Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/03/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 4th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawing art requires artist's permission. 176.239.93.1 09:09, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This drawing is my own work. And I don't upload to anywhere. Jerjer Li (talk) 09:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's good to assume good faith but Jerjer Li's denying the upload and closing the discussion hastily could also give some suspicion about that good faith. Couldn't they? Drawing the picture of a person who betrayed his wife with another married woman could also be suspected. Maybe this user is the betrayed wife, or her familiar, or the husband of the other woman etc. Why has Jerjer Li decided to upload four pictures suddenly? The other three are just porno or do they depict one of the women in this case? Maybe life made me be more suspicious of people's goodwill. Sorry. --176.239.93.1 12:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per B dash. Ruthven (msg) 09:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appear to be digital conversion of Internet images with no permission and dubious license information. B dash (talk) 06:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy. ~riley (talk) 08:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/User talk:Didym

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image, no EXIF -- probably copyvio. Also I doubt that it is useful for any educational purpose. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy -- Facebook image, which is copyrighted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from her website, no indication of permission given. MatthewVanitas (talk) 08:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 18:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Gérôme - An Arab Caravan outside a Fortified Town, Egypt.jpg 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily PD-70 as claimed in the translation... Indira Devi Chaudhurani (1873–1960); At the very least this may need to be hosted on a local project. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Billinghurst: For localisation please. Hrishikes (talk) 16:42, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; moved to enWS.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:25, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yes it's pre 1923, but the publication location noted is London, UK applies 70 p.m.a, Author lifetime is ( 1888-1975) ; at the very least thismay need to be hosted on a local project with an updated license. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Billinghurst: For localisation please. Hrishikes (talk) 16:42, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; worked moved to enWS.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:27, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File should be localised to English Wikisource, as PD-old 70 is not applicable to some of the translations , for example - s:Mashi and Other Stories/The Supreme Night, trnalsation is by Jadunath Sarkar (1870–1958) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Billinghurst: For localisation please. Hrishikes (talk) 16:42, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; pre 1923 work though some of the translators alive; moved to enWS.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS tag applied by non OTRS member, at least several files are reuploads of recently deleted files

Jcb (talk) 21:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I meant to speedy them. --Jcb (talk) 21:50, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source page [1] says "© 2018 Wellingborough Conservatives" in the footer. Even disregarding that this looks like a possible sock of Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/TheBlueNosedTory. -- Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:55, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry is serious allegation and no grounds for that. If you have evidence, you should report it to a checkuser not make unfounded comments here. Referenced website relates to second subject of image, that actual image is not there so no copyright problem. IN conclusion, seems valid and I am happy for the discussion to be closed. 176.24.8.35 21:04, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I know sockpuppetry is serious. The ground and founding for the allegation is that this is an image that has been repeatedly uploaded by that account. The reference website must support both subjects of the image not just a part. You do not conclude the closing admin will do that when they are happy that it is valid or invalid. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:58, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyright violation (and uploaded by block evading sockpuppet). --Nick (talk) 19:37, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation RaviC (talk) 15:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 16:23, 6 März 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Non-trivial logo --Krdbot 19:34, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mario - Amiibo - Super Mario series.jpg (COM:TOYS & COM:DW) --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 22:28, 6 März 2018 UTC: Uploaded files of a blocked user. To prevent harm from new tenant. - --Krdbot 01:34, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a free YouTube license. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:45, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license forging is not acceptable. I'll block the uploader. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Lucyin Mahin. Jcb (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you have the permission, of course ! It has been uploaded in an early Walloon Wikipedia version. I ask for re-naming "Lesse a Ôtchamp"

--Lucyin (talk) 18:09, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flamenc also claims to be the author, see here. Are you the same person as Flamenc? Or is Flamenc mistaken? Jcb (talk) 18:14, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Uploaded to the Walloon Wikipedia on 18 May 2006 by User:Lucyin, the photographer. Transferred to Commons by Flamenc on 9 Sept. 2007, who now mistakenly labelled this action wrongly. (Well, his action was more than 10 years ago.) I will adjust the metadata (source) of the file. Vysotsky (talk) 20:26, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, let's close this then. Jcb (talk) 21:22, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 21:22, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo, no evidence it is not copyrighted MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:40, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:PS: Advertisement 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work Artix Kreiger (talk) 00:29, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:07, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appears to be a crop of a copyrighted image. See http://nepalireporter.com/thapa-resigns-rpp-chairman/ Whpq (talk) 02:52, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:07, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is claimed as a free screenshot but does not provide proper source information to validate. Given the subject matter, I very much doubt the source material as under a free license. Whpq (talk) 02:54, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:09, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

“author request”; - The photo is really blurry and of low quality D A R C 12345 (talk) 04:21, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:09, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request - matterial not encyclapedic D A R C 12345 (talk) 04:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:10, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyvio: Author listed as Aris Ziagos but metadata states "Copyright holder (c)2015 Mick Cantarella Photography" Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:58, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:13, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: SM ENtertainment. Possible more korean spam. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:08, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:13, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:10, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anskei (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr.Amel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal photo Adamgerber80 (talk) 08:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ajmal payami From Chamanpur dbg I am future doctor and indian top most faculti — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajmal payami (talk • contribs) 2018-03-02T17:52:14‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

out of scope, personal photo, was deleted once already // sikander { talk } 16:52, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:28, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 09:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not my own photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.237.120.178 (talk • contribs) 2018-02-27T19:33:31‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Swastik17796 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:17, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ugly & superceded — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2018-02-27T13:44:34‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:17, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have repllaced this figure. It is was only being used on pages I have written on Wikiversity.--Guy vandegrift (talk) 00:04, 28 February 2018 (UTC) 14:59, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:44, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: Screenshot listed as "Own work" hence DW. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:47, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:48, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a 11 years old photo of a wikipedia user (me), should be deleted asap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dziadzik (talk • contribs) 2018-03-01T13:07:17‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:20, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: Jason Oung Photography listed on watermark. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:50, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:20, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roosnom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:52, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fuctional flag. not neccesary in commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by A. Katechis Mpourtoulis (talk • contribs) 2018-03-02T04:44:22‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:20, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pszklarska (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: No useful content.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:59, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: No Ed-Use and possibly an Attack. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:06, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:12, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Renan Campos Nascimento (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvio: Metadata states Author:Flavio H. Pretti

Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:23, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kylefummey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Corrupted: Unknown content, can't distinguish subject

Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Listed as in Description and Metadata ad Author:Matthew Butcher, Uploaded as "Own work". Without otrs permission this couldn't be kept under a free license on commons. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marciart11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Corrupted: Unused, Unknown content and can't distinguish subject

Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:23, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo. Also copyvio per Description: Photo by Ed Canas while saying "Own work". Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:27, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:26, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:26, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not perfectly JinSHOCK81 (talk) 07:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uncertain copyright. --Yann (talk) 08:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I couldn't find the image elsewhere on the Internet but EXIF data show that the copyright holder is the French presidency (:Julien:) (talk) 07:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:28, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Les logos de marque déposée sont interdits sur Commons, et doivent être importés localement sur fr.wiki - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 09:04, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. May be PD-textogo, but should be SVG. --Yann (talk) 08:29, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Les logos de marque déposée sont interdits sur Commons, et doivent être importés localement sur fr.wiki - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 09:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:28, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:29, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional image by Rolls-Royce MB-one (talk) 09:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vojtěch Dostál as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: no value. I'm not sure, we can discuss it for a week. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:PS: Invitation for a ceremony 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File should be localised, Bertrand Arthur William Russell (1872–1970), Whilst it may well be PD-1923, it's not PD-old70 in it's source country UK ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Query, is this actually a US edition? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:09, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Publisher's note at page #5 of the DjVu suggests to me that this was simultaneous edition in UK, US, Canada & India. So {{PD-1923}} applies here. Ankry (talk) 20:03, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Provisional withdrawl - Apparently this seems to have been uploaded in good faith as a US edition published simultaneously.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:38, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 08:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File should be localised, Bertrand Arthur William Russell (1872–1970), Whilst it may well be PD-1923, it's not PD-old70 in it's source country UK ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is simultaneous US publication as publisher declares, so IMO, US should be considered as country of origin here. Ankry (talk) 11:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Which page is the declaration on? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Page 9, it is New York, again pre-1923, it is public domain. Jasonanaggie (talk) 22:27, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 08:32, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File should be localised, Bertrand Arthur William Russell (1872–1970), Whilst it may well be PD-1923, it's not PD-old70 in it's source country UK ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:47, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Chicago - London 1917: unless an earlier non-US publication of this work can be pointed out, I think, US should be considered its country of origin (as for simultaneous publication). Ankry (talk) 12:03, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah it's good All copyrightable works published in the United States before 1923 are in the public domain. This is clearly a US printing as it is a part of the University of California Library System [2] -- Jasonanaggie (talk) 22:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn per logic expressed above. Please update file info accordingly.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:54, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 08:32, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File should be localised, Bertrand Arthur William Russell (1872–1970), Whilst it may well be PD-1923, it's not PD-old70 in it's source country UK ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:47, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn US Edition. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:29, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 08:32, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File should be localised, Bertrand Arthur William Russell (1872–1970), Whilst it may well be PD-1923, it's not PD-old70 in it's source country UK,(Also this appears to be a decorative element, which may be by a third party who is uncredited.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:48, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - Per provisional withdrawal on source scans.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:41, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per above. PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 08:32, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File should be localised, Bertrand Arthur William Russell (1872–1970), Whilst it may well be PD-1923, it's not PD-old70 in it's source country UK,(Also this appears to be a decorative element, which may be by a third party who is uncredited.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:48, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - Per provisional withdrawal on source scans.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per above. PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 08:33, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and also:

Derived content, File should be localised, Bertrand Arthur William Russell (1872–1970), Whilst it may well be PD-1923, it's not PD-old70 in it's source country UK. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merged.
  • IMO, it should be resolved first whether the original work is really a pure UK publication or simultaneous UK/US (or maybe even just US publication). This does matter here. Ankry (talk) 12:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 08:33, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File should be localised, Bertrand Arthur William Russell (1872–1970), Whilst it may well be PD-1923, it's not PD-old70 in it's source country UK. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:53, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per above. PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 08:35, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File should be localised, Bertrand Arthur William Russell (1872–1970), Whilst it may well be PD-1923, it's not PD-old70 in it's source country UK. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:54, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is a G.P. Putnum imprint from New York, scanned from the University of Michigan Library, it is Pre-1923, it is public domain. Jasonanaggie (talk) 22:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Exclusively? I'm seeing a number of publishers listed. You would seem to be saying at least that this is "simultaneous publication". Have you checked for a prior UK publication? If there isn't one, I'm minded to withdraw this, based on what you've said on this and previous DR's.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:53, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 08:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File should be localised with updated license, Bertrand Arthur William Russell (1872–1970) so not PD-old 70 in origin country as claimed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:03, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All copyrightable works published in the United States before 1923 are in the public domain. [3] Jasonanaggie (talk) 13:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Commons requires that it's PD both in the US and the origin country. Are you claiming simultaneous publication? The listed publisher on the title page is London based. Prove it's PD outside the US, or that this is clearly a US edition, please.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence in the back of the Djvu suggests a UK printing. More evidence would be needed for this to be considered as US published work.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"Longman's, Green , And Co. / London, Ney York, And Bombay / 1896" (page #9 of the DjVu file).
I assume it can be interpretted as simultaneous publication in UK, US and India. Ankry (talk) 15:25, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That is how I read it too, and it should be assumed to have been purchased in the United States as it is a part of the Stanford Library, located in Stanford, California. Jasonanaggie (talk) 22:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn as it was apprently uploaded in good faith as a presumed US edition.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:08, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per above. PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 08:35, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File should be localised, Bertrand Arthur William Russell (1872–1970), so not PD-old-70 in origin country for work, (although it is noted this is New York edition.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:07, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe that PD-old-70 applies as it's pre-1923 and published in USA. Anyway this is a photo of the book cover, the contents are on Wikisource. Chris55 (talk) 11:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's a djvu file, it contains scans for all the pages. Was this work published in the US first? Or was there a prior UK edition? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:02, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is a New York printing pre-1923, it is copyright free. Jasonanaggie (talk) 22:25, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn as US edition. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:48, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 08:36, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File should be localised, Bertrand Arthur William Russell (1872–1970), so not PD-old-70 if UK work. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PD-old-70 does not apply as the International Journal of Ethics was published in the USA pre-1923. Whether this is regarded as a useful picture I leave open. Chris55 (talk) 11:42, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn - Can you provide more information or a link to confirm Journal was US based? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the last page, it is stated that this is printed in Cambridge, Massachusetts. -- Jasonanaggie (talk) 22:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn as clearly a US publication. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:35, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 08:36, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File should be localised - Hilaire Belloc (1870–1953) British origin. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:13, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a New York imprint of Henry Holt, and it is pre-1923. It is free of copyright Jasonanaggie (talk) 22:23, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to be claiming PD-US-1923 for the edition. Have you checked to see if there was a previous UK edition? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:50, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 08:36, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CountOfTabarnia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These all seem to be part of a hoax. Also, the source of the underlying maps in unclear.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:03, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:47, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dear Admin of wikipedia this is picture shows picture of hazrat bilal who is a sahabi of Prophet Mohammad (SAW) so this picture will cause a voilance in the muslim community so it is requested to kindly remove this picture thank you 39.32.251.146 09:41, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:55, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Art. --Yann (talk) 11:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar photos, not notable person. Let's keep only File:Rushmore IMG 5593 (15299157563).jpg, from which the person could be cropped.

Kulmalukko (talk) 21:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Very similar photos (and not notable person). Let's keep only one: File:Rushmore IMG 5608 (15732774889).jpg.

Kulmalukko (talk) 21:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Similar photos and not notable person. Let's keep only File:Rushmore IMG 5698 (15731204618).jpg, from which the person could be cropped.

Kulmalukko (talk) 21:29, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned, better alternatives available in Category:Afatinib. Leyo 21:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a copyvio (this pro wrestler is taking the pose, low resolution and no exif) Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 21:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:25, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:29, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, almost identical is File:Rushmore IMG 5702 (15731197338).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Both deleted, unused personal images. --Yann (talk) 11:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created for attack/vandalism purposes; not an official logo C.Fred (talk) 21:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant, overexposed. Superseded by similar view, which is not overexposed File:Colosseum (176).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:47, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:52, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:55, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:59, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like some kind of unused personal photograph. Too small resolution to be of any real illustrative use. Hopelessly miscategorised: the image is in category Category:Mojito but there are no mojitos, in fact nothing related to the mojito at all, in the picture. JIP (talk) 22:08, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:23, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Remis Ladislav. Copy of https://f4.bcbits.com/img/a3826345318_10.jpg, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:20, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, found at https://gal.img.pmdstatic.net/fit/http.3A.2F.2Fprd2-bone-image.2Es3-website-eu-west-1.2Eamazonaws.2Ecom.2Fgal.2F2018.2F02.2F06.2F222fc8b7-790d-48d9-9282-3f9a174ce762.2Ejpeg/1140x499/quality/80/gal.jpg, out of COM:SCOPE (fr:Judith d'Aleazzo) Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, lacks source and copyright details. --ghouston (talk) 22:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-France. --Yann (talk) 11:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found everywhere (http://www.sabaharabi.com/upload/press/X/17/11/22/~15113560500111051_L.PNG). Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:13, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:03, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:04, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:01, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:01, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion for political candidate. Unclear which of these guys is which person in the description. Username is inappropriate under COM:IU. Apocheir (talk) 16:21, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:01, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: Film poster without permission Karsten11 (talk) 16:27, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also: File:Congo - A Political Tragedy.jpg. Please note Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:PoliticalTragedyPOSTER.jpg and User_talk:Karsten11#Deletion.--Karsten11 (talk) 19:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand the reason why you want to delete the poster of my documentary. I'm the rightful owner of it. Kadimina (talk) 18:03, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kadimina, Please send a permission via COM:OTRS, so that the file can be restored. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:56, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:56, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oussama0012 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:55, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to me fairly out of scope. JuTa 17:13, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Speedy delete --Niridya (talk) 13:24, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:55, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably too blurred to be educationally usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:55, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, see [4]. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:54, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to me fairly out of scope. JuTa 17:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:54, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shivamabvpgonda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:39, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:54, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurred. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:52, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurred. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:03, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:52, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free licence. Michaelangelo Laxina (talk) 17:37, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

uploaded by non-existing user 180.191.134.90 18:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:51, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No added value. Commons:PENIS applies here. Wiki13 talk 18:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Nothing against sexual images as such, but does Commons really need hundreds of bad-quality, low-resolution images of someone's penis? JIP (talk) 22:18, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by -revi. --Yann (talk) 11:50, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small size without EXIFs : unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:22, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - per nom. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:37, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:48, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : lacks of educational value, better images in the category Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:48, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antu Nag Anton (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User seems to be here to upload personal files and selfies use them in their WP user pages, without making other contributions. Commons is not a webhost. Please see all their uploads and WP edits.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:54, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 11:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:04, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a possibility that personal information is reflected 218.219.174.105 11:17, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:05, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. In addition, depicted persons are unidentified and Jaboco isn't mentioned in en.wiki, maybe the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:07, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, cannot be used Toni Müller (talk) 11:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:07, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from https://www.ffr.fr/Equipes-de-France/Rugby-a-XV/XV-France/Tous-les-joueurs/BEZY-Sebastien - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 11:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:07, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from http://www.rugby365.fr/sebastien-bezy-ca-sannonce-tres-dur-contre-lirlande-2410693.html - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 11:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:07, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author died in 2003, copyrigted photo. Regasterios (talk) 12:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Regasterios, Szatmári Imre (1938-2003) fiához fordulok a jogbiztosítás érdekében.

Üdvözlettel: --Timar56 (talk) 00:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:08, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong upload Dieguillo (talk) 12:53, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from facebook. 220.137.20.88 12:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from facebook. See File:河岸留言演唱會under lover.jpg 220.137.20.88 13:02, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kasia.Polak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Professional photographs. For example the Hasselblad H6D-50c Camera (Body Only) costs €14,280. Please send us a permission via OTRS that you had the right to publish this pictures under a free licence, COM:PCP!

Ras67 (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:10, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

de:Thea Sternheim (1883-1971) copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 13:13, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:11, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the photographer is the copyright owner of the image(s) on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using e.g. {{Licensed-PD}}.
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • l'image est de suffisamment mauvaise qualité pour que l'on doute vraiment de son origine. le gars a du prendre la photo lui-même sur l'étal fromage d'un supermarché. Matpib (talk) 14:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. COM:PACKAGING. --Yann (talk) 12:13, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyivos Files uploaded by Sofia Merlini (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent copyivos. Exif shows photographer is Pedro Marcelino and copyright holder as being workmove-com.visual

P.g.champion (talk) 13:40, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:13, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test upload. Of no use on WC. P.g.champion (talk) 13:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Pierre Belhumeur, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author died in 2015. No permission. Regasterios (talk) 13:48, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Regasterios, ezt a képet Bácskai Mihály menye, Bácskainé Fazekas Márta (1951-2015) készítette az Általa szerkesztett 2000-ben kiadsott gimnáziumi évkönyv számára.

A családi archívumból került hozzánk szkennelésre a Könyvtárba a szócikk írásakor. Márta férjétől tudok engedélyt kérni a közzétételére, ha az megfelel.

Üdvözlettel: --Timar56 (talk) 21:12, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Timar56: az jó lesz. --Regasterios (talk) 06:45, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author died in 2003. No permission. Regasterios (talk) 13:48, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Regasterios, ezt a képet Bácskai Mihály (1929-2011) országos hírű drámatanár, gimnáziumigazgató feleségétől, Erzsike nénitől kaptuk meg szkennelésre. A hátoldalán fel volt tüntetve, hogy Szatmári Imre készítette. Úgy gondolom, emiatt ifj. Szatmáritól kell az engedélyt megkérnem.

Össze fogom gyűjteni a Szatmári által jegyzett képek hivatkozását, ha megoldható az egy kérő levéllel való engedélyezés.

Üdvözlettel: --Timar56 (talk) 20:58, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Timar56: így van. --Regasterios (talk) 06:44, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albifritsch (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern artworks - no permission from the artits

Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:04, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:17, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:04, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:17, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:04, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This one is OK. --Yann (talk) 12:17, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused/uncategorised screenshot : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:06, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image was linked to at an archived featured article nomination on the English Wikipedia; but, given that it was archived a while ago, deleting this image makes no difference. Seppi333 (Insert ) 20:13, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused/uncategorised text document of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:07, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shaneking561 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Unknown person, promotional corrupted adverts, all unused and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Hungary. --Regasterios (talk) 08:42, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:23, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The flickr account is unlikely the copyright holder of this photo, see the watermark. The photocomes likely from another account. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:23, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:20, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inappropriate pdf format : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:20, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused/uncategorised graph of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused/uncategorised graph of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused/uncategorised graph of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:37, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused/uncategorised graph of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:38, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:50, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:58, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:59, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:23, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

modern drawing : lacks of permission from the author Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:23, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small without EXIFs : unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:10, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:23, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:12, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work : small size without EXIFs - copyvio uploader Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image, out of scope. Uploaders sole contrib to any wiki project. Achim (talk) 15:21, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:25, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:26, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely false authorship claims. Looks like a screenshot. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by AmirWikiFa. LX (talk, contribs) 15:47, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:26, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free YouTube license. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by ~riley. --Yann (talk) 12:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free YouTube license. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:02, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by ~riley. --Yann (talk) 12:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are all of dreadful quality and almost identical (in fact, #1 and #2 *do* appear to be identical). We need one at most, and even in the absence of other photos of this band, it's open to question whether they're of acceptable quality.

Options; either delete three out of four, or delete them all?

Ubcule (talk) 16:25, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:28, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate image RSSwiki (talk) 17:03, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Of which specific image? There's a cropped version of this in Princess Sumaya bint Al Hassan and an image of her standing, but nothing that fulfils our definition of duplicate. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:29, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to me fairly out of scope. JuTa 17:47, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pribate photo from Flickr. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:04, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source for the base map. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 18:06, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This is from 2004. COM:GOF applies. --Yann (talk) 12:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe out of scope. Object is not clear. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:32, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:33, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:33, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost identical is File:Rushmore IMG 5621 (15731465960).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Good photo, we can have both. --Yann (talk) 12:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:39, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ihrcsunny (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Corrupted: Unknown content, can't distinguish subject

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:39, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:40, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source, no author Mutter Erde (talk) 13:18, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source, no author Mutter Erde (talk) 13:18, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source, no author (with a watermark from an auction house) Mutter Erde (talk) 13:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost identical is File:Rushmore IMG 5632 (15733014957).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:22, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:35, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost identical is File:Rushmore IMG 5640 (15916783641).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are they from the same user though?

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:36, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost identical photo is File:Rushmore IMG 5642 (15916780461).jpg, from which the person could be cropped. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:25, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A dark image, difficult to see where is Patricia B dash (talk) 03:45, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

modern statue and no FOP in Estonia WikedKentaur (talk) 07:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

modern statue and no FOP in Estonia WikedKentaur (talk) 07:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HeyLetgoletgo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 08:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

............. please help me out in learning how to upload picture on wikipedia so that i can repair the articles which doesnt have pictures on them and can make wikipedia a better place HeyLetgoletgo (talk) 09:23, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To understand what you can and cannot upload to Wikimedia Commons (the site you are on right now), please read Commons:Project scope/Summary. LX (talk, contribs) 10:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in USA for 2-dimensional art and the photo violates artist's copyright. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chrisndg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work - photos of photos

Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:17, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exists elsewhere on the web, on page dated before uploading to Commons [5]. Also different author in filedescription and metadata. ~Cybularny Speak? 18:42, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:01, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painting by Somlai Lajos who is still alive. Copyrighted artwork. Regasterios (talk) 19:06, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And: File:SomlaiFotoThalerTamas4.jpg --Regasterios (talk) 19:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:01, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Likely copyrighted artwork. Regasterios (talk) 19:10, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Enrico Valenti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works - despite the big sizes, there are catches with google search - +derivative works issues

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:59, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description states "Photo Courtesy of Fact, Inc", negating claim of "own work". Evidence of permission from legal copyright holder would be needed to provided to OTRS Animalparty (talk) 21:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:58, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader lifted the image from the internet here: https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/styles/width_300/public/2018a_rsz_beckerkc-co-17.jpg?itok=2NxgoftS There is no evidence that the uploader has secured permission to reproduce the picture here or to release it under a free license. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 21:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:57, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zero Limit Web

[edit]

Earlier copies exists (see tineye). Most likely a COM:License washing-Panoramio account.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:54, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:56, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found at https://twitter.com/judithdaleazzo, out of COM:SCOPE (fr:Judith d'Aleazzo) Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:38, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a doll. Dolls are protected by copyright law. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My photo. Please help save the images. And make under the right licenses. DENAMAX (talk) 23:12, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: see COM:DW. --Didym (talk) 13:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE (fr:Judith d'Aleazzo) Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Nice portrait, but the photographer has to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 11:13, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:51, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Font seems above COM:TOO --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:44, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:51, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing to suggest the uploader's claim that s/he owns the copyright; access to parliament is generally restricted to members of the press corps. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 13:10, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:17, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, same series as http://ghanadjawards.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/WhatsApp-Image-2018-02-02-at-12.40.17-768x512.jpeg, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:29, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mario - Amiibo - Super Mario series.jpg (COM:TOYS & COM:DW). Also, most likely a COM:NETCOPYVIO --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, the user was never an "active participant" at one of the wikimedia projects Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

object of interest out of focus; not a helpful picture Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mario - Amiibo - Super Mario series.jpg (COM:TOYS & COM:DW) --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:13, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kryukov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works - small sizes without EXIFs - the uploader already uploaded copyright violationd

Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:53, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:12, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope without more informations than "birds" Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:56, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:11, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused/uncategorised graph of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:11, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Algiles03 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works + unused/uncategorised media of questionable notability : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:10, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thi file is not needed anymore as I uploaded a better version. Stormxpadme (talk) 14:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:09, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:03, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:06, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused signature of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:18, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:06, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small duplicate of File:Volksbank eG Mosbach.JPG Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:47, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vector version available: File:Mapuche kultrun.svg Janitoalevic (talk) 17:44, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused/uncategorised graph of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vobamos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to own works (very) small sizes without EXIFs - included 1 unused personal image

Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work (5 different cameras, watermarks)

Didym (talk) 15:54, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Mapuche kultrun.svg Janitoalevic (talk) 17:45, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:02, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused/uncategorised chemical formula of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 04:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. персона скончалась в 2015 году в возрасте 93 года, фото явно не 2018 года и явно неизвестного автора из какого то архива Dogad75 (talk) 13:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the historical photograph uploaded as a modern own work by the uploader. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:16, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото явно не 2018 года и явно неизвестного автора из какого то архива Dogad75 (talk) 13:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the historical photograph uploaded as a modern own work by the uploader. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:16, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. персона скончалась в 2015 году в возрасте 93 года, фото явно не 2018 года и явно неизвестного автора из какого то архива Dogad75 (talk) 13:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the historical photograph uploaded as a modern own work by the uploader. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:16, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iceland. Wdwd (talk) 17:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:20, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iceland. Wdwd (talk) 17:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iceland. Wdwd (talk) 17:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iceland. Wdwd (talk) 18:18, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iceland. Wdwd (talk) 18:21, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a free license. It permits copying, but not modification or the distribution of modified copies. Carnildo (talk) 21:54, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep! I took a hard look at this license, as the record shows. I thought it was going to need to be deleted. But, it is a valid free license. The law explicitly allows use for "commercial purposes". Blanket permission for use for uses including commercial purposes necessarily includes modification and distribution. Do you dispute that permission for commercial use on Sundays isn't specifically granted, but nonetheless, commercial use is permitted even on Sundays? --Elvey (talk) 07:35, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That's not true at all. For example the CC-BY-ND license allows commercial use, but not modification. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 08:59, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Armbrust, The CC-BY-ND license specifically prohibits derivatives. There is nothing that indicates that New Jersey government material cannot be modified. The state website specifically says that materials can be distributed "without obligation to the State" which means that user are free to do what they want with them DavidinNJ (talk) 02:35, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not saying that the files can't be modified in this case. I'm just saying, that the use for commercial purposes, doesn't necessarily mean also the allowance of derivative works. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 22:23, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Elvey's comments. The attached link states that "anyone may view, copy or distribute State information found here without obligation to the State." The "without obligation" verbiage is a blanket permission. DavidinNJ (talk) 02:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is blanket permission to do any of "view, copy, or distribute". Nothing in that license permits modifying without obligation to the state of New Jersey. --Carnildo (talk) 23:04, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP per Elvey and DavidinNJ, and the State of New Jersey, this is a valid free license. The copyright statement on the State websites is clear and unequivocal...they release their rights to anyone who may want to view, copy, or distribute.--ColonelHenry (talk) 02:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Any file hosted on Commons must allow derivatives, no exceptions. If it's copyright restricts derivatives, it cannot be hosted on Commons. FASTILY 08:36, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This template has been deleted in the past for restricting derivatives. Are there any changes since 2013 in the New Jersey law acording this? JuTa 12:04, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the NJ Open Data act, which is cited in this template. It is explicitly mentioned in the law that all data released by the State of New Jersey released under their Open Data Act is public domain. The mentioned bill was signed in to law in 2016, after the initial discussion on this template. EDIT: the law is, N.J.S.A. 52:18A-234.5, specifically, "Open data and datasets made available by an agency on the open data website, unless subject to a disclosed legal restriction, shall be treated as license-free, subject to reuse, and not subject to copyright restrictions". A copy of this law can be found here, https://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/njstats/showsect.php?title=52&chapter=18A&section=234.5&actn=getsect User talk:Acebarry 15:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looks like a valid copyright tag: "data" and "datasets" are apparently not subject to copyright. I'd imagine that images aren't included in "data" or "datasets" so we probably can't use this for any images, only for database extracts. This probably makes the tag more or less useless for our purposes.
That is not quite true. There are many PDFs that contain images that are hosted at data.nj.gov . It is very possible that one could extract an image from one of those PDFs. 00:28, 13 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acebarry (talk • contribs)
@Acebarry: Do you have any examples of such PDFs?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This template is currently only used for one file, File:Jeff-Van-Drew-njdmava-2017.jpg, which is also tagged as "OTRS pending" and "no license since". That file is an image, so if we assume that this tag doesn't cover any images, then the tag doesn't apply to that file. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • We should probably rename this to {{PD-NJGov-data}} instead, and reworded to say "a formatted dataset of the state government" instead of "a work of the State" to make it clear. Otherwise, it's certain to be misapplied more often than used correctly: It managed to mislead me (Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#New Jersey government files now potentially PD-NJGov) and I'm usually pretty good at this. This criteria is not as broad as the usual PD-??Gov templates, so it should be specified. Definitions from N.J.S.A. 52:18A-234.3:

    "Data" means final versions of statistical or factual information in alphanumeric form, in as granular form as possible, and reflected in a list, table, graph, chart, map, or other non-narrative form that can be digitally transmitted or processed, and regularly created or maintained by or on behalf of and owned by a State department or agency...

    "Dataset" means a named collection of related, digitally-stored data with the collection containing individual data units organized or formatted in a specific and prescribed way, often in tabular form, and accessed by a specific access method that is based on the dataset organization...

    So Stefan2 may be right: This might only apply to the most obvious traditional definition of "data" as in statistics and factual tables, not to the broader concept of "everything on a computer is data". --Closeapple (talk) 22:17, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, rename, and reword per Closeapple.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:50, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I have deleted this template rather than renaming it as suggested above. The reason I did that is that anything that falls within the scope of the cited law -- a dataset -- is outside of the scope of Commons, so the renamed template would be useless. Also note that broadly speaking datasets have no copyright in the USA, so the law has no real effect. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:11, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality of photo. There are another better photos of this 3 buildings in Zelenograd. AntonioK talk 18:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Better examples (not all we have):


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:06, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page needs to go per Commons:Village pump/Proposals/Archive/2018/01#Proposal to uninstall Flow.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:44, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

本图像被拍摄主体模糊没有对焦,没有充分展示图片的主题。同一分类有高质量的图片可用。 Tyg728 (talk) 04:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Google translate: The subject was blurred with no focus, and the subject of the picture was not fully displayed. There are high quality pictures available in the same category.)

Kept: sufficient quality, only 1 other image in the same location. P 1 9 9   16:10, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates and main object of the photo is a big modern building. The photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no one building is the object of this photo; general scenery instead. P 1 9 9   16:22, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

@P199: , if you want to call this multiple buildings, OK then. But all those buildings are created by same architect, they share the same style and main object of the photo is block of similar modern buildings. I believe, that the photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Panoramic photo. de minimis must be used. Ruthven (msg) 14:18, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In order to move <File:Hwaseong1-map.png> to <File:Hwaseong-map.png> 오모군 (talk) 13:10, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:38, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In order to move <File:Hwaseongsine-map1.png> to <File:Hwaseongsine-map.png> 오모군 (talk) 13:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:38, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader Lukaspribyl (talk · contribs) marked as author singer Olga Lounová. Professional photo, no EXIF, no evidence of free license by (declared) author Lounová. Other user's uploads were deleted. Kacir (talk) 13:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:40, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader Lukaspribyl (talk · contribs) marked as author singer Olga Lounová. Such type of photos is on web, no EXIF, no evidence of free license by (declared) author Lounová. Other user's uploads were deleted Kacir (talk) 13:17, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:40, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused/uncategorised graph of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:59, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: properly categorized now. P 1 9 9   16:43, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in France and the building is modern. The building surpasses threshold of originality: they are not simple cylinders. The photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:09, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: writing systems and transliteration tables are generally in scope. No equivalent available. P 1 9 9   16:58, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Irrelevant to article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: purely promotional, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Author permission founded. Siddiqsazzad001 (Talk) 17:02, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   17:00, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably out of scope. Object is not clear. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:01, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurred. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:02, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:01, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this user is no longer exist 180.191.134.90 18:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Latest contribution was of 26 Oct 2017. CU-blocked indef on en:wp. --Achim (talk) 22:09, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   17:02, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost identical is File:Rushmore IMG 5571 (15893049466).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:54, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost identical photo is File:Rushmore IMG 5617 (15918129192).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is based on one of many masks worn by en:Deadmou5 ([6]). Tbhotch 22:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: own work, simple shapes, no copyrightable elements. P 1 9 9   17:06, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the work of a Forest Service employee, but part of a citizen science project collated by Forest Service. Actual photographer / copyright holder is birding4fun at iNaturalist, where the photo is marked © all rights reserved

Related files added from the same Forest Service twitter feed will also need checking, and probably most will need deleting. MPF (talk) 00:42, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Think I've found and deleted all the other relevant files - MPF (talk) 15:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:44, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawing borrowed from File:Aragorn.png. --Guise (talk) 09:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And that's a problem?--Plank (talk) 15:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, since the file doesn't originally portray Ned Stark but Aragorn. To rename it after a minor change is not very respectful of the author's initial purpose. Besides, there's no point displaying a same drawing in order to depict two different characters : that's just confusing (and cheap). --Guise (talk) 17:29, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's is incredibly cheap, yes. But if it's stupid and it works, it isn't stupid.
The reason why the original image can be included in Commons is because it's very generic, it could portrait any bearded man with a sword. So I changed the color pallet to give it a more gelid tone (to better evocate Ned Stark) and I think the result works fine. I made sure to link the original in the description to avoid any confusion, so I don’t see why it would be a problem.--Plank (talk) 17:57, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that I said confusing, not stupid, because I respect your intent to display drawings for Game of Thrones characters (I've tried to do the same thing concerning Tolkien's legendarium and Lovecraft's Cthulhu Mythos). Anyway, you're right about the generic aspect but I think it's better to search a specific drawing depicting Stark himself (i.e. to contact talentuous Deviantartists). Furthermore, I don't think these artworks are allowed here, unless Aythami Cruz Darias gave his agreement. --Guise (talk) 18:11, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A bit of topic but yes, the description of these artworks specifically say that uploading was supported by Wikimedia España, so I assume that there was there was agreement.
Back to the subject at hand, I don’t see why it would be “confusing”. The illustration is simply a man with a sword, it serves its purpose. The reason why I mirrored and change the color palette was precisely so it could be easy to tell it apart from the original--Plank (talk) 18:32, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's confusing because the color palette and the mirror effect don't seem enough for distinguishing the two drawings, imho. But maybe my deletion request was not fully justified, after all.
On the other hand, I still doubt the uploading of Aythami Cruz Darias's artworks (except a large overview like this one) is really legal. Better to ask to Wikimedia España... --Guise (talk) 21:03, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. To add this generic image to an article is misleading and serves no purpose other than to merely have an image. If I was editing wp.es, I would remove the image from the article as irrelevant. It has no educational value in itself. --P 1 9 9   17:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission says "copyright FPCL; the Consistory of the FPCL grants permission to share with attribution for the exclusive purpose of sharing knowledge about the Church without any pecuniary intent". Permission is unclean if commercial use is allowed. Artix Kreiger (talk) 00:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're unsure whether the expression "without any pecuniary intent" precludes commercial use? Really? Delete anyway, I uploaded the file under the French and English Wikiepedia portals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cpella (talk • contribs) 2018-03-04 19:43:27‎ (UTC)
@Cpella: Artix Kreiger made a typo: The problem with the file is that the permission does not allow commercial use. Files on Commons must allow re-use even if commercial; but the file can require all users, including commercial users, to share the files in the same way. See Commons:Licensing or Commons:À propos des licences. (This is also true on English and French Wikipedia, except for "fair use": see en:Wikipedia:Non-free content and fr:Wikipédia:Exceptions au droit d'auteur.) --Closeapple (talk) 18:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
logo de l'Église protestante française de Londres : pas de licence CC Pierrette13 (talk) 11:27, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tasnim photos sourced to khamenei.ir

[edit]

Source for all of these is khamenei.ir not Tasnim. None of them qualify for the Tasnim license. While khamenei.ir is under an acceptable Creative Commons license past DRs and past consensus states that an exact link to the khamenei.ir site where the image resides must be listed. Example of past DRs that shows this include 1, 2, 3, and a keep after the exact link was found.

Old list

Majora (talk) 02:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sheikh Maher Mahmoud 02).jpg has been struck as the khamenei.ir link has been provided. --Majora (talk) 05:03, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Majora: I have changed the tasnim links with Khamenei ones except the following files, which i could not find them in Khamenei.ir and it seems that they are from leader.ir/ which is not licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution:
  1. File:دیدار رئیس و مسئولان قوه قضائیه با مقام معظم رهبری-۱۳.jpg
  2. File:دیدار رئیس و مسئولان قوه قضائیه با مقام معظم رهبری-۱۵.jpg
  3. File:دیدار رئیس و مسئولان قوه قضائیه با مقام معظم رهبری-۱۱.jpg
  4. File:دیدار رئیس و مسئولان قوه قضائیه با مقام معظم رهبری-۸.jpg
  5. File:دیدار رئیس و مسئولان قوه قضائیه با مقام معظم رهبری-۶.jpg
  6. File:دیدار رئیس و مسئولان قوه قضائیه با مقام معظم رهبری-۱۰.jpg
  7. File:دیدار رئیس و مسئولان قوه قضائیه با مقام معظم رهبری-۱۲.jpg
  8. File:دیدار رئیس و مسئولان قوه قضائیه با مقام معظم رهبری-۱۴.jpg
  9. File:دیدار رئیس و مسئولان قوه قضائیه با مقام معظم رهبری-۹.jpg
  10. File:دیدار رئیس و مسئولان قوه قضائیه با مقام معظم رهبری-۷.jpg

--Mbazri (talk) 06:23, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Truly excellent work, Mbazri. I've started to go through and check and re-license review the images that now have proper sourcing. The ones that I have checked I have struck from the original list. I will finish up the checks tomorrow. I've also collapsed the main list since it probably won't be needed anymore once I'm done with my checks. Again. Excellent work. Thank you! --Majora (talk) 06:56, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. I also thank you for checking the permissions and sources.--Mbazri (talk) 07:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. All checked. The only ones left are the 10 files listed above. Thanks again for your work, Mbazri. --Majora (talk) 04:40, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, research and discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the assigned license on Flickr is free, the image description suggests the image is actually unfree:

This official Republic of Korea photograph is being made available only for publication by news organizations and/or for personal printing by the subject(s) of the photograph. The photograph may not be manipulated in any way. Also, it may not be used in any type of commercial, advertisement, product or promotion that in any way suggests approval or endorsement from the government of the Republic of Korea.

Ytoyoda (talk) 05:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I've added the proper {{Korea.net}} copyright template to the image which has aOTRS permission that overrides anything on the Flickr pages. You can also look at File:Samples of the Olympic medals XXIII of the Olympic winter Games 2018 in Pyeongchang.jpg which has been given a good review. Unless you want to challenge the authority of the template as used in many images this is a keeper. Ww2censor (talk) 22:40, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Proper license has been added. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is British (1888–1956) so the claimed PD-70 doesn't seem to apply. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

However as a pre 1923 publication it may be possible for it to be locally hosted at English Wikisource.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:52, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I thought this was entirely a US work, not a British author. If it can be moved over to English Wikisource, that would probably be good, but I'm not particularly active there at the moment. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn - Uploader is aware of the issue, and on re-examination, this might in fact be "simultaneous" publication given the presence of both a London and New York publisher on the relevent title page. The file should ideally still be localised though, but there seems to be a technical issue preventing this.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:16, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Housekeeping " 16 March 2018 Billinghurst (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Hector Macpherson - Herschel (1919).djvu (Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: moved to English Wikisource)". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Different crop of photo available at https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C4XxD2SWQAA5-II?format=jpg&name=medium, unlikely to be free and needs OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 12:44, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by unknown photographer taken in 1970. Regasterios (talk) 13:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Regasterios, Bácskai Mihály tablóképének, és a szentesi Horváth Mihály Gimnázium más jeles pedagógusai portréinak forrása a Szentesi Levéltár, mivel az iskola az utánuk maradt iratokat oda átadta és ott szabadon kutathatók.

Ez esteben melyik intézménytől kell engedélyt kérnem?

Ez a fotó történetesen a Bácskai család archívumában is megvan, de hozzájuk is a Gimnáziumból került.

Üdvözlettel: --Timar56 (talk) 01:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Szerintem a levéltártól. --Regasterios (talk) 19:39, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permissions for archive photo. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Regasterios (talk) 13:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Regasterios, Járay Imre tablóképének, és a szentesi Horváth Mihály Gimnázium más jeles pedagógusai portréinak forrása a Szentesi Levéltár, mivel az iskola az utánuk maradt iratokat oda átadta és ott szabadon kutathatók.

Ez esteben melyik intézménytől kell engedélyt kérnem?

Üdvözlettel: --Timar56 (talk) 01:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission from copyright holder. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Regasterios (talk) 13:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Regasterios, Soltész Gyula tablóképének, és a szentesi Horváth Mihály Gimnázium más jeles pedagógusai portréinak forrása a Szentesi Levéltár, mivel az iskola az utánuk maradt iratokat oda átadta és ott szabadon kutathatók.

A jelen gyenge minőségű kép az iskola Évkönyvéből származik, amelynek kiadója a Gimnázium, őrzője pedig a Levéltár illetve a saját Könyvtárunk.

Ez esteben melyik intézménytől kell engedélyt kérnem?

Üdvözlettel: --Timar56 (talk) 01:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The counter argument is that this comes from "our" school and "our" library, without official permission from school, library or photographer. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Regasterios (talk) 13:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Regasterios, Bárdos Rezső tablóképének, és a szentesi Horváth Mihály Gimnázium más jeles pedagógusai portréinak forrása a Szentesi Levéltár, mivel az iskola az utánuk maradt iratokat oda átadta és ott szabadon kutathatók.

A jelen fotó egy tablóképről való, melyet a Levéltár őriz l.sz.: 3029 - I. 622/1 alatt.

Ez esteben melyik intézménytől kell engedélyt kérnem?

Üdvözlettel: --Timar56 (talk) 01:33, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission from "Tabloid" stated in discussion to be the source of the image. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Regasterios (talk) 13:47, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves @Regasterios: és és @Tgr: , Nagyajtósi István portréja, és a szentesi Horváth Mihály Gimnázium más jeles pedagógusai arcképeinek forrása a Szentesi Levéltár, mivel az iskola az utánuk maradt iratokat oda átadta és ott szabadon kutathatók. Nem egy közülük megjelent már máshol is, pl.:

Ez esetben a Gimnázium, vagy az iratokat őrző Levéltár engedélye szükséges, illetve technikailag lehetséges lesz-e itt is egy a permissons-hu@wikimedia.org címre küldött levéllel több kép engedélyét biztosítani?

A további együttműködés szándékával kérem szíves útmutatásotokat. Üdvözlettel: --Timar56 (talk) 23:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ha a levéltár azt mondja, hogy ők biztosak abban, hogy jogszerűen adnak felhasználási engedélyt a képre, szerintem elhisszük nekik. (Ez tipikusan azt jelentené, hogy az iskola birtokába kerül a képek felhasználási joga is, nemcsak a képek maguk, mondjuk mert munkaviszonyban készültek vagy szerződtek róla; az iskola pedig továbbadta a jogokat a levéltárnak.) --Tgr (talk) 02:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Despite a list of documents provided, none were licensed in a way useful for commons. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indoor bust made in 2008. Regasterios (talk) 14:08, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Regasterios, a fotót magam készítettem 10 évvel ezelőtt - itt a cikkem, amiben megjelent.

A szobor akkor ideiglenesen a szentesi Megyeház előterében lett elhelyezne, amely 3 közintézmény forgalmas, közös bejárata. Azóta már az egykor a nevét viselő utca főtéri torkolatában áll.

Amint az idő engedi, készíteni fogok róla azon a helyszínen egy friss, saját képet.

Üdvözlettel: --Timar56 (talk) 19:31, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oké, az jó lenne, mert a magyar szerzői jogi törvény szerint nem mindegy, hogy egy szobor egy épületben vagy köztéren áll-e. Előbbi esetben nem teheted közzé a fotót a szobrász engedélye nélkül, utóbbi esetben igen. --Regasterios (talk) 06:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves @Regasterios: , feltöltöttem az új képet Harruckern János György szobráról + módosítottam az adatokat ahol kellett.

Köszönöm a tanácsodat! Üdvözlettel: --Timar56 (talk) 20:49, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Timar56: ne erre a képre töltsd rá az újat, hanem új fájlként, más néven. Ne keveredjen a kettő. --Regasterios (talk) 21:33, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves @Regasterios: , feltöltöttem az új képet most már új fájlként: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Harruckern_J%C3%A1nos_Gy%C3%B6rgy_mellszobra.JPG

Ahogy érkezem, próbálok haladni a jogbiztosítással. Üdvözlettel: --Timar56 (talk) 16:57, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Így jó lesz, köszönöm. --Regasterios (talk) 17:55, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This file was replaced by original uploader with new image clearly showing the bust's placement in a public place. This one is deleted. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Timar56 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Szöllősy Géza a szentesi gimnázium igazgatója volt. Dokumentum-hagyatéka az iskolából a helyi Levéltárba került, szabadon kutatható. Ez esetben melyik intézmény engedélyét kell megszereznem? Üdv.: --Timar56 (talk) 21:09, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mátyás Sándor a szentesi gimnázium tanára volt. Az előbbi kép a 2000-ben általunk szerkesztett Szentes helyismereti kézikönyve c. kötetben, illetve ezzel párhuzamosan a saját szerverünkön is közzétételre került. A kötetet és a webes változatot jegyző 3 szerzőtől - Kis-Rácz Antalné, Labádi Lajos, Vörös Gabriella - tudok engedélyt kérni, ha ez megfelelő.

Ezek a képek Mátyás Sándor tanár dokumentum-hagyatéka részeként a Gimnáziumból a helyi Levéltárba kerültek, ott szabadon kutathatók. Ez esetben melyik intézmény engedélyét kell megszereznem?

Nagyajtósi István a szentesi gimnázium tanára volt. Ezt a képet Szatmári Imre (1938-2003) szentesi fotóművész barátom készítette, akire épp a napokban emlékeztünk születése 80. évfordulóján. Számos nagyítását a Szentesi Levéltárra hagyta, ott beleltározottak és kutathatók. Ez esetben innen kell engedélyt kérni, vagy a fiától, akivel az emlékestet szerveztük?

Ezt az érettségi tablóképet a Szentes Városi Könyvtárban általam gondozott e-Könyvtár Szentes digitális helytörténeti gyűjtemény teszi közzé. Az ilyeneket többnyire az egykori diákok hozzák be szkennelésre, vagy a helyszínen fotózzuk le azokat. Ez esetben a Gimnázium engedélye megoldást jelenthet-e?

Antal Endre mérnök fotóját egy a városi tisztviselőket bemutató tablóról reprózta Szatmári Imre (1938-2003), majd ezt a képet a Levéltárra hagyta, ahol beleltározott és kutatható. Újságcikk illusztrációjaként publikálva is volt már. Ez esetben a Levéltár, vagy ifj. Szatmári Imre engedélye szükséges?

Kedves Regasterios, az együttműködés őszinte szándékával egyelőre eddig jutottam. Ahogy érkezem, folytatom, hogy beleférjek az 1 hetes terminusba. Örömömre szolgálna, ha visszajeleznél.

Üdvözlettel: --Timar56 (talk) 22:37, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Most of these photos were taken less than 70 years ago. --Regasterios (talk) 14:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Regasterios, fegyelmezetten tudomásul vettem a törlésre jelöléseidet. Sajnos épp rosszkor jöttek a rájuk fordítható idő szempontjából, de próbálom majd egyenként megvédeni a képeimet. Mindegyik szeretett városunk, Szentes helytörténetéhez kapcsolódik, és reménykedem, hogy rendezni tudom a szerzői jogi helyzetüket.

Előre is köszönöm, ha nálam sokkal tapasztaltabb lévén segítesz majd a tanácsaiddal.

Üdvözlettel: --Timar56 (talk) 20:49, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Timar56: megkérdem @Tgr: -t, adhat-e engedélyt azokra a képekre a Szentesi Levéltár, amelyek onnan származnak. Annyit mondhatok, hogy azokra a fotókra, amelyeket id. Szatmári Imre készített (tehát nem úgy reprózott, hanem ő maga volt a fotós), ifj. Szatmári Imre kellene hogy engedélyt adjon írásban a permissons-hu@wikimedia.org címre elküldve. --Regasterios (talk) 06:37, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Általában a szerző vagy az örököse adhat engedélyt a kép felhasználására (vagy engedélyezheti másnak, hogy további engedélyeket adjon). Ha a levéltár azt mondja, hogy náluk vannak a szerzői jogok, szerintem nincs okunk nem elhinni nekik. Saját magunk aligha tudjuk lenyomozni, hogy a jogokat is átadták az örökösök (vagy maga a szerző), vagy csak a képeket. --Tgr (talk) 07:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves @Regasterios: és @Tgr: , köszönöm szépen a tanácsaitokat - ebben a szellemben igyekszem folytatni a bizonytalanságok feloldását.

Üdvözlettel: --Timar56 (talk) 08:15, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Images are not own work of uploader. Insufficient information on source, creator. Please read COM:L before making more uploads. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the file description, the statue was erected in 2011; copyright is still in effect, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow such statues. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation per COM:PACKAGING. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Please let me know if you plan to delete this entry so that I can cancel my donation which I make each year. This year’s donation is suspended pending your decision.

  • First, threats will never help your case. Full stop. Moving on; I was able to find the boat in question online so notability can be established. If you are the author copyright can be solved even if an email to OTRS is necessary. There isn't a need a delete this once these issues are resolves. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 21:55, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; no permission to use the image because we don't know the source. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission.-- Merkcron (talk) 17:37, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Adeola sent me the picture and asked me to upload it for her. So it was at the subject's request. She provided this picture which she has rights to. Best, -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 08:28, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - no permission via COM:OTRS. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:55, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not established as a free image. No reason to believe this photo of an American actress was created in Italy, even though it was published there, so that Italian law does not apply or control. No evidence as to the manner of American publication, so it has not been shown that it was published without a copyright notice. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 19:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Copyrighted work due the URAA. Regasterios (talk) 19:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indoor bust made in 2002 when National Theatre was opened. Regasterios (talk) 19:18, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hay archivos mas actualizados y completos CITY MVD (talk) 19:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unused poor quality map. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like not own work. Misleading file name. Inverted file is appeared in Mizkan's recipe site intoroduced as Udon Chiri. Okritre (talk) 12:06, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It didn't come from the Mizkan site, but Google has two pages of hits for it, mostly at the same resolution as Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:54, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted memorial medal made in 1988. Regasterios (talk) 12:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Regasterios, az idén 30. alkalommal adták át a Bugyi István Emlékérmet, amelyet a nevét viselő szentesi kórház Tudományos Tanácsa ítél oda a legkiválóbb orvosok munkájának elismerésére.

A Tanács elnöke dr. Papp Zoltán PhD, aki az alapítástól kezdve részese volt a kitüntetések odaítélésének - hozzá tudok fordulni a jogbiztosítás érdekében.

Üdvözlettel: --Timar56 (talk) 00:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tgr-t tudom ismételni: ha Papp Zoltán biztos abban, hogy ő elnökként jogszerűen ad felhasználási engedélyt a medálra, akkor valószínűleg elhisszük neki. Ugyanakkor a fotós írásos engedélyére is szükség volna. --Regasterios (talk) 19:37, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Two copyrights here -- one for the photograph and one for the medal. We have no evidence of a free license for either one. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dölling und Galitz is a contemporary publishing house http://www.dugverlag.de/ . No evidence, that this is a free file Mutter Erde (talk) 13:39, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zolnay Géza died in 1965 see here. Regasterios (talk) 13:39, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Regasterios, Zolnay Géza a festő Zolnay Károly gimnázium-alapító igazgató unokaöccse valóban 1965-ben hunyt el, ezt én sem próbáltam eltitkolni.

A festmény reprodukciója a Szentes helyismereti kézikönyve illusztrációjaként jelent meg nyomtatásban és webes változatban, illetve számos más helyen, pl. egy Szentesi Élet cikkben is szerepel.

Maga a festmény a Gimnázium nagytermét díszíti. 1926-ban az intézmény megrendelésére készült a festmény, onnan tudok engedélyt-, és akár jobb minőségű reprodukciót kérni.

Üdvözlettel: --Timar56 (talk) 01:02, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The painting will be under copyright until January 1, 2035. The copyright is held by the artist's heirs, not the owner of the painting. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. The source is in the Original upload log: "from www.nps.gov". If so, the license is correct, but the image was uploaded 10 years ago and it is no longer possible to check. On the other hand, the same image found elsewhere on the internet with Google Images also credits "NPS", so there is enough reason to assume that the license is correct. --P 1 9 9   16:54, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The home page of a website is not a valid source. This cannot be verified. Jcb (talk) 16:57, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - the source is clearly stated in the "Original upload log" section. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Это дубликат улучшенного файла с прозрачным фоном - File:"Российский исторический орден" (2).png Skklm15 (talk) 10:54, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Skklm15: пользуйтесь для таких случаев шаблоном {{Duplicate}} и описывайте кратко суть желаемого по-английски, хотя бы с помощью гуглоперевода. Sealle (talk) 21:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, unused file per uploader’s request. --Sealle (talk) 21:23, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader in the YouTube video isn't Venezolana de Television (VTV), but the video belongs to VTV, so the copyright in the YouTube uploader seems to be false (license washing). Therefore, this capture too. Taichi (talk) 22:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, good night, it was a mistake to have placed VTV, what happens is that in the video of Luigino Bracci Roa, who is a journalist of the same, upload the VTV videos, also, the license of the video is as follows: Attribution of Creative Commons (allowed reuse). LuisRiera Wiki97 (User Talk:LuisRiera Wiki97) 18:58 4 march 2018 (UTC)
 Comment The holder of the transmission rights isn't the journalist, is the television channel (VTV). --Taichi (talk) 23:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I know but I used that because I had the license, in addition, regardless of who has uploaded, but I have no conscience of whether the license is legitimate or not, just ask me for free content under Creative Commons, and i managed to get this video.--LuisRiera Wiki97 (talk) 23:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Question @LuisRiera Wiki97: Can you provide us the source of the video of Luigino Bracci Roa please? --Ruthven (msg) 09:56, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – We have had this issue with Luigino Bracci Roa files before. Yes, Luigino Bracci Roa is a Venezuelan government employee and has been tasked with disseminating their work, but the work is not his. --ZiaLater (talk) 16:53, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Well, the best solution in this case would be to write to OTRS, and check for the permissions for the files. We can even make a customized license template. --Ruthven (msg) 06:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No evidence that the YouTube uploader is authorized to license this video. --Guanaco (talk) 10:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Philippines banknotes are non-free, see COM:Currency#Philippines.

Sealle (talk) 22:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • According to {{PD-PhilippinesGov}}, all works by the government of the Philippines are in the public domain. I'd imagine that banknotes are government works, so the template currently contradicts the section you linked to.
Note that the copyright tag has been listed for deletion twice because of unclear things in the law, and there's the contradicting template w:Template:Non-free Philippines government which has also been listed for deletion twice. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:52, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is true, in the same way that in the English Wikipedia has been requested several times to change that template. Note that the two templates reflect the consensus reached in both projects, although they contradict. I am not an expert in laws, the aforementioned law says "legal tender bank note", that is, bills that are currently in circulation. Note that such regulation makes reference to the falsification of money. I think that copyrights are independent, as are brand rights or personality rights. The problem is not the copyright, but what you do with the images (Template:Currency)). Ultimately, these images can be transferred to other projects since the restrictions are compatible with fair use (which are not the same size as real bank notes, which have an educational purpose, etc.). Note that the only thing not allowed are the faithful printed or engraved representations and the same size, larger images and digital images are allowed. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 01:01, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In the chapter on coins only prohibits their representation "on metal", they are clearly restrictions against counterfeiting of currency, not against copyright. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 01:24, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I'm not 100% expert in Philipine copyright law (or, specifically, in PH case law), but I do know for a fact that imitation/toy banknotes and plastic coins are widely sold in bookstores and even in department stores in the Philippines (with the requisite "SPECIMEN" or "PLAY MONEY" or "FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY" markings on them), despite the apparent "non-free" status of Filipino banknotes (as alleged by the nominator). (Here is a sample, from an online seller.) No one has been sued or jailed for printing or selling those, if I'm not mistaken. As mentioned by "That was also done by the president" not an excuse, I think the intent of the law is against the counterfeiting of money, and all other images or reproductions especially intended for educational purposes would probably not be covered by the BSP regulations. --- Titopao (talk) 11:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:Currency conflates anti-counterfeiting laws and copyright restrictions. It appears that these are all works of the Philippine government and therefore public domain. Restrictions against counterfeiting should be indicated with the appropriate template such as {{Currency}}. --Guanaco (talk) 10:54, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most of these banknotes are not allowed to be here per COM:CUR Philippines.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • The Central Bank of the Philippines was established in 1949. How can their prohibition apply to notes issued prior to 1949? Furthermore, the Philippine Island Treasury Proofs were designed, engraved, and printed by the US Bureau of Engraving & Printing when the Philippines was a U.S. Territory and as such they are in the public domain.-Godot13 (talk) 05:41, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Godot13: Then COM:CUR United States would apply for those older notes.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:54, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WWII occupation notes were issued by the Japanese Government, the 1898 note was issued by the Spanish Government when the Philippines was part of Spain...-Godot13 (talk) 06:00, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Godot13: Then COM:CUR Japan and COM:CUR Spain would apply for those older notes. You really don't have to duplicate these posts on my user talk page.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 06:03, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies.-Godot13 (talk) 06:06, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Applicable law (per the bank [7]) regards the illustration of legal tender Philippine notes. I understand that to mean currency with current monetary value (I may be wrong), which notes prior to 1949 do not have.-Godot13 (talk) 06:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
For the file "File:BSP Peso Announcement Sign.JPG", the sign was made by BSP. PD-PhilippineGov can work, unless COM:CUR Philippines still stands. Ominae (talk) 10:27, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
COM:CUR Japan would not apply at all for those notes, I don't think. The Philippines was a territory of Spain and then the U.S., but it had its own law at the time, and the laws of the other countries often were not directly applied, or altered a bit when they were, and other local laws were also in effect. You have to go through Philippine legal history specifically. Secondly, the regulations in question are part of the anti-counterfeiting laws, and are a non-copyright restriction. Anything which is not legal tender in the Philippines would pretty much be outside the scope of those regulations (which, as mentioned below, I think restrict printed reproductions only anyways). So any pre-1949 notes should be OK, as long as the copyright status checks out (per Philippine law). Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm leaning  Keep per the closure of the previous DR -- I'm not so sure those regulations apply to photographic reproductions. The regulations specifically say "object" and refer to printed reproductions, and do not mention photographs. There are certainly non-copyright restrictions which apply to printed versions, just like the U.S., but I'm not sure they rise to the point that hosting them here violate the regulations. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:35, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Per the BSP website: Current banknotes and coin “in circulation issued by BSP” include coins (1995-present), New Generation Currency Coin Series (2018-present), and New Generation Currency Banknote Series (2010-present). [8] The Old Banknote Series (NDS), launched in 1985, was demonetized and replaced with the New Generation Currency (NGC) launched in 2010. [9] The last day for redemption of the NDS was 30 June 2017. As of 1 July 2017 the NDS had no monetary value. [10] Demonetized coin series include the English Series (1958–66), Pilipino [sic] Series (1969–74), Ang Bagong Lipunan (1975–82), Flora and Fauna Series (1983–91), and Improved Flora and Fauna Series (1992–94). [11] While I won’t make any assumptions, it likely follows that paper currency series pre-1985 have also been demonetized. The rules and regulations for series 2010 on I can't say.-Godot13 (talk) 20:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Clindberg and Godot13: Please feel free to strikeout any links to depictions of banknotes that have been demonetized.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 23:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jeff G.: Will do, thanks. A list of demonetized banknote series can be found at [12].-Godot13 (talk) 02:24, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Clindberg and Jeff G.: I can't speak to the Peso Announcement Sign near the top, but any note not crossed out is current issue circulating legal tender.--Godot13 (talk) 03:11, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Godot13: Thanks.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:13, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Philippines, currencies that are legal tender in the Philippines are copyrighted.

A1Cafel (talk) 07:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. This deletion request is a misreading of COM:CUR Philippines. As stated there, copyright does not exist in works of the government of the Philippines and this includes banknotes. (Hence, why we have the {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} template.) What is restricted are reproductions (aka facsimiles) of legal tender banknotes in order to prevent counterfeiting. However, none of the nominated images can reasonably be construed to be reproductions of whole banknotes since they are either photos of small portions of banknotes, or are oblique photos of whole banknotes that cannot be used for reproducing counterfeits. —seav (talk) 07:57, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:1000 Peso Bill ENGC 2020.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:1000P Front Enhanced.jpg--A1Cafel (talk) 06:19, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. These are details from banknotes. Per COM:CUR Philippines, material is copyrighted: Any handbill, advertisement, placard, circular, card, or any other object whatsoever bearing the facsimile, likeness or similitude of any legal tender Philippine currency note, or any part thereof, whether in black and white or any color or combination of colors, without prior authority therefore having been secured from the Governor, BSP or his duly authorized representative. (Bold or any part thereof' by me). Thefore the images must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 19:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

reason=wrong creation. --Io Herodotus (talk) 10:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty, renamed, author's request. --Achim (talk) 18:57, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]