Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/07/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 31st, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 10:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: File in use יעקב הכט (חוקר אינטרנט). -- Geagea (talk) 10:22, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scoop Usamasaad 10:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, misuse of Wiki Loves Earth. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work" photo of a model... the image is attributed to "© Oscar Picazo" on this website. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scoop Usamasaad 10:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, misuse of Wiki Loves Earth. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scoop Usamasaad 10:29, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, misuse of Wiki Loves Earth. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scoop Usamasaad 10:30, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, misuse of Wiki Loves Earth. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:11, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scoop Usamasaad 10:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, misuse of Wiki Loves Earth. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:12, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scoop Usamasaad 10:32, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, misuse of Wiki Loves Earth. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:13, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scoop Usamasaad 10:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, misuse of Wiki Loves Earth. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:21, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scoop Usamasaad 10:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, misuse of Wiki Loves Earth. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:21, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scoop Usamasaad 10:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, misuse of Wiki Loves Earth. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:32, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scoop Usamasaad 10:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, misuse of Wiki Loves Earth. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scoop Usamasaad 10:40, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, misuse of Wiki Loves Earth. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoop Usamasaad 10:46, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, misuse of Wiki Loves Earth. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoop Usamasaad 10:47, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, misuse of Wiki Loves Earth. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoop Usamasaad 10:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Kept: Within scope, seems ok. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:35, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoop Usamasaad 10:50, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Kept: Within scope, seems ok. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoop Usamasaad 10:52, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Kept: Within scope, seems ok. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoop Usamasaad 10:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Kept: Within scope, seems ok. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:52, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoop Usamasaad 10:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Kept: Within scope, seems ok. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoop Usamasaad 10:58, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, misuse of Wiki Loves Earth. --Tarawneh (talk) 13:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, movie poster Ciacho5 (talk) 13:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In future, use speedy instead of delete. 54.155.207.23 14:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily deleted as a blatant copyvio. --Storkk (talk) 14:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

accidental creation QualysPR (talk) 17:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:EDUSE. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:EDUSE. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:EDUSE. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:EDUSE. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:EDUSE. Possible copyright violation ([1]). Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:EDUSE. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:EDUSE. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoop Usamasaad 10:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Kept: Within scope, seems ok. --Tarawneh (talk) 19:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think the lady appeared more than the building in the photo Sarmad Yaseen (talk) 07:59, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9   14:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoop Usamasaad 10:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Kept: Within scope, seems ok. --Tarawneh (talk) 19:45, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoop Usamasaad 10:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: Within scope, seems ok. --Tarawneh (talk) 19:47, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong file

Verkeerde file, hoefde hier niet te staan, direct verwijderen Spotter2 (talk) 15:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. --Achim (talk) 20:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not published under CC licensing; non-free image (see Flickr source) Drown Soda (talk) 20:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not published under CC licensing; non-free image (see Flickr source) Drown Soda (talk) 20:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:52, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

naming mismatch; Foreign Species (talk) 20:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Should have been a category. --Achim (talk) 20:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Themagio159 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:52, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I... fudged up a bit. Probably would have caught it if I wasn't uploading multiple files at the same time. TimothyJosephWood 19:30, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Daphne Lantier: Accidental creation. I... fudged up a bit. Surely would have caught it if I wasn't uploading multiple files at the same time.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PuppyPatcha (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

Unused personal drawings and sketches, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:22, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Unused personal drawings and sketches drawn in a lifetime were handed over as a gift for improvisation. The drawings capture many moods and subtle expressions. Wikimedia Commons is not a training medium. Images are self-explanatory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PuppyPatcha (talk • contribs) 09:27, 1 August 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PuppyPatcha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artworks by non-notable artist/s are outside of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nice car but OoS. E4024 (talk) 11:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small image of unidentified person. E4024 (talk) 12:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry pic of unintelligible activity. I doubt this image can contribute anything to the projects. E4024 (talk) 14:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashkan Heidary (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope — unused personal images

Daphne Lantier 01:18, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 01:19, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hossein kazemi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope — unused personal artworks

Daphne Lantier 01:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 01:22, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:39, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 01:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:39, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 01:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:41, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 01:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:41, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a scan of a magazine photo Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a scan of a magazine photo Titipong11196 (talk) 09:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From http://talent.futbolowo.pl/zawodnik,141,bartlomiej-niedziolka.html Ytoyoda (talk) 19:43, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:38, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop of this unidentified news photo: https://drewbalis.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/a-j-feeley.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 19:50, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:38, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned (copyrighted) Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:36, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:36, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from website with copyright policy preventing reuse. No indication that website is the copyright holder. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 15:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete the image. I was actually going to delete it in the near future, so it would be helpful to me if you did that for me. I did not follow the proper protocol to upload the image. Michipedian (talk) 15:58, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:54, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PaoCalderon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are all found here. There's no indication of their being free.

Mhhossein talk 18:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Found on website gallery as stated. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:52, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Used only for vandal-edits at ptwiki (user indef blocked). Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 18:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the US for sculptures.

russavia (talk) 16:13, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dura lex, sed lex. Vcohen (talk) 20:58, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Well, Russavia is right so deleted Natuur12 (talk) 12:23, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Again, no FOP in the US for sculptures. The category, too.

  — Jeff G. ツ 00:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RichardAlexander22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos and abum covers. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RichardAlexander22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Flickrwashing. No evidence the Flickr accounts are official or own the images. Rather than complying with advice and proving ownership via OTRS, uploader has just continued uploading promotional imagery of bands and their record company.

  — Jeff G. ツ 00:58, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 01:09, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 01:15, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per COM:ADVERT Daphne Lantier 01:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per COM:ADVERT Daphne Lantier 01:47, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 01:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Burcu uner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

as per COM:ADVERT

Daphne Lantier 01:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johi92 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope — unused personal artworks

Daphne Lantier 01:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mehrkamco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All ""own work". Missing EXIF, missing permission.

Hystrix (talk) 06:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added permission for some of the pictures. Two pictures are logos of FC. This file is copy-rigted and should be deleted but others are self-work and should be kept. --Doostdar (talk) 04:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - implausible own work claim. --Jcb (talk) 13:48, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hamdard1906 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images / unknown person : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:16, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:53, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:53, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Used for ptwiki spam. Gunnex (talk) 18:18, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:52, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DIRECTOR NIKHIL KATOLE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:18, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:52, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anbuselvan trichy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 22:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:53, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per COM:ADVERT Daphne Lantier 01:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 01:36, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexsautos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

as per COM:ADVERT/no COM:EDUSE

Daphne Lantier 01:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sourabh.wiki1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

as per COM:ADVERT

Daphne Lantier 01:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 01:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Helen.saenz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

as per COM:ADVERT

Daphne Lantier 01:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kashiffarooq 5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope — unused personal images

Daphne Lantier 01:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per COM:ADVERT Daphne Lantier 01:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 01:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Clement Ngissah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope — unused personal images

Daphne Lantier 01:58, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 01:59, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 02:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bhoomika P. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope — unused personal images/artworks

Daphne Lantier 02:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not free. Antigng (talk) 02:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 02:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WilkinsCruz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope — unused personal images

Daphne Lantier 02:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nailabari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful own work, appears to be professional photoshoots and a copy of someone's Facebook page. Appears to be promotional/self-promotional.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:46, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laura Noemi de la Peña (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work, appear to be copied from web, CD covers, etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Meninoz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Also per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 04:47, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:10, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality duplicate of File:Protest of Donald Trump's ban on transgender military service (35363855274).jpg. MB298 (talk) 03:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has the watermark of a newspaper all over it. Copyright information for the newspaper can be found at its website. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 08:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grabbed from (example) https://www.facebook.com/vitorinoleo.official/photos/a.178054982246802.52499.178054655580168/1167400813312209/?type=3&theater (24.05.2016). Gunnex (talk) 08:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 31 July 2017 Sealle (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Leonardo Vitorino.jpg (Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing)per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:EDUSE. Possible copyvio from google searches. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:35, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 06:14, 31 July 2017 Sealle (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Eueh 05.jpg (Copyright violation;. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising from this clothing website, the original image isn't there but the rest of the photo shoot remains; can assume not "own work". Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:40, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 31 July 2017 Daphne Lantier (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:29th Da’i Saiyedna ‘Ali Shamsuddin and the Court of Mughal Emperor.pdf (per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Taken from here with no indication the image is available under the license stipulated. Further no indication the uploader is in fact the owner of the image and missing metadata. Hammersoft (talk) 14:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 19:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep my fail. In use via pt:Agência nova/sb. Gunnex (talk) 19:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

game screenshot, out of scope, apparently along with File:Landing01.jpg, File:EVA05.jpg, file:EVA02.jpg, File:EVA04.jpg, File:EVA03.jpg, File:EVA01.jpg and rest of uploads Pibwl (talk) 23:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, game screenshots are (C) by the game companies. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:18, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alhamra912 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files are all tagged "PD-textlogo", regardless of where they were created. They may be above the TOO in their countries of origin or the US.

  — Jeff G. ツ 00:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would say Softron and LeadCruch would. Ashley Madison IMO is too simple. But not my area of expertise.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree on Ashley Madison. Its country of origin is Canada, which has similar threshold expectations to the U.S. seb26 (talk) 01:16, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:53, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo. This is a UK company, where the threshold of originality is very low. ~ Rob13Talk 01:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@BU Rob13: Is this not how you upload logos, such as IBM, Apple, Tesco, BT, etc.? I have done it this way in the past before, If not, how can I make sure this is right going forward? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reallylauranne (talk • contribs)

@Reallylauranne: It depends. If the logo is public domain, it can go on Commons with a suitable copyright tag. If the logo is copyrighted, it can go on the English Wikipedia under the non-free content criteria. ~ Rob13Talk 02:05, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free work. The photo is not exempted by {{PD-PRC-exempt}}. Antigng (talk) 02:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's nothing at the source page to support the license given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:41, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused composite image without permission from creator/s of images copied. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:46, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that this was created by uploader, but it appears promotional. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Art without permission of artist, if it's "street Art" it's not grafitti. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this chart. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagen con copyright Soosie. (talk) 04:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skarpbrats (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, derived from a stock image, considering 123rf-watermark (https://de.123rf.com) still visible under the foot. Gunnex (talk) 04:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used respectively uploaded by a user who didn't make real contributions, apart from the creation of the user page. Gunnex (talk) 05:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Considering also the watermark "Atila Vieira Fotografia", needing permission from https://www.facebook.com/atilafotografia/photos_albums. Gunnex (talk) 05:52, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Wrong tag to avoid deletion. Greenbörg (talk) 06:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image downloaded from the web. Greenbörg (talk) 06:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook, like another upload, already tagged with copyvio (File:Jefferson Moura.jpg) Gunnex (talk) 06:17, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used respectively uploaded by a user who didn't make real contributions, apart from the creation of the user page. Gunnex (talk) 06:19, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 06:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:FocustheNation

[edit]

Self-promotional logos, not in use. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:30, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Selfgrow

[edit]

Unused photos of non-notable individual (only listings on Google are a GoFundMe page and Twitter feed), probably self-promotional. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal logo. Out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 06:40, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used respectively uploaded by a user who didn't make real contributions, apart from the creation of the user page. Gunnex (talk) 07:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From this website, and the metadata lists an author and copyright holder, so doubtful it is "own work". Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:11, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jorge Castro oficial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 22:31, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:35, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jorge Castro oficial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per previous DR: out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Used for vandal edits at ptwiki.

Gunnex (talk) 07:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality unused personal image. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki user page speedy deleted (spam). If IN scope, needs permission via http://jorge.durao.ziXXXXXp.net/ (2011) = http://jorge.durao.ziXXXXXp.net/images/cof.jpg (remove XXXXX) Gunnex (talk) 07:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a personal pic or selfie. Not used anywhere. E4024 (talk) 07:30, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion (Youtube-channel spam). No educational purpose: Not used respectively uploaded by a user who didn't make real contributions, apart from the creation of the user page. Gunnex (talk) 07:35, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CV in Category:Biographies. Let's delete this and wish success to Mateo. E4024 (talk) 07:37, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of the uploader, not own work as noted; the image is used on this website, where it is attributed to "Riksdagen" (Swedish government); I'm not able to confirm that images issued by the Swedish government are in the public domain or have a free license. If they are, the image needs to be attributed and tagged properly, thanks. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Italy and the sculpture seems modern. Is former footballer it:Marco Veronese really the sculptor? That case OTRS-permission is needed. How old the sculpture is? But maybe the cross does not surpass threshold of originality? Opinions needed. Taivo (talk) 07:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor-quality unused personal photo, out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 07:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Defined as "Entrelineas", I cannot understand what this file serves at. If the person has any notability, they could have an article in some WP, I guess. Therefore the pic looks OoS to me. E4024 (talk) 08:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused former user page image. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 08:11, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it, the photo serves no use and I added before I fully understood the principles of Wikimedia Commons. Stinger20 (talk) 16:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The website isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in fa.wiki, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:16, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 08:16, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, the image is found elsewhere in Internet in more size. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:19, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Passport size, does not look like an own work. E4024 (talk) 08:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 4x speedy deleted. User locally indef blocked. Gunnex (talk) 08:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 08:45, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The historical photograph uploaded as a modern work by the uploader. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:47, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. The depicted person died in 1991 and the photograph cannot be taken on 2012. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Laurapopa

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of Project scope. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, probadly derived from a stock vector image + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 08:59, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious sourcing. I found this used in Odyssey of the dragon, which had a substantial of copyvio text. This image appears at about 13 seconds into this Youtube video so I suspect the uploader may not actually own the image. AussieLegend () 09:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion (url spam). No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 09:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Portrait photo of the uploader, not own work as stated, the metadata contains info about the author and copyright holder. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:21, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope (w:Special:Undelete/User:Gadumaguing). MER-C 09:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope (w:Special:Undelete/User:Bshivam67). MER-C 09:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope of Commons. PDF rendition of Wikipedia article "Happiness economics" with track changes, used to improve that article. Henxter (talk) 09:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior quality (replaced by File:Yammer_logo.svg), not in use. +mt 09:37, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:46, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio and out of scope Nolispanmo 09:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Mahargial

[edit]

Personal photos uploaded for self-promotion; the files are not in use. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam, out of scope Nolispanmo 09:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, copyright violation Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:03, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:SocialDemocrats

[edit]

The metadata on each file contains extensive copyright information. If the uploader is the copyright holder listed, they should provide permission. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:03, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 10:11, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor-quality unused selfie. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:13, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality image of an unidentified person; without context has no potential educational value. Out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:15, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, copyright violation Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:18, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, copyright? Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work". There are several versions of this photo on the author's biographical website, for example, and the original source of the photo is unclear. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:21, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo Trizek from FR 10:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Kudpung (talk) 10:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, copyright? Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Internet screenshot, each image is likely thoroughly copyrighted. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:30, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of the uploader which can't be "own work", happens to have an obvious photographer's watermark; uploader will require permission from the photographer to license and distribute his work. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From this website, where it is apparently under copyright; also from this YouTube video, which does not have a license compatible with Commons. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:43, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From Yourstory.com, where it is the property of the website as outlined in its Terms & Conditions disclaimer. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:52, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

States that the uploader purchased this photo from a professional photographer (who is listed in the metadata); this claim will need to go through Commons:OTRS. In addition, this is self-promotional and the file is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I said 2600:100B:B009:3447:4003:290B:4DF2:574F 10:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. --ghouston (talk) 11:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Per * grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 11:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo (with a doubt about the copyright of the background tree sculpture) Ruthven (msg) 11:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does this pic have any educative value? E4024 (talk) 11:29, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Birthday cake, but assigned to a name. Personal file or OoS. E4024 (talk) 11:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From this website, which does not establish authorship or licensing status, no need to assume "own work" without metadata. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:47, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Theustubeoficial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 11:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Theo Branches (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 12:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 12:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kotoviski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works, COM:PACKAGING

Яй (talk) 12:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tvs Brasil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: probadly derived from elsewhere copyrighted content + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 12:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 13:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki user page 3x speedy deleted. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 13:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal images put together as an album. OoS. E4024 (talk) 13:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like an advertisement with e-mail address etc. E4024 (talk) 13:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by BellEpoque as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyvio from personal collection. Likely to be PD. Sealle (talk) 13:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artem9512

[edit]

All "own work". Copyrighted photos and fair use logos.

--Serhio Magpie (talk) 13:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is an outdated logo no longer used by Coillte (Ireland's forestry service). Is is appearing in google search results instead of the new logo which can be seen in this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coillte Communicraft (talk) 13:40, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per billinghurst. Daphne Lantier 18:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:08, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

-- It is my own work. The reason for its format, is because it is a scan of an old album, edited for its size.


Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:08, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GTDharmasena (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GTDharmasena (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qwerty123uiop (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 14:11, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Ejercicio dos.pdf.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't know if he has any notability but no article around. Not a Sergeant Pepper, apparently. E4024 (talk) 14:15, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How notable can a fitness trainer become so that his picture may be used in an article? I guess not much of a chance. E4024 (talk) 14:18, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iskandarcjr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 14:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Philcotof (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical paintings and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Frang2823 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://presidenti.quirinale.it/Saragat/images/4SARAGAT07gr.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related user page speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 14:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like screenshot from tv-series. Dmitry89 (talk) 14:36, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rei Denis (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in es.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:52, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Goianésia regarding official symbols

[edit]

Coat of arms (brasão) and flag (bandeira) of Brazilian municipality pt:Goianésia which were altered (according to the related ptwiki entry) by municipal law n. 2.445 from 22.12.2006 (see law .pdf), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." or {{PD-Art}} (for File:Bandeira goianesia.jpg). No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. The actual Brazilian copyright law from 1998 makes no exception for government works.

Gunnex (talk) 14:52, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused doodle, the only contribution of the uploader Pippobuono (talk) 14:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Probadly a video screeshot/YT-channel spam. Gunnex (talk) 14:59, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was created in 1988. [2] Y.haruo (talk) 14:59, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan for artistic works, this sculpture was erected by Nakamura Shinya (中村晋也) who is living person. Because the copyright still exists, unfortunately Commons can not hold this file. See here. Y.haruo (talk) 15:51, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:27, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With all the watermarks on it, can this be an own work? Maybe a book cover or so? E4024 (talk) 15:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like an advert, no? E4024 (talk) 15:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not see any educational content or even intent here. E4024 (talk) 15:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hombre sexy is looking for friends. Perhaps not in the correct place. E4024 (talk) 15:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Per * grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 15:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal and marked up photo, speculative and unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, low-quality image giving (bad) advice about passwords Apocheir (talk) 15:52, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was created in 2002. [3] Y.haruo (talk) 16:17, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: thumbnail of unknown person of no educational value Optimist on the run (talk) 16:37, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samo.nazari (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

Likely not own work, based on the frame in 2 images which seems to indicate that they are taken or cropped from somewhere else.

P 1 9 9   16:41, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tonystark2222 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 16:47, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free logo. Greenbörg (talk) 16:50, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hugo.a.paredes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status.. Related: pt:Raul Ventura (1919—1999). Source country: most likely Portugal. Fails probadly also {{PD-Portugal-URAA}}.

Gunnex (talk) 16:58, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 17:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 17:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No context to make this mathematical graph useful, and likely nothing more than a personal artwork as the description seems to indicate. Out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a terrible loss, I agree.--Alexmar983 (talk) 07:04, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering a false claim of authorship. Probadly grabbed from social media, considering also (even cropped, example) https://www.pinterest.de/pin/520517669407441937/ = https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/7b/0a/06/7b0a06503038cddda095faafc544d4ac.jpg (last modified: 2015) Gunnex (talk) 17:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ruff tuff cream puff as no source (No source since)

The others from the same artist are under discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lucien Haffen. -- (talk) 15:08, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used respectively uploaded by a user who didn't make real contributions, apart from the creation of the user page. Grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 17:46, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIFs, don't look to an own work IMO Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Per * grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 18:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Athena0726 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small sizes, no EXIFs, unlikely to be own works but grabbed from social medias (one image has "FBMD" in the metadatas)

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely out of scope, if no, then it lacks an OTRS permission Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:14, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nikhil katole (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:18, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, probadly derived from an elsewhere copyrighted image. Gunnex (talk) 18:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, low-quality diagram that should probably be text anyways Apocheir (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Basically a duplicate of File:Innovacion2.jpg, so that should probably go too if this does. -Apocheir (talk) 01:09, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 18:37, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work (promo shot for a Brazilian band, album cover?): small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Otavioanacleto and a related upload (on same day) File:1973 - RG - Kennedy Nunes.jpg, deleted per no-permission. Gunnex (talk) 18:43, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 19:01, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 19:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MARIANADUTRAA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 3x speedy deleted. Also per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 19:13, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal drawing, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:18, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Subhash jha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images without educational content.

GeorgHHtalk   19:19, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

HIghly stylized photo, unlikely to be original work Ytoyoda (talk) 19:35, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 19:36, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logos uploaded by Princesinhafm

[edit]

Unused promotional logos, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image without description and categorization. Uploaded in 2004 year it is in no wikipage or article. --Karelj (talk) 19:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete further more, copyright violation likely: maybe taken from https://windows-media-player-10-visual-style.de.softonic.com/ --ProfessorX (talk) 20:43, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private couple in the foreground. Nice on flickr (where the image comes from), but out of scope on commons. Luckily there are enough pictures of the mountains (category:Cerro Torre). Rupert Pupkin (talk) 20:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anke and Me near Lago Torre (3260000773).jpg Rupert Pupkin (talk) 22:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, the request actually links here. Added the link to the old request page as reason for deletion, so here we are again...--Rupert Pupkin (talk) 22:14, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:31, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image out of scope, mountains in the backround are covered well on commons (Category:Cerro Torre) Rupert Pupkin (talk) 20:09, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has multiple different historical versions and all of these are of fairly low resolutions to be believable "own work". Wcam (talk) 20:19, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

請勿刪除要求

無論是這張圖片還是之前我上傳的照片都是我於李任燊同意下他讓我替他拍攝,全部的照片絕對是我的作品,而且他亦同意將我幫他拍攝的照片上傳到維基百科網站。但由於之前上傳的圖片像數比較低,加上李任燊本人希望能夠用一張比較清晰的半身照片。所以在他同意的情況下,於2017年7月23日香港書展進行期間,讓我幫他拍攝了這張新照片,並根據他同意及意願才換上這張新照片作維基介紹頁面的圖片。而且他是知道以上所有照片會上傳到維基百科,他亦同意我將照片上傳到維基百科網站。如果之前有任何表達不清晰,敬請見諒。所以請管理員們不要刪除這張照片,謝謝。 Teatea221 (talk) 17:56, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

同意Teatea221的說法,因為就我所見之前的相片解像度比較差,新的相片相對真的比較清晰。 如果Teatea221當時已經獲得相中人同意下拍攝,而相中人亦清楚相片用途,管理員沒理由將此相片刪除。 而且本人不認同管理員認同更換相片就等同別人想以一張來歷不明或侵權得來的作品,再作出虛假陳述或企圖增加作品的作者是他本人可信性,及有誤導別人作者是他的這個觀點。
雖然本人明白管理員們有一定資力和經驗,但在這事件上,指控只是管理員的個人推測而並無實質證據證明這相片不是Teatea221的作品。但這指控對用Teatea221的名聲會造成嚴重的影響和污衊其人格,及對當時人極其不尊重。希望管理員可以明白,撤回刪除相片的申請。 Monchhichi Love (talk) 16:57, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Skövde kommunvapen.jpg
File of unknown origin.
Free, almost identical, image by National Archives of Sweden.

Image copied from the internet. Identical to the second image on this page. The image has probably been on Skövde municipality's homepage with unclear license.


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor description; can't imagine any purpose for this picture Jochen Burghardt (talk) 20:35, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Looks like a television screenshot with the black borders. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:37, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status for the stage backdrop. Guanaco (talk) 20:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Copyrighted element has been minimized. De minimis can be applied here. To the administrator closing the request, please, delete the original image from the history. --Discasto talk 15:00, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: original revision hidden. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status for the stage backdrop. Guanaco (talk) 20:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Copyrighted element has been minimized. De minimis can be applied here. To the administrator closing the request, please, delete the original image from the history. --Discasto talk 15:00, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: original revision hidden. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status for the stage backdrop. Guanaco (talk) 20:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Copyrighted element has been minimized. De minimis can be applied here. To the administrator closing the request, please, delete the original image from the history. --Discasto talk 15:00, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: original revision hidden. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoop Usamasaad 20:46, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoop Usamasaad 20:47, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photos is a cropped version of https://www.dhv-jugend.de/nachlese/fruehlingserwachen-2015/#jp-carousel-1559 from a commercial website. I cannot find a copyright sign on the website (https://www.dhv-jugend.de) but it is likely to assume it is so. Pierre cb (talk) 21:22, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:20, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matt.davidson20 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely/demonstrably false authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing/incriminating metadata, and the uploader's history. Clearly, the uploader either doesn't understand or doesn't care what the words "own work", "author" or "copyright holder" mean.

LX (talk, contribs) 21:30, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:20, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 21:30, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:20, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Montenegro, and the sculptor does not appear to have given his permission, so I'm afraid this is a copyright violation. Surtsicna (talk) 21:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:20, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 21:40, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:20, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DonNato (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 22:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Microsoft . HombreDHojalata.talk 22:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoop Usamasaad 10:50, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Kept: photo is within the scoop. --Tarawneh (talk) 20:42, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per COM:ADVERT Daphne Lantier 01:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:34, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 01:30, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:34, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arkadiusz.sniezek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope — unused personal images

Daphne Lantier 01:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:34, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Public Domain Mark images are not accepted from the flickr accounts of private individuals, only state or sub-national organisations. A Public Domain Mark (PDM) tag here on the flickr source is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication (CC0) licenses. PDM is revocable by the copyright owner at any time....and that is why Commons does not take this license from a private individual unless the work depicted is by an artist who has been dead for 70 years. Leoboudv (talk) 09:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: The flickrbot passed this image where the flickr license was CC0 or public domain dedication on flickr. This is the PD license that Commons accepts because the copyright owner promises that the image is indeed Public Domain. A flickr license change is needed for the above image under DR to be kept. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:52, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Public Domain Mark images are not accepted from the flickr accounts of private individuals, only state or sub-national organisations. A Public Domain Mark (PDM) tag here on the flickr source is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication (CC0) licenses. PDM is revocable by the copyright owner at any time....and that is why Commons does not take this license from a private individual. Leoboudv (talk) 09:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: The flickrbot passed this image where the flickr license was CC0 or public domain dedication on flickr. This is the PD license that Commons accepts because the copyright owner promises that the image is indeed Public Domain. A flickr license change is needed for the above image under DR to be kept. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:29, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:52, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is FOP OK in Angola? Mhhossein talk 12:59, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep What research have you done to establish this? My guess is none. But if you look at Article 29 of the Angolan Law on Authors' Rights (No. 4/90 of march 10, 1990) you'll see that it states "Uses lawful without authorization: (c) reproduction of ...works shown permanently in a public place". There are later amendments to this law, but none alters that article. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:21, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Would you mind giving us the url to the mentioned law? --Mhhossein talk 06:18, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Here. Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:58, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I checked the law, thanks to your url. However, there's still a major condition which I don't think you had paid attention to. The article reads: "...on condition that the title and the name of the author are stated and that the work is respected." --Mhhossein talk 14:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, let's be clear on what we're talking about here. I presume you query the buildings in the background of the photograph, which would be protected as "works of ... architecture" in Article 6(i) of the linked law. I don't think the image could be construed as disrespectful. They constitute about 50% of the image, so a de minimis argument would probably fail. However, we have numerous images in Category:Buildings in Luanda, and if this one goes, so must all the others. I think it would be an undue burden to expect photographers to make enquiries as to the names and architects of every building they photograph, and we should therefore read the law as if the words "where known" were included. If you ask the legislators or judiciary of Angola whether they intended such an onerous burden to prevail, I'm sure they would say not. However, I have sent an email to the cultural affairs section of the Angola Embassy in London and hope they can clarify this for us. As I pointed out to them "We would hate to lose all our images of buildings in Angola". Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
We never keep a bunch of violating files, do we? So, if needed, we'll remove all of them. The words of law are selected precisely verbatim and we'll never alter the law by reading it "as if the words 'where known' were included". We must act based on what we have at hand, not based on what we expect or guess. Moreover, we can't accept the work as de minimis; Just see that the car and the bus make less than a quarter of the whole surface area. I'm sure that you hate to keep files in violation of copyright. Thanks for the email, although I think written law is priored over other things. --Mhhossein talk 07:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

De minimis does not apply here. Wikicology (talk) 06:58, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The issue here isn't de minimis, it's Freedom of Panorama in Angola and until that issue is decided, dm is irrelevant. Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:30, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I don't know about Angolan copyright law but usually the work has to be above a certain Threshold of originality. I really don't see that in this generic buildings. --Magnus (talk) 13:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Angloa has FOP? Did you know that Angola's FOP law has a major 'if'; "...on condition that the title and the name of the author are stated and that the work is respected." Now, which of the title or author is stated? The best action was to nominate this violation for deletion and you closed the discussion without knowing/reading the comments. --Mhhossein talk 17:13, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment --- FoP exception does not eliminate the need for a license from the photographer. BTW....FoP exception vary from country to country. There is a freedom of Panorama in Nigeria and Angola (for example) but the terms and conditions are not the same. In the case of Angola, the copyright law state that "reproduction of "works shown permanently in public" is allowed "without the authorization of the author and without payment of remuneration on condition that the title and the name of the author are stated and that the work is respected.". Can anyone point me to where the architect was credited? Unless the architect is credited, that image remain a copyright violation of the architect's work. Regards. Wikicology (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment That's not a valid reason for deletion. It would be easy to fix if we know the location. However seeing the poor composition, and the lack of a useful description, I don't mind if this is deleted as "out of scope". Currently not used. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:59, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, Angola's copyright law requires that authors be credited for FoP exception to apply. Your personal opinion is not useful here. The author is not credited and this exclusively violates Angola's copyright law on FoP. "It would be easy to fix if we know the location" is not a valid reason to keep this image. BTW... Out of scope does not apply here as the image may be used on Luanda/Angola related articles. Please, note that every images on Wikimedia Commons don't have to be used on Wikipedia articles to be realistically useful for educational purpose. This image is a copyvio and should be deleted per our precautionary principle and not because the image is out of scope. Regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:46, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, that's good. You seem to have move a step forward and have accepted that there's a problem which needs to be fixed; "It would be easy to fix if we know the location"??? See COM:PRP. --Mhhossein talk 11:31, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Before we talk about FOP we need to find something in the picture that is eligible for copyright. I am not familiar with Angolan case law but in the background we have just regular apartment buildings with standard features and design elements that are functionally required. Buildings like these wouldn't be eligible for copyright in the United States and many other countries. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:40, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Flickr license has been verified, and there is nothing above ToO in this photo. Ruthven (msg) 12:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

want to upload a different photo of myself. Parviziskender (talk) 12:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You should better read Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parviz iskenderov.jpg more carefully. --E4024 (talk) 13:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake due to misslead Parviziskender (talk) 07:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: This photo was uploaded upon your suggestion on July 19, 2017 stating "Please upload the new pic first. Before that we cannot delete this one" https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Parviz_iskenderov.jpg. However that photo was not deleted, therefore this photo has to be deleted. Thank you. Parviziskender (talk) 07:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Edit conflict: If the mislead is a reference to this user, instead of speaking English Azerbaycan dilinde de danışa bilirem. Please first decide better what you want do with your pics and then take action. Also use your avaliability to add better cats to them: Kickboxers from Azerbaijan, from Australia? Or not kickboxers? What then? Please use more of your own time and less of others. I hope your pic is deleted. --E4024 (talk) 08:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: Mate, as stated the waste of time started due to your genius suggestion to upload a new photo at first place. That's about it. Parviziskender (talk) 08:15, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you ask for the deletion of a file, like File:Parviz iskenderov.jpg, that is used in some Wikipedia (in this case EN:WP) "anybody" would ask you a new pic (to be installed in that WP) to delete the other one. Or perhaps they would just not do what you asked and not show you the way out. My fault is, I'm a good person who wants to help others. Possibly never again in your case. Therefore please do not mention me any more because I will not respond. --E4024 (talk) 08:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per uploaer's request. Ruthven (msg) 12:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:47, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

She's a renown writer. Decide deletion according to similar pictures in internet. Who took it from whom, Commons from another site or they took it from here? --176.239.99.241 09:31, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just about everyone who uploads a picture of themselves to the Commons thinks they're renowned in some way. Another criterion for deletion, as you suggest, is the lack of permission from the person who took the photograph. Without that, we automatically delete photos after 7 days. So far, it has been 6 days. -Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:05, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not in a writer's category, so we assume it's a personal photograph. Ruthven (msg) 12:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused topless man image. E4024 (talk) 12:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Kargaltsev often uses himself as a model, along with casual photographs taken by polaroid or camera phone to give an insight into his life and work in New York. These photographs range from intimate personal shots to posed compositions and are often homoerotic, political, or provocatively sexual. All types and quality of photograph feature in his gallery exhibitions and publications. See previous deletion requests and explanation about this artist at Category:Kargaltsev deletion requests. -- (talk) 12:52, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep In scope, per Fæ. Also "Unused topless man image." is not a reason to delete, or will you nominate images with the argument "Unused topless cat image." or "Unused train image."?
I think you got too carried away and forgot to sign. Never mind, if people oppose they don't delete the handsome guy. --E4024 (talk) 14:13, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear status of the photo on display, labeled Spiderman Gordo. Also the Spider-Man costume is subject to copyright. Guanaco (talk) 20:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Copyrighted element has been minimized. de minimis can be applied here. To the administrator closing the request, please, delete the original image from the history. --Discasto talk 15:00, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Discasto: The character Spider-Man and his costume are copyrighted. Guanaco (talk) 11:19, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Guanaco: Yes to the first. No to the second: COM:COSTUME (or maybe I misunderstood this category) --Discasto talk 21:01, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I'm convinced.  Keep. Guanaco (talk) 21:03, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Discasto. Ruthven (msg) 18:04, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antuán (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://casamejicu.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/sarape-1.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hola @EugeneZelenko: el archivo que subí ilegalmente fue este File:Sarapes de Chiautempan.jpg y usted me esta mostrado el ejemplo [aquí]. Pensé que estaba en el dominio público, me disculpo, y acepto que sea borrado. Pero que hay del resto?, fotos que fueron marcadas para su borrado fueron tomadas por mí, y algunas de ellas son del lugar donde vivo, así que no entiendo y de los demás son heráldicos, con el permiso correspondiente. No solo por ser fotos de baja resolución tienen que ser borradas, además de que usted me esta mostrando un link para ocho fotos, pido atentamente eliminar esa solicitud, saludos. --Antuán (talk) 21:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( You could re-upload own photos in full resolution with EXIF as proof of your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@EugeneZelenko: so that means that you will delete all the photos that you choosed, even if the link shows a pic and the rest are mine? Antuán (talk) 20:04, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Question @Antuán: ¿Cuales son las fotos tomadas por ti? Así vemos si se puede guardar algo. --Ruthven (msg) 12:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruthven: estas:

El Sombrerero (talk) 23:36, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and kept the pphotos made by @El Sombrerero: . De todas maneras, si puedes subir el fichero original (y no el de Picasa) serìa mejor. Gracias. Ruthven (msg) 06:09, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questions raised in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Deepin was not adequately addressed. Proof is still needed if the photo itself (not the Linux distro) was released under a free license. The photo was published elsewhere under a non-free license. Wcam (talk) 13:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I took the image from here: https://www.deepin.org/en/2017/07/21/deepin-15-4-1-released/ I don't know if it's under a free license but I assume so given that this is the project's blog that announces the release. It's in their best interest that this image can be shared... --orschiro (talk) 13:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think we need to be careful with this. The Deepin repository containing the wallpaper photo on Github comes with a GPL-3.0 license. However, the source or the creator of the photo were not attributed. It is courteous even for public domain works to credit the creator. I doubt that Deepin has permission from the photographer to reuse the photo as wallpaper. --Wcam (talk) 17:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nimbus08 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The artist is alive. It lacks an OTRS permission from the artist https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henrijean

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


I am the author of theses works and I allow their use on Wikimedia Commons. Can you use the same permit than this work I upoloaded in 2008 ? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Le_temps_d%27une_seconde_-_Heanrijean.jpg Thank you

--

Je suis l'auteur de ces travaux et j'autorise leur publication et leur utilisation sur Wikimedia Commons. Pouvez-vous utiliser la même licence que cette oeuvre que j'ai ajouté en 2008 ? Merci https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Le_temps_d%27une_seconde_-_Heanrijean.jpg

 Comment @Nimbus08: Vous devriez confirmer votre autorisation pour ces deux fichiers en envoyant un courriel à OTRS, en précisant "[Ticket#2008031710023665]" dans l'en-tête. Merci --Ruthven (msg) 12:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - no new messages appeared in the ticket. --Jcb (talk) 20:03, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No identifiable author or date of publication. My estimation places its creation in the 1950s. This is likely to be in the public domain in Egypt, but not in the US due to the 1996 copyright restoration date. It's also possible this was not published until recently, which would mean it's copyrighted everywhere. Guanaco (talk) 10:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Guanaco!
Having said that, the licence published with this photograph is of Commons 1.0 (see orange button at the top of the link).
Many thanks! --Barbudo Barbudo (talk) 16:34, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The issue seems to be whether the Spanish Museum of the Army is the holder of this picture's copyright. It seems it isn't --Discasto talk 15:16, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear copyright situation. --Jcb (talk) 20:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]