Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/01/11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 11th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deriviative photoraph of a non-free book cover: See [1] Animalparty (talk) 00:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio, Derived from copyrighted cover. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Meizu M8.jpg Khanhlong566 (talk) 02:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 04:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Skklm15 Khanhlong566 (talk) 03:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 04:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I guess it's a DW. E4024 (talk) 11:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, not selfie as claimed, violates real photographer's copyright. I'll delete the user's all uploads as copyright violations (see her talkpage). Taivo (talk) 19:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks out of Commons scope to me. E4024 (talk) 11:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like an unused out of scope image ("fotografia pessoal" according to the file definition). E4024 (talk) 11:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 18:52, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't know how to introduce this DR, as I'm not even sure what I'm proposing for deletion: A file, a userpage, what? E4024 (talk) 11:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I deleted her last remaining contributions as copyright violations, see User talk:Erika Gasbarro for details, and now I can delete the userpage as out of project scope and self-promotion. Taivo (talk) 19:15, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not encycloaedic: claims to be a murder victim Technopat (talk) 00:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Rastrojo (DES) 22:17, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google Image Search doesn't reveal an exact match, but this does appear to be the player cropped out of a news photo Ytoyoda (talk) 20:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 21:16, 11 Januar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 01:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image found on web: http://i1322.photobucket.com/albums/u572/spartacus120/spartan%20images/this%20is%20sparta/new%20album-1/rafa%20images-2_zps919eorb6.png Ytoyoda (talk) 20:29, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 21:16, 11 Januar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 01:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is a web image: http://www.tennishead.net/userfiles/images/BABOLAT%202012_Rafael%20Nadal.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 20:29, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 21:16, 11 Januar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 01:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear:Blurry ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:18, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: one of only 2 images of her, now that the 3rd was deleted as a copyvio. --lNeverCry 00:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright vio JiiQo (talk) 11:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I found file:Myriam Fares - Northern coast of Egypt - July 2015 3.jpg, uploaded by the same person, and this was clear copyvio (another person was named as author in metadata). Here's no metadata at all, but it is probably made on the same day and probably not by uploader, whose account is locked. Copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright vio JiiQo (talk) 11:15, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, another person is named as author in metadata, uploader's account is locked. Taivo (talk) 12:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

subpage del 최광모 (talk) 01:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: own userspace. --Achim (talk) 16:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright vio JiiQo (talk) 10:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload: unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn as per User:Fae,. P 1 9 9   19:29, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright from (http://ydays-news.blogspot.com/2014/06/the-royal-massacre.html) Pitpisit (talk) 21:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Wdwd at 12:41, 12 Januar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 19:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal file. Kalbbes (talk) 00:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:56, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal file. Kalbbes (talk) 00:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:56, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal file. Kalbbes (talk) 00:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:56, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright vio JiiQo (talk) 10:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Dyolf77 at 19:11, 12 Januar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 01:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright vio JiiQo (talk) 10:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Dyolf77 at 19:11, 12 Januar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 01:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright vio JiiQo (talk) 10:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Dyolf77 at 19:11, 12 Januar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 01:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error uploading Psn1111 (talk) 00:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentally posted BurdettePark (talk) 18:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright:Nicolas Cantin. Identity of PanacheQueen should be verified via Commons:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:44, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 18:46, 14 Januar 2018 UTC: re-uploaded File:Panache Portrait-1-18.jpg --Krdbot 01:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) dusko miljanic. Identity of Zanović should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Nick (talk) 11:15, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) dusko miljanic. Identity of Zanović should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Nick (talk) 11:15, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Ondřej Němec. Identity of Zanović should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Nick (talk) 11:15, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS &/or copyrighted sculptures/characters Elisfkc (talk) 18:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:24, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file appears to have been deleted before per COM:TOYS Di (they-them) (talk) 02:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS &/or copyrighted sculptures/characters Elisfkc (talk) 18:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file appears to have been deleted before for being derivative work of a copyrighted sculpture/character art. Di (they-them) (talk) 02:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shiraz capital (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Shiraz capital (18 uploads = 7 copyvio). All files most likey cropped and especially File:Maral ardabil.JPG I remember to have seen already as copyvio somewhere earlier. Ignoring 5 high res files with exif "Canon IXY 50S" which are most likely own work.

Gunnex (talk) 08:37, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not specify which license this has been released under. Using Google Translate: "There some are muddied with intellectual property. You understand - fill in, I authorize (Wikipedia administrators can consider this post an official permission or what is required)." Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:55, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The comments at Facebook post scrolled down i read with date May 6, 2016: „This image is free to be used under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 license as well as this one“: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1099762216743340&set=a.674047649314801.1073741828.100001287172833&type=1&theater --Migebert (talk) 20:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Must've missed that, my apologies. I withdraw this nomination. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:34, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:16, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality blurred unused images

Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TSFgrupo1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This user uploaded a wildly diverse collection of images in one day in 2011, claiming all as their own work. They look more like a grab bag of uncredited textbook scans and web page lifts in very different styles, and the text languages vary between English and Spanish. Some quick correlations: File:TSF9.jpg is an unnecessarily drop-shadowed version of an image that appeared at http://www.x86-secret.com/popups/articleswindow.php?id=64 eight years earlier, File:TSF10.jpg exists more cleanly at http://www.mmtc.co.jp/en/products/silicon-h.html.

Gapfall (talk) 16:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Resamartinez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, commons is not facebook

Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:12, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:2011 stamps of Hungary

[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Hungary --Regasterios (talk) 13:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:08, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted on en-wiki : "Unused non-free media file for more than 7 days". So, if it was unfree, why is it on Commons now? AntonierCH (d) 16:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear or erroneous statement. --DDupard (talk) 07:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Keep: Free media--DDupard (talk) 17:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Why exactly ? — Racconish ☎ 17:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Uploaded after cropping from here : [2] + diff [3]--DDupard (talk) 17:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Delete I don't see any evidence the file at Photobucket is PD or released under a Commons compatible license. — Racconish ☎ 22:05, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, since the image is not used, I suppose it could be deleted. Either way is ok.--DDupard (talk) 07:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    The criterion of use is only relevant to assess the educational value which is not the concern here. — Racconish ☎ 08:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Well in this case, I don't know if it would be relevant or not to say that since the man lived a rather long life, a portrait of him at a younger stage of his life wouldn't be of interest ....--DDupard (talk) 11:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Once again, what is at stake here is not the interest of the image but whether or not the image has fallen in the public domain or has been released under a Commons compatible license. Please note Commons rules are different from WPen. On WPen, you can upload a copyrighted image under fair use, provided it is used, but on Commons fair use is not accepted. — Racconish ☎ 12:12, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok Racconish, I am just answering with what I understand, (or believe to understand) . Now it is up on Pinterest as well, and looks like a family snapshot to me: [4]. But hey, it is not so important a matter to me.--DDupard (talk) 13:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    The file at Pinterest comes from the same Photobucket source, with the same lack of clarity on the license status. — Racconish ☎ 15:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Delete: no evidence the file is free. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 12:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC).[reply]
  4.  Delete, there is no indication of year, therefore it is impossible to know whether the photo was taken (and published) before 1923 (which would make it Public Domain) and as such it cannot stay on Commons. Skimel (talk) 16:07, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:11, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robshcult (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own work: various sizes and styles, no EXIF data, some look like press releases taken at official events.

P 1 9 9   16:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robshcult (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1304308/mediaindex?ref_=nm_phs_md_sm

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:50, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haznaury (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Mitte27 (talk) 21:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe too unclear to be usable (not focused and the camera was shaked during exposing). Kulmalukko (talk) 22:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Jeff_G. --Wdwd (talk) 09:49, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, image from facebook. --Wdwd (talk) 09:47, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably out of scope. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:45, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file's source is listed as "smith.senate.gov" which redirects to this page. The website does not show this picture. An exact url to the picture is needed, otherwise there is no proof that this was taken from the US House Office of Photography. Corky Buzz by the Hornet's Nest 22:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC) It’s on her Facebook and Twitter page TexasMan34 (talk)[reply]

having already provided the link, I request the nomination to be closed and keep the image. TexasMan34 (talk)

Kept: nominator withdrew. Corky Buzz by the Hornet's Nest 19:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://www.facebook.com/LisaMayMusic/photos/a.684598244918127.1073741825.683945374983414/1745785362132738/?type=1&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://www.facebook.com/laurenconrad/photos/a.255994767764277.66122.107025612661194/1700867523276987/?type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Can be found on https://laurenconrad.com/blog/2017/12/chic-peek-december-kohls-collection-3/ where the text at the bottom says "Photos: Steve Erle/Kohl’s". So copyright obviously rests with Kohls. Tabercil (talk) 02:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:42, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:41, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Owen Carey 2017; All Rights Reserved, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Unused personal image of uploader. Hiàn (talk) 22:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:39, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, oos. --Wdwd (talk) 09:39, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work, not simple enough for inclusion. Hiàn (talk) 22:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal signature of the uploader. Hiàn (talk) 22:54, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 09:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion of non relevant person. Stego (talk) 23:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 23:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any valid permission. Authorization by Yves Bottalico should be sent via Commons:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:36, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Authorization from Yvon KERVINIO should be sent via Commons:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:35, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyrighted album cover, not sure how the uploader can claim ownership Ytoyoda (talk) 20:56, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:06, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Superseded by better straightened view, in which the building is not overexposed: File:Otto Wagner Nussdorf Lock Administration Building - 8 (8676828143).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:17, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 10:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably this Hitman image is not really with CC license. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: private photo, unused, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 09:56, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope. Kalbbes (talk) 21:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:55, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. All files by Files uploaded by AKMOLLA (talk · contribs) Kalbbes (talk) 21:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:55, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photos, out of scope Files uploaded by AKMOLLA (talk · contribs) Kalbbes (talk) 21:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:55, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 00:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:59, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused promotional/personal image of uploader Hiàn (talk) 00:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:59, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unlikely to have any educational use. --ghouston (talk) 02:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:01, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:01, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Internal document, questionable copyright claims, likely out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:01, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Internal document, questionable copyright claims, likely out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:02, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:02, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:02, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:04, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Skeezix1000 (talk) 01:52, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abeedz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:06, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:07, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sidlikesus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, out of scope. Commons is not facebook

Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:08, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because it is not existed in reality and it is asking for violence 5.37.227.104 09:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Érico (talk) 17:11, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User231901 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 17:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, has no educational use Elisfkc (talk) 18:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 17:09, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File does not match page Jenstevs (talk) 22:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As the image is in use on :en, no valid reason for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 14:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe too small size and dark to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of COM:SCOPE, deleted per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:11, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:Openminded is deleted once and da:Openminded is deleted twice, all as advertizing. Probably its logo is also out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:13, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not in educational value. I should've screened it out, but anyway. — regards, Revi 13:05, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus, looks like a copy of a website image Migebert (talk) 13:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is no more used (deleted from a user page) Quadrien (talk) 13:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:15, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 13:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of non-notable company, en:Hua-chuang Automobile Information Technical Center was speedily deleted. Taivo (talk) 13:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo; corrupted file. Only upload by this editor. Out of scope. Kalbbes (talk) 13:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 13:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GossipRx isn't mentioned in en.wiki. en:GossipRx was twice deleted due to non-notability. This is non-notable website, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:18, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this in scope? I mean so dark, I cannot understand if that is a person's image. E4024 (talk) 14:17, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:19, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work from non-free photo ShinePhantom (talk) 14:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:20, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

privacy violation not notable minor MoiraMoira (talk) 14:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, del on DE Nolispanmo 16:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unvalid date, dubious own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at the URL, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


You can find it by scrolling down the page.kobacic5548 But I guess it is missing permission. How do you delete it?


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See File:ZC17SASK.png Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, File:Zach Collaros.png is the same thing. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 08:43, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:30, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

When I found this image, I really had to laugh. Nevertheless, this photo is pretty useless. The description ("Sommerfest Haus Neukirchen") is so unclear, that you cannot locate this file. Nor does this photo has any education value for Commons. It intends to show a summer fest, but it doesn't really. So I'd suggest to delete this photo. Cheers, Jcornelius (talk) 23:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:28, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dopolnyka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Mitte27 (talk) 00:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 20:12, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked as "own work" but easy to locate in a Google Images search. EricEnfermero (talk) 00:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 20:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Miloša Vuškovića (1900 - 1975). Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle at 17:36, 24 Januar 2018 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source - --Krdbot 19:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, used for deleted wikipedia page w:Michael Wolff (consul-general) Billhpike (talk) 01:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate of: File:Michael Wolff Base Jump North CA.JPG. --Amada44  talk to me 20:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, used for deleted wikipedia page w:Michael Wolff (consul-general) Billhpike (talk) 01:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 20:28, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identical to File:Michael Wolff Skydive Boatjump.JPG, but lower resolution and improper orientation. Billhpike (talk) 14:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Identical or not it could/should be deleted. While even ambassadors' notability has been discussed elsewhere (EN:WP) and agreed that only having served as ambassador does not bring notability per se, perhaps being a Consul General brings less. (I understand this gentleman is not a career diplomat but an honorary consul, right? Please see my note on the TP of their person-specific cat.) --E4024 (talk) 15:17, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I totally disagree. I have deleted it since it was a duplicate and I didn't catch that in the first round. If the person is notable or not does not matter in this case. Show me a file on commons where people are skydiving in a boat that could replace this image! This really, really unique image! Even google image search does not provide many results of people sitting in a boat skydiving. Why should we then delete it from commons? Amada44  talk to me 17:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate. --Amada44  talk to me 17:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, used for deleted wikipedia page w:Michael Wolff (consul-general) Billhpike (talk) 01:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 20:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

used for deleted wikipedia page w:Michael Wolff (consul-general) Billhpike (talk) 01:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Amada44  talk to me 20:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, used for deleted wikipedia page w:Michael Wolff (consul-general) Billhpike (talk) 01:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 20:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, used for deleted wikipedia page w:Michael Wolff (consul-general) Billhpike (talk) 01:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 20:33, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, used for deleted wikipedia page w:Michael Wolff (consul-general) Billhpike (talk) 01:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate of: Dr. Michael Wolff Basejump, Arizona, USA, 1999.jpg. --Amada44  talk to me 20:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, used for deleted wikipedia page w:Michael Wolff (consul-general) Billhpike (talk) 01:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 20:33, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lots of cats added to an unused personal file, which is clearly out of scope. This is not the file discussed in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Michael Wolff Skydive Boatjump.JPG. E4024 (talk) 09:17, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:36, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, used for deleted wikipedia page w:Michael Wolff (consul-general) Billhpike (talk) 01:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: exceptional image, not sure if we have anything similar on commons. --Amada44  talk to me 20:34, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

사진이 오른쪽으로 90도 회전되었음 Amigogh (talk) 01:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: dr was just for rotating image. --Amada44  talk to me 21:13, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked "Image Connecticut Commission on Culture and Tourism": probably requires a license from this organisation. --ghouston (talk) 02:56, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Original seems to be from Michael Melford: https://yalealumnimagazine.com/articles/3538-heart-and-soul. --Amada44  talk to me 21:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Banner featuring copyrighted artwork. Likely fails de minimis. Samuel Wiki (talk) 03:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Not de minimis as it was used to illustrate the artwork. --Amada44  talk to me 21:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exceeded the same storm with three images existed. Nino Marakot (talk) 03:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 21:24, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already have an "Grid-less and true color" image existed. Nino Marakot (talk) 03:15, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - @Nino Marakot: - Since when did commons delete images just because another better image possibly exists.Jason Rees (talk) 13:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry for the mistake. Just found it on Worldview. I'm ready for the consequences for mistaking that they are the same image. - Nino Marakot (talk page) 01:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Might get your permission to delete this deletion request? New image coming in. - Nino Marakot (talk page) 01:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hang on @Nino Marakot: You still need to answer my question about why you are uploading new images over existing images, which goes against commons policy afaik. It is worth remembering that we can have two or three copies of the same image on Commons, even if they have slight differences.Jason Rees (talk) 03:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jason Rees: Well, i'm just uploading updated images for these existed images. Since Eosdis Worldview had 2003-present images, well I felt like I want to update these visible images, so they can see more clearer in that image. Also, found that this image belongs to Tropical Depression 02C. I'm not backing back to what I say, just saying that we need to update the images, no matter what. - Nino Marakot (talk page) 15:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thats fine Nino Marakot but commons policy states that they should have been uploaded as brand new images and not like you have done by overwriting the images that were there.Jason Rees (talk) 22:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 21:36, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a original image existed, and it is gallery version. Nino Marakot (talk) 03:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 21:39, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a original image existed, and it is a true color and grid-less image. Nino Marakot (talk) 03:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 21:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is one existed and it is the one targeted to be a grid-less image. Nino Marakot (talk) 03:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Its not a duplicate so I see no reason to delete this image. --Amada44  talk to me 21:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gallery version is existed and therefore this image has no help. Nino Marakot (talk) 03:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Its not a duplicate so I see no reason to delete this image. --Amada44  talk to me 21:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another image just like this existed. Therefore, this is just a piece of "junk". Nino Marakot (talk) 03:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Its not a duplicate so I see no reason to delete this image. --Amada44  talk to me 21:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free logo under different licence https://glanceclock.com/ 1997kB (talk) 05:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 21:42, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Hungary --Regasterios (talk) 14:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This work is not covered by copyright.

According to the Hungarian copyright act of 1999:

  • I.4 The protection provided by this Act shall not cover legal provisions, other means of state direction, court and other official resolutions, announcements and documents issued by an authority or other official organ, as well as standards made obligatory by law and other similar regulations.
  • I.7 The expressions of folklore may not enjoy copyright protection. However, this may not prejudice copyright protection due to the author of a folk-art-inspired work of individual and original nature.

English | magyar | +/−

Cekli829 11:03, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cekli829: This act not covers stamps. Stamps of Hungary are not legal provisions, other means of state direction, court and other official resolutions, announcements and documents issued by an authority or other official organ, nor standards made obligatory by law and other similar regulations. --Regasterios (talk) 13:29, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Unclear The 2009 discussion, Commons talk:Licensing/Archive 23#Hungarian stamps copyright, did not analyse the Hungarian law provision, it just assumed that it did not apply. The definition of "document" (Hungarian dokumentum) is the crux. As a stamp is a docuent in a broad sense, but may not be in a narrow sense, we should look to Hungarian interpretations. There is a specific regulation against copying postage stamps for the purposes of using the copies as originals. See bizhub C10 Nyomtató/fénymásoló/szkenner Felhasználói Útmutató: "A másolás jogi korlátozása" page 5 which appears to consider a stamp to be a document, that is it lists stamps among the many documents that it is forbidden to forge. In searching for - levélbélyeg OR postabélyeg AND "szerzői jog" - I got no meaningful hits on the issue. However, even if the exemption applies, it is possible, but by no means certain, that the artist may retain a copyright despite it being a "work for hire", i.e. a transfer of economic rights from the artist to the State. --Bejnar (talk) 02:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That commentator absolutely misunderstands the law. Nobody agree with him. --Regasterios (talk) 08:30, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted cropped File:Antall József.png. Guanaco (talk) 05:20, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exceeded 3 images of the storm in same day. Nino Marakot (talk) 03:05, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images are all public domain so there's no limit to how many we can upload. Not a valid reason for deletion. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 03:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 22:12, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: potentially, (unidentified) logo,D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: pd-text. --Amada44  talk to me 22:00, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No companies in en:Blueshift (disambiguation). Unused logo of non-notable organization, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:52, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Male beauty? Quite a vanity title for an unused, out of scope image. Personal file from Flickr. E4024 (talk) 14:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • User:Kargaltsev, are you the photographer/artist? After I opened the DR I see that this was in Category:Photographs by Sasha Kargaltsev. I have nothing to say on your artistic/photographer abilities, as I contribute here with -mostly- simple food pictures taken with my mobile phone. (I mean I'm not a photographer.) However, every time I make a DR of one of your photographs I attract some reaction. Why? Are they above other files? If they have to be kept they will; I think the first step should be to categorize them all. I come into these pics while I'm categorizing uncategorized images (for me Category:Photographs by Sasha Kargaltsev is not smth visible at first sight) and frankly if I do not see any special definition (other than "male beauty" etc) I open a DR. If this hurts your feelings tell me and I will withdraw the DR. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 14:52, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Raising DRs because images could be improved with more categories is a misuse of the deletion process. -- (talk) 10:57, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i think they are above all (kargltsev) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kargaltsev (talk • contribs)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 22:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie; poor quality B.Hort (talk) 15:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 22:19, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless due to very poor resolution B.Hort (talk) 16:13, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 22:20, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is from organization's website http://coachellavalley.church Bri (talk) 15:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the image was altered to be an advertisement. See here: [5]

Deleted: per DR. --Common Good (talk) 07:24, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private touristic photo, maybe not notable person. There are pics of this monument without that man: Category:Monument of Cabo da Roca. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:12, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably out of scope, because the object is not clear. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:08, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claimed this to be their "own work" which appears unlikely. Neither the photographer nor a date of publication was given. A proof is missing that {{PD-UKGov}} applies. AFBorchert (talk) 22:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:07, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : potentially personality and copyright issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?

Roland zh (talk) 22:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Alexander Zemlianichenko Jr. Identity of Mirahmedov should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Alexander Zemlianichenko Jr. Identity of Mirahmedov should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Alexander Zemlianichenko Jr. Identity of Mirahmedov should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Alexander Zemlianichenko Jr. Identity of Mirahmedov should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Alexander Zemlianichenko Jr. Identity of Mirahmedov should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS &/or copyrighted sculptures/characters Elisfkc (talk) 18:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:33, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : unused one-file-upload, potentially copyright issues, but also missing EXIF data to verify claimed 'own work', hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 18:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)  Comment: "...The MPKV is a brief letter written by Malayalees in the social media...", as per Malayalam description, Roland zh (talk) 18:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:32, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload: unused random photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:33, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:31, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload: unused random photo, no educational value, out of scope P 1 9 9   19:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:31, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload: unused random photo, no educational value and usuable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was a poster for an event and someone had asked to have it posted so that they could write an article, Ouvrard (talk) 20:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits © Kozoom Korea. Image appears to be copyrighted Ytoyoda (talk) 20:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:28, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to ad an file description, so I need to upload a new identical picture Skåneleden (talk) 20:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No need to remove the file. I will add the descriptions.Jorchr (talk) 09:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: invalid reason for deletion, but copyright violation. --Didym (talk) 21:28, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wider crop of this image appears at http://www.gosportboroughfc.co.uk/teams/80237/match-centre/1-1587951, unclear if this is really the uploader's work Ytoyoda (talk) 20:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a crop of image found here: http://www.oneman.gr/samba-magkes/athens-mundial/omid-homayoun.2902975.html Ytoyoda (talk) 20:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop of a web photo: http://heritage.org.cy/portals/0/Images/EVENTS/CULTURAL/4thApril2011/1.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 20:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from http://heritage.org.cy/Residence_Kostas_Christodoulou Ytoyoda (talk) 20:33, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:21, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:15, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:20, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Watchmansite7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spamer's contribution, logo as a free file

Bilderling (talk) 14:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:46, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many uses of this image on Google Images, some spanning back before 2015. We cannot be sure that the Pixabay author is the original author. Anarchyte (work | talk) 15:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:45, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from some dot com. E4024 (talk) 16:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:44, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One more from this user (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by TSFgrupo1). Looks like an uncredited text book scan rather than "own work". Gapfall (talk) 16:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:44, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol image: https://www.tineye.com/search/8911e091900f64eeb3edc5446bdbf0e7ca0cd57f/?extension_ver= Holapaco77 (talk) 17:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:43, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol image: https://www.tineye.com/search/c5a463dec6b33068883d9d4fa65a428bb7580d5a/?extension_ver= Holapaco77 (talk) 17:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:42, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol image: https://www.tineye.com/search/e4b9c3b0b4de03dc86e1a349f999ce0d39d17509/?extension_ver= Holapaco77 (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:42, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Authorization from Deon M Cooper must be provided. See Commons:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:42, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character Elisfkc (talk) 18:29, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:40, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture, no proof of permission by artist Elisfkc (talk) 18:29, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:40, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character Elisfkc (talk) 18:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:39, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Figurines, no proof of artist permission Elisfkc (talk) 18:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:39, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a problem 223.176.89.227 11:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope personal image, file with same filename has been deleted before for same reason. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 20:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by Fanghong. --Didym (talk) 21:38, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters Elisfkc (talk) 18:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Dyolf77. --Didym (talk) 21:34, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character/sculpture Elisfkc (talk) 18:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:34, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS &/or copyrighted sculptures/characters Elisfkc (talk) 18:44, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:33, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS &/or copyrighted sculptures/characters Elisfkc (talk) 18:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:33, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Non-free poster in Japan. Batholith (talk) 10:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:02, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright vio JiiQo (talk) 10:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep What is wrong with this file?  Comment btw, a cropped pic can not be deleted first, if there is any wrong with the main file, you should nominate first the File:رنا سماحة 22.jpg --Rafic.Mufid (talk) 22:03, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Túrelio. --Didym (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from here no indiaction its in public domain, no author no permission Rode raaf (talk) 10:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:58, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: http://www.europainfo.at/home/fotogalerie/145/from1/1017; © Ludwig Schedl. Parvolus (talk) 10:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:57, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most uploads of Shiva786 (talk · contribs) are found in Internet, they are copyvios. I cannot find this, but this is small photo without metadata, probably copyvio as well. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:56, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is simple textlogo and ineligible for copyright. But what about notability? I did not find it at en:Kantar (disambiguation), maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:56, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the Flickr page that is identified as the source, the license is © All rights reserved. Steve Morgan (talk) 11:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:55, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication on the source page that the author [who is not the uploader] has released the photo under an appropriate-for-Wikimedia-Commons Creative Commons license Steve Morgan (talk) 11:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:54, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't know what "MDS Girl" stands for. Media Design School? Please if the file is in scope do not get angry with me, I was just making categorization and found this blondie. E4024 (talk) 12:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:50, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparantly, {{Useful}} is not a very useful template, as it is not being used for anything1. It seems it was once used to categorize useful Commons pages into Category:Useful Commons pages, which was deleted years ago by User:Ephraim33 for not being useful because "there are no useful Commons pages". TL;DR: Useless.

1If Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list still appears here when you read this that's just a caching issue: It was transcluded from a sub-page from which I've already removed it for – you guessed it – not being useful. El Grafo (talk) 14:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not useful. --Didym (talk) 21:49, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file. All other images of this so-called user (no constructive edits anywhere) are out of scope and some are on user pages. I would delete them all. E4024 (talk) 08:52, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:11, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Original to find on https://www.nicole-mieth.info/fotos/. It is possible, that the uploader is Nicole Mieth herself. Maybe we can get a OTRS-ticket. See also File:Nicole Mieth - .jpg --Redrobsche (talk) 09:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:11, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Original to find on https://www.nicole-mieth.info/fotos/. It is possible, that the uploader is Nicole Mieth herself. Maybe we can get a OTRS-ticket. See also File:Nicole Mieth .jpg


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:11, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Focus is on the label (so COM:PACKAGING does not seem to apply) and to me the logo is probably too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. Also see Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Mountain dew bottles. W3ird N3rd (talk) 09:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is a copyrighted label for Mountain Dew by PepsiCo on a bottle. It is not DM. The filename is about the label. See also https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/ELIAAOSwTQtaOZ2t/s-l300.jpg as displayed by http://www.ebay.com/itm/253321003141.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:55, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:09, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name of file created inadvertently. Needless after redirect to new Lemma Muck50 (talk) 10:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:07, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name of file created inadvertently. Needless after redirect to new Lemma Muck50 (talk) 10:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name of file created inadvertently. Needless after redirect to new Lemma Muck50 (talk) 10:13, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name of file created inadvertently. Needless after redirect to new Lemma Muck50 (talk) 10:13, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:04, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name of file created inadvertently. Needless after redirect to new Lemma Muck50 (talk) 10:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:04, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name of file created inadvertently. Needless after redirect to new Lemma Muck50 (talk) 10:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:03, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rbhu23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the nature of the works.

LX (talk, contribs) 07:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The resolution does not display well on Wikipedia. I'm re-uploading a better version. Pcaabplroa (talk) 00:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, not for the nominated reason but because the alleged source doesn't have any obvious CC BY-SA 4.0 licence. --bjh21 (talk) 15:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment license is OK per File:Zerogram Press.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, quite right. --bjh21 (talk) 13:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate of File:Zerogram Press.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 14:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be authorized art, not illegal graffiti, and given the lack of FOP for art in the U.S. I believe this is a copyvio. Jmabel ! talk 02:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source given as stevewindom.com, no indication of free release. MB298 (talk) 05:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The image has been on commons for nearly 10 years now. Maybe there was a indication of a free release 10 years ago on that homepage? Also very likely is, that uploader is Steve Windom. Anyhow, its been on his wikipage for 10 years now and should it have been a problem we would have heard that by now. Amada44  talk to me 21:51, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: in 2008 the website was: © Copyright 2008 Steve Windom LLC | All rights reserved, see [6]. Ruthven (msg) 14:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright vio JiiQo (talk) 06:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep this is a crop pic of File:Elissa - August 24, 2012 (2).jpg (a file by Listenarabic, in creative commons).--Rafic.Mufid (talk) 22:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 14:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Salavat as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo owned by the Union of Armenian Evangelical Churches in the Near East
Converted by me to DR, as it needs to be discussed whether this logo is above COM:TOO and, if it is, if it is still in copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Obvious copy of non-free image from en-wiki en:File:Uaecne.jpeg Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:35, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I would call it a parallel upload, performed within minutes and both by the same user. --Túrelio (talk) 23:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • In my opinion the file is above the TOO. As to whether it is still within copyright we may have to err on the side of caution and delete in favour of the non-free logo on Wikipedia. Salavat (talk) 01:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is not available, license is not reviewed. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright vio JiiQo (talk) 10:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep i don't see any Copyright vio, this files comes from flickr. --Rafic.Mufid (talk) 22:03, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 14:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I dont want it anymore 46.194.7.196 10:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 14:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

drawn by Savo Sovre[7] (born 1928, still alive) Sporti (talk) 11:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep seems to be from Kopitar's memorial 1880, J. Navratil, Jernej Kopitar, p.16 see here: http://www.hervardi.com/jernej_kopitar.php. He died in 1844, very likely PD-old.  Delete Amada44  talk to me 22:09, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Under the image on the site it says "Jernej Kopitar –portret je delo akademskega slikarja Sava Sovreta (Kopitarjev zbornik)" (portrait is the work of academic painter Savo Sovre). --Sporti (talk) 13:43, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo en doublon Guydec (talk) 15:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution duplicate of File:Des. Mário Albiani.jpg B.Hort (talk) 15:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. @B.Hort: Next time use the template {{Duplicate}}, thanks. Ruthven (msg) 14:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"New files should not be uploaded with this tag, or they will be deleted" is clearly stated in the template of "NOT-PD-US-URAA" AntonierCH (d) 16:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Keep Uploaded from Google Art Project cultural Beta:[8], Category:Amrita Sher-Gil: "Note: All her works are in Public domain in India, hence you may use the tag - PD-India. They are also in the Public Domain in the European Union and all other countries where the copyright expires 70 years after the death of an author, hence PD-old-70 also applies." + better quality image than Amrita Sher-Gil - Portrait of young man.jpg, already on site --DDupard (talk) 17:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    So what.... the license is mentionned nowehre (as far as I can see). --AntonierCH (d) 17:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    So .... where are you going to go next? [9]--DDupard (talk) 17:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Keep Amrita Sher-Gil died in 1941. See the note in Category:Amrita Sher-Gil : "All her works are in Public domain in India". As for using URAA as the sole reason for deletion, please see Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA. — Racconish ☎ 17:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Read the template itself, URAA files uploaded previous this decision can be kept. Otherwise, no they can't be uploaded. --AntonierCH (d) 18:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Diff please--DDupard (talk) 18:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    See the template talk page: this passage does not seem to reflect the community consensus after the 2014 RFC. — Racconish ☎ 07:37, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 14:27, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license. This is a copy of the original video. Original: [10] Tyka17 (talk) 10:52, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: correct license. The original video is under CC-BY. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:29, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license. This is a copy of the original video. Original: [11] Tyka17 (talk) 16:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, original is under Standard YT license. Ruthven (msg) 14:29, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 17:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:29, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:29, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I am the uploader of File:Flower bed of the hotel New-York at Disneyland resort Paris.jpg. There were already 2 DR about this file on october 6th 2013 and june 24th 2015, a discussion and the decision was kept. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flower bed of the hotel New-York at Disneyland resort Paris.jpg. Please, once, once, once again, dear Elisfkc, before creating the DR of a photo, give a look to the discussion page of the photo. You will see if there was not already a DR (or 2). --Tangopaso (talk) 09:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Tangopaso: my apologies, when I was nominating files, I did not see the previous deletion requests on any of the images that I nominated. That is my mistake. Elisfkc (talk) 16:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, keeping as de minimis. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:43, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Most of these are focusing on the ice rink, which the photographer has the rights to (since they are apparently Xtraice, the manufacturers of the rink). However, they don't have the rights to the hotel itself, which is not de minimis in several photos... and is, unfortunately, the main reason we're using these photos... :-( --GRuban (talk) 20:42, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per GRuban, kept the photos of the rink. Ruthven (msg) 14:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:35, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:49, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:21, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 22:43, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:49, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: for some images DM applies or nothing copyrighted is depicted at al, but these all all unused and IMO unusable, so out of scope. --Krd 04:34, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload: unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload: unused random photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload: unused photo of random shrubbery, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wird nicht mehr benutzt ZellmerLP (talk) 20:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 14:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe too dark to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The darkness of Shintō shrine at night without the enough lighting up, is not the inappropriate thing but the meaningful thing, as a sacred place of hybrid of not only the ancestral worship (after Yayoi period) but also the nature worship or animism (since Jōmon period). These darkness are often referred on many Japanese literary works till today (see search results of "深夜 神社" [Midnight Shrine] on Japanese Wikipedia), so we need not to delete this photograph due to its darkness.
FYI:
(A) original photo
(B) brightened photo
Also we can edit the original photograph (A) to improve the visibility as shown on (B), however, its unnatural brightness is not familiar as "shrine at night", in my opinion. --Clusternote (talk) 06:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. In other words, the darkness itself is main subject of this photograph! --Clusternote (talk) 03:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Did you write the articles about Shinto Shrine ? If you didn't, surely you need not the photograph showing the darkness of Shinto Shrine at night : ). However, these darkness are necessary attribute for Shinto Shrine. --Clusternote (talk) 02:56, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per Clusternote. The darkness, in this photo, is an intrinsic part of the religious and spiritual simbology of Shinto shrines. Tm (talk) 02:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I don't subscribe to the idea that showing the darkness is important at least for pictures of modern-day shrines - I wasn't able to find a Japanese Wikipedia article that refers to them in such a context. However, Commons doesn't have any other picture showing the particular shrine from the particular angle. Seeing that the shrine is recognizable (particularly because the name is clearly shown in the brightened version), I think it should be kept for now. --whym (talk) 05:04, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 14:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This a composite image made up of two different images taken of the subject Pat O'Keeffe at different points in his life. I believe there are three copyrrights which need to be resolved here: the copyright of the derivative work created when the two images were combined together as a sort of a collage, and the copyrights of each component image.

Placing the two images side by side together for comparison purposes seems to be more than a simple reproduction and, therefore, is likely something which is considered sufficient for copyright protection if they were published that way in some book. If this is the case, then I believe permission of the person who created the derivative is needed for Commons to keep it.

In addition, the copyright status of each of the component images needs to be addressed. The image on the right is dated taken sometime around the time of the World War I which means it was taken prior to 1923 and would be highly likely PD in both the US and the UK (its country of origin) assuming it was also published prior to 1923. The photo on the left, however, show O'Keeffe later in life and was possibly taken some time in the late 1940s or early 1950s: The collage photo is dated 1953 and appears to have been taken from a book titled "Illustrated". This could be an issue because if it's still considered protected by copyright in either the US or the UK, then Commons should not really accept it this as is per COM:PCP because if part of the photo is copyrighted then I believe the entire photo needs to be treated as copyrighted. So, unless the creator of the collage is the same person who took the photo showing O'Keeffe later in life,, the permission of the photographer of that photo is also likely going to be needed for Commons to keep the collage photo.

It might be possible to keep the picture of young O'Keeffe separately from the others if it's copyright status and date of publication can be verified, but I'm not sure. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't really understand the Copyright restrictions on this site when i first started. I see now that it can't be used, plus as has been alluded to, it's a pretty poor picture, the use of the iPhone rather than a scanner was due to haste. Lastly i can't find an online archive holding the article to cite, nor anyone to ask for copyright permission as the magazine is long gone. So please  Delete i could see no way of deleting it my self. I have found one half of the picture that can be used as it's a UK GOV picture in the public domain. Okeeffemarc (talk) 18:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any basis for {{PD-USGov}} claimed here? Seems unlikely to me: U.S. mug shots are rarely federal. And is there even any reason to think it's U.S.? The notes under the photo on the linked source page refers to him as a "Labourer" (note the u, not a U.S. spelling). Might be OK on some other basis, but this license is very unlikely. Jmabel ! talk 06:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gda0608 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.newsinstar.com/news/article.html?no=9713
Converted by me to DR, as this case needs discussion. Our image is cropped version of the one at tistory.com, which identical to the one at newsinstar.com and both have been published on the same day. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gda0608 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.newsinstar.com/news/article.html?no=9713
Converted by me to DR, as this case needs discussion. Our image is cropped version of the one at tistory.com, which identical to the one at newsinstar.com and both have been published on the same day. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with Commons:Deletion requests/File:EXID in a showcase on November 7, 2017 (1).jpg.


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gda0608 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.newsinstar.com/news/article.html?no=1945
Converted by me to DR, as this case needs discussion. Our image is cropped version of the one at tistory.com, which identical to the one at newsinstar.com and both have been published on the same day. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tistory source posted 09:55, newsinstar.com posted 15:31. Inclined to keep. — regards, Revi 08:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. However, both images carry a Newsinstar watermark. Surely, tistory has a permission for publication by Newsinstar, but also a permission to put it under a free license? --Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I was under impression that they were owned by same entity, while... having a tistory blog and (at the same time) own homepage sounds... weird. — regards, Revi 11:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per my reasoning at Commons:Deletion requests/Images from Solkka. Sometime in past Solkka began working for NewsInStar making all of their images a work for hire. They do not appear to have the right to release the images under a creative commons license unilaterally. Previous images that are watermarked "Solkka" appear to be different but more investigation is required. I had only gone through those Solkka images that still needed license review in that DR. It looks like I'm going to have to go through all of them now. Thanks for letting me know, -revi --Majora (talk) 21:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work of a new user Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old image, author request (uploader cmt: useless image). This file was initially tagged by Dyolf77 as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Immagine non necessariaD Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not produced by VOA, So Not in PD. Mbazri (talk) 11:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shaunawatt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and previous publications found elsewhere. The photos taken with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Mark IV have metadata identifying Dan Schultz as the author; Shaunawatt seems like an unlikely user name for someone by that name. Other photos have metadata indicating they were taken with a Nikon D3, and professional photographers typically don't alternate between incompatible SLR systems.

LX (talk, contribs) 12:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

* Comment Please reconsider deletion, all photos are the property of Beerenberg Pty Ltd and were either taken for marketing purposes or converted from family slides. I will happily change the authorship details on the files but may need some instructions on how to do that, to see the metadata so I can get it right and to work the right copyright license for each one. Shaunawatt (talk) 23:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You cannot upload other people's work as your own work. Are any of the files you've uploaded as your own work actually your own work? Furthermore, you cannot issue a valid copyright license for works of which you are not the copyright holder, and you wouldn't be the copyright holder of someone else's work unless you have a written document assigning the copyright to you (which you would then need to provide via e-mail). LX (talk, contribs) 05:39, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Shaunawatt: We need a written authorisation from Beerenberg Pty Ltd. sent to COM:OTRS. It is possible? --Ruthven (msg) 14:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
* Comment Thanks Ruthven, I will obtain written authorisation from my boss, the Managing Director and Owner of Beerenberg. Is there a particular reference I should use when sending to COM:OTRS and do I need to mention each photo specifically?

Deleted: per nomination. No action in over 2 weeks. When/if COM:OTRS permission is received, affected images may be restored. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This PNG file which is a duplicate of File:Time Zones of Africa.svg was also uploaded with an obsolete version from the same SVG file and has not been updated once. The original uploader did not identify himself or herself as the orginal author of this file. As the original SVG version is up to date and is a better quality, this obsolete PNG file should be redirected to that file. Maphobbyist (talk) 16:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The statement about “duplicate” (read: a trivial SVG-converter derivative) doesn’t look true. None of revisions of Time_Zones_of_Africa.svg since October 8 contains a strange reddish online of Namibia, whereas before that date in 2017 Egypt wasn’t (bright) yellow. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:27, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
1. that red line is most likely conversion and export error, 2. Egypt was bright yellow on the map from 2016. C933103 (talk) 19:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
My bad. Hence, the PNG likely resulted from a clumsy attempt to update https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/e/e0/20171008081600!Time_Zones_of_Africa.svg Delete. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: The map has been uploaded with out of date time zones (i.e. Sudan) and is clumsily colored (i.e. DR Congo and Namibia). The PNG file should be directed to the updated SVG file, which is better in case of updates. --Saguamundi (talk) 21:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A higher quality svg file exists here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Albanian_Tourism.svg Kj1595 (talk) 17:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 18:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 18:05, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 18:05, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 18:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sturm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:TOYS &/or copyrighted sculptures/characters

Elisfkc (talk) 18:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sturm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama for non-architectural artworks in the U.S.. The Cloud Gate is already notorious among content creators: see this and this, as well as this article from Getty Images wiki. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cloud Gate. Photos violate Anish Kapoor's copyright over his public art. None of the nominated Flickr imports show the Cloud Gate artwork trivially or in an unimportant manner.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:20, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep File:Chicago (9989580265).jpg. The photograph includes only reflections and nothing of the Cloud Gate itself.  Delete the rest per nom. Abzeronow (talk) 17:59, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The one with the reflection is brushing the surface of COM:SCOPE. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:19, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sturm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Previously deleted by community consensus. No FoP in Qatar.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:48, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Most Deleted per nom; 3 kept per Túrelio -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sturm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are some photographs whose specific flaws or generally low quality I believe makes them unlikely to be educationally useful. (I also doubt that the topics covered by these images are in such dire need of illustrations that these images should be kept merely for lack of better alternatives.)

Sinigh (talk) 20:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:12, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

yes UruW (talk) 00:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. ~ bayo or talk 10:20, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the "own work" by the uploader as claimed, author of the artwork not named. AFBorchert (talk) 19:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload: unused random photo, out of focus, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:44, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation João Justiceiro (talk) 19:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown author; no evidence that PD-Nepal applies. Pitpisit (talk) 21:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown author; no evidence that PD-Nepal applies. Pitpisit (talk) 21:27, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown author; no evidence that PD-Nepal applies. Pitpisit (talk) 21:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could be mistaken, but I don't think Romania allows broad enough F.O.P. to cover plaques like this. Jmabel ! talk 23:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion the photo of the people in line. Ruthven (msg) 13:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 05:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France & these are copyrighted characters of Marvel

Elisfkc (talk) 14:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 19:58, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom and most of the above DRs.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 21:05, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:07, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Very, very dark photos. And there are already File:Disneyland Paris 132.jpg and File:Disneyland Paris 133.jpg very similar

--Tangopaso (talk) 20:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Also if Freedom of Panorama covers an illuminated Eiffel Tower (see also Category:Eiffel Tower at night), there is no way these lights that are complex are not covered as well. --Elisfkc (talk) 03:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see the lighting as complex enough to be copyrightable: such Christmas lighting is ordinary and can be replicated by anyone in the world, even Frenchmen, thus the lighting director of this Christmas display cannot claim copyright. With regards to usability of the photos, I leave that judgment to the closing admins. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:06, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom and most of the above DRs.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: I do not see any copyright issue, as the lights are not creative enough to be copyrightable. There is no definite artistic character on Christmas lighting used. Anyone including us here can copy the lighting without lighting director's permission. And the original nomination by Tangopaso concerns COM:SCOPE issue, please do not reinstate the FOP-related category here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:56, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: How is this not a pending Disneyland Paris-related deletion request?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: because this request is not related to freedom of panorama issue. The lack of artistry in Christmas lighting means any FOP issue is moot. (And I disagree with Elisfkc's added reason for deletion). This is of scope related deletion discussion, as Tangopaso originally cited ass reason for deletion. Notice Category:Disneyland Paris-related deletion requests is grouped under "French FOP cases" (similarly, "Disneyland Paris-related deletion requests/pending" is categorized under "French FOP cases/pending", not a category about scope-related deletion requests, if there is one). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:10, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345 and Labattblueboy: I'm sorry, I did not realize until now that Category:Disneyland Paris-related deletion requests was in Category:French FOP cases (along with respective pending, kept, and deleted subpages). Why is that? If it is to stay in that category, shouldn't it have "FOP" in the name, so as not to surprise? I propose a new Category:Disneyland Paris FOP-related deletion requests (along with respective pending, kept, and deleted subpages).   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:33, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: on same naming convention as Category:Burj Khalifa-related deletion requests, Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests, Category:N Seoul Tower-related deletion requests, and Category:63 Building-related deletion requests. Personally I find this impractical to group several DRs by categories as per landmark, since it covers up the real number of case pages resulting to deletions, unless one has the interest to do math, thereby reducing efforts to introduce FOP in their respective countries through complacency courtesy of "reduced" number of deletion case pages. But I assume that it helps to make future undeletions easier in case the landmarks fall public domain. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:49, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 1

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Benoît Prieur: If it is not in France, what was it doing in Category:Disneyland Paris? Also, according to the GPS tag on the image, it is in France. Elisfkc (talk) 21:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I did not say it is not in France: I said the topic and what it is represented is not concerned by the lack of FoP. --Benoît Prieur (d) 21:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Dunderklumpen: I would presume so, but that is a better question for someone on French Wikipedia. Elisfkc (talk) 00:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This building has been destroyed in december 2010 and it seems that «The destruction of the work extinguished copyright.» Is that correct? - Dunderklumpen (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, un éventuelle suppression des fichiers est à voir au cas par cas. En effet, certains équipements photographiés ne constituent pas une œuvre de l'esprit originale, lorsqu'il s'agit par exemple de la reproduction de bateaux ou de constructions anciennes. Concernant spécifiquement File:Plaque de rue Auguste-Gusteau à EuroDisney.jpg, il n'y a aucune raison de le supprimer, il s'agit de la simple reproduction à Eurodisney des milliers de plaques de rue qui existent à Paris, il n'y a aucune création originale pour cette plaque. Concernant File:Espace Euro Disney 2008.JPG, je ne vois aucune œuvre de l'esprit du point de vue architecturale à protéger ; à moins que ce soient les droits d'auteurs sur les graffitis qui justifiraient la suppression du fichier. O.Taris (talk) 10:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
J'ajoute que l'Espace Euro Disney a été détruit en 2010 (lire plus haut) et il semblerait que la destruction entraîne l'extinction des droits d'auteur. Cependant, dans l'exemple donné plus haut, il est question de peinture murale et non d'architecture. Merci @Benoît Prieur: d'avoir relevé cette exception. - Dunderklumpen (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,
Je reproduis ce que je viens d'écrire sur le bistro de #WpFr.
Quand le bâtiment est détruit le droit d'auteur ne semble plus s'appliquer et apparemment l'image est acceptable sur Commons :
"The destruction of the work extinguished copyright." => [12] sur un exemple équivalent File:Maison sur friche Bouchayer-Viallet.JPG).
--Benoît Prieur (d) 11:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Destruction of art never ended a copyright on the art itself ! Loreleil (talk) 10:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jebulon: I would rather have open a deletion request in order to facilitate a discussion and decision on such files that may be on the edge than to have them be sitting around and being used by others. Elisfkc (talk) 01:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, kept some. Note that all architecture is covered by copyright, not just unusual architecture. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 2

copyrighted site plans.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to withdraw this, because I would like opinions from others, but I think it is possible that these are, in fact, "own work" as claimed, and not scans or photos of Disney produced maps. They could also be derivative works made from Disney maps. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at them, File:Disneyland Resort Paris Kaart.png looks like there might be a chance that it came from Disney or somewhere else. The other two look like they were done in Paint. Elisfkc (talk) 01:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep it all. The first and the third are the same pictures and they seem to be based on a road map and the real land. There is no derivative work. - Bzh-99 (talk) 22:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep own work, not copyrighted. Multichill (talk) 09:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 13:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 3

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:DLRP schema.png was accidentally included. Withdrawing nomination for that image only. Elisfkc (talk) 17:24, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@O.Taris:
English: The topiary and the fact that there is no FOP in France. Elisfkc (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Français : Le topiaire et le fait qu'il n'y ait pas de FOP en France. Traduit avec Google Translate Elisfkc (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Si on considère que les jardins et plantation sont en général soumis au droit d'auteur, on va devoir supprimer beaucoup de photos de commons... La plantation représentée sur la photo ne me parait pas particulièrement originale pour pouvoir justifier un droit d'auteur. O.Taris (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If we consider that the gardens and plantation are generally subject to copyright, we will have to delete many photos of commons ... The plantation shown in the picture does not seem to me particularly original to be able to justify a copyright. O.Taris (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 4, Kept: 2. --Yann (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 5

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 01:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep 20, 22 et 6 : je ne vois pas d'oeuvre pour laquelle le droit d'auteur serait enfreint, il s'agit de simples photos de rue ou de parking. O.Taris (talk) 06:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion for most of those files. Two of them actually violate FoP. Ruthven (msg) 22:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 6

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep 2, delete the rest. Yann (talk) 18:12, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Boats with artistic designs have previously been deleted, if I remember right. Elisfkc (talk) 19:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
These pictures were not deleted because of "boat of artistic design", but for the other elements of the settings. BTW in only two of them there is a boat. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 7

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, les arbres et autres plantations, les lampadaires quelconques, les bateaux ou les trains dans un paysage ne sont pas des bâtiments soumis au droit d'auteur dans le cadre de la liberté de panorama. On se demande même pourquoi une pauvre guitoune peut-être proposée à la suppression pour une question de droit d'auteur ! En revanche, le respect du droit d'auteur architectural se pose effectivement pour File:Sleeping Beauty's Castle Disneyland Paris - panoramio.jpg et File:Disneyland Paris - panoramio (15).jpg. O.Taris (talk) 21:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as per O.Taris above. Yann (talk) 08:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Topiaries have been found to be copyrightable in the past. I try to nominate files like these to have a precedent set for them later. I would rather nominate 50 files that are fine and have a decision made about them than to have one that is not ok left alone. --Elisfkc (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, not in France, AFAIK. Your practice doesn't help admins. It pass the burden of review to them, and they are already overbooked. It would be much more useful to carefully review your nominations before making them. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Pretty sure Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alice's Curious Labyrinth at Disneyland Paris was an example of topiaries that were deleted because of copyright in France. If not, I remember having another case at some point, I'd just need to find it. --Elisfkc (talk) 20:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Most of them show some copyrightable element, and IMO, File:DLP Maze View.JPG was deleted by error. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Here we go, the example of topiaries in France being deleted that I was thinking of was Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fantasyland at Disneyland Paris. Elisfkc (talk) 22:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per FoP in France, but only the buildings. Kept are the trees, and boats, and non architectural elements of the park. File:Disneyland Paris - panoramio (16).jpg is borderline for me, but was deleted to be coherent with Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alice's Curious Labyrinth at Disneyland Paris. Ruthven (msg) 09:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 8

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 03:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Disneyland - panoramio (3).jpg et File:Disneyland - panoramio (15).jpg : les camions ne sont pas des oeuvres architecturales soumises aux droits d'auteur des constructions,  Keep File:Disneyland - panoramio (18).jpg, l'élément principal est la montagne et le HOLLYWOOD, qui ne sont pas des oeuvres architecturales soumises aux droits d'auteur des constructions. O.Taris (talk) 16:04, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, except 2, as per O.Taris. --Yann (talk) 09:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, partly as out of scope, but one file is  kept, because in my opinion copyrightable details are de minimis. Taivo (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 13

Copyrighted characters

Elisfkc (talk) 00:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Sealle (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 15

No FOP in France. Moving files to correct categories, as this is too high up for most.

Elisfkc (talk) 15:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 16

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 17

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy delete all as derivative work copyright violations ({{France-cv}}). The Flickr photographers and uploaders here did not obtain permission from the architects, sculptors, graphics artists, and other authors of the copyrighted works of Euro Disney. Such permissions must be sent via COM:OTRS. French FOP doesn't suffice Commons standards because it is noncommercial, and thus doesn't adhere with COM:Licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 18

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Tube Disaster cause of non originality. Delete the others. - ~~ Bzh-99 (talk) 18:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted two, kept the other two per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]