Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/12/01
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
The uploader has a record of copyright violations and I doubt he was able to personally take this professional image. Leoboudv (talk) 07:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md mahmood (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of the project scope. Commons is not a place to share personal images.
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jon Kolbert. Ruthven (msg) 06:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md mahmood (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal files, misuse of commons as a webhost.
- File:Md 10.jpg
- File:Md 9.jpg
- File:Md 8.jpg
- File:Md 7.jpg
- File:Md 6.jpg
- File:Md 5.jpg
- File:Md .jpg
- File:Md 4.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 09:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Wants to remove my fake name --Bukhari Talk 06:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Dyolf77 at 10:10, 1 Dezember 2017 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file: Commons:Deletion requests/File:حمادبخاری.png: Wants to remove my fake name --Krdbot 13:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
fdfsdfsdfsdfsdf 1.247.152.6 02:52, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: IP vandalising Sanandros (talk) 11:58, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Rusty lake logo.png NCen2 (talk) 15:07, 1 December 2017 (UTC) 메일로 허락은 맡았지만 wikipidia로 제작자가 직접 메일을 보내야 한다고 하길래, 일단은 삭제를 요청합니다.--NCen2 (talk) 15:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC) {{OTRS pending}}--NCen2 (talk) 15:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — regards, Revi 15:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Equivalent media at English Wikipedia was non-free w:File:Logo of MOEE Myanmar.jpg , Doe state agency logos have an exemption in Myanmar? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE -> Hoax text Takeaway (talk) 13:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: vandalism. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:02, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Seu artigo foi removido por falta de notabilidade veja (Israel Lucas Gois) Juniorcardenas30 (talk) 13:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 10:55, 2 Dezember 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution --Krdbot 13:38, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Dyolf77 at 17:31, 2 Dezember 2017 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Surajit Sarkar.jpg: Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto ([[User talk:Sixflashphoto|discussion</s... --Krdbot 19:38, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No license for the source country. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 11:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- The source for the image is Harrow Memorials of the Great War: Volume V (p. 30). Published in London, 1920. No photographer is credited as far as I can see. Alansplodge (talk) 12:17, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! In this document, the photographer actually is credited: Richard Neville Speaight, see page 243. Speaight died in 1938, so that {{PD-old}} applies. Jcb (talk) 14:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 14:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
taken from the web 201.254.31.147 03:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- it is probably captured image. not CCL--Make WP Great Again (talk) 14:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Stolen from Getty images http://www.gettyimages.de/license/872150136 .--Chianti (talk) 21:18, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by Johan. --Achim (talk) 19:52, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
No one cares. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:17, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. We've got a collection; I'm almost sure you can find many erected brown ones there. --E4024 (talk) 09:26, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Agree that no one cares. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:46, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:28, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
No one cares. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:17, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. We already have a collection of those things. I've not checked it personally but I'm almost sure we also have more than enough unshaved semierected ones in there. --E4024 (talk) 12:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Keep falls within scope and its not a personal picture. DDotsroeg (talk) 17:12, 1 December 2017 (UTC)- Delete re:E4024 and Commons:PENIS -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:45, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:29, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:29, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:29, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:47, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:47, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:47, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:47, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Saudi Arabia Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: in scope ( notable actor), but copyvio (no cropped version are available in the web). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Probably not own work. Also, smiley ruins the image. Syced (talk) 04:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Self-promotion, not social media - out of scope. GermanJoe (talk) 05:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- also crop file:Julio Leiva Molina (cropped).jpg
The uploader has a record of copyright violations and I doubt he was able to personally take this professional image. Leoboudv (talk) 07:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. I added a crop for deletion due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Image published previously on the web (https://www.google.co.jp/imgres?imgurl=https://scontent-cdg2-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/e35/23417353_297728954055178_240600945480695808_n.jpg&imgrefurl=https://topsy.one/hashtag.php?q=%23Yoonsohee&h=1080&w=1080&tbnid=JzzRlYsMKHZU0M&tbnh=225&tbnw=225&usg=__YklUZMJVdUgsCfvkurvdNmxpxLo=&docid=Hv5T16gMk1t3fM). No evidence of permission or ownership. DAJF (talk) 07:40, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + "FBMD". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a video screen grab. No EXIF data. Doubtful that this is the own work of the uploader as claimed. DAJF (talk) 07:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: facebook image "FBMD". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shawaizatthwal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal vanity photos of non-notable individual. Outside the project scope.
DAJF (talk) 07:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohit chadoli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low-quality vanity photos of non-notable individual. Outside project scope.
DAJF (talk) 07:57, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
who is he? 194.67.7.130 08:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - likely out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Personal photoshopped Twitter image - out of scope. GermanJoe (talk) 08:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Agree. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a photoshopped image. Claims to be of an actress and thus used on her draft pages but this is clearly a man so a case of vandalism Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
"Derecho de imagen de los asistentes" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucas.espanol (talk • contribs) 07:18, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
{{Vk}} Concern is covered by {{Personality}}. — Jeff G. ツ 08:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)- Some people there asked me to delete it. Lucas.espanol (talk) 09:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete OK for a courtesy deletion: asked by uploader, not used, low quality, etc. Yann (talk) 10:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Unused recent upload, low educational value. Agree with courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as courtesy. — Jeff G. ツ 01:29, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dondogerel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Various low-resolution images with no EXIF, copyrighted logos and BI graphics. False/unlikely "own work" claims throughout. Delete all as likely copyvios and per COM:PCP.
- File:Haрны аймаг.jpg
- File:Таж махал.jpg
- File:Таж Махал.jpg
- File:Mandah University.jpg
- File:Mandah UNIVERSITY.png
- File:Мандах бүртгэл University.jpg
- File:Хятадын цагаан хэрэм.jpg
- File:Фэйсбүүк гэж юу вэ?.jpg
- File:Linkedin судалгаа.png
GermanJoe (talk) 08:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Photoshopped selfies used for unsourced self-promotion on ru-Wiki. Previously published at [1]. Out of scope.
GermanJoe (talk) 08:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by H4RDC0R3 (D3DS3C) (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal files, out of scope
- File:Polos122.gif
- File:Dedsec dude cg by junguler-da6cgrv.gif
- File:Eb25c3539ac53454503421cc6109dc89 (1).gif
- File:Dedsec skull noise by junguler-da6229q.gif
Mjrmtg (talk) 11:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+ copyright issues. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by S.J. Global (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal photos, out of scope
Mjrmtg (talk) 11:27, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A FREE KA SMILE 4 ALL (talk · contribs) 1
[edit]Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album.
- File:Reunion Island with Eric Kotuba Adidas CEO for the area.jpg
- File:Reunion Island with my mum at the volcan 2014.jpg
- File:Family road trip Guillaume Canet and Freddy Roux by JP Gailhard 2005.jpg
- File:27 years of patience to have my 1st Kelly boards.jpg
- File:24.10.2017 Roux F SOTICI RIDER-1.jpg
Wikicology (talk) 11:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A FREE KA SMILE 4 ALL (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Abatta laguna kafololagoon Djakiss Diarassouba and I.jpg
- File:Autoportrait free surf Senegal2006.jpg
- File:10.8.2017 Kafololagoon RouxF by Roux Kayla.jpg
- File:2.7.2017 RouxF home-1.jpg
- File:2West africans most wanted free surfersRouxSidibe.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A FREE KA SMILE 4 ALL (talk · contribs) 3
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in France.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 14:29, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ShekharGehlot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:Ansh Rathore.jpeg
- File:Ansh Rathore at Eiffel Tower.jpg
- File:Ansh Rathore checking out Lamborghini.jpg
- File:Ansh Rathore in Milan, Italy.jpg
- File:Ansh Rathore touring Amsterdam.jpg
- File:Ansh Rathore at Karlsruhe.jpg
- File:Ansh Rathore touring Germany.jpg
- File:Ansh Rathore at Baadshaho set.jpg
- File:Ansh Rathore at American Film Festival, Deauville, France.jpg
- File:Ansh Rathore.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:50, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:50, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Also no useful content. Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
(c) Olivier Rubin, missing permission. Identity of Terrien01 should be veryfied via OTRS.Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission - "Archives cantonales vaudoises" don't give compatible licenses http://www.patrimoine.vd.ch/archives-cantonales/accueil. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Either person photo or of unknown people but in either case out of scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
(c) Olivier Rubin, missing permission. Identity of Terrien01 should be veryfied via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission - "Archives cantonales vaudoises" don't give compatible licenses http://www.patrimoine.vd.ch/archives-cantonales/accueil. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abhishek gonai (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- File:IMG 20171112 062835qqq.jpg
- File:IMG 2390bsbbjla.jpg
- File:Xsplash 201792402219124.jpg
- File:IMG 20171129 092130 573jj.jpg
- File:IMG 20171118 210731 627kk.jpg
- File:IMG 20170912 104854 248ll.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
(c) Olivier Rubin, missing permission. Identity of Terrien01 should be veryfied via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission - "Archives cantonales vaudoises" don't give compatible licenses http://www.patrimoine.vd.ch/archives-cantonales/accueil. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
(c) Olivier Rubin, missing permission. Identity of Terrien01 should be veryfied via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission - "Archives cantonales vaudoises" don't give compatible licenses http://www.patrimoine.vd.ch/archives-cantonales/accueil. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NINJA BABE EMMA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Killerboymoederz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Not a very active user or Wikipedian. E4024 (talk) 13:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
personal file, out of scope. Only used on userpage from user who only edits in userspace Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+logo above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:07, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Support --Alaa :)..! 13:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
No permission. OTRS from Liam Bateman needed. Jcb (talk) 08:50, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Pure advertisments with no educational value. Therefore these images are out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Puma Guard GPS vehicle Tracker Chandigarh India.jpg
- File:Puma Guard- ARAI approved Best GPS vehicle tracking system in India Chandigarh.jpg
- File:Best Vehicle -Car Theft protection with Puma Guard.jpg
- File:Puma Guard GPS Vehicle Tracking Device.jpg
Zaccarias (talk) 08:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE -> self-created artwork; unlikely to be used in a project. Takeaway (talk) 09:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be used perhaps unless the project is about; (1) the relationship between science and art, (2) the nature of size and perspectives, (3) the creative process in science (and art), or (4) how different everyday objects appear thorough the microscope. I expect you could think of more; but, these were just a few examples I came up with immediately.
This and the other one tagged (Winter night) were part of a series of images that covered the spectrum of these concepts. Starting with how a well-known substance (vitamin C) can look when view through a microscope using a specific technique (polarized light) to how that technique not only provides interesting images, but also the means to assess quantitatively tissue architecture to then imagining how all of this could come together to create something new. - PW31 (talk) 17:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Please read COM:NOTUSED and also the examples mentioned directly below that. Seeing how the file description mentions "Exposing the film multiple times to different objects (dust, crystals) using polarized light can create microscopic landscapes.", it can only be viewed as deliberate "artwork", and not, like most of your other uploads , as a scientific image which could be viewed (by chance) as being an artwork. - Takeaway (talk) 17:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- I'd prefer to keep this image as a good example of scientific art made through microscopy. It's likely that there are very few images of this type under free licenses, and this image would be good to have on Commons as an educational example of such art. Antony-22 (talk) 06:50, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal art is out of scope, see the relevant policy. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:10, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE -> self-created artwork; unlikely to be used in a project. Takeaway (talk) 09:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be used perhaps unless the project is about; (1) the relationship between science and art, (2) the nature of size and perspectives, (3) the creative process in science (and art), or (4) how different everyday objects appear thorough the microscope. I expect you could think of more; but, these were just a few examples I came up with immediately.
This and the other one tagged (desert rideg) were part of a series of images that covered the spectrum of these concepts. Starting with how a well-known substance (vitamin C) can look when view through a microscope using a specific technique (polarized light) to how that technique not only provides interesting images, but also the means to assess quantitatively tissue architecture to then imagining how all of this could come together to create something new. PW31 (talk) 17:50, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Perhaps it would have been a better idea to have had this categorised elsewhere than in its original Category:Landscapes. As it was where I had found it, I could only assume that it was meant as "self-created artwork". If the file description had been less artistic and more scientific, it could have been categorised elsewhere and if and when such articles as you mentioned here above would be created, this image might be found, amongst other scientific images, to be good illustrations of the article subjects. But one can now not know how this image was created as it isn't mentioned at all. It could indeed be similar to what you did with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Desert ridge on a distant planet.jpg; i.e. being a deliberate artwork. - Takeaway (talk) 18:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- I'd prefer to keep this image as a good example of scientific art made through microscopy. It's likely that there are very few images of this type under free licenses, and this image would be good to have on Commons as an educational example of such art. Antony-22 (talk) 06:50, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you both for those suggestions. I will indeed expand the file descriptions and use other categories too.
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Most likely to be out of Commons:Project scope. Small telecommunication firm 50-200 employees according to https://www.linkedin.com/company/temp-ltd
Zaccarias (talk) 09:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope. Not a notable company. According to http://singhaniainternationalgroup.com/about.aspx a 2016 Indian startup. Zaccarias (talk) 09:46, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:13, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Images from Flower Bed
[edit]The blog owner of flowergarden522.tistory.com is committing license laundering. Just in this post alone (when looking at the license reviews for photos from the 17th Mnet Asian Music Awards), images are watermarked by various authors, including "Overboard for Exo-K Suho", "바람의꽃이되어서 Only For Sehun", "Suho Point", "moonminhyun9192", "Stellar Star Hong Kong", "Suho Taiwan", etc. A look through other posts on the blog show the exame same pattern, with watermarks to even more different authors. These images are not acceptable.
- File:160409 제 16회 음악풍운방 시상식.jpg
- File:161116 2016 아시아 아티스트 어워즈.png
- File:161123 형 VIP 시사회 (1).jpg
- File:161123 형 VIP 시사회 (2).jpg
- File:161123 형 VIP 시사회 (3).jpg
- File:161123 형 VIP 시사회 (4).jpg
- File:161123 형 VIP 시사회 (5).jpg
- File:161123 형 VIP 시사회 (6).jpg
- File:EXO at KBS Open Concert on June 21, 2016.jpg
- File:EXO at Love Concert on October 10, 2015.jpg
- File:EXO performing "Monster" in Asian Music Awards on November 16, 2016.jpg
- File:Kai at 8th Melon Music Awards 01.png
- File:Kai at 8th Melon Music Awards 02.png
- File:Kim Joon Myun at DMC Festival Music in October 2016 01.jpg
- File:Kim Joon Myun at DMC Festival Music in October 2016 02.jpg
- File:Kim Joon Myun at DMC Festival Music in October 2016 03.jpg
- File:Kim Joon Myun at DMC Festival Music in October 2016 04.jpg
- File:Kim Joon Myun at DMC Festival Music in October 2016 05.jpg
- File:Kim Joon Myun at DMC Festival Music in October 2016 06.png
- File:Kim Joon Myun at DMC Festival Music in September 2015 01.jpg
- File:Kim Joon Myun at DMC Festival Music in September 2015 02.jpg
- File:Kim Joon Myun at DMC Festival Music in September 2015 03.jpg
- File:Krystal Jung and Suho at press conference SMTown The Stage in August 2015 01.jpg
- File:Krystal Jung and Suho at press conference SMTown The Stage in August 2015 02.jpg
- File:Krystal Jung and Suho at press conference SMTown The Stage in August 2015 03.jpg
- File:Krystal Jung and Suho at press conference SMTown The Stage in August 2015 04.jpg
- File:Krystal Jung and Suho at press conference SMTown The Stage in August 2015 05.jpg
- File:Lay Zhang at 1st Asia Artist Awards 01.jpg
- File:Lay Zhang at 1st Asia Artist Awards 02.jpg
- File:Oh Se-hun at Melon Music Awards on November 19, 2016.jpg
- File:Park Chan-yeol at 1st Asia Artist Awards.jpg
- File:SUHO 160421 LOUIS VUITTON VOLEZ VOGUZ VOYAGEZ.jpg
- File:SUHO 160424 K-POP TOP GROUP CONCERT.png
- File:Suho and Byun Baek-hyun at 17th Mnet Asian Music Awards 01.jpg
- File:Suho and Byun Baek-hyun at 17th Mnet Asian Music Awards 02.jpg
- File:Suho and Chen at 17th Mnet Asian Music Awards 01.jpg
- File:Suho and Chen at 17th Mnet Asian Music Awards 02.jpg
- File:Suho and Chen at 17th Mnet Asian Music Awards 03.jpg
- File:Suho and Lay at 1st Asia Artist Awards.jpg
- File:Suho at 17th Mnet Asian Music Awards 01.jpg
- File:Suho at 17th Mnet Asian Music Awards 02.jpg
- File:Suho at 17th Mnet Asian Music Awards 03.jpg
- File:Suho at 17th Mnet Asian Music Awards 04.jpg
- File:Suho at 17th Mnet Asian Music Awards 05.jpg
- File:Suho at 17th Mnet Asian Music Awards 06.jpg
- File:Suho at 17th Mnet Asian Music Awards 07.jpg
- File:Suho at 17th Mnet Asian Music Awards 08.jpg
- File:Suho at 8th Melon Music Awards 01.jpg
- File:Suho at 8th Melon Music Awards 02.jpg
- File:Suho at 8th Melon Music Awards 03.jpg
- File:Suho at 8th Melon Music Awards 04.jpg
- File:Suho at 8th Melon Music Awards 05.jpg
- File:Suho at 8th Melon Music Awards 06.jpg
- File:Suho at K-Pop Top Group Concert in April 2016 01.jpg
- File:Suho at K-Pop Top Group Concert in April 2016 02.jpg
- File:Suho at K-Pop Top Group Concert in April 2016 03.jpg
- File:Suho at K-Pop Top Group Concert in April 2016 04.jpg
- File:Suho at K-Pop Top Group Concert in April 2016 05.jpg
- File:Suho at press conference SMTown The Stage in August 2015 01 (cropped).jpg
- File:Suho at press conference SMTown The Stage in August 2015 01.jpg
- File:Suho at press conference SMTown The Stage in August 2015 02.jpg
- File:Suho at press conference SMTown The Stage in August 2015 03.jpg
- File:Suho at press conference SMTown The Stage in August 2015 04.jpg
- File:Suho at press conference SMTown The Stage in August 2015 05.jpg
- File:Suho at press conference SMTown The Stage in August 2015 06.jpg
- File:Suho at press conference SMTown The Stage on August 15, 2015 01.jpg
- File:Suho at press conference SMTown The Stage on August 15, 2015 02.jpg
- File:Xiumin at 1st Asia Artist Awards 01.png
- File:Xiumin at 1st Asia Artist Awards 02.png
- File:Xiumin at the 2016 Asian Music Awards (1).png
- File:Xiumin at the 2016 Asian Music Awards (2).png
ℯxplicit 10:53, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE -> Personal image; unlikely to be used in a project. Takeaway (talk) 10:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused image, superseded by File:Zwake wapen.svg. -- 109.238.80.85 11:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Former wapen of Zwake, now a family wapen (in dutch). No reason to delete this. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 10:46, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- You're not going to argue that the vector version is worse than raster? It is at times better, objectively. For me, no reason to keep this outdated and unused version. It is only reason why this file nominated for deletion. Quality. --109.238.80.85 13:48, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The vector version is totally different, so yes, history would suffer and there really is no reason to delete unused images that are in scope. Zanaq (talk) 10:15, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "totally different"? the shape of the shield? So it is incorrect here, and the SVG version is more accurate. Source:File:Wapen-Zwake.jpg. --109.238.80.85 17:00, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- For instance, the style is different. I am not saying anything about correct and incorrect. The style of the old one is far superior btw. Zanaq (talk) 17:20, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "totally different"? the shape of the shield? So it is incorrect here, and the SVG version is more accurate. Source:File:Wapen-Zwake.jpg. --109.238.80.85 17:00, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: not a exact duplicate. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
personal image : out of scope. The only edits of the user were on user namespace, not really a contributor Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:07, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image: out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:07, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
if in scope, then it lacks of a proper permission from the copyright holder Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
out of scope, personal image. — regards, Revi 13:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
out of scope, personal image. — regards, Revi 13:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:31, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- File:My suit.jpg
- File:Iskon trip.jpg
- File:Guhantara.jpg
- File:Serco.jpg
- File:Mall in bangalore.jpg
- File:Sriranga patana.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:31, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:24, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: this image of a Colombian amateur film group was uploaded only to illustrate es:Puñeta films, an advertising page which has been marked for deletion/deleted, on Commons would only serve advertising/web hosting purposes and not for practical educational purposes seb26 (talk) 13:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- File:Karol Baptism.jpg
- File:Karol with Rocky & Belle.jpg
- File:Karol Christmas Mass.jpg
- File:Karol PreschoolGrad 001.jpg
- File:Karol Tran.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Probably not own work, no exif. Jcb (talk) 13:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
No information on the authors of both the depicted object and the picture itself. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 13:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Non-trivial logo – above COM:TOO. jdx Re: 13:40, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE -> personal image; unlikely to be used in a project. Takeaway (talk) 13:46, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pedrotidns (talk · contribs)
[edit]Nonsense/non-encyclopedic drawings, see also file page descriptions which consist of just "hahaha"
seb26 (talk) 13:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pedrotidns (talk · contribs)
[edit]These logos appear to be fictional. (The uploader doesn't seem to be a serious contributor, considering his upload history. See User talk:Pedrotidns.)
Sinigh (talk) 22:36, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Obviously not own work. Copyvio - https://www.mangopostdaily.com/4384 Twofortnights (talk) 15:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE because uploader Latio Lobor has no net positive contributions to any project. — Jeff G. ツ 15:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rafallepik96 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Kazania Dawida dla Salomona - Kazania Koholet.pdf
- File:Słowa z j. niemieckiego (dla polaka znajacego j ang i j. polski).pdf
- File:Przysłowia Salomona.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Surendra Sidar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.hindustantimes.com/rf/image_size_640x362/HT/p2/2016/06/27/Pictures/_fc374ff4-3c36-11e6-86cd-639e2418d1d4.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Surendra Sidar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-x3AQswZCurM/Wf81ZnEwFTI/AAAAAAAAyqE/Ze7WNgjPVAUNSwyUSmDNNjbt6RqGsfY_ACHMYCw/s1600/India-currency-cash-notes-images-for-whatsapp-MyWhatsappImages.com-239.jpg.
- File:Incredible cg boy.jpg
- File:Prayas Durg 4.jpg
- File:Prayas Durg 3.jpg
- File:Prayas Durg 1.jpg
- File:₹200 INR.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Surendra Sidar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Multiple phones/cameras, varying sizes and quality. Tagging logos as CC. Clear flickr washing.
- File:LCIT Group of Institutions Bilaspur.jpg
- File:The Jain International School Bilaspur gate.jpg
- File:The Jain International School Bilaspur.jpg
- File:Govt Digvijay College Rajnandgaon.jpg
- File:Prayas Residential School Bilaspur.jpg
- File:Govt Gundadhur College Kondagoan.png
- File:Shaheed Mahendra Karma Vishwavidyalaya CG.png
- File:KG Arts&Science College.png
- File:Govt. E. Raghavendra Rao Science PG College Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh - 53241805832.jpg
- File:Govt. E. Raghavendra Rao Science PG College Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.jpg
- File:Govt ER R PG Science Clg Bilaspur.png
- File:OPJS 3rdConvocationceremony.jpg
- File:Img monochrome.jpg
- File:Cmd-pg-college-bilaspur-cg.jpg
- File:CMDCollegeBilaspur.jpg
- File:CMDCollegebsp.png
- File:OPJU Raigarh logo.png
- File:OPJU Raigarh.jpg
- File:Kalinga University Raipur.jpg
- File:KV Jashpur Nagar.jpg
- File:KVJashpurStudents.jpg
- File:Ss pic bw.jpg
- File:SNPV Raigarh.jpg
- File:SNPV Raigarh logo.png
- File:Govt Model HSS Jashpur.jpg
- File:Prayas Residential School Bilaspur CG.jpg
- File:Prayas Awasiya Vidyalaya Bilaspur CG.jpg
- File:Govt Model HSS Jashpur logo.png
- File:Govt Model HSS Jashpur.png
- File:Atal Bihari Vajpayee Vishwavidyalaya2.jpg
- File:Surendra sidar sign.png
- File:Surendra Sidar.ogg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- This decision is wrong. I do not think that the photos I uploaded violate Wikimedia's rules.And as far as the size and quality of photographs are different, it is natural that different types of photographs can be taken with different cameras, as a result of which photographs of different sizes and quality are created. Surendra Sidar|Talk 🌠 08:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- See above, your upload history says otherwise. If they are really you own work, please send your permission to COM:VRT. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 18:47, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 15:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antonio Zurgena (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Cuadrado13.png
- File:Cuadrado14.png
- File:Cuadrado12.png
- File:Cuadrado11.png
- File:Cuadrado10.png
- File:Cuadrado9.png
- File:Cuadrado8.png
- File:Cuadrado7.png
- File:Cuadrado6.png
- File:Cuadrado5.png
- File:Cuadrado4.png
- File:Cuadrado 1.png
- File:Cuadrado 2.png
- File:Cuadrado3.png
- File:Descripción 2.jpg
- File:Descripción 3.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antonio Zurgena (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antonio Zurgena (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Naciri Imane (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Soares Borges (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this?
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: liekly no. Thus deleted per COM:PCP. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sheraz Ali Joyia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Spam. Also may be above COM:TOO. jdx Re: 16:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Found several places on the web : https://scontent-cdg2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13001090_907489009373787_7349988102963245375_n.jpg?oh=f6e411d338f3ae4da1510df881b8700b&oe=5A896181 or http://remipauvros.fr/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/portrait.jpg, which is © 2016 Rémi Pauvros. Tous droits réservés, messing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, too small, too official looking and user has many other problemattic uploads. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:57, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ER.AKASHPATEL (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:Akashpatel 01.jpg
- File:Akashpatel 02.jpg
- File:ER AKASH PATEL 05.jpg
- File:ER AKASH PATEL 04.jpg
- File:ER AKASH PATEL 03.jpg
- File:ER AKASH PATEL 02.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 19:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KRISHNA MURARI SINGH (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:KRISHNAHCL.jpg
- File:Kmsingh.jpg
- File:Krishna murari.jpg
- File:KMSINGH.jpg
- File:KRISHNA MURARI SINGH.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gregoriomagno (talk · contribs)
[edit]Mug shots without source, and own attribution is obviously abusive.
- File:La foto della polizia necessaria per espletare le pratiche per il visto americano.jpg
- File:Plato 1992 bis.jpg
Ruthven (msg) 20:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
your opinions are asked : two unused WLE2017 uploads which are missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content ?
Roland zh (talk) 20:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:45, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Muhammad Ali Fateh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:Muhammad Ali Fateh and Khizer Hayat.jpg
- File:Muhammad Ali Fateh and his bro.jpg
- File:Muhammad Ali Fateh Offical.jpg
- File:Muhammad Ali Fateh G.jpg
- File:Muhammad Ali Fateh and Okasha.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:46, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Copyright der verwendeten Quelle, der Scanner kann keine uneingeschränkte Freigabe erteilen. Mef.ellingen (talk) 23:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:46, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
00000000000000 105.67.130.62 00:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:13, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
0000000000 105.67.130.62 00:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Why delete? You didn't provide a reason. Hjk321 (talk) 17:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:13, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
The background etching has too much going on for this to be public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Oppose No, it doesn't. It's a random pattern of grain--every one looks slightly different. There is nothing unique, creative, or transformative about it any more than something being painted onto rough wood makes it a different piece of art. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)- Oppose Unless someone can find a copyrighted grain pattern that exactly matches the one on this image, I second Koavf's opinion. Hjk321 (talk) 17:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - not PD-textlogo, all right reserved at source. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:07, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Want to reupload with proper declaration of license Devang likemike (talk) 09:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 00:22, 9 Dezember 2017 UTC: No license since 1 December 2017 --Krdbot 07:24, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No license for the source country. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 13:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete and send it back to the English Wikipedia, since it is PD-US. Jc86035 (talk) 09:29, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:41, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:41, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Copyright owner (per EXIF) is David Gomes Photography. No evidence of permission. Also, no educational usage (photoshopped Google+ image) - out of scope. GermanJoe (talk) 08:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Puput Jumantirawan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- File:Puputbajukontras.jpg
- File:Apelakbaransorriau.jpg
- File:Persiapanharisantri.jpg
- File:Puputpakaianmelayu.jpg
- File:Puputditengahlaut.jpg
- File:Puputdanipur.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shahzebhussain2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
If this IS own work, why is "NurPhoto via Getty Images" given in the EXIF metadata? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:40, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Personal file. Out of scope Kalbbes (talk) 19:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:55, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:04, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:53, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:Ravi Prajpati (6).jpg
- File:Ravi Prajpati (12).jpg
- File:Ravi Prajpati .jpg
- File:Ravi Prajapati.jpg
- File:Ravi Prajapati33.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:53, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Poor quality: blurry. There are many better images available in this category. Sitacuisses (talk) 22:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:52, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 22:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:52, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Previously published PR photo. Uploader is likely not the copyright owner (I gave the user some advice about OTRS on en-Wiki, in case such a permission can be obtained later). GermanJoe (talk) 23:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:52, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
COM:Gallery: "Our goal is not to simply have a gallery on every notable or noteworthy subject." This gallery does not contain any 'noteworthy'/'notable' stuff. — regards, Revi 13:26, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: There's no need nor benefit to have galleries by object by day. But it seems to deal with an event of firefighters (according categorisation), so it should be renamed if it's worth to be kept. --Achim (talk) 19:43, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:11, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Old unused template. Functions fulfilled by Template:Aircraft. Josh (talk) 18:54, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unused template. --JuTa 19:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
On web many places, for example http://bunchoffaceclaims.tumblr.com/post/156054120997/liza-koshy-gender-female-dob-31-march-1996 which is marked as "10 months ago". Need proof uploader owns rights to this image emailed to OTRS. GRuban (talk) 15:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:14, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 19:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 19:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Promotional image featuring shop locations of a company in Romania Gikü (talk) 14:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xxiiilarken (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:31, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
useless screenshot Hiddenhauser (talk) 18:27, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support copvio + screenshot for AR. magazine website--Alaa :)..! 10:16, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 00:42, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:42, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:42, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheLastMelon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope no ed purpose, possible coyp vio and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:47, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:47, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:53, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Alaa :)..! 10:11, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:43, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Corrupted file. Same as uncorrupted File:Pravin Rathore.jpg Kalbbes (talk) 19:04, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
The copyright status of the depicted photograph is unclear. Seems to be copied from facebook anyhow. JuTa 19:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Meaningless unused (out of personal space) personal image. E4024 (talk) 08:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep In use at User:Geo Swan/Sexy librarian, destined to be an English Wikipedia article on the "sexy librarian" meme. — Jeff G. ツ 08:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete OoS file. Until your draft is accepted as an article, it does not bring any "scope" to Commons files. Good luck with that article. --E4024 (talk) 08:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- You don't get two !votes. — Jeff G. ツ 14:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- I don't even have one. It is not a "votes" thing, it is an "arguments" thing, although I see exceptions increasing... --E4024 (talk) 15:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Since you have acknowledged you don't get two !votes I have overstruck your confusing second !vote. Geo Swan (talk) 14:00, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- If you want to strike anything, strike your words below which imply a "bad faith" on a user. Here we assume good will from our colleagues. --E4024 (talk) 07:49, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- I've done my best to keep my comments to you civil, collegial, and confined to issues of policy. I think I succeeded.
I considered reporting you for vandalism at the Administrator's noticeboard, because you tried to delete this image so I can't use it in an article I am working. In other discussions I had posed you good faith, civil, collegial questions, and, rather than either try to explain yourself, or admit your couldn't explain your position, you reacted with snide angry comments. [2], [3]
This is not the only discussion where you have sarcastically repeated the phrase "Good luck with that article." You wrote below that while you know my plans to make use of this image on a wikipedia article, but I don't know your plans.
First, given your sarcastic and evasive comments in previous discussions I thought it was obvious you were threatening to use the wikipedia nomination for deletion as soon as I moved my draft of the sexy librarian article to the wikipedia's article space. Second, if there are any genuine doubts about the subtlety of your position on this and other related images, and the Category:Sexy librarian meme, surely that is because you chose not respond to my good faith requests for you to explain yourself?
There is a principle that is supposed to be true for the Commons and all other WMF projects -- we are not supposed to be trying to win arguments, at all costs. We are supposed to be engaging in discussions as to what is best for the project. If we are engaged in a discussion with someone we recognize has made a valid point, but who isn't fluent in our language, or who otherwise hasn't explained their position clearly, we are not supposed to use cheap rhetorical tricks, or otherwise keep arguing with them, because we think we can exploit our greater ability to explain ourselves to avoid admitting they were right and we were wrong.
You refused to explain why you regarded a partygoer dressed as "sexy librarian" character as in scope at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sexy librarian Halloween costume (287390750).jpg or Commons:Deletion requests/File:Licking (287390923).jpg. At Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/11/Category:Sexy librarian meme you called these images out of scope, as if it were obvious, again without making the slightest good faith effort to explain why you consider them out of scope. Geo Swan (talk) 14:55, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- I've done my best to keep my comments to you civil, collegial, and confined to issues of policy. I think I succeeded.
- If you want to strike anything, strike your words below which imply a "bad faith" on a user. Here we assume good will from our colleagues. --E4024 (talk) 07:49, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Since you have acknowledged you don't get two !votes I have overstruck your confusing second !vote. Geo Swan (talk) 14:00, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- I don't even have one. It is not a "votes" thing, it is an "arguments" thing, although I see exceptions increasing... --E4024 (talk) 15:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- (To Jeff again :) Jeff, you already understood what I mean; but still let me say a few words more so that more people understand me better. Sometimes you just open a file to discussion. Of course it may imply a "pre-conception" of an intention to delete. But you may also only wish to learn the opinions of others. There are many examples of such DRs, several are mine. When you open a discussion saying "this looks out of scope to me, what do you think?" it implies you yourself no dot have a clear opinion (or "vote", see the following) as regards. You may (or may not) produce/formulate one later. OTOH, what we call "vote" here is not a "vote" as we conceive the word in daily life. (We don't need "that kind of votes" here. We're not electing deputies or President.) Here votes are "opinions". Those opinions have no reason to be frozen or dead. They develop within the discussion process. See an example here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:FMoPA at night Front Page website.jpg. (Nobody told me I could not use two votes! there... :) --E4024 (talk) 08:06, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- You don't get two !votes. — Jeff G. ツ 14:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep This is not a personal picture and was uploaded by Geo Swan through Flickr and is currently in use. --DDotsroeg (talk) 17:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- "Soy mexicano y mi no hablar Ingles." De veras? Pero si está hablando el inglés perfectamente?! Admin Nyttend is this another re-encarnation of the user whose DR's you cancelled a few days ago? --E4024 (talk) 08:14, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- I see no reason to say that; this isn't INeverCry's standard approach. I don't believe this statement, given the incorrect infinitive, the extraneous possessive, and the incorrect capitalisation, but at this point it doesn't matter. Also, don't unstrike invalid votes. Nyttend (talk) 12:48, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- "Soy mexicano y mi no hablar Ingles." De veras? Pero si está hablando el inglés perfectamente?! Admin Nyttend is this another re-encarnation of the user whose DR's you cancelled a few days ago? --E4024 (talk) 08:14, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I uploaded this image. Note: nominator E4024 was well aware of my plans to use this image to illustrate wikipedia coverage of the stereotype of the sexy librarian. I think this makes their decision to nominate this image for deletion very hard to explain.
- To be in scope an image doesn't actually have to be in use, it merely has to be of potential use. I think that this image is of potential use in article space, whether I complete my draft, or if the topic of the sexy librarian merely gets some coverage in a library related article. Geo Swan (talk) 03:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- I may be aware of your declared plans but you are not aware of mine, as I have not declared them yet. Until your draft is accepted as an article, it does not bring any "scope" to OoS files. Good luck with that article. --E4024 (talk) 13:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- The first COM:INUSE reference to userspace is talking about images on userpages; the context is people adding badly out-of-scope images to their other-project userpages merely to save them from being deleted. Images in use in a good-faith draft are quite different; they shouldn't be deleted unless they have problems bigger than SCOPE. Nyttend (talk) 06:38, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- I may be aware of your declared plans but you are not aware of mine, as I have not declared them yet. Until your draft is accepted as an article, it does not bring any "scope" to OoS files. Good luck with that article. --E4024 (talk) 13:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Comment I think it would be good practice to prepend a DR reason with {{Cmt}} if one does not want to delete at the moment of DR creation, but does want a discussion. This would make the DR more akin to enwiki's "Files for Discussion". — Jeff G. ツ 13:09, 4 December 2017 (UTC)- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tanis Barrientos.jpg was also opened by me, and the deleted file was in a similar space ("taller" / workshop). --E4024 (talk) 11:49, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- User:Jeff G., are you telling me that when I opened this DR on 1st December the file was in use in two WP articles? Your changes without consideration of timeline may cause others to think strangely about me. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 06:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- @E4024: The file is now in use in two English Wikipedia articles, sorry about the timeline. — Jeff G. ツ 10:38, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- "Sorry"? At last someone said "sorry" -at least to me- in Commons. Thanks Jeff; I withdraw the nomination. --E4024 (talk) 10:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Correction, the image is in use on one article. I removed it from "Halloween costume" since it is unrelated to Halloween and not a costume. I would remove it from "Librarians in popular culture" but I don't want to set Geo Swan off again. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:02, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- "Sorry"? At last someone said "sorry" -at least to me- in Commons. Thanks Jeff; I withdraw the nomination. --E4024 (talk) 10:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- @E4024: The file is now in use in two English Wikipedia articles, sorry about the timeline. — Jeff G. ツ 10:38, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept as withdrawn. The file is in use on multiple pages. — Jeff G. ツ 01:22, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO: fake license, and contains post-1989 material, so not public domain. Nominating instead of going for speedy deletion, just in case the uploader can find Jim Selleck to have him send permission via COM:OTRS. Closeapple (talk) 00:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per own nomination: Uploader, who does not seem to be the author, both claims public domain and then applies a CC-BY-4.0 license without author permission. According to both the uploader (claiming January 1990 in the description) and page 84 of the text (claiming no earlier than September 12, 1990), this version 2.5 manual was first published after March 1, 1989. U.S. works after that date are copyrighted regardless of copyright message. So, at the least, any of the (apparently significant) new material that appeared in the version 2.5 manual is copyrighted, whether or not an older version of the manual might have escaped copyright. --Closeapple (talk) 00:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:11, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
EXIF gives author as "F. Terry Reid Photography, all rights reserved". MB298 (talk) 01:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
메인 화면에 파일 노출이 안됩니다 부산대 홍보실 (talk) 02:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (author request within 7 days of upload). Green Giant (talk) 02:14, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
The license is problematic since Italy is in EU and the copyright term is 70 years after publication for an anonymous work (if the photo is indeed anonymous). Дима Г (talk) 02:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
"Cartoonists" is not an author. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:27, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I have updated the author to unknown as the summary was directly transferred from the English Wikipedia without evidence of who the author is. Per the PD-Australia and URAA date, the copyright has expired under part A1 "A1 Works published anonymously, under a pseudonym or the creator is unknown: (not photos): Published prior to 1 January 1946" this work was published in 1934. Flickerd (talk) 05:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- "Unknown" does not mean "I didn't properly research." A signature with a name is right on the bottom of the drawing, although it's ineligible in this digitized version. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:07, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. Unknown really does mean Unknown to everyone. The signature(s) are illegible but suggest an author. Green Giant (talk) 02:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
COM:FOP#United Kingdom doesn't apply to text. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Delete: copyright violation. Hjk321 (talk) 17:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Cambodia. Bulding was designed 1961, architekt is known (died this year). Photo will be free from 2067. DerFussi 04:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Vann Molyvann died in 2017, so copyright extends until 1 January 2068. Green Giant (talk) 02:36, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
No permission. Uploader states that they have received the picture from depicted person. OTRS from photographer needed. Jcb (talk) 07:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:42, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Restored per OTRS permission. --Krd 11:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Suspected copyright image taken from Twitter (no EXIF data) given uploader's track record of uploading large number of Twitter images as own work. (See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ウーノ.) DAJF (talk) 08:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- There is a false color peculiar to the recompressed image in this image. I probably suspect that it was not a copy from the original but a craft that was posted somewhere.--Licsak (talk) 13:07, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:42, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
File:1989 Berliner Mauer, Mauerspechte, Brandenburger Tor und Eindrücke vom Mauerfall 1989.webm
[edit]There is a language barrier here, but the description reads: "Das Material besteht aus Videomaterial von Sebastian Senftleben " (Google Translate: "The material consists of video material by Sebastian Senftleben"). The YouTube channel's name is Thorsten Doil. Who is Sebastian Senftleben, and did he release his material under a free license? Where? Does Thorsten Doil have the authority to release this under a Creative Commons license? There is an array of videos on this channel's upload page from various sources and, oddly, this is the only upload under a Creative Commons license. This casts doubt over the licensing. ℯxplicit 08:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:44, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete without OTRS-permission. I doubt that this is "own work" -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:36, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:44, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Not an image "of people or of aspects, elements and facts of natural or social life" and not a "simple photograph" Zanaq (talk) 09:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:45, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Statue from 2014 : artist still alive and under copyright and no liberty of panorama in France Culex (talk) 09:57, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:47, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Statue from 2014 : artist still alive and under copyright and no liberty of panorama in France Culex (talk) 09:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:47, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Statue from 2014 : artist still alive and under copyright and no liberty of panorama in France Culex (talk) 09:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:47, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Statue from 2008 : artist still alive/under copyright and no liberty of panorama in France Culex (talk) 09:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:48, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
I am the author of this work. I need to erase some people's faces. Motoko C. K. (talk) 10:12, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Author request within seven days. Green Giant (talk) 02:49, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
It states PD-ART-70 as license. However, there's no information about the artist, date, or work itself that identifies this work as public domain, or a reference for it. The source is unhelpful (as it is dead and seemingly not archived), and the uploader has not provided identifiable information. Cold Season (talk) 11:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:50, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
I highly doubt that a picture from 1942 is "own work". 1942 is also still too recent enough for it to be reasonable to assume the author hasn't been dead for 70+ years. Vera (talk) 11:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:52, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Copy of http://pic.inbooker.com/9094.jpeg Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour Patrick, pour information je suis le détenteur des droits de cette photo. Les photos que j'utilise sont toujours miennes.
- Hi. In that case, you should try to to scan directly the photo print you own, so the picture will have a much better resolution. At this time this file is an exact copy of the low-resolution file found at http://pic.inbooker.com/9094.jpeg. Yours, Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:08, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
OK thank you !
Deleted: per nomination. No action as suggested. Green Giant (talk) 02:54, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Copy of http://pic.inbooker.com/9097.jpeg Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Bonjour Patrick, pour information cette photo est libre de droit. Elle m'appartient. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhillippePierre (talk • contribs)
- @PhillippePierre: . Sauf erreur de ma part, vous n'avez pas envoyé d'autorisation prouvant, justeemnt, que ces photos vous appartiennent. Merci de consulter la démarche à COM:OTRS --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 20:37, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:54, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Claimed as own work but credit to "Stringer, Hulton Archive" given in EXIF metadata, image dates from 1935, so willing to assume good faith as to satus if it's clarified. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:55, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Sports photos of User:Victorcargiolli
[edit]Delete all photographs uploaded by User:Victorcargiolli that are related to the sports (futsal) club w:es:Club Malvín and are marked as own work, unless he gives more details about their source. This means the following files.
- File:Pablo Lopez.jpg
- File:El tecnico de malvin que gano mas clasicos - Pablo Lopez 16 clasicos.jpg
- File:Basket femenino Malvin de Uruguay.jpg
File:Pablo Lopez actual dt de Malvin.jpg- File:Conferencia de prensa de Nicolas Mazzarino en Liga de las Americas.jpg
- File:Fernando Martinez un simbolo de Malvin.jpg
- File:Malvin-campeon-copa-tenfiel.jpg
- File:Año soñado para Malvin el 2014 ...campeon y su archirival Union Atletica descendio al torneo Metropolitano.jpg
- File:MALVÍN CAMPEÃO FOTO.jpg
- File:Equipo del federal 79 con los 2 primeros gringos.jpg
- File:Equipo del 77 que fuera tercero en el torneo federal.jpg
- File:16-malvin.jpg
- File:Malvin elimina a union atletica en semifinales de liga uruguaya.jpg
- File:Malvin elimino a union atletica en semifinales de liga.jpg
- File:Malvin vencio a union atletica por 45 puntos.jpg
- File:Sede de malvin ubicada en la avenida legrand.jpg
- File:5-862x555.jpg
- File:20915353 331106384004450 854874294310199529 n,jpg.jpg
- File:Gimnasio juan francisco canil1.jpg
- File:21 04d5401f053edd .jpg
- File:El presidente actual de malvin.jpg
- File:Pablo lopez por muchos años dt de malvin.jpg
- File:Malvin sede.jpg
Multiple such these images were incorrectly attributed as own work, and have already been deleted:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fernando martinez le da la victoria a malvin en el ultimo suspiro ...momento soñado.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Malvin campeon federal de veteranos en 1986.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:La inauguracion de la cancha abierta el 30 de agosto de 1952.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Comision directiva 1952 impulsora del estadio de malvin en la calle Peñon.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sede que tuvo el Club Malvín en Pilcomayo y Amazonas.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Equipo de malvin de los años 50 en torneos de primera division.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Primer equipo del club en jugar en la fubb.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Equipo de malvin en torneos federales que realizo una buena campaña(02).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:El tablero electronico de la cancha abierta.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Equipo de malvin en torneos federales que realizo una buena campaña.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Regional(1).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fernando martinez goleador historico de los clasicos de la playa.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Malvin.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Plantel malvin 2006 2007.jpg
(I recommend reviewing especially the last ones in this list if you don't have time to review each of them.) This casts a serious doubt to the attribution of the rest of the images as own work, which IMO is enough to delete them unless the user returns to clarify the source. In addition, some of these are also very low quality images, which suggests they are not originals.
One more image is already requested for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pablo Lopez actual dt de Malvin.jpg, so I do not include it in this request.
– b_jonas 13:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:57, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work -- reproduction of published graphic works without indication of copyright status of those works, visible is the cover and excerpt pages of the comic seb26 (talk) 13:26, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
All the rights of copy of this comic, they are of my property. Also the ISBN and the record in the Legal Warehouse of the work.ae50650 (talk) 22:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- ae50650, OK, thanks for explaining that, it was not made clear by you in the file page description at all. I recommend following the instructions at COM:CONSENT to send a permission release to our OTRS. Write from the email address professionally associated with you. The team will accept the email and add a permission tag which will maintain the image on Commons. Cheers, seb26 (talk) 01:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No ticket found at OTRS. Green Giant (talk) 02:58, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:59, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:40, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:32, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:59, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Part of the same photoshot as this. Credited to "modheshworld". Vanjagenije (talk) 21:35, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, it is copied from her twitter account ([4]). Vanjagenije (talk) 21:36, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure if this is the same image deleted before or if it has been taken from here but the source shown has been deleted. E4024 (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This and a different photo were previously deleted. Green Giant (talk) 03:02, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
see description of metadata. It may not own work. suspicious copyvio 軽快 (talk) 13:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Copyvio for sure: Delete - the metadata already say that and on internet I found: © photo christophe masson - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 10:55, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 03:03, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
not clearly, low quality 軽快 (talk) 13:57, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 03:03, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Does not cite source images, lisence violation. Additonaly, this is low resolution. 軽快 (talk) 14:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 03:04, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of date logo 5.148.2.202 14:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Is there a rule that out of date logos are not allowed on Commons? I couldn't find one, see e.g. Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Aalto_university_school_of_economics_logo.svg. By the way, only the text below the triangles seems to have changed [5]. Why not simply upload the new version? --DeWikiMan (talk) 15:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Upload the new version, keep the old one. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Green Giant (talk) 03:04, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
unused low-quality photo, plenty of superior photos of birthday cakes/candles available. Jon Kolbert (talk) 11:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep
- Being unused is not grounds for deletion, if an image is in scope.
- Nomination "claims we have "plenty of superior photos of birthday cakes/candles available."
- Which policy document sets a maximum number of images, per topic? We have thousands of images of iconic landmarks, like the Statue of Liberty.
- Category:Birthday cakes contains about 400 images. I looked at the first 200. About a dozen other images show the birthday person in the act of blowing out their candles in a darkened room. I would be surprised if nominator was able to defend the claim that we have "plenty" of images of a birthday person in the act of blowing out their candles in a darkened room.
- I would also be surprised if they could explain how the other images of a birthday person in the act of blowing out their candles in a darkened room were superior to this image. Geo Swan (talk) 22:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think the following images are superior to the image nominated for deletion here. Geo Swan (talk) 23:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![196 File:Novela Gráfica "DESKIZIADOS - El Doberman".jpg](#File:Novela_Gráfica_"DESKIZIADOS_-_El_Doberman".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Licking_%28287390923%29.jpg&diff=269695586&oldid=269694306){kind=link}
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Sexy_librarian_Halloween_costume_%28287390750%29.jpg&diff=269988226&oldid=269944698){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![13:26, 1 December 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/12/01#c-Seb26-2017-12-01T13:26:00.000Z-File:Novela_Gráfica_"DESKIZIADOS_-_El_Doberman".jpg){kind=link}
![22:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/12/01#c-Ae50650-2017-12-01T22:56:00.000Z-File:Novela_Gráfica_"DESKIZIADOS_-_El_Doberman".jpg){kind=link}
![02:58, 19 December 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/12/01#c-Green_Giant-2017-12-19T02:58:00.000Z-File:Novela_Gráfica_"DESKIZIADOS_-_El_Doberman".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Delete per nom. If those files are not better, they also should be deleted. I will nominate a couple of them for deletion. --E4024 (talk) 07:11, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- E4024 did nominate File:Birthday 2011.jpg for deletion. I left an explanation there of how a host prepares birthday candles for the birthday boy or birthday girl to blow out. E4024 witmhdrew their delete after reading that explanation, so I will include it here, too:
- The cake is prepared with candles out of sight of the birthday boy or girl. If possible the host lights one candle for every year of their age.
- The lights in the room where the birthday is being celebrated are turned off.
- When the host enters with the cake with the candles blazing other celebrants start singing happy birthday.
- The host sets the cake in front of the birthday boy or girl.
- Celebrants encourage them to "make a wish", and they then try to blow out all candles with one breath. By convention, if they fail, they cannot expect their wish to come true.
- This photo was taken in a darkened room correctly reflecting the tradition that the candles are emphasized by turning off the lights when they are lit.
- This is one of the relatively few images we have that capture the birthday boy or girl in the act of blowing out the candles, so it is certainly in scope.
- I consider it a strong possibility that our nominator was also unaware of why birthday candles are blown out in darkened rooms, so does not understand why this photo was taken in a darkened room. Geo Swan (talk) 17:56, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:05, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Keep: I will use this image in a project. The original commenting user seems to be trying to invoke the 'Not educationally useful' or 'Self-promotion' policies listed under 'Out of scope.' Just because the original commenting user would not use this image does not mean that someone else, including myself, will not use it. Wheresteddy (talk)
In that case, please categorize your images better. There is no categorization at all nor is there a thoughtful or thorough description. Those lead one to think this is simply an image uploaded for personal use. If it's a personal photo that is from an established contributor that is perfectly fine, but without it being in use, lacking any categorization and a description that simply leads one to think this is a personal image that doesn't quality for COM:INUSE. These are things that could be improved upon in the future to keep an image from being nominated for deletion simply for unused personal photo. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:06, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
The copyright situation of the depicted map is unclear. JuTa 19:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:06, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
the picture is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Besides, dresses look different from the style of "Very Nice Clothing" Collections and the models look like common people. It seems just a goliardic joke. Harlock81 (talk) 19:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:06, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
copyvio from Doripoke (talk) 16:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
copyvio from https://twitter.com/t0da/status/13697324612 Doripoke (talk) 16:49, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:55, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
only NonCommercial use allowed, i.e. {{https://www.flickr.com/photos/elosaatio/24435100004/in/album-72157665846651152/}} Paju~commonswiki (talk) 23:50, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - {{PD-ineligible}} - Jcb (talk) 23:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:56, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Likely invalid licensing information:
- "This image (or other media file) is in the public domain because its copyright has expired and its author is anonymous. This applies to the European Union and those countries with a copyright term of 70 years after the work was made available to the public and the author never disclosed their identity."
The image is a typical photo provided by Propagandakompanie, the propaganda arm of the Wehrmacht; these authors are not anonymous. The tag is very likely invalid. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:26, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
No FoP in Cambodia and the building is subject of the photo DerFussi 04:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- I may blur the Vattanak building then, or cut off the top part of it. This picture is supposed to show the lycée français René Descartes next to that big building. (There are many pictures of the Vattanac on Wikimedia) --Io Herodotus (talk) 10:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- But some of the pictures are considered as DeMinimis, because part of the skyline. Let's wait what other users say about this case. -- DerFussi 13:40, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Its sole use is with the caption "Vattanac Capital Tower, the tallest building in the Phnom Penh.". I suspect the school building is also still under copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:17, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Not in Use --Bukhari Talk 11:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused image, superseded by File:Blason-fr-Pierre-de-Cabrol de Mouté.svg. -- 109.238.80.85 11:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Upload new logo. Keep a copy of both. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused logo, superseded by File:Blekko Logo.svg. -- 109.238.80.85 11:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Keep both -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused low-resolution logo, superseded by File:DEgov-BMBF-Logo.svg. -- 109.238.80.85 11:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Upload new one and keep them both. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:42, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused image, superseded by File:Coat of arms of Boettstein.svg. -- 109.238.80.85 11:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Redundancy does not imply deletion, and the (nice) shadow effect is missing from the svg, so it's not really redundant. Zanaq (talk) 18:26, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hmm. I couldn't find reliable official sources with this blason, and unreliable could take image from here. So the shadow effect really can indeed be an important part of the blason. Let's keep the file for now, until the situation becomes clearer. I withdraw the nomination. Thanks to a colleague Zanaq for observation. --109.238.80.85 14:54, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- Redundancy does not imply deletion, and the (nice) shadow effect is missing from the svg, so it's not really redundant. Zanaq (talk) 18:26, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused image, superseded by File:Borge komm.svg. -- 109.238.80.85 11:27, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Upload new one and keep both. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:43, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused image, superseded by File:Coat of arms of Borsele.svg. -- 109.238.80.85 11:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Because it's a former wapen, it does not have to be deleted. It's history. No deletionism please.. - Grtz. from the Netherlands, Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 10:49, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- I didn't say anything about the fact that this former wapen. I suggest to remove the old raster version of the image, because now there is more qualitative vector wapen. History won't suffer after this. --109.238.80.85 13:34, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- The vector version is totally different, so yes, history would suffer and there really is no reason to delete unused images that are in scope. Zanaq (talk) 10:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Keep both. That's how history works. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:26, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- The vector version is totally different, so yes, history would suffer and there really is no reason to delete unused images that are in scope. Zanaq (talk) 10:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- I didn't say anything about the fact that this former wapen. I suggest to remove the old raster version of the image, because now there is more qualitative vector wapen. History won't suffer after this. --109.238.80.85 13:34, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused image, superseded by File:Coat of Arms of Borzna raion.svg. -- 109.238.80.85 11:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep keep both the old and new ones. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused image, superseded by File:Brokdorf-Wappen.svg. -- 109.238.80.85 11:46, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep keep the old and new ones. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused image, superseded by File:USAF Basic Military Training Honor Graduate Ribbon.svg and File:Coast Guard Honor Graduate Ribbon.svg. -- 109.238.80.85 11:53, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Keep the old ones for historical reasons if nothing else. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:12, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused image, superseded by File:Vlajka města Bučovice.svg. -- 109.238.80.85 11:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Com:Redundant. Unused low-resolution logo, superseded by File:Bundesarchiv-Logo-ohne-Wappen.svg. -- 109.238.80.85 11:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Keep the old one too. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- باسلام خدمت دوستان و مدیران محترم،
عارضم خدمت بزرگواران ،این عکس متعلق به قهرمان کارته جهان،اقای سعید احمدی کریانی می باشد، این تصویر از دوربین شخصی ایشان تهیه شده و حقوق مربوط به کپی رایت کاملا رعایت شده است، لذا از محضرتان تقاضامندم،از حذف تصویر مذکور جلوگیری فرمایید. باتشکر Payamkermanshahi (talk) 16:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Notable person. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Could someone tell them how to categorize their photo then? --Mjrmtg (talk) 18:54, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Sure: See Category:Saeid Ahmadi. Also, {{Withdraw}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 02:22, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:27, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
This is not used any page. Out of Scope 軽快 (talk) 14:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio per EXIF. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Obviously not own work. Copyright violation. Twofortnights (talk) 14:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This montage using non-free file from Flickr. 2 files already deleted. Batholith (talk) 15:04, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- See Souce form.--Batholith (talk) 07:50, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The guide map is a copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 15:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Japan.. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from web sites screenshots. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The guide map is a copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 15:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The guide map is a copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 15:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 15:26, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 15:27, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Image from Weather underground, no evidence that it is a US government image. B dash (talk) 08:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- B dash, NEXRAD imagery is produced by NOAA radars. Weather Underground does not have any doppler radars of its own. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Cyclonebiskit. Ruthven (msg) 17:36, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 15:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The guide map is a copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 15:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The guide map is a copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 15:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The guide map is a copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 15:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Batholith (talk) 15:49, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: blurred, bad quality. Ruthven (msg) 17:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Besshotown Higashihoda Mikicity Hyogopref Hyogoprefectural road 513 Miki belt line No,2.JPG
[edit]
Out of scope Batholith (talk) 15:49, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: blurred, bad quality. Ruthven (msg) 17:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
possibly grabbed from Facebook per FBMD Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 15:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 17:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This montage made to using deleted file. Batholith (talk) 15:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- See source form.--Batholith (talk) 07:12, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/Hyakushaku Kannon. Ruthven (msg) 17:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
uploaded in error Alonso Anderson (talk) 16:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:40, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Extrem low res Sturm (talk) 16:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Indeed, too low resolution (PT: de fato, resolução muito baixa!). Abs, Solstag (talk) 14:37, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:40, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Logo meets the threshold of originality and may be copyrighted from its source country, Germany. There's a clear notice here that this logo may not be suitable to upload to Commons. theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete That link makes this look pretty clear. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:48, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:40, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:40, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
_1.JPG){kind=link}
_1.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The photography could not be taken without breaching a private property and can be considered a violation of privacy (the building is not a registered historical monument and function as the living place of non public, living persons).
Other photographies are available and those were appropriately taken outside of the private property: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ch%C3%A2teau_de_la_Combe_(Saint-Germain-au-Mont-d%27Or_3.JPG
(main article in which they appear: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ch%C3%A2teau_de_la_Combe_(Saint-Germain-au-Mont-d%27Or)
Those do not constitue an issue, so the deletion if this one won't produce any educational information loss. Fefelune (talk) 17:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
_1.JPG){kind=link}
- Keep Picture shows a registrated historical monument. See also: www.france-voyage.com/villes-villages/saint-germain-au-mont-d-or-27477/chateau-combe-13114.htm --Foreign Species (talk) 20:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Foreign Species: The source you linked is a commercial generic tourist website aggregator which constitutes no authority on what is a "registered historical monument" (this is an official label). The building is NOT a registered historical monument: you can consult the official government lists at http://traduction.culturecommunication.gouv.fr/url/Result.aspx?to=en&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.culturecommunication.gouv.fr%2FRegions%2FDrac-Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes%2FArchitecture-et-patrimoines%2FRessources%2FPatrimoine-protege-labellise (check the PDF on the right side "Buildings protected in conformance with the historic monuments of the Rhône and Metropolis of Lyon" against for either "SAINT-GERMAIN-AU-MONT-D'OR" or "Chateau de la Combe".) --Fefelune (talk) 14:51, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 18:35, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
_1.JPG){kind=link}
Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 21:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + copyvio from [6]. Ruthven (msg) 18:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 21:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: + copyvio from [7]. Ruthven (msg) 18:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Source page states "If you are preparing an article on Frisbee history for publication or broadcast, you are free to download and use the information in any of the text documents as well as the photos on this page." This does not translate into permission to use, redistribute, commercialize etc "for any purpose" as stated on the uploaded file pages.
- File:Walter Frederick Morrison and Phil Kennedy.jpg
- File:Walter Frederick Morrison 1967.jpg
- File:Flat Flip Flies Straight! True Origins of the Frisbee®.jpg
Ariadacapo (talk) 16:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- I agree. If there is no way to use the photos with the given permission, they should be deleted. Druidsaki (talk) 11:37, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Prize-winning cinematographer. If he were not notable they would not make the following interviews with him: (i) https://indieactivity.com/interview-with-burak-oguz-saguner/ (ii) https://www.sbs.com.au/yourlanguage/turkish/en/audiotrack/interview-cinematographer-burak-oguz-saguner (iii) http://cinemajam.com/mag/interviews/burak-oguz-saguner Or do we need someone to grab an Oscar to be able to keep a pic here? --E4024 (talk) 09:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per E4024. Ruthven (msg) 11:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata (except metadata indicating tha it was grabbed from social media), and the uploader's history (likely sockpuppet with a history of copyright violations). —LX (talk, contribs) 20:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 16:49, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination / per the precautionary principle: Not enough information, no source. --Rosenzweig τ 13:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
acc. to uploader: "Es ist ein Repro einer alten Ansichtskarte ohne Urheber (Rückseite leer). (Scan of an old postcard, without author (backside empty). Uploader cannot name date and author (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=265826409) and asks for deletion. It is not own work. Whether the postcard is old enough to keep it as PD, or not, I don't know Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not enough info to ascertain copyright status. --Rosenzweig τ 13:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
No evidence that this photo was ever published in Italy, Ethiopia, or Sweden and was in the public domain in these countries on the URAA date. Indy beetle (talk) 17:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- If "published" means made available to other press agencies abroad, it was published in Italy. If it was published in Sweden is irrelevant. {{PD-Sweden-photo}} applies to photos taken in Sweden, not photos published in Sweden. /ℇsquilo 19:34, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- If the file was made available by an Italian agency at the time, I'd think it also was used (published) in Italy. And if it was created for commercial purpose in Abyssinia it was probably published there. Those should have been the two countries most interested in the conflict. The only reason for not publishing the photo would have been it not being available for publishing by the press (I suppose there was not redundant availability of such photos). --LPfi (talk) 08:58, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- The photo is fine, you might close this Deletion requests--Tahurus (talk) 21:20, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
- A clear and unambiguous definition of "published" is needed. Obviously, DMacks definition differs from mine. Published does not necessarily mean printed in daily press. /ℇsquilo 13:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think it needs to get as far as printing, but it needs to get out of the image library of the original owner. Publication usually does include transfer from the original owner to another (even to a secondary press agency, etc.), which is why knowing the identity (or at least nationality) of the original owner matters. See Commons:Publication. DMacks (talk) 13:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Looking more closely now that I have time, I have not been able to find any further information about this image (other publications with it that have authorship or wider view with a copyright statement in the margin/back, etc). That does (as we all seem to agree) make it "actual author unknown". I could see it being {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}, but we need to be pretty sure it was actually published back then and where. We know it was created before 1976, but not that it was published first in Italy and not also published in the US within 30 days (see {{PD-italy}} and Template:PD-italy/US notes...image may need to meet all not just any one of different laws). DMacks (talk) 02:55, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The photo is public in both italy and Ethiopia and it is 1936 so 81 years old was used in Ethiopia and Italy frequently because the author is unknown, it's free--Tahurus (talk) 23:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- "was used in Ethiopia and Italy frequently"--what matters is when it was first given to someone, not how often or where later. I don't feel we have strong evidence that it was published 81 years ago. What is your basis for declaring "was used in Ethiopia and Italy frequently"? DMacks (talk) 02:55, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep DMacks The image https://abyssiniancrisis.wordpress.com/2015/11/17/ethiopian-army/ was used by sports and general press agency, located in Fleet Street, London but many of their archives were destroyed in a 1941 bombing raid.
- So it is without copyright that have passed more than 80 years--Tahurus (talk) 10:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for that additional bit of info. That would make it PD-old. DMacks (talk) 16:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per DMacks, in 1936-1941 Ethiopia was an Italian colony, so Italian law applies. Ruthven (msg) 08:04, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Renominating for deletion. Previous argument still stands undressed: There is no reliable evidence that this photo was ever published in Italy, Ethiopia, or Sweden and was in the public domain in these countries on the URAA date, only speculation and wishful thinking (we have no date of it being published or in what medium). Also, the fact that it "was used by sports and general press agency, located in Fleet Street, London but many of their archives were destroyed in a 1941 bombing raid" (quoting previous deletion discussion) doesn't help, because. Note that here it is stated that Alpha Photo Press Ltd owns the rights of the Sport and General Archive. So just because the S&G was mostly destroyed in 1941 doesn't mean the copyright disappeared. And just because a print of the photo was sold on Ebay doesn't mean the rights were also transferred. Indy beetle (talk) 20:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Italy considers photos taken on Italian soil, it doesn't matter where it has been published (GB, Sweden or US). It was PD in 1996, so it was in the public domain on the URAA date. --Ruthven (msg) 18:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept, the photo is created in Ethiopia in 1936. That year Ethiopia became part of Italy. Either Italian or Ethiopian law applies. If we apply Italian law, then copyright lasts 20 years from creation and the photo is in PD since 1957, no publication data is needed. If we apply Ethiopian law, then 25 years from creation or publication, whichever latest, that means on worst case 50 years from creation is needed and the photo is in PD since 1987 (probably earlier). Both cases publication data is not needed at all and both cases the photo is in PD on URAA date. Taivo (talk) 14:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Nominating again (I just realized) because there is consistent failure to match this photo with appropriate PD tags or otherwise demonstrate that it is PD. There is no proof the photo was taken by an Italian, taken in an Italian jurisdiction (These are armed, mounted Ethiopian soldiers serving on behalf of the Ethiopian Empire, which was recognised as a sovereign nation as of 1936. For this photo to have been physically possible, these troops would have been posing /before/ the country was occupied by Italy. How can it be argued that this photo originated in an Italian jurisdiction, then?) or /first published/ in an Italian jurisdiction. The source is a Swedish Press Agency. -Indy beetle (talk) 03:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- It does not matter if Ethiopian, Italian or Swedish jurisdiction is applied, the photo is still free in all of them. /ℇsquilo 08:48, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Esquilo: How so? Place of being first published and the date of that publishing matters. This strategy of throwing enough shit at the wall and hoping some of its sticks in regards to conflicting licensing schemes is not how this is supposed to work. -Indy beetle (talk) 17:04, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- No, all of the shit sticks to the wall because the licensing schemes are NOT conflicting. /ℇsquilo 05:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- I guess it's possible that it is mis-tagged as to the place of original publication. Having an incorrect pub-location tag is definitely a technical mistake, but I don't think that it is itself a reason for deletion. I take ℇsquilo's point to be that no matter which of the proposed places of original publication is correct, it meets the criteria for being freee in that place. That is, "it's from A or B or C and maybe we aren't even sure which" but "if it's from A it's free by A's rules; if it's from B it's free by B's rules; etc.". If there is no "not free" path, then I don't see how it's deletable on license grounds. DMacks (talk) 06:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Esquilo: How so? Place of being first published and the date of that publishing matters. This strategy of throwing enough shit at the wall and hoping some of its sticks in regards to conflicting licensing schemes is not how this is supposed to work. -Indy beetle (talk) 17:04, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- @DMacks: I think you're missing how this is exactly the problem. Yes, if it was published in Italy in 1936 it would meet the criteria for being PD. If it was published in Ethiopian or Swedish jurisdiction it would be PD. Zero proof was been provided that it was actually published in any of these specific jurisdictions (being photographed at a certain date and being published are two different things, for one). Has a news article from 1936 with the photo been produced to show it was published? No. Has a note from the archive that affirms when and where it was first published been produced? No. By this standard, we should all feel free to go grab old photos off the internet and add a hodgepodge of licensing permissions for countries with more lenient terms and say "Well, if it was published in country X or Y at this certain date than its in the PD. But we don't need proof that it was actually first published in X or Y at this date." I suspect this is exactly how this photo got uploaded. -Indy beetle (talk) 06:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Well, that is exactly how the copyright law works in many countries, Sweden for example. It does not matter when it was published or if it was published at all. It is only the time it was taken that matters. /ℇsquilo 09:58, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, but then was it PD by the URAA date? Because if not it's not PD in the US and then cannot be on Commons. -Indy beetle (talk) 02:17, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Taivo already noted it would be PD prior to URAA for either country-of-origin's laws. DMacks (talk) 02:31, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, but then was it PD by the URAA date? Because if not it's not PD in the US and then cannot be on Commons. -Indy beetle (talk) 02:17, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Well, that is exactly how the copyright law works in many countries, Sweden for example. It does not matter when it was published or if it was published at all. It is only the time it was taken that matters. /ℇsquilo 09:58, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- And for the record, the photo needed to have been PD by the URAA date for it to be allowed on Commons. -Indy beetle (talk) 06:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:54, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
IMHO this 1980 Soviet Union work is not in Public Domain! The licence says:
- This non-U.S. work was published in 1923 or later, but is in the public domain in the United States because it was simultaneously published (within 30 days) in the U.S. and in its source country and is in the public domain in the U.S. as a U.S. work (no copyright registered, or not renewed).
Therefor we need proofs. It was simultaneously published in the U.S. and the Soviet Union? Whereto? Cuba and the United States are enraged opponents, very questionable. An additional rationale is:
- Photo was created to show the general public the crew of the Soyuz 38 mission. It was not intended to be copyrighted. It was created in a communist county. Photo is older than 1996.
With this reason we could upload many old soviet space photos. I don't believe that this is valid. --Ras67 (talk) 15:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep — Well, I for one remember that Arnaldo Tamayo Méndez's picture was in the news. He was the first Black person in space, after all. It is perfectly believable that it was published in the US within 30 days. By the way, have you ever heard of "enraged opponents" publishing propaganda to make themselves look better than the other country? Ras, Soviet space triumphs and tragedies were widely reported in the US and other Western countries. I remember news about Sigmund Jähn's flight, too, the first German in space. He went up five years before Ulf Merbold. Kelisi (talk) 05:45, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Even when it should be Public Domain in the US, it is not PD in the Soviet Union resp. Russia. But this is the requirement for Commons. --Ras67 (talk) 12:43, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence, that the photo was ever published in US before upload into Commons, and it's copyrighted in Russia anyway. Taivo (talk) 16:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Fuck Russia. They respect no one, they deserve no respect. MostlyTexasArticles (talk) 00:29, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Lower-resolution duplicate of File:Olymische_Sommerspiele_2004_Moderner_Fuenfkampf.jpg. However, this file has a somewhat better description, and the other has a misspelling in the filename. So some kind of merger would be preferable: would it be OK to upload the higher-res file over this one, just changing the source URL, then delete the former? —Odysseus1479 (talk) 23:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, OK, I'll merge the photos. Taivo (talk) 18:27, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work of the prior deleted Igla docking system antennas.jpg. Ras67 (talk) 16:40, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Il me semble que le dessin d'origine figure dans un document de la NASA et a été produit en licence libre. Il faut que je le retrouve. --Pline (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Something like this (server is down) http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/_techrep/RP1357.pdf --Pline (talk) 17:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- It is indeed a derivative work of RP1357 p64 Salyut 1.svg which is a free NASA work. I don't know, if the modifications are below the threshold of originality so that we keep this file with a NASA licence. Should be MarcRic itself the crator of this modifications we have a licence from him. Additionally an administrator could examine if the original is also eligible for Commons. --Ras67 (talk) 18:17, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- Something like this (server is down) http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/_techrep/RP1357.pdf --Pline (talk) 17:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per User:Pline and User:Ras67, it appears that the original image is indeed from NASA. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:09, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information stated by uploader. May be not own work, no exif. Also hardly usefull due to bad quality. Jcb (talk) 16:53, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, better alternatives available anyway. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:00, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Seal of Algeria.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
No proof the photo was published in Iraq, therefore making the license invalid. Indy beetle (talk) 20:50, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- it is from Photos Match. So probably published outside of iraq.--Sanandros (talk) 21:49, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PumpkinSky talk 15:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Invalid licensing information. The image is a logo of an organisation, and is thus subject to copyright. The statement "This representation of a coat of arms is potentially different from the one used by the armiger (municipality or organisation) in question" is off topic. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- The image is not the logo of the organisation. It is an independent interpretation (by my) of the organisations oficial Blazon (I blått ett stolpvis ställt svärd överlagt en vase allt av guld.). Please see COM:COA. /Lokal_Profil 08:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- I don't believe that COM:COA applies; the image is presented as belonging to the organisation. I could redraw the Deutsche Bank logo, for example, and claim it for myself. It would still belong to Deutsche Bank. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:19, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- If the Deutsche Bank has a Blazon and you redraw it yourself, or as in this case, combines freely licensed resources, it would not be their copyright. There is no copyright on ideas, it is the actual representation that gets copyright. You are also wrong when you say "the image is presented as belonging to the organisation", it is only presented as the coat of arms of the organisation. Ainali (talk) 09:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- All COA'S aside, Deutsche Bank owning the copyright shouldn't be a theory it should be a legal fact. Deutsche Bank owns this or they don't. What am I not seeing here? -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:42, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- It's the difference between the idea (non-copyrightable) and the execution (copyrightable). A blazon falls in the first category whereas a the drawn coat of arms falls in the second. In this case the blazon is constructed by the organisation but the drawing is constructed by me. The difference to the Deutsche Bank example is that for a logo there is no variation allowed in how it is drawn, so any image will be a copy. By contrast blazons are designed to be unspecific som any coat of arms independently drawn from it will end up being different. Again COM:COA explains all of this. /Lokal_Profil 09:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Lokal Profil: I've thought about this and reread COA several times. I'm leaning towards voting keep but one line of COA I can't get past A representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable. Yet if this was never under copyright, copyright was never defended (I don't know how Swedish laws compare to American though) or it is not copyrightable in the first place there is no issue. I really don't think this is simple geometric shapes so this needs to be cleared up by someone with a more meticulous knowledge of the subject IMO. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Sixflashphoto: I read the same quote differently. Rephrased it becomes "the representation of a description is copyrightable". I.e. the actual image (both that drawn by me and the one used by the organisation) are copyrightable, BUT if they are both only based on the description then one isn't a derivative work of the other.
- This is why we for Swedish Coat of Arms cannot just upload the image of the arms used by the organisation, but instead have to draw a new one based only on the description. /Lokal_Profil 20:38, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep @Lokal Profil: You're right. Public domain definition (blazon) does clarify this. Also you're from Sweden and you have made many of these. I looked to see if I could find an old DR of something like this that was closed as keep for some additional context but couldn't find one. A representation drawn to faithfully depict a geometric specification of an emblem (a definition) is not copyrightable. It is a bit confusing but I've thought about this one emblem more than any middle aged man from Ohio should and I really think this is an easy keep now. It's either a Keep or I could see commons having a mass ridiculous DR spree one day. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:35, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Lokal Profil: I've thought about this and reread COA several times. I'm leaning towards voting keep but one line of COA I can't get past A representation drawn to represent a description containing non-geometric shapes is copyrightable. Yet if this was never under copyright, copyright was never defended (I don't know how Swedish laws compare to American though) or it is not copyrightable in the first place there is no issue. I really don't think this is simple geometric shapes so this needs to be cleared up by someone with a more meticulous knowledge of the subject IMO. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- It's the difference between the idea (non-copyrightable) and the execution (copyrightable). A blazon falls in the first category whereas a the drawn coat of arms falls in the second. In this case the blazon is constructed by the organisation but the drawing is constructed by me. The difference to the Deutsche Bank example is that for a logo there is no variation allowed in how it is drawn, so any image will be a copy. By contrast blazons are designed to be unspecific som any coat of arms independently drawn from it will end up being different. Again COM:COA explains all of this. /Lokal_Profil 09:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- All COA'S aside, Deutsche Bank owning the copyright shouldn't be a theory it should be a legal fact. Deutsche Bank owns this or they don't. What am I not seeing here? -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:42, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- If the Deutsche Bank has a Blazon and you redraw it yourself, or as in this case, combines freely licensed resources, it would not be their copyright. There is no copyright on ideas, it is the actual representation that gets copyright. You are also wrong when you say "the image is presented as belonging to the organisation", it is only presented as the coat of arms of the organisation. Ainali (talk) 09:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- I don't believe that COM:COA applies; the image is presented as belonging to the organisation. I could redraw the Deutsche Bank logo, for example, and claim it for myself. It would still belong to Deutsche Bank. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:19, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: the representation, made by the author with free sources, is copyrightable and freely licensed, and as far I can see the description is not copyrightable. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Probably not a photo with CC-BY-SA-4.0-license, can be found on Vallestad`s Linkedin profile https://no.linkedin.com/in/siljevallestad/no and at her Twitter profile https://twitter.com/siljevallestad Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 19:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- The photo is taken by my husband. Rimfjord 19:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Rimfjord: Can your husband send an e-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org conferming the license?--Sanandros (talk) 21:46, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- There is also [8] Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
![[8]](https://www.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=https://hrnorge.no/assets/img/person-img/Silje-Vallestad.jpg&imgrefurl=https://hrnorge.no/fagomrader/organisasjon-og-ledelse/organisasjonskultur/mennesket-som-utkonkurrert-og-overflodig&h=1305&w=1305&tbnid=YGZ7sAghwI_SeM&tbnh=225&tbnw=225&usg=__JLj27FqahjgXUxXuRkCGdDUlwHM=&docid=ic7Sa9HZ42loFM){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
