Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/04/21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 21st, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 15:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jocelyn-2.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:JobsGalore.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joel's headshot.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mo Laouni.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mobile Banking in Ghana.pdf Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mobile communications and Telecommuting.pdf Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mochama Nairobi 2018.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:11, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Moein-Z-Called-Nareye-Chah-e1510045584957.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Moeinz1.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:11, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ksa ther siom seda 2600:1700:CB30:BA40:219E:8868:90F4:5B4A 04:40, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:56, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From [1], 2016. Yann (talk) 16:24, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:25, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yo subi este archivo
No cumple con normas de Commons:Licencias Victor Gibby (talk) 06:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 21:37, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://i2.wp.com/kifache.com/content/uploads/2017/12/FB_IMG_1514455657764.jpg?w=950 Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:59, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:29, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License laundering is possible. The image has small size, no camera metadata. It's copyrighted by SERGEY KISELEV [2]. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:11, 21 April 2018 (UTC) The photographer's permission is needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:08, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The image is taken from https://www.mos.ru/upload/newsfeed/newsfeed/tverskaya-zastava01.jpg which lies at the official portal of the Moscow Mayor and Moscow Government https://www.mos.ru/en/ hence the licensing of the file indicated as {{Mos.ru}} --Vаdiм (talk) 12:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As declared at the bottom of every page of the portal :
All materials are available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. If you use the materials please acknowledge the source and provide a link to the portal.
including the source page -- https://www.mos.ru/en/news/item/37954073/ --Vаdiм (talk) 14:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There is no evidence that SERGEY KISELEV, the author of this image, and SERGEY KISELEV from http://sergeykiselev.pro are the same person. http://sergeykiselev.pro has a link to https://www.facebook.com/sergey.kiselyoff.9/about where one could read that the later one "Lives in Tyumen", which quite in a distance from Moscow. More over, the site http://sergeykiselev.pro contains images of far more superior quality than the image in question --Vаdiм (talk) 15:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:15, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo was actually taken by Bruno Barbey and was wrongly attributed to US DoD https://pro.magnumphotos.com/image/PAR35824.html Le Petit Chat (talk) 10:51, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:36, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Could be many things. Undescribed, unused, unusable. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:14, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: vandalism by LTA sock. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:04, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://sobory.ru/photo/?photo=2484 - 2003, author = Автор фотографии: Сергей Бузланов Снято: май 2003 НоуФрост (talk) 19:09, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:40, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious attack-image. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:00, 21 April 2018 UTC: Attack image, used only for vandalism on English Wikipedia --Krdbot 06:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:34, 21 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: COM:NETCOPYVIO of https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0493001/mediaviewer/rm3920048128 (again) --Krdbot 06:36, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For a 1952 photo, {{PD-old}} is obviously not applicable (the creator can't have died more than 70 years ago) and the source website doesn't mention any kind of public domain or free license either. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:08, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 09:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:24, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:24, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:24, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:25, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:25, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:30, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:30, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Banffy (talk) 05:30, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept: obviously not such bad quality that warrants deletion. --Krd 15:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio based on user's history. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:56, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Edgar181 at 14:39, 23 April 2018 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Daniel Parejo.png: Likely copyvio based on user's history. --Krdbot 18:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio based on user's history. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:56, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Edgar181 at 14:41, 23 April 2018 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hector Bellerin.png: Likely copyvio based on user's history. --Krdbot 18:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 18:58, 23 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work of http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Jamareo+Artis/iHeartRadio+Music+Festival+Day+1+Show/NznWsw_0r4g --Krdbot 00:33, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wilsoncleveland (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Movie stills and posters. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just emailed the release below to permissions-commons-at-wikimedia-dot-org.

I hereby affirm that I, Wilson Cleveland, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the media: File:Jaime Murray and Eddie McClintock in the web series Suite 7 distributed by Lifetime.jpg

I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Wilson Cleveland 2018-04-21


Deleted: per nomination - it's hard to believe that depicted person would be the author of these pictures. --Jcb (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I am an owner and uploader of this image. I can upload the image with EXIF. Is there any reference for resolution? I can upload with high resolution as well.


Kept: Better resolution with EXIF was uploaded. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:19, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:06, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No significance of any kind. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:40, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:31, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no metadata, picture certainly found elsewhere on the web. Cjp24 (talk) 02:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original image belongs to Cuartoscuro: https://www.animalpolitico.com/2012/04/muere-miguel-de-la-madrid/ Luisalvaz (talk) 02:29, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't show the proper license or permission. And it is used in other web sites: https://www.elmanana.com/expresidente-echeverria-sale-del-hospital-recibir-cuidados-medicos-luis-echeverria-salud-hospital/4265769 Luisalvaz (talk) 02:33, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The imagen doesn't show the proper permission or license to its reuse: https://lideresmexicanos.com/300/carlos-salinas-de-gortari/ Luisalvaz (talk) 02:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scaledown duplicate of file:Iowa County, Wisconsin, Courthouse - Icon - 300-dpi.png Louperivois Ψ @ 04:32, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:31, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahmudur Rahman Jawad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images.

--ghouston (talk) 05:15, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mahmudur Rahman Jawad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope, self promotion

Cabayi (talk) 17:33, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, except 3 kept because are likely in scope for Category:2018 Quota reform protest --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:23, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal artwork? No meaningful description. --ghouston (talk) 05:19, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:30, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used for vandalism/nonsense on en.wiki, caption "Takin after his arrest in Japen" appears derogatory, and it's clearly not a police "mugshot" as the title implies. Given the nature of its en.wiki use, there must be copyright concerns too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:20, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 06:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 06:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

burry image SecretName101 (talk) 06:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a logo. Probably copyrighted. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 06:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.6.178 06:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 17:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own work anyway. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kamaljeet Singh Bawari. He uploaded again. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 06:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, used for promotional purposes on enwiki by now-blocked acount Acroterion (talk) 06:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Guardian has copyright in this support plea. and all rights are reserved. this is incompatible with Commons' policy. im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 07:09, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot of a non-free webpage im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 07:11, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 07:19, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+photomontage. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 07:20, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+ unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 廣九直通車 as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: The file is an advertisment of Kung Fu Panda, which is either a violation of COM:FU, or a violation of COM:ADVERT, or both of them.
Converted by me to DR after protest by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:49, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: The uploader claim it to be his own photography, which is not contested. However, IMO the depicted building has enough creativity to be copyrightable. Regrettably, UAE has no freedom-of-panorama exception, whereby this photo violates the copyright of the architect or designer of the depicted building/portal. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the file looks so similar to a movie poster or CG graphic advertisement, which I overlook the file.廣九直通車 (talk) 13:59, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Todesgeist as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: }} personal reasons --Todesgeist ([[User talk:Todesgeist|{{int:Talkpagelinktext
Converted by me to DR, as it does not qualify for SD (uploaded in 2012). -- Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support courtesy deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope Perumalism Chat 08:58, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I used the wrong rationale for this file when I was less experienced; it does not allow NC and should be deleted. Kees08 (talk) 09:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that the Flickr user is the publisher of this bible. Therefore, while the photo may be freely licensed, the Bible is not and in the image cannot be kept here without a free license from the publisher. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low Quality Out of Scope Perumalism Chat 09:37, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:46, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:47, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:46, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

3A Immobilien isn't mentioned neither in de.wiki nor in en.wiki. The logo can be out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:47, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work НоуФрост (talk) 11:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Sealle (talk) 18:42, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation MaksOttoVonStirlitz (talk) 12:12, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:38, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bielawakochana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

NC licence only on Flickr.

~Cybularny Speak? 20:25, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:46, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work. Looks like a photograph from a TV screen Mutter Erde (talk) 12:39, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:24, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identic and unsued copy of File:Wikipedia-logo.png. Niridya (talk) 12:40, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Support --Niridya (talk) 12:40, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:24, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The following person want her image to be deleted from Wikipedia pages including Wiki Commons. The following person is female from India and wants her picture to be deleted because she thinks this image can be used for wrong purpose on Internet. Imshukzz (talk) 13:08, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following person want her image to be deleted from Wikipedia pages including Wiki Commons. The following person is female from India and wants her picture to be deleted because she thinks this image can be used for wrong purpose on Internet. Imshukzz (talk) 13:10, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I want my mom's photo to be deleted from Wiki Commons! Please delete it asap! Shubhanshu Shukla (talk) 13:18, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It's a very poor-quality, blurry image anyway, and there are enough other photos illustrating the subject "married women of India". --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not uploader's own work. Can be found here on Getty Images https://www.gettyimages.com/license/107225290 AgWoolridge (talk) 21:52, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--Orowitz (talk) 19:10, 21 April 2018 (UTC) It's a wrong upload, please delete it! Thank you! (I thought to make a simple experiment uploading a file and then delete it by myself. But then I cannot delete it.)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:39, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:39, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:42, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:42, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (see [[Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats]), likely copyright violation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:27, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 19:51, 29 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Icyflame102 --Krdbot 00:27, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Although the main author of the book died in 1931, the file also contains copyrighted preface by philologist Lidziya Savik (Belarusian: Лідзія Савік; born in 1936) on pages 3-10 and comments by local historian and writer Mixasʹ Kazlouski (Belarusian: Міхась Казлоўскі, born in 1959) on pages 261-277. Also the book contains some elements of design (e.g., on title page, pages 3, 11) by artist Anatoli Akulik (Belarusian: Анатоль Акулік, born in 1954) which by no means can be available under CC-like license and be called {{Own}} work by the uploader. Jarash (talk) 09:27, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:03, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:19, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, user has history of uploading copyvios — Dudek1337 (talk) 23:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, found elsewhere on the web in uncropped versions. --Guanaco (talk) 08:59, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by a sockpuppet/serial copyvio user. I can't find this one online, but we can't take their word for "own work" either. Guanaco (talk) 08:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Exif is consistent between the two so own work is possible. Are these COM:TOYS copyrighted? Guanaco (talk) 08:42, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I believe own work, but delete the photos nevertheless due to bad quality. We have better photos in category:Rubik's Revenge. The photos are used in userpages, but as the users are globally locked, this does not count. Taivo (talk) 08:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, useless for any educational purpose Guanaco (talk) 08:48, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, empty image, totally black. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong source.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain, @Jeff G.: . File:Batophora.jpg is clearly clipped from the link specified. --NessieVL (talk) 16:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@NessieVL: Sorry, I was fooled by the 96.2% you clipped out and the change of name.  I withdraw my nomination.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:50, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9   16:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per a dissucssion at s:Wikisource:Copyright_discussions#Index:The_maritime_provinces_of_British_North_America_and_the_American_Revolution.djvu , it was determined that this was still in copyright. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:44, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:47, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image utilisée ailleurs sur Internet, voir notamment ce lien, autorisation du photographe nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 09:51, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. P 1 9 9   16:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incredible own-CCBYSA license, seems to be copied from Internet, authorship "appropriated" by uploader, extremely poor quality Julo (talk) 10:12, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Now much better Julo (talk) 16:58, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This photos are not from Internet. I made them many years ago, and cropped them to show referee. That's why quality is not very good. But usability of this photo is high. At pl-wiki there is global discussion about this photos: w:pl:Wikipedia:Kawiarenka/Artykuły#zdjęcia w artykułach o koszykówce and opinions on this subject vary. Please do not delete this photo until discussion at pl-wiki ends. Mariusz Swornóg (talk) 10:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The two entities (commons & pl-wiki) are independent. Here we decide, if Commons rules enjoin to delete this file. Julo (talk) 12:33, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To prove that this is my photo, here you can see the original non-cropped photo with EXIF - File:Proof - Basketball foul 2.jpg. Mariusz Swornóg (talk) 13:31, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I also improved quality of this photo. So I think we can end this discussion and photo can stay. :) Mariusz Swornóg (talk) 14:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Julo (talk) 16:58, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9   16:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of a 1966 copyrighted drawing. Kokonino (talk) 10:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's too recent indeed. No objection against deletion. Sorry for the goof ! --Eunostos (talk) 14:00, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:53, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo with unclear notability, maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Taivo, nice to see you! "Logo with unclear notability" mean... - what it mean exactly? This file meat the notability criterion - or not? Where are arguments for or anti-? I see nothing. Unclear mean also all or nothing - isn't it?
"On 12th of August 2015 I deleted 963 files during 6 hours and 47 minutes" - I'm really impressed, but... how many valuable files do you uploaded in 7 hours? About 7 since 2013??? - it could not be a truth! :) --Jasc PL (talk) 22:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jasc PL: I suspect, that the logo should be deleted, because there's nothing to do with it. For example, the company isn't mentioned in en:AVC. Taivo (talk) 07:35, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo - first of all, above is nothing personal - it's the only one of many examples of astonishing kind of thinking many people here. Probably about 80% of COM files are not used in the enwiki (I understand that all another wikis don't exist or are negligible - yes?), so all are not used at the time should be deleted - isn't it?
I practice I don't care about this particular image - I'v uploaded it by the way, for category concerning some of accessories from one of producers, for one of main topics I'm working on, but... It's the mater of rules and the sense of spending many time on planning, searching, uploading, properly naming, describing and categorizing files here. This is also the question about the sense of spending so many amount of time here. I don't like to waste my time - it's not unlimited. Taivo - I suspect e.g. that Michael Jackson is live - you find it as a basis for anything? :). --Jasc PL (talk) 14:36, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. You found zero evidence, why the file is useful. Taivo (talk) 14:40, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly - what?? No; your request = you must explain the reasons. --Jasc PL (talk) 14:57, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No, @Jasc PL: . You as uploader must show, that the file is somehow useful. If you cannot, then it's enough to delete the file. Taivo (talk) 15:15, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope: promotional image only, no educational value. P 1 9 9   16:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. In addition, the logo can be in out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused promotional logo, no educational value. P 1 9 9   16:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo with unclear notability. Corresponding wikidata item should be deleted soon. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused promotional logo, no educational value. P 1 9 9   16:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo with unclear notability, maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: vastly inferior version of File:CBC Television 2009.svg. P 1 9 9   16:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A small and unused loop 219.79.127.166 12:05, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: higher quality version now uploaded. P 1 9 9   17:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 13:12, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Texts copyrighted. — regards, Revi 13:12, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to delete my photo Peter1170 (talk) 13:13, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: uploaded almost 3 years ago, it no longer qualifies for a courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9   17:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Texts copyrighted — regards, Revi 13:14, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope low quality Perumalism Chat 13:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is a description of the Schulof family, but this is considered a violation of COM:NOTWP, moreover, the source of this file is dubious. 廣九直通車 (talk) 13:40, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality out of scope Perumalism Chat 13:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality out of scope Perumalism Chat 13:49, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality out of scope Perumalism Chat 13:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless and poor quality picture of anonymous person. Out of scope. Harlock81 (talk) 20:35, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio based on user's history. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:56, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 10:39, 23 April 2018, by Edgar181. P 1 9 9   17:18, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical book page. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file now has an svg version: File:Skin color in Skyrim.svg. The caption below the colors is obsolete on the English Wikipedia which already encyclopedically describes the colors. Wumbolo (talk) 14:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   17:22, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Musicalsrule990 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of fan/promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Felipe.paladare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 국회예산정책처 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meaningless small excerpt. Adam37 (talk) 14:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:26, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 17:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:27, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Augusto Filipe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).

hiàn 17:30, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BulleT.FalconZ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).

hiàn 17:31, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 17:36, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 17:42, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 17:43, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:27, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NN individual - should be using a webpage not Wikipedia reddogsix (talk) 19:15, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, accidentally included in batch upload Mindmatrix 19:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:31, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Takafumi Uehara 1.jpg 71.237.209.13 20:49, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason given for deletion. P 1 9 9   17:31, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo serves to promote non notable people. Has been deleted for this same reason before. Bneu2013 (talk) 21:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:32, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF data notes this is a screenshot, so I'm doubtful we have the original copyright holder's release. Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:30, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:30, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:34, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader and creator requesting deletion of an inferior raster graphics file superseded by a vector version. --PhilipTerryGraham (talk) 23:05, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   17:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:BnF_ms._854_fol._61_-_Folquet_de_Marseille_(2).jpg, the source seems to indicate this is an attempt at creating a hoax. Savhñ 23:27, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:35, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP-Russia. This is sculpture НоуФрост (talk) 13:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 00:07, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the UAE. Storkk (talk) 14:52, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 00:06, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama for architecture in the UAE. Storkk (talk) 14:53, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 00:07, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP-Russia. This is art mosaic НоуФрост (talk) 14:57, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 00:06, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to EXIF the file are copyrighted by KRAYNEV DMITRY.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:11, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:44, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stated to be unfree on the English Wikipedia (see en:File:Manwithmoviecamera2.jpg) Lucasbfr (talk) 10:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Cirt (talk) 04:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's not PD, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stenberg_brothers Маленькая красная тряпочка (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If they did it together it's a collective work, and it comes to PD after 70 years of it's release--Sailko (talk) 06:51, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no it is not a collective work, it is a case of joint authorship. Therefore, the copyright term is to be calculated from the death of the last author (1982). --BrightRaven (talk) 08:03, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image found at https://twitter.com/Discover_DZ/status/977610780328759296 ; no permission mentioned Tractopelle-jaune (talk) 19:09, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image found at https://fr-fr.facebook.com/observalgerie/posts/1653556258000023 ; no permission mentioned Tractopelle-jaune (talk) 19:13, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erik Nussbicker is born in 1963. No freedom of panorama in France, no OTRS.

Chassipress (talk) 20:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images already deleted once : Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Erik Nussbicker, still no OTRS

Shev123 (talk) 10:58, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission from the artist. --Wdwd (talk) 12:06, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, found as early as 2016 at http://www.nikikai21.net/blog/media/201605_higuchi_tatsuya.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:55, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a part of other filme (both from me) Joseolgon (talk) 09:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: request by uploader (film is too short to be useful). --BrightRaven (talk) 08:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of a free license. Oscar Vazquez has to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 12:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:46, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From YT, Standard YouTube License. Yann (talk) 16:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 09:20, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Snoop2018 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Majority previously deleted as "out of scope" by "other" uploaders - Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jeazz, files have also been uploaded by user:Welldo321 and deleted. Also some strange other deletions listed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tanga in der Sonne - Thong in the Sun.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tanga am Strand - Thong on the Beach.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mann mit Stringtanga in einer Bucht.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Man with Thong on the Beach.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mann mit Stringtanga im Tropical Island Resort Krausnick.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tanga - Thong - Tropical Island.jpg

Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 09:27, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Edith Bizot, autorisation de l'auteur nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 21:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: published before the upload: http://www.purepeople.com/article/yannick-noah-et-ses-complices-en-prison-ils-coupent-les-barbeles_a156523/1. --BrightRaven (talk) 09:33, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yvonne Serruys died in 1953. No freedom of panorama in France.

Chassipress (talk) 21:09, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no Freedom of Panorama in France. Undelete in 2024. --Storkk (talk) 16:36, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(1)The original picture is not in public domain. (2)The original picture was announced in 1992,the original creator has copyright. This anti-picture is a Violation of copyright, interpretation and adaptation (especially against original logo picture) is unauthorized. (3) Its seems created by a Single-purpose account, or a sock puppetry. only 8 edits in chinese-wikipedia, and 6 for anti-falungong. (4)and the account"Jiangze men" seems means the chiinese Communist Party ex-leader, who launched persecution against Falungong. Wetrace (talk) 03:09, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 OpposeThe Deletion requester is witch hunting.蘇州宇文宙武 (talk) 14:51, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: If the logo is protected by copyright (because it is recent and above TOO), then all the images in Category:Falun Gong emblem should be deleted. BrightRaven (talk) 07:42, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose The original file used the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which allows "Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially", so unless the licensing template used was incorrect the adpatation does not need an authorization, and did not violate copyright. "Single-purpose account" is not a reason for deleting either as many users only uploaded one image on Commons. The uploader's name also has nothing to do with this deletion request.--Mongolian Beef (talk) 12:24, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Original logo is below ToO. Ruthven (msg) 05:43, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To my knowledge this image is not used encyclopedically on any project and is just being used by users to promote religious intolerance Dronebogus (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruthven: I see a direct violence to UCoC § 3.3.4. It shows a terroristic harrassment by KPCh against Falun Gong including human rights violation and should be deleted therefore. The use of derivation of File:Falun Gong Logo.svg is not allowed because it's even not CC-by-sa-3.0 as erroneously stated but a copyrighted symbol and should be deleted too as copyright violence. @Krd: Please check it as second sysop view. Thank you ... Doc Taxon (talk) 13:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to the close statement at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Falun Gong Logo.svg the logo depiction is considered a derivative work of an uncopyrightable blazon (coat of arms description). Make of that what you will. I have no opinion, I’m not an expert and the case seems fairly ambiguous to me. Dronebogus (talk) 14:31, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am not of the opinion this is TOO since it’s neither pure simple geometry/symbols nor based heavily on a PD work such that there’s minimal creative addition to the original. Dronebogus (talk) 14:34, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just because I was asked personally above: I see the logo above TOO. It is clearly in scope because heavily used. --Krd 18:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Krd: it may be in scope because heavily used. But it is not encylopedically used. It's above TOO, but there's no permission for using it with CC-by-sa - therefore it should be deleted. (The original is not an uncopyrightable blazon because it's not a coat of arms.) Also there's a direct violence to UCoC § 3.3.4 because it shows a terroristic harrassment by KPCh against Falun Gong including human rights violations. Commons should not be motivated to support this. Doc Taxon (talk) 21:04, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The original Falun Gong symbol is basically a bunch of colored swastikas and yin-yang symbols, both very old symbols and as such not copyrightable unless a version were drastically different and original, which those in the Falun Gong symbol are not. As for the claims that the symbol is used to promote religious intolerance: Perhaps. But then don't try to have the image deleted, but tell the people promoting that intolerance to stop (if they will listen to you). Else others will come and try to get File:Anti-Catholicism.svg or File:Anti-Islamism.svg deleted, and probably many more in Category:Anti logos. So no, this is not the way to go. --Rosenzweig τ 20:43, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

die Version ist fehlerhaft und hat eine Nachfolger version in der die Niederschlagssumme richtig ist. Hoefler50 (talk) 04:29, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the correct version? BrightRaven (talk) 07:50, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no answer. Unclear request. Ruthven (msg) 05:44, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of Radio station, no permission Papuass (talk) 09:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:45, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:45, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyrighted corporate logo (which is explisitly stated in descr.) falsely marked as CC-Zero Akim Dubrow (talk) 11:20, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:45, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from photographer William Silverman is needed. No evidence, that original uploader Was113 is the same person. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:46, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture violates copyright. See https://www.chessqueens.nl/nieuws.php?itemId=81 84.199.103.113 14:13, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. In particular this files comes from Facebook. Ruthven (msg) 05:46, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio; sourced from https://web.archive.org/web/20120115215143/http://www.lce.lublin.pl/archeo/eneolit/eneo_2.html Izno (talk) 16:57, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:48, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio; sourced from https://web.archive.org/web/20120115215143/http://www.lce.lublin.pl/archeo/eneolit/eneo_2.html Izno (talk) 16:57, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:48, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio; sourced from https://web.archive.org/web/20120115215143/http://www.lce.lublin.pl/archeo/eneolit/eneo_2.html Izno (talk) 16:57, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:48, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio; sourced from https://web.archive.org/web/20120115215143/http://www.lce.lublin.pl/archeo/eneolit/eneo_2.html Izno (talk) 16:57, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:48, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious licensing, no indication this is PD. Sealle (talk) 17:48, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:48, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Captura fotograma de vídeo de programa de televisión con copyright Geom (talk) 18:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:47, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work". Logo of the Tibetan Football Association. Complex enough to be copyrightable.Fma12 (talk) 19:20, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 05:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Majora as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: ALLRIGHTSRESERVED@SATISH KUMAR PHOTOGRAPHY in EXIF.

I think this needs a closer look.

No identical file found online via Google Images. Speedy deletion was objected by the uploader ("This photo was taken during a recent event in Bhubaneswar and this guy was not there. " - see file talk page) - perhaps was it a borrowed or second-hand camera that added obsolete EXIF lines of the previous owner? whym (talk) 08:06, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: ALLRIGHTSRESERVED@SATISH KUMAR PHOTOGRAPHY. OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 20:37, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader Ronhjones said, that the OTRS-ticket isn't valid for the logo, but the logo is in his opinion simple. But in my opinion it's a complex logo. Other opinions are needed. Source country is UK, which has low threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 15:01, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Ticket just relates to the source of the image. I just saw it as 5 plain overlapping circles (yellow, green, red, black, blue from bottom to top), with 5 Vs and 5 blobs. I could try going back to the academy in OTRS if desired. Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:40, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Or it can just go to a non-free image on en-wiki, since that's it only use. Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:07, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most likely above TOO in the UK. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:12, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ww2censor as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: There is no freedom of panorama exception for anything other than buildings in Taiwan.
Converted by me to DR to allow for a discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:20, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama? I do not think so. As previously discussed here: [3], Taiwan's laws are stipulated: "於街道、公園、建築物之外壁或其他向公眾開放之戶外場所長期展示之美術著作或建築著作,除下列情形外,得以任何方法利用之." I think it means that people can take photographs in public places. But the question is why I can't upload "File:Monument for the Yoshino Immigrant Village in Ji'an.jpg"?--Kai3952 (talk) 22:07, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to discuss Commons:Freedom of panorama#Taiwan (Republic of China), that's the wrong place. See Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#FOP_in_Taiwan. --Túrelio (talk) 22:16, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, where is the problem with File:Monument for the Yoshino Immigrant Village in Ji'an.jpg?--Kai3952 (talk) 11:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Taiwan (Republic of China). --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:14, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Srittau: Per The "Copyright Act" of "Republic of China" Article 58, FoP does exists. --WQL (talk) 17:05, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Restored: {{FoP-Taiwan}} Yann (talk) 14:36, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taiwanese freedom of panorama does not apply to literary works like this memorial text. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


kept.

structure rebuilt in 1933 = public domain. https://www.ji-an.gov.tw/attraction/detail/19 「拓地開村記念碑」為昭和8年(西元1933年)重建.--RZuo (talk) 03:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.ldk-ks.eu/ is "Copyright © 2017 by LDK"

This is a fairly simple logo, with simple text, geometric shapes, and a gradient. I'm not sure about Kosovo's threshold of originality. Guanaco (talk) 21:01, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: we have no information about TOO in Kosovo -> deleted per the PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:16, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]