Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/01/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 31st, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotes war Punkypower76 (talk) 06:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: "Source/Author: its free to use goddamit" vs. ©2014 merdeka.com/muhammad lutfhi rahman. --Common Good (talk) 07:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jhonfis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. Missing EXIF.

kovox90      02:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvios, speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Einordnung Lothar520 (talk) 14:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: housekeeping. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Existent in many pages on the internet before uploading date ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{Speedydelete|Created by mistake}} ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk)

Deleted: Deleted by Jcb. --Achim (talk) 21:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sorry, ik heb op de verkeerde knop gedrukt. Pagina moet blijven!


Speedy kept: Mistake DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

gebruikersnaam wijzigen Ajvdw (talk) 20:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: vandalism. Ruthven (msg) 19:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Walibi_Mascotte.jpg?uselang=nl Luuk58 (talk) 14:20, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster likely copyrighted. Spam for an incoming event. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sklimek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: copyright Yann (talk) 21:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:05, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a direct copy of a Wikipedia (EN) article created by an editor who has been banned for abusing multiple accounts. Exemplo347 (talk) 09:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 16:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

renamed User:Abubiju 31 January 2017


Deleted: Empty & bad name. --Achim (talk) 17:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alternative photo Moajjem 01:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: Deleted at request of uploader -- 3x file. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kolforn (talk · contribs) nominated the file for speedy deletion with reason "Unused personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope". Taivo (talk) 10:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dharma-lotus-wiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion (covers of book authored by the uploader, poster for a meditation event, "order here" buttons). Moreover, some images used might still be under copyright, and I wonder whether the uploader has the permission to publish them under a free licence)

BrightRaven (talk) 12:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dharma-lotus-wiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, texts and diagrams without obvious educational use

BrightRaven (talk) 13:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dharma-lotus-wiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are all details of this image, which can be found on the web. They can be kept only if the origin image is in the public domain.

BrightRaven (talk) 13:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The original image is a painting more than 100 years old, so there is no copy right. The foto is made by me. Dharma-lotus-wiki (talk) 22:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please provide more information about the original painting? For example: creator, date of production, area of production, technique, present location (museum)... Without any information, it is very difficult to check if this painting is in the public domain or not. BrightRaven (talk) 13:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dharma-lotus-wiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I wonder whether these images are in scope: they are unused files, with diagrams and drawings without obvious educational use. Moreover, some of these images can be found on the web (see [4], [5], [6]...). The uploader pretends that he is the creator of these images, but he has a record of copyright violations.

BrightRaven (talk) 13:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo: Out of project scope: Commons:Deletion requests/File:کوههای اندیمشک.JPG

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo: Out of project scope: Commons:Deletion requests/File:کوههای اندیمشک.JPG

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, cropped (micro-thumbnail), hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Krd: Broken redirect

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused raster flags of the Netherlands Antilles

[edit]

All this files are unused raster flags totally remplaced by its vector equivalent:

Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 13:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep files from 2005/2006. There could be external usage, usage in printed media, usage in PDF's who have a link to the source file etc. There is no reason to delete png's that have been here for 10 years purely because there is a svg-file available. Natuur12 (talk) 13:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Wikicology (talk) 10:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation SANCAN112 (talk) 00:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation SANCAN112 (talk) 00:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation SANCAN112 (talk) 00:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в лицензии. Автор неизвестен, источник Russian Wikipedia ни о чём не говорит, из русскоязычного отдела Википедии файл уже удалён. Но до удаления в описании файла, в Русскоязычной Википедии также не было источника. Проверить лицензионный статус не представляется возможным. Dogad75 (talk) 11:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is 90 years old and its original upload is from the page of a book. I can't read Russian so don't know the details but it's a highly valuable image since so few images exist from Central Asia during this period.Monopoly31121993 (talk) 13:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Monopoly31121993: its original upload is from the page of a book: Unfortunately, there is no source at all. This photo is 90 years old: You have to provide evidence that the work was originally published 70 or more years ago. Sealle (talk) 14:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'm requesitng help of Russian speaking editor from the village pump. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎ Monopoly31121993 (talk • contribs) 14:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Monopoly31121993: What book it was scanned from?--Anatoliy (talk) 20:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's pretty well known photo found in different books, for example: Mikhail Vasilyevich Frunze. Life and actions in the photographs and documents. Moscow, "Politizdat", 1973. (Михаил Васильевич Фрунзе. Жизнь и деятельность в фотографиях и документах — М.: Политиздат, 1973.).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nut1917 (talk • contribs) 12:14, 5 февраля 2017‎ (UTC)
Even if so, that won't help. 1973 + 70 = 2043. Sealle (talk) 14:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Jcb: Missing source as of 29 January 2017. --Sealle (talk) 16:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GA Ede (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These were all uploaded under ticket:2014091610024198 as photos by A. B. Wigman. However, OTRS ticket:2017012310010662 - the uploaders have received a notice - "In December 2016 we received a letter from Dutch Fotomuseum showing that not all photos by A. B. Wigman made and he was not the copyright holder of these images." The uploaders are investigating the situation, but they say it will take a long time to check, and they therefore ask that the images be removed as they cannot confirm that they are free images. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:A.B. Wigman, some here may be redirects to renamed images.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faizan faiz khan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

--ghouston (talk) 04:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faizan faiz khan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

--ghouston (talk) 03:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

замена фото Карина Цой (talk) 05:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 05:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amddydore (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by User:Pinterest-Anti-Christ

[edit]

Collection of anti-Pinterest memes that are out of scope, with no real educational or historical value. Generally unused: one image is used on a user talk page; one is used on an inactive meta page. Dubious claim of own work, with no metadata. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 14:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to summary, this is a photo from a family archive by an unknown author. --sasha (krassotkin) 14:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Drmartyklein (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused certificates of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Drmartyklein (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. Commons is not social media; it is not here to promote oneself, nor to claim "own work" on images of oneself - as they are obviously not own work, nor are the certificates, newspapers and so on uploaded here for a self-promotional or promotional gallery.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:31, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo does not appear at cited source page, copyright status unknown Ytoyoda (talk) 21:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   22:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, user uses ru.wikipedia for permanent advertising Кронас (talk) 22:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please unblock me so that i can use it to design my user page were i will ony keep the list of my wiki edits....

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Comment: DR started as per confusing message on my talk, guessing this one was pointed to ... quotation: == Out of scope images == Hi, Please create a regular deletion request, and inform the uploader. Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
as pointed before, obviously advertisements, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 23:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Clear propaganda material. Exhibit B: File description. Rahul Bott (talk) 04:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 05:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission, also out of scope. Jcb (talk) 23:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an original logo in France that is neither covered by freedom of panoramo nor de-minimis. De728631 (talk) 00:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Missing EXIF. kovox90      02:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination http://diariocorreo.pe/espectaculos/antonio-pavon-le-propuso-matrimonio-a-karen-20039/. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KRISHNA2780 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work due to age, no source or copyright details. --ghouston (talk) 03:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unclear copyright statut. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As uploader states, stolen from hereSunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 03:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As uploader states, stolen from hereSunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 03:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 05:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+source is not ok. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Italy -> Commons:Freedom of panorama#Italy тнояsтеn 07:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France : painting is made by Ernest Pignon Ernest ComputerHotline (talk) 07:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 07:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of Batman, copyrighted character UAwiki (talk) 07:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Attribution in image does not match the uploader—need COM:OTRS permission czar 08:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kunaal Rajput (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal type photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 08:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May come from a copyrighted video. Several similar shots can be found when we look for images of "Sylvain Durif" : https://www.ecosia.org/images?q=Sylvain+Durif TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination https://www.spi0n.com/sylvain-durif-est-un-messager-de-la-fin-du-monde/. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abscomputerclass (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photo album. Out of scope.

Castillo blanco (talk) 09:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, note that 1 logo and 1 copyvio are included in this DR. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lettering this heavily stylized (especially the dripping blood) is probably copyrightable, and there is no evidence the uploader is the copyright holder. BTW, if this is deleted the "ShadowsCommons" template on ought to be changed to "Deleted on Commons" Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 00:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Type fonts, even highly stylized type fonts dripping blood, do not have copyright protection in the USA. This is a USA company. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, false "own work" claim, as the image is owned by Gun Media Holdings, Inc. and New Line Cinema Productions Inc. Lordtobi () 09:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:52, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Check metadata: appears to belong to Stuart McLean/News Corp Australia. No indication that the uploader has authorisation to use this file. Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are copyright, non-free license to their countries of origin with only a few exceptions. Belgium is not one of the exceptions. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Belgian Euro commemorative coins and coins at Commons:Deletion requests/Images of money of Belgium. Hammersoft (talk) 00:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are copyright, non-free license to their countries of origin with only a few exceptions. Belgium is not one of the exceptions. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Belgian Euro commemorative coins and coins at Commons:Deletion requests/Images of money of Belgium. Hammersoft (talk) 00:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:EURO Triplecaña (talk) 15:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 20:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are copyrighted with a non-free license to their country of origin, with few exceptions. France is not one of them. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Commemorative 2 euro coins (France). --Hammersoft (talk) 01:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are copyrighted with a non-free license to their country of origin, with few exceptions. France is not one of them. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Commemorative 2 euro coins (France). Hammersoft (talk) 01:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Missing EXIF. kovox90      02:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Missing EXIF. kovox90      02:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. kovox90      02:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, it's not my "own work". I never claimed it to be my work. It's an old advertisement that is in the public domain.--MarshalN20 (talk) 14:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It is highly unlikely that this work is PD. Both the use of color and the bathing suit suggest that it is post WWII. Copyright in Peru lasts 70 years after the death of the photographer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [7]. Yann (talk) 09:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not authorize this picture of me to be used in any way. Please take down. 45.46.223.202 03:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We do not generally delete images after anonymous requests, but this is an out of scope personal image anyway. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As uploader states, stolen from someone's Facebook page — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 03:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As uploader states, stolen from hereSunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 03:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As uploader states, stolen from hereSunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 03:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Turkmenistan. Яй (talk) 05:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no FoP in Turkmenistan. Яй (talk) 05:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luise35 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyvios. Inconsistent sizes, EXIF, and filenames.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Turkmenistan.

Яй (talk) 05:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seem unlikely to be own work. Looks like a scan from some unknown publication so there's no way to verify it's copyright status. Should be deleted per COM:PCP unless it can be clearly shown to be either released under a free license or within the public domain. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jdx (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work of a non free photo http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-union/international/six-nations-2014-wales-v-italy-leigh-halfpenny-feels-wales-are-better-than-last-year-9100523.html

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong info Enamulhaqueche (talk) 06:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: THat's not a reason to delete, but these are no categories and no useful description, so out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this obvious rephotograph. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image of Putin would appear to be a derivative of his Time magazine front cover photo. Hence, this is a copyright violation. 180.94.80.126 06:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep -- This appears to be radically transformed from whatever photographic source (if any). There's no "homeopathic" copyright law. AnonMoos (talk) 21:53, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: As above. Natuur12 (talk) 22:43, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the copyright holder Arseny Gabdullin (Арсений Габдуллин) agrees to license this under a free licence as stated by user:Yoxel. Sealle (talk) 08:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-India location images of Bollywoodhungama.com are deleted on precaution basis. Refer Commons:Deletion requests/SIIMA images from bollywoodhungama for example. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from copyright holder JOHFBAKS PHOTOGRAPHY is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without camera data, the uploader's last remaining contribution, not yet nominated for deletion. I suspect not own photo, but real photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 10:22, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many people using my file to promote themselves. Dr malar (talk) 11:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many people using my file to promote themselves. Dr malar (talk) 11:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unwanted usage Dr malar (talk) 08:17, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:08, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many people using my file to promote themselves. Dr malar (talk) 11:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 11:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anirbancmandal (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 11:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 11:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not educationally usable. Unclear/unfocused. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:52, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crisb10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work. Small size, no Exif. Other upload already speedy deleted.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Esby23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal artwork. lLikely out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kchek852 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Middle size, no Exifs, unlikely to be own work. Other uploads deleted. Maybe out of scope too.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

of temporary use for meta discussion only Aalfons (talk) 12:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do we need it? Seems to be a personal photo. Mhhossein talk 13:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has the copyright information right in it. How in the world did this file survive here for more than four years? Headlocker (talk) 13:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Though the Electronic Frontier Foundation has released this video, it is clear that Wyden is reading prepared notes. There is no evidence that the notes have been freely released. (talk) 13:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that Ted Cruz has released his speech in these video segments. (talk) 13:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a warranted concern, however, considering the brevity of the excerpts from the speech that are included?SecretName101 (talk) 17:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A single setence has a copyright in the USA. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant advertising Takeaway (talk) 13:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnotable person. Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 14:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnotable person. Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 14:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As it says at the bottom of the photo, "Image copyright 2016 DigitalGlobe" 2600:1011:B053:E768:F97D:93B5:1F1B:F990 14:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

de:Leo Leonhard died in 2011. Uploader can't be the Artist. Karsten11 (talk) 14:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elvis also has not designed his own Wikipedia Page. The Picture itself is an Artwork of Leo Leonhard.


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:24, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luxvn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Source sites don't seem to have license statement. License review by person who knows Korean is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Google finds no evidence of a CC-BY license on the source page. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IProkashSingha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anupriyatkd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/photo/55667557.cms.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photograph of a video, original source not given Ytoyoda (talk) 15:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giri123456 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i.ytimg.com/vi/q2Su264R0YU/maxresdefault.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mumtaz (Physiotherapist) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PANCHOGARRANCHO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nicolefogt30 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tedmfm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://1.bp.blogspot.com/--XirohtBfJo/V6Pynn4zv3I/AAAAAAAAHdw/91DQnHCNxicjthWyapdNDxFMdmeaR4slgCLcB/s1600/I%25C3%25B1aki%2BUrlezaga.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image probablement non libre Shev123 (talk) 11:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ticket:2017020210014062 is a valid permission. --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 19:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Framawiki. Ruthven (msg) 12:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: Previously published via (examples) http://www.taringa.net/posts/arte/15396816/Mini-Homenaje-a-Edmundo-Rivero.html (14.08.2012) = http://sp4.fotolog.com/photo/20/27/87/cruzdelsur_flog/1200588689_f.jpg (last modified: 2011) or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgaeJ_ogAUo (2011) or http://creerycrecercultura.blogspot.de/2009/01/rivero.html (2009). With no further details (the file is undated, portrayed is Argentine singer es:Edmundo Rivero, 1911—1986), fails also {{PD-AR-Photo}}: If created after 1970 not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Gunnex (talk) 12:24, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 22:47, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Widely present on the web. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://djmag.com/sites/default/files/styles/djmag_landscape/public/top100/djs/image/dvlm%20by%20Boy%20Kortekaas%2001%20WHITE%20BG.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits Thorsten Springmann Ytoyoda (talk) 15:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture of a not-relevant person - useless for educational purposes L736E (talk) 16:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since it's not a selfie and I don't think the subject is operating a remote camera, it's not possible for the subject and photographer to be the same. Need more complete source info Ytoyoda (talk) 16:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the user's only upload. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality - blurred, poor definition. Out of scope as no educational value. MPF (talk) 16:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by CaroleHenson as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This sculpture was made in 1927 - but the license is This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Yann (talk) 21:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Valid license for derivative work of public domain sculpture. The sculpture appears to be {{PD-US-not renewed}} despite https://www.brooklynmuseum.org/opencollection/objects/360 (the owner of the physical sculpture) claiming "© Estate of Malvina Hoffman". The sculpture does have "MALVINA HOFFMAN / © 1928" engraved on the back of the neck, which is visible in 28.384_threequarterfront_acetate_bw.jpg via the same website. However, U.S. copyright before 1963 requires both the notice and registration. I've both searched and looked at pages from multiple years of the Catalog of Copyright Entries surrounding 1928 and can't find anything that comes close to this work. Malvina Hoffman only has the following registrations:
Renewals were required at 28 years, so I also searched and looked at the renewal pages around the period of 1956 (which is 1928+28):
  • 1953, 9 new works, 1 renewal: Baby Neptune fountain. © 15May25, G74477. R111266, 23Apr53, Malvina Hoffman (A) (Catalog of Copyright Entries, 1953, p. 172 and p. 1953)
  • 1954, no entries
  • 1955, 1 new work, no renewals
  • 1956, no entries
  • 1957, 1 new work, no renewals: Strangely, the new work is also of John Keats: John Keats; portrait mask. Ceramics. © Malviva Hoffman; 23Jan57; GP12719
  • 1958, no entries
Works exhibited to public view before 1978, without active means of restricting the public from making photographs or other copies, were "published" under U.S. law; and according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory#United States, published works before 1964, without renewal, have long entered the public domain. I'm going to be bold and declare this copyfraud: After doing the substantial search above, I've found no evidence of registration in the places it should be for a copyrighted 1928 work, or renewal in the places it should be for a copyrighted 1928 work, and there is no evidence that the Field Museum (or wherever it was exhibited prior to 1978) had guards or other means of preventing photography or derivatives, or anything else that would cause it to have remained "unpublished" until 1978. --Closeapple (talk) 10:32, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: There are a bunch of the other sculptures from The Races of Mankind in the 1933 Catalog of Copyright Entries. Apparently 1933 is when the sculptures were first revealed, and they didn't have to be registered until publication even though "1928" is on the back. Some in 1935–1937 also. Haven't found "Martinique Woman" yet though. --Closeapple (talk) 12:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Martin Sg. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: artworks of living artist The main subject is the artist, not the ark works, so it should be OK. Yann (talk) 21:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lacrymocéphale as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.telecogresca.com/ca/site/avisLegal § "Propietat intel·lectual" is not compatible with CC BY-SA 4.0. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 21:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo for the company, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 21:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, uncertain copyright, very poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, uncertain copyright, very poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, uncertain copyright, poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, uncertain copyright, very poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, uncertain copyright, very poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, uncertain copyright, very poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:37, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, poor quality, unused personal image, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:37, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:37, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Coc123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 21:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:37, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:37, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vergicrush (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal artworks?

--ghouston (talk) 04:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and previous set by Vergicrush.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:32, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work on this tiny image which is used on an apparently bogus page in wikidata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license. 89.178.7.55 22:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture "Maria Purpur" in Kotka, Finland, by estonian sculptor Juta Eskel, born 1927. Not in PD because of living sculptor; no FOP for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 22:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This probably needs a formal written permission from the photographer (see EXIF and [8]). Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Yann (talk) 22:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pages-the (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure.

Yann (talk) 22:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused dup. of File:Nathan Hale Embarkation marker.jpg. ɱ (talk) 23:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyrighted text, erected 2005 by Cnnecticut DAR, no reason to beleive this is PD. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: self-created artwork Takeaway (talk) 17:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT. --XXN, 17:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Recepciongralet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:ADVERT.

--XXN, 17:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, malformed image file. --XXN, 17:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because the author don't want to share this file anymore 82.37.120.251 17:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: we should have a mail from him or from User:Weft that uploaded the file as own work. Ruthven (msg) 12:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 17:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 17:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused selfie. Ruthven (msg) 12:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Also may be copyrighted and a formal permission needed. --XXN, 18:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 18:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Henri-Charles Calmettes : no authorization for this file Arcyon (discuter) 20:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: COM:OTRS permission needed from M. Calmettes. Ruthven (msg) 12:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality file that is inferior to File:Eleonore Prochaska.jpg. De728631 (talk) 15:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Article about depicted person en:Edmund Marriage was deleted due to non-notability. Probably this photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:SEO

[edit]

Unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:SEO

[edit]

Out of scope. Logos not used on any projects, some likely promotional.

Yeeno (talk) 08:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:09, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nourina.allymun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably COM:ADVERT. The logo is copyrighted; the map is out of scope.

--XXN, 17:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Set Time OFFICIAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

--XXN, 17:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A montage of multiple images, without provided sources/authosrhip data for each image. --XXN, 17:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT. --XXN, 17:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 17:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 18:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, undue suspicion. P 1 9 9   16:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 18:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, undue suspicion. P 1 9 9   16:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 18:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, undue suspicion. P 1 9 9   16:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Macucal as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://paroquiadepenacova.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/brasao-dom-virgilio.jpg Yann (talk) 13:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 18:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, undue suspicion. Provide proof or stronger argument for deletion. P 1 9 9   16:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Macucal as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xAoG9g38I3Q/UUBhRqPMQII/AAAAAAAAA9U/iAw1ipFMtW0/s1600/escudobispo.jpg Yann (talk) 13:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion_policy#Out_of_scope: self-created artwork Takeaway (talk) 18:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 18:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, undue suspicion. Provide proof or stronger argument for deletion. P 1 9 9   16:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Maurizio.dirienzo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.diocesisabina.it/pls/poggiomirteto/v3_s2ew_consultazione.mostra_pagina?id_pagina=26 Yann (talk) 13:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' - although transferred from WN-WP - as imho potentially non-free content: rather thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, undue suspicion. Provide proof or stronger argument for deletion. P 1 9 9   16:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' (missing EXIF data), but also personality rights isusses, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad cuality; too small to be original Macucal (talk) 18:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, undue suspicion. Provide proof or stronger argument for deletion. P 1 9 9   16:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Macucal as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: derivative from http://abu-bratislava.sk/abuba/pomocny_biskup and coats forom some source source with low resolution. Yann (talk) 13:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Denmark.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover. --XXN, 17:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify this Wikimapia 'transfer' : potentially copyright issues ? Roland zh (talk) 18:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: undue suspicion, Wikimapia images are released as CC BY-SA 3.0. P 1 9 9   16:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality; too small to be original Macucal (talk) 18:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, undue suspicion. Provide proof or stronger argument for deletion. P 1 9 9   16:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small-sized and rather poor quality upload, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, and file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 19:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, undue suspicion. Provide proof or stronger argument for deletion. P 1 9 9   16:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Macucal as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.araldicavaticana.com/Backis0001.jpg Yann (talk) 10:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, no permission. --Yann (talk) 10:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 19:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, undue suspicion. Provide proof or stronger argument for deletion. P 1 9 9   16:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Macucal as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.sscc.es/ampliar_noticia.php?id=33 or derivative e.i. https://www.cirkev.cz/Media/ContentItems/306_00306/009722.gif Yann (talk) 13:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per discussion up to 7 December at COM:UDR. Green Giant (talk) 01:56, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.    FDMS  4    19:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:24, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:24, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of File:Artaxiad.svg Kareyac (talk) 04:52, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kareyac this file is my personal work. I am the author of it and I hold the copyrights to it. Some other user has uploaded my file to Wikipedia before I did. It has nothing to do with the Artaxiad.svg file, that flag was created by https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA:Gegart but someone had updated his file with my work. So please help me remove Artaxiad.svg file instead of removing this file which is my original work. --Freeanthony (talk) 10:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regards!

Hi Freeanthony, No one of versions of File:Artaxiad.svg is uploaded by you. If you can improve copyright violation in any of them, contact Commons talk:Licensing. Sorry, I cant help you delete or change File:Artaxiad.svg, Im not informed enough on the subject. Best wishes - Kareyac (talk) 10:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination till situation clear. - Kareyac (talk) 10:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kareyac that is because I did not upload the Artaxiad.svg file, I uploaded the Artaxiad-coat-of-arms-by-PeopleOfAr.svg file. I am the owner of this file because I have created it myself. I am the admin of PeopleOfAr blog, here you can see the full reconstruction: http://www.peopleofar.com/2017/01/30/reconstructing-artaxiad-flag/ The person who has updated the Artaxiad.svg file even included my blog in the description linking to this very article. In order to prove that I am the admin of peopleofar I have left a comment there under admin referring to freeanthony account: http://www.peopleofar.com/2017/01/30/reconstructing-artaxiad-flag/#comment-10189 So I guess I would like your advise on this. What should be done? A gentlemen by the name of Vahram Mekhitarian had taken my file and uploaded to the wikipedia before I did with his account. He did mention me as the author and because all the Artaxiad articles link to the Artaxiad.svg file they got replaced, which is fine by me. However he replaced the Artaxiad.svg which was created by Gegart, a different author. I assume this is not a proper way to upload new media. So should I just leave his upload and delete mine, or should we delete his upload, since he has overwritten someone else's work and leave mine and then link to this one in the articles which show artaxiad.svg? I know this is all confusing lol but I hope you understand what happened and perhaps can help resolve this?--Freeanthony (talk) 11:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Freeanthony, I'm afraid I can't give you the correct advice, because you talk about your relations with users, mentioned above. I would like to keep in Commons both files with different versions if: 1. they have free copyright, 2. they are worth to keep here. May be Gegart's version is unacceptable and should be deleted or kept only in the file history? I don't know if is it posiible to delete only versions of file if you like. It's confusing me too lol because I never met such unusual case in my small acivity in Commons.
P.S. You can use this tool to replace if need. - Kareyac (talk) 06:46, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kareyac lol yes this is very confusing. I have no desire to delete any artwork created by anyone else. My problem is that someone else is using my artwork to replace that of Gegart. You remember the old flag right? Well it was inaccurate and I took on the challenge to reconstruct it based on the best primary historic accounts we have. So I know it is more accurate. When I posted it on my blog someone took the file and uploaded it to wikipedia before I did. Now that is not a problem to me as I have released it copyright free, but my problem is that now when I upload it and properly cite it, people on wikipedia like yourself are nominating my file for deletion lol. This is indeed the weirdest case I have even witnessed :D Perhaps I should delete my file and just let the universe sort it out :D Thanks for the advise I will have to get familiar with Wiki commons more.--Freeanthony (talk) 22:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not an exact copy. --Yann (talk) 21:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence from source that image has been released under claimed licence and possibly not the original source MilborneOne (talk) 17:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is above COM:TOO (due to that animal figure). --XXN, 17:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upscaled image, poor quality; unlikely to be uploader's work. --XXN, 18:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for this file are Playwrights / American authors / Prize Winning authors (Osborn Prize) / This file may be eliminated. It was used on line once to identify Mr. Canady when he won the Osborn Award. KFFOWLER (talk)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Constitui uma ofensa difamatória à dignidade e ao respeito sobre D.João V e o povo português. 93.102.237.4 18:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pelo contrário

É imoral esta tentativa de revisionismo histórico pela sua parte. A linha temporal em que nos encontramos exige a preservação desta peça histórica para que se continue a seguir e estudar o efeito Castelopill. Ainda mais vale a pena sublinhar que D.João V (o da linha temporal sem o Castelo) derramaria uma lágrima pela Nação se a visse no estado em que se encontra. Certamente não será por revelar as verdades da natureza transdimencional do Castelo Branco que se há-de ofender uma dignidade que há muito deixou o nosso Povo.


Deleted: Out of scope. --Yann (talk) 21:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist de:Hans Pilhs died in 1986. No indication for CC licensing. GeorgHHtalk   18:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist de:Kurt Weber (Maler) died in 1964. No indication for CC licensing. GeorgHHtalk   18:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started as imho doubtful claimed 'own work' (newspaper, moirée of a scan?), but also personality rights isusses and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 19:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep -- Notable process on going! Regards Sakhalinio (talk) 19:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 21:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted material. Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 18:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio: [9]. --Sealle (talk) 08:52, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidental upload by me (the uploader)! Photo has no value other than to search some databases. Alfvanbeem (talk) 19:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of licencing under Creative Commons terms. Al-Douri (talk) 19:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Migel Sances Huares as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://lezgisport.com/glavnye_novosti/2037-lezginy-oficialno-prinyali-obschenacionalnyy-flag.html Copyright 2014 © 2015 LezgiSport. Лезгинское спортивное содружество. (date=22-10-2015, 15:55) Yann (talk) 21:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:37, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Mehman 97 12:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

here the original fileMehman 97 13:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (© 2016 Copyright Jolo. All Rights reserved.). Ruthven (msg) 22:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely that uploader is the author. Tekstman (talk) 19:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 22:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CarsAreAwesome (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 20:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 10:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Joeyconnick as Copyvio (db-f9) and the most recent rationale was: This is a logo used by TransLink for their B-Line bus services with no indication that the logo is licensed compatibly with Wikipedia, which the user admits to having erroneously uploaded as their own work in the edit summary here. PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 21:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo, out of project scope. --Wdwd (talk) 10:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве: http://kamenka2.blogspot.ru/p/blog-page_29.html -- Tomasina (talk) 14:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely that uploader is the author. Tekstman (talk) 19:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely that uploader is the author. Tekstman (talk) 19:52, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Keep - You say "very unlikely" however you don't have definitive proof that they or aren't the author, Unless you can actually prove this a copyvio then this should be speedy closed. –Davey2010Talk 20:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • I think not, the burden of proof lies with the uploader. While I generally assume good faith, here there are a lot of signs that this is not own work. It does not look at all like someone scanned his or her old photograph, it is more like it was just picked from the internet. On top of that, the upload history in the English wikipedia that was copied to Commons is rather suspect, with several uploaders and 'property claims'. Tekstman (talk) 11:50, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: artifacts of scanned image, COM:DW. --Sealle (talk) 04:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Migel Sances Huares as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://moslezgi.ru/novosti/print:page,1,489-nizami-abdulgamidov-chto-izobrazheno-na-flage-flnka-podstavka-dlya-luny-ili-podstava-dlya-flnka.html (date=27.12.2012, 13:32) Yann (talk) 21:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watemark or description state "copyright" or "source" danieletrevisani.com (or one of Trevisani's books). I didn't ask for speedy as a copyvio because some might be eligible for {{Pd-text}} or {{Pd-simple}} (if so watermarks should be removed). --Vituzzu (talk) 11:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Impropriate licence. Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 16:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:58, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-res but high quality square-cropped image suggests this isn't original uploader's own work, no useful source info or EXIF data.

Ytoyoda (talk) 16:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination http://kookymendes.tumblr.com/post/102398125436/shawn-in-nyc-at-the-mtv-building-performing. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of a copyrighted, non-free architectural work. LX (talk, contribs) 17:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think that an OTRS confirmation is needed here. Yann (talk) 20:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photography taken by my assistant Fabienne Dalphin with my camera. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrickmontama (talk • contribs)
Hi, @Patrickmontama:
Who is the copyright owner? Could you please send a permission for a free license via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:29, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, Fabienne Dalphin must send a permission. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very borderline case; is this logo simple enough to not meet the COM:TOO of the United States? The Prince logo is cited as an example of a copyrightable logo and the same logic might apply here as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this is a Spanish logo, so the ToO there, whatever it may be, must be applied. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Christian. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused bordered SVG flag, replaced by the parameter "border". Only is used in File:Flag of Poland.svg (protected page). See Commons:Deletion requests/Unused SVG flags bordered. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 12:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that uploader has authority to license. Image is widely used in multiple forms in subject's online promotion. See https://tineye.com/search/3c1e95f37da06de4a587de0fa840b29518d7a58c/?page=1&sort=score&order=desc The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 16:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Christian. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by CaroleHenson as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Part of the Hall of Man series (https://archive.org/stream/racesofmankindin30fiel#page/n61/mode/2up/search/Kashmiri) which was started in 1930, but the image is tagged with a Creative Commons license Yann (talk) 20:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per Christian. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [10]. Yann (talk) 15:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by CaroleHenson as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Made in 1933 per https://wellcomeimages.org/indexplus/image/M0005600.html, but tagged as in the public domain because it was made before 1923 Yann (talk) 21:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t see where the pre-1923 claim is being made. Seems likely the original work would have been published without notice or renewal, but it would be nice to have evidence of that, also to identify the photographer (or do we presume the photo was work-for-hire by the museum? Since the subject is 3-D there are two potential copyrights here). Do the Wellcome curators have a good reputation for care in checking copyrights? Unless they’ve been found neglectful concerning others among the many files of theirs here, I’m inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt and say Keep. Otherwise, I note the sculptor’s 70-ypma term won’t expire until 2037.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 01:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bronze figure of Kashmiri in Meditation by Malvina Hoffman Wellcome M0005215.jpg. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [11]. Yann (talk) 15:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I find it questionable that a logo with such a stylized face would be too simple for copyright protection. BTW, if this is deleted the "ShadowsCommons" template on en:File:PBS Logo.svg ought to be changed to "Deleted on Commons" Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 00:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [12]. Yann (talk) 09:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]