Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/07/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Files found with Special:Search/File:Purple flower (5816336083)
[edit]Insufficient quality to be educationally useful.
Hiàn (talk) 01:12, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Keep wut? (delete the duplicate though, but I already tagged it) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:39, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Withdrawn (non-admin closure) - looks like I didn't look close enough (and I need some sleep :/). Hiàn (talk) 03:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
ЛИН ГИН ХУЕСОС Alexander Bardyshev (talk) 17:57, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
[Homophobic comment removed] Прелестный (talk) 11:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Speedy keep, see above for more details. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:19, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
[Comment removed] Прелестный (talk) 11:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep vandalistic request. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:18, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: vandalism. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
http://www.joan-pau.com/noticies/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Facebook copyvio. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Clear copyvio. Probably warrants investigation of user's other uploads too. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:58, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- File:Jay A. Garcia-Gregory.jpg
- File:José A. Fusté.jpg
- File:Juan Pérez-Giménez.jpg
- File:Carmen Consuelo Cerezo.jpg
- File:Daniel R. Dominguez.jpg
- File:Francisco A. Besosa.jpg
- File:Hector M. Laffitte.jpg
- File:Raymond L. Acosta.jpg
- File:Salvador E. Casellas.jpg
- File:Aida M. Delgado-Colón.jpg
too Andy Dingley (talk) 19:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Note the sourcing links for these (which were on the image pages, but make this DR much clearer in isolation)
- https://www.prd.uscourts.gov/?q=judges-united-states-district-court&q=judges-united-states-district-court
- http://davidwellsroth.com/artwork/copyright-notice/
Also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:William Henry Holt.jpg (2015)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Nothing Amrio (talk) 16:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders request shortly after upload. --JuTa 04:19, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Update info Pauloeecs (talk) 19:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 04:15, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sami Mlouhi as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: I'm the subject of this photo, please can you delet it . Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Delete. @Great11: : As uploader, if you agree we can speedy delete this file per COM:SPEEDY#G7. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- talk , Thank you for your intervention, i was very beasy at wikimania to answer you, sorry!
Sami Mlouhi, if you want , i will uploading another one, as you like? Thank you! --Great11 (talk) 12:36, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Cropped. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 08:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 16:46, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:52, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 01:11, 23 Juli 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.facebook.com/lipetorresoficial/photos/a.1579164155530723.1073741826.1355517907895350/1579164165530722/?type=3&theater --Krdbot 06:51, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Janilin.bappi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Gallery of images which by size, content, and so on are unlikely to be "own work" of uploader... includes several logos, a professional portrait and what appear to be book covers as well as photographic images.
- File:BRACU logo.png
- File:M121.jpg
- File:Meherpur Govt. High School.png
- File:Zen e leen.png
- File:Dipnirban.jpg
- File:Alaler Ghore Dulal.jpg
- File:ডিম পাহাড়.jpg
- File:জুম চাষ.jpg
- File:BIL.png
- File:BRACU.jpg
- File:Sayed Saad Andaleeb.jpg
- File:Chameli House..jpg
- File:TARC.jpg
- File:Dhaka University logo.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Keep File:Alaler Ghore Dulal.jpg & File:Dhaka University logo.png as per copyrightright free. per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 18:17, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BAJAGAIN 4042 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:At working.jpg
- File:New 04.jpg
- File:New 03.jpg
- File:New 01.jpg
- File:LG Awards.jpg
- File:LG Award.jpg
- File:L.G Films Awards 2017,Best Editor.jpg
- File:On The Set of Love Dairies Nepali Movie.jpg
- File:Box Office Awards Nomination Ceremony , Top Five 2017.jpg
- File:L.G Films Awards 2017.jpg
- File:Award Ceremony 2016.jpg
- File:L.G Films Awards 2016.jpg
- File:ACHYUT BAJAGAIN.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:57, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Unused photo of unnotable people. Out of scope. Maxim Gavrilyuk (talk) 13:54, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:42, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Unused photo of unnotable people. Out of scope. Maxim Gavrilyuk (talk) 14:17, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:43, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Unused photo of bad quality. No education value. Maxim Gavrilyuk (talk) 15:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:43, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:51, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:43, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Maybe too blurred to be educationally usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:12, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:43, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Maxim Gavrilyuk as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Unused photo of bad quality. Not a valid speedy deletion reason. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:12, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:43, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Insufficiently described unused private photo. Out of scope. ŠJů (talk) 05:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:06, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wasim Khosa 786 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:12, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andreas Pandu Pamungkas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
- File:Andreas Pandu Pamungkas, image03.jpg
- File:Andreas Pandu Pamungkas, image02.jpg
- File:Andreas Pandu Pamungkas image01.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:32, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
As per COM:PENIS. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:48, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
لطفا حذف شود Rezagholampoor (talk) 21:05, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
لطفا حذف شود Rezagholampoor (talk) 07:19, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
لطفا حذف شود Rezagholampoor (talk) 07:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Useless panoramio upload. Contains no educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 13:21, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site. User trying to create her own Wikipedia article ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
- File:POPO 11.jpg
- File:POPO 12.jpg
- File:POPO 5.jpg
- File:POPO 4.jpg
- File:POPO 1.jpg
- File:POPO 2.jpg
- File:POPO 3.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site.
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 14:51, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jabardast video by Arjun saxena (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos. Commons is not photo album repository.
- File:SAXENA.jpg
- File:SAXENA JI.jpg
- File:Arjun saxenaa.jpg
- File:Arjun ji.jpg
- File:Asasasggtr.jpg
- File:Gdfas.jpg
- File:Arjun .jpg
- File:Arjun saxena ji.jpg
- File:Arjun saxena.jpg
Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 15:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ehmeriftikhar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems to be advertisements; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:09, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
private pic Yulia Dmitryevna 19:38, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:18, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Looks like a photograph of some sort of 2D artwork of uncertain copyright status. Not clear how this is in project scope either. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:54, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 06:57, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
I've cropped this, but I'm not sure who this is (the artist, the depicted, random visitor?). And the resolution seems a bit low, but that may not mean anything. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:59, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Watermarked with "Anthony Harris Photography" which is not the government of Seattle. --Guanaco (talk) 06:56, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Crane oon the hunt (5816337053)
[edit]Low quality file, insufficient quality to be useful for an educational purpose.
Hiàn (talk) 01:32, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 06:57, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Ljubljana-Bridge-01.jpg Adelfrank (talk) 01:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request shortly after upload. Reason is no FoP in Slovenia. --Guanaco (talk) 06:59, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Slovenia Works of authors who died in 1944 or earlier are public domain in Slovenia. Works of authors who died in 1945 or later are copyrighted. - Jože Plečnik died in 1957. Adelfrank (talk) 01:43, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request shortly after upload. --Guanaco (talk) 07:01, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by רונאלדיניו המלך as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: replaced with File:HabimaLogo.svg. Not a valid speedy deletion criterium. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:43, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, Why not? it`s copyrighted logo and was replaced by vector file. Tal (רונאלדיניו המלך, talk) 22:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- @רונאלדיניו המלך: Please see COM:SPEEDY for valid speedy deletion reasons. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:19, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Also per the current license templates {{Pd-textlogo}}, {{Trademark}} it does not meet the originality threshold for it to be copyrighted (just trademark). The logo is just simple text with the last ה mirrored. --Arseny1992 (talk) 22:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Great, so it was replaced by a better file. Where should I request deletion? Tal (רונאלדיניו המלך, talk) 13:45, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- No need to, it can be discussed here. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:05, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Great, so it was replaced by a better file. Where should I request deletion? Tal (רונאלדיניו המלך, talk) 13:45, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Also per the current license templates {{Pd-textlogo}}, {{Trademark}} it does not meet the originality threshold for it to be copyrighted (just trademark). The logo is just simple text with the last ה mirrored. --Arseny1992 (talk) 22:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- @רונאלדיניו המלך: Please see COM:SPEEDY for valid speedy deletion reasons. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:19, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete SVG version is vastly superior, this GIF has artifacts. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. -- Geagea (talk) 08:51, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Also:
Out of scope. Insufficiently described unused private photo of an unknown girl. -- ŠJů (talk) 02:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:34, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
An image of entirely promotional nature. Mys_721tx (talk) 02:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:35, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Original from imgur, also images from reddit account "Indianapolis" are copyrighted B dash (talk) 02:59, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep @B dash: I'm not sure you actually understand this.. "Indianapolis" is a subreddit, not an account. Imgur is just a hoster (reddit does not offer image hosting afaik, so if you want to share a picture you need to upload it elsewhere first) and the Reddit user "BleezyEnternational" says this is own work ("I took the photo") and agreed to release it as CC-BY. (the uploader asked BleezyEnternational in the comments) @Leoboudv: can you take a look? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep obviously. @B dash: , did you read the rationale? Why are you proposing this for deletion? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- There is a doubt that is originally from imgur. --B dash (talk) 10:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- @B dash: why. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:35, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- The file was uploaded on imgur first (Mar 16, 2015), and no proof they are the same uploader. --B dash (talk) 12:18, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- @B dash: File uploaded on imgur on March 16 2015 23:12:06 GMT+0100 (CET). And the date on Reddit.. whaddayaknow, Mar 16 22:12:34 2015 UTC, 28 seconds later! Closing admin: please give the image a license review. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:56, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Original author released under a free license. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:38, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
No metadata, unlikely own work Jamez42 (talk) 05:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:40, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
As per COM:NUDE and COM:PENIS. The description looks like a harassment. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:09, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
This pictrue shows more context (age,race,length) than exist pictures.And it is medical-proved.I hope you can consider this.——Wingyuen2001 (talk) 07:19, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Probably not own work. Bogus license used. Works of Google's software. Not sure that in open source. User has same issues on uploads in the last. Many were found copyright violation
- File:Google IO - EASTER EGG GOOGLE 369.png
- File:GOOGLE IO 2 - EASTER EGG GOOGLE.png
- File:GOOGLE IO 3 - EASTER EGG GOOGLE.png
- File:Google drive PRIDE - EASTER EGG GOOGLE.png
- File:Google birthday - EASTER EGG GOOGLE.png
- File:Sonic 3 - EASTER EGG GOOGLE.png
- File:Sonic 2 - EASTER EGG GOOGLE.png
- File:Sonic 1 - EASTER EGG GOOGLE.png
- File:Super mario bloque - EASTER EGG GOOGLE.png
- File:The answer of life CALCULADORA - EASTER EGG GOOGLE.png
- File:Conway's game of life - EASTER EGG GOOGLE.png
- File:Funcion corazon - easter egg google.png
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:41, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted content SecretName101 (talk) 06:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:42, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted content SecretName101 (talk) 06:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:42, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 06:29, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:42, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 06:29, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:42, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LESLIE MARCALAYA GUERRERO (talk · contribs)
[edit]Clear copyvio and spam
- File:DERECHO ABIGAIL MENDOZA.jpg
- File:DERECHO LESLIE MARCALAYA.jpg
- File:AURIS DERECHO.jpg
- File:INFOGRAFIA.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:34, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:42, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alfonsortll (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional content and spam
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:39, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:42, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
replication Mini Anto (talk) 08:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate of File:Peacock 10.jpg. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:43, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
This photo is from Chicagoice, who posted ot for Donald Trump. 219.79.126.231 08:29, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence that this is a federal work. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:50, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
non-free image, taken from ESPN website Lugnuts (talk) 12:21, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:51, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:51, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by YasirMonon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:51, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Usman.maxtrain (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Promotional content and spam
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Movie still. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:NIdeas Creations and Productions Pvt Ltd.tif
- File:NIdeas Creations and Productions Pvt Lt.jpg
- File:Mayurakshi.jpg
- File:Mayurakhshi Logo.jpg
- File:Mayurakhshi Logo.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Poster or movie stills: copyrighted. Besides though having a verified account uploader's uploads since 2015 have been deleted.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Could someone explain what the point of OTRS:2013101810015603 is, if not a release for their own uploads for the production company? --Fæ (talk) 17:12, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Fæ: It seems a few hours ago you knew already what was inside the ticket. Why asking now? By the way are you an OTRS Team member? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:03, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Public knowledge User_talk:MITA_PAL#OTRS permission --Fæ (talk) 21:59, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Fæ: It seems a few hours ago you knew already what was inside the ticket. Why asking now? By the way are you an OTRS Team member? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:03, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Mauvaise qualité Yves Garand (talk) 02:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request, unused photo. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
too blurred to be of use Malcolma (talk) 09:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Wrong file uploaded Ainali (talk) 14:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:51, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Wrong file uploaded Ainali (talk) 14:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:51, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Wrong file uploaded Ainali (talk) 14:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:51, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Online Donation for Charity Starting small can make a big Difference.pdf
- File:Because I am differently able, not disabled.pdf
- File:Why Fitness is the way to healthy life.pdf
- File:How to get rid of Tobacco Addiction.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Unused photo of bad quality. There is the photo of better quality exist (File: Pryvokzal'nyi, Cherkasy, Cherkas'ka oblast, Ukraine - panoramio (22).jpg) Maxim Gavrilyuk (talk) 14:48, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:53, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:53, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:53, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Missing metadata, unlikely own work Jamez42 (talk) 15:21, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:53, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Very poor picture quality, poor description, poor title Marc Mongenet (talk) 15:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:54, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Source page is listed as copyright, there's no indication when/where or by whom this image was created. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:04, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:05, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope due to pdf format as well as who actually owns the copyright? The source page given is listed as (C) at the source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:05, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
appears to be a screenshot, and promotional upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:06, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:06, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Obvious promotional image, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:07, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmed Nader Mohamed (talk · contribs)
[edit]So this pair of images appear to be identical so they share the same problem. The uploader is the person depicted, but these are not selfies.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:07, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
out of scope 98.109.59.215 16:36, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:07, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
personal image, out of scope. 98.109.59.215 16:41, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:07, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
personal image, out of scope, probably taken by professional photographer 98.109.59.215 16:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:07, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Private photos, not used.
- File:Cherkas'kyi district, Cherkas'ka oblast, Ukraine - panoramio (1585).jpg
- File:Cherkas'kyi district, Cherkas'ka oblast, Ukraine - panoramio (1586).jpg
- File:Cherkas'kyi district, Cherkas'ka oblast, Ukraine - panoramio (1588).jpg
- File:Kanivs'kyi district, Cherkas'ka oblast, Ukraine - panoramio (197).jpg
- File:Khorol's'kyi district, Poltavs'ka oblast, Ukraine - panoramio (193).jpg
Kulmalukko (talk) 16:47, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:07, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely that uploader created images depicted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:07, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These files appear to violate COM:FOP#United States.
Stefan4 (talk) 21:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Stefan4 (talk) 11:56, 27 May 2013 (UTC) Deleted: Derivative works of copyrighted work PierreSelim (talk) 05:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Derivative work of images on a screen.
Stefan4 (talk) 09:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept - As noted, the first the screen is PDTEXT, in the second it's just real-time. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC) See COM:PACKAGING. The Flickr user is unlikely the person who made the packaging. Stefan4 (talk) 22:09, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Deleted: INeverCry 19:32, 4 February 2014 (UTC) No freedom of panorama in Russia. Stefan4 (talk) 14:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept as above. Yann (talk) 12:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC) The timetables might be considered as "databases" under the w:Database Directive. In that case, the timetables remain unfree until they are at least 15 years old.
Stefan4 (talk) 13:05, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as per Hedwig and others. Yann (talk) 06:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 2[edit]Derivative work of the aquarium's info boards. However it is conceivable that this is OK due to COM:FOP#Spain.
-mattbuck (Talk) 10:55, 28 September 2015 (UTC) Deleted: COM:DW. Alan (talk) 16:55, 18 October 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 3[edit]Incomplete uploads. Please delete and/or reupload.
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:40, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 01:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 4[edit]
Ww2censor (talk) 17:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Ronhjones. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:09, 28 July 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 5[edit]incomplete uploads - let the uploaders do them again
Ww2censor (talk) 10:28, 1 August 2018 (UTC) Deleted: Only Unfixed images deleted. --Ronhjones (Talk) 22:41, 2 August 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 6[edit]Files seem to have been accidentally uploaded as a .jpg instead of as a video
Elisfkc (talk) 19:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Mixed close. Deleted those where video was uploaded. Kept those which are essentially links to the original videos. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:24, 12 November 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 7[edit]Screenshots of videos
-Killarnee (C•T•U) 13:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 8[edit]unused, useless screenshot of a video
-akko (talk) 12:27, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 9[edit]Useless screenshots of a video
-Killarnee (C•T•U) 19:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: concensus is to keep. Agree that these are in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC) |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(18941409463).jpg){kind=link}
_Sutter_(25705590834).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![124 File:Aperçu du jeu "Complots".jpg](#File:Aperçu_du_jeu_"Complots".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(1873)_(14598168668).jpg){kind=link}
_(1873)_(14782454304).jpg){kind=link}
_(20226595758).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(14586757407).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(18941409463).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(18941409463).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(18941409463).jpg){kind=link}
_(18941409463).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Sutter_(25705590834).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Sutter_(25705590834).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Sutter_(25705590834).jpg){kind=link}
_Sutter_(25705590834).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(39097253295).jpg){kind=link}
_(28216254809).jpg){kind=link}
_(39097256505).jpg){kind=link}
_(39097260125).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_Dark_Grass_Blue_(Female)_(41920030290).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5286278649).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6146174256).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(11197630903).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Rotating_White_Smiley_Wink_on_Black_(3386235660).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Rotating_White_Smiley_Wink_in_%22Black_Smoke%22_(3386231596).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Rotating_Black_Smiley_Wink_in_%22White_Fog%22_(3385415445).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Rotating_Green_Smiley_Wink_with_Red_reverse._(3386221428).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Rotating_Smiley_Wink_with_Multicolour_Illumination_and_Shadows_(3385403397).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Rotating_Monochrome_3D_Anaglyph_Smiley_Wink_with_Multiple_Illumination_Sources_and_Shadows_(3386200666).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Rotating_Colour_3D_Anaglyph_Smiley_Wink_with_Multicolour_Illumination_and_Shadows_(3386193198).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Flickr images needing human review 10
[edit]Derivative works of copyrighted logos.
- File:Escut - Diada d'Aniversari dels Castellers de Lleida, 2016 (retallat).jpg
- File:Escut Castellers de l'Alt Maresme - Festes de Maig de Badalona, 2017 (retallat).jpg
- File:Escut - Diada d'Aniversari dels Castellers de Lleida, 2016.jpg
- File:Escut Castellers de l'Alt Maresme - Festes de Maig de Badalona, 2017.jpg.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(｀・ω・´) (talk) 00:21, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I added the intermediate works File:Escut - Diada d'Aniversari dels Castellers de Lleida, 2016.jpg and File:Escut Castellers de l'Alt Maresme - Festes de Maig de Badalona, 2017.jpg. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:25, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-quality personal photo with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also: questionable authorship claims, as the uploader appears to be the subject, rather than the photographer. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 20:09, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 20:09, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 20:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry image m SecretName101 (talk) 20:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Сомнения а авторстве и лицензии. Автор фото и изображённый на фотографии-одно лицо Dogad75 (talk) 22:35, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Оф.сайт. А также: Киномания, радио Шансон и др. --193.233.70.48 16:39, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvio. It's a professional photographer's work taken in a studio. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:35, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Same series as http://www.wday.ru/stil-zhizny/kultura/20-zvezdnyih-uraltsev-kotoryie-sdelali-etot-god-golosuy/gallery/20/#1 : Photo by @miasnikov.s Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:50, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata, the uploader is depicted. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:12, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Мясников Вячеслав Владимирович (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata, the uploader is depicted.
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:22, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:11, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Advertisement, out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:12, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:11, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Migebert as no permission (No permission since). It probably doesn't need permission, but it's definitely out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:11, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:11, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mahesh Dhami as Speedy (Db) and the most recent rationale was: -u1. No reason given. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete User request, unused personal file. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:40, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:12, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
No evidence that the photographer is the copyright owner of the image(s) on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using e.g. {{Licensed-PD}}.
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:23, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Per Commons:Image casebook#Board games and COM:DW. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:24, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS, Commons:Image casebook#Board games and COM:DW. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS, Commons:Image casebook#Board games and COM:DW. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:DW --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
![22:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/07/21#c-Josve05a-2018-07-21T22:26:00.000Z-File:Aperçu_du_jeu_"Complots".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
![22:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/07/21#c-Jon_Kolbert-2018-07-28T22:13:00.000Z-File:Aperçu_du_jeu_"Complots".jpg){kind=link}
Per Commons:Image casebook#Board games and COM:DW. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
The CC license on the source page indicates that this is only for the "theme" of the page (hover over the icon to see the tooltip). So the brick background and layout of the page. There is no indication that I can find that the images on the page itself are under a CC license. Majora (talk) 22:27, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:14, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations - user's other uploads were copyvios, and none of these have camera metadata. TPE Coach is web-resolution. That being said Google image search returns no results.
- File:TPE COACH.jpg
- File:Class 68 TPE.jpg
- File:Class 195 Northern.jpg
- File:Class 397 Trans Pennine Express.jpg
-mattbuck (Talk) 22:27, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Image is from Railcolor.com - Specifically this article - Photo Credit to Quintus Vosman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enotayokel (talk • contribs) 21:13, 22 July 2018 (UTC) Enotayokel (talk) 21:14, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Good find. That would be File:Class 397 Trans Pennine Express.jpg. --De728631 (talk) 21:46, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- File:TPE COACH.jpg was cropped from this image, [1]. De728631 (talk) 21:57, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Class 195 Northern appears to have been ripped from here and cropped to remove the watermark. LostCause231 (talk) 20:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:15, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of commons scope. -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 22:44, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:16, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Corrupted image, unused personal photo, out of scope. Wcam (talk) 23:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:17, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Found in an online forum in 2010 (here) Discasto talk 20:36, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 01:31, 29 Juli 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Beps89 --Krdbot 12:43, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Not found at the source specified. Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 09:47, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:02, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: автором указан Nik Konietzny (www.nik-foto.de), участник, загрузивший файл-Никита Соловьев Dogad75 (talk) 22:39, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:03, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: в Интернете данное фото опубликовано на сайте «Вечерний Петербург» в №186 (25455) от 12.10.2015, где фотографией указана Чайка Наталья <http://www.vppress.ru/stories/Nikolai-Burov-Po-legende-lesa-so-Spasa-dolzhny-byli-snyat-kogda-padet-sovetskaya-vlast-Tak-i-sluchilos-14660> Dogad75 (talk) 23:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:03, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: малый размер файла, отсутствуют метаданных. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS от автора фотографии. Dogad75 (talk) 23:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:03, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The subject of this photo no longer wants to appear on Wikipedia. I am the photographer, and will follow the subject's wishes at this time. Datagod (talk) 15:01, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
The subject of this photo no longer wants to appear on Wikipedia. I am the photographer, and will follow the subject's wishes at this time. 107.77.161.6 23:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope regardless. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:38, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
_(1873)_(14598168668).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1873)_(14598168668).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by ВоенТех as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: error during the digitalization of the original upload (two images mishmash). Not a valid speedy deletion criterium. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:58, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
_(1873)_(14598168668).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, in my opinion this is spoiled upload. Taivo (talk) 11:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
_(1873)_(14598168668).jpg){kind=link}
_(1873)_(14782454304).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1873)_(14782454304).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by ВоенТех as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: error during the digitalization of the original upload (two images mishmash). Not a valid speedy deletion criterium. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:59, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
_(1873)_(14782454304).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, in my opinion this is spoiled upload. Taivo (talk) 11:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
_(1873)_(14782454304).jpg){kind=link}
_(20226595758).jpg){kind=link}
_(20226595758).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by ВоенТех as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: error upload. Not a valid speedy deletion criterium. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:35, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
_(20226595758).jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Not actually an error upload, unless the error was on the Flickr end. However, just this small part of the page with no additional information I'm not seeing an in scope use here. --Majora (talk) 20:32, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Comment Can't we get this page from the book link? I tried, but got the wrong page. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:06, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- I though it loaded the wrong page too, Jeff G.. But it didn't. The header is part of a larger graphic within that page. If you zoom in on the lower half on the book like object it is the header there. --Majora (talk) 04:08, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Majora: I see, my iPad lied to me. The web version is only 639x926 pixels, I extracted the whole page at that 250% resolution from the PDF version using Acrobat Reader DC. 186 MB files are not to be thrown around lightly. @Srittau and Fæ: How does it look now? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:14, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Pinging @ВоенТех too. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Thanks, Jeff!. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:49, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
_(20226595758).jpg){kind=link}
- @Srittau: You're welcome! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Kazimier Lachnovič as Speedy (speedy deletion) and the most recent rationale was: low-qualitive duplicate of File:Mačul. Мачуль (A. Bochnig, 1929).jpg, request by file uploader. Not an exact duplicate and not within seven days, therefore not eligible for speedy deletion. But Delete. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:52, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Alangi Derick as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Delete this picture as the right one is here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Google_Chrome_Interface_Home_Page.png and uploading new versions is messing up. Uploader request, file older than 7 days. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:39, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Converted a {{Cc-by-nc-nd-2.5}} speedy deletion in a regular DR. File has an interesting history, and was originally licensed as cc-zero. That said, Delete as out of scope. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete According to the Service Agreement[1] of the source website,the file only can be used by the licensed as {{Cc-by-nc-nd-2.5-cn}},it can't use by a licensed as {{Cc-zero}}.So it need be Speedy deletion.(The OTRS also have a reply e-mail to notice the file only can be used by the licensed as {{Cc-by-nc-nd-2.5-cn}}.)--Jacky Cheung (talk) 11:22, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Weak keepThe file may probably be kept based on the concept of Template:Flickr-change-of-license. Though the file is not from Flickr, it was licensed under a CC license (cc-0), so the concept may still be applied here?廣九直通車 (talk) 06:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Данные об авторе и времени фото недостоверны, нарушено АП. -- Tomasina (talk) 12:27, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 08:57, 22 August 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) - --Krdbot 12:39, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work as claimed. Photographer should confirm the license by following the instructions at OTRS. Storkk (talk) 08:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:57, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Fake license, not in public domain because this is photographic work, not an 'official document'. Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 08:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Also a cropped one: File:Andriy Biletsky2.jpg. Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 08:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:57, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by InstantExample (talk · contribs)
[edit]Weird rationale for PD. Author permissions required.
Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 08:29, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. The uploader appears to have appropriated some photos from websites or social media. The uploader had no right to upload them on to Commons. The public domain rationale claimed is not applicable to this case.--Toddy1 (talk) 10:44, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:58, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
False PD rationale. Complex logo, not consisting of "simple geometric shapes and text". —LX (talk, contribs) 09:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:59, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Picture-of-picture taken from a monitor or similar. Original photographer unknown. MKFI (talk) 09:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:59, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:00, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
The bust was erected in 1965 [2]; not in PD, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow such artworks. Yasu (talk) 15:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:01, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Text is clearly readable, and seems to have been authored in 2014 (the 26th year of the Heisei era) or later. Not in PD. Yasu (talk) 15:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:01, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Seems too complex to be COM:TOO and unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:01, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Dubious claims of own work on this gallery promoting "Calcutta 64". Many images have overprinting showing prior use. Sizes are facebook and smaller. No indication of own work on any image.
- File:PIZZA C64.jpg
- File:Doodle art c64.jpg
- File:Cust c64.jpg
- File:Chf c64.jpg
- File:Cosp c64.jpg
- File:C64 3.jpg
- File:Calcutta 64 outlet.jpg
- File:C64 7.jpg
- File:C64 1.jpg
- File:Art c64.jpg
- File:Pizza C64.jpg
- File:C64 logo.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:02, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Harold as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: out of project scope (en:Transrapid "project" through the town of en:Křtiny). Not a valid speedy deletion criterium. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the initiation of the deletion request. :-) Better explanation: it is a useless childish "doodle" used only in personal uploader's draft subpage at cs.wikipedia. That draft is complete fiction in fact. The file has probably no value for any encyclopedic article. -> out of project scope --Harold (talk) 06:55, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per Harold. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:35, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete The image has no relevant description about the hypothetical construction intent. Seems to be a private fantasy only → out of scope. --ŠJů (talk) 20:16, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Sealle (talk) 21:04, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Aoke1989 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author or uploader request deletion. Image from 2013 and in use. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as per Sebari Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:25, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ImanFakhri as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: user request. Not eligible for speedy deletion, uploaded more than 7 days ago. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete likely out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
is not updated Alanmede (talk) 03:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: OOS. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:13, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation – see Exif data. jdx Re: 07:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I added this headshot as the assistant to Rob Sorcher himself. If there was another way that I was supposed to upload it, please let me know and I will adjust; but this is his official headshot used by Cartoon Network Studios as provided to me by the Cartoon Network PR department and approved by subject of the photo, Rob Sorcher. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassist (talk • contribs) 17:07, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation – see Exif data. jdx Re: 07:34, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samtheman9934 (talk · contribs)
[edit]YouTube channel does not appear to be original rights holders of the source footage for its compilation videos.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 07:44, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
This appears to be a Getty Images photo, not a Tasmkn News image: https://www.gettyimages.com/license/107251347 Ytoyoda (talk) 12:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:15, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Picture shot in France : any reason for Italian law to apply. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr. Andrea Bruce (talk · contribs)
[edit]Attributed as " Photo by Ronald Dunlap" which is not same as uploader who has uploaded files by several other creators licensed as "own work"
- File:RonLindenWDogs3000.jpg
- File:Ron Linden, photography by Ronald Dunlap.jpg
- File:Ron Linden At Home 6 10 2010.jpg
- File:Ron Linden in studio, by Ronald Dunlap.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
" Photo by Gary Mark Smith" is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:19, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:17, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Ich möchte eine aktuelle Datei hochladen Hungerbuehler (talk) 17:48, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Auf der Seite unterhalb Dateiversionen ist ein Link neue Version dieser Datei hochladen, reicht das aus? [German explanation of "upload new version"] Be..anyone (talk) 01:16, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Green Giant (talk) 01:18, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Ich möchte dieses Foto löschen, da es veraltet ist, und es durch ein neues ersetzen. Hungerbuehler (talk) 21:00, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: you can upload another photo with another name, and replace it in the Wikipedia article. Ruthven (msg) 11:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
ich möchte das neue gegen das alte Bild auswechseln Hungerbuehler (talk) 22:40, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
ich möchte das heruntergeladene Portrait fotografiert von Elena Zaucke als Wikipedia Bild Hungerbuehler (talk) 23:35, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones (Talk) 19:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones (Talk) 19:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Pottery and porcelain, from early times down to the Philadelphia exhibition of 1876 (1878) (14586757407).jpg
[edit]_(14586757407).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14586757407).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by ВоенТех as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: error upload. Unclear deletion rationale. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Nowadays, after moving to computerized systems librarians affix books with barcodes and before they used date due slips glued to the inside back cover (and some libraries still use them while checking out books). So, here we have a valuable image of an artifact from the past. --Taterian (talk) 22:16, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, we have better photos in category:Library date due slips. Taivo (talk) 18:42, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Emmanuel Macron célébrant un but de l'Equipe de France lors de la finale de la Coupe du monde.jpg
[edit]
il ne s'agit très certainement pas d'un travail personnel, violation de copyright probable vip (talk) 18:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 10:44, 18 September 2018 UTC: Copyright violation:
copie d'image d'un site web --Krdbot 12:33, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Cites Flickriver as source but the actual Flickr source says “all rights reserved”: https://www.flickr.com/photos/riikkeary/27465573993/ Ytoyoda (talk) 20:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 06:21, 23 September 2018 UTC: per COM:SPEEDY: No permission / copyvio --Krdbot 12:33, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
False information 46.217.244.109 08:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Rename}} or {{Fact disputed}} instead. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
False information Gero1119 (talk) 17:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
False information 46.217.244.109 13:38, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please do not open repetitive DRs. --E4024 (talk) 13:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
False information 46.217.244.109 06:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:36, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Non free image and not correspond with real society and famousness Gero1119 (talk) 07:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Gero1119: Why do you think it is a violation of copyright? While it is small and has no EXIF data, there is no copy on the Internet except [3], which is not the source. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:35, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:25, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the subject (who is supposedly the author of the photo, even though it doesn't look like a selfie) agreed to transfer the copyright to the uploader. The uploader claims to be the copyright holder ("I, the copyright holder"), but makes no claim of being the author. OTRS permission confirming the authorship and copyright transfer is needed. Looking at Special:Log/Gero1119, the uploader appears to have been making dubious claims of being the copyright holder of the works of a lot of different people. It's worth noting that the uploader is the one who initiated at least two (probably all four) of the previous deletion discussions, so they probably realized that this upload was a copyright violation and tried to rectify it. Disappointing to see so many administrators failing to connect the dots. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:01, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Support I agree, I don't know why I missed this previously. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:57, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:28, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikimaribarre (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:PRP. This gallery contains images which are either very small and of poor quality, or more recent larger and of higher quality. Some have obvious JPG artefacts. In summary, it appears that these were uploaded to contribute to articles but are not "own work".
- File:Ines Etxegibel.jpg
- File:Koro Benito.jpg
- File:June Arbeo Sarriugarte.jpg
- File:Kristina Mardaras Sedrun.jpg
- File:Mila Salterain.jpg
- File:Amaia Aroma.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:26, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikimaribarre (talk · contribs)
[edit]inconsistent sizes, meta-data. see user's other deleted uploads for more examples
- File:Amaia Gabantxo.jpg
- File:Estibalitz González.jpg
- File:Digna Garitaonandia.jpg
- File:Silvia Trigueros.jpg
- File:M.Carmen Madariaga.jpg
- File:Nerea Etxegibel.jpg
- File:Elena Solatxi.png
- File:Miren Maortua.jpg
- File:Irati Eguren.jpg
- File:Lourdes Munitxa.jpg
- File:Lourdes Unzueta.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:26, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikimaribarre (talk · contribs)
[edit]per concerns raised in previous DRs
- File:Irati Eguren.jpg
- File:Estibalitz González.jpg
- File:Amaia Aroma.jpg
- File:Oihana Azkorbebeitia.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:42, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:26, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 4nn1l2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://streetphoto.com/15-select-places/paris/. Nothing wrong with the nomination, but I'm converting to Deletion Nomination for a reply from the uploader who may need to file a COM:OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
There is an OTRS email received for “File:ParisPhoto10.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2018101810000861. —Tks4Fish! talk•contribs 20:30, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no OTRS permission for 30 days. --Jcb (talk) 01:02, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIOs. Uploader is not photographer credited with these images. After two nominations, I received an email from uploader claiming that this photographer wants his work on Commons but is unable to upload it himself (!). I have left a message on their talk page about COM:L and COM:OTRS.
- File:UN Tank.jpg
- File:Congolese Military Police.jpg
- File:Mugunga Refugee.jpg
- File:Chukudu.jpg
- File:Pusher Street Freetown Christiana.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:UN_Tank.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2018101810000861. —Tks4Fish! talk•contribs 20:30, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Congolese_Military_Police.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2018101810000861. —Tks4Fish! talk•contribs 20:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Chukudu.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2018101810000861. —Tks4Fish! talk•contribs 20:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Mugunga_Refugee.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2018101810000861. —Tks4Fish! talk•contribs 20:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Pusher_Street_Freetown_Christiana.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2018101810000861. —Tks4Fish! talk•contribs 20:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no OTRS permission for 30 days. --Jcb (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:54, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 05:03, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:2017 Portugal wildfires
[edit]Unlikely to have been created by 20minutos.es. It is a free newspaper with no foreign infrastructure. The video in the web page is available through a piece of news by a news agency (Atlas) and it's much more likely that the video comes from Atlas. As such, it's not covered by 20minutos.es licens
- File:Incêndios Pedrógão Grande 2017-06-18 (01).png
- File:Incêndios Pedrógão Grande 2017-06-18 (02).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Discasto talk 21:12, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 19:22, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 05:01, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Harold as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: out of project scope. Not a valid speedy deletion criterium. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:34, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the initiation of the deletion request. :-) ("Out of project scope" criterium was valid in many cases which I tagged for speedy deletion, but ok.) Better explanation: it is a useless childish doodle used only in personal uploader's draft subpage at cs.wikipedia as a logo for uploader's non-encyclopedic biological "project" (probably partially fictional). The file has no value for any encyclopedic article. --Harold (talk) 07:04, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete obviously, but please review COM:SPEEDY for when speedy deletions are possible. Out of scope is not a valid speedy deletion criterium. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:34, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Insufficiently described unused scribble, no obvious educational value → out of scope. --ŠJů (talk) 20:07, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 05:00, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
http://www.listal.com/viewimage/7813385h Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:43, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Hello! :) this is my first time uploading and attaching a photo to an article. I would like to know why this particular photo [[4]] is in request for deletion? Photo is public and not under any copyright licenses or names and it is free under fair use, also strongly relates to the public figure. --Ryeo Wookiechul (talk) 13:20, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Ryeo Wookiechul: There's no fair use on Commons. Besides "being public" means it has previously been published and, it that case, without a free license. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:15, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Thanks for responding Patrick, how would I be able to add in additional information including copyright information/Source of the photo? Or would I have to somehow take it down, and then upload it under as “someone else’s work”? Thanks again. --Ryeo Wookiechul (talk) 23:19, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Ryeo Wookiechul: There's no fair use on Commons. Besides "being public" means it has previously been published and, it that case, without a free license. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:15, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Keith_Levene-1976_Public_Image_Ltd.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleted by another. --Majora (talk) 04:52, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Dogad75 (talk) 21:04, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 05:23, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Dogad75 (talk) 21:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 05:23, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Dogad75 (talk) 21:06, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 05:23, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Dw no source since (dw no source since). It seems likely original, but it is definitely out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Majora (talk) 05:21, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Dw no source since (dw no source since). It seems likely original, but it is definitely out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Majora (talk) 05:21, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect structure; correct alternatives in Category:Vulpinic acid. Leyo 11:54, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep pending further research. The references cited at en:Vulpinic acid are not consistent about which isomer it is. Regardless which way it winds up, one or more files in Category:Pulvinic acid will also need attention. DMacks (talk) 03:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: It's been nearly half a year without any progress. If anyone follows up and determines that the chemical structure is indeed incorrect, it can be corrected or nominated for deletion again. Ed (Edgar181) 19:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal photo B dash (talk) 04:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep It's perfect!! - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:21, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: now used. --whym (talk) 13:06, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic, no location, no description. Till (talk) 10:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:59, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 1957 Martin Sg. (talk) 15:59, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:57, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
COM:PRP request... the images in this series are of small size, many contain what appear to be images or text created by others, and there is no indication of own work on any of the images. Even the outdoor photos are Facebook sized.
- File:نقشه شهرک رسالت عظیمیه کرج.jpg
- File:مجتمع نور سعدی مجتمع نور راغب مجتمع نور ملارد مجتمع نور مارلیک مجتمع نور اندیشه.jpg
- File:عظیمیه کرج.jpg
- File:شماره تلفن بیمارستان امام علی عظیمیه.jpg
- File:بیمارستان امام علی کرج.jpg
- File:بیمارستان امام علی کرج عظیمیه.jpg
- File:شماره تلفن بیمارستان امام علی عظیمیه کرج.jpg
- File:شماره تلفن بیمارستان امام علی کرج عظیمیه.jpg
- File:عظیمیه.png
- File:نقشه عظیمیه کرج.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:56, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, contains map and illustrations without attribution. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:56, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Apparent copyvio - image also found at https://twitter.com/vrferose (where its last modification date is April 2018, so the uploader is at least fibbing about the Date). No evidence of permission. Pinkbeast (talk) 16:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- For the record, the uploader has visited the IRC help channel today and stated that the original photographer is planning to email in a release to OTRS. Obviously they didn't read/understand what they were doing, but I wanted to point out that they seem to be actively trying to resolve it, fwiw. Waggie (talk) 22:39, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS received. --Didym (talk) 23:55, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Appears to be an ordinance or Topographical map, unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:54, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
By size this appears to have been culled from Facebook and not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:54, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
" photo by Arnée Carofano" is not own work of uploader who has uploaded works by a number of other people. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:53, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
By size and metadata appears to be culled from Facebook and not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:53, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Low quality, unused image of person, with additional difficulty of file size may indicate being copied from an unattributed source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:53, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused except in a user sandbox page unchanged for several years, this would appear to be part of a promotional series of uploads (read the sandbox page) about an HIT enterprise. Also the photo is very small without useful metadata and unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:12, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:53, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Dubious claim of own work on this obviously professional portrait. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:52, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
In use in 2014 at http://ghanavatmahshahr.blogspot.com/2014/, unlikely to be own work, dated 2018. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:52, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, appears to be an historical air photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
I didn't find this license at that source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:39, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
image sous copyright Tiraden (talk) 19:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- A supprimer appartient à BestImage / Clearly to del, own by BestImage Agency --mikani (to talk) 11:59, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
your opinions are asked : unused upload, and potentially personality and copyright issues ?? Roland zh (talk) 20:32, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:BIG KERALA AWARDS.jpg, thx, Roland zh (talk) 20:35, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kerala BIG award.jpg, unused upload, and potentially personality and copyright issues ?? Roland zh (talk) 20:34, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Uploader claims the Flickr member gave permission to use it, but there’s no evidence it ever had a license that allowed commercial use: https://www.flickr.com/photos/guuleed/299167789/ Ytoyoda (talk) 20:44, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:48, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Logo possible above COM:TOO. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:09, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Sorry but possible copyright violation http://pcet.my/storage/upload/pcte/images/Disted/gallery/DJI_0027-low.jpg *angys* (talk) 08:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- I am pretty sure this is a fair use image as well. No copyright prohibitions from the original site. IMO it is a PD image, since no exclusive intellectual property rights apply. Vnonymous (talk) 09:22, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:07, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
I don't agree that this is PD-textlogo eligible as it clearly contains the (certainly copyrighted) logo of Springer. As an aside: not used in any article. Randykitty (talk) 13:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This is PD-textlogo. The Springer logo is not "certainly" copyrighted, especially given examples at COM:TOO and would be de minimis in this use even if it were. En.wiki has a Clinical Autonomic Research article, so the implication that this is not in scope ("As an aside: not used in any article") is incorrect. Эlcobbola talk 15:51, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- But it is not used in any article. The article you mention is illustrated with an image of the journal cover under fair use. Also adding the logo would just be too much for such a brief stub. Whether TOO applies I cannot say and leave that for others to decide. --Randykitty (talk) 06:43, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- We host millions of images, millions of which are not in use. The test is whether an image is "realistically useful for an educational purpose," not whether it is actually in use (being in use merely means that test has been "automatically" satisfied.) By pointing out that the journal has an en.wiki entry, I'm pointing out the legitimate (i.e., realistic) potential for an educational use. That en.wiki may or may not consider both images too much for a stub 1) erroneously presupposes an image must be in use and 2) is an en.wiki editorial issue with no bearing on Commons hosting (as an aside: the current en.wiki image is a violation of WP:NFCC#1 as its purpose of "The image is used for identification" could be fulfilled with this free logo. Somewhat ironically, it's actually that image that should be deleted, replaced with this image.) Эlcobbola talk 14:37, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- I never said that not being used was a reason for deletion, I only mentioned that as an aside. I only reacted to your assertion that it was incorrect when I said it wasn't used. It is NOT used. It MIGHT be used, but that's not the same thing. So can we now concentrate on the main issue, which is the presence of the Springer logo and whether or not that disqualifies this for PD-text. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 16:54, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The copyrighted content in this file was intentionally included, and therefore does not qualify as de minimis. DM is not about size or placement, but rather non-intentional inclusion and the resulting endfile. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:37, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal photo B dash (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- @B dash: I really, really, really want to know how a photo of Jonathan Teo is "out of scope". - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:57, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Oppose- Delete While the subject is likely notable, the small size and lack of metadata point to a highly dubious claim of {{Own work}}. The photographer should confirm the license by following the instructions on OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:45, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Storkk: I've searched his Facebook, Twitter, website, Tineye and Google images. Came up dry. Since the picture is square, it would appear to have been cropped from a larger photo. While cropping, the uploader may have also decided to scale the image down. (possibly unaware of Mediawiki scaling options) This would explain the lack of metadata and small size. Should we delete every low resolution photo without metadata that is claimed to be "own work"? Or only those that feature notable people? (and delete the ones featuring people that aren't notable as "unused personal photo") I could understand that, but in that case it shouldn't be applied arbitrarily to photos that get nominated for invalid reasons. It should, in fact, be policy. I've seen plenty of pictures that I found questionable "own work", but without a single shred of proof I don't nominate them. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: We require OTRS verification for dubious claims of own work. This one is not just dubious but extremely dubious. Had you found it elsewhere, it would have likely been a speedy candidate; but as you did not, it's a regular DR that requires the photographer's OTRS confirmation. The notability of the subject is, as it is so often on Commons, a red herring. Storkk (talk) 20:12, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Storkk: I've searched his Facebook, Twitter, website, Tineye and Google images. Came up dry. Since the picture is square, it would appear to have been cropped from a larger photo. While cropping, the uploader may have also decided to scale the image down. (possibly unaware of Mediawiki scaling options) This would explain the lack of metadata and small size. Should we delete every low resolution photo without metadata that is claimed to be "own work"? Or only those that feature notable people? (and delete the ones featuring people that aren't notable as "unused personal photo") I could understand that, but in that case it shouldn't be applied arbitrarily to photos that get nominated for invalid reasons. It should, in fact, be policy. I've seen plenty of pictures that I found questionable "own work", but without a single shred of proof I don't nominate them. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- My original comments still stand because they are correct; this DR is wrong-the file is in scope. But on the real issue of is this file able to hosted on commons? No. The user, Stewlin2341, has only 1 edit on commons, uploading this photo. This photo is a highly dubious claim of {{Own work}}. You don't have to use COM:PRP as a cudgel on everything but when it smacks you in the face you don't have to like it. Policy is policy. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:19, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Dubious claim of own work. PCP delete. --Majora (talk) 03:42, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Also goes for other sculptures in the category. FunkMonk (talk) 07:57, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Je ne comprend rien a cette demande. Puisque ce fichier vous gêne tellement, retirez-le ! 90.39.7.159 07:54, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:33, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Weiterleitungshinweis wird nicht benötigt Im Fokus (talk) 01:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
No date, no author, no source, no nothing. Could be PD, but no way to tell. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
copyrighted logo still in use Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cocolinmichela (talk · contribs)
[edit]Newspaper clippings and small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:Julian and Celia wedding.jpg
- File:Wedding article.jpg
- File:1.-William-Lloyd-Webber.jpg
- File:Julian and Jiaxin Lloyd Webber.jpg
- File:Elke Hermine Wilhelmine Gerns.jpg
Yann (talk) 07:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Photo of Julian and Jiaxin Lloyd Webber taken at the Capitol, Horsham is my own work!! Newspaper clippings were sent with the sole intent to prove the date of the marriage, which was contested by a user. They can be deleted if you so wish. Why do you want to delete the photo of Elke Gerns (my mother)?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cocolinmichela (talk • contribs) 09:28, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep File:1.-William-Lloyd-Webber.jpg PD-UK unknown. deletion is not a license improvement process. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 13:43, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- What about a proper source, and removing the wrong license? Regards, Yann (talk) 13:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
No proof of "own" work, picture is from 1952 so there is a possible copyrigth violation, permission is missing Rode raaf (talk) 07:59, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Answer from user chlotarius: This picture is since 1952 in the possession of our family (the user chlotarius). I tried to find the family of the photographer, but without results. On the back of the photo is written that the photographer has been : F.Valk in The Hague, who worked as a street photographer. I hope I am writing this on the right page. To me as a beginner it is still a bit confusing how it all works with Wikipedia. (user:chlotarius) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlotarius (talk • contribs) 18:31, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work. Photographer needs to contact com:OTRS. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Doubtful if the user who posted this cable news logo is really the sole copyright holder or the logo's real creator. Could be a copy of the original image in Facebook (www.facebook.com/ntv7mandarinnews/photos/a.426328810447.231070.151049370447/10155227070640448/?type=1&theater). Vnonymous (talk) 08:34, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Yes copied from facebook and do some adjustment but this is a PD logo as it only comprise of easy shape. If you think this logo has copyright, same thing should goes to Media Prima logo. *angys* (talk) 08:43, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- I admit first I'm canvassed here by uploader. To nom and uploader, please stop the WP:POINTy behaviour. AFAIK, and IMO, the image is fair use but not PD, so my suggestion will be to transfer to local projects and with size reduction to meet NFCC#8/9. Requesting speedy close in part of suspected bad faith nom as well as the possible outcome is likely to be snowy, if not very.--Cohaf (talk) 08:52, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Seriously, the uploader is the creator of the logo? And that logo is his copyright? Then I suppose the uploader could be working with NTV7, maybe. Look at the file's summary & licensing. Enough said. Vnonymous (talk) 09:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- I would suggest you drop it per deadhorse. There is already a likely snow delete outcome, no need to continue these statements. I believe the sysops will see properly all the licensing. --Cohaf (talk) 10:35, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: logo is complex enough to have a copyright. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
File:180402 EXID.png can be used instead. 1.239.86.121 08:40, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
copyright owned by third party Ammielb (talk) 08:44, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested providing a valid deletion rational. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Dieses Bild wird von Abmahnanwälten genutzt, bzw. der Urheber diese Rechte mit einem Anwalt durch. Das ist nicht verwerflich, fraglich ist für mich, ob Wikipedia wirklich Reichweite als Bilddatenbank so bereitstellen will. 109.192.132.109 12:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Zur Klarstellung: Nicht der Fotograph handelt hier falsch oder hat etwas unberechtigt getan. Ich frage mich wie Wikipedia das sieht — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 109.192.132.109 (talk) 12:52, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:23, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
From http://www.demis.nl/, All rights reserved. Did they change the license? Hanooz 12:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: You can find the permission e-mail at file:Demis Bestätigung.png. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Nobody uses this name "File:Tuku_Junior_high_school_03.jpg" to link to the file S099001 (talk) 14:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Historical books. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:Il Lavater delle donne, o sia, L'arte di conoscere le femmine dalla loro fisonomia.pdf
- File:Il Lavater portatile, o sia, Compendio dell'arte di conoscere gli uomini dai tratti del volto.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
wrong PD, Photograph of 1932 Goesseln (talk) 15:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Corrected several issues with this file description. This 1922 image is in the public domain because its copyright has expired and its author is anonymous. Most versions of this image found online are captured from a publication in L'Illustration, 27 May 1933. The photographer remains anonymous.Coldcreation (talk) 21:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Concerns seem fixed. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Flickrwashed image. Previously deleted 14:00, 15 November 2017 File:Master-jun-hong-lu-buddhism.jpg, Flickr image uploaded July 21, 2018. Can be found on the net as well. Will Need OTRS validation to stay. Ronhjones (Talk) 16:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Ronhjones. I do not know who had previously uploaded this photo but this photo was taken by me. Do you require further verification? Thank you.Rauth R. Clement (talk) 06:36, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Insufficient quality to be useful for an educational purpose. Hiàn (talk) 16:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Not the same found at http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/more/photos/view/stills/parties-and-events/id/3977715 Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Keep- The original photograph uploaded is the exact same image found in the link with the watermark of the copyright holder.
It should be reverted back.
The images uploaded later (without watermark) have so much resemblance to the original photo that it wasn't noticeable until now.
Hogwarts Portal (talk) 22:43 21 July 2018
- Per @Hogwarts Portal: Yes it should be reverted back to the image with a permission. The one you uploaded has none. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
@Patrick Rogel: I didn't actually notice that they were different pictures, until you pointed it out. They are very similar that I comprehended it was the same image without the watermark. Hogwarts Portal (talk) 09:11, 22 July 2018.
Kept: Resolved by deleting the disputed versions. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:30, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Unused image that's adding no real value to the encyclopedia. It's just 200x133 in size, which is far too small to be useful, and it's an image of non-notable people sitting on a park bench in a non-notable location -- so for both of those reasons, there's simply no article in which it can actually be used. In practice, all that actually happens is that every once in a while there's an add vs. remove edit war over its use in the main article about Toronto itself, where it isn't adding anything of value. Bearcat (talk) 17:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- It's 800 × 534 now. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:53, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Which still hasn't answered the "what is it actually useful for?" part of the problem. Bearcat (talk) 21:50, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Bearcat: I'm currently not feeling bold enough to add it to w:Acclimatization (I'd also have to think of a really good caption), but it would fit. I'll happily support a rename to remove "Toronto" from the filename though, perhaps that'll help to reduce the odds of it being added to the Toronto article. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:55, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) With the platform shoes and cross-dressing, it's a good illustration of changing mores or the intersection of vastly different lifestyles. Even if it's not immediately useful for a Wikipedia article, it could still be educationally useful according to COM:SCOPE. clpo13(talk) 23:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Which still hasn't answered the "what is it actually useful for?" part of the problem. Bearcat (talk) 21:50, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
- You were referring to this edit. I think @Emjd9: might actually be Gary Mark Smith. (or paid by Gary Mark Smith) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:01, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Have we many photos of 1990s cross-dresser fashion? @Bearcat: “the encyclopedia” is situated on the domain
wikipedia.org. Here is Wikimedia Commons; learn what it is not, please. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:02, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- I need zero lessons in what Wikimedia projects are or aren't. The purpose of Commons is not to serve as an indiscriminate repository of random files of no discernible value; it is to serve as a repository of images and files relevant to the building of an encyclopedia, such as images that are actually usable in and relevant to the -pedia parts of the project. Bearcat (talk) 18:32, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- You need many lessons. Commons also serves Wikisource, Wikivoyage, Wikibooks, Wikispecies, Wikidata, Wikinews, Wikiquote, Wiktionary and Wikiversity. And any third party websites with educational content, either by hotlinking or InstantCommons. Discogs? Informative. Strategywiki.org? Instructional. Wikihow? Educational. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Which fails to contradict what I said in any way. I'm correct that the purpose of commons is not to serve as an indiscriminate repository of random files of no discernible value; it is to serve as a repository of images and files that have a purpose. A picture of non-notable people sitting in a non-notable generic location, which thus depicts no identifiable topic of one iota more use to any of the sites you listed than it does to Wikipedia, simply does not serve any useful purpose. Bearcat (talk) 17:21, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- You need many lessons. Commons also serves Wikisource, Wikivoyage, Wikibooks, Wikispecies, Wikidata, Wikinews, Wikiquote, Wiktionary and Wikiversity. And any third party websites with educational content, either by hotlinking or InstantCommons. Discogs? Informative. Strategywiki.org? Instructional. Wikihow? Educational. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- I need zero lessons in what Wikimedia projects are or aren't. The purpose of Commons is not to serve as an indiscriminate repository of random files of no discernible value; it is to serve as a repository of images and files relevant to the building of an encyclopedia, such as images that are actually usable in and relevant to the -pedia parts of the project. Bearcat (talk) 18:32, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per Incnis Mrsi and my comment above. clpo13(talk) 20:30, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus to delete as out of scope. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:30, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Low-resolution duplicate of File:Base-antenne.JPG with apparently incorrect copyright information. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:30, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
potentially personality and/or copyright right issues - your opinions ?? Roland zh (talk) 18:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: DR not properly motivated. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:31, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Unlicensed. This image is not the user's own work that has uploaded it, the image has already been uploaded twice, each with a different user, and both times it appears that it is their own work. Stalin990 (talk) 18:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:31, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Possibly it is a false account. Stalin990 (talk) 22:33, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 23:16, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
This image is not the work of the user who uploaded it. This image is not the user's own work that has uploaded it, the image has already been uploaded twice, each with a different user, and both times it appears that it is their own work. Stalin990 (talk) 18:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:31, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 20:27, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: в метаданные файла указан автором EDektyarev. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS от автора фотографии. Dogad75 (talk) 20:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Taken off www.archivofortinmapocho.cl küñall (nütramyen) 21:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
taken off archivofortinmapocho.cl küñall (nütramyen) 21:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: очень маленький размер файла, отсутствуют метаданные Dogad75 (talk) 21:31, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Aoke1989 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author or uploader request deletion. Not within 7 days, has been here several years. Also in use. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:36, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. File is in use. For a courtesy deletion I need a proper reason. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jean-Louis Tripon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:Livret-Beridze-Pour-WEB.pdf
- File:Sémantique et Fonctions Mentales.pdf
- File:COURS de SEFOME.pdf
- File:CONSCIENCE ET INTROSPECTION.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC) Je suis l'auteur de ces quatre livres téléchargeables gratuitement dans mon site https://www.sefome-academie.fr/ l'un d'eux (le premier) a été publié en 2018 sous le titre A la découverte de notre vie mentale ISBN : 979-10-326-0437-3 Je ne comprends pas la raison de votre demande de suppression de mes ouvrages personnels et je vous prie de vous exprimer en français — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean-Louis Tripon (talk • contribs) 22:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC) User:Jean-Louis Tripon These four pdf books are mine. Livret-Beridze-Pour-Web (Alexandre Beridze is my friend illustrator, he is an abstract artist) was published by Stanley-Laurent in 2018 with the title "A la decouverte de notre vie mentale" ISBN 979-10-326-0437-3, see on Amazon. I wrote Sémantique et fonctions mentales in 2015, this book is on several french author plateforms like http://www.lirenligne.net et http://www.inlibroveritas.net. COURS de SEFOME is my personnal development course studied by 18 studients in philosophy Ecole Normale Supérieure which form teatchers in Porto-Novo (Bénin) and many of the 15 000 people who visited my website. CONSCIENCE ET INTROSPECTION is a conference I prepared in expectation of a future thesis. I doubt a Russian administrator who do not know french langage could evaluate a french author. Please give me a proof I am not the author of these works and not subjective opinions of yours. --Jean-Louis Tripon (talk) 05:12, 23 July 2018 (UTC) 23 july 2018 5:11 (UTC)
- Vous pouvez supprimer ces quatre fichiers qui font partie de mes œuvres d'auteur et qui ne sont que des références à mes cours et leçons dans Wikiversité française, une simple opportunité pour les télécharger de ce Wiki, mais qui resteront téléchargeables gratuitement par tous dans mes sites et bientôt dans l'Association Française de DMS (pour l'évolution mentale de l'espèce humaine) en cours de création.--Jean-Louis Tripon (talk) 11:59, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Crochet.David: Pour clore cette affaire, je pense qu'il vaut mieux annuler (par suppression rapide) ces 4 contributions protégées par le Copyright de mon site, et dont je transférerai la propriété à l'Association Française de DMS dont je suis le fondateur, dès qu'elle sera créée début septembre 2018.--Jean-Louis Tripon (talk) 06:59, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:20, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jean-Louis Tripon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Grille ennéanaire variante.png
- File:Cube émotionnel.png
- File:Premier diagramme ennéanaire.png
- File:Rosace des émotions.png
- File:Structure générale de la mémoire.png
- File:Formes nombres élémentaires.png
- File:Création des tableaux et des rosaces de sens.png
- File:Fonction analytique 2.png
- File:Opération fondamentale.png
- File:Grille ennéanaire.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
S'il vous plait, parlez en français, je ne suis pas supposé comprendre des termes techniques anglais sur un wiki français, et ce serait faire injure à notre langue qui je vous le rappelle est l'une des principales origines de la langue anglaise, que de vouloir nous imposer votre langue vernaculaire. Le 21 Juillet 2018 à 18:04 (heure locale française) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean-Louis Tripon (talk • contribs) 16:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Ces fichiers, principalement des schémas, cartes heuristiques et des livres sont des créations personnelles que vous pouvez retrouver dans mon site sefome-academie, une partie a été publié dans mon livre illustré par l'artiste Alexandre Beridze : A la découverte de notre vie mentale IBSN 979-10-326-0437-3. Leur statut me paraît donc parfaitement clair et accessible à Commons, donnez-vous la peine de vérifier. Jean-Louis Tripon Le 21 Juillet 2018 à 18:26 (heure locale française)
Comment EugeneZelenko : These files are made to illustrate wikiversity and wikipedia (french). Jean-Louis Tripon say he's their author. I'm not agree with your point of view. - Bzh-99 (talk) 16:57, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep for the PNGs, I can't evaluate the PDFs. --Achim (talk) 18:48, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Jean-Louis Tripon I repeat : All these are mine. One of my book (pdf Beridze for web) is published by Sydney Laurent édition in France with the name "A la découverte de notre vie mentale" ISBN 979-10-326-0437-3. This referenced book contains all the 10 files you doubt. All theses éléments are on my website, my books, my facebook pages, my Google + collections. Seek my name on Google and you will find all of these. These works of mine on mental functions are world unique, free of use for everybody, Nobody could write on this subjet but me, as I am the single world mentalist expert to master and run our nine non physique out of brain mental functions. I doubt a Russian administrator who do not know the french langage and this subject could evaluate anything on this. You must be French to be able to evaluate the work of a french author. Give me a proof that I am not the author of these. Give me an other thing than a subjective argument to delete my files. --Jean-Louis Tripon (talk) 04:15, 23 July 2018 (UTC) 23 july 2018 4:15 (UTC)
- Ces 10 PNG font partie d'une série de 50 destinés à illustrer les chapitres de mes Cours et Leçons dans Wikiversité Française Faculté Philosophie Département Dualisme. Si vous les supprimez de ces pages sans comprendre leur usage et sans vous informer auprès des administrateurs de ce Wiki, vous ne faites que vandaliser des chapitres de ce département. C'est dommage ! Bien qu'ils soient librement téléchargeables de nombreuses plateformes sur Internet : Facebook, Google +, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Quora et mes sites. Trois semaines sont maintenant passées depuis la demande de suppression deUser:EugeneZelenko qui ne sait pas lire le Français, aussi je demande aux administrateurs de Commons de valider leur usage par Keep afin que je puisse les utiliser librement dans mes cours à l'avenir.--Jean-Louis Tripon (talk) 12:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't know French :-( Please read w:fr:Scalable Vector Graphics. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:46, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't know Russian, and do not master perfectly english. Why do you delete french works as you don't know french to evaluate it ? French administrators do not agree with you, and your action will held up my Wikiversité contributions for months. Please remove your deletion request on the 10 PNG. I will never do SVG as I do not master this technique, your wanting of SVG is totaly abusive--Jean-Louis Tripon (talk) 16:09, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Ces schémas font partie d'une série de 22 grandes cartes heuristiques réalisée sur le logiciel de DAO Ashlar Vellum graphite, regroupées sur 2 feuilles A3 pour transfert par mail, découpées en capture d'écran PNG pour insertion dans des textes Word office. J'ai conservé tous les brouillons papier crayonnés cotés, venez chez moi je vous les montre. vous n'avez pas le droit d'exiger de moi que je vous fournisse des SVG, dont je n'ai pas besoin dans Wikiversité.--Jean-Louis Tripon (talk) 18:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't know Russian, and do not master perfectly english. Why do you delete french works as you don't know french to evaluate it ? French administrators do not agree with you, and your action will held up my Wikiversité contributions for months. Please remove your deletion request on the 10 PNG. I will never do SVG as I do not master this technique, your wanting of SVG is totaly abusive--Jean-Louis Tripon (talk) 16:09, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't know French :-( Please read w:fr:Scalable Vector Graphics. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:46, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: quite a few of these are actually currently in use so out of scope would not apply. If you wish for them to be SVG perhaps you can covert them for the uploader since they don't seem to know how? Otherwise, since they are in use the nominating rationale is invalid. --Majora (talk) 01:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Koavf as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Low quality. Not a valid speedy deletion criterium. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Srittau: Thanks. Delete. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:20, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: In use, so we cannot delete it, although the quality is indeed very bad. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:23, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- I removed it from es.wp in the article namespace. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:56, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Such bad quality as to be out of scope. Any educational use would be unrealistic. --Majora (talk) 01:39, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Küñall as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader request.. Uploaded 2009, definitely not within 7 days. Also, uploader is a different user. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Srittau: if you look closely, you will see I uploaded the file, although with my former account. I think requesting deletion of an unused file is perfectly acceptable. And also, it was not my own work and so I could not have licensed it as stated. --küñall (nütramyen) 22:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) @Küñall: Please see COM:SPEEDY for valid speedy deletion reasons. Also, administrators are not mind readers, and can't know about user's other accounts. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:04, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- no, of course you cannot read minds, all you had to do was click on the uploader's username :) kind regards --küñall (nütramyen) 22:19, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) @Küñall: Please see COM:SPEEDY for valid speedy deletion reasons. Also, administrators are not mind readers, and can't know about user's other accounts. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:04, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: while the file is in use so the original rationale is invalid, I'm not seeing any evidence this was ever licensed properly. No direct source link, no permission, nothing. So deleted on that rationale. --Majora (talk) 01:37, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by רונאלדיניו המלך as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: replaced with YadSarah.svg. Not a valid speedy deletion reason. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep File:YadSarah.svg is not a direct replacement for this file, it has text underneath and a differently-drawn snake. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:34, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Not a direct replacement. --Majora (talk) 01:27, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Levi Henriques De Castro & Rachel Halevi Cohen at Tiger Cave Mahabalipuram, Chennai, Paradesi Jews of Madras.jpg
[edit]
your opinions are asked : dated 24 May 2016 (but assumably earlier date), personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 21:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Authorship is highly doubtful. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:01, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Contradictory authorship claims and unclear permission situation. The uploader claims to be the copyright holder of all three files and that all are his own work. Despite this, they have different authors.
- File:Czeslaw Borsowskinv.jpg – Author: Artur Bednarski. So if this is the uploader's own work, Kelvin = Artur Bednarski?
- File:M. Taubitz w zajezdzie Skowronki 13 maja 2012.jpg – Author: Kelvin. Maybe Kelvin/Artur Bednarski prefers different attribution for different photos?
- File:M. Taubitz w zajezdzie Skowronki solo 13 maja 2012.jpg (clearly a crop of the previous photo) – Author: Henryk Grzybowski. Nope, can't explain that.
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:17, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
@LX: As for the contested photos #1, on July 23, I asked the author Artur Bednarski to send a statement to OTRS. Photos # 2 and # 3 are my own, but at the first I gave my name, at the second my username. I have still problems with sending photos. Kelvin (talk) 18:21, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: File:Czeslaw Borsowskinv.jpg was originally uploaded as "own work" with author "Kelvin". Kelvin later corrected the author to "Artur Bednarski" without prompting, which suggests a mistake of inexperience (Kelvin has 60 edits) rather than an attempt to deceive. Although that image needs to be deleted due to lack of permission from Bednarski (it can be restored if and when COM:OTRS receives appropriate permission), it does not cast significant doubt on the other image(s), especially as they do not appear in reverse image searches or have multiple copyvio hallmarks. --Эlcobbola talk 17:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
These are specimens of money (with numbers 0000000), not real money. According the copyright law only real money are not copyrighted (but not money projects). Official 20-UAH-banknote will be issued in September 2018. And 100-RUB souvenirs are not money.
Anatoliy (talk) 21:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Щодо specimens/real: "неплатіжні банкноти (монети) - справжні банкноти (монети), що не можуть використовуватися за всіма видами платежів, а також для зарахування на рахунки, вклади, акредитиви та для переказів у зв’язку з набуттям у процесі обігу ознак зношення та пошкодження, які не відповідають установленим Національним банком критеріям, а також навмисно пошкоджені з метою вчинення кримінального правопорушення банкноти; навмисно пошкоджені монети (з надрізами, отворами, надломами); деформовані монети; банкноти (монети), які виведені Національним банком з обігу; зразки банкнот;" ([5])
- Щодо money projects: "Проекти офіційних символів і знаків, зазначених у пунктах "г" і "д" частини першої цієї статті, до їх офіційного затвердження розглядаються як твори і охороняються відповідно до цього Закону" ([6])
- Тобто статус зразка банкноти (після офіційного затвердження) такий самий, як і виведеної з обігу банкноти. Щось не видно, щоб на банкноту з номером "0000000", що відповідає офіційно затвердженому зразку, розповсюджувалось авторське право. --Reader85 (talk) 20:27, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: The Ukraine Law on Copyright and Related Rights includes "bank notes" as objects not covered by protection. "Bank notes" is broad and devoid of extra conditions; for example, the law does not say "circulated bank notes," "finalised bank notes," "non-specimen bank notes", etc. Unless law or statue can be provided that demonstrates interpretation to be limited to circulated notes, this is not an adequate reason for deletion. --Эlcobbola talk 17:48, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- ↑ Service Agreement(Chinese only). Ctrip.com.