Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/06/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 2nd, 2017

Commons:Deletion requests/File:List 277 48.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yangyi1.jpg

[edit]

Obviously non-free work. WhitePhosphorus (talk) 13:09, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 14:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Renée Fox.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Shalor (Wiki Ed) as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The artist's website doesn't have anything to show that the content was released under this license. Yann (talk) 18:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fayeginsburg.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Shalor (Wiki Ed) as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Page has copyright notice at the bottom, doesn't seem to be a compatible copyright. Yann (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Official portraits of Donald Trump

[edit]

Apparently ticket:2017050810015705 contains information from an unknown individual claiming that this photograph (and derivatives) are not works of the US government and thereby are NOT public domain. The photographer is Doug Coulter. Apparently confidentiality agreements don't allow OTRS agents to even confirm nor deny whether Doug Coulter is the person who this ticket is from (ping Odder). It is absolutely astounding that an official portrait of the US President is not in the public domain, but there we go, apparently photos of the Oompah Loompah-in-chief need to be deleted from Commmons.

Slangcamms (talk) 03:01, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm somewhat skeptical. I think a considerable amount of more research needs to be done before we should consider deletion. MB298 (talk) 03:02, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I'm an OTRS agent and can verify that the ticket demonstrates beyond any reasonable doubt that this picture is not in the public domain. I can confirm the image is not a work of the US government, but can't say much more than that without violating the confidentiality agreement all OTRS agents sign. I will say WMF Legal has seen the ticket and indicated support for the determination made by OTRS agents. The research has been done, but it's based on information that is not public and can't be made public. ~ Rob13Talk 03:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • You may be an OTRS agent, but you just argued that an image is not in the public domain when the issue is that whitehouse.gov released it under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Trump and his administration are idiots, uptil a few weeks ago, there were no images on the WH flickr stream, and when some were added, they were tagged with the wrong license (public domain instead of USgovernment), its obvious people here have no idea what they are doing, regardless of what Doug claims, as long as he was officially charged to take the presidential/VPresidential pics, the rights to those images officially belong to the US Government, not him..he did not do it for free, he was paid for it by the USGovernment.--Stemoc 03:51, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete Sorry Stemoc, the pictures are NOT in the public domain based on the information in the OTRS ticket. Due to confidentiality agreements I can not comment any further than to say the information provided by Rob is essentially correct. - Cameron11598(talk) 03:56, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • Whether or not it is in the public domain is not the issue. The issue is that that whitehouse.gov released it under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Stemoc: I will say that your description of how the picture was taken is inaccurate in full. (Not trying to sound like an ass, just trying to be succinct so as not to say something without meaning to.) ~ Rob13Talk 04:21, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • So Lets see, according to the super secret otrs people, the author, Doug Coulter only has issues with the President's image being used here freely, not the VP's which he also took? (talk about due diligence) ...--Stemoc 22:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • For purposes of the Copyright Act, a work of the United States government is "a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties." 17 U.S.C. § 101. I find it highly unlikely that a photographer hired on a contract basis is an "officer" or "employee" of the federal government. Rebbing 00:09, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • OTRS agent (verify): I've followed this ticket at OTRS since the first email, and can confirm that it appears that the image is not in the public domain, from what has detirmined in the responses, hence  Delete. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 08:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Whether or not it is in the public domain is not the issue. The issue is that that whitehouse.gov released it under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete: OTRS knows how to handle complex issues, and the Foundation's legal team is OK with the OTRS decision. If OTRS says delete, it's probably right. (Stemoc, on the other hand, has given no evidence that someone "did not do it for free", or that the U.S. government was the one that paid someone else. See the craziness at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Donald Trump President-elect portrait.jpg to see how vague claims have gone wrong on this file before. BU Rob13 has said specifically that it's "not a work of the US government". By the way, the U.S. federal government can have copyright on works that weren't originally their own: {{PD-USGov}} only applies to work that was "born" as a federal employee's work product at creation. If the work was made by a private party then the rights are sold or transferred to the government, the copyright is not extinguished and {{PD-USGov}} doesn't apply. I'm not saying any of that necessarily applies here, just that it's possible for such works to exist, so current "ownership" by the federal government is not a 100% indicator of {{PD-USGov}}.) --Closeapple (talk) 09:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Closeapple and BU Rob13: can the community see a statement made by WMF Legal? I understand we have to take your word for the content of the OTRS ticket, but surely whatever WMF has said should be shared with the community so that this decision can be made. Finnusertop (talk) 19:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC) Pinging some more OTRS people to see if they could answer: @Cameron11598 and Josve05a: Finnusertop (talk) 22:03, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • OTRS agent (verify): Any statement made by the WMF Legal team would still be under similar privacy protection as an email by any other person. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:11, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • @Josve05a: Can the community at least get WMF Legal on the record saying 'We looked at the OTRS ticket and the concern is valid'? We should be able to hear it from them directly. I don't distrust you when you tell us that this has been the case. But this is a high profile case and the community deserves to get all the information we can if we are expected to reach a community decision instead of an office action. Finnusertop (talk) 23:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • You would have to ask them. However, if they were t make such a statement, then they may be in deep water regarding safe harbour since they would publically acknowledge a copyright problem existing on their servers without doing an office action. I'll leave it up to the individual staffers if they want to respond (or waive the privacy of their possible responses) and participate in this community discussion. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment this is just insane. Couldn't we have more details and, if necessary, can't the actual author be persuaded to allow the use of the image ? If that picture is deleted, I suggest we replace it by this one until we have a better, more recent one. (This one is more recent but kind of unflattering - not that I really care about flattering Trump but we need to remain somewhat neutral). Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 10:49, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment This is the picture as it appears in Federal buildings, (can confirm JKF Federal Building) so would it not be considered fair use on the English Wikipedia? As regardless of this bizarre quagmire, this remains the image used to represent him in official government protocol. --Simtropolitan (talk) 17:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Simtropolitan: Fair use is only if the image itself is being discussed. As clarified above only works created by the US-GOV are PD, not merely works owned by them that were created by third parties. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:22, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete - If an OTRS volunteer (BU Rob13) has already concluded that the images are not in the public domain and were not CC licensed by the copyright owner, then what is the purpose of this discussion? Shouldn't the images be promptly deleted? - MrX 18:08, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • It should be temporarily deleted (we err on the side of caution with copyright issues) while we discuss this, but the claim that whitehouse.gov lied when they released it under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License is an extraordinary claim, and extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. The fact that so many OTRS volunteers have posted comments that indicate that they were not even aware that whitehouse.gov under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, instead commenting about whether it is in the public domain, leads me to suspect that they are taking the word of whoever contacted them without examining the evidence of the other party that claims to own the copyright. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Can a OTRS user confirm that the original B&W image is the image that is in mentioned in the ticket. This image was released by the Joint Congressional Inauguration Committee on 15 December 2016 at a now dead link at http://www.inaugural.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Entire%20Program.pdf , which I have not been able to find an archived copy of. This image differs to the possibly colourized version in not only resolution and software, but more importantly the colour version was edited at 11 January 2017 on which the date metadate was also modifed. Furthermore the B&W image has a more precise APEX shutter speed and APEX aperture, as well as differing slightly in Focal plane X resolution and IIM version. If the colour version is the problem we can use the version by Gage that was manually coloured. If however the B&W version is copyrighted then work must be done. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Emir of Wikipedia: Please don't go removing these images from use until this discussion is closed. I put back the one you removed on Simple English Wikipedia. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The White House's copyright policy states that, "[e]xcept where otherwise noted, third-party content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License." There is no such indication presented with this photograph, so it appears to me that this is either a work of the federal government, in which case there is no copyright, or a third-party work, in which case we have the White House's assertion that this image is licensed under a Commons-compatible license. Accepting the OTRS-related concerns as valid, I see no reason we can't simply change the license tags on these files and close this as "keep." Rebbing 00:05, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It's abuse of OTRS to deliver takedown request to volunteers who have signed a confidentiality clause that prevents them from sharing relevant information with the community, who are then asked to come to a consensus while in the dark. Takedown requests should be posted as DMCA Takedown Notices that WMF has pledged to publish. Finnusertop (talk) 00:21, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Rebbing, barring a convincing rebuttal. I'll watch for one. Mandruss (talk) 00:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unless/until this can be resolved. We have an obligation to remove potentially copyrighted images that we likely don't have to right to publish. I agree that it's not fair the the OTRS agents for them to have to deal with it, but they ended up with it anyway. Waggie (talk) 02:03, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedily, as an unambiguous copyright violation based on information available in the OTRS ticket. The image was taken by Doug Coulter in December of 2016 before Trump assumed office. The original request made to OTRS was not a DMCA takedown notice. Upon investigation of a request made in the ticket, it was made clear that we do not have a license from the copyright owner. OTRS has thoroughly pursued a free license for this image, but we have not received such a license after waiting a substantial period. Allowing this DR to continue to run is pointless, as the community does not have the specific information to determine if the images are acceptable, and OTRS agents cannot disclose those details. A consensus to keep the images based on incomplete information and incorrect conjecture would be irrelevant, as it would not be capable of resolving the unambiguous lack of an acceptable license originating from the copyright owner. - Reventtalk 02:17, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undid close: per Rebbing, barring a convincing rebuttal. This image was posted at whitehouse.gov[1] under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.[2] A convincing rebuttal would be a comment directly from a member of the Wikimedia legal team explaining, in detail, how that they determined that whitehouse.gov is lying about the copyright status of the image. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Although User:BU Rob13 makes a good argument that it is not public domain, the argument given by User:Smallbones on Jimbo Wales' Wikipedia talk page strongly supports CC-BY status. To wit, a) the photo is on the White House website with no copyright information given, [4] and b) the White House website says all material is CC-BY licensed unless otherwise indicated. [5] Unless and until one of the better users than us who has right to read the secret content explicitly tells us that this is a copyright violation on the White House's part, I'm going to assume they just didn't think of it. Remember that it is NOT our duty to verify whether a reliable publisher obtained its permissions correctly, or else every single publisher we go to that has CC-BY licensed material, whoever it is, cannot be believed and their material cannot be used, and Commons must explicitly restrict its scope to subscriber-generated material -- that is, if we can trust our subscribers, which seems dodgier than trusting the publishers. Maybe you just want to get some gasoline and pour it on the servers and declare it a sacrifice to the copyright god? Wnt (talk) 19:16, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Wnt: Revent, a respected admin with extensive knowledge of copyright law, has access to the ticket. They closed as delete on the basis of the information therein, so your request for a "better user" has already been granted. ~ Rob13Talk 23:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • It was disruptive to open this discussion again and demonstrates a disdain for process. There is no evidence that the Whitehouse owns the rights to the photo, and according to OTRS, there is evidence that a photographer does.- MrX 19:30, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regardless of the actual copyright status of the file, this non-admin reopening is clearly against established procedures and clearly of an absolutely unhelpful nature given that a discussion is currently underway at COM:UDEL.    FDMS  4    21:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is disruptive to shut down an an ongoing discussion with a claim (a claim made without a shred of evidence or even anyone willing to defend it) that whitehouse.gov is lying about the copyright status of the image. I did !vote for temporary deletion until the copyright status is clear, but refusing to let the community even discuss the issue is an unconscionable invocation of a supervote. If you want to report me for disruption for insisting that the community be allowed to discuss this and make the decision, go right ahead. Any such attempt will blow up in your face. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's not a shred of evidence supporting the claim whitehouse.gov is lying about the image, because nobody is suggesting whitehouse.gov is lying. The situation is not unusual, it's fairly clear actually, and the confusion is almost certainly the result of unintentional, non-malicious confusion or error on the part of the whitehouse.gov and/or Trump transition staff. The portrait was taken before the new whitehouse.gov website went live, and quite likely before the copyright policy of the new whitehouse.gov website was agreed upon, so any contracts with the photographer possibly would not reflect the intended copyright policy of the as yet unbuilt new whitehouse.gov website. It's not all that unusual to see some material on a US Federal Government website which isn't actually covered by the United States Federal Government Public Domain release; we see data and illustrations from scientists incorporated into works by the USGS, FDA etc, we see extracts from aircraft and airline flight maintenance manuals in the FAA and NTSB reports, and manufacturer publicity material often appears in US DoD publications. We remove these as we find them, some issues are actually flagged by the agencies themselves, letting us know they forgot to add a picture credit or copyright notice and can we remove the material. TL;DR This sort of issue with a US Federal source isn't all that unusual and doesn't cause any major issues. Oh, and @Slangcamms: can you please remove the 'Oompah Loompah-in-chief' quip in your nomination, it's not the sort of language we would expect to see when discussing the subject of a photograph, regardless of our personal thoughts of the subject. Nick (talk) 22:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • We cannot assume without evidence that whitehouse.gov made a mistake any more than we can assume without evidence that whitehouse.gov is lying. whitehouse.gov claims copyright. Some unnamed individual who opened a OTRS ticked instead of a DMCA takedown also claims copyright. As Wnt pointed out above, it is NOT our duty to verify whether a reliable publisher obtained its permissions correctly, or else every single publisher we go to that has CC-BY licensed material, whoever it is, cannot be believed and their material cannot be used, and Commons must explicitly restrict its scope to subscriber-generated material. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:22, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • We have evidence that whitehouse.gov has made a mistake, the photographer has told us that to be the case. We accept that errors happen from time to time and we deal with them. That was the case before this issue happened and it will be the case afterwards. You're correct that it's not our duty to verify whether a reliable publisher obtained its permissions correctly, but we go above and beyond what we technically need to do in order to protect us and (primarily) our re-users who don't have the benefit of DMCA Takedown and Safe Harbor protection. That's why we routinely remove material that has come from US Federal Government sources where we know or have good reason to believe the material is not actually Federal Government work and thus in the public domain. It's why I nominated for deletion an illustration of the Douglas DC-10 cargo door mechanism, sourced from the FAA, it was actually content provided to the FAA by McDonnell-Douglas, who retained the copyright. Nick (talk) 22:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nick: I fear you may be missing the thrust of our argument: We are not suggesting that these images are public domain works created by a federal employee in the course of his duties. Rather, we are proposing that the private photographer granted to the White House the right to sublicense these images under a Creative Commons license. That's what the White House's website indicates. I understand that the OTRS ticket refutes the public domain claim, but does it also prove that the photographer never agreed to let the White House sublicense these photographs (or never issued such a license himself)? Rebbing 22:42, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I understand the OTRS ticket refutes both the public domain and specific Creative Commons licence claims that exist on the whitehouse.gov website (I was asked by one OTRS agent when the e-mail arrived how they could prove the person who had contacted OTRS was actually the photographer, I suggested, as the EXIF data in the photograph has the camera serial number, they could use that as confirmation). Nick (talk) 22:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • It would be nice if an OTRS volunteer familiar with the ticket would chime in on this point, but thank you for that information (and for getting my point). I have two follow-up questions: Between the White House's published statement that it has a license and a secret claim saying that it doesn't, why should we trust the secret claim? And, second, even if we would be willing to take the photographer's words about his contractual agreement with the White House (or Trump transition team), are the OTRS agents sure they're talking to a him and not to any of the countless computer-savvy persons who would be highly amused to tarnish the president's Web presence in any way possible? That serial number is right there in the EXIF information for anyone to see: it's 6....7; it took me all of ten seconds to find it, and, with another minute, I could easily transplant the appropriate EXIF fields from that photograph onto my own proof photograph to "prove" that I was the camera operator. If I can do that, anyone can. Rebbing 23:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Overturning an administrator's close was highly improper and, considering there was already an ongoing deletion review, only served to confuse the matter. UDEL provides an adequate remedy for even the most indefensible of closes—which this was not. Now, as for the White House's license, I think we ought to take it at its word, but there's a wide berth between the license being accurate and the White House lying. No one needs to accuse the White House of dishonesty to conclude that it made a mistake. Rebbing 22:53, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I will be pursuing an office action to take this out of the community's apparently less-than-able hands. Guy Macon, this was incredibly improper. You do not have access to the information OTRS does. This never should have gone to DR; it was tagged for deletion in about a week due to lack of OTRS permission. A globally banned user starts this discussion with a sock and we're stuck with a copyright violation on-wiki for longer. ~ Rob13Talk 23:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Will you be be pursuing an office action regarding the deletion (which I support) or regarding the attempt to shut down an active community discussion? An office action to delete an image with disputed copyright status would be noncontroversial and rather routine. An office action to shut down a discussion -- especially now that the discussion includes discussing office actions -- would seem to be not allowed under our policy at m:Office actions. --Guy Macon (talk) 23:40, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Guy Macon: Those two things are one and the same. If the images are deleted via office action, the discussion closes as "nothing to do here". The community can continue to discuss the tyranny of those evil OTRS volunteers if it cares to, but the copyright violations will be removed either way. ~ Rob13Talk 00:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • So it is your position that all office deletions are permanent and that the WMF cannot delete an image with disputed ownership while allowing further discussion and presentation of evidence that may resolve the ownership issue? Got a link to a policy that says that? --Guy Macon (talk) 00:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re-closed: The files have already been deleted (while some have been temp. undeleted for an undeletion request or for global replacement assistance). This DR was re-opened out-of-process, and should go through a deletion review (COM:UNDEL-request). The files have not procedurally been undeleted, therefore a Deletion Request-discussion can not continue, since they are already deleted. Do not reopen closed deletion requests, unless it is uncontroversial, or on advice of closing admin. As for the arguments made, there is above threshold of reasonable doubt as to the claimed CC-By license on the WH.gov site, per COM:PRP, and the information which OTRS agents (which as the support of the Commons community through policies) have access to. These files would have been automatically speedy deleted due to missing permission, something which happens every day to many files tagged as such by OTRS agents. These are not office actions. As I said, if you disagree with the closure (or this re-closure of an improperly re-opened DR for already deleted files), take it to COM:UNDEL. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A lady and the sea.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, and no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:34, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural close, all files by uploader now nominated: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ratnadeep114. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:34, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fishermen sunset.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, and no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:35, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural close, all files by uploader now nominated: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ratnadeep114. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Healthy morning.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, and no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:37, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural close, all files by uploader now nominated: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ratnadeep114. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flickr - ronsaunders47 - RELAX WITH A VIEW. CRETE..jpg

[edit]

Out of scope IMHO, low quality, low EV too. C messier (talk) 10:06, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --matanya • talk 23:11, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GettyImages-670101420-600x400.jpg

[edit]

External source, Getty in metadata ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:00, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Copyvio. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kd-1.jpg

[edit]

Prominently has " Copyright Notice: Copyright 2014 NBAE (Photo by Layne Murdoch Jr./NBAE via Getty Images)" in metadata ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:03, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Copyvio. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Deborahblando.jpg

[edit]

Copyright infrigement. It's a picture taken from Glamour magazine. 88marcus (talk) 06:09, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Deborahblando.jpg

[edit]

It seems a picture from a magazine. The rights are reserved. 88marcus (talk) 22:59, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Deborah4.jpg

[edit]

Copyright infrigement. It's a picture taken from brazilian Quem magazine. 88marcus (talk) 06:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shaileshsingh072 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious copyright status/out of scope

/St1995 17:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 14:07, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NEAlogotext.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Quite simple. What's the license for works of the government of Philipines? Yann (talk) 19:18, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per P199. --Yann (talk) 17:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naran valley and I.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 10:37, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naran valley and I.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:33, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:04, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shigar Desert.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 10:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shigar Desert.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 13:04, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:04, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:04, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kjjg-b.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by JJGimnazija as Fair use (fairuse) Yann (talk) 13:31, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment May be {{PD-textlogo}} Yann (talk) 13:32, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's Non-free logo. I didn't know how to insert pictures. Now I know, that I have to put logo for Kauno Jono Jablonskio gimnazija — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJGimnazija (talk • contribs)

Please read Commons:Non-copyright restrictions#Trademark law. Yann (talk) 17:22, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Withdrawn. A one-word italicized logo is considered not complex enough for copyright, especially in the UK. --George Ho (talk) 06:26, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metroline Logo.svg

[edit]

This logo, i.e. "Metroline", is italicized. Therefore, since UK's originality standards are set very low, I wonder whether the logo itself is free to use in the UK. George Ho (talk) 14:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If curious, compare this to w:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 September 28#File:Human League Love and Dancing.jpg. --George Ho (talk) 14:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't think that italic can make a written word - copyrighted. Italic is a widely used basic typographic style; perhaps the most common typographic style after all defaults. Perhaps, a logo/cover which contains multiple elements differently stylized (bold, italic, fonts, shades, etc.) could be original & creative enough to be above TOO, but a single word customized in such a basic way isn't enough to pass TOO, IMO. I'd say  Keep. --XXN, 20:23, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. Even by the UK's standards, this doesn't appear to be particularly complex. ℯxplicit 04:50, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naperville flag.png

[edit]

Self-promotion; created as part of a personal campaign. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Daughter Sticker.jpg

[edit]

Out of the project scope ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daughter Sticker.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site. The main subject in the image is person and not the natural scenery which is the objective of WLE India 2017.. Sankoswal (talk) 13:08, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:UEFA trophies

[edit]

These trophies are all under copyright and are the only think in the photos, so the images cannot be kept on Commons.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Salman Sarfraz.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sartees.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:59, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sartes.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:59, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:School children playing cricket in Pakistan.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 13:00, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shahi qila lahore.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 13:01, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Diego Sanchez Más Saint.jpg

[edit]

Unused photoshopped (?) image. Out of scope. Badzil (talk) 13:04, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sisters from same mister.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 13:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sons of Skardu.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 13:09, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Soul of Pakistan.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 13:09, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Student in happy mood.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 13:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Summer Sun and Water.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 13:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sun Behind clouds.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 13:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Swat Mahudand Lake.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 13:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Uzair Joiya.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 13:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Warsak.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 13:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Water fall kah=shmir.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 13:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Walnut trees hunza.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 13:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Waterfall SWAT.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 13:22, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zahid 186.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 13:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Татьяна Бойчевская (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably copyvio. Different metadata, low resolution. And uploader is Татьяна Бойчевская, but description says author is Мария Халилова.

Dmitry89 (talk) 15:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Парк "девятсотиріччя" у луцьку.jpg

[edit]

poor quality, blurry, watermark Hiddenhauser (talk) 16:59, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:22, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LibTSATU (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works, bogus license, no permission.

Yann (talk) 20:19, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LibTSATU (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 06:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MIG23 0805 - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

looks like a screen capture photo Pibwl (talk) 21:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo de Fly Boys.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:04, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Beauty of hillstation.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site. The main subject is the person and not the natural scenery ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beauty of hillstation.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site. The main subject is the person and not the natural scenery. Sankoswal (talk) 12:58, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AJANTA ELLORA CAVES.jpg

[edit]

The person in the image is not the ajanata or ellora cave ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:07, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:AJANTA ELLORA CAVES.jpg

[edit]

Out of WLE India 2017 contest scope, personal image being nominated for deletion. Sankoswal (talk) 12:57, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chandrapratap singh thakur.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:11, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chandrapratap singh thakur.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site. The main subject in the image is person and not the natural scenery which is the objective of WLE India 2017.. Sankoswal (talk) 13:04, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Head Massage.jpg

[edit]

Out of project scope ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:21, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hrishikesh Das.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a selfie repository ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:22, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hrishikesh Das.jpg

[edit]

Out of WLE India 2017 Project Scope. Sankoswal (talk) 13:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hrishikesh das.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:22, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hrishikesh das.jpg

[edit]

Out of WLE India 2017 Project Scope. Sankoswal (talk) 13:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IMAG1323.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a selfie repository ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:22, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMAG1323.jpg

[edit]

Out of WLE India 2017 Project Scope. Sankoswal (talk) 13:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IMAG1334.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:22, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMAG1334.jpg

[edit]

Out of WLE India 2017 Project Scope. Sankoswal (talk) 13:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:6tag-2274121953-1378514050518752623 2274121953.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Figures by Michael Lau Gardener

[edit]

Dolls are protected by copyright law.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:OF Mainufer O 1885 1.tif

[edit]

doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 00:29, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo BERSAMA small.png

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Pitpisit (talk) 01:02, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Till the End of Time 1944 poster.jpg

[edit]

False license, absolutely marked as copyrighted, see https://movieposters.ha.com/itm/drama/till-the-end-of-time-rko-1946-lobby-card-set-of-8-11-x-14-drama-total-8-items-/a/161423-50433.s?ic4=GalleryView-Thumbnail-071515# Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vice Squad 1953 poster.jpg

[edit]

False license, absolutely marked as licensed. See https://movieposters.ha.com/itm/crime/vice-squad-united-artists-1953-one-sheet-27-x-41-crime/a/161606-51474.s?ic4=GalleryView-Thumbnail-071515#. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:26, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Red River Robin Hood 1942 poster.jpg

[edit]

False licensing, it clearly has a notice. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:30, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Atlantic.jpg

[edit]

Can't be used due to personality rights. Other images ot topic available, see category. Zaccarias (talk) 03:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Iy1gsyq9.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iy1gsyq9.jpg

[edit]

Out of WLE India 2017 Project Scope. Sankoswal (talk) 13:37, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Natures gift 1.jpg

[edit]

Please upload the non watermark version of the image. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Khirganga by raj.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:27, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Om Shanti, Shanti !.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:On one of the highest mountains.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a selfie repository ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:On one of the highest mountains.jpg

[edit]

Out of WLE India 2017 Project Scope. Sankoswal (talk) 13:43, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:REAL HERO...Who never gives up.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:REAL HERO...Who never gives up.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope. Sankoswal (talk) 13:51, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Speed zero.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:29, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Togetherness of all.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:29, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Triund by Raj Lekharu.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:30, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TWINIIS.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:30, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:TWINIIS.jpg

[edit]

Out of WLE India 2017 Project Scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:National park of india.jpg

[edit]

The image is not of a natural park. It's a farm. The location takes to a park in haryana(India) ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:All about family.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tohamatsu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The license is not good + the source provided don't show the image and/or don't have a free license

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:John Abraham 2007 - still 18374 crop.jpg

[edit]

BH photos of non-Indian events are not free. This was taken in London. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kakslauttanen glass igloos for watching northern lights.jpg

[edit]

duplicate of File:Rovaniemi - Igloo village.jpg Kotivalo (talk) 07:07, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rajat Nagpal.jpg

[edit]

No permission, and article on subject on enwp will likely be deleted. But needs to go through COM:OTRS Colombavia (talk) 07:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GenHarding@Camp Cable.jpg

[edit]

The image is from a personal website and there is no information about the author of the image or its copyright status. Stating that the author of the image is "The Government" is not helpful. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Columbia Pictures (logo).jpg

[edit]

The absence of copyright on the trailer does not make the prexisting copyrighted logo incorporated in the trailer fall in the public domain. — Racconish ☎ 07:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elsa en HCH.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work as claimed, missing metadata except "FBMD" indicating it was lifted from Facebook. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions at OTRS. Storkk (talk) 07:57, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ranslogo.jpg

[edit]

Logo above TOO imho, bogus copyright claim. —MarcoAurelio 08:09, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maynilad Logo.png

[edit]

Not own work, third party logo. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yamenew.png

[edit]

PicScript (c) Robin 2017 as watermark, but could not find it elsewhere so bringing to discussion —MarcoAurelio 08:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cea-mai-variata-gama.gif

[edit]

COM:CSD#G4 for me, but this is a file not a gallery, so nominating for deletion as out of scope due to advertising. —MarcoAurelio 08:49, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Advent Rising.png

[edit]

Licenza Errata/Possibile violazione di Copyright Colibrì (talk) 09:38, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MunarwoWillis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos solely used for self promotion. out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SANTOSH6011 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User talk:Uoutios

[edit]

Δεν τη Θέλω Uoutios (talk) 11:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 21:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Acacias.jpg

[edit]

Versión PNG disponible. Falconaumanni...llámame Carlos 12:07, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Exposition de Bonzais - Japan Touch - 2013-11-30- Eurexpo - Lyon - 8497.jpg

[edit]

This photo is quite identical to File:Exposition de Bonzais - Japan Touch - 2013-11-30- Eurexpo - Lyon - 8333.jpg. No encyclopedic value to have 2 similar photos Tangopaso (talk) 12:16, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Գիտություն.jpg

[edit]

unused; superseded by File:Գիտություն2.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:18, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mushkpuri Top Dec 2015.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:26, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Graffiti in Shoreditch, London - The Terminator by Graffiti Life (9425010886).jpg

[edit]

Freedom of panorama in the UK is not applicable to graphic works. Additionally, this graffiti is a copyright violation because it is derived from a promotional photograph for the film (seen on posters and covers for home media). Discostu (talk) 12:27, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:My baba jan.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:27, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MySelf.jpg

[edit]

unused image of oneself, out of project scope 117.192.171.166 19:58, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MySelf.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naeem ullah baig.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nalla Baan Kotli AJK PAKISTAN.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:22, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NARAN KAGHAN.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:22, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Northern pakistan winter view.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:22, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Scientific articles AZ91 AZ31.pdf

[edit]

unused, uncropped, and unrotated version of File:Scientific articles AZ91 AZ31.png Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:22, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pakistani spoil.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paradise Like Beauty Kandol Lake.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Qudama rafiq graphic designer .jpg

[edit]

Mdrafiqkhan (talk · contribs) uploaded some personal photos and this is his last remaining contribution in Commons. His only edit in en.wiki article nameroom was vandalism. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:48, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PATHWAY.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:49, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Former cricketer Anil Kumble meets PM Modi.jpg

[edit]

There is a (minor) issue with all the files coming from Narendra Modi's Flickr account. They have his name as the author but he is the subject of the photographs most of the times. If the photographer is a Government of India employee, this becomes a Government of India work which is not copyright free for 60 years from publication date (by Indian law). The copyrights do not belong to the photographer or the Prime Minister for them to release the work under a CC license. If it is a personal employee, we need some clarification/OTRS/confirmation. Rahul Bott (talk) 12:49, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: {{GODL-India}} Yann (talk) 09:53, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zajazd na przełęczy - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

I can't think of any reasonable use of this photo. IMHO, it is out of scope. C messier (talk) 12:51, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, good quality , appropriately categorised and has coordinates. Commons images not for use only- this file valuable for people outside of Wikimedia searching for content related to this region. /St1995 17:35, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment It doesn't depict so well the region, only some random cars, and also it is not categorised in the correct categories. --C messier (talk) 10:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Qundmalir.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:51, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:River Swat View.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:54, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:River Swat View 8.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:54, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saif ul maluk lake.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saif Ul Mulook Lake Naran.jpg

[edit]

personal image. out of commons scope Saqib (talk) 12:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elm logo.jpg

[edit]

The logo was imported from ar.wiki, where it is used as fair use. Fair use is not allowed in Commons. In my opinion the logo surpasses threshold of originality and cannot stay in Commons. Taivo (talk) 12:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:El Atardecer 2013.png

[edit]

Unused logo with unknown importance, maybe out of project scope. Search "El Atardecer 2013" in es.wiki does not give anything good. Taivo (talk) 13:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aaronruddock (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fotos von einem verurteiltem Pädophilen. Ursprünglich hatten alle drei Dateien des Hochladers den Vermerk Eigenes Werk. Das Polizeifoto wurde dann von einer IP mit einer anderen Lizenz und Quelle versehen. Dieses Bild findet man auch online beim theguardian mit der Angabe: Photograph: NCA/PA. Für mich ist sehr unwahrscheinlich, dass der Hochlader alle drei Bilder in Namibia, Malaysia und auf der Polizeistation gemacht hat. Allerdings konnte ich weder auf Google noch via TinEye Bilder mit einem älteren Datum finden.

Hystrix (talk) 13:38, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Red Ball Express 1952 poster.jpg

[edit]

Likeky copyrighted as suggested by this alternate poster of the same film. — Racconish ☎ 13:47, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Falcon Out West 1944 poster.jpg

[edit]

Likely copyrightes as suggested by this alternate poster for the same film. — Racconish ☎ 13:54, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dimples 1936 poster.jpg

[edit]

Copyright mentionned at he bottom right. — Racconish ☎ 13:57, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bride by Mistake 1944 poster.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted to RKO [7] — Racconish ☎ 13:59, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Estacion internacional España-Portugal, Barca d´Alba, Portugal. - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

Smaller resolution duplicate of File:Estacion internacional España-Portugal, Barca d´Alva, Portugal 02.jpg, meanwhile cropped. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:03, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fitandgo.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Metabolic Processes in an Endurance Event.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LA REPRESENTACION MISOGINA DE LA MUJER E.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zeitschrift für Ostmitteleuropa-Forschung Bild.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused cover of journal of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Climon Mufaro Gondongwe.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Reotaxis.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:26, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:بهروز سبط رسول.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:26, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:استفيد الان.png

[edit]

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:26, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:COMMON PRUEBA-01.jpg

[edit]

Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:26, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo WEC Italia.jpg

[edit]

This is a copyrighted logo, as you can see here. -ARCHEOLOGO 14:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:26, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gabriela,cantante y compositora.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.lahistoriadelrock.com.ar/fot/fot3/mgab06.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:26, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wesam.tantish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/s480x480/e35/c236.0.608.608/15259074_1048915281902203_4268359071658147840_n.jpg?ig_cache_key=MTM5MjIzMzI3OTU5MTUxMDY2OQ%3D%3D.2.c.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:26, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mensaje.png

[edit]

Rudyard Kipling is in public domain, but the image is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:56, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kings of Ambohidrabiby Madagascar.JPG

[edit]

No indication of why this drawing is "own work" of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:03, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Somesh Mathur A Panditji.jpg

[edit]

Small photo without camera data, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arash Milad Teheran.JPG

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Goldis Tower - Aryashahr - Tehran.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ministry of Roads & Urban Development (Iran).jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mofid Headquarter.JPG

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palladium mall spider facade bigg.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:11, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paytakht-Center.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:My South View - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rayzan2.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gilligan'sIslandFlyer.jpg

[edit]

Not own work. A copyrighted ad for the 1991 machine. We hope (talk) 16:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rayzan.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Noubar-afeyan-george-clooney-ruben-vardanyan-vartan-gregorian.jpg

[edit]

EXIF shows a different author. Yann (talk) 16:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abbasabad, Tehran, Tehran, Iran - panoramio - Behrooz Rezvani (15).jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abbasabad, Tehran, Tehran, Iran - panoramio - Behrooz Rezvani (25).jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:محمد القلش.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2010-04-25 04 08 10 Iran Tehran Exhibition.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:16, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aurora Prize Statuette.jpg

[edit]

COM:DW. Which place is this? What about COM:FOP? Yann (talk) 16:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:All Most Summer In Tehran, May 31, 2011 - panoramio (5).jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marguerite Barankitse with Aurora Prize Statuette.jpg

[edit]

EXIF shows a different author. Yann (talk) 16:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ASP Towers.PNG

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Building or Ship؟ Tehran کِشتی با بادبان در شهر - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:18, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mahan Air Central building Tehran.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Melli.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Restaurant, Park-e Azadegan, Moshiriyeh, Tehran رستوران پارک آزادگان،بهار - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Reflection in Azadegan lake, Park-e Azadegan,Moshiriyeh,Tehran تصویردرآب دریاچه پارک آزادگان - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Samutprakan School Logo.png

[edit]

School logo as fail use Tvcccp (talk) 16:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mellat Cinema Gallery, Tehran.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bulova Alen Kobilica.jpg

[edit]

Probable copyvio, an advertisement which is not likely the uploader's own work (see e.g. https://www.aktivni.si/dobro-pocutje/za-telo-in-duso/jude-low-in-dior/galerija/alen-kobilicajpg/) — Yerpo Eh? 16:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tehran-Stock-Exchange-Building-1.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:27, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Beautiful temple in South India.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather thumbnail format, missing location, and no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tirumala Andhra Pradesh.png

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, and family-album-oriented, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free contenthence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons ??  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vizag port area LIGHT HOUSE top view.png

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format and quality, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free contenthence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons ??  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:26, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mypadu Beach Mypadu.Nellore.Andhra Pradesh.png

[edit]

DR started as family-album-oriented content, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free contenthence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons ??  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:27, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Scuol

[edit]

low quality panoramio images imported by panoramio bot not showing anything of encyclopaedic value

Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:30, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:30, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bidar kumbad.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, and no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bidar underground.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, and no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Holy place at BIDAR.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, and no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Barren island in andaman and nicobar islands.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': thumbnail format, and no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:33, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vypin beach.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, and no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Toni Perämäki. Photo- Daniel Taipale, 2016.jpg

[edit]

The photo's subject (= uploader) claims authorship of the photo ("own work") but gives name of another photographer apparently with no OTRS permit. Kotivalo (talk) 17:57, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sonu 1.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal photo, upload was the only global edit by this user. Sitacuisses (talk) 18:09, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Calvijn College hoofdlocatie (2017).jpg

[edit]

Omdat ik deze twee foto's niet langer wil aanbieden op Wikipedia, gelet op de mogelijkheden die de licentie biedt KleinFrankrijk (talk) 18:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mithu.jpg

[edit]

Screen grab from an old movie which was cropped and uploaded by a new user. The watermark from the video uploader is visible on the photo as well Jupitus Smart (talk) 18:18, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Change the future generations will regret!.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': small-sized format, no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Моисеев.jpg

[edit]

Small image without EXIF data. Please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 18:22, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Araku View Point Vizag.Andhra Pradesh.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': thumbnail-format, and no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:My clicked.jpg

[edit]

there is enough better material inside Category:Rhinoceros unicornis of the Kaziranga National Park.--Tostman (talk) 19:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:30, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PicoGlobalGP.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Techyan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.pico.com/people/life-at-pico Yann (talk) 19:19, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HK Arena Exhibition Constractor Pico a.jpg

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, sole upload by this account. It also looks like advertisement to me. Yann (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pranu Upadhyay Model.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:27, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Antonio Herrera Barreirense.jpg

[edit]

Small image without EXIF data. Please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 19:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KILLAM PROPERTIES SAINT JOHN NB.png

[edit]

Advertisement Braveheart (talk) 19:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fpmobd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 19:49, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo Holidays Hunt.jpg

[edit]

Unused JPEG logo, should be SVG if useful, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:50, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Raj Paras Photo.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:50, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tomb of Baba Chamliyal.jpg

[edit]

Small image without EXIF data, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 19:55, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BME917 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 20:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Old Gopura.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small sized-format, and no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Golden Gopura.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small sized-format, and no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eu 2.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope; personal photo 1989 18:16, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 04:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eu 2.jpg

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image which may or may not be the same as a file previously deleted of this same name. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:27, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

deleted. INeverCry 01:51, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eu 2.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Davey2010 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: All taken from the internet but with no URL of source. Also affected File:Perfil 4.jpg from which this was derived. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Delete - There was another image that uploaded by the user that was a copyvio and so assumed the rest were aswell, Anyway as per above DRs the image is out of scope (it may well be a copyvio but we'd never know). –Davey2010Talk 23:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:35, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eu 2.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope, Could the closing admin please protect this from future creation if possible? –Davey2010Talk 20:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:One of the Tele-evidence rooms at PGIMER, Chandigarh.jpg

[edit]

No reason to believe the PGIMER gave permission for this photo to be shared. Kiteinthewind (talk) 20:51, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Island Lost Soul poster.jpg

[edit]

Likely copyrighted to Paramount as alternate version here — Racconish ☎ 21:11, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Island of Lost Souls 1932 poster.jpg

[edit]

Likely copyrighted to Paramount as alternate version here — Racconish ☎ 21:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Trump (34397382675).jpg

[edit]

COM:DW of a sticker/poster --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DC-Climate-March-2017-1510742 (33520242724).jpg

[edit]

COM:DW of a sign --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DC-Climate-March-2017-1510987 (34203928562).jpg

[edit]

COM:DW of a sign --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:14, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Frankfurt . (33819203490).jpg

[edit]

COM:DW of a sign --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:14, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Graffiti critical of Trump.jpg

[edit]

COM:DW of graffiti which in turn most likely are COM:DWs of photographs --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:14, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hocking County Republican Party Headquarters (29613156633).jpg

[edit]

COM:DW of a sign which is an unattributed photo --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AntiTrumpStreetArt1.ScottCircle.WDC.20February2017 (32927669681).jpg

[edit]

COM:DW of a sticker/poster --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:16, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AntiTrumpStreetArt2.ScottCircle.WDC.20February2017 (33012376796).jpg

[edit]

COM:DW of a sticker/poster --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:16, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fred Testot by Thomas Lavelle Photographe.jpg

[edit]

This file is by T. Lavelle, the user who uploaded it says Own work but says the same for File:FRED TESTOT .jpg which has a watermark with a different name as copyright holder. Symac (talk) 21:19, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:East Rand mall ally where I sometimes found piece of mind and found inspiration towards writing about my life.jpg

[edit]

Self-created artwork. Per COM:NOTUSED. Takeaway (talk) 22:57, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saudoso Antonio Alves e sua amada Quiterinha - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

photo of a photo, unclear copyright, unused, bad quality (and unknown notability) Pibwl (talk) 22:57, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dario Pot.jpg

[edit]

Advert Page Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:21, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abraham Fouché.jpg

[edit]

unlikely own work - newpaper image? quite old Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:26, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sopio Tkebuchava (სოფიო ტყებუჩავა) 2010.jpg

[edit]

It is my photo, want it to be removed please Aka shodan (talk) 23:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tehran Stock Exchange Building.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:26, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This building has been built over 40 years ago and it is somehow a historical landmark of Tehran. FaraM 20:59, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Do you know about its architect? Is he/she alive? The original rights belong to him/her. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:44, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the architect is Abdol-Aziz Mirza Farmanfarmaian who died on June 2013 (aged 93) FaraM 06:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, you can publish your picture under a free licence after 2063, fifty years after his death!
Nevertheless, the architecture might be too simple to meet the originality threshold for copyright protection. I'm not sure. Let's see how the admins deal with this situation. 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:55, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: this appears to be a piece of extremely plain architecture, and it seems there is nothing to be copyright protected. --Sealle (talk) 03:31, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MTA Kings Hwy BMT Brighton 07.jpg

[edit]

it is a duplicate if the file MTA Kings Hwy BMT Brighton 05. jpg Olsen24 (talk) 02:04, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Olsen24: No it's not, it's a crop of File:MTA Kings Hwy BMT Brighton 08.jpg. Tdorante10 (talk) 03:26, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: That may be, but it was taken of the same bus at virtually the same time and 05 is sharper. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MTA Kings Hwy BMT Brighton 06.jpg

[edit]

It is a duplicate of the file MTA Kings Hwy BMT Brighton 06.jpg Olsen24 (talk) 02:05, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Olsen24: No, it's an alternate crop showing both the bus and the bus stop sign. Tdorante10 (talk) 03:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I don't think we need two different images of the same bus at the same time. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:24, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kajuraho temple.jpg

[edit]

dubious claim of "own work" found elsewhere including http://hindi.nativeplanet.com/img/2016/11/03-1478175059-kajuraho-temple.jpg 2606:6000:CB87:F400:7021:6EE9:5408:91A8 03:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nativeplanet has copied it from Wikimedia Commons. See http://hindi.nativeplanet.com/travel-guide/interesting-facts-about-khajuraho-temples-hindi-001209.html#slide7890 -- it reads "Image Courtesy: Spandana sangishetty". That said, the fake sky background suggests that this may have been derived from a copyrighted work. Failing COM:EDUSE may also be an argument because of the fake background. I'll leave it to more experienced editors to make a decision. Utcursch (talk) 13:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope -- personal art. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:26, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aviso publicitario Cambiemos.jpg

[edit]

no especifica autor Emmanuel Sosa (talk) 03:26, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio, also out of scope. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:37, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Federer serve wide view Wimbledon 2006.JPG

[edit]

This image has been uploaded without a valid licence from the copyright owner, The All England Lawn Tennis Club (Championships) Limited (“AELTC”).

The Terms and Conditions of Entry to the grounds of the All England Club (http://www.wimbledon.com/en_GB/atoz/conditions_of_entry.html) clearly state at Section 20 that “the AELTC is the sole legal and beneficial owner of any intellectual property rights (including copyright) in any images, footage or material taken or recorded in the Grounds (including by the attendee) and attendees hereby assign any rights they may have in respect of such material to the AELTC and waive all moral rights in the same”.

Copyright law in England & Wales (specifically, Section 16(1) of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 (the “Act”)) provides that the owner of copyright in the work has the exclusive right to copy and licence the work.

This image is taken from a professional lens within the grounds and is taken by the AELTC and taken from the AELTC’s official website without permission.

Any licence relating to its use has not been granted by the AELTC (as the copyright holder) and therefore is invalid. K&Co LLP (London) (talk) 12:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.

  1. It was taken with a Fujifilm FinePix A330, which is an entry level point and shoot, hardly "a professional lens".
  2. One can not transfer a UK copyright without a written agreement signed by the creator of the work. (see Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 at 90(3) "An assignment of copyright is not effective unless it is in writing signed by or on behalf of the assignor." The photographer, who is certainly the original holder of any copyright, cannot give that away except in a writing which does not exist here.
  3. The image was taken in 2006, so linking the current Conditions of Entry is not probative.

I note for the record that the image turns up, smaller, in several places on the Web. That's not surprising given that it has been here for ten years. I think that those uses do not require any further action here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:42, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:J.K. Shillington of W&L University.pdf

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This portrait (actually a picture of the portrait that I took) was commissioned bought and owned by Dr. J. K. Shillington. It was entirely his property. Upon his death, it was given to W&L University. It was uploaded to this site for his many former colleagues and students (several of whom are prominent MDs and professors) who will never get to see it in person. DWA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidwa (talk • contribs) 17:18, 2 June 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

If J. K. Shillington was copyrights holder, when he died? In which country painting was made? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Shillington died in 1993. the painting was done in Lexington, Va, USA by his friend and fellow professor who was in the art department of Washington & Lee University (Ray Prohaska) who died several years earlier. [D. W. Armstrong] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidwa (talk • contribs) 18:39, 9 June 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

Deleted There is good news and bad news here.

  1. As a general rule, commissioning a painting does not transfer the copyright. Copyrights to portraits are almost always held by the artist. Even if Shillington owned the copyright simply giving the painting to the school, would not transfer the copyright to the school, so, unless there were a separate written transfer, the school would not have right to license the copyright.
  2. Note also, that Wikidwa's claim of "own work" is incorrect. There is no copyright in making a photo of a painting.
  3. However, the good news is that the painting was done in 1964. If it was "published", in the technical copyright sense of the word, before March 1989, then it is in the Public Domain for lack of notice. In order to claim that as a reason for having it on Commons, Wikidwa must prove that either it was photographed and printed copies were distributed, or that it was on public display before 1989. If it was simply hanging in Shillington's home until then, then it will not qualify for {{PD-US-no notice}}.
  4. However, we do not keep PDFs of images, so the current version cannot be kept.
  5. Finally, there is the question of notability. I do not see any WP article on J.K. Shillington and Google does not turn up any relevant hits. We do not generally keep images of non-notable people. Commons is not Facebook or Flickr.

If, and only if, Wikidwa can prove that Shillington was notable for some reason -- simply being a professor at a major university does not qualify -- and either (a) he can prove that it was published before 1989, or (b) Prohaska's heir sends a free license using OTRS, then he could upload a new version of the image in JPG format. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GothTeaParty-221 (5484847973).jpg

[edit]

blurry photo Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 14:38, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Out of scope as having no educational purpose and overloaded with the usual ton of irrelevant Flickr tags. NWEP. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:52, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: tags, etc. are irrelevant to a deletion discussion. The issue isn't whether it might need better description, categories, etc., the question is whether there is a reason to keep the photo. In this case, the one possible use (but I am not convinced it would meet the bar) is to illustrate Goth subculture. Motion blur is something of a negative, but for a person who is running it is not necessarily unacceptable. The question would seem to me to be whether the image is realistically useful for any educational purpose. - Jmabel ! talk 15:00, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's one of just one set of 210 images illustrating Goth subculture. I think we have enough. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:02, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:59, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:European Skeptics Congress ‘17.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Evropský skeptický kongres je vědecko-skeptický kongres pořádaný jednou za dva roky pod záštitou Evropské rady skeptických organizací. Nadcházející sedmnáctý kongres se bude konat v polské Vratislavi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petrstepan (talk • contribs) 16:04, 2 June 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I don't see any sign of a free license in the document and I doubt very much that the uploader wrote the whole document and took all of the photographs. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tehran architecture 60's.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:26, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Far more than 30 years has been passed after its date of public presentation, building is more then 50 years old. --Orijentolog (talk) 19:07, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • That 30-year provision in the Iranian copyright law only applies to 1) photographic or cinematographic works; and 2) the works that belong to a legal person. The original rights here belong to the architect, who might not be dead at all. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:50, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Motorola Atrix Jelly Bean 4.1.JPG

[edit]

gogle konto vergessen 87.166.205.42 17:22, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Estacion internacional España-Portugal, Barca d´Alva, Portugal 02.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no permission (No permission since). However there is clear evidence of permission by the creator/uploader. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Author is the (original) uploader; the Flickr image (actually mislinked to another shot of the same series) was added, I presume, for reference only. This is a simple case of (missing) {{Own}}, not a case for a deletion request and even less for a speedy deletion — unless there’s evidence that neyoka (talk · contribs) (ping: @Neyoka: ) is not the actual photographer. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:49, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, if you ore somebody finds the correct flickr source link with a compatible license, we should keep it. Otherwise it has no valid source. --JuTa 13:53, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Discasto: , who asked for their deletion last week. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:21, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: I agree with Tuvalkin, this seems to be only a misunderstanding. The file must not be deleted, and all the others in question that have already been deleted must be recovered, if possible. -- Ajpvalente (talk) 07:49, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We assume GF from the original uploader (which inserted its website as well). For the (other) photos coming from Flickr, it is preferable to have a change of license there. Ruthven (msg) 20:00, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mariage carnavalesque de Basile et Pat à la mairie du XXème arrondissement.jpg

[edit]

pas d'autorisation de l'auteur - can be a photo by "Basilou" because Basilou is Basile Pachkoff and Basile Pachkoff is on the photo (a lot of photos in the same case) Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 12:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Je m'appelle Bernard Jean-Marc. Je suis passionné notamment par l'informatique, la photographie, l'histoire sociale, l'histoire de Paris et de ses fêtes.

Je suit de près depuis nombre d'années le remarquable et très généreux travail bénévole de mon ami Basile Pachkoff, dit Basili ou Basilou, pour la renaissance du Carnaval de Paris.

Quand je prends des photos de Basile, naturellement je les lui offre. Il a souhaité mettre de mes photos dans Wikipédia. J'ai bien sûr accepté. Il m'a demandé si je souhaitais voir apparaître mon nom. J'ai trouvé plus simple qu'il indique être l'auteur de mes photos.

Cette manière de faire a fonctionné durant longtemps. Mais voilà que très judicieusement un contributeur consciencieux a fait remarquer que des photos où Basile figurait ne pouvait pas être faites par lui.

C'est pourquoi j'ai créé mon compte sur Commons afin de clarifier la situation en indiquant quand des photos étaient de Bernard Jean-Marc et pas de Basili ou Basilou.

Je félicite et remercie le contributeur consciencieux et précis qui a montré par son initiative qu'il veille avec attention au bon fonctionnement de Wikipédia et Commons !

Paris, le 6 juin 2017

Bernard Jean-Marc

---

Fichier concerné https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mariage_carnavalesque_de_Basile_et_Pat_%C3%A0_la_mairie_du_XX%C3%A8me_arrondissement.jpg

Post-scriptum: I am not fluent in english, this is why I wrote this request in french. If you need it, I will do my best to translate it. Best regards, Jean-Marc

Bjmarc (talk) 15:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bjmarc and Basilou: Ce serait possible que Basilou nous confirme la paternité de la photo? Un message par COM:OTRS serait préférable (dans le cas, on demanderait à Jean-Marc de nous envoyer une confirmation de l'autorisation). Merci --Ruthven (msg) 19:54, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Confirmation by the uploader and received at Special:Diff/247774650. Ruthven (msg) 12:58, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TransformersDay2017.png

[edit]

Fan art, violates copyright .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jim,

The art work was created by Myself - Anan Kumar Mallik.

So I'm not sure where the copyright violation is?

thanks,

Anan — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] • contribs) 10:51, 2 June 2017‎ Ananmallik1980 (UTC)

Hello Jim,

The art work was created by Myself - Anan Kumar Mallik.

I mean used photoshop to combine it into the current image.

So I'm not sure where the copyright violation is?

thanks,

Anan

Anan — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] • contribs) 14:48, 2 June 2017‎ Ananmallik1980 (UTC)

PS

So are we keeping this or not? -Anan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ananmallik1980 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 6 June 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:36, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/06/02&oldid=247896577"