Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/04/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Complex logo without OTRS. E4024 (talk) 11:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Slight modification of File:Atom of Atheism-Zanaq.svg, a CC logo created by a Wikipedian years ago. The text is not copyrighted. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 12:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- We have no proof that the logo is not copyrighted. Therefore the principle of precaution prevails. --E4024 (talk) 12:18, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
, Duplicate of the DR of File:Ateizm Derneği logo.png Vera (talk) 13:59, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without camera data, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Duck copyvio - uploaded by sock in violation of block/ban. --Эlcobbola talk 15:33, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Self-promotional item, out of scope. Only use is on promotional article on ar.wiki. hiàn 03:43, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 14:33, 9 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:37, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
not in the public domain Touzrimounir (talk) 09:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 14:33, 9 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
not in the public domain Touzrimounir (talk) 09:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 14:33, 9 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Weil etwas besseres unter einer Freien Lizenz in Auftrag gegeben wurde Tokota (talk) 08:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:18, 10 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: flickr licence is NC-ND --Krdbot 12:37, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
File da cancellare per copyviol Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 20:15, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:15, 10 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Book cover --Krdbot 18:38, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:10, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
useless profile photo not used on any pages JennyC1989 (talk) 05:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 07:04, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Darkness and light.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Didy.gif Commons:Deletion requests/File:Doctor Venuz.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Favyoon.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Document (4)-1.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dr Wilbert GOBBO CV.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:DSC 0271(1).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Duggy.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dishod.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dishod Rowe.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ctc The Label.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eeli.png
useless blurry photo JennyC1989 (talk) 04:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Delete samee .com 10:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)- Delete It looks like the photographer also photographed his finger. Out of scope personal finger. --E4024 (talk) 13:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, I mean out of scope personal file. --E4024 (talk) 07:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 18:37, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
useless blurry photo of some guy's ass JennyC1989 (talk) 04:54, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete samee .com 10:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 18:37, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
useless blurry photo of unknown person JennyC1989 (talk) 04:54, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete samee .com 10:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 18:37, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 18:38, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alsundanisujong (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal type photos, out of scope
- File:Wilsondhialda.png
- File:Aldawilson.png
- File:Wilsonalda.jpg.png
- File:Wilsonsundanialda .jpg
- File:Aldaalexaalley.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 18:44, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shahrukh Nawaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
- File:Shahrukh.jpg
- File:Rajput Bhatti.jpg
- File:Shahrukh Nawaz.jpg
- File:At a wedding.jpg
- File:After footbaal match.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 18:44, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope, one currently used on promotional user page
Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Uploader is only here at Wikimedia projects for self-promotion. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 22:47, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 18:45, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
поганий перегляд Оскілко (talk) 12:21, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 18:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 18:49, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Used only for promotion on enwiki. Home Lander (talk) 02:20, 9 April 2018 (UTC) THIS IS PROPERTY OF EASY SNACKS AND EASY SNACKS HAS GIVEN ME PERMISSION TO USE THE TRADEMARK IMAGE FOR THEIR WIKIPEDIA PAGE PLEASE DO NOT REQUEST THIS BE DELETED AS THAT IS NOT NEEDED IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO REPORT A TRADEMARK CLAIM OF THIS IMAGE YOU MAY CONTACT EASY SNACKS AT easysnacks.easyandcheap.com@gmail.com
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 03:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 03:36, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+small size without EXIFs : unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Promotional item, out of scope. hiàn 03:41, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kedwadee.por (talk · contribs)
[edit]These seem to be screenshot of smartphone. possibly copyvio.
- File:Chem04.jpg
- File:Solution chem03.jpg
- File:Chem03.jpg
- File:Solution chem02.jpg
- File:Chem02.jpg
- File:Solution chem01.jpg
- File:Chem01.jpg
Kkairri (talk) 03:48, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
It seems to be a catalog, Out of Scope. Kkairri (talk) 03:54, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation from http://www.info7.mx/internacional/opositores-son-obligados-a-reconocer-constituyente-venezolana/1992953 Jamez42 (talk) 03:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio - other catches with google. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:55, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation from https://elcooperante.com/nueva-esparta-se-debate-entre-un-alcalde-adeco-y-un-militar-salpicado-por-corrupcion/ Jamez42 (talk) 04:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation, possibly from http://www.coranztur.gob.ve/Coranztur/notituristico-noticia.php?recordID=148 Jamez42 (talk) 04:32, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope per COM:SCOPE#Excluded educational content: "Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text." This is already described much more completely in en:Names of God in Islam. HyperGaruda (talk) 05:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope per COM:SCOPE#Excluded educational content: "Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text", specifically "quotations". HyperGaruda (talk) 05:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo file uploaded only as self-promotion/advertising by a single-purpose account. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+maybe above ToO too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 03:18, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo file uploaded only as self-promotion/advertising by a single-purpose account. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal low-quality photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:30, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HariKrishna123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader has been uploading webgrabs as own work, I can't find the individual sources for these but I don't expect these are any different. The newspaper image is likely not allowed as it's entirely just non-free and fails de-minimis.
—SpacemanSpiff 07:30, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - very unlikely to be own works - at least 2 comes from facebook. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:08, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image, taken from http://naradanews.com/2017/02/rahul-dravid-and-his-india-under-19-team-have-no-money-for-dinner-report/ Lugnuts (talk) 07:50, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Most icons in bottom row are copyrighted and background image is likely copyrighted too. Taivo (talk) 08:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:11, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Subject of image is a bunch of movie & tv posters, with copyrights belonging to Netflix, Disney/ABC, CBS, and more. Nodstrum Tech has no right to release any of these Elisfkc (talk) 21:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Anyway Tous droits réservés © 2018 Archives des Religieuses Hospitalières, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+anyway we need the permission from the painter. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
COM:Toys Elisfkc (talk) 21:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation to website listed in license info John from Idegon (talk) 21:15, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Does not conform to threshold of originality, should be deleted speedily. Lone Guardian (talk) 22:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal foto. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 23:41, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
A 1967 photo can't be PD-1923. --ghouston (talk) 06:26, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: clearly not PD 1923. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:41, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request - Missing Source — Preceding unsigned comment added by M.Smith73 (talk • contribs) 11:41, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Keep The source existed when the file was uploaded and reviewed. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:53, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: Source existed when uploaded the flickreview is made for that. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:48, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ekemini Otung (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:Olivia Peace Otung is Chilling.jpg
- File:Ekemini Otung's Darling Wife.jpg
- File:Ekemini Otung's Wedding.jpg
- File:Ekemini Melvin Jr @ 5 months.jpg
- File:Olivia Peace Otung.jpg
- File:Ekemini Otung's Spouse.jpg
- File:Olivia's First Visit to Ikot Ekpene. February 2014.jpg
- File:Ekemini Otung's Wife at 23.jpg
- File:Ekemini Otung's Wife 2015.jpg
- File:Olivia and Jr@5 months.jpg
- File:Olivia Otung.jpg
- File:Ekemini and Oliva.jpg
- File:Olivia and Jr during the naming ceremony. 27.04.2017.jpg
- File:Ekemini Otung's Wife and Ekemini Melvin Jr at 2 months.jpg
- File:Olivia Ekemini Otung.jpg
- File:Ekemini Otung and wife.jpg
- File:Ekemini Otung's Wife.jpg
- File:Ekemini Otung's Wife at 22.jpg
- File:Autograph of Olivia Otung.jpg
- File:CANDLE LIGHT INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS GHANA. (Ekemini Otung).jpg
- File:Ekemini Otung's Photograph.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 13.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 09.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 19.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 18.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 17.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 16.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 15.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 14.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 12.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 11.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 10.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 08.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 06.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 05.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 04.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 03.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 02.jpg
- File:Pictures and Autograph of Ekemini Otung 01.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)‹‹‹‹››››
Deleted: deleted by Moheen Reeyad. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:47, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ekemini Otung (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:Ekemini Otung's Wedding Picture.jpg
- File:Ekemini Ukpong Otung .. Laziness simply means, resting before you are tired.jpg
- File:Ekemini Ukpong Otung .. The Generator of Life is Christ Himself.jpg
- File:Ekemini Ukpong Otung, MD & CEO, Kemilivia Group of Companies.jpg
- File:Melvin Ekemini Otung.jpg
- File:On the horse.jpg
- File:Ekemini Otung. Decisions Determine Destiny.jpg
- File:Ekemini and Olivia Otung.jpg
- File:Ekemini Ukpong Otung. Life has a junction where everyone meets.jpg
- File:Ekemini Otung.jpg
- File:Ekemini Ukpong Otung . Dogs do not prefer bones for meat. No one has ever given them meat.jpg
- File:Imdid.jpg
- File:Ekemini Ukpong Otung (Chairman of the Conference Management Council of the International Model Diplomats for Integrated Development).jpg
- File:Ekemini Ukpong Otung. Skillful Pilots gain their reputations from storms and tempest.jpg
- File:Ekemini Ukpong Otung. It was a nice outing with my family.jpg
- File:Picture & Autograph of Ekemini Ukpong Otung.jpg
- File:Elder Ekemini Ukpong Otung.jpg
- File:Picture and Autograph of Ekemini Ukpong Otung.jpg
- File:Comrade Ekemini Ukpong Otung.jpg
- File:Mr. Ekemini Ukpong Otung.jpg
- File:Ekemini Ukpong Otung.jpg
- File:Ekemini Ukpong Otung. Be the best ever and second never.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: out of project scope. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yuange317128 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
It does not show any interest MONUMENTA (talk) 00:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 01:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of focus; Category:Journey Behind the Falls has several other images of these tunnels with the same lighting DMacks (talk) 02:50, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:17, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Out-of-focus and obscured by water on the lens. Category:Journey Behind the Falls has several other images of crowds of tourists in these yellow ponchos on the various observation areas DMacks (talk) 02:51, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:17, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:09, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope : image only used in user namespace, however the user was never an" active participant" to the wikimedia projects Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:18, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Postcards from 20th century are not enough old for assuming public domain without evidence. Possible reason for PD is anonymous work, but what is written on backside of postcard? Maybe photographer's name? Per Italian-language text, maybe the postcard was first published in Italy – but maybe still in Albania? Taivo (talk) 08:41, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Taivo: See similar postcards from these same period: one, two - no author signature, or provided abbreviation of publisher only (but not the author). There are no reasonable reasons to believe that this postcard was different. --Kaganer (talk) 13:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Looks OK to me. --Yann (talk) 08:19, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
It's my job and I don't want to publish anymore. EZBELLA (talk) 09:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Poor quality, not used, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 08:20, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jhonnatan Tejada Matos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Organ14ggg.png
- File:Organ922.png
- File:Organ124.png
- File:Organ18.png
- File:Organ16.png
- File:Organ92.png
- File:Organ91.png
- File:Orga6.png
- File:Orga5.png
- File:Orga4.png
- File:Orga3.png
- File:Orga2.png
- File:Orga.png
- File:Monogram1.png
- File:Fiscalia.png
- File:Organigramajud.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jhonnatan Tejada Matos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Organ14jjj.png
- File:Organ15.png
- File:Organ13.png
- File:Organ12.png
- File:Organ9.png
- File:Organ8.png
- File:Fiscalia22.png
- File:Fiscalia2.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 08:02, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Not own work, false date (1960), missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. We received an invalid permission via ticket:2018041110012247. I do not think that a correct permission will be issued and therefore recommend to delete the file directly. --AntonierCH (d) 19:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion, unlikely to be free. --PierreSelim (talk) 08:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Likely a hoax to be used for vandalistic purposes at en:Rebecca Sugar. In the unlikely event that this is not a hoax, the copyright assertion of the uploader is very implausible as well. Sandstein (talk) 21:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rebecca Sugar school photo.jpg, same image with different copyright assertion by the same uploader. Sandstein (talk) 21:59, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely free. --PierreSelim (talk) 08:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rebecca Sugar school.jpg. Sandstein (talk) 21:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely free. --PierreSelim (talk) 08:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
It's my job and I don't want to publish anymore. EZBELLA (talk) 09:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Small size, no EXIF data, not used. --Yann (talk) 08:21, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
It's my job and I don't want to publish anymore. EZBELLA (talk) 09:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Disagree Free license can't be revoked. --Horus (talk) 20:33, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Old image, no date or source, uncertain copyright. --Yann (talk) 08:21, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
It's my job and I don't want to publish anymore. EZBELLA (talk) 09:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: From FB. --Yann (talk) 08:24, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
It's my job and I don't want to publish anymore. EZBELLA (talk) 09:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: From FB. --Yann (talk) 08:24, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
It's my job and I don't want to publish anymore. EZBELLA (talk) 09:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: From FB. --Yann (talk) 08:25, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
The art shown in these images is copyrighted. Keeping it on Commons requires a free license from the actual copyright holder via OTRS. Sathish kalathil (talk) 09:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:26, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio from various sources, e.g. https://vk.com/hctorpedo Xgeorg (talk) 09:56, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:29, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Сергей Губернаторов в составе "СКА" (Санкт-Петербург).jpg and File:Сергей Губернаторов в составе "Металлург" (Жлобин).jpg
[edit]copyvio from vk.com Xgeorg (talk) 09:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:30, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
already on Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:De_la_boisson_%C3%A0_l%27%C3%A9glise..._ou_le_contraire._(34426594864).jpg Fmvh (talk) 10:34, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:31, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:51, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:31, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
low quality, blurred, there are many better ones Pibwl (talk) 11:10, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:32, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
low quality, blurred, there are better ones Pibwl (talk) 11:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:32, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
low quality amateur vagina photo, with nothing educational. There was a photo with more educational value under this name (clearly that one was used on some pages, showing urethra), but origonal uplader kept replacing it with this one, for unknown reason. Either it should be restored against uploader's will, or deleted. Pibwl (talk) 11:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 08:34, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
low quality vagina close-up - bad lightning making it useless. There are many others. Pibwl (talk) 11:19, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Comment: I'm afraid I don't see the "bad lightning" in the photo. Also, I did a colorfix, but it was reverted.--Auric (talk) 11:23, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Possibly not a bad lightning, but bad filter. A colorfix definitely helped, but still not much, considering, that we have other better photos. And the uploader seems to keep reverting any changes. Pibwl (talk) 17:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, ccan be fixed. --Yann (talk) 08:35, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
exact duplicate of File:Glücksschwein.jpg with meaningless name Anvilaquarius (talk) 11:19, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:36, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Not from Flickr, promotional and photo by Nike: https://www.google.com/search?safe=active&q=nike+pro+hijab+prix&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSmQEJIF550mZ0vc8ajQELEKjU2AQaBggVCAEICQwLELCMpwgaYgpgCAMSKIoRtg61Ds4RhRuUEakF7ByJEZURsS_1oL846syXmL-UvuDuwL7kvwy0aMIT9JP6OoK_1nSxOd0x_18ogMlRRBjY2GklwaBrZjatygkApuAUuz688laMypKjL4aGiAEDAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIEXPDFAww&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwisyrTPia3aAhUB7IMKHe71BG4Q2A4IIygB&biw=375&bih=628 Ytoyoda (talk) 11:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:37, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
corrupted photo Artix Kreiger (talk) 11:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:38, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
non-free content. See en:File:Delphine Seyrig.jpg Caméléon Diaphane (talk) 12:07, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- fair enough Victuallers (talk) 13:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:39, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:39, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Twitter image. E4024 (talk) 06:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 11:57, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Does not look like own work, because text is too small to be readable. Real author and better license is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Medals are usually protected with copyright and the photo violates rights of medal creator. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:04, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:09, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
A shopping bag like thousands. No particular encyclopaedic relevance. Zenwort (talk) 12:56, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: non-trivial logo. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:09, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Kallakurichi MP & yarcaud MLA ZONE AMMA THITTAM LAPTOP DONATED- -By RAJARAJACHOLAN AIADMK AMMA PERAVAI- 2013-09-22 13-22.jpg
[edit]Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Found at https://www.celebritypix.us/celebrities/aiadmk-wikimedia-celebrities-4baa9.html . I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:51, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
- File:IMG-20180407-WA0033.jpg
- File:IMG-20180407-WA0030.jpg
- File:IMG-20180407-WA0027.jpg
- File:IMG-20180407-WA0026.jpg
- File:IMG-20180407-WA0024.jpg
- File:IMG-20180407-WA0020.jpg
- File:IMG-20180407-WA0019.jpg
- File:IMG-20180407-WA0016.jpg
- File:IMG-20180407-WA0014.jpg
- File:IMG-20180407-WA0010.jpg
- File:IMG-20180407-WA0007.jpg
- File:IMG-20180407-WA0011.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:52, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
G15 G10 spam Ngrebeccang (talk) 13:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:53, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Although the video has a CC license, it's using images licensed from other sources. The image is actually from Getty Images: https://www.paralympic.org/abdellatif-baka Ytoyoda (talk) 13:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Turelio. --Yann (talk) 12:54, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
failed upload, unused, out of project scope Hiddenhauser (talk) 18:21, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:55, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
very low quality image of little value Gareth (talk) 18:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: 25.19 Megapixel. --Yann (talk) 12:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: logo of non-noteworthy e-commerce site IagoQnsi (talk) 18:51, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Wikitext table ({{ShouldBeText}}), not in use/reduntant. 84.250.17.211 18:51, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danilozeus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: logos of non-noteworthy retail store with no realistic educational purpose. (if not all of these images are deleted, then at the very least, the low-resolution duplicates should be deleted in favor of the highest-resolution version)
- File:Dunamys-Store-banner.png
- File:Dunamys Borda-arredondada.png
- File:Dunamys Borda-arredondada-128x128.png
- File:Dunamys-Store.png
- File:Dunamys Banner-wordpress.png
- File:Dunamys 128x128.png
- File:Dunamys 250x250.png
- File:Dunamys Banner.png
- File:Dunamys 24x24.png
- File:Dunamys 16x16.png
- File:Dunamys 75x75.png
- File:Logo-Dunamys.png
IagoQnsi (talk) 18:56, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bigmilkman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like copyvio from [1]
- File:1P78 Kashtan Ukraine04.jpg
- File:1P78Kashtan Reticule100mStanding.jpg
- File:1P78-Tritium.jpg
- File:1P78 Range01.jpg
- File:1P78-1 AK74 Supressor.jpg
Avron (talk) 19:07, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Article deleted, picture no longer relevant, picture not linked in any article Weinleser1512 (talk) 19:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 19:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Löschantrag gem. "CommonsLöschregeln" Nr. 7: "von keinem einzigen Wikimediaprojekt (auch nicht in naher Zukunft) gebraucht wird (z. B. ein Gemälde eines unbekannten Künstlers)" --> es handelt sich um das Werk eines unbekannten Künstlers Löschantrag, da auf diese Datei nicht verlinkt wird 2003:C4:9BD3:8A00:88A9:1A62:87A5:B8B1 10:49, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Article deleted, picture no longer relevant, picture not linked in any article Weinleser1512 (talk) 19:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 19:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Löschantrag gem. "CommonsLöschregeln" Nr. 7: "von keinem einzigen Wikimediaprojekt (auch nicht in naher Zukunft) gebraucht wird (z. B. ein Gemälde eines unbekannten Künstlers)" --> es handelt sich um das Werk eines unbekannten Künstlers Löschantrag, da auf diese Datei nicht verlinkt wird 2003:C4:9BD3:8A00:88A9:1A62:87A5:B8B1 10:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Article deleted, picture no longer relevant, picture not linked in any article Weinleser1512 (talk) 19:13, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 19:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Löschantrag gem. "CommonsLöschregeln" Nr. 7: "von keinem einzigen Wikimediaprojekt (auch nicht in naher Zukunft) gebraucht wird (z. B. ein Gemälde eines unbekannten Künstlers)" --> es handelt sich um das Werk eines unbekannten Künstlers Löschantrag, da auf diese Datei nicht verlinkt wird 2003:C4:9BD3:8A00:88A9:1A62:87A5:B8B1 10:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Article deleted, picture no longer relevant, picture not linked in any article Weinleser1512 (talk) 19:13, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 19:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Löschantrag gem. "CommonsLöschregeln" Nr. 7: "von keinem einzigen Wikimediaprojekt (auch nicht in naher Zukunft) gebraucht wird (z. B. ein Gemälde eines unbekannten Künstlers)" --> es handelt sich um das Werk eines unbekannten Künstlers Löschantrag, da auf diese Datei nicht verlinkt wird 2003:C4:9BD3:8A00:88A9:1A62:87A5:B8B1 10:52, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Article deleted, picture no longer relevant, picture not linked in any article Weinleser1512 (talk) 19:13, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 19:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Löschantrag gem. "CommonsLöschregeln" Nr. 7: "von keinem einzigen Wikimediaprojekt (auch nicht in naher Zukunft) gebraucht wird (z. B. ein Gemälde eines unbekannten Künstlers)" --> es handelt sich um das Werk eines unbekannten Künstlers Löschantrag, da auf diese Datei nicht verlinkt wird 2003:C4:9BD3:8A00:88A9:1A62:87A5:B8B1 10:53, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Article deleted, picture no longer relevant, picture not linked in any article Weinleser1512 (talk) 19:14, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 19:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Löschantrag gem. "CommonsLöschregeln" Nr. 7: "von keinem einzigen Wikimediaprojekt (auch nicht in naher Zukunft) gebraucht wird (z. B. ein Gemälde eines unbekannten Künstlers)" --> es handelt sich um das Werk eines unbekannten Künstlers Löschantrag, da auf diese Datei nicht verlinkt wird 2003:C4:9BD3:8A00:88A9:1A62:87A5:B8B1 10:53, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Article deleted, picture no longer relevant, picture not linked in any article Weinleser1512 (talk) 19:14, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 19:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Löschantrag gem. "CommonsLöschregeln" Nr. 7: "von keinem einzigen Wikimediaprojekt (auch nicht in naher Zukunft) gebraucht wird (z. B. ein Gemälde eines unbekannten Künstlers)" --> es handelt sich um das Werk eines unbekannten Künstlers Löschantrag, da auf diese Datei nicht verlinkt wird 2003:C4:9BD3:8A00:88A9:1A62:87A5:B8B1 10:54, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Article deleted, picture no longer relevant, picture not linked in any article Weinleser1512 (talk) 19:14, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 19:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Löschantrag gem. "CommonsLöschregeln" Nr. 7: "von keinem einzigen Wikimediaprojekt (auch nicht in naher Zukunft) gebraucht wird (z. B. ein Gemälde eines unbekannten Künstlers)" --> es handelt sich um das Werk eines unbekannten Künstlers Löschantrag, da auf diese Datei nicht verlinkt wird 2003:C4:9BD3:8A00:88A9:1A62:87A5:B8B1 10:55, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Article deleted, picture no longer relevant, picture not linked in any article Weinleser1512 (talk) 19:14, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 19:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Löschantrag gem. "CommonsLöschregeln" Nr. 7: "von keinem einzigen Wikimediaprojekt (auch nicht in naher Zukunft) gebraucht wird (z. B. ein Gemälde eines unbekannten Künstlers)" --> es handelt sich um das Werk eines unbekannten Künstlers Löschantrag, da auf diese Datei nicht verlinkt wird 2003:C4:9BD3:8A00:88A9:1A62:87A5:B8B1 10:56, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
poor quality and sharpness Joschi71 (talk) 20:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
I want to upload this file to wikipedia instead of wikimedia and it is only possible when i deleted this file from here Hereyouth (talk) 19:31, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
i don't want like this picture and the links are outdated also Hereyouth (talk) 19:41, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Needless raster duplicate of File:US CDC logo.svg with false authorship claims. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:40, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the modest resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. Published at http://blogs.plos.org/dnascience/files/2014/07/1920px-Immunization_for_Infants.jpg two years before the uploader claims to have created it. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:42, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
This is a low-resolution and slightly off-color version of File:Patreon logo with wordmark.svg. I see no reason to keep this, and risk someone accidentally using it instead of the superior SVG version. IagoQnsi (talk) 20:13, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:44, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
very blurry JiriMatejicek (talk) 20:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:47, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Movie poster, unlikely that the director made the movie posters. As such, the director (whose name is on the Flickr account) cannot release the poster's copyright
- File:Closer - Scott Barley (poster).jpg
- File:Nightwalk - Scott Barley (poster).jpg
- File:Womb - Scott Barley (poster).jpg
- File:Hunter - Scott Barley (poster).jpg
- File:Hinterlands - Scott Barley (poster).jpg
Elisfkc (talk) 20:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyright © 2012. TRAHFE, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:49, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Artwork by Sonny Liew, any evidence that is CC0. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:17, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:50, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
This image is clearly sourced from a copyrighted website, the author did not release in into PD TheChampionMan1234 (talk) 05:42, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 09:46, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio: as stated in the source URL, “Copyright ©2015-2016(8) www.gov.cn ... All rights reserved. ”Also, the source has labelled "Xinhua" as its author, which means that the picture was taken by Xinhua News Agency, not the State Council. Photos from XNA are no free copyrighted. WQL (talk) 15:09, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 15:48, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal foto. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 16:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:50, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
No encyclopaedic relevance. Commons is not a repository for holiday snaps. Possibly infringing personality rights of childeren depicted. Zenwort (talk) 12:54, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Yasu (talk) 15:15, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Vegetable shopping basket of no encyclopaedic relevance. Zenwort (talk) 12:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Yasu (talk) 15:16, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
http://www.johnnys-net.jp/page?id=profile&artist=24 からの許可なき画像使用。--Aikata28 (talk) 13:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:16, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
File with technical problem. Unusable. ~Cybularny Speak? 17:29, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:50, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
So somebody tried to invent perpetuum mobile. But nothing more is known about working principles of the machine, so in my opinion the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Doublette, Picture is in much higher quality on commons; (File:ErichII.Pommern.JPG) Lupi82 (talk) 08:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Signature of unknown person. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:37, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
The photo is out of project scope, because it is blurry. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
No source. The file description names https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=File:Drone_panguan_mapping.jpg as the source, but the OSM file names the Commons file as the source. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Oppose I'm the author. No need to delete. Thank you. @NMaia Schadow1 (talk) 05:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)- Oppose It seems the original description page may have been deleted, but it is pretty clear the original author was the uploader @Schadow1. ~★ nmaia d 11:33, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- The logs state that the file was deleted on that wiki as a Duplicated file one day after it was uploaded to Commons. Possibly some process like w:Template:Now Commons. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure I tagged it exactly that way when I uploaded it here. ~★ nmaia d 01:04, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Comment: If there is no source, then Commons cannot keep it as the license cannot be verified. There are 2 licenses on this image file. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)- Delete Unless the user can prove he is the author by sending his permission to OTRS. --Mhhossein talk 05:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: there is no contest that User:Schadow1 is the author, and he confirms own work. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, looks like it is being used to vandalise a page Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Nondescript picture of road could be anywhere no encyclopaedic relevance. Zenwort (talk) 12:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: streetscene, properly identified and categorized, in scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Rear of boys head. Just becasue a photo has been taken by an American soldier dies not ake it relevant. Zenwort (talk) 13:00, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Hardly seen. Out of scope per bad quality (and contents). --E4024 (talk) 07:54, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Low resolution personal image, out of project scope, only used for self-promotion at enwiki. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 13:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
personal signature, not being used except for self-promotion at enwiki and other project(s). -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 13:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
out of Commons scope. Same as File:Neel naik signature.jpg which was uploaded by sock account Vicky s. Naik. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 13:07, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
unused personal image, copyvio possible Migebert (talk) 13:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LeMarocain211975 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Lucas Nascimento ensaio para peça teatral em Castanhal no Pará.jpg
- File:Lucas Nascimento Pereira.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheMasterPro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyright info on image doesn't match uploader info Ytoyoda (talk) 14:20, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Jhonnatan Tejada Matos - Legal Information & Legal Services - Información legal y servicios legales.png
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope not used file. E4024 (talk) 15:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- I don't object since a better version of the flag is already available.
Editor abcdef (talk) 07:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
1.jpg){kind=link}
![70 File:"The Next Generation".jpg](#File:"The_Next_Generation".jpg){kind=link}
![72 File:Сергей Губернаторов в составе "СКА" (Санкт-Петербург).jpg and File:Сергей Губернаторов в составе "Металлург" (Жлобин).jpg](#File:Сергей_Губернаторов_в_составе_"СКА"_(Санкт-Петербург).jpg_and_File:Сергей_Губернаторов_в_составе_"Металлург"_(Жлобин).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![182 File:'Girl With Dark Hair 30"x36" (2017).jpg](#File:'Girl_With_Dark_Hair_30"x36"_(2017).jpg){kind=link}
![183 File:'Queen Elizabeth '36"x36" (2014).jpg](#File:'Queen_Elizabeth_'36"x36"_(2014).jpg){kind=link}
![184 File:'The Seated Queen', 24"x60" (2017).jpg](#File:'The_Seated_Queen',_24"x60"_(2017).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_of_Walt_Kuhn.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
1.jpg){kind=link}
1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![09:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/04/09#c-Sathish_kalathil-2018-04-09T09:39:00.000Z-File:"The_Next_Generation".jpg){kind=link}
![08:26, 16 April 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/04/09#c-Yann-2018-04-16T08:26:00.000Z-File:"The_Next_Generation".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_1.png){kind=link}
_1.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Not used complex logo taken from an internet site. No OTRS. E4024 (talk) 16:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused photo about young football fan, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Serves no educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 18:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo IagoQnsi (talk) 18:13, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xxx Nut dog xxX (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like copyvio [2] and unappropriate description.
Avron (talk) 18:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rawaha.shah.9 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Unused personal photos with no educational value
- File:Mazaar e Quiad Museum (Rawaha).jpg
- File:Mazaar e Quaid Karachi (Rawaha).jpg
- File:Sea View Karachi2 (Rawaha).jpg
- File:Malir Karachi Marriage Hall2 (Rawaha).png
- File:Malir Karachi Banquet (Rawaha).jpg
- File:Malir Karachi Marriage Hall (Rawaha).jpg
- File:Sea View Karachi (Rawaha).jpg
- File:Malir Karachi (Rawaha).jpg
- File:Karachi Airport (Rawaha).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
IagoQnsi (talk) 18:36, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Serves no educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 19:14, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work (screenshot) of a photo without proper attribution of the author and license terms. A.Savin 20:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- {{Cc-by-sa-3.0|Wikimedia Foundation}} And what is this then? - This is a revenge issue by the way for the discussion on nl:Overleg_gebruiker:A.Savin#Unblock_request because the reporting user is blocked there. Kind regards, Rodejong 💬 ✉️ 20:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Is Wikimedia Foundation the author of the citadel photo at the right? --A.Savin 20:43, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Rodejong: Please provide source for the derivative work. Your upload is violating the licensing policy. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- I have to find that image, but I don't know where to look, as I don't speak the Bulgarian language. It's easier if you remove it. Sorry for the miss understanding, as I wasn't aware that I had to source the images in the screendump as well. But It's logical. Sorry. Kind regards, Rodejong 💬 ✉️ 17:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The difficult way to find the source of the image:
- 1- Read the description in english abput the image, in the Bulgarian Wikipedia.
- 2- Search for "Saksaywaman" on the internet.
- 3- Open en:Sacsayhuamán.
- 4- Scroll down and secomd image is File:Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 05.JPG , the original image (and Featured image to boot). Tm (talk) 04:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Tm. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- @P199: Don't you see that the picture is still not properly licensed and attributed? --A.Savin 17:37, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Same reason as previously. Nothing has changed, the attribution and licensing are still not sufficient. At least three images used in the screenshot (including WP logo; the Vlad Dracula portrait may be PD, though) are copyrighted and not owned by the uploader. So, either the screenshot is to be properly licensed, or it must be deleted. The closing admin unfortunately does not respond on the pinging. A.Savin 18:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- en:WP:POINT? Kind regards, Rodejong 💬 ✉️ 19:04, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Keep Same reason as previously. Nothing has changed.
Again difficult way to find the sources of the images:
1- Read the description in english abput the image, in the Bulgarian Wikipedia.
- 2- Search for "Saksaywaman" on the internet.
- 3- Open en:Sacsayhuamán.
- 4- Scroll down and secomd image is File:Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 05.JPG , the original image
Repeat again to the image of Vlad the Impaler, read the en:Vlad the Impaler and see the image File:Vlad Tepes 002.jpg or Category:Portrait of Vlad III the Impaler (Ambras Castle)
Repeat again to the image of Metabolism, find bg:Метаболизъм, and see the image File:AdenosineTriphosphate.qutemol.gif.
The Wikipedia logo is straight forward. Total time spent=5 minutes. Tm (talk) 20:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC) Total time spent fixing the licensing of the image=15 minutes. Why the DR, when is more simple and easier to just correct the licenses? Tm (talk) 20:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- Because I'm not the uploader and it's not my job. --A.Savin 21:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment So, improving the description and\or licensing is not your job, but instead, open two deletion requests is your job? Right. Your answer says it all. Tm (talk) 01:54, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- As always, you are extremely friendly and intelligent. Fixing the correct license IS the job of the uploader, and anyone who finds an incorrect license IS of course free to open an RfD. Any more questions? --A.Savin 02:09, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- No. Your answers and actions speak for themselves about your motives to open a second deletion request. Tm (talk) 03:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- As always, you are extremely friendly and intelligent. Fixing the correct license IS the job of the uploader, and anyone who finds an incorrect license IS of course free to open an RfD. Any more questions? --A.Savin 02:09, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn, as the licenses have been fixed. --A.Savin 12:29, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Derivative of an artwork, possibly copyrighted, COM:FOP#Denmark does not apply for anything else than buildings. A.Savin 20:40, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Works of art may be reproduced in pictorial form and then made available to the public if they are permanently situated in a public place or road. Kind regards, Rodejong 💬 ✉️ 20:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- If you quote, do it at least completely. The full quotation is as follows: "(2) Works of art may be reproduced in pictorial form and then made available to the public if they are permanently situated in a public place or road. The provision of the first sentence shall not apply if the work of art is the chief motif and its reproduction is used for commercial purposes." The second sentence should be self-evident. Any more questions? --A.Savin 20:51, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Works of art may be reproduced in pictorial form and then made available to the public if they are permanently situated in a public place or road. Kind regards, Rodejong 💬 ✉️ 20:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Falsified licensing data, not a free image. Source provided by uploader makes no reference to the image being released as CC-by-3.0, and imaged is clearly watermarked. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:18, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- 'Delete - image is from BollywoodHungama which does freely license some of their images, but not all. Template:BollywoodHungama has the details, with one of the requirements (underlined in the template) is that the image must be from an event or party in India. This is from an event in Dubai, so it's not covered. After they uploaded the image, the editor added this saying the image was verified by an admin. IP editors have subsequently removed copyvio deletion requests and the deletion notice. Ravensfire (talk) 18:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
What can i say you assume that ip addresses have revert back edits so it should be deleted, but its not genuine reason and ok if it is copyrighted then should be deleted. My concern was that i added license by BH which shows that some admin has to review it then should decide. ARY121 (talk) 18:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- @ARY121: , When you added the license by BH, did you carefully review the terms and check that the image met those terms? In particular, the "in India" requirement? The file name on BH tells you where it was take - Bollywood Parks in Dubai. See the conflict here? Ravensfire (talk) 16:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: License review done. --Yann (talk) 05:53, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bronco rider (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the nature of the images.
- File:Major General Fida Hussian Malik as Deputy Force Commander, Darfur, Sudan.jpg
- File:Major General Fida being awarded HI(M).jpg
- File:Maj Gen Fida Hussain Malik.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
—LX (talk, contribs) 16:30, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused low-quality personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also: questionable authorship claims. The uploader appears to be the subject rather than the author. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:43, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FAZLA.RABBY.223 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata (except metadata indicating that some of the images were grabbed from social media), previous publications found elsewhere, and the uploader's history.
- File:Swadhinata Debash Hall.jpg – http://www.studentstation.com/Colleges/Images/480x360/635339205485313093.jpg, grabbed from http://www.studentstation.com/colleges/bangabandhu-sheikh-mujibur-rahman-science-and-technology-university.aspx
- File:View of Male Student Dorm.jpg
- File:Best fan of the Album- Moumita.jpg – also outside of Commons' project scope. Low-quality personal photo of unidentified subject with no apparent notability; no meaningful description or categories.
—LX (talk, contribs) 16:43, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Non-CC news agency image Teslaton (talk) 16:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Didym (talk) 16:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope (same image as at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ratna Sarita Efandi.jpg). P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:53, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- also file:Torre Vicenta.png
Small photos without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contributions. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation, as a cropped version of the image appears here. To the uploader: If you are in fact the copyright holder of this image, please see COM:OTRS for info on how to provide permission for this photo. IagoQnsi (talk) 18:18, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation: appears to be a recolored version of this image. To the uploader: If you are the copyright holder of this image, please see COM:OTRS for info on how to provide permission for this image. IagoQnsi (talk) 18:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation to website listed on license info John from Idegon (talk) 21:23, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
unlikely own work with different web sources, press photo (eg https://assets.hardwarezone.com/img/2016/05/gtx-1080-sli_0.jpg ) Wdwd (talk) 13:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Seems like the dragon art takes this logo above the threshold of originality Ytoyoda (talk) 13:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from photographer Juliette Guénon (look description) is needed. Taivo (talk) 14:13, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata and the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. In addition, search in en.wiki for "porehead" gives only links to fish, the photo can be out of project scope as well. Taivo (talk) 15:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Found at http://xdccian.com/about.php (http://xdccian.com/admin/images/about/0c32e1ca4e.jpg). I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio of derivative work: permission is required for the depicted paintings.
BethNaught (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The art shown in these images is copyrighted. Keeping it on Commons requires a free license from the actual copyright holder via OTRS. Sathish kalathil (talk) 09:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
![09:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/04/09#c-Sathish_kalathil-2018-04-09T09:44:00.000Z-File:'Girl_With_Dark_Hair_30"x36"_(2017).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
![18:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/04/09#c-Didym-2018-05-04T18:06:00.000Z-File:'Girl_With_Dark_Hair_30"x36"_(2017).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The art shown in these images is copyrighted. Keeping it on Commons requires a free license from the actual copyright holder via OTRS. Sathish kalathil (talk) 09:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
![09:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/04/09#c-Sathish_kalathil-2018-04-09T09:45:00.000Z-File:'Queen_Elizabeth_'36"x36"_(2014).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
![18:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/04/09#c-Didym-2018-05-04T18:06:00.000Z-File:'Queen_Elizabeth_'36"x36"_(2014).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The art shown in these images is copyrighted. Keeping it on Commons requires a free license from the actual copyright holder via OTRS. Sathish kalathil (talk) 09:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
![09:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/04/09#c-Sathish_kalathil-2018-04-09T09:45:00.000Z-File:'The_Seated_Queen',_24"x60"_(2017).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
![18:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/04/09#c-Didym-2018-05-04T18:06:00.000Z-File:'The_Seated_Queen',_24"x60"_(2017).jpg){kind=link}
The art shown in these images is copyrighted. Keeping it on Commons requires a free license from the actual copyright holder via OTRS. Sathish kalathil (talk) 09:48, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
The image was uploaded here on the same day the device was announced to the public (according to en:CFexpress#Readers), which smells a bit fishy in terms of copyright. It is also identical to the official promo images used to sell the device (eg. at B&H, full image) – notice the position of the dust particles in both images. Given that users history of uploading copyrighted material, I don't expect a permission to come up in OTRS any time soon … El Grafo (talk) 09:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Found elsewhere : https://www.google.fr/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiuZjKB9BWwpkL1mkq4-SmXSlCkIHy1n-h8DM19NbaitADw0tF2V3lQZucu6BwOB2LU_12njhw07hXDV2I1I-BkGysynsVz_1jiWX2jd8X04JrrIxS3pmdWe0s-1NyeOvULv5sQL30kBXKx41YRKaBCRfw0O5pOvmQ2-KI9gT3_1tZF7CF4StKhDb7ilNHhKLGwSpedMd9Kj2tRGJ6QDOU8IdH4ZKfZGDhp5D9C4e0kDFwIIqBayx27arg9jsLMgeEJUMWM9Iy9gtKZ2XK9XYTUmdTOADmXdwduSE_1lye1JJru3JgODDcQKbywWDkU3jRy9JnBE9Rg9ZzpJnqyDL-8iBvc4dqm4HQ&gws_rd=cr&dcr=0&ei=RkvLWs2vCcqtUavoqtAO, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Complex logos need OTRS-permission from copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 11:29, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
This image was published here https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/10616005 under a NC license, and uploaded as if it were CC BY-SA instead Enwebb (talk) 13:35, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Might not be PD, per Invaluable info: [3] , signed Estate of Anton Giulio Bragaglia DDupard (talk) 11:27, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- Also not exactly neutral as a depiction of a writer --DDupard (talk) 11:28, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: I don't see why PD-Italy would not apply. --Jcb (talk) 18:15, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DDupard as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation: per Italian law makes an important distinction between "works of photographic art" and "simple photographs" (Art. 2, § 7). Photographs that are "intellectual work with creative characteristics" are protected for 70 years after the author's death (Art. 32 bis), whereas simple photographs are protected for a period of 20 years from creation. The author/creator: Anton Giulio Bragaglia died in 1960 [4] . His works might enter the Public Domain 70 years after his death in 2030. Therefore license header is incorrect ; It is not PD Italy since it is "a work of photographic art". Needs one week discussion. Taivo (talk) 14:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete : It is misleading to say that it is PD Italy, since it is a work of "photographic art" (Art. 2, § 7) and that the author: Anton Giulio Bragaglia passed away in 1960: [5]; The law says that in the case of Photographs that are "intellectual work with creative characteristics" [they] are protected for 70 years after the author's death (Art. 32 bis). It means that there is here infringement of Copyright laws and that Wikimedia has to wait until 2030 to respect the law.--DDupard (talk) 15:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- If this is photographic art, then it is clearly copyright violation. But I am not sure, that this is photographic art, maybe simple photo. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Taivo; To understand better: on the Artnet site , for the entry 'Anton Giulio Bragaglia' (Italian, 1890–1960) : [6], among the "Artworks" listed/presented is the very image here discussed with the added mention that it was sold in May 2003. There is a wikipedia article on Bragaglia here [7], and various authorities about him as an artist, like RKD : [8], Moma : [9], Musée d'Orsay : [10], Delarge : [11], Luminous lint Photographer : [12], Christies : [13], Benezit Dictionary of artists :[14], New York Public Library: [15], Bridgeman: [16], Getty edu: [17] all related to the artistic field.--DDupard (talk) 11:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- I understand, that he is an artist. Not everything done by artist is art. But if the photo is sold, then this is a strong argument. Taivo (talk) 06:51, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Taivo: Lot 128: ANTON GIULIO BRAGAGLIA (1889-1963), sold by Christie's, London, United kingdom, May 21, 2003. See here: [18].--DDupard (talk) 09:53, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- I understand, that he is an artist. Not everything done by artist is art. But if the photo is sold, then this is a strong argument. Taivo (talk) 06:51, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Taivo; To understand better: on the Artnet site , for the entry 'Anton Giulio Bragaglia' (Italian, 1890–1960) : [6], among the "Artworks" listed/presented is the very image here discussed with the added mention that it was sold in May 2003. There is a wikipedia article on Bragaglia here [7], and various authorities about him as an artist, like RKD : [8], Moma : [9], Musée d'Orsay : [10], Delarge : [11], Luminous lint Photographer : [12], Christies : [13], Benezit Dictionary of artists :[14], New York Public Library: [15], Bridgeman: [16], Getty edu: [17] all related to the artistic field.--DDupard (talk) 11:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- If this is photographic art, then it is clearly copyright violation. But I am not sure, that this is photographic art, maybe simple photo. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, sold in auction, therefore photographic art. Can be restored after copyright expiring in 2034. Taivo (talk) 06:22, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This cannot be inthe public domain in country of origin (Malta). Firstly, it does not (now) appear in the source given: [19] Secondly, it is claimed that the photo was taken in 1905, but the ship did not look the same then - this is after the 1951 refit. In reality the date was 10 July 1960 and it was taken by Anthony Grech, the grandfather of Captain Lawrence Dalli, whose name is mentioned as the "author" and on whose website it appears, with protective watermark [20]. Of course, since Capt Dalli is alive and well in this mid-40s and running his photographic business, he may have licensed the photo appropriately, but the page says nothing about that. A small profile: [21]. Davidships (talk) 17:57, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Davidships: I reviewed your deletion request, and agree that something might have gone wrong during or since the upload, although I cannot remember the details. Thanks for being vigilant. I propose to delete the file. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 13:32, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Still copyrighted, as per nom. --rimshottalk 23:04, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
It's my job and I don't want to publish anymore. EZBELLA (talk) 09:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Next time you upload pictures somewhere, please read the conditions better. The job may be yours, but the file is not yours anymore. --E4024 (talk) 09:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
- roger that but it Poor quality, not used, no source, uncertain copyright--EZBELLA (talk) 13:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: it's in use. Ruthven (msg) 08:38, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Poor quality, not used, no source, uncertain copyright EZBELLA (talk) 09:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:38, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Poor quality, not used, no source, uncertain copyright EZBELLA (talk) 09:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: this file is in use. Ruthven (msg) 08:38, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
It's my job and I don't want to publish anymore. EZBELLA (talk) 09:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Poor quality, not used, no source, uncertain copyright--EZBELLA (talk) 14:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: this one is bad quality. Ruthven (msg) 08:38, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
It's my job and I don't want to publish anymore. EZBELLA (talk) 09:07, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- It from Facebook--EZBELLA (talk) 21:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: undertain source. Ruthven (msg) 08:39, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Dante_and_Virgil_on_the_back_of_Geryon_MET_DP824541.jpg. The other is correctly titled since the Met's open access policy PatHadley (talk) 11:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- That's a false claim. File:Dante_and_Virgil_on_the_back_of_Geryon_MET_DP824541.jpg is a duplicate of File:Bertel Thorvaldsen - Dante and Virgil on the back of Geryon.jpg and should be deleted. --Trzęsacz (talk) 12:58, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Trzęsacz and PatHadley: Next time use the template {{Duplicate}} and do not open a DR, thanks. Ruthven (msg) 08:40, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
,_of_Walt_Kuhn.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_of_Walt_Kuhn.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted work by Walt Kuhn (d. 1949), missing permission. Not immediately obvious that this is a copyright violation, given that US copyright rules for a 1930 work are not based on author's deathdate. Possibly {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-not renewed}}, but more information may be necessary to ascertain status. Storkk (talk) 13:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
,_of_Walt_Kuhn.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:42, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
,_of_Walt_Kuhn.jpg){kind=link}
duplicado de escudo existente y mejor diseñado Usuarioperuano2 (talk) 10:57, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep in use Kathisma (talk) 00:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
duplicado mala calidad vandalismo Chicoperuano (talk) 07:42, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
vacio , no sirve Chicoperuano (talk) 16:20, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 05:58, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
porque no existe y es falta de respeto hacer duplicado sin sentido Chicoperuano (talk) 17:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: it's a redirect. Ruthven (msg) 08:44, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
There is not indication that this photograph have free use, and the credited author (Jorge Carrillo) is not the same person that uploaded the image. The original can be see here: http://paleovenezuela.blogspot.com.co/2013/08/urumaco-tierra-de-gigantes.html Rextron (talk) 00:36, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:22, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:03, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Angel jiménez Ortiz
[edit]
No metadata, seems a copyright violation of https://dimensionhipica.blogspot.com/2010/05/nuevos-cambios-en-el-inh.html (Published on 19th May 2010
No metadata either, although I can't find another source I suspect it may also be a copyright violation.
Has metadata, but has been user by the Venezuela's Ministry of Communication without credits to Commons after it's upload (13 February 2017), referencing AVN as its source. --Jamez42 (talk) 14:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Probably these are not the uploader's own works. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:41, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr license/source-washing. All other images uploaded here by User:Cyctolaugh from ashwin arokyaraj have been found as copyvio. Most recent three examples are File:Vijaychineseladies (39218145525).jpg, File:Vijay thullatha manamum thullum (26145072518).jpg, and File:Shahrukh khan and vijay dance (39180079854).jpg DMacks (talk) 15:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:44, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
False date, found at https://www.facebook.com/sethgliermusic/photos/a.462140834371.250341.30374814371/10153929741294372/?type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Not neceessarily false, our page says the photo was from August 5, 2016, and it was published on 2016-08-10 by the official Seth Glier account (About a month before being uploaded to commons). We should require a OTRS release, though. Platonides (talk) 21:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Platonides: Comment The EXIF says 10 August 2016 not the 5th. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Против удаления. DENAMAX (talk) 20:58, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Platonides. OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:58, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Wer ist der Urheber? Welches Recht gilt? Ralf Roleček 22:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see the file page's licensing. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:10, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Speedied for "Copyright © Zenda https://www.zendalibros.com/". Since there's a Zenda specific license tag, I'm going to go with not an obvious case that should be speedied. No personal opinion. Prosfilaes (talk) 02:23, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- See File talk:Karina and Boris Izaguirre.jpg as to why the license claimed is invalid. Note that the license tag was created by the user who uploaded this file. Secondarywaltz (talk) 08:35, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- No, this is a DR, move the discussion here. It's important that the discussion be preserved even if the file and talk page is deleted.
- In general, once someone has produced license text they claim establishes the freedom of a work, it's beyond the issue of a speedy deletion.--Prosfilaes (talk) 09:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- As I said in the other talk:
- This file does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion because, according to the legal notice and the intellectual property of Zenda, it authorises the view, impression, downlad, storage amd share whether in whole or in part is permitted:
Queda autorizada la mera visualización, impresión, descarga o almacenamiento temporal, la acción de compartir en redes sociales o por correo electrónico ya sea en su totalidad o parcialmente, de los contenidos y/o de los elementos insertados en el sitio Web o en las páginas que lo conforman exclusivamente para su uso personal, privado y no lucrativo por el usuario, siempre que, en todo caso, se indique su origen y/o su autor y que, en su caso, aparezca el símbolo del copyright y/o notas de propiedad industrial de Ruritania Editores S.L., o sus titulares.
- In any case, I've sent an e-mail to Zenda yesterday to explain me if images from there can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Tajotep (talk) 11:14, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Which is an invalid license for Commons because it translates to "it is exclusively for personal, private and non-profit use by the user" Secondarywaltz (talk) 13:36, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: incompatible license as per User:Secondarywaltz. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Queensland State Library assertion of public domain probably in error. black&white print of a well-known photograph of the ship taken when the ship was new in 1959, and published at that time by the ship's owners Holland America Line. I have never seen the photographer identified, nor an air photo company, but there is a likelihood that this was commissioned by the shipowners, who may well consequently still hold the copyright. Cannot see that this meets any of the QSL criteria A-E.
Examples: [22][23]. Note reverse showing publisher Holland America Line, and legend "Our new flagship", suggesting published 1959. Davidships (talk) 17:09, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: State Library is a reputable organization, we'll need more than just suspicion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Probable copyright violation: this is a book cover, and the copyright is probably owned by Dell Publishing and/or S. E. Hinton.
P.S. This also might indicate that the Flickr user needs to be blacklisted (on COM:QFI, I don't see a process for a non-administrator such as myself to report a user to administrators, so if the closing admin on this DR could take a look at the user, I'd appreciate it). IagoQnsi (talk) 18:23, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely license laundering. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Derivative of a magazine cover, the picture may still be copyrighted but there is no info on its author and permission/license status. A.Savin 20:30, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- It's well past the 70 year limit on copyright in DK, a photo of a cover is akin to a quote. -- Vrenak (talk) 20:43, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, 70 years after the author's death. So who is the author and when have they died? --A.Savin 20:48, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete copyrights not expired yet (life plus 70 years). --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- In 1936 most drawings were delivered anonymously, as was usual for "Carl Allers Etablissement A/S" i Valby at that time. January 23, 1945 the arkives were completely destroyed (page one), so it's unlikely that there is anyone who can claim the copyright, other than Familie Journalen, and that magazine has been out of print in well over 70 years as Vrenak pointed out.
- I have been unable to trace a specific artist for this drawing.
- I understand copyright in the big picture, not the details, so forgive me if I was in violation. I will call Familiejournalen tomorrow, if they can shed more light on it.Kind regards, Rodejong 💬 ✉️ 00:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unfortunately, "unlikely that there is anyone who can claim the copyright" is not a keep reason. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Unclear license/permission status. The description links to a text, which -- translated into English -- is the following: "This image bank contains photos of all our council members (and their deputies). The photos can be downloaded in good print quality. Use of it is free if the name of the photographer is mentioned". There is no mention of CC-BY-SA, nor anything about free (re-)distribution, modification, etc. See also User_talk:Robotje#Category:Photographs_by_Christiaan_Krouwels
- File:05. Gijs van Dijk (31763202586).jpg
- File:Arnoud Boot.jpg
- File:Boggelen.jpg
- File:Coen Teulings.jpg
- File:Ferdinand Grapperhaus (cropped).jpg
- File:Ferdinand Grapperhaus.jpg
- File:Hietkamp.jpg
- File:Klaver.jpeg
- File:Lans Bovenberg.jpg
- File:Leo Stevens.jpg
- File:Louise Fresco.jpg
- File:Paul van der Heijden.jpg
- File:Robin Linschoten.jpg
- File:Yvonne van Rooy.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A.Savin 23:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- The very first one on the list about Gijs van Dijk has been tagged "It was reviewed on 22 December 2016 by FlickreviewRand was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0." and for what I can see that same photo is still under cc-by-2.0 on Flickr. So the license is clear. - Robotje (talk) 05:20, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep First photograph is NOT by Christiaan Krouwels, but -as User:Robotje indicates- clearly CC-BY-2.0. (I'll change the attribution accordingly.) All other photographs are photos of members of the SER, an official Dutch government council. On the website of the SER this statement can be found: In deze beeldbank staan foto's van alle raadsleden (en hun plaatsvervangers). De foto's kunt u downloaden in goede afdrukkwaliteit (2Mb). U mag ze gratis gebruiken, mits naamsvermelding van de fotograaf. (No English version available). My translation: This database contains photographs of all council members (and their substitutes). The photographs can be downloaded in good print quality. They can be used freely, if the photographer is attributed. Vysotsky (talk) 07:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- This is not sufficient to assume CC-BY-SA and I already wrote it in the RfD summary. --A.Savin 10:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) "U mag ze gratis gebruiken" translates to "You may use them at no (additional) cost", not to "They can be used freely". These pictures are not and, according to the Wayback Machine, have never been made available under a Creative Commons license, so the statements made to that extent by the various uploaders appear to be false. Statements made by other uploaders that the copyright holder "allows anyone to use it for any purpose", including the making of derivate works, appear to be equally untrue.
- So what's going on with the first file? The photograph found on the Flickr page is not the same as the one uploaded to Commons. The one on Flickr was supposedly made by Lex Draijer on January 15, 2017 (though the EXIF data states: "artist - Rob van Esch"), whereas according to the EXIF data the one uploaded to Commons was in fact made by Christiaan Krouwels on 26 August 2015. In any case, the file on Flickr was changed. But is the one uploaded to Commons made by Draijer or by Krouwels? The EXIF data says Krouwels. But the photograph shares the characteristic blue background with the pictures made by Draijer. Then again, one could argue, so does this one supposedly made by Tessa Posthuma de Boer, and this one supposedly made by Raphaël Drent. Are these similar looking pictures made by different photographers, the background having been chosen by the party, or did someone fuck up when writing the descriptions for Flickr and are these in fact all works made by Draijer? Jeroen N (talk) 10:24, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I have asked SER to add a clear statement about the license at their website. Vysotsky (talk) 11:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- No response from SER as yet (2 months later). Statement on their website hasn't changed. Vysotsky (talk) 08:21, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Renewed request sent to SER. Vysotsky (talk) 08:32, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- No response from SER as yet (2 months later). Statement on their website hasn't changed. Vysotsky (talk) 08:21, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment As I tend to believe EXIF data, I undid my changes to Gijs van Dijk (2017). Thanks. Vysotsky (talk) 12:19, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mariya Bayda
[edit]Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this.
- File:BaydaMK Hodataystvo str1.jpg
- File:BaydaMK Hodataystvo str2.jpg
- File:BaydaMK Hodataystvo Vyrezka.jpg
- File:BaydaMK Ukaz KrasnayaZvezda 21061942.jpg
- File:BaydaMK Ukaz Vyrezka.jpg
- File:Mariya Bayda.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The documents are declassified official documents and should be under PD-RU-exempt. It appears that the original uploader took photos of the documents (in the public domain) and put them under a creative commons license since they were in the public domain. While the uploader is not the person who wrote them, they are still permitted on Commons and should remain. Since they are 2-D with not much creativity in the simple photography, {{PD-RU-exempt|type=official documents}} is the correct license, and the newspaper should be PD-Russia since its from 1942 and copyright expired. Hero of the Soviet Union nomination sheets are declassified and PD.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:28, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as what PlanespotterA320 said. Even if the uploader didn't photograph them, copyright cannot be claimed on such documents.--BevinKacon (talk) 22:06, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- If not they are probably from Podvignaroda.ru, and as seen here they are all PD-RU-exempt. 1942 newspapers from Redstar without author mentioned or just clippings of lists (like the Hero of the Soviet Union announcement lists consisting of full name and rank in the military) are public domain under Russian law.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: First three files were clearly not own work, newspaper is most likely not an "anonymous or pseudonomymous work", authorship of photos unknown. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:49, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [24]. Yann (talk) 10:18, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
And
Complex logo without OTRS. E4024 (talk) 11:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Slight modification of File:Atom of Atheism-Zanaq.svg, a CC logo created by a Wikipedian years ago. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 12:07, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- We have no proof that the logo is not copyrighted. Therefore the principle of precaution prevails. --E4024 (talk) 12:19, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- KeepFile:Atom of Atheism-Zanaq.svg has been on Wikimedia Commons since 2006. This logo is based on that one and not significantly different. Vera (talk) 13:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- We have no proof that the logo is not copyrighted. Therefore the principle of precaution prevails. --E4024 (talk) 12:19, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Complex logos cannot be in Commons without OTRS. It's free to DR File:Atom of Atheism-Zanaq.svg. --E4024 (talk) 08:54, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Vera, the NGO is actually is newer than our file, so if anything their logo is based on our file. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:53, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
