Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/08/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.Фрагмент.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![107 File:Скульптура "Вобла-кормилица" - panoramio.jpg](#File:Скульптура_"Вобла-кормилица"_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![202 File:Augusto De Luca, attacca sui muri di Napoli l'immagine di "Lucio Amelio". 2.jpg](#File:Augusto_De_Luca,_attacca_sui_muri_di_Napoli_l'immagine_di_"Lucio_Amelio"._2.jpg){kind=link}
_(Unicode-Codierungskonflikt).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Flag.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Copy from KOEI https://www.google.com.tw/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivCOR0QHEhbuswlWkVBPk0Eoq37s7uYjqHBq5n3hKV6VJVsf3VwxRo6hxmQn46UTs55KMQTUatkkF8zZEq15IheFzUzbupLfPI-rfzT6lHR83IAQDTRhC5sW_1Qp2-g8VeG9Ee8HeUiWUjD2FpBGyBrJKrCmmYu6s6WC9_1GT1bCBkZc-fL_1uqFMVCKZh5pZqBoVXcw9tjXjGQgoAV-rKeQtR5fqmjprQE0xoE-RnpU3bynVslhAkwvc8x3OLtuXwUcmi8c-ZqyCO0-QNDHCBBqf5sc_12GTfMNtehntu1ebgBgdcMxXyL1eOkorSrZiHbiKg0RVYY117LgoKWbX3XS2S4hpcICg&hl=zh-TW Outlookxp (talk) 02:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
copy form https://www.google.com.tw/imgres?imgurl=https://s2.op46.com/history/20180304151911dkigivy3qpt.jpg&imgrefurl=https://op46.com/history/99e7d692a4bbc1f8b1fd36295d90d8c5.html&h=480&w=390&tbnid=_fBJtgkiOcmFrM&tbnh=249&tbnw=202&usg=__qxlvay0daKaT6OuqVz7o8O28Ie8=&docid=ha7nNFAUUNVjWM Outlookxp (talk) 02:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:16, 9 August 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQxw10bhbw22KsFS73MjPLRaWwAFxLjxuAHh8es-rag4UhuACrmXA --Krdbot 13:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
cpoy from https://www.google.com.tw/imgres?imgurl=https://i1.kknews.cc/SIG%3D2b2sfuj/ctp-vzntr/1527405801823430rq56on0.jpg&imgrefurl=https://kknews.cc/zh-mo/history/5ljzrv3.html&h=720&w=356&tbnid=1HqUBwO429GZFM&tbnh=319&tbnw=158&usg=__G63qYpGIHiY6YhFhoNmj15LnHTU=&docid=T-b8HTXeYZzmuM&itg=1 Outlookxp (talk) 02:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:18, 9 August 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.google.com.tw/imgres?imgurl=https://i1.kknews.cc/SIG%3D2b2sfuj/ctp-vzntr/1527405801823430rq56on0.jpg&imgrefurl=https://kknews.cc/zh-mo/history/5ljzrv3.html&h=720&w=356&tbnid=1HqUBwO429GZFM&tbnh=319&tbnw=158&usg=__G63qYpGIHiY6YhFhoNmj15LnHTU=&docid=T-b8HTXeYZzmuM&itg=1 --Krdbot 13:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
copy from https://www.google.com.tw/imgres?imgurl=https://i1.read01.com/SIG%3D3qegtu3/304448474b6c3030.jpg&imgrefurl=https://read01.com/zh-tw/Pgy3kM.html&h=480&w=390&tbnid=TNNKixcZpZG10M&tbnh=249&tbnw=202&usg=__n0Mk-n2a2_o7DyHbPEe3gf0taoY=&docid=97fG063A-Xlk3M Outlookxp (talk) 02:26, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:18, 9 August 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.google.com.tw/imgres?imgurl=https://i1.read01.com/SIG%3D3qegtu3/304448474b6c3030.jpg&imgrefurl=https://read01.com/zh-tw/Pgy3kM.html&h=480&w=390&tbnid=TNNKixcZpZG10M&tbnh=249&tbnw=202&usg=__n0Mk-n2a2_o7DyHbPEe3gf0taoY=&docid=97fG063A-Xlk3M --Krdbot 13:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
It was just my own test Syced (talk) 05:28, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:05, 9 August 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 13:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
It was just my own test Syced (talk) 05:28, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:05, 9 August 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 13:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
False date, COM:LL Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - only survived this long because IP removed no permission template and added bogus PD template. --Эlcobbola talk 22:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
re-uploaded copyvio. License does not seem to agree with the facts. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:09, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 19:35, 10 August 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file --Krdbot 01:06, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: малый размер файла, нет метаданных, низкое качество фото сделано не может быть в 2018 году Dogad75 (talk) 21:16, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Translation says: "Doubts in authorship and license: Small file size, no metadata, poor photo quality made may not be in 2018"
Delete Looks like a scan to me. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:31, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: не указан художник и его разрешение, нет метаданных фотография Dogad75 (talk) 21:19, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Translation says: "Doubts in authorship and license: Not specified artist and his permission, no metadata picture"
- Delete Looks like a painting. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:40, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:48, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The only significant content here is a (presumably copyrighted) totem pole; I believe it's one of the two in Victor Steinbrueck Park. No FOP for sculpture in the U.S., and clearly not de minimis. Jmabel ! talk 23:11, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete: (s)he nominated the image for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 16:02, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Shuaibbahman (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images look like TV screenshots, so they are not own work. I have already deleted some that clearly were screenshots.
- File:H 1486145926 7654773 0090484167.jpg
- File:H 1486145921 3117330 8a20c58b13.jpg
- File:H 1482605027 9029943 1e965fe2df.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 644.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 88.jpg
- File:H 1494097249 6311499 c19af54cfe.jpg
- File:H 1494097099 2473018 558feab37e.jpg
- File:H 1443086853 8677619 dfb40a0d5e.jpg
- File:H 1437148578 8847844 ac9e272d0f.jpg
- File:H 1438325648 9803169 4cac4aaba8.jpg
- File:H 1429854767 4859412 36f4555c04.jpg
- File:H 1428654559 9942248 04b74ddefd.jpg
- File:H 1428674360 7326819 6d4a5b55b8.jpg
- File:H 1428654543 5496965 e8772a2420.jpg
- File:H 1428654521 3052000 607d4d08ea.jpg
- File:H 1428654501 8093994 0fbc717834.jpg
- File:H 1449060318 4357166 9beefb390e.jpg
- File:H 1449409632 1730228 0153e71efe.jpg
- File:H 1449059293 2772443 4ac9825188.jpg
- File:H 1449059287 9326008 2c82fe103f.jpg
- File:H 1449059284 3699764 098ad6bca2.jpg
- File:H 1449059280 6521933 bccc6c873d.jpg
- File:H 1449059280 6521933 bccc6c873d (1).jpg
- File:H 1449059280 6521933 bccc6c873d (2).jpg
- File:H 1449059280 5152839 23cd509838.jpg
- File:H 1449059279 3371761 8c18a9cc08.jpg
- File:H 1449059268 3176706 98c19708ee.jpg
- File:H 1449059268 3176706 98c19708ee (1).jpg
- File:H 1449059267 4194860 ab336bbe08.jpg
- File:H 1449058755 8591393 8efb949d5b (1).jpg
- File:H 1449058754 8119552 eb498f27b3.jpg
- File:H 1449058743 4801190 6a4b21450b.jpg
- File:H 1449058736 1844946 8882832988.jpg
- File:H 1449058727 2274965 ea79505857.jpg
- File:H 1449058722 8260315 124b4b8a20.jpg
- File:H 1449058721 5934437 fa017f2582.jpg
- File:H 1449058714 9140300 29a1cba6cd.jpg
- File:H 1449058432 7187040 178a24802d.jpg
- File:H 1449058429 6979888 cfc7d0f5fc.jpg
- File:H 1449058426 3748364 421c4b4b24.jpg
- File:H 1449058429 6979888 cfc7d0f5fc (2).jpg
- File:H 1449058424 6315282 2e251b772e.jpg
- File:H 1449058422 8644924 52d2143fec.jpg
- File:H 1449058415 6905904 877839d653.jpg
- File:H 1448529409 7636488 e39e52dc61.jpg
- File:H 1449058412 4479858 2ac1d8256d.jpg
- File:H 1444375817 5714249 2173207af6.jpg
- File:H 1444375824 3425095 1fdb60c947.jpg
- File:H 1444375817 5714249 2173207af6 (1).jpg
- File:H 1443085185 4763922 e3e1f7af21.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 1111.jpg
- File:IMG 2476-1-500x333.jpg
- File:IMG 2474-500x333.jpg
- File:IMG 2472-500x333.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 443.jpg
- File:IMG 2466-500x333.jpg
- File:IMG 2465-500x333.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 44.jpg
- File:H 1515427055 8305022 d0f23e2958.jpg
- File:H 1512365678 9507099 f7ae6ddfbf.jpg
- File:H 1512365678 9507099 f7ae6ddfbf (1).jpg
- File:H 1511185527 6637603 6708e47f30.jpg
- File:H 1511185259 2173024 edab03db57.jpg
- File:H 1511183091 4488659 a357587939.jpg
- File:H 1511183086 8318656 684f3fef2b.jpg
- File:H 1511183081 2088593 a343bf24c7.jpg
- File:H 1511182291 6615457 ec4a416f07.jpg
- File:H 1511182555 7628820 d170a2197b.jpg
- File:H 1509817182 9505089 2de4ae2d14.jpg
- File:H 1509817154 5420165 5b8a0cd377.jpg
- File:H 1509816759 2225527 c5a327b32f.jpg
- File:H 1509816752 6719381 cec812d514.jpg
- File:H 1509300631 2136881 ce6374c647.jpg
- File:H 1509299969 8247854 6ca88a873e.jpg
- File:H 1502566546 9631490 39c9d73301.jpg
- File:H 1502566531 4334248 ab23f57123.jpg
- File:H 1502566536 7328759 bece0c6106.jpg
- File:H 1502565746 4850981 aa34fcc5a9.jpg
- File:H 1502565725 8922635 c5d17f733e.jpg
- File:H 1502565611 4314274 a2edea9018.jpg
- File:H 1502565671 8711966 a221028a06.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 63.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 61.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 01.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 21.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 20.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 19.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 18.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 17.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 16.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 15.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 14.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 13.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 11.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 10.jpg
- File:13950606001080 PhotoL.jpg
- File:13950606001080 PhotoL (2).jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 09.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 70.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 08.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 07.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 06.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 05.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 04.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 03.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 02.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 00.jpg
- File:Shuaib Bahman 0.jpg
- File:Shuaib.png
- File:H 1509300636 5020361 7e198b01bb.jpg
- File:H 1502562298 6817916 c66eeb1435 (1).jpg
- File:H 1449059264 4099307 f3d3265f86.jpg
- File:000 ts 283.jpg
- File:000.ts-1428.jpg
- File:000.ts-283.jpg
- File:000.ts-1158.jpg
- File:Shuaib bahman.jpg
- File:Шуайб Бахман.jpg
- File:000 ts 1428.jpg
- File:000 ts 1158.jpg
- File:000 ts 5903.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 1.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BrightRaven (talk) 08:00, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shuaibbahman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion (simple book covers and portrait)
BrightRaven (talk) 08:08, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shuaibbahman (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images look like TV screenshots, so they are not own work.
- File:شعیب بهمن 565.jpg
- File:شعیب بهمن 454.jpg
- File:H 1509299994 9865996 1ebfc8a0f6.jpg
- File:H 1502565709 6940843 ed16f967a5.jpg
- File:H 1468093767 3885904 7130abea8b.jpg
- File:H 1502565604 9672632 4d83531e4b.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 13:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shuaibbahman (talk · contribs)
[edit]I doubt these image are own work given the copyvio record of the uploader. Moreover, they can also be out of scope (unused files, advertising or self-promotion)
BrightRaven (talk) 13:51, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:52, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy, needs permission from the stricker holder B dash (talk) 05:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- @B dash: sorry, which part of this image qualifies as art again? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:42, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- The stickers in the middle. --B dash (talk) 06:36, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- @B dash: are we looking at the same picture? I see some sort of door/gate with a note on it that says "hiv non esiste www.youtube.com". - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:10, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- That is the one I refer to. --B dash (talk) 07:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- @B dash: are we looking at the same picture? I see some sort of door/gate with a note on it that says "hiv non esiste www.youtube.com". - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:10, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- The stickers in the middle. --B dash (talk) 06:36, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- I only see one sticker (that isn't empty) with some PD-text in the center and some graffiti that would be either PD-text or PD-signature. Can you add image notes for those stickers (plural!) that you claim to be able to see with descriptions of what they show? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Keep, the text are in PD. No copyrighted material in the photo. --219.79.96.227 13:05, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- Kept, withdrawn the nomination. --B dash (talk) 11:15, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
required on the page itself F (talk) 07:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, there's no freedom of panorama in France and the photo violates artist's copyright. Taivo (talk) 07:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Johnny uploads everything as own work, even very old photos, paintings and 3D castles. While this photo would be plausible as own work, there's no metadata and the compression is high. If Johnny actually took the photo, he should upload the original. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:31, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, there's no freedom of panorama in Belarus and the buildings are probably modern. The photo violates architects' copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:16, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:01, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:03, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:31, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:04, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:31, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:07, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:34, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:16, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:21, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Image is probably not the property of the uploader, and very unlikely to be licensed under CC to remix / adapt. It is an old version of the trademarked logo of an online used car company. See: https://www.carvana.com/home Elephanthunter (talk) 00:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 13:36, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:30, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:31, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:43, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:33, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:43, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:39, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:41, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
.%D0%A4%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.%D0%A4%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:44, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:45, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 00:51, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 01:03, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 01:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 01:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 01:19, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:49, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 01:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 01:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 01:31, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: image with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 01:34, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 01:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 01:39, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 01:40, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
COM:PENIS: low quality
4nn1l2 (talk) 02:06, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:58, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 09:52, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 09:56, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
From Facebook, missing more complete source info Ytoyoda (talk) 10:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Sprite of a Pokémon. Juxlos (talk) 01:01, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:36, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Sprite is from the original games - copyrighted Juxlos (talk) 01:02, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:36, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. SPA. Yes. I know who´s on the right. Fixertool (talk) 01:36, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use, not out of scope. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:37, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
This is derivative work, photo of photo. Who is photographer of depicted photo and does (s)he allow publishing his/her work freely? Taivo (talk) 09:05, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: dw Alan (talk) 18:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
This file has a long history of being deleted and subsequently re-uploaded (see log info). Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 05:28, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: it seems as if a different photo is uploaded everytime, but this image seems to be a derivative work. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:41, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
COM:OOS: spam
- File:스ㅋㅏ이프@ｄｂｄｂｄｂ8989.jpg
- File:탤래그랩@ＤＢＤＢＤＢ8989.jpg
- File:스카ㅇㅣ프@ｄｂｄｂｄｂ８９８９.jpg
- File:텔그랲@ｄｂｄｂｄｂ８９８９.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 05:36, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Green Giant. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:41, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 07:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:43, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Cropped, low res photo that appears to be from a professional photo shoot, can’t verify license Ytoyoda (talk) 10:21, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
From an eBay listing: https://m.ebay.com/itm/ST-MICRO-Transient-Voltage-Suppression-TVS-Diode-600W-200V-DO-15-NEW-10-PKG/191101336747?_mwBanner=1&_rdt=1 Ytoyoda (talk) 10:26, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Better version available: File:Gnom at Wikimania 2018 welcome reception.jpg Gnom (talk) 13:50, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Wouldn't mind speedy deletion. :-) --Sargoth (talk) 14:00, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:49, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Better version available: File:Gnom at Wikimania 2018 welcome reception.jpg Gnom (talk) 13:50, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Wouldn't mind speedy deletion. :-) --Sargoth (talk) 13:57, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:49, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:10, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vicente Y Ronny (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Vicente y ronny 4.jpg
- File:Vicente y ronny.jpg
- File:Vicente y ronny 3.jpg
- File:Vicente & Ronny.jpg
- File:VicenteYRonny.jpg
- File:Vicente Y Ronny 2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 16:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete I uploaded this? I see that it was 2009, but I have no idea why I would do that. Maybe it was a mistake. Muboshgu (talk) 16:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:53, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Very low quality, no realistic educational use -> out of COM:SCOPE Sneeuwschaap (talk) 16:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:53, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mosesminage (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE (:es:Moses Minage)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:32, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:54, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in France for copyrighted works. The artist died in 2005, so this won't be public domain until 2076. clpo13(talk) 16:54, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 00:59, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
have wrong name on it Kabircha (talk) 02:04, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: file does not exist. --Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Unable to verify license - Google reverse image search does not yield a site that credits the White House for this photo. Please provide more complete source information. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:33, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- From the White House's official Instagram page. The White House has stopped posting photos to their website, but continue to post to their official social media pages. https://www.instagram.com/p/BkkvzBFghw2/?taken-by=whitehouse. Avilan01 (talk) 15:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Withdrawing nomination: the uploader has provided the link. Thanks. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:47, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Ymblanter (talk) 08:46, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Low quality Lotje (talk) 06:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 08:47, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Most probably not own work: logos, small pictures without EXIF data, etc.
- File:ALG-NGA 1990-03-16.svg
- File:Mohamed Benguesmia.jpg
- File:Maillot Algerie 2014.png
- File:Maillot Algerie 2010.jpg
- File:Maillot Algerie 2012.png
- File:Maillot Algerie 1982.png
- File:Air Algérie Logo.svg
- File:JSM Bejaia (Logo).png
- File:Supercoupe d'Algérie.png
- File:ASVBlida-USMBlida (Volley-Ball).svg
- File:Logo Par Année (USM Blida).svg
- File:Ancien logo USM Blida.svg
- File:Logo Nedjma D2.svg
- File:USM Blida logo.svg
- File:Stade Frère Brakni.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 12:11, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:55, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Considering the user's history and the EXIF data, these images are unlikely to be own work. NB user is currently blocked.
- File:Yacine.Brahimi.jpg
- File:Championnat d'Algérie de football D2 1991-1992.jpg
- File:CS Constantine vs USM Blida, Mai 6th 1994.jpg
- File:Mustapha Tchaker Stadium.jpg
- File:Stade Mustapha-Tchaker.png
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:19, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 08:48, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 09:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 08:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 09:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 10:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
плохая цветокоррекция Miksam69 (talk) 17:18, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Color is not a reason to delete. However, this appears to be a recent Russian monument and therefore this image infringes on its copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:06, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 10:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 10:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Violation of source image authors' copyright. At least one part (File:Вид на Рязанский Кремль.JPG) is not taken by the uploader. A.Savin 12:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте! Не могли бы вы пояснить, почему авторское право было нарушено? В описаниии используемого файла написано, что его можно использовать под свободной лицензии, в том числе и изменять. Xardaas (talk) 07:38, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Составные части - сделаны другими авторами. Вы обязаны их указывать со ссылкой на все исходные изображения. --A.Savin 11:01, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Проверьте сейчас, пожалуйста. Xardaas (talk)
Kept: Withdrawn. A.Savin 11:22, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Нарушение авторских прав на исходных произведений: в коллаже используются несвободные памятники Есенина и Олегу Рязанскому, ( No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks). Dogad75 (talk) 10:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Bad quality photo that doesn't seem to show the grave that it is supposed to show... Randykitty (talk) 10:39, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
This photo is not under free license. Author's name is Martin Siebert, ms@a-do.cz. This photo set was shot to be published in a magazine Revue 50+. After that, reproduced with no permission. Legal actions will follow shortly. 94.230.146.243 11:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS needed. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted music, so the sound may have to be removed for it to stay. FunkMonk (talk) 12:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep @FunkMonk:
Done - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:52, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Erreur de notre part (suppression rapide) Hafgaspard (talk) 12:55, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Erreur de notre part Hafgaspard (talk) 12:57, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 13:21, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 13:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 13:32, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 13:32, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 13:32, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 13:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 13:44, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 13:55, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 13:58, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:01, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Seems to be Google Maps/Earth or similar service screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- It isn't, though. It's part of a series of aerials shot from a plane. I uploaded this picture because it shows a school building in Oglala Lakota County, which is what I'm writing about on the Dutch-language Wikipedia. DimiTalen 14:07, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- In the meantime I've edited the picture so that the north's up and the picture is centered on Lone Man Rd and the school complex. DimiTalen 10:55, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: I have examined the Flickrstream and this is one of a large number of aerial photos by the Flickr user. We have to assume the PD-Mark means they’ve released their work into the public domain. --Green Giant (talk) 23:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted text and images on a sign. FunkMonk (talk) 13:26, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:15, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Нет разрешения фотографа на 3-d объект (значок) Dogad75 (talk) 14:04, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:16, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Нет разрешения фотографа на 3-d объект (значок) Dogad75 (talk) 14:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:16, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Girl with a jug. Astrakhan. Russia. Девушка с кувшином. Астрахань. Россия - panoramio.jpg
[edit]
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:06, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:17, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:07, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:17, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
![14:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/08/09#c-Dogad75-2018-08-09T14:08:00.000Z-File:Скульптура_"Вобла-кормилица"_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:17, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
![13:17, 19 August 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/08/09#c-Ymblanter-2018-08-19T13:17:00.000Z-File:Скульптура_"Вобла-кормилица"_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:17, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:18, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:18, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:18, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:18, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:15, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:19, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:15, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:19, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:15, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:19, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Flag of the Lugansk People's Republic (Official).svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:36, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 13:07, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Test upload? not used, no description, no data source. Atlasowa (talk) 20:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Escudo del Senado de España.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 13:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:40, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:38, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 14:40, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:38, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GENERAL STEPHEN TOWNSEND (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:37, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
"This art is not property of the U.S. government, but property of Jeanne Kelly of Aaardvark Inc who licenses the art to US gov."
It is not made by a US government employee and is therefore not automatically in the public domain. We would require permission and/or evidence from Jeanne Kelly.
- File:Cáncer1EN.png
- File:Normal cancer cell division from NIH-2.svg
- File:Normal cancer cell division from NIH.png
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- If the file does not belong in Public Domain then we should delete it. Roscoe x (talk) 04:12, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete If it's from a third party it would need the OTRS queue to hold permissions from that third-party. COM:PRP applies I think.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:54, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:34, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Advertising, out of scope Gazoth (talk) 17:35, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:33, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Previously published at https://www.fardanews.com/fa/news/788781/%D8%AF%D8%AE%D8%AA%D8%B1-%D8%AC%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C-%DA%A9%D9%87-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%A2%D9%85%D8%B1%DB%8C%DA%A9%D8%A7-%DA%A9%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A7%DA%A9-%DA%A9%D8%B1%D8%AF-%D8%AA%D8%B5%D8%A7%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%B1 Ytoyoda (talk) 17:57, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy delete COM:NETCOPYVIO http://www.atrasc.com/programme.php 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:42, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:32, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SAJID ALI THAHIM (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope personal images of a not-active user
- File:SAT SAJID ALI THAHIM.jpg
- File:SAJID ALI THAHIM SAHAB SAHAB.jpg
- File:SAJID ALI THAHIM SAHAB.jpg
- File:SAJID ALI THAHIM $.jpg
- File:SAJID THAHIM SAT$.jpg
- File:SAJID THAHIM $.jpg
- File:SAJID THAHIM SAT.jpg
- File:SAJID THAHIM.jpg
- File:SAJID ALI.jpg
- File:SAJID.jpg
- File:S SAJID ALI THAHIM.jpg
- File:SAJID ALI THAHIM S.jpg
- File:SAJID ALI THAHIM SAT.jpg
- File:SAJID ALI THAHIM.jpg
- File:SAJID THAHIM SAHAB.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:34, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - clear COM:NOTHOST issue. Эlcobbola talk 11:36, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:29, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works, small middle sizes without EXIFs, one is obviously a photo of a photo (or a scan)
- File:Ujjaini Playing A Scale Changing Harmonium At Age 5 At A Performance.jpg
- File:Ujjaini Mukherjee At The 2015 Kalakar Awards.jpg
- File:Ujjaini Mukherjee Performing At A Concert In Kolkata In 2015.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:31, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ирина Головченко (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own works
Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Found curiously at higher resolution at https://www.facebook.com/179612798767066/photos/a.357468400981504.80886.179612798767066/1324152417646426/?type=1&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:30, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:25, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
This flag is completely fictuous, and has no real relevance. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 21:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:24, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of the project scope Edslov (talk) 21:47, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, out of scope. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 13:25, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:24, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Fictional, no official relevence. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 21:50, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:23, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
This flag is fictuous, with no real relevance. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 21:51, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:23, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Fictuous with no real relevance to Wikipedia. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 21:58, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:21, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
It's my photo and my first upload to Wikipedia. I butchered the file name. It says I'm not logged in, which I think refers to Commons, not Wikipedia. I don't want to lose my place. My user name is JeffreyLoydWilson. 2601:482:457F:DD00:C9BB:1A37:91AC:AECB 22:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
I was invited to comment, so I'll say again, please delete this file. :-) I'd love to re-upload it with a proper file name. I uploaded it this afternoon, and nothing is linked to it.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeffreyLoydWilson (talk • contribs) 01:59, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:20, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Photoshop of la freeway, not chinese and not free licence: http://www.bricoleurbanism.org/whimsicality/when-photoshop-is-so-good-its-bad/ grillo (talk) 23:00, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:20, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Images of Assumption Church in Milašavičy
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. The church was built in 1996. --Jarash (talk) 15:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:18, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Photo of a screen, unknown source, photographer, copyright status seb26 (talk) 21:17, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:17, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
został źle opisany Bd161153 (talk) 21:17, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not a reason to delete, consider moving. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:13, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
został źle opisany Bd161153 (talk) 21:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
nieprawidłowa nazwa pliku Bd161153 (talk) 21:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not a reason to delete, consider moving. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:13, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
został źle opisany, chodzi o nazwę pliku więc edycja niemożliwa Bd161153 (talk) 21:19, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not a reason to delete, consider moving. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:13, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
nieprawidłowa nazwa pliku Bd161153 (talk) 21:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not a reason to delete, consider moving. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:14, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
nieprawidłowa nazwa pliku Bd161153 (talk) 21:21, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
nieprawidłowa nazwa pliku Bd161153 (talk) 21:21, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not a reason to delete, consider moving. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:14, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
nieprawidłowa nazwa pliku Bd161153 (talk) 21:21, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
nieprawidłowa nazwa pliku Bd161153 (talk) 21:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not a reason to delete, consider moving. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:15, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
nieprawidłowa nazwa pliku Bd161153 (talk) 21:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not a reason to delete, consider moving. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:16, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
nieprawidłowa nazwa pliku Bd161153 (talk) 21:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
nieprawidłowa nazwa pliku Bd161153 (talk) 21:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not a reason to delete, consider moving. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:17, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 05:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:53, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D artwork in Denamrk B dash (talk) 05:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for graphic works in UK B dash (talk) 05:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:58, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D artwork in Finalnd B dash (talk) 05:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:59, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D artwork in Argentina B dash (talk) 05:30, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:14, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP for non-artistic craftsmanship works in Canada B dash (talk) 05:32, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:16, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sticker art in France
[edit]No FoP in France, needs permission from the sticker holder
- File:"J'Existe" @ Paris (25463116651).jpg
- File:DSCF6117.JPG
- File:Jef-Aerosol-Pray-the-holy-trinity.jpg
- File:Mr Brainwash Paris 2007.JPG
- File:Paris - Rue Meslay - 20110712 (1).jpg
- File:Paris - Rue Meslay - 20110712 (2).jpg
- File:Paris Bd St-Germain.jpg
- File:RDE01 Gkay Montpar.jpg
- File:Stickerart by Mr.E and I LOVE TP.jpg
- File:Stickerart in Bordeaux.JPG
- File:Stickers sur mob.jpg
- File:Toulouse - Rue Peyrolières - 20120418 (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
B dash (talk) 05:34, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:18, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy, needs permission from the stricker holder B dash (talk) 05:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:20, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy, needs permission from the stricker holder B dash (talk) 05:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:21, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sticker art in Naples
[edit]No FoP in Italy, needs permission from the stricker holder
- File:Augusto De Luca, attacca sui muri di Napoli l'immagine di "Lucio Amelio". 3.jpg
- File:Augusto DeLuca, attacca sui muri di Napoli l'immagine di "Lucio Amelio". 1.jpg
- File:Lucio Amelio - Augusto De Luca, attacca sui muri di Napoli il ritratto di Lucio Amelio. (1).jpg
- File:Lucio Amelio - Augusto De Luca, attacca sui muri di Napoli il ritratto di Lucio Amelio. (2).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
B dash (talk) 05:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:23, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for graphic works in UK B dash (talk) 06:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:25, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for graphic works in UK B dash (talk) 06:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:26, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: нет разрешения свободных лицензий автора-художника на данное произведение Dogad75 (talk) 10:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:30, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Historical map. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:31, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D artwork in Japan B dash (talk) 06:56, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- COM:DM As a whole it is Not a 2D artwork ? Just a streetlamp with many samll Sticker,It show Sticker bomb art unavoidable.-Zest (talk) 08:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Kept, nomination withdrawn. --B dash (talk) 16:56, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
sculpture not in public place, not FoP UK, Madame Tussauds charges admission [1]. need permission from sculptor, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Madame Tussauds, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hulk Madame Tussauds 02.jpg Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 15:50, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Comment COM:FOP#United Kingdom: According to Copinger and Skoane James, The expression "open to the public" presumably extends the section to premises to which the public are admitted only on licence or on payment. Again, this is broader than 'public place' which is the wording in many countries. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Madame Tussauds London 00801 Nevit.jpg. FWIW, I also would rather see a photo of Hill himself on en:Benny Hill as opposed to a picture of a wax sculpture (context). clpo13(talk) 16:32, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- madame tussauds explicitly say NC [2], and the email linked to reaffirms that: "All Madame Tussauds are copyright to us, therefore no figures must be used for commercial reasons. If people are found doing this we will take legal action." as com:PRP matter, would not want reusers to get sued. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 17:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Comment Virtually identical DRs from Slowking4:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Benny Hill (Madame Tussauds).JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Marilyn Monroe Wax Statue in Madame Tussauds London.jpg
.JPG){kind=link}
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:24, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete because the wax statues aren't permanently built of stone and shown outside in a park, but are temporary in a showcase you have to pay for to enter. Also, it's apparent in the email that they aren't happy with their pictures being online. Furthermore, the most optimal image to show for Benny Hill's Wikipedia article would be an actual photograph; in the case of "no free alternative", another non-free image that is actually a photograph of Benny Hill would be best. -- Stapmoshun (talk) 19:41, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Stapmoshun: FoP in the UK differs from many other countries, covering more than just parks. And being "permanent" does not mean "for all eternity", it just means something is placed without any specific or expected end date. (this, too, depends on the country though) Deleting this picture on Commons because fair use policy on enwiki is flawed is obviously not a good reason for deletion. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:08, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- The point still stands that a representative from Madame Tussauds stated they would take legal action if they found a picture. -- Stapmoshun (talk) 20:22, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Stapmoshun: legal threats don't automatically mean removal of content. Wikipedians and Commons users have been sued before. There was one case, IIRC, from a British museum that sued a user here for uploading images of public domain paintings. The images weren't taken down. (if I find the link again I'll put it here) Such cases would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- yes - they do right here Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2015-11#File:Raising_the_Flag_on_Iwo_Jima.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spectrum Range melt - Mount Edziza Provincial Park.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Waterneverstorf, Park.JPG, the selective use of PRP is instructive. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 22:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- "Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima" is a complex case that isn't over yet. The second case, "Spectrum Range melt - Mount Edziza Provincial Park" wasn't deleted because of a legal threat. The images were Flickrwashed. The third case, Waterneverstorf, was a deletion requested by the uploader because of silly unclear German laws. The images themselves, according to the uploader, "are not from high quality and are not really needed to illustrate an article". Another complex case that doesn't demonstrate
"Commons bends over for any legal threat"Commons bends over for any legal threat (sorry, shouldn't have used quotes, I was paraphrasing, I do think that's what you were thinking though) nor are they in any way similar to wax Benny Hill. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:41, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- "Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima" is a complex case that isn't over yet. The second case, "Spectrum Range melt - Mount Edziza Provincial Park" wasn't deleted because of a legal threat. The images were Flickrwashed. The third case, Waterneverstorf, was a deletion requested by the uploader because of silly unclear German laws. The images themselves, according to the uploader, "are not from high quality and are not really needed to illustrate an article". Another complex case that doesn't demonstrate
- yes - they do right here Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2015-11#File:Raising_the_Flag_on_Iwo_Jima.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spectrum Range melt - Mount Edziza Provincial Park.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Waterneverstorf, Park.JPG, the selective use of PRP is instructive. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 22:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Stapmoshun: legal threats don't automatically mean removal of content. Wikipedians and Commons users have been sued before. There was one case, IIRC, from a British museum that sued a user here for uploading images of public domain paintings. The images weren't taken down. (if I find the link again I'll put it here) Such cases would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- The point still stands that a representative from Madame Tussauds stated they would take legal action if they found a picture. -- Stapmoshun (talk) 20:22, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Stapmoshun: FoP in the UK differs from many other countries, covering more than just parks. And being "permanent" does not mean "for all eternity", it just means something is placed without any specific or expected end date. (this, too, depends on the country though) Deleting this picture on Commons because fair use policy on enwiki is flawed is obviously not a good reason for deletion. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:08, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- that's funny, you might very well say "Commons bends over for any legal threat", i could not possibly. and it is over, not enough courage of conviction to do an actual undeletion, more evasion.
- it is astonishing how contemporary sculpture copyright can be waved away, based on a flimsy caveat in a legal textbook, behind a paywall, just because we want to knock out fair use images on other projects; but cannot have photos of US contemporary sculpture, because "no FoP US". very convenient how the wikilawyering works. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 00:18, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- It ain't over 'til the fat lady sings. And if you have a problem with the way UK FoP is currently handled, very well, but create a thread on COM:VPC or Commons talk:Freedom of panorama please. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:40, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: as per Commons:Village pump/Copyright#FoP in UK. --Yann (talk) 12:05, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
sculpture not in public place, not FoP UK, Madame Tussauds charges admission [3]. need permission from sculptor ; see also Commons:Deletion requests/Madame Tussauds, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hulk Madame Tussauds 02.jpg Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 15:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
madame tussauds explicitly say NC [4], and the email linked to reaffirms that: "All Madame Tussauds are copyright to us, therefore no figures must be used for commercial reasons. If people are found doing this we will take legal action." as com:PRP matter, would not want reusers to get sued. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 17:30, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Comment Virtually identical DRs from Slowking4:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Benny Hill.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Marilyn Monroe Wax Statue in Madame Tussauds London.jpg
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:30, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- feel free to start the DR by category. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 01:28, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: as per Commons:Village pump/Copyright#FoP in UK. --Yann (talk) 12:06, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
sculpture not in public place, not FoP UK, Madame Tussauds charges admission [5]. need permission from sculptor, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Madame Tussauds, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hulk Madame Tussauds 02.jpg madame tussauds explicitly say NC [6], and the email linked to reaffirms that: "All Madame Tussauds are copyright to us, therefore no figures must be used for commercial reasons. If people are found doing this we will take legal action." as com:PRP matter, would not want reusers to get sued. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 17:32, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Slowking4: that's not what Commons:Freedom of panorama#United Kingdom says..
- "The practical effect of the broad Freedom of Panorama provisions in the UK and in other countries with similar laws is that it is acceptable to upload to Commons not only photographs of public buildings and sculptures but also works of artistic craftsmanship which are on permanent public display in museums, galleries and exhibitions which are open to the public. According to Copinger and Skoane James, The expression "open to the public" presumably extends the section to premises to which the public are admitted only on licence or on payment. Again, this is broader than 'public place' which is the wording in many countries."
- - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:11, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- citation needed, mixed record of deletion decisions. wishful thinking. do not know if they are on permanent display. show some case law or evidence in the face of legal assertions from the museum. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 22:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- That sounds like something to discuss on Commons talk:Freedom of panorama, not here. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- burden is on uploader to provide evidence of permanent display. sounds like something to discuss at DR. why delay discussion of copyright vios? Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 01:27, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- That sounds like something to discuss on Commons talk:Freedom of panorama, not here. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- citation needed, mixed record of deletion decisions. wishful thinking. do not know if they are on permanent display. show some case law or evidence in the face of legal assertions from the museum. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 22:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Comment Virtually identical DRs from Slowking4:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Benny Hill (Madame Tussauds).JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Benny Hill.JPG
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:23, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- same facts, same rationale. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 01:27, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: as per Commons:Village pump/Copyright#FoP in UK. --Yann (talk) 12:06, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Non free images taken from http://www.parquelineal.es/blog
- File:Abuelo2.jpg
- File:Trincheras2.jpg
- File:Casa cuarta esclusa2.jpg
- File:Canal manzanares2.jpg
- File:Cabeza sileno3.jpg
- File:Pobladogavia3.jpg
Triplecaña (talk) 10:35, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:35, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
It does not have permission to be uploaded, as the links to source and proof of permission are invalid 37.205.58.146 10:39, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per the last attempt to delete these, a month ago User_talk:Jcb#Parliament_images. --Fæ (talk) 10:47, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Per Fæ. Random IP request, without any prooof, contrary to the very public and very open release of image of MP by the british House of Commons. Also keep the other 3 images, open to deletion of 3 separate DR. Tm (talk) 12:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment OTRS volunteers please have a look at ticket:2018071910003701 regarding this file and others --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:59, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
It does not have permission to be uploaded, as the links to source and proof of permission are invalid 37.205.58.146 10:39, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per the last attempt to delete these, a month ago User_talk:Jcb#Parliament_images. --Fæ (talk) 10:47, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Per Fæ. Random IP request, without any prooof, contrary to the very public and very open release of image of MP by the british House of Commons. Also keep the other 3 images, open to deletion of 3 separate DR. Tm (talk) 12:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
It does not have permission to be uploaded, as the links to source and proof of permission are invalid. Clearly, these images are not part of the official set of MPs' portraits and should be deleted. 37.205.58.146 10:40, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete this doesn't appear to be a part of the official parliamentary portrait series, as shown by the links to it being invalid. Suggests that permission for use has been withdrawn.
- Keep per the last attempt to delete these, a month ago User_talk:Jcb#Parliament_images. --Fæ (talk) 10:47, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Per Fæ. Random IP request, without any prooof, contrary to the very public and very open release of image of MP by the british House of Commons. Also keep the other 3 images, open to deletion of 3 separate DR. Tm (talk) 12:45, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment The above delete vote was added by the same IP that opened this DR. Tm (talk) 10:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:39, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
It does not have permission to be uploaded, as the links to source and proof of permission are invalid 37.205.58.146 10:40, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per the last attempt to delete these, a month ago User_talk:Jcb#Parliament_images. --Fæ (talk) 10:47, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete This isn't part of the parliamentary release, as seen by the invalid links
- Note, this was added by the IP who created this DR. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:39, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Per Fæ. Random IP request, without any prooof, contrary to the very public and very open release of image of MP by the british House of Commons. Also keep the other 3 images, open to deletion of 3 separate DR. Tm (talk) 12:45, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
this image is copyrighted from Lailson Santos/Veja, from the same interview as this one: http://www.revistanovafase.com.br/wordpress/2018/04/06/brasil-14-pre-candidatos-a-presidencia/foto_-lailson-santos-10-11-2014/ Paladinum2 (talk) 14:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
En tant que détenteurdudroit de cette page , je vous demande de la supprimer ,une autre page sur cette personne a était écrite. RUDEAU.G (talk) 09:51, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 21:26, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jacklombardi77 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not sure how the first is own work when he's clearly not holding a camera. Either way both low quality images of non-notable individual. Second one used on Wikidata in page now nominated for deletion there.
GMGtalk 19:16, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Well the first image is me recording myself and the second was an image taken with my cell phone. Both are me and both are my work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacklombardi77 (talk • contribs) 20:40, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- The ownership of the cell phone makes you not the creator of a picture taken with it. --DaB. (talk) 21:14, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photos. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jacklombardi77 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out-of-scope and/or spam.
- File:Meet Positives Small Logo.jpg
- File:Meet Positives- Herpes dating website.png
- File:Meet Positives cover image.jpg
- File:Meet Positives tagline - Never have the talk again.jpg
- File:CWDSC Chicago SEO Logo.jpg
- File:Chicago Website Design SEO Company letter head.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 20:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Obvious advertising, from a user who has already been warned on another project for advertising. GMGtalk 20:28, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Out-of-scope and/or spam. - FitIndia Talk Mail 22:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
I accidentally uploaded the file with a typo in the title Marcel Rogge (talk) 20:19, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: umplausible redirect. Ruthven (msg) 11:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
File:ABS-6401.0-ConsumerPriceIndexAustralia-Cpi-GroupSubgroupExpenditureClassIndexNumbersByCapitalCity-IndexNumbers-AllGroupsCpiExcludingHealth-Sydney-A2332286X.svg
[edit]
Reason [1] A.Bogdanov.A. (talk) 20:47, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep What do you mean reason 1? --99of9 (talk) 21:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:49, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Completely fictuous, no official relevence. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 21:45, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use in some userpages. I added {{Fictional}}, just in case someone uses it out of confusion. Ruthven (msg) 12:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
This flag is completely fictuous and has no official relevence. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 21:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: test upload. Ruthven (msg) 11:59, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Fictuous, no actual relevance. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 21:54, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- In use in several dozens of projects. Stronger arguments are requied IMO.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:22, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Ymblander. I added {{Fictitious flag}} just in case. Ruthven (msg) 11:59, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated hoax flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 17:28, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:13, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
No actual relevance to Wikipedia. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 21:56, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- It's political commentary about events of 15 years ago (see en:Flag of Georgia (U.S. state)), but the image is very small and crude, and unlikely to serve any purpose... AnonMoos (talk) 04:48, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + AnonMoos : resolution too low to be usable. Ruthven (msg) 11:56, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
there is no clear indication that this is indeed in the public domain, just that the image title claiming it was shot in 1907. No info on publication available, it appears on a website with no licensing information on it. John from Idegon (talk) 22:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- The indication that it is in the public domain is my statement that it is. Other than blanket suspicion, what indicates to you that its license status is not as presented? Who exactly do you expect to appear out of nowhere to assert a copyright claim on a picture that has no identification of the photographer, of a building which is no longer in existence, and is in the collection of a 501(c)3 historical museum that makes no objection to its non-commercial reuse? I've been tinkering with the page most of the day, interacting with you directly...would it have killed you to ask me if I had any bona fides before slapping a deletion request on it? I'm trying to understand the reasoning behind why things are done the way they are here but that's rather difficult when you insist on making more work for us both.
- I say my assertion trumps your skepticism, which way does the policy fall in such matters over here? RogueScholar (talk) 22:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: PD-1923 + building not longer existing (thus, not copyrightable). Ruthven (msg) 11:55, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Same issue as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Сецессия РФ.gif. Not clear where this file comes from or what it is based on. For all we know it is made up.
From the other DR:
- "Maybe then you can show ме where in the rules of Wikipedia it is written that the illustration must necessarily have links to sources?"
COM:SOURCE, w:WP:SOURCE, you're welcome. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:10, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Alexis in your provided rule (COM:SOURCE) it is said that "If you are uploading a file or image that you have created entirely by yourself, you should mark the source field as source={{Own}}" and nothing more in connection. The user properly displays (unless we won't prove otherwise) that it is his own work per COM:SOURCE, so no issues here. Regarding w:WP:SOURCE it applies on wikipedia not on commons, so you can't demand deletion of commons file by en wikipedia rule.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ★ 10:55, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Giorgi Balakhadze: I don't demand deletion based on Wikipedia rules, but the user asked where in the rules of Wikipedia it said that. For Commons the rules are different and I'm not saying this is a copyright violation. As far as we can tell though, it's completely made up and thus fails COM:SCOPE. I could draw a map of how I would split Germany and that wouldn't be in scope either. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: well, per COM:INUSE we can't say that it fails COM:SCOPE.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ★ 07:51, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- The article on enwiki was created by the uploader (and nominated for deletion by me), the uploader added the picture himself to w:hy:Ռուսաստանի փլուզում and w:uk:Розпад Росії. If those wikis actually see educational value in this, I would like to hear from them what it is. (or better yet they can add it to the file description) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:04, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: well, per COM:INUSE we can't say that it fails COM:SCOPE.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ★ 07:51, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Giorgi Balakhadze: I don't demand deletion based on Wikipedia rules, but the user asked where in the rules of Wikipedia it said that. For Commons the rules are different and I'm not saying this is a copyright violation. As far as we can tell though, it's completely made up and thus fails COM:SCOPE. I could draw a map of how I would split Germany and that wouldn't be in scope either. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- This image without a reliable source (the author's fiction) and can not be used in any project. Delete according to COM:OOS and COM:EDUSE. If the file was based on scientific work, of course it should be kept. --Insider (talk) 06:27, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per Insider. Ruthven (msg) 11:54, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Fictuous, no official relevance, and potentially offensive. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 22:16, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- If it has no legitimate purpose, just defamation or slander, then that would be a strike against it... AnonMoos (talk) 04:38, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Possibly keep: If I found such relevance to that flag, it is Anti-Zionism and criticism against the Israeli regime. This flag shows critics that they compared Israel to Nazi Germany however. One picture from The Times of Israel shows a house in Sacramento decorated with swastikas angering neighbours. -FreshCorp619 (talk) 19:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This has been used by various anti-Israeli movements, making it notable. Fry1989 eh? 17:16, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Fry1989 and the rest of discussion. Ruthven (msg) 11:53, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
The image encourages hatred against a people and a state 80.246.141.194 10:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Of course it is offending and derogatory, but that's IMO not a reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 13:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Oppose/Keep: Per User:Fry1989 in the 2018 discussion, this is still used by various anti-Israeli movements because the people had compared Israel with Nazi Germany. Close discussion. —184.148.150.235 00:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
It's anti-Semitic 71.172.236.198 13:11, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept. The file is used and cannot be deleted because it is anti-Semitic or offends somebody. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
derivative work of a medal Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:30, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:12, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
a source for each images have to be provided in order to determine the copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:33, 9 August 2018 (UTC) I made all the pictures myself. I am a beginner in Wikipedia and I do not understand why administrators want to delete my site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmitrovicni (talk • contribs) 16:34, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Gmitrovicni (talk) 16:37, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Gmitrovicni: If you want to use all those photos, you must be the photograph of all of them, or send to OTRS a permission from each photograph. Ruthven (msg) 12:12, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
No longer appears on any actual articles (aside from old User pages and two archived Graphics Lab pages) and has been superseded by a superior SVG version. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 18:36, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep -- images aren't necessarily deleted just because a corresponding vector has been created, and this has a very different visual appearance than any vector replacement. AnonMoos (talk) 04:57, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep -- I created this (based on File:COA Narnia.PNG) and would like to see an SVG version, but File:Flag of Narnia.svg does not have the clean simple outlines used for most images in Category:Lions rampant in heraldry. Goustien (talk) 02:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 12:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Author is Aristotle Saris/AP, not NPR. Even if it were NPR, the media organization does not publish its content under a free license [7] 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:53, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:52, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Neither Tasnim watermark nor attribution to one of their in-house photographers. Therfore {{Tasnim}} conditions are not met. Furthermore, the meetings have been outside of Iran, in Astana, Kazakhstan. 4nn1l2 (talk) 04:31, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:52, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Neither Tasnim watermark nor attribution to one of their in-house photographers. Therefore, {{Tasnim}} conditions are not met. 4nn1l2 (talk) 05:07, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:52, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sticker art in Milan
[edit]No FoP in Italy, needs permission from the stricker holder
- File:Graffiti at Via Sammartini.JPG
- File:0117 - Milano - Graffiti in Via Meda - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 24-Nov-2007.jpg
- File:Milano - Italy - Gary Coleman.JPG
- File:Sticker art2.JPG
B dash (talk) 05:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:52, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
No FoP for graphic works in UK
- File:Sticker, Deansgate, Manchester, October 2017 (01).jpg
- File:Sticker, Deansgate, Manchester, October 2017 (02).jpg
- File:Sticker, Deansgate, Manchester, October 2017 (03).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
B dash (talk) 06:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:52, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
I'd like to review the file Appleysj (talk) 00:53, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
I'd like to review the file Appleysj (talk) 00:53, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
I'd like to review the file Appleysj (talk) 00:53, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Small image, no EXIF B dash (talk) 03:15, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, sufficient quality and not found elsewhere using Google Images. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Image comes from Ivanka Trump's social media: https://twitter.com/ivankatrump/status/1024724343140442112?s=21 Unclear who the photographer is, and is Ivanka Trump a White House employee? Ytoyoda (talk) 03:51, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, Ivanka Trump is one of the Senior Advisers of the president, which is part of the Executive Office of the President. --B dash (talk) 06:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- That’s only half the puzzle though. The uploader claims this is an official White House photo but I can’t find the image on any .gov site or identify the photographer. Ytoyoda (talk) 10:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Came from the White House's official Instagram page. https://www.instagram.com/p/Bl8Y62MhJhE/?taken-by=whitehouse, I was the original poster. Avilan01 (talk) 15:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks. And Instagram photos don't show up on reverse image searches unless they're indexed elsewhere. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:45, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Came from the White House's official Instagram page. https://www.instagram.com/p/Bl8Y62MhJhE/?taken-by=whitehouse, I was the original poster. Avilan01 (talk) 15:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Withdrawing nomination - original poster has provided a link to the original. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sticker art in Ljubljana
[edit]No FoP for works published after 1944 in Slovenia
File:20130528 Ljubljana 267.jpgFile:A (2763069049).jpgFile:Autechre poster in Ljubljana, Slovenia (4813542134).jpgFile:Ljubljana7 stickers (4627555340).jpg- File:Petto di pollo (2456367447).jpg
- File:Pulpo (2763952580).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
B dash (talk) 06:52, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and little educational value. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Self promotion. This picture is part of a massive promotional attack to Wikipedia and all its related projects. Details can be found here Hypergio (talk) 06:56, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No rationale for deletion - image of street art in Naples SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:05, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy, needs permission from the sticker holder B dash (talk) 06:55, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:14, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope B dash (talk) 06:57, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- He is one of the zh:上班不要看 team, He is a Public Figure not private image collections.-Zest (talk) 08:11, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Zest. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope B dash (talk) 06:58, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- He is one of the zh:上班不要看 team, He is a Public Figure not private image collections.-Zest (talk) 08:10, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Zest. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Small image, no EXIF B dash (talk) 07:56, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Uploads by Majciii8
[edit]- File:Matjaž Kirn-Trbovljezrak1.jpg
- File:Trbovlje pomlad 18 6.jpg
- File:Robert Balen - funsterc.jpg
- File:Robert Balen granedirmars.jpg
- File:Nohšiht.jpg
- File:LOGO 4 DRITL pravi RGB-01.jpg
- File:Matjaž Kirn-LaibachTrb.1.jpg
- File:Trbovlje v objemu pomladi.jpg
- File:Matjaž Kirn-Lovski dvorec1.jpg
- File:Matjaž Kirn-Kum1.jpg
- File:Dimnik.jpg
Very likely all copyright violations - according to this edit and filenames, most photos were taken by Matjaž Kirn or Robert Balen, and there's no evidence of permission. There's also a non-free logo. — Yerpo Eh? 08:50, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
The file Seems a screenshot of some mobile gallery. Similar image can be found at File:Michael Ajakwe.png. OTRS verification of that file is under process. This image lacks information that the author has released under a free license. If that image passes OTRS verification this image is exact Duplicate of that file. Thereby nominating this for deletion. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:56, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Appears to be from a product listing: https://m.indiamart.com/pune/power-mosfets.html Ytoyoda (talk) 10:28, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
_(Unicode-Codierungskonflikt).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Unicode-Codierungskonflikt).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
ich möchte eine bearbeitete Version dieser Datei hochladen Hungerbuehler (talk) 11:42, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
_(Unicode-Codierungskonflikt).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. Likely COM:DW copyio as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
_(Unicode-Codierungskonflikt).jpg){kind=link}
It's not John C. McCullough. It's John G. McCullough, California Attorney General and Vermont Governor. There are other illustrations of John G. McCullough which will verify. Example: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:John_G_McCullough.jpg Billmckern (talk) 11:52, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Is this a reason for deletion???? Sounds more like a reason for renaming the file. SecretName101 (talk) 16:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Fact disputed}} or {{Rename}} instead. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Definitely not an own work, hence can not choose the licence. acagastya 12:58, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Definitely not an own work, and hence, can not decide the licence. acagastya 12:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
This photo was taken by the in house photographer of the National Museum of History and Art Luxembourg. The museum's photographer is the only photographer who has access to the collection in order to create professional photos. The museum never made this photo freely available and we would much appreciate if it could be taken down. Gilleszeimet (talk) 13:06, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jean-philippe.miconi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:Juillet 1969.jpg
- File:Neige en janvier 1987.jpg
- File:La gare et le mini golf de Sausset-les-Pins en 1962.jpg
- File:Le port de Sausset-les-Pins en 1976.jpg
- File:Port de Sausset-les-Pins en 1971.jpg
- File:Gare de Sausset-les-Pins en 1935.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Promoter of noted people (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF.
- File:Imran A. Chowdhury social and community campaigner .jpg
- File:Imran A. Chowdhury.jpg
- File:Imran A. Chowdhury with The Mayor of Northampton .jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Photo of a photograph, no EXIF, doubtful own work. Ruthven (msg) 14:54, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: DW, dubious source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Very probably a recent painting from 1969 of the Monastery of St Macarius. See [8]. No permission, and not own work. Ruthven (msg) 14:57, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope, unused personal photo 219.79.126.188 15:16, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
non-free, taken from ESPN cricinfo - http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/player/446808.html Lugnuts (talk) 15:58, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:46, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Uploader's artwork, image of a satellite for which no real images exist. Commons is for educational content, not for false images. Moreover, this particular artwork is quite unrealistic. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 16:09, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:47, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Esperanto publicity
[edit]Neither educational, nor of historical value. See COM:OOS, COM:ADVERT
- File:Esperanto * Internacia Lingvo * 1887.svg
- File:Esperanto * justa komunikado.svg
- File:Esperanto - lingvo internacia - língua internacional (PT) .svg
- File:Esperanto - lingvo internacia - língua internacional (PT).svg
- File:Esperanto - Stela Vojaĝo .svg
- File:Esperanto - Stela Vojaĝo.svg
- File:Esperanto .svg
- File:Esperanto 2015-09-23.svg
- File:Esperanto 2015-10-27 .svg
- File:Esperanto 2015-10-27.svg
- File:Esperanto amuza lingvo.svg
- File:Esperanto biera .svg
- File:Esperanto biera 0.svg
- File:Esperanto biera.svg
- File:Esperanto Interkosmos -0.svg
- File:Esperanto Interkosmos.svg
- File:Esperanto ja .svg
- File:Esperanto ja-.svg
- File:Esperanto ja.svg
- File:Esperanto kaj mondo.svg
- File:Esperanto kc.svg
- File:Esperanto kolora.svg
- File:Esperanto kuras.svg
- File:Esperanto Zamenhof.svg
- File:Esperanto Ŝipa Flago.svg
- File:Esperanto.svg
- File:Estu trankvila kaj lernu Esperanton .svg
- File:Estu trankvila kaj lernu Esperanton 0.svg
- File:Estu trankvila kaj lernu Esperanton 1.svg
- File:Estu trankvila kaj lernu Esperanton.svg
- File:Lingua latina fuit Anglica est Esperantica erit = Latin was English is Esperanto will be = Latina estis Angla estas Esperanto estos.svg
- File:Mi amas Esperanton .svg
- File:Mi amas Esperanton.svg
_.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
~★ nmaia d 16:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Very low-quality unused image with many better analogs, no realistic educational use, out of scope. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 16:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Not an action shot of the NFL player Footballtrivia1958 (talk) 16:52, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy keep There is no valid reason for deleting the picture. The deletion nomination has no merit. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 17:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC).
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, advertising. Image was probably used for a now-deleted promotional article at enwiki. Gazoth (talk) 17:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, advertising Gazoth (talk) 17:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Appears to be from Ebay: File:Liz Phair Live.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 17:56, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: "File:Liz Phair Live.jpg" - did you perhaps paste the wrong link? I couldn't find a pre-2016 ebay page with this photo. whym (talk) 14:22, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Whym: Sorry, yes, that’s a copy-paste error. The image is from an eBay listing that predates this upload: https://m.ebay.com/itm/MorningStar-SunSaver-SS-MPPT-15L-15A-12-24V-Solar-Panel-Charge-Controller-MPPT-/380985935965?_mwBanner=1&_rdt=1 Ytoyoda (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Personal portrait of non relevante person Stego (talk) 18:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, low resolution personal photograph. GRuban (talk) 18:15, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
No longer appears on any actual articles (aside from old User pages and an archived Graphics lab page) and has been superseded by at least two superior SVG versions Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 18:21, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep -- images are not necessarily deleted just because a corresponding vector has been created. The vector image has an annoying French-Wikipedia-style pseudo-reflective gradient, and so is not in fact superior in visual appearance. AnonMoos (talk) 05:02, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:AnonMoos. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
out of scope + grabbed from facebook Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:13, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Possible Copyvio, screenshot of initial d anime 2601:647:101:D030:1CA1:8B8E:775B:9105 18:26, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
dubious own work (see half-toning, appears to be scanned newspaper photo or similar), uploader has history of copyright violations Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:07, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
I presume this is a recreation of the file discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jennifer Montoya.jpg, with no explanation as to why the status has changed. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: recreation of previously deleted content. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
A censored and possibly deleted tweet with what looks to no media coverage of this specific tweet is out of scope in my understanding. The inclusion of the profile picture also puts this tweet in a questionable copyright situation. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:30, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/20/james-gunn-fired-by-disney-after-long-history-of-p/ - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:09, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete without the image(s), it is now out of COM:SCOPE - "..following are not considered media files, and may not be hosted here: Files which are representative merely of raw text". w:Template:Tweet exists for this purpose.--BevinKacon (talk) 19:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:24, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Its actually based in the background of another image, so it would actually be a "de minimis" Paladinum2 (talk) 19:03, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
It's actually based in the background of another image, so it would actually be a "de minimis" Paladinum2 (talk) 19:04, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't appear on any articles (aside from one archived Graphics Lab page) and has been superseded by a superior SVG version. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 19:16, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Self-promotion (see file descs), out of project scope.
Achim (talk) 19:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Not own work Tekstman (talk) 19:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't appear on any articles, and has already been superseded by a superior SVG version. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 20:52, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I created this file but don't see any reason to keep it since there is an SVG version File:Flag of Archenland (Narnia).svg. Goustien (talk) 04:13, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't appear on any actual articles (apart from some old User pages) and has been superseded by at least two superior SVG versions. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 20:57, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I created this file but see no reason to keep it since an SVG version File:Coat of arms of Archenland (Narnia).svg exists. Goustien (talk) 04:25, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't appear in any actual articles, and is completely fictuous with no official relevance. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 21:36, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep -- It's an attempt at a comprehensive flag or indicator for the English language. It's not any more fictitious than most of the other images in Category:English language flags. P.S. "Fictuous" isn't even a word of English... AnonMoos (talk) 02:56, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: image with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 01:34, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This image has far greater educational value than literally thousands of low-quality nude selfies currently sitting idle on Commons. AshFriday (talk) 01:25, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Granted it is of relative higher quality, the uploader does not seem to be the photographer of this photo. Judging from the deleted edits of the uploader, this photo and other images uploaded are intended to promote a theater of which they are associated with. I would argue that a photo of a nude person, whose notability is not established, in a partially lighted room has limited educational value. -Mys_721tx (talk) 06:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: likely not own work, readily found online. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:33, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Quite likely that the uploader is not in fact Danelle Bergstrom. Pichpich (talk) 16:35, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
_Flag.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Flag.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused fictitious flag; not in COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 13:41, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
_Flag.png){kind=link}
- I'm not especially attached to this one particular image, but there are many hundreds of "Special and fictional" flags on Commons, and there's been a de facto policy for many years that such flags are not usually deleted just for being special or fictional, but rather only if there's some additional aggravating factor (such as being hoaxing or hatemongering)... AnonMoos (talk) 16:00, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In scope. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:36, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
_Flag.png){kind=link}
Irrelevant post-closure remarks
[edit]_Flag.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
- How so? Keφr (keep talk here) 12:12, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete For me, a file being fictionnal but not from a howsoever popular/widely known fiction and not used on any project is out of scope. Kathisma (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
_Flag.png&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
No official relevence, completely fictuous. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 21:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- It's a political satire image. If you didn't have anything significant to add with respect to the previous rejected deletion nomination above, then you really should not have made a new deletion nomination. By the way, if you nominate the similar "Flag of Soviet Canuckistan" for deletion, I imagine there would be significant resistance... AnonMoos (talk) 03:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Has no place being on the commons, useless image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cristiano Tomás (talk • contribs) 12:41, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
No official relevence, completely fictuous. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 21:39, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep — Because it is meant to be used only in usperpage and userspace, Also, it is satire, and last but not least - the donkey mascot is public domain. --Oren neu dag (talk) 14:10, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:38, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Claimed as own work, but is pretty clearly a company logo being used without attribution SamHolt6 (talk) 23:00, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hi SamHolt6, regarding this file I have sent an email to Wikimedia Commons. The ticket number is Ticket#: 2018080310007341. It is the logo of my company and I on behalf of the company have sent this email and have informed Wikimedia Commons before using it. Please suggest how to rectify this. I read that sending an email to Wikimedia before uploading something is the best way to go about it. How do I attribute the file? --AlphaKGN (talk) 15:52, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional logo, advertising and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation, digital copy of an article in the Marathi newspaper w:Lokmat Gazoth (talk) 16:51, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Not own work as claimed, probably taken from this PDF document. Not covered by {{GODL-India}} as this a logo of a local government body. Gazoth (talk) 17:53, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JackFineArt (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence that the painter ever released these under a free license. The painter is still alive so the works would still be under copyright and PD-Art would not apply either.
Majora (talk) 20:31, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
This is a misleading map. Tati refers to at least 2 different Iranian languages: Tat (Caucasus) and Tati language (Iran). Tati of Caucasus is a Southwestern Iranian language, but Tati of Iran is a Northwestern Iranian language. They are completely different languages. Map shows Tati is also spoken in northeast of Iran (Sankhvast, Esfarayen, Bojnord). But it is wrong. Persians, Kurmanjs, Turkmens and Khorasani Turks are ethnic groups of the Northern Khorasan (Name of the northeast parts of Iran is Northern Khorasan). Some Persian speakers of Northern Khorasan (villagers) call their language 'Tati', but their language is a Persian dialect which is different than Tati of Caucasus and Tati of northwestern Iran. So this map shows 3 different Iranian languages as 1 language. Actually Tati speakers of northerstern Iran live in some villages, not in the huge parts of North and Northwest of Iran. In around of Tabriz, there are just 2 Tati-speaking villages! In Around of Tehran and Karaj, there are no Tat. In Around of Shahrud, there are just 8 Tati villages. There are no Tat people in around of Saveh, And etc. Mohammad.MSV (talk) 16:30, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment It seems to be a complicated issue. However, both languages share the name of "Tati" and both are from the Iranian languages branch, according to their Wikipedia articles (Tati language (Iran) and Tat language (Caucasus)). So it appears that there is nothing wrong with the map or the file name. Commons should not editorialize Wikipedia. You can add {{Factual accuracy}} to the file page. Whether or not the file should be used on Wikipedia is a matter for Wikipedians which should be resolved there. I'm inclined to vote "keep", but I cannot, becaue I am not knowlegable aboout the subject matter and also I could not find both languages on Ethnologue. There is only Tat, Muslim on that website. 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:23, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
This is a misleading map. Tati refers to at least 2 different Iranian languages: Tat language (Caucasus) and Tati language (Iran). Tati of Caucasus is a Southwestern Iranian language, but Tati of Iran is a Northwestern Iranian language. They are completely different languages (In ethnology, they are 2 different Iranian ethnic groups. Also, Tats of Caucasus are Sunni and Tats of Iran are Shia). Map shows Tati is also spoken in northeast of Iran (Sankhvast, Esfarayen, Bojnord). But it is wrong. Persians, Kurmanjs, Turkmens and Khorasani Turks are ethnic groups of the Northern Khorasan (Name of the northeast parts of Iran is Northern Khorasan). Some Persian speakers of Northern Khorasan (villagers) call their language 'Tati', but their language is a Persian dialect which is different than Tati of Northwestern Iran and Tati of Caucasus. So this map shows 3 different Iranian languages as 1 language.
In addition, Tati speakers of Northwestern Iran live in some villages, not in the huge parts of North and Northwest of Iran. In around of Tabriz, there are just 2 Tati-speaking villages! In Around of Tehran and Karaj, there are no Tat. There are no Tat in around of Saveh (Most southern part of map) as well. And etc.
e.g. Michael Izady's maps (Gulf 2000 Project of Columbia university) are reliable (His maps aren't free to uploading on Wiki). According to Izady's map, Tati language of Iran and Tat language of Caucasus are 2 different Iranian languages: "Iranian langaues" Mohammad.MSV (talk) 21:07, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Add {{Fact disputed}} if necessary. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
A foto se encontra nesse site aqui, https://www.lance.com.br/corinthians/prestes-estrear-pelo-roger-diz-pressionado-mas-pronto.html, e está substituindo uma foto do Flickr hospedada legitimamente. WikiGusta (talk) 01:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: latest version per COM:LL and reverted to previous version per COM:OVERWRITE. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:00, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Please delete the latest version and restore the previous version that is verified to be freely licensed. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Done as requested. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shifra612 (talk • contribs) 02:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Please don't delete my photos
[edit]Deleted: per nomination, dubious source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:09, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work from commercial packaging. Should be cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Cropped vertically, any DW should be DM now. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Facebook download, needs further source info Ytoyoda (talk) 16:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:31, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
No commercial use (https://www.si.edu/termsofuse). Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:52, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Doesn't seem to matter, Smithsonian is a federal institution, and as such employees are those of the federal government. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:33, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
This is probably a depiction of a non-free character, wikimedia commons doesn 2601:647:101:D030:1CA1:8B8E:775B:9105 16:54, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:33, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong B dash (talk) 07:06, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:31, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Similar to https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/928953898446008321/h2ltzzoV_400x400.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:32, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:32, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't appear on any proper articles, and has been superseded by a superior SVG version. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 21:41, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- An image is not necessarily deleted just because a vector counterpart has been created, but here the JPEG has some rather crude compression artefacts... AnonMoos (talk) 04:40, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: compression artifacts make this functionally useless. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:33, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
No longer appears on any actual articles (aside from two archived Graphics Lab pages), and has been superseded by a superior SVG version. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 19:11, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep -- images are not necessarily deleted just because a corresponding SVG has been created, and File:Flag of Telmar.svg has a very different visual appearance than this one... AnonMoos (talk) 05:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Erroneous image - the actual flag/arms of Telmar (as seen in the book "Prince Caspian) features a bird that is all black and that has smooth-edged wings and no tongue. The bird on this flag has none of those things. Additionally, this flag features a white stripe on the bottom, which shouldn't be there, and is a lighter shade of orange than it should be. Considering a more accurate version of the flag now exists on Wikimedia, there's really no point in holding on to this one. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 08:45, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- I have removed the white stripe at the bottom. Although I created this file (based on my File:COA Telmar.png), the newer File:Flag of Telmar.svg has a better replica of the eagle/raven emblem as illustrated by Pauline Baynes in Prince Caspian. The illustration is visible here: https://www.thefandomentals.com/king-not-prince-caspian-the-chronicles-of-narnia-reread-project-part-4 or here: http://narnia.wikia.com/wiki/Telmarine_Dynasty (I believe the color was added later, perhaps by Baynes). Goustien (talk) 22:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per AnonMoos. --whym (talk) 23:46, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Courtesy of First Aliyah Museum : http://www.mapa.co.il/%D7%9E%D7%A4%D7%94/%D7%90%D7%98%D7%A8%D7%A7%D7%A6%D7%99%D7%95%D7%AA/6297, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:21, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 06:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Similar to https://www.christopherraeburn.co.uk/events/?catId=studio-tour Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Promo image. Non-free content. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 21:47, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- I don't know that a Facebook profile picture counts as a "promo photo". This appears to be a snapshot taken by a friend of the subject that the subject then loaded as her Facebook photo. WikiDan61 (talk) 23:33, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP Slovenia: the monument is still copyrighted to France Hrastar. Eleassar (t/p) 08:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Oppose We already had a debate years ago, why the interpretation at COM:FOP Slovenia is wrong. See https://www.slov.si/doc/Fotografska_dela.pdf again. --Miha (talk) 08:36, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sure...
- Let me cite the beginning: 'In the case of lawful publication of a copyright work (CC marked or not) on its pages, Wikipedia is not responsible for further use of this work! The responsibility is borne by the person who takes over Wikipedia's publication and uses it unlawfully.'
- Followed by: 'Also publication with the purpose of obtaining commercial interests, in catalogues, guides, expert publications, presentations, etc., of individual photographs of generally accessible architectural copyright works does not violate the law if the publication is a citation (Article 51 of the ZASP) illustrating the main text.'
- I don't think this meets the criterion of free use for any purpose.
- Best, --Eleassar (t/p) 17:08, 10 August 2018 (UTC)¸
- Oppose France Hrastar is not the author of the monument, he was just one among its initiators, who expressed the idea how the monument should look like. According to the Slovene law (9. člen ZASP) ideas are not copyrighted. The monument has been conceived and produced by anonymous volunteers at the Jesenice ironworks (Ogromen klin v dolini Vrat: kaj pomeni in kako so ga postavili? Siol.net 18. 8. 2017). Neither pictures of carabiner nor pictures of pitons are copyrighted on Wikimedia Commons [9] [10], though somebody designed them. --Hladnikm (talk) 20:30, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- This is an architectural and sculptural work. Models are considered sculptural works and are, therefore, eligible for copyright protection. --Eleassar (t/p) 10:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: This is not an idea; this is a sculpture. That Hrastar did not personally forge the metal does not deprive him of a copyright, just as the owner of a printing press does not own the copyright to a book thereon fabricated. The linked pdf is neither authoritative nor does it refute COM:FOP Slovenia. Slovakian copyright law is directly available and says "Works permanently placed in parks, streets, squares, or other generally accessible premises [...] may not be reproduced in a three-dimensional form, used for the same purpose as the original work, or used for economic gain" (Article 55). This limitation on derivatives and commercial use means Slovian FoP is not sufficiently free for our purposes. --Эlcobbola talk 19:48, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Wrong PD, can't be own Goesseln (talk) 11:09, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Photograph was added by Chinsegut Hill Manor, who owns it. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.32.178.225 (talk) 14:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
The Author is the person who took the photo, not the owner. The author should be listed as unknown. Creative Commons license. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.79.171.146 (talk) 23:23, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - ownership of physical property (photo) is not the same as ownership of the related intangible property (copyright). Actually authorship information (or evidence of date of first publication) is required. --Эlcobbola talk 19:51, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, no 1915 on source. 195.91.134.34 15:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --Эlcobbola talk 19:52, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Why USA law is applied to photo from India? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Also PD in India per {{PD-India-photo-1958}}. --Эlcobbola talk 19:59, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
If this is "To be used only on the [English Wikipedia] user page for user "jeffreyehall", wouldn't that contradict the license? Should this be on Commons? (I had already asked User:FastilyClone on his/her talk page, but it was archived without response.)) @Jeffreyehall: Jmabel ! talk 16:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Such a limitation ("To be used only on the user page for user 'jeffreyehall'") is indeed not compatible with the Commons or the claimed license(s). However, the non-revocable GFDL/cc-by-sa license is the only thing that governs; it is not nullified or circumvented by what is effectively a mere request in the description (i.e., re-users may freely ignore the statement.) That said, consider nominating this per COM:INUSE, as someone with only 119 edits (and largely minor, and to namespace) who hasn't edited in over 5 years is likely not reasonably "an active participant.". --Эlcobbola talk 20:12, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
I believe this belongs to the government of algeria and you shouldn't put it in commons unless if you have their premission or OTRS. 2601:647:101:D030:1CA1:8B8E:775B:9105 16:50, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:59, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of an Indian government agency, not licensed under CC 4.0. {{GODL-India}} does not apply to logos of government agencies and departments. Gazoth (talk) 17:03, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- This Logo pertains to the Indian Audit and Accounts Department of the Government of India, and should not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 43.248.72.46 (talk) 05:32, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment moved here from the talk page. —Gazoth (talk) 14:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:55, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Doesn't appear on any articles, and has been superseded by at least two superior SVG versions. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 17:44, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- The SVG has a stupid French-Wikipedia-style pseudo-reflective gradient, and so is not superior in visual appearance to this image... AnonMoos (talk) 05:09, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- I created this file, but File:Coat of arms of Telmar (Narnia) alternate.svg is a better replica of the Pauline Baynes illustration in Prince Caspian. The illustration is visible here: https://www.thefandomentals.com/king-not-prince-caspian-the-chronicles-of-narnia-reread-project-part-4 or here: http://narnia.wikia.com/wiki/Telmarine_Dynasty (I believe the color was added later, perhaps by Baynes). Goustien (talk) 16:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
_alternate.svg){kind=link}
Superfluous - the image itself already exists in the form of this file: File: Coat of arms of the German Reich (Weimar Republic) .svg Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 07:19, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- I adapted it from File:Wappen Deutsches Reich (Weimarer Republik).svg but made some changes (tips of wing feathers and the top of the wings). File:Coat of arms of Telmar (Narnia).svg, on the other hand, uses the German image and just changes the coloring and the shape of the shield. Both of these are unnecessary, since the more accurate File:Coat of arms of Telmar (Narnia) alternate.svg is used throughout Wikipedia. Notice the article at https://narnia.wikia.com/wiki/Telmarine_Dynasty interprets the emblem as a raven, not an eagle; it is never described by Lewis in the books, only illustrated by Baynes. Goustien (talk) 02:17, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
- Dear User:Snow Lion Fenian -- please learn how deletion discussions work on commons. You don't start a new nomination just to add a comment. And as I explained above, the SVG file has a stupid pseudo-reflective gradient of the type required on French Wikipedia (but mostly unwanted elsewhere), and so is not truly equivalent to the PNG... AnonMoos (talk) 14:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Apologies for that, I guess I'm just relatively new to the whole process of deletion nomination. Sorry for any trouble caused. And sorry, I never was aware that the whole pseudo-reflective thing was a problem outside French Wikipedia either. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 20:31, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 17:58, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Permission needed : "The journal of Indian Armed Forces is published every fortnightly in thirteen languages including Hindi and English on behalf of the Ministry of Defence. It is not necessarily an organ for the expression of the Government's defence policy. The published items represent the views of respective writers and correspondents." Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:50, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Patrick Rogel. The official website of Sainik Samachar states the following: Publisher - Ms SR Rajashekar, Official Spokesperson, MoD.Nungsanglemba Ao, Officiating Addl DG (Media & Communication), Directorate of Public Relations, South Block, New Delhi-110 011. Additionally, the website of the domain from where this image was sourced is www.sainiksamachar.nic.in. The crucial part here is the top level domain (TLD) i.e., ".nic.in." This lop level domain is owned by National Informatics Centre (NIC) and the same can be allocated ONLY to Indian Government Entities. Please refer to this link for more information. As such, this is clearly a Government owned entity. Hence, all the items published are in the public domain and free for use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FlyingBlueDream (talk • contribs) 06:00, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hi . @FlyingBlueDream: It's clearly stated that the website is not "an organ for the expression of the Government's defence policy" so it's clearly not a Government owned and operated website but managed by SR Rajashekar. But let's an Administrator decide... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:46, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- (comment)@Patrick Rogel: It clearly states "Ms SR Rajashekar, Official Spokesperson MoD". Here "MoD" is Ministry of Defence, India and "South Block, New Delhi" is the building where MoD is located. Also in the discussion Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2018/06#Extent of Template:GODL-India, http://sainiksamachar.nic.in is covered. So in my opinion the license for this image should be changed to Template:GODL-India. Please see discussion Template talk:GODL-India. Thanks —Sarvatra (talk) 21:30, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: when the source site states it is not public domain it *is not*. --JuTa 17:25, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
