Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/08/18
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Copyright file downloaded from Steam. Check link. Geom (talk) 12:38, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:25, 18 August 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Movie poster --Krdbot 19:17, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:30, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
no free licence given Gnom (talk) 10:29, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Marcus Cyron at 21:07, 18 August 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 01:10, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
ошибка загрузки Нина Конькова (talk) 18:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders request. --JuTa 01:56, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Smaller duplicate of File:General J. J. Singh and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.jpg. Yann (talk) 07:13, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to higher resolution image per nom. —Gazoth (talk) 06:24, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:10, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Corrupt SVG, orphaned. Leyo 20:37, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 05:34, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 18 August 2018 (UTC) Slava Volk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slava Volk2000 (talk • contribs) 17:55, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No license for 7 days. --Majora (talk) 00:51, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Pexels took this photo from skitterphoto and is not the copyright owner of this image. This image is not CC0 or free. Leoboudv (talk) 03:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep @Leoboudv: actually, it is CC0 on Skitterphoto. I just said we should get the license from the source instead of an aggregator and it looks like the photographer agrees with me. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:13, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: Alexis Jazz is quite right. I could not see the CC0 license on skitterphoto.com until I took a very very close look. I withdraw this DR. Please close this as a keep. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Request withdrawn. --Majora (talk) 02:01, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs by Faisal Akram
[edit]Unused personal images
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300335405).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300361265).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300493753).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300504363).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300508283).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300518583).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300522943).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300569815).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300595845).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300740034).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300741594).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300759563).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300767824).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300769803).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300772284).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300785764).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300992474).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12300995864).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12301022584).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12301023434).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12301153816).jpg
- File:A Day Out With Friends (12301277396).jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:42, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 04:32, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
D'accord pour moi (qui l'ai importé !) Glzwiki (talk) 15:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Dw no source since 17 August 2018. --Majora (talk) 04:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Those are not artist's impressions.
- File:An artist impression of Phobos' landscape.jpg
- File:An artist impression of Triton's landscape.jpg
- File:An artist impression of the Moon's landscape.jpg
- File:Artist impression of the Galactic Core.jpg
JCP (a.k.a. John Carlo Pagcaliwagan) 22:59, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep These were uploaded by the nominator, who was subsequently indef blocked for other reasons. They were uploaded as "own work." These could be useful, in particular on Wikiversity, I'm thinking. They are obviously artist's impressions. The nominator's English is problematic. --Abd (talk) 01:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The Triton landscape has what is likely a derivative of a copyrighted photograph of the Mitten Buttes in Monument Valley. -84user (talk) 05:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC) And the Galactic Core image is clearly a modified photograph of the Andromeda Galaxy (the dust bands and star patterns match). It would help if the uploader could add the source of the images used, because there are free to use versions of this galaxy, eg. File:Adev1.jpg. 84user (talk) 05:33, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment 84user is correct about the artist's impression of Triton's landscape. The artist used Commons File:Sunrise silhouette, Mitten Buttes, Monument Valley Tribal Park, Arizona, USA.jpg and narrowed the window of the Auto levels until the rock strata are visible. --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:16, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Speedy keepDelete all as author request and possibly derivative works of copyrighted material. Unencyclopedic and unused in any case. --189.25.237.123 15:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Arizona on Triton is somewhat mind-blowing, the others are too low-quality/unrealistic. Stas (talk) 10:47, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: OUt of scope Natuur12 (talk) 15:32, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Bad quality, out of scope
- File:Trees Blowned (20146998339).jpg
- File:Road and Trees Blowned (20339681591).jpg
- File:Old House (20307381816).jpg
- File:Cars and Trees Blowned (20145645488).jpg
- File:Old House Destroyed (20145650678).jpg
- File:Doghouse Tree (17861689596).jpg
- File:Bacon-Wrapped Potatoes (17021296350).jpg
- File:Cooking Bacon-Wrapped Potatoes (17021084128).jpg
- File:Cooking Bacon-Wrapped Potatoes on the Oven (17207172132).jpg
- File:Backside of a Telescope (17195842391).jpg
The NMI User (talk) 05:46, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 21:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:31, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope
- File:Solar System Model (17308749581).jpg
- File:Clownfishes and Coral Reefs (17120983948).jpg
- File:Bones in the Sea (17120298248).jpg
- File:Tumon Aerial Photo in 2006 (17121765869).jpg
- File:City on Guam in 2006 (17120244848).jpg
- File:The Fish Swimming (17121837929).jpg
- File:The Yellow Fish Swimming (17100601897).jpg
- File:Caged Lion (16685587714).jpg
- File:Roots on the Sand (17308048325).jpg
The NMI User (talk) 08:36, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to keep File:Tumon Aerial Photo in 2006 (17121765869).jpg, File:City on Guam in 2006 (17120244848).jpg and File:The Fish Swimming (17121837929).jpg, they have rather decent informativeness and quality. Other ones, I agree, are not useful for educational purposes. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 20:20, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: mostly kept, deleted some. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Making image of a landscape from the internet for the artistic rendition The NMI User (talk) 05:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Making image of a landscape from the internet for the artistic rendition The NMI User (talk) 05:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Making image of a landscape from the internet for the artistic rendition The NMI User (talk) 05:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 06:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 16:05, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 06:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 06:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 06:59, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 06:59, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 06:59, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 06:59, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 06:59, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:33, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:01, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:01, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Unnecessary user page. Paul Ewe (talk) 01:48, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
See COM:SIG#United Kingdom. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:50, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
possible screenshot of film, possible copyvio 2601:647:101:D030:68A5:39CB:E603:7BF6 01:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep What makes you say that?. The album has other photos of the filming set as well.--Zeroth (talk) 01:01, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per Zeroth and also this image was uploaded in 2011. If this were true, anyone would've noticed this earlier, don't you think? Triplecaña (talk) 07:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Pretty obvious, care to withdraw this? —innotata 18:19, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:04, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Bogus licensing. Copyright violation. See also [1]. -- Asclepias (talk) 01:59, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 14:15, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Apparently bogus licensing and copyright violation. No source for the license tag. La Presse is a media business that is not known to offer free licenses. -- Asclepias (talk) 02:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 14:15, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:25, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:25, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:25, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:25, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:05, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:05, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:05, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 02:41, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:05, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:25, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Modern art and promo photos. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Artista-Lobo-Cowparade.jpg
- File:Artista Lobo Monica Parade.jpg
- File:Artista Lobo e Rogerio Flausino da Banda Jota Quest.jpg
- File:Artista Lobo Pop Art.jpg
- File:Artista Lobo.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:25, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted works
- File:Artista-lobo-4.jpg
- File:Artista-lobo-3.jpg
- File:Artista-Pop-Art-no-Brasil.jpg
- File:Artista-Brasileiro-Lobo-Pop-Art.jpg
Rodrigolopes (talk) 06:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:57, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Muddy Roots 2015, Cookeville, Tennessee, Dr. Ralph Stanley & Dylan Walshe.jpg
- File:St. Patrick's Day at The Nashville Palace in 2016. Spider Stacy of The Pogues & Dylan Walshe.jpg
- File:Dylan Walshe - Where Dublin Meets Wicklow (Featuring James Fearnley of The Pogues) 2018 promo sleave.jpg
- File:Left to right, Ramblin' Jack Elliott, Peter Rowan, LC Ulmer, Kristin Bargmann & Dylan Walshe. Muddy Roots 2015. Cookeville, Tennessee.jpg
- File:Dylan Walshe & Dave King of Flogging Molly performing on the Salty Dog Flogging Molly cruise through the Bahamas in 2017.jpg
- File:Dylan Walshe & Billy Bob Thornton of The Boxmasters. Bar Harbor, Maine 2018.jpg
- File:House Of Blues, Boston 2017.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:26, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prince Waqar Jalbai (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
- File:Prince Waqar 49.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 48.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 47.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 46.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 45.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 44.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 43.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 42.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 41.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 40.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 38.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 39.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 37.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 35.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 36.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 34.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 33.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 50.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 32.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 30.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 31.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 29.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 28.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 27.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 26.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 24.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 25.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 23.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 22.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 21.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 20.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 19.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 18.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 17.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 16.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 15.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 14.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 13.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 12.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 11.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 10.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 9.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 7.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 8.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 6.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 5.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 4.jpg
- File:1 (2) New1.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 2.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 1.jpg
- File:Jalbain Group.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar.jpg
~Cybularny Speak? 17:19, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prince Waqar Jalbai (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused COM:OOS photos, different camaras : unlikely to be own work.
- File:Prince Waqar 76.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 75.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 74.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar Prince Waqar 73.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 70.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 71.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 72.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 67.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 68.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 66.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 63.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 65.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 64.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 61.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 60.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 62.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 57.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 59.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 58.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 54.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 56.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 55.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 52.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 51.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 49.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 48.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 47.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 46.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 45.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 44.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 43.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 42.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 41.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 40.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 38.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 39.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 37.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 35.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 36.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 34.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 33.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 50.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 32.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 30.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 31.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 29.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 28.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 27.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 26.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 24.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 25.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 23.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 22.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 21.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 20.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 19.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 18.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 17.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 16.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 15.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 14.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 13.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 12.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 11.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 10.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 9.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 7.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 8.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 6.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 5.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 4.jpg
- File:1 (2) New1.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 2.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 1.jpg
- File:Jalbain Group.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:28, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prince Waqar Jalbai (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused COM:OOS personal photos.
- File:Prince Waqar 21354.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 685655.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 89798.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 5454.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar uhjgj.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 23554.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 83479.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 6565.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 855.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 5654564.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 345789.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 87.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 355.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 95.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 24.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar 23.jpg
- File:Prince Waqar.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:45, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:50, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 04:36, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:07, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:08, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:08, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:08, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:09, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:09, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:09, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:09, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 13:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 13:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 13:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:11, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 13:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 13:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Weak delete per nom - out of scope, although I think it may very well still be useful for illustrating a meal of some sort. Hiàn (talk) 13:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:11, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:13, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 16:11, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:11, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:13, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 16:09, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:11, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 06:04, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 14:57, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:11, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:21, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 16:02, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:11, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 15:58, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:11, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 07:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 15:57, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:11, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Blatant spam. jdx Re: 09:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anlasotomasyon (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
Didym (talk) 09:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:11, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 10:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: it is "used" on Wikidata, but in an otherwise empty item that only exists because this image exists here. --Randykitty (talk) 11:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope.
- File:Tenant Management Service in Odisha.jpg
- File:Elder Health Care Service in Odisha.jpg
- File:Travel Planning Service in Odisha.jpg
- File:Home Delivery Service Odisha.jpg
- File:Home Delivery Service in Odisha.jpg
Ies (talk) 11:55, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:42, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
out of project scope
Didym (talk) 10:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmadashrafi1368 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshots, out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Alamolhoda com.jpg
- File:MFAIR.jpg
- File:President iran.jpg
- File:JahangiriTelegram.jpg
- File:TelegramKhamenei.jpg
- File:توییت آذری جهرمی درباره هایجک مخابرات روی تلگرام.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:29, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:14, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:30, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
I am the owner of the facebook page. Neille Clark Davis (talk) 14:17, 18 August 2018 (UTC) Neille Clark Davis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neille Clark Davis (talk • contribs) 14:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope as well. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:15, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Placebo75nrw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not an amateur porn site
- File:Micropenis-Mikropenis.jpg
- File:Microphallus-Micropenis.jpg
- File:Mein micropenis5.jpg
- File:Mein micropenis4.jpg
- File:Micropenis4.jpg
- File:Mein mikropenis.jpg
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 13:31, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:14, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Neille Clark Davis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Just a Buska.jpg
- File:Justabuska.jpg
- File:Neille Clark Davis (Justabuska).jpg
- File:FUQ - Justabuska.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:32, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
I am not sure what the problem is. The images are all my own and are connected to my blog, my Facebook page and my Book. They have no association with a page as yet as I am still creating it. I have only just uploaded them. Should I direct them to other pages? If you can tell me what I am doing wrong I will gladly fix it. Neille Clark Davis (talk) 14:16, 18 August 2018 (UTC) Neille Clark Davis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neille Clark Davis (talk • contribs) 14:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:15, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jeffrey J Hewitt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a porn site. We have enought photos of micropenis
- File:1 Micropenis White Male Using a Fucking Machine.jpg
- File:1 Completely Shaved White Male Micropenis in Chastity.jpg
- File:White Micropenis.jpg
- File:Micropenis Chastity.jpg
- File:Erect Micropenis.jpg
- File:A Male Micropenis.jpg
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 13:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Promo image, non-free MiguelAlanCS (talk) 13:40, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Hola. Tengo permiso para usar este poster, pero agradecería una explicación de qué podemos hacer para conservarlo. Gracias. Rudose
Deleted: as copyvio. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:15, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
I don't see any potential educational use, out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:45, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:17, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Poor quality, no educational use, out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:47, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:17, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
No educational use, out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:47, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:17, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
out of scope personal image + advertizing Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:17, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
personal photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 17:17, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:18, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Files on User:BevinKacon/Badstock
[edit]Logos originally tagged to be speedy deleted, as their description shows uploader was likely promoting themselves, and not used anywhere. Speedy contested, so listing for deletion for being out of scope.
- File:Indian Toonz.png
- File:Logo-imoney-group.png
- File:Logo-imoneymy.png
- File:Logominordefault.jpg
- File:MagnonTBWA.png
- File:Maxon recordings.jpg
- File:Meskita Logo.png
- File:MySupermarket logo.jpg
- File:Nexlang-logo-blanco&rojo G.jpg
- File:Nuevo Logo Banco Popular Español.jpg
- File:PartySons logo.png
- File:Point Logo.jpg
- File:TrippNT Manufacturing main Logo.jpg
- File:Web1honchoz2.png
BevinKacon (talk) 12:29, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:05, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Віолета Москалу, eксперт з питань державного управління та міжнародного розвитку, громадський діяч, візіонер, меценат..jpg
[edit]Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:06, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:05, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:06, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:13, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:06, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adejumo Segun Emmanuel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG or STL if useful.
- File:Duplex building 04.pdf
- File:Duplex building 01.pdf
- File:Duplex building 03.pdf
- File:Duplex building 02.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:01, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
I am the original creator and no longer wish for my work to appear here. Hoyentsang (talk) 17:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
I am the original creator and no longer wish for my work to appear here. Hoyentsang (talk) 08:20, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
I am the original creator and no longer wish for my work to appear here. Hoyentsang (talk) 12:17, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - You cannot revoke your contributions. --Jcb (talk) 13:31, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Source for the background image and the music? The beginning is a screenshot of Windows, so not OK. Yann (talk) 14:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- It's a video I made on my own for a Wikipedia convention so I thought there will be no problem uploading it. is the fact of using screenshots is a problem? המקיסט (talk) 05:19, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- המקיסט: Yes, the screenshot, background image, and music make this a derivative work, and it is not allowed on Commons without express permission from the copyright holder of these works, which is very unlikely for Windows. Actually MP4 was allowed by error. So please reupload your video without the derivative part in a free format. You can use Video2Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Yann, The music is a non-copyrighted one (NoCopyrightSounds release), so I guess there won't be any problems on this topic. If I made the screenshots by myself, will they still be a problem? Anyway, you can remove the MP4 video and I'll upload the video in a free format if anything else is ok. Thanks.המקיסט (talk) 09:55, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- המקיסט: You must provide the source for any element with a potential copyright, otherwise it will be deleted. It doesn't matter who made the screenshot, the copyright is the same. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:27, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- Yann, if there are still copyright problems- remove it please. Thanks.המקיסט (talk) 12:47, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- המקיסט: You must provide the source for any element with a potential copyright, otherwise it will be deleted. It doesn't matter who made the screenshot, the copyright is the same. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:27, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- Yann, The music is a non-copyrighted one (NoCopyrightSounds release), so I guess there won't be any problems on this topic. If I made the screenshots by myself, will they still be a problem? Anyway, you can remove the MP4 video and I'll upload the video in a free format if anything else is ok. Thanks.המקיסט (talk) 09:55, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- המקיסט: Yes, the screenshot, background image, and music make this a derivative work, and it is not allowed on Commons without express permission from the copyright holder of these works, which is very unlikely for Windows. Actually MP4 was allowed by error. So please reupload your video without the derivative part in a free format. You can use Video2Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:02, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Scan, no source, Unlikely to be own work. May be {{GODL-India}}, but evidence needed. Yann (talk) 06:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope; not educationally useful Yeenosaurus (talk) 07:39, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
derivative of a non-free image. Gnom (talk) 10:31, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
That's a photo of a screen. Independently, whether the uploader is the owner or not, we don't need photos of a photo of a screen. Jcornelius (talk) 10:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- A imagem foi retirada do Google Street View, ver aqui: https://goo.gl/maps/jWLd53DW5UU2. -- Ajpvalente (talk) 11:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Translation: The image is taken from Google Street view. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. As this case is about copyright infringement, shouldn't this deletion request be changed for quick deletion? Best regards, -- Ajpvalente (talk) 07:53, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Self-promotion (see file desc), out of project scope. In addition no author & no source. Achim (talk) 11:59, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Сомнение в авторстве и лицензии: человек с фото скончался в 1986 году, автор портрета, скорее всего не известен, снимок сделал в наше время Dogad75 (talk) 12:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 19:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
False date, already deleted, found everywhere such as http://www.freepressjournal.in/world/sex-drugs-illegitimate-children-7-startling-allegations-made-by-imran-khans-ex-wife-reham-in-her-book/1315211 Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Files by Panoramio upload bot
[edit]- File:Zonalnaya st., Tomskaya oblast', Russia, 634507 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Zonalnaya st., Tomskaya oblast', Russia, 634507 - panoramio - Vladimir Zhdanov (WT….jpg
- File:Zonalnaya st., Tomskaya oblast', Russia, 634507 - panoramio - Vladimir Zhdanov (WT… (1).jpg
- File:Zonalnaya st., Tomskaya oblast', Russia, 634507 - panoramio - Vladimir Zhdanov (WT… (2).jpg
- File:Zonalnaya st., Tomskaya oblast', Russia, 634507 - panoramio - Vladimir Zhdanov (WT… (3).jpg
- File:Zonalnaya st., Tomskaya oblast', Russia, 634507 - panoramio - Vladimir Zhdanov (WT… (4).jpg
- File:Zonalnaya st., Tomskaya oblast', Russia, 634507 - panoramio - Vladimir Zhdanov (WT… (5).jpg
out of scope, useless quality Figure19 (talk) 14:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. Might be a copyvio. However web search didn't help to find out who is actual sculptor. Jarash (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- According to reference books "Памяць" (2000) and "Гарады і вёскі Беларусі" Vol. 8. Pt 4 (2013) the monument was installed in 1951. --Jarash (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Whatever they were trying to do, I don't think it worked. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Oh that is odd.. the original seems to play but some transcodes don't? I withdraw my nomination - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
This is a derived work of screenshot of non-free software CityInfo (version 3). Jarash (talk) 14:19, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Painting by Andy Warhol, no OTRS Carl Ha (talk) 14:40, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GRALISTAIR (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
work by Andy Warhol Carl Ha (talk) 14:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Campbell Soup by Andy Warhol - The Great Graphic Boom expo - Staatsgalerie - Stuttgart - Germany 2017.jpg
[edit]Work by Andy Warhol Carl Ha (talk) 14:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Copied from a copyright protected webpage. Yasu (talk) 15:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Text is supposedly authored in no earlier than 2011, i.e. copyrighted. Yasu (talk) 15:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Monsieur Jimmy Wales , Fondateur Hémérite De L ' Encyclopédie Libre De Droits = « Tractopelle-jaune » (Supposition , Hypothèse ).jpg
[edit]Vandalism on title + description (against me) ; blocked indefinitely on frwiki. Tractopelle-jaune (talk) 15:34, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Video is upside down. Reuploading with correct orientation. Johnnylangridge (talk) 15:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:45, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Copied from that page: http://www.dalhem.be/WEBSITE/BEFR/01/Presentation0105.php Akela NDE (talk) 16:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
out of scope of the project Wvdp (talk) 17:45, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims. For obvious reasons, it is very unlikely that these paintings, photographs and publications are all the uploader's own works.
- File:Old Metal 60x90 oil, canvas.jpg
- File:David Finkelstern. Mother.jpg
- File:David Finkelstern. Daughter.jpg
- File:David Finkelstern.jpg
- File:Vladimir Viardo.jpg
- File:Борис Симский.jpg
- File:13simfShost.jpg
- File:Programma.jpg
- File:Simsk3.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:01, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.
—LX (talk, contribs) 11:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:43, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
In my opinion this is not a simple logo. Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 19:01, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only uploaded photo. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 19:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
This is a repetitive and low quality image from the meetup. Kindly see Category:Training on Wikipedia's Voice, Wikimedia Fan Club, University of Ilorin Danidamiobi (talk) 20:11, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 20:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 20:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
unused personal upload and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 20:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
appears to be advertising Leangle30 (talk) 20:36, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
unused personal upload and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 20:39, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Schwede66 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The main part of the photo is of a video screen and given that video footage hasn't been released under a free license, the photo of it is a copyviolation. ~riley (talk) 21:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948 and no indication that this would be an anonymous work. Jcb (talk) 21:35, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
I would like it to be deleted. Thank you Exposedindiapers (talk) 21:40, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted material. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:56, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Personal document; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:56, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:56, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:16, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:56, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Not own work Tekstman (talk) 23:39, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
File:US Navy 110705-N-XG305-407 Sailors carry leaves during a community service project at the Little Sisters of the Poor retirement home.jpg
[edit]Personal privacy concerns, redundancy, PII 159.142.0.105 14:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: com:INUSE. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:58, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:13, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:58, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it Emily J. Rose (talk) 21:31, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:59, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:00, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:00, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:01, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:01, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
No proof of the image being licensed as CC-BY 3.0. MarioGom (talk) 21:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Video was, as it says, shared with the media to disseminate. Which the media did, saying that it came from the government. Since multiple news outlets all share and say the same, it's certainly fair use. Kingsif (talk) 21:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Please, see Commons:Licensing to check what is acceptable for Wikimedia Commons uploads.
- An authorization from one party (Government) to other parties (media outlets) is not extensible to everyone. You cannot assume everyone has the right to distribute it.
- Mere redistribution rights are not enough for Commons. For it to be acceptable here, the license must allow redistribution, derivative works and commercial and that must be irrevocable. In this case, the image is not licensed under such conditions. In fact, the upload is labeled as CC-BY 3.0, but that is not the case. --MarioGom (talk) 22:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- It's labeled as that because the video that the other media outlet was that. Government frees it to media, media frees it to public. Kingsif (talk) 22:18, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- It does not work like that. If Government is the copyright holder, only the Government can release it under a given license. A media outlet not owning the video cannot license it. --MarioGom (talk) 22:22, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Uploaded as fair use rationale, delete from Commons. Kingsif (talk) 02:30, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- It does not work like that. If Government is the copyright holder, only the Government can release it under a given license. A media outlet not owning the video cannot license it. --MarioGom (talk) 22:22, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Please, see Commons:Licensing to check what is acceptable for Wikimedia Commons uploads.
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 16:42, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
a depiction of a non free character. This is unacceptable in commons 2601:647:101:D030:802C:210:D6E9:9457 19:17, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep -- this is the type of depiction which is specifically used as an example on policy page Commons:Fan art as being acceptable for Commons... AnonMoos (talk) 14:43, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep -- Acceptable in commons as this is literally the example of the type of images that is acceptable in commons see COM:Fan_art Cth103 t (talk) 21:17, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept - no valid reason for deletion. COM:FAN clearly states why this image is okay on Commons. clpo13(talk) 21:41, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Juan Requesens holding his hand out as camera is turned during arrest on August 7th 2018.png
[edit]No proof of the image license, not even of the copyright owner. MarioGom (talk) 22:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Added source link to BBC article with the video properly attributed as being publicly released by Primero Justicia. Will update CC to public domain. Kingsif (talk) 22:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, no proof of proper licensing. MarioGom (talk) 22:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- What? The video was publicly released by Primero Justicia, and the BBC article says that and provides a link to - and embedded copy of - the video. What more could you possibly want Kingsif (talk) 22:16, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Is there any source where we can check that the video was filmed by Primero Justicia (it must be the copyright owner) and releases it under the public domain? --MarioGom (talk) 22:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- As security footage of the area in Requesens' hall, it is footage from a camera belonging to Requesens, Primero Justicia is the party he is a leader of. I don't think an article is going to bother explaining that. And the BBC article says they shared the video on twitter, which I remember the terms saying that everything is public once it's tweeted. Kingsif (talk) 22:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Tweets retain full copyright. Unless there is an explicit release with a specific license, this cannot be uploaded to Commons. --MarioGom (talk) 22:37, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- If it's also been shared by individual people from the group with ownership (e.g. here), does that mean it's free? Where do you look between "no written statement" and "but obvious that they want everyone to see"? Kingsif (talk) 00:00, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- See Commons:Licensing. Valid uploads can be one of these cases:
- All copyrighted material on Commons (not in the public domain) must be licensed under a free license that specifically and irrevocably allows anyone to use the material for any purpose; simply writing that "the material may be used freely by anyone" or similar isn't sufficient. This is not the case, since the copyright holder has not released the work under a free license.
- Material in the public domain. That is not the case either. See the Hirtle chart for an overview of what kind of works fall under the public domain in the US.
- Note that fair use is NOT allowed in commons. --MarioGom (talk) 10:01, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- I suppose sorry about that. It may come from the fact I find commons much easier so just click through the wizard without reading. Should we look for licenses or see if free use can be determined for a Wikipedia upload? Kingsif (talk) 10:56, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- I have never uploaded an image to English Wikipedia, so I'm not familiar with the fair use criteria applied there. Maybe someone is able to help at the teahouse. --MarioGom (talk) 11:08, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- I have uploaded to English Wikipedia before, so I've uploaded under 'screenshots of copyrighted videos', here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Juan_Requesens_holding_hand_out_as_camera_is_turned_during_arrest_on_August_7th_2018.png Kingsif (talk) 22:25, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- I've given the en-wiki image a tiny crop to get it into en:WP:NFC guideline size, otherwise my bot will tag it soon and DatBot would reduce (which would probably be a poor reduction with such a non-sharp image). Ronhjones (Talk) 15:30, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- I have uploaded to English Wikipedia before, so I've uploaded under 'screenshots of copyrighted videos', here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Juan_Requesens_holding_hand_out_as_camera_is_turned_during_arrest_on_August_7th_2018.png Kingsif (talk) 22:25, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- I have never uploaded an image to English Wikipedia, so I'm not familiar with the fair use criteria applied there. Maybe someone is able to help at the teahouse. --MarioGom (talk) 11:08, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- I suppose sorry about that. It may come from the fact I find commons much easier so just click through the wizard without reading. Should we look for licenses or see if free use can be determined for a Wikipedia upload? Kingsif (talk) 10:56, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- See Commons:Licensing. Valid uploads can be one of these cases:
- If it's also been shared by individual people from the group with ownership (e.g. here), does that mean it's free? Where do you look between "no written statement" and "but obvious that they want everyone to see"? Kingsif (talk) 00:00, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Tweets retain full copyright. Unless there is an explicit release with a specific license, this cannot be uploaded to Commons. --MarioGom (talk) 22:37, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- As security footage of the area in Requesens' hall, it is footage from a camera belonging to Requesens, Primero Justicia is the party he is a leader of. I don't think an article is going to bother explaining that. And the BBC article says they shared the video on twitter, which I remember the terms saying that everything is public once it's tweeted. Kingsif (talk) 22:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Is there any source where we can check that the video was filmed by Primero Justicia (it must be the copyright owner) and releases it under the public domain? --MarioGom (talk) 22:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - image in use is the non-free en-wiki version. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Missing any educational content of this video A.Savin 19:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep fictional film. --Sergkarman (talk) 22:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- This is not a reason to keep. --A.Savin 22:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
-
- Are we talking about File:Night of the Living Dead (1968).webm, or about File:Жопа Хэнка.webm? --A.Savin 00:15, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- I gave my opinion. I think that's sufficient argument. --Sergkarman (talk) 00:50, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
-
- Delete, non-notable self-published artwork, out of scope--Ymblanter (talk) 08:05, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Anti-clerical video educates us how to interact with church propaganda. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The expression "educational" from Commons:Project scope is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative". This film is notable enough. It was shown on Kyiv International Short Film Festival (KISFF 2015) [2], [3], also on Гогольfest 2015 [4] --Butko (talk) 18:45, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as per Butko and Sergkarman. Yann (talk) 08:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as per Butko and Sergkarman. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:23, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept, in scope per Butko. Taivo (talk) 06:43, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Incorrectly named, replaced by Category:Hsin Peitou Station. This page must be deleted because the old station was built in 1916 under Japanese rule, so it was neither Taiwan Railways Administration (TRA) or the Republic of China. I think in this case that this category name is not suitable to use Template:Bad name.--Kai3952 (talk) 02:42, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Agree I accept the reason for deleting. See User talk:そらみみ#Category:TRA Hsin Peitou Station.--そらみみ (talk) 12:08, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 06:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Gallery with 1 image, which is wrong: it is image of NGC 346. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 19:13, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 07:00, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Mars from Astro-Espace Jcpag2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikimedia Commons 11:49, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Making a random image of Mars from the internet, source is from here: http://www.astrosurf.com/astro-espace/marsj353c12aba4268.jpg The NMI User (talk) 06:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:57, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Earth Rise from Astro-Espace Jcpag2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikimedia Commons 11:49, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Uh, keep. This is a NASA photo. That is inherently PD, and of course copies will exist elsewhere. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:22, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Making this image was mirrored, source is from here: http://www.astrosurf.com/astro-espace/laterreb3c12ab1e189.jpg The NMI User (talk) 06:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, useless low quality version of File:NASA-Apollo8-Dec24-Earthrise.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Flipped horizontally source from http://www.astrosurf.com/astro-espace/ Jcpag2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikimedia Commons 11:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Making this random image of Earth was mirrored, source is from here: http://www.astrosurf.com/astro-espace/laterrej163c12ab35214.jpg The NMI User (talk) 06:05, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by numerous better and original versions at Category:The Blue Marble. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Uranus from Astro-Espace Jcpag2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikimedia Commons 11:51, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- I do not understand, who is a fool among us? Your or me? This a NASA image. Ruslik (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep This user has nominated a number of NASA photos, with best guess that somehow their existence on other websites means there is a copyright problem, which is not remotely the case. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:24, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Making this random image of Uranus from the internet, source is from here: http://www.astrosurf.com/astro-espace/laterrej163c12ab35214.jpg The NMI User (talk) 06:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, numerous better ones in Category:Photos of Uranus by Voyager 2. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Photos from photos, your licence is nice but irrelevant for Commons! We need the names of the original photographers and their (or the heirs) permission to publish this photos under a free licence. Or you expound, that these pictures are in public domain.
- File:Catherine Palace, Arabesque hall, 1944.jpg
- File:Catherine Palace, main staircase, 1944.jpg
- File:German officers on the steps of Catherine palace, 1942.jpg
- File:German soldier near Catherine palace, 1941.jpg
- File:Research worker Elena Gladkova sorting fragments of gilded woodcarving, 1948.jpg
- File:Work team clearing up Great Hall of Catherine Palace, 1946.jpg
Ras67 (talk) 16:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I don't have idea about photographers. So you can delete as soon is possible. --Codas (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
This is a photoshopped image, not the actual Apollo 16 image. It is made for propaganda purposes. 68.98.182.53 17:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:07, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:16, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:07, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
See COM:TOO#Common law countries (South African logo). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This logo seems pretty simple to me: only font using simple shapes. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:00, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
See COM:TOO#Common law countries (New Zealand logo). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:48, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
This File is duplicite with file "File:Walter.Jacobi.(1909 - 1947).after.Second.World.War.gif" and this file has false name, has also false description and this file shows a different person. Deletion has been discused on "Commons:Village pump" Village pump. Mojmir Churavy (talk) 07:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, PCP. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:43, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
No evidence that it is an official govt portrait. That the National Portrait Gallery holds the original image means nothing. Sitush (talk) 10:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete License has been changed to PD-US - which is wrong as it's not a US work, also no UK license. We need both. Image is too young for {{PD-old-assumed}} Ronhjones (Talk) 22:53, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused music score. Should be in SVG or music score if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in scope of Category:National anthem of Honduras. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Supposedly copied from the school's own website. Own work claim is highly dubious. Yasu (talk) 15:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Self-nominating as uploader; copyright expires 1 January 2020 (author died 16 May 1949). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:50, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep - not by Nicholson CapnZapp (talk) 19:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Do you have any evidence for that, other than the disputed opinion discussed in the recent television programme? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:16, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry what? As if the burden of evidence lies on me? No no no... Do you have any evidence it is by Nicholson? CapnZapp (talk) 17:46, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- You asserted "not by Nicholson". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 04:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry what? As if the burden of evidence lies on me? No no no... Do you have any evidence it is by Nicholson? CapnZapp (talk) 17:46, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Do you have any evidence for that, other than the disputed opinion discussed in the recent television programme? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:16, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- I think precautionary principle would have us treat this as if Nicholson painted it unless there is definite proof that somebody else painted it. Abzeronow (talk) 22:32, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Abzeronow. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Nothing on image source to indicate licensing, google and tinyeye show results everywhere. Very suspicious of the license claim from a first time image upload in this area. Ravensfire (talk) 16:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 20:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 20:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Support
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 20:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 20:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 20:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 20:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
personal image Rudolphous (talk) 20:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
personal image, more something for a photo album Rudolphous (talk) 20:29, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Corrupt SVG, orphaned. Leyo 20:38, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
unused personal file and personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 20:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Not own work, that is a Google Maps screenshot. MarioGom (talk) 22:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- this was just used for brief illustration, I was intending to delete it. /thank you for looking at everything that I uploaded/ Kingsif (talk) 22:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- No problem. I'm checking all your uploads after seeing the initial nomination notifications. It seems almost everything that you uploaded has no proper authorship or licensing information, which is strictly required for Commons uploads. --MarioGom (talk) 22:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- this was just used for brief illustration, I was intending to delete it. /thank you for looking at everything that I uploaded/ Kingsif (talk) 22:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
I made multiple errors on my info ZeZeNapsid002 (talk) 22:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
No evidence that this is an official govt portrait. That the image is held by the National Portrait Gallery means nothing. Sitush (talk) 23:42, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Walter Stoneman died in 1958. Undelete in 2029. Abzeronow (talk) 20:29, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
No evidence that this is an official portrait created by/for the govt. That the image is held by the National Portrait Gallery means nothing. Sitush (talk) 23:47, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Walter Stoneman died in 1958, so it should be deleted and then undeleted in 2029. Abzeronow (talk) 17:12, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Abzeronow (talk • contribs) 17:11, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
No evidence that this is an official portrait created by/for the govt. That the image is held by the National Portrait Gallery means nothing. Sitush (talk) 23:50, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Walter Stoneman died in 1958, so undelete in 2029. Abzeronow (talk) 17:13, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
your opinions are asked : as per file name description, potentially advertising, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 20:40, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Maybe uploaded with promotional intent, but there's nothing wrong with that image as an example of commerce buildings in Bangalore. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:34, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
No sound, no educational use, out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:55, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Yann: you're partially deaf. This is HORRIFIC. Try playing it to your dog. It's higher than File:17 KHz.ogg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:44, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: So this is an extremely high-pitched sound? I can't hear it either. Although there might be a possible educational use for such sounds (e.g. for demonstrating a sound out of many people's hearing range), it's in a wrong file format anyway, and it shouldn't be a problem to upload a high-pitched sound as Ogg Vorbis or MP3 file if desired, so I'm deleting this. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:16, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, many alternatives in its category. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:45, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:17, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, many alternatives in its category. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:45, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:17, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, no equivalent image available, license irrevocable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:17, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, many alternatives in its category. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:45, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:18, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, many alternatives in its category. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:45, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:18, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, no equivalent image available, license irrevocable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:19, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, no equivalent image available, license irrevocable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:19, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, many alternatives in its category. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:20, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, no equivalent image available, license irrevocable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Rafat Mey-Elahy (d. 1942), missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:42, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:49, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Photograph is credited as taken by Charles Kwesi Sagoe, but there is no indication that this is the uploader. An OTRS ticket should be made. Henxter (talk) 11:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Need to mute the audio and revdel.
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- I did not understand what the problem was and how it could be solved... Chenspec (talk) 12:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Chenspec: the audio (music presumably under copyright) needs to be removed. The video can stay without sound. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: I do not know how to get the sound out of the file. Can you do it for me? Chenspec (talk) 18:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Chenspec: you can download your videos from https://openload.co/f/BJQEa6z3sRk/Yermi.zip and upload them using COM:Video2commons. Mp4 files were never supposed to be allowed in the first place, so the files nominated here probably won't be kept anyway. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:13, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Is this OK? ? Chenspec (talk) 12:57, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Chenspec: Clearly something went wrong there.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:16, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Well, that's already too complicated for me. If there is no simpler way to fix it, it is better to delete the files.Chenspec (talk) 14:27, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Chenspec: But the short bit I do see isn't even from the videos you had uploaded. I have no idea where it is from. Did you download the .zip from openload, unpack it and upload the contents to Video2commons? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:30, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: I used the original file I uploaded - it is still on my computer Chenspec (talk) 18:59, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Chenspec: and you removed the audio from that? Because that's what I did with your videos before uploading them to openload.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MP4 files, muted videos now available: File:Yermi Kaplan 2018 1.webm, File:Yermi Kaplan 2018 2.webm, File:Yermi Kaplan 2018 3.webm. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Recent wallpaper uploads of this user contain artwork not produced by them. File:Blue urban night (1).jpg and File:Blue urban night (2).jpg contains [5]. I kindly asked the uploader to provide all sources or tag them for deletion, instead they're claiming they are own works.
- File:Hedgehog background designed in camouflage style.jpg
- File:Light blue lizards background.jpg
- File:Background of butterflies in stone.jpg
- File:Brown background with stars and arrows.jpg
- File:Science cat with stars.jpg
- File:People with rectangles and flowers - abstract (2).jpg
- File:People with rectangles and flowers - abstract (1).jpg
- File:People with rectangles and flowers - abstract (3).jpg
- File:Blue urban night (1).jpg
- File:Blue urban night (2).jpg
- File:Silhouette of a bird on a branch with an abstract background (2).jpg
- File:Silhouette of a bird on a branch with an abstract background (1).jpg
- File:Silhouette of a bird on a branch with an abstract background (3).jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 21:36, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- That is because they are my own works. Why do you claim they are not mine? Chenspec (talk) 06:36, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Wait, sorry - I saw the link now. Is it because I used this silhouette? It is Free for commercial use - No attribution required, So I didn't think it would be a problem. Whether Elmets should not be used with such a license - I'm sorry, I didn't know. In this case, you can delete them. But it is important for me to emphasize that the design of the image is mine. I would love to have an explanation on the issue and follow your guidelines for future uploads. Chenspec (talk) 07:00, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- BevinKacon The files have not been deleted yet. Given that the elements I have used for some of the works have no copyright and are not required to attribute them - can I continue uploading my works? Chenspec (talk) 13:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Wait, sorry - I saw the link now. Is it because I used this silhouette? It is Free for commercial use - No attribution required, So I didn't think it would be a problem. Whether Elmets should not be used with such a license - I'm sorry, I didn't know. In this case, you can delete them. But it is important for me to emphasize that the design of the image is mine. I would love to have an explanation on the issue and follow your guidelines for future uploads. Chenspec (talk) 07:00, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Regarding the discussed silhoutte in the discussion above, on 9 January 2019, Pixabay switched the old sitewide license for all uploads from Creative Commons CC0 to the Pixabay license which does not meet the free content licensing requirements for Commons. Therefore, media published on Pixabay from 9 January 2019 onwards is not considered to be freely licensed and can't be accepted on Commons (their license of "free for commerical use" is according to current consensus not comaptible with COM:L. Given that the user has used unknown elements in their derivatives at hand here, we need to err on the side of caution. If you can list the elements used and their sources, and they are compatible with COM:L you can linst the file(s) for undeletion, following COM:EVIDENCE. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:55, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
No longer appears on any actual articles (aside from two archived Graphics Lab pages), and has been superseded by a superior SVG version. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 19:11, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep -- images are not necessarily deleted just because a corresponding SVG has been created, and File:Flag of Telmar.svg has a very different visual appearance than this one... AnonMoos (talk) 05:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Erroneous image - the actual flag/arms of Telmar (as seen in the book "Prince Caspian) features a bird that is all black and that has smooth-edged wings and no tongue. The bird on this flag has none of those things. Additionally, this flag features a white stripe on the bottom, which shouldn't be there, and is a lighter shade of orange than it should be. Considering a more accurate version of the flag now exists on Wikimedia, there's really no point in holding on to this one. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 08:45, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- I have removed the white stripe at the bottom. Although I created this file (based on my File:COA Telmar.png), the newer File:Flag of Telmar.svg has a better replica of the eagle/raven emblem as illustrated by Pauline Baynes in Prince Caspian. The illustration is visible here: https://www.thefandomentals.com/king-not-prince-caspian-the-chronicles-of-narnia-reread-project-part-4 or here: http://narnia.wikia.com/wiki/Telmarine_Dynasty (I believe the color was added later, perhaps by Baynes). Goustien (talk) 22:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per AnonMoos. --whym (talk) 23:46, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
I don't trust an own work claim from a user who uploads Mythbusters in Russian and claims to have created this TV show. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:34, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:53, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Mercury from Astro-Espace Jcpag2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikimedia Commons 11:50, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion stated; image seems to be licensed fine. No surprise there are other copies on the web but that wouldn't matter. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:18, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Making this random image of Mercury was mirrored, source is from here: http://www.astrosurf.com/astro-espace/laterrej163c12ab35214.jpg The NMI User (talk) 06:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Poor quality, unknown if this is an actual NASA image that has been flipped and recolourer, or some mash-up. See https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA02418 for correct orientation. No real value in keeping this image if we have no provisions as to its origin. — Huntster (t @ c) 13:28, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Mercury from ThinkQuest Library Jcpag2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikimedia Commons 11:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Source is from ThinkQuest Library website: http://library.thinkquest.org/; making this image of Mercury found from the internet The NMI User (talk) 06:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Huntster (t @ c) 13:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
http://www.uhk-bnd.de/?page_id=41 Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:12, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. This is not own work, but work of Brazilian government, and not before 1983 like {{PD-BrazilGov}} requires, but from 1990. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
The terms of use of the Brazilian Ministry of Justice website (http://www.justica.gov.br/termos-de-uso), where the logo was taken, says the following:
"Interested web users can reproduce texts, images, videos, and audios from the Ministry for journalistic use, provided the source is mentioned. However, they are prohibited from selling, reselling or commercially exploiting all content on this site."
So the use of the logo is appropriate as the owner explicitly permits it for this purpose.Felipefgf (talk) 14:04, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Unfortunately all files in Commons must be usable for any purpose, including commercial, and also for derivative works. Some local projects, for example en.wiki, allow fair use, which is prohibited in Commons and es.wiki. The logo can be uploaded locally into such projects. Taivo (talk) 16:52, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- The former logo of the system, from the same owner, has been on Commons since 2014 (file:Classind.png), using the same kind of licensing, witch was the image formerly on the page. Felipefgf (talk) 12:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- But the former is pure textlogo and can be in Commons. Taivo (talk) 20:17, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- The former logo of the system, from the same owner, has been on Commons since 2014 (file:Classind.png), using the same kind of licensing, witch was the image formerly on the page. Felipefgf (talk) 12:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ℯxplicit 23:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Doesn't appear on any articles, and has been superseded by at least two superior SVG versions. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 17:44, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- The SVG has a stupid French-Wikipedia-style pseudo-reflective gradient, and so is not superior in visual appearance to this image... AnonMoos (talk) 05:09, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- I created this file, but File:Coat of arms of Telmar (Narnia) alternate.svg is a better replica of the Pauline Baynes illustration in Prince Caspian. The illustration is visible here: https://www.thefandomentals.com/king-not-prince-caspian-the-chronicles-of-narnia-reread-project-part-4 or here: http://narnia.wikia.com/wiki/Telmarine_Dynasty (I believe the color was added later, perhaps by Baynes). Goustien (talk) 16:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Superfluous - the image itself already exists in the form of this file: File: Coat of arms of the German Reich (Weimar Republic) .svg Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 07:19, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- I adapted it from File:Wappen Deutsches Reich (Weimarer Republik).svg but made some changes (tips of wing feathers and the top of the wings). File:Coat of arms of Telmar (Narnia).svg, on the other hand, uses the German image and just changes the coloring and the shape of the shield. Both of these are unnecessary, since the more accurate File:Coat of arms of Telmar (Narnia) alternate.svg is used throughout Wikipedia. Notice the article at https://narnia.wikia.com/wiki/Telmarine_Dynasty interprets the emblem as a raven, not an eagle; it is never described by Lewis in the books, only illustrated by Baynes. Goustien (talk) 02:17, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Dear User:Snow Lion Fenian -- please learn how deletion discussions work on commons. You don't start a new nomination just to add a comment. And as I explained above, the SVG file has a stupid pseudo-reflective gradient of the type required on French Wikipedia (but mostly unwanted elsewhere), and so is not truly equivalent to the PNG... AnonMoos (talk) 14:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Apologies for that, I guess I'm just relatively new to the whole process of deletion nomination. Sorry for any trouble caused. And sorry, I never was aware that the whole pseudo-reflective thing was a problem outside French Wikipedia either. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 20:31, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 17:58, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://peru21.pe/opinion/la-opinion-del-director-juan-jose-garrido/juan-jose-garrido-sendero-terror-375475
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Not public domain in Peru. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:11, 18 August 2018 (UTC) Besides (according to @LLs: 's logic) it will be strange that Wikimedia U.S. located servers host any material illegal in the U.S. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:40, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Unknown copyright information, at least the uploader does not seem to be the copyright owner. --Y.haruo (talk) 12:47, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Statue of Niiyama Sosuke
[edit]According to Japanese Wikipedia, the statue was erected in 2004. Not in PD, and COM:FOP Japan doesn't allow such statues. Yasu (talk) 15:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: This statue was rebuilt what Ikeda Yuhachi (1886-1963) made. Although it is a reproduction from the photograph, it seems that a new copyright has not occurred. see here and there. --Y.haruo (talk) 13:11, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Source link does not match image and in any event there is no evidence that this is an official portrait created by/for the govt. That the image is held by the National Portrait Gallery means nothing. Sitush (talk) 23:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PCP Abzeronow (talk) 15:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 22:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Copyright isn't owned by CBS. It's owned by MGM, so CBS's print of the image is irrelevant. Besides, it's labelled "AP Wirephoto" on the back. DrKay (talk) 07:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- So there's a minor error in the description data -- what does that have to do with anything? What does the "AP Wirephoto" label have to do with anything? How does any of this affect the argument that it's PD? EEng (talk) 23:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- AP are still distributing it[6]. That CBS bought a license to use the image is not relevant to the copyright notification. Copyright does not transfer from the owner to CBS just because CBS showed it once. DrKay (talk) 07:17, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- I asked what any of this has to do with the argument that the work is PD, and you haven't answered. I'll ask more explicitly: what does any of what you're talking about have to do with the points, recited on the file description page, that it lacks copyright symbol, year, and owner; and the fact that publicity photos were routinely not copyrighted by design? EEng (talk) 13:04, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Publicity photos need to be distributed and released by the rights holder. CBS is not the rights holder. Outlets that publish AP photos do not have to use a copyright symbol, but they do have to attribute the rights holder or distributor, as this does. DrKay (talk) 13:49, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- I continue to be mystified by what you're saying. This photograph was clearly taken during production of the film. Given that it lacks the required copyright notice, and given that we know such stills were routinely released into PD intentionally so as to facilitate publicity, why do you doubt this is a case of that? CBS and AP and so on have nothing to do with it. EEng (talk) 16:50, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Publicity photos need to be distributed and released by the rights holder. CBS is not the rights holder. Outlets that publish AP photos do not have to use a copyright symbol, but they do have to attribute the rights holder or distributor, as this does. DrKay (talk) 13:49, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- I asked what any of this has to do with the argument that the work is PD, and you haven't answered. I'll ask more explicitly: what does any of what you're talking about have to do with the points, recited on the file description page, that it lacks copyright symbol, year, and owner; and the fact that publicity photos were routinely not copyrighted by design? EEng (talk) 13:04, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- AP are still distributing it[6]. That CBS bought a license to use the image is not relevant to the copyright notification. Copyright does not transfer from the owner to CBS just because CBS showed it once. DrKay (talk) 07:17, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ℯxplicit 05:27, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
No evidence that this is an official portrait created by/for the govt. That the image is held by the National Portrait Gallery means nothing. Sitush (talk) 23:45, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment
- "Oswald Mosley
- by Bassano Ltd
- whole-plate glass negative, 28 October 1922
- Given by Bassano & Vandyk Studios, 1974
- Photographs Collection
- NPG x18938" Could be PD-UK-Unknown if the 1922 date is around when it was made available to the public. If the 1974 date is when it was made available to the public, then we'd have to wait until 2045 to undelete. Abzeronow (talk) 15:27, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Kept per Commons:Deletion requests/File:SirDavid Bruce.jpg. — Racconish 💬 19:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
No evidence that this is an official portrait created by/for the govt. That the image is held by the National Portrait Gallery means nothing. Sitush (talk) 23:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Could fall under PD-UK-unknown if 1931 date was when it was made available to the public. NPG doesn't list an individual photographer and they've probably done a reasonable inquiry. Could be a snag if 1974 is the true date it became available to the public. @Clindberg: Abzeronow (talk) 15:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Someone did change the license to PD-UK-unknown and removed the deletion template. The NPG also has this version and this version, which shows it was indeed published in 1931. To me, it is PD-UK-unknown and Not-PD-US-URAA (until 2027). Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Kept per Commons:Deletion requests/File:SirDavid Bruce.jpg. — Racconish 💬 19:29, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
No evidence that this is an official portrait created by/for the govt. That the image is held by the National Portrait Gallery means nothing. Sitush (talk) 23:52, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Could be PD-UK-unknown and PD-1996 if 1924 date is when it was made available to public. If 1974 was when it became available to public, it has to wait until 2045 to be hosted on Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 15:38, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Kept per Commons:Deletion requests/File:SirDavid Bruce.jpg. — Racconish 💬 19:30, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
No evidence that this is an official portrait created by/for the govt. That the image is held by the National Portrait Gallery means nothing. Sitush (talk) 23:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Corrected author information so that Walter Stoneman (1876-1958) is credited for it. He was the official photographer for the National Portrait Gallery. Abzeronow (talk) 22:24, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Should be deleted then then undeleted in 2029 when Stoneman's copyright would expire. Abzeronow (talk) 20:21, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Keep. It is out of copyright in the US as it was taken before 1924. PicMonkies (talk) 19:54, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Should be deleted then then undeleted in 2029 when Stoneman's copyright would expire. Abzeronow (talk) 20:21, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- That this is public domain in the US is not under dispute. It also needs to be public domain in its country of origin, which is the UK. UK is Life + 70 and it hasn't been 70 years since Stoneman's death yet. Abzeronow (talk) 16:45, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- The permission could be changed then as there is this one which would be acceptable. {{PD-UKGov}} PicMonkies (talk) 16:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- The National Portrait Gallery is not the UK Government. - Sitush (talk) 19:17, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- The permission could be changed then as there is this one which would be acceptable. {{PD-UKGov}} PicMonkies (talk) 16:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- That this is public domain in the US is not under dispute. It also needs to be public domain in its country of origin, which is the UK. UK is Life + 70 and it hasn't been 70 years since Stoneman's death yet. Abzeronow (talk) 16:45, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:31, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
No evidence that this is an official portrait created by/for the govt. That the image is held by the National Portrait Gallery means nothing. Sitush (talk) 23:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Portrait is by Walter Stoneman (1876-1958), who was the official photographer for the National Portrait Gallery. Abzeronow (talk) 21:42, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Upon further reflection and checking into various scenarios, this should be deleted and then undeleted in 2029 since that's when any copyrights on Stoneman's work would expire. Abzeronow (talk) 20:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Keep. It is out of copyright in the US as it was taken before 1924. PicMonkies (talk) 19:53, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Upon further reflection and checking into various scenarios, this should be deleted and then undeleted in 2029 since that's when any copyrights on Stoneman's work would expire. Abzeronow (talk) 20:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- The issue is that it doesn't appear to be out of copyright in the UK, the country of origin of the photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 16:47, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- The permission could be changed then as there is this one which would be acceptable. {{PD-UKGov}} PicMonkies (talk) 16:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- But there is no evidence that it is an official government photo. Did you read my opening statement? - Sitush (talk) 18:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: there's no indication that the image is in the public domain; please also see the related discussion at Undeletion requests, pertaining to the images from the same uploader. -- K.e.coffman (talk) 23:36, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 19:36, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
See COM:SIG#Common law countries (Indian signature). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. — Racconish 💬 13:15, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
See COM:SIG#Common law countries (Nigerian signature). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. — Racconish 💬 13:15, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Converted by me to DR, as image does not qualify for speedy-deletion, has been uploaded in 2016 and may be externally re-used. However, a courtesy-deletion might be possible. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion as not in use on any wiki project. — Racconish 💬 13:17, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
I create a SVG-Version (File:SHK Logo.svg) and replaced this file everywhere. Malo95 (talk) 10:35, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:17, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Charles Crodel
[edit]Crodel died in 1973, so those windows in German churches are still protected until January 1, 2044. No freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany.
- File:Magdeburg St Petri 07.jpg
- File:Roth bei Prüm (Eifel); katholische Filialkirche St. Leonhard t.jpg
- File:Roth bei Prüm (Eifel); katholische Filialkirche St. Leonhard u.jpg
- File:Roth bei Prüm (Eifel); katholische Filialkirche St. Leonhard v.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 13:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect, there is freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany. Panoramafreiheit is defined in article 59 of the German Urheberrechtsgesetz, see §59 UrhG (Germany). There are thousands of pictures from inside of buildings in Germany on commons. --Ourgmich (talk) 08:50, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- You are wrong. See the overview at Commons:Freedom of panorama#Germany: “It is possible by § 59 (English translation) of the Urheberrechtsgesetz, the Act on Copyright and Neighboring Rights, to take pictures or otherwise reproduce works that are permanently found outside on public ways, streets or places (e.g. squares, plazas) and to distribute and publicly communicate such copies.” The key word being “outside”. Freedom of panorama is solely about works protected by copyright, like these windows. If a photograph does not show a work protected by copyright, no freedom of panorama is needed. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Ok, then thousands of pictures from the interior of German churches with modern artworks on Commons must be deleted (immediately...). Stop these requests, nobody cares in Germany. --Ourgmich (talk) 16:10, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- "We can get away with it" is against the aims of Wikimedia Commons. --Rosenzweig τ 16:52, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Thats nonsense, make this request for thousands of pictures with modern artworks in German churches or stop it. --Ourgmich (talk) 07:16, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:35, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Charles Crodel
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 1973 (public domain in 2043); no freedom of panorama.
- File:20040926420DR Schmalkalden Georgenkirche Chor.jpg
- File:20040926430DR Schmalkalden Georgenkirche Chor.jpg
- File:Hildesheim St. Michael 13.JPG
- File:Imm023 22A.jpg
- File:Katharinenkirche Frankfurt Innenansicht.jpg
- File:Sangerhausen, Herz-Jesu-Kirche, Innenansicht.jpg--Dguendel 15:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- File:Schmalkalden St. Georg 06.jpg
- File:Schmalkalden St. Georg 07.jpg
- File:Schmalkalden St. Georg 08.jpg
- File:Schmalkalden St. Georg 09.jpg
- File:Schmalkalden St. Georg 10.jpg
- File:SM-Kirche-StGeorg-3.jpg
- File:St. Jakobi Hamburg Blick nach Osten.jpg
- File:Stadtkirche Friedberg Blick 02.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 22:53, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hallo,
- was den File Sangerhausen, Herz-Jesu-Kirche, Innenansicht betrifft, so wäre es nicht im Sinne von Wikipedia, wenn wegen den weit im Hintergrund brfindlichen Fenster, der gesamte schone Innenraum der Kirche nicht mehr dargestellt werden darf. Sobald das Bild gelöscht ist, retuschiere ich die Fenster aus dem Bild und stelle es mit entsprechendem Hinweis wieder Wikipedia zur Verfügung.
- Grüße aus Sangerhausen ! Dguendel 07:15, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- Objection! Aus meiner Sicht sollte hier die Anwendung des §57 UrhG geprüft werden. Bei diversen der hier eingstellten Fotos ist das Urheberrecht nicht unzulässig verletzt, da die Fenster nur Beiwerk im Gesamtkontext sind. Wirklich viel von den Fenstern erkennen kann man auf vielen der Bilder eh nichts.
Zunächst bemerke ich, dass ich im Bild nicht selbst die Category:Charles Crodel eingefügt habe, weil wegen der Entfernung des Objektes keinerlei Einzelheiten zu erkennen sind. Da ich Ihre Meinung kenne, habe ich das Bild nochmals ohne Fenster hochgeladen. Es wird so auch ersichtlich, das das rechtlich geschützte Objekt entfernt werden kann, ohne dass das Ziel des Bildes - neugotischer Innenraum der Kirche - verfälscht wird. --Dguendel 15:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- Siehe: File:SM-Kirche-StGeorg-3.jpg
- @ Martin Sg. normalerweise wird das nicht über archivierte Diskussionen geregelt oder? --An-d (talk) 09:49, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- Das ist grundsätzlich richtig, allerdings wurde die Diskussion beendet und trotzdem nachträglich weitere Bilder zur Löschung freigegeben, ohne dass die Urheber dieser
- Bilder sich noch an der Diskussion hätten beteiligen können. So geht das nicht ! Dguendel 13:13, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Den Ausweg "unwesentliches Beiwerk" hat uns leider der Bundesgerichtshof 2014 verbaut, siehe Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany/de#Unwesentliches Beiwerk. Nach diesen sehr restriktiven Kriterien sind die Fenster in keinem dieser Fotos unwesentliches Beiwerk. --Rosenzweig τ 21:23, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Crodel died in 1973, so those pillars in a German administration building are still protected until January 1, 2044. No freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany. When deleting the images, the empty category should be deleted too.
- File:2017-11-21-Bonn-Bundesrechnungshof-05.jpg
- File:2017-11-21-Bonn-Bundesrechnungshof-07.jpg
- File:2017-11-21-Bonn-Bundesrechnungshof-09.jpg
- File:2017-11-21-Bonn-Bundesrechnungshof-10.jpg
- File:2017-11-21-Bonn-Bundesrechnungshof-11.jpg
- File:2017-11-21-Bonn-Bundesrechnungshof-12.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 14:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
The Gebäude des Bundesministeriums für das Post- und Fernmeldewesen in Bonn is a public monument, so the photographs are allowed to be shown.Formativ (talk) 19:15, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- No, this doesn't change anything. --Rosenzweig τ 18:50, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Das Bild File:2017-11-21-Bonn-Bundesrechnungshof-09.jpg zeigt die Behördenkantine, die Säulen sind Beiwerk (§ 23 KunstUrhG). Axel Kirch 15:56, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- De minimis (= Beiwerk)? I'd rather say the pillars are central in those photos. --Rosenzweig τ 18:41, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Mein Fehler, es ist nicht File:2017-11-21-Bonn-Bundesrechnungshof-09.jpg gemeint sondern File:2017-11-21-Bonn-Bundesrechnungshof-07.jpg. Da der Raum nicht sehr breit ist, ist eine andere Perspektive nicht möglich. Axel Kirch 08:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:37, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- also redirect file:CSC Media Group Logo 2013.gif
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10|2=unused, misc self promo batch}}== {{int:filedesc. The logo is in scope, but maybe copyright violation? Source country UK has low threshold of originality. Are the blue and yellow line really simple geometrical figures? Taivo (talk) 18:18, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:39, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
artist Crodel died in 1973, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 18:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- if the problem are windows. you can crop the file. --Chatsam (talk) 14:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:39, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:20, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion, uploader's request, not in use. — Racconish 💬 17:44, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:21, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion, uploader's request, not in use. — Racconish 💬 17:44, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
potentially personality and copyright issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 19:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jayamala bio for wiki(2).jpg, thx, Roland zh (talk) 19:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Found on Facebook. — Racconish 💬 17:41, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Very unlikely that News In Town is the copyright holder. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:42, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jayamala.jpg, potentially personality and copyright issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 19:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Found on Facebook. — Racconish 💬 17:42, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
I don't like it as an author Emily J. Rose (talk) 19:21, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion, uploader's request, not in use. — Racconish 💬 17:45, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Não foi uma boa tomada Eduardo Afonso Cardoso Mergulhao (talk) 19:39, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- It's good enough. I like it.--ProfessorX (talk) 12:42, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -seems to be considered useful. — Racconish 💬 17:47, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Posters by Viktor Deni
[edit]These (created after October 1917) works of Viktor Deni are not PD until 2021.
- File:D23 103 (438851669).jpg
- File:Kulak plakat.jpg
- File:Polish Pig trained in Paris, Russian propaganda poster 1920.PNG
- File:Polish-soviet propaganda poster 14Y.jpg
- File:Polish-soviet propaganda poster 16Y.jpg
- File:Polish-soviet propaganda poster 18Y.jpg
- File:Polish-soviet propaganda poster 19Y.jpg
- File:Polish-soviet propaganda poster 22Y.jpg
- File:RUL06852 (438859710).jpg
- File:RUL09694 (438858013).jpg
- File:RUL09695 (438858053).jpg
- File:Russian Civil War posters.jpg
- File:Wikipe-tan,The New Brush That Sweeps Clean.JPG
- File:Неизвестный художник. Тов. Ленин очищает землю от нечисти.jpg
- File:Стереть с лица земли Троцкого (плакат, 1937).jpg
- File:Ясновельможная Польша плакат РСФСР 1920.jpg
Sealle (talk) 07:42, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:37, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Replacing with new design Aldontknow (talk) 15:42, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 17:31, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Finder icon is copyrightable. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Isn't that de-minimis here? --Sreejith K (talk) 04:12, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)