Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/03/16
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![71 File:Fu"i.jpg](#File:Fu"i.jpg){kind=link}
_06.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
It was an error, it must be deleted because i have no rights to use this. Kierk211 (talk) 00:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request admits no rights, clear speedy. --99of9 (talk) 00:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
This image belongs to someone else and was uploaded as a test. Thanks Msafari (talk) 05:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion of page. (t) Josve05a (c) 05:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Forwhat790406 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out-of-scope files by an hard-to-trust user. May contain copyvios.
- File:Learn plscareconcernacceptforgivelovelikeicem(theclosenextnewgenerations)plsvi.jpg
- File:Learn plscareconcernacceptforgivelovelikeicemee(theclosenextnewgenerations)plsvi.jpg
- File:Learn plscareconcernacceptforgivelovelikeicemee(theclosenextnewgenerations)pls.jpg
- File:Learn plscareconcernacceptforgivelovelikeicemee(theclosenextnewgeneration)pls.jpg
- File:431405 2559454712764 647004368 nvi.jpg
plsvi.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
plsvi.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
pls.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
pls.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Forwhat790406 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not a selfie repository; out of scope
- File:179001 1786036580719 5232054 nvi.jpg
- File:167085 1786014380164 5867523 nvi.jpg
- File:29434 431017310293954 724413770 nvi.jpg
- File:36257 1753359123803 7364007 nvi.jpg
TJH2018talk 22:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Forwhat790406 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of scope images; one seems like a program and other is a chemistry formulas but equating atoms with girls and boys. Pure vandalism!
- File:Learn plscareconcernacceptforgivelovelikeicemee(theclosenextnewgeneration)plsviii vi.jpg
- File:Learn plscareconcernacceptforgivelovelikeicemee(theclosenextnewgeneration)plsvii.jpg
plsviii_vi.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
plsvii.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Forwhat790406 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work. Questionable copyright status. No category. No description.
- File:Learn plscareconcernacceptforgivelovelikeicemee(theclosenextnewgeneration)plsvi.jpg
- File:Learn plscareconcernacceptforgivelovelikeicemee(theclosenextnewgeneration)plsvivi.jpg
- File:1490346969993vi.jpg
- File:1488168855429vi.jpg
- File:1490346870831vi.jpg
- File:Learn plscareconcernacceptforgivelovelikeicemee(theclosenextnewgeneration)plsvxivvii.jpg
- File:Learn plscareconcernacceptforgivelovelikeicemee(theclosenextnewgenerations)plsx.jpg
- File:Learn plscareconcernacceptforgivelovelikeicemee(theclosenextnewgenerations)plsviii.jpg
plsvi.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
plsvivi.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
plsvxivvii.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
plsx.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
plsviii.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:42, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
licence not valid any longer Zinnif (talk) 09:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please explain? Are you the photographer, as stated on upload? Jcb (talk) 16:29, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
yes we are the rightsholder and we have no personality rights for thomas muster. all white / black pictures have to be deleted from the atp kitzbühel page.
- A CC license cannot be revoked. Now you have declared that you are the copyright holder, that makes your release valid and non-revocable. Jcb (talk) 16:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: CC-license cannot be revoked. --Jcb (talk) 16:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
samochd nasweo 89.161.96.197 15:33, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
uuu3c5nh0c3 89.161.96.197 15:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; no real educational value; no nudes
- File:ArtisticMaleNude.jpg
- File:Naked Man.jpg
- File:Artistic Male Nude.jpg
- File:Naked man, back side.jpg
- File:Naked man with mask.jpg
TJH2018talk 22:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Notfleg
[edit]Out of scope; no real educational value; no nudes Notfleg (talk) 19:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Available at larger resolution here: http://www.perrykafri.com/ItemPage.asp?id=173 Ytoyoda (talk) 15:33, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 11:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Allhamdollah (talk · contribs)
[edit]1st video promotional,<be> 2nd is of poor quality (and I highly doubt the file is even theres)
- File:(Hindi) Earn money online 35000 ₹ per month, Best way to earn , Support Digital India, Easy process.webm
- File:Love natur.jpg
–Davey2010Talk 20:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, by Ruthven with reason "Copyviol videos from Arabic TV channels". Taivo (talk) 14:42, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Dieses Foto wurde unerlaubterweise hochgeladen. Der Nutzer "Teilchenbeschleuniger" hat sich als Urheber angegeben. Das Foto stammt vom NRW-Landesportal: https://www.land.nrw/de/media/image/ministerpraesidentin-hannelore-kraft-verleiht-den-verdienstorden-des-landes-nordrhein-2 - Dort ist der korrekte Urheber angegen. Hinweise zur Weiterverwendung von Bildern sind rechts verlinkt: https://www.land.nrw/de/impressum-0#UrheberUndKennzeichenrecht - Wir bitten um Entfernung des Bildes aus Wikimedia Commons und auf der Wikipedia: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Rso170118-02-106.jpg - Mit freundlichen Grüßen, die Internetredaktion des Landespresse- und Informationsamtes der Staatskanzlei NRW. Staatskanzlei NRW (talk) 11:16, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Liebe Staatskanzlei, ich bitte um Entschuldigung. Ich dachte, für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke sei eine Verwendung statthaft. Und dass ich das Werk als mein eigenes ausgegeben habe, tut mir leid, das ist mir tatsächlich durchgerutscht. Ich habe das Copyright schon geändert. Es ist natürlich trotzdem ihr gutes Recht, die Löschung des Bildes anzustreben. Ich stelle mich dem nicht in den Weg. Beste Grüße, --Teilchenbeschleuniger (talk) 12:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sehr geehrter Teilchenbeschleuniger, vielen Dank für die schnelle Rückmeldung.
Eine Verwendung unserer Fotos ist ohne weitere Genehmigung nur für journalistische Zwecke vorgesehen. Wir bitten daher weiterhin um Löschung. --Staatskanzlei NRW (talk) 12:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sehr geehrter Teilchenbeschleuniger, vielen Dank für die schnelle Rückmeldung.
- In Ordnung. Dann habe ich natürlich als Uploader dieses Bildes keine Einwände und bitte hiermit einen Administrator, dieses Bild zu löschen. Dank und Gruß, --Teilchenbeschleuniger (talk) 08:26, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- We now added it as candidate for speed delition. Is there anything else we can do to get it deleted? --Staatskanzlei NRW (talk) 09:31, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 15:55, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of project scope DCB (talk) 19:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- + non-notable individual. --DCB (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused picture of non-notable individual, deletion on request of the uploader (Ticket#2017031510020458)- Deleted Best regards --Neozoon (talk) 20:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Neozoon (talk) 20:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tiziana Miss Attitude (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images out of the scope. Commons is not a social media site
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also copyright status not clear. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Sock, out of scope. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:11, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Sock, out of scope. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:11, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Sock, out of scope. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Many copies on the web [1], unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 23:54, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Oden cans
[edit]
G I Chandor (talk) 00:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
The photo was previously published here and here. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 00:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. G I Chandor (talk) 00:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:Derivative works. G I Chandor (talk) 00:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:Derivative works. G I Chandor (talk) 00:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. G I Chandor (talk) 00:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
The user not is the author. Copyrighted logo. ✎kovox90 02:42, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Logo with copyright ✎kovox90 02:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
The user not is the author. Copyrighted logo. ✎kovox90 02:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
The user not is the author. Copyrighted logo. ✎kovox90 02:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia. where the subject's article was speedily deleted as spam in February 2016. Out of project scope. ℯxplicit 03:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Redundant and not used in any article in any language. I, Ypna, originally uploaded this file. Ypna (talk) 04:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Low quality illustrations. Not used in any article in any language. I, Ypna, originally uploaded this file. Ypna (talk) 04:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted content as specified in description and exif (Anadolu Agency) HakanIST (talk) 04:49, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
No Indication that the flickr user has the rights to release under this copyright notice. Looking through the rest of their uploads does not fill me with confidence. Peripitus (talk) 05:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
That face makes the image unusable on encyclopedia. Also COM:Personality rights infringed. Cropping is an option, but we have plenty better quality images of the monument. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image outside our scope. Cropping to use the Taj Mahal in background is not really needed as we have abundant images of the Taj in better quality. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image outside our scope. Cropping to use the Bibi Ka Makbara in background is not really needed as we have abundant images of the Makbara in better quality. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Blurry/grainy images with watermark and filters making them unusable. We have better quality images of all these monuments.
- File:Biwi ka makbara.jpg
- File:Victoria terminus Mumbai.jpg
- File:Gateway of india Mumbai.jpg
- File:Biwi ka makbara aurangabad.jpg
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Only used on the German Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in June 2016 as non-notabe. Out of project scope. ℯxplicit 06:30, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr.mohan m.muthal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Filter applied images, dark, wide frames, watermarked, unused and unusable, no educational use.
- File:Nishat dentl clinic.jpeg
- File:Greenary at daulatabad fort.jpeg
- File:View at daulatabad fort.jpeg
- File:A moment near daulatabad fort.jpeg
- File:A night at makai gate.jpeg
- File:Entry into bibi ka maqbara.jpeg
- File:A moment at daulatabad fort.jpeg
- File:My bike at bibi ka maqbara.jpg
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:42, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Blurry shaky and unusable. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:47, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Attributed to a commercial newspaper. Creative Commons license unclear. Themightyquill (talk) 08:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Attributed to a commercial newspaper. Creative Commons license unclear. Themightyquill (talk) 08:26, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Attributed to a commercial newspaper. Creative Commons license unclear. Themightyquill (talk) 08:26, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Attributed to a commercial newspaper with a watermark from another company. Creative Commons license unclear. Themightyquill (talk) 08:26, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Attributed to a commercial newspaper. Creative Commons license unclear. Themightyquill (talk) 08:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Attributed to a commercial newspaper. Creative Commons license unclear. Themightyquill (talk) 08:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Low-quality personal image, no indication of notability, the file is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:50, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Camjohnson0
[edit]- File:Cameron G. Johnson - Volex Design Founder.jpg
- File:Cameron G. Johnson Signature Black.png
- File:Meteorsites Logo.png
- File:Volex Design Logo.png
Advertising, business-related self-promotion; the files are not in use. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:54, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Apbohr
[edit]
Professional headshots with "Copyright holder Jeffrey Mosier Photography 2014" in the metadata. The uploader is apparently not this person and does not give evidence of permission to license copyrighted photos. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Badzil (talk) 09:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
probable copyright, see watermark downleft Pippobuono (talk) 09:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, see watermark Pippobuono (talk) 09:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, see watermark Pippobuono (talk) 09:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photos, out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 09:42, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, see watermark Pippobuono (talk) 09:42, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
The image is found on many places on the web, the source is wrong and possibility of copyvios ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, see watermark Pippobuono (talk) 09:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, see watermark Pippobuono (talk) 09:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Against Commons rule COM:PENIS . ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:47, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ra-jeani semlali (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal type photos, out of scope
- File:Mmz.jpg
- File:Mmz gustavo.jpg
- File:Mmz gacha.jpg
- File:Mmz valentina.jpg
- File:Mmz cocaina.jpg
- File:Mmz tout pour le gang.jpg
- File:Mmz pandora.jpg
- File:Mmz au pieds de ma tours.jpg
- File:Dans nos tetes.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+likely copyvios of albums cover. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ra-jeani semlali (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a selfie repository image out of the scope
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:56, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MOHAN LAL MOURYA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files in front of notable monuments. But we have plenty better quality images of those monuments. Fails COM:EDUSE.
- File:विजय स्तम्भ चित्तौड़गढ़ राजस्थान.jpg
- File:जल महल डीग भरतपुर राजस्थान.jpg
- File:ताजमहल आगरा उत्तर प्रदेश में मैं और मेरा रोस्त.jpg
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:00, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Highly photoshopped. Looks like use of atleast two images, of the Taj and the moon; copyrights of none are clear. Educational usage is doubtful. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
DR raised to examin claim of "own work" which is doubt it is. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, no free license available ☣Banjo tell me 10:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Non-fee image, can be found on multiple sites posted before Commons: http://luvideo.ru/muz/neveroyatno-obayatelnyj-duet-lyubov-uspenskaya-i-intars-busulis-ya-milogo-uznayu-po-poxodke/2 Papuass (talk) 10:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
out of com:EDUSE, unused anyway Pippobuono (talk) 10:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
![10:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/03/16#c-Pippobuono-2017-03-16T10:59:00.000Z-File:Fu"i.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
![00:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/03/16#c-Daphne_Lantier-2017-03-23T00:24:00.000Z-File:Fu"i.jpg){kind=link}
Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. Pitpisit (talk) 11:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. Pitpisit (talk) 11:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. Pitpisit (talk) 11:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 11:49, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
There's no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The photo violates sculptor's copyright.
В Украине нет свободы панорамы. Эта фотография нарушает авторские права скульптора. Taivo (talk) 12:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Spam/out of scope/copyvios
/St1995 12:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
I did not find copyright message on source site. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author misspvivas is needed. Uploader is depicted person. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Probably copyrighted screenshot from television. Taivo (talk) 13:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio issue - subject can't be the photographer. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 13:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- This is a blatant copyright violation. It isobviously a pro type portrait photo which would be practically ompossible to take of herself. Antonioatrylia (talk) 01:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio issue - subject can't be photographer PageantUpdater talk • contribs 13:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- This is an obvious blatant copyright violation. It is a professional type portrait photo which would be practically impossible to take of herself. Antonioatrylia (talk) 01:24, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Umy Umesh (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Commons, except userpage and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Commons is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cesarthebest20 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 13:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
This image, a logo of an Israeli beer, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 14:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#G4 Recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus at Commons:Deletion requests/File:ESF60Y - RGB - DE.png. Simple text logo. Could be used here. --Hystrix (talk) 16:03, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. @EugeneZelenko: I agree with you that it is "Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful." What do you think now, a year later? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:50, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete unused, deprecated logo and out of scope.--Wdwd (talk) 09:21, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete What had changed since previous deletion? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:02, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Crop of a poster: https://proxy.bigfooty.com/forum/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fhawthornpastplayers.com.au%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F08%2F1986-Team.jpg&hash=9665fa25ab14fbeb90f0072ade0ecc55 Ytoyoda (talk) 14:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Referring to OTRS tickets #2012081310003944 (August 2012) and #2017031610011144 (today) this image lacks a proper license and should never have been accepted by OTRS.
The original photographer and rights holder asks that it be removed.
While the image was originally donated by the photographer (but uploaded by an OTRS agent), the rights holder never agreed to (and possibly has never read) any specific license, eg. CC-by 3.0, so the submission is not valid.
Nornally, I would just have asked to have the photo deleted speedily as it lacks the necessary license, but since this case is somewhat extraordinary, given the OTRS oversight, I'm nominating it through the standard channels.
Nevertheless, the photo cannot be retained and should be deleted ASAP. Asav (OTRS) | Talk 14:31, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
This is the on-ride photo. Universal Studios (owner and operator of the attraction) is the copyright holder. Elisfkc (talk) 14:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Análisis de representaciones sociales sobre la sexualidad en personas con discapacidad cognitiva en la ciudad de Bogotá.pdf
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marc.uccio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:53, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; no educational value; not a selfie repository TJH2018talk 15:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cancerventurecapital (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope; not a selfie repository; no educational value
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
TJH2018talk 15:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Advertising, complete with website and phone number! Out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a selfie repository; no educational valie TJH2018talk 15:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
No metadata seems like take from photograph Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 15:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a selfie repository; no educational value TJH2018talk 15:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; possible copyvio; no educational value TJH2018talk 15:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; no educational value; not a selfie repository TJH2018talk 15:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a selfie repository; no educational value TJH2018talk 15:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
An official album cover,[2] should be copyrighted by the record label or the artist himself. No evidence that uploader has the permission to publish this image under a free license. XXN, 15:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pressa.shymkent (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images likely belong to architecture firm unspecified in image description
Ytoyoda (talk) 15:28, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Part of mass upload; useless image of Mt. Mayon, numerous better ones in Category:Mayon. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_06.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 15:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
_06.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
_06.jpg){kind=link}
OTRS-permission from author Don Sherrill is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Poor quality, low resolution, partly unclear. Unusable. Lacks encyclopedic value. XXN, 16:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Photo of non-notable persons. Somehow this picture was altered in Photoshop and now it has some kind of artifacts, what makes it unusable. Plus that big watermark/inscription. Probably lacks educational usefulness and is out of project scope. XXN, 16:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by YungRoloTrueLove4 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal pictures - out of project scope.
XXN, 16:31, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bad quality Aabdullayev851 (talk) 16:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I'm not seeing the photo release of license on the page provided. Needs permission through OTRS. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Misidentified anyway: This is Psilocybe semilanceata, P. strictipes is not a valid species. That user does not post any more so it would be hard to get permission. I'd delete it. Alan Rockefeller (talk) 21:30, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:41, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
This is the front cover of a copyrighted document. The extraordinary claim that the uploader is its creator and owner is not supported in any way, and the user's discussion page shows a log of other fraudulent uploads. Harambe Walks (talk) 17:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Personal picture that doesn't have a description. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:33, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata. The image is found in Internet. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:31, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:33, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
not an own work, scanned without source provided and PDF not for images Ezarateesteban 18:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:33, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
User request on userspace —UY Scuti Talk 18:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:34, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyright vio: Source is google images link to the original protected image Silraks (talk) 19:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:34, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
scanned photo, not an own work, not source provided Ezarateesteban 19:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:34, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
not an own work, it is a photograph of another photo, copyvio Ezarateesteban 19:50, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:34, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
EZZAAMARI (talk · contribs) has made nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in fr.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 20:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:34, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:33, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:34, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:34, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:34, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio screen shot Sakhalinio (talk) 20:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Dr.Hasan Fırat Diker'in Ayasofya'daki mozaik Serafim meleği figürünün yüzünün restorasyon-konservasyon çalışmaları kapsamında açılması (2009) .jpg
[edit]_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
copyvio screenshot Sakhalinio (talk) 20:42, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:46, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
The user not is the author. Copyrighted logo. ✎kovox90 20:50, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:53, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio (Photographer unknown) as every other upload (current and in his history) of this user. Mirer (talk) 21:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio (or at least wrong license if old enough to qualify as PD) as every other upload (current and in his history) of this user. Mirer (talk) 21:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio (or at least wrong license if old enough to qualify as PD) as every other upload (current and in his history) of this user. Mirer (talk) 21:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio (or at least wrong license if old enough to qualify as PD) as every other upload (current and in his history) of this user. Mirer (talk) 21:18, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio (or at least wrong license if old enough to qualify as PD) as every other upload (current and in his history) of this user. Mirer (talk) 21:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio (or at least wrong license if old enough to qualify as PD) as every other upload (current and in his history) of this user. Mirer (talk) 21:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio as every other upload (current and in his history) of this user. Mirer (talk) 21:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio as every other upload (current and in his history) of this user. Mirer (talk) 21:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio (or at least wrong license if old enough to qualify as PD) as every other upload (current and in his history) of this user. Mirer (talk) 21:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio (or at least wrong license if old enough to qualify as PD) as every other upload (current and in his history) of this user. Mirer (talk) 21:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio (or at least wrong license if old enough to qualify as PD) as every other upload (current and in his history) of this user. Mirer (talk) 21:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
Didym (talk) 22:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
User's upload history suggests these are not the user's work
- File:Estadio Ciudad de Cumaná - Ayacucho.jpg
- File:Briceño.jpg
- File:Julio Lores Colan.jpg
- File:Estadio IPD Nueva Cajamarca.jpg
- File:StadiumPeru.jpg
- File:ESTADIO MANSICHE.jpg
- File:Estadio enrique torres belon.jpg
- File:Estadio Luis A. Gutierrez Toro.jpg
- File:Estadio Guillermo Briceño Rosamedina-maqueta.jpg
- File:Estadio Guillermo Briceño Rosamedina.jpg
- File:Juan-Vargas.jpg
- File:Estadio Huancayo.jpg
- File:ESTADIO MIGUEL GRAU CALLAO.jpg
- File:Estadio cutervo.jpg
- File:Estadio cutervo occidente.jpg
- File:Estadio sesquicentenario.jpg
- File:Pasion ugartina.jpg
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, most since they had metadata from Facebook or other social media sites. Kept 2 that had camera EXIF, TinEye doesn't show any hits before upload here. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
No permission from photographer Jcb (talk) 22:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Is this real an Own work of the user who upload the image? Isn't clear data and license. L'Ospite Inatteso - I love to love you 10:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal images - out of project scope.
XXN, 22:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal drawings with no encyclopedic value - out of project scope.
- File:Firestar's Quest Storyboard 5.jpg
- File:Firestar's Quest Storyboard 4.jpg
- File:Firestar's Quest Storyboard 3.jpg
- File:Firestar's Quest storyboard 2.jpg
- File:Firestar's Quest the movie.jpg
XXN, 23:00, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. XXN, 23:00, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
DW rather than own work. No source for the base map, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. XXN, 23:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 23:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Victorybiz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos + a promotional logo in multiple versions - out of project scope.
- File:Victory Osayi Airuoyuwa.jpg
- File:Victory Osayi Airuoyuwa2.jpg
- File:Vibrantsharer logo 200px.png
- File:Vibrantsharer top logo banner.png
- File:Vibrantsharer side logo banner.png
XXN, 23:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 23:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo of unclear notability - out of project scope. XXN, 23:16, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 23:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 23:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 23:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdullah94945 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, I think.
- File:Youtube now pakistan version.jpg
- File:Moabile life ki inzahasaeo h hfserhfmggdsobile life ki ggh hfserhgg.jpg
- File:Mobssssile lifessssss ki inzahssssasseo h hfssserhf.gif
XXN, 23:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. XXN, 23:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 23:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image - out of project scope. XXN, 23:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 23:46, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 23:47, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
COM:Derivative works of anime character dolls.
- File:Doll and cosplayer of Asuka Langley Soryu at Tokyo Game Show 20090927.jpg
- File:Dolls and cosplayers of Asuka Langley Soryu and Rei Ayanami at Tokyo Game Show 20090926 1.jpg
- File:Dolls and cosplayers of Asuka Langley Soryu and Rei Ayanami at Tokyo Game Show 20090926 2.jpg
- File:Dolls and cosplayers of Asuka Langley Soryu and Rei Ayanami at Tokyo Game Show 20090927.jpg
G I Chandor (talk) 00:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
This is a personal picture of a relative of mine. There has been a request from the person for this picture to be deleted. Thank you. Deep007999 (talk) 04:57, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
This is a personal photograph, needs to be deleted. Thank you Deep007999 (talk) 04:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
feo sin sentido mi vida no tiene sentido suicidio Azywomacias1 (talk) 00:57, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- DeleteTaken from the internet. No proof of this image being freely licensed. Tm (talk) 00:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect (misrepresented) license -- see source information. Does not have a license that Wikipedia accepts. Softlavender (talk) 03:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- COM:LR is needed. The gallery was licensed as {{CC-BY-3.0}} back in 2012. See http://wayback.archive.org/web/20120626073359/http://gallery.srichinmoycentre.org/sri_chinmoy but the thumbnails are broken, so dates and metadata is needed to confirm) (t) Josve05a (c) 04:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
At http://gallery.srichinmoycentre.org/sri_chinmoy I see creative commons license on left and thumbnails are working --Finarfin77 (talk) 10:38, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, but the previous license was CC BY-SA 3.0 apparently until recently, see [3], so it is correct on the Commons page. I suppose the new CC BY 4.0 can be added, but I'm not sure if it's a good thing to remove the other one. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:18, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: It has CC-BY-3.0 now. I have added {{Licensereview}}. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
These photos contain copyrighted works.
- File:2017TICAF Day 1, Muse Communication Booth 20170202.jpg
- File:2017TICAF Day 1, Shadowverse Booth 20170202.jpg
- File:2017TICAF Day 1, Sharp Point Press 20170202iPa.jpg
- File:2017TICAF Day 1, Sharp Point Press 20170202iPb.jpg
- File:2017TICAF Day 5, Shadowverse Booth 20170206a.jpg
- File:2017TICAF Day 5, Shadowverse Booth 20170206b.jpg
G I Chandor (talk) 03:46, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Keep These Photos are Photographing Booths, Not Close-up Copyright Grapgh Work. Crowd Blocked Graphic Works that so Not Completed. --玄史生 (talk) 05:50, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: We have people's backs and large copyrighted graphics. The only things in scope in these images are the graphics. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
These photos contain copyrighted works.
- File:2016TICA Day 5, Good Smile Company 20160214a.jpg
- File:2016TICA Day 5, Good Smile Company 20160214b.jpg
- File:2016TICA Day 5, Good Smile Company 20160214c.jpg
- File:2016TICA Day 5, Good Smile Company 20160214d.jpg
- File:2016TICA Day 5, Megaridge 20160214.jpg
- File:Ching Win Publishing booth, Taipei International Comics & Animation Festival 20160211.jpg
- File:Chita Musume at Asicom International booth, Taipei International Comics & Animation Festival 20160211.jpg
- File:DNAxCAT booth, Taipei International Comics & Animation Festival 20160211.jpg
- File:Good Smile Company booth, Taipei International Comics & Animation Festival 20160211.jpg
- File:Monking International booth, Taipei International Comics & Animation Festival 20160211.jpg
- File:Muse Communication booth, Taipei International Comics & Animation Festival 20160211.jpg
G I Chandor (talk) 03:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep File:2016TICA Day 5, Good Smile Company 20160214d.jpg and File:2016TICA Day 5, Megaridge 20160214.jpg are Photographing Booths, Not Close-up Copyright Grapgh Work. --玄史生 (talk) 06:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: We have people's backs and large copyrighted graphics. The only things in scope in these images are the graphics. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
completely wrong, there is no "VEB aircraft" anywhere Frze > talk 05:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Error transfer. The content is from a book pulibshed in 1974, and is not the "simple logo or text" categories. Therefore, it has copyrights. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 06:46, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think a simple alphabet table is a creative work. --Wcam (talk) 14:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Nothing creative here. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
False licensing. Image is copyrighted in Hong Kong and comes from here: http://hkrail.wikia.com/wiki/檔案:MTRLR_logo_old.png. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:31, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Then shouldn't File:FutureMTRNetworkAfterMerger.png be nominated as well, since it contains the same icon? It was traced from that file, and then rounded corners are added. Emphrase (talk) 11:52, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the use of the Icon in the map is absolutely de minimis -- a very good example of it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
This doesn't really qualify for {{Pd-shape}}. The current revision should be reverted to the text icon and then hidden from upload history. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 06:53, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- The licensing decision was based upon File:Budapest tram symbol.svg, does the same apply here? JaJaWa |talk 10:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- @JaJaWa: I'm not sure, although that image probably isn't PD-shape either. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 12:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- @JaJaWa: I'm not sure, although that image probably isn't PD-shape either. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
Deleted: Icon. Left placeholder. Note that the fact that the similar icon has not been deleted proves nothing. We have several hundred thousand images that should be deleted. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
taken from websites that claims the copyright Pierpao.lo (listening) 07:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Have you proof this file is not own work? The file at the non-free website was edited (has a broad white border) and lacks Exif. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Taken from the architect's web site -- © 2017 DA Architects + Planners. All rights reserved. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Useless picture Derbrauni (talk) 15:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
See COM:AN/U#Administrator reinstates apparent copyvio, censors file page history Yann (talk) 15:47, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- What is the reason for this DR? The source [4] is a major image database maintained by a respectable organization (Wellcome Trust). They obviously have access to the original, as they list non-obvious details in the description. Yet they license the image as CC-BY. I see no valid claim this might be incorrect, and I don't even see a valid claim this image was ever copyrighted. Materialscientist (talk) 00:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- As others in the discussion linked above, I also have some doubt about the license. Wellcome Images certainly does not have the right to license this under CC-BY. However it could in the public domain for lack of a notice or renewal, but this needs more information. Regards, Yann (talk) 01:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Wellcome Images certainly does not have the right to license this under CC-BY - we don't know. Wellcome database does not technically support the wide range of Commons license templates, they use only a few. Obviously, they do not hold copyright for many images they tag as CC-BY, but they do have information to assess their copyright. Meanwhile, we can only make a wild guess, i.e. speculate out of thin air. Yes, a good guess would be that this images falls under {{PD-US-no notice}}, and that Wellcome know that because they have a journal copy. Materialscientist (talk) 01:31, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- As others in the discussion linked above, I also have some doubt about the license. Wellcome Images certainly does not have the right to license this under CC-BY. However it could in the public domain for lack of a notice or renewal, but this needs more information. Regards, Yann (talk) 01:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Wellcome Images certainly does not have the right to license this under CC-BY - Once again, no-one has claimed this. They are re-publishing it under such a licence, if we trust Wellcome then we assume that they have somehow found such a licensing permission from Marvel. We do trust Wellcome. There is no reason not to.
- As you are so adamant to claim "certainly does not", then perhaps you would share with us the source of this certain knowledge? Andy Dingley (talk) 22:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- It may not be absolute certainty, but Marvel has regularly securitized its commercial borrowing with its copyrights, including the copyright to this title. See, for example, [5]. If Marvel/Disney were to release its rights, it would likely violate its bond covenants. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 23:42, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- But in this case, this isn't content randomly scraped off the web, it's the Wellcome Library (for whom we have a certain expectation of competence) publishing content through their documented channel, and advertising it with a CC licence. I have no idea how this came about - what deal they struck with Marvel, or what deal Marvel struck with them (there is commercial advantage to a big publisher releasing some content under free licences) - but I'm happy to trust a claim that Wellcome make about licensing, and to believe that it's a valid claim. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:22, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- It may not be absolute certainty, but Marvel has regularly securitized its commercial borrowing with its copyrights, including the copyright to this title. See, for example, [5]. If Marvel/Disney were to release its rights, it would likely violate its bond covenants. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 23:42, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Good guesses should be, at least, sensible. Otherwise it's just imaginative stuff for copyright washing. Marvel hasn't been ever a lazy company when it comes to copyright. The mere statement of Marvel not including a copyright notice in any of their publications is really weird and not actually believable (BTW, if that's the case, there's a CC0 license available). Stating that Wellcome Library has been transferred the copyrights of this specific front-cover by Marvel is simply untenable. --Discasto talk 09:32, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Fortunately no-one, including Wellcome, is claiming that copyright has been transferred to Wellcome. Reading the introductory texts on the Creative Commons site should explain the difference between copyright and its ownership, and licensing. The claim here is that it has been licensed under a free CC-by licence, not that it is not covered by Marvel's copyright. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Whatever the merits of this argument, the argument made in my original deletion request was that "This is a copyrighted magazine cover and there is no indication that anyone involved with its uploading had any authority to license it". Wellcome does not have the authority to license a cover image simply because it owns a copy of the magazine involved. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 22:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Fortunately no-one, including Wellcome, is claiming that copyright has been transferred to Wellcome. Reading the introductory texts on the Creative Commons site should explain the difference between copyright and its ownership, and licensing. The claim here is that it has been licensed under a free CC-by licence, not that it is not covered by Marvel's copyright. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete User:Discasto sets out the basic principles effectively. Since the fact of a copyright notice has been put at issue, I managed to find a scan of the publication at issue (on a copyright-violating site, so I won't link to it) and can confirm that this magazine carried a standard copyright notice in the indicia on page 3. As a post-1963 US copyright, no renewal was required. Also, if, as the Wellcome Library description states, the cover "shows Bruce Lee in a scene from the film, 'Enter the dragon'", this is likely a derivative work, and the copyright may well be shared by Marvel and the film producers. (I assume it's an authorized derivative work, since the issue includes an interview with the film's director.) I don't see any basis for concluding that this is anything but an error in the library listing, and we can't safely represent that this is a demonstrably free image. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 14:42, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No credible reason has been presented as to why we should disbelieve the licence offered from the Wellcome Library. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Comment I sent a mail to the U.S. Copyright Office, asking if there is a copyright notice for this; I received an automated mail saying they will respond within 5 working days. I have never made such a request, I do not know if I will really have an answer. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- I received a reply, there is a fee for this kind of request. It has nothing to try. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: (a) I have little faith in a Wellcome assertion. We had a 700+ image mistake by them some months ago. (b) While it is possible -- difficult to imagine, but not impossible -- that the work was published without notice, that does not give Wellcome the right to license it as CC anything -- would be PD, so it is clear that the informationon their web site is wrong. (c) I don;t believe Marvel licensed this to Wellcome -- why on earth would they? Note to Christian -- all copyright applications and renewals are on line at www.copyright.gov. Those before 1978 are images of paper works and difficult, but not impossible,to search. Thiose after 1977 are in digital form and are searchable. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Artwork without permission from the artist, see "Quantum Prayer was a title piece at the Glasstress 2013 exhibition, a collateral event of the 55th Biennale di Venezia." in description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Eduardo Bó Rabadán fundador de Kurisu Electronics Systems e inventor de Kurisu OS y KYOU.JPG
[edit]
¿Esto a qué viene? Autobombo claro. Revisar edición en la lista de distribuciones de Linux para entender el por qué del borrado. 185.14.56.14 18:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
the image on background may be copyrighted and, out of scope? Ezarateesteban 19:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: 1990 work -- certainly still under copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather thumbnail format, but also montage without links to Wikimedia Commons files used for, hence, potentially copyright isusses and potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Two British logos… this is the logo from the Edge case. - Reventtalk 21:31, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep: But EDGE Tech Corp. is from the United States (it is a totally unrelated company). --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:30, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: @Perhelion: If this is, specifically,the logo of the US corporation and not the UK one, then this DR was in error... the logo is well below the TOO in the US. I might have misunderstood which it was. - Reventtalk 05:23, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Oklahoma company -- similar to the UK logo, but not identical. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
outdated photo Derelict808 (talk) 22:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- File:Marc Broude 2012.jpeg
- File:Marcbroude07.jpg
- File:Marcbroude1.jpg
- File:Marcbroude11.jpg
- File:Marcbroude14.jpg
- File:Marcbroude19.jpg
- File:Marcbroude26.jpg
- File:Marcbroude36.jpg
- File:Marcbroude53.jpg
- File:Marcbroude7.jpg
- File:Marcbroude76.jpg
- File:Marcbroudeimg.jpg
Requested by subject Sphilbrick (talk) 16:54, 7 January 2020 (UTC) The subject wrote to Wikimedia, originally to request the deletion of an article about them, but also regarding images of him:ticket:2020010610007479 He asserts that these photos were taken from him without permission. They are claimed to be "own work" by Derelict808. The subject does not know the editor by that name. I note that two of these were proposed for deletion by Derelict808 in the past, but the deletion was declined because the reason wasn't particularly convincing.
I picked the first entry in the category, but all photos in this category:
Category:Marc Broude should be treated the same way.--Sphilbrick (talk) 16:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: ticket:2020010610007479. ~riley (talk) 07:33, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
suspected not own work, found several place around the web, including a fullbody image. TherasTaneel (talk) 23:18, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by S M Zubair Islam as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: deletion |Copyright Violation. If the uploader is en:Azizur Rahman (film director), then own work is possible, but due to large number of fans and impostors OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Redundant. Superseded by similar image with more light: File:Parking na ścieżce rowerowej.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Copied from en.wiki where it was deleted for "Lack of source and licensing information". Same issue here. XXN, 23:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, but here the file has author and license. OTRS permission may be needed. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, metadata reads "Author AYCIN CAKI Copyright holder aycincaki.wordpress.com", source was given as en:wiki with no further information. Reverse searching did not find any image like this at wordpress, unable to verify license. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Uploader request Atudu (talk) 13:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: uploader request is only a valid reason for deletion within a week after upload. --Jcb (talk) 11:42, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Uploader request Atudu (talk) 13:16, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: uploader request is only a valid reason for deletion within a week after upload. --Jcb (talk) 11:42, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
licence not valid anylonger Zinnif (talk) 09:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please explain? Are you the photographer, as stated on upload? Jcb (talk) 16:29, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: CC-license cannot be revoked, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thomas Muster Kitzbühel.jpg. --Jcb (talk) 16:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
we have no rghts to distribute this picture online. only print and only one country! please delete! Zinnif (talk) 11:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- So you are saying that you were lying at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thomas Muster Kitzbühel.jpg where you declared to be the copyright holder? Jcb (talk) 13:54, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:19, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused and doesn't seem to be anyone notable. Indigo Shire is a place in Australia. --ghouston (talk) 00:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:30, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Uploader request Atudu (talk) 13:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, unused and unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Missing information about the photographer and the license on the photograph. No evidence that it is own work, because it is missing the exif information, and if it was taken from the web, the source site has not been cited. Comparable to euro coins the photographs of which have been considered copyrighted. See also Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag#This does not apply to photographs of 3D works of art. In the case this is not a photograph but a rendering, it is directly comparable to it due to the choice of the lighting, which is a creative choice. Eleassar (t/p) 08:16, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. Evidently a crop of [6], published by the Army Institute of Heraldry. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:25, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_Navy_030313-D-0000X-002_Global_War_on_Terrorism_Service_Medal.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Unused, non-photographic JPEG. Superseded by PNG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 00:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Your PNG version has different colors, and quality is worse. No valid reason for deletion, even, your edits at the English Wikipedia should be reverted; at least, the newer PNG should be edited properly (I discourage the use of the Magic Wand, instead, I preffer to use the Lasso for these kind of editions). --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment The reason why the colors are different is because my version has the proper colors, specified by the U.S. Defense Logistics Agency. The other version has wrong colors. So my version is more factually accurate as well as bigger. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 18:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: @Illegitimate Barrister: Unfortunately that is a big mistake. And if an DR is ongoing a rename is to omit. -- User: Perhelion 13:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 10:28, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: Can you please click in addition the keep button here? (Maybe the admin script should do this the same time!?) -- User: Perhelion 23:56, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Perhelion: I did it :) ...but the file was renamed, so the script didn't follow the redirect. All set now --Ruthven (msg) 07:57, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: Oh sh*t and you did it now manually? Should the script be fixed? If yes, please made a request on the script!? (Unfortunately this case was another test for a bug fix of the script...) -- User: Perhelion 10:15, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Este archivo lo diseñé con errores de extensión, y debe ser eliminado porque no puede divisarse en un artículo, ya que posee dos extensiones (jpg y png) causa por la que el archivo entra en conflicto, será reemplazado por otro similar, con mejor resolución. Gracias. DIEGO73 (talk) 03:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: @DIEGO73: El archivo ha sido renombrado. No hace falta cancelar cuando hay un error en el nombre: se usa {{Rename}}. Ruthven (msg) 10:29, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
@Ruthven: Grazie, et merci. Thanks, und danke. Gracias, e obrigado. Cпасибо :) DIEGO73 (talk) 00:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect (misrepresented) license -- see source information. Does not have a license that Wikipedia accepts. Softlavender (talk) 03:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- COM:LR is needed. The gallery was licensed as {{CC-BY-3.0}} back in 2012. See http://wayback.archive.org/web/20120626073359/http://gallery.srichinmoycentre.org/sri_chinmoy but the thumbnails are broken, so dates and metadata is needed to confirm) (t) Josve05a (c) 04:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Updated license to CC-BY-4.0 to reflect http://gallery.srichinmoycentre.org/sri_chinmoy/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Finarfin77 (talk • contribs) 10:55, 18. March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: file in CC by-sa. Ruthven (msg) 10:37, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Contains errors. Was uploaded in jpg format; a superior alternative exists in svg format. I, Ypna, originally uploaded this file. Ypna (talk) 04:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- I see no errors. Direct us to the .svg version you say you are replacing it with. --Andynct (talk) 07:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Errors were pointed out at File talk:Nuclear power plant construction.jpg. I didn't say I am making a replacement. An alternative already exists (File:NuclearPowerStats.svg). I know the two graphs don't strictly show the same thing, but both y-axes are essentially proxies for the prevalence of nuclear power. Ypna (talk) 10:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- I just noticed you have corrected those errors. Thanks. But the question still stands over whether the file is worth keeping given that there is an alternative and given that this file will be annoying to update in jpg form. Unfortunately I don't have the original file. Ypna (talk) 10:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- If the consensus is keep, I think I may as well recreate the file from scratch and upload it in svg. I would also look into using number of plants in operation rather than construction starts as it is simpler. But the alternative seems ok to me. What do you think? Ypna (talk) 10:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. You can still create a svg version. Ruthven (msg) 10:39, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
taken from website that claims the copyright Pierpao.lo (listening) 07:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: This file has Exif and a valid source; the file at the non-free website lacks of it. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:33, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: government source. Ruthven (msg) 10:34, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted image 194.199.4.202 12:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:34, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Depicted person is long dead, so this isn't own work. Who is the photographer and when (s)he died?
Изображённый человек уже давно умер, так что это не собственная работа. Кто фотограф и когда он(а) умер(ла)? Taivo (talk) 12:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:35, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Two Chocolate Albatross Appias lyncida and one Common Bluebottle Graphium sarpedon WLB DSC 9054.jpg
[edit]
Uploader request Atudu (talk) 13:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: the file has been uploaded almost one year ago. Ruthven (msg) 10:35, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
это не свободное изображение Barbarian (talk) 14:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:36, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Błędna lokalizacja torów odstawczych przy trasie tramwajowej na Jar Mateuszgdynia (talk) 09:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:07, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece, modern building. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Well, Athens Central Railway Station is not at all a "modern" building; by the word "modern", I believe that user Taivo implies that it is not in the public domain because no more than 70 years have passed since the creator deceased. Please take note of the following:
1. I have not yet discovered the architect or the engineer who designed the building.
2. The building must have been designed in the 1890s as it was completed in 1904 (see Wikipedia: Athens Railway Station), so even if the architect was in his 30s in 1890s, he would be in his 80s in 1940s and most possibly, he or she deceased about then. So, at least 70 years have passed since his most probable death.
3. There are also many more pictures of Athens' Larissa Station in Category:Athens Larissa Station, so either all of them should be deleted or all of them be kept, accordingly, not to mention all the pictures of mid-war Greek buildings (1920's and 1930's) in Athens or in other places. --Argos (talk) 20:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I think this one we can keep, per above & since the architectural originality is very low here anyways. --A.Savin 23:21, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Savin, no defining architectural elements visible. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 17:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: PNG don't have Exif, and no proof of copyvio provided. No valid reason for deletion (Google Image Search results returned only Wikipedia mirrors). --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:33, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
File is licensed as "own work" and {{PD-Albania-exempt}}. The former seems unlikely because the logo is for the Albanian soccer team en:Golemi FC and the latter seems unlikely because it does not appear that this team logo would be "official symbols of the state, symbols of other public organizations and public authorities, such as: coats of arms, seals, flags, emblems, medals, medallions and other signage". Soccer teams, excluding national soccer teams, tend to be privately owned and operated and I don't think such entities would be considered to be PD. Marchjuly (talk) 02:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC);[Note: I have edited my original post because I mistakenly wrote "the latter seems likely" when my intention was to write "the latter seems unlikely" -- 21:05, 17 March 2017 (UTC).]
- In Albania soccer teams are partially owned by the municipality who owns rights to the name of the club, images associated with the club and has ownership of the stadium where the club plays. I added a disclaimer footnote in the PD template. The logo is my work in the sense that I created it in its current vector form. Kj1595 (talk) 02:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- The disclaimer "Football clubs in Albania are partially managed and funded by the municipality who has ownership of the club name, the images associated with it and the stadium grounds where the club competes in.[7]" may be true, but that still seems to imply that public ownership is not 100% public so it's not clear if that type of exemption should be allowed by Commons. Moreover, I'm not sure creating a vector version of a possibly copyrighted logo makes it your "own work" in the sense that any original copyright which might exist is no longer applicable. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- I can remove the "own work" part. However, to further argue my point, a football club has sponsors but the municipality is the rightful owner of the club name and all images associated with it. Sponsors come and go but they can only sell their shares and have no legal authority over the club name and its symbols. That rests with the municipality. Kj1595 (talk) 02:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- The disclaimer "Football clubs in Albania are partially managed and funded by the municipality who has ownership of the club name, the images associated with it and the stadium grounds where the club competes in.[7]" may be true, but that still seems to imply that public ownership is not 100% public so it's not clear if that type of exemption should be allowed by Commons. Moreover, I'm not sure creating a vector version of a possibly copyrighted logo makes it your "own work" in the sense that any original copyright which might exist is no longer applicable. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: As I see it Marchjuly created significant doubt. Therefor deleted per com:PCP. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Dear Wikimedia decision maker. Please delete this video immediately! some people - about 30 - named in the video do not want to be named in the public and be shown in this video publicly. They are also afraid of their security about several reasons and asked me to delete this video. (by lawyer) The investiture in Laibach was a private event and not public. The people did not give the allowance to be filmed and be published. The video was originally private in my youtube account and not indented to go public. The people have the right to stay private and I also deleted the video at my Youtoube account. I did not upload the video to Wikimedia, it was only at my youtube account. I have no idea who uploaded it to wikimedia. Wikimedia doesn’t have my permission to show this video. I must respect the privacy of the people, I hope You do this too and delete this video immediately Best regards Gerhard H.J. Fruhmann MA gerhard.fruhmann@aon.at Gerhard H.J. Fruhmann MA (talk) 12:30, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
I fully concur with the proposal to remove this video for safety, privacy, and copyright reasons. Best regards, Dr. Dr. Immanuel Fruhmann
- Delete Deleted on Youtube, we can afford a courtesy deletion. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Investiture is never a private act. The file is within the scope of Commons and Wikimedia and very useful. --Eleassar (t/p) 14:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Looks like a case of {{Change-of-license}} also it was in the news[8]. --Sporti (talk) 07:34, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. We don't want to be meanies that continue to hoste files when the subjects want a file deleted for a reasonable reason don't we?. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:20, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Die Datei enthält ein falsches Wappen BürgermeisteramtÖstringen (talk) 15:54, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Hallo BürgermeisteramtÖstringen, wie man der Quelle leicht entnehmen kann entspricht dieses genau einer heraldischen Referenz, im Gegensatz zu ihrem: File:Wappen Stadt Oestringen.tif (welches nur "Own work" hat und einem leicht unpassendem Dateiformat, zudem die Färbung/Tinktur für hiesige Belange ziemlich unzureichend ist, Gold und Silber sind fast nicht zu unterscheiden). Sie scheinen sich auch nicht recht mit dem Wappenrecht an sich auszukennen, denn Sie haben {{PD-Coa-Germany}} ignoriert. Da Wappen abgesehen der Heraldik heute wie Logos gebraucht werden – daher exakt sein sollen – (aber von Wikipedia eben auch nicht gefordert) ist Ihre Intention verständlich, allerdings aus heraldischer Sicht Unfug und daher hier ohne Erfolg. MfG -- User: Perhelion 20:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Per Perhelion. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:20, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
