Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/07/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 8th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When checking the source of this image I found an acceptable license and a higher resolution that I uploaded, however after to have tried to upload another "free image" available at the source, I had a warning that there is a deleted file with a similar name, and I found the DR linked above created by Jim. Therefore I think this image has to be deleted too. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:00, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: That is correct. THe MacArthur Foundation license is CC-BY-SA-NC and they are unwilling to change it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:20, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensing issues Northwest (talk) 01:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: License review: Non-free license, or license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong link Agent001 (talk) 03:07, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: FASTILY (TALK) 04:23, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader gave an incorrect link to the source, so the license is questionable. I can not find this particular photo at this website: [1]. Sealle (talk) 11:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am the original uploader, the link originally went to the photo. I just went over the entire Kremlin photo archive using their search engine and could not find it again. Feel free to delete it if you believe it necessary. Fdutil (talk) 13:27, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fdutil, please feel free to upload any of these (see {{Mil.ru}} and the bottom of http://eng.mil.ru/en/index.htm). I think in this case the best way is to overwrite the existing file by a new one. Sealle (talk) 13:41, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! Excellent suggestion. Photo changed, source amended. Fdutil (talk) 15:49, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: old version deleted. --Sealle (talk) 16:08, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, easily replaceable by wikitext if needed Guanaco (talk) 15:40, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by NahidSultan: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Endfassung des Artikels mit grammatischen Korrekturen erscheint in Cancer Medicine July 2017 Stefanie1966 (talk) 19:54, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 09:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain text document of questionable notability Basvb (talk) 19:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:04, 24 April 2015 (UTC)---- Deleted: out of project scope -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable personal biography. This should probably be salted with a warning about project scope. Guanaco (talk) 06:56, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was meant to be an overwrite PaulBommel (talk) 15:20, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Wdwd: Exact or scaled down duplicate: File:Fotothek df n-35 0000034 Facharbeiter für Drucktechnik.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal pose. 176.239.72.246 21:34, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:21, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

noFoP in Japan copyvio Kkairri (talk) 00:31, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educative value, out of COM:SCOPE. Stas (talk) 00:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description says "!!! D I S C L A I M E R !!! This material should only be used for personal use and not for commercial use because it could be protected by copyright. Therefore those who use it improperly are solely responsible!" FunkMonk (talk) 01:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, superseded by File:Forest Route 23.svg which uses the correct font. Rschen7754 04:46, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohamed.tarkiss (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All images below are selfies or lifted from other websites. Out of scope/copyvios.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:56, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:06, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Spaceastron (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All images uploaded by Spaceastron apparently taken from http://www.lidax.com/en/ in some form or fashion. One image even has the LIDAX logo watermarked on it. Uploader claims own work, but per precautionary principle, these images should not be kept.

Huntster (t @ c) 05:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:06, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 06:42, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:07, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project's scope

~ Nahid Talk 11:00, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Henaselakesan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution images without EXIF, dubious self copyright claim

KOLI (talk) 11:05, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammad Mohsin Al Aziz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, promotional uploads.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 12:57, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Behnam nazemi 31 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://farmande.tv/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/farmande3-7-2.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Behnam nazemi 31 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and book illustration. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 8 July 2017 (UTC) My english not good , but how can i send license???, (Please Show Me?) Thanks Behnam nazemi 31 (talk) 23:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-trivial logos and documents. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Victor Costa de Paula (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Catha 90 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.acupari.com/img/tandem-acupari-06-060.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:13, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:14, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:14, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Graham1892 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samsavaclav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are works by Michal Ožibko, who is a living artist. There is no evidence that the uploader has the right to freely license these works.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Samsavaclav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are works by Miroslav Javůrek, a living artist. There is no evidence that the uploader has the right to freely license these works.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Samsavaclav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are works by Zdeněk Beran who died in 2014. There is no evidence that the uploader has the right to freely license them.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Samsavaclav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are works by Pavel Holas who died in 2015. There is no evidence that the uploader has the right to freely license them.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Exist agreetments of all authors! But I was send scans of dokuments via email many years ago. All rights is OK, and dead authors confirmed upload his artwork for free wiki use. (talk to me) 17:47, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:17, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored some per OTRS permission. --Krd 12:15, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused, non-notable business logo Guanaco (talk) 16:27, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused, non-notable business logo Guanaco (talk) 16:28, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kotob77 (contribs)

[edit]

Orphaned images of equations; no image needed, TeX is sufficient; {{BadJPG}}.

Leyo 19:49, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal artwork, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image - out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:41, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license Kamolan (talk) 08:38, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-own work! also Wikimapia is Creative Commons (CC-BY-SA) license KOLI (talk) 09:50, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Henaselakesan

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary art (believe it or not) in a museum in Russia. No freedom of panorama. Retired electrician (talk) 10:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:21, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2379028/mediaviewer/rm3280346624 86.152.123.206 15:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:01, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be out of scope. Guanaco (talk) 07:07, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF autobiography, out of scope Guanaco (talk) 07:08, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. Mr. Smart ℒION☎️I👨‍👩‍07:22, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. Mr. Smart ℒION☎️I👨‍👩‍07:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Viiictorrr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of a free license.

Яй (talk) 07:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All files are allowed to be used within the license: Copyright (c) 2017. RFE/RL, Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave NW, Ste 400, Washington DC 20036.

Here's local credentials allowing these photos to be used in non-commercial purposes: license «Copyright © 2017 RFE/RL, Inc. Передруковується з дозволу Радіо Вільна Європа / Радіо Свобода» --Goo3 (talk) 10:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal information, copyright violation 114.124.200.200 10:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:08, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal information, copyright violation 114.124.200.200 10:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:08, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 11:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 11:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. / no source not own work Pitpisit (talk) 11:56, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment : If it's absolutely necessary, I won't object to the deletion of the image. I created it many years ago, when I was unaware of the benefits of SVG. However, I am unsure why the nominator has mentioned such claims as "no source not own work" (such details are clearly spelt out on the file page) and "unused trivial logos of questionable notability" (the fact that an image is unused should have no major bearing on its right to exist on the Commons, and the Proton Suprima S is certainly notable enough in its own right). Furthermore, I am inclined to believe that the nominator has some questionable judgement or motives, judging by the contents of their talk page. Therefore, I find it difficult to take User:Pitpisit 's deletion request seriously, and I will leave the final 'keep/delete' decision to other, more reputable and experienced Commons members. Regards, Aero777 (talk) 12:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you --Pitpisit (talk) 13:20, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Pitpisit (talk) 13:20, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 11:56, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:08, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 11:57, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:07, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:07, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:07, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:07, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want my photos to be on this site Adamthompson88 (talk) 14:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:06, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:06, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:06, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:06, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted packaging as main aspect of the image (not De minimis, not simple design).

Ies (talk) 14:50, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most, kept one, per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 11:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation http://www.fandimefilmu.cz/osoba/698-corin-hardy 86.152.123.206 14:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 11:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, illegible diagram. Apocheir (talk) 21:07, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, unidentified, not useful. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:46, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:01, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image blurred Svetlov Artem (talk) 14:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:46, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Midnight-MIke (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Professional-quality images which lack exif files and could be found on the internet prior to upload. (See for instance [2]). Uploaded as "own work" but probably copyright violations.

Takeaway (talk) 15:29, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:52, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wronginformation TNSE G SWAPNA AGRI KPM (talk) 16:21, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested. --Sealle (talk) 13:49, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Puramyun31 (talk · contribs)

This photo (and cropped version) is licensed as CC-BY-SA-2.0 on Flickr, but it is a magazine cover, so the files should probably be deleted due to improper licensing on Flickr, as the name of the uploader of the file on Flickr isn't even the same as the name of the person who performed the concert photography.

Logan Talk Contributions 22:14, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio Béria Lima msg 20:59, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Puramyun31 (talk · contribs)

Puramyun31 (talk) 03:10, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 17:29, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Puramyun31 (talk · contribs)

5 photos of Asuka Nishi, Japanese voice actress.

These photos are taken without her consent. (see COM:BLP, COM:CSCR#Japan.) She is requesting they are deleted. (cf. her radio program Asuka Nishi's Delicate Zone #57 8m7s–; official tweets [3][4]) --Waiesu (talk) 13:26, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per previous discussions, photo of a public figure, taken in a public place during a public event, fall into the COM:CSCR#Japan exceptions. If there's really a legal problem with those pictures, the personality or the producer/agent should contact legal@wikimedia.org instead with some proof. They're also welcome to send us an official picture, see COM:OTRS/ja for more information. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:04, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Puramyun31 (talk · contribs)

Not in use, doubtful educational value.

— Racconish ☎ 20:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. --Sealle (talk) 13:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Puramyun31 (talk · contribs)

COM:TOY issues. Lots of stuffed animals that would be copyrightable in the US. Part of a large batch upload. Most were fine or de minimus but these are a little too close for comfort so I'm bringing them here.

Majora (talk) 02:53, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This DR seems to be somewhat too speculative because the DR is opened for just the reason "a little too close for comfort", with regard to com:assume good faith. The photos are clearly not intended to depict the toys as main subjects. if really the images are deleted per the reason "a little too close for comfort", these images (which are introduced as examples of de minimis, the images include "copyrightable parts" even at the centers of these) will not also be survived at all. --Puramyun31 (talk) 11:29, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting something because it is a little too close to comfort is a Commons policy. In any case, I spent literally hours combing through this batch of uploads from this site eliminating dozens of images that had stuffed animals in them that were actually de minimis. Of course you think they are fine, you wouldn't have uploaded them if you didn't. However, if you seriously think that something like File:1월 21일 오마이걸 팬사인회 (90).jpg is de minimis we have a much larger issue. That is a copyrighted Cartoon Network cartoon character. Front and center in the image. In a location that would also render the image useless if removed. I'm willing to work with you here. Crop out some parts of the images if need be. But to call these all de minimis is reaching way too far. --Majora (talk) 21:25, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- Also note that I could not find a CC-BY icon on the source page. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:39, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per UDR. I restored the files where the toy is only de minimis (half hidden, blurred, etc.). I cropped some files. Yann (talk) 07:31, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Puramyun31 (talk · contribs)

No metadata, license laundering is suspected and/or the uploader on lofter is not the copyright owner. -Mys_721tx (talk) 18:12, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Channel does not exist, unable to verify the official status. -Mys_721tx (talk) 18:12, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

partial  Keep @Mys 721tx: just "no metadata" is not simply a reason of deletion, since there is no real clue of first publishing of the images at other webpage(s) and the lofter blog(s) copied from the webpage(s)(per image search results, 160106 幻城媒体探班 最近好喜欢刘蕾啊 嘻嘻 (刘力菲 谢蕾蕾) imagecut search 1imagecut search 2 【一个脑洞】 跟之前写的菲蕾那篇连起来的 (郑丹妮 陈珂) imagecut search 1 imagecut search 2 and the youtube video 【TPE48一期生徵選形象歌曲】「向前走」★小花絮③★.webm has archived page (https://archive.fo/kxdSt) and license info HTML code (https://imgur.com/a/QJgDGeg).

except 啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊 无限循环播放 (秦岚), since the images are from http://peachring.com/weibo/user/5628148368/4283527518323172

Puramyun31 (talk) 00:03, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per the precautionary principle, low resolution and the lack of metadata are sufficient to remove a file. Your example has perfectly demonstrated that the license declaration of some files from Lofter are untrustworthy. -Mys_721tx (talk) 02:49, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't say "where the images are from another website(s)" as seperately (image by image), but just repeatly said "low resolution and the lack of metadata". this is a speculation. there are many low resolution/no metadata files but the fact is not necessarily a reason of deletion. also the youtube video at this DR has archived page and license info as i said above, and the cc license of the video is irrevocable.Puramyun31 (talk) 03:07, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  1. By your own words, four files in this DR alone are not licensed by their author. The previous DR on this page also shows files that have this problem. Taking those into account, Lofter is untrustworthy for its copyright declaration and metadata must be required for verification. The lack thereof also warrants deletion.
  1. The channel in question is not verified on Youtube. Merely having the word "official" does not mean this channel is indeed the copyright owner. There is at least one case the YouTube licensing is abused. Until the identity of the channel has been confirmed, the irrevocability of the CC license is irrelevant to the discussion.
  1. If you notice any editor that are importing resolution/no metadata files en masse from an untrustworthy source, feel free to start a separated DR. However, the existence of such files are not valid defense in this DR.
-Mys_721tx (talk) 05:23, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"By your own words, four files in this DR alone are not licensed by their author. The previous DR on this page also shows files that have this problem. Taking those into account, Lofter is untrustworthy for its copyright declaration and metadata must be required for verification. The lack thereof also warrants deletion." : the reason of "The previous DR" as you said is not related to the existance of metadata but I opened the DR just according to blog user's comment, as the reason that is screenshots from a TV program from another site. also don't make the mistake of blanket/hasty generalization of "trustworthiness" of lofter images without talking about "where the images are from another website(s)" for each lofter images.

"The channel in question is not verified on Youtube. Merely having the word "official" does not mean this channel is indeed the copyright owner. There is at least one case the YouTube licensing is abused. Until the identity of the channel has been confirmed, the irrevocability of the CC license is irrelevant to the discussion." : the youtube account (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCumoYG0Ijzya5vcry8szlzQ, "author" section of the file page) is official account, as per HTML Code of archived TPE48 official website Puramyun31 (talk) 10:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I had no doubt that the blog owner is the copyright holder of the images in their posts, and no metadata is not sufficient grounds to argue deletion under COM:PCP, as I have an uploaded of a picture I took myself on the English Wikipedia with no metadata other than the program I used to edit it (en:File:FNC Entertainment entrance.jpg). So, as I searched for more conclusive evidence, I was led to a link which redirects to the user's Weibo account. There, I made the unfortunate discovery of the following text: "好多鱼【本博图禁止去logo、商用以及任何形式二改,转载请注明出处。】". Google Translate: "A lot of fish [This blog is forbidden to go to logo, commercial and any form of second change, please indicate the source. 】". I don't understand Chinese, but it seems pretty clear derivatives and commercial use is prohibited. I think this cements the user's credibility as the photographer, but not in the way we needed.

These pictures, as well as some others not found on the Lofter blog, are found on other webpages. COM:PCP can be applied here.

This is based on the blog contents. It is mostly fan art, with an occasional picture. This other photo has a second watermarked, but its unclear of what it says. This might be screenshot (is that a cropped logo in the upper left?). This is mostly a stab at the dark, really... I don't think there's sufficient evidence either way.

Lofter is a blog service, so scrutiny should be made by account rather than the site as a whole. We don't call Flickr untrustworthy based solely on the amount of license laudering that goes on there. xplicit 09:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit: according to these searches (1 2 3), "160106 幻城媒体探班" photo themselves don't exist on the weibo blog https://www.weibo.com/rofs0712, so the weibo text does not applicable in this case. Puramyun31 ( talk) 07:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit: Precisely because Lofter is made of user generated content, all images from it should not be viewed as freely-licensed by default. The same applies to images from Flickr. The lack of metadata and the low resolution certainly do not help the case. -05:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, all but 【TPE48一期生徵選形象歌曲】「向前走」★小花絮③★.webm. Ruthven (msg) 14:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Puramyun31 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Oops, sorry for my mistake. these are accidentally uploaded.

Puramyun31 (talk) 14:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:24, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of de:User:Mailtosap

[edit]

All these images were uploaded on the German wikipedia by de:User:Mailtosap and then moved to Commons by User:Wdwdbot.

Unused images with no description or categories, and the filenames aren't much help either. They seem to be measurements of something? Without some description, these images are useless. --Apocheir (talk) 21:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:54, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: This low-quality file clearly adds nothing educationally distinct to the collection of private photo albums we already hold. Jotzet (talk) 23:45, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:54, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by SVG files in Category:Old South Carolina Highway shields. This version is missing the rounded corners, and the font is wrong (notice the 8).

Rschen7754 06:12, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of Android OS which is copyrighted I suppose. Mr. Smart ℒION☎️I👨‍👩‍06:56, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Screenshots of Android should be fine under the Apache license, but I'm not sure what the copyright status of the background image would be. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 14:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Lewis Hulbert. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio Farchering (talk) 14:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:21, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio Farchering (talk) 14:13, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tatididi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical postcards. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a work of an employee of the Federal Transit Administration; rather it was sourced from a document prepared by the MTA, a state agency of New York. Works by NYS employees are not in the public domain. Train2104 (talk) 16:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image like File:Heydar Aliyev Baku Oil Refinery 3.jpg Hystrix (talk) 18:08, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:50, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image like File:Heydar Aliyev Baku Oil Refinery 3.jpg Hystrix (talk) 18:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:50, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Infringes on the copyright of the WWF. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:11, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:49, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused apparent dup of File:W7935920-8354 stat CTrebova2005.jpg. Not byte-for-byte equal but same graphical size and visually equal. Sending to DR instead of {{Dup}} because I don't understand what the actual difference is and if it matters. Same uploader, but who is long-inactive. DMacks (talk) 20:13, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 21:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this picture is not an own work of the uploader as he claims, it is a picture from a photoshoot for Lilac magazine. MR.HJH (talk) 22:49, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader is clearly not the creator of this image. It seems to have been ripped off the net or scanned from a book. Since we aren't certain of the actual creator, we can't determine the copyright status of the image. Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 00:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been ripped off the web. The website it's taken from doesn't credit it in any way. Since we don't know know who the actual author is, and we don't know when it was created, we can't determine the copyright status of the image. Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 00:29, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from the internet without permission Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:07, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:12, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:14, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wurde als jpg doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 05:38, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random unidentified street, not useful. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not self-created. Google Images finds decades-old results. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:47, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified slum, not useful. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:52, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, no source, no author, no date of creation. Copyright status is unclear. Sealle (talk) 05:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from author, "a Japanese photographer" (see desc). Sealle (talk) 06:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 06:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyrighted novel. Mr. Smart ℒION☎️I👨‍👩‍07:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:19, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Bosnia and Herzegovina: sculpture from 2014 Smooth O (talk) 10:22, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Becuase this isn't my file and Becuase it's uploaded to the Wong article Reegs12 (talk) 10:34, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work as it's a third party logo, Equivalent media at English wikipedia is non-free. 80.176.129.180 11:20, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free logo from en-wiki en:File:European Court of Human Rights logo.svg Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bigger copy here. Yann (talk) 12:00, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from Facebook. Please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 12:02, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exarchaat_van_Afrika 82.161.202.195 12:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Year of publication is unknown; not enough information to determine PD status. Wcam (talk) 12:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 13:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is a registered trademark euipo number 1900364, can not be released in CC ZioNicco (talk) 13:37, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted file. Kingofcruiserweight (talk) 14:00, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the pictured sculpture. No FOP for sculptures in the U.S. Powers (talk) 14:16, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I should point out that the uploader's user name matches the surname of the sculptor. But there's no evidence that they are the same person. Powers (talk) 14:18, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patatcmts (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seems to be works by US government, so proper license tag should be used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://scontent-sjc2-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/s640x640/sh0.08/e35/c0.135.1080.1080/19121969_241444523008779_6944070830313701376_n.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i0.wp.com/marshallislandsjournal.com/Journal_WP/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/WCPFC-12-16.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted Snowflake91 (talk) 14:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a possibly copyrighted material. Yasu (talk) 15:02, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the catalog for an art exhibition at the Olomouc Museum of Art. I doubt that the upoader actually created the book cover and has the right to freely license it, See http://www.culturenet.cz/en/news/fascination-with-reality-hyperrealism-in-czech-painting/n:22818/ .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I´m not designer of cover, but I make photo of this book and I think, that is OK for intelectual property - this is not a book, this is photo of it... (talk to me) 17:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per COM:DW. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture shown here is the work of Martin Janecky. The photograph is also credited to him. There is no evidence the uploader has the right to freely license either the photo or the sculpture. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

was meant to be overwrite PaulBommel (talk) 15:32, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad license. Probably PD-ineligible, but it's a non-notable logo. Out of scope. Guanaco (talk) 15:59, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission grant for non-Wikipedia use is unclear. Guanaco (talk) 16:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requires permission for reuse. No evidence of permission for use on Commons. Guanaco (talk) 16:13, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission from the photographer or of a free license. Guanaco (talk) 16:14, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia / Wikimedia Commons is not a social network providing free webspace. User just made two Global edits, see https://tools.wmflabs.org/guc/?user=Eng+Gilbert : Image upload + writing his CV in EN-Wikipedia. Zaccarias (talk) 16:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear free licensing ("I won't mind" doesn't necessarily release copyright). Globally replaced by the higher-resolution File:SNES mouse.jpg. Guanaco (talk) 16:48, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License only permits promotional use, not criticism etc. Guanaco (talk) 16:50, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free license [5] Guanaco (talk) 16:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requires permission for reuse. Guanaco (talk) 16:52, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requires permission for reuse. Guanaco (talk) 16:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely this is used by the source site as fair use. No evidence they hold the copyright. Guanaco (talk) 16:57, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Authorship for this particular version is unclear. The underlying design seems fine under Iranian and US law, but if this has original authorship the status is unclear. Superseded by File:SAVAK.svg. If a black-and-white version of that is desired, I can create it. Guanaco (talk) 17:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Evidence of permission not properly given through OTRS. Superseded by wikitext pie charts. Guanaco (talk) 17:38, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable logo with unclear permission; out of scope. Guanaco (talk) 17:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear whether this is {{Attribution}} or a non-free requirement that the file must not be renamed. Guanaco (talk) 17:42, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear whether this is {{Attribution}} or a non-free requirement that the file must not be renamed. Guanaco (talk) 17:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is the iPhone background an mage by NASA, if so, then keep as being PD. Otherwise, this needs to be cropped (first screens),and the thumbnails when searching needs to be attributed. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is the iPhone background an image by NASA (and thereby PD)? Are the icons in the iPhone settings menu PD? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:11, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of scope. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:19, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Memorial by finnish sculptor Vilho Aalto in Malmi cemetery, Helsinki, Finland , unveiled in 1963. Not in PD, no FOP for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 18:48, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, non encylopedic, meaningless name, unknown location Hugo.arg (talk) 19:40, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphaned, replaced by File:Diketen v4.svg. Leyo 19:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of table of text with uneven alignment, could easily be replaced by wikitext as usual DMacks (talk) 20:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, orphaned/replaced by File:1,4 addition of organolithium in the presence of HMPA.png. Leyo 20:07, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low graphical quality (low res, "light" bonds), have File:Caprolactamsynthese.svg among others in Category:Caprolactam as good replacements DMacks (talk) 20:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Circle with a gradient on one side. Unused, unclear purpose, better images of circles with gradients exist in Commons. Apocheir (talk) 20:11, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid license, but the logo may be public domain: either ineligible, or an old design. Guanaco (talk) 20:27, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-derivative license. Guanaco (talk) 20:34, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly public domain, depending on the year of first publication, copyright notice, renewal, etc. I'm not able to verify the status. If Texas Tech holds the copyright, it's under a noncommercial license. Guanaco (talk) 20:41, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license. "original naming wil be preserved": either attribution, or a non-free restriction on filename. Guanaco (talk) 21:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License indicates that JCPA has rights to this image but not the general public. Guanaco (talk) 21:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, unused icon. Better icons exist in Category:C++. Apocheir (talk) 21:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication in the source that the picture was taken in 1944. Texniths (talk) 21:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

courtesy deletion- mistake Youngayoung (talk) 17:27, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image has been here since May and I was unable to find any use of it on the internet prior to this upload. Commons licenses are irrevocable. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:54, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:52, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no evidence this picture was taken by the uploader. The picture is all over the web. Bbb23 (talk) 22:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is taken by me and uploaded by me using Wikimedia Commons. The event itself is all over the internet. The photo itself has no exact replica. If you can find it, then please link me and THEN take it down. Obviously that wouldn't happen because I took this picture. Franci DB (talk) 22:40, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, concerning the mass of similar copyrighted photographs (just a quick guhgel search) taken during the shooting, if you took the photograph by yourself, why don't you simply upload a better quality version that includes the EXIF data which would prove your authorship? Jotzet (talk) 01:44, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I have reuploaded the original file File:Anne Hathaway in 2016.jpg with exif data - PLEASE KEEP THAT FILE. Please delete these "File:Anne Hathaway at 2016 TIFF.png" and "File:Anne Hathaway at TIFF 2016.png". Thank you. Franci DB (talk) 22:40, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Moheen Reeyad. --Yann (talk) 13:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I wish to replace it with a better version. Monsterblader (talk) 23:08, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's no need to request the deletion. Simply upload a better version which will substitute the existing file. Jotzet (talk) 23:58, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission. --Yann (talk) 13:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by SVG files in Category:1970 North Dakota Highway shields. This version is missing the rounded corners.

Rschen7754 06:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Also:[reply]

Rschen7754 06:34, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: we do not usually delete png that have a svg version. Use {{Vector version available}} instead. Ruthven (msg) 20:47, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Post-mortem reconsideration, following request in my talk page: files have been replaced and are thus not in use anymore. Revision #251999591. Keeping the blank File:North Dakota wide.png, just in case. --Ruthven (msg) 07:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

plus d'actualité 2A01:CB1C:607:2F00:D5FF:6BAF:1118:2E00 06:49, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: dubious copyright for this French blogger's picture. Ruthven (msg) 20:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be CC BY-NC [6]. Guanaco (talk) 16:21, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Commons:Grandfathered old files. Ruthven (msg) 20:57, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is probably not the person stated in this image, ticket:2017070810007667. I cannot find the image at the ANEFO collection from where it has been uploade. Elly (talk) 11:56, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The file can easily be found in the ANEFO collection of the Dutch National Archives, under a CC-O license. If metadata is incorrect, then the false desription should be changed, but a file shouldn't be deleted. I will act accordingly: change the name & the description and improve the link to the original file. Vysotsky (talk) 20:37, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Vysotsky. --Storkk (talk) 12:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of a free license. Beside a bigger color copy with a watermark is available here. Yann (talk) 12:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This specific image comes from a collection of the New York Public Library and is found here but other copies exist. As can be seen from the file description, this is stated to be a private study by Hine, who died in 1940 so this work should be PD and the image provides no evidence of any copyright notice. There are a few other Hine/Ellis Island images already on the commons though I have not analysed them in detail. According to Eastman Museum, the person in this photo is Rabbi Shalom Haim Nadoff. Yann, the colourised image you point to is a series of such colourisation done by Matt Loughrey of My Colorful Past in Westport, Ireland per this article but those may even obtain a new copyright due to the selective creative decisions made in the colourising process. Hine did not take any color photos to my knowledge and certainly not at that time. Ww2censor (talk) 14:27, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the information. This is a much better source, which should be mentioned in the description. I suppose that the source country is USA, so the license mentioned is wrong. It may be {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-no renewal}}, and we need more information to confirm these. And why then the NYPL says "Date created: 1905"? I wish we could get a HR version... Regards, Yann (talk) 14:49, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you read it carefully, the Eastman Museum article pretty much cements the 1926 date, so the no-notice is likely more correct, though you are more expert than I on that front. Ww2censor (talk) 15:57, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: If the photo was created in 1926 and the photographer died in 1940, then its copyright was very likely not renewed if it was ever registered. --Storkk (talk) 13:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

به دلیل آپلود عکس جدید علیرضا خالوندی تبار (talk) 13:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Delete. Nobody knows him. --176.239.7.157 16:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. File mentioned by seb is in use on fawiki as a user page image, so is in scope... it was not correctly nominated (no delete template, no notification of uploader), so since it is not blatantly a copyright violation, if there are remaining concerns, it should be properly nominated and the uploader informed. --Storkk (talk) 13:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zbisem (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bardzo proszę o pozostawienie w Commons zdjęć, które przesłał Zbisem - pl:Zbigniew Semadeni. Jestem bardzo wdzięczna Panu Zbigniewowi za zdjęcie Pani Prof. Konopackiej-Semadeni - było bardzo potrzebne w biogramie, który pisałam. Dziękuję też za próbę podzielenia się z nami innymi cennymi pamiątkami ze swojego rodzinnego albumu. Proszę, nie zmarnujmy okazji na utrwalenie w Wikipedii śladów naszej historii. Serdecznie pozdrawiam --Joanna Kośmider (talk) 05:04, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to what I wrote yesterday on a discussion page of EugeneZelenko, I provide the following data:

The file: Allan Andrzej Semadeni 1944 na balkonie ul Noakowskiego was taken by me (Zbigniew Semadeni) on 17 April 1944; I remember this was my brother's birthday. The photo was taken at the balcony at Noakowskiego street 20, apt. 3, in Warsaw, Poland. This was the last his photo before his death on August 19, 1944.

The file: Tadeusz Semadeni plynie kraulem.jpg was also taken by me (Zbigniew Semadeni) on June 4, 1944. I remember that was Sunday, my father's birthday. He took me to a swimming platform at Vistula river in Warsaw, Poland, and I took some pictures.

The file: Irena Semadeni-Konopacka w Szczecinie.jpg was taken by me (Zbigniew Semadeni) on December 3, 1966, in Szczecin, Poland. This was wedding party of a friend of mine. I took this picture of my mother, Irena Semadeni (who was a professor of Madical Academy in Szczecin).

The file: Wladyslaw Semadeni (1865-1930).jpg was taken by an unknown person in Warsaw, Poland, after he had moved to Warsaw in 1910, probably in 1920, when he was 55 years old. He was my grandfather and this picture is in our family archive.

I think will be good idea to confirm authorship for own works via Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Other photos falls under {{PD-Polish}}, so it should be used as proper license tag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent (to permissions-pl@wikimedia.org) three mails concerning: Allan Andrzej Semadeni 1944 na balkonie ul Noakowskiego.jpg, Tadeusz Semadeni plynie kraulem.jpg, Irena Semadeni-Konopacka w Szczecinie.jpg. I declared myself as a copyright holder and wrote the text according to the template. I also addedd {{PD-Polish}} to the file: Wladyslaw Semadeni (1865-1930).jpg. Zbisem (talk) 20:48, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS permissions processed, links to tickets added. Ankry (talk) 21:13, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just searched family photos and found another picture of my grandfather Władysław with the date Feb. 1901 written by him on the reverse. I then used CREATOR to locate this new photo at Wikimedia Commons. I also realized that I had made a mistake when I described another photo of both: Władysław and his wife Helena, which is already in W.Commons. I compared those pictures with a picture of Helena dated "Marzec 1893" and realized that the photo of Władysław+Helena must have been taken ca. 1895. I added an explanation to the file. Eugene, could you correct the name of the file from File:Helena i Wladyslaw Semadeni 1909.jpg to File:Helena i Wladyslaw Semadeni 1895.jpg This file has not been used in Wikipedia yet. Zbisem (talk) 11:25, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. File renamed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

At the file Wladyslaw Semadeni (1865-1930).jpg I just found the comment: "w opisie grafiki należy podać źródło i datę publikacji" I added the following explanation: "Zdjęcie, wykonane wkrótce po I Wojnie Światowej, wisiało w publicznym miejscu w Domu Parafii Ewangelicko-Reformowanej w Warszawie, ul. Leszno 20, obok innych portretów Superintendentów Kościoła Ewangelicko-Reformowanego w Polsce (w dzisiejszej terminologii: biskupów) aż do II Wojny Światowej. Budynek spłonął w 1944 r. Obecnie kopia zdjęcia znajduje się w archiwum rodziny Semadeni." I do not know whether this photo has been also published in print. Zbisem (talk) 09:59, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS permission accepted for three of them, PD for other. --Storkk (talk) 13:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by WikiAnika as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not cc-by-sa; see https://www.medienservice.sachsen.de/medien/news/210778/assets Wdwd (talk) 08:47, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have to cancel "not cc-by-sa" and add "not cc-by".
{{PD-GermanGov}} (für Amtliche Werke) does not apply.
Das Änderungsverbot gilt leider. --Anika (talk) 09:34, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Die Frage ist ferner, ob die Grafik die notwendige Schöpfungshöhe erreicht. Siehe zum Vergleich: de:Datei:Logo-rettungsgasse-at.png. Möglicherweise nach de zu verschieben.--Partynia (talk) 17:31, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and over the threshold of originality. Ruthven (msg) 14:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]