Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/12/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 24th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YOKOTINDEKA

[edit]

YOKOTINDEKA (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

"FBMD" in metadata, OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 05:35, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:52, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flibirigit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The photos are derivative works of trophies

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:41, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing should be

Canada

The photographical reproduction of this work is covered under s. 32.2(1)(b) of the Copyright Act (Canada), which states:
32.2 (1) It is not an infringement of copyright...
(b) for any person to reproduce, in a painting, drawing, engraving, photograph or cinematographic work
(i) an architectural work, provided the copy is not in the nature of an architectural drawing or plan, or
(ii) a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship or a cast or model of a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship, that is permanently situated in a public place or building
This freedom does not apply to typical two-dimensional works such as paintings, murals, advertising hoardings, maps, posters, signs or other flat artworks. See COM:CRT/Canada#Freedom of panorama for more information.

English | suomi | français | македонски | +/−

. Flibirigit (talk) 12:07, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Trophy exhibits are part of the Hockey Hall of fame, similar to File:Stanley cup hhof.jpg et cetera. Flibirigit (talk) 12:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Fop canada applies insode museum. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:47, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, clearly film poster art, English Wikipedia gives http://ca.movieposter.com/poster/A70-831/Battle_Beyond_The_Stars.html as source ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:19, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:05, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no metadata, no permission, picture certainly found on the web. Cjp24 (talk) 15:57, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violations

All of the pics that this editor added on December 23, 2017 File:Mk5_Road_Racer_a.jpg, File:Mk5_Road_Racer_b_at_the_NEC.jpg, File:Mk5_Road_Racer_c_at_the_NEC.jpg, File:Mk5_Road_Racer_d_at_the_NEC.jpg, File:Mk5_Road_Racer_e_promo.jpg are not his work. And here is proof [1] from a 2015 online article on Bennetts. -72bikers (talk) 20:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pic is not this editors work it along with similar pics on a 2015 article on bennetts here[2]. 72bikers (talk) 21:05, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 01:02, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has no source. Leoboudv (talk) 00:05, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: This image can be kept. The uploader separated the number 69723 from the Mushroom Observer Bracket resulting in an error message. But it is Suillus acidus, not "Suillus subalutaceus" as the source says. --Leoboudv (talk) 23:33, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 10:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no valid license Thraen (talk) 09:13, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 00:45, 29 Dezember 2017 UTC: Copyright violation --Krdbot 07:28, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license is CC BY NC SA 3.0 There is no evidence if it was ever free. Leoboudv (talk) 00:07, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 14:56, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work (taken form facebook "FBMD") + maybe an unused personal image (out of oscpe). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YOKOTINDEKA 2

[edit]

YOKOTINDEKA (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

"FBMD" in metadata, OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed.--Y.haruo (talk) 01:18, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+likely out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, out of project scope. --Moheen Reeyad (talk) 06:47, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:21, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 09:19, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 09:19, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 09:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 09:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Suleyman cavusoglu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Mitte27 (talk) 09:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oxwell L'bu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Mitte27 (talk) 09:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daaichan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Mitte27 (talk) 09:23, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Mitte27 (talk) 09:24, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 09:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 09:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 09:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joel pacheco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Mitte27 (talk) 09:28, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joel pacheco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk 00:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 09:32, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was uploaded for and used in article that is about person who does not exist. Description and date (see exif) appear fake. 91.154.11.117 09:53, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This sculpture, by Edward Jonas, was unveiled in 2002. Therefore, "no-notice" does not apply and it will be under copyright until 70 years after the sculptor dies. The images infringe on the copyright and cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from Jonas via OTRS.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This sculpture, by Bob and Melinda Copper, was unveiled in 2009. Therefore, "no-notice" does not apply and it will be under copyright until 70 years after the later of the sculptors' deaths. The image infringes on the copyright and cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from the Coppers via OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This sculpture, by Bob and Melinda Copper, was unveiled in 2010. Therefore, "no-notice" does not apply and it will be under copyright until 70 years after the later of the sculptors' deaths. The image infringes on the copyright and cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from the Coppers via OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:30, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains non-free logo of the ICC, see [2]. Also not the uploaders own work. Appropriate to upload under a non-free fair use licence for each local Wikipedia, but not appropriate for Commons. Flickerd (talk) 10:32, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This sculpture, by W. Stanley Proctor, was unveiled in 2004. Therefore, "no-notice" does not apply and it will be under copyright until 70 years after the sculptor's death. The image infringes on the copyright and cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from Proctor via OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Makro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very small, no EXIF. Although these don't show up in a Google search, it seems unlikely that they are "own work" as claimed.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These are my own work. The sizes are not small or what i would consider small. If you want the JPG for EXIF then i can upload those instead.Makro (talk) 12:16, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They are certainly small by modern camera standards.If they are actually your images please replace them with the original JPGs at full camera resolution. Use "Upload a new version of this file" near the bottom of each file page. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It wont let me replace a png with a jpg so delete both PNG images and i will upload the original JPG. Makro (talk) 15:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF. Although this does not show up in a Google search, two of this new uploader's other uploads have een deleted as copyvios. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:51, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:36, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While we allow a limited number of personal images for the user pages of active contributors, "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. See COM:SCOPE. This editor has made three uploads besides this, two of which have been deleted as copyvios and the third of which has been tagged for DR. She has a user page on WP:BN with no other contributions there. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:35, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily own work, Book cover art. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:19, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painting of an historical figure. Obviously not self-made by original tr-wiki uploader as claimed, but likely also not old enough for PD-art; style seems modern. Fut.Perf. 10:48, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:37, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I strongly doubt that this painting was painted by the uploader himself as claimed. JuTa 12:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:46, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Pre-existing online image according to reverse image search Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:51, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:46, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image -> out of scope. JuTa 12:59, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:45, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Störm as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.flickr.com/photos/106257537@N06/10417409823/in/photostream/ say All rights reserved
Converted by me to DR, as the image had been uploaded in 2013. Eventually there might be some evidence that it was under the claimed free license at the time of upload. Otherwise, the image needs to be deleted, as currently the source states "All rights reserved". -- Túrelio (talk) 13:08, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright situation - one single upload into flickr one single upload the same day here. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:51, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VeDrux NRJ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Mitte27 (talk) 14:26, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy paste LorenzoSims (talk) 05:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --JuTa 08:20, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a derivative works of several other photos Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:07, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a promotional logo, outside the project scope. Guanaco (talk) 11:33, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by فارس الوطن 2000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small sizes without EXIFs : unlikely to be own works. Note that I speedy deleted the other uploads

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:06, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vengolis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Mitte27 (talk) 14:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 14:42, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 14:43, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 14:43, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 14:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 14:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jamalstandar4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Mitte27 (talk) 14:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jamalstandar4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:45, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:51, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jarbio filipe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Mitte27 (talk) 14:47, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giova HIS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Mitte27 (talk) 14:51, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:29, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, this nomination was made by the globally banned cross-wiki Troll INeverCry/Daphne Lantier, if a legitimate user were to want this file 📁 to be deleted they could file a deletion request themselves, but this request is illegitimate, and deleting this file 📁 would fall under w:en:WP:PROXYING which means that deleting this file based on this nomination could be considered “abuse”. Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 14:35, 25 December 2017 (UTC) Merry Christmas 🎅🏻🎄[reply]
    • Merry Christmas 🎅🏻🎄. Are you sure we're not exaggerating? (I confess I know nothing about EN:WP's policies or whatever they are called. I'm also quite ignorant on Commons: Do we have any obligation to follow EN:WP's things? Why don't we follow Turkish or Catalan WPs?) Does Xmas spirit make no help here? Looks like we have too much time... Let's just delete every stupid file like the above-mentioned. We will still have millions of good ones. --E4024 (talk) 14:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
BTW our closing admins know better than anybody what is what and who's who. No need to create alarm around petty things, IMHO. (Note: With "petty" I'm referring to UPFs, nothing else. ) --E4024 (talk) 15:00, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Clearly out of scope. Silly and pointless to have it renominated by another user now that it is on our radar. Nominator may be banned but (s)he is not doing the actual deleting, nor making the final decision. There is no "abuse" here. --P 1 9 9   18:49, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:32, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:34, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:06, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:06, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:06, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded with the wrong date. A newer file has been uploaded with the correct date: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Berliner_Zeitung_6-4-1984_featuring_Marlis_Jermutus.jpg Rasadeva (talk) 21:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete both. The newspaper article and the depicted image are still under copyright by their authors. --JuTa 18:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:05, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ngalu kakai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Cold and gray (talk) 22:10, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:04, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:12, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:15, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammad Kashan Khan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Cold and gray (talk) 22:19, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These men don't seem to be noteworthy

Jessy Walters (talk) 08:18, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal images, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:10, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karthikeyanseo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Cold and gray (talk) 22:24, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:01, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal, unused. Out of COM:SCOPE Steinsplitter (talk) 17:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:23, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:28, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:01, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:29, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:30, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image - watermarked by photographer as well Cold and gray (talk) 22:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:32, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:32, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:33, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:34, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:58, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:58, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kamal Naskar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Cold and gray (talk) 22:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:58, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:39, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:58, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jatashanker.babu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal images of uploader.

Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 22:40, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:41, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:41, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:42, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:43, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:56, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:56, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:47, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:56, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 18:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 18:10, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 18:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 18:12, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 18:13, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 18:14, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image + unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:30, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:20, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded better version Chromaticka harmonika (talk) 20:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:14, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded better version. Chromaticka harmonika (talk) 20:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:14, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Relaxwiky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Cold and gray (talk) 20:57, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:14, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 20:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:14, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:13, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:13, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two issues here : first the photo is a derivative work of an object with an unclear copyright status, secondly the photo itself is unlikely to be own work (small size without EXIFs) Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:12, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:04, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:05, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:07, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:13, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:14, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:15, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 21:16, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamkaran1994 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Cold and gray (talk) 21:18, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE.   — Jeff G. ツ 15:43, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:49, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a copyrighted game screenshot or uploader's own work, really? Alexander Roumega (talk) 16:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:48, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted photo not suitable for Commons, should be hosted locally Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 16:08, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:46, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal art -- fictitious flag. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:44, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akifji (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal art-- fictitious place and flags. Out of scope.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:44, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:23, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:23, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:24, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work - published in 2012 at https://web.archive.org/web/20120711074413/http://vaniyamarriagebureau.com/about.html Sitush (talk) 17:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images

Cold and gray (talk) 17:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FranTalucas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Cold and gray (talk) 17:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:28, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:29, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:30, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The azhar saifi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:32, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tonisantosbalbi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Cold and gray (talk) 17:33, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:36, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:36, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:36, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:36, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:40, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:35, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Syedhussainofficial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: personal images, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:46, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:35, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toseef tariq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: personal images, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:47, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:34, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cross on the mountain is not visible in this photo under these weather conditions. Uploader mistake sorry. SusanLesch (talk) 17:47, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 19:34, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:49, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dhiru7839 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: personal images/selfie, only contribution and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:50, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:32, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:32, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:32, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:32, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:57, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:31, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:31, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 17:59, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:31, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 18:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:31, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 18:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:31, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 18:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:31, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pekerjasosial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Cold and gray (talk) 18:04, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:30, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 18:05, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:30, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 18:08, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo LorenzoSims (talk) 05:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from instagram Mitte27 (talk) 06:53, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative copyvio. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:51, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid licence claim - uploader wasn't the original author Andy Dingley (talk) 12:12, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:05, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I strongly doubt that one of these licenses could be valid here: {{Swiss Government Portrait}} {{PD-Switzerland-official}} JuTa 12:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 14:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Mitte27 (talk) 14:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:01, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 14:39, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:01, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harwinder Junior (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Mitte27 (talk) 14:40, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harwinder Junior (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional uploads, to promote "Junior Team". Nothing here shows own work, instead it looks like an internet roundup of fan files.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:47, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 14:50, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:54, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vibebusta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Mitte27 (talk) 14:53, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:54, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 14:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:54, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 14:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:54, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 14:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:54, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 14:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:54, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 14:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:53, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vidhan2049 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Mitte27 (talk) 14:57, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:53, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, picture certainly found on the web. Cjp24 (talk) 15:10, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:52, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license is CC BY NC SA 2.5. NC restriction. Leoboudv (talk) 03:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --Guanaco (talk) 02:36, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kamil.ryy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Murales in El Salvador; it is not clear if it's on an ""external wall", but the description suggests that the murales is indoors (thus, no FOP).

Ruthven (msg) 13:12, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 09:51, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kamil.ryy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Cold and gray (talk) 21:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:44, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author : Paul Green. Identity of Yann bonnet should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:49, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Une autorisation a été fournie sur OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:09, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

je souhaite supprimer cette photo de moi Yannbonnet (talk) 17:30, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per Ticket:2017122810007431 and personality rights in France. Yann Bonnet has sent an email to OTRS to delete this picture. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:28, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Noah Siegel deleted his account before this image could be reviewed. I recommend using one of these images as a replacement where it is used. Leoboudv (talk) 05:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Non-Commercial restriction. Leoboudv (talk) 06:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Non-Commercial restriction. Leoboudv (talk) 06:14, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:23, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, no FOP in Ukraine. Дима Г (talk) 07:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure if own work, source saysː "family archive" . Дима Г (talk) 07:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-educational KatieHowells21588 (talk) 03:29, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:59, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, poor quality for Camera shake. Categorizing (talk) 07:40, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:59, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jessejess (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image.

Mitte27 (talk) 09:16, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About photos (most of which should be KEPT, I strongly believe, as do most others as noone else has a problem with most of these:

Riverwalk/Stuart riverwalk: You can delete these ones, I don't care

The following should be KEPT because:

Capitol building: This is a fine historic picture which is primarily of the Capitol building and surrounding area from 1992

Smithsonian Air Space: This is a very nice picture, primarily of very historic aircraft inside the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum, taken in 1992. I'm confident that Wikipedia does NOT already have anything like this

Washington Monument: Very nice photo from 1992, extremely primarily of Washington Monument and surrounding area and how it looked at the time

USS Constitution: This file is actually of the USS Constellation from 1992, got the ships confused. This is the ONLY photo of it submitted for the national monuments contest, and probably the only one that Wikipedia has of actually on the ship. Very historic

Smithsonian: This is extremely primarily of the exterior of the Smithsonian Museum in 1992, showing how it looked then. Very historic

Outside of Statue of Liberty: Considering how much the Statue of Liberty has been closed off in recent years, I would think there's a dearth of images of it. This is a historic image from 1992 before more recent renovation

Statue of Liberty: Very historic. Taken at the top of the Statue in 1992. Notice the lack of restoration at the time. Extremely unique to this or any site I would think, especially with the Statue being closed off so much in recent years, making inside photos all the more rare

White House: Photo is from 1992, so a historic look at the White House and surrounding area

Wilson Dam: Actually Fontana Dam, got mixed up. Only photo of it submitted for the competition, and very few photos already on here. This is a historic photo from 1992.

Fort Mchenry: Only photo of Fort Mchenry submitted for contest, I would think very few are on this site at all. This is historic, from 1992

Jessejess (talk) 04:42, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, most definitely personal and out of scope. Numerous better alternatives already available. P 1 9 9   22:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Cold and gray (talk) 22:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clearly out of scope. Silly and pointless to have it renominated by another user now that it is on our radar. Nominator may be banned but (s)he is not doing the actual deleting, nor making the final decision. No abuse here. And the persons are far too prominently in this picture to use it as a depiction of some vehicle interior (which is not even specified). Unusable. P 1 9 9   22:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Noah Siegel deleted this photo before it could be reviewed. Leoboudv (talk) 03:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 07:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image's original source was deleted. The image appears here but with no license. Leoboudv (talk) 03:47, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license review ok now. --Guanaco (talk) 07:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was deleted before it could be reviewed but it can be replaced by another image in its category Leoboudv (talk) 20:16, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 16:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

& File:Suillus spraguei 24365 crop.jpg


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 23:01, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was deleted at the source but since it is in use please replace it with another image in its category Leoboudv (talk) 20:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 22:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake image with no source. --KVK2005 (talk) 08:48, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to previous Vodafone logos. All deleted. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone.svg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone Logo klein.svg Majora (talk) 22:04, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the logo would be acceptable in the USA, but not in UK. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

silinməli fayl --Masalli qasimli (talk) 12:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masalli qasimli (talk • contribs) 2017-12-23T13:24:55‎ (UTC)[reply]

Why? --E4024 (talk) 08:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of nothing to do with Me --Masalli qasimli (talk) 12:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request, not in use. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:47, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

silinməli fayl — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masalli qasimli (talk • contribs) 2017-12-23T15:18:32‎ (UTC) --Masalli qasimli (talk) 12:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Photo of nothing to do with Me ---Masalli qasimli (talk) 12:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:52, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no account Vetolib. Achim (talk) 14:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: User:Adrianamassino is blocked indef on fr:wp per advertising. I suggest block&nuke here as well. --Achim (talk) 21:43, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:54, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://hillpost.in/2013/05/jairam-thakur-is-bjp-candidate-for-mandi-seat/81342/ 88.97.100.7 19:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:03, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 18:59, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, superseded by file:Blason famille fr Beauffort-Metz-Marquais.svg. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 19:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, superseded by file:Blason famille fr Beauffort-Oiran.svg. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2008, Guy Goossens Belgian Senate. Identity of Frv1830 should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:46, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, "All rights reserved" in EXIF, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map, taken from Jerusalem Underground by Louis-Hughes Vincent, published in Paris and London in 1911, is signed by him (bottom right). Vincent died in 1960 and his work is not in the public domain. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parker Map.jpg. — Racconish ☎ 18:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, will be restored in 2031 (70+1 years after death). Taivo (talk) 12:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author’s permission missing 2A02:2168:1237:FF00:29AB:9B42:1094:DFA3 21:18, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, still no permission. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Small photo without metadata, taken from not easily accessible place. Own work is doubtful. Taivo (talk) 12:59, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Without context this image is useless and out of scope. I'm guessing it's some kind of translation chart but having searched the Internet I fail to find any meaning behind it. Unused. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 12:13, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This seems to be have written in Thai and the A/B/O letters are blood types. I ran the image through OCR and got this:

กรุ๊ปเลีอด ฉัน&เธอ
A+A >คู่เหดุผล
A+B >คู่ไวไจ
A+O >คู่กัด
A+AB >คู่เขย
B+B >คู่หี่น
B+O >คู่กวน
B+AB >คู่เขืาใจ
O+O >คู่หวาน
O+AB >คู่ปร็กษา
ซ่วยส่งด่อด์วยนะจั้ะ

Running it through Google translate, OCR errors non-withstanding, it seems to be a couple compatibility chart based on blood type. Doesn't seem to have much encyclopedic use. Opencooper (talk) 02:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 06:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request from subject at OTRS ticket:2017122310007281. Permission was never granted to publish this image (taken in France - permission necessary Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#France) Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep « It is generally recognized both by case law and legal doctrine that consent is implied or not needed for pictures of public figures performing their public functions or activities (not in private life) ». The author promoted her work at a public event. Otherwise, we should also delete thousands of photos from the category Salon du livre de Paris. Okki (talk) 23:26, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Public event. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. there is no expectation of privacy in a public event, the subject is posing therefore is consenting to be taken in photo, the photo is first published in USA servers, and the uploader voted a keep. Désolé madame. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:27, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 永井誠 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Initially tagged by Eien20 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://seizahyakkei.com/news/list3/

COM:OTRS is preferable, but at least it doesn't seem like the usual situation of 'a random fan grabbed images from the web'. The uploader seems to control the official website - https://seizahyakkei.com/project/ has this note: 本文一部抜粋:ウィキペディアに投稿済 (Text in part contributed to Wikipedia). See also ja:利用者‐会話:永井誠#著作権に関するお願い.

永井誠さん:COM:OTRS/ja、特に「この画像は私のウェブサイトや共有スペースで最初に公表されました」の部分をご覧ください。

whym (talk) 02:06, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:28, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not relevant any more — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silaupura (talk • contribs) 2017-12-20T17:54:25‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Green Giant (talk) 14:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of wrong person uploaded Silaupura (talk) 14:19, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not relevant any more — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silaupura (talk • contribs) 2017-12-20T17:55:11‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Green Giant (talk) 14:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of wrong person uploaded Silaupura (talk) 14:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not relevant any more — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silaupura (talk • contribs) 2017-12-20T17:56:05‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Green Giant (talk) 14:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by mistake Silaupura (talk) 14:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Need Permission from Secretary of State under Connecticut General Statutes,. - MattLongCT (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Only federal and some state works are PD. --Green Giant (talk) 14:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-educational - dark, tilted, random parking lot KatieHowells21588 (talk) 03:23, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination but also uploaded by a blocked FRWP user. --Green Giant (talk) 20:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not used in any pages. A higher resolution svg version can be found here https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Gjykata_e_Lartë.svg Kj1595 (talk) 03:26, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redundant to File:Gjykata e Lartë.svg. --Green Giant (talk) 20:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid licence claim - not the original author. This is almost certainly keepable, as PD-UK-Gov for the original, but it needs the licence changing. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, but can’t keep it without a source. --Green Giant (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Leoboudv as no license. Well, there is a PD-because, but its very doubtfull this this is valid. JuTa 12:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PD-Mark is insufficient on its own because it lacks the legal aspects found in other licenses. --Green Giant (talk) 20:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not used in any articles. A higher quality svg file exists here https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/Ministria_e_Bujq%C3%ABsis%C3%AB_dhe_Zhvillimit_Rural.svg Kj1595 (talk) 13:41, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Redundant to File:Ministria e Bujqësisë dhe Zhvillimit Rural.svg. --Green Giant (talk) 20:07, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not used in any articles. A higher quality svg file already exists here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ministria_e_Infrastruktur%C3%ABs_dhe_Energjis%C3%AB.svg Kj1595 (talk) 13:42, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not used in any articles. A higher quality svg file exists here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ministria_e_Arsimit,_Sportit_dhe_Rinis%C3%AB.svg Kj1595 (talk) 13:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A higher quality svg duplicate can be found here https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6b/Seal_of_the_President_of_Albania.svg Kj1595 (talk) 16:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 17:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not used in any articles. A higher quality svg duplicate can be found here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Seal_of_the_President_of_Albania.svg Kj1595 (talk) 13:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is the author's original research. It is not confirmed by reliable sources. Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 14:49, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are on the Wikimedia Commons currently. Notice that the project: Original research link is red here. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:08, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • You allude, that the "author's original research" is not correct and therefore has to delete? I don't know if "own research" is forbidden on Commons. Merry Christmas! --Ras67 (talk) 19:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OR is not a valid deletion reason on Commons. Please address the issue on a relevant WP if it is used there. --Green Giant (talk) 20:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong colours and sizes. Not used, replaced by File:Xiaomi logo.svg. — kashmīrī 15:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per Special:Permalink/311148394. Green Giant (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a poor quality image. It vector version of the highest quality be used in place of this raster image Олексій Непота (talk) 19:42, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, "Suffer the Children to Come Unto Me" painting by C. Vogelstein per https://restoredtraditions.com/products/let-children-come-unto-me-vogelstein illustrating Luke 18:16.   — Jeff G. ツ 16:51, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Fake authorship claim to File:Vogel von Vogelstein Lasset die Kinder.jpg. Crosswiki vandal. --Green Giant (talk) 20:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of questionable notability : out of scope. Personal image only used on user namespace, however personal images are allowed only for the active participants Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to previous Vodafone logos. All deleted. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone.svg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone Logo klein.svg Majora (talk) 22:04, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exists here, dated a week before uploading to Commons. ~Cybularny Speak? 22:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader might be related to http://www.pitercars.pl . --Túrelio (talk) 11:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. --Green Giant (talk) 20:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yger as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: nonfree as stated by the org it is taken from and not taken today JuTa 22:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EXIF data suggest that the image has been copied from Facebook. --Túrelio (talk) 11:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. --Green Giant (talk) 20:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

silinməli fayl — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masalli qasiml (talk • contribs) 2017-12-23T15:16:07‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently uploaded, unused file. --Martin H. (talk) 13:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Silinməli fayl Не хороший файл. Пожалуйста удалите этот файл. --Masalli qasimli (talk) 12:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masalli qasimli (talk • contribs) 2017-12-23T14:20:12‎ (UTC) Photo of nothing to do with Me --Masalli qasimli (talk) 12:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently uploaded, unused file. --Martin H. (talk) 13:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work without permission, no FoP in Italy. Sealle (talk) 20:14, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. The focus of this photo is the billboard / the Nike advertising. --Martin H. (talk) 13:34, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Just another non-free image from en-wiki en:File:Trotsky Service.jpg. Invalid licenses added. Sealle (talk) 16:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming the UK the country of origin and considering COM:TOO#United_Kingdom and en:Sweat_of_the_brow#United_Kingdom its possible that the trivial text is enough for a new copyright on the book cover. Therfore  Delete. --Martin H. (talk) 13:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Would be happy to agree if {{PD-trivial}} is changed this way. Currently this template does not state any difference between UK/Peru/US/... --Balabinrm (talk) 00:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
More specific: I just cannot imagine how addition of the name "Trotsky" under the PD photo of Trotsky could be interpreted by any court as production of logo, artwork or anything non-PD... --Balabinrm (talk) 00:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: the photo is PD, the rest is too simple for copyright. --Yann (talk) 06:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unvalid PD tag : no proof that creator died before 22 August 1980 or died more than 50 years ago, unvalid source. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:30, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep PD according to {{PD-Iran}} as photographic work published more than 30 years ago (Article 16). The source is not important as it's a scanned print Al-Douri (talk) 17:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The source is a matter since it can be found all over the Internet (here, there, or there) but I agree with you that the picture has probably been taken before 1980. A date and an author's name would be a plus. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:26, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-Iran. --Yann (talk) 06:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I honestly doubt this is any truth to this. Greater east Asia refers to an area of japanese nationalism. Most likely hoax Artix Kreiger (talk) 20:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I know about your perspective about Japanese nationalism. That's said, this map is a valid historical fact about the influence of East Asian culture.


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: in use, please discuss in Wikipedia or in the file talk page. --Yann (talk) 06:36, 12 February 2018 (UTC) I honestly doubt this is any truth to this. Most likely hoax. Poorly done map including parts of India and half of Bhutan. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 01:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: The statement has been made that, "this map is a valid historical fact about the influence of East Asian culture." That statement MUST be proven with respect to all areas colored light blue, for instance, Chukotka and Yamalia in Siberia. What is the foundation for these claims? --Geographyinitiative (talk) 21:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, There is already a {{Fact disputed}} tag. Since this file is used on one Wikimedia project, there is no reason for deletion, even if the facts are disputed. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:19, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 96.23.97.22 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Bad quality image uploaded by banned User:Bull-Doser. JuTa 22:57, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Then look at all his imports and see the bad quality photographs of the people. Rozmador (talk) 18:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment We should wait for the moment because the subjet is being discussed here (fr) and here (fr). Rozmador (talk) 01:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:35, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No own work. It´s from the „Internet Archive“. Book by Donald B. Prell: „Karl Nolde An artis´s life“ Page 6. Source: https://archive.org/details/KarlNoldeKanol. Author of the pics unknown. Donald B. Prell licensed the book under CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0). ....HMS (talk) 18:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright status of the photo unclear. Looking at the book there seem to be various photos and images of various, unnamed authors, so I doubt they are all CC-0 as well. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:05, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It´s from the „Internet Archive“. Book by Donald B. Prell: „Karl Nolde An artis´s life“ Page 6. Source: https://archive.org/details/KarlNoldeKanol. Author of the pics unknown. The book is licensed under CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) by the uploader. Perhaps Sirswindon is Donald B. Prell, but we don´t know. ....HMS (talk) 19:26, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Think that an admin that has both WC & WP privileges, gets involved here , as the account name Sirswindon is begining to give us the run around between WC & WP. Sirswindon is not doing himself any favors. One can see from his edits on WP that he wasn't born in 1924 thus not Donald B. Prell. Yet Sirswindon states that he himself owns the painting, suggesting that he is Donald B. Prell and is still the original first time owner I.E., himself! Which suggests it has become a shared accountant and outside WP policy. Also the article Donald B. Prell appears too heavily dependent on vanity press references with just the odd ref to a journal or two and many of us would not consider ourselves notable for such similar brief mentions. So that article needs visiting and reappraisal. There is also, no saying if Draft:Karl Nolde (Kanol) is unattributed plagiarism. Doubt, that note to this effect on Sirswindon's WP talk page will have any gravity as there appears to be a history of willful ignorance to the advice so far given to Sirswindon on WC. P.g.champion (talk) 19:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Very doubltfull that this was uploaded by copyright owner and no suggestion that he is willing to summit a OTRS. P.g.champion (talk) 19:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright status of the photo unclear. Looking at the book there seem to be various photos and images of various, unnamed authors, so I doubt they are all CC-0 as well. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:05, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]