Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/10/19

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 19th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lirazelf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files need OTRS permission. They list Inverclyde Library Service as photographer, although copyright probably belongs to the uncreditted individual photographers.

Jcb (talk) 16:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm the uploader. I'm a Wikimedian in Residence at the Scottish Library and Information Council. These pictures have been provided by various library services, who own the copyright to the images. They've provided them to SLIC explicitly for upload to WikiCommons. I was using the Pattypan uploader and left out the permission column & the GLAM-Wiki Collab code, heading back in just now to fix. Lirazelf (talk) 16:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, but Wikimedian in Residence or not, the permission has to be properly documented. Please be aware that it's highly unlikely that those services own the copyright of all these pictures. In principle the individual photographers own the copyright. Anything beyond that needs proper documentation via OTRS. Jcb (talk) 17:16, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In the UK, it's usually the case that copyright in photos taken in the course of employment (as these seem to be) are owned by the employer. See section 11(2) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. --bjh21 (talk) 22:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The "in the course of employment" needs documentation, as very few libraries have a photographer on their payroll. Jcb (talk) 14:43, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You don't need to be employed solely (or even primarily) as a photographer in order to engage in photography in the course of employment. I do it occasionally, and I'm a sysadmin. --bjh21 (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, but in such cases the photographer will hold the copyright, not the employer. Jcb (talk) 16:53, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why? The photograph is still taken in the course of employment, so why would section 11(2) not apply? --bjh21 (talk) 18:53, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"The photograph is still taken in the course of employment" - that is your assumption. Although it doesn't matter. E.g. if someones job is to bring returned books to the correct shelf and one day they make a picture they are the copyright holder of that picture. It's even unknown whether the photographer have been asked to take these pictures, uploader did not provided any vital information. Jcb (talk) 21:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, my assumption is that librarians' jobs are broad enough to encompass whatever needs to be done to keep the library running, be that reshelving books, changing lightbulbs so patrons can see better, or taking promotional photos to encourage use of the library. You're right that if these photos were taken for personal reasons by people whose sole job was to reshelve books, copyright would be owned by the photographer, but I really doubt that that's the case. Anyway, I agree that the uploader needs to be clear how these pictures came to be taken and by whom. --bjh21 (talk) 23:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hey folks, as above yes, assumption was at time of upload that the works had been taken in the course of employment and were therefore the Library Services' to transfer - it's pretty common with local authorities to have those clauses in the contracts. I've not come across the OTRS request before, and can action the paperwork but as there are multiple partners (and part time jobs) involved, there's no way to get it done quickly, will likely take me another week or so, will reupload then with the appropriate paperwork. Lirazelf (talk) 08:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. COM:PRP, no indication of proper licenses, no action from uploader in 3 weeks. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:00, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lirazelf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scholar and artist George Bain (1881–1968), has not been dead 70 years, so his works are not in the public domain, and even if they were these images are incorrectly licensed as they are not "own work" of the uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:59, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, the copyright for the George Bain images is owned by the Groam House museum, and were uploaded as part of a GLAM-Wiki collaboration with them, some time ago. If you could let me know what needs to be done (OTRS is new to me) and I'll see if I can contact the museum to get these cleared in the appropriate fashion.Lirazelf (talk) 12:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ellin Beltz Hello again, I've emailed my contacts at the museum, however there looks to have been some personnel changes since I last spoke to them, fingers crossed... Lirazelf (talk) 11:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:57, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional or advertisement, in this collage with no sources. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:56, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation https://i2.wp.com/d12m281ylf13f0.cloudfront.net/images09/car-exhaust.jpg?resize=325%2C217&ssl=1 taweethaも (talk) 00:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo at 10:06, 19 Oktober 2017 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution --Krdbot 12:33, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pterosaur in amber.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Canon EOS-1D Mark IV Author Keith Allison in meta ~Moheen (keep talking) 12:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination I don't know why this happened, but when I tried to find it on flickr yesterday I got a 404. Today I got to the image. Thanks for catching this. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --~Moheen (keep talking) 21:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

might not be user's own work: it seems a photo of a screen and here there's a similar image (not exactly the same). fringio · α†Ω 18:55, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Y.haruo at 19:23, 19 Oktober 2017 UTC: Copyright violation: not user's own work; same image found here (on the cover there's [http://www.saturno22.it/web/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/michele-caccamo-640x520... --Krdbot 00:33, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flickr2commons had a hiccup ~nmaia d 11:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested deletion immediately after upload. --Guanaco (talk) 06:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 13:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 07:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope per com:nudity. Mhhossein talk 14:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, low quality, no ED-use. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:37, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private pic Ryan5970 (talk) 18:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE Ryan5970 (talk) 20:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private pic Ryan5970 (talk) 22:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private pic Ryan5970 (talk) 22:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private pic Ryan5970 (talk) 22:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private pic Ryan5970 (talk) 22:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private pic Ryan5970 (talk) 22:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private pic Ryan5970 (talk) 05:56, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:27, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private pic Ryan5970 (talk) 06:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:27, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. The software is GPL, so the logo may be as well. Guanaco (talk) 04:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - non-free en:File:New ClamAV Logo.png. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copiright violation, fake license. Draa kul (talk) 09:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, screenshot form Star Wars. Taivo (talk) 08:04, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, fake license Draa kul (talk) 09:19, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - I agree, also for the other picture - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, screenshot from Star Wars. Taivo (talk) 08:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not a place to advertise. xplicit 01:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, self-promotion-only user, indefinitely blocked in en.wiki. Actatek isn't mentioned in en.wiki, its logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in September 2016 as non-notable and spam. Out of project scope. xplicit 01:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo to a wrong place in the Wikimedia Commons. Kumasatsugoro (talk) 02:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Youtube. B dash (talk) 02:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license is "Standard YouTube Licence" which means it is fully copyrighted under youtube. Leoboudv (talk) 04:52, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Darameekha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 05:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:09, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission.. Unsure about UK threshold of originiality, but this is a very simple textlogo. Guanaco (talk) 05:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, standard font, simple logo. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shantotanaya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 05:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:29, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:36, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 12:03, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:37, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sharmer96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 05:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:08, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grimwepa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 05:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:14, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:07, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:11, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:13, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:56, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:15, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Bytheway, he is not at age 5, 25 is more likely. Taivo (talk) 14:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:59, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, bad quality, superseded by file:Kaveramma.jpg. Taivo (talk) 14:19, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 06:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:21, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 06:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:Hip2rap logo.jpg. Hip2rap (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except advertising in fa.wiki, where he is indefinitely blocked, and uploading personal files for that promo. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:30, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shehata112 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 06:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, derivative works of photo with unknown origin and copyright status. Taivo (talk) 15:18, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 06:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:19, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 06:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 15:21, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

操作ミスで確認を完了する前に Broadmedia (talk) 07:54, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

操作ミスで確認を完了する前にアップロードされてしまったため。 Broadmedia (talk) 07:55, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:25, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Confusing 3D aspect of the bridging bond (dotted, but cis to the wedged; dotted means "back" but the bond is in front of a plain-line). Have File:Ibogaine.svg among others that has more self-consistent geometric detailing DMacks (talk) 08:36, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The way stereochemistry is depicted in this image is contrary to standard conventions and therefore potentially misleading (and confusing at best). Ed (Edgar181) 15:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the proposed alternative is clearly better. Taivo (talk) 15:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely own work. Missing EXIF Raymond 10:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Y.haruo with reason "copyright violation, see watermark bottom left corner". I did not block the uploader, but last warning is sent out. Taivo (talk) 15:54, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advert. Join me? E4024 (talk) 08:49, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I deleted all other contributions of Yallabook (talk · contribs) as copyright violations and warned him/her. Taivo (talk) 09:05, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want anymore share this image. Lord of Sheriff's Lench (talk) 09:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file is being used. Little or nothing can be done. --E4024 (talk) 09:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, free licenses are irrevocable. Once published under free license, nothing can be done anymore. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Low quality picture. Solomon203 (talk) 10:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, only 220×176 pixels, no metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Geologic map south of Armorican Massif granites belt FR.svg : same with better quality Salsero35 (talk) 10:16, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eric Odhiambo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also: questionable authorship claims; the uploader appears to be the subject rather than the author of these photographs.

LX (talk, contribs) 04:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - a few image could have been in scope for the contest "African people at work", however as per the nominator, the uploader can't be the subject and the photographer. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free image, just found on the internet. Tekstman (talk) 05:00, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Actorshanmugaraja (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 05:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete OTRS-permission from author Amtphototouch (look EXIF) is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Georgy1984 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 05:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Taivo (talk) 14:13, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 06:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 06:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 06:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, uploader does not seem to have the rights. Tekstman (talk) 07:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - the artist ,Jef Diels, must end a permission to OTRS. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:02, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyright violation SecretName101 (talk) 08:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyright violation SecretName101 (talk) 08:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Copyrighted painting. Taivo (talk) 15:27, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyright violation SecretName101 (talk) 08:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Manifest Hope Gallery Show (2803986662).jpg SecretName101 (talk) 08:19, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:21, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:21, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 08:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Manifest images (2803511915).jpg SecretName101 (talk) 08:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 08:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 08:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 08:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 08:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 08:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alexandre.vert (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except self-promotional userpage in fr.wiki and uploading a photo, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alexandre bastien (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in fr.wiki, where he has no edits in mainspace, and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighed SecretName101 (talk) 08:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 08:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alexandro Marquez (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage and user subpage in fr.wiki and uploading a personal file, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 08:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 08:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 08:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 08:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 08:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 08:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 08:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 08:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 08:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 08:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 08:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 08:49, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alexdeybi~eswiki (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in es.wiki (and one edit in sandbox) and uploading a personal file, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author Jeff Tse is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. (Depicted person seems a bit notable, although no article exists.) Taivo (talk) 09:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corey Mills isn't mentioned in en.wiki. He is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deprave413 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Poor, unused image, with a black shadow in the middle of the picture.

B dash (talk) 09:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, thick black line spoils the photos. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny photo (134×200 pixels) without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 17:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 17:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shifaahmadathil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 17:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alwafarelief (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 17:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Uax (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of non-notable thing, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mud therapy or OoS personal file? E4024 (talk) 11:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Failed upload. New upload as "Invigningsvandring på Långlötleden 12 juni 2015" ACMatHimmelsberga (talk) 11:54, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupt file. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file. OoS. E4024 (talk) 13:15, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 13:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 14:01, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:19, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Estremely blurry image, unlikely to be used in a project. Takeaway (talk) 14:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:19, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be used in a project -> Extremely blurry image of an object of which there are ample alternatives. Takeaway (talk) 14:13, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brahmam.yata (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 21:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by INformerINformacije (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 22:02, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 22:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 22:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 22:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Swiftsource97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 22:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Commons is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 22:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 22:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 22:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 22:59, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 23:00, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:24, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 23:02, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tshamkhalov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This gallery of images contains images of 3D medals (possibly olympic?), some apparently Olympic logos from Tokyo 1964, Munich 1972, Montreal 1976, Mexico, etc. and photographs of various Olympians (all apparently same family) and not a single indication that any of this is own work of uploader, much more likely copied from unattributed sources.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:43, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion upload. Quick websearch gave no indication of sufficient significance necessary for keeping. No other global edits, except user namespace on en.wikipedia Zaccarias (talk) 19:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:37, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:43, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 20:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 20:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 20:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 20:52, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 20:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:02, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lvera9383 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 21:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:39, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:16, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:39, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Personal logo of a non-notable person/people; has no chance of being used for an educational purpose Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 21:49, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:39, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:55, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:55, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 17:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 17:33, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 17:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:01, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:02, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo showing identifiable indiviuals/data, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'posing' respectively family album' content, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:57, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:NUDITY - low quality image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:57, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:57, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE Ryan5970 (talk) 18:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope. Not a social network here. Uploaders only global contribution. Zaccarias (talk) 18:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We do love Africa but this is out of Commons:Project scope. No people at work instead a private selfie. Not a social network here. Zaccarias (talk) 18:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:50, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dhirajpatidar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not a social network here. Users who just come here for self-promotion get their stuff deleted. 1 other global edit: User namespace on en.wikipedia.

Zaccarias (talk) 18:54, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:50, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused COM:SELFIE. Potential copyvio due to the mascot. HyperGaruda (talk) 19:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:49, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:02, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:13, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:02, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 18:16, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:19, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:21, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pixelated, with uneven bond thicknesses. Have File:Brucina struttura.svg among various SVG and higher-quality PNG alts. DMacks (talk) 08:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Omnia P (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nickboariu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, these files are not working correctly and should be deleted --Nickboariu (talk) 00:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Nickboariu (talk) 21:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-used selfie. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-used selfie. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope; personal and useless Bultro (talk) 16:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pousada Villa Alferes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely used for advertising purposes.

Achim (talk) 16:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope, promo. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sheraman Shery (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sheraman Shery (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 17:21, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 17:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sherif nasr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 17:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SherwinDPrakas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 17:30, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:31, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Max Aaron Presement (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 17:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author, Евгений Асмолов, is a professional photographer, who often works for Trend News Agency. A web search on their names gives many images published in multiple unrelated professional outlets. I guess it's possible this specific photograph has been released under CC-BY-SA by Asmolov or Trend, but I think we'd have to see proof of it, or email to OTRS or something. GRuban (talk) 13:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akashi Mc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos

Apocheir (talk) 20:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mal'phyre (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 20:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by La Full Promo Dans (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 20:49, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sayu veva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 20:55, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: derivative copyvio. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To be a collage in Commons, each picture needs to be uploaded separately and individually sourced and licensed. There is no clickable link to back check the statement that this is source Aberdeen Library Service. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, ok! I am discovering lots of new things about Commons... do you have an example at all? I'll either get something sorted, or be resigned to this one being deleted and try again from scratch... Lirazelf (talk) 12:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. You want examples? Please look at file:BarquisimetoCollage.png, file:Rev collage.png, file:Collage of views of Lublin.jpg and file:Jimbo and friends.png. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:55, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - this is a photo of a page from Listen to Wikipedia, I believe that this should comply with Commons:Screenshots? Lirazelf (talk) 12:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Per https://help.github.com/articles/github-terms-of-service/ , this is not a free site. Taivo (talk) 08:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, not own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:56, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, as with the previous image, this is a photo of a page from Listen to Wikipedia, which should (I hope) comply with Commons:Screenshots...? Lirazelf (talk) 12:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Per https://help.github.com/articles/github-terms-of-service/ , this is not a free site. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"El Mundo" usually is the name of a newspaper or magazine, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Looks like students from the University of Murcia have some project on Spanish Wikinews which, without proper guidance, is causing an influx of copyright violations. LX (talk, contribs) 14:37, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This uploader uploaded this image with a source that is a dead url. This is a recent upload. Leoboudv (talk) 04:21, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: This situation is just like this case with an identical image but a dead url source. Same uploader is the second case I mentioned. Something is wrong here. This might be a speedy delete case. --Leoboudv (talk) 04:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete This can be an experiment: which image is deleted faster? Taivo (talk) 10:15, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused dup of the matched-style set in Category:Dichloroaniline DMacks (talk) 07:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of:

Perhaps my original nom was not worded clearly enough. Per COM:EDUSE, this file does not appear "educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". DMacks (talk) 04:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redundant. P 1 9 9   16:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplivcate of File:Sede a Cellino San Marco.jpg Threecharlie (talk) 10:49, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. Next time use {{Duplicate}} instead. P 1 9 9   16:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Oscar Escobar Santos (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except user talkpage in es.wiki and uploading logo of non-notable YouTube channel, which is used only on the user talkpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akkol81 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I don't think the permissions are acceptable

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and most are promotional logos without educational value. P 1 9 9   16:13, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sugoi Ediciones isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Unused logo of non-notable thing, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:13, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is obviously not the uploader's own work; the subject of the photo has been dead since 1986 and hasn't played baseball since the 1930s. The same applies to File:Minor Heath.jpg, which appears from the pixellated appearance to be a scan from an old newspaper article. Diannaa (talk) 21:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, dubious source and author. P 1 9 9   16:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

map of unclear copyright status, a free source should be provided Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of likely copyrighted content. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Numerous google images matches Exif = google Arjayay (talk) 12:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minor artwork. E4024 (talk) 13:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Liang916 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo has change, I dont want share these information Adels (talk) 16:13, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:19, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A faulty file name Tall-timothy (talk) 16:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A faulty file name Tall-timothy (talk) 16:37, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, just use {{Rename}} instead. P 1 9 9   16:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 17:19, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:24, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - badly tilted - no COM:EDUSE Ryan5970 (talk) 17:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, 100's of better alternatives at Category:Dal Lake. P 1 9 9   16:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fellmon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 17:54, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small without EXIFs : unlikely to be own work + may be out of scope too Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:59, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shital Tudu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 17:59, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shiv C (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 18:00, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file, potentially copyright issues, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shivjee singh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 18:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 786ggg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 18:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shohana mini (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 18:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hobby.png is an example for the use of Henna and I don't think that the personal characteristics are that pronounced here. --Kersti (talk) 12:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; kept one as per above. P 1 9 9   16:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mbalangandja (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 18:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work, if it is free for a specific reason then this reason must be given Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:01, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW. P 1 9 9   16:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work, if it is free for a specific reason then this reason must be given Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:01, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW. P 1 9 9   16:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad scan from a book page, neither in use nor useful. Achim (talk) 19:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://www.lenouveleconomiste.fr/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Henri-Nijdam-445x162-copie-2.jpg, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 19:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Otter in grass.jpg in a less helpful format. bjh21 (talk) 21:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:39, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:TOYS. VateGV taper la discut’ 21:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:39, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a low-quality image of a private residence. According to location data, it was taken from a private drive. ticket:2017101910010715 alleges that this was done without the consent of the landowner and requests removal. Guanaco (talk) 21:30, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: While I wouldn't trust co-ordinates from Geograph very much (especially since GeographBot confused camera and object locations), there doesn't seem to be a public highway from which you could get that shot. I don't know that that makes it ineligible for hosting on Commons, but it's pretty marginal whether it's in scope anyway. --bjh21 (talk) 23:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The biggest problem is the filename, which isn't the name of the house. It really should be changed to something bland like "A House in Crewkerne".The fact the photo was taken from private property isn't a restriction that matters to us, but gives the landowner a reasonable grievance. The property has no significance and is just a random house, so there is no benefit to keeping the file. I'm inclined to a courtesy deletion.--Nilfanion (talk) 21:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per User:Nilfanion. P 1 9 9   16:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I screencapped the image from a CC-BY video (which is uploaded here) however the image is fuzzy and as such IMHO it won't be any use to anyone, The vehicle is a '15 plate and as such I'd imagine there's much better images of the vehicle on here, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 22:02, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: low quality, numerous better alternatives available. P 1 9 9   16:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Azacz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Series of files scanned from various works and re-posted without permission or simply as "own work"

Ariadacapo (talk) 10:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Ariadacapo, I write in the name of Mr. Jerzy Hubert Mroz - he wrote a book in which he proved that the current information on the so-called Moody Chart and Froude Number contains an error, led the modified Froude Number and displayed on the Moody Chart correct value - in addition to simplify all elements contained in the article.

You can read about it on its website: http://www.criticalflow-by-jerzymroz.com/

or in a book he published: https://www.google.pl/search?q=critical+flow+by+jerzy+mroz&oq=critical+flow+by+jerzy+mroz&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l3.6218j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Please see reviewers: - Professor dr hab. Paweł Rowiński, Institute of Geophysics Polish Academy of Sciences v-ce President - Professor dr hab. Witold G. Strupczewski, Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences (PAN)

http://www.criticalflow-by-jerzymroz.com/reviewers

This is true and confirmed knowledge. Why need to be deleted? What can I do to keep the page?


ALSO: All scans comes from that book - all are made or modified by Mr. Jerzy Hubert Mroz.


Deleted: confirmation via OTRS needed. --Jcb (talk) 23:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rgalhama (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashanti Major (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BaileyP (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sonalibatra1985 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images all seem to have been copied from different sources on the internet but uploaded as "own work": different cameras or phones used, different copyright holders mentioned, and a very inconsistent image quality

Takeaway (talk) 18:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kevinq17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication that this sports club logo is available under a free license, is complex enough to be considered copyrightable (COM:TOO)

seb26 (talk) 12:43, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographed subject seems to come from a book, so unlikely to be own work. HyperGaruda (talk) 19:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faberventi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern works of art by w:fr:Vladimir Kara, who is still alive, ergo no public domain and thus copyvio.

HyperGaruda (talk) 19:56, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission ? Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 22:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, OTRS-permission is needed to restore the file. Taivo (talk) 20:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

“In U.S. law there is no freedom of panorama for artwork or sculpture ….” The underlying 1979 sculpture was publicly installed in 1992 and was created by a sculptor who died in 1991. Elyaqim (talk) 08:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong track map of Typhoon Faxai, it hasn't reached Category 4 strength. The correct one is File:Faxai 2014 track.png B dash (talk) 10:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, replaced by File:Faxai 2014 track.png (history). --Wdwd (talk) 11:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo of the company Porsche has been designed in the 1950's by Ferdinand Porsche. As he died in 1998 and as Porsch Is not a body regulated by public law but a private society, the design is still copyrighted

80.215.133.70 12:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 20:11, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per en:Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2016_November_27#File:Porsche_logotype.png this logo seems copyrighted. Since it was converted to fair use, I think a detailed discussion about this is needed again.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 04:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

again with this!? -  Keep for ALL OF THE REASONS LISTED IN THE SECTION ABOVE, RESTED THE LAST TIME WE TALKED ABOUT THIS. the porsche logo is the COAT OF ARMS OF STUTTGART, superimposed (in traditional heraldic matter) on the COAT OF ARMS OF BADEN-WURTEMBURG, whish is where stuttgart is located; with the words "porsche" & struttgart" added to it, in a fairly plain/standard typeface. the arms of stuttgart & of baden-wurtemburg are "ancient" & PD. the arrangement of the arms in this manner is COMMON/STANDARD HERALDIC PRACTICE. adding 2 words to the design does NOT meet the threshold or "originality". & tl,dr - the cited "discussion" @ wikipedia involved a grand total of 3 people, each of whom posted ONE SHORT SENTENCE, & an admin who uncritically & unthinkingly passed it. all 3 of the commentors posted within 1 week of each other, then the discussion sat dormant & IGNORED for the rest of a month, before some admin doing "housecleaning" wrongly closed it, without taking any time to research the matter, or look any further than the discussion on the page. not the best of "precedents". THERE, & now, we have "discussed it"! ^__^ again, ...again.... best, Lx 121 (talk) 05:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Lx 121 and Commons:Deletion requests/Automobile manufacturer logos. Ruthven (msg) 11:18, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely own work. Missing EXIF Raymond 10:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; image from FaceBook. Ruthven (msg) 11:20, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by 2A02:1206:4585:29C0:9407:6DDD:1A64:AD94 as Copyvio (copyvio, no rationale). Needs information as to who took the photo, when it was first published if at all, and possibly OTRS permission. Guanaco (talk) 04:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, if OTRS-permission arrives, then the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 19:26, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: picture from 1930s, unknown if author is anonymous. Tekstman (talk) 05:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:29, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very dark image, hardly to see Typhoon Nuri in this picture. B dash (talk) 10:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, too dark. Taivo (talk) 19:30, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely own work. Missing EXIF Raymond 10:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The concerned image was taken by myself.--Rashkeqamar (talk) 16:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Special instructions field of metadata starts with FBMD..., that means, the image comes from Facebook. Facebook does not allow publishing its content on other sites, including Wikipedia. If this is really your own work, you should send OTRS-permission and after that the photo can be restored. Without permission it is difficult to believe, that the image was taken by yourself. Taivo (talk) 19:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrinknp_200_200/AAEAAQAAAAAAAApnAAAAJGNkZTcwN2E5LTMzM2EtNGY1ZC05NmRmLWMzODMwMGY5NmRlZg.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also copy file:Albert assaraf wiki.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 19:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:39, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Caminhada na praia de Copacabana - PSOL (14611053534).jpg ~nmaia d 11:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Low quality picture. Solomon203 (talk) 12:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, educational value is weak. Taivo (talk) 19:46, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Low quality picture. Solomon203 (talk) 12:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, blurry, educational value is weak. Taivo (talk) 19:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Supposedly an American porn actress but has no WP article. E4024 (talk) 12:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Not a surprise. WP was purged of porn related articles a few years ago, even multiple prize-winning porn stars of the past have had their articles deleted. Jimmy Wales' anti-porn campaign did not help the situation. Notability is not a requirement for hosting a portrait photograph on Commons. This has educational value for anyone researching or presenting about the glamour/porn industry and this particular model can be found at http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1036551/ with a long filmography. I particularly enjoyed reading "Blowjob Adventures of Dr. Fellatio 36". -- (talk) 15:21, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, somehow the photo is used in arz.wiki and so in scope. Taivo (talk) 19:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permitted? E4024 (talk) 12:59, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, OTRS-permission from game author is needed. Taivo (talk) 20:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can this be an own work? No permission required for uploading this kind of games' files? E4024 (talk) 13:00, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, OTRS-permission from game author is needed. Taivo (talk) 20:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think "own work" does not replace a permission here. These things must have some legal something. E4024 (talk) 13:01, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, "own work" means likely own screenshot, but permission must come from game author. Taivo (talk) 20:00, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anybody knows this gentleman? The pic looks like a personal image and therefore OoS to me. E4024 (talk) 13:02, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 19:57, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Low quality picture. Solomon203 (talk) 13:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that the pic is that bad for quick deletion but it is no marvel either. If there is a better pic of that dish delete it, if not keep. --E4024 (talk) 13:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is a better pic: File:三商巧福峨眉店飲料與燙青菜 20080805a.jpg --Solomon203 (talk) 13:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the other file is better. Taivo (talk) 20:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake CC-BY-SA-4.0 + no freedom of panorama MisterXS (talk) 13:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete file:Kamennaya Horka.jpg due to same reason: no freedom of panorama in Belarus. Taivo (talk) 20:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake CC-BY-SA-4.0 MisterXS (talk) 13:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Belarus. Taivo (talk) 20:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could not find the football player in internet. I found a volleyball player with the same name (here) but that one is playing in regional leagues of Turkey and is hardly notable. E4024 (talk) 13:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 20:15, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

So called user-page image. (No contributions by the uploader.) E4024 (talk) 13:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could be an own work as stated, but this and File:Amber Chia 2017.jpg are very professional pics. I believe the artist could send a permission via OTRS. E4024 (talk) 13:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, they are called selfies, but that's unlikely. Taivo (talk) 20:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image de mauvaise qualité ne présentant aucun intérêt + nom donné au fichier inexact. --Thor19 (talk) 10:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Images des restes de la Chapelle de Glandelles ici. --Thor19 (talk) 20:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, extremely bad quality. Taivo (talk) 20:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nome immagine errato / wrong image name (to be reloaded later) Aldoaldoz (talk) 14:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 20:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

immagine non necessaria / unnecessary image Aldoaldoz (talk) 14:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. If this is really needed, then it can be easily recreated. Taivo (talk) 20:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

immagine non necessaria / unnecessary image Aldoaldoz (talk) 14:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, nobody objected. Taivo (talk) 20:27, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sadly this picture cannot be used as the title makes clear that this owned by the Sunday Herald and or Colin Mearns Victuallers (talk) 14:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, interesting photo, unfortunately not free. Taivo (talk) 20:29, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is plan of a house. House is unidentified, notability is unclear. File is unused. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 20:38, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://periodicocorreo.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/sagun56.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 20:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i.pinimg.com/736x/75/63/1f/75631fea81d209bb922c714446394922.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 20:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 20:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no lo quiero publicar mas "IJEFA" (talk) 14:54, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:43, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't finished writing the article. If I cannot include it, I agree it should be deleted. I will search for an SVG format but cannot guarantee one is available --Nickboariu (talk) 00:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, whole week has passed and the image is still unused. Taivo (talk) 20:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is over the threshold of originality. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 15:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 20:59, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject of the image is dead in 2008. The notation of the file is wrong and explains that uploader is not the author. Y.haruo (talk) 15:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

speedy as Content intended as vandalism, threat, or attack. see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roh_Moo-hyun&type=revision&diff=806075360&oldid=805263899--Y.haruo (talk) 15:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dear Sir or Madam, The file uploaded in this page has an error in the legend. The blue color should reresent QQ while the yellow PQ (as you can see in the Wikipedia page on Hardy Weinberg equilibrium). On a side (less relevant) note it also lacks descriptions of the axes. Best Regards. Michela Leonardi 93.65.189.76 15:30, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, really incorrect file. Taivo (talk) 21:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certainly not an own work and if I'm not wrong had been deleted before. E4024 (talk) 15:59, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Jeff speaks the truth. Taivo (talk) 21:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Smaller uncropped duplicate of File:ZA Domain Name Authority logo.png Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:11, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Common stock photo of this species, can be found here credited to Greenpeace, here credited to Zuma Press, and anywhere else mentioning "Blobfish." The original publisher of the photo has been lost to the internet, would take some detective work. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:21, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder : CHAMUSSY/BENAROCH/ SIPA PRESS Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:24, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder : Eric Matheron-Balay Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:55, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found several places on the Internet : https://www.babelio.com/users/AVT_Gal-Tchakaloff_3739.jpg or http://www.magcentre.fr/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/EwrjGf9n.jpg. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:58, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, tiny photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 21:29, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder : Eric Matheron-Balay Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:55, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:39, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The CC licensing does not appear to come from the photographer himself. It's not clear that the uploader has the right to so license a photo that otherwise would be protected by copyright. Deor (talk) 16:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:Henry Miller Memorial Library.jpg: small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The own-work claim by User:Michaelwhite is belied by the image description. May be a copyvio. Deor (talk) 17:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:Shortfilm.jpg, because its author is Kodiak Greenwood. Taivo (talk) 21:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque ya no quiero que exista, estoy haciendo uno nuevo Adriel Acosta (talk) 17:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 21:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Source: William Hereford" is not the uploader, no evidence of cc licensed contrib Bri (talk) 17:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. Source page given states copyrighted with no indication of any other licensing. The Wayback machine does not have an archive of the page from before the upload, but https://web.archive.org/web/20160730004215/https://www.speeddoctor.net/2015/bmw-m3-gtr-e36/ is from 10 days after and there is no free license listed on that page either. Whpq (talk) 18:15, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:57, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful Ryan5970 (talk) 18:16, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 21:59, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fue un error Joosems (talk) 18:19, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 22:00, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder : Éric Matheron-Balaÿ, copy of http://i.f1g.fr/media/ext/1900x800_crop/madame.lefigaro.fr/sites/default/files/img/2017/03/gael-tchakaloff.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:00, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder : Éric Matheron-Balaÿ, copy of http://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2017/04/09/2553195-romanciere-campagne-candidat-devrait-dire-ca.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:02, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La subí ayer por error Joosems (talk) 18:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 22:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif metadata indicates image is copyrighted to Dan Kosmayer (www.kozzi.com). this stock photo is also available elsewhere, also credited to Kosmayer (e.g. https://www.123rf.com/photo_17486552_stock-photo.html) Animalparty (talk) 18:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating the following versions of this image for the same reason:

 Deleted, these are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 22:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rineesh Asokan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

Ryan5970 (talk) 18:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cstevencampbell (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW of models, product packaging, and printed materials (e.g. File:AMT57TBird.jpg) See User:Elcobbola/Models for rationale and precedent DRs.

Эlcobbola talk 19:36, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep File:DinkyTank.jpg and potentially others, on account of their age. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    The Dinky Toys 151a was produced from 1937 to 1941, which is not nearly old enough to presume the author has been dead 70 years (UK is pma + 70). Similarly, an anonymous claim cannot be made without appropriate evidence, as not known to us does not mean not known to anyone. There's no reason this, or others, would be PD due to age. Эlcobbola talk 22:49, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Our practice, here and at en:WP, is that when reasonable (and the legal definition of "reasonable" is both the subject of first year law school essays, and met here) efforts to ascertain the designer are fruitless, then that may be considered anonymous. Accordingly the pre-war UK Dinky designs may be considered as PD. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:40, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    And what reasonable efforts have been made here? By all means, forward negative correspondence to COM:OTRS and we can certain retain images of the related works. Эlcobbola talk 14:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    None of the standard histories for Dinky record designers for these models of this era. Dinky themselves may have held records, but most of those were destroyed in the various shrinkages of the Binns Road factory site through the 1970s. I ought to know - it was our family that hauled much of the scrap off that site. I could even check Meccano's own filing cabinets for traces - I still have three of them in the workshop. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Considering the copyrighted creation vs. utilitarian subject argument, it just seems that there is no exploitation of creative license by posting a few examples of a toy in a Wikipedia article where no one is making money off of the subject matter. The picture is used for 'illustrative' purposes, not profiteering ones. It makes little sense to have articles on the subject, if the subject cannot be seen. Is there ANY leeway for 'fair use' here at all? --Cstevencampbell (talk) 22:17, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I understand the law is different in different countries regarding portrayal of toys, so pictures of toys from France may be protected differently for pictures from toys from the United States, etc.--Cstevencampbell (talk) 22:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your first comment is essentially an invocation of notions disallowed by COM:PRP; whether anyone is currently making money is not relevant. Images on the Commons must allow commercial exploitation if so desired. Fair use is also not allowed on the Commons - see COM:FU. All images on the Commons must comply with the laws of the US and the origin country, if different. (Because WMF servers are in the US.) Accordingly, it does not matter how other countries treat a given work if it is copyrightable in the US. Even some of the images here explicitly claim a copyright (see File:BritainsHowitzer.jpg - "copyright model"). Эlcobbola talk 22:49, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Elcobbola: Please avoid to insult intelligence of others ones. Please try to suppose the good faith of people who don't think like you. It is the minimum we can expect from an administrator. Thank you. --Benoît Prieur (d) 14:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Benoît Prieur: Please keep patronizing nonsense to yourself. Questioning one's objectivity is not questioning one's intellence. Clearly you believe (albeit wrongly) that these files are not copyvios; I have not said otherwise, which would be a failure of good faith. Read and think critically. Эlcobbola talk 19:10, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The verdict was: "the scale model has nothing added to the original car that meets the threshold of originality - the different overall size doesn't, the use of plastic instead of steel doesn't and the absence of an operational engine isn't even visible at the picture" --Arosio Stefano (talk) 14:28, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Models, being non-utilitarian, are not exempt from copyright in the same way as the object that they depict. I have tried to err on the side of caution, keeping those that may be PD per Andy Dingley, and those that just might fall under the COM:TOO (although this is very low in some countries, like the UK), or those for which Copyright registration would have had to be renewed (i.e. possible {{PD-US-not renewed}}). They should be re-nominated if I have kept them in error. None of the {{Vk}} arguments other than Andy Dingley's appear to even attempt following law or Commons policy, which elcobbola has summarized thoroughly at User:Elcobbola/Models. Failure to either address those points or argue why they should not apply renders ones {{Vk}} moot, remember that this is not a vote. Note that some of these may be uploadable to local wikis like English Wikipedia that allow for fair use. If assistance or temporary undeletion is needed for this purposes, that can be arranged. Storkk (talk) 09:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

US models that may be PD (or may not be)

[edit]

This is a renomination of some that I did not delete when closing the previous DR... These are models, which as non-utilitarian objects are not exempt from copyright in the same way as the objects they represent (see User:Elcobbola/Models). These were made in the US, so may be PD due to copyright lapsing (see {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-not renewed}}) - this would need to be ascertained for each before they can be kept. Storkk (talk) 10:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this is not the place, but any suggestions on how to illustrate models in Wikipedia articles if they are copyrighted and cannot be used without permission? The articles seem pretty hollow without the ability to show the vehicles or their packaging - the pictures, even used sparingly, say a lot about the product discussed. They seem to get deleted just as quick in local Wikipedias also. Maybe if I 'draw' a precise picture of the scale model? I'm being facetious. I think it's about time to say that there are types of subjects that really are not appropriate for Wikipedia and are best treated elsewhere (books and other published outlets) where permissions are obtained or fair use is considered more broadly. Such a subject is perhaps all too specialized for Wikipedia anyway.--150.134.234.144 15:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ooops. The above comment was me. --Cstevencampbell (talk) 15:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Cstevencampbell: Local wikipedias have differing rules... English Wikipedia allows Non-free Content under a "Fair Use" argument in a number of different circumstances. The image's description page must include a non-free usage rationale detailing why each specific usage of the image is legally allowable under US law. A relevant example might be File:Vogue_USA_January_2010.jpg. The criteria are relatively stringent, and can be found at W:WP:NFCC, but I do think they might apply to some of the photos that were deleted, hence my offer to temporarily undelete and assist in my closing above. Please use my talk page to request or discuss that.
Regarding the images in this new DR, they can be kept if it can be shown that either:
  • The toy was released before 1978 and its copyright was not declared by a copyright notice (this might be difficult to do unless all the packaging and documentation of the toy can be examined) - this would make the toy {{PD-US-no notice}}
  • The toy was released before 1964 and its copyright was not renewed. Copyrights initially registered before 1964 had to be renewed every 28 years (with some grace period). Renewals are found at https://archive.org/details/copyrightrecords but I've never searched for toys before, so am unsure where exactly they would be located. Failure to renew would make the toy {{PD-US-not renewed}}. Storkk (talk) 18:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Any that are of vehicles after 1950 are relatively easy to check for renewals at http://www.copyright.gov/records/ because all records from 1/1/1978 are searchable by title or copyright owner. Any renewal of a model later than 1/1/1950 must show up in the searchable database. I've done four of them for starters. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jameslwoodward: Thanks! For my own edification (I find searching for copyright renewals difficult), would you mind sharing some search strings you used? I have always be loathe to "certify" I have not found a renewal, since I am often unsure of exactly what I should be searching for, so I'm stymied before I start by the prospect of false-negatives. Storkk (talk) 17:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
First, let's be clear that we are talking about an automated search in the Office's on line searchable database that starts at 1/1/1978. Searching earlier records is harder, particularly because they are in six month chunks and there is a grace period, so you need to search at least three times.
It's like any other search, except it isn't Google -- it turns up only the exact words you ask for. "Ford" as a title returned 3047 hits (25 to a page), so that was no good. "Hubley", as a name, returned only 94, so that was good. I looked at "Revell " (note the space, which eliminates names like "Revell, John") and it turns up only post 1979 models, but I didn't do anything with it because the Revell models above aren't dated and might be before 1950.
I agree that models are harder than works that naturally have a title, like books and most paintings. You can search on one or more words, and, using the "other search options" button, search in more than one way at a time. Mostly it's just finding a search term that doesn't turn up thousands of results.
By the way, are we assuming that all of these models have a copyright notice on the bottom -- I think that assumption is appropriate. Every model I've ever seen has one. If so, then the Franklin Mint examples above are not PD -- the Mint was founded in 1964, so no renewal was needed to keep them under copyright for 95 years from first publication with notice. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:51, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your advice, Jim. Is it a safe assumption that the copyright would be registered in the name of the company? (that's a genuine question, and not implying that I don't think it's safe) It's probably somewhat obviated when the company's name is the same as the founder (and presumed designer?), but I guess the assumption is that they did not as a general rule license designs from a third party. Storkk (talk) 13:17, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright registrations for corporate works (at least for corporations in the toy business) are virtually always in the name of the company and there is virtually always a work for hire agreement in place (I speak as an expert -- I have both written and signed many of them over the years, although not in the toy business). Even if they licensed a third party design, they would do the registration in order to ensure that it was done correctly. The toy industry is super paranoid about its Intellectual Property. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me)
Thanks, that is good to know. Storkk (talk) 14:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license is invalid as the file is not an official document or a state symbol. Underlying lk (talk) 19:15, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I agree, not an official document. Taivo (talk) 07:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears multiple times on the internet e.g. https://www.filmibeat.com/kannada/news/2016/three-main-reason-for-darshan-and-wife-vijayalakshmi-split-218825.html Arjayay (talk) 19:37, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:00, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-Italy}} MPF (talk) 23:52, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 07:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-Italy}} MPF (talk) 23:52, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 07:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-Italy}} MPF (talk) 23:52, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 07:58, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per errore ho inserito una fotografia che credevo mia per similitudine, io stesso l'ho inserita nel pomeriggio pensando fosse una delle mie invece si tratta di una foto di una mia amica fotografa, quindi vorrei fosse eliminata. DavideRR (talk) 20:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image uploaded under a false copyright claim of Creative Commons. It is taken directly from the subject's profile on the website of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario (http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/members/members_detail.do?locale=en&ID=7283), but that means that the Assembly, not the uploader, is the copyright holder -- and the Assembly does not release MPPs' headshots under CC: it permits reuse for non-commercial purposes only, but Wikipedia is not a non-commercial use. Bearcat (talk) 20:56, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:03, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Andy Warhol died in 1987. No freedom of panorama in France. 90.43.27.135 21:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151845994792118&set=t.1311626259&type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:37, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:12, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the US. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Partners Statue at Magic Kingdom Elisfkc (talk) 22:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:13, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Esewaniray (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios "Credit: New York Times".

Wikicology (talk) 22:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:19, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without permission Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 22:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:25, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission ? Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 22:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:27, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the subject's LinkedIn profile picture. No evidence of permission to upload by this user. Bri (talk) 22:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

permission ? Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 22:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Strange things: Born in 1976 but took part in a 1974 film. According to the site http://www.sinematurkplus.com/amy-actor/ayta-sozeri/ the site has copyrighted contents and this photograph is there. If they took the photograph from Commons they claim copyright for a free image 176.239.88.24 22:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 109.238.80.47 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Location Ukraine Europe New.png -- User: Perhelion 23:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file was created first but resolution worse. If other file used more often than this then you can delete it. Al-mazeratti (talk) 18:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Elsewhere on the web [1], no metadata, unlikely to be on work. ~Cybularny Speak? 23:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:03, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Elsewhere on the web [2], no metadata, unlikely to be on work. ~Cybularny Speak? 23:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:08, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of a file, which is nominated here. ~Cybularny Speak? 23:13, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-Italy}} MPF (talk) 23:54, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

this has nothing to do with FOP, it simply is someone's drawing which is copyrighted wherever you find it, either in public spaces or in private ones. I wouldn't go investigating about who owns these rights, yet there is a possibility that it is a free drawing, because the museum it belongs to was created in 1940, and the drawing itself doesn't seem to be really young; in case it was created and published more than 20 years ago, it would be free for IT-GOV, but I wouldn't spend time on this, as said, I'd rather watch at what the concrete use is for this file. If it's useful, then we can deepen the study. --g (talk) 22:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Italy. In some country such photo is permissible. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work? http://www.elizabetharends.com/ Hystrix (talk) 23:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed to restore the photo. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, looks like not own work, but photo of photo. As depicted person was born in 1945, the original photo is likely still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

map of unclear copyright statis, a free source should be provided Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:21, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny photo (150×170 pixels) without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A.J. Bailey isn't mentioned in en:Bailey (surname), he is out of project scope. Small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution, copyright violation is likely too. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Low quality picture. Solomon203 (talk) 12:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 23:29, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is over the UK's threshold of originality. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 15:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. I tend to say, that it's simple. Taivo (talk) 21:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. Ruthven (msg) 23:29, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As it says on the talk page it says:This so-called Cleveland speech is taken verbatim from the last two paragraphs of Bryan's famous 1896 "Cross of Gold" speech to the Democratic National Convention. I assume it is a actor because that speech was never recorded Champion (Talk) 04:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: according to the Republic of Palau Copyright Act of 2003 found on the WIPO website, the term for works for hire is 75 years from date of publication, or possibly, if the authors are known and it was published prior to the date of the act, for 50 years pma. It is certainly not the work of the uploader. Ww2censor (talk) 09:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Am uncertain with whom I'm responding to and what exactly is being asked. However in reading the above paragraph which states, "It is certainly not the work of the uploader.". Well surprise! You have clearly misspoken and I'm wondering why? It is my design work and it's easy to prove. Who are you and why are you attempting to challenge something you don't know about? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.243.142.92 (talk • contribs) 04:01, 20 October 2017‎
You are responding to a deletion nomination where any editor can comment on the merits of the nomination. If you are the designer of the stamps, I apologise in assuming the uploader could not be the designer, but in 11 years I have never seen a stamp designer claim their own work here and I have been dealing with stamps copyright issues for most of that time. We take copyright status very seriously and see many stamps uploaded by editors who claim them as their own work but really all they did was take a photo or scan and assume that makes it their own work, which is obviously untrue. On that basis I made the nomination because your name is not well known to me as a stamp designer, so assuming you are Rosemary De Figlio, I am sure you will be able to verify your claim, however, because this comment was posted by an anonymous IP editor we can't tie this post to the user who uploaded the image, so please log in and add a response to this nomination again pointing us to the proof which can also be added to the image page as well. If you designed the stamps for the Palau Post Office, or an agent of theirs, and did not transfer the copyright to them under a work-for-hire contact then you can of course release the image under a free license but if not, they own the copyright. Are you aware that the license tag added allows anyone to use the image for anything including commercial and derivative use? I hope this explains it to your satisfaction and thanks for your understanding. Ww2censor (talk) 22:52, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, there has been no additional discussion on this for 20 days. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely to be duplicate with the jpg version. B dash (talk) 09:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution, found at https://upclosed.com/people/manas-shah/ . I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The pic is used only in an EN:WP draft article. Could someone who has not been ousted from that WP kindly check if the draft has any chances of being published? If not, this could be OoS as it is only in Category:Profile pictures. E4024 (talk) 13:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. I looked at en:wiki, but that's not really relevant here. I looked at the file metadata which reads "FBMD"... making this a copyright violation. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The State of Idaho does not release it's images in the Public Domain. See here for more. Corky Buzz by the Hornet's Nest 23:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author "various" means that none of these items is correctly licensed. They're 3D items with artwork and sayings, one is a sewn patch. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! This image was provided by the Glasgow Women's Library as part of a GLAM-Wiki collaboration back in 2016. The badges are part of their collection, they're protest badges donated from various sources. How's best to proceed here? Lirazelf (talk) 12:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again Ellin Beltz. Had a look on Commons for some similar files - this seems pretty close: [3] - to confirm, would it be satisfactory to include the photographer's details (or, potentially, the museum if the picture was produced as work product?) to make this comply? (your comment above seems to indicate not, but I'm looking at the Atheist badges as a template. Advice appreciated!) Lirazelf (talk) 12:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Atheist badges.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the photo is a derivative work of the badges, therefore the badges creator(s) have some rights on this photo. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File says George Curry, but it is a photo of Big Nose George Parrott. A larger uncropped version of this exact photo is used by the Big Nose George article on Wikipedia while this smaller cropped one links to nowhere. There are photos of George "Flat-Nose" Curry linked in his Wikipedia article and he doesn't look like this. Another full version of this photo actually says "Big Nose George" on it. Mr. Satterly (talk) 01:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not educationally useful. refer to it. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Joel Haddley is real photographer, but this is small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution. The photo is found multiple times in Internet before upload into Commons. As Commons does not know, who is behind the username, OTRS-permission from Joel Haddley is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I took this photograph in November 2010. International press became interested in it late 2015, and as I was fielding many requests for publication I uploaded it here to settle any questions about rights. I have no idea what an OTRS is. Could you please let me know how I can prove to your satisfaction that it is really me behind the username?--Joel Haddley (talk) 10:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please open COM:OTRS page and look, what kind of e-mail should be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Bytheway, I am very happy to see you answered, because this photo has real educational value! Taivo (talk) 11:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per OTRS permission. --Krd 08:35, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Terosaur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PRP 4 files uploaded - all images of amber. Two obvious copyvios (File:Bird in amber.jpg and File:Pterosaur in amber.jpg) and tagged as such, cannot find other two, but suspect they are also not "own work"

Ronhjones  (Talk) 12:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

these ambers belong to me and i took the photographs myself with my camera and i have on my website aakz.com and i want to share many of my own important photos with the world for free using wiki media then why can i not?

@Terosaur: Because too many people upload images illegally from the internet, and we cannot tell who you are - you need to add CC licenses to the internet images (https://creativecommons.org/choose/) or go to COM:CONSENT to donate the copyright. Any upload that is already on the internet will be regarded as a copyright violation until one is done. Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:00, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

please forgive me i am new to this i have just added

<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/80x15.png" /></a>This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.

to the crab and pterosaur pages at aakz.com and will check other pages, sorry for not understanding the need to put a notice as i am already giving the pictures freely, it is good to learn how to donate pictures as i take many :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terasour (talk • contribs)

@Terosaur: You seem to say that you have added the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 statement to your website, but I don't know where I can find it. Can you please tell us the full URL? whym (talk) 07:12, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

you can see the link under the pterosaur picture on this page http://www.aakz.com/pterosaur-in-amber.html


Deleted: per nomination, if the CC-SA 4.0 license on the website is ever available, the images may be restored. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]