Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/07/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 3rd, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lord Vamanadeva, the dwarf incarnation.jpg - This image, along with a few others (not all) has been uploaded by this new editor from a website with copyright notice. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 01:00, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done by Daphne Lantier. Ruthven (msg) 11:56, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Загрузивший файл участник признался, что это не его работа (пруф). Согласно этой ссылке фото есть в музее Боратынского и датируется 1950 годом. Sigwald (talk) 10:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:14, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused, sole upl. Pibwl (talk) 16:13, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want it up anymore 2tbc1887 (talk) 12:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - This image, along with a few others (not all) has been uploaded by this new editor from a website with copyright notice. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 18:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inappropriate user name. Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 20:27, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:26, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate user name. Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 20:29, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 20:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:27, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 21:07, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:40, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 21:07, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:39, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal album pic. OoS E4024 (talk) 11:33, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 12:19, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, per COM:SELFIE Rodrigolopes (talk) 20:51, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 12:19, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TaufikKhan06 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works, no permission.

Yann (talk) 08:00, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:48, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Quelle und falscher Urheber, leider keine Rechte BlümchenXY (talk) 10:22, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Falsche Quelle und falscher Urheber leider keine Rechte BlümchenXY (talk) 10:50, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Quelle und falscher Urheber leider keine Rechte BlümchenXY (talk) 10:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Falsche Quelle und falscher Urheber leider keine Rechte BlümchenXY (talk) 10:51, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No references to author data. A lot of books were published less then 70 years ago.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Book without information about authors.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:35, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by P.Roebuck (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appears to be promotional material, out of scope

Guanaco (talk) 18:57, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by P.Roebuck (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Political posters. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:52, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created in error Gavin Collins (talk) 12:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, author's req. --Achim (talk) 11:30, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by P.Roebuck -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of https://www.filmcentro.com/profile/kaikala-satyanarayana-biography. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:26, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:46, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://cd1d.com/sites/default/files/imageupload/image_square/60960-13-ans-caravaning-mar-11032009-1302.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:45, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.ruchemania.fr/IMG/jpg/republiquedusauvage.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not "own work", copyright status unclear. El Grafo (talk) 13:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: this is a colourised version of this 1948 portrait of Einstein by Yousef Karsch who died in 2002, so still in copyright until 2073. Ww2censor (talk) 22:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny picture (60×60) and near-duplicate of File:River_Wharfe,_Castley.jpg bjh21 (talk) 23:26, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + same author of photo!. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-resolution near-duplicate of File:Ashbrook Bridge, Cheshire.jpg, which was uploaded a few minutes later by the same user. bjh21 (talk) 23:58, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support. No point in having a poorer near-idential version. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 12:58, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 14:38, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personal image showoff BukhariSaeed (talk) 07:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Im not sure I have rights to post Kimbopro (talk) 04:54, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete, {{copyvio}}. LX (talk, contribs) 09:36, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no, you havn't. --JuTa 07:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation --Frze > talk 17:27, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Sealle. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото встречается в Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад http://srdsc.com/ru/projects/fast-assault-craft-kentavr/ Dogad75 (talk) 09:51, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:40, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, см. http://dumskaya.net/news/noveyshie-bronekatera-akkekrman-i-berdyansk-vysh-064685/ Dogad75 (talk) 09:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:43, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, blurry, watermark Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete. The watermark can easily be removed by cropping, but I agree that the image is of unusable poor quality, and is not used in any projects. --DAJF (talk) 01:00, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:43, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be some form of upload artefact which has created a mostly grey image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:18, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the file is corrupt. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:47, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image claimed to be from the 1800s but obviously not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:44, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photo of Roman Romanyuk, a Ukrainian politician. There are pages about him on Russian and Ukrainian Wikipedia: ru:Романюк, Роман Сергеевич and uk:Романюк Роман Сергійович. Hence the fact that this photo is currently unused does not mean that it is useless. The date was obviously a mistake, the description tells that the photo was taken in 1995, so I corrected the date. However, the main issue is who is the author / the copyright owner, since the description specifies "various people" as author. The issue is the same as for File:Роман Романюк в парламенте 2017.jpg and File:Роман Романюк в детском доме Ромашка 2016.jpg. Google does not find these images elsewhere, so it may be that the uploader owns the copyright, but so far it is not stated in the description. --Off-shell (talk) 09:25, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS permissions of various authors are needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:52, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image with attribution problems, i.e. author is not uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:45, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS permissions of various authors are needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:55, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the image shown on the display screen Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:46, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC license from Flickr is not truthful --- This image was not likely taken by author Cristal Montanez as she is also in the pageant pictured. Here is the Flickr photo link listed in the source field. The other images in this album are magazine cover scans which are also not her authorship, also demonstrating that this photo is not hers. seb26 (talk) 14:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam for a website where one can order photos online. Also out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 15:17, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:58, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I took this photo, intend to re-upload better quality version after deletion PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I took this photo, intend to re-upload better quality version after deletion PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I took this photo, intend to re-upload better quality version after deletion PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ghetocmax (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promo images, out of scope

Mahir256 (talk) 01:54, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mcdd27 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused promo images, out of scope

Mahir256 (talk) 01:56, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Snic12345 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a photo album; I'm surprised these didn't get caught before

Mahir256 (talk) 02:13, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aztiraw Serrot Zepol (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality EXIF-free images unlikely to be own work

Mahir256 (talk) 02:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It' a commercial logo. Motoko C. K. (talk) 03:02, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self made deletion request - the original uploader wishes to remove this image. 180.149.192.133 03:40, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation (possibly taken from here), no EXIF data, and the only edit of the uploader in the project. Helmy oved 04:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr Streps (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A free source must be provided for this map

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vicjane77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope bad quality images

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lourdes Burgueño (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal/promotional images. The article have been erased https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lourdes_Burgue%C3%B1o

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 08:56, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antsangel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, artworks without obvious educational use

BrightRaven (talk) 09:11, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 09:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:Znak mesta trebon II.svg; author meant to upload a new version but created 2 new files with minor changes instead. TFerenczy (talk) 09:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:Znak mesta trebon II.svg; author meant to upload a new version but created 2 new files with minor changes instead. TFerenczy (talk) 09:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork by . The permission of the artists is necessary. BrightRaven (talk) 09:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING. Ruthven (msg) 09:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Malik maryam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, artworks without obvious educational use

BrightRaven (talk) 09:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems a tourist panel with the map of the monastery, thus copyrighted and not free.

This affects also the crop Jaulian complex. Taxila.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 09:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small, selfie Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:54, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent map of the archeological site, on display for tourists, which is not in the public domain.

Ruthven (msg) 09:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear source given for the drawing on the right, unclear if one or both of the images are from the Galveston Daily News. (Image on the left is File:CrashCrushTx.jpg.) Image seems to be a screenshot, making it unlikely that the drawing is the uploader's own work as stated. Gapfall (talk) 10:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused content, apparently uploaded for use in es:FUNDACION PROFESOR ANIBAL ARIZTIA, which has been deleted, presumably for lack of notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 10:50, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invisible coin. Out of scope. Mr. Smart ℒION☎️I👨‍👩‍11:00, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qwer093 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, the appearance of several of the images, and previous publications found elsewhere.

LX (talk, contribs) 11:07, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CRISTIAN21934 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copright violations: Images were copied from a variety of websites but uploaded as own work to Commons.

Takeaway (talk) 11:28, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by CRISTIAN21934 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violations: Images were copied from a variety of websites but uploaded as own work to Commons.

Takeaway (talk) 12:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete there is no freedom of panorama in France, besides which this image is of webpage quality without any metadata, it is also found on a number of online webpages, so is most likely not even the work of the uploader. Ww2censor (talk) 11:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Talitiainen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All files come from several blogs. It is unclear if the uploader has COM:PERMISSION from the copyright holders to upload these files to Wikimedia Commons under their present license. For the uploader: please follow the procedure as mention in COM:OTRS.

Takeaway (talk) 12:01, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment from the uploader: Some images mentioned above (such as File:Bossam and jokbal.jpg) are from Pixabay, where images are uploaded under public domain (CC0). Other images are from the blog posts that have a Creative Commons license icon (by 4.0, by 2.0, or by 2.0 sa; as specified) at the bottom (bottom right or bottom left of the blog post, but above the comment section). You can click the source URLs to verify. --Talitiainen (talk) 22:54, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep My bad. Didn't see the tiny copyright signs down there. Retract deletion request. Sorry for the inconvenience Talitiainen. - Takeaway (talk) 15:00, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. Daphne Lantier 18:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of an Israeli organization. This design cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 12:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is an Israeli NGO logo and is used in the NGO's program pages in wikipedia. What should be the correct copyright calsification?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoharkapalan (talk • contribs)
As I explained user:Zoharkapalan in he.Wikipedia, the fact this is an NGO and not a for-profit one doesn't matter at all. Since this is a logo of an organization, unless they release it to any use (unlikely to happen), the logo can be used in he.Wikipedia in Fair Use only and has nothing to do in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 10:56, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has even coordinates, but actually it presents nothing in particular. Panek (talk) 12:07, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, album coverart , equivalent at English Wikipedia under non-free fair use w:File:The Beatles - 1+.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:17, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User who uploaded these files has done very few edits in his wiki (mostly promotion and some useless edits). All his activty is out of scope. File:Natural place.jpg has bad quality

/St1995 12:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Text is nonsense, with no historical merit Rsteen (talk) 13:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama exception for modern buildings in France. Ww2censor (talk) 13:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Text is nonsense, with no historical merit Rsteen (talk) 13:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Text is nonsense, with no historical merit Rsteen (talk) 13:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Blurred watermark. Better resolutions can be found TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by F-Den (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two photos of a young person, one holding a trophy he didn't create, the other image is of medals. Highly unlikely own work, notice the facebook size on the picture on the wall, etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in metadata shows this was in and out of facebook before here, Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:22, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With the information given, date October 2016 (dubious), photographer unknown; the image cannot be licensed as it is. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Offical document. Proper license tag should be specified if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be really from April 2017, "source = Book book" doesn't seem to be licensed correctly. There is no indication that the author has been dead 70 years, the only W. Rae Wilson i could find on Google search is a character on a television show. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:27, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NoorAlavi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical books. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Dead site" doesn't mean that you can help yourself to the images. COM:COPYVIO whether the site is alive or not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valid source, therefore no way to validate the license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient information to know if this image is what it claims to be. In any case, it would not be CC0. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.banjaratimes.com/mediac/400_0/media/ecc6759db0a214d5ffff8935ffffe41e.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BedrockPerson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files swiped from a variety of sources, ex: "pinterest" or "blogspot", not own work, cannot be licensed by uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:11, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C77ciLTXwAEIeYX.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:11, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:11, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously deleted in another DR. Now upaded here from Flickr. The Flickr accunt was set up when the image was last deleted, an only have one image Still missing EXIF. I call COM:LL on this. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:11, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I find the claim of "own work" on this image dubious. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:11, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aser11223344 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.saudiprojects.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/widetest3_0007.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aser11223344 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these small files which seem to be culled from the internet.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:43, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohalucky13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Utterly no confidence that any of these band images were created by uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Collectall (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images outside of COM:SCOPE, Commons is not a personal photo gallery.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:35, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 04:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Collectall (talk · contribs)

[edit]

At least one of these images is highly unlikely to be own work (see overprinting). The others may or may not be, but are so small they could have come from Facebook. Besides which, they appear to be out of scope.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:50, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly dubious claim of own work on this image of a steam locomotive in operation. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:50, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo has copyright inscription other than uploader's, same for File:Нічний Червоноград.jpg with some author's inscription. Other uploads (a few) are suspected, but without evidence. Pibwl (talk) 14:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC) Same for File:Церква св.Йосафата.jpg - copied from [1] with cropped signature.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wosa1279 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appears to be promotional upload by art gallery, without permission from the artists whose works are depicted. Four cameras in five images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Salonijain011 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Six blurry logos, none of which were created by the uploader or they wouldn't be this blurry.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of licensing permission. The uploader, while evading a block, blanked out a {{copyvio}} tag, claiming that "consent" (for what? by whom?) was given. LX (talk, contribs) 14:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alano Motors Pvt Ltd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:ADVERTising... pages of a catalog. Commons isn't here to help you build your business.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SanaSDcardkonasabahay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Wallpaper patterns not created by uploader but claimed as own work. All appear to be from company "Topboss Plastic"

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:54, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shahadat154 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on any of these images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shahadat154 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own work. For example, one of the files has also been uploaded as someone else's work, see w:File:MdBayazidKhanPanniMP.jpg.

Stefan2 (talk) 22:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"collage of Hans Ulrich Steger" without artists permission Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"screenshot" seems unlikely own work, see black borders. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Twitter account logo https://twitter.com/IrinaMironova/status/855099705621069824 Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:00, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted pic re-uploaded. I don't see if the problem was solved. E4024 (talk) 10:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:28, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the license at the given source is CC BY-SA 3.0, there are older and larger unfree copies of this image available (some even with a bowl that was removed from this image), so I doubt that license was ever valid. Didym (talk) 15:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eg. this one?  Delete Ankry (talk) 19:24, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Redison1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scope/copyright doubt: these band photos and album cover (a) can only be used to illustrate the subject, which was deleted once from es.wikipedia for notability issues (es:Noise Of Death) and (b) appear on other design portfolio sites with all rights reserved statements [2] [3] [4]

seb26 (talk) 15:27, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No author ship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:33, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 15:35, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 15:35, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License does not apply, see here. No indication that this stamp would be PD for other reasons. Jcb (talk) 15:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 15:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License does not apply, see here. No indication that this stamp would be PD for other reasons. Jcb (talk) 15:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License does not apply, see here. No indication that this stamp would be PD for other reasons. Jcb (talk) 15:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License does not apply, see here. No indication that this stamp would be PD for other reasons. Jcb (talk) 15:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License does not apply, see here. No indication that this stamp would be PD for other reasons. Jcb (talk) 15:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2D drawing, appears in part on other web sites - e.g. https://pantip.com/topic/35818336 Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

verkeerde foto wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 16:14, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:17, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License does not show a valid criteria Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

autopromo, along with other uploads: file:Pronto-office.jpg, file:www.prontocreative.co.uk 9798.jpg file:Prontocreative-profile-250.png Pibwl (talk) 16:29, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional picture. The article on Portuguese was deleted... Sturm (talk) 16:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

autopromo, along with only other upload File:500 Promotional items 20309 Balck.jpg Pibwl (talk) 16:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope thumbnail, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 16:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in a scope, bad quality, with inscription, along with File:Eike von Pastoral.jpg Pibwl (talk) 16:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused book cover, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 16:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own information in PDF file. Too long. Who will read the whole? Out of scope. Mr. Smart ℒION☎️I👨‍👩‍16:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested by phone. She had lost access to her account and cannot place the request herself Ravi (talk) 16:29, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional picture. The article on Portuguese was deleted... Sturm (talk) 16:29, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional picture. The article on Portuguese was deleted... Sturm (talk) 16:29, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional picture. The article on Portuguese was deleted... Sturm (talk) 16:29, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional picture. The article on Portuguese was deleted... Sturm (talk) 16:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional picture. The article on Portuguese was deleted... Sturm (talk) 16:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, along with the rest of user's uploads: File:Captureadada.png, File:Capturedsgsg.png, File:Bruhbruhaddf.png Pibwl (talk) 16:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, no cat., doesn't seem to be in a scope, no useful description Pibwl (talk) 16:40, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol from http://gruppofamiglie.sitiwebs.com/attachments/Image/PAPA_BENEDETTO_XVI_3D.jpg Bramfab (talk) 16:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

El sistema de subida no me permitía borrarla y se ha subido de todas formas. Santamarcanda (talk) 17:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cooyright violation, see the copyright notice on left corner 178.7.124.96 17:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of licence at http://colorido-medio.deviantart.com/art/porcupine-sleeping-497072725 Farchering (talk) 17:42, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Has anyone contacted the author from that page to see whether she was the one who uploaded this and/or whether she is willing to release it under a free license? 0x0077BE (talk) 19:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite Image - COM:DW - background is internet wallpaper - e.g. http://www.androidwallpapercentral.com/Android/Download/Lenovo-Tab3-10-wallpapers/Season/All-seasons-in-one.aspx Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:49, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope and/or autopromo, along with other two uploads File:Logo saydam.png, File:Iç kapak foto.jpg Pibwl (talk) 18:01, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sign of permission Shev123 (talk) 18:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused autopromo logo, along with the rest of uploads File:555-organic.png, File:Organic555.png Pibwl (talk) 18:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license (taken from Twitter account) Rashinseita (talk) 18:08, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

family photo, unused, doesn't seem to be in a scope Pibwl (talk) 18:10, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rather not an own work - a photo of a photo? Pibwl (talk) 18:11, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful own work, unused, no category, no apparent notability Pibwl (talk) 18:13, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - book's back cover, unused Pibwl (talk) 18:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DesignAnna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Évariste Jonchère ‎died in 1956. Copyright violation.

Chassipress (talk) 18:27, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 18:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope book cover, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 18:44, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope painting, unused, unclear copyright, as well as the second upload File:Floating Jack.jpg Pibwl (talk) 18:49, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:Suppression image

Added a new version with same name MDDN (talk) 19:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contradictory upload ownership claims, see User talk:Jmabel#File permission error Bri (talk) 19:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needless thumbnail-sized duplicate of File:Four dead soldiers in the woods near Little Round Top, Gettysburg, Pa.jpg with extremely sloppy file description – incorrect date, incorrect authorship information, incorrect copyright claims and no categories. LX (talk, contribs) 19:43, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope and questionable copyright claims.

Apparently grabbed from http://www.digitalnewschannel.com/approfondimenti/il-colore-nellera-digitale-409/cos-e-il-colore. Because of the big, promotional logo, the illustration is hardly useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.

The uploader claims that the illustration is copyrighted but published by the author (who the uploader incorrectly claims is named "Lo spettro") under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 4.0 license. However, the source site has a Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved) copyright notice and no sign of any free licensing, so that claim seems to be completely made up. The illustration is a relatively simple representation of mere facts, but some aspects of the illustration, such as the drop shadow, may put it above the threshold of originality. LX (talk, contribs) 19:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberschaft zweifelhaft. Profi-Fotografie aus Druckwerk Offenbacherjung (talk) 20:01, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

URV - Fischnaller ist laut Artikel erst 2006 gestorben. Xocolatl (talk) 20:08, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

URV - Grosz ist erst 1959 gestorben. Xocolatl (talk) 20:10, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low quality, no usage → out of scope Nihar Jindal (talk) 20:11, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haley0096 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of the Commons:Project scope.

Hystrix (talk) 20:14, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful licence as Flickr-page referred to does not exist. Might be unfree. The Banner (talk) 09:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: license can not be confirmed Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License incorrect 207.237.14.197 20:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Previously deleted item. --176.239.84.148 15:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: can just be done with a wikitable Sofosbuvir (talk) 20:26, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate user name. Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 20:29, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 20:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. KediÇobanı🐈 20:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. KediÇobanı🐈 20:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fcarvajalbrown (talk · contribs)

[edit]

"The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that Wikipedia article be written." Unclear what is required and whether the creator actually intended to allow use outside Wikipedia. Also, these would require OTRS verification because the copyright holder may be a third party.

Guanaco (talk) 20:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted object of à Star Wars film Clodion (talk) 20:33, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted object of à Star Wars film Clodion (talk) 20:33, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted object of à Star Wars film Clodion (talk) 20:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted object of à Star Wars film Clodion (talk) 20:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate user name. Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 20:35, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: locked acct. Daphne Lantier 18:20, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file of this artist is not recommended to load this file it contains all your rights see on this page: 1 and 2 Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 20:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:20, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate user name. Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 20:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Huda Alomar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Vanispamcruftisement; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted object of à Star Wars film. Clodion (talk) 20:39, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour, la personne sur la photo, un client que j'ai emmené en parachute tandem en 2008 lors de son enterrement de vie de garçon souhaite qu'elle disparaisse. Il nous a contacté par SMS ce jour 03 juillet 2017 pour nous demander de la supprimer. Cordialement. Régis Dufour. Si vous avez besoin de me contacter par tel 0698860433 ou par mail dregcla@wanadoo.fr ou contact@aair-parachutisme.fr Dregcla (talk) 20:51, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. KediÇobanı🐈 20:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 20:56, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

previously published here Rodrigolopes (talk) 20:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertissement. Pointless for encyclopedia. KediÇobanı🐈 20:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. KediÇobanı🐈 20:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. KediÇobanı🐈 21:00, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sign of permission Shev123 (talk) 21:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate user name. Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 21:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate user name. Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 21:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 21:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 21:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 21:08, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copied from textbook Sofosbuvir (talk) 21:08, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 21:09, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that the copyright holder is properly attributed and don't made bad use of them." Bad use could be anything the copyright holder doesn't like Guanaco (talk) 21:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file should be deleted as it is a screenshot of the app GyazMail, an app copyrighted by GyazSquare Inc. (per app's website [1]). This means that any screenshots of the app are copyrighted works (per COM:Screenshots which have to be deleted as Commons only allows free works. KAP03 (talk) 21:17, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred, unkown mountain of india Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission (© 2009-2016) + copy of http://boris-lejeune.com/borislejeune.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission (© 2009-2016) + copy of http://boris-lejeune.com/Photos/Jeanne/Jeanne-C.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:40, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred picture. There are many better examples in [Varanasi at night] category Oo91 (talk) 21:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. KediÇobanı🐈 21:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://cd1d.com/sites/default/files/imageupload/image_square/219456-hulements-en-scene-03012013-1450.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. KediÇobanı🐈 21:49, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License does not apply, see here. No indication that this stamp would be PD for other reasons. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License does not apply, see here. No indication that this stamp would be PD for other reasons. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License does not apply, see here. No indication that this stamp would be PD for other reasons. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License does not apply, see here. No indication that this stamp would be PD for other reasons. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License does not apply, see here. No indication that this stamp would be PD for other reasons. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. KediÇobanı🐈 21:51, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:11, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:12, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:13, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope advert Pibwl (talk) 22:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:17, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope, user created no articles except for user talk page. Mjrmtg (talk) 22:18, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't see to be in a scope, along with File:Step vijf.jpg, File:Step vier.jpg, File:Step drie.jpg Pibwl (talk) 22:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown person, unclear copyright, uncategorized Pibwl (talk) 22:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope -book scan Pibwl (talk) 22:39, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il s'agit de Gabriel Tapié de Céleyran et non de Michel. Je propose la modification du titre. 109.31.193.105 22:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Copyright expires in 2080. Off-shell (talk) 23:01, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:26, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/hanoi_panorama-skyline_gallery/21952271173/in/datetaken/ — Le Loy (talk) 23:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader has also published some other copyrighted pictures (File:Ssfddf.jpg from the same Flickr account), it's probably worth checking all of their uploads. — Le Loy (talk) 23:25, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:26, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia KediÇobanı🐈 23:24, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:26, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor Qualityː Visibilty of aircraft so poor that is can barely be seen; incredibly grainy PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:39, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:26, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: there is no evidence the photographer died more than 70+ years ago which is the usual copyright term. I think more details are needed to keep this image. Ww2censor (talk) 23:44, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:26, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused uncategorized thumbnail photo of a person with non apparent notability (similarly other user's uploads) Pibwl (talk) 18:13, 3 July 2017 (UTC) "Own work" might mean, that the user took a photo of this tableau: File:Keluarga Haji Ahmad b Haji Ali.png, and not each of them.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. KediÇobanı🐈 20:54, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, artwork without obvious educational use BrightRaven (talk) 09:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The image is of a one-off (one-of-a-kind) experimental print integrating both woodcut and oil-stick techniques. The blurry appearance of the photo is true to the image because of the artist's desired blurring effect. This print won a $1000 prize in an exhibition at Virginia Commonwealth University's Anderson Gallery, for which the juror was a curator from the Corcoran Gallery. I am the artist of the print and give my copyright permission for it to be in the public domain images of Wikimedia Commons.--Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 19:20, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. Every artist likes to think their work is one-of-a-kind something special. P 1 9 9   13:33, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With both date and author unknown, and the appearance of coming from a halftoned source, the licensing given is highly unlikely to be correct. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Both have been added. 2600:387:5:803:0:0:0:82 15:01, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The license is still incorrect because it's from a 1991 book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:09, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Mmmkay, give me a minute. I fix. 2600:387:5:803:0:0:0:82 15:35, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9   13:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Padarn Lake Railway Train at Llanberis Terminal - geograph.org.uk - 254283.jpg except that this one has a watermark at the bottom. bjh21 (talk) 19:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this one gives due credit to its creator I would say it should be kept and the uncredited one should be chucked away.DavidAHull (talk) 21:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
According to COM:WATERMARK, in-image watermarks are discouraged. As I understand it, Commons prefers its metadata to stay in the metadata (namely the file decscription page), which in this case provides the same information as the watermark. --bjh21 (talk) 00:24, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so long as Mr Jones is properly recognised then I'm happy. Will you replace accordingly in the Llanberis Lake Railway article (and any others) when you chuck the watermarked one away?DavidAHull (talk) 07:59, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think I already have done: Special:GlobalUsage/Geograph-254283-by-Eric-Jones.jpg --bjh21 (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. All objections by User:DavidAHull have been addressed. P 1 9 9   13:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unscharfes, nichtssagendes Bild Mehlauge (talk) 20:44, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unusable. Hundreds of better ones at Category:Birds in flight. P 1 9 9   13:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My fault. KediÇobanı🐈 20:49, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: category. Discussion kept. P 1 9 9   14:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. KediÇobanı🐈 20:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

  •  Keep Difficulty in understanding what "pointless" means for the requester. The picture is perfectly in scope of/with Commons. If I want to write an article on weddings in Turkey, wedding dresses or anything similar is Kedi Çobanı going to take a picture for me, when we delete the existing ones? Let's stop trying to make a point to say "I delete therefore I exist". Kedi Çobanı, you already exist with your valuable contributions to the Wiki projects, please do not try to make a point by destroying our archives for the many lacking (or very poor) articles we've got about Turkey, its people and its culture in all WPs. We will need these pictures. --E4024 (talk) 06:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: adequate quality wedding photo. P 1 9 9   13:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. KediÇobanı🐈 21:01, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

  •  Keep In the Category:Hijabs in Turkey, there are 39 pictures, at the moment I write. Just like Duygu Dağ, the women in that category (some are not Turks, you must know very well) are part of Category:Women of Turkey.Are all those files "pointful" for you? Why have you suddenly proposed the deletion of several Turkish women, in a selective manner? "Some" women of Turkey are "pointless" for you? What is behind this selective approach? Please don't remind me things like "other stuff exist", tell me truth. --E4024 (talk) 11:26, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yine selamlar @E4024: , siz mealen Türk kadınlarla neden uğraştığımı yazmışsınız. Burada benim kimseyle uğraştığım yok. Dün kullanıcı mesaj sayfasının amacına uymayan, reklam, tanıtım içeren sayfaları etiketledim. Bu fotoğraf da o sayfalardan birinde bulunuyordu. Fotoğrafların başka her hangi bir maddede bulunmadıklarını gördüm. Ayrıca hijab kategorisi ile de alakası yok gibi. Women of Turkey kategorisi ile alakası var. --KediÇobanı🐈 18:04, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   13:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate user name. Advertissement. KediÇobanı🐈 21:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

 Weak keep This is stiill a user talk page and it useful for discussions so it could be kept for that purpose but there is has lots of nonsense written over so I wouldn't keep it for that purpose but because it is a user talk page, I would go for a weak keep. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually i want to tag for blockade this user talk page but i can't, because this user name includes advertissement a car shop. This user talk page included advertissement to this car shop. Thanks. --KediÇobanı🐈 12:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Kept: but blocked as per COM:IU. P 1 9 9   14:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless for encyclopedia. KediÇobanı🐈 21:35, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

 Keep. He is a painter. The DR nomination is pointless. --E4024 (talk) 06:27, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: personal out-of-scop photo. This is just self-promotion. P 1 9 9   13:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not my Work --Ralf Roleček 10:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

If you upload an image but then decide that you don't want it to be on Commons any more, then you have the right to list it at Commons:Deletion requests, and the other users there may sympathise with you as the uploader and support a courtesy deletion. However, if the consensus is to keep the image, it will be kept, and you have no special right to protest about this.


Kept: You will have to do a much better job motivating your deletion request. Sorry. --Natuur12 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not na Work --Ralf Roleček 09:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

If you upload an image but then decide that you don't want it to be on Commons any more, then you have the right to list it at Commons:Deletion requests, and the other users there may sympathise with you as the uploader and support a courtesy deletion. However, if the consensus is to keep the image, it will be kept, and you have no special right to protest about this. Keep --Frze > talk 09:42, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: You will have to do a much better job motivating your deletion request. Sorry. --Natuur12 (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a 1927 work from an American author; death dates are irrelevant and there's no information about publication, so no reason to think this is PD. Prosfilaes (talk) 01:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment (I was uploader) My understanding when uploading that 75 years after death *was* ok for US artists as well. It is not? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Only works first published after 2002 or created after 1977 are life+70 in the US.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 23:08, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the author of the note depicted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:35, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As is the case with ALL the NCRT pictures I have uploaded, I gained consent from both the administrators of the synagogue AND authors of the works depicted (if I could) before uploading. The authors only condition was her name be censored, which obviously was complied with. 2600:387:5:803:0:0:0:82 14:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BedrockPerson (talk • contribs) [reply]

The owner of the synagogue doesn't have the rights to license many of your images and while you might have gotten permission, you didn't pass that along to Commons via COM:OTRS methods, so at present the images do not have permission because you claimed all this as your own work. I did put the block on your account because you had prior warnings not to upload copyright violations. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:01, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It was never claimed as my own work. Only three NCRT pictures uploaded were not taken by me, and this is clearly labeled as one of the three. The upload form all made clear this was NOT my work. Also: I had ONE prior warning. Not warnings. 2600:387:5:803:0:0:0:82 15:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The words on this file have copyright, we need permission from the author or their heirs via COM:OTRS. Your claim that you did not say this was own work is disputed by your edits on the initial upload template [5]. February 8th you were warned, April 20th you were again warned; that's two. Ping administratorYann. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:08, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
First of all: no. You pointed out I was warned twice for copyright violation, when in reality anyone can see in my talk that the February 8th warning has absolutely nothing to do with copyright. So again, I only have one warning for copyright violation. Secondly, consent was verbal and I'm not even going to be within the author's state until July 28th. I have no other method of communicating to the author directly. What am I supposed to do? Also, instead of linking the page history you just linked the URL for editing. 2600:387:5:803:0:0:0:82 15:14, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see! I suppose I thought "author" meant who took the picture, not the picture's content. So, that is my mistake. 2600:387:5:803:0:0:0:82 15:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Actually we need both authorisations if the object pictured is an artwork (from the artist, and from the photographer). Ruthven (msg) 07:55, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of art without permission from artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permission was granted by building administrators who have the rights to this work. 2600:387:5:803:0:0:0:82 15:01, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read COM:L; you seem to be missing very important points, such as the rights remain with the creator, not the owner of artworks. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:10, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:55, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vadim Muzychenko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images of people at a metting, with difficulties such as images on displays, and unknown if the uploader actually created the images, due to metadata (at least four cameras), etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The photos are used on Wikipedia pages, and I see no difficulties with this. The different cameras were used at different times, i.e. one camera in 2008 (Panasonic, one image), another one in 2010 (Konika Minolta, one image), the next in 2012 (Canon EOS 550D, one image), and several newest images starting from 2013 were taken by Canon EOS 1100D. This is not unusual. --Off-shell (talk) 09:56, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use, and the background ican be considered dm. Ruthven (msg) 07:56, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a fake flag. I can't found any realiable source in both English and Vietnamese language to back it up Lão Ngoan Đồng (talk) 08:53, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This was once discussed in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Early Nguyen Dynasty Flag.svg and the file was deleted. But the nominated file is used in 2 projects and so automatically in scope. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is unsourced flag. In Vietnamese Wikipedia (its mother project), we already discussed it here as an unreliable flag, please help us by deleting this flag. Using it in (some) projects is not a so valid argument to keep. Lão Ngoan Đồng (talk) 01:22, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - different from with you state, being in use in article space IS a valid argument to keep. --Jcb (talk) 15:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a fake flag which is unsourced (not one single academic source in Vietnamese describle this flag). And the sockmaster who uploaded them (C) has been blocked in so many times because of this reason. I already have removed them from all Wikipedias due to this reason, please delete them and dont let this guy add these flags again for block evasion. Lão Ngoan Đồng (talk) 06:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no longer used in article space. Daphne Lantier 21:01, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musée Annam (talk • contribs) 2017-11-24T03:34:48‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 18:55, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is faked and unsourced flag. I cannot find any reliable source to back it up. Lão Ngoan Đồng (talk) 08:55, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. The file is used in 8 projects at moment. It does not matter, how bad, erroneous and misleading the file is. Used files are automatically in project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

WRONG LICENSE: This flag is taken from a website and then got attributed as a work of a Wikipedian? By the way, no source to prove the authencity. Lão Ngoan Đồng (talk) 07:00, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:01, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sarah.chapman1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artworks by Shane Guffogg. The permission of the artist is necessary.

BrightRaven (talk) 09:09, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How do I show that permission from the Artist is given? Sarah.chapman1 (talk)

I received permission from Mr. Guffogg and took the photos of the artwork. Please let me know how to show this to avoid getting these images deleted. Thank you Sarah.chapman1 (talk)

Hello. You need to follow this procedure: COM:OTRS. BrightRaven (talk) 07:00, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:01, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably personal image Jugydmort (talk) 23:10, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 13:30, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like self-PR of artist, used only on personal page, similar images already were deleted Jugydmort (talk) 09:54, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 17:09, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Possibly an LTA by Fouadadan, this vandal who is uploading hoax files and creating hoax pages. That file was uploaded by the third time by Norislamic, a possible Fouadadan sock. 64.113.165.126 18:00, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:44, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 04:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:42, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are two random photos of German terrorists from the 1970ies which were at the time distributed by Durch agency Anefo and are now part of the collections of the National Archive of the Netherlands. If you look at the source, it is clear that the agency distributed the images for reporting purposes, but they certainly did not photograph the terrorists themselves; the photographer is said to be "unknown". So Anefo never had the copyright for these photos, and consequently no copyright was transferred to the archive, which makes the Creative Commons license tag they use invalid. Because of this, the photos should be deleted as potential copyvios per the precautionary principle.

Rosenzweig τ 17:01, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep(1) Dutch Nationaal Archives (Nationaal Archief) made >310,000 photographs of press agency ANEFO available under a Creative Commons license in 2012. Several ten thousands of these photographs are labeled "Fotograaf onbekend" ("Photographer unknown"). (A search with the terms "fotograaf onbekend cc" ten minutes ago resulted in 63,956 hits.) That doesn't matter at all: because of the contracts of the photographers, who were employed by Anefo, they sold their copyrights of these photographs to Anefo. On its turn, Anefo transferred the copyright to the Dutch National Archives, who made the photographs available under CC-BY-SA-3.0.
(2) The Dutch National Archives recently changed the license of all these >310,000 photographs to CC-0 (including the license of these photographs).
(3) While taking a closer look at these photographs, they look like passport photographs. These photographs don't meet the treshold of originality (Dutch jurisprudence art. 4.2), more specifically explained here with photographs. Vysotsky (talk) 19:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All of your lengthy explanations about ANEFO, copyright transfer etc. don't matter if ANEFO didn't have rights to those photos in the first place. As I wrote, I think that is what is the case here: ANEFO took some available photos of those people and reproduced them. Or do you propose they sent their own photographers to take pictures of those fugitive terrorists who then posed nicely?
Re your second argument (passport photographs don't meet the threshold of originality in Dutch law): These are photographs of German people. Why should Dutch law apply to them? Were the photos taken in the Netherlands, or by a Dutch photographer? Unless you have proof to the contrary, we'll have to assume what makes sense: That these photos were taken in Germany by Germans, and were published in conjunction with the hunt for fugitive terrorists in Germany and elsewhere. By German law (codified law and case law), even passport photos taken by automated photo booths are protected as Lichtbild for 50 years after first publication (or after creation if never published). If photos are taken by a human photographer, they are normally protected 70 years pma. So by these standards, these ca. 1977 photos are definitely not in the public domain. --Rosenzweig τ 18:33, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To expand on that: Getty and Keystone also claim copyright to the photo of Wagner, see [6][7], though I'm sure they don't actually own any copyright to it as well. Those photos were circulated by the German police back then and used in "wanted" posters like the one at [8]. So naturally photo agencies picked them up as well. There are legal provisions (at least in Germany) for the police and the press to use photos in cases like these (the public search for criminals, missing people etc.), regardless of any copyrights. But that certainly does not mean that any photo agency acquires rights to these photos besides using them for that one specified purpose. --Rosenzweig τ 19:04, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Friederike Krabbe rented an appartment in Scheveningen (the Netherlands) under a false name in July 1977. If the police would have liked to use recent photographs of Krabbe and Wagner after the murder on Schleyer in October 1977, it is not unlikely that they would have used the most recent photographs they could lay their hands on, e.g. photographs supplied for the rental contract in the Netherlands. Do I know that for certain? No, I don't, but it is in fact far more likely than using old German photographs, and the Krabbe and Wagner photographs clearly look like passport photographs. So yes, I do think Dutch copyright law applies, and that the photographs don't meet the treshold of originality and are therefore not copyrighted. Vysotsky (talk) 21:25, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So to summarise, we don't know for sure if those are Dutch or German photographs. Then it is clear what to do: Apply the Precautionary principle and delete the files. --Rosenzweig τ 22:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment@E4024: Sure there are problems with the files. I explained them above in detail. --Rosenzweig τ 14:01, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur : HBM (pas clair), autorisation nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 07:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 21:51, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sign of permission Shev123 (talk) 17:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Shev123, je dispose de l'autorisation écrite du photographe et pourrais la mettre à dispo en ligne... à condition de trouver le moyen de le faire ! Merci de m'indiquer la marche à suivre pour ajouter ce fichier qui permettra de maintenir ce portrait dans Wikicommons et dans la fiche de M. Restellini. Cordialement,--Claire76009 (talk) 13:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:OTRS ticket received for this file. Linedwell (talk) 18:34, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I just read the ticket, "libre de droits" = "royalty-free", it's not enough for Commons, the author must explictely specify a licence (CC0 or CC BY 4.0, or CC BY-SA 4.0) --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:45, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This ticket is currently in process, please wait before the deletion of this file. Thanks --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 13:14, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS. Daphne Lantier 21:03, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of an artist dead in 2009, autorization needed Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 19:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending OTRS ticket: ticket:2017070410010615 --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 19:21, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS. Daphne Lantier 21:03, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:p2_0m0crbyQJ:gyazsquare.com/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us