Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/03/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 28th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Logo for a small local business, serves no realistic educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 02:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 04:48, 28 März 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Non-free logo (above threshold of originality) --Krdbot 06:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very blurry; other images from the same place available JiriMatejicek (talk) 07:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:17, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Third party logo, above threshold of originality, w:File:Tashkent Airport Logo.jpg was non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - non free logo (above threshold of originality). --Nick (talk) 09:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the one who post this picture, and would love to delete it as I posted it under the wrong name. Please help . Nhaso3 (talk) 09:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the title is not a problem. Who is she? Known for something special? (Artist etc.) --E4024 (talk) 09:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - easier to allow the uploader to correct this given cross-wiki nature of upload. --Nick (talk) 09:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spoiled upload. E4024 (talk) 09:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - file is corrupt or otherwise has display issues - may also impact on the uploader's wish to rename their other upload. --Nick (talk) 09:36, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Nick (talk) 09:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oldnorthstate1789 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, appears to be taken from http://www.wakegop.org/2020-beyond/

Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - files appear to be copyright violations. Permission if existent can be forwarded to COM:OTRS if necessary. Source website has ARR copyright statement. --Nick (talk) 09:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cfinizza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, appears to be taken from http://www.strandoc.com/developer.html

Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - files appear to be copyright violations. Permission if existent can be forwarded to COM:OTRS if necessary. Source website has no copyright statement which would permit use of these files. --Nick (talk) 09:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously incorrect copyright notice; incorrect name, and it's only because an IP changed the description that this has any correct information associated with it SchroCat (talk) 07:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I didn't eve remember this photo. How do you are sure that the picture is not depicting what is reported in the description?--Ferdinando Scala (talk) 09:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - duplicate file, incorrect subject, invalid licence (though file is in public domain). --Nick (talk) 10:08, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation http://niutishmusic.ir/page/gallery MohammadtheEditor 09:26, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:51, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Again and again. No more arguments. E4024 (talk) 13:28, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation: [1]. --Themightyquill (talk) 14:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 83.149.47.108 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: Facebook file per Exif Yann (talk) 15:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 83.149.47.108 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: Spam/self-promotion/FMBD Yann (talk) 15:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 83.149.47.108 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: Facebook file per Exif Yann (talk) 15:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a commercial game IOS/WIN sold on Steam Kungfuman (talk) 12:52, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:56, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:36, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OK, fine. --Yann (talk) 16:06, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo with questionable copyright license, see this. SA 13 Bro (talk) 00:56, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Promotional content. Deleted by Herbythyme. SA 13 Bro (talk) 16:14, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certain changes needs to be done as per new rules Elearnmarkets1234 (talk) 12:36, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy: per uploader request. --Ankry (talk) 20:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation, see this. SA 13 Bro (talk) 21:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is actually not a copyvio, the magazines image have been released to PD. But the materials is a promotional content, change it to speedydelete instead. SA 13 Bro (talk) 03:00, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licensing. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:07, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 00:09, 29 März 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Stopgame-logo.png --Krdbot 06:34, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo : Sara Kager (https://img.rtvslo.si/_up/upload/2017/07/27/65425224_foto-sara-kager.jpg), missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 00:01, 29 März 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Foto Sara Kager.jpg --Krdbot 06:35, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image IagoQnsi (talk) 20:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 04:38, 29 März 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Non-free logo (above threshold of originality) --Krdbot 06:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File page are not available. SA 13 Bro (talk) 01:18, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily: Inappropriate use of tp of not existing file page by IP. --Achim (talk) 20:29, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

typo - just one backslash - instead of // Turíbio Branco (talk) 01:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Own userspace. --Achim (talk) 19:49, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no source (No source since) (talk) 04:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedily: Clear case, as source (ref Category:Kurmainzischer Hof- und Staats-Kalender (1797)) is given. --Achim (talk) 20:05, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicado de escudo existente y mejor diseñado Usuarioperuano2 (talk) 10:57, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep in use Kathisma (talk) 00:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

duplicado mala calidad vandalismo Chicoperuano (talk) 07:42, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


vacio , no sirve Chicoperuano (talk) 16:20, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 05:58, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque no existe y es falta de respeto hacer duplicado sin sentido Chicoperuano (talk) 17:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: it's a redirect. Ruthven (msg) 08:44, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicado no sirve Chicoperuano (talk) 16:21, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 05:59, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it wrong. Caps2475 (talk) 09:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request deletion within 7 days: CSD applied. — regards, Revi 09:55, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is too small and blurry and can not be used in an article Migebert (talk) 08:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (and no license since 26 March 2018). --Green Giant (talk) 11:09, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio => http://www.seychellesnewsagency.com/articles/8903/Ethiopie+Abiy+Ahmed+choisi+par+la+coalition+au+pouvoir+pour+devenir+Premier+ministre Benoît Prieur (d) 06:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We do not believe there's copyvio. Our participant in the meeting took the picture. Odaw (d)

Hi,
I just saw this credit "Dr Abiy Ahmed next einstein forum (Wikepedia)". Badly credited but we can think that the wikicommons version is the original. So quite oriented to the keeping of that picture, now. --Benoît Prieur (d) 18:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, no reason to assume a copyvio. --Metrancya (talk) 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above discussion. --Benoît Prieur (d) 05:48, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright paint - Death in 1999 mik@ni 23:11, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your question. I took a photograph of this painting and from that photograph, created this picture myself. I thought that was okay? DACC23 17:49, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not okay for me because the painter is dead in 1999. Your photo is composed by the paint. You don't have the right on the paint. --mik@ni 12:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 23:14, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 23:18, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 23:19, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

二次的著作物になる可能性があるため Marukitax (talk) 23:21, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - FoP in Japan is for buildings only. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 23:22, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol, cf. source. Danyele (talk) 23:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 23:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 23:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ajaya samantaraya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope, not in use, personal image.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sharma naresh29 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).

hiàn 23:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashokrajpurohit36 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope, not in use, personal images.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohamad Mahmoud Khalaf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).

hiàn 23:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom and in addition, these have been uploaded since:

Promotional images, copyright violations and out of scope.

Smartse (talk) 08:32, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable subject with no Wikipedia coverage [2] as es:Argüello Music was deleted for advertising, low educational reuse purpose, potential advertising seb26 (talk) 22:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:27, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashashyou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW, permission required

Didym (talk) 22:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - except two images whose copyrightable content is De Minimis, and one image cropped. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:26, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashashyou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence that picture has been ever published. Original source, please.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

as indicated in all files. The original author is unknown. All photos are in public domain in Egypt. The first photo for example was published by Ismail Serageldin (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ismail_Serageldin) grandson of Dr Ali Ibrahim at his official page on Facebook. I think Facebook and Twitter are treated as pintrust and other websites. Again all the photos have unknown author are in public domain in Egypt. It's practically nearly impossible to reach the original author for my capacity. I have made all efforts to try to teach other sources or the author, but didn't succeed. Kindly, unless you can find an original source or data about the author, it is unfair to delete it. Don't delete based on suspicion. Photos are in public domain in Egypt. Regards,--Ashashyou (talk) 22:19, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ashashyou: An image published 2013 is not public domain in Egypt. If published earlier please provide evidence by modifying the source. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:50, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The person in the photo has died in 1947. The photos depicted him in official Royal uniform. He was not allowed to wear such a uniform before being appointed as a minister of health. He served as minister of health between 1940-1941. The photo has been shot anytime between 1940-1947. That is what i mean. The author of the photo is the one who shot the photo, not the one who has put it online. The photographer is unknown. So according to Egyptian law it is in public domain. You can check {{PD-Egypt}} for end of copyright of unknown authors. Regards. --Ashashyou (talk) 16:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No there's a confusion betweed creation and publication: Egyptian law and template above you refer to always talks about publication, not creation and there's no evidence that image has been published before 2013 so please have Ismail Serageldin sending a permission via COM:OTRS since it's quite likely he inherited of this picture. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The evidence that the photo was publicized before 2013 is that the person in the photo has died in 1947 and has signed it in 1946. The photo was taken inbetween 1940 and 1946.--Ashashyou (talk) 07:16, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of publication prior to 2013, which is required by COM:PUB. --ƏXPLICIT 03:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashashyou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:PACKAGING.

Ruthven (msg) 15:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:53, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 23:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures of actors uploaded by User:ميدو المحلة

[edit]

close-up of actors and actresses derived from postcards, film stills, and posters, of which User:ميدو المحلة (born in 1995) can't be author. --Harlock81 (talk) 22:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - some may be in public domain but sadly, and without more infos, their copyright status is unclear. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ali Akberov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of "own work" on this gallery of food pictures (at least three have watermarks), and photographs of people. All of the images are without metadata, very small and of low quality. Not even considering the watermarks, there's nothing here to suggest own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WikiGusta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Getty Images photo: http://metro.co.uk/2018/03/27/manchester-united-fans-beg-jose-mourinho-free-paul-pogba-france-masterclass-7421780/

Ytoyoda (talk) 10:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:25, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WikiGusta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely/demonstrably false authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, the uploader's history, and previous publications found elsewhere.

LX (talk, contribs) 23:05, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, File:Danilofernandes.jpg is from Facebook ("FBMD" string in the EXIF) and File:Pre-temporada-inter-2019-2.jpg looks like it's a video screenshot.
File:Atletico-Final2018.jpg looks like it could be from a fan's camera but with this uploader, who knows? Ytoyoda (talk) 04:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:15, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary (by uploader) Zoupan (talk) 00:30, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:37, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright situation; license inside the file contradicts license given on the page and is incompatible with Commons. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation -- image is a book cover, so copyright presumably belongs to author Jakob Wilms and/or the book publisher IagoQnsi (talk) 02:11, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:39, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found lots of copies of this image on net. No EXIF, small size, extremely unlikely uploader is owner as claimed Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:42, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lots found on net. Looks like copied from a newspaper. Upload unlikely to own this image as claimed Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:42, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like copy from newspaper, unlikely uploader owns this Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:42, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From 1992, lots on net, unlikely uploader owns copyright as claimed Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:42, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like copy from newspaper, unlikely uploader owns this Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:36, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal logo IagoQnsi (talk) 02:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image, no EXIF, unlikely uploader is owner of this as claimed Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:39, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:45, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious license: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:39, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yearuk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, no usable metadata, probable copyvios given the uploader's history.

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SamDavid1021 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, out of scope. commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SamDavid1021 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely all copyright violations - nothing has EXIF data and they are a variety of resolutions. File:Mumbai Indians.jpg has an author mark in the upper right corner. File:Himan Sharna.jpg was tweeted at [3] two weeks before it was uploaded here. File:Captain Sharma.jpg was published at [4] last December.

B (talk) 21:24, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Taivo (talk) 12:34, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Palash K Sen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Palash K Sen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:44, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:54, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal type photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Finncannon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chandhupantulu2002 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cdw102089 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images

Bi-Polar expedition (talk) 18:13, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:02, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal files, out of project scope.

Jon Kolbert (talk) 10:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:32, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although free licensed on Flickr, this is a case of commons is not a photoalbum, even if they are free to use

Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:36, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate template. Copyvio. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:00, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Agree that this template does not appear to make sense on Commons – how can something be public domain in the USA if the copyright has been renewed?--Muzilon (talk) 02:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as a template with no legitimate use. I've been trying to imagine a circumstance in which removing the years, or otherwise rewording this template, would meet some rare need, but I believe that it's logically impossible: As far as I know, copyright in the United States has never been renewable more than once, and only works published before 1922 would have had time to expire after a renewal. Nothing published or copyrighted in the U.S. before 1923 matters anymore to copyright on Commons, so I'll start there for calculation: In 1923, the Copyright Act of 1909 was in effect. Section 23 provides for a new copyright term of 28 years from first publication, plus one renewal for 28 years, making the maximum term 56 years from first publication. The Copyright Act of 1976 took effect on January 1, 1978, and removed the requirement for further renewals. 1923+28+28 = 1923+56 = 1979, so even the earliest-published work that is still potentially under copyright today would have made it to "salvation" in 1978 by being renewed only once; there is no work which could have been expired by being renewed only once, except things that were already {{PD-US-1923}} long before Wikipedia and Commons were established. --Closeapple (talk) 05:37, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: The creator M Waner (talk · contribs) currently has a 7-day block on en.wp for adding movies to en:List of animated films in the public domain in the United States and has been indefinitely blocked on fr.wp since February for being a sockpuppet of fr:Discussion utilisateur:455jiujo. It appears that false public domain claims are part of this user's modus operandi. --Closeapple (talk) 01:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Well, that might explain a thing or two. On 23 March I asked M Waner to explain the intended purpose of this license on the Template's Talk Page, but received no response.--Muzilon (talk) 04:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Editor has been blocked indefinitely for edit warring on the English project and this was an extension of the disruptive behaviour. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you're right. It doesn't fully comply with copyrights. SuperSucker (talk) 11:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The reason I violated policies is that in my perspective a fairly visible lack of deontological weight for prevention is present at that article (which is rolling on a thousand hits daily). Since many years nevertheless. It's a shame. Also I was fairly drunk. Hopefully will face no consequences for resorting to a non-deontological action. As I already pointed out at its talk page, I'm passionate about that article 'cause I did come across it years ago and had to research the subject on my own before reaching the truly illuminating conclusions: this transpires from the sound description I wrote for the other map still in use (thankfully). Knowledge is supposed to be freely available at Wikipedia, unless I got it all wrong: stuff is licensed, but lies need no copyrights then.. why bother? Thanks for your attention. SuperSucker (talk) 20:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Above all I disagree with its lede section thwarted in favor of females' attempts (the reported ones actually include self-harm in adolescence, of which there's no explicit mention but that's fine), and instead would agree with a more neutral and complete one that draws attention to the actual picture, like this. Men suicide 3 times more thus what's the given bias? A truly unbalanced picture is confusing and does indirectly affect the overall understanding, instead, drawing the correct weight on men's suicide epidemic (3-4:1 ratios) has indirect consequences on the understanding of females' dramatic high rates of reported self-harming and suicide attempts, and shapes the generally preventative ground you'd expect, which seems to be lacking. Men do not lack failed attempts, it's just that they won't report them because of social stigma. Note: don't believe in other editors' hurried comments neither, as my version is fully sourced and well-researched. I'm banned and the article is protected thus won't be able to contribute. SuperSucker (talk) 17:10, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also replying at my talk page with more elaboration. Feel free to come read over there as well. SuperSucker (talk) 00:30, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: logos are presumed copyrighted, and in my opinion this exceeds the threshold of originality. IagoQnsi (talk) 03:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image IagoQnsi (talk) 03:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal logo IagoQnsi (talk) 04:00, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal image IagoQnsi (talk) 04:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 04:07, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Logo of the uploader's personal website that no longer exists and was never noteworthy IagoQnsi (talk) 04:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in March 2013 as non-notable. Out of project scope. xplicit 04:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal logo IagoQnsi (talk) 04:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MennasDosbin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Doesn't bring knowledge to the Wikimedia projects and looks more like advertising or using Commons as a webhost.

Wiki13 talk 12:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete I was going to batch nominate these uploads for deletion. I agree with the nominee, there's no benefit in hosting all of these files, perhaps one or two may be kept for coverage of Jenna Marbles, but they're not particularly useful 'educational' videos; they aren't really providing knowledge, nor are they particularly useful as instructional or informative videos, and I can't envisage any meaningful usage elsewhere within the WMF-sphere or beyond it despite their free licence. Nick (talk) 13:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment From a pure technical level, the language used "Please subscribe to my channel" and the amount of external links goes beyond needed for source/permission/description information, are more in the realm of promotion. If some videos were to be kept, a single link to the original upload, and one to identify the author would be enough. Even the titles could be considered not adequate according to Commons:File_naming- maybe clickbaiting is ok for Youtube, but should not be ok for Commons. Not voting to delete definitevely for now because maybe after they are fixed, there is something to keep (genuine useful guides for wikibooks, etc.).--jynus (talk) 13:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete as per others above. Yann (talk) 14:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant advertising, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amni86.instrumentation (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata (four images with camera metadata from three different cameras, several images have metadata indicating they were grabbed from social media, most of them have no metadata), previous publications found elsewhere, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 15:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, Out of Scope Migebert (talk) 14:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused cartoon logo, might be copyrighted, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tcarson1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photographs used for vandalism/joke article about non-notable person on EN Wiki, out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 19:42, 28 March 2018 (UTC); edited 19:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope unused logo (as well as some other user's uploads) Pibwl (talk) 19:42, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Serves no realistic educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 19:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Serves no realistic educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 19:47, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of dead non-noteworthy website—serves no educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 19:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SKA FALA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images serve no educational purpose; they just advertise the uploader's website.

IagoQnsi (talk) 20:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

About as far outside of scope as imaginable. Only used on a draft on en.wiki that was deleted as a BLP violation and likely harassment. I'll borrow my logic from my !vote on that draft's MfD on en.wiki: delete per wtf. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:07, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Serves no educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 21:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom. I didn't know what exactly the project scope was when I uploaded this. Fma12 (talk) 22:36, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:59, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Logo created by the uploader with no realistic educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:59, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 23:10, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:59, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 18:08, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:24, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The black top and bottom bars betray that this is a picture of a picture, DW, not own work. P 1 9 9   18:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:23, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in a scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:23, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2014 published book: not Own work Ankry (talk) 20:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:21, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture. unknown location --> out of scope Rupert Pupkin (talk) 20:56, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a copyright violation due to exceeding COM:TOO, and probably out of scope anyway IagoQnsi (talk) 21:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to https://www.princegeorge.ca/Things%20to%20Do/PublishingImages/Learn%20About%20Prince%20George/History/shari_green.jpg, © 2017 City of Prince George, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:11, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in a scope, doubtful copyright, one of 2 uploads Pibwl (talk) 21:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably personal unused photo, of unknown person Pibwl (talk) 21:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: I found the source which is not Flickr but the copyright status is unknown. It looks like a television screenshot from a different source. To keep this we need an OTRS verification. Ww2censor (talk) 21:34, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Probably an out of scope personal image. E4024 (talk) 08:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:29, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 12:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:30, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Depicted ru:Флорин, Дмитрий Алексеевич is notable, but this is small photo without metadata, maybe not own work as claimed. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Taivo. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:34, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:36, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Depicted ru:Флорин, Дмитрий Алексеевич is notable, but this is small photo without metadata, maybe not own work as claimed. Taivo (talk) 10:03, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Taivo. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:34, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Depicted ru:Флорин, Дмитрий Алексеевич is notable, but this is small photo without metadata, maybe not own work as claimed. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Taivo. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:34, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Фото: Григорий Явлинский / vk.com Grigory Yavlinsky Migebert (talk) 15:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:35, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque han eliminado su pagina Proyecto HANA (talk) 09:20, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elcobbola as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1383863965220418&set=a.1383807605226054.1073741825.100007904831310&type=3&theater HR with EXIF, let's have a proper DR. Yann (talk) 17:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann, I am the owner of the copyright of this picture. Please do not delete it. Michel de Broin is using it with my permission on his personal Facebook profile. If you wish a formal confirmation by Michel de Broin, you can contact him via email through his website. Best, Seeris (talk) 13:58, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Seeris,
It doesn't work that way. Michel de Broin has to send a permission via OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:10, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Yann, please take the time to read my previous message again carefully. I am afraid you have misunderstood the situation here. I AM the author of the image. I shot this picture and I own the copyright. Thanks Seeris (talk) 21:32, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: AGF, as per above. --Yann (talk) 03:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i own this photo plkease delete Paul port (talk) 01:54, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the photo is used only in twice rejected draft. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i own this and i dont want it on here Paul port (talk) 01:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since you uploaded it here, you kind of not "own" it any more. Still I'm sure they (the closing admins) may help you as it is a recent upload and not used other than in a draft article, yet. --E4024 (talk) 13:23, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the photo is used only in twice rejected draft. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i own this and i want it deleted Paul port (talk) 01:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the photo is used only in twice rejected draft. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unclear what this image is supposed to represent; serves no realistic educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 00:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused logo for the uploader's gaming clan. IagoQnsi (talk) 00:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused logo of essentialtrance.co.uk, a website that doesn't exist anymore and doesn't seem to have been at all noteworthy when it did exist. IagoQnsi (talk) 00:19, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Taken from this source, with no indication the image is available under a license compatible with Commons, nor any indication it is the work of the uploader. Hammersoft (talk) 00:28, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal logo. IagoQnsi (talk) 03:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:15, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal logo IagoQnsi (talk) 03:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:15, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. I can't read it, but I'm pretty sure this is just an animated advertisement. IagoQnsi (talk) 03:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:15, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:14, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very blurry; other images from the same place available JiriMatejicek (talk) 07:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:18, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very blurry; other images from the same place available JiriMatejicek (talk) 07:14, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like personal promotion. Unused sole upload. E4024 (talk) 08:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has become a user only to upload their own image. E4024 (talk) 08:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spoiled upload. E4024 (talk) 08:36, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too dark to serve anything. There are better images of the building. E4024 (talk) 08:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image and probably grabbed from facebook (see exif data "FBMD01") Migebert (talk) 08:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ayush Prakash Yaduvanshi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like self promotion. (No use, no cats, sole upload.) E4024 (talk) 08:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality slide scanned at low res, better version is (1)Lutheran Church 004.jpg Sardaka (talk) 09:19, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   16:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality slide scanned at low res, better version is (1)Lutheran Church 002.jpg Sardaka (talk) 09:21, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   16:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality slide scanned at low res, better version is (1)Lutheran Church 001.jpg Sardaka (talk) 09:22, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   16:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality slide scanned at low res, better version is (1)Lutheran Church 003.jpg Sardaka (talk) 09:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   16:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, sattelite photo Migebert (talk) 10:15, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal file, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 10:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The image was uploaded (not by me) with the intention of using it on the Danish Wikipedia page for Johan Dalsgaard. There is currently a discussion going on there about whether to use it or not, but tagging it for deletion here has muddied the issue. If the election hinges on it not being on any local wikipedias, I suggest you check the usage in a few days. NisJørgensen (talk) 12:52, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: seems like notable person with article on 5 wikis. P 1 9 9   16:28, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. In addition, en:Draft:Three Rivers Regional Library System was not accepted due to non-notability, that case its logo is also out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of project scope. Slow 11:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:30, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope due to low quality and weak educational value. We have hundreds of photos about beaches and palms in Venezuela. Taivo (talk) 12:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Migebert (talk) 12:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Game cover. Unlikely to be own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 12:47, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The terms & conditions of this game are pretty clear that is copyrighted and non-free. Even personal downloads are prohibited. De728631 (talk) 14:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown people ; Personal image ; No notability ; Unknown location ; No use Civa (talk) 12:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a game. ~Cybularny Speak? 12:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover (http://rapdb.ru/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/NewZcool-%D0%A8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%A0%D1%8D%D0%BF-2006_Moon_CD_00.jpg) : copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:54, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:33, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, in my opinion the photo is out of project scope due to low quality. Taivo (talk) 13:08, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:33, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, in my opinion the photo is out of project scope due to bad quality and weak educational value. Taivo (talk) 13:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:33, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le sujet photographié n'est-il pas mineur ? Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 11:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The only question is : "is the photographed subject over the age of legal majority?" --Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 20:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 11:00, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The alone answer for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Montreal Comiccon 2016 - Lucca (27643958944).jpg (Archimëa and Kigsz) is « COM:COSTUME ».
According to this element the answer is: “no valid reason for deletion”. Sealle 11:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But there is only one question: "is the photographed subject over the age of legal majority?"

So the discussion did not take place.
Could you make it happen?
Thanks

PS I have already spoken to Sealle : [5] Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 14:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[6], the age is not a problem as long as the girl is not a small child. The file does not depict any sexuality too. --Archimëa (talk) 14:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When we are not sure of something, we use the precautionary principle. Don't we? --E4024 (talk) 06:38, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: User:6PO has given no valid reason for deletion, only asking if the person is a minor or not. Even if she is, so what?. P 1 9 9   16:43, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le sujet photographié est-il majeur ? Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 12:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The only question is : "is the photographed subject over the age of legal majority?" --Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 20:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello 6PO, this is a cosplayer that has dressed up as the character Ayla from the video game Chrono Trigger. It is a relevant photograph and I do not see any reason to delete it. --Kigsz (talk) 13:30, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 11:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The alone answer for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Montreal Comiccon 2016 - Lucca (27643958944).jpg and File:Chrono cosplay 10.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chrono cosplay 10.jpg. (Archimëa and Kigsz) is « COM:COSTUME ».
According to this element the answer is: “no valid reason for deletion”. Sealle 11:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But there is only one question: "is the photographed subject over the age of legal majority?"

So the discussion did not take place.
Could you make it happen?
Thanks

File:Sophia Loren topless.jpg
Sophia Loren (born 1934) topless in 1951

PS I have already spoken to Sealle : [7] Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Identifiability" is more than enough. (If you mind going to the policy page you can also have a look at where it talks about "smiling". :) --E4024 (talk) 15:54, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per Archimëa, I see no reason to deletion. Electron   15:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I do not see any reason for deletion. --Kigsz (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question to User:Archimëa: What do you mean when you say "The file does not depict any sexuality too." You mean no depicted sexual relations? Obscenity is "only" that for you? Have you had a look at our files in Category:Nude or partially nude females and their so many subcats? I am not referring to a small girl making ballet or in a swimming course; here we have an underage adolescent exposing her body more than generously. This hurts personality rights; hers and the parents'; because she is an identifiable person and not in legal age yet to decide what to do with her body. "My body my decision" is valid after certain age. --E4024 (talk) 08:40, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep - The woman looks to be in her 20s tho ? .... Ofcourse if she was or looked like a child then this would've been speedied years ago, If I were to guess I'd say she was 25-28 somewhere there ..... So the whole child thing doesn't even come in to it for me. –Davey2010Talk 11:31, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Here, I added upstairs a picture of Sophia Loren when she was 17; if you think she was an exception, or that 17 is the top age before 18, you can have a look at the girls in Category:16-year-old human females, the first individual file in there at this moment would be more than enough to change your mind, Davey. Best. --E4024 (talk) 07:44, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yet again the image you link doesn't like a 17yo (My guess would've been 20 tops), I personally see the DR image as a woman in a costume pulling sort of a tiger pose ..... If proof came to light that she was a child/teenager (ie she's not 25-28) then I (like anyone on this project) would without a shadow of a doubt endorse deletion and would do everything in my power to have it deleted but as I said I'm simply seeing an adult in a costume .... and I'll also say that if she was 25 but looked under 18 then again it would be a delete from myself and I'd imagine others.... –Davey2010Talk 22:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
When we are not sure of something, we use the precautionary principle. Don't we? --E4024 (talk) 06:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: consensus is to keep. It's my opinion also that she is a (young) adult. P 1 9 9   16:51, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos are illustrations of covers of books. These illustrations are original. But there is No Fop in France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs.

Civa (talk) 14:15, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:12, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't believe that this complex map was actually drawn from scratch by the uploader as claimed. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I confirm about that the user doesn't sketched the map. It is may be clicked as a image.--Godric ki Kothri talk 13:38, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 14:36, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 14:43, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Djdrach (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only these 2 photos whose the subject is himself and friends.

Civa (talk) 14:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1997 book according to zhwiki. ~Cybularny Speak? 15:07, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:20, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:20, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:15, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

broken image Migebert (talk) 15:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:15, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; Unknown location ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 15:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:16, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elliot Jager (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only these 2 photos whose the subject is himself.

Civa (talk) 15:42, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:16, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lakesh M. Makwana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 15:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see File:Arishfa Khan7.jpg. hiàn 23:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to be OK, with metadata. --E4024 (talk) 12:59, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: closing DR. P 1 9 9   02:16, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted by artist, uploaded by mistake Alecjames11 (talk) 15:49, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:17, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. And a DR was already created on Dec 7 2012 with a result "Deleted". The photo has been recreated after that. Civa (talk) 15:52, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:17, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

supports an "under development" tutorial; superceded due to design modification. Ritjesman (talk) 15:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   02:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, uncertain copyright. Yann (talk) 15:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weirdly angled photo, unlikely to be used on Wikimedia projects. We have far superior images of both the building and the subway entrance. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can either of you explain how this file is in scope? Its poor quality and weird angle make it unlikely to have educational or historical value or use. Commons is not a catch-all repository; it is a curated collection of useful media. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:56, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: useful is subjective, and image is deemed in scope by at least 2 users. P 1 9 9   02:21, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 16:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Yapo Assi Estelin (talk) 10:05, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=File:Estelin image .jpg]]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:21, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:21, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zoyeb Ahmad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All unused personal images, out of project scope

Migebert (talk) 16:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zoyeb Ahmad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope uploads by vanity vandal and sockpuppeteer. See en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zoyeb Ahmad/Archive, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zoyeb Ahmed and previous discussions above.

LX (talk, contribs) 19:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 00:21, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name of the man unclear (see description and file name) ; Unknown country ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 16:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is a photo of me, and I do not want it to be on commons NSaad (WMF) (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't bother me to remove it if someone doesn't want a picture of them there! Jami (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9   02:25, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 17:17, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:25, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:19, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:25, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture does not appear at the source. Leoboudv (talk) 19:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The photo is from the XVII Legislatura not the, more recent, XVIII Legislatura. Like all images from the Senate site, it is under {{Cc-by-3.0-it}}. --Majora (talk) 04:30, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Free license (cc-by-3.0-it). --Holapaco77 (talk) 10:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   02:27, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low possibility of educational reuse, as subject is really not visible at all seb26 (talk) 21:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:28, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear educational value, out of project scope. Commons is not an Airbnb listing. Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:28, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear educational value, out of project scope. Commons is not an Airbnb listing. Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:28, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious copyright status, appears to be a mock illustration of a proposed development Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:28, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lawren Harris died in 1994 1970. Work not in public domain. Labattblueboy (talk) 22:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. A moment of confusion between the death dates or Lawren Stuart Harris and his son Lawren P. Harris. death date for hte artisit ofthis work is, I agree, 1970.--Labattblueboy (talk) 20:55, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. He actually died in 1970, according to Wikidata. But that still puts his work under Canadian copyright until 2021, and in the US for 95 years after the first publication of each particular painting (assuming it was in Canada). IIANM in this case that would be 1930.x + 95 = 1 January 2026.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 07:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:29, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MME2237 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:41, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MME2237 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The user has uploaded only these 5 photos : Unknown location : what is MME ? in what country ? On Google, CISMA is said to be a French company, but on the photos, the posters are in English ! ; generic file names without information (a warning has been sent to the user about that) ; too short descriptions ; no use ; so no encyclopedic value.

Civa (talk) 17:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: now identified (Indian School of Mines), in scope. P 1 9 9   02:37, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

アップロードがうまく行かなかったため 春桜咲く (talk) 12:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested deletion on the day of upload. --Yasu (talk) 15:58, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

アップロードが旨く行かなかったため 春桜咲く (talk) 12:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested deletion on the day of upload. --Yasu (talk) 15:58, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

誤ってアップロードした為 春桜咲く (talk) 12:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested deletion on the day of upload. --Yasu (talk) 16:00, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Annie Pootoogook died in 2016. Work not in public domain. Labattblueboy (talk) 22:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:57, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No in public domain mik@ni 22:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I took a photograph of this painting and from that photograph, created this picture myself. I thought that was okay? DACC23 17:44, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You took the picture, but the paint is not your. --mik@ni 12:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:58, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete It does not appear this image, by an artist who only died in 1994, complies with the Austrian freedom of panorama requirements as described at Commons:Freedom of panorama#Austria.

Ww2censor (talk) 15:56, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to upload this file to wikipedia instead of wikimedia and it is only possible when i deleted this file from here Hereyouth (talk) 19:31, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i don't want like this picture and the links are outdated also Hereyouth (talk) 19:41, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alternativetours (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data. Please upload the original images, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 17:21, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. User blocked. --Yann (talk) 16:06, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by T3ru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NETCOPYVIO - Unsourced images (source only "internet" or "интернет") and thus no COM:EVID of date of publication or date of author death. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Делла-Вос (Мария Люд. и Ольга Люд., дочь Катя) и Кардовские(Дм.Ник., муж Ольги) в заграничной поездке. 1906г. Аббация.jpg for same issue from this uploader.

Эlcobbola talk 15:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- I add sources and etc. for all this files. --T3ru (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by T3ru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Russia - no FoP for sculpture in Russia

Эlcobbola talk 15:30, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- 7 fotos monuments of RusEmpire (File:Памятник полевой конной артиллерии русской армии (1912г). (T3-2010).jpg  -and etc.) was loaded special for Wiki - "Wiki Loves Monuments!" in 2017. And I think they not for delete. --T3ru (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Crossed out the photos of the 1912 monument on the Borodino Field. Next attempt to delete PD-RusEmpire files uploaded during Wiki Loves Monuments in Russia and repeated ignorance of Commons:Monuments_database_in_Russia will bring the nominator directly to the Administrator's Noticeboard. --Alexander (talk) 18:50, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by T3ru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW of photographs. Per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Russia, no FoP for artwork (e.g., photos) in Russia.

Эlcobbola talk 15:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- This File:Рязанов Эльдар Александрович могНовод EldRyaz mog-2017.jpg - not artwork (but only temporary flowers and fotos on grave). Please, not del. --T3ru (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: modern FoP cases, kept others after appropriate dating and sourcing. --Sealle (talk) 10:01, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by T3ru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free photographs of 3D-objects, taken from external sources without free licenses. As per Commons:Currency#Important points, a picture of a 3D-object creates in most jurisdictions a new copyright on the picture. So even if the objects are in the public domain, the photographers' permissions are still required.

VLu (talk) 09:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Большинство этих фото из того же источника - (Гос.Исторический музей: сайт https://catalog.shm.ru; их изображения свободны для образовательных целей(чему соответствует Wikipedia)) и с той же лицензией (PD-RU-exempt|type=orders, decorations and medals), что и аналогичные царские награды, использованные в Wikipedia (например - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:StAndrew_All.jpg ). Хотелось бы единых правил размещения фотографий русских наград (во всяком случае, для гос.музейных изображений). T3ru (talk) 12:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • T3ru, вы заблуждаетесь. Условия: © Государственный исторический музей, 2018. Все права защищены / All rights reserved - это наиболее строгий запрет из всех возможных. Какие разрешения должен давать ресурс для возможности загрузки его контента сюда, смотрите на странице COM:Лицензирование#Разрешённые лицензии - это и есть самые единые-преединые правила для всех изображений, включая эти награды. --VLu (talk) 20:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The uploader is right that awards themselves would be PD-RU-exempt but 3D photos of these awards create new copyright. If all these awards would have been photographed by you, for example, you could license them under some of the free licenses and they would be kept as PD-RU-exempt + your free license. Education purposes only aren’t enough to say that images are free and could be kept: we need to have an approval for commercial use, too. --rubin16 (talk) 19:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, exists elsewhere on the web. Possibly not own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 07:08, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader should confirm authorship by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not a fan of COM:PACKAGING, especially in food items, which are very common products; but this image and several others in the same supermarket cat violate that policy, principle or whatever it is called, and blatantly. E4024 (talk) 07:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative of copyrighted package labels. --Storkk (talk) 12:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. 175.159.215.220 05:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 13:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Chinese characters meet COM:TOO#China (PRC). 175.159.215.220 05:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 13:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Chinese characters meet COM:TOO#China (PRC). 175.159.215.220 05:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 13:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

William Somerset Maugham (1874 – 1965 was a British playwright, novelist and short story writer.... His works are still protected in his home country Mutter Erde (talk) 10:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 13:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

William Somerset Maugham (1874 – 1965 was a British playwright, novelist and short story writer.... His works are still protected in his home country Mutter Erde (talk) 10:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 13:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exactly the same image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dog_myocardium.jpg Lucas.Belo (talk) 16:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 14:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, found similar image at http://newzcool.do.am/fotonovosti/IMG_9718x2.JPG, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:52, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, found similar image at http://newzcool.do.am/fotonovosti/IMG_9718x2.JPG, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, found at http://newzcool.do.am/20424101_1354062501316378_3739924084898827537_o.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-re image, any metadata, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-re image, any metadata, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:36, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copvio: © 2015 - Brian Westerholt / Sports On Film Xgeorg (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is artwork for a game Sincerely, NeoMeesje (talk) 14:19, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:34, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Coongalone (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very likely not own works: inconsistent and small sizes, inconsistent quality and styles, no EXIF data. Many images are also out of scope.

P 1 9 9   14:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:34, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:HoMen, please stop uploading old pictures as "own work". I have no idea about Armenian Wikipedia, but in many WPs you can use these files under what is called "fair use". (BTW, please use cats correctly in your uploads.) Regards. E4024 (talk) 14:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:34, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from modern art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:32, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio, proshot image with no evidence of permission Ringerfan23 (talk) 15:22, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:32, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio, proshot image with no sourcing info from user with only one upload Ringerfan23 (talk) 15:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:32, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Last remaining file, all others deleted as copyvios, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 16:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:31, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to EXIF-Data, the photograph is Anja Wechsler. Description says Hermann Scherer (Person on picture) is the creator. Permission of the real creator is missing Superbass (talk) 21:55, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The picture shows Hermann Scherer and he owns all the rights. --109.90.88.125 21:59, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

see https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Textvorlagen#Freigaben_von_Texten_und_Bildern or https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates --Superbass (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata (any metadata at the 2-images Flickr account), found at https://kurtsteindl.com/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Patrick Rogel, das Bild habe ich bei Flickr entdeckt und reingenommen, weil da "Public Domain" geschrieben steht. Bei dem Bild habe ich keine Metadaten und keinen Namen des Autors gesehen. Wo und wie kann man die Metadaten erkennen? Über Deine Antwort würde ich mich freuen, da ich oft Bilder vom Flickr für Wiki-Artikel übernehme. Danke!--Mrs.Snipping (talk) 07:45, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Info: Possibly cropped from https://kurtsteindl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Kurt-Steindl-Slider-Scherer.jpg which has no relevant metadata (just photoshop info). --Achim (talk) 20:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Achim55 Thanks!--Mrs.Snipping (talk) 08:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I´m really wondering why we spend energy on this. If there is something not correct it´s an issue for Flickr. I did it fine, the source is correct (and maybe the Flickr account is from Anja Wechsler)--Mrs.Snipping (talk) 08:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Didym (talk) 13:31, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 16:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:28, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FarzadFA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:28, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gbawden as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Personal photo, out of scope Yann (talk) 17:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: Sorry Yann I used the wrong tag to delete it. Shouldn't have been a copyvio Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:26, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

request by subject of the image; taken without consent Ivi104 (talk) 17:05, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide evidence that Simon Baron-Cohen has requested deletion of that image. The easiest way to do that is via COM:OTRS. Materialscientist (talk) 00:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
ticket:2016061210003013, "conversation" No 4, under number 10 in the mail. --Ivi104 (talk) 01:09, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. In the UK, consent is not required for pictures taken at a public event. One cannot claim that the depicted person would have had a 'reasonable expectation of privacy'. --Jcb (talk) 13:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was taken w/o consent. The last deletion request was kept because it was taken at a public event, but article #16 of ticket:2016061210003013 notes that it was taken after the public event had finished, so it was not taken at a public event. My name is not dave (talk) 20:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - how do you know what's in the ticket? You are not an OTRS agent as far as I can see. I cannot open the ticket, so it's not in a Commons queue. - but no regardless what is stated in the ticket, it's obvious from the picture itself that it was taken at a public event. If the program of an event has ended, but the visitors are still present, this is not suddenly a private situation. Jcb (talk) 20:59, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jcb. I am an OTRS agent. It's in info-en. My name is not dave (talk) 21:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weird, you are not in the Global OTRS group. Please make sure to have that fixed. And could you please move the ticket to a Commons queue? Jcb (talk) 21:36, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have that right because I only answer info-en tickets. Not a permissions person. Sure, I'll move it there for you to answer. My name is not dave (talk) 21:56, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have looked at the ticket and I really don't see any reason why this would not be a public event as meant by the UK law. Jcb (talk) 16:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 13:24, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a professional portrait photograph, published among others here! We need a permission via OTRS, else COM:PCP. Ras67 (talk) 21:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Fop in France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. The sculpture of this thumb was achieved in 1994.

Civa (talk) 16:45, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


No Fop in France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. This sculpture, Tindaro (not Tindareu eh buddy!) was achieved in 1997.

Civa (talk) 16:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:33, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Fop in France : according to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. This is a recent sculpture (1970s).

Civa (talk) 14:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:16, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Articseahorse as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: taken from website, copyright information unknown This seems to be old... Yann (talk) 17:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status, the airplane is not so old... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_P-26_Peashooter. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE: uploaded from kowiki which article I deleted for promo, no other educational use — regards, Revi 18:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep If I'm understanding correctly, this appears to be a logo for a broadcast TV channel. Even if the TV channel isn't notable enough for a Wikipedia article, I think a logo of a TV channel would definitely be considered realistically useful for an educational purpose. --IagoQnsi (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: ok, mainly because people have worked to categorize it. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need a permission from Henry Joe Sakala. Yann (talk) 18:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: small size without EXIFs, unlikely to be own work but grabbed from a social media. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:28, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uselessly blurred. We have plenty of non-blurred images of the same rolling stock. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:20, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image is blurred intentionally; those should not be deleted but placed in Category:Intentionally blurred images.


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo may be above COM:TOO, since the UK has a low threshold. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:25, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong image of person titles Hellboy1973 (talk) 18:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Doesn't look so wrong, furthermore it is used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon avec File:Usine de Montricher.jpg, maintenance demandée par téléverseur (voir fr:Discussion utilisateur:CHABERT Louis#Problème des photos en doublon) Borvan53 (talk) 18:43, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 10:53, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exactly the same image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cat_skull_02.jpg Lucas.Belo (talk) 17:10, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 15:08, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:08, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, no usable metadata, probably copyrighted by truTV.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:00, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:08, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, author given as chapuis-photo.com in exif Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:09, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright viol Thraen (talk) 10:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:10, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this license applicable here? Yann (talk) 10:54, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 22:11, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:11, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:12, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture just for a logo, now file for logo is File:Héritage logo .jpg Hrtgmxpr (talk) 21:12, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not useful and ridiculous picture 209.171.207.250 01:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. The photo cannot be deleted on that reason, because it is used. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Where is it in use? Doesn't seem to be at present. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:08, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as source for File:Héritage logo.jpg. Also in scope of category:Shopping bags. P 1 9 9   14:18, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The relevant cats are full of much better images. For outstanding examples please see File:Brassiere-white.jpg and File:Two pairs of briefs at fashion show.png, for instance. Or look at File:Model in black lingerie at Western Canada Fashion Week 2016 Spring - Edmonton.jpg to see an image -of a professional model- without the face half cut as in this case. E4024 (talk) 08:00, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep the first image is black and white, the second image is only of underwear and the third linked image is of a model which could be considered "promotional" when using as one could argue that she's getting paid for it while this "anonymised" photograph doesn't reveal the face and only showcases the subject. I am not arguing that this type of imagry should be encouraged, only that this particular image isn't necessarily of bad quality and that It's useable. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What about the other images in the same cats? --E4024 (talk) 11:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Hello. Dear E4024, i agree that your examples of women's lingerie are technical and artistic much more better. But "molded bra" is a specific type of women's brassierie, characterized by formed cups. Your examples show other types of bras Of course, if Wikimedia repository contain the better photos of molded bras then deletion of my photo is reasonable. Regards Stan old (talk) 17:43, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello dear ol' Stan. I appreciate your knowledge on bras. I also appreciate your expressing your views kindly; something I miss in Commons at times. OTOH I would prefer to have less images of this kind in Commons, as we pretend to be a serious "general" source. I would not like to think that people enter our pages looking for nudity. (There are better sources for that.) It may be the favourite area of work of many Commoners, but please note that I'm not saying that we should not have nudity; I'm only sure that the proportion of nudity-related material in Commons is much more than the place it has in real life. I would like to see some statistics: Have we got enough "food" in Commons, for instance? Enough "literature"? Enough "music"? Enough "sports"? Enough "politics"? (Not referring to pics of people with kalashnikovs.) What is the proportion of images in those areas to "nude or partially nude women"?.. (BTW how many cats have we got which contain this formula? :) At least you're not adding more material to our huge (I mean in number :) penis collection, AFAICS. Have I already voted to delete? This is an out of scope and unused personal "partial female nudity" pic. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 07:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Dear E4024, i respect your opinion, although i do not quite agree with it. I also thank You for the kind words, that the people can compare arguments without quarrels. Regards Stan old (talk) 16:55, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note to closing admins: I see very clearly that you have a lot of deletion work. I may be also be contributing to that burden, sorry; just doing what I feel right. Having said that, while this discussion has not yet been closed (with two keep opinions although for me it's an obvious delete) the file has entered in a mass DR also. Maybe those admins who are not so active or keep away from these discussions should be convinced to help their colleagues who work here, in closing DRs, with patience and certainly (nobody wants to lose friends :) sacrifice. --E4024 (talk) 07:54, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by User:Jcb while closing a different DR that also included this file. --Rosenzweig τ 17:20, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same picture with File:Anikka Albrite AVN Expo 2015.jpg. The file seems to have been uploaded twice from Flickr under different names. (If you look at the source, you see that they are the same original file in Flickr.) Although in use, one must be deleted. Adding the other to the same WP pages will make no difference because the images are identical. If I'm wrong about anything please tell me. E4024 (talk) 11:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate deleted and redirected. --Rosenzweig τ 17:55, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This isn't a "selfie" - so needing permission from photographer. Quedel (talk) 12:34, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 08:59, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary (by uploader) Zoupan (talk) 00:30, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added more images from same photo session uploaded.--Zoupan (talk) 00:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:09, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary (by uploader) Zoupan (talk) 00:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Zoupan, it looks in scope.  Keep --E4024 (talk) 13:12, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:10, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary (by uploader) Zoupan (talk) 00:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Zoupan, it looks in scope.  Keep --E4024 (talk) 13:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:10, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See [9] and [10]. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Madeleine-Monette.jpg, which may or may not be about the same photo, but the copyright owner is documented as being Simon Jutras. -- Asclepias (talk) 01:42, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Different image, same problem. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:11, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It needs to have more information on the vegetation of Alaska 2601:203:4000:72E7:2183:917B:F376:7088 03:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a climate map made according to the Koeppen climate classification system. This is not a vegetation map, nor does it aim to be. The Koeppen system is used widely in scientific contexts. If there is a concern that the Koeppen system does not appropriately incorporate vegetation, that's a criticism for the system and not for this particular map. It should also be noted that there are hundreds of Koeppen climate maps on Wikimedia Commons, and these maps have their own established categories on Wikimedia Commons. If this map is removed for 'lack of vegetation information', then that would not only be a categorical error, but to be consistent, all those maps would require removal. Redtitan (talk) 03:42, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, obviously. Huntster (t @ c) 06:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per above im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 09:47, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:12, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Masur as no source (No source since) (talk) 04:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Source is given which can be researched further. -- (talk) 04:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment For the sake of clarity - the document itself is of course PD. But the photo of this document, with its seal is a copyrighted work - as it is not a faithful 2D reproduction/scan. And here, the source and author indicated doesn't justify PD status. Masur (talk) 18:26, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Cropped off the seal. In my view the creative element for this particular photo was below the threshold, as the clear intention was to make as flat as possible a faithful reproduction, with no special lighting. However I do not think it is worth the debating time. -- (talk) 18:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: hid the old version with the medal, kept per Fae. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:14, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Should be deleted and replaced with Escudo de... (linked in the file description) 201.241.87.35 05:08, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Usually we use English language for the titles. This nomination does not make sense. --Gastón Cuello (talk) 00:04, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It makes sense. The original file should have been renamed, not re-uploaded under a different name. File:Escudo de la Provincia de Ñuble.svg is exactly the same file, but unlike this one "Coat of arms", "escudo de..." has been around for years. That is the point. --201.241.87.35 17:36, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 OpposeThe difference is that this file is for the Ñuble Region articles and not the Ñuble Province articles, the Coat of arms is probably going to be the same, but in case of any changes, this file will be changed without affecting the Province articles.

Deleted: processed as duplicate, names do not need to be English. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. English law has a high COM:TOO. 175.159.215.220 05:43, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. 175.159.215.220 05:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Not eligible for de minimis. 175.159.215.220 05:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ich hatte mich geirrt es ist nicht mein eigenes foto gewesen .. entschuldigung dafür Atitlan~nlwiki (talk) 06:19, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:20, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Also is this license applicable here? Yann (talk) 10:54, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that the picture of Elena Fattori is not copyrighted. It comes from this page http://www.senato.it/leg/17/BGT/Schede/Attsen/00029093.htm --Gciriani (talk) 16:36, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural close in favor of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PD-EdictGov. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:21, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

most likely not own work (small resolution) HerrAdams (talk) 11:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:22, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The fr:Institut du Monde Arabe was built in Paris in 1987. But there is No Fop in France. So the building, but also the windows, panels and moucharabiehs (some of ones by fr:Jean Nouvel still alive) are copyrighted. Civa (talk) 13:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the building of the Ministère de la Culture in Paris. Over the building was added a special artistic grid in 2004. But there is No Fop in France : according to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. Civa (talk) 13:30, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Fop in France : according to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original building until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. This building was achieved in 2008.

Civa (talk) 13:47, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:24, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Fop in France : according to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original building until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. This building was achieved in 2006.

Civa (talk) 13:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:24, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Space4Time3Continuum2x (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FOP in the US for statues

Elisfkc (talk) 16:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom and because sculptor Jack Kershaw died September 7, 2010, so his works will remain under copyright until 2010+95+1=2106.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:24, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • When I uploaded the images I wasn’t aware of the copyright issues concerning the depicted statue because the derivatives (i.e., the photographs) are CC BY 2.0. I have removed the link on the namespace page to the first file; the third file wasn’t linked yet, and I uploaded the second file only because it was the basis for the third, cropped file. I also didn’t know that there is a separate upload process for the English Wikipedia and that its fair use exemption doctrine policy does not apply to Wikimedia Commons. I think it may be OK to upload one image - in a lower resolution and with the appropriate additional justification - to the English Wikipedia. Space4Time3Continuum2x (Wikimedia Commons doesn't add time stamp automatically?) Space4Time3Continuum2x
@Space4Time3Continuum2x: Yes, you can upload one image with Template:Non-free 3D art on English Wikipedia. I have found it easiest to upload non-free images using a high resolution version originally, then adding Template:Non-free reduce so a bot will automatically reduce it to the largest size allowed. Elisfkc (talk) 16:54, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'll try that in the next few days, need to formulate the justification. Space4Time3Continuum2x

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:24, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof that this is taken by an officer or an employee of the American government. EtienneDolet (talk) 16:43, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, very unlikely indeed. Thuresson (talk) 21:42, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. 175.159.215.220 05:47, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Official logo http://www.atimonan.gov.ph/. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 11:42, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work.Copyright Indian Post Office Philafrenzy (talk) 11:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 13:40, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work.Copyright Indian Post Office Philafrenzy (talk) 11:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 13:41, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work.Copyright Indian Post Office Philafrenzy (talk) 11:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 13:42, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The fr:Institut du Monde Arabe was built in Paris in 1987. But there is No Fop in France. So the building, but also the windows, panels and moucharabiehs (some of ones by fr:Jean Nouvel still alive) are copyrighted. Civa (talk) 13:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Et celle-ci donc File:Institut du Monde Arabe au bord de la Seine.jpg pourquoi ne pas demander sa suppression User:Raphodon 13:52, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sur la 2e photo, la question est de savoir si l'immeuble est l'objet principal de la photo. Ça se discute car on voit aussi un bout de l'île Saint-Louis et la Seine. Si l'immeuble n'est pas l'objet principal, La photo peut être conservée selon le principe de De minimis. --Civa (talk) 10:49, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:05, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exactly the same image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Elephant_trunk_01.jpg Lucas.Belo (talk) 16:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Exact or scaled-down duplicate, deleted and redirected. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:33, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exactly the same image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bovine_cutaneous_vessels.jpg Lucas.Belo (talk) 16:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Exact or scaled-down duplicate, deleted and redirected. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:38, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exactly the same image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Whale_lung.jpg Lucas.Belo (talk) 16:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Exact or scaled-down duplicate, deleted and redirected. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:42, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exactly the same image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Whale_Trachea.jpg Lucas.Belo (talk) 16:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Exact or scaled-down duplicate, deleted and redirected. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exactly the same image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dog_skull_06.jpg Lucas.Belo (talk) 17:08, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Exact or scaled-down duplicate, deleted and redirected. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exactly the same image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dog_skull_02.jpg Lucas.Belo (talk) 17:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Exact or scaled-down duplicate, deleted and redirected. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:53, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image when you enlarged the scale, is it clearly that the up-loader was taking the photograph from any magazines or pictures image, but the free copyright license statement from the original author are not available. SA 13 Bro (talk) 20:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:59, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a low resolution version of File:US Navy 090723-N-3666S-038 Sailors man the rails aboard the Virginia-class attack submarine USS Hawaii (SSN 776) as she pulls into her new homeport at Naval Station Pearl Harbor.jpg CroMagnonMan (talk) 20:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Exact or scaled-down duplicate, deleted and redirected. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:03, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an imported flickr album of a recording session by non-notable artists. The photos are mediocre in quality - most are under- or over-exposed, many are blurry, and some are only 480x640. A handful may be useful as an illustration of music recording (and even then, not very useful), but we certainly do not need dozens of photos of this non-notable event.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination - bad quality, blurry. It looks much more like a personal photo album. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

@Andrewssi2: This is obviously not entirely your own work, with major parts of it being from Openstreetmap. Please fix the source, authors and licensing information accordingly. It would probably be a good idea to use Template:OpenStreetMap for that – or at least Template:ODbL OpenStreetMap if you rendered you own map based on OSM data. Thanks, El Grafo (talk) 12:28, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi El Grafo - It was taken from OSM. I will add the correct OSM attribution. Otherwise I assume that there is no other copyright issue here? Andrewssi2 (talk) 00:06, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Closing. Uploader seem to be on a wikibreak. Updated image description with OSM template. Thuresson (talk) 01:51, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was taken in 1956, so there are doubs that it is in public domain in Poland. 95.49.22.76 21:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. It has not been shown that a museum ticket is specifically pulic domain in Poland. From Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Poland: "Anonymous and pseudonymous works lose copyright protection seventy years "from the date of the first dissemination of the work [...]". Uploader has not provided any information that this photo was pulished before 2015. Thuresson (talk) 02:04, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in public domain mik@ni 22:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image is from the Metropolitan Museum of Art's online database and is free for usage and therefore, in the public domain. Am I mistaken? DACC23 17:48, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Author's death of the picture is 1955. So 1955+70 years = 2025... So for me, the picture is in public domain in 2025 ! Not before. --mik@ni 12:12, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted From the Met website: "Rights and Reproduction: © Estate of George Platt Lynes". From terms and conditions: "Materials identified as CC0 are either those that the Museum believes to be in the public domain, or those to which the Museum waives any copyright it might have. Copyright and other proprietary rights may be held by individuals or entities other than, or in addition to, the Museum." Thuresson (talk) 02:20, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Chatsam as Copyvio (copyvio) PD-ineligible? Yann (talk) 17:43, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: a disc is a 3d object, the photo has very likely a copyright. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:18, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Женщина неоднократно уже просила не использовать её фото. Игнорировать её не могу. Zimin.V.G. (talk) 16:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - ok unused file, courtesy deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:00, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to http://www.ehw.ag/fileadmin/_processed_/5/b/csm_de_Maiziere_43a6c67a2b.jpg, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep But our file has a higer resolution and exif. So maybe the other webpage copied our pic.--Sanandros (talk) 10:59, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ok let's AGF for this one. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:59, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Léo Jacquet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images anciennes (années 60 ou 70) probablement pas issues d'une travail personnel. Auteur exact à retrouver et autorisation de l'auteur nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr

Shev123 (talk) 11:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour à vous, ces images appartenaient à mon défun grand-père, lui même sur les photos.Elle datent en fait de 1950 environ, pendant la guerre d'indochine.Nous pouvons y apercevoir Gérald Chevalier, ainsi qu'une section des troupes de marine et Jean de Lattre de Tasigny, Maréchal de France.Je peut vous garantir sur l'honneur que je possède l'exclusivité des droits de cette photo et que je la met à disposition de la communauté notamment pour la page en cours de création de gérald chevalier. Cordialement, Léo

@Léo Jacquet:
Bonjour,
Lorsqu'on importe des images prises par une autre personne et qui ne sont pas dans le domaine public (c'est le cas ici), il faut passer par Commons:OTRS/fr. Cette procédure permet de bien vérifier qu'il n'y a pas de problème de droits d'auteurs. Par ailleurs, il faudrait modifier les pages des images les dates et la géolocalisation ne sont pas bonnes et il ne s'agit pas d'un travail personnel. --Shev123 (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Shev123: Bonsoir, au vu du caractère non urgent de cette déclaration, elle sera faite dans la semaine, d'ici là merci de ne pas supprimer les images, je n'ai pas la localisation précise de ces images même si prises en Indochine, aussi comment faire pour changer ces données ? Enfin je tenais à dire qu'il est fortement désagréable de se justifier de posséder les droits d'auteur d'une image chargée par moi même, ce matin de plus.N'y voyez aucune attaque personelle, bonne soirée, Léo


Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:31, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I had reported the file as possible copyvio. Mardetanha argue that the claimed author owns the file. On the other hand, one may see the file elsewhere on the net. The file will be deleted unless the author sends his permission to OTRS. Mhhossein talk 12:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Author is a trusted person, he has already uploaded the original pictures.

Mardetanha talk 12:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

he is the file owner and doesn't need to send anything to OTRS, though smaller version of the file has been published before but he proved he is the author and he is holder of the filse, no further action is neccsacry here, and you should have asked all these before oppening nomination request, he is active and I was active too Mardetanha talk 13:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder why you are trying to evade a normal procedure. Add your disruptive revert to the list. OTRS process is very simple. --Mhhossein talk 20:11, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What is the relation of this picture with OTRS whatsoever? The person can prove he is the author wihout sending anything to OTRS at all. Amir (talk) 15:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The older versions of the file were published elsewhere. Asking the authors to send their permissions is very normal. --Mhhossein talk 13:59, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • While Mhhossein is right to ask for a permission in case of prior (non free) publication, and we thank him all for the help he brings in the search for copyright infringement. However, firstly I am not able to currently find one of these publications, secondly the uploader uploaded several images belonging to the same photo set, in full resolution and with EXIFs. Let's AGF for this case. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per my comment above. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a simple logo. Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. The TV-channel is defunct since 2008, but its logo is still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Permission sent to OTRS. --Videoway (talk) 20:46, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not original enough + otrs pending. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 11:56, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The bag is not simple. Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Permission sent to OTRS. --Videoway (talk) 20:42, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Reinstate if the OTRS permission is ever received. P 1 9 9   13:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Look at the logo of Moscow Christmas Swing Dance Camp [11] 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This video belongs to Tantsklass and to MXDC organizators. Before uploading first I asked Svetlana Gavrilova if she is okay with that. She gave her agreement but instead my video she said this one is of better quality. And the MXDC owner also said he does not mind.
The initiative was mine - these booggie-woogie dancers really are focused on other things. But the fact that russian dancers are on 5th place in World Listing - has great significance.
I have direct approval from MXDC owners and from the dancers. - there is no infrigment of rights. Before uploading all my videos first of all I got the dancers approval.
One of my first videos with training session was made by me but when I asked about it - the dancers said it is private so I did not publish it.
I take responsibilty for my uploads, checking it this those who have right to the content — Preceding unsigned comment added by PirateDen (talk • contribs)
@PirateDen: Please ask the copyright holder to send the statement of permission to OTRS. Thank you 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:29, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll see them on Monday 2 april and ask to send email with approval, which they gave me before.


Deleted: per nomination. Reinstate if the OTRS permission is ever received. P 1 9 9   13:38, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As it says in the template, an edict is a law (or ordinance, which is simply a law enacted by a municipality), a judicial decision, or an administrative ruling. A photograph might be part of an edict, but by itself is not, even if published by a government. Therefore these photographs cannot use this template.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: What would you suggest be put in its place then? Particularly for all Massachusetts related files as any media generated by the Commonwealth (barring copies of other copyrighted media, e.g. a photo of a photo) is considered deemed to be in the public domain.--Simtropolitan (talk) 20:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's likely that many of these can be kept with appropriate labels, but that's up to the uploader. As for the Massachusetts rule, it covers only "records", which probably does not include photographs. It is nowhere near as broad as the Federal and California rules. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jameslwoodward: Jim respectfully, I don't remember if it was the two of us who had this conversation before but I have personally reached out to the Secretary's office multiple times, they consistently pointed to this citation. I can't find the previous discussion at the moment but since multiple editors did not want template clutter, the PD-Edict template was given as a compromise, as the law specifically indicates "public records" include photographs and "other documentary materials" taken for any official public purpose of the government. How would public records by this definition (specifying these include photos created in an w/in an agency's charter), not fall under official legal materials? Edit- see Template:PD-MAGov --Simtropolitan (talk) 22:11, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is probably not the place for this, but the word "copyright" does not appear in the cited document. While it is clear that the Commonwealth must make copies of public records as defined, with the exceptions noted, I can see no indication that someone holding such copies has any right to license their use to others. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We're talking about deletion, isn't the purpose of this thread to inquire the appropriate use of the template? Right now preventing its use, prevents materials from the Massachusetts state library from being used, this seems as appropriate a time as any. When this is raised I have completely opposite conversations with the Secretary of the Commonwealth's office, who has custody of this source material, and Wikipedia's editors. So let me put it like this, we have a legal definition for what the subject material is, and what it isn't. Public records include photographs created by agencies under their state statutes, (in the case of Seibel and Garrison, under Section 18, Ch. 5 of MGL), we have the statement by the Secretary of the Commonwealth proclaiming "those records created by Massachusetts government agencies and institutions held by the Massachusetts Archives are not copyrighted and are available for public use. Copyright for materials submitted to state agencies may be held by the person or organization that created the document.", and we have the law that, prevents this from covering material from towns/cities/counties, but confers the Secretary's office authority over materials at the state level. These photos came from the state, they were the original disseminator. So again, how does this not qualify portraits of lawmakers, and photographs of buildings from state cultural resource files as free of copyright? In the portraits listed above the State Library was even thorough enough to put NOT_IN_COPYRIGHT in their metadata, so if this is what their public domain status derives from, how do I note that here besides the defunct MaGov template, or as a gov edict? --Simtropolitan (talk) 16:28, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Peace - Walter L Dean.jpg should have no part in this discussion, I have changed the license to what it should have been in the first place. Please delete the DR for it. Broichmore (talk) 18:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, kept a few that have other valid licenses. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:51, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has Archive.org as source, where an user with the author's username, published it with CC-BY-SA 3.0. However, on the author's website there are no copyright indications, just that the books are "freely downloadable". For the same reason, the book has been marked as copyvio on Italian Wikisource. In the following discussion, after contacting the author privately, it appears that he refuses to accept the "unrevocable" clause of the Creative Commons license.
We have to decide if to trust archive.org or just consider that the file hasn't the requested permissions to be uploaded on Commons. Ruthven (msg) 20:39, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Nevertheless please wait some days, just to notify this request into it.wikisource scriptorium and to discuss it again a little bit. --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 21:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven: Please go on and delete the file. I'll delete Index and derived pages into it.wikisource. I'll never upload again books by living authors. :-( --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 21:51, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alex brollo: Living authors unwilling to provide a full free license release are… difficult to manage. :) Let's have another admin to  Delete the file. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 22:12, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:54, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]