Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/04/02
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Unused, File:Flag of Atlántico.svg exists, user likely uploaded a 500px thumbnail version of that svg file based on their other uploads seb26 (talk) 01:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
200px thumbnail version of File:Escudo de la Federación Colombiana de Fútbol.svg, unused, uploader has uploaded other thumbnail versions before and may not understand how to use thumb sizing or embed existing images seb26 (talk) 01:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:10, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
It is boring Juwita Liana (talk) 00:37, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, the file has two versions. First one is unused personal photo and uploader's request, the other is uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Juwita Liana.jpg
This is not necessarily own work, it's an album cover by a third party. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:55, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 13:39, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
The source is said to be IMDb. Although I cannot find the image there, all content on that site is protected by copyright laws and may not be used without permission, as far as I can see. ErikvanB (talk) 14:11, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied as copyvio. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
All content on IMDb is protected by copyright laws and may not be used without permission, as far as I can see. ErikvanB (talk) 14:37, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Moreover it seems that files from Geaorges Biard (aka @JJ Georges: ) are better quality. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![77 File:Lisa "Left Eye" Lopes grave 1.jpg](#File:Lisa_"Left_Eye"_Lopes_grave_1.jpg){kind=link}
![114 File:A sign reading "Riverside- Beam Me Up Scotty" in Riverside, Iowa- the predicted birthplace of fictional character Captain James T. Kirk of "Star Trek".jpg](#File:A_sign_reading_"Riverside-_Beam_Me_Up_Scotty"_in_Riverside,_Iowa-_the_predicted_birthplace_of_fictional_character_Captain_James_T._Kirk_of_"Star_Trek".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_found_in_the_Aegean_Sea._12-10_BC.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![154 File:Strong body language by Désirée Murk, conducting her workshop "Doing Business Richly" in New Delhi, India (9445104907).jpg](#File:Strong_body_language_by_Désirée_Murk,_conducting_her_workshop_"Doing_Business_Richly"_in_New_Delhi,_India_(9445104907).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Speedied as copyvio. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Made in error Broichmore (talk) 11:52, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: housekeeping. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Only Advertising Migebert (talk) 16:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 16:37, 2 April 2018 UTC: Spam --Krdbot 18:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Officialumaryusuf.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ohoje1.jpg
out of scope: private shot from panoramio. Te750iv (talk) 17:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:29, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope: private shot from panoramio. Te750iv (talk) 19:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:29, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope: private shot from panoramio. Te750iv (talk) 19:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:29, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ochoa artista del viento.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Official jeetu.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jeetu Regar M.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jeetu Mandoliya.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hana Koko Father Christmas.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:Non-official Wellington regional flag.png
Appears to be broken, unthumbnailable, and over 2 Gigapixels. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:10, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- I think this might be music. - Alexis Jazz 18:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Is actually a video, I'm working on getting it to play. - Alexis Jazz 20:36, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: No luck. Some crackling, that's it. It's an mp4 video from Google created in 2011. I'm missing something but I don't know what. - Alexis Jazz 23:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted – file contains embedded data,. --jdx Re: 01:28, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Samsung Galaxy S Duos 2.JPG 42.113.156.213 02:25, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 12:26, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
(c) Yuli Alexa Pérez Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
(c) Yuli Alexa Pérez Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
{{Vk}} This image is in use. — Jeff G. ツ ping or talk 05:28, 7 April 2018 (UTC)- And ? May you explain why are you signing @Jeff G.: since your username is another one. Thanks for your reply. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Strong Delete Copyvio, no proof Yuli Alexa Pérez gave permission to Maria Candelaria for https://www.flickr.com/photos/141042466@N02/40477191684. The previous post allegedly by me above (now struckout) was a fraud by TheBellaTwins1445 in this edit. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
(c) Yuli Alexa Pérez Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:37, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:12, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
(c) Yuli Alexa Pérez Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:38, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:12, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
self-advertising CoCoCounty97 (talk) 00:24, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --E4024 (talk) 09:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 01:11, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Self-promotion on es.wiki. Out of scope; not educationally useful. hiàn 01:16, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 01:17, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Alexis Jazz as Copyvio (copyvio) PD-textlogo, but out of scope. Yann (talk) 01:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- It is copyvio: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone 2017.svg. - Alexis Jazz 11:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
[1]: Own work? Yann (talk) 01:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio - several publications are prior to the one here. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
A flag depicting a false country 'Hafassar', with no coverage or mentions in Wikipedia, and other imagery related to 'Hafassar' from this uploader was deleted in October 2017 for being personal files out of scope seb26 (talk) 01:30, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Image uploaded for the purposes of advertising (see page history). No clear educational reuse purpose given the lack of coverage of the band in Wikipedia seb26 (talk) 01:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Probably copied from Facebook. Yann (talk) 01:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - from there or from elsewhere. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal image seb26 (talk) 01:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
picture of no educative interest Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:39, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Keep It’s actually a photograph I took uploaded by another Commons user. I believe the requestor has made a mistake and may want to withdraw the nomination. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope—personal, non-notable art created by the uploader. No obvious educational use Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:41, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It’s actually a photograph I took uploaded by another Commons user. I believe the requestor has made a mistake or is confused about the project scope, and may want to withdraw the nomination. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope—personal, non-notable art created by the uploader. No obvious educational use. Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:41, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It’s used in Japanese Wiki so I think there’s encyclopedic use for this image. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thegoatman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Obviously not own works, no source, no valid license.
Yann (talk) 01:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope—personal, non-notable art created by the uploader. No obvious educational use. Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It’s actually a photograph I took uploaded by another Commons user. I believe the requestor has made a mistake and may want to withdraw the nomination. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope—personal, non-notable art created by the uploader. No obvious educational use. Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It’s actually a photograph I took uploaded by another Commons user AND it’s used in a Wiki article. I believe the requestor has made a mistake and may want to withdraw the nomination. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope—personal, non-notable art created by the uploader. No obvious educational use. Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It’s actually a photograph I took uploaded by another Commons user. I believe the requestor has made a mistake and may want to withdraw the nomination. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:50, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope—personal, non-notable art created by the uploader. No obvious educational use. Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It’s actually a photograph I took uploaded by another Commons user. I believe the requestor has made a mistake and may want to withdraw the nomination. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:48, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
low phtography AndLikeThings (talk) 11:38, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep no valid reason for deletion. M.Bitton (talk) 13:37, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yasu (talk) 15:40, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope—personal, non-notable art created by the uploader. No obvious educational use. Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Not sure is exactly call this art. It’s just a photograph taken with a point and shoot camera. I believe the requestor is mistaken. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope—personal, non-notable art created by the uploader. No obvious educational use. Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC) UTC)
- Keep Not sure is exactly call this art. It’s just a photograph taken with a point and shoot camera. I believe the requestor is mistaken. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope—personal, non-notable art created by the uploader. No obvious educational use. Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This is actually graffiti created by the artist w:Neck Face. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:37, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope—personal, non-notable art created by the uploader. No obvious educational use. Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:46, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This is actually graffiti created by the artist w:Neck Face. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:39, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
La imagen fue tomada de internet y ninguna licencia justifica su uso Victor Gibby (talk) 01:46, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope—personal, non-notable art created by the uploader. No obvious educational use. Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:46, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This is actually graffiti created by the artist w:Neck Face. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:40, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope—personal, non-notable art created by the uploader. No obvious educational use. Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:46, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Could you explain how a photograph of objects that are covered in multiple Wikipedia topics has no obvious educational use? Ytoyoda (talk) 03:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope—personal, non-notable art created by the uploader. No obvious educational use. Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:46, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep In use on Wikipedia, so there’s evidence to suggest the image is in scope and has an obvious educational purpose. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:03, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope—personal, non-notable art created by the uploader. No obvious educational use. Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:47, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The image is in use on 3 different Wikipedia articles, which suggests the image is very much in scope. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:01, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
La imagen fue tomada de internet y ninguna licencia justifica su uso Victor Gibby (talk) 01:47, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Víctor, si no sabes no opines ni solicites eliminar un medio, contamos con la sesión de fotos original que el fotógrafo Pablo Martínez le realizó al Diputado Jorge Triana Tena y la foto contiene su crédito como debe ser.
RE
- Primero, cuida tu lenguaje o podrás ser bloqueado indefinida o permanentemente (WP:Civismo)
- En tal caso de contar con la sesión original, debes marcarla en el parámetro de "Fuente" para comprobarlo (A causa de esto se pone {{subst:nsd}})
- Debes marcar las licencias correctas (licencias que el autor haya interpuesto a su trabajo) o justificar su uso en Wikimedia (Puedes leer Commons:Licensing)
- (A causa de esto último se pone también {{subst:nld}}
- Victor Gibby (talk) 19:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 01:47, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope—personal, non-notable art created by the uploader. No obvious educational use. Jacquelinekato (talk) 01:47, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This is not non-notable art, but a photograph I took (granted, not with the best equipment) at a basketball game, not non-notable art, and it was uploaded to Commons by another user. I believe is the requestor is mistaken and should withdraw the nomination. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
La imagen fue tomada de internet y ninguna licencia justifica su uso Victor Gibby (talk) 01:47, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Inappropriate use of {{PD-Colombia}}. COM:CRT#Colombia and this template show that there is no exemption for government works, in fact they are protected for 70 years after publication seb26 (talk) 01:57, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo, depicts an entity that was not notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia (es:Ciencuadras) and written for advertising purposes seb26 (talk) 02:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Wrong license, it would surpass the threshold for originality anyways. Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Willy1018 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.cmsh.khc.edu.tw/releaseRedirect.do?unitID=206&pageID=3104
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion whether this logo is really covered by the claimed Taiwan license. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete.It belong to logo. And wrong license ,isn't belong PD-ROC-exempt.--Willy1018（talk） 08:59, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 06:29, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Author 西村光人 (artist painter) is alive. Batholith (talk) 14:04, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 06:29, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Davidmejoradas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Senado México 2017 (actualizado).jpg
- File:Senado México 2017 (cortada).jpg
- File:Senado México 2017.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 06:29, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Davidmejoradas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright notice that the uploader links to says "El Usuario no deberá modificar, reproducir o mostrar pública o comercialmente los materiales, ni podrá distribuir o utilizarlos con algún propósito público o comercial" (the User must not modify, reproduce or display the materials publicly or commercially, nor may they distribute or use them for any public or commercial purpose) and "El Usuario no deberá transferir los materiales a ningún tercero" (the User must not transfer the materials to any third party).
All files on Commons must allow modification and commercial uses, and copying a file to Commons is literally transferring material to a third party.
- File:Pablo Lemus Navarro 2.jpg
- File:Pablo Lemus Navarro 2 (cropped).jpg
- File:Mariana Rodriguez Cantu 3 (cropped).jpg
- File:Mariana Rodriguez Cantu 4 (cropped).jpg
- File:Mariana Rodriguez Cantu 4.jpg
- File:Mariana Rodriguez Cantu 3.jpg
- File:Mariana Rodriguez Cantu 2 (cropped).jpg
- File:Mariana Rodriguez Cantu 1.jpg
- File:Mariana Rodriguez Cantu 1 (cropped).jpg
- File:Mariana Rodriguez Cantu 2.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
La imagen es tomada de internet y no justifica su uso (no licencias) Victor Gibby (talk) 02:05, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work. --Ymblanter (talk) 11:59, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
La imagen es tomada de internet Victor Gibby (talk) 02:08, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:00, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Wrong license, it would surpass the threshold for originality anyways. Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Wrong license, it would pass the threshold for originality anyways. Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:25, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
no reason specified
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Basque backside.jpg. E4024 (talk) 11:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Please also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Modern basque.jpg . --E4024 (talk) 11:46, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Imagen proveniente de internet, Redundantes/Mala calidad, Duplicado y ninguna licencia justifica su uso Victor Gibby (talk) 03:40, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Mys 721tx at 06:29, 9 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Davidmejoradas --Krdbot 12:29, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Imagen proveniente de internet, Redundantes/Mala calidad, Duplicado y ninguna licencia justifica su uso Victor Gibby (talk) 03:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Mys 721tx at 06:29, 9 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Davidmejoradas --Krdbot 12:29, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Imagen proveniente de internet, Redundantes/Mala calidad, Duplicado y ninguna licencia justifica su uso Victor Gibby (talk) 03:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Mys 721tx at 06:29, 9 April 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Davidmejoradas --Krdbot 12:29, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
This letter was written in response by M. Xavier Dezuchowicz to a request to the Mairie of La Baule for a memorial. The copies of the entire correspondance have been verified and the author of the letter has confirmed that it he wrote it. It is a matter of public record and has also been seen by journalists at Ouest France and by staff at the Mémorial de la Shoah. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conseilhistorique (talk • contribs) 3 avril 2018 à 17:12 (UTC) The attempt to delet this letter is very suspect, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conseilhistorique (talk • contribs) 3 avril 2018 à 17:14 (UTC)
Delete as downloaded, without letterhead or signature, this document has no value for Wikimedia projects. It is an attempt to use french Wikipedia for own local political interests. --Habertix (talk) 11:37, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:20, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Also re-upload of File:Believerzmusicmusic.jpgRonhjones (Talk) 18:50, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:20, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio photo: http://www.library.taichung.gov.tw/lib/content/index-1.asp?Parser=1,25,254,253 220.137.18.149 12:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 01:46, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
likely copyvio, no evidence of permission SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 17:36, 9 April 2018 UTC: License review: Non-free license, or license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works - --Krdbot 00:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
likely copyvio, no evidence of permission SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:46, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 17:36, 9 April 2018 UTC: License review: Non-free license, or license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works - --Krdbot 00:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
likely copyvio, no evidence of permission SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:46, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 17:36, 9 April 2018 UTC: License review: Non-free license, or license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works - --Krdbot 00:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
likely copyvio, no evidence of permission SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:47, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 17:36, 9 April 2018 UTC: License review: Non-free license, or license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works - --Krdbot 00:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
likely copyvio, no evidence of permission SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:47, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 17:36, 9 April 2018 UTC: License review: Non-free license, or license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works - --Krdbot 00:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
likely copyvio, no evidence of permission SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:47, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 17:35, 9 April 2018 UTC: License review: Non-free license, or license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works - --Krdbot 00:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
likely copyvio, no evidence of permission SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:48, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 17:36, 9 April 2018 UTC: License review: Non-free license, or license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works - --Krdbot 00:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
DUPLICATE FILE NAME Adamtl (talk) 22:06, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, and no file name of the duplicate given. --Wdwd (talk) 13:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:27, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
![22:27, 2 April 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/04/02#c-Patrick_Rogel-2018-04-02T22:27:00.000Z-File:Lisa_"Left_Eye"_Lopes_grave_1.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: in use. --Wdwd (talk) 13:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
![13:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/04/02#c-Wdwd-2018-04-10T13:55:00.000Z-File:Lisa_"Left_Eye"_Lopes_grave_1.jpg){kind=link}
The uploader can't be the artist because Peyo died in 1992. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, see Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Belgium. --Wdwd (talk) 13:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Kenneth James Dover.jpg Elly (talk) 22:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 13:50, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
No source, authorship or licensing information for the base map used. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:34, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims. Looks like a screenshot of non-free Google content. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:47, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 14:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
self promotion Cabayi (talk) 20:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
self promotion Cabayi (talk) 20:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope private photo. --Wdwd (talk) 14:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
self promotion Cabayi (talk) 21:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Febah Martin (talk · contribs)
[edit]self promotion
- File:With Puri Jagannadh and Charmy Kaur in 2018.jpg
- File:With Ram Gopal Varma in 2018.jpg
- File:With Tammareddy Bharadwaja in 2018.jpg
Cabayi (talk) 21:10, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope private photos. --Wdwd (talk) 14:19, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
It's a photograph of a modern newspaper front page, including a prominent image. Unless there is something very unusual about Uruguay law, the newspaper should hold the copyright. GRuban (talk) 21:18, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:18, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
self promotion, out-of-focus selfie, out of scope Cabayi (talk) 21:26, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
(c) ESProductions.co.za, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Falsified creator information. Here the summary states its a portrait of Juan Arroyo by himself (mon portrait). The use on fr:Juan Arroyo states it's by Isabelle Françaix. Cabayi (talk) 21:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Different older web-version (from 2014) exist, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 14:16, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Claimed as own work, but able to be found online on various websites, [2] for example. Very likely copyright infringement SamHolt6 (talk) 22:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Its my own work and has been released already so its available everywhere since he is a public figure HeyLetgoletgo (talk) 22:05, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- @HeyLetgoletgo: By "Your own work" you mean that you, personally, took the image? You described the image as being created in September 2017, but I found the image attributed to a site that uploaded [3] the image on 2 August 2017. This seems to contradict your claim, so verification you are the actual owner of the image is needed. --SamHolt6 (talk) 01:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - agree with SamHolt6 about previous works, plus the track record of the user gives no confidence this is their work, but something they grabbed online and uploaded. Ravensfire (talk) 21:17, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per SamHolt6, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 14:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
The source does not indicate it has given permission for this image to be used. SamHolt6 (talk) 13:22, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Image was updated after the deletion request was created to use the Bollywood Hungama permission which is for BH events and parties. Link given is from the BH events and parties and the image was found there. I think this one is okay. Ravensfire (talk) 15:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: as per Ravensfire. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, watermark in bottom right corner. Uploader is twice blocked for copyvios. Probably this is copyright violation as well. Taivo (talk) 16:41, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 15:05, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Poor quality, and appears to be a screenshot of a web photo rather than an image owned by the uploader TAnthony (talk) 16:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 15:05, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Non-free images for living people are deprecated, and this image is taken from their Facebook page and is not owned by the uploader TAnthony (talk) 16:57, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:02, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
unused small book cover, unclear copyright, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 17:31, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:01, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
book cover, unused, unclear copyright Pibwl (talk) 17:33, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:01, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
book cover, unused, unclear copyright Pibwl (talk) 17:34, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:01, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nakibul Islam Tuhin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:00, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
This photograph is just an advertisement. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:46, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
not simple logo — Draceane talkcontrib. 18:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
above ToO — Draceane talkcontrib. 18:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, out of scope image. --Wdwd (talk) 14:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
extremely low resolution — Draceane talkcontrib. 18:50, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, out of scope image. --Wdwd (talk) 14:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
extremely low resolution — Draceane talkcontrib. 18:50, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, out of scope image. --Wdwd (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tamirsofer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Almost small size without EXIFs, unlikely to be own works. Some looks a bit as screenshots.
- File:יוסי קאנץ בתפקיד צביקה המנהל בעונה הראשונה של ראש גדול.png
- File:רוברט הניג בסרטו האחרון פטר השלישי 2016.png
- File:ספי ריבלין.png
- File:צחי נוי בסדרה חגי ישראל עם אין כמוטי.png
- File:עפרון אטקין בסדרה החיים זה לא הכל 2011.jpg
- File:דנה בראיון הסרט מבצע ביצה 2017.png
- File:חיים אוסדון מספר כהדוד חיים איך הוא התחיל מחיים הליצן.png
- File:חיים אוסדון משחק את התפקיד הראשי שלו בסרט מבצע ביצה ליד כלוב הג'ירפות בספארי ברמת גן.png
- File:רועי מגלם את כוכב הילדים רוי בוי בסדרה רוי בוי ביער הסודי.png
- File:רועי עוז מברך ילדי יומולדת 2012.png
- File:שי ורועי בסדרה מותק של יומולדת בהוט.png
- File:שראל במקום האמיתי ערוץ הילדים 2010.png
- File:דן שצברג.jpg
- File:איציק בתפקיד אלחנן ברדוגו בסדרה ראש גדול ראש חדש 2017.png
- File:דץ.png
- File:חיים אוסדון מתראיין 2015.png
- File:נאיה בראיון לסרט גיואבות 2015.png
- File:מיכל מוכתר בסרט הקולנוע חבורת ראש כרוב 2010.png
- File:אסף פריינטא 2013.png
- File:אורנה כץ 2017.jpg
- File:דן שצברג 2017.jpg
- File:צביקה פורמן 2017.jpg
- File:אמנון וולף 2017.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Part of them are screeshots from Israeli TV (according to the file name). -- Geagea (talk) 16:24, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted file. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 19:34, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted file. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 19:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:42, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
This photograph appears in two German newspapers, Handelsblatt [4] and FAZ [5], with both noting that its source is Metropolis-Verlag. FNAS (talk) 19:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:38, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion: Uploader's request, mistake. Near-identical duplicate of another uploaded photo. My apologies. Julle (talk) 20:21, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. --Wdwd (talk) 14:37, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion: Uploader's request, mistake. Near-identical duplicate of another uploaded photo. My apologies. Julle (talk) 20:21, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. --Wdwd (talk) 14:36, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
File:A sign reading "Riverside- Beam Me Up Scotty" in Riverside, Iowa- the predicted birthplace of fictional character Captain James T. Kirk of "Star Trek".jpg
[edit]
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi EugeneZelenko, I am unclear as to why the file I uploaded has been marked for deletion. Would it be possible if you could explain why you requested the file to be deleted? Thank you! Hhull45 (talk) 22:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:50, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:49, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Uploaded for vanity purpose.
- File:श्री के.एस. गुप्ता एंड फेमिली.jpg
- File:श्री केसर सिंह गुप्ता 3.jpg
- File:श्री केसर सिंह गुप्ता 2.jpg
- File:श्री केसर सिंह गुप्ता 1.jpg
- File:श्री केसर सिंह गुप्ता .jpg
Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 10:10, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Lots of unreasonable geometries, especially the N and the N-methyl; arbitrary perspective is so poorly chosen that one of the CH2 H is not visible. And this is the less-active stereoisomer...better to have nothing than this mess DMacks (talk) 05:27, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 21:01, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Poor geometry (C off phenyl and its para H are not parallel bonds). Category:Cathinone has multiple better ones DMacks (talk) 05:30, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 21:00, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Geometric nonsense DMacks (talk) 05:31, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 21:01, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Geometric nonsense DMacks (talk) 05:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 21:01, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Geometric nonsense and have File:Dihydromorphine 3D ball.png DMacks (talk) 05:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 21:01, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Wrong license, it would pass the threshold for originality anyways. Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:34, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:49, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
The CC-BY 3.0 license of Bom only suitable for water products. Satellite image may not qualify with this. 219.79.181.42 04:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:15, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
The CC-BY 3.0 license of Bom only suitable for water products. Satellite image may not qualify with this. 219.79.181.42 04:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
The CC-BY 3.0 license of Bom only suitable for water products. Satellite image may not qualify with this. 219.79.181.42 04:55, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:21, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
It is is low resolution Antonioliriololi (talk) 02:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. But possibly copyvio as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
COM:Out of scope: hoax flag of a hoax state. The uploader was blocked on En-wiki as a sockpuppet of someone trying to push a fictional history of a hoax state in South Asia, copying images from the internet and giving them a fictional description in the process. HyperGaruda (talk) 08:33, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:54, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not used and there is a bigger one here: File:Recep Tayyip Erdogan - Caricature (23158412651).jpg. E4024 (talk) 09:10, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:57, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I did not have the permission of the people shown in the picture to photograph them next to the statue. They might not have a problem with that but I cannot be sure. George E. Koroneos from Athens, Greece. 09:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:00, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Bronze statue of the emperor Augustus (27 BC - AD 14), found in the Aegean Sea. 12-10 BC.jpg
[edit],_found_in_the_Aegean_Sea._12-10_BC.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_found_in_the_Aegean_Sea._12-10_BC.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I did not have the permission of this gentleman to include him in the picture I posted here. He might not have a problem with that but I cannot be sure. George E. Koroneos from Athens, Greece. 09:50, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Delete this is highly unlikely the work of the uploader as claimed. Tineye find several versions and on discogs.com there are a couple of album covers with this image, such as these (click on the "More Images" link below the displayed cover). Ww2censor (talk) 10:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
"Parking at Yushan Trailhead" is a controversial name. This page has now been replaced by "File:Mitsubishi Delica 2G-3476 parking at Yushan Trailhead 20151016.jpg".--Kai3952 (talk) 10:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: nothing controversial here. Redirect kept to preserve original filename. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:04, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 11:11, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 11:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:30, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Also a potential copyright issue, too. RJaguar3 (talk) 18:40, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
April Fools hoax - Alexis Jazz 13:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:17, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused DW on a classical painting. Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 14:03, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Please also note that the uploader has been warned on attack uploads. What a pity that people use and abuse Commons to make a point for their personal issues. --E4024 (talk) 14:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:17, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IIC Holdings (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Company Logo f international consolidation holdings.jpg
- File:IIC HOLDINGS WIKI.jpg
- File:IIC Holdings logo.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 14:31, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 14:31, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, likely copied from http://www.patricknagel.com/images/bio_content_img01.jpg . --Túrelio (talk) 06:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:PREZIVLJAVANJE (SAVETI PRILIKOM BORAVKA U PRIRODI).pdf
- File:MUŠKARAC KURVA (Muškarac je samo muškarac ).pdf
- File:PRIRUČNIK BORAVAK U PRIRODI.pdf
- File:BORAVAK U PRIRODI.pdf
- File:RCEPTI NAŠIH PREDAKA.pdf
- File:DETE U PRIROD ZA RODITELJEI.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Fake logo; not educationally useful. hiàn 14:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Unknown people ; Personal image ; No notability ; Unknown location ; No use Civa (talk) 16:10, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:01, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope personal file. It could also be the re-upload of a deleted one. E4024 (talk) 15:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of scope. ~Cybularny Speak? 15:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
I did not take this picture by myself, so it could have copyright issues. Please remove it. Caroline456 (talk) 16:08, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
I did not take this picture by myself. Could you please remove it? Thanks Caroline456 (talk) 16:37, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
unused logo, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 17:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo with unknown importance. Daibukan Sogo Bugei isn't mentioned in en.wiki. Probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Strong body language by Désirée Murk, conducting her workshop "Doing Business Richly" in New Delhi, India (9445104907).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I took the photo, and the lady portrait doesn't feel comfortable with the photo. She asked me to delete it. Ikreis (talk) 19:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- delete per nomination, avoid personality right. Editor-1 (talk) 08:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused image. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Small size and bad quality. Out of project scope. We have better photos in category:Arecaceae in Venezuela. Taivo (talk) 19:50, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
In my opinion the photo is out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 19:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry, poorly framed, and useless for illustrating anything. Clearly out of scope and of no use to Commons. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope illustrations, some of them used for user space made-up-country cruft on Spanish Wikipedia. Includes at least one Google Maps copyvio.
- File:Arcea Location Map.png
- File:Coat of Arms Arcea.svg
- File:Coat of Arms Arcea.png
- File:Flag of Arcea.svg
- File:Location Arcea 2.png
- File:Location Arcea.png
—LX (talk, contribs) 20:55, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The "country" is actually the Hala'ib Triangle, and we already have plenty of maps for that. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - the poor little girl has articles in two WPs. Her own pics have been DR'ed. What image are they going to use if those are deleted? Let's leave this at least. --E4024 (talk) 14:46, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- @E4024: May you explain why an image is mandatory in a WP article, and in what way this one is "realistically useful for an educational purpose". Thanks, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Mandatory, no, but nice and useful. Have we got too many child pyjamas? --E4024 (talk) 11:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Once again, what's the COM:SCOPE ? (If you've not a "nice and useful" reply, feel free not to reply : it's not mandatory). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Mandatory, no, but nice and useful. Have we got too many child pyjamas? --E4024 (talk) 11:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- @E4024: May you explain why an image is mandatory in a WP article, and in what way this one is "realistically useful for an educational purpose". Thanks, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- My final opinion: We do not have too many kids' pyjamas and this belongs to a kid who has articles in WP. Therefore I find it in scope. I hope the image is not deleted. --E4024 (talk) 14:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:LL, all over the internet. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Il va être remplacer par un autre fichier identique qui est corrigé. Dan.84.F (talk) 16:17, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: quand un autre fichier sera disponible, on pourra le télécharger sur celui-ci. Ruthven (msg) 11:24, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. Sorry for that. Ymblanter (talk) 08:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Semms below ToO; besides, it is not on the protected architecture list of the Ministry. Ruthven (msg) 11:26, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Twitter. E4024 (talk) 14:48, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:28, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:28, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:27, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Historical painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:27, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thesilverbodgie (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:28, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Necropolis Hill (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
I can assure you they are my own work. I don't know why you would think that they are not. I took them with my iPhone. Necropolis Hill (talk) 15:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Assuming GF. @Necropolis Hill: Please keep the camera data next time (maybe it's the processing software that removes them). Ruthven (msg) 11:29, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- It's doing something to delete them. I'm not manually deleting them. Necropolis Hill (talk) 13:29, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:32, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Restored: {{PD-AR-Photo}}. Yann (talk) 11:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
it:Luigi Senesi died in 1978, so this drawing is still copyrighted. We cannot keep derivative photos of such artwork. De728631 (talk) 15:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Also nominated:
- File:LONDRA La Estorick Collection "l'Astrazione Oggettiva”. Luigi Senesi.jpg
- File:Mostra De Picture Luigi Senesi- Sala Teatro - Pergine Valsugana 2014.jpg
- File:Anni 70 . Gradualità segnica - Variazioni sul tema n.2.jpg
- File:Anni 70 . Anonimia celeste.jpg
- File:L'evoluzione artistica . Immagine significante .jpg
- File:Evoluzione artistica . Omaggio AT.jpg
- File:Mostra De Pictura - sala Teatro - Pergine Valsugana 2014.jpg
De728631 (talk) 16:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:41, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Image is from a different angle and time of day than the source image listed Elisfkc (talk) 23:55, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept Correct source found Elisfkc (talk) 23:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
I probably shouldn't have transferred this file to Commons, since Finland doesn't have freedom of panorama for sculptures. --ghouston (talk) 06:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- I don't know the date or copyright status of the sculpture. --ghouston (talk) 06:25, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete The statue of A. A. Levón (1820–1875; Q4820641) in Palosaari, Vaasa, Finland, was sculpted by Lauri Leppänen (1895–1977; Q17382189) and unveiled on 25 August 1956.[6] So yes, the original work is copyrighted until 2048. FOP in Finland is for buildings only. ––Apalsola t • c 17:56, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Comment Actually De minimis might apply to this case. ––Apalsola t • c 18:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. The bust only takes up a small proportion of the image, but it's sort of the entire purpose of the image. --ghouston (talk) 23:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per ghouston - the bust is the main subject, also indicated by the image's title. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:10, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
著作権侵害 https://aihotel-nh.jp/images/IMG_0460.jpg をトリミング、縮小したもの ＫｏＺ (talk) 04:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 08:03, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
著作権侵害 https://aihotel.jp/img/hotelist/img_ageo.jpg と同じ画像 ＫｏＺ (talk) 04:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 08:04, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
著作権侵害 https://cdn.4travel.jp/img/thumbnails/imk/dm_hotel_img/r/0/3/9/440x330_039c4a23-b626-4039-8a60-68e26a00f3ab.jpg に同じ ＫｏＺ (talk) 05:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 08:04, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
著作権侵害 http://aihotel-nh.jp/images/images20180324164250.jpg の画像 ＫｏＺ (talk) 05:11, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 08:04, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
著作権侵害 https://aihotel.co.jp/images/IMG_0009.jpg を縮小しただけ ＫｏＺ (talk) 05:14, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 08:05, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
No FoP - Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Tajikistan Ronhjones (Talk) 00:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep In Tajikistan it is not forbidden to photograph sculptures and distribute them Franrasyan (talk) 08:36, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
No FoP - Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Tajikistan Ronhjones (Talk) 00:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep In Tajikistan it is not forbidden to photograph sculptures and distribute them Franrasyan (talk) 08:37, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
No FoP - Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Tajikistan Ronhjones (Talk) 00:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep In Tajikistan it is not forbidden to photograph sculptures and distribute them Franrasyan (talk) 08:37, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
No FoP - Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Tajikistan Ronhjones (Talk) 00:21, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hello! In Tajikistan there is no law regulating or prohibiting to photograph or distribute these photos,so if there is no prohibition, then do not delete.Franrasyan (talk) 14:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Cree una SVG para este archivo Victor Gibby (talk) 02:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Archivo con una SVG disponible (tampoco se enlaza a nada) Victor Gibby (talk) 02:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Archivo duplicado e incorrecto (tamaño) (no se enlaza a nada este) y hay una SVG disponible Victor Gibby (talk) 02:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:18, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Official Writer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:エイブルコーポレーション社製 プロボウルで遊ぶ子供達.jpg
- File:エイブルコーポレーション 孫の日ボウリングの様子.jpg
- File:エイブルコーポレーション 孫の日ボウリング大会.jpg
- File:エイブルコーポレーション 熊谷俊範.jpg
- File:JAMMA 会議 2.jpg
- File:熊谷俊範 JAMMA理事 流通委員長時代 会議.jpg
- File:JAMMA 会議 1.jpg
- File:JAMMA ゴルフコンペ 入賞者.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:01, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Official Writer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:AOU2006 アミューズメントEXPO エイブルコーポレーション.jpg
- File:土井正博.jpg
- File:馬場敏史 西武ライオンズ一軍コーチ時代.jpg
- File:辻発彦 西武監督時代.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:18, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Found elsewhere : http://www.quinenco.cl/eng/img/ejecutivos/Alvaro-sapag.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:04, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jorgeluiscabezas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Foro "Impacto de la 4ta Revolución Industrial en el Trabajo, la Producción y la Seguridad Social", Congreso de la Nación, 2018-03-06.jpg
- File:Presentacion Libro AGC 25 años.jpg
- File:Firma de convenio entre AGC y USPAFIP.jpg
- File:Firma de Convenio entre AGC y UPSAFIP.jpg
- File:Firma de Convenio entre AGC y la Fac. de Ingeniería UBA.png
- File:Plenario Federal de la Asociación Gremial de Computación - Diciembre de 2017.jpg
- File:PLENARIO CIERRE 2018.jpg
- File:Juan Manuel PEDRINI.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:16, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:14, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio: Cover of Crash Landing (2005 film) Karsten11 (talk) 15:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:13, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
"Miss Curvy Africa Founder" - could this be serious? It looks like a very clear out of scope personal image to me. Note: Interestingly INC has edited this file without proposing its deletion. Am I missing something here? E4024 (talk) 16:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:12, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims. The map at the top appears to be a screenshot of Google Maps. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:10, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Highly dubious whether these are usefully in-scope for Commons' usage. Also not 100% clear whether user understood that even graphics free for "non-commercial" use aren't Commons-compatible (as per User_talk:Jrichmo93#Unblock).
User already banned and images from other sockpuppets apparently deleted already.
- File:Asteroids thrust.wav
- File:Spaceship Explosion Spritesheet.png
- File:Asteroid Explosion.png
- File:Start image.png
- File:Asteroid1.png
- File:Pong Paddle hit sound.ogg
- File:Shooting stars.png
Ubcule (talk) 20:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:10, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlicensed derivative of copyrighted, registered trademarks. Also likely copyright violation, as the image appears to be a professional, stock photo taken for an old advertisement. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 21:06, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Image has been updated with a new one from my personal collection. Justin Lippolis 16:28, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete GigglesnortHotel, trademarks have nothing to with it. {{Trademarked}} is OK for Commons. COM:PACKAGING indicates this image is not okay though. It looks old, but these illustrations would have had to be around since 1988 at least to have any chance of a PD license. To be safe you should find some packaging that has been around since before 1923. And this packaging is sold today. @JL6er: I can't find much info on this. Is it an old design? - Alexis Jazz 02:53, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:09, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
File:מימין לשמאל - אורנה כץ, שרון שחל, צביקה פורמן, ותמיר סופר באולפני וידאופילם אינטרנשיונל לאחר דיבוב הסדרה משטרת האגדות.jpg
[edit]
Any description, COM:SCOPE ? Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- unlike other images uploaded by this user, He appears in this one, so he probably did not take the image, but maybe a family member did. This user probably has a disability or autism (as he stated on his user page) Golan's mom (talk) 11:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Hystrix. --Didym (talk) 12:07, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Derivative photograph of a non-free painting. it:Luigi Senesi died in 1978, so this painting is still copyrighted either as a self-portrait or to another painter. We cannot keep derivative photos of such artwork. De728631 (talk) 16:04, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:43, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Wrong license, it would pass the threshold for originality anyways. Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:41, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:56, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Lower-resolution dupe of File:Fortytwo.jpg Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:15, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Imagen tomada de internet, Redundantes/Mala calidad y ninguna licencia justifica su uso Victor Gibby (talk) 03:48, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Justificación: La imagen no es tomada de internet (antes de acusar que se demuestre), es producto de trabajo propio, es decir, lo elaboré yo. Es una interpretación personal del logo de Teresa Castell como candidata independiente al gobierno del Estado de México en 2017. Los colores, tipografía, el acomodo y datos que contiene el original y mi versión son totalmente distintos como de puede apreciar aquí o al fondo de esta imagen. La imagen tampoco es de mala calidad (como se puede observar debajo; la imagen está en un tamaño ajustado de 500px) ni es redundante pues no se encuentra otra exactamente igual a la que yo proporcioné y no cumple con las normas de borrado. La licencia que justifica su uso la doy yo pues es trabajo propio.Davidmejoradas (talk) 03:28, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: de todas formas, parece muy PD-text. Ruthven (msg) 22:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:34, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: this one seems below ToO. Ruthven (msg) 22:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:34, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:35, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:34, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:35, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of Project Scope. Personal Opinion about the Foundation. This file should be put at Wikipedia instead of Commons. It also only consists of simple words (Chinese Characters) which does not have enough originality. 1233 (talk) 04:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep According to COM:INUSE, "a media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose." --Antigng (talk) 03:41, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep According to COM:INUSE, "a media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose." --WQL (talk) 15:51, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep According to COM:INUSE, "a media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose." --夢蝶葬花 (talk) 05:41, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
- How about in the same section "images that are being used on a talk page just to make a point can be discounted."? --J.Wong 17:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- How about **three** office actions taken in a short period in Chinese Wikipedia? This might be the possible reason of some users' feeling that Chinese Wikipedia is under high-pressure control by WMF since office actions are always critical but immediate. I just do not think that in these reasons his/her opinion can be "discounted". --WQL (talk) 12:46, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- How about in the same section "images that are being used on a talk page just to make a point can be discounted."? --J.Wong 17:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 22:38, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused, low-res PNG of vector file uploaded by now-banned user. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:37, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:39, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:37, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Before mass deletion nominations, at least glance at the image. This is clearly PD-simple geometry. Not enough threshold for originality. Wrong license, but fix and keep.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:04, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per PlanespotterA320. Ruthven (msg) 22:40, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Watermarked file uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:38, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: PD-old. Ruthven (msg) 22:41, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:38, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:41, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:39, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:41, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:39, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- So simple geometry I could draw this in Google Sketchup blindfolded.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:48, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per PlanespotterA320. Ruthven (msg) 22:42, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:39, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: PD-old. Ruthven (msg) 22:46, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:40, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No clear source. Ruthven (msg) 22:48, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:40, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. File is copyrighted. Ruthven (msg) 23:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:41, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; copyrighted file. Ruthven (msg) 23:21, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:41, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- I would file this one under simple geometry.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:50, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per PlanespotterA320. Ruthven (msg) 23:21, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 23:30, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Not CC, but PD bc it's a 14th century COA with somewhat simple geometry.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:52, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + replaced by vectorial version. Ruthven (msg) 23:42, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 23:42, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Created by now banned user. Taken from commercial site. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 22:33, 16 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Grosvenor COA.jpg --Krdbot 00:15, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:33, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 22:33, 16 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Villegas COA.gif --Krdbot 00:15, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
No authorization shown to get pictures inside this private building. Thomas1313 (talk) 05:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: public gym interior: OK. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
No authorization shown to get pictures inside this private building. Thomas1313 (talk) 05:33, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: public gym interior: OK. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Not authorization shown to take pictures inside this private building. Thomas1313 (talk) 05:41, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: public gym interior: OK. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Image has only been used in (now deleted) advertorials on en.wiki, no encyclopaedic value. —SpacemanSpiff 06:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Does not seem to be "own work" but rather a plate taken from a book. Likely in the public domain if it's old but we still need information about the book it is from. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:04, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: dubious source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:07, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Crop of cover of 2011 version of Sushruta book - see [7] Not self made -- Deadstar (msg) 08:11, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Crop of cover of 2011 version of Sushruta book - see [8] Not self made -- Deadstar (msg) 08:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image available on tineye at least as far back as 2009, it does not look like own work. Description states that it could be uploaded from en: wiki - perhaps there is more info there. Otherwise delete as no proof of own work or PD source. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:09, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I uploaded the wrong file. I have uploaded the correct one with the cc licence in it Algeny (talk) 08:26, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Algeny Generation BabyBoomer Card.png. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:11, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
THis is not "own work" of User:Maps, it is attributed to Kelmendi & Hoti on the image itself. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:06, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Should be in Wikitext if useful. — regards, Revi 09:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:12, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF -- I doubt very much that the uploader is the actual photographer of this image as claimed. It appears elsewhere on the Web, but not as large as this. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Jim, I'm not the photographer, I'm uploading the biography of an artist from my city and I'm taking as a reference what he sent me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcsd19 (talk • contribs) 06:48, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and uploader's own admission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Reply: This photo was legally taken by me, Birgit Phelps, at a concert in Boise, Idaho, in October 2017.I, Birgitphelps, personally own the rights to this image. I am the photographer who took the image and uploaded it to the Commons. Birgitphelps (talk) 21:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader's assertion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Pamphlet produced by the City of Boston, which is a local government whose works are not PD Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:10, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Presumably this x-ray was taken by an x-ray tech, and then the uploader took a photo of that. Does the medical group that took the x-ray hold the copyright, or since it's a machine-made work is it PD, and thus the uploader can reasonably assert some claim to it? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:16, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: I can't see how an x-ray tech or x-ray machine manufacturer can assert copyright on this. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- also file:Fig 6 Burgio.jpg
Small photos without camera data, the uploader's last remaining contributions. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:16, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Clearly DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 83.149.47.76 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope/self-promotion. We can discuss it for a week. Taivo (talk) 16:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- I like the picture and think it could be used for some "crowded family" purposes, but am not sure if this argument would be accepted. Would it? --E4024 (talk) 14:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Omylem jsem nahrál špatný obrázek Karelduchac (talk) 17:27, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Historical paintings are not own work. The painting can be easily in public domain due to age, but real artist and his/her death year are needed to determine copyright status. Taivo (talk) 17:38, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: dubious source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:18, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Logo with questionable copyright license, not own work, see [9] and [10]. SA 13 Bro (talk) 23:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Im listed on the Known members list and can guarantee thats its an own picture, because I made it with Photoshop touch, and all the banner what you can see on the Interwebs, is made by me. Trust me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keithwinslow (talk • contribs)
- @Keithwinslow: Hi, please take note that all images you has uploaded must be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope materials such as like promotional images are not acceptable to heritage on Wikimedia Commons. I may like to close this DR after a few days if there is no longer any issues on your this image. SA 13 Bro (talk) 17:43, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Non-free media. Logo of a (Spanish?) political party. Jahoe (talk) 08:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Keep PD-textlogo. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: per Taivo JuTa 13:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Duplicado y Redundantes/Mala_calidad Victor Gibby (talk) 23:39, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Keep The nominator overwrote the image (I guess that by mistake). The original image (restored now) is not a duplicated, but a version without the lower text. --Discasto talk 18:06, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Discasto. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:59, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Duplicado, mala calidad, y no hay licencias que justifique su uso Victor Gibby (talk) 23:52, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Es un duplicado, el archivo esta mal y ninguna licencia justifica su uso Victor Gibby (talk) 01:52, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 14:41, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Wrong license, it would pass the threshold for originality anyways. Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 14:43, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Wrong license, it would pass the threshold for originality anyways. Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: it's not original enough for being copyrightable. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 14:44, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Wrong license, it would pass the threshold for originality anyways. Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 14:45, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Wrong license, it would pass the threshold for originality anyways. Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Do you have information about threshold of originality in Cyprus? As Cyprus if former colony of UK, maybe British rules apply there? Taivo (talk) 15:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 14:46, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong license, it would pass the threshold for originality anyways. Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Keep File:Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands Logo.svg and File:Laufendes-Auge.jpg are far less simple and below German TOO. - Alexis Jazz 06:46, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - below too. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 15:38, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
see [11], maybe no permidion shizhao (talk) 03:08, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: copyvio from http://www.qqtxb.com/d/file/2017-02-08/01daeed0d2c2bcbd3bc715892344530b.jpg. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 15:41, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Wrong license, it would pass the threshold for originality anyways. Ionutzmovie (talk) 03:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comment. This is my own camera work, however, please advise how can I edit the License so that the file stays. Thanks. --OmerMarcel (talk) 18:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- OmerMarcel, upload it to en:wiki and use the licensing from File:Manchester United FC crest.svg as an example and everything should be ok. In order to be kept here the rhinos should be erased, so it's better to upload it there.Ionutzmovie (talk) 23:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the direction. I will upload it again. Do you want me to wait until this gets cleared or advise me to upload to en.wikipedia.org straight away? --OmerMarcel (talk) 00:37, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Upload it straight away.Ionutzmovie (talk) 01:25, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the direction. I will upload it again. Do you want me to wait until this gets cleared or advise me to upload to en.wikipedia.org straight away? --OmerMarcel (talk) 00:37, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 15:42, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, please delete the file 109.25.44.23 13:33, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Copyright infringement from where? --Ruthven (msg) 11:27, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Delete please thx 77.136.85.252 09:37, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I have no idea about the CR situation, but certainly this is not only an inner wear photo, it has an aspect which can be considered out of scope, COM:Porn or COM:Penis; whichever you prefer. (I mean the inner wear is not in natural shape. :) --E4024 (talk) 14:09, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Not all swim briefs have an inner layer. 🐱💬 08:42, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:14, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, please delete the file 109.25.44.23 13:34, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Question Copyright infringement from where? --Ruthven (msg) 11:27, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: , pacco fuori misura :D -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:11, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shadows light 22 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Hello, it is possible to delete the old version of this photo please? there's no need to keep the old version. this one: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/7/79/20171129191238%21Male_Swim_brief_2.jpg Achim (talk) 18:08, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Uploader requests revdel of old version which doesn't contain private or sensitive data in EXIF. --Achim (talk) 18:11, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- If people do not want their nude or semi-naked images to be identified they should better refrain from taking pics of their own body and uploading them to internet. If there is a need to photograph a male swim brief, in many department stores they are exposed on mannequins. BTW I am not sure we need this file desperately. I would choose to delete it if I had a button to use. --E4024 (talk) 18:32, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if WC has files of briefs on mannequins.DMBFFF (talk) 18:47, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- If people do not want their nude or semi-naked images to be identified they should better refrain from taking pics of their own body and uploading them to internet. If there is a need to photograph a male swim brief, in many department stores they are exposed on mannequins. BTW I am not sure we need this file desperately. I would choose to delete it if I had a button to use. --E4024 (talk) 18:32, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: I deleted the oder version as requested. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
The photo is free in source country Italy, but due to URAA not in USA. In addition, source link is dead. Taivo (talk) 19:11, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: whereas the photo is pd in italy, is not in the US because of URAA. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:06, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Falscher Dateiname. Ist eine neue Version von "Gleiszellen Gleishorbach Winzergasse 43 002 2016 08 04.jpg". F. Riedelio (talk) 06:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: There is already another image in this file name File:Gleiszellen Gleishorbach Winzergasse 43 002 2016 08 04.jpg. Please use "Move & Replace" at the top of the file space "More". --Y.haruo (talk) 18:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Dubious own work claim by newcomer, no EXIF info, image is taken from the actor's official social media pages Malayy (talk) 08:17, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Image is not in public domain per PD-AUS (must be prior to 1955) Flickerd (talk) 09:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- If that's true, then it can't be used. Lindsay658 (talk) 09:04, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:12, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
likely copyright violation. Caméléon Diaphane (talk) 09:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep see license at youtube. --Migebert (talk) 13:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Migebert. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:19, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING, OTRS-permission from producing company is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Also:
This file was initially tagged by Salavat as no source (No source since). However, it seems plausible that the uploader did create this seal, since a substantially similar bu not identical one was uploaded by the same person, indicating probable graphics editing. Per COM:SEAL. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:38, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Happy to concede that the seal may be the work of the uploader. My main issue was proofing the accuracy of the seal and whether it actually a correct re-creation of Lower Shebelle's state seal. I couldn't find anything to support it with a quick search. Salavat (talk) 07:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- I researched that too, and I couldn't find anything. What do we do when Somalia has no internet presence or way to verify this information? The uploader may represent the state, the uploader may have made his own seal according to specifications, or the uploader may have just made something up for fun. It's impossible to tell. User:Ahmedadan1951, if you can understand us, any clarification you could provide would help. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Looking at the quality of the seal it might be better to assume this isn't real. The small stars are kind of just jammed in between the text, the one on the right hits the black border. The green circle is thicker at the top compared to the bottom. It just looks like some custom job. Salavat (talk) 23:33, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- I researched that too, and I couldn't find anything. What do we do when Somalia has no internet presence or way to verify this information? The uploader may represent the state, the uploader may have made his own seal according to specifications, or the uploader may have just made something up for fun. It's impossible to tell. User:Ahmedadan1951, if you can understand us, any clarification you could provide would help. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Copied from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ahmedadan1951:
- Duplicate files in varying quality? Commons:Coats of arms Own work, received through WhatsApp? I can't even find a source to prove this *is* the CoA of Lower Shebelle, for all we know this is made up. Source needed. Also: w:Lower Shebelle. This CoA says "State of Lower Shabelle".
- - Alexis Jazz 12:00, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Confirmed: this is a new (re)creation. The elements move around a bit in the various versions. Issues are the same: unknown copyright status and no source that this is the CoA of Lower Shebelle. - Alexis Jazz 12:10, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Also:
- No source these are real. - Alexis Jazz 12:32, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Following comment copied from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Barawa Flag.jpg:
- Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Regarding the spelling of Shabelle/Shebelle, there seems to be a lot of confusion about that. Shabelle seems to be more common and I suspect Wikipedia contributed to the spread of the "Shebelle" spelling. (but did not invent it) - Alexis Jazz 14:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Possibly enwiki Loliban sock. - Alexis Jazz 19:51, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oh for fucks sake..
- http://lowershabellegovernment.com/
- Yahoo mail address, creation date: 2018-04-06T23:49:03Z. And why wouldn't it be lowershabelle.so? And as you can see in the filename here, he doesn't even know how to spell "Shabelle". Ruling out any possiblity this would be legit.
- This has got to be illegal. - Alexis Jazz 07:24, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Wut.. that website states "Its leaders declared the territory an autonomous state in 2018." !
- Here's a fun thought that just came to me. If this is real, these files have both a valid license (they appeared here first!) and they would be notable or in other words: in scope. Which would mean we should keep them. If it's a troll, I think this is quite a special case that will be interesting enough to document. Or in other words: in scope. Keep but for the last possible reason you would have expected. - Alexis Jazz 08:24, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- That website definitely throws a spanner in the works. The website itself has a copyright notice at the bottom of the page but is that possible per PD-Somalia? Also as you mentioned, recent creation, yahoo email, this could just be some imagined project by an individual. I couldn't find anything backing the information on the webpage with a admittedly quick google search. This article from November 2017 mentions that Abdifitah Hajji Abdulle is the governor which differs from the website (unless he has been since replaced). Salavat (talk) 09:39, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Salavat: Well the website claims they have declared themselves to be an autonomous state "in 2018". (when exactly?) So whatever you find from 2017 isn't really relevant.
- I see no spanner. File:Barawa Flag.jpg was created 27 March and File:State Of Shebelle.jpg was created 2 April. Those licenses are irrevocable. The domain was registered 6 April, and however obvious it would seem, we actually don't have any proof the website is operated by Ahmedadan1951. (the uploader here) Absolutely anyone could have ripped the logos right here from Commons and created that website. - Alexis Jazz 10:00, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- I found an IP edit in the history of a page that I'm 99% sure is Ahmedadan1951. (is it ok to link it?) The IP leads to Boston, Massachusetts and is for T-Mobile USA. I don't know how one would access the internet in Somalia, but to me this is just a troll. A pretty elaborate one, worth writing a little piece about (mostly because they probably broke some laws) making the images in scope. - Alexis Jazz 20:10, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Well, this was a doozy. Very likely a hoax, based on the evidence. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:19, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by banned user. File is taken from a blog. Nothing indicates the file or blog contents are free under Creative Commons. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:27, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Could you provide us with the url from which this file comes? -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 15:44, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. It is doubtful that he created the file himself. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused file of unknown source uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Dude, don't you recognize this image? Just search for "spain municipality coat of arms" and you'll find it. Do you really want to develop an hasty precedent that would make us delete every spanish coat of arms and municipality flag? See Category:Coats of arms of municipalities of Spain by autonomous community--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- This is an unused jpg and is not the source for a single file on here. It's not identical to this File:Escudo de La Acebeda.svg, for example. I nominated THIS file and the slippery slope argument is not a justification for keeping files on Commons. If you can prove that the file is copyright free (ie exists on here as SVG), then list that reason, although it's still a low-quality jpeg uploaded by a reject that serves no purpose. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 18:40, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- No more mass deletion requests for you! This is a textbook example of PD-simple geometry.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:13, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Definitely PD-simple. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
This image was taken by his wife, Alice Loxley, who died in 1955, so it will be under copyright until 1/1/2026. (see Gerald Loxley). . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Not if I own the copyright! L'honorable (talk) 23:43, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- No matter who owns the copyright, it will be under copyright until 1/1/2026. If the copyright to Alice Loxley's photograph has been licensed or transferred to you, you must prove it by sending a copy of the license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- I am the heir - what proof do you need? Since what was presented in good faith now has to descend into this type of procedure? Please advise promptly. L'honorable (talk) 00:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
PS. this is no way to carry on, unless I am thoroughly mistaken - especially if Wiki now wishes me to publish a copy of her Will just to prove this? L'honorable (talk) 00:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)- You can explain in public here or in private using OTRS why it is that you are the heir of a woman who died without children. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: I am her great-nephew. Thank you. L'honorable (talk) 20:40, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- You can explain in public here or in private using OTRS why it is that you are the heir of a woman who died without children. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- I am the heir - what proof do you need? Since what was presented in good faith now has to descend into this type of procedure? Please advise promptly. L'honorable (talk) 00:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- No matter who owns the copyright, it will be under copyright until 1/1/2026. If the copyright to Alice Loxley's photograph has been licensed or transferred to you, you must prove it by sending a copy of the license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn by nom. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by now banned user who did not believe in copyright. No indication this is available under any CC license. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
La imagen es de internet y no justifica su uso Victor Gibby (talk) 02:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Tamaño de archivo incorrecto (se crea una alternativa SVG) (No se enlaza a nada) Victor Gibby (talk) 02:14, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:05, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paul Bedson (talk · contribs)
[edit]These three are images from Facebook per the uploader who said that they got it from a Facebook group (with the Facebook ID) and have an author, but there's no apparent release from the author. Unless a compatible release from the original author is provided, these should be deleted.
—SpacemanSpiff 06:21, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi SpacemanSpiff. The photos were given to me by a friend, who is also a Facebook group member of my Facebook group, Fredrik Schjefstad [12]. Frederik visited Beit Mer y Temple yesterday and took some photos and sent them me at my request. They weren't simply taken from a Facebook group Save Beqaa Heritage [13] and to my knowledge have not been published to the group yet, although I have encouraged Fred to do so. Fred has given me permission to release the photos to Wikipedia under free license. You're welcome to message Fred on Facebook to verify that. I have a network of agents exploring the archaeological heritage of Lebanon and hope to contribute more like this to preserve records of our cultural heritage, and (hopefully if I can get unbanned) make Wikipedia a more colourful and interesting place! I hope this solves the problem. Please let me know if there is anything else needed to correct anyting further? Paul Bedson (talk) 20:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Despite what you may say, the images have been taken from Facebook as is evident from the metadata of 1 & 3. As for any release, please see WP:OTRS and have the original author follow that process or these will have to be deleted. —SpacemanSpiff 03:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the direction Spiff. I've sent some e-mails releasing them and asked Fred to do the same. He said he'd have a look into it tonight. Our conversation about the release on facebook chat is below for reference : "Me: Great photos! I love the Swastikas! Would be great if they can be used free licence for Wikiedia? Feel free to post all the photos on the Save Beqaa Heritage group page. They're most welcome there! thank you! Fred : Hehe, yes the swastikas are a hoot :P Yes, use them of Beit Mery on Wiki" Paul Bedson (talk) 16:49, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Waiting for OTRS permission. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Restored per ticket permission. --Krd 07:42, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
This is not "own work", but a book scan. The author died in 1981, so the copyrights have not expired. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:25, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- None of the text except for the basic title is readable due to the resolution, making in de minimis. An own scan/photo of a copyrighted work that is de minimis can be kept.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:07, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted per the precationary principle. This is also not how de-minimis works. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:07, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Too similar with File:Modern basque 2.jpg. Also please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Modern basque side.jpg. Other than COM:NUDE abuse, I imagine the depicted woman has not consented to the publication of her images. E4024 (talk) 11:38, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Closing admin, please also see the backside of this deletion process. The lady in the pics said she did not want them to be published. The uploader first consented to a deletion, a few months later uploaded the same images again, and using the "update" format, thus, while pretending to undress her less, exposed her more "natural" images. I smell kind of a model abuse here; in case we can call the lady a model. Apparently the pics have been taken without her being even aware of, indeed some of them are taken from behind. I would delete all her images for protection of the lady's personality rights. --E4024 (talk) 12:59, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
the model in question did not request any deletion, the uploader never provided feedback or consent to delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markfree123 (talk • contribs) 01:04, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- That appears to quite the opposite of your statement here. --El Grafo (talk) 10:29, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely personality rights violation. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:10, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Insufficient information (no date, no author, taken from a 1999 publication); although the lithography shows how the place looked in the 19th century, it could have been created later. See also discussion at uploader's talk page (in German). Gestumblindi (talk) 12:30, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:13, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata (any metadata at the 3-images Flickr account), perhaps COM:LL Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
If there is something not correct it should be an issue for Flickr. The picture on Flickr is public domain, so I find and use all pictures.--Mrs.Snipping (talk) 10:05, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Patrick Rogel, if you want your words to be understood by others, please be careful to use appropriate wording. Were you going to say "no any metadata", "without any metadata" or "any metadata missing"? --2A02:2168:1237:FF00:91AB:7A48:AFB:3E45 17:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:14, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata (any metadata at the 4-images Flickr account), perhaps COM:LL Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:48, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
If there is something not correct it should be an issue for Flickr. The picture on Flickr is public domain, so I find and use all pictures.--Mrs.Snipping (talk) 10:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- COM:LL seems very likely. The pictures on Flickr are part of a professional picture series used for official campaigns by Reil's party (eg [14]). Delete per COM:PCP (as well as File:Reil 1.jpg and its derivative File:Reil 0.jpg). --Jergen (talk) 13:54, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata (any metadata at the 4-images Flickr account), perhaps COM:LL Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
If there is something not correct it should be an issue for Flickr. The picture on Flickr is public domain, so I find and use all pictures.--Mrs.Snipping (talk) 10:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PCP. See [15]. --Jergen (talk) 13:56, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
![[15]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Reil_4.jpg&diff=299253647&oldid=295816618){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Probably not own work. Why does it have a file name in Portuguese but description in Dutch and English? This strongly suggests that is was taken from somewhere by uploader. Jcb (talk) 16:18, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
above ToO (shadings) — Draceane talkcontrib. 18:11, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
not simple logo (colour gradient) — Draceane talkcontrib. 18:55, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Kusner-Trump family 19113714 10155532515197682 4727968954922492068 n.jpg
- File:Arabella Rose Kushner 47279.jpg (cropped from Kusner-Trump family)
- File:Kushner children at the Navy Museum.jpg
- File:Joseph Kushner in James S. Brady Press Briefing Room 19957031.jpg
Image on personal Facebook of Ivanka not a goverment page.
No proof that the author is the "U.S. government", the sourceo of the image is an Instagram with page no indication of authorship or copyright status. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:38, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Where it was posted is irrelevant so long as it can be argued that this image was published as part of her duties as White House Advisor.SecretName101 (talk) 14:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It's irrelevant where she posts it. She could have dumped it on imgur/photobucket/tinypic and it would make no difference to the copyright status. You might wonder "was this taken as part of her duties?", but "Kusner-Trump family" is obviously a promotional image for the Trump administration. There are personal photos on that Facebook account that would be hard to argue were made as part of her duties, but not this one. Grounds for deletion might be COM:SCOPE but this photo tells me little Joseph is going to be pushed towards a political career, he may even run for president one day. If this is not in scope now, I bet it will be in a few decades. - Alexis Jazz 06:34, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- We can accept images that are posted elsewhere if they are indicated to have a compatible license, we can't just forget about the Commons:Precautionary principle and say that because it appears to be promotional that it must be PD. Consensus at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Donald Trump- 'Modern Day Presidential'.png was that even tweets by the president himself are not even PD. The only text that means some is valid to be put on Commons is text about licensing, just because something sounds promotional to someone doesn't mean that they get to overrule copyright laws. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:34, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
User blocked for socking
|
|---|
|
Comment Facebook text that went with Kusner-Trump family: "Great being with family tonight for a lovely birthday dinner hosted by @flotus for @realdonaldtrump".
Seems like obviously PD-USGov material. - Alexis Jazz 15:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Comment Text that went with Navy Museum picture on Ivanka's Facebook page: "Arabella, Joseph, Theo & I had the best time visiting the #NavyMuseum today. It's a terrific place to teach kids about the great work of our amazing American sailors, past and present!"
Which sounds pretty promotional. I lean towards keep, but that's in part because of that text. I would probably consider a similar image without promotional text to be personal. - Alexis Jazz 15:46, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- The text does not affect whether we should keep or delete unless mentions licensing, just because something "sounds" promotional to someone doesn't mean we are free to forget about copyright laws. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:56, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
@Emir of Wikipedia: Why don't you just nominate {{PD-USGov}} for deletion? That's easier for me than having to keep updating a list of links. - Alexis Jazz 19:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- That is a valid copyright tag which can be used when something is clearly an original work of the US government, not just something that a user on Commons deems "promotional". Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:44, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Comment All files from this DR:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kusner-Trump family 19113714 10155532515197682 4727968954922492068 n.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arabella Rose Kushner 47279.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kushner children at the Navy Museum.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joseph Kushner in James S. Brady Press Briefing Room 19957031.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Donald and Tiffany Trump.jpg
- Alexis Jazz 15:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- It is unclear who took the photo of Donald and Tiffany Trump. Certainly not a selfie, and looks like it could be a White House photographer (very likely was). However, since Tiffany is not a White House employee, there are means in which she (or a friend) could hold the copyright to this image, making it fail to be PD-USGov. Without being more sure that it was a White House photograph, we have no reason to believe that it is public domain. I currently support deleting that image. Someone could always DM her to ask her if it was provided to her by the White House Photographic Office (uncertain whether she would provide a timely response, if any). SecretName101 (talk) 23:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- @SecretName101: Must be the same friend of Tiffany that took File:Kusner-Trump family 19113714 10155532515197682 4727968954922492068 n.jpg.. - Alexis Jazz 00:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- It is unclear who took the photo of Donald and Tiffany Trump. Certainly not a selfie, and looks like it could be a White House photographer (very likely was). However, since Tiffany is not a White House employee, there are means in which she (or a friend) could hold the copyright to this image, making it fail to be PD-USGov. Without being more sure that it was a White House photograph, we have no reason to believe that it is public domain. I currently support deleting that image. Someone could always DM her to ask her if it was provided to her by the White House Photographic Office (uncertain whether she would provide a timely response, if any). SecretName101 (talk) 23:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status, no clear indication this is government work. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Discussion moved to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kusner-Trump family 19113714 10155532515197682 4727968954922492068 n.jpg.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Discussion moved to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kusner-Trump family 19113714 10155532515197682 4727968954922492068 n.jpg.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Discussion moved to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kusner-Trump family 19113714 10155532515197682 4727968954922492068 n.jpg.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Ya se creó un Duplicado SVG para este trabajo (además este está desactualizado y con errores) Victor Gibby (talk) 19:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- y donde es este duplicado? -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:00, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, uploader request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
No evidence of permission from Lucas Attwell, who would have authorship even if it was a "co-work", and who is credited with the watermark IJReid (talk) 20:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
There is no permision because this file is now mine. I buy it. The watermark the author left is because he wants some publicity on the Wikipedia. If you have any doubt, you can contact with him and ask it: attwell.lucas@gmail.com. Same for the Two Drzewica Formation Pictures. Sorry for the mistake. Yewtharaptor (talk) 1:12, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Purchasing an image doesn't transfer copyright. IJReid (talk) 00:46, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:25, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
