Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/12/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![98 File:"SÁTOR" - panoramio.jpg](#File:"SÁTOR"_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_,_Büste.jpg){kind=link}
,_Büste.jpg){kind=link}
,_Büste.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Has to be a copyvio. Basically, a straight-out photo of copyrighted material. Jmabel ! talk 08:31, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 09:54, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Charmix enterprises
[edit]- File:2 Feathers MV.jpg
- File:Boys&Sometimes Girls MV.jpg
- File:Faded (Alan Walker Cover) MV.jpg
- File:Poisoned by You Cover.jpg
- File:Maxim Hot 100 2017.jpg
- File:Wiki Main Pic.jpg
- File:2 Feathers Stills.png
- File:2 Feathers Stills 3.png
- File:2 Feathers Stills 2.png
- File:Faded (Alan Walker Cover) MV2.jpg
- File:BTS - 2 Feathers.jpg
- File:Faded (Alan Walker Cover) MV3.jpg
- File:Hands To Myself (Selena Gomez Cover) MV.png
- File:Panda Doll MV.jpg
- File:Set of Boys&Sometimes Girls MV.jpg
- File:Stills.png
- File:2 Feathers Cover.jpg
- File:2 Feathers Single Cover.png
_MV.jpg){kind=link}
_MV2.jpg){kind=link}
_MV3.jpg){kind=link}
_MV.png){kind=link}
No own work. All pics from facebook or instagram (official account of the shown musician) and therefore copyright violations. ....HMS (talk) 07:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
1. What is the issue here as i have already emailed the otrs release to permissions email from the email address of website that has all these content. 2. I own all the content that was uploaded - these are all my pictures. The aforementioned facebook and instagram accounts - i also own. All these original pics are on my phone - some of the pics seen on fb and ig, i uploaded them to my facebook and instagram account. 3. I am the author and owner of all these pics. What else do we need to do here to solve this issue?
- Then add the OTRS pending to your 18 pics:
{{OTRS pending|year=2017|month=December|day=30}}(And please, sign your comments.) ....HMS (talk) 07:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 13:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
This is not necessarily own work, Organisational logo, of a non-trival nature. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 16:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
BBC does not typically release promotional material under Creative Commons license. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 16:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyviolation Ciacho5 (talk) 08:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
This is sourced only to English Wikipedia, where it is non-free, and gives http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/communications/corporate/downloads/pdfs/the_crest.pdf as the source ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 16:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
photo of probably copyright photograph Rudolphous (talk) 14:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Slam dunk. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal images outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:58, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Keep: It is technically and esthetically an excellent photo, with great illustrative power, regardless of the fact that the model is a non-notable person (if indeed). -- Tuválkin ✉ 15:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Well, glad to see that you have put in a lot of appropriate categories to the image. I have nominated many images with this rationale recently. So is good quality an excuse to keep such images? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:32, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- “Excuse”? I call it a reason, not an excuse. But then I see Commons as a repository of useful media, not as a gallery for photographers’ vanity… -- Tuválkin ✉ 19:19, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Well, glad to see that you have put in a lot of appropriate categories to the image. I have nominated many images with this rationale recently. So is good quality an excuse to keep such images? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:32, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, no concensus to delete this image. Krd 08:23, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 20:48, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, per previous decision. User:Moheen Reeyad should not waste the community’s valuable time with frivolous DRs. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:02, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: It's categorized in some deept feeld cat so I think this is acually a good example for it. --Sanandros (talk) 23:05, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, per previous decisions. As said before about a previous nominator, User:EugeneZelenko should not waste the community’s valuable time with frivolous DRs. Do I dare to say about an admin what I said about a regular user? Yeah, I do. You see, admins should be accountable to a higher standard, not the opposite. Trying to make a point, EugeneZelenko? Pinging @Krd and @Sanandros, previous keep-closers. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Comment: Since in some past DRs nominators and/or other concerned deletionists tried to sway the vote by removing categories (although the lack thereof should never be cause for deletion), I did archive this filepage as of just now here and here. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)- Comment It is a high quality photograph even if this is the only contribution of a user. Could find some future educational use in the right context Abzeronow (talk) 18:35, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: This is not a new argument so I speed up the kept decision.--Sanandros (talk) 20:04, 20 October 2018 (UTC). --Sanandros (talk) 20:04, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. OOS. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:27, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination per above. Sorry. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:52, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawn: 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:52, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
massively 'over-tagged', hence, out of scope - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:53, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: file is in use, thus in scope. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:01, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I take it you don't understand German. I'll give you one hint: "Schwänze" means "dick". This image needs to be deleted, like, YESTERDAY. W3ird N3rd (talk) 22:50, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: And legal needs to be contacted. --Natuur12 (talk) 22:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Invalid source and author details. Only use is on Simple English Wikipedia for a likely hoax article. See also the deletion nomination of WWE Team.jpg The Dales of Glendale (talk) 20:54, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 03:52, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Published by The Telegraph (UK) on 18 April 2016 with comment above the pic: CREDIT: VIA TWITTER: @POLIZIADISTATO/ POLIZIA DI STATO Link: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/18/how-an-alleged-mafia-chiefs-appetite-for-pizza-led-to-his-arrest/ ....HMS (talk) 17:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 05:33, 31 Dezember 2017 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandicam 2017-12-29 22-34-45-449.jpg: Published by The Telegraph (UK) on 18 April 2016 with comment above the pic: CREDIT: VIA TWITTER: @POLIZIADISTATO/ POLIZIA DI STATO Link: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/... --Krdbot 07:47, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
No permission from google.com is accepted. Leoboudv (talk) 23:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Dyolf77 at 23:59, 31 Dezember 2017 UTC: Copyright violation: The permission link here says it is for Non-Commercial use. --Krdbot 01:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Author : Paul Green. Identity of Yann bonnet should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:49, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Une autorisation a été fournie sur OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:09, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
je souhaite supprimer cette photo de moi Yannbonnet (talk) 17:30, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Delete Per Ticket:2017122810007431 and personality rights in France. Yann Bonnet has sent an email to OTRS to delete this picture. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:28, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Discussion page used for just spam Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:04, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Test page or page with no valid content. --Achim (talk) 12:47, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jayasurya chen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
Sara Quill (talk) 06:41, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:02, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jayasurya chen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal image/selfie, unused and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:School kurichi.jpg
- File:JayasuryaMailsamy20198.jpg
- File:JayasuryaMailsamy.jpg
- File:Jayasurya chen 2.jpg
- File:Jayasurya chen.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, by Dyolf77 speedily as out of scope. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Derivative works of non-free content (dolls)
4nn1l2 (talk) 03:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - likely more sculptures than toys but anyway derivative works. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:51, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of com:scope: advertisement 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope; see w:A Bandarage Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:19, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope; see w:A Bandarage Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:19, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:21, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suhailnasa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal image/selfie, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:08, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image/selfie, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:11, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unknown person, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work Sitacuisses (talk) 05:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:55, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by M Al Faisal Ahmed Jewel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal images, only contributions and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:56, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image/selfie, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:58, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ajitesh Nag (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:58, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contributions and unlikely to be used in a project. If preexisting notability can be established then they could be in scope but I can't find any.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:59, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image/selfie, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:00, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
"Commons does not need you to drop your pants and grab a camera" Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:35, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:00, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:00, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MJ janardhan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:00, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahmudul Hasan Mahe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfie and only contribution. Is this person notable enough to be in scope? Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amit Kumar Bhagat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:Amit Kumar Bhagat.jpg
- File:Amit Kumarr.jpg
- File:Amit Kumar Bhagat Super Hero .jpg
- File:Amitkumarbhagat.jpg
- File:Amit Kumar Bhagat .jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:43, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
© 2017 New Jerusalem Music: http://www.newjerusalemmusic.com/lenny-smith/ ....HMS (talk) 05:44, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:03, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:44, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:03, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image/selfie, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:03, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ngashitrin shangh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:49, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyright © 2008 - 2017 CelebMafia: http://celebmafia.com/sammi-hanratty-just-jared-summer-bash-los-angeles-8132016-584127/ ....HMS (talk) 05:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:24, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by حمدون محمد ابكر حمدون (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal image, only contributions and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:حمدون عرنجل 6.jpg
- File:حمدون عرنجل 7.jpg
- File:حمدون عرنجل 5.jpg
- File:حمدون عرنجل 3.jpg
- File:حمدون عرنجل 4.jpg
- File:حمدون عرنجل 2.jpg
- File:حمدون عرنجل 1.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:55, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:24, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by حمدون محمد ابكر حمدون (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:حمدون محمد ابكر حمدون 04.jpg
- File:حمدون محمد ابكر حمدون 01.jpg
- File:حمدون محمد ابكر حمدون 03.jpg
- File:حمدون محمد ابكر حمدون 02.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Baseer Tahir (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal image, and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:25, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:26, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:26, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unknown person, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:07, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:26, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
copyvio, non-free:Because I have not got permission from the group that made the inscription. Licsak (talk) 07:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - FoP for buildings only, in Japan. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:28, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Low quality nude image of no encyclopedic value Denniss (talk) 08:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom : low quality, better equivalent files. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:18, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Low quality nude image of no encyclopedic value Denniss (talk) 08:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete As per Denniss. Absolutely no encyclopedic value whatsoever. AshFriday (talk) 03:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep No more/less value than many of the nude pictures we have on Commons, and there's no valid/neutral reason to delete that specific one. Furthermore the quality is not so bad. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:16, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
The terms of use do not clearly allow free and commercial use. Translated to English using Google Translate, Article 2.1 states: "This character is protected by copyright law and other applicable laws and regulations." Article 3.2(6) states: "For commercial use, we shall obtain prior approval from this production committee." See previous discussion at village pump/copyright. Animalparty (talk) 08:07, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination and village pump discussion. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 08:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Permalink to the village pump discussion (section "License of a Japanese virtual character") Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 05:48, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete License incompatible to Wikimedia Commons. (The quote line should read "For commercial use, you must obtain prior approval from this production committee" though) Relicense and redistribution are not allowed either - "利用者は、当製作委員会が本ライセンスで許諾した権利を第三者に再許諾することはできないものとします。" ("The User may not relicense the rights granted by this License to a third party.") whym (talk) 06:53, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:43, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Not necessarily own work, non-trival logo ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:43, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Not necessarily own work, Organisational logo. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:46, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Not necessarily own work, Non trivial organisational logo ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:46, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Not necessarily own work, Non-trival organisational logo. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:46, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
All images can be found in multiple locations on a web search. No evidence is provided of release with a compatible free license.
- File:BCCI logo.png
- File:Akash Chopra.jpg
- File:Virender Sehwag1.jpg
- File:Virat Kohli.jpg
- File:Gautam Gambhir 2008.jpg
- File:VVS Laxman, Cricketer.jpg
Begoon 09:45, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note also that the uploader blanked this page. -- Begoon 10:07, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permissions. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
not a web host + promotional
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 07:33, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:19, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Unused private self-promotional image, out of scope. Achim (talk) 10:04, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
No permission, and i don't think it fall in scope of PD like this photos in Category:Monkey selfie. Smooth O (talk) 10:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - funny image, but I don't think it is in PD. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
すみません、「屋外美術」を自分で撮影した写真を、間違えてコモンズにアップロードしてしまいました。被写体は郡山市の公式マスコットですが、著作権上問題がある場合は、お手数ですが、削除をお願いします。 ウィキ太郎 (talk) 10:19, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Speedy delete COM:CSD#F1 unapplicable COM:FOP#Japan and COM:CSD#G7. --eien20 (talk) 18:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - derivative work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of User:Mmma2690
[edit]All photos uploaded by Mmma2690 (talk · contribs) are from various websites without permission. --Smooth O (talk) 10:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: already speedy deleted by Didym. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:55, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Low quality/resolution, no EXIF: unlikely "own work". Wcam (talk) 13:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted + any verifiable source. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:45, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: all personal image, only contributions. Does anyone else see notability?
- File:Ryan Lebow Hoopdome Champions 1.jpg
- File:Ryan Lebow Hoopdome Champions 2.jpg
- File:Ryan Lebow at Buffalo bills.jpg
- File:Ryan Lebow B & W.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:57, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahesh Sunkara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal images, only contributions and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:04, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:54, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:05, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
None of the files have Metadata. Some of them with long texts probably copied from medical websites like File:New photo of oral lichen planus ,it is important to examine the patient mouth.jpg copied from here. In some others the texts are on the file talk, see File talk:Systemic lupus erythematosus new photo to avoid wrong diagnosis as ichtyosis to help doctors and students.jpg or File talk:Basocellular epithiloma new photo for diagnosis.jpg. Some are obvious copyvios: File:Psoriasis scales.jpg found on several sites (one of the sites), File:Ichtyiosis new photo for diagnosis.jpg from here. The uploader states in their user page dermatologist interested in clinical diagnosis and ttt I need your encourage to add more All photos are formed by me and all are real cases and claims authorship of all of the images, I suspect none of them is own work, many of them can't be found on Google though.
- File:Angioedema anaphylaxis new photo for help disgnosis.jpg
- File:Malaria tuba new photo avoid wrong diagnosis.jpg
- File:Guttate psoriasis new photo for diagnosis ,avoid mistakes.jpg
- File:Chicken pox new photo for diagnosis.jpg
- File:Fibroma new photo for diagnosis.jpg
- File:Pomphyolix new photo for diagnosis.jpg
- File:Dyshidrotic eczema new photo for helping tight diagnosis.jpg
- File:Prurigo pregnancy new photo for diagnosis.jpg
- File:L eishmaniasis new photo for diagnosis.jpg
- File:Geographic tounge new photo for diagnosis.jpg
- File:Planter keratolysis new photo for dignosis.jpg
- File:Black hairy tounge new photo adding for diagnosis.jpg
- File:Impetigo contagusum new photo for help diagnosis.jpg
- File:Leukoplakia new photo to help diagnosis.jpg
- File:Lupus erthymtouses new photo for helping diagnosis.jpg
- File:Tines corporis new photo for help diagnosis.jpg
- File:Miliria pustules new photo for help right diagnosis.jpg
- File:Cryoglobulinemia new photo for diagnosis.jpg
- File:Molluscum contagiousum new photo for diagnosis.jpg
- File:Allergic contact dermatitis new photo for man hand suffer from allergic ,he works in chemical factory.jpg
- File:Varicose eczema or venous eczema new photo for helping diagnosis.jpg
- File:It's called chlore acne but this case as you see due to used steroids with acne ,as you see skin pigmentation with acne.jpg
- File:Erythematosus p apules new photo for helping diagnosis.jpg
- File:Seborrheic dermatitis new photo for diagnosis.jpg
- File:Impetigo C ontagusom new photo for diagnosis.jpg
- File:Eczema herpitcum new photo for diagnosis.jpg
- File:New photo of oral lichen planus ,it is important to examine the patient mouth.jpg
- File:Tinea versicolour new photo avoid wrong diagnosis it should immediately tt by antifungal nystatin.jpg
- File:Systemic lupus erythematosus new photo to avoid wrong diagnosis as ichtyosis to help doctors and students.jpg
- File:Another photo for Fox fordyce disease to help in diagnosis and avoid wrong diagnosis.jpg
Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Parthivgohil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photos, some selfies, some advert and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:Parthiv Gohil at WOMAD Festival with bassist, composer, and producer Michael League. League calls Snarky Puppy.jpg
- File:Parthiv Gohil Halka Suroor Music Video.jpg
- File:Parthiv Gohil Single Music Video GARBO.jpg
- File:Parthiv Gohil Live show banner.jpg
- File:Parthiv Gohil.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:04, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nikhilshuklaindianarmy1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:Tranning.jpg
- File:Partytime.jpg
- File:Cammando tranning visit.jpg
- File:Nikhilshuklaindianamy.jpg
- File:Nikhilshuklaindianarmy.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iftakhar Ahmad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal images, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:Iftakharkhan.jpg
- File:Iftakharistyak.jpg
- File:Ifta.jpg
- File:Ahmad.jpg
- File:Iftakhar.jpg
- File:Iftakhar Ahmad.jpg
- File:Iftakhar Ahmad (3).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Official Boica (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal images/selfies/advert, only contributions. none are used and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:Official Boica.jpg
- File:Boica photos 10.jpg
- File:Boica photos 7.jpg
- File:Boica photos 6.jpg
- File:Boica photos 5.jpg
- File:Boica photos 3.jpg
- File:Boica photos 4.jpg
- File:Boica photos 2.jpg
- File:Boica photos1.jpg
- File:Boica photos.jpg
- File:Boica official image 9.jpg
- File:Boica official image 8.jpg
- File:Boica official image 7.jpg
- File:Boica official image 6.jpg
- File:Boica official image 5.jpg
- File:Boica official image 4.jpg
- File:Boica official image 3.jpg
- File:Boica official Image.jpg
- File:Boica official image.jpg
- File:Boica Dor-ba-le.jpg
- File:Boica's Auto Biography.jpg
- File:Boica dor-ba-le official.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: advertisement 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:31, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 22:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 22:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
copyrighted, fansite t-araworld.net is not an owner of this pic Snowflake91 (talk) 22:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
(c) BRON YR AUR, missing source. Identity of Khalil Le Rajaoui should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unidentified subject with insufficient description. ŠJů (talk) 22:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
![22:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/12/30#c-ŠJů-2017-12-30T22:56:00.000Z-File:"SÁTOR"_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
![22:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/12/30#c-Didym-2018-01-06T22:12:00.000Z-File:"SÁTOR"_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
(c) BRON YR AUR, missing source. Identity of Khalil Le Rajaoui should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:55, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
(c) BRON YR AUR, missing source. Identity of Khalil Le Rajaoui should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal file. Low resolution, motion blur and the only other image from the user (File:Aryan 10207835343991458 3801090833110309234 n.jpg) is a questionable and photoshopped image. The latter is suggesting we can't take this user's word for it when saying it's their own work. W3ird N3rd (talk) 00:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 22:20, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Simorgh statue, Nishapur
[edit]No COM:FOP in Iran.
- File:Signboard of Simorgh statue 1.JPG
- File:Simorgh Culture House - simorgh statue- Nishapur 002.JPG
- File:Simorgh Culture House - simorgh statue- Nishapur 003.JPG
- File:Simorgh Culture House - simorgh statue- Nishapur 004.JPG
- File:Simorgh statue - morning - Nishapur 2.JPG
- File:Simorgh statue - morning - Nishapur 3.JPG
- File:Simorgh statue - morning - Nishapur 4.JPG
- File:Simorgh statue - morning - Nishapur 6.JPG
- File:Simorgh statue - morning - Nishapur 7.JPG
- File:Simorgh1.JPG
- File:Simorgh2.JPG
- File:Simurh (Roc) Statue at Nishapur.jpg
_Statue_at_Nishapur.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
4nn1l2 (talk) 01:09, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- one of them (File:Simorgh1.JPG, i liked this sunset view) can be cropped, i will use CropTool. Why you @4nn1l2: just focusing on deletion man! be creative . --Rafic.Mufid (talk) 14:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you! I try to be more creative :) 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 22:28, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Probably a bit too unclear to be useful. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
HOLA QUISIERA QUE ELIMINEN A LA BREVEDAD MI CUENTA DE WIKICOMMONS, YA QUE NO ENTENDI SU FUNCIONAMIENTO. MUCHAS GRACIAS Anselmo Francisco Aieta (talk) 21:21, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 03:19, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Previously published on Facebook and EXIF creator does not match Author. Likely a copyright violation. - MrX 13:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:29, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rejirajesh7 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo/selfie and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused photo of unknown person and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:19, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:22, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:27, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:28, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shafahidislam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:35, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:35, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Don´t know how to handle, therefore a deletion nomination. This pis is from flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/josecamoessilva/6395369869. Author: Jose Camões Silva, Upload: 24th November 2011. ....HMS (talk) 19:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 12:35, 7 Januar 2018 UTC: No permission since 30 December 2017 --Krdbot 19:26, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted light installation. From the festival page https://www.luxhelsinki.fi/en/info/ : "taking photos or videos of the festival and its installations for non-commercial purposes is permitted and even encouraged." Kyykaarme (talk) 20:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ok. Please remove the image if it infringes copyrights. -Puppe100 (talk) 08:06, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:49, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted light installation. From the festival page https://www.luxhelsinki.fi/en/info/ : "taking photos or videos of the festival and its installations for non-commercial purposes is permitted and even encouraged." Kyykaarme (talk) 20:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ok. Please remove the image if it infringes copyrights. -Puppe100 (talk) 08:04, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:48, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
child sexual abuse image Usernameeeee123456 (talk) 20:54, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
child sexual abuse image Usernameeeee123456 (talk) 20:57, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=File:Liv Forsythe.jpg]]
Deleted: personal image, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 19:46, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
child sexual abuse image Usernameeeee123456 (talk) 20:55, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
child sexual abuse image Usernameeeee123456 (talk) 20:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=File:Liv Forsythe.jpg]]
Deleted: personal image, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 19:46, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Company/organisation logo, on webpage with copyright notice. See http://research-groups.usask.ca/cris/index.php Nick Moyes (talk) 22:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, complex logo without permission. --Wdwd (talk) 19:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Probably out of scope: personal image, only contribution an google search of Shamba Tull doesn't come up with much notable other then a facebook page Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:27, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KABIR KHAN MONNA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 19:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: coypvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Duplicating someone's work Störm (talk) 17:05, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Duplicating what?. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:12, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Naval_Colony_(HBCHS)_-_Main_Gate_(Entrance).jpg + wrong attribution Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:54, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
_-_Main_Gate_(Entrance).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 20:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Charles Hartanto Wijaya (talk · contribs)
[edit]COPYVIO Files are from http://www.piugame.com Copyright ⓒ Andamiro Co., LTD. All rights reserved. The uploader does not have permission to claim use under CC license.
- File:PIU2017UPDATED.png
- File:PIU2017UCS.png
- File:PIU2017FAVORITE.png
- File:PIU2017QUESTZONE.png
- File:PIU2017RANDOM.png
- File:PIU2017COOPLAY.png
- File:PIU2017SHORTCUT.png
- File:PIU2017XROSS.png
- File:PIU2017WORLDMUSIC.png
- File:PIU2017JMUSIC.png
- File:PIU2017KPOP.png
- File:PIU2017ORIGINAL.png
- File:PIU2017ALLTUNES.png
- File:PUMPITUPJAPANESEPRIMELOGO.png
- File:PRIME22018LOGO.png
- File:PIU2017PRIMEBANNER.png
- File:PIUPRIME2 BANNER.png
- File:PIU2017FIESTAFIESTAEXBANNER.png
- File:PIU2017FIESTA2BANNER.png
- File:PIU2017NXNXABANNER.png
- File:PIU2017EXCEEDZEROBANNER.png
- File:PIU20171STPERFBANNER.png
- File:PIU2017EXTRAPREX3BANNER.png
- File:PIU2010WORLDMUSIC.png
- File:PIU2010MISSIONZONE.png
- File:PIU2010SKILLUPZONE.png
- File:PIU2010NEWTUNES.png
- File:PIUBANNERJMUSIC.png
- File:PIUBANNERWORLDMUSIC.png
- File:PIU2015BANNERKPOP.png
Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 20:04, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --Wdwd (talk) 20:02, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Charles Hartanto Wijaya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Clogoakb48.png
- File:SKELogo.png
- File:Boysandmen2010.jpg
- File:Matsuri-nine.png
- File:BMK-Kenkyuusei.png
- File:YHlogo BOYSver.png
- File:Andamiro black.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Advertising and self-promotion are not allowed on Commons. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 20:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 19:58, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
small-sized panoramio upload of rather poor quality ? Roland zh (talk) 20:50, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 19:51, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:33, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph. There are numerous other pictures of this statue on Commons at Category:Tian Tan Buddha Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 14:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:34, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:45, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
This coat of arms of education society in es:Urachiche has two problems. At first, I am not sure, that {{PD-VenezuelaGov}} applies, in my opinion this is not governmental society, that case it is copyright violation and needs OTRS-permission from society representative. At second, although the society is mentioned in the linked article, maybe it is still out of project scope, because no article exists and notability is unclear. Taivo (talk) 07:24, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:11, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Narges 1374 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal images, and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:17, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TRISHA DESIGN PUNE (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:ADVERT
- File:FIND ON US Google+.jpg
- File:STANDEE DESIGN.jpg
- File:PRODUCT PACKAGE DESIGN.jpg
- File:PRODUCT PACK.jpg
- File:ADVERTISEMENT.jpg
- File:BROCHURE DESIGNS.jpg
- File:PACKAGING DESIGN.jpg
- File:BROCHURE DESIGN.jpg
- File:ILLUSTRATION.jpg
- File:BRANDING.jpg
- File:GRAPHIC DESIGNING & PRINTING SOLUTIONS.jpg
- File:LOGO DESIGNING.jpg
- File:LOGO DESIGN.jpg
Sad crown (talk) 18:31, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free work. Wcam (talk) 13:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Wcam: Could you please help me to move this file to zhwiki as fair use? I have comfirmed that it is a non-free work.--WQL (talk) 13:47, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Please feel free to do so by yourself, since it does not require any special privileges such as admin. --Wcam (talk) 13:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by Dyolf77. Ruthven (msg) 17:25, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:25, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Acharya Sagar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:12, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 17:59, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samirmridha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 18:51, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
© 2017 NCAA | Turner Sports Interactive, Inc.. Copy of http://www.ncaa.com/news/football/article/2017-09-07/texas-am-commerces-luis-perez-most-interesting-man-dii-football Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable person, article was deleted, no other use possible. King Rk (talk) 13:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Common Good (talk) 07:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:11, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:53, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:11, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:53, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
previously published on the Internet. No fair use. http://culture.affinitymagazine.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/sleepingatlast-300x217.jpg https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CQ4FcnDUAAA_p1w.jpg https://i0.wp.com/celebmix.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/exclusive-interview-with-sleeping-at-last-01.jpg?resize=364%2C205 Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:50, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: the indicated url have been published after the upload on Commons. Ruthven (msg) 10:53, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The original file may be OK per COM:DM, but I think this one is problematic. 4nn1l2 (talk) 02:54, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:54, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Pic was originally posted by brazil newsportal G1 (belongs to Globo Comunicação e Participações S.A.) as shown here Foto: Érico Andrade/G1. ....HMS (talk) 03:14, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @PaulasBunt: Please use speedy deletion for such blunt copyvio next time. Thx. Ruthven (msg) 10:55, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Semble ne pas correspondre au personnage à lier avec cette image. DamMic (talk) 05:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Proposer un autre nome ou changer la description. Ruthven (msg) 10:55, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work for such a small size file. User with just one upload and username suggestive of some organization. COM:PRP Rahul Bott (talk) 12:14, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:56, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
nothing is sharp on this image. no educational value. uploaded by bot Albinfo (talk) 12:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:56, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Friedrich Ebert (* 4. Februar 1871 in Heidelberg; † 28. Februar 1925 in Berlin) , Büste.jpg
[edit]_,_B%C3%BCste.jpg){kind=link}
_,_B%C3%BCste.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no author, no source Mutter Erde (talk) 12:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:57, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
,_B%C3%BCste.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_B%C3%BCste.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no author, no source Mutter Erde (talk) 12:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:57, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
,_B%C3%BCste.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_B%C3%BCste.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no author, no source Mutter Erde (talk) 12:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
,_Büste.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:58, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
,_Büste.jpg){kind=link}
This portrait has been replaced by a better portrait which is now active @ https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quintalle_Nix . This picture is now obsolete and not much liked by Ms Nix. Pls remove. Thx a lot, Hans van der Kruijf Hansvdkruijf (talk) 12:47, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. I see currently no need for deletion of this image, which has been uploaded to wikiportret and licenced with the CC-BY-SA licence by the user who is now nominating it. The reason somebody does not like it much is imho irrelevant. Elly (talk) 13:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep alongside millions of images replaced in Wikipedia (and elsewhere) for various reasons. And it’s a 2000 × 2000 px image, dammit. It was, generally, a poor decision to make starting deletion debates by strangers (for a manufactured, not legal, reason) so easy. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Why keep a picture that is replaced by a better one, not used on any page and if the portreteed does not like this pic ? . This pic was used for testing the media upload and page before publishing the final version with the final picture. I have removed the CC lics if that solves the problem. Pls note that under any licensing structure, the copyright owner (me in this case) has the full right to delete his work no matter for what reason !
Hans van der Kruijf Hansvdkruijf (talk) 15:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Hansvdkruijf: your copyright claim requires evidences. Why should one challenge the conclusion of an OTRS member but accept an empty-words statement of a user who only edited two articles in nl.wikipedia? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: CC licenses are irrevocable, so the removal of the licensing template is irrelevant (and has been reverted). We only have two pictures of the subject and they're distinctly different, so neither of them is even slightly redundant. --bjh21 (talk) 19:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 10:57, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork by still living artist, not permanently located in public space. Elly (talk) 13:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
NOT copyrighted material, I am the author. These are my and my father's works and given to the public domain by us. This concerns a photograph made by my father and me, enhanced in Photoshop, by me. If there is no concrete copyright infringement complaint, please refrain from trying to remove material added to Wiki Commons. I have been unable to reach permissions-nl@wikimedia.nl (mail bounces back) in order to inform about the CC-BY-SA-4.0 Hadifa25 (talk · contribs)
- User has contacted OTRS. For this file permission is pending as of today. See ticket:2018011410002427. Mbch331 (talk) 10:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Permission is granted in ticket:2018011410002632. Mbch331 (talk) 15:12, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 10:58, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Cambodia. This infringes on the copyright for the two buildings that are the principal subject. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Dear Jim, thanks a lot for the notice! Please provide the exact number and date of the Cambodia law related to authorship, which you are sure this image violates. Also I'd like to ask you to make a proper translation from Khmer into English, because me and possibly other wikipedia contributors are not very familiar with Khmer language. Have you asked an opinion of a lawyer who specializes in copyrights? I would like to see his answer here, preferably with his contact details. Thank you so much for making Wikipedia better. --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 17:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . See Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Cambodia. Ruthven (msg) 11:04, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork by still living artist, not permanently located in public space. Elly (talk) 13:17, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Artist has contacted OTRS. Permission is pending. See ticket:2018011410002427. Vysotsky (talk) 11:46, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Waiting for OTRS to conclude. Ruthven (msg) 11:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork Elly (talk) 13:19, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
NOT copyrighted material, I am the author. These are my and my father's works and given to the public domain by us. If there is no concrete copyright infringement complaint, please refrain from trying to remove material added to Wiki Commons. Besides this, I urge Wikipedia to embrace and defend the idea of 'fair-use'. Hadifa25
- Comment Please wait one week before taking action. Give this user the chance to substantiate his claim by writing to OTRS. In this case I assume good faith. Vysotsky (talk) 21:48, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I have tried to contact permissions-nl@wikimedia.nl, however the mail bounces back. Please, your advice. Hadifa25 (talk · contribs)
- The correct address is permissions-nl@wikimedia.org. I will post this also on your talk page. Elly (talk) 14:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Permission received. See ticket:2018011410002632. Mbch331 (talk) 10:53, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Image can be kept. Elly (talk) 17:48, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 11:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Similar to http://www.imgrum.org/media/1615973318783251034_1131848289 Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Patrick Rogel: Please use {{Copyvio}} next time, instead of opening a DR. Ruthven (msg) 11:07, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
The given license {{PD-PRC-exempt}} does not apply here. Wcam (talk) 13:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Please excuse my innocence, but why? This file is an attachment of The Temporary Regulation for Making and Using of The Logo of Shanghai Municipality, which was released into the public domain initially.--WQL (talk) 13:31, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- {{PD-PRC-exempt}} only covers textual documents, not images. See for example Commons:Deletion requests/File:China Immigration Inspection brand image-nihao.jpg. --Wcam (talk) 13:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your useful explanation! Could you please help me to delete this file? I would like transfer it to zhwiki. --WQL (talk) 13:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- {{PD-PRC-exempt}} only covers textual documents, not images. See for example Commons:Deletion requests/File:China Immigration Inspection brand image-nihao.jpg. --Wcam (talk) 13:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:07, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.JPG_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
bad quality, not usable Rudolphous (talk) 13:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.JPG_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:07, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.JPG_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
(c) Aurélie Raisin. Identity of Schabel alexandre should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:07, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:10, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Due to the alienating effect this picture is not within the scope of the project. Cannot be used to illustrate any article. Grueslayer (talk) 14:11, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:08, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:31, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:10, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: selfie, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:47, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:10, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:12, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused unknown personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:55, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:12, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:12, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
OTRS ticket is missing Mutter Erde (talk) 15:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:14, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:04, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused, unknown person and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unknown person and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:18, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:Tim Enso Studio Session.jpg
- File:Photo Nov 08, 7 45 50 AM.jpg
- File:Tim Enso.jpg
- File:TimEnso.jpg
- File:Photo Dec 15, 6 23 29 PM.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:19, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + ADVERT. Ruthven (msg) 11:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Loumi aziza (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal image, and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:43, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:47, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:50, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
If notable enough to keep would need otrs permission. Can not be "Own work" and taken by someone else. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 11:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Image of unknown person and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:54, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RAHUL GROVER (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:55, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
This is a crudely photoshopped edit to File:Andrew Rannels.jpg to add a fake nose ring. Eggishorn (talk) 15:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:05, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:14, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:21, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:20, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:21, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:20, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unknown person, unused, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:20, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Spam. jdx Re: 16:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:20, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
no proof that the author allowed reuse Nomen ad hoc (talk) 16:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Image from FB. Ruthven (msg) 11:20, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:47, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Should be used eventually on WikiBooks. Ruthven (msg) 11:21, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:21, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:21, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Not used self promotion photo, out of project scope! Ras67 (talk) 16:49, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom -Daylen (talk) 20:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:21, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:50, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:21, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
out of scope; promotional image; may also be a copyvio as well, especially the portrait theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:50, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:21, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
out of scope; promotional image theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + no permission. Ruthven (msg) 11:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be "own work". Pope Paul VI died in 1978 Py4nf (talk) 16:54, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photo shot in Brazil. Ruthven (msg) 11:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyright: http://www.panaghyatsambika.com.br/?p=1042 Py4nf (talk) 17:08, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Py4nf: Use {{Copyvio}} next time please. Ruthven (msg) 11:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
experimental out-of-scope stuff Joschi71 (talk) 17:14, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: can be used. Ruthven (msg) 11:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
experimental out-of-scope stuff Joschi71 (talk) 17:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
experimental out-of-scope stuff (here: is this art or low quality??) Joschi71 (talk) 17:17, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: can be used. Ruthven (msg) 11:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Already published at http://esplendordafe.blogspot.com.br/2017/01/?m=1 Py4nf (talk) 17:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 11:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:24, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
and File:Organisation service "information française" . sténo-radio du Petit Parisien.jpg
Dear Slitinsky, this photo can not be your "own work", therefore the licence is invalid. We need the actual photographer to assess, whether this work could be in Public Domain or so on. Your scanning/photographing produces no new copyright! Please read COM:L! Ras67 (talk) 17:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:24, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal privacy KingChandrakant (talk) 17:27, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Personal privacy KingChandrakant (talk) 17:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 11:26, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:26, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
low quality or experimental out-of-scope-stuff, alternatives available Joschi71 (talk) 17:35, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:26, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Author and copyright holder Olga Plastino: www.olgaplastino.com (Metadata) ....HMS (talk) 17:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: OTRS authorisation needed from the author Olga Plastino. Ruthven (msg) 11:27, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Inferior to File:Kjp emblema.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:44, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: use {{Superseded}} instead. Ruthven (msg) 11:28, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Art work by living artist pt:Benedita Serrano.
- File:Benedita Serrano, 2000, Untitled, oil on canvas, 81x100cm.JPG
- File:Benedita Serrano, 1972, "Untitled", oil on canvas, 160x140cm.jpg
GeorgHH • talk 17:57, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 11:28, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
File:L'écrivain Vakaba savané en compagnie du Ministre de la culture et de la francophonie de la Côte D'ivoire , Mr Maurice Kouakou Bandama aussi écrivain et l'écrivaine Mahoua S Bakayoko.jpg
[edit]
Any metadata, low-re image, out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:09, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
badly tilted low quality image - no edu value Sad crown (talk) 18:09, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: OOS. Ruthven (msg) 11:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
File:L'écrivain Vakaba Savané invité au Salon du livre d'Alger en compagnie du Célèbre écrivain Algérien Rachid Boudjera.jpg
[edit]
Copy of https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1693845677332565&set=a.311450025572144.96263.100001214469278&type=3&theater, out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused no eduse and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:11, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Cover art : (c) Zouhair Essekrat, any permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:12, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Own work seems unlikely to me - the chance that the uploader attended a royal wedding in 1950 seems rather low. No matches from google image search though. COM:PRP -mattbuck (Talk) 18:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment. If the author can't be identified, and the picture has been published in UE, it sounds reasonable to restore it in 2021. But for that, we need to try to make reasonable inquiries to check the author. The uploader could help explaining where they found the picture. --Dereckson (talk) 19:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Changed the license to PD-EU-no author disclosure. To be undeleted in 2021. Ruthven (msg) 11:34, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
User has uploaded large numbers of images claimed as own work. However most appear to be old photos which may or may not be PD. There's also some paintings which again may or may not be PD.
File:Sophia Weber Haibl 1.jpgkept, XVIII century painting. --Ruthven (msg) 11:57, 27 January 2018 (UTC)File:Josepha.jpgkept, painting attributed to Benjamin Vandergucht. --Ruthven (msg) 11:57, 27 January 2018 (UTC)File:Hermine of Austria par Anton Einsle.jpgkept, XIX c. portrait. However, attribution disputed.File:FriederikeOldemburg.jpgkept, XIX c. portrait- File:CarmenRuiz.jpg
- File:Emma Penella Manuela.jpg
- File:Luisa Carlota.jpg
File:MariW.jpgkept, XV c. artwork- File:Maria reina.jpg
- File:Maria de Aragon.jpg
File:Maria d Este.jpgkeptFile:Miguel Mihura.jpgkept- File:CICLO-AMPARO-RIVELLES-web1.jpg
- File:Terelex.jpg
- File:Aurora-rodriguez-carballeira.jpg
File:AA ASANTEWA--QUEEN MOTHER OF THE EJISU CLAN OF THE ASANTE.jpgalready in a DR at Commons:Deletion requests/File:AA ASANTEWA--QUEEN MOTHER OF THE EJISU CLAN OF THE ASANTE.jpg. --Ruthven (msg) 15:51, 31 December 2017 (UTC)File:Giuditta Grisi.jpgkept, XVIII c. portraitFile:Catalina de Inglaterra.jpgkept, XVI c. portraitFile:CatalinaReina.jpgkept, XVI c. portraitFile:Catalina .jpgkept, work by Lucas HarembourgFile:Catalina de Aragon.jpgkept XVI century portrait --Ruthven (msg) 00:30, 4 January 2018 (UTC)- File:Tórtola Valencia.jpg
- File:Fawkia.jpg
- File:Princess Necle.jpg
- File:Neclita2.jpg
- File:Necla.jpg
- File:Elizabeth of Greece.jpg
- File:Isabeley3.jpg
File:Eugenie.jpgkept pd-oldFile:Teodolinde.jpgkept pd-oldFile:Princess Teodolinada.jpgkept pd-oldFile:Princess Eugénie of Sweden.jpgkept – work by Friedrich Dürck --Ruthven (msg) 00:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)File:Sin título-Color real-12.jpgkept, pd-old
-mattbuck (Talk) 18:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- File:Princess Teodolinada.jpg is probably pretty safe -- a 19th-century style engraving of a woman wearing an 1840s hairstyle. Churchh (talk) 19:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- File:Sin título-Color real-12.jpg appears to be a crop of File:Marie Luise, Prinzessin von Sachsen, geb. Prinzessin von Lucca.jpg and therefore is {{PD-art-old-100}}. Arthur Kerensa (talk) 16:55, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- File:Neclita2.jpg is 69 years old? How is the CR law of Egypt? --E4024 (talk) 07:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- File:Necla.jpg She was born in 1926 and married at 17 years of age (AFAIK). That makes 1943. 1943 photos in Egypt (75 years old) are still protected? Who knows? Ashashyou, User:Rafic? --E4024 (talk) 07:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- let @4nn1l2: check them. --Rafic.Mufid (talk) 07:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Kept the others. Ruthven (msg) 13:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - Not educationally useful; personal image of uploader Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 18:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept:
This image is used on a user page of a Wikimedia user and is stored on Commons according to the rules set out in Commons:Project scope#File in use on Commons only: the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed or Commons:Project scope#File in use in another Wikimedia project: the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project.
If the image ceases to be used it may be eligible for deletion as it may have no educational purpose.
Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 18:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:08, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded better resolution photo. Please remove the image from deletion page Comment: updated EXIF info and better resolution photo, Srichakra Pranav (talk) 17:21 , 31 December 2017 (IST)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: file has exif data. Ruthven (msg) 13:09, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal image of uploader. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 18:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:09, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
unused personal files and/or partially personality and copyright right issues ?
- File:THUNDERS THIRD WIN.JPG
- File:HURRICANES THIRD WIN.JPG
- File:VOLCANOES.JPG
- File:HURRICANES.JPG
- File:THUNDERS.JPG
- File:Day 2 - Winners - Tornadoes (15-Sep-2013).jpg
- File:Day 2 - Winners - Volcanoes (15-Sep-2013).JPG
- File:Day 2 - Winners - Avalanches (15-Sep-2013).JPG
- File:Winners - Harricanes (14-Sep-2013).jpg
- File:Winners -Thumders(14-Sep-2013).JPG
- File:Winners-Volcanoes (14-Sep-2013).jpg
- File:Most runs.jpg
- File:MOST RUNS.png
- File:Most wickets.jpg
- File:Most Runs.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Roland zh (talk) 18:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: kept the photos of the cricket team, deleted the others. Ruthven (msg) 13:13, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
unused personal file,~ Roland zh (talk) 18:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:13, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the work of Willy Stöwer in 1912 LMLM (talk) 18:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Correct, this one is Willy Stöwer's. --Achim (talk) 22:12, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jcb. Ruthven (msg) 13:13, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded better resolution photo. Please remove the image from deletion page Comment: updated EXIF info and better resolution photo, Srichakra Pranav (talk) 17:21 , 31 December 2017 (IST)
Kept: per Srichakra Pranav. Ruthven (msg) 13:14, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
unused panoramio upload of rather bad quality & personality right issues, Roland zh (talk) 19:17, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: good enough quality and no personality issues. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no other copies found around. Appears to be genuine. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Not de minimis: Copyrighted work (Late Show ad) is a key part of the subject (it is the reason for taking the photo). Wcam (talk) 19:27, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 19:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 19:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
x-wiki self promo, LTA Minoraxtalk 13:43, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- This is not an "own work" either; while "this" is an own work. Delete the former. --E4024 (talk) 13:48, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- What has changed since this was kept after the first deletion request? It is still in use. Please clarify why this is not an "own work". It is used in several user pages, although some or all of the user accounts are now globally locked. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. Only used on userpages of a multiple accounts abuser, no meaningful edits whatsoever. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be "own work" since it was published in 2009 at http://revistaeletronicadesaomiguel.blogspot.com.br/2009/05/dom-manuel-parrado-carral.html Py4nf (talk) 19:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
panoramio upload of very bad quality, Roland zh (talk) 19:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Advertising and self-promotion are not allowed on Commons. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 19:44, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
I uploaded better resolution photo. Please remove the image from deletion page Comment: updated EXIF info and better resolution photo, Srichakra Pranav (talk) 17:21 , 31 December 2017 (IST)
Kept: per Srichakra Pranav. Ruthven (msg) 13:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be "own work": http://pilulasliturgicas.blogspot.com.br/2017/06/eleito-novo-patriarca-greco-melquita.html Py4nf (talk) 19:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be "own work": the user uploaded several images without appropriate license. Py4nf (talk) 20:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Possible copyright infringement, it is not a "own work": image in glamurama.uol. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 20:04, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Ukraine. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Ukraine. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Ukraine. Built in 1982. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
panoramio upload of rather poor quality ? Roland zh (talk) 20:19, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: can be kept. Ruthven (msg) 13:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
unused file with potentially copyright issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 20:21, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: no notable person. Ruthven (msg) 13:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
unused personal file, hence, out of scope ? Roland zh (talk) 20:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: building in India, can be used. Ruthven (msg) 13:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
unused, twice tagged panoramio upload, what to do to ? Roland zh (talk) 20:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
twice tagged panoramio upload, unusable ? Roland zh (talk) 20:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I added the {{Watermarked}} template. Ruthven (msg) 13:20, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
twice tagged panoramio upload, unusable ? Roland zh (talk) 20:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Kuttichal_-_panoramio.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 13:20, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
twice tagged panoramio upload, unusable ? Roland zh (talk) 20:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:20, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
twice tagged panoramio upload, unusable ? Roland zh (talk) 20:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Kuttichal_-_panoramio.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 13:21, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personality rights issues, hence, out of scope ? Roland zh (talk) 21:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: personal image. Ruthven (msg) 13:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo with no encyclopedic value. Blurry background. There are many clear images of the area to use instead. Kalbbes (talk) 21:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep illustrative, good quality portrait. --Fæ (talk) 22:30, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Fae. Ruthven (msg) 13:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unvalid date, not own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:54, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: photo of a photo. No permission. Ruthven (msg) 13:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
no forseeable edu use - out of scope Sad crown (talk) 18:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 13:09, 27 Januar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Grassland and sunset.jpg --Krdbot 19:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Tapirus kabomani
[edit]- File:Tapirus kabomani 2013 famale.jpg
- File:Tapirus kabomani 2013 famale.pdf
- File:Tapirus kabomani 2013 female.jpg
- File:Tapirus kabomani 2013 male.jpg
- File:Tapirus kabomani 2013.jpg
Illustrations from this article in the Journal of Mammalogy (located in the supplemental information section). Not public domain as claimed, the license at the bottom of the article is "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/)", which is not compatible with Commons. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Question Where are the illustrations of Tapirus kabomani in the aforementioned BY-NC-ND-3.0 text? I didn't see there. The pictures alone could be free, but i tend to the precautionary principle and therefore Delete. --Ras67 (talk) 18:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Are we sure this is an official gov. photo? It says "Photo by MPI/Getty Images" in the EXIF. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- It's the same portrait as in https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=msu.31293012374009;view=1up;seq=54. That version is black and white and doesn't have the flag in the background, but note the tie and the stray strand of hair just below the part. Looking at http://www.gettyimages.com/search/photographer?family=editorial&photographer=mpi&sort=best#license, it's obvious that MPI and Getty Images are in the business of taking credit for other people's work. —LX (talk, contribs) 00:54, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- This is just a high resolution photo of the same picture that is in the public domain. There are many other instances like this whereupon Gettyimages sells the photo but does not actually have the right to claim copyright. Take for instance, President Obama's presidential photo portrait. http://www.gettyimages.com/license/84291632 Getty sells this picture but does that mean this photo is owned by Getty? --Daffy123 (talk) 03:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded better resolution photo. Please remove the image from deletion page Comment: updated EXIF info and better resolution photo, Srichakra Pranav (talk) 17:21 , 31 December 2017 (IST)
Kept: a higher resolution have been uploaded, thank you. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: a higher resolution have been uploaded, thank you. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:44, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded better resolution photo. Please remove the image from deletion page Comment: updated EXIF info and better resolution photo, Srichakra Pranav (talk) 17:21 , 31 December 2017 (IST)
Kept: a higher resolution have been uploaded, thank you. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jbharvad36 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: selfie, unused and unlikely to be used in a project.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:47, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 22:03, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 14:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: This is a good picture, and would be in scope. But I doubt the license is valid. --Yann (talk) 08:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
This emblem is incorrect. It should say "2d Marine Logistics Group" instead of "2d Marines Logistic Group." The correct emblem is https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2D_MLG_Logo.jpg 2dmlg im (talk) 14:27, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: in use. Please fix it, or ask the graphic help board. --Yann (talk) 08:17, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:49, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Where's the OTRS ticket ? Mutter Erde (talk) 14:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: This file predates OTRS, so maybe COM:GOF applies. --bjh21 (talk) 19:09, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per above. --Yann (talk) 08:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work by the depicted person. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- This file has the permission of Behrouz [User:VASHGIRD|VASHGIRD]]
- @VASHGIRD: please follow the instructions at OTRS: the authorisation is needed from the author. --Ruthven (msg) 11:25, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Talk:18th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)/GA1: "The link to Getty images seems to imply that they might own the copyright to this, as they are asking for a considerable sum for licences." EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 18:54, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, PD-Japan-oldphoto certainly applies. --Yann (talk) 08:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
This user does not understand copyright so we can't trust that. The artist (Ilse DeLange) probably did not release this. The link (https://web.archive.org/web/20120625000709/http://www.ilsedelange.com/news/Ilse's-nieuwe-single-'Doluv2luvu'-gaat-maandag-in-premi%C3%A8re-bij-giel3fm/17669826) does not indicate that either. If this is kept it has to be on the basis that it would be simple geometric forms, but I doubt that applies. W3ird N3rd (talk) 21:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- To clarify, this album cover may or may not be PD-ineligible in the US. The TOO in The Netherlands is considerably lower than the TOO in the US, so this file should probably be removed. But I admit I can't be sure either. If it is kept the license would have to be changed. - Alexis Jazz 03:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-textogo. --Yann (talk) 10:01, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 1
[edit]No FoP in Romania - this palace was designed by a team of architects led by Anca Petrescu (died in 2013) - construction was begun in 1980 and finished in 1997
- File:Palace of the Parliament (world's largest civilian building ) Bucharest, Roamnia, Southeastern Europe.jpg
- File:20140701 Bucureşti 08.jpg
- File:20140816 București 116.jpg
- File:20140816 București 118.jpg
- File:20140816 București 119.jpg
- File:20140816 București 120.jpg
- File:20140816 București 122.jpg
- File:20140816 București 172.jpg
- File:20140816 București 179.jpg
- File:20140816 București 181.jpg
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 02.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 03.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 04.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 05.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 07.jpg
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 08.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 09.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 12.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 13.jpg
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 16.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 17.jpg
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 18.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 19.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 20.jpg
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 26.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 29.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 30.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 40.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 47.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 48.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 49.jpg
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 50.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 51.jpg
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 52.JPG
- File:Bucarest Palatul Parlamentului 53.JPG
- File:Bucarest, Palazzo del Parlamento di notte 03.JPG
- File:Bucarest, Palazzo del Parlamento di notte 04.JPG
- File:Bucharest - Palace of Parliament (14696884403).jpg
- File:Bukareŝto, parlamentejo de sudo 1 retuŝita.jpeg
- File:Casa Poporului, Romania's House of Parliament.jpg
- File:Ceauşescu's Palace of the Parliament.jpg
- File:EPP Congress 1831 (8096486583).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 1837 (8096486337).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 1841 (8096494034).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 1842 (8096493958).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 1844 (8096493862).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574447).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574579).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574691).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574781).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574951).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094580084).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094580922).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094581040).jpg
- File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094600194).jpg
- File:Largest structure in Europe and second in the World after The Pentagon - Palace of the Parliament (11321680666).jpg
- File:Palace of Parliament (941185367).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament Bucharest.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament of Romania (1518113141).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament of Romania (8003910699).jpg
- File:Palace of the parliament, Bucharest (7969980610).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament.JPG
- File:Palace of the Parliament.jpg
- File:Palais du Parlement Bucarest 1.JPG
- File:Palatul Parlamentului 1.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului 1a.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului 1b.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului b.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului Palace of Parliament at night Bucharest Bucuresti Romania.JPG
- File:Palatul Parlamentului Palace of Parliament Bucharest Bucuresti Romania 3.JPG
- File:Palatul Parlamentului Palace of Parliament Bucharest Bucuresti Romania.JPG
- File:Palatul Parlamentului schuh001.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului schuh002.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului schuh004.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului și Bulevardul Unirii, Zilele Bucureștiului 2014.JPG
- File:Palatul Parlamentului, Zilele Bucureștiului 2014.JPG
- File:Parliament (2477764893).jpg
- File:Parliament of Romania (8839005789).jpg
- File:Peoples Palace (6653232757).jpg
- File:Romania-002.jpg
- File:Romania-1181 - Palace of the Parliament (7557753382).jpg
- File:Romanian parlamenttitalo.jpg
_Bucharest,_Roamnia,_Southeastern_Europe.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 08:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Keep the following, as having the palace as a secondary subject (which is acceptable for the Romanian law): File:EPP Congress 1831 (8096486583).jpg, File:EPP Congress 1837 (8096486337).jpg, File:EPP Congress 1841 (8096494034).jpg, File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574447).jpg, File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574579).jpg, File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574691).jpg, File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094574781).jpg, File:EPP Congress 2012. Day 1 (8094580084).jpg, File:Palatul Parlamentului 1.jpg, File:Palatul Parlamentului schuh001.jpg, File:Palatul Parlamentului și Bulevardul Unirii, Zilele Bucureștiului 2014.JPG--Strainu (talk) 09:18, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Having a few people standing around, or some blue signs hung about doesn't make the Palace, which takes up the majority of the frame in all of these, a "secondary subject". These should be deleted. INeverCry 09:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- You're generalizing. In some of these picture the palace is blurred, in others only the base of the column is visible and in others yet the palace takes only a fraction of the picture. These cannot be considered as having the palace as main subject.--Strainu (talk) 10:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- I was told that images which showed multiple buildings, so that no one particular building was the primary subject of the photo, did not violate Romanian FOP. I looked at Strainu's list, above, and it seemed to me only the following two images meet that criteria. File:Palatul Parlamentului 1.jpg and File:Palatul Parlamentului și Bulevardul Unirii, Zilele Bucureștiului 2014.JPG Geo Swan (talk) 12:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- You're generalizing. In some of these picture the palace is blurred, in others only the base of the column is visible and in others yet the palace takes only a fraction of the picture. These cannot be considered as having the palace as main subject.--Strainu (talk) 10:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment When I uploaded File:Casa Poporului, Romania's House of Parliament.jpg about six years ago, together with several dozen other Romanian images, I wasn't aware of Romanian FOP restrictions. When one of those images was challenged, I found FOP restrictions deeply counter-intuitive, and confusing. I prepared a list of the other Romanian images I uploaded that night.
I still find FOP counter-intuitive. FOP is sometimes interpreted surprisingly leniently for images from France, with contributors arguing it only applies to building with designs that have a "creative" element, which I find odd, as even the most utilitarian garden shed has some creative elements. Anyhow, if this image should go, some of the other images in the list of images I uploaded at the same time should go too. Geo Swan (talk) 12:33, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Most uploaders don't know FOP restrictions exist, find them absurd when they hear about it, and protest in good faith when the deletion of their pictures is requested. The French community being particularly vociferous on the matter, many French admins (including myself) have studied FOP case law, which mitigates the absence of FOP in French law – hence the perceived leniency. My knowledge of Romanian case law is almost non-existent, but we generally apply the De Minimis rule, which encompasses both the building being shown as a secondary subject and the building being shown as part of a general landscape. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 17:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- There are two different de minimis situations in copyright law:
- The work is not the main subject. For example, article 24.2 of the Danish copyright law states that artworks permanently installed in public places may be depicted if they are not the main subject of the depiction, but other artworks do not qualify for this kind of de minimis under Danish copyright law. I would say that no building is the main subject of File:Palatul Parlamentului 1.jpg, so that picture seems to satisfy this de minimis situation.
- The work is irrelevant to the context. This essentially means that removing the work from the picture wouldn't cause any harm. For example, article 23.3 of the Danish copyright law tells that published artworks and copies of artworks which the author has transferred to others may be reproduced in newspapers, magazines, film and television if the artwork is contextually irrelevant. This Danish exception covers virtually all artworks, but it is more difficult to find a situation where an artwork is contextually irrelevant, so there are fewer cases where this situation applies. The purpose of this picture appears to be to display pictures of houses in a city, so this version of de minimis doesn't seem to apply.
- France seems to have chosen to use something similar to Danish article 24.2 with respect to works permanently installed in public places. I'm not sure which version of de minimis Romania uses, though. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. Romanian law acknowledges a limitation to copyright for the reproduction "of the image of an architectural work (...) permanently located in a public place, except where the image of the work is the principal subject (subiectul principal) of such reproduction", so that would be your 24.2 (French case law acknowledges both 24.2 and 23.3 meanings). Unfortunately I can't find any case law on the matter. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Jastrow, I think your interpretation is quite narrow; if the work is irrelevant in the context (such as here and in some other EPP pictures, both inside and outside the palace), how can it be considered the main subject of the picture?--Strainu (talk) 14:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Also probably need to delete File:20140816 București 153.jpg, File:20140816 București 155.jpg, which I just placed in the category. I think File:Bucharest (14161334433).jpg (which I also recently categorized) is arguably OK because it is de minimis, the main focal subject is a fountain that I think is itself below any threshold for copyright. - Jmabel ! talk 00:00, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Also File:Bucharest (13954606099).jpg. - Jmabel ! talk 03:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
19 more:
- File:Bucharest Day 2 - Parlamentului (9335139611).jpg
- File:Bucharest Day 2 - Parlamentului (9337924696).jpg
- File:Bucharest Day 2 - Parlamentului (9337925234).jpg
- File:Bucharest Day 2 - Parlamentului (9337925722).jpg
- File:Bucharest Day 2 - Parlamentului (9337927882).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament (façade).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament Bucharest, Romania (16438450396).jpg
- File:20140819 București 29.jpg
- File:Bucharest (11375435065).jpg
- File:20140816 București 105.jpg
- File:20140816 București 128.jpg
- File:20140816 București 135.jpg
- File:20140816 București 136.jpg
- File:20140816 București 139.jpg
- File:20140816 București 145.jpg
- File:20140816 București 146.jpg
- File:20140816 București 166.jpg
- File:Palace Parliament Romania Bucharest.jpg
- File:20140816 București 230.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Jmabel 16:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
I think File:Palatul Parlamentului Palace of Parliament from University Square Bucharest Bucuresti Romania.JPG (not listed above but also in the category) is OK. Despite being mentioned in the name of the photo, the Palace is barely visible, in little enough detail that I suspect no copyright problem arises. I'm not nominating it for deletion, but someone else may want to. - Jmabel ! talk 02:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted (most pictures): per the nominator: the building is still copyrighted, no freedom of panorama in Romania. Were kept:
- pictures thought to be part of a larger urban landscape, i.e. File:Palatul Parlamentului 1.jpg and more tentatively File:Palatul Parlamentului b.jpg
- pictures representing an event which happens to take place at the Palace, in this case the 2012 EPP Congress in Bucharest.
However, I deleted some pictures of the EPP series which looked more like the Palace with some tiny blue banners on it. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 2
[edit]No FOP in Romania.
- File:Bucurestiul meu - panoramio.jpg
- File:Casa Poporului - Palatul Parlamentului - Romania - panoramio.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament in Bucharest - panoramio.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului - Bulevardul Unirii (25154814949).jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kulmalukko (talk) 17:18, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 3
[edit]No Freedom Of Panorama in Romania.
- File:Bucharest - Union Square (28505857291).jpg
- File:Crop exterior shot of Palace of the Parliament in Bucharest Romania.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament in Bucharest Romania in June 2017.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament.jpg
- File:Parcul Izvor (1).jpg
- File:Parcul Izvor.jpg
- File:Parlement de Bucarest.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kulmalukko (talk) 12:38, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep for File:Parcul Izvor (1).jpg, because it is more about the park than the building in the background. Razvan Socol (talk) 18:11, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 4
[edit]No FOP in Romania.
- File:Bucharest, Palace of the Parliament, 01-08-2004.jpg
- File:Bucuresti, Romania. Cladirea Parlamentului Roman (Fosta Casa a Poporului).jpg
- File:Bucureşti The Presidential Palace. May 1996 (3993876724).jpg
- File:Bukareszt - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:House of the People (20151230 103941 1PS) (24126610366).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament (Bucharest) (30856720786).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament - panoramio.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament in Bucharest (AP4M1788) (7211710170).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament in Bucharest (AP4M1788) (7211710648).jpg
- File:Palata parlamenta - panoramio.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului Häuser des Parlament Bukarest c.jpg
- File:Romanian Parliamentary Palace - panoramio.jpg
- File:Romanya'nın 5 bin odalı muhteşem yapısı ve katledilen çavuşesku ailesi by ismail soytekinoğlu - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(24126610366).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(30856720786).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(7211710170).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(7211710648).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kulmalukko (talk) 19:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep File:Bucureşti The Presidential Palace. May 1996 (3993876724).jpg as the palace does not hold the central place in the picture (as required by Romanian copyright law) and the cars themselves are relevant for Bucharest at the time.--Strainu (talk) 10:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (except one kept). --Green Giant (talk) 21:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 5
[edit]This building was designed by Anca Petrescu, d. 2013. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Romania has no Commons-acceptable FoP. Its FOP is limited only to noncommercial, not compatible with Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses. The selected images fail COM:DM, as the main focus and intent of the images is the building itself.
- File:2004 in Romania (65).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (66).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (67).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (68).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (71).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (72).jpg
- File:2004 in Romania (73).jpg
- File:Bucharest 007.jpg
- File:Bucharest 035.jpg
- File:Bucharest 037.jpg
- File:Bucharest 038.jpg
- File:Bucuresti, Romania. Casa Poporului (Palatul Parlamentului) 2 Iunie 2018. (5).jpg
- File:Bucuresti, Romania. Casa Poporului (Palatul Parlamentului) 2 Iunie 2018. (6).jpg
- File:Bucuresti, Romania. Casa Poporului (Palatul Parlamentului) 2 Iunie 2018.jpg
- File:Bucuresti, Romania. Casa Poporului (Palatul Parlamentului). 2 Iunie 2018. (3).jpg
- File:Bucureşti June 1996 (3407051287).jpg
- File:Bucureşti The Presidential Palace. May 1996 (3993876724).jpg
- File:DSC09310 (15048479080).jpg
- File:Palace of Parliament (37522982520).jpg
- File:Palace of Parliament.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament Bucharest.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 20180226-1.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 20180226-2.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului Häuser des Parlament Bukarest b.jpg
- File:Palatul Parlamentului-Bucuresti.jpg
- File:Palatul Parliamentului 1990.jpg
- File:Parlamentspalast - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Pałac Parlamentu.jpg
- File:PMadia 000277 NA NA.jpg
- File:Romania-1193 - Union Square (7557758988).jpg
- File:Romanian Parliament Palace colorfully lit at night (4329909380).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2_Iunie_2018._(5).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2_Iunie_2018._(6).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2_Iunie_2018.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._2_Iunie_2018._(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Keep the following, for the reasons mentioned in the previous discussions in this page:
- File:Bucureşti The Presidential Palace. May 1996 (3993876724).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament Bucharest.jpg
Razvan Socol (talk) 01:31, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
The building was completed in 1997 by Anca Petrescu (1949–2013). Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term in Romania lasted for 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2084.
- File:Bucarest - Palau del Parlament.png
- File:Bucharest Parliament Palace.jpg
- File:Bucharest, May 2018. 56713.jpg
- File:Bukarest este a parlament épületével.jpg
- The main object is not the building of the parliament. This is a city scape. You can't take any photo of this boulevard without the building in the background. --Regasterios (talk) 16:12, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Ceausescu Palace (43095103491).jpg
- The main focus is the boulevard in this picture.--Dhyana b (talk) 01:35, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Palace of Parliament (27450816555).jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 1.jpg
- File:Palace of the Parliament of Romania 2.jpg
- File:Palacio del Parlamento Rumano 01.jpg
- File:Palacio del Parlamento Rumano 02.jpg
- I say the focus is the street. Parliament is in background. --Dhyana b (talk) 01:44, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Palacio del Parlamento Rumano 03.jpg
- File:Palacio del Parlamento Rumano 04.jpg
- File:Parliament Ro. Bucharest.jpg
- File:Peoples House Unirii Bvd.jpg
- I would like to argue here that it is a picture of the boulevard, with the building towering in the background. It's not necessarily the main focus. --Dhyana b (talk) 01:30, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Romania Parliament at night.jpg
- Main attraction is the light artwork. --Dhyana b (talk) 01:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Romania-1181 - Palace of the Parliament (7557753382).jpg
- This picture has already been proposed for deletion several times, but passed inspection... --Dhyana b (talk) 01:50, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:The Parliament Palace, in Bucharest.jpg
- I say it's the exact same case as the pic above. A very similar perspective. If "File:Romania-1181 - Palace of the Parliament (7557753382).jpg" passes, this has to pass as well. --Dhyana b (talk) 01:53, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 07:34, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The several claims of de minimis are absurd. The palace overwhelms the images -- the only thing in the image beside the palace is an street that could be anywhere. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork by still living artist, not permanently located in public space. Elly (talk) 13:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- See ticket:2018011410002427. Vysotsky (talk) 11:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Vysotsky: I haven't found an explicit mention of this file in the ticket. Can you please either add the Permission template or confirm the deletion please? --Ruthven (msg) 11:01, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- I have no access to OTRS tickets. But see this discussion. Vysotsky (talk) 16:04, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Vysotsky: I haven't found an explicit mention of this file in the ticket. Can you please either add the Permission template or confirm the deletion please? --Ruthven (msg) 11:01, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- See ticket:2018011410002427. Vysotsky (talk) 11:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:21, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Talk:18th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)/GA1, file is still under copyright EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 18:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:17, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
