Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/07/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 9th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal audio - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:30, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy; zero case. -- ~ Nahid Talk 18:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal audio - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:31, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy; zero case. -- ~ Nahid Talk 18:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal audio - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy; zero case. -- ~ Nahid Talk 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal audio - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy; zero case. -- ~ Nahid Talk 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal audio - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:46, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy; zero case. -- ~ Nahid Talk 18:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously false date, source, authorship and licensing information. Quite possibly old enough to be in the public domain, but truthful source, authorship and publication details are required. LX (talk, contribs) 11:53, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a copyrighted 2D image, not covered by FoP in UK Hchc2009 (talk) 22:07, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; it's usually quicker to tag with {{Copyvio}}. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been uploaded to be included in article de:Pronto (Rapper), which has been deleted due to obvious encyclopedic irrelevance. As this file's licensing is unclear, it should be deleted. 85.178.38.124 10:55, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in Washington: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source. Media missing permission as of 2 July 2017 -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been uploaded to be included in article de:Pronto (Rapper), which has been deleted due to obvious encyclopedic irrelevance. As this file's licensing is unclear, it should be deleted. 85.178.38.124 10:55, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in Washington: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source. Media missing permission as of 2 July 2017 -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been uploaded to be included in article de:Pronto (Rapper), which has been deleted due to obvious encyclopedic irrelevance. As this file's licensing is unclear, it should be deleted. 85.178.38.124 10:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in Washington: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source. Media missing permission as of 2 July 2017 -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False licence. Photo from http://www.dokaz.org.ua/%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B9%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F-%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%85%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0-%D0%B2-%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%B5-%D0%BD%D0%B0-%D0%B2%D0%BE/ Anaxibia (talk) 11:29, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license. Photo from https://topwar.ru/25236-kitaysko-amerikanskiy-osnovnoy-tank-jaguar.html Anaxibia (talk) 11:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falce license, Photo from http://www.ipukr.com/?p=24542 Anaxibia (talk) 11:40, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright notice at the bottom left. Minimal resolution, but watermark. jed (talk) 06:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:35, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by عرايبية بلال (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded by serial copyright violator; images found on Google Images.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I talked with the uploader. Not his files. Good faith bad actions case. --Tarawneh (talk) 12:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image without an educational or useful purpose. —Alvaro Molina ( - ) 07:47, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file no true Odank Smile 80 (talk) 18:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The object is unclear. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:43, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:21, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:44, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:21, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. Photo from NATO web Anaxibia (talk) 09:27, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:53, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work can not be the product of this author, who download it. Photo from NATO web Anaxibia (talk) 09:28, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:53, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image of an unidentified woman, with only the uploader's assertion that this is an actress. Unused, and without an ID I can't see how it would be usable. See COM:NOTUSED Tabercil (talk) 15:43, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:54, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal selfie - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:40, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:43, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:42, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:43, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:43, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:43, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misplaced double bond, replaced by File:Limonin Strukturformel V5.svg. Leyo 21:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's right. This structure isn't in usage, anymore.--TSOL (talk) 08:17, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:32, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright https://www.om.net/equipes/effectifs/joueurs/322490/gustavo-dias-luiz Remy34 (talk) 21:27, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:31, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image seems captured from a film. See talk page and history of contributions of uploader, too. Elisardojm (talk) 22:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:30, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infrigement. It's a picture taken from Glamour magazine. 88marcus (talk) 06:09, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems a picture from a magazine. The rights are reserved. 88marcus (talk) 22:59, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation (whitewashing) > no source 2A01:C23:C415:E900:91AA:8725:9F6C:A38B 23:11, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright notice at the bottom left. Minimal resolution, but watermark. jed (talk) 07:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Cropped and kept per COM:PDART. --Sealle (talk) 10:38, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright notice at the bottom left. Minimal resolution, but watermark. jed (talk) 06:58, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The water markers across this images make these files unusable. --jed (talk) 13:30, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-Art, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 13:31, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright notice at the bottom left. Minimal resolution, but watermark. jed (talk) 06:58, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Art, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 13:32, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright notice at the bottom left. Minimal resolution, but watermark. jed (talk) 06:58, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File replaced with watermark free version. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:58, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-Art, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 13:32, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright notice at the bottom left. Minimal resolution, but watermark. jed (talk) 06:59, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Art, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 13:32, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright notice at the bottom left. Minimal resolution, but watermark. jed (talk) 07:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Art, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 13:32, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used, very small, intrusive watermark, out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OK now. --Yann (talk) 12:12, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright notice at the bottom left. Minimal resolution, but watermark. jed (talk) 07:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Art, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 13:32, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio https://www.ch-aviation.com/portal/news/55318-moldovas-flyone-leasing-a-turkish-a320 Farchering (talk) 07:43, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Other photo is a copyvio (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FLY_ONE.jpg) this one too is probable Farchering (talk) 07:44, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, grabbed from [1]. --Sealle (talk) 12:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trivial image of text DMacks (talk) 10:40, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 12:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete This should be speedily deleted as this is clearly a copyright violation. Google is not a valid source so this is clearly a copyright violation. Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Sealle (talk) 12:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not source provided, may be not an own work Ezarateesteban 00:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose the file is a derivative work of my own from an original taken from commons, it depicts the path that once had the vanished street of Yerbal, Ciudad Vieja, Montevideo, Uruguay, and actually is in use on the article Calle Yerbal (Montevideo) in eswiki.--Neurorebel (talk) 18:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is the original file? Ezarateesteban 20:50, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is the source File:Old Town, Montevideo.png.  Keep: Openstreetmap. --P 1 9 9   15:54, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per P199. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old photo 179.192.194.209 00:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy- Keep cause the reason given contradicts the project scope. You could add the facts you mentioned about the history of the monument to the file description instead. Jotzet (talk) 03:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file might be a copyright violation. The license tag claims that the author died more than 70 years ago. According to w:de:Johann_Krüger_(Linguist) the person shown on the picture lived from 1911 to 1992. In the picture he appears to be at least 40 years old, so the picture was probably taken after 1950. This means even if the photographer died immediately after taking the picture, the 70-year-mark will not be reached until around 2020. In addition to this, the description lists André Cherpillod as the author. Presumably that refers to w:fr:André_Cherpillod who seems to be still alive today. Also, there is no evidence that André Cherpillod released the photo under an acceptable license. Stopselliese (talk) 00:36, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:34, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of the uploader out of COM:SCOPE, one without a license, all with questionable "self" attribution.

  — Jeff G. ツ 03:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 01:09, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of the uploader out of COM:SCOPE uploaded since the last mass DR, all with questionable "self" attribution.

  — Jeff G. ツ 00:49, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 19:21, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal images of no use, Commons is not for personal family photos. None in use.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:56, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:45, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality: very unsharp. Speravir 01:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 19:21, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality duplicate of File:The Master meets the Apprentice (2).jpg. MB298 (talk) 01:49, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 19:24, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyright material. Not exempted by Commons:De minimis. --DAJF (talk) 02:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:34, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no evidence this picture was taken by the uploader. The picture is all over the web. Franci DB (talk) 03:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I have reuploaded the original file File:Anne Hathaway in 2016.jpg with exif data - PLEASE KEEP THIS FILE. Please delete these "File:Anne Hathaway at 2016 TIFF.png" and "File:Anne Hathaway at TIFF 2016.png". Thank you. Franci DB (talk) 22:40, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, File:Anne Hathaway at 2016 TIFF.png deleted by User:Wdwd. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 19:26, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like an official promo photo. Low-resolution and no EXIF data, so it is doubtful that the image is the own work of the uploader as claimed. DAJF (talk) 03:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 19:25, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poor-quality selfie serving no obvious educational purpose. Outside the project scope. DAJF (talk) 03:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:34, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a copyright infringement: 2. Intellectual Property Rights www.innaofficial.com site’s content: images, text, graphics, scripts, software, design rights, model rights, patents, trademarks, www.innaofficial.com and is fully owned by its suppliers and is defended by the Law on copyright and related rights and intellectual and industrial property laws. Use without the www.innaofficial.com any items listed above be punished according to law. www.innaofficial.com and logo are registered trademarks of www.innaofficial.com www.innaofficial.com. NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:34, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a copyright infringement: Intellectual Property Rights www.innaofficial.com site’s content: images, text, graphics, scripts, software, design rights, model rights, patents, trademarks, www.innaofficial.com and is fully owned by its suppliers and is defended by the Law on copyright and related rights and intellectual and industrial property laws. Use without the www.innaofficial.com any items listed above be punished according to law. www.innaofficial.com and logo are registered trademarks of www.innaofficial.com www.innaofficial.com. NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:34, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RomanRussia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos are of various resolution, no EXIF, PNG format.

File:Ан-24 авиакомпании Сахалинские Авиатрассы (Аврора) в аэропорту Оха.png is taken from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/47808512 which is (C) ARR File:Bombardier DHC-8 авиакомпании Якутия в аэропорту Оха.jpg is a screenshot from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ti9AOF2r1n4 etc

Farchering (talk) 05:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samulihuusko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logo of questionable notability+maybe above ToO

Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:41, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 19:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover of unclear copyright statut + there is an issue with the description, the text is a copy and paste from the (not free) source, therefore if the image is kept because the drawing/painting is old enough to be in PD, then the description has to be changed, as well as the relevant file history hidden. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:48, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source information for this photo. It could very well be French. Farchering (talk) 06:50, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spelling mistaken, False is "Prinstone", Correct is "Princeton" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yokohama2010 (talk • contribs) 2017-07-03T23:57:18‎ (UTC)


Kept: use {{Rename}} instead. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quality is not good enough — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taman Renyah~commonswiki (talk • contribs) 2017-02-10T05:44:54‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; used by wikis.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this is unattractive. I want to upload better version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taman Renyah~commonswiki (talk • contribs) 2017-07-05T07:50:19‎ (UTC)

Please do it. What are you waiting for? We cannot delete the file without a replacement. --E4024 (talk) 06:09, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdarin (talk • contribs) 2017-07-06T09:26:52‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 19:28, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

an addvertisment of a not notable (?) game. Picture from http://medievalrealm.net/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Estopedist1 (talk • contribs) 2017-07-08T21:10:33‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 19:30, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KediÇobanı (talk • contribs) 2017-07-03T19:49:57‎ (UTC)


Kept: as per E4024. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taman Renyah~commonswiki (talk • contribs) 2017-07-05T07:52:01‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is already on Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Le_Brady,_December_29,_2011.jpg Fmvh (talk) 08:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

already on commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Th%C3%A9%C3%A2tre_Antoine_29_decembre_2011.jpg Fmvh (talk) 08:29, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M R Karim Reza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Indonesia has no freedom of panorama, see COM:FOP#Indonesia. These buildings are not part of the exception on works by the government and they are too new to be in the public domain,

HyperGaruda (talk) 08:55, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • HyperGaruda, keep going with your mission obstructing my works here in Wikipedia.These pics are captured and uploaded by me.If it violates any copyright regulation then there should be no image of Indonesia in Wikipedia, if I am not wrong. User talk:M R Karim Reza.
@M R Karim Reza: If you had actually read COM:FOP#Indonesia, you would have found out that buildings are a form of architecture and are thus works of art, protected by copyright. The only exceptions are works by the government and works whose creator died more than 50 years ago. These modern skyscrapers are obviously not part of the exceptions, unlike e.g. old structures and of course nature. --HyperGaruda (talk) 11:45, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • HyperGaruda, I dont have interest to hire a lawyer to stop your obstructive, destructive and abusive behavior towards my work here in Wikipedia. There are thousands, if not millions of pictures in those criteria mentioned by you already uploaded in Wikimedia commons before. Use your common sense! Nobody complained, now here comes you! Keep it up.User talk:M R Karim Reza
@M R Karim Reza: People complained at least 36 times (see Category:Indonesian FOP cases) and I am starting to complain about your disrespect for the rules. --HyperGaruda (talk) 13:49, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M R Karim Reza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Freedom of Panorama in Indonesia. None of these supermodern buildings even remotely look like they are PD-old.

HyperGaruda (talk) 19:41, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal[2] photo. XXN, 09:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License review failed. Flickr account: Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum, EXIF: Author - Robert Suchy, Copyright holder - Ministerstwo Obrony Narodowej RP. Possible flickrwashing. Sealle (talk) 10:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. In this case Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum failed to acknowledge copyright holder on their Flickr site. – Maliepa (talk) 11:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably COM:FOP#Indonesia, at least based on age. I am however not sure if the FoP rules also apply to buildings still under construction, which is why I started a full discussion. HyperGaruda (talk) 10:29, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mornington.rema (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Last remaining files. For any document previously published elsewhere, we need a formal written permission from the copyright owner. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards,

Yann (talk) 23:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:37, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mornington.rema (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The user loads many files, marked as their own. Some of the files are already marked as copyvio. The others should be checked.

Hystrix (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:40, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mornington.rema (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Another batch of uploads from this user - still doubtful that any of these are own work as indicated.

4ing (talk) 22:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - also, with no categories and limited descriptions these will never be seen or used. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mornington.rema (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Last set of uploads by this editor. Same style as before, precautionary principle and all that.

DMacks (talk) 10:52, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note that the filename is apparently an error -- the person is "Usama Trapper". There are two issues here:

First, is Usama Trapper notable?

He has no WP article. If he is not notable, then this image is out of scope.
If he is notable, then Username policy requires that he must verify that User:Usama trapper is actually the notable person.

Second, is this a copyvio? It seems unlikely that this portrait is actually "own work" as claimed. The description says, "Logo art Designed by Angel Eye Production" which confirms that.

Therefore, I don't think we can keep this without (a) a decision on notability, {b} confirmation of identity, and (c) a free license from the actual creator of the work or evidence that the uploader has the right to freely license it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:58, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:39, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

subject request, not in use Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 11:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:39, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

subject request not in use Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 11:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:39, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

subject request not in use Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 11:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:39, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

subject request not in use Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 11:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:39, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this upload is a mistake, the image is a movie poster and does not releaved under free license Puramyun31 (talk) 11:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:39, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a third party book/manga cover - Equivalent at English Wikipedia is non-free w:File:Gabriel Dropout Volume 1 Cover.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion via {{copyvio}} would have been appropriate. --Don-kun (talk) 05:07, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Deleted by User:Billinghurst. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 19:32, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Equivalent media at English Wikipedia is non-free w:File:Sonagas Logo.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 19:34, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly not a simple logo, Equivalent media at English Wikipedia is non-free w:File:Lions Tour logo 2017.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:11, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Deleted by User:Billinghurst. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 19:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source file does not indicate whether it can be used under the added license. Soosie. (talk) 12:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:39, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Colorful armchair, without the person would be nice 176.239.84.148 12:41, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:39, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to recent decicion from shwedish court, this file is likely not free enough for commons. As the photographer and uploader I wich to have it deleted. Taxelson (talk) 12:54, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This should be coordinated. There will be thousands of pictures to delete. We can't have a deletion request for every one of them. Edaen (talk) 12:59, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:39, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per extensive EXIF data, the copyright belongs to WEY Technology AG, and the screen shows a snapshot of a copyrighted television transmission from Bloomberg. Mardus /talk 13:52, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheWilliamBlake (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyright violations (what metadata there is credits various organizations (CUNAPHOTO.IT, Waifproject) . The photographers should confirm the license via COM:OTRS.

Storkk (talk) 15:40, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheWilliamBlake (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:35, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistake on my part, meant to overwrite, instead of uploading a new file. AmorPatiturMoras (talk) 14:30, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is translator? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dexnaroks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims. Professional photos without metadata. All previously published elsewhere. The only other file uploaded by the user has already been deleted for copyright reasons.

LX (talk, contribs) 14:47, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dexnaroks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As before, questionable authorship claims. Professional photos with varying metadata. All appear to be previously published elsewhere. All other files uploaded by the user have already been deleted for copyright reasons.

Marbletan (talk) 18:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carol.goncalves72 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep The copyright status seems fairly clear, with the book itself having a standard GFDL notice on page three, which translates to "Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts." The same PDF can be found elsewhere online, always with the GFDL notice present. However, it's probably not useful as a source for copying into Wikimedia projects because it's far past the date for license migration. Guanaco (talk) 15:28, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Unused text-only document, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   16:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per P199. Daphne Lantier 19:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry shot of an unidentified woman, with only the uploader's assertion that this is an actress. Unused, and without an ID I can't see how it would be usable. See COM:NOTUSED Tabercil (talk) 15:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photograph uploaded to Commons 176.239.84.148 15:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Hugo.arg (talk) 15:27, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted material not Wikipedia:de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 15:41, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: biiger original version is here: https://siviaggia.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/guardie-rocca.jpg?w=786&strip=all 92.75.34.245 16:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by HyperGaruda as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No full freedom of panorama nor PD-50: COM:FOP#Indonesia. Sealle (talk) 16:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by HyperGaruda as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:FOP#Indonesia, this non-governmental building's completion date (1995) indicates it is still a long way from being PD-50-eligible. Sealle (talk) 16:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by HyperGaruda as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:FOP#Indonesia, residential (i.e. non-governmental) and recently built in 2003. Sealle (talk) 16:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by HyperGaruda as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:FOP#Indonesia, non-governmental and recently completed (2016). Sealle (talk) 16:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by HyperGaruda as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:FOP#Indonesia, commercial office building and much younger than PD-50. Sealle (talk) 16:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe the uploader was not the original copyright holder of this image, and uploaded it under a different license as his/her's own work. Zhangj1079 (talk) 16:43, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe the uploader was not the original copyright holder of this image, and uploaded it under a different license as his/her's own work. Zhangj1079 (talk) 17:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aniveshrai8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata (except metadata indicating the photos were grabbed from social media), watermarks (e.g. Convite Luz' Studios watermark in File:KUNWAR UJJWAL RAMAN SINGH.jpg and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata (except for metadata indicating it was grabbed from social media), and the uploader's history. LX (talk, contribs) 17:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly not 'own work'. It is possibly copied from the internet. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Araibiabilel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i.huffpost.com/gen/4387546/images/o-CHARDONNERET-LGANT-facebook.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:22, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Araibiabilel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works and/or unclear copyright statut. The uploaders already upladed copyright violations. If some images are in PD or free for a specific reson, then this reason should be provided.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:27, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Araibiabilel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded by serial copyright violator; images found on Google Images.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:38, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 19:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wunsch der Küstlerin selbst - Wish of the artist. SpreeTom (talk) 17:55, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to WorldCat the creators of Chanukkah-Büchlein Sipur-Hanukah are Paul Hannemann and Heinz Wallenberg. Wallenberg, Heinz (the illustrator) died in 2003. 91.15.71.44 18:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author Uri Ben-Avraham is not the uploader. We have no OTRS release approval. It has no place in the Commons in this situation. 91.15.71.44 18:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork SecretName101 (talk) 18:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 05:16, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 14:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The background is copyrightable. We have no OTRS release approval. It has no place in the Commons in this situation. 91.15.71.44 18:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was down from the original source... 91.15.71.44 18:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

car je me suis trompée sur le logo, le logo que j'ai mit est protegée Vendée images 85 (talk) 18:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has nothing to do with muons (despite being used on the Indonesian wiktionary page for muon). Appears to be a screenshot of a YouTube video, so copyright status is dubious. A previous image from the same user, File:Muon.svg.svg, was speedied for copyright issues. Apocheir (talk) 18:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Following from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ներսես Շնորհալու անվան միջնակարգ դպրոց.jpg. I think this is supposed to be a drawing of the user's secondary school. Frankly it looks like the drawing was made in MS Paint. It was briefly in use on a page in the Armenian wikipedia, but now it's not, so they must have decided it wasn't useful on the article. Apocheir (talk) 18:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine Uncle Fred 18:37, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file should be deleted as it derives from http://dota2.gamepedia.com/File:Agility_attribute_symbol.png which states the file is copyrighted by Valve Corporation. Since this derivative file came from copyrighted file (which means it is copyrighted), and Commons only accepts free files, the file must be deleted. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 19:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file should be deleted as it derives from http://dota2.gamepedia.com/File:Strength_attribute_symbol.png which states the file is copyrighted by Valve Corporation. Since this derivative file came from copyrighted file (which means it is copyrighted), and Commons only accepts free files, the file must be deleted. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 19:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file should be deleted as it derives from http://dota2.gamepedia.com/File:Intelligence_attribute_symbol.png which states the file is copyrighted by Valve Corporation. Since this derivative file came from copyrighted file (which means it is copyrighted), and Commons only accepts free files, the file must be deleted. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 19:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also on Twitter, yt and g+. OTRS required. Achim (talk) 19:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant: Superseded by File:New England Tablelands Merino in snow during winter..jpg, a version without watermarks. 2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 19:53, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image should not belong to the naturism cathegory. 80.104.51.143 19:54, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wunsch der Künstlerin - Wish oft the Artist. SpreeTom (talk) 20:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:38 АК.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 20:53, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplikat von "Henschel F 191 AK 19 (1968, 230 PS).jpg" mit fehlerhaftem Namen Wleiter (talk) 20:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by SVG files, see File:Cesta I. triedy číslo 10.svg. This version is the wrong color, font, and border. Similar files were already deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Diagrams of signs of 1st-class-roads of Slovakia. Rschen7754 20:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License is only free in the context of describing the Swedish Parliament and its work. Guanaco (talk) 21:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has specific licensing restrictions, potentially more onerous than the GFDL full-license text requirement. Even in print, a full page is required to be dedicated to this image if it's used. Guanaco (talk) 21:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"All photos and images on the site, unless indicated, are the copyright of the legitimate owners."[3] The site waives copyright for its own works, but there is no evidence the site owner produced the image. Guanaco (talk) 21:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please delete this page, candidature is to early, there are some errors I have to fix first Wladyslaw (talk) 21:39, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License restricts critical commentary. Guanaco (talk) 21:51, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Multiple copies are permitted but not for sale except to cover minimal printing costs." Guanaco (talk) 22:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Multiple copies are permitted but not for sale except to cover minimal printing costs." Guanaco (talk) 22:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the logo download page on the company's website, this is "all rights reserved" not creative commons licensed. Delete unless it could be considered as PD-TEXTLOGO. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 22:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused company logo; out of scope Guanaco (talk) 22:07, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License restricts use to works describing the Swedish Parliament and its work. Guanaco (talk) 21:42, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Georges Salendre died in 1985. no freedom of panorama in France.

Chassipress (talk) 13:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (one kept as per comments). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:10, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mdia12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:33, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mdia12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from software and web site screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hello EugeneZelenko (talk) i'm about to have the permission of the person responsable of pasdecalais site. He will come back to work next week. Can you wait a little bit beforde deleting the files please ? Thanks in advance.

Question is not only about permission. Propitiatory software screenshots should be removed. Is it possible to do the same with open source software (Linux, LibreOffice, etc)? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:03, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License à vérifier. Image aussi présente sur http://www.occitanie-tribune.com/articles/111/merci-aux-habitants-d-occitanie-par-le-collectif-bastir/ Habertix (talk) 22:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image libre de droits, envoyée par "Bastir !" à Occitanie tribune pour illustrer communiqué de presse (et à d'autres médias, qui l'ont également publiée) http://politicregion.fr/article/nom-de-la-region-pour-bastir-cest-loccitanie-qui-prime http://lejournaldugers.fr/article/12752-bastir-present-sus-tres-departements-enta-convecer-les-ciutadans / Raymond Trencavel


Kept: This is not the source. AGF. --Yann (talk) 13:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

questionable copyright attribution Andrewgprout (talk) 00:41, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Go to the website and you will find that it is under a creative commons license and therefore it is properly lisenced[reply]

Perhaps you could provide a link to the actual image on the site and also link to any copyright information confirming its copyright status - that would be very helpful. The geographic search function on the site does not identify any images from Turku. Andrewgprout (talk) 20:52, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: NC license. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:43, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I really doubt this image as own work of uploader and especially as a photo made today rather than years ago - previously published at several resources e.g. https://ok.ru/profile/557656101496 and http://operetta.name/kostjukov.html and even considering stage makeup, the person on this photo doesn't look to be in his 70s (born 1942). Tatewaki (talk) 19:20, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, Tatewaki! Of course, this photo belongs to our family, because the man on the photo is my father. We are sitting now together with him and wondering why You have any questions? This is my father's photo when he was working at the operetta theater, in the role of Boni in Silva. In theaters, actors are clothed in costumes, which are related to definite times. All written link belongs to us. Thank You!


Deleted: unclear copyright status, no date, no author. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:46, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lantus is not the photographer. A Louis xxx is to be found in the bottom-left corner of the pic. Goesseln (talk) 22:26, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Originaly I took a wrong description with copy&paste to this file. That is now corrected. Sorry for this mismatch. Lantus (talk) 08:32, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If the author is unknown, how can you be sure the image is public domain? Somebody born before c. 1924 could potentially still be alive (unlikely) or died less than 70 years ago (more likely). --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 12:24, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 05:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License tag was recently changed. --Ultrabyte (talk) 02:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • The file page references archived email correspondence at es.wiki which is from the departmental government (of Colombia) who is attributed as the source. It agrees to license their whole web page (presumedly where the audio file was sourced from) under the GFDL, rather than public domain. In Colombia, government works are not exempted from copyright, so the GFDL license mentioned is more important here and potential PD status or claims are not relevant (including the CC0 tag which is on the file page at the moment). I think some consideration might need to be given for this file under Commons:Grandfathered old files. OTRS was instituted in late 2006 and it would not be a stretch to say that the Spanish language OTRS queue might not have been brought into full use at the time of this file's upload, either (7 January 2007). I would support  keeping this file with a GFDL tag and reference to the grandfathering guideline, assuming good faith about the correspondence that was had with the government official by email at that time. seb26 (talk) 04:31, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per seb26 (license tag changed accordingly). Ruthven (msg) 14:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
@Rasizade: Is there any evidence of permission to upload this image? Normally, there would need to be evidence of permission to upload images that eere scanned from a passport. The image is not a copyright violation as I have checked it online already but you may need evidence of permission to upload this image. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:07, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As for the copyright issue, I am the holder of my own copyright, since the photo was taken by myself and submitted to the Department of State: "If a copyright is indicated on a photo, graphic, or other material, permission to copy these materials must be obtained from the original source (that is from me). For photos without captions or with only partial captions, hold your cursor over the photo to view the "alt tag" for any copyright information... Only State Department photos are in the public domain." = Ibidem

There has been a discussion at Wikimedia on passport picture issues in 20015: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Public_domain#Passport_photos "US passports themselves are PD because they are generated by an employee of the State Department. But is the photo within the passport copyright-free? In most cases, the applicant takes two photos of themselves (or has a photographer do it) and submits them along with their application. Does the application contain any language that the applicant is surrendering the copyright of those photograph?" They came to a conclusion that as long as the photo is not of another person's, one may use his own passport photo as he pleases. Furthermore, my passport (from which the picture is uploaded) has expired in 2010 and is not a valid document. I can provide you with the images of both passports (issued in 2000 and 2011), but do not know how to place them here -- I refrained from uploading them into Wikimedia to avoid cluttering with unnecessary files. = Sincerely: Rasizade (talk) 16:14, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rasizade: Firstly, how did you end up with somebody's passport photo. I don't understand. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:51, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rasizade: I don't know what are you intending to achieve from uploading this photo. However, unfortunately personal photos fall out of the project's scope. I observed you have your own page on the Azerbaijani wikipedia ( if I am right ) but you are not at all notable so it will be speedy deleted as soon as possible but I can't speak Azerbaijan's language so I can't contribute on there. I would still think that it will be deleted soon. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • You cannot judge who is notable or not notable in Azerbaijan. Nevertheless, let me explain the intent of my personal page on the Azerbaijani Wikipedia: it has been written and placed there in response to its editors' appeal to collect information about compatriots who have distinguished themselves by promoting Azerbaijan abroad. I am an American scholar and a prominent figure in the field of Azerbaijan studies, although comparatively not so notable in the USA, where I live. If you dig deeper, you will find many people of much lesser importance on the pages Azerbaijani Wikipedia. I do not know what is your purpose, but would believe that your persistence with deletion request is just an attempt to save your face by constantly shifting the subject of discussion instead of simply withdrawing the request, despite all the proofs of my picture's legitimacy within the scope of Wikipedia provided above. After failing with your scope, copyright and permission objections, you resorted to belittling my personality and trying to delete my entire page in the Azerbaijani Wikipedia just to justify your picking on a single uploaded photograph. I understand that my personality is not notable enough for English or Russian Wikipedia, but on a scale of Azerbaijani Wikipedia it is more than prominent (compared to most of the entries). It is obvious that here are involved either a personal bias against me or a national and racial prejudice against my nationality. Let us wait for arbitration. = Rasizade (talk) 21:39, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, image is indeed in scope being used on an article in az.wiki. We can't decide article notability for other wikis, if it is used there, that is reason enough to keep it. With respect to the photo copyright, it is a much safer assumption to say that the photographer owns the work rather than the State Department, given the absence of any evidence to say that rights are changed or surrendered by the submission of a passport application. A recommendation would be to crop the photograph so it focuses more on the face and less on the material of the passport itself. seb26 (talk) 04:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 14:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]