Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/04/17
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_From_Nepal.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Cars_Auto-Riviera_Louis_Melchiorre_Monte_Carlo.jpg){kind=link}
_Cars_Auto-Riviera_Louis_Melchiorre_Monte_Carlo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Actual author and date needed to verify copyright status. Image appears to have been taken from http://www.lombardiabeniculturali.it/architetture/schede/CO250-00050/ Storkk (talk) 10:00, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - COM:NETCOPYVIO. --Эlcobbola talk 15:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Tineye finds this image to have been uploaded multiple times all over the internet going back to well before it was uploaded here. Actual photographer should confirm the license by contacting OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - COM:NETCOPYVIO (see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Olga.Bru1). --Эlcobbola talk 15:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Very unlikely an own work, and it seems the uploader just don't understand the meaning of this term. The description is in very illiterate Russian but it can be understood that this musician participated in 1970s in Soviet TV show. Tatewaki (talk) 13:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy, per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:53, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DMicroLatino_Mercenario_717.png LA IMAGEN ES DE MALA CALIDAD Y NO CUENTA CON LOS PERMISOS Antonio Ospia (talk) 07:11, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- OK, let's suppose you just learned the "permisos" issue; but did you not know the quality of this pic before uploading it yourself? --E4024 (talk) 07:22, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
PORQUE ME EQUIVOQUE AL SUBIR EL ARCHIVO. Antonio Ospia (talk) 07:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
REQUIERO QUE LA BORREN PORFAVOR Antonio Ospia (talk) 07:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Si Ud sigue así yo voy a tener que pedir que lo bloqueen. Ya ha hecho su pedido, ahora siéntese y espere. --E4024 (talk) 07:37, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Amigos cometi un error al seleccionar el archivo, ayudenme a borrarlo. Antonio Ospia (talk) 00:50, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- Está cometiendo más errores como repetir el DR; por favor no me obligue a hacer que lo bloqueen. Es muy difícil después volver a levantarse en Commons. Así que calladito esperando. --E4024 (talk) 15:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Delete - uploader request and seems out of scope anyway. --E4024 (talk) 15:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, found similar image elsewhere, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Guanaco at 12:44, 17 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 18:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
The license here says "This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited." This would appear to be a Non-Commercial restriction. Leoboudv (talk) 01:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deletion per nomination; Noncommercial-License. --Indeedous (talk) 19:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Strange reason for upload, see history of file Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:35, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: attack page, vandalism. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Omar_Helwany.jpeg Editor67329652 (talk) 20:54, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Omar_Helwany.jpeg Editor67329652 (talk) 20:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Hemant Kumar.jpg Hemant 2002 (talk) 07:47, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:13, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Hangar 13 (2018 Logo).png Gamziko (talk) 06:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:23, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Carlos Yáñez del Pino Cyaneztoledo (talk) 16:08, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Gigi Shibabaw Photo.png Yitbe (talk) 13:38, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Keep Another finger-trouble nomination. I think you need this image File:Gigi Shibabaw Photo.png, which is up for speedy deletion at present, because of sourcing problems. Please discuss that there, not here. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)- Keep, no valid reason for deletion, and all of the above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:08, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 18:01, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 19:39, 17 April 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Le transport à Antananarivo.pdf --Krdbot 00:37, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Seems that from some other source; the contributor must provide the original source and the source must have proper permission. Poem (talk) 20:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Mys_721tx (talk) 03:37, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Blurry photo and copyrighted posters. We can easily live without that photo. Ruthven (msg) 18:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
I am nominating for deletion something that I have no idea what it is. E4024 (talk) 08:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Article created by an IP as talk page of a not existing gallery page. --Achim (talk) 21:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Infringing pictures 源環 (talk) 08:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 05:33, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Therohansoni (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:INGELESEZ AHOSKERAREN HIZTEGIA.pdf
- File:ENGLISH PRONOUNCING DICTIONARY.pdf
- File:DIZIONARIO PRONUNCIA INGLESE.pdf
- File:DICCIONARIO PRONUNCIACION.pdf
- File:TextoPrincipal.pdf
- File:TextoApendice.pdf
- File:TextoAnexo.pdf
- File:TextoENSAYOS ROMANTICOS.pdf
- File:FRASES INGENIOSAS.pdf
- File:ENSAYOS.pdf
- File:TextoANTIBIBLIA.pdf
- File:ANTIEVANGELIOS.pdf
- File:TextoFRASES ROMANTICAS.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. There is also the question of who actually owns the copyright.. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:24, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:00, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Poor quality amateur bed-room nude. 185.9.18.148 02:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:09, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Logo of non-notable YouTube channel used for vanity page at EN Wiki. Out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 02:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Speedy delete Moreover, the file is a copyrighted advertisment, so it is also a violation to COM:ADVERT.廣九直通車 (talk) 09:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:09, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
watermark indicates this is copyright of David Gonzales Photography SecretName101 (talk) 03:03, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:09, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
High suspicon of copyvio. From that angle, looks like a (copyighted) capture from a video of the session of the parliement. Highly unlikely a visitor can take a picture from that point of view Rhadamante (talk) 03:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
_2.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:10, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
_2.png){kind=link}
I made it as a minor and it has no basis in reality. sorry. Iwilltellyou (talk) 05:35, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:10, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 06:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:10, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
not being used Imeavanjahzara (talk) 08:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. The user has another pic for her user page and per uploader request on an unused file. --E4024 (talk) 08:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:10, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
out of project scope, selfie Hiddenhauser (talk) 08:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
_From_Nepal.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_From_Nepal.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
_From_Nepal.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
_From_Nepal.jpg){kind=link}
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie, poor quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie, poor quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie, poor quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, poor quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie, poor quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, poor quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie, poor quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, selfie Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted work by Kosta Hakman (d. 1961), missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:52, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by JacquesTomlinson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Look like personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. I found it here https://dailymedia.com.ng/i-woman-class-time-south-africas-black-female-pilot-asnath-mahapa-shares-inspiring-story/ and on other sites Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted work by IVAN RADOVIĆ (d.1973), missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:54, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This looks like third party album cover-art, so a clarifcation as to how it's own work is needed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted work by STOJAN ARALICA (d. 1980), missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted work by Ivora Dajić (b. 1976), missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Found elsewhere such as http://media.hotbirthdays.com/upload/2015/10/28/tameka-cottle7.jpg, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused company logo, so out of scope; formerly in w:Kesari Tours. The "own work" claim is absurd as well, though this is below the threshold of originality at least in the US. —Cryptic (talk) 11:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
It is overlapped with other same file names. Mistakenly upload file. Boboksofisa (talk) 11:44, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission anyway. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:31, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KoalaDiving (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
- File:KoalaDivingDimensions.jpg
- File:KoalaTemplate.jpg
- File:Dimensions + koala.jpg
- File:SpaceAstronautDiving.jpg
- File:KoalaInvertedDiving.png
- File:KoalaSideDiving.png
- File:KoalaDiving.png
- File:RollDiving.png
- File:InvertedBatDiving.png
- File:RocketLauncherDiving.png
- File:BatDiving.png
Russian Rocky (talk) 12:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:31, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
failed upload Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
https://cdn.svenskalag.se/teamdata/photos/15372/517208_1080.jpg?v=2&scale=both&mode=max&w=400&quality=100, out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
1) This is not just photowork. The copyright status of newspaper must be defined (unfortunately we do not see bottom part of page). I agree that Finland is country of origin (regardless of country of creation as Russia). 2) Moreover - 7 Aug 1941 is date of publication for newspaper, what is the date/year of publication of photowork (source indicates 2010). Alex Spade (talk) 09:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - it is IMO a 3D photo of a newspaper, therefore we need a permission from the photographer. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. strakhov (talk) 12:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. strakhov (talk) 12:16, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. strakhov (talk) 12:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. strakhov (talk) 12:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. strakhov (talk) 12:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. strakhov (talk) 12:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mynetholon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos of not notable person from Israel. Not in use. The only uploades by uploader.
-- Geagea (talk) 13:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:55, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Cette photo est un Copyvio d'une photo du journal Le républicain : https://www.le-republicain.fr/a-la-une/essonne-francois-durovray-president-du-conseil-departemental-fait-le-bilan Poudou99 (talk) 13:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Non, photo du conseil départemental. L'autorisation de Patricia Marais est de toute façon nécessaire via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:58, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Je m'en suis aperçu ensuite car les Exifs contiennent :
- Auteur : patricia marais
- Titre de l'image : président hotel département essonne - contact shauma gew (avec ses n° de tel mobile et fixe et son adresse mail)
- Statut du droit d'auteur : Soumis au droit d'auteur
- La photo a dû être prétée au journal.
- --Poudou99 (talk) 16:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Je m'en suis aperçu ensuite car les Exifs contiennent :
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
nothing new, we have a lot on commons, cf com:PENIS
- File:Foreskin 2.jpg
- File:0. Erect human penis with Foreskin.jpg
- File:0001. Human penis.jpg
- File:0. Human glans.jpg
- File:001. Penis.jpg
- File:01. Penis.jpg
- File:0. Penis..jpg
- File:Erect human penis 4.jpg
- File:Erect human penis 3.jpg
- File:Erect human penis 2.jpg
- File:Human penis front side.jpg
- File:Human glans 2.jpg
- File:Human penis left side.jpg
- File:Human penis right side.jpg
- File:Human penis anatomy.jpg
- File:Human penis 4.jpg
Pippobuono (talk) 20:32, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
PENIS - we’ve got enough.
- File:Erected human penis 001.jpg
- File:남성의 귀두.jpg
- File:Penis 09909.jpg
- File:Erect Human Penis 404.jpg
- File:남성의 음경.jpg
— regards, Revi 13:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for sculptures. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:59, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
"Yunarmiya" — it’s not a state government or municipal formation.—Iluvatar (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Yunarmiya was founded by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 536 of October 29, 2015, based on the DOSAAF. DOSAAF is a state organization. Георгий Долгопский (talk) 17:16, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Yunarmiya is not an institution of state governing. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata indicates that copyright is not held by Mark Warner SecretName101 (talk) 00:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata indicates that copyright is not held by Mark Warner SecretName101 (talk) 00:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata indicates that copyright is not held by Mark Warner SecretName101 (talk) 00:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata indicates that copyright is not held by Mark Warner SecretName101 (talk) 00:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata indicates that copyright is not held by Mark Warner SecretName101 (talk) 00:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata indicates that copyright is not held by Mark Warner SecretName101 (talk) 00:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata indicates that copyright is not held by Mark Warner SecretName101 (talk) 00:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata indicates that copyright is not held by Mark Warner SecretName101 (talk) 00:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata indicates that copyright is not held by Mark Warner SecretName101 (talk) 00:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata indicates that copyright is not held by Mark Warner SecretName101 (talk) 00:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata indicates that copyright is not held by Mark Warner SecretName101 (talk) 00:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata indicates that copyright is not held by Mark Warner SecretName101 (talk) 00:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata indicates that copyright is not held by Mark Warner SecretName101 (talk) 00:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata indicates that copyright is not held by Mark Warner SecretName101 (talk) 00:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This photo seems to be from [1]. It needs confirmation that the copyright holder has released it with a free license: see COM:OTRS.
--ghouston (talk) 03:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
All are scans of news images etc, nothing is own work here, some subjects were long dead before the date these photos were supposedly taken.
- File:Bsamgr.jpg
- File:Bsavenkataraman.jpg
- File:Bsamaktoom.jpg
- File:Bsatata.jpg
- File:Bsarostamani.jpg
- File:Bsarajivi.jpg
- File:Bsajaffer.jpg
- File:Bsakarunanidhi.jpg
- File:Bsa.jpg
- File:Bsaismail.jpg
- File:B.S.A.Rahman.jpeg
—SpacemanSpiff 04:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arhazaf Mohammed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:Tasunayt tamaziɣt s twenɣa talatinit - Copie.pdf
- File:Tasunayt s Tmaziɣt s twenɣa talatinit.pdf
- File:Projet de lexique Français-Amazigh de géologie.pdf
- File:Projet de lexique de Géographie Français negh asenfar n umawal Afransis-Amazigh.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:26, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Image is from Alex Brandon of the Associated Press. No evidence provided that this was given a creative commons license SecretName101 (talk) 01:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:53, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:10, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal unused foto. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 16:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edwin Boeckxstaens (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal artwork, no or little educational value, out of scope. Commons is not for advertising/promoting oneself.
- File:IMG 0896 kopie.jpg
- File:Painting door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Embleem door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Child Art door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Cartoon van mannetje door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Cartoon van man -Edwin Boeckxstaens-.jpg
- File:Cartoon van bootje edwin boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Visual art Edwin .jpg
- File:Stilleven met blokjes door Edwin Boeckxstaens .jpg
- File:Portret van persoon door Edwin Boeckxstaens-.jpg
- File:Orange studie door Edwin boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Modern Art portret van vrouw door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Modern art Mini-schilderij door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Modern art Edwin.jpg
- File:Modern art Edwin-Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Modern Art edwin--.jpg
- File:Modern Art edwin-.jpg
- File:Modern Art edwin.jpg
- File:Modern Art door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Modern Art door Edwin Boeckxstaens-.jpg
- File:Cartoon schilderij door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Cartoon Potret van vrouw door -edwin -boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Cartoon Muzikanten door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Cartoon modelstudie door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Acrylic paint Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Cartoon Boeckxstaens Edwin.jpg
- File:Acrylic paint Edwin Boeckxstaens----.jpg
- File:-Modern Art Edwin Boeckxstaens-.jpg
- File:-Modern art edwin.jpg
- File:-Majorelle bleu edwin-.jpg
- File:--head edwin.jpg
- File:---self-portret edwin.jpg
- File:----Man Edwin Boeckxstaens----.jpg
- File:---Cartoon Edwin Boeckxstaens---.jpg
- File:Modern Art portret door -Edwin Boeckxstaens-.jpg
- File:Triestige vrouw.jpg
- File:Portret van gebroken iemand.jpg
- File:Gebroken portret.jpg
- File:Portret van vrouw.jpg
- File:Gebroken relatie.jpg
- File:Schilderij van man in auto door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Portret door Edwin Boeckxstaens-.jpg
- File:Schilderij door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Tekening door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Portret door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Fishtank door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Hereniging.jpg
- File:Fotoheemdalvzw 298.jpg
- File:Fotoheemdalvzw 297.jpg
- File:Schilderij Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Nelson mandalla.jpg
- File:Groepstekening Edwin & vrienden.jpg
- File:Make art not war door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Tekening van Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Drakenalfabetvoor scherm Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Edwin ontwerp.jpg
- File:Edwin .jpg
- File:Man op Boot.jpg
- File:Portet van vrouw.jpg
- File:Spelende Kinderen.jpg
- File:Vrij werk van Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Edwin Boeckxstaens met eigen werk.jpg
- File:Edwin Boeckxstaens-.jpg
- File:Portret van vrouw in psychiatrie.jpg
- File:Portret van man.jpg
- File:Portret van man in tuin.jpg
- File:Schilderij van man met auto.jpg
- File:Fotoheemdalvzw 286.jpg
- File:Edwin Boeckxstaens.JPG
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 18:00, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as OOS, COM:ADVERT. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:23, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:12, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Очень сомневаюсь, что фото сделано в 2015 году. Следовательно и авторство сомнительно MisterXS (talk) 09:46, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 04:48, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
File:10 of 'A Short History of Annapolis Royal, the Port Royal of the French, from its settlement in 1604 to the withdrawal of the British troops in 1854' (11242106324).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Almost empty page. On the other site of this page is File:9 of 'A Short History of Annapolis Royal, the Port Royal of the French, from its settlement in 1604 to the withdrawal of the British troops in 1854' (11240411164).jpg Robot Monk (talk) 06:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:16, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Сергей Поздняков 1955 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Ефименко Владимир Петрович 1.jpg
- File:Ефименко Владимир Петрович.jpg
- File:«Вот кто-то с горочки спустился».jpg
- File:Поздняков Лев Григорьевич 5.jpg
- File:Поздняков Лев Григорьевич 4.jpg
- File:Поздняков Лев Григорьевич 3.jpg
- File:Поздняков Лев Григорьевич 2.jpg
- File:Поздняков Лев Григорьевич 1.jpg
- File:Лазарь Яковлевич Вербицкий.jpg
- File:Вербицкий Лазарь Яковлевич.jpg
- File:Леонид Вербицкий - диск.jpg
- File:Iван Дем'янович Шевченко.jpg
- File:Стародубов Кирилл Фёдорович 2.jpg
- File:Стародубов Кирилл Фёдорович.jpg
- File:Удостоверение 1967.jpg
- File:Аттестат папа.jpg
- File:Диплом 1965.jpg
- File:Премия СМ).jpg
- File:Поздняков.jpg
- File:Поздняков Лев Григорьевич.jpg
- File:Могила 1969г. Киев.jpg
- File:Кремль 1943г.jpg
- File:1941г. 17 августа.jpg
- File:1941г. Иван Шевченко.jpg
- File:Анкета 1924г. 3.jpg
- File:Анкета 1924г. 1.jpg
- File:Шевченко Иван Демьянович 1946г.jpg
- File:Олександр Вратарьов.jpg
- File:Леонiд Вербицький.jpg
- File:Александр Вратарёв.jpg
- File:Леонид Лазаревич Вербицкий.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- File:Удостоверение 1967.jpg, File:Аттестат папа.jpg, File:Диплом 1965.jpg, File:Премия СМ).jpg, File:Анкета 1924г. 3.jpg, File:Анкета 1924г. 1.jpg look like {{PD-text}}. --sasha (krassotkin) 08:16, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- Подправил лицензии, добавил категории, описание, время и место съёмки. --Сергей Поздняков 1955 (talk) 12:36, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:46, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Might be PD-old. Date and author information are required to determine this. Guanaco (talk) 09:11, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 01:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
This looks like a hoax. No blue supergiant can be larger than VY Canis Majoris, whose name is furthermore misspelt in Russian. 2407:7000:817C:1701:51FB:9977:C74:D4CA 01:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Raoul Dufy
[edit]Raoul Dufy died in 1953.
File:Dufy Les Allies.jpgkeep- File:Dufy1 (7336778028).jpg
- File:Dufy2 (7336778138).jpg
- File:Dufy3 (7336778164).jpg
- File:Dufy4 (7336778290).jpg
- File:Dufy5 (7336778356).jpg
- File:Issoudun (Indre) (35859275025).jpg
- File:La forêt à Montsaunès 1943.jpg
- File:La Sirène Mallarmé.png
- File:La Tour Eiffel, Raoul Dufy.png
- File:Raoul Dufy, Château de Chaumont-sur-Loire, 1937.jpg
File:Victory rooster.jpgkeep
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(35859275025).jpg){kind=link}
- Alexis Jazz 01:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete most per nom, undelete in 2024, but Keep both File:Dufy Les Allies.jpg and File:Victory rooster.jpg per previous DR closures. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:58, 17 April 2018 (UTC) (updated 00:31, 18 April 2018 (UTC))
Comment it's apparently right for several of these items, but Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Victory_rooster.jpg exists and argues that work is out of copyright. I don't speak French, I don't know French copyright law, but I don't think it can be summarily closed without looking at the individual issues that caused it to be kept.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:37, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Okay, hadn't seen that, we can keep the rooster. - Alexis Jazz 03:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep both File:Dufy Les Allies.jpg and File:Victory rooster.jpg per previous DR closures. See here and there. In short, these two are manufactured objects (printed squares) for which model protection has expired. In any case they should be considerd for copyright as collective works which have fallen in the public domain 70 years after publication. If more information is needed on these two objects, I can supply it next week as I am currently away from my documentation. Delete the others. — Racconish ☎ 14:42, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Seems like bad quality and unclear author/copyright status. - Alexis Jazz 02:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Quality improved, it's now clear Steriadi is the author. Undelete in 2027. - Alexis Jazz 06:59, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. https://dalecoyneracing.com/vasser-sullivan-racing/ John from Idegon (talk) 05:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
I am an intern for the team who was asked directly to upload this logo file.
- Keep and convert to fair use Like every other IndyCar team logo. 52.124.92.11 16:48, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Ancien logo de la Banque Blabanking (talk) 06:51, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Just call it a "former logo" --Jwh (talk) 07:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Auteur NIKO RODAMEL NIKKAO@FREE.FR, autorisation de l'auteur nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 07:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sri Lanka ha no Freedom of Panorama for modern buildings. Leoboudv (talk) 08:37, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep General view and ordinary building. No original architecture is featured. Yann (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: agree with User:Yann. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:33, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
La personne dans le photo (Russell Boncey) m'a indiqué que le photo a été utilisé a des fins frauduleuses. Emilie Cecile (talk) 08:53, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Wrong upload Hassi72 (talk) 09:04, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
failed upload Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Photos by Jun, 品川 2017SS, https://www.fashion-press.net/snaps/gallery/4314/24455, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:43, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
DeleteThe file is an apparent copyright violation, the file should be deleted.廣九直通車 (talk) 13:31, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
The file could be a copyright violation. Further moer I'd like to aks if it is within the scope. Sanandros (talk) 11:31, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
_Cars_Auto-Riviera_Louis_Melchiorre_Monte_Carlo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cars_Auto-Riviera_Louis_Melchiorre_Monte_Carlo.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
c'est le mien et je ne souhaite pas qu'il souhaite sur la toile. Jeanruby (talk) 12:35, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
_Cars_Auto-Riviera_Louis_Melchiorre_Monte_Carlo.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
_Cars_Auto-Riviera_Louis_Melchiorre_Monte_Carlo.jpg){kind=link}
_Cars_Auto-Riviera_Louis_Melchiorre_Monte_Carlo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cars_Auto-Riviera_Louis_Melchiorre_Monte_Carlo.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
c'est le mien et je ne souhaite plus qu'il soit sur la toile. Jeanruby (talk) 12:37, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
_Cars_Auto-Riviera_Louis_Melchiorre_Monte_Carlo.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
_Cars_Auto-Riviera_Louis_Melchiorre_Monte_Carlo.jpg){kind=link}
Photo of prined map issued in 2000-s, copyright prorably to Rosreestr Svetlov Artem (talk) 14:41, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Illustration already exists on Commons in a better quality: Schloss Bornsdorf Sammlung Duncker.jpg Giorgio Michele (talk) 15:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: This one has a much higher resolution. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by البوعياشي امين (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:جمعية تلاميذ بني بونصار للتنمية 1.pdf
- File:جمعية تلاميذ بني بونصار للتنمية.pdf
- File:القانون الأساسي للجمعية تلاميذ بني بونصار للتنمية.pdf
- File:القانون الأساسي للجمعية.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC) --البوعياشي امين (talk) 16:57, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Generally newspapers are copyrighted. At least exact source and better license is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:37, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Wrongly uploaded. It should not be here Nitin Mishra (talk) 15:44, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I am skeptical that this particular image was created by the account who claims to have created it and released it into public domain. ජපස (talk) 15:50, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not a real Wikipedian as yet. (Only two edits, this pic and adding it to user page.) E4024 (talk) 15:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no meaningful contributions. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused low-resolution personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:43, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
The logo is not used so I'd like to question weather it is in scope or not. Sanandros (talk) 17:03, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused selfie, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:04, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Part of stable file File:Augustin Crampon - Traduction de la Bible - Desclée 1923.djvu created for test of large file problems, no longer useful. Request made by uploader Nyapa Nyapa (talk) 17:37, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
5 personal files uploaded by Judson061988 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Batch of five personal files/selfies, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?
- File:Judsonselvadani s.jpg
- File:Judson selva dani ss.jpg
- File:Judson selva dani saju.jpg
- File:Judson selva dani.jpg
- File:Judson selva dani s.jpg
Roland zh (talk) 18:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused simple logo of non-notable company (not mentioned in en.wiki), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
mass-upload of panoramio streams, upload for obviously personal use showing identficable individuals, hence, personality right isusses, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devbridge Group the company is non-notable. That case its logo is out of scope as well. Taivo (talk) 18:37, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
mass-upload of random panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: for now, only 1 alternative. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
mass-upload of random panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
2 files uploaded by Jp vinoth11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]two assumably unused personal files, and/or personality right issues, but also small-sized and missinge exif data to verify claimed own work, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?
Roland zh (talk) 18:41, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. It was used in en:Draft:1010data, which should be deleted soon. Taivo (talk) 18:46, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 83.149.44.164 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FBMD Ciell (talk) 19:47, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Uploader suggests on the talkpage it's his own image: asked him to upload the original. Ciell (talk) 19:50, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: new, larger version has been uploaded. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emanuelzozor (talk · contribs)
[edit]
Files related to non-notable micronation invented by the user themself, out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 19:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Federated Corporate Control isn't mentioned in en.wiki. Maybe the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 20:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Quality is too low to be useful, better alternatives available BevinKacon (talk) 20:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Resolution is too low to be useful, better alternatives available. BevinKacon (talk) 20:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
9 files uploaded by Nidhaga Karunad B M (talk · contribs)
[edit]Batch of 9 small-sized files having potentially copyright/personality right issues, but also potentially 'profiling', hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
- File:Nidhaga karunad.jpg
- File:Nidhaga 08.jpg
- File:Nidhaga 09.jpg
- File:Nidhaga 05.jpg
- File:Nidhaga 06.jpg
- File:Nidhaga 04.jpg
- File:Nidhaga 03.jpg
- File:Nidhaga 01.jpg
- File:Nidhaga 02.jpg
Roland zh (talk) 20:43, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: in scope IMO, but not own work: inconsist sizes, qualities, and EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
unused personal file, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nuha Khuwan Sayyed Sadiq Asgar Rizvi.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 20:46, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
8 files uploaded by Dr. Kcalpana Bhushan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Batch of eight unused personal images, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?
- File:Dr.Kcalpana Bhushan (200 x 133).jpg
- File:Dr.KcalpanaBhushan.jpg
- File:Kcalpana Bhushan Takyar.jpg
- File:Kcalpana Bhushan.jpg
- File:Dr.Kcalpana Bhushan Takyar.jpg
- File:Dr. Kcalpana.jpg
- File:Dr.Kcalpana Bhushan.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Roland zh (talk) 20:54, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:04, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
personal file, but also 'proflining', hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:04, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
small-sized format, one-file-upload, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Old picture, don't like it. Kevincpora (talk) 21:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Old picture, don't like it. Kevincpora (talk) 21:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Old picture, don't like it. Kevincpora (talk) 21:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
3 files uploaded by Jerrynagar132 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Batch of three unused personal files, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?
Roland zh (talk) 21:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
one-file-upload, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:03, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Asserted as "own work" but there is no information about the origin or licence of the elements in this photomontage: the horse, the chamfron, the feathers. --Pitke (talk) 22:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Pitke (talk) 22:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
copyrighted material Ionutzmovie (talk) 22:49, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Obviously not own work. - Alexis Jazz 06:21, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
This file is refering to a non existing mexican federal highway though it is a existing mexican autopista it should have the leter D below it to make it a mexican autopista 67.203.107.72 23:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Surprisingly, Datos Viales does not include a "D" designation for S30. Consult the Coahuila page of the 2018 Datos Viales released by the SCT. However, it is worth noting that this is a legal designation and the highway is actually signed 40D. Raymie (talk) 23:43, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal images used for cross-wiki promotion and spam. hiàn 23:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Please also delete:
- Thanks, hiàn 22:54, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suprava Saha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
- File:Suprava Saha.mp3 logo.jpg
- File:Suprava Saha India Developer, App designer.jpg
- File:Suprava Saha Google Developer of India, West Bengal.jpg
- File:Suprava Saha Google Developer.png
- File:Suprava Saha Developer.jpg
- File:Suprava Saha.jpg
- File:Suprava Saha.png
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:44, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
10 files uploaded by Saurabh2017 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Batch of 10 files, partially montages of non-Wikimedia files, but also potentially copyright issues and/or 'profiling', hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
- File:Replica by skeleton dance crew.jpg
- File:Iron Man by skeleton dance crew.jpg
- File:Robots by skeleton dance crew.jpg
- File:Tron Bhangra.jpg
- File:Visual Pixel Poi.jpg
- File:LED Buugeng .jpg
- File:Animatronics Act.jpg
- File:Tron Dance.jpg
- File:Visual Tron Dance.jpg
- File:Skeleton Dance Crew Team.jpg
Roland zh (talk) 21:04, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:20, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Sotnik-TV
[edit]Following are screenshots (derivative works) where underlying work is not known to be under free license.
--90.191.81.65 19:42, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Withdrawn: There is said to be an OTRS correspondence, so I converted my nomination to {{OTRS pending}}. 90.191.81.65 08:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Je suis la personne représentée sur cette photo et son auteur l'a mise sur wikicommons sans me le signaler, ni me le demander. Je en souhaite pas que cette photo puisse etre réutilisée sans mon consentement. Vous pouvez m'écrire, si besoin, à : <email>. I am the person shown on this photo, and the author put it on wiki without telling or asking me. I don't want this photo of me to be reused. You can write to me, if needed, to <email> 90.6.13.66 07:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete While the photography depict a book author and was taken in a public place during a public book fair, I see no problem having it deleted from Commons it since the person has no article on any wiki and the photography appears to be of no usage. (I am the author of the photography) Esby (talk) 09:40, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- I got a phone call this morning from the person, the discussion was nice, I'd be for a courtesy deletion since the person has no wiki article, that the photography is ten year old and is not depicting the person the way he looks everyday, there are private issues / contexts associated with the photography. Esby (talk) 10:27, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Hallo,
ich bitte um die Löschung dieser Logodatei da diese nicht mehr der aktuellen Logogestaltung entspricht.
Viele Grüße Swhl-online Swhl-online (talk) 11:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Swhl-online Swhl-online (talk) 09:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Das Logo wird auf Ihrer Homepage noch verwendet. Also - NICHT LÖSCHEN!! Woehlecke (talk) 12:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Dieses Logo wird so nicht mehr auf der Homepage verwendet! Wenn Sie sich das aktuelle Logo der Stadtwerke Lübeck GmbH ansehen, erkennen Sie, dass der Stadtwerke Lübeck Schriftzug nun außerhalb des Symbols sitzt und über 2 Zeilen verläuft! Beim alten Logo startet der Schriftzug innerhalb des Symbols und wird in einer Zeile abgebildet! Das ist NICHT mehr aktuell!!! Deshalb bitte ich um LÖSCHUNG DIESES ALTEN LOGOS.= Swhl-online (talk) 10:59, 24 April 2018 (UTC) Swhl-online (talk) 13:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: svg auf neue Version aktualisiert. --Amada44 talk to me 15:29, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bovril
[edit]Bovril posters and jars. Posters have no author information. Jars per COM:PACKAGING above COM:TOO for the UK.
- File:"I hear they want more Bovril. My place is at the front" - S.H.B. Ltd. LCCN2003668493.jpg
- File:"I hear they want more Bovril. My place is at the front" - S.H.B. Ltd. LCCN2003668493.tif
- File:"I hear they want more Bovril. My place is at the front" LCCN2003668493.jpg
- File:"I hear they want more Bovril. My place is at the front" LCCN2003668493.tif
- File:Bovril 250g.jpg
- File:Bovril chicken.jpg
- File:Bovril poster c1900.jpg
- File:The Pope and Bovril.jpg
- Alexis Jazz 20:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep In the case of LCCN2003668493 and the other early posters, the author is unknown, only publishers and companies are identified as copyright holders. 1915 + 70 = 1985 → PD in the UK. --Fæ (talk) 20:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Fæ: I was thinking something like that would be the case for the posters. I changed the author to "The Bovril company", but I'm not sure which license should be used. Please update the license information.
- Keep all Per Fae in the case of the posters and the packaging it seems like it's PD-simple anyways, so does not seem to be any issue there. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:40, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Jon Kolbert: Bovril is a UK company, TOO is very low in the UK. The packaging/logo would have to be PD-old, not PD-simple and I don't know how old that version of the logo is. - Alexis Jazz 23:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: I made that comment cognizant of Bovril being a UK company. My original statement still stands. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Jon Kolbert: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone 2017.svg is of similar complexity and that seems to be headed for deletion per discussion. - Alexis Jazz 00:22, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: I made that comment cognizant of Bovril being a UK company. My original statement still stands. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Jon Kolbert: Bovril is a UK company, TOO is very low in the UK. The packaging/logo would have to be PD-old, not PD-simple and I don't know how old that version of the logo is. - Alexis Jazz 23:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept, due to age, but 2 files are deleted, because they are not old. Taivo (talk) 08:48, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Low resolution, amateur, bed-room nude, Exif shows it is a web thumbnail, likely ripped from elsewhere without permission. Let's not spread this further. 185.9.18.148 02:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 19:28, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Emily Coonan
[edit]Artist died in 1971. These paintings will be in the public domain in Canada in 2022. Or we need a permission from the heirs.
Yann (talk) 06:51, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 19:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot rather than an original photo. Likely copyright violation. Guanaco (talk) 07:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 19:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Dubious own work without metadata. E4024 (talk) 13:25, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be a free work. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 17:40, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Subject asked for the deletion of this image as it doesn't represent the subject anymore. She has provided a new, more current image at File:Veda Hlubinka-Cook.jpg. Denny (talk) 19:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
- Was this asked privately or on-wiki? And do we have a policy on this? I thought we keep all images with educational/historical use and valid licenses czar 21:04, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- btw, had asked about the license of File:Veda Hlubinka-Cook.jpg on its talk page czar 21:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- What's the easiest way to have the photographer confirm? I assume a tweet should be sufficient? --Denny (talk) 00:44, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Usually we ask the photographer/copyright holder to send Commons:Consent just to affirm that they understand the terms of the license (esp. commercial reuse). In terms of just confirming that the photographer did choose that license, could also document however the photographer communicated this in the first place.
- (Let's continue this thread on the photo's talk page so the discussion isn't split between two locations.) czar 01:22, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- What's the easiest way to have the photographer confirm? I assume a tweet should be sufficient? --Denny (talk) 00:44, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- btw, had asked about the license of File:Veda Hlubinka-Cook.jpg on its talk page czar 21:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- The request was private. It seems the right thing to do in this case? --Denny (talk) 00:41, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- I think there's reasonable educational/historical use for this photo, but if we were to delete as a courtesy, the relevant guideline would be Commons:Photographs of identifiable people#Removal requests czar 01:22, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- OK, so I am asking here, in the name of the depicted subject, to have this picture removed based on the reasons stated above: the picture is dated and shows her in a way she is not comfortable anymore. --Denny (talk) 16:20, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- I am strongly in favor of deletion and also think we should have a discussion separately about adding a section to speedy delete to cover this sort of case. --Zippy (talk) 06:02, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
I assume it is OK if I ask in other places for attention for this request, without being accused of canvassing? --Denny (talk) 01:07, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
- as this discussion has been open for over a month, i think it's fair to move ahead and delete. Zippy (talk) 00:57, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: This is a courtesy deletion, and contra Zippy, this is certainly not a speedy deletion candidate. While the person's public-facing identity has changed, and the photo no longer represents them, this is a historical record of the person as they appeared at a certain time. In general, encyclopedic subjects do not have the right to choose how they are portrayed on Wikipedia or other projects. Additionally, we normally require that the subject themselves request removal via OTRS to ensure the request does indeed come from the subject, but in this case I think an exception could be made, although I'm mindful the decision to delete without OTRS confirmation may be controversial. I would oppose deleting the uncropped version, however, unless and until it is used for deleterious purposes. --Storkk (talk) 16:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
- just to clarify what i was saying, it was that this is not a case (presently) for speedy delete, but that a seperate discussion about images of living people and transgender discrimination would be useful for a policy discussion around delete requests in general. --Zippy (talk) 00:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lindseyjo.ohalloran (talk · contribs)
[edit]Clearly professional promo shots with no evidence that they are their own work as claimed.
- File:Tommee Profitt Headshot.jpg
- File:Tommee Profitt Headshot 3.jpg
- File:TPHeadshot.jpg
- File:Tommee and NF.jpg
- File:TOMMEE PROFITT HEADSHOT.jpg
- File:Ben Glover Headshot.jpg
Smartse (talk) 20:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer must confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 16:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
13 files uploaded by Chudamani D (talk · contribs)
[edit]Batch of 13 files, most of them sourced "www.fac...", but also potentially 'profiling', hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?
- File:Pregnancy Dance2.jpg
- File:Pregnancy Dance.jpg
- File:Chudamani dance6.jpg
- File:Chudamani dance 13.jpg
- File:Chudamani dance 10.jpg
- File:Chudamani dance 11.jpg
- File:Chudamani dance 9.jpg
- File:Chudamani dance 8.jpg
- File:Chudamani dance 7.jpg
- File:Chudamani dance 5.jpg
- File:Chudamani dance 6.jpg
- File:Chudamani dance 4.jpg
- File:Chudamani image.jpg
Roland zh (talk) 21:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violations. Original photographers should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 16:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Indianactors (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope, promotional and not useful for education
- File:Chani bollymadrid.jpg
- File:Bollymadrid Chani.jpg
- File:Luis garcia.jpg
- File:Dev nataraj.jpg
- File:Miss india europe 01.jpg
- File:Miss india europe 02.png
George Chernilevsky talk 17:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Indianactors (talk · contribs)
[edit]Duck copyvios - generally professionally staged images of purportedly notable persons with differing technical characteristics and multiple camera models (e.g., Canon EOS 450D. SAMSUNG WB5500, Canon EOS 60D, GT-S5830i, NIKON D7000, Canon EOS 550D, etc.) Some likely COM:DW's of backgrounds (e.g., File:Chani dance choreographer 02.jpg), some explicitly not uploader's work despite self license (e.g., File:Performers dholkichya talavar 02.JPG source is "dholkichya talavar tv show"), others COM:NETCOPYVIO (e.g., File:Chani Kaur 02.JPG is here, etc. Quack.
- File:Chani and Ashish Patil.jpg
- File:Performers dholkichya talavar 04.JPG
- File:Performers dholkichya talavar 03.JPG
- File:Performers dholkichya talavar 02.JPG
- File:Performers dholkichya talavar 01.JPG
- File:Chani dance choreographer 03.jpg
- File:Chani dance choreographer 01.jpg
- File:Chani dance choreographer 02.jpg
- File:Chani Snow 05.JPG
- File:Chani Snow 04.JPG
- File:Chani Snow 06.JPG
- File:Chani Snow 03.JPG
- File:Chani Snow 01.JPG
- File:Chani Snow 02.JPG
- File:Chani june 03.JPG
- File:Chani Devotional song 01.JPG
- File:Chani june 02.JPG
- File:Chani lavni dance june 01.JPG
- File:Chani lavni dance june 02.jpg
- File:Chani saree picture 02.JPG
- File:Chani lavni dancer 01.jpg
- File:Chani lavni dancer 02.JPG
- File:Chani lavni dancer 03.JPG
- File:Chani kaur and tiger.jpg
- File:Chani kaur 02.JPG
- File:Chani kaur 01.JPG
- File:Tve chani kaur 03.jpg
- File:Tve chani kaur 02.jpg
- File:Tve chani kaur 01.jpg
- File:Chani kaur march 201301 07.JPG
- File:Chani kaur march 201301 06.JPG
- File:Chani kaur march 201301 04.JPG
- File:Chani kaur march 201301 05.JPG
- File:Chani kaur march 201301 02.jpg
- File:Chani kaur march 201301 03.jpg
- File:Chani kaur march 201301 01.jpg
- File:Chani Kaur in Vogue.jpg
- File:Chani Kaur 16.jpg
- File:Chani Kaur 13.JPG
- File:Chani Kaur 15.jpg
- File:Chani Kaur 14.JPG
- File:Chani Kaur 10.jpg
- File:Chani Kaur 11.jpg
- File:Chani Kaur 07.jpg
- File:Chani Kaur 08.jpg
- File:Chani Kaur 09.jpg
- File:Chani Kaur 06.JPG
- File:Chani Kaur 04.JPG
- File:Chani Kaur 05.JPG
- File:Chani Kaur 03.JPG
- File:Chani Kaur 01.JPG
- File:Chani Kaur 02.JPG
- File:Chani 02.jpg
- File:Chani 01.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 21:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, near-certainly the work of multiple copyright holders, thus making them copyright violations here. Photographers should confirm the licenses by following the instructions at OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 16:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in USA for sculptures. When the sculpture was created? Who is the sculptor and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 21:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, except death date probably not relevant. We would need to know the date and publication details to ascertain whether or not it is PD due to one of the various reasons that a work can be PD in the US. --Storkk (talk) 16:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Claimed as own work, but clearly a company logo being used without proper licencing. SamHolt6 (talk) 03:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Text only - PD-Textlogo. --Achim (talk) 17:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
wrong author, wrong date, wrong PD Goesseln (talk) 16:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 23:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Wrong author, Primavera Boman-Behram is born 1946; wrong PD Goesseln (talk) 16:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 23:39, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
A political rant/vlog. Seems to be outside the project scope. The uploader should seek an alternative outlet. Guanaco (talk) 14:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- There is no other alternative because the world wide-web is being censored, their is no alternative with facebook, twitter, youtube, word-press, google/blogger, that are monopolizes of the means of communications and are the internet at this point. And there is mainstream alternatives that will allow anyone with a right-wing perspective on their platform. So in conclusion that only leaves, Wiki to which can host what little could be accepted. And it is better not to have an eco-chamber mainly dominated by one political spectrum. And with it the death of debate and rationality. And with it, it be an age in which the time for talk is all but over and there will be nothing more to say. Because one side of the political-spectrum holds all the power being the mainstream-establishment. Which will create a generation would will resent any and all attempts at any political discourse or debate. And if there is not even given the chance to make an argument regardless without having of what one or others think about it. Then the great-divide will happen between the left and the right, and people will not want to talk anymore. And the worst out come for such thing will not be an arguments but a response with violence by both the left and the right in reactionary to it because one side of the political-spectrum is being abused and suppressed. And P.S its not like i am going to uploaded many things on here, but what needs to be talk about and this is one of them. Because it does bring up an augment or am I missing something? And does wiki likes to be an eco-chamber to which there is not debate or reflecting on importation hot topic subjects? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anarchist360 (talk • contribs) 14:54, April 17, 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Per Guanaco's nomination & the uploader's strange argumentation. Out of scope: Abusing Commons as platform for political propaganda. --Achim (talk) 17:46, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: please see COM:SCOPE. Commons is a media repository for items with educational value, not a free video host or a debating society. We construe "educational value" rather broadly, but a rant about how "disgusted" you are simply doesn't qualify. --Storkk (talk) 10:03, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Uploads by User:Ebn17
[edit]- File:Anant Madabhushi.jpg
- File:BME Faculty circa 1990.jpg
- File:Brain machine interface.jpg
- File:Diaphrahm pacing system.jpg
- File:High frequency stimulation.jpg
- File:Implantable neurostimulators for human clinical trials.jpg
- File:Spinal cord stimulation for pain.jpg
These files are claimed as the uploader's own work, but they all appear to be images taken from other sources. (Note: File:Cselogo124.png isn't included in this request, because while it's also incorrectly tagged as own work, it might qualify as a PD-textlogo. It's a borderline case, IMO.) - Eureka Lott 14:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violations. See also COM:DW. --Storkk (talk) 10:04, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
copyvio of Assemblée natiomale, as all similar images Rhadamante (talk) 03:13, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:01, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
The information on the page is inaccurate Hekesco (talk) 08:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 11:16, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Restored: {{PD-textlogo}} Yann (talk) 15:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng - Head of the Judiciary and Head of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of South Africa.jpg
[edit]
Author in exif given as YOLANDE SNYMAN, not own work Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing legal information. OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 11:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
No metadata and uploader has previously uploaded a blatant copyright violation, making their current claim of {{Own work}} dubious. The photographer should confirm the photo's license by following the instructions at OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:41, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 11:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
this sock farm keeps uploading pictures of dubious provenance on to here, one has already been deleted (see logs -- File:Prateek singh.jpg Selfy.jpg) another from the master is at File:Prateek Singh.jpg —SpacemanSpiff 13:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 11:55, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Modified from previously published image: http://images.emusic.com/music/images/album/140/773/14077367/600x600.jpg Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- This exact image is also located on http://www.concertboom.com/eowyn/tour-dates/ Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, album cover. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Not own work. The metadata claim that the image was taken by a mobile phone in 2013, but the person portrayed died in 1996. It is a photograph of a photograph. The picture appear in http://www.masonic-research.com/www.masonic-research.com/Forget-me-not.html and there it says: "Contributed by Miguel H Bronchud". Miguel H. Brochoud is a Spanish doctor who still lives. However it is possible that he is not the author either, the photograph looks like an official portrait of the Gran Logia de España (a Masonic lodge). The photograph should have been taken in Spain between 1985 and 1996, when the portrayed was Grand Master of the lodge. On the indicated website it says that the Wikipedia article was «created by the GLE» [Gran Logia de España] and as the person who created it was the same person who uploaded this file, I can assume that he had the consent of the lodge. However, if the GLE wants to publish it an OTRS permit is necessary because it is not in the public domain. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 14:35, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:43, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining uploaded photo (I deleted the other as obvious copyright violation). I suspect copyvio here as well. Taivo (talk) 15:04, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:59, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Found at https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/983960912192253954/yCyRnnaj_400x400.jpg, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:52, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- User seems to work with Rita Hagl-Kehl. I have emailed the user asking for OTRS. Please wait befor deleting this image. Amada44 talk to me 19:45, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:04, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:53, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
COPYVIO. Professional image with copyright declaration different from the user that uploaded, and no OTRS. Part of a set of images uploaded by the same user, at the same time, which follow this pattern. Theredproject (talk) 17:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OTRS permission from Dustin Yellin is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:28, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
COPYVIO. Professional image with copyright declaration different from the user that uploaded, and no OTRS. Part of a set of images uploaded by the same user, at the same time, which follow this pattern. Theredproject (talk) 17:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OTRS permission from Dustin Yellin is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:28, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
COPYVIO. Professional image with copyright declaration different from the user that uploaded, and no OTRS. Part of a set of images uploaded by the same user, at the same time, which follow this pattern. Theredproject (talk) 17:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OTRS permission from Dustin Yellin is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:29, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
COPYVIO. Professional image with copyright declaration different from the user that uploaded, and no OTRS. Part of a set of images uploaded by the same user, at the same time, which follow this pattern. Theredproject (talk) 17:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OTRS permission from Dustin Yellin is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:29, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
COPYVIO. Professional image with copyright declaration different from the user that uploaded, and no OTRS. Part of a set of images uploaded by the same user, at the same time, which follow this pattern. Theredproject (talk) 17:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OTRS permission from Dustin Yellin is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Google translates file source as "The photograph is from the singer herself". This is not acceptable. OTRS-permission from author Nitza Termin is needed. Taivo (talk) 17:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
In my opinion the photo is out of project scope due to bad background. Taivo (talk) 17:31, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
non free picture Tiraden (talk) 18:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Not notable person; article in dewiki has been deleted. PM3 (talk) 18:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:41, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Website T-Express isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in ru.wiki. Apparently out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:11, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:43, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A crop of a deleted file - see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Canserbero.jpg. JuTa 18:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Why? --Californipedia (talk) 03:35, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Moheen Reeyad. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:45, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': small-sized format, one-file-upload, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 09:43, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lucky.odissi.mohanty (talk · contribs)
[edit]batch of three small-sized files, but also potentially personality and copyright issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?
- File:Luckymohanty3 indian classical dancer.png
- File:Luckymohanty2 Indian Classical Dancer.png
- File:Indian Classical Dancer Luckymohanty1.png
Roland zh (talk) 21:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no EXIF, small size, doubts whether this is own work. --Ymblanter (talk) 09:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Found everywhere such as https://darbaculture.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Natos-Waor-y-Recycled-J-christiangarciaph-color-57-1800x1200-1024x683.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 09:46, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
rather small-sized format, one-file-upload, potentially personality right isusses and/or 'profiling', but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 09:47, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Unauthorized screenshot taken from this youtube video. Take Mirrenberg (talk) 18:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
I understand the argument. The youtube video was produced in our assignment, using our animations. But, indeed, we did not produce the video ourselves. I will replace the image by another diagram.--Fboss0808 (talk) 07:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: replaced, version deleted. -- User: Perhelion 02:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
re-uploaded - see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steve Jurvetson 2014.jpg Ronhjones (Talk) 19:37, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, I reuploaded it. Asa took this photo for me in 2014, but I own it for any use so I could upload it to Flickr, under CC-BY-2.0. This photo was on my article for several years, until less than a month ago when it was noticed that the license on Flickr was accidentally changed from CC-BY-2.0. As you can see from the Flickr source link https://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/14711700622/ now that I've fixed the license back to CC-BY-2.0 there should be no issue having this image on Wikipedia. I have hundreds of images from my Flickr on Wikipedia under this license: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=Jurvetson&title=Special:Search Jurvetson (talk) 20:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: CC-BY 2.0
Confirmed. --Achim (talk) 17:21, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per above. -- User: Perhelion 02:25, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Single upload without metadata. The uploader has two global edits, this and adding it to a WP. E4024 (talk) 13:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Personal promotion; used only in a draft. Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 14:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
This image is essentially impenetrable, but from what I could determine it was also entirely inaccurate. Serves no educational purpose, therefore. Completely antithetical to the goal of the wikimedia movement. ජපස (talk) 15:41, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Same rationale as before. Inaccurate, obscurantist, and without any redeeming educational value. ජපස (talk) 15:42, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
As the previous two graphs nominated, this image serves no educational nor illustrative purpose and cannot be purposed for wikimedia's goals. ජපස (talk) 15:43, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
http://www.maisondelaradio.fr/les-midi-trente Ronhjones (Talk) 18:58, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, one-file-upload, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:58, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 08:25, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Delete/permission needed, considering 1. previously published via (official) https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=344347648935144&set=a.298864846816758.59150.100000797358253&type=3&theater (03.2012) and 2. http://www.manfredsdotter.com/ (official site) = http://www.manfredsdotter.com/images/start.jpg (last modified: 2011), credited with "Foto Torbjörn Hedmark 2011. Gunnex (talk) 18:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:05, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Marit Manfredsdotter.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': small-sized format, potentially personality right isusses, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
as per File:Ashok Pandey, Shovana Narayan & Bharat Gauba.jpg, small-sized format, potentially personality right isusses, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
(c) Miguel Marnoto, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, one-file-upload, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:47, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, one-file-upload, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
3 files uploaded by VSRsitaraman (talk · contribs)
[edit]batch of three files, rather small-sized format, potentially personality right isusses, but also partially missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?
Roland zh (talk) 22:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
3 files uploaded by Srivalli gac (talk · contribs)
[edit]batch of three files, small-sized format, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?
- File:World Dance Day 2015 by Gayathri Apartment Club- Sri Valli Sitaraman.jpg
- File:World Dance Day 2015 073.jpg
- File:World Dance Day 2015 072.jpg
Roland zh (talk) 22:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
your opinions are asked : one-file-upload, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content ?? Roland zh (talk) 22:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
as per File:Ashok Pandey, Shovana Narayan & Bharat Gauba.jpg et al, small-sized format, potentially personality right isusses, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:35, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
as per File:Ashok Pandey, Shovana Narayan & Bharat Gauba.jpg et al, small-sized format, potentially personality right isusses, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:37, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
one-file-upload, potentially 'profiling' or personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
small-sized one-file-upload, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 22:47, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Author has only given a "Wikipedia only" type release. No Commons compatible release is present on the source link. We would need an explicit license that meets COM:L or an COM:OTRS release. Majora (talk) 22:49, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/incategory:"Jean Alexandru Steriadi" -hastemplate:delete
[edit]Jean Alexandru Steriadi died in 1956. I doubt the "simple photographs" license used on some would cover paintings. The stamp license is probably not valid either.
- File:J.A. Steriadi 2000 Romanian card.JPG
- File:Stamps of Romania, 2003-01.jpg
- File:Jean Alexandru Steriadi - Chivutele in piata mare din Bucuresti.jpg
- File:Jean Alexandru Steriadi - Poetul Alexandru Toma.jpg
- File:Jean Alexandru Steriadi - Peisaj din Olanda (1).jpg
- File:The Whitewashers by J.A. Steriadi 1967 Romanian stamp.jpg
- File:Jean Alexandru Steriadi - In port (Braila).jpg
- File:Jean Alexandru Steriadi - Hamali.jpg
- File:Jean Alexandru Steriadi - Femei din Chioggia (Vanzatoare de dantele).jpg
- File:Jean Alexandru Steriadi - Turc.jpg
- File:J.A. Steriadi 2000 Romanian stamp.JPG
- File:Jean Alexandru Steriadi - Colt de carciuma bretona.jpg
- File:1971 I.Al. Steriadi - Corabii in portul Braila.jpg
- File:Stamps of Romania, 2003-05.jpg
- File:Jean Alexandru Steriadi - Portretul mamei.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Alexis Jazz 02:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Related DR:
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep for stamps. There is no valid reason to delete them. Delete for artworks per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory#Romania. Romania has a 70 pma protection for artworks. Photographs of those are derivative works. Materialscientist (talk) 02:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Materialscientist: Romanian government can force a painting to go out of copyright post mortem by putting it on a stamp? (Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Romania does seem to suggest that I admit..) Even if that's true, the Romanian government has no power to void copyright in the United States. - Alexis Jazz 03:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- By putting a painting on a stamp, Romanian (or other) government does place the painting in public domain, only the stamp. The stamp is in PD in its country of origin, and hence in the US.
- This is clearly explained in Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Russia. Materialscientist (talk) 04:16, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Materialscientist: Romanian government can force a painting to go out of copyright post mortem by putting it on a stamp? (Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Romania does seem to suggest that I admit..) Even if that's true, the Romanian government has no power to void copyright in the United States. - Alexis Jazz 03:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep because a such stamp is a official work of a government, equally of the pictured content. It’s so in the most countries. I think that additionally for Romania may be the case that a stamp is seen as an “official mean of payment” of the government (all criterions for a such are fulfilled (...and on the basis of the Romania-licenses at Wikimedia Commons is not to see a law or similar prohibiting such. Anyway a such law fulfills only the aim that the children, grandchildren or grandgrandchildren of a late artist may earn much money with the depicturing of whose works, what would prevent by a permission with a corresponding Wikimedia Commons license). In the concerning case was the designer, at least of the 1971 set, Ion Dumitrana (1923-1976) or one of whose team. However, I see no violation of {{PD-RO-exempt}}. --Katharinaiv (talk) 06:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Question: How is the statutory law at a Maxicard (of the same artist) see: File:J.A. Steriadi 2000 Romanian card.JPG. I think it was published by the corresponding government too (Postal administration of a Ministry XY) and should have a corresponding government-license as contrasted with an artworks-license. (my opinion) --Katharinaiv (talk) 06:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, there is no indication that stamps (or government edict in general) are not covered by copyright. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:45, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Kept: The stamps per Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Romania. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:52, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kurdish Peshmerga
[edit]There is no FOP in Iraq. The statue was just completed in 2017 so is definitely still under copyright.
- File:Peshmerga Statue.jpg
- File:Statue of a Peshmerga with the Kurdistan flag at the entrance to Kirkuk on the road with Erbil 01 (cropped).jpg
- File:Statue of a Peshmerga with the Kurdistan flag at the entrance to Kirkuk on the road with Erbil 01.jpg
- File:Statue of a Peshmerga with the Kurdistan flag at the entrance to Kirkuk on the road with Erbil 02.jpg
- File:Statue of a Peshmerga with the Kurdistan flag at the entrance to Kirkuk on the road with Erbil 03.jpg
- File:Statue of a Peshmerga with the Kurdistan flag at the entrance to Kirkuk on the road with Erbil 04.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Majora (talk) 03:58, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- The cropped version of 01 is probably ok provided the statue to the right is out of copyright and/or is considered de minimus. I included it here just in case. --Majora (talk) 04:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I don't think so for all of the Pictures above because of The exception generally applies only to works on permanent public display as in this case and as declared in Freedom of panorama (outdoor public places) --Sarbast.T.Hameed (talk) 06:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Agreed with what Sarbast says. The work was completed by a coalition comprised of a lead artist, supporting artists, a private donor, and the municipal Kirkuk government. It was installed in public space as a public memorial with the intent of being appreciated by the public, in the creators' own words, in dedication to military sacrifices. This makes it reproducible in media per freedom of panorama based on their own statements and the legal framework. Side note: the artwork has been changed since Iraqi forces regained authority over Kirkuk and these photos (which represent a previous version of the artwork, extant at that time but only for a few weeks) are one of the only creative commons resources for the creators' legacy online. -- Leviclancy (talk) 06:52, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Both of your arguments are invalid. The specific Iraq law doesn't have any such exemption. And it explicitly covers sculptures. Article 8 pretty much seals any debate here. no person shall do any of the following acts: Reproduce a work in any manner or form, whether transitory or permanent, including onto photographic (including cinematographic) film or onto a digital or electronic storage medium. It doesn't matter one bit what the intention of the sculpture is, nor if it is still in the same form. Copyright is attached. --Majora (talk) 20:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Are you an Iraqi citizen ??ǃǃ because I am ... Concerning the Low in Iraq, what do you know about it? I donot think there is such thing as what you said and did you even Read the article Freedom of panorama (outdoor public places) ?? ǃǃ, the exemption is mentioned there and you can read it well, also if you serched the Commons you will find alort of Pictures like this one ...will you handel the taske to Delet them all?ǃ.after all, there is no need to be so offensive or maybe there is something bothering you in the Pictureǃǃǃ --Sarbast.T.Hameed (talk) 06:51, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Both of your arguments are invalid. The specific Iraq law doesn't have any such exemption. And it explicitly covers sculptures. Article 8 pretty much seals any debate here. no person shall do any of the following acts: Reproduce a work in any manner or form, whether transitory or permanent, including onto photographic (including cinematographic) film or onto a digital or electronic storage medium. It doesn't matter one bit what the intention of the sculpture is, nor if it is still in the same form. Copyright is attached. --Majora (talk) 20:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep for File:Statue of a Peshmerga with the Kurdistan flag at the entrance to Kirkuk on the road with Erbil 01 (cropped).jpg, in which any copyrightable elements seem de minimis. Unfortunately, Iraq does not recognize Freedom of Panorama exceptions to copyright law, so Delete the others. That the statue was intended in an outdoor public place to be displayed for all to see is not relevant to its copyright. Storkk (talk) 15:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as above, except one file. Closing admin, maybe you can also say something on "maybe there is something bothering you in the Pictureǃǃǃ" There is no FOP in Ukraine, for certain works in the States etc, but I never saw such a POV comment with 3 (three) exclamation marks in similar discussions. --E4024 (talk) 15:53, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- Dear E4024 I am sorry for the sentence "maybe there is something bothering you in the Pictureǃǃǃ" because I did not mean anything about it but I am really confused , why this aggression way in Commenting on this Subject ? is it me and my talking maybe which I am sorry about it if it bothered anyone or they misunderstand it or it is just the Picture and what it is to us I mean Kurdish people, it is so precious to us and we are very proud of what it represents and all the secrefices they made to let us live Free and safe, i think we have all the right to publish thier story to leat all the world know about them and thier courage in Fighting ISIS in Iraq..i am realy sorry agine if i bothered any one --Sarbast.T.Hameed (talk) 16:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- No problem, say that to the concerned party. Please see this, a DR from today: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Могила Шукшина.JPG and relax. --E4024 (talk) 15:12, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- I contacted the artist to get confirmation of permission. Will that answer this once and for all? If we get confirmation that the photos are suitable then we can keep them. Leviclancy (talk) 07:04, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Dear E4024 I am sorry for the sentence "maybe there is something bothering you in the Pictureǃǃǃ" because I did not mean anything about it but I am really confused , why this aggression way in Commenting on this Subject ? is it me and my talking maybe which I am sorry about it if it bothered anyone or they misunderstand it or it is just the Picture and what it is to us I mean Kurdish people, it is so precious to us and we are very proud of what it represents and all the secrefices they made to let us live Free and safe, i think we have all the right to publish thier story to leat all the world know about them and thier courage in Fighting ISIS in Iraq..i am realy sorry agine if i bothered any one --Sarbast.T.Hameed (talk) 16:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- I contacted the artist to confirm their permission, which they gave in their interview, regarding the role, purpose, and intent of the artwork. I specifically asked if we can post photos on Wikimedia and gave the artist the link to the talk page to provide context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leviclancy (talk • contribs) 08:08, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- The artist will need to follow the instructions on OTRS to confirm that they allow photos of their work to be freely licensed. Storkk (talk) 09:34, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- It is not just Wikimedia, Leviclancy. The artwork must be licensed under a free license that allows anyone to use or modify the image, at any time, and for any purpose (including commercial reuse). This must extend beyond Wikimedia and be irrevocable. Please see COM:ET for the standard release form. --Majora (talk) 18:00, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- I figure having them use the OTRS by having them email it (CC me) with links to the images and a grant saying that images of the statue are free to be used in the public domain, is acceptable? Leviclancy (talk) 12:07, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Quick question. According to the law mentioned in the FOP page: "Exceptions to exclusive rights of the author shall be confined to certain special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the right holder." Taking photos of a civic monument (not just a regular statue) sounds like normal exploitation based on this statement regarding the artists: "A group of artists in the province of Kirkuk have erected a giant statue of Peshmerga fighter as a sign of appreciation for the Kurdish force protecting the people of the area from Islamic State (IS) attacks." Considering it is a war monument erected at a major intersection at the gateway of the city, do we need to classify this as something outside normal exploitation? And do we need to classify it was unreasonably prejudicing the legitimate interests of the right holder? It sounds like it falls within those cases in a positive way that satisfies the exception. Leviclancy (talk) 12:38, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Lets not start deciding what is a "special case" and what isn't. We are not lawyers and we are not a court system. Doing that in any case is the start of a rabbit hole that we do not want to venture down. As for if that is acceptable, any free license will do. It does not have to be public domain. See COM:L for a list of licenses that are (and are not) acceptable. --Majora (talk) 23:31, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- In any case, it might also be useful to gain a little legal insight since there is a massive disconnect between Wiki treatment of Iraqi law and Iraqi treatment of Iraqi law. It was alarming when I noticed that anti-FOP decisions were being used extensively for Iraqi media dealing with monuments to genocide, culture, folklore, and history. Iraq has a very strong park culture and culture of public space, so I did ask a lawyer about the legal situation and they mentioned that although the law does not specifically mention park, public spaces, civic monuments, etc. that these are acceptable to photograph and the photographs can be reproduced. I think that is why Sarbast was so shocked because Wiki's interpretation is an ocean apart from the legal practice here and from what I could see in the history seems to punish even civic monuments to the genocide which were installed precisely to remember what happened and for awareness through history-making and media. TLDR: Would a legal letter from a lawyer reduce Wiki's paralysis on Iraqi law, and thus benefit content overall? Leviclancy (talk) 09:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- I'm afraid not. Any lawyer can have an opinion and oftentimes there are numerous lawyers with diametrically opposed opinions on the same subject. It would have to be a court case, decided by a judge, that would further explain and detail the current Iraqi law as written which can be seen here: COM:FOP#Iraq. If there is a court decision or an amendment made by the Iraqi legislature then we can change our interpretation. --Majora (talk) 18:59, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- In any case, it might also be useful to gain a little legal insight since there is a massive disconnect between Wiki treatment of Iraqi law and Iraqi treatment of Iraqi law. It was alarming when I noticed that anti-FOP decisions were being used extensively for Iraqi media dealing with monuments to genocide, culture, folklore, and history. Iraq has a very strong park culture and culture of public space, so I did ask a lawyer about the legal situation and they mentioned that although the law does not specifically mention park, public spaces, civic monuments, etc. that these are acceptable to photograph and the photographs can be reproduced. I think that is why Sarbast was so shocked because Wiki's interpretation is an ocean apart from the legal practice here and from what I could see in the history seems to punish even civic monuments to the genocide which were installed precisely to remember what happened and for awareness through history-making and media. TLDR: Would a legal letter from a lawyer reduce Wiki's paralysis on Iraqi law, and thus benefit content overall? Leviclancy (talk) 09:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Lets not start deciding what is a "special case" and what isn't. We are not lawyers and we are not a court system. Doing that in any case is the start of a rabbit hole that we do not want to venture down. As for if that is acceptable, any free license will do. It does not have to be public domain. See COM:L for a list of licenses that are (and are not) acceptable. --Majora (talk) 23:31, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no freedom of panorama in Iraq, unfortunately. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:56, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, found at https://mapio.net/s/28870164/ (as 40th from 50 photos). I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:56, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
no source, wrong PD, wrong author Goesseln (talk) 16:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Is there any chance this would be PD in Germany? Otherwise, yes, it should be deleted. FunkMonk (talk) 13:10, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:57, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
This particular image has no license information on the photo. Is it copyrighted? Leoboudv (talk) 19:41, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Leoboudv, yes. Added metadata.--Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 06:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: The metadata says: "© 2017 Silverscreen Media Inc. This image is protected under the United States and International Copyright laws and may not be downloaded, reproduced, copied, transmitted or manipulated without written permission." The image link shows the picture Without the text this image is licensed as CC BY SA 3.0--unlike other images from this website. This image needs COM:OTRS from the copyright owner--the photographer. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:18, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Dear Let There Be Sunshine,
From this set of images let me mention 2 images:
- File:J Mahendran at Veena S Balachander Felicitation.jpg when you access the actual image on silverscreen, it says the image license is CC BY SA. (photo 13/30)
- File:M. M. Keeravani at Inji Iduppazhagi Audio Launch.jpg (9/32) the photo on the silverscreen website says it is licensed as CC BY SA 3.0
- File:AR Rahman and Shankar at Oru Kadhai Sollattumaa Audio Launch.jpg when you access the image on wilverscreen it expicitly says the license is CC BY SA 3.0.
Your image on the silverscreen website has no such notice which suggests that Silverscreen has Not licensed it freely. Silverscreen has the option to license some images freely if it wishes and others are still copyrighted. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:24, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Received permission from silverscreen.com Perumalism (talk) 00:25, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: now available under the stated license at source site. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:59, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Wrong flag for Samukawa, Kanagawa. The correct flag should be File:Flag of Samukawa, Kanagawa.svg as shown in this photo. The flag is neither the flag of Sangawa, Kagawa, which is like File:Flag of Sangawa Kagawa.JPG. Both towns share the same Japanese kanji but different pronunciation and hence different romanized name. This flag is instead the flag of Kiyokawa, Kanagawa. Xeror (talk) 22:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:01, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Wrong license, it would pass the threshold for originality anyways. Ionutzmovie (talk) 22:53, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Wrong license, complex shapes. It would pass the threshold for originality Ionutzmovie (talk) 23:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Unlikely to exceed US TOO. - Alexis Jazz 06:33, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Alexis Jazz. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation: http://www.al-mawqif.com/84462 Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:39, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:03, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Complex shape, it would pass the threshold for originality Ionutzmovie (talk) 23:04, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Logo is from 1932: http://www.astonmartin.com/en/heritage/aston-martin-badge. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Kingdom isn't clear about corporate copyright. I don't know. - Alexis Jazz 06:30, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: In the best case scenario, this became public domain in the UK in 2003 (1932+71). This is after the 1996 URAA restoration date. Not public domain and not freely licensed in the US. --Guanaco (talk) 04:10, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
