Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/08/13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 13th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free image, taken from https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/40782213 Lugnuts (talk) 11:10, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious copyvios may use {{Copyvio}}. --Эlcobbola talk 14:36, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free image, taken from https://sports.ndtv.com/cricket/fakhar-zaman-becomes-first-pakistan-cricketer-to-score-double-century-in-odis-1886890 Lugnuts (talk) 11:11, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious copyvios may use {{Copyvio}}. --Эlcobbola talk 14:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Desrespeito a uma religião. Trata-se de um objeto de devoção e deve ser preservado. Não é permitido fotografar ou divulgar essa imagem. É lamentável encontrá-la exposta na internet. É uma falta de respeito. Baliharafly (talk) 03:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason for deletion given. File is in use. INeverCry 00:21, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Soka Gakkai do not allow this Myjak rasmussen (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Transcription of work by "13th-century Japanese priest Nichiren" according to accompanying en:wiki. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete:The uploader “Crazysigns” neither is the real author of this image nor owns its copyright. This particular style of Gohonzon is published and used solely by the Buddhist organization Soka Gakkai International, which has the sole right and ability to reproduce it using a sacred woodblock. This specific style of Gohonzon was first published in 1993 by SGI, and its copyright is still in effect. SGI has never given any permission to post the image of Gohonzon to neither Crazysigns nor Wikimedia Commons; therefore, the image of Gohonzon needs to be deleted since SGI’s copyright has been violated 63.175.16.9 17:17, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This in turn would mean that it’s not a Gohonzon by 26th High Priest Nichikan (1665–1726)? So it’s a hoax?? Interesting stuff! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.130.198.116 (talk) 19:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, I do not believe, that SGI has sole right to reproduce the letter, because its copyright has expired, and I do not believe, that SGI has sole ability to reproduce it. If you claim, that it is work of SGI, then this makes the image a hoax, but it is used nevertheless in multiple projects. No strong evidence for recent work has been given, only indirect hints. Conclusion: evidence for copyright violation is weak, probably the work is very old. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich möchte eine bessere/eigene Aufnahme des Bildes einbinden. Gorkow (talk) 10:27, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gorkow: Wenn das exakt das selbe Bild ist, dann lade das halt als neue Version über das Bild, dazu muss man das Bild doch nicht löschen. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 19:37, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 19:41, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Titel ist falsch, er müßte "Judas" heißen. Ich möchte das Bild mit dem richtigen Titel dann einfügen. Gorkow (talk) 10:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gorkow: Dann stelle halt einen Umbenennungsantrag (bzw. sag mir rechtzeitig Bescheid, dann benenne ich es um), auch dazu muss man das Bild nicht löschen. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 19:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: a rename is no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 19:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

reuploaded. Uploader argues its not a derivate work, because its no-longer recognizable as the original. I dont think so. The original is clearly recognizable. JuTa 19:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JuTa: I insist my case in that the original work contained the image-component along with text and a background to the photo. The "derivative" includes a false-color rendition of the figures without background and text. There's also the point that the original was released into public domain, and I included a source for the original as well. Учхљёная (talk) 19:35, 13 August 2018 (UTC).[reply]
Where do you see the source in public domain? I cant find it. --JuTa 19:38, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This is a reupload and is to be speedied per COM:GCSD#4; it should not have been made a DR. If the uploader contests the deletion, they are welcome to open a thread at COM:UDR. Their claim, for what it's worth, is patent nonsense. "A 'derivative work' is a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a[n ...] art reproduction [...] or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted." Being "no-longer easily recognizable as the original" is 1) not a consideration (but rather the uploader's fiction) and 2) implicitly acknowledges the original remains recognizable (not being "easily recognizable" is still "recognizable"). If there is proof the original is PD, that can be presented at COM:UDR. --Эlcobbola talk 19:51, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No file, just a comment Lacrymocéphale (talk) 07:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:03, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded incorrectly. Learning how to use Lecollman (talk) 19:23, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its not correct Bacavima (talk) 10:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 08:07, 18 August 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://elpais.com/elpais/2017/12/29/album/1514532235_366717.html#foto_gal_12 --Krdbot 13:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New version won't upload Jajhill (talk) 00:02, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jajhill: I can see the new version. Try bypassing your browser cache. Anytime you upload a new version you usually have to do that:
w:Wikipedia:Bypass your cache
I don't see any difference in the timeline beginning and ending year. The only difference I see is in the line colors. Why did you upload this version? --Timeshifter (talk) 02:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Re:Timeshifter: Additional color coding. Darker red lines indicate groups where the rate of death has increased more. I was going to include that in the new description, but when I couldn't seem to get it to work at all, I didn't bother. -- Jajhill (talk) 4:55, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
@Jajhill: OK. I guess this thread can be deleted now? Or resolved as "no need to delete this file"? --Timeshifter (talk) 12:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Timeshifter: Yes. Thank you for your help. -- Jajhill (talk) 16:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Caching issues resolved. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:46, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Despite some minor differences, this file is effectively a copy of File:I-000 (state) template.svg and File:Caltrans 1971 MUTCD G27-2 3.svg. Both of which are better SVG templates than this file. –Fredddie 00:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a still photo from the video taken at 3:53. Further investigation shows a potential link to News-Ade, not TV10. According to the timestamp on the News-Ade article it showed up there first two hours earlier, and with a different watermark, then it did on TV10. The timestamp issue and the watermark issue raises significant doubt that this is actually TV10's property. Majora (talk) 01:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @Majora: The image at Newsade is a different image than the one by TV 10. You can tell by looking the position of multiple members in the band and comparing them between photos. Most notably is the member J-Hope (far right) is in a totally different position in the two images. In the Newsade photo, his hand is down and his expression is neutral, while in the TV 10 photo his hand is up and he's smiling. Member Jin (third member, from left) is looking to (his) right in the TV10 photo, while in the Newsade one he is looking straight ahead. Other differences include: Suga (second from the left) having his mouth open in the Newsade photo and not the TV10 one, member RM (third from right) looking up in the Newsade photo and straight ahead in the TV10 one, and member Jimin (blue jacket) looking down in the Newsade photo and straight ahead in the TV10 one. Thus, it can be deduced that the photos are not the same, despite being similar on first glance, and the first instance of the photo is the one published and watermarked by TV10. Thus, the still that later appears in the video is their's and they have the right to release it under CC-BY 3.0. DanielleTH (talk) 02:23, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oh...so they are. My mistake, DanielleTH. Apologies. Got wrapped up in following what came up on a reverse image search I missed the subtle differences. My bad.  I withdraw my nomination --Majora (talk) 02:33, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Manifesto unrelated to our Project Scope. Already deleted from eswiki.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:OOS: unused personal image without educational value 4nn1l2 (talk) 02:06, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:48, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ruthven as no permission (No permission since). I see no evidence of a problem, so clearly this should not be speedied. Ruthven, what is the issue? Jmabel ! talk 04:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: Hi! I see no evidence of a permission. The file wasn't uploaded by the author (who is Paulrclarke, and who uploads his photos himself), so I wonder how the permission was given. Am I missing something? --Ruthven (msg) 07:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination See my comment here. --Ruthven (msg) 07:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.flickr.com/photos/paul_clarke/7260701764 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulrclarke (talk • contribs) 09:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:49, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ruthven as no permission (No permission since). I see no evidence of a problem, so clearly this should not be speedied. Ruthven, what is the issue? Jmabel ! talk 04:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination See my comment here. --Ruthven (msg) 07:27, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Jmabel. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:49, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted Ned Stephenson is not mentioned in en.wiki. Probably the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:50, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. In addition, the file is uploaded for self-promotion, look en:Shine Hair Studio. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:50, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Making random images from the internet for the artist's impressions of exoplanets

The NMI User (talk) 10:27, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. No need for artwork (=false illustrations) here. Commons is an educational project, not an art project. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 21:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:53, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Promotional cover art. No permission ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 13:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:55, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 13:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:55, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 13:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:55, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Idonavarro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 13:23, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:55, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size and website credit indicate this came from another website Ytoyoda (talk) 17:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:57, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chirag Shaikh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Chirag Shaikh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of Commons Project scope: self-promotion, unused personal files

George Chernilevsky talk 18:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:57, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Helper234892 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images apparently from shutterography.com. They are free images, but they don't appear to be under an particular free license. They're certainly not "own work". Per their license info, you cannot use images from Shutterography to create a similar or competing service. As far as I am aware, that is a restriction that is not compatible with a CC-BY-SA license.

GMGtalk 19:32, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:58, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Commons is not a place to store your vacation photo collection." Msaynevirta (talk) 20:51, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus copyright tag. The author is w:Kim Won-gyun, who died in 2002, less than 50 years ago. Stefan2 (talk) 20:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

own request Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 07:34, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio 2601:647:101:D030:F90F:8FC2:29B4:9F9E 23:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:01, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a crop of a wider shot here: https://picclick.com/Petri-FTE-Film-Camera-222419715976.html#&gid=1&pid=1 Ytoyoda (talk) 23:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:01, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copied from http://lens-club.ru/lenses/item/c_5092.html Ytoyoda (talk) 23:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:01, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certainly not the uploader's own work, it could be from here, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 01:51, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:40, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot. the uploader is not the copyright owner. Md.altaf.rahman (talk) 02:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:41, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue unveiled only in 2016. No FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 08:17, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:41, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi, my sister and I are the two painted girls in this picture and are requesting for it to be taken down from Wikimedia Commons and any/ all other platforms you may have uploaded this to, on the premise that our faces are recognizable. I understand that we were in a public space and that you had the right to photograph and to upload this image but we would very much appreciate if it were taken down. This image has recently been used in the alt-right newspaper "Nyheter Idag" and somebody who doesn't even know me so well recognized me from the article and brought it to my attention. I would appreciate if you could respect mine and my sister's privacy and take down the image. JJoh92 (talk) 13:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:42, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shmtv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Violation Template:NoFoP-Russia

Maxinvestigator (talk) 08:41, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:02, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong format - jpeg will be provided Jtaramaa (talk) 08:59, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded this photo falsely, because I actually wanted to delete it before and didn’t want to upload it with the other images. In my opinion, this picture is a bad contribution, because the panorama shows cars, that move and that’s why they appear multiple times and warped. -- Fantaglobe11 (talk) 09:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of probably non-notable company, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:05, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong CMYK to RGB convertion - this are not Statistics Poland colours Nowak666666 (talk) 10:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:05, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Sophie BETTIG, autorisation de l'auteur nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 10:13, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:06, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Sophie BETTIG, autorisation de l'auteur nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 10:13, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:06, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope, currently used on a promotional user page Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:07, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dhar Singh Chauhan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal images, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:09, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich möchte eine bessere/eigene Aufnahme des Bildes einbinden. Gorkow (talk) 10:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: already overwritten. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:09, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not simple enough Discasto talk 10:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MOBO1909 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical newspapers and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:41, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, author and license The Banner (talk) 18:38, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:54, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, author and license The Banner (talk) 18:38, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, author and license The Banner (talk) 18:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, author and license The Banner (talk) 18:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, author and license The Banner (talk) 18:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:09, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, author and license The Banner (talk) 18:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:09, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, author and license The Banner (talk) 18:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:09, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, author and license The Banner (talk) 18:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, author and license The Banner (talk) 18:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; pd in 2018, no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:37, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:49, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation -- Credited to Getty Images MShabazz (talk) 20:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Picture used is likely to be under copyright. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. I think that the relief is an important part of the picture and the main subject. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:01, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precautionary principle (can't determine date of creation). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per precautionary principle (can't determine date of creation). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:59, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:56, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (created in 1965). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per precautionary principle (unlikely to determine the date of creation). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 23:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where is art?--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 06:22, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DR withdrawn. --Wdwd (talk) 12:45, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

complex logo, possible copyvio 2601:647:101:D030:F90F:8FC2:29B4:9F9E 23:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Meet meet the threshold of originality. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file Bkleinberg (talk) 23:32, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:44, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the non-free portrait B dash (talk) 02:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:37, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used in any article. See also w:User talk:G1f2d. Mathglot (talk) 03:23, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not used and promotional. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:38, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google search file Mulkh Singh (talk) 06:48, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unknown author, image used on various websites. Permission need to be provided to COM:OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google search file Mulkh Singh (talk) 06:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unknown author, image used on various websites. Permission need to be provided to COM:OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The following photographs are derivative works of Paavo Nurmi, a 1955 statue, based on the 1925 sculpture (Q17382947) by Wäinö Aaltonen (1894–1966; Q213619), located in Turku, Finland. The original work (the sculpture) is still under copyright and thus not in public domain. FOP in Finland is for buildings only. Apalsola tc 01:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Related cases:
––Apalsola tc 01:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:09, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmed faiz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:10, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file has two problems. At first, I do not believe own work, probably copyright violation. At second, both depicted persons are probably non-notable, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of the Sibelius Monument 7

[edit]

The following photographs are derivative works of the Sibelius Monument (Q2584017), a 1967 sculpture by Eila Hiltunen (1922–2003; Q460402), located in Helsinki, Finland. The Sibelius Monument is still under copyright and thus not in public domain. FOP in Finland is for buildings only.

Related cases:

––Apalsola tc 10:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the ones where the artwork was the main theme of the photo. I support  Keep for the others, as De minimis.-- Darwin Ahoy! 11:12, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For the files File:Sibelius-monumentin-paljastus.jpg and File:Eila-Hiltunen-1965.jpg de minimis does apply because the monument is only partially visible in the background and the person or a group of persons is the actual and intended subject of the photograph. --Mlang.Finn (talk) 14:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: three deleted, two kept as de minimis. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image, a youth organization logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 11:36, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos from 951010.net

[edit]

Although the posts are labeled as {{Cc-by-4.0}}, the blog's homepage states: "2차 가공은 어떠한 경우에도 금지입니다!" ("Secondary processing is not allowed under any circumstance!"). This contradicts the Creative Commons license, and photos from this blog can not be hosted on Commons.

xplicit 11:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all deleted by Hystrix. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file with unknown importance, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like Flickr washing. Blurry image ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 13:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 14:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sry88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused screenshots images unlikely to be used at th.wikipedia.org since the user is blocked there.

 Keep This picture is on Flickr under Public Domain https://www.flickr.com/photos/148083379@N08/43103520695/in/dateposted-public/ It was reviewed on 2018-08-13 10:30:49 by FlickreviewR 2. --Call of the Nightowl (talk) 23:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This file is a copyvio of 59.8MB http://iwpfi2017.org/download/program-book.pdf (just below the middle of page 12, row 3, column 3).   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:38, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was blocked due to political conflict with Administrators .I found the photo of the Politician I like .Because of him millions of children could go to school.It seems that some influential people don’t like them because they contribute to much for the poor.

I would be appreciated if you do not delete my photo and let me contribute. I doubt that with multimillion photo and millions of them is not used. Why ‘s my photo ,I believed some of you thought something is wrong. File:The name of school His Excellency Mr.Sukavich Rangsitpol Ministers of Education founded between 1995and 1997 No.1.png

14 August 2018 File:The name of school His Excellency Mr.Sukavich Rangsitpol Ministers of Education founded between 1995and 1997 No.2.png

User created page with UploadWizard

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E0%B8%95%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%87_%E0%B8%95%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B9%E0%B9%89_%E0%B8%A7%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B9%82%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%82%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%87_%E0%B8%AF%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%93%E0%B8%AF_%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B8%E0%B8%82%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%8A_%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%B5%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%84%E0%B9%88%E0%B9%84%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%99_%E0%B9%83%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%95%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B0%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%A8.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sry88 (talk • contribs) 11:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

01:19

File:The name of school His Excellency Mr.Sukavich Rangsitpol Ministers of Education founded between 1995and 1997 No.1.png

User created page with UploadWizard

01:19

File:The name of school His Excellency Mr.Sukavich Rangsitpol Ministers of Education founded between 1995and 1997 No.3.png

User created page with UploadWizard

01:19

Pongsak ksm /Interface Administrator /Thai wiki

←Created page with 'Category:Thailand

File:ผลงานทางการเมืองที่ดีต้องเป็นความลับ เรื่องโกหกจะได้น่าเชื่อ คนดีจะได้พ่ายแพ้.png File:ต้องปิดบัง ต้องตัดการรับรู้ ว่านโยบายของ ฯพณฯ สุขวิช ดีแค่ไหน ในต่างประเทศ.png


And now he deleted the fact and edit history page information

Many of us in education profession have noticed the situation that why we are trying to tell the truth

1)https://th.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B8%9C%E0%B8%B9%E0%B9%89%E0%B9%83%E0%B8%8A%E0%B9%89:22sep/%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B0%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%B0%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A2

I just found out ,it is very hard to explain no wonder I was blocked

ที่โดนลบhttps://wikivisually.com/wiki/Draft_talk:Sukavich_Rangsitpol

References Edit

^ https://www.linkedin.com/in/thita-rangsitpol-manitkul-6ab77080/ ^ [1][dead link] ^ [2][dead link] ^ http://www.ombudsman.gov.ph/UNDP4/we-content/upload/2013/01/Plenary Highlights APPAN.pdf[dead link] ^ http://www.ombudsman.gov.ph/UNDP4/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Plenary_Highlights_APPAN.pdf

This is why the link dead and then This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page

https://wikivisually.com/wiki/Draft_talk:Sukavich_Rangsitpol — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sry88 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Set A

http://ebooks.dusit.ac.th/sdubook/ob-content.nsp?view=IKNOW&db0=ThesisEducation&cid_bookid=201307171235288900000003461&cid_chapid=10000000010&sortfield=recid&sortorder=ASCENDING&numresults=10000

http://ebooks.dusit.ac.th/sdubook/ob-content.nsp?view=IKNOW&db0=ThesisEducation&cid_bookid=201307171235288900000003461&cid_chapid=10000000006&sortfield=recid&sortorder=ASCENDING&numresults=10000

Set B

^ http://www.ombudsman.gov.ph/UNDP4/we-content/upload/2013/01/Plenary Highlights APPAN.pdf[dead link] ^ httpu://www.ombudsman.gov.ph/UNDP4/wpcontent/uploads/2013/01/Plenary_Highlights_APPAN.pdf

Draft talk:Sukavich Rangsitpol [show article only] From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [w] This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. WikiProject icon Biography portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the projectand contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.

Draft 	This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

WikiProject icon flag Thailand portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.

Draft 	This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Blue alert icon. The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of the article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. 22sep (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. (Special:Diff/751488336, Special:Diff/740903529, Special:Diff/751528727, c:Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Panda m.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sry88 (talk • contribs) 10:05, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 15 uploads[reply]


ต้องปิดบัง ต้องตัดการรับรู้ ว่านโยบายของ ฯพณฯ สุขวิช ดีแค่ไหน ในต่างประเทศ

ผลงานทางการเมืองที่ดีต้องเป็นความลับ เรื่องโกหกจะได้น่าเชื่อ คนดีจะได้พ่ายแพ้

To tell public about the schools the person found consider Advertising

The Reasons was “ To put the name of the person founded in his Wiki page would consider Advertising?!?

The name of school His Excellency Mr.Sukavich Rangsitpol Ministers of Education founded between 1995and 1997 No.2

The name of school His Excellency Mr.Sukavich Rangsitpol Ministers of Education founded between 1995and 1997 No.1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sry88 (talk • contribs) 11:05, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sry88 (talk · contribs) subsection

[edit]

Unused pictures, COM:OOS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:07, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I have blocked Sry88 for three days for persistent disruptive editing, namely cross-posting of undeletion requests for these files that are still being discussed. De728631 (talk) 17:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Political Peference

[edit]

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Prang_Vejjajiva#/media/File%3A%E0%B8%9C%E0%B8%A8.%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%A3.%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%9E%E0%B9%8C%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%9E%E0%B9%87%E0%B8%8D_%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%8A%E0%B8%8A%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%8A%E0%B8%B5%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%B0_%E0%B8%A0%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%90%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B5_%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%9B%E0%B9%87%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B0%E0%B8%98%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99_-_Flickr_-_Abhisit_Vejjajiva_(8).jpg

That link is full of unused photo and my photos is used . What is the real reason? Sry88 (talk) 21:56, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That is just the mobile view of Category:Prang Vejjajiva.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:49, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep pseudocode

if license == "Public domain mark":
    if no {{License template tag}}: // no license of any kind
        add {{Remove this line and insert a public domain copyright tag instead}}{{No license since|month=August|day=19|year=2018}}
        review passed
    else if no {{PD-Layout}}: // non PD license found
        review passed_changed
        skip try_license_subst
    else: // PD license
        review passed

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Requests_for_comment/Flickr_and_PD_images — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sry88 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:NPOVT : All my photos I upload was from Flickr under Public Domain Public domain  Keep

1)This Link to the Unused Photo that is not deleted https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Prang_Vejjajiva

2)But that is not the action to my photos https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Sry88

3) File:Professor Doctor Thitiporn Rangsitpol Suwatanapongched,Sukavich Rangsitpol ‘s Daughter.jpg Symbol keep vote.svg Keep This picture is on Flickr under Public Domain https://www.flickr.com/photos/148083379@N08/43103520695/in/dateposted-public/ It was reviewed on 2018-08-13 10:30:49 by FlickreviewR 2. --Call of the Nightowl (talk) 23:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC) This file is a copyvio of 59.8MB http://iwpfi2017.org/download/program-book.pdf (just below the middle of page 12, row 3, column 3). — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)


Both of them are right,the photo was different,the one I upload was from Flickr .I believe the owner of the Flickr account used photoshop or something before upload in Flickr under Public Domain . Public domain ,and the link http://iwpfi2017.org/download/program-book.pdf was under the photo I think the one who vote keep check it out that it was difference .

https://www.facebook.com/100005548114343/posts/896511200543809/


  • The other one :

https://www.facebook.com/100005548114343/posts/896510357210560/

4) File:Lieutenant Colonel Thita Rangsitpol Manitkul.png https://www.flickr.com/photos/157145480@N04/41541966735/in/photolist-28TsDzL-29YXWzD-29YXWDB-28EUNZV-28XvxTf-LdWoWr-28Q5qtN-MVviTs-29stmuS-8yhBz3-26hVrpM

  • . Uploaded on May 29, 2018
Public domain

Sry88 (talk) 05:08, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violations. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sry88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Screenshots of deleted Wikipedia contributions uploaded by the same long-term sock-farming COI user who wrote the article.

Paul_012 (talk) 22:52, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 07:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PRP - lower res, no camera exif, prior to CropTool crop contained watermark crediting "Solomas Ebeniste", which is not the uploader (NardineSolomas) or the credited author (Jordan64359) - that this purports to be a self work and the uploader credits someone other than themself is itself a problem. All other user uploads have been COM:NETCOPYVIOs from the Solomas company site. Quack? Эlcobbola talk 14:32, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:34, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Himynameisvans (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTHOST - unused image of non-notable person Эlcobbola talk 14:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:36, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:36, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is available on the net ever since 2013 and cannot be claimed as "own work". This is a case of copyright violation. Vivvt (talk) 14:55, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 15:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:49, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 15:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from copyrighted character. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. The building shown in the photo is a house in Independence Avenue, Minsk, Belarus (Russian: Проспект Независимости 34). The architects were Michail Ossipowitsch Barschtsch (Russian: Михаил Осипович Барщ, 1904-1976) and Leonas Aranauskas (Russian: Леонас Аранаускас, 1921-2015). Jarash (talk) 16:13, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional, out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:15, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:56, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. The statue was installed in 2011, the sculptors are Uładzimir Żbanau (Russian: Владимир Иванович Жбанов, 1954-2012) and Yaroslav Filippovich (Russian: Ярослав Филиппович, born: 1981). Jarash (talk) 16:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:56, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake licence Snowflake91 (talk) 17:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as own work. Photo was taken as part of a professional photoshoot by youtuber Lauren Mychal aka "Glam and Gore." (https://www.instagram.com/p/BmWum9ygC5D/?taken-by=thegabbieshow). Unlikely that the uploader is this person and likely a false attribution. Additionally, user has a known history of uploading falsely attributed non-free works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidSSabb (talk • contribs) 17:04, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Elcobbola. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, out of scope. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 17:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; can't even tell what this is supposed to be IagoQnsi (talk) 18:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of licence Ariam (talk) 18:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by INapoli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Disagree that the book and video game controller are simple geometric shapes - seem above COM:TOO

Эlcobbola talk 19:27, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. It's unlikely that the author would have died before 1948 and it's highly unlikely that uploader is the copyright holder. Jcb (talk) 20:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:01, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 21:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:01, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bogdanov-62 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks

This is a building--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 05:01, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Where is a sculpture???--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 04:58, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dogad75 (talk) 21:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No sculptures--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 04:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I kept a mausoleum which is a building and one photo which is de minimis. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bogdanov-62 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of non-free posters, no FoP in Russia for those.

It's my work. It's my handmade. Therefore it's free poster Bogdanov-62 (talk) 12:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC) VLu (talk) 10:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very funny. --VLu (talk) 13:58, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I do not see anything funny. Poster of the study-museum of academician G.G. Cherny was created by the curator of the cabinet-museum and provided for free use--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 19:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bogdanov-62, do me a favor, show the definition of that free use on the Commons:Licensing page. --VLu (talk) 11:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
catch:{{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} Bogdanov-62 (talk) 12:35, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's worse than I thought . Thank you. --VLu (talk) 16:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Don't think. Remove your label for delete. Thank you.--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 21:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted both. The first file can be restored after getting OTRS-permission from artist. The second photo – nothing helps, permission is needed from text author plus from all three photographers (some of them are probably unknown). Taivo (talk) 14:32, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bogdanov-62 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP in Russia for sculpture.

Xunks (talk) 05:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:33, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bogdanov-62 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of copyrighted 2D and 3D artworks. No FoP in Russia except architecture.

Quick1984 (talk) 14:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:37, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:38, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's a building. Using license is OK for buildings. It isn't sculpture--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 04:47, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I agree this is a building. --Ymblanter (talk) 11:22, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:38, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 11:43, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 11:43, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 11:46, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:41, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 11:52, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 11:53, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No sculpture. It's the stone.--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 06:17, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
На памятник нанесено строение, что является работой какого-то автора. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 08:40, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:37, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:38, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:40, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 14:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 14:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 14:13, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 14:14, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:39, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:37, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture that appears on the web. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 10:16, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 20:49, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, found as early as May 2017 at https://ccss3172.blogspot.com/2017_05_17_archive.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:11, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:13, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am Vice President of World Wisdom Inc. World Wisdom holds the copyrights to all photographs that were in Frithjof Schuon's private collection at the time of his death in 1998. This particular photo, Schoun2.jpg, is, in fact, a doctored version of a large photo used on page "x," which faces page "xi" (the Foreword) of the book "Frithjof Schuon: Messenger of the Perennial Philosophy" (ISBN: 978-1935493082). The author of the book is Michael Oren Fitzgerald, and the book was published in 2010 by World Wisdom. The copyrights are stated on the edition notice page of the book. It says that "no part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner without written permission." No such permission was ever sought for the underlying photograph. To view the photograph in the book, online, you can go to the Kindle version of the book, https://www.amazon.com/Frithjof-Schuon-Messenger-Perennial-Philosophy-ebook/dp/B004ASORES/, going to "Look Inside" and scrolling down to the Foreword. You will see the photograph there. A quick glance at this very dignified photo of Mr. Schuon, and then a glance at Schoun2.jpg, will show that the photograph in the Commons is essentially the one from the book, except for a cartoonish layer imposed over it. I am sure that the submitter's intention in posting this photo to the Commons was not bad, but World Wisdom wants Mr. Schuon's own, dignified, photo to remain unembellished, as he would have wanted it. At this time, we do not want the photo to be in the public domain. Thus, I request that this file be deleted as soon as possible. Thank you, Roger Gaetani Vice President World Wisdom Rsalimg (talk) 21:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 21:47, 10 September 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: This image is copyrighted by Mark Perry, whose late father, the author and editor Whitall Perry, took the the photo of his long-time friend, the late Frithjof Schuon. The photo is shown at http://www.frithjofschuon.com/english/imagegallery/Frithjof-Schuon-1965-taken-by-Whitall-Perry.jpg and is also printed in the book “Frithjof Schuon: Messenger of the Perennial Philosophy.” This image, "Schoun2.jpg, is a doctored version of the original, and is a violation of (1) --Krdbot 00:46, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to this, it's a newspaper photo, making it copyrighted. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 05:59, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Source provided isn't free and possibly wrong license. --Ezarateesteban 23:51, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vectorised file can be found at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maplestory_Leaf.svg instead. Wynterheim (talk) 09:36, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We must delete both files, svg too, it's copyright from here, https://www.deviantart.com/thenewhylton/art/MapleStory-Old-Logo-Leaf-658605981 and IMHO too complex for TOO. --Ezarateesteban 23:53, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author fa:حسین شیخ died in 1991. His works are protected by the Iranian copyright law until 2042. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 23:55, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image MiguelAlanCS (talk) 14:04, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 23:58, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image MiguelAlanCS (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 23:58, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 23:59, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very similar to File:Rio y nieve (40269210395).jpg, but I think that one is better. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Alexis Jazz: What you see is actually not relevant. Commons policies and rules are relevant indeed. So, the point is not whether you see the point in keeping the image but whether it fullfills Commons requirements. --Discasto talk 18:54, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how you expect me to ever take you seriously again after what you just said. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:00, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Absolutely no reason to have two nearly-identical images, just because the uploader wasn't careful when mass-importing from flickr. Up and Go, please be more judicious with your future uploads. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User mentions in the description that they do not own any copyrights and still tag the work as their own, which is contradictory Vivvt (talk) 14:51, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:20, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only information the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office is releasing to Wikipedia writers now.
The Florida state attorney filed a manslaughter charge against Drejka on August 13, 2018.[1]
Once more information is available to Wikipedia writers I am going to post it.

--Wyn.junior (talk) 16:06, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:20, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From https://www.showyboys.com/allenatori/ Ytoyoda (talk) 17:55, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:20, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bildbezeichnung falsch, steht in Keinem Zusammenhang mit dem Artikel 93.184.128.19 08:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Diese Aussage ist definitiv falsch. Siehe https://www.e-recht24.de/datenschutzgrundverordnung.html Folglich ist das Bild zu löschen... — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:16B8:4A5:2100:CC7A:9F17:38D2:7CC1 (talk) 12:41, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. If description is wrong, use {{Rename}} or {{Fact disputed}}. P 1 9 9   17:26, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wie bereits in der Disskussion festgestellt wurde, ist dieses Foto, im Gegensatz des noch vorhandenen anderen, durch Betreten des Grundstücks getätigt worden. Dies ist unzulässig. Ich bitte um Entfernung. 2001:16B8:432:4700:8D00:8E8F:52E0:6945 11:12, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Durch die Bearbeitung des Fotos, das ich von der Straße aus gemacht habe, entsteht ein falscher Eindruck. Ich habe bei diesem Foto das private Grundstück jedenfalls nicht betreten. --Pingsjong (talk) 11:46, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Es ist völlig unerheblich, ob dazu Privatgelände betreten wird. Der Besitzer kann den Fotografen des Grundstücks verweisen, Hausverbot erteilen. Aber nicht mehr. Die Bildrechte sind nicht betroffen und §201a StGB ist ganz offensichtlich nicht einschlägig. Es liegt kein Löschgrund vor und auch kein Grund, das Kennzeichen unkenntlich zu machen. Ich muß mir mal ansehen, wo das liegt, scheint ja ein fotografisch sehr interessantes Umfeld zu sein. Ich glaube, das muß ich mal aus allen Winkeln und aus der Luft fotografieren. --Ralf Roleček  12:33, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bildbezeichnung falsch, steht in Keinem Zusammenhang mit dem Artikel 93.184.128.19 08:23, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep siehe dazu
Broichen
Diskussion:Broichen
Straße Broichen heute mit Straßenschild
Der Text in der Einleitung des Artikels Broichen sagt, dass die Straße Broichen, die als Verbindung zwischen der Broicher Straße und der Brüderstraße nach wie vor besteht, an die ehemalige Ortschaft Broichen erinnert. Von dieser Straße aus habe ich das Foto Ortsteil Broichen in Kaule.2.JPG gemacht. Das Foto ist im Übrigen panoramafrei, wie man an den beiden rot-weißen Pflöcken sehen kann, die gleichzeitig Grenze des Privatgrundstücks sind.--Pingsjong (talk) 15:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Panoramafreiheit ist sowieso nicht betroffen, da kein Kunstwerk abgebildet ist. --Ralf Roleček  16:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. If description is wrong, use {{Rename}} or {{Fact disputed}}. P 1 9 9   17:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bildbezeichnung falsch, steht in Keinem Zusammenhang mit dem Artikel, Datenschutzverletzung 93.184.128.19 08:23, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Das Foto kann gern gelöscht werden, weil man das Nummernschild auf dem Auto lesen kann.--Pingsjong (talk) 16:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dann sollte das andere gelöscht werden. Es gibt keinen Grund, Nummernschilder unkenntlich zu machen. --Ralf Roleček  16:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Falsch, lieber Ralf. Nach der DVSGO ist dies in diesem Fall nicht mehr zulässig. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 109.40.64.174 (talk) 09:07, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dadurch hat sich in der deutschen Rechtssprechung nichts geändert. --Ralf Roleček  10:14, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nun EU Recht bricht Bundesrecht. Das sollten Sie eigendlich wissen... Insofern bezieht sich Ihre angesprochene deutsche Rechtsprechung auf altes nationale Recht. Werden Sie aber auch noch merken.... — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:16B8:4B8:700:A812:BD45:509B:FB3C (talk) 17:54, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nach DSGVO ist das Bild zu löschen.... siehe auch https://www.e-recht24.de/datenschutzgrundverordnung.html — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:16B8:4A5:2100:CC7A:9F17:38D2:7CC1 (talk) 12:45, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Durch ständiges Wiederholen wird das nicht wahrer. Es ist kein Löschgrund gegeben. --Ralf Roleček  13:15, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dies gilt auch für Ihre Aussage. Hätten Sie den Link gelesen, wäre Ihnen nunmehr klar, dass europäischem Recht die Veröffentlichung von KFZ Kennzeichen als Veröffentlichung von persönlichen Daten zu werten ist. Im Gegensatz zu Ihnen zeige ich Ihnen eine klare Rechtsgrundlage, welche auf Grund Ihrer Wiederholung sicherlich nicht ausgehebelt wird. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:16B8:4A5:2100:CC7A:9F17:38D2:7CC1 (talk) 14:16, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Was interessiert die kommerzielle Seite eines Anbieters, der mit der Panik um die DSGVO Kohle scheffeln will? --Ralf Roleček  15:04, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interessante Auffassung. Aber jeder der ne Homepage hat, beruft sich auf diese Seite. Und Ihre Aussage wird dadurch nicht wahrer. Mit dieser laienhaften Auffassung gegen geltendes Recht zu verstossen, finde ich schon mutig. Aber zum Glück ist die DSVGO ja veröffentlicht. Kann jeder es nachlesen. Intetessant wie manche Menschen für sich und andere entscheiden, über dem Recht zu stehen. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:16B8:419:E400:D64:D520:576B:8A7 (talk) 07:06, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hierzu eine nicht kommerzielle Seite.... https://www.ldi.nrw.de/mainmenu_Datenschutz/Inhalt/FAQ/PersonenbezogeneDaten.php

Soviel zu dem Thema, die wollen nur Geld machen. Auch die Datenschutzbeauftragte??? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:16B8:419:E400:D64:D520:576B:8A7 (talk) 08:10, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as near duplicate of File:Ortsteil Broichen in Kaule.jpg (license plate is obscured on this one). P 1 9 9   17:29, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Markle has now become a UK citizen and as such her signature is protected by copyright laws. Also there is no source information proving that this is her real signature. Domdeparis (talk) 08:37, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A few points: 1) her citizenship as last reported by the media is not yet British, and won't be for years 2) you've not explained what difference citizenship could make to copyright, perhaps because there is none. 3) is this some kind of disfavored retroactive copyright claim? The source country for the file says it is "United States of America", and date of production is 17 March 2016, those have not and will not change. -Alanscottwalker (talk) 10:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
COM:SIG states "Unless further legal commentary or caselaw to the contrary becomes available, the UK position is that typical personal signatures are arguably entitled to protection under local law, and generally UK signatures should be deleted under the precautionary principle. However, if the signature is extremely simple (eg a scribbled line or two), it will not be copyright even in the UK" would she be protected by UK law as a UK resident regardless of citizenship? Also as she is now married she will have undoubtedly changed her signature so this one is most probably also redundant. Domdeparis (talk) 19:36, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
On 17 March 2016, none of your British claims existed, none of that would matter for copyright - copyright's not retroactive. And no it's not redundant, it is now, always was, and always will be a signature of 17 March 2016. Alanscottwalker (talk) 04:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Can you just clarify what is important for copyright the place that the signature was signed, is it the nationality of the person at the time the signature was signed or their place of residence at the time? Domdeparis (talk) 08:27, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per User:Alanscottwalker. No comment on whether or not this is her real signature. P 1 9 9   17:32, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commercial Golan's mom (talk) 10:14, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:33, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You can find same picture in [1]. Maybe it was imported from a certain website. 禁樹なずな (talk) 12:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, found online using Google Images. P 1 9 9   17:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The designs of banknotes issued by the Bank of England are not in the public domain. Each banknote has a copyright notice on it. Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 12:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dimensions are indeed incorrect, replaced all usage with Matrícula automovilística España 2000 2008 ZGZ largo Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected to File:Matrícula automovilística España 2000 2008 ZGZ largo.svg. P 1 9 9   17:38, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Surekha Kamath (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical books. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC) Read, Date and Country are provided (" Portugal Época 80-81 "), and the author is unknown, but all the rights to this photo belong to public domain and Grupo Desportivo Águias de Camarate. --Daniel AR Pires (talk) 19:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence that "rights to this photo belong to public domain". P 1 9 9   17:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue of Aleksis Kivi 3

[edit]

The following photographs are derivative works of the Statue of Aleksis Kivi (Q11850731), a 1939 sculpture by Wäinö Aaltonen (1894–1966; Q213619), located in Helsinki, Finland. The original work (the statue) is still under copyright and thus not in public domain. FOP in Finland is for buildings only.

There are also other photographs in Category:Statue of Aleksis Kivi, Helsinki, but in my opinion they clearly fall under de minimis, so I did not nominate them.

Related:

––Apalsola tc 14:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC) –– (added a link to an earlier DR) Apalsola tc 15:05, 13 August 2018 (UTC) –– (one file added) Apalsola tc 15:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, kept some as DM. P 1 9 9   17:44, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:H2254625

[edit]

Helianthus丨杨超越 uploaded this photo with the watermark in the weibo(the third photo) on June 30 2018. We can get the larger version by pressing 查看大图.--Gda0608 (talk) 15:14, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gda0608: The one on Weibo is processed with watermark and color adjustment(which is given out by me), this is the original photo. You can not revert the process, use your common sense. -H2254625 (talk) 19:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: claimed as own work by uploader, no reason to doubt it for now. P 1 9 9   17:48, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by H2254625 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see COM:OTRS: "I am the copyright owner but my file has been previously published without a free license on a medium I can't alter", in which case the uploader must send an email to OTRS to verify the free license.

Wcam (talk) 21:28, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wcam: Please provide a site with date of this image with no watermark before claiming the image was "previously published".--H2254625 (talk) 00:29, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
With all due respect, you already said that the Weibo images were given out by you. Given that you claimed to be the copyright owner, you are expected to follow the rules and verify the copyright claims (COM:EVID) by contacting OTRS, or these images should be deleted. --Wcam (talk) 03:39, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I was trying to make the point that the non watermarked image was first published in common. But I guess this is what I have to do. So base on my understanding, all I need is to email a statement generated by release generator?--H2254625 (talk) 06:01, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Verified by Jimmy Xu. --WQL (talk) 15:38, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is from https://www.konzerthaus.de/de/foto/fotos-der-saison-201819/82. Copyright notice reads: "The content and works on these pages created by the site operators are subject to German copyright law. The reproduction, processing, distribution and any kind of exploitation outside the limits of copyright require the written consent of the respective author or creator. Downloads and copies of this site are for private, non-commercial use only." Ytoyoda (talk) 15:33, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Como autor de la obra deseo su eliminación de esta página. Isaac3003 (talk) 15:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9   17:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Como autor de la obra deseo su eliminación de esta página. No quiero ninguna relación con wikipedia. Isaac3003 (talk) 15:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9   17:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Como autor de la obra deseo su eliminación de esta página. No quiero ninguna relación con wikipedia. Isaac3003 (talk) 15:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9   17:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Como autor de la obra deseo su eliminación de esta página. No quiero ninguna relación con wikipedia. Isaac3003 (talk) 15:58, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9   17:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Como autor de la obra deseo su eliminación de esta página. No quiero ninguna relación con wikipedia. Isaac3003 (talk) 15:58, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9   17:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Como autor de la obra deseo su eliminación de esta página. No quiero ninguna relación con wikipedia. Isaac3003 (talk) 15:58, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9   17:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credits doesn't match with the EXIF informations. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete It looks like the paid editor of SOHO found a way to upload some photo and claiming it is CC. The creator of such flickr account was Nina Ni but it did not match the exif "Zhang Rui Qi" nor "Ricky Xia". Matthew hk (talk) 17:32, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:54, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has been posted at https://namu.wiki/w/%ED%8C%8C%EC%9D%BC:Island-castle.png, the resort website is credited Ytoyoda (talk) 17:37, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. P 1 9 9   18:08, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published photo: http://www.finland.se/public/default.aspx?contentid=374797&nodeid=36125&contentlan=1&culture=fi-FI Ytoyoda (talk) 17:55, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:08, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I create a SVG-Version (File:Dot.swiss Logo.svg) and replaced this file everywhere. Malo95 (talk) 18:10, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded. P 1 9 9   18:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a company logo is seldom own work... The Banner (talk) 18:33, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 17:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The logo is stated to be own work by an editor who admits not to have a clue about copyright. So it is unlikely to be own work... The Banner (talk) 18:14, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: below TOO. P 1 9 9   18:18, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a company logo is seldom own work The Banner (talk) 18:37, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: below TOO. P 1 9 9   18:22, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, author and license The Banner (talk) 18:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep PD-textlogo. Authorship is therefore irrelevant. Fry1989 eh? 17:19, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:22, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, author and license The Banner (talk) 18:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 17:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:22, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, author and license The Banner (talk) 18:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 17:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:22, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, author and license The Banner (talk) 18:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 17:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:22, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, author and license The Banner (talk) 18:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, author and license The Banner (talk) 18:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear source, author and license The Banner (talk) 18:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense dating and license - source calls this "artist's conception" of a historical event, but offers no additional information, including no evidence or support that it was drawn contemporaneous to the event it depicts. Indeed, image appears more modern. Эlcobbola talk 19:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:26, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No publication information and no evidence that the author has always been unknown, so that both conditions of the license are not met. Jcb (talk) 20:33, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably COM:COPYVIO: low resolution, no Exif data, looks much like a professional studio photo. Besides, it is out of the scope of the project, as it is a portrait of a non relevant person. Stego (talk) 22:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment
1) It has now an article in pt.wikipedia (pt:Talita Coling) and this photo is in use, so it's in scope.
2) Almost every actor with a page in IMDb who participated in a movie/TV series or so ...is notable enough for Wikidata (a database), so images of them should be in scope here. We do not only illustrate Wikipedia (an encyclopedia).
3) It was uploaded by a single purpose account and, indeed, has low resolution and no EXIF data.
Strakhov (talk) 17:52, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio, found on Twitter Aug. 9. P 1 9 9   18:32, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio, should use a 2d black and white version of the logo 2601:647:101:D030:F90F:8FC2:29B4:9F9E 23:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: below TOO. P 1 9 9   18:33, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded with Own work, but contains logo of the Southwest Minzu University – see http://english.swun.edu.cn/
The logo may be ineligible for copyright, but in any case the correct source should be specified. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:12, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:59, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have doubts that this file is in public domain especially because the description of the file states that author is "Unknown" and the names of the authors can be seen in the lower right corner of the image. Also almost identical file is published at [3] but with a lower resolution, where it is copyrighted. Jarash (talk) 18:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have legally received this file from the town administration. It cannot be copyrighted. I'd say it is public domain. There is nothing secret about it. The image was released in a local newspaper as part of the public hearing campaign to discuss Logoisk's future so that its residents could argue for or against specific parts of the plan. Since the town administration didn't want to release a high-resolution version of this image, I decided it would be a good idea to make the file public here. Otherwise, I'd do it in some social network or something. The town administration is not very smart. They even sent me this file as 286MB jpeg or something. I've reduced its size without reducing its quality. So, please, reconsider. The file is meant for people and Wikipedia is a platform to deliver this file to people. Vedarough (talk) 14:48, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not a simple map. No reason to assume this was released as PD. P 1 9 9   17:32, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nincs bizonyítva, hogy az 1930-as években publikálták a képet. Ha van rá bizonyíték, azt jelölni kell. A megadott forrás nem érhető el. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 06:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A megadott forrásnak új neve van, és elérhető itt valamint a kép elérhető itt is itt Tambo (talk) 08:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
És melyik forrás támasztja alá, hogy 1930 körül publikálták a képet először? Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 16:27, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Pontosítok. Az MTA rendelkezik és rendelkezett a képpel. A MTA-n Ábrahám Ambrus Andor felvétele 1945-ben volt. A kép biztosan nem akkor készült, de ennek nincs is jelentősége. A Szent István Akadémia rendes tagja volt 1930-tól. Az viszont biztos, hogy a kép nem 2018-ban került elő a szekrényből. Tambo (talk) 08:23, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Úgy látom, annyi év után sem érted: nem feltételezések, hanem konkrét bizonyítékok kellenek az állításokra. Ráadásul azt senki sem állította, hogy 2018-ban került elő a kép. De előfordulhat, hogy mondjuk az 50-es években publikálták először, és az sem 70 évnél régebben volt. Abban igazad van, hogy annak kevesebb jelentősége van, hogy mikor készült a kép. A hatályos jogszabályok szerint az számít, hogy mikor publikálták először, ezt viszont konkrét bizonyítással kell bizonyítani, nem hagymázas feltételezésekkel operálni. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 11:12, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The claimed license ({{PD-HU-unknown}}) explicitly says: "’the author is unknown’ is NOT the same as ‘I don't know who the author is’. You have to provide a reason why you think no one else can know it; otherwise the image shall be deleted." Finding an old image on a website that merely neglects to attribute the photo is not adequate in the slightest. What research has been done? What enquiries have been made?. --Эlcobbola talk 21:35, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not simple enough

Discasto talk 10:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep they are indeed simple. Can be replicated on Photoshop as a PNG file and Inkscape as an SVG one. Perceived as "not simple" due to the noise in the image's background. ---Bankster (talk) 08:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The test is not simplicity (“simple”), but originality. It does not matter whether something is easy to reproduce (“Can be replicated on Photoshop”). For example: "All that is needed to satisfy both the Constitution [of the United States of America] and the statute is that the 'author' contributed something more than a 'merely trivial' variation, something recognizably 'his own.' Originality in this context 'means little more than a prohibition of actual copying.' No matter how poor artistically the 'author's' addition, it is enough if it be his own." (Alfred Bell Co v. Catalda Fine Arts, 191 F. 2d 99 (2nd Cir. 1951)) The burden of supporting a license is on the uploader or those wishing to retain an image (COM:EVID). “They are indeed simple” is not adequate explanation of why this not sufficenly original in both the US (see aforementioned cite) and in Honduras. --Эlcobbola talk 16:13, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in China for text. Maybe the photo violates text author's copyright. Who is text author? Is (s)he dead? Taivo (talk) 14:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Using Google Translate for the file description, it seems to be about "the origin of Moziqiao Town, Yangxian County, Shaanxi Province". So it might be a historical, out-of-copyright text. Or it might be a current, copyrighted text... without further information, I would tend to delete per COM:PRP. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Эlcobbola talk 16:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appeared here in 2015. They credit it to "All These Worlds".

Clearly an old photo, quite possibly {{PD-US-1978-89}}. Not sure about the "own work" claim, I don't see this photo with scanner data elsewhere. I hope the uploader can clarify how they obtained this. Has scanner data on All These Worlds. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I am the author of this photo. It is of me at the UCF Institutue for Simulation and Training in Orlando where I worked on early VR. I have the original negative, since it was an analog image from 1989-90 and that is what I scanned some years ago. My company is All These Worlds and I upload photos under it. -Skydeas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skydeas (talk • contribs) 20:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not possibly {{PD-US-1978-89}} in the slightest. That license 1) would require evidence of publication, not mere creation on that date; 2) would require subsequent non-compliance with formalities; 3) is explicitly inapplicable per the uploader’s comments above: creation 1989-90, and publication thereafter (generally the distribution of a work to the public – i.e., the upload of the scan). As copyright is generally held by the author, not the mere subject (“It is of me at the UCF Institutue for Simulation and Training”), the actual author (“I am the author of this photo” is not consistent with also being the subject; the composition does not suggest use of a timer) would need to submit permission using the process at COM:OTRS. --Эlcobbola talk 16:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure if photographed by a US government employee (simply having it in their archives is not enough). Getty attributes this to the photographer "Galerie Bilderwelt/Getty Images" and their source is Hulton Archive, which claims copyright. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:17, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The uploader merely wrote "US national archives" with no link, reference number, or other means of verifying that assertion. COM:L requires " information sufficient for others to verify the license status". This has not been done, and this image is thus effectively unsourced. Accordingly, Getty's claim of copyright and attribution to non-government entities by major publications suggest this is a copyvio. --Эlcobbola talk 16:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Персона скончалась в 1962 году, источник автора неизвестен, дата обнародования неизвестна Dogad75 (talk) 21:17, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Источник - Сайт Львівського університету. Фото з особової справи ректора М. Паше-Озерського. Указана дата 1944. Ну и что, что персона скончалась в 1962 году--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 04:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:L requires " information sufficient for others to verify the license status". This has not been done, and this image is thus effectively unsourced. This is merely a scan (COM:DW) of an old photograph with no verifiable date, author, or other information. If this is indeed held at the University of Lviv in the file of М. Паше-Озерського, they may submit evidence of permission using the process at COM:OTRS. --Эlcobbola talk 16:40, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  1. State Attorney files manslaughter charge in Clearwater 'stand your ground' shooting, ABC Action News, August 13, 2018