User talk:Andreas Bohnenstengel
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- 16:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Foto Kim Schmitz
[edit]Hallo Andreas! Schönen Dank für das Foto von Kim Schmitz. Würdest Du bitte noch in der Dateibeschreibung des Fotos die Angaben ergänzen, wo & wann Du die Aufnahme gemacht hast? Danke & Gruß --Sir James (talk) 12:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Rolf Mueller.jpg was uncategorized on 27 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Wolfgang Ramadan SZ - 03.jpg was uncategorized on 30 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Wolfgang Ramadan SZ - 01.jpg was uncategorized on 30 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Wolfgang Ramadan SZ - 02.jpg was uncategorized on 30 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Wolfgang Ramadan.jpg was uncategorized on 30 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Pferdemarkt.jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Fotos: Wolfgang Ramadan SZ
[edit]Hallo Andreas, und vielen Dank für diese Beiträge. Es gibt dabei zwei große Probleme. Zuerst einmal ist der ganze Artikel drumherum mit eingescannt, was bedeutet, dass diese Bilder alle Urheberrechtsverletzungen sind und gelöscht werden müssten. Das kannst Du aber schnell und einfach beheben, indem Du nur den Ausschnitt mit dem Foto einscannst und die alten Bilder auf den jetzt hier vorhandenen Bildseiten mit "eine neue Version hochladen" ersetzt.
Das nächste Problem ist eben auch, dass das gamze schon mal veröffentlicht worden ist, d. h. Du müsstest noch ausdrücklich per Email eine Bestätigung an die Wikimedia Foundation schicken, dass dieses Material von Dir unter der entsprechenden Lizenz hier zum öffentlich Gebrauch bereitgestellt wird. Mehr dazu hier. De728631 (talk) 22:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo De728631! Ich melde mich hier, weil ich Andreas ein wenig beim Einstellen und Lizensieren seiner Fotos helfe. Okay; Zeitungsausschnitte hochzuladen, die fremde Texte beinhalten, ist keine gute Idee. Du hast dankenswerterweise angegeben, wie er das aus der Welt schaffen kann. Dein zweites Argument kann ich nicht recht nachvollziehen. Andreas lädt seine von ihm selbst angefertigten Fotografien hoch und gibt eine der gültigen Lizenzen an. Damit sind die Voraussetzungen erfüllt. Er ist der Rechteinhaber, das hat er bereits erklärt, indem er beim Hochladen weiterklickt und ein zweites Mal, indem er dies in der Dateibeschreibung angibt (Quelle: own/eigenes Werk). Ich kann nicht erkennen, warum eine zusätzliche Erklärung an das OTRS-Team notwendig sein sollte. Gruß --Sir James (talk) 22:31, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Weil sich nunmal jeder Benutzer Andreas Bohnenstengel nennen kann, auch wenn der echte Herr Bohnenstengel gar nicht dahinter steckt. Gerade bei solchen "Kultfotos" aus der Zeitung müssen wir uns vor Nachahmern schützen (siehe "Flickr-washing"). Was nicht heißen soll, dass ich Andreas hier böse Absichten unterstellen will. Und so wie es auf en.wiki erklärt ist, benötigt man für jedwede Zweitveröffentlichung via WMF eine Bestätigung der Rechte, auch wenn man definitiv der Urheber ist. Das mit dem OTRS habe ich nicht von ungefähr vorgeschlagen, sondern auch, weil meiner Erfahrung nach solche Lizenzen regelmäßig per Löschantrag angezweifelt werden. De728631 (talk) 23:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Um diesen Zweifel an der Identität auszuräumen, sollte eine Mail genügen. Genau eine. Zu verlangen, dass jeder Upload zusätzlich mit einer solchen Ehrenerklärung zu versehen sei, ist eindeutig über das Ziel hinaus geschossen. Ich freue mich sehr, dass wir hier Profiaufnahmen spendiert bekommen; noch dazu von Menschen, zu welchen wir nur sehr schwer Fotos bekommen können. Außerdem dazu sind diese Arbeiten von ungewöhnlich guter Qualität; mit einem überraschend agierenden Blick gemacht. Gruß --Sir James (talk) 23:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ich habe auch nie verlangt, dass alle Fotos einzeln bestätigt werden sollen. De728631 (talk) 23:27, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Und vielen Dank an Andreas für die Korrekturen! De728631 (talk) 23:38, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Gern geschehen
[edit]Also hiermit möchte ich versichern, dass ich der echte wahre und einzigartige Andreas Bohnenstengel aus München bin. Mein Nutzerprofil gibt ein wenig Auskunft: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Andreas_Bohnenstengel . Die Zeitungsausschnitte sollten eigentlich nur Provenienz der Fotografien sein. Mit besten Grüßen Andreas
People of Munich
[edit]Hallo Andreas, vielen Dank für die tollen Bilder. Damit Du Dich nicht wunderst, warum ich nun zum zweiten Mal einige Deiner Fotos aus Category:People of Munich entfernt habe: Wenn Bilder bereits in einer Personenkategorie enthalten sind, dann werden die Oberkategorien dieser Personenkategorie den einzelnen Bildern nicht erneut zugewiesen. Und Category:Andreas Bohnenstengel ist bereits in Category:People of Munich enthalten. Beste Grüße, --Rudolph Buch (talk) 11:59, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Spielsucht.jpg
[edit]File:Spielsucht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
M.E. besteht die ernste Gefahr, dass Persönlichkeitsrechte verletzt werden, da die Person durchaus identifzierbar sein kann.--Lefschetz (talk) 07:42, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hallo, Andreas, ich habe hier bzgl. des Bildes eine Frage gestellt. Grüße, --Coyote III (talk) 16:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Armin Schulz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Krd 14:30, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Spielsucht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sebari (talk) 16:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Büro Rolf Müller.webm
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Büro Rolf Müller.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 17:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Gaudirndldrahn 02.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Gaudirndldrahn 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yann (talk) 21:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Gaudirndldrahn 03.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Gaudirndldrahn 03.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yann (talk) 21:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Gaudirndldrahn 01.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Gaudirndldrahn 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yann (talk) 21:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Urheberrecht bei Zeitungsartikeln?
[edit]Hallo,
ich fürchte, für einige deiner jüngsten Beiträge gilt dasselbe, was hier vor einigen Jahren bereits diskutiert wurde: die Rechte an den gescannten oder fotografierten Zeitungsartikeln gehören erst einmal dem Herausgeber der Zeitung, selbst wenn du der Autor der Artikel bist (Own work, nicht nur Self-photographed) – da müsste in deinem Vertrag mit der Zeitung eine Klausel über anderweitige Verwendung stehen:
Das BISS-Bild könnte gehen, weil man dort die Schrift nicht lesen kann. Aber die anderen Artikel kann man lesen. Da bräuchte WC wohl eine Zustimmung von Hallo bzw. SZ. Das könnte möglich sein, für meinen eigenen Netzauftritt habe ich so was schon mal bekommen.
Grüße, -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 13:56, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Boxtraining 04.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Achim Raschka (talk) 18:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Hallo Andreas, mit diesem Edit hast du den Lizenzbaustein von dem Foto entfernt. Falls du das nicht zurückänderst, muss es gelöscht werden. --Túrelio (talk) 20:52, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- Entschuldigung. Es ist von mir bei der Modifizierung der Bildbeschreibung versehentlich gelöscht worden. Danke für den Hinweis. Beste Grüße --Andreas 10.01, 18. März. 2018 (CET)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
- Done. Andreas 12.01, 3. April 2018 (CET)
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
[edit]Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit]Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
- Danke für die immer wiederkehrenden Erinnerungen. Wie ich bereits mitteilte, habe ich an der Umfrage längst teilgenommen. Andreas
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 15:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Ich zitiere die Doppeseite in dem ich Sie nicht vollständig zeige. Name und Seitenzahl der über 20 jahre alten Veröffentlichung in dem Magazin (dessen Verlag gar nicht mehr existiert) sind vollständig genannt. --Andreas 09:41, 30 Juni 2018 (UTC)
File:Die Erstausgabe der Novelle Angst von Stefan Zweig.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Goesseln (talk) 15:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Bilder von Meisam
[edit]Hi, du hast neulich im WikiMuc Bilder von Technik für User:Meisam gemacht. Kannst du die bitte noch hier hochladen. Wir füllen dann die Beschreibungen aus und kategorisieren sie, etc. Danke! -- Michael F. Schönitzer 19:17, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Andreas Bohnenstengel,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Andreas Bohnenstengel,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Andreas Bohnenstengel,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
[edit]A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thanks
[edit]thanks for your pictures of retirement home. :-) 77.235.178.3 17:35, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
We need your feedback!
[edit]Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!
I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.
We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.
Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.
Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.
Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Hallo Andreas, ist das in der Zeitung abgedruckte Foto auch von dir oder nur das von Foto von dem Zeitungsausschnitt? --Túrelio (talk) 09:40, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Das in der Zeitung abgedruckte Foto ist von mir. Siehe: Category:Marie Luise Wilckens. 13 October 2021 Andreas
Hinzufügen einer Legende
[edit]Hallo, ich habe eine Datei über einen Hund im "Gefängnis" gefunden, aber es fehlte eine Legende, also habe ich sie erstellt (allerdings ist sie auf Französisch, aber ich werde sie auf Deutsch einfügen).TYURZ-Commons (talk) 17:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- Merci beaucoup! 29 April 2022 Andreas
Copyright status: File:Fototapete Kaputzinerstrasse 2022 03.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Fototapete Kaputzinerstrasse 2022 03.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Fototapete Kaputzinerstrasse 2022 03.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Fototapete Kaputzinerstrasse 2022 01.jpg
- File:Fototapete Kaputzinerstrasse 2022 02.jpg
- File:Fototapete Kaputzinerstrasse 2022 08.jpg
- File:Fototapete Kaputzinerstrasse 2022 07.jpg
- File:Fototapete Kaputzinerstrasse 2022 06.jpg
- File:Fototapete Kaputzinerstrasse 2022 05.jpg
- File:Fototapete Kaputzinerstrasse 2022 04.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:12, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ich danke dir Andreas Bohnenstengel (talk) 18:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ich habe die Beschreibung nachgeliefert und bitte um die Freigabe. Andreas Bohnenstengel (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kingsif (talk) 13:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Bundeshauptstadt Bonn 07.jpg
[edit]Hallo,
mir scheint, dass der Gesprächspartner von Heinz Riesenhuber in dem Foto der Börsenjournalist Friedhelm Busch ist. Gibt es dazu Erkenntnisse?
Vielen Dank und beste Grüße --K. Nagel (talk) 11:38, 2 November 2024 (UTC) Ich weis es leider nicht. Andreas 11. November 20214