Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/06/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 27th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Long term abuse user + OOS --Alaa :)..! 03:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also this --Alaa :)..! 06:10, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Uploader's account is locked. Taivo (talk) 07:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense upload, see image manipulation, nonsense description and nonsense category. Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:33, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@علاء: Please choose a delete or keep template per Commons:Polling templates.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think it equal  Delete --Alaa :)..! 06:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo present in many website and is the same of an electoral affich of himself. Enough proof that the real author has given his permission. Olivier LPB (talk) 08:38, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Copied from Facebook. --Yann (talk) 09:14, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Monkey D Louffy (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Flickr-washing. --Эlcobbola talk 16:24, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure whether this satisfies {{PD-Italy}} as a simple photograph (versus a work of photographic art), but the {{PD-EU-Anonymous}} is almost certainly incorrect given the embossed logo on the bottom right. Storkk (talk) 09:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 19:06, 27 Juni 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file --Krdbot 00:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph was found on the web before it was uploaded on commons. [1], OTRS-permission from the copyright holder is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 11:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:31, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chraibibadr1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Content lifted from all over the web

Ytoyoda (talk) 23:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all obvious copyright violations. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright: © PSA 2018 All rights reserved Jmax (talk) 18:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Description doesn't match image. Yann (talk) 22:55, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Je suis vraiment désolé pour ce téléchargement raté. Maîtrisant mal le processus, je commet parfois des erreurs. Surtout que celle-là est vraiment grossière. Je suis tout à fait d'accord pour supprimer cette page. Comment s'y prend-on, SVP ? --Paul Morère (talk) 13:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC) Paul Morère[reply]


Deleted: See above. --Yann (talk) 13:59, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously deleted file File:Joe 4.jpg Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: speedy deleted, obvious copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Charachada (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commercial advertising, SPAM: out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 05:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Special instructions FBMD0f00076f010000a9ae0000dcb8010033d60100fce801005b760200bf4f04007a5a0400 — Bukhari (Talk!) 11:34, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 21:42, 29 Juni 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file --Krdbot 00:44, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

to reupload without rights to reserves Matankic (talk) 23:02, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as dupe. --JuTa 01:57, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file Tym2412 (talk) 01:38, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request shortly after upload. --JuTa 01:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

coorect category Maps of rivers of Asia by country Мельников (talk) 10:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There exists a lot of maps where rivers are especially indicated regarding many countries, also in Asia. Because of that, I think it makes sense to have this category.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 15:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 01:34, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no like this file L9AHBA666 (talk) 16:10, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request. --JuTa 02:02, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no like this file L9AHBA666 (talk) 16:15, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request. --JuTa 02:01, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spoiled upload. E4024 (talk) 14:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:27, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Messyjessi1983 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense upload, see nonsense description and nonsense category. Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:08, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Messyjessi1983 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense upload, probably meant offensive, see image manipulation. Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:10, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:09, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work, is it? E4024 (talk) 14:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - obvious copyvio. -- Darwin Ahoy! 11:08, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Grey ghost as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free poster. Wcam (talk) 04:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia the image is categorized as a non-free poster, see here Grey ghost (talk) 14:46, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Deletion_request_needing_OTRS_member_input. Hopefully an OTRS member will respond. --Wcam (talk) 15:08, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: valid OTRS permission. --Guanaco (talk) 10:50, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality images that appear to be cctv images. Unlikely to be used in a project

Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Essel kwame asamoah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, all with garbage names, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Neo2013 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

None of these seem to be own works. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 10:24, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panix32 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images out of scope, not used on WIkipedia

Ytoyoda (talk) 13:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:07, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Rohnjons. --Jianhui67 TC 16:07, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-encyclopaedic, only locally relevant, appears to be promoting a local political agenda. Alistair1978 (talk) 00:51, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:58, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is all over the web, e.g., https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0234910/mediaviewer/rm4286711552. Bbb23 (talk) 02:19, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image already deleted before, own work unlikely and no metadata. Jamez42 (talk) 03:07, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hellseek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted or out of scope posters and images of non-notable band Hellseek.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:14, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small size without EXIFs, unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for Commons. Bad photographic quality. CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 05:08, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anushu451 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 05:45, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monoklon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This is not trivial logos.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:58, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:03, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monoklon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-trivial logos (more than just text and simple shapes), missing permission

A.Savin 21:14, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per my comment above. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:20, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monoklon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violation. Low resolution. Missing EXIF. There are similar files.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 03:29, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Приветствую, Maxinvestigator! Насчёт нарушения авторских прав, возможно, тут Вы ошибаетесь! Эти файлы числились на Ру-Вики, как свободные, и их автором является Tpyvvikky. Возможно, перенеся их сюда с помощью For the Common Good я просто небрежно оформил лицензии. А насчёт разрешения и EXIF: я свои собственные работы грузил сюда, как-то не придавая этому значения. Ваш Monoklon!! (Для заметок/Касса) 14:36, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: файлы малых размеров, отсутствуют метаданные. Не всё, что находится в Рувике, можно сюда переносить. Только при уверенности в чистоте лицензии. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 23:56, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Автор этих фото Tpyvvikky опубликовал их на Ру-Вики под лицензией «Общественное достояние», стало быть, он всё загрузил без нарушений. А насчёт отсутствия метаданных — быть может он перед публикацией отредактировал свои работы, что EXIF и перестал отображаться. Ваш Monoklon!! (Для заметок/Касса) 18:20, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unlikely to be own works. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:41, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo.--Kai3952 (talk) 06:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:03, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:40, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:39, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:39, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:38, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks out of scope. E4024 (talk) 14:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:38, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie? E4024 (talk) 14:48, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:37, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sguerre84 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:58, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:37, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sguerre84 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:13, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:31, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Addemup (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused or used in draft fictitious diagrams and flags of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:36, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no like this files L9AHBA666 (talk) 16:19, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You know, theres already too much pictures for butts. -Giggity miggity — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giggity miggity (talk • contribs) 19:16, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:35, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no like this file L9AHBA666 (talk) 16:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no like this file L9AHBA666 (talk) 16:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused signboard. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:30, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized, small image with no indication of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of altarpiece somewhere, but with no information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of altarpiece somewhere, but with no information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of altar arwork somewhere, but with no information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:30, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of altar somewhere, but with no information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:29, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of something, somewhere, but with no information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:29, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small blurry photo of something, somewhere - but with no information it's not educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:29, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos; out of scope for the Commons. Kalbbes (talk) 19:14, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Affected files:

Kalbbes (talk) 19:17, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:28, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file or personality right issues ?? Roland zh (talk) 20:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:27, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable. Out of project scope. Hanooz 20:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:26, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I appear on the picture and I dont want this picture anymore on internet Mtyrock (talk) 22:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused OoS personal image. E4024 (talk) 13:55, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:43, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused promotional image of a person. Formerly in w:User:OGticktock/sandbox. —Cryptic (talk) 13:55, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:43, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used. In scope? Other files of the same uploader? E4024 (talk) 13:58, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:42, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. In scope? E4024 (talk) 13:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:42, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF. OoS. No? E4024 (talk) 14:03, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:41, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:41, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In scope? Other uploads of the same party, are they in scope? E4024 (talk) 14:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:26, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional, out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. All four were promotional spam. --Green Giant (talk) 01:03, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any reason to be public domain in Spain. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:20, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Already deleted June 25, undeletion request pending. However, the deleted omage is another one, so converting to a regular DR. I see no obvious reason to delete the newer version. Ankry (talk) 13:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 22:11, 5 Juli 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 00:38, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused PNG logo, out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:10, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- User: Perhelion 21:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to https://www.tremblay-en-france.fr/fonctionnalites/actualites-109/desengagement-de-l-etat-le-maire-reagit-1704.html?cHash=9b2c05a697a87efb1b8dbd83a3f04a02, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to Patrick Rogel : Site of origin expressly indicates : CC BY-SA 3.0FR, therefore why remove? -- DCh50 (talk) 10:34, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination the CC BY-SA 3.0FR tag has been added since the last deletion of the file so it's OK now. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:55, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nomination withdraw. -- User: Perhelion 21:26, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is duplicate of File:Cherenkov2.svg and File:Cherenkov Wavefront.svg. Just use original file. Glrx (talk) 20:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader agreed on user talk. -- User: Perhelion 20:59, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I appear on the picture and I dont want this picture anymore on internet Roleric (talk) 22:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- User: Perhelion 21:33, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I appear on the picture and I dont want this picture anymore on internet Roleric (talk) 22:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- User: Perhelion 21:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication Enemali Bonaventure (talk) 22:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Enemali Bonaventure: please use {{Duplicate}} I can't find the dupe, so the nomination is invalid. -- User: Perhelion 21:50, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, but most likely your other duplicate get also deleted if you not provide more information. -- User: Perhelion 21:57, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dibatensilestructure (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FOP in Iran and OTRS permission added by non-OTRS member. Is ticket #2018021710004258 valid for these files?

Hanooz 13:01, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hanooz, Would you please tell me about the reason you nominated these photos for deletion? As you know, a permission (ticket #2018021710004258) has been sent by Diba Tensile Architecture (the owner of both architectural projects and photos) to Wikipedia Commons following SlowManifesto helps and tips. So, please explain your reasons to me. Thank you in advance. OldArchineer (talk) 05:22, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS tags must be added by an OTRS member, not the user himself. As I said above validity of the ticket must be checked by an OTRS member. Maybe @Ruthven: could help. Hanooz 11:36, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The OTRS ticket:2018021710004258 holds for File:IMG_3928-watermarked.jpg and File:نمای پشتی آمفی تئاتر آب و آتش تهران.jpg only. Diba Tensile Architecture should send another email for the new files they uploaded or a more general authorisation for all the past and future uploads of the works they own. --Ruthven (msg) 11:50, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS permissions processed. Ruthven (msg) 13:49, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/deputes/fiche/OMC_PA719496 Rhadamante (talk) 06:45, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 12:52, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/deputes/fiche/OMC_PA2529 Rhadamante (talk) 06:46, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 12:52, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Assemblée nationale Rhadamante (talk) 06:51, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 12:52, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indoor statue without author's permission Regasterios (talk) 07:27, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Likely copyright violation. Sculptor must confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:53, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyright violation https://vk.com/aramjakomo?z=photo134384151_456240353%2Fphotos134384151 MisterXS (talk) 08:53, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 12:54, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyright violation https://vk.com/aramjakomo?z=photo134384151_456239159%2Fphotos134384151 MisterXS (talk) 08:54, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 12:54, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work without MD. E4024 (talk) 08:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 12:54, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More about commercial promotion than a useful image. Also the size is small, the quality is fuzzy and the authorship is dubious as this is quite probably a web image. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:45, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 12:55, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Anyway © DICS Technologies LTD. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 12:55, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kamel bel kacem (talk · contribs)

[edit]

KBK, initials of the uploader Kamel bel kacem. Commons is not a place to advertise.

xplicit 11:34, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Unused non-notable logos. See COM:SCOPE. --Storkk (talk) 12:56, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IAmDipanjanDey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nothing visible. Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:34, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Out of COM:SCOPE. --Storkk (talk) 13:20, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1997. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:22, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atulipano (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The wide variety of quality and style, plus two different cameras and then none at all lead me to suggest that perhaps these are collected images, not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Original photographer(s) should contact OTRS to confirm authorship and license. --Storkk (talk) 13:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now we need to revdel this page because you just put the image itself on it.
Also, the uploader said it was from Twitter, not Facebook: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/505427557110386688/7BVumyKu_400x400.jpeg.
 Delete anyway. (I don't expect OTRS from a some SPA) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:10, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, but we should be clear about the problem as the uploader may read this. The issues are:
  1. We need permission from the copyright holder of the image. Unless there is evidence to the contrary we assume that this is the original photographer, not the subject of a photograph.
  2. If the subject of the photograph has the copyright then we need evidence of this. We would also need evidence that the uploading account Envergjokaj is controlled by the actor w:Enver Gjokaj.
To resolve these issues, acceptable evidence should be sent to COM:OTRS. Verbcatcher (talk) 13:32, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, no the uploader didn't say it was from Twitter, they said it was "own work," so on search it came up as from Facebook earliest use. It's not own work, it's 400x400 image copied from social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:47, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ellin Beltz: did too! "Description: English: Enver Gjokaj Twitter Profile Pic" - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:47, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS confirmation of photographer required. --Storkk (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MEGATRON France (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files from some company's website and catalog are not "own work" of uploader. And company needs notability, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megatron_(disambiguation) for lack of entry.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Copyright and scope issues. --Storkk (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I appear on the picture and I dont want this picture anymore on internet Roleric (talk) 22:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The copyright holder of a file is usually the photographer, not the subject. Given you appear in it, this is likely a copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 13:29, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I appear on the picture and I dont want this picture anymore on internet Roleric (talk) 22:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The copyright holder of a file is usually the photographer, not the subject. Given you appear in it, this is likely a copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 13:29, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot of a timeline, not useful Triplecaña (talk) 22:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Should be wikitext. --Storkk (talk) 13:30, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- User: Perhelion 20:20, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC BY-NC-ND Py4nf (talk) 02:57, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: correct and compatible license ({{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}). P 1 9 9   19:38, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The watermark reads CC BY-NC-ND Py4nf (talk) 18:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is the second nomination of the same user. The author could change his opinion (independently or on request) under a license on the site Panoramio and not change after that the image itself. The license is checked by the robot at loading. There is no reason to delete.  Keep --Insider (talk) 06:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: By Insider, re-nomination without changed reason. -- User: Perhelion 20:18, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo.--Kai3952 (talk) 06:46, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:52, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:52, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo.--Kai3952 (talk) 07:01, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:52, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:53, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:53, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anybody knows this actor? Can he be out of scope? E4024 (talk) 13:48, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, most probably out of the scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:54, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is he in scope? Sorry for the question, because no use, no cats... E4024 (talk) 13:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Most probably out of the scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:54, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think we cannot keep this promotion. E4024 (talk) 13:54, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination :). --Podzemnik (talk) 03:54, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks out of scope. E4024 (talk) 13:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:55, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Loïc432 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Simplicissimusfan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical paintings and drawings. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:48, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ritter, Lietzmann, Krämer, and Finetti and keep the rest Mutter Erde (talk) 06:03, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lbenes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of non-free works (some two-dimensional and others three-dimensional), which are obviously not the uploader's own works, since the real author has been dead since 1975. There is no evidence that any of these works are permanently located in a public space as required for Commons:Freedom of panorama#Czech Republic to apply. Several of the photos of three-dimensional works are obviously not taken in a public place, and it's questionable whether they were even taken by the uploader.

LX (talk, contribs) 14:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am a grandson of Antonin Lhotak and I am owner of all these non-public works and my grandfater´s rights - and we desided to release these pictures to public use - for illustration in wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbenes (talk • contribs) 07:27, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Permission of all Lhotak's heirs is needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:02, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Murals are copyright-protected + No FOP in Iran.

Hanooz 18:08, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:07, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source description says "Re-posting this video without are [sic] permission will result in legal action.", seems like they selected the wrong license or something.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:12, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Murals are copyright-protected + No FOP in Iran.

Hanooz 20:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I object to the deletion of Teheran US embassy propaganda statue of liberty.jpg

File:Teheran US embassy propaganda statue of liberty.jpg
and ask for careful consideration of the facts, since this image is of very high historic value, often being featured prominently in articles about the Iranian hostage crisis, as well as in coverage about Iranian propaganda in general.
  • While it is true that there is no general FoP provision in the copyright law of Iran, the rules are quite clear for architectural works, designs, sketches and buildings and sculptures of all types: "In cases where the work belongs to a legal personality or rights are transferred to a legal personality, it will go into the public domain after 30 years from the date of publication or public presentation (Article 16)." (see here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Iran).
  • The seizure of the former American embassy (which is to this day maintained by the state-sponsored revolutionary guards) and the creation / public display of these murals lie well beyond 30 years in the past. Therefore these works are clearly in the public domain, according to Iranian copyright law. --Nikopol (talk) 13:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi, Could you prove that this mural is for more than 30 years ago? Hanooz 23:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:42, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I want create a new image Anonimo58 (talk) 10:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep That file is heavily used. @Anonimo58: If you want to make a small change, use the "Upload a new version" link under "File history". If you're uploading a completely new picture, do it under a different name. --bjh21 (talk) 14:14, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - per bjh21. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:23, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Monsegnor Sorrentino has a nice hat, but who are they? Are they in scope? "Lo scrittore" is a writer? E4024 (talk) 14:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Domenico Sorrentino is an Italian Catholic Archbishop (has Wikipedia articles in English, German, Italian, and Polish). Thus in scope, and Cristian Bonaldi indeed seems to be a writer (mentioned in an Italian Wikipedia article), though I don't know how notable. Another question could be: who took this picture if Bonaldi is in the picture and identifies himself as the uploader? But let's give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he used a self-timer. @E4024: I'm keeping this mainly on grounds of Sorrentino's notability, as you asked the scope question, but if the question of authorship is too problematic for you, feel free to re-nominate. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:50, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://www.timeout.com/miami/blog/espanyola-way-is-finally-reopening-after-months-of-construction-052417 Ytoyoda (talk) 14:37, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:41, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spoiled upload. E4024 (talk) 14:38, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (broken image). --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:41, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and likely unusable creator template, no works made by this person uploaded, looks like being part of "creating as many links as possible" activity by a couple of new accounts around d:Q18126169. Te750iv (talk) 21:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please note the reasons for repeated deletion at enwiki. --Te750iv (talk) 04:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Te750iv: Acknowledgments Firstly, Thank you very very much for your very careful review and correcting the subject. ... With all due respect, Sir, I have only and only created the links (social media, occupation, family and Authority control) links which are available on the net. Smita Nair Jain's work: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2434804/
I shall appreciate if you could correct the creator template.- Suzanne — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuzanneKruger (talk • contribs) 07:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 04:42, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Abdulehed Mexsum Hajimning Istanbuldiki ghayibane jinaza namizi.jpg
Where is the yellow?

Baseless unused personal flag. It's not what it claims to be. E4024 (talk) 07:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • See the real-life flags in the pic I added: Do you see anything yellow? I insist, we must prohibit "invention" of flags. This is not a factory, it is just a depot or warehouse. --E4024 (talk) 08:08, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:12, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ronhjones  (Talk) 12:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:13, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer we've apparently received permission from, Ursus Magana, is not the copyright owner shown in the EXIF data, Alex Hallajian. Nor do the dates correspond (how was a 2017 portrait taken in 2012?). Please see discussion here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, where did you find 2012? --E4024 (talk) 12:52, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@E4024: 2012 is in "Copyright 2012 All rights reserved" in the EXIF metadata.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:03, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:14, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. The uploader is indefinitely blocked for vandalism on English Wikipedia. LX (talk, contribs) 14:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:14, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2018 Gaza border protests

[edit]

These images are copyrighted by Reuters, AFP, or Getty Images, not Fars News Agency. FallingGravity (talk) 16:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:15, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

larger and older at https://cheapst.blogspot.com/2017/03/cheap-thrills-lyrics-this-is-acting.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:16, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. Kalbbes (talk) 17:55, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:16, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MasqueIV (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Any metadata, false dates, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:17, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MasqueIV (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MasqueIV (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work: inconsistent sizes, quality, and styles, missing EXIF data. Unreliable uploader, many previous DR's.

P 1 9 9   20:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not required anymore Mehran Bottlers (Pvt.) Ltd (talk) 09:04, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:24, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:14, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want my personal data shared from the file's EXIF information. DavesTrumpet (talk) 13:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   16:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a real, contributing user. E4024 (talk) 14:01, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No cat, no use, no description. I. e. Out of Scope. E4024 (talk) 14:04, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scope? Exif? E4024 (talk) 14:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Other than M.K. Gandhi on the wall, I cannot see the scope of this image. If you keep it, please separate it from the UPF behind and at least delete that "version". E4024 (talk) 14:09, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Free poster? E4024 (talk) 14:10, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: looks like DW, likely not own work. P 1 9 9   16:40, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:40, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

People with nice hats, but who are they? Are they in scope? E4024 (talk) 14:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Puramyun31, I see that three and a half years after uploading the file you have added it to a cat. I'm happy that even my wrong deletions serve something good. Now you may also take a paper and pencil to calculate the ratio of wrong ones among my hundreds of DRs. Take care sis or bro. --E4024 (talk) 06:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   16:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark says ©NB Press Online Ytoyoda (talk) 14:24, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:43, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nice necktie but regrettably the person looks out of scope. Anybody knows him? E4024 (talk) 14:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" from an SPU. No MD. E4024 (talk) 14:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nice car but who is the gent? Looks out of scope. E4024 (talk) 14:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:43, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:56, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User with 11 global edits, including two files I am presenting to discussion for deletion. E4024 (talk) 14:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. No meaningful contributions by this user. P 1 9 9   17:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a sympathetic person but I doubt she has been a real contributor to keep her personal image in Commons. I hope she suddenly begins to make many meaningful contributions and I will be happy to withdraw this DR. E4024 (talk) 15:04, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked: JIBI Photo; low resolution, no EXIF Ankry (talk) 15:07, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used and duplicate of Logo-Énergir.svg on French Wikipedia Jack Stupp (talk) 15:57, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lesser quality duplicate of File:Eglise de Tiffauges.jpg. No need to keep both. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of small size and low quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small sized, unused in project space, possibly not even own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:37, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Uploader appears to be copying files from the Internet and simply declaring himself as copyright holder. Given that, claim that this image that also comes from Facebook is not credible. -- Whpq (talk) 14:42, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:13, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ref ml:അഷ്റഫ് അലി, batch of three uploads, potentially personality and/or copyright issues - your opinions ??
btw: affected File:2017-11-06-PHOTO-00000185.jpg, File:2017-11-06-PHOTO-00000186.jpg, File:2017-11-06-PHOTO-00000188.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 20:46, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Don't have data EXIF Gastón Cuello (talk) 20:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused one-file-upload, rather small-sized and personality right issues - your opinions ?? Roland zh (talk) 20:54, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission added by non-OTRS member.

Hanooz 21:08, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

+ File:Alidivandari.jpg Author: M. Hiteh. Hanooz 21:18, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Double checked the files and fixed them, last file seems to be in PD Mardetanha talk 06:32, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Are you sure that the last one is in public domain? The author, محمود حیطه, is still alive. Hanooz 18:48, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; four artworks by living artist deleted. One portrait of artist, on project for 8 years, retained, although research may result in its renomination with a valid rational. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran and the artist is still alive.

Hanooz 21:27, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work, no exif and small resolution. Jcb (talk) 22:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:57, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtNKyGRNPBA at 10:29. The girl whose channel this is is in the photo, the photo was taken by some guy. The video also kept rolling during that shoot, so she didn't shoot the whole video herself. An image of this guy may still be extractable from this video, but not this image. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:32, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://www.astronomo.org/foro/index.php?topic=10456.0 Jamez42 (talk) 17:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Murals are copyright-protected + No FOP in Iran.

Hanooz 18:04, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Murals are copyright-protected + No FOP in Iran.

Hanooz 18:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I object to the deletion of Teheran US embassy propaganda gun.jpg

and ask for careful consideration of the facts, since this image is of very high historic value, often being featured prominently in articles about the Iranian hostage crisis, as well as in coverage about Iranian propaganda in general.
  • While it is true that there is no general FoP provision in the copyright law of Iran, the rules are quite clear for architectural works, designs, sketches and buildings and sculptures of all types: "In cases where the work belongs to a legal personality or rights are transferred to a legal personality, it will go into the public domain after 30 years from the date of publication or public presentation (Article 16)." (see here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Iran).
  • The seizure of the former American embassy (which is to this day maintained by the state-sponsored revolutionary guards) and the creation / public display of these murals lie well beyond 30 years in the past. Therefore these works are clearly in the public domain, according to Iranian copyright law. --Nikopol (talk) 13:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination... except for one file due to discussion: the age of mural is known to be over 30 years of age & public display. The other murals were not age identified to allow this exception. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong licence for non free logo Snowflake91 (talk) 18:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Also appears in several websites like eltrecetv.com.ar and canalsiete.com.ar Mega-buses (talk) 18:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added File:Logo-eltreceIntjulio2016.png and File:Logo-El-siete--BB.png. Both are also copyright violation. Mega-buses (talk) 18:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Does not infringe copyright infringement just by appearing on the channel's website. Valid as well. --Bankster (talk) 02:20, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Argentina is not listed on COM:TOO. This is an image of a 3D-model. It's a simple model, but I'm not sure, we don't know the TOO. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:05, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Similar or same logos had been previously deleted per nomination request (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:El Trece, logo 2013.png and Commons:Deletion requests/Artear logos). Mega-buses (talk) 13:43, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; as before. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from promotion photo, not the person. AT (talk) 18:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from promotion photo, not the person. AT (talk) 18:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright infringement, very small size, no metadata. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be a personal photo. More likely it is a picture from Univision Noticias television channel. Pierre cb (talk) 18:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be a personal photo. More likely it is a picture from Univision Noticias television channel. Pierre cb (talk) 18:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be a personal photo. More likely it is a picture from Univision Noticias television channel. Pierre cb (talk) 18:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be a personal photo. More likely it is a picture from Univision Noticias television channel. Pierre cb (talk) 18:51, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : one-file-upload, comic art with potentially copyright issues ?? Roland zh (talk) 20:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, rather small-sized png file, potentially copyright issues - your opinions ?? Roland zh (talk) 20:19, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused on 27 June 2018, see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gmc palakkad logo.jpg, thx, Roland zh (talk) 18:29, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:04, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : unused, rather small-sized upload, potentially copyright issues ?? Roland zh (talk) 20:24, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:03, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : (rather) small-sized file with potentially personaly right issues ?? Roland zh (talk) 20:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Roland zh What exactly is personaly right issues? Rakesh90menon (talk) 13:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:03, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ref ml:അഷ്റഫ് അലി, batch of three uploads, potentially personality and/or copyright issues - your opinions ??
btw: affected File:2017-11-06-PHOTO-00000185.jpg, File:2017-11-06-PHOTO-00000186.jpg, File:2017-11-06-PHOTO-00000188.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 20:45, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as below. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ref ml:അഷ്റഫ് അലി, batch of three uploads, potentially personality and/or copyright issues - your opinions ??
btw: affected File:2017-11-06-PHOTO-00000185.jpg, File:2017-11-06-PHOTO-00000186.jpg, File:2017-11-06-PHOTO-00000188.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 20:45, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as below. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is trademarked - serial number is 87-437,175 and its publication date was Dec. 12, 2017. (Link to its page on the United States Patent and Trademark Office: http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4802:l4kq9d.2.11) Alec Voss (talk) 15:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Trademark is not the same as copyright. We only care about copyright. --Majora (talk) 18:43, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a campaign photo. So the uploader is not the author of the subject. Olivier LPB (talk) 15:16, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 18:43, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in metadata shows this was in and out of Facebook before upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Full metadata version or OTRS required for verification purposes. --Majora (talk) 18:45, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in metadata shows this was in and out of Facebook before upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Full metadata version or OTRS required for verification purposes. --Majora (talk) 18:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

</noinclude>

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringemen from: https://www.facebook.com/avi.gil.92 דגש חזק (talk) 13:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 18:55, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on a website from before this upload https://cdn0.weddingwire.co.uk/emp/fotos/8/5/1/8/314155-10152179649490637-1767676064-n_4_108518.jpg, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 18:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyright violation from https://www.alexeybalash.com/modeling?lightbox=dataItem-j87ls3mi MisterXS (talk) 08:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:58, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:48, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:00, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work by Francesco Venezia, who is still alive. Italy does not have FOP. Horcrux (talk) 12:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Interesting tattoos. Is this DJ in scope, or just one of too many? E4024 (talk) 13:03, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: To answser your question, yes it is in scope. w:Headhunterz. Unfortunately, it appears that this is a COM:NETCOPYVIO. --Majora (talk) 04:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from https://alumnius.net/thunderbird_school_o-7782-26#id16624075 Ytoyoda (talk) 13:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:06, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wfre2018 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All photos appear to be from https://www.facebook.com/pg/OnEspanolaWay/photos/?ref=page_internal. It's possible the uploader owns the images, but probably needs an OTRS ticket.

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license for tiger image. Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Transaero (Siberian Tiger livery), EI-XLN, Boeing 747-412 (21544278369).jpg Glrx (talk) 17:08, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license for tiger image. Same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Transaero (Siberian Tiger livery), EI-XLN, Boeing 747-412 (21544278369).jpg Glrx (talk) 17:08, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dominicyant (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One logo, two photos, unifying theme "about Peter Godwin", but no indication that these tiny thumbnails were taken by the uploader, nor that logo was created by same.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The center image of "sia" was published " Found as early as May 2017 at http://plus.cusica.com/2017/05/25/sia-estrena-to-be-human-soundtrack-wonder-woman/". Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:57, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on performer's website ... unlikely own work http://www.chris-cross.co.uk/aboutchris.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:57, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The watermark in lower left hand corner kinda gives away that this isn't own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:57, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same image at https://www.weddingwire.co.uk/wedding-entertainment/chris-cross-magician--e108518/fotos/16, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:57, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's unlikely this is own work of uploader, it was in and out of an editing programme, and most of the other uploads about this magician by this uploader were culled from the internet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:57, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The watermark in lower left hand corner is a very good indicator that this is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:58, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The size and lack of quality suggest this image was culled from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:58, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was found at this large size at another website, which my browser would not open. But if you google search it, you will also find it. It's not own work of this uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:58, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licence of {{PD-EdictGov}} don't available for me for this file.

  • I have some doubt regard to the use of this law in the world
  • It is NOT a law, the exhortation has no authority in the functioning of the institution, it is a just.. an exhortation

Olivier LPB (talk) 08:15, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This would probably be for the best. I figured it because it was canon-law, and I saw others on this site considered things of similar nature to be Public Domain that it would also qualify. I am willing to say that delete might be best option however, to avoid liability/infringement. MJL (talk) 02:54, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:43, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mark Schierbecker as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Crowder's video is under CC-by-SA, but Benjamin still owns the copyright to his stream ~Moheen (keep talking) 08:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Agreed. The source YouTube channel is not the source for this image. --Majora (talk) 04:44, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously deleted because of Commons:Deletion requests/Post-1923 works by Philip Alexius de Laszlo. Celia Homeford (talk) 10:38, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this looks like it should be kept. Celia Homeford (talk) 10:33, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion and apparent withdrawal of nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:45, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image used elsewhere on the Internet, (for example), probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 11:46, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:49, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in metadata shows this was in and out of Facebook before upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:53, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size without EXIF data. Please upload the original image, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. See also [2]. Yann (talk) 09:19, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could it be taken form this CR'ed page: http://tokensummit.com/speaker/sacks-david/ ?--E4024 (talk) 09:27, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS confirmation required. --Majora (talk) 01:45, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Holy see press office publish only in copyright, except the chain Catholic Television of the Vatican. Olivier LPB (talk) 11:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Vatican copyright lasts 70 years pma. --Majora (talk) 01:44, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems not a US Government work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:07, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep just because he isn't in sailor's uniform doesn't mean it isn't a work of the Government. He works for the US Naval Academy, whose works are in the PD, this work is in the PD. Corky 16:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Corkythehornetfan: I don't call training baseball "working for the Government" and it's very doubtful he became a sailor at 42... By the way, what says the metadata from the picture ? Is it originated from a government website ? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
He works for a US federal service academy, which works are released in the Public Domain. My point is, the players are dressed in their sailor uniforms whereas the coaches are not. The photographer is an employee of the United States Navy, therefore making the picture a work of the US Government. You have the same tools I do, so why don't you look up the metadata yourself. Corky 18:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No I haven't the same tools. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:24, 27 June 2018 (UTC) Besides (and sorry to insist) without having seen the metadata (which shows generaly Name on the sereviceman, rank, and number of US Navy photo), I'm not able to say it's an official Navy photo so I wonder how you can. @Arbor to SJ: may you modify the file description and fill it with the requested informations ? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Because it came from the official US Naval Academy sports website... There is no metadata on it as I've checked with an online tool. Corky 15:54, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep (as uploader): This picture is clearly a work of the United States Naval Academy, which is a part of the United States Military. Therefore, it is in the public domain, as a work of the US federal government. Arbor to SJ (talk) 17:04, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Photos only qualify for the US Government exemption if they are taken by a federal employee, during the course of their duties. For all we know this could have been taken on staff picture day by a professional, non-governmental, photographer. There is absolutely no proof that this photo meets the standards required for the federal exemption. --Majora (talk) 01:41, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's in use. I guess it would be better to delete after a discussion. E4024 (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought someone was trying to speedy delete it. Then let me withdraw this DR. --E4024 (talk) 12:42, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn by nominator. --Majora (talk) 01:38, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation : https://principautedelochaber.jimdo.com/s-a-s-le-prince-souverain/ Lofhi (talk) 12:32, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. OTRS would be required for this. --Majora (talk) 01:38, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Manifest copyright violation : it's a stamp of the French company "La Poste" Lofhi (talk) 12:34, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:36, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this not considered a DW? E4024 (talk) 14:42, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:33, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is one of those complicated Flickr situations, but it appears that the Flickr uploader may not have had rights to this image, and thus this may not be correctly licensed. There is no indication why the Flickr user would have rights to a 960x960 size image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Suspected flickrwashing of a one-off flickr account. No metadata, no proof of proper license. --Majora (talk) 01:31, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems that I initially made a mistake as the copyright of this portrait expires within 80 years following the author's death, not 70 years. Additionally, it was previously deleted because of Commons:Deletion requests/Post-1923 works by Philip Alexius de Laszlo. It seems that it can be undeleted in 2027. Keivan.fTalk 18:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Procedural close: Withdrawn by nominator and file redirected to duplicate anyways. --Majora (talk) 01:28, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work, and more likely from company website, which used same image for Holiday Card: http://www.megatron.fr/files/images/articles/calendrier/Happy_New_Year_2018.gif Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:26, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very similar image to one published on http://mmaservis.cz/karlos-vemola/, I have strong concern about complying with copyright works and this being own work of the uploader, as stated in the license selection dialog Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 05:05, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems not a US Government work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:07, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Just because it is on the West Point website doesn't mean it was taken by a federal employee during the course of their duties. --Majora (talk) 05:06, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Germany This isn't located in a public place. Hanooz 12:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This look pretty public to me. You can even see a person on the walkway. Meets the standards for {{FoP-Germany}} in my opinion. --Majora (talk) 05:10, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found everywhere such as http://ucrazy.ru/sport/1349838691-otkrovennye-pozy-simpatichnyh-sportsmenok-chast-2.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to disagree, @TwoWings: . That the file has been published before uploading here without a free license mean something on Commons (and not what you're suggesting). Besides there are 7 permission for a total of 39 files concerned (32 have been deleted by Jcb; you should talk to him). Do you know COM:PCP ? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:06, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, OK, no need to bite ! @Carrotcake5 and Jcb: any explanation ? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:48, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Personne ne vous mord, @TwoWings: l'on vous fait remarquer que vous vous trompez : une photo trouvée sous une license non libre ou sans license libre explicite AVANT d'être téléchargée sur Commons nécessite au moins une permission OTRS ou est supprimée sans autre forme de délai après un certain temps, donc "the fact that we find this picture elsewhere" prouve justement quelque chose; c'est justement comme ça que l'on établit un copyvio. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dans ton message de départ, tu ne précises à aucun moment que cette photo pouvait être trouvée ailleurs avant son import ici. Il est donc logique que je précise que cela ne signifiait rien tel qu'expliqué dans ce message. À part ça, je trouve assez étrange que Carrotcake5 ait pu fournir des preuves suffisantes pour plusieurs fichiers et pas pour les autres... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:48, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Specific permission for every image is required. The fact that there is OTRS confirmation for others by the same uploader is irrelevant. --Majora (talk) 05:13, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, Romania does not have freedom of panorama, so unless the author died more that 70 years ago, this is a non-free derivative work. :( – Quadell (talk) 22:19, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Budapest is capital of Hungary, not Romania, and Hungary has freedom of panorama. Taivo (talk) 20:48, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh dear. You are quite right: this is Hungary, and this sort of reproduction is allowed. I withdraw this deletion request, and I will go study my European geography more carefully. – Quadell (talk) 11:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:50, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hungary has freedom of panorama but this art creation was not erected with a permanent character. See {{FoP-Hungary}}. Regasterios (talk) 13:10, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Cows are removed at the end of the event so they were never permanent so FoP exemptions do not apply. --Majora (talk) 19:35, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

トリミング未処理で投稿しましたので削除お願いします 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 13:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 19:36, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to support the claim that the author (whose identity is unknown to the uploader) has been dead for more than 70 years and no US PD rationale. LX (talk, contribs) 14:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 21:01, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 21:01, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, low-re image, not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Confirmatory issues regarding the license on this one. --Majora (talk) 00:21, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any reason to be public domain in Spain. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: None that I can see. Can't use PD-old either if the author is anonymous. --Majora (talk) 04:51, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andreas Bohnenstengel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seemingly a copyvio. Andreas Bohnenstengel seems author of the photographs. However, he is NOT author of the magazine's text.

Ies (talk) 15:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ich zitiere die Doppeseite in dem ich Sie nicht vollständig zeige. Name und Seitenzahl der über 20 jahre alten Veröffentlichung in dem Magazin (dessen Verlag gar nicht mehr existiert) sind vollständig genannt. --Andreas 09:41, 30 Juni 2018 (UTC)


Kept: The photos in the magazine are by Bohnenstengel. The photo of the magazine is by Bohnenstengel. The text is either PD-text or de minimis. No valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 04:54, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image does not appear to have been taken in 2014 and by the quality it's unlikely to have been made with a digital camera - unless it's a rephotograph of an older work. Please provide more information because at present it doesn't look like own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC){{}}[reply]

  • The uploader has said: Tomado de ARMANDO GIOVANNINI, "Se i Profeti parlano in antico spagnolo", en Jesus, Ano 1, settembre 1979, Milano, Italia.
  • Translated: Tomado de ARMANDO GIOVANNINI, "If the Prophets speak in ancient Spanish", en Jesus, Ano 1, September 1979, Milan, Italy.
  •  Delete subject died in 1982, so Mexican copyright will expire by 2032.--BevinKacon (talk) 20:08, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:18, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

L'autocollant est collé de travers et donne une mauvaise image du parti (volonté de nuire ?) - Joël Goffin, secrétaire du R.W.F. - Elle sera remplacée dans les meilleurs délais par l'autocollant officiel Joël Goffin (talk) 11:54, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Logo above TOO. Derivative work that can't be kept here. --Majora (talk) 05:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AuteurParticipatif (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (fr:Paul Fitoussi). Perhaps cropped versions (without Fitoussi) are eligible.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:04, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that user published his draft on the French Wikipedia just 2 hours after beeing notified here, so fr:Paul Fitoussi (red because deleted twice) became blue. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use is in use I'm afraid. If there was a community discussion that ended in delete I could see how this might be an illegitimately in use situation but the two deletes were speedy. Keep for now. --Majora (talk) 05:02, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AuteurParticipatif (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos and newspapers. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:59, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. Hanooz 12:34, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep There's actually a rationale on the file description page arguing for the statue being in the public domain: "The original statue: Made in 1970 and because its copyright belongs to Tehran city management office (legal person) it has be expired after 30 years", using {{PD-Iran}}. If that's correct, then it doesn't matter that there's no FoP in Iran. But I don't feel qualified to assess this PD claim. The photo is widely used in Wikipedia, by the way. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:29, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Unfortunately we have no reason to believe that not only did Abolhassan Sedighi create this statue, but that he also transferred the copyright to it. Therefore we must see that he has died in 1995 and that we have to wait for 50 years. As such please Undelete in 2046. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 16:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Try as I might, I can't find any evidence that the copyright was transferred so unfortunately I have to agree with Gone Postal here. We can't keep the image without evidence. --Majora (talk) 03:59, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. Hanooz 12:34, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

</noinclude>


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:00, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran.

Hanooz 17:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: While it is true that the US does not grant copyright to bridges (pages 37-38) there are countries out there that do. Without further information on how Iran treats such objects I don't see how we can keep these images. PCP delete due to lack of information on Iranian copyright over these objects. --Majora (talk) 04:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of original File:Cherenkov2.svg. Rendering fixed and improved at original location. Glrx (talk) 20:14, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep invalid request. Sorry Glrx but you have done an absolutely controversy global replace. You have also not the user right for a File Mover. It seems you are also don't firm with the Renaming rules. File:Cherenkov2.svg was the example file for 4 years. This mistake should be undone, all replacing done by Glrx should be reverted. This is the most visible example file of the textPath (straight line) effect (since 4 years). -- User: Perhelion 21:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the references to File:Cherenkov Wavefront.svg to point to Kuiper's original file, File:Cherenkov2.svg. How is pointing to the original file with the same appearance a controversial change?
That is not moving a file. I did not move any files.
I am not making a rename request, so Commons:Renaming files does not apply. Cherenkov2.svg is the original filename, and I am not asking to change that filename.
What I have done is straighten out the file history for Pieter Kuiper's contribution.
I am asking to delete this file (which was a copy of Cherenkov2.svg with trivial changes) and File:Cherenkov1.svg (which was also a trivial copy). The official guideline for editing files, Commons:Overwriting existing files, permits minor changes when "the essential composition is not altered".
The dates do not suggest that Cherenkov2.svg was created as an example file. Cherenkov2.svg is the original file.
  • File:Cherenkov2.svg (Pieter Kuiper) shows a creation date of 22 June 2007. It is the earliest file date.
  • File:Cherenkov Wavefront.svg (Inductiveload) shows a creation date of 4 October 2007. Inductiveload credits Pieter Kuiper. Inductiveload's upload has the same spelling mistake in the description. Inductiveload credits Cherenkov2.svg as the original file.[3]
    Cherenkov Wavefront.svg was created by converting Cherenkov2.svg's text to curves. It was a workaround for Cherenkov2.svg rather than an original file.
  • File:Cherenkov1.svg (Sarang) was created on 13 May 2018. It claims to be generated from the Cherenkov2.svg.
Cherenkov2.svg is poor example of librsvg's inability to do textPath because (1) the path is a straight line and (2) librsvg is capable of rendering text on straight lines. An example that uses a curved path would be a better illustration of the bug. There are plenty of maps with river names painted along the river's path.
We should not be keeping Cherenkov2.svg in a broken state. As User:Thomas Linard said recently, Commons should not be a "museum of old SVG horrors."[4] Pieter Kuiper submitted a perfectly valid SVG 1.1 file to illustrate Cherenkov radiation. We should not usurp his contribution to be a poster child for librsvg's weaknesses.
The only plausible controversial change I did was deleting the references to Cherenekov2.svg and Cherenkov Wavefront.svg on a de.WP page where they were used as an example for fixing a linear textPath. With the fix to Cherenkov2.svg, the illustrative value was lost. The example is dubious; how many linear textPath elements are out there?
Glrx (talk) 22:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Glrx: Replacing is in fact a subpart of moving. And of course, partially the same rules apply as a basic requirement. A Global Replace is a higher intervention as a move.
The original file was never really used as such. This file was the first fixed after 2 weeks after the last version of the original author. So the original file to be the original file is fully irrelevant for usage.
What you have done is fully confusion. You also not mentioned the other file which fixed/used years before your claim of fixing.
@"museum of old SVG horrors." This was a very first illustrated example to omit such bugs, so deleting this long year example with this argument is not suitable, if we do not show another better example. Anyway, the quote is not really in context. "textPath" has many appearances, this is only one.
-- User: Perhelion 12:06, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep What's bad to have different examples of how to draw such a diagram? Now we have versions with sizes from 1 KB to 46 KB, showing many ways of solution. IMHO we should select one file, maybe Cherenkov2, and add the interesting solutions of the other drawings as versions to it; then the other files can be deleted and the remaining file which shows all solution examples offers the possibility to select one of this versions as the best one. But nothing is lost, all interesting examples can be examined, and having only one file avoids irritation. -- sarang사랑 04:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Forgive me, but I do not understand your comment. You are voting keep, but then you say there should be one file rather than three, so you seem to agree that deletions are in order. The end result of my deletion requests are to choose that one file: Cherenkov2.svg, which was the original. That is consistent with your one-file comment. Yes, there are versions of different sizes, but are any other versions interesting enough to keep? The formerly 46 KB version (Cherenkov Wavefront.svg) had the text converted to a curves. Consequently, it would be marked as deprecated with {{Path text SVG}} and we'd hope somebody would fix it; that's not an interesting version. That's what Perhelion did with Cherenkov Wavefront: he changed the file to use text rather than curves; he got it down to 1kB. Kuiper's original 2kB version used an element that librsvg does not render, but the fix is trivial. Kuiper used groups and indentation, but such coding conventions are not particularly remarkable. It's time to choose that single file to "avoid irritation", and the proper candidate is Cherenkov2.svg, the original. Glrx (talk) 16:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep
  • As long as a file is used on de:Wikipedia:Probleme mit SVGs I think the file should be kept. (In my option ideally this should haven been discussed/done before the deletion request.)
  • If Cherenkov2.svg should not be overwritten (since it is a SVG benchmark-file), this file will be used in articles again, then this request would be invalid.
 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 23:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Cherenkov2.svg needs no special status as a "benchmark file"; it is a poor example for a benchmark because it uses a trivial straight line path. More reasonable benchmark files would use the textPath element with a curved path (where the textPath element is actually needed) rather than the trivial straight path. Cherenkov2.svg (with the unnecessary straight-line textPath element replaced with a simple rotation) can and should be used in files today instead of Cherenkov Wavefront.svg. Glrx (talk) 18:13, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I really don't know what to say here. The original author of this illustration made File:Cherenkov2.svg to illustrate a physical phenomenon. Minutes after making the image, he put it in the Sound barrier gallery to advertise it.[5] The next day he marked the file as having librsvg bug.[6] He made the image using valid SVG; for example, the image displayed correctly when he drew it and it displays correctly on Chrome. In 2007, Inductiveload "fixed" the librsvg issue by converting the text to curves and posted the fix to this filename. In 2014, Perhelion removed the text-as-curves by displaying rotated text. Arguably, Perhelion's fix should have been made to the original Cherenkov2.svg file; making the change to Cherenkov2.svg would better preserve the file history; it would fix the original problem rather that fixing the workaround of the problem. That's what I did with my changes: I fixed the original file and made other wiki's reference the original filename rather than the workaround filename (I also added some RDF).
    Since filing this DR, my upload of the fixed Cherenkov2.svg has been reverted (breaking the images on other wikis)[7] and claims have been staked to make the original file an example of librsvg's limitations rather than the physical phenomenon.[8] That has usurped the original uploader's intent. The derivative files should be deleted and original uploader's file (with textPath fixed) should be used. That respects the original uploader's contribution. If an example of librsvg's inability to handle textPath is desired, then it should be forked as something like Cherenkov2-librsvg-limitation.svg (a file whose intent is to show the limitation). This file (Cherenkov Wavefront.svg) should be deleted; it was only intended to fix rendering problems with the original file. Glrx (talk) 18:00, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Normally that had to be cleared before you global replaced this file (but now that horse has already bolted). Normally this is no reason for global replace. There is a small paradox in your reasoning, you give "respects the original uploader". Normally respect is, do not overwrite the original uploader. Normal is uploading a new file as derivative (use this) and keep the original, if the original has important details. -- User: Perhelion 18:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      @Perhelion: . You are misstating the guideline Commons:Overwriting existing files. It states, " the basic rule is that existing files should not be overwritten with substantially different content, whilst minor improvements should overwrite the previous version". Making a change the produces exactly the result intended without the librsvg glitch is a minor improvement and should overwrite the file. Converting text to curves, although giving the same visual appearance, makes the text unselectable, so it may not be "minor" and may not be an "improvement". Glrx (talk) 18:48, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      Well that is arguable, for the feature example (librsvg), for the original uploader and for the visual appeareance (makes the file only usable) it was a substantially change, so at this point it is not a minor change. The question is not, is it a bug or not to overwrite, the question is, is there a reason for two files?? And the answer is still yes! That should be enough debate. -- User: Perhelion 19:08, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      By your logic, you would now prohibit the original uploader from making any changes to his own file because you want to use it for your own purposes. Your position is that Pieter Kuiper, the guy who sourced all of these Cherenkov illustrations, should be prevented from making his file usable for its intended purpose on any Wikipedia. Glrx (talk) 19:47, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      I did not say that. Are you Pieter Kuiper?? -- User: Perhelion 19:55, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Consequence
    1. File:Cherenkov2.svg should be renamed because it is now used (and again overwritten with file:Cherenkov Wavefront.svg).
    2. As File:Cherenkov2.svg is now the used file, file Cherenkov Wavefront.svg must now be overwritten with a duplicate of the original file Cherenkov2.svg
  • Conclusion
    Bloating file histories, (global article histories and) talk page time completely useless. (oh* forgot) for "respecting" the original uploader.
Then we do that. -- User: Perhelion 20:06, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@JoKalliauer and Sarang: If you agree we don't need 2 versions as bug examples (only file history) then I would withdraw my keept-vote!? -- User: Perhelion 20:29, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Perhelion: I just checked phab:T11420 and Librsvg_bugs, and found following bug examples
My favourite Bug-example would be Fort Hall Location Map.svg because it has two possible Workarounds (Text converted to Path, and one with rotate), but a proper workaround as in India southwest summer monsoon onset map en.svg is still missing.
Since we only need one example we could also just use the first one: Major levels of linguistic structure.svg
 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:48, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Outdated stiked by  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 10:31, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment This is a weird DR. On File:Cherenkov2.svg we see a request to leave the file alone and to only upload new versions as new files. Then we have tons of overwrites of that file and nomination of another file for deletion. This is something very strange. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 17:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Regardless of how things need to be renamed, moved, overwritten, etc. there is no consensus whatsoever, nor any valid reason, to delete this file that I can see. Beyond this, if someone wants to fix filenames, uploads, etc. so be it. But that is outside the purview of DR. --Majora (talk) 21:30, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://feedyeti.com/hashtag.php?q=anuryzm Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:58, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 19:36, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems not a US Government work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Blount was the last federal level postmaster general before the USPS became quasi-independent. So his official photo, which this appears to be, would be PD-USGov. --Majora (talk) 19:38, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shakeandshake01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical paintings and photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: three of them after fixing the licensing. Deleted: one of them that is likely still in copyright. --Majora (talk) 19:36, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ltosnar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All photos of automobiles dating back to the 1920s and 1930s, all marked as own work and licensed as CC-by-sa. Nevertheless, it is very unlikely that those are really “own work”—many images look like scans of printed material. Clarification of source is needed, as well as proper license (many may be in the public domain) or permission from copyright holder.

Ariadacapo (talk) 05:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(I copy here Ltosnar’s answer on his talk page) Ariadacapo (talk) 19:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the Answer As employee of a Motorlet (1979-1994), based on a contract, I wrote two historical articles on Walter cars. That's why I got to use (and I get it) the relevant photos from the archive. Motorlet no exist from 1995. see: 1) TOŠNAR, Libor; SOMMER, Bohumil. Motorcycles, Tricycles and Cars (1901-1951). New Signal, Motorlet, 1981-2. 2) TOŠNAR, Libor. Sports and racing cars in the history of our business. New Signal, Motorlet. 1980 Best regards Libor Tošnar, 27 June 2018 Libor Tošnar
And it is true that those "glass plates" were created more than 70 years ago. I took it myself and picked out those interesting ones. --Ltosnar (talk) 11:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
@Ltosnar: Thank you for your answer. Unfortunately the problem is not with permission to access source documents, nor permission to use them on Wikipedia. The problem is that by posting photos here under a CC-by-sa license you are granting rights for their re-use by anyone for any purpose: this can be done only by the copyright owner themselves. Unless these images are in the public domain they cannot be published here without permission. To summarize, for each photo there seems to be 3 possibilities: 1) we can determine that it is in the public domain (the author must be identified for this); 2) you can obtain permission from the copyright owner (e.g. editor of book from which photos have been scanned) and forward it through the OTRS system; 3) The photo must be deleted from Wikimedia Commons. This is independent from the quality of your contributions here and on Wikipedia. I am very sorry. Ariadacapo (talk) 19:14, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the Answer 2 1) Files: File:Walter WIZ (1921), kresba Milan Tošnar 1981.jpg is a picture of my father, Milan Tošnar, who died in 2016 and I am the general heir. As an heir, I am giving the right to use Wikimedia/Wikipedia. 2) Files: File:Walter Super 6 (1930) na vzpomínkové jízdě 1000 mil Čs. 2018.jpg is my photo on Sunday (16. 6. 2018, 18:08) at the National Technical Museum in Prague. See details for the photo. 3) all other Files: I got the photo from the owner (Motorlet Prague) to create the following works. As author and editor of the book from which the pictures were used: (1) Libor Tošnar, Bohumil Sommer: "Motorcycles, Tricycles and Cars 1901-1951" In: New Signál - Motorlet, Praha, 1981-2 and (2) Libor Tošnar: "Sports and Racing Cars in the History of Our Business" In: New Signál - Motorlet, Praha, 1980, 28 p. I agree to use pictures on Wikimedia/Wikipedia. --Ltosnar (talk) 04:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the Answer 3 ad 3) I have corrected the date, source (Motorlet Prague) and author (unknown). Others can you delete, I do not need them. Sincerely Libor Tošnar --Ltosnar (talk) 22:03, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday, you explained that you consulted Motorlet’s archives and scanned the glass plates yourself, and now you explain that they all were already published before 1947 in the EU? If those images come from a private archive, they are still very likely copyrighted. If they were published in the EU before 1947, please provide a source.
To be clear: the permission you obtained to use those pictures in a book in the 1980s is not a license to publish them here under your favorite license. Please do not make up copyright information. If you do not know the author, provide a source. If you do not know the source, please identify the author. Otherwise it seems unreasonable to keep images from the 1930s here. Ariadacapo (talk) 06:10, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the Answer 4 I do not understand what you want me to do. The original pictures were created between 1912-1937. They were owned by company Walter (Walter, a car factory and aircraft´s engines)by the Kumpera family. Photo author is unknown. I do not know, where are the "glass plates" now. Copies from "glass plates" have been published maybe in many publications, newspapers and magazines that were published at the time. Why else would they be taken? After World War II, Walter was nationalized under President Beneš's decree without compensation. Attempts to restore property to the Kumpera family after the revolution in 1989 rejected the Czechoslovak state. The archive of these images has already been transformed into national ownership of the Motorlet National Company (1946-1995). In the years 1980-82, I used these images for the works mentioned, like hundreds of authors before me. I got the photograph from the Motorlet archive. From "glass plates" (negatives) are posibillity to make many copies - photos. That was the my contract with Motorlet. I will write the two publications and get the pictures. I chose them myself. I have about 200 of these photos. I want to use them for more articles on Wikipedia. Walter ceased making cars in 1951. Motorlet went bankrupt in 1995. In 1995, the company Motorlet was privatized as Walter a.s., and in 2005 the residual company was sold out - Walter Medica (healthcare), Walter Engines (aircraft´s motors), Walter - Deritend (precision casting foundry) etc. Land was sold and now here Penta Investments (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penta_Investments) built office and residential complex REZIDENCE WALTROVKA (https://www.waltrovka.cz/en/home/). The Czech Republic became a member of the EU in 2004. Czechoslovakia could not be a member of the EU in 1912-1937 because the EU did not exist in those years.

Now please, tell me what to do. --Ltosnar (talk) 10:02, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe other editors will have a different understanding, but in my eyes, the copyright status of those files can’t be determined and they should be deleted.
Like the vast majority of documents produced at the start of the 20th century these files are probably not in the public domain. The line of inheritance of copyright owners doesn’t matter. Without evidence they were published anonymously before 1947 in the EU, or published before 1923 in the US, or that the authors died before 1947, or without evidence that one of the countless complicated rules for copyight exiry applies, we can’t assume they are here for all to use. I am sorry. Again, maybe other editors will disagree, but I don’t see a solution to this. Ariadacapo (talk) 12:26, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the Answer 5 The Archives of Motorlet are stored in the State Regional Archives of Prague (Státní oblastní archív Praha), Walter a.s. (1902-1996). During the transformation of the state enterprise Motorlet, a.s. into a joint-stock company Walter a.s. under the Law Archives Act, the State Regional Archives of Prague took over the documents, which were stored in the company archive Motorlet - see page: http://aplikace.mvcr.cz/archivni-fondy-cr/VysledkyHLEDANI.aspx?stranka=1 --Ltosnar (talk) 05:49, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Can you contact them to ask about the copyright status of those images? Ariadacapo (talk) 05:59, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
According to Mgr. Marie Tarantová, Head of the Department of Economic Operators' Units from the State Regional Archives in Prague, Archivní 4, 149 00 Prague 4, is a free copyright status.
Ltosnar (talk) 15:46, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is great news. May you have them either state this on a publically-accessible website (best solution, as it would permit further uploads), or at least forward this permission through the OTRS system? -- Ariadacapo (talk) 13:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: With regret since there is no evidence that an OTRS ticket was ever sent in nor any statement on any website regarding the copyright status of these images. Without further information there really is nothing we can do as the copyright status of the work is in doubt. If we ever receive additional evidence I will happily undelete these. --Majora (talk) 05:26, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ltosnar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unfortunately, since the last nomination, a number of further files have been uploaded with the same problem. The source is indicated but there is no evidence provided for the license given (most of them CC-by-sa, a few anonymous-EU). Most of those images seem to have been produced in the 1920s and 1930s and are unlikely to enter the public domain before a long time.

Ariadacapo (talk) 12:28, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Walter, Tresoria, Ivan Hodač, Jindřich Knapp (1902-1947): Name of the fond (archive group): Walter, a.s. Stored in archives: Státní oblastní archiv v Praze (State Regional Archives in Prague) Place of origin of the fond (archive group) Praha (Česko) Time extent: 1902-1996 Accessibility: Archivní soubor je částečně přístupný pro nahlížení Creator of the fond (archive group) - agency: [Walter, a.s.]; Walter, a.s., IČ 00010561 Motorlet, národní podnik Motorlet a.s. Brief content description: Příkazy ředitele, oběžníky, vyhlášky, směrnice a pokyny, zápisy z porad, korespondence, komplexní rozbory, státní plán, zprávy o výsledcích hospodaření, významné návštěvy, kroniky, revizní zprávy, právní záležitosti, zřizovací listina, ochranné známky, závady a reklamace, spory, stížnosti, organizační směrnice, pracovní řády, smlouvy, závazky, negativy, fotografie (photo), časopisy automobilové, letecké, ceny ze soutěží, knihy protokolů, schvalovací dekret, stanovy, majetek, licence, představenstvo, filiálky, zaměstnanci, stávky, účetnictví, investice, odbyt, propagace, obchod, technický úsek, výroba The pictures are from the Walter archives stored in the State Regional Archives in Prague. The purchase of a digital copy of archival records is possible for CZK 25. Other

Pictures taken from public, digitized form of newspapers and magazines Auto, Pestrý týden, Lete Světem, Národní listy, Lidové noviny, etc. All these archival materials published before 1948 are free and publicly accessible. see Czech Digital Library: http://www.digitalniknihovna.cz/cdk/search/?sort=alphabetical&accessibility=public&doctypes=periodical And the best for the end

You let me delete the picture once(File:Walter WIZ (1921), kresba Milan Tošnar 1981.jpg). Milan Tošnar (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milan_To%C5%A1nar) was my father (1925-2016). In his life he painted about 1000 drawings. This is one of them. I am authorized to handle his inheritance by his own will. --Ltosnar (talk) 13:44, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding File:Walter Super 6B (1930), kresba Milan Tošnar.jpg, please forward permission through OTRS. For the others, I think everything has been explained in the previous deletion requests already. Ariadacapo (talk) 14:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think Anonymous-EU (which is PD-anon-70-EU) applies to files from the newspaper archives, e.g. File:Gabriela Preissová (1937).jpg. But many other files, e.g. File:Walter Junior SS (1934), karoserie Uhlík 2.jpg, come from a private archive (as you explained above) and were not published before 1948. Ariadacapo (talk) 07:57, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: O potvrzení OTRS na výkresy mého otce jsem zažádal na mailu: permissions-cs@wikimedia.org. Ostatní licence jsem opravil dle podobných případů na wikimedia commons. I apologize for the misconduct of the original files.Ltosnar (talk) 17:26, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

__________________

Re-ordering the list of nominated files according to the situation: (please fix, this is tedious work and I may make errors)

Fixed:

Fix coming, OTRS pending:

Problematic:

please compare with File:Nürburgring Felle Vogelschau.jpg and File:Nürburgring Felle.jpg The route plan was also published in the magazine Pestrý týden, 1926, no. 4 (24.11.1926), p. 8--Ltosnar (talk) 14:44, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
These two files are just completely different, I don’t know what you want us to see there. If the magazine source applies, please fix the author, source, and licensing, and then move this item in the section below. Ariadacapo (talk) 18:37, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Archives from magazine, fixed licensing, PD-anon-70-EU likely applies

Files from private achive, no evidence for year of publication, PD-anon-70-EU unlikely to apply

→ source expanded by Ltosnar, but book apparently published in 2012, PD-anon-70-EU likely does not apply
→ source expanded by Ltosnar, but book apparently published in 2015, PD-anon-70-EU likely does not apply
→ source expanded by Ltosnar, but book apparently published in 2015, PD-anon-70-EU likely does not apply

Ariadacapo (talk) 08:26, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently dealing with these photos via OTRS, so I would like to ask the Commons sysops to not close this discussion for a few more days (I am a little bit lazy to add OTRS received template to all photos, the way in discussion is more effective ). --Michal Lenc (talk) 18:12, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zažádal jsem 13. prosince 2018 o potvrzení Státní oblastní archív v Praze, že snímky 1902-1947 pocházejí z archívu Walter (Motorlet). I filed December 13, 2018, to confirm the State Regional Archives in Prague that the 1902-1947 images came from the Walter archive (Motorlet).--Ltosnar (talk) 14:58, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the three files * File:Tresoria 1.jpg, File:Walter 6 B, příčný řez (1928) A.jpg and File:Walter 6 B, příčný řez (1928) B.jpg, I don’t understand where the files were published before 1948 in the EU, so I moved the list items back in the bottom category. Ariadacapo (talk) 09:12, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ltosnar: please immediately stop uploading further files. You have a large number of problematic files right here. Please fix the existing problems first before continuing your imports. Ariadacapo (talk) 09:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ariadacapo: I have a few books (22 !), where the photos have been published. The source was either the State Regional Archives in Prague or the Walter (Motorlet) archive. The whole world can presented these photos, but Wikimedia Commons not. Is not it strange ? Finding those photos in old magazines and newspapers is a job for some years. And even the little child is clear that the photos were maked before 1948. Walter was only producing cars until 1948:
  1. Zdeněk Čížek: "Grand Prix Brno", NADAS, Praha, 1978, 200 s.
  2. Stanislav Minařík: "Automobily 1885/1940", NADAS, Praha, 1980, 175 s.
  3. Miloš Kovařík: "Velké závody - Muž pro Alfu Romeo", Novinář, Praha, 1982, 256 s.
  4. Graham Macbeth, Milan Jozíf: "Velký obrazový atlas automobilů", ARTIA, Praha, 1985, 608 s.
  5. Adolf Kuba: "Automobil v srdci Evropy", NADAS, Praha, 1986, 312 s.
  6. Adolf Kuba: "Atlas našich automobilů 2 (1914-1928)", NADAS, Praha, 1988, 236 s.
  7. Václav Petřík: Walter - AutoAlbum č.9, 735.ZO Svazarmu při UJEP, Brno, 1988, 64 s.
  8. Adolf Kuba, Milan Spremo: "Atlas našich automobilů 3 (1929-1936)", NADAS, Praha, 1989, 249 s.
  9. Milan Olšanský: "Prvních osm. Masarykův okruh 1930-1949", AGM-Gomola, Brno, 1995, 100 s., ISBN 80-900-594-6-5
  10. Zdeněk Zavřel, Alena Doskočilová: "Historie automobilových závodů 1930-2000", Computer Press, Praha, 2001, 150 s., ISBN 80-7226-449-4
  11. Miroslav Gomola: "Josef Walter - Akciová továrna na automobily a letecké motory", AGM CZ, s.r.o., Brno, 2002, 232 s., ISBN 80-85991-23-3
  12. Pavel Hanák a kol.: "75 let Masarykova okruhu ve fotografiích", Automotodrom Brno, a.s. a AMK Automotodrom Brno, 2005, 176 s.
  13. Alois Pavlůsek, Ondřej Pavlůsek: "České sportovní automobily", CP Books, a.s., Brno, 2005, 238 s., ISBN 80-251-0534-2
  14. Karel Řepa: "Závod do vrchu Zbraslav - Jíloviště", GT Club - Karel Řepa, Praha, 2008, 240 s., ISBN 978-80-902516-2-5
  15. Marián Šuman-Hreblay: "Encyklopedie nákladních automobilů", Computer Press, a.s., Brno, 2008, 222 s., ISBN 978-80-251-1718-7
  16. Hubert Procházka, Jan Martof: "Automobily Aero, Jawa, Walter, Wikov, "Z" (1905-1946)", Computer Press, a.s., Brno, 2009, 176 s., ISBN 978-80-251-1940-2
  17. Marián Šuman-Hreblay: "Autobusy", Computer Press, a.s., Brno, 2011, 240 s., ISBN 978-80-251-3455-9
  18. Marián Šuman-Hreblay: "Dvě století českých automobilů", CPres v Albatros Media, Brno, 2015, 160 s., ISBN 978-80-264-0716-4
  19. Zdeněk Král: "Motorismus v srdci Evropy", REBO International CZ, Praha, 2015, 304 s., ISBN 978-80-255-0987-6
  20. Jan Tuček: "Auta první republiky (1918-1938)", Grada Publishing, a.s., Praha, 2017, 356 s., ISBN 978-80-271-0466-6
  21. Marián Šuman-Hreblay: "Hasičská vozidla", CPress v Albatros Media, Brno, 2017, 216 s., ISBN 978-80-264-1388-2
  22. Marián Šuman-Hreblay: "Encyklopedie automobilů", CPres v Albatros Media, Brno, 2018, 272 s., ISBN 978-80-264-1852-8

Ltosnar (talk) 10:52, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about?? All we want to see is permission from the copyright owners --nothing else. Ariadacapo (talk) 13:06, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Further files

[edit]

Co-nominating those files for reasons stated above

Ariadacapo (talk) 13:04, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Permission from the copyright owners: owner from the copyright is Czech Republic (State Regional Archives in Prague). The photographs may have been taken by a Walter employee and were therefore owned by the Walter plant, owned by the Kumpera family. The property of the Kumpera family (Kumpera) was confiscated according to the Decree of the President of the Republic of 25 October 1945 on Confiscation of Enemy Assets and National Restitution Funds No. 108/1945 Coll. Factory Walter was nationalized after the II. World War in 1945. All property belonged to the Czechoslovak Republic. Now the documentation is stored in the state archive and "belongs to all the people". Archiving site: The State Regional Archives in Prague. See: https://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/archivy-a-archivalie.aspx?q=Y2hudW09Mg%3d%3d. The Walter Archive(1902-1948) is accessible and anyone can copy, photograph, scan, etc. For many photos (where isn´t author) I also mention where they were published(all photos are in the State Regional Archives), ie Magazines and Newspapers: Auto, Pestrý týden, Český svět, Motor Journal, Národní listy, Lidové noviny). The "community" also suggests deleting these pictures. Why? Are not they measuring "dual" meter here? Just look at hundreds of photos on the Wiki, for example: File:Hans Stuck aux Quatre-Chemins, côte de La Turbie 1936.jpg, File:Hans Stuck, vainqueur de la côte de La Turbie 1936 sur Auto Union V16 Type CD.jpg, File:Albert Divo vainqueur de la Targa Florio 1928, sur Bugatti Type 35B.jpg, File:Janine Jennky victorieuse de la Coupe de Bourgogne 1928, sur Bugatti 35C.jpg, File:Hans Stuck au Grand Prix de l'ACF 1934 (Auto Union Type A).jpg etc. It's just a coincidence that the all pictures are from the French authors. This is generally the case.Ltosnar (talk) 14:33, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the copyright information? We need a statement, on the archive website, or sent by email to COM:OTRS, that says "the copyright of those photos has expired" or "these photos are in the public domain". The copyright information. The copyright information. We don’t care where the photos have been or who owns the glass plates. Ariadacapo (talk) 15:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am constantly updating the sources where the photographs were published before 1948. I firmly believe that I will find adequate resources for all the photographs, so it is unnecessary to delete these photos.Ltosnar (talk) 05:17, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ltosnar: What’s your progress on this "constant update"? Also, in the last three weeks, there has been one more copyvio and now all your further uploads (e.g. today File:Walter - stánek firmy na Autosalonu (1922).jpg) are incorrectly tagged (if the author is unknown, we cannot state they died 70 years ago). Ariadacapo (talk) 12:34, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ariadacapo: I'm constantly looking for where the images were printed. I go to the state archive every week and study stored materials and prints - magazines. Again, I go to the archive on Thursday. I think I can almost find all the pictures. I've already found them a lot in the digital library.

To this today's Autosalon. How should I be tagged with an unknown author image that was published more than 70 years ago? PD-old is wrong?Ltosnar (talk) 13:24, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. If the work is anonymous and was published more than 70 years ago in what is now the European Union, you can use Anonymous-EU. You can use VisualFileChange to correct several files at once. Thank you for your continued research. Ariadacapo (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ariadacapo: The Case (Walter Automobiles Photos) is like this. All the "infested" photographs were published in the Walter Bulletins. It was a factory magazine that was published in 1928-1939. Every volume have 20-160 pages. Today, I have studied all the editions in the State Regional Archive, and I found the all photographs there. Bulletins especially with cars:
  1. Bulletin Walter, Vol. 1930, August, No. 6, 40 p., publisher: Akciová společnost Walter, továrna na automobily a letecké motory, Praha XVII - Jinonice
  2. Bulletin Walter, Vol. 1934, June, No. 6, 12 p., publisher: Akciová společnost Walter, továrna na automobily a letecké motory, Praha XVII - Jinonice
  3. Bulletin Walter, Vol. 1934, September, No. 9, 20 p., publisher: Akciová společnost Walter, továrna na automobily a letecké motory, Praha XVII - Jinonice
  4. Bulletin Walter, Vol. 1937, July, No. 4, 92 p., publisher: Akciová společnost Walter, továrna na automobily a letecké motory, Praha XVII - Jinonice
  5. Bulletin Walter, Vol. 1938, April, No. 2, 100 p., publisher: Akciová společnost Walter, továrna na automobily a letecké motory, Praha XVII - Jinonice

Bulletins are available at: The State Regional Archives in Prague. Come to Prague, you will not regret it. Prague is wonderful.

It would be best to release all the pictures without I have to record them again. Even if, I have them from the archive now in better quality. All sources (Walter Bulletins) I add to the photos. It's a pity you deleted photos from June 2018.

Ltosnar (talk) 17:41, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. I will go through the entire list of nominated files once again to sort them out, when I find time in the coming days. I will also file an undelete requests for those previously-deleted files that were featuread in the bulletins. Please overwrite existing low-quality files with newer versions if you have them. Finally, your final remark is unwarranted: your sourcing and licensing of those files were entirely fanciful. Really, given the length of this page and the recent overstep, you may have chosen a different wording. Ariadacapo (talk) 13:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Summary, April 2019

[edit]

Coming back at this problem, and summarizing the situation. The complete list of files with my recommendations are:

Keep, fixed by other volunteers

Keep, fixed, vefifiably sourced with magazine, PD-anon-70-EU likely applies

Keep, fixed, sourced to Bulletin Walter publication in the 1930s, PD-anon-70-EU likely applies

Delete Problem files, no fix provided in the last 3 months

Delete Not fixed in the last 3 months, no evidence for year of publication given, PD-anon-70-EU unlikely to apply

Delete Not fixed in the last 3 months, extracts from books, no permission provided

I am pinging Majora who handled the previous deletion request, Harold and Michal Lenc who helped with fixes already, as well as Ltosnar, the uploader. -- Ariadacapo (talk) 17:07, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: most with fixed license. Deleted a few. --JuTa 17:02, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any reason to be public domain in Peru. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file clearly states the following:
" Peruvian copyright law, signed under the Manuel Prado administration, had a 20 year protection over images starting in January 1, 1962. All images published in Peru prior to 1976, whose protection lasted until 1996 (and by which time a new 70 year protection was imposed by the Alberto Fujimori administration), are in the public domain. "
Additionally, there's already been multiple discussions about Peruvian copyright law, including most recently the following about an image from 1968.
Hence, the photograph is in the Public Domain.--MarshalN20 (talk) 13:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please remove the deletion orders in the respective sub-images of File: Peru 1970 National Football Team (digital restoration) .jpg. --LLs (talk) 15:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: as discussed. --Storkk (talk) 12:57, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
reverting own closure... given that this appears to be a relatively novel interpretation of the law, apparently discussed only on one Undeletion request for a file that itself still does not have a copyright tag for its country of origin, I think we need to see a fuller discussion on COM:VPC and a (re-)creation of {{PD-Peru}} before keeping. Storkk (talk) 13:04, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Closing admin should be aware of, and probably take the time to read through and understand Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Peru_and_the_URAA (which I have not yet done). Storkk (talk) 13:10, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion has already taken place, extensively. Adding more time on this matter is unnecessary. I agree that the PD-Peru page should better reflect the matter. I am available to address any questions, preferably if they have not already been answered in any of the aforementioned discussions.--MarshalN20 (talk) 00:27, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Image was taken in Mexico not Peru. Best case scenario is that this is truly an anonymous work and will be PD 50 years after publication in 2020. Also deleted the original File:Peru 1970 National Football Team.jpg --Majora (talk) 03:46, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]