’s not unused anymore, either: I just added it to fr:NQT, to replace a fair use image of what seems to be a previous logo.)
-- Tuválkin 23:10, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 12:10, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tonythewriter2018 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-res images that appear to come from social media. One image credits Christophe Brysse, and another is highly stylized and needs to credit the photographer as well as the editor.

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:11, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:04, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:12, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:11, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexfurse84 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene, Please assist in explaining how photos can be granted permission and published. These photos belong to the band of which I am a part of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexfurse84 (talk • contribs) 22:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights holder should send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:35, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:12, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VDESIDERIO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:13, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:13, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credited to the subject's Instagram account, needs COM:OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 15:57, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:14, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be a selfie, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This file is not Self camera-contained. If the policy of the wiki can not be made by itself. You can delete this file.--Ransah1963 (talk) 14:59, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:14, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author does not provide any citation if they are the copyright owner of the logo of an event Psubhashish (talk) 18:40, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no citation how the author is the original author of the book Psubhashish (talk) 18:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete at the request of author Nipponeselover (talk) 19:24, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:21, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blank image Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value: low quality (bad jpeg compression artefacts and blurry), birds unidentifiable, no file description. MPF (talk) 19:49, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it isn't an own work, not source provided Ezarateesteban 20:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata shows copyright holder as being Evanston Photographic Studios and both description and title identify photographer as Genie Lemieux SecretName101 (talk) 21:19, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of Scope Migebert (talk) 21:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 21:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a much better (vector format instead of PNG) and up-to-date version of this file exists; this one can be safely deleted as nothing links to it and the information in it is severely outdated Cherkash (talk) 22:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: as per above. --Yann (talk) 12:17, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by a single-edit user, unused, not notable and otherwise uninteresting logo {{Badjpg}} image containing also private information (apparently a Portuguese cell phone number). -- Tuválkin 23:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:17, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the subject consented. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vagina ultra01.JPG.

Same applies to other derivatives:

—⁠andrybak (talk) 00:05, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is that new policy that consent must be shown for all pictures? I thought we assumed consent? I don't remember consent forms being required on Wikimedia? Nesnad (talk) 05:24, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nesnad, I simply noticed that in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vagina ultra01.JPG some derivatives of File:Vagina ultra01.JPG were deleted. File:Clitoris y labia.jpg still refers to File:Vagina ultra03.JPG as the source, so it seems reasonable to finish what was started in that deletion request. —⁠andrybak (talk) 18:21, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nesnad, this, of course, implies that if this nomination does not go through, than the previous nomination could and should be reconsidered and files undeleted. —⁠andrybak (talk) 18:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Worthless, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 09:26, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - how is it out of scope? it is in use. I feel like this is puritain scared feelings because this is "private parts" or something ? Nesnad (talk) 14:25, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: in use. --Yann (talk) 12:16, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file with questionable license Wumbolo (talk) 17:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: in use. --Yann (talk) 12:27, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Dw no source since (dw no source since). Seems to be a FOP case which must go through DR. What buildings are we looking at, in what country? Guanaco (talk) 17:27, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like an architect's model to me - they are no real windows. Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:30, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Faizan E Madina in Karachi Pakistan At Gulshan E iqbal Town  Near P.T.C.L Exchange Office and Behind Askari Park on university Road Karachi...Abid Ali — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abid2641 (talk • contribs) 03:46, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per Ronhjones. --Yann (talk) 12:26, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source of the picture not cited Psubhashish (talk) 18:34, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata at Flickr, found at https://www.gettyimages.fr/license/500445124 Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:27, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion of Missouri Historical Society photographs based on EXIF data

[edit]

These four files have the identical issues raised in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bodice Designed by House of Worth and Worn by Julia Dent Grant.jpg.

OTRS ticket:201808241000417 applies, this is an official email from the museum confirming that:

  1. The Missouri Historical Society does not assert its copyright in photographs of its artifacts, and releases them for free use. We generally ask for the credit line: “Courtesy of the Missouri Historical Society, St. Louis,” but otherwise we encourage the free use of our object images.
  2. The copyright statement in the metadata of the image pre-dates the adoption of the policy, but unfortunately we were unable to remove it from our older files.

After receiving the email confirmation which addresses the issues raised in the 9 July 2018 DR, an undeletion request was raised here (September 2018) and has been archived leaving the file in its deleted state.

There is no legally meaningful doubt that the photographs have been correctly released in compliance with COM:L. The situation of deleting one file and refusing to undelete it is illogical; either we undelete the above bodice photograph or we delete these four further photographs which have exactly the same issue in the EXIF data. The case would make a new guideline for Commons that text in EXIF data with any apparent copyright claim will permanently overrule later official correspondence confirming that a free release exists, which otherwise would have been sufficient for Wikimedia Commons to host the file.

Previously commenting parties: @Ankry, Josve05a, Nemo bis, Yann, and PKM: @Jeff G., Clpo13, and Jcb:

-- (talk) 10:30, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • The intend of the museum may be to release these under a compatible license with Commons, and that's great. But currently, these files do not have a valid license. The current license doesn't cover the photographer's rights, and these are not 2D artworks. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:37, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
{{Attribution}} added, which is, of course, not a license but represents "The Missouri Historical Society does not assert its copyright". -- (talk) 05:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, that's a step in the right direction. I would expect a specific template, but I won't object if there is a consensus. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:43, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I can draft a specific template. - PKM (talk) 20:11, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Proposed: {{Attribution-MissouriHistoricalSociety}}
@: Can you double-check the OTRS ticket number? It throws an error when I add it to the custom template, and I don't have access to OTRS. - PKM (talk) 21:11, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The number is correct. As just 5 files are relevant, manual cut and paste would be a better technical solution rather than avoidable transclusions. -- (talk) 21:31, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. - PKM (talk) 23:07, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The custom attribution template {{Attribution-MissouriHistoricalSociety}} has been placed on the four files listed above. Per guidance, I'll defer to an OTRS volunteer to add the OTRS template as appropriate. - PKM (talk) 23:18, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There are a large number of files that can use this attribution template (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Clothing in the collections of the Missouri History Museum), so I believe we'd be better off adding the OTRS ticket template to the attribution template. I’m happy to do that if an OTRS volunteer will gave me the go-ahead since I can’t view the ticket myself to verify. Or an OTRS person could update the template ... - PKM (talk) 19:29, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Verification is literally pointless, as I sent the email in to OTRS. -- (talk) 11:30, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

((Outdent}} Two of these four files are clothing and have been marked to Keep via Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Clothing in the collections of the Missouri History Museum. Can we Keep the remaining two now? - PKM (talk) 21:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 03:47, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Self-promotion; Not educationally useful. Lemonnurse (talk) 00:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this photograph when attempting to create a Wikipedia page for this business. The Wikipedia page was deemed insignificant and deleted in 2012. (For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Charles_Dewhirst_Funeral_Home&action=edit&redlink=1). It recently came to my attention that this photo still exists on Wikimedia Commons, and, since there is no Wikipedia page for the business, I believe it is not appropriate on this site. Specifically, I believe it constitutes self-promotion. Additionally, it is not educationally useful, as evidenced by the fact that there are many other photographs of funeral homes of equal quality already on Wikimedia Commons, and the fact that there are no other pages on Wikimedia Commons that link to this photo. Thank you for your consideration. Lemonnurse (talk) 01:05, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 12:42, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Not educationally useful; self-promotion. Lemonnurse (talk) 00:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this photograph when attempting to create a Wikipedia page for this business. The Wikipedia page was deemed insignificant and deleted in 2012. (For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Charles_Dewhirst_Funeral_Home&action=edit&redlink=1). It recently came to my attention that this photo still exists on Wikimedia Commons, and, since there is no Wikipedia page for the business, I believe it is not appropriate on this site. Specifically, I believe it constitutes self-promotion. Additionally, it is not educationally useful, as evidenced by the fact that there are many other photographs of funeral homes of equal quality already on Wikimedia Commons, and the fact that there are no other pages on Wikimedia Commons that link to this photo. Thank you for your consideration. Lemonnurse (talk) 01:06, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: can be used to illiustrate Funeral homes in the United States. Ruthven (msg) 12:42, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 06:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: screenshot from The Voice on NBC TV [2]. Ruthven (msg) 12:41, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:PTC Eight 2018-09-07 1437Z.jpg B dash (talk) 08:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not exact duplicate. Ruthven (msg) 12:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licence is Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) - NON COMMERCIAL => pas sur wikipédia Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 12:17, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the licence was different on Flickr years ago, when uploaded here and checked by FlickreviewR. Ruthven (msg) 12:44, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata at Flickr, found at https://www.gettyimages.fr/license/500445124 Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:29, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:31, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata and the uploader's history. LX (talk, contribs) 05:49, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:24, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:NETCOPYVIO. Yann (talk) 16:50, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif metadata states "Author: Paula Islas; Copyright holder: FIL". If User:User:Delapurissima is affiliated with FIL (Feria Internacional del Libro de Guadalajara), they should indentify themselves using COM:OTRS. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:08, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Italy, The architect, Tommaso Buzzi, dies in 1981, and the file can be undeleted on 1 January 2052. Ymblanter (talk) 14:26, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:27, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sicher nicht im Interesse der Kinder dort von Jedermann unter der Kategorie zu erscheinen. Elisauer (talk) 12:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It could be better categorized for the main subject (the children), but that’s no good reason to delete. As for the location, it does illustrate the scale of some of the details on the façade, but at any rate we have lots of photos in building categories that show people in & around a site more than the building itself. If such images clutter the main category too much, a subcat something like People at the Walhalla could be created to keep them aside.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:09, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the photo does not illustrate Walhalla at all. It's simply photo about bunch of children. Taivo (talk) 20:31, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

L’architecte, Auguste Bluysen, est mort en 1952. Son œuvre entrera donc dans le domaine public en 2023. Pas de liberté de panorama en France.

Not all fil of the category nominated (maybe DM? to be checked). Previous DR for this building : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Casino 2013-09-09 08-21-32.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Casino de Granville.jpg. VIGNERON (talk) 11:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:37, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sadbomb images by user:Lollipop

[edit]

Sorry IM not sure how to do this. i want to delete the images i uploaded on my alt account (mobile editing only) and could not naviagte around the page on mobile so i followed the instructions as best i could. These are:

Sorry fopr the confusion and the mess, i wasnty able to do this on my mobile phone. i just now removed the old diff because it wasnt rendering properly. While I put a lot of wortk into these images, i think they dont belong here because

File:Ss (6).jpg
Im ready to go.
  1. Theyre JPGs and there is no way to delete the background using MediaWiki,
  2. Some have errors which are invisible at low resolution as they appear in the game but visually distracting at full resolution,
  3. Nobody is using them, and
  4. I seem to not have uploade4d the complete set to begin with ... the most central image of all is missing. unless it has already been deleted and i somehow missed that.
  5. The URLs are unhelpful.
  6. I found the original PNG images but to upload both those and these would create unnecessary confusion.

I know that deleting images doesnt actually save any server space and therefore even an unused image can be kept just because it might potentially be useful, and if this is kept i might just decorate my userpage evenm so, but i consider these images useless.

thank you, Soap (talk) 17:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

if there is any doubt that i am the same account i can verify it but I only get to this áccount when Im on wi-fi or visiting a place that has it.Soap (talk) 17:46, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From https://www.fonderiamarinelli.it/en/monuments/1986-2005/la-porta-del-mito-2005/9-lo-scultore-onofrio-pepe-accanto-alla-porta-terminata-in-fonderia-2/ Ytoyoda (talk) 19:04, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not CC license, actually the comments on the license imply a no-Derivative use restriction, which is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. Note the words "provided that the Content is unchanged and used in its entirety." B dash (talk) 08:54, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not CC license, actually the comments on the license imply a no-Derivative use restriction, which is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. Note the words "provided that the Content is unchanged and used in its entirety." B dash (talk) 08:57, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not CC license, actually the comments on the license imply a no-Derivative use restriction, which is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. Note the words "provided that the Content is unchanged and used in its entirety." B dash (talk) 08:59, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:15, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The comments on the license imply a no-Derivative use restriction, which is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. Note the words "allow others to copy, distribute and send in unaltered form." B dash (talk) 09:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The comments on the license imply a no-Derivative use restriction, which is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. Note the words "allow others to copy, distribute and send in unaltered form."

B dash (talk) 09:09, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:17, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The comments on the license imply a no-Derivative use restriction, which is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. Note the words "allow others to copy, distribute and send in unaltered form." B dash (talk) 09:10, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:17, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not CC license, actually the comments on the license imply a no-Derivative use restriction, which is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. Note the words "provided that the Content is unchanged and used in its entirety." B dash (talk) 09:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:17, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not CC license, actually the comments on the license imply a no-Derivative use restriction, which is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. Note the words "provided that the Content is unchanged and used in its entirety." B dash (talk) 09:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:17, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not CC license, actually the comments on the license imply a no-Derivative use restriction, which is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. Note the words "provided that the Content is unchanged and used in its entirety." B dash (talk) 09:12, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:17, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work, Alexander Archipenko died in 1964, thus still protected. h-stt !? 10:49, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here is my mistake. I think I confused with some artists already in PD, like Juan Gris. Ok to delete --Sailko (talk) 11:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion of another famous artist, out of scope. In addition DW (montage). Achim (talk) 18:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

and also:

--Achim (talk) 17:40, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:19, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pascal Convert is born in 1957. No freedom of panorama in France. 90.43.35.117 22:30, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What does that mean? Could you write it in your native tongue, please? Eric talk 21:25, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. It means that this is an artwork and that the permission from its author is required. Ruthven (msg) 18:20, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a trivial copy of File:Russia_besvizi2.PNG; nothing of substance links here. Cherkash (talk) 22:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 21:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JaroslavSil as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: ruším autorská práva a licenci k užití fotky
Converted by me to DR, as it does not qualify for speedy-deletion. Courtesy-deletion would be o.k. However, I've found 1 external use here. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:45, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission, uploader is depicted person. --Jcb (talk) 16:15, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be a selfie, permission from photographer needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. Strakhov (talk) 01:31, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by User:OberRanks, known for habitual source falsifications and copyright violations (now banned on en-wp). Sourcing claim is vague and unverifiable, hence dubious. Fut.Perf. 11:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. OberRanks has dishonestly claimed other images came from various US institutions and are therefore PD, and the tiny 85x153 size of this one makes the U.S. Navy Historical Society seem an unlikely source. Without bomb-proof evidence, I think we have to assume the provenance here is falsified. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:34, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no proper source, not claimed as own work but also no source specified. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:56, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie, very unlikely to be own work, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:15, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Patrick, obviously it's not a selfie, but it's a picture taken by a photographer who I regularly paid for, and whose rights I bought. If I'm wrong to insert the copyright references I apologize, I'm new on wiki. Can you explain to me how to set the details correctly? Thank you in advance. Claudio Belotti (msg) 14:41, 12 set 2018 (CEST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Claudio Belotti (talk • contribs) 12:45, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Claudio Belotti: . You must send a permission at COM:OTRS/it and enclose the letter which mention the transfer of ownership from the photographer to you. Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:53, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I'll do it! Claudio Belotti (msg) 14:41, 12 set 2018 (CEST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Claudio Belotti (talk • contribs) 12:45, 12 September 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Claudio Belotti (talk • contribs) 17:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS received, valid authorization. Added {{PermissionOTRS}}. --.avgas 08:14, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS confirmed. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:57, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, please provide source for the original work Ytoyoda (talk) 12:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:57, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:58, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Après vérification, la carte comporte un certain nombre d'erreurs de localisation ou d'approximation B-noa (talk) 12:44, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: heavily used. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce fichier comporte des erreurs de localisation et de droits d'auteur. B-noa (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:58, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badly rotated version of File:Usb-logo.png. Niridya (talk) 18:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Delete --Niridya (talk) 19:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:58, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Champlax (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Ww2censor (talk) 22:48, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:59, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Usa imágenes de logos con protección de copyright CarlosArturoAcosta (talk) 23:05, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:59, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vista940521 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Source unclear. User uploads photographs from the web and claims ownership.

Ytoyoda (talk) 18:26, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:01, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is no EXIF info Psubhashish (talk) 18:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:00, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems like a scanned image which lacks EXIF info of camera Psubhashish (talk) 18:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:00, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badly coloured version of File:Certified USB.svg. Niridya (talk) 18:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Delete --Niridya (talk) 19:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:00, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An picture of an pictures doesnt make it own work Father of Lies (talk) 18:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:00, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badly coloured version of File:Certified_Hi-Speed_USB.svg. Niridya (talk) 19:34, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Delete --Niridya (talk) 19:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:01, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo was originally uploaded to be used in our Wikipedi company page which was rejected so this logo is not used anywhere in Wikipedia nor Wikimedia. It is under our Copyright and that's why we request to delete it from Wikimedia. Thanks. Kzfabi (talk) 19:46, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:01, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logos are not allowed on Commons, it should have been uploaded on fr.wiki, see fr:Fichier:Logo Champions Cup 2018.png - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 20:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:01, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL, any evidence that image is under CC0 Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:48, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When you click through the gallery the picture is included. All images on the Defensie.nl website are under CC0 licence (unless otherwise noted). (https://www.defensie.nl/copyright) Poppo154 (talk) 13:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Lymantria (talk) 10:14, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, similar to https://www.facebook.com/tombarcalofficial/photos/a.342354249248984/1130597750424626/?type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:46, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Das Foto wurde im Jahr wurde am 5.9.2017 von der Fotografin Jennifer Többen aufgenommen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Veron88 (talk • contribs) 15:23, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Veron88: Jennifer Többen must send a permission via COM:OTRS/de. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: the picture is borrowed from http://www.delfi.lv/kultura/news/music/sigvards-klava-ar-panakumiem-uzstajies-amsterdamas-concertgebouw-zale.d?id=42166636 Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:59, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source of the book not cited Psubhashish (talk) 18:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:41, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to http://www.halakazim.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Anger-Workshop-220918-02.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:30, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not at claimed CC-BY source; uploader has history of copyvio uploads. MPF (talk) 16:34, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. @MPF: You can speedy delete those copyvios. Ruthven (msg) 13:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not at claimed CC-BY source; uploader has history of copyvio uploads. MPF (talk) 16:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not at claimed CC-BY source; uploader has history of copyvio uploads. MPF (talk) 16:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not at claimed CC-BY source; uploader has history of copyvio uploads. MPF (talk) 16:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern 3D artwork, author’s permission needed.

Sealle (talk) 17:10, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake LoiDavid2307171 (talk) 17:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment While I appreciate the hard work that went into this drawing, it seems to be missing a fin as compared with the image we have at w:Hyneria. File:Hyneria_Lindae_2.jpg is also missing the same fin. Also, I assume you are the same person as the uploader? Soap (talk) 18:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: artistic work, permission needed from the author (given that they are > 18yo). Ruthven (msg) 13:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text of 1933, not public domain. Tohma (talk) 15:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-text. --Rosenzweig τ 21:23, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ransah1963 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

On my talk page today, the uploader, Ransah 1963 claims that he is Seung-Moo Ha, the subject of these images. The uploader claims that he is the photographer of all of them. Since few, if any, of them are selfies, it is likely that all of these violate the copyrights belonging to the actual photographers.

I also note that there is no WP article on the subject and that there are no first page Google hits. It seems likely that he does not meet our notability requirement.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:18, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal against file deletion request at the top
I am Korean poet & Pastor Seung-Moo Ha(ransah1963). My official site is http://poetofoz.blogspot.com. All files are my own. Please visit and confirm that it is my file. All the files I uploaded are those that I have taken directly, and the other pictures are those taken by my colleagues. So I have the copyright to all these files.Ransah1963 (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If, as you claim, you are the actual photographer of any of these images, you may identify them and we will consider them. As for "those taken by my colleagues", first, they are not "own work" as you have claimed in all of the file descriptions. Second, unless you have a formal, written, transfer or license of copyright, you do not have the right to upload them here. In any case, if you were not the actual photographer, then in each case either (a) the actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS, or (b) you must send a free license also using OTRS together with evidence that you have the right to freely license the image.
Also, please remember that while Ransah1963 claims that he is Seung-Moo Ha, identity theft, both by fans and by vandals, is common here and we must rely on OTRS to verify claims such as this. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:35, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your answers. All the above files are jpg or png files. And the old Acquaintances received from the files can not be traced. I am still very novice about how to use the wiki.

I hope you can help me. All of the above materials are on my official site. I would not want to claim any copyright for all materials. We hope that all users will be able to use it freely if it meets the requirements to identify the source from the wiki.Ransah1963 (talk) 21:59, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ransah1963 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be a selfie. Permission needed.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This file is not Self camera-contained. If the policy of the wiki can not be made by itself. You can delete this file.--Ransah1963 (talk) 15:01, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All image is not "self" and "free". Thanks. --Garam talk 10:47, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Besides @Ransah1963: is COM:OOS on Wikimedia sister projects. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:18, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 19:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Italy, The architect, Tommaso Buzzi, dies in 1981, and the file can be undeleted on 1 January 2051. Ymblanter (talk) 14:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 05:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Italy, The architect, Tommaso Buzzi, dies in 1981, and the file can be undeleted on 1 January 2051. Ymblanter (talk) 14:26, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 05:34, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Italy, The architect, Tommaso Buzzi, dies in 1981, and the file can be undeleted on 1 January 2051. Ymblanter (talk) 14:27, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 05:34, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: unfortunately Austrian stamps are copyright to the designer and require individual permission from them for each stamp per Commons:Stamps/Public domain. The uploader does not have permission to release this image freely. Ww2censor (talk) 14:34, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:19, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Italy, The architect, Tommaso Buzzi, dies in 1981, and the file can be undeleted on 1 January 2051. Ymblanter (talk) 14:26, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Cropped and kept the result. --Storkk (talk) 12:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is uploaded as an advertising material to a certain movie. However, there are no proofs that such a movie exists: it looks like the uploader has only shooted something for youtube. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:12, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

25 KB w/o EXIF, claimed as own work. Dubious. E4024 (talk) 03:09, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the number of personal photos used at personal pages of this user is by far higher than reasonable; Commons is not for collecting private memorabilia. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:35, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]