Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/01/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Holy_Roman_Emperor_(1452-1493),_King_of_the_Romans_(1440-1493),_Duke_of_Styria,_Carinthia_and_Carniola_(1424-1493),_Archduke_of_Austria_(1457-1493)._1468.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
es pornografia 181.176.75.254 13:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, watermark "BRAZZERS", copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
No copyright information. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 12:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation (https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiukUjRZx-HPPXfFxoEtbBEtawOPru6KB-tv-NQxnkoQ0n3ORfWxK-b1YHVelaQj2KFmKN6g2KPzCkMWJBPCAx9vU5IDSIHvOhgXp1U9qT19V2ieceaalKqiyjekJpA1_1yC3EJifsADj4swBu-8K1BIMfAQNykSwdJO9v3R6TSN27FxFsAWZMoXvQOSWSMNoyVIz0Bouy72DwelpDs34dQ51ZdLkxEsRq6n155ozHBwvTuDBPG5UQniOLiUujIgV_1QrpMW8Q_1yP-YNPGxX0wzn61bhN2rEHgyOk7uqAcg7kNhhiVU3xGWbiib0TtANa40Kblq4zy3QTk2tVsBgd_1ey00_1LsKlcUVc-2SQsFHLQjEJBZr2bIKnFU9wRymbJy8xeXkhXH6NR3vrsxoZsouudFXDW7IaLAWm_1ua8rxPHsFCBE6KVbIi3b_1e0niomVuX1vAp782L8U_1OX3R-q_19-FPCE-WhZtPqSMxiDVi-45CoZJicfla16W73GunBpj_1wi1uu6I5keXpiJQUFW-yKdZeoT7dG0bUYi_1LVjTXmRHXizKCugZQJaWH7dwd_1UQmLxfbA5F30i2iT-ShMBaBfprrEPTf-ebuOwodt6mrQHL0aV2luF8B6IAcoOoK85AF5fztxMJue0XfOhaeKNkgPZNme42mjn2TFZ5atiIPRjHn3YR0jccJZLlAxpLRbQhFCyuUdPwKPG6Nixx08Bn1-_1_1gzbyiSzb-OxWFagYGNPRAiJHkfHIx5p6Nilk1Gs7gxs3bwCpO9o5ox5d_1xfEnAKJmvOds14AwupUIm9NPIj6DoiJcy218KkBqJAy-8V4E3yLlGXI7_1E4xope4Emy2Udt98KzxCnNCxj4qD-3DU6XDCtjIJ2PKF2JFVRmUzcsdwK1axFrODd6idmUnsc3g8zHXdYzRHV6lxml6I9bvUj5Wwt847Yaj-Xj1ea3Cb3-p2BwGK7w21dFP87o6DDrxi5tWzvk7aIaWeuXxIhP63m9LZLvXrINUwCQxnEK5mcFqEBPX_1UwXai66nuRrjEoSjfN1-ECnO_14lM141S5Gdrsri-g9AVXt8AxbD1pGx-LB5fz0RvmM-jUk56zG5EblGV4p6RKm-hOB7qNT89Uelw7le5JxlDov1wFezTwA_1jc7-pbGC0Mdk5HMqkRIVF6wB_1G0K2o05nfBE07avEl9gnbA0NNnL2h1RWrg7WgE4rN_1gQrm5GyBFooowyiF7fjPQZznkvoZ04pRVlzXaga-AieVrpnC86OSFR5Fc3MWsjTJg-Z3Dchghe7E_1uFxh5zlN414NWmmQp6cSOHyy7yzLEZZsc0Wz8m1wZ_1twHlY4JXW-K_1PLo5ddi5mLV-zzViMI4RGbyipuRvrGYyQQ-bKxcZ72N7ObmRASNB-iCHlJWGcC-8V7huRc65jo2C6b1k-R2AA3qGUFuJuljrx89IESqePsqS3AJPrbCRzO3c9016p5iJhHVolg5nX24shQCIPyOzVBJQ8lc4kZcqswJ7FxZ-ha3Sg2B3Cz0KTLF-nfHxhRaZQ1FKW0byRI6yauTJPDcSDVZyAIvWFPGH_1XWSjrAWhIV07bAKx6-YNtUgxAuPiQvtRhptp4HTvKx_1ReDt1HdJvPB_1lk_10L5hJpSlB7XgnpMHwkV42p8KS19MPF3IZqQ5OCrGVhog-Qv291Qaxa1w2suF98j0KABqY8MRuruvRE3eMBnsfn5w&hl=fr-US) Supporterhéninois (talk) 16:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Сомнительная лицензия. В источнике http://web.archive.org/web/20130921173159/http://www.tyniste.cz/?page=vendelin-opatrny не указано, что дата обнародования файла в1940 году Dogad75 (talk) 17:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the file dor speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 22:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Logo : not free / Not personal work Supertoff (talk) 18:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, the logo surpasses threshold of originality and obtaining permission is very unlikely. Taivo (talk) 22:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Per FBMD grabbed from facebook Rodrigolopes (talk) 20:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.
Part of mass upload, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- We have only one image of the old series of books "The Science-History of the Universe".
Keep --Insider (talk) 06:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per User:Insider. Withdrawn. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Uploaded by mistake. Violates copyright. Theauburnavenue (talk) 04:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Actually it does not violates copyrights, because is a simple text image, with correct licensing and authorship data. But I agree that this image may be deleted, because you re-uploaded it in new version with better name. I've tagged the file as {{Duplicate}} of File:Auburn Avenue Logo.jpg. --XXN, 17:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted & redirect created to File:Auburn Avenue Logo.jpg, by an administrator. --XXN, 00:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Image was uploaded from Flickr with Commons licensing but has copyright mark on the bottom of it. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 20:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep This is probably OK. Yann (talk) 21:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep You don't waive your copyright by granting a Creative Commons licence. The whole point of regular CC licences is that the author keeps the copyright but grants anyone else a free right of use. De728631 (talk) 00:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- I didn't know that, thanks for the info! PageantUpdater talk • contribs 02:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 11:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, source not available, no license review, OTRS permission needed. Yann (talk) 21:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
there was a license Judor92 (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Currently you need to log in to Flickr with an account to see the original file description. Anyone with a Yahoo account should be able to do this but a simply verification of the licence by anyone else is not possible. I suggest we put this
On hold until we find a reviewer or admin with a Yahoo account who can check the release information. De728631 (talk) 23:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- I have a account and I had not see the file, it is private. You need the autorization of the uploader for watch it. I suggest we put this On hold until we can contact the author of the photograph (and get the original file, if it is posible). I think that a OTRS authorization is necesary. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 00:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- It is strange... The user Marlon Cocqueel only uploads images of helicopters and airplanes, always with all rights reserved. The image with id 24906208564 is private and the combination user+id is a broken link. According to precautionary principle Delete. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 06:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Well, there are also some sports and scenery galleries there, but aside from that I agree it seems incongruous.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 07:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- I was wrong: Miss France au CERPL (cc-by-nc-nd). The admin of Marlon Cocqueel Photographies confirmed that he can find out if the photo is from Marlon and under what license he published it. But he asks me for patience. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 07:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- If the file being discussed here is also really licensed under a "cc-by-nc-nd" license, then that's quite different from "cc-zero" and means the file cannot be accepted by Commons, right? -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- That’s a different picture of the same person, just indicative of how she may have become a subject for this photographer. One might wonder why the photos would be licensed differently, but it doesn’t prove anything either way. Let‘s hope Metrónomo gets a response that clarifies things.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 10:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- If the file being discussed here is also really licensed under a "cc-by-nc-nd" license, then that's quite different from "cc-zero" and means the file cannot be accepted by Commons, right? -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- I was wrong: Miss France au CERPL (cc-by-nc-nd). The admin of Marlon Cocqueel Photographies confirmed that he can find out if the photo is from Marlon and under what license he published it. But he asks me for patience. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 07:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Well, there are also some sports and scenery galleries there, but aside from that I agree it seems incongruous.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 07:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- It is strange... The user Marlon Cocqueel only uploads images of helicopters and airplanes, always with all rights reserved. The image with id 24906208564 is private and the combination user+id is a broken link. According to precautionary principle
- I have a account and I had not see the file, it is private. You need the autorization of the uploader for watch it. I suggest we put this
Marlon Cocqueel wrote me today:
Bonsoir,
Je vous garanti que la photo a été prise par mes soins, au centre commercial "Lens-2" à Vendin-le-Vieil. Je vous transférerai les données EXIF dans la soirée. J'avais donné mon accord à un contributeur Wikipedia à utiliser la photo (nous avons communiqué sur Flickr)
I will continue until I get a proof that it tells the truth. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 20:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Keep. The photo is already public, everyone can verify the authorship and the license. Marlon just changed the license to cc-by-sa to be compatible with Commons. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 12:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- PD: for the record, these are the EXIF data according to the photographer. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 12:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, but those are those are not the EXIF data. He should have clicked on "Afficher l'EXIF" to unfold the EXIF information. The current snapshot is just the standard Flickr summary. That aside, if the licence is now CC-by-sa we can keep the file, and even CC-0 would have worked before. De728631 (talk) 13:06, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Wrong name. Right name is Category:Wikimarathon 2017 in Fedir Dostoyevskyi Library in Kyiv --Perohanych (talk) 16:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Typo. --Achim (talk) 19:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
It has a alternative photo for better view Vespertunes (talk) 07:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: deletion at request of uploder of 3x file. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Wrong name, right name is Category:Fedir Dostoyevskyi Library in Kyiv --Perohanych (talk) 16:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Typo. --Achim (talk) 19:24, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:48, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:49, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:49, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personnal photo. No educational. Out of scope Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 15:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:50, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Wrong name. right name is Category:Wikimarathon 2017 in Fedir Dostoyevskyi Library in Kyiv --Perohanych (talk) 16:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Empty, bad name, author's req. --Achim (talk) 16:17, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Flickr washing. Higher resolution found at: http://www.unbelievablefact.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/priyanka-chopra-hot-saree-sexy-41ab32a8ee30c68af11c6e320db4f5d0-big-45095.jpg —Vensatry (Ping me) 05:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- The user has uploaded two duplicates: File:Priyaanka Chopra.jpg and File:Priyanka Chopra Batn.jpg. —Vensatry (Ping me) 08:23, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Stolen from the airline's Facebook page, which does not indicate the image was released under CC BY-SA 4.0. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 06:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Uploader changed from external source to own work - see [1] here to get rid of a "no permission" tag. JuTa 07:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ALogo_rs.png&type=revision&diff=231527108&oldid=231526337){kind=link}
что нужно сделать? я не понимаю.
- The copyright holder has to send a releasing email to the commons support team - see Commons:OTRS or Commons:OTRS/ru. --JuTa 16:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:09, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:10, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, out of scope - commons is not a photo album
Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:11, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ernest harton (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, out of scope - commons is not a photo album
- File:Ernest harton 7.jpg
- File:Ernest harton 6.jpg
- File:Ernest harton 5.jpg
- File:Ernest harton 4.jpg
- File:Ratna efriani 1.jpg
- File:Ernest harton 3.jpg
- File:Ratna efriani.jpg
- File:Ernest harton 2.jpg
- File:Ernest harton 1.jpg
- File:Ernest harton.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:11, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio of http://www.manutd.com/en/News-And-Features/Features/2017/Jan/Wayne-Rooney-receives-Golden-Boot-from-Sir-Bobby-Charlton.aspx?newsid=FAB09BAC-278E-4F3D-9256-8BBA46012125 Arjayay (talk) 11:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:12, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Персона скончалась в 1951 году, с 2009 года фото размещено в русскоязычной Википедии как несвободное https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Manandyan.jpg. Необходимо подтверждение авторства Dogad75 (talk) 11:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:12, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, персона скончалась в 1974 году, автор фото скорее неизвестен https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Medzhidov-kiyas-medzhidovich.jpg. Производная работа от несвободного файла Dogad75 (talk) 11:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal type photos, out of scope
- File:^E7210228801D834766F29825D627D25CB0AD9E56341A4099A3^pimgpsh fullsize distr.jpg
- File:^A8EDCFE7641B15851DB77CFA076A5523607B9BDF95AE0AF2C5^pimgpsh fullsize distr.jpg
- File:^B4621CA8DBAD9C850B0A164FEB023B2744A00A832DBE8F5D32^pimgpsh fullsize distr.jpg
- File:^90FF7EF0EAB97705501B2010C1DF4C489769D6823EEFF9BD10^pimgpsh fullsize distr.jpg
- File:^4D02D9D4CC4856360D30FBAF5A826ABC0BA7724D6D1F27709F^pimgpsh fullsize distr.jpg
- File:^0A91D63C6354B1B478082811D174FA466F2D9EEBB93C68A879^pimgpsh fullsize distr.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:17, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
advertising or copyright violation Berthold Werner (talk) 13:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Sealle (talk) 17:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
I grabbed the image from Google/ Krupa Vara Prasad (talk) 13:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:21, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Сомнения в лицензии. Персона скончалась в 1984 году, источника нет, время обнародования установить нельзя, лицензионный статус установить невозможно Dogad75 (talk) 14:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:22, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused copyvio poster Sakhalinio (talk) 14:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:23, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation [2] Austriantraveler (talk) 14:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
![[2]](http://www.detail-online.com/fileadmin/_migrated/pics/aga_khan_award_2013_nominierung_altach_08.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation. [https://www.google.at/imgres?imgurl=http://www.bernardobader.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/02_1_web_RGB-1-742x495.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.bernardobader.com/en/projekt/kapelle-salgenreute-2&h=495&w=742&tbnid=oy3BMyIH7dysxM&tbnh=183&tbnw=275&usg=__a9o_usGRyAzRntDm-XYXWKRVwHw=&hl=en-AT&docid=ieJqJidomBFdvM} Austriantraveler (talk) 14:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Bernardobader: Für zuvor publizierte Fotos benötigen wir eine Autorisierung über unser OTRS-System. Siehe dort für mehr Informationen. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Анна Каревская (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:26, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i.skyrock.net/1382/36671382/pics/1415652555.jpg.
- File:OUTILES MAROC.jpg
- File:Oude.jpg
- File:Musicc.jpg
- File:Melhoun.jpg
- File:Marakech.jpg
- File:Kanon MAROC.jpg
- File:Kanun2sm.jpg
- File:Group musique.jpg
- File:Andalosi.jpg
- File:Group DE MUSIC.jpg
- File:Sun set in MARZOOGA CITY MOROCCO.jpg
- File:Nature of atlas.jpg
- File:ZARBIA.jpg
- File:MRAKECHH.jpg
- File:MAROC épices.jpg
- File:GARAB.jpg
- File:MARAKECH.jpg
- File:CULTUR.jpg
- File:CULTURE.jpg
- File:COSCOS.jpg
- File:AHIDOSS.jpg
- File:OUDAYA2.jpg
- File:RABAT1.jpg
- File:LAWDAIA.jpg
- File:MONTAGNE ATLASS.jpg
- File:FES CITY.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Dance de Oujda.webm
- File:Dance HAYT de Kenitra.webm
- File:عرس واد امليل mariage à wadamlil.webm
- File:Ahidous Amazigh.webm
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:29, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
no es la imagen correcta Femenina07 (talk) 22:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders request shortly after upload. --JuTa 07:43, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Extremely low res images of 3d objects, no evidence of own works, probably scaled down derivatives of ones found on the Web: File:1-02-БелОрел.png ↔ [3], File:1-02-БелОрелЗМ.gif ↔ [4], File:1-00-АндрейЗ.png ↔ [5] and so on.
![[3]](http://medalirus.ru/upload/awards/bo5_a.jpg){kind=link}
![[4]](http://medalirus.ru/upload/awards/st_ss7.jpg){kind=link}
![[5]](https://topwar.ru/uploads/posts/2014-09/1409882986_orden-svyatogo-andreya-zvezda-1jpg.jpg){kind=link}
- File:4-03-ВладМБ.png
- File:4-03-ВладМ.png
- File:4-03-Влад.png
- File:4-0Б-ГеоргГ.png
- File:3-05-СтасМБ.png
- File:3-05-СтасМ.png
- File:3-05-Стас.png
- File:3-04-АннаМ.png
- File:3-04-Анна.png
- File:3-03-ВладМ.png
- File:3-03-Влад.png
- File:2-05-СтасМ.png
- File:2-04-АннаМ.png
- File:2-05-Стас.png
- File:2-04-Анна.png
- File:2-03-ВладМЗ.png
- File:2-03-ВладЗ.png
- File:2-03-Влад.png
- File:2-03-ВладМ.png
- File:1-05-СтасМ.png
- File:1-05-СтасМЛ.png
- File:1-05-СтасМЗ.png
- File:1-05-СтасЛ.png
- File:1-05-СтасЗ.png
- File:1-05-Стас.png
- File:1-04-АннаМЗ.png
- File:1-04-АннаМ.png
- File:1-04-АннаМЛ.png
- File:1-04-Анна.png
- File:1-04-АннаЗ.png
- File:1-04-АннаЛ — копия.png
- File:1-03-ВладМЗ.png
- File:1-03-ВладМ.png
- File:1-03-ВладМЛ.png
- File:1-03-ВладЗ.png
- File:1-03-ВладЛ.png
- File:1-03-Влад.png
- File:1-02-БелОрелМЛ.png
- File:1-02-БелОрелМ.png
- File:1-02-БелОрелМК.png
- File:1-02-БелОрелЛ.png
- File:1-02-БелОрелЗМ.png
- File:1-02-БелОрелЗ.png
- File:1-02-БелОрел.png
- File:1-01-АНевский.png
- File:1-01-АНевскийЛ.png
- File:1-00-Екатерина3.png
- File:1-00-Екатерина.png
- File:1-00-АндрейЛ.png
- File:1-00-Андрей.png
- File:1-00-АндрейЗ.png
- File:1-00-АндрейЗ.gif
- File:1-00-Андрей.gif
- File:ЗОВО4Г.gif
- File:4-03-ВладМБ.gif
- File:4-03-ВладМ.gif
- File:4-03-Влад.gif
- File:4-0Б-ГеоргГ.gif
- File:4-0Б-Георг.gif
- File:3-05-СтасМБ.gif
- File:3-05-СтасМ.gif
- File:3-05-Стас.gif
- File:3-04-АннаМ.gif
- File:3-04-Анна.gif
- File:3-03-ВладМ.gif
- File:3-03-Влад.gif
- File:2-05-СтасМ.gif
- File:2-05-Стас.gif
- File:2-04-АннаМ.gif
- File:2-04-Анна.gif
- File:2-03-ВладЗ.gif
- File:2-03-Влад.gif
- File:1-05-СтасМЗ.gif
- File:1-05-СтасМ.gif
- File:1-05-СтасЗ.gif
- File:1-05-Стас.gif
- File:1-04-АннаМЗ.gif
- File:1-04-АннаЗ.gif
- File:1-04-АннаМ.gif
- File:1-04-Анна.gif
- File:1-03-ВладМЗ.gif
- File:1-03-ВладМ.gif
- File:1-03-ВладЗ.gif
- File:1-02-БелОрелМК.gif
- File:1-03-Влад.gif
- File:1-02-БелОрелМ.gif
- File:1-02-БелОрелЗМ.gif
- File:1-02-БелОрелК.gif
- File:1-02-БелОрелЗ.gif
- File:1-01-АНевский.gif
- File:1-02-БелОрел.gif
- File:1-01-АНевскийЗ.gif
Sealle (talk) 16:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:01, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Первичный источник изображений здесь на с. 10. Автор файлов исказил пропорции изображений наплечных отличий в официальном документе (официальная пропорция составляет 5:4, пропорция автора 4:3) и исказил поверхность звёздочек - сделал её неровной вместо гладкой. Загруженные изображения являются произвольной фантазией автора и существенно искажают исторически правильный вид наплечных отличий.
- File:1886kimf-p05.png
- File:1886kimf-p04.png
- File:1886kimf-p03.png
- File:1886kimf-p01.png
- File:1886kimf-p02.png
vvk121 (talk) 00:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Уважаемый vvk121, не разобравшись, Вы удалили всю информацию из файлов, в том числе авторскую лицензию, прошу вас работать внимательнее. Ответ от автора последует в ближайшее время. — Niklitov (talk) 12:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Уважаемый Niklitov, "всю информацию из файлов, в том числе авторскую лицензию" удалил не я, а утилита COM:VFC, которой рекомендовано пользоваться при вынесении файлов на удаление. По этой части, пожалуйста, все претензии к разработчикам утилиты. Прошу вас работать внимательнее и, не разобравшись, не выдвигать необоснованных обвинений. - vvk121 (talk) 12:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Уважаемый vvk121, если Вы так неаккуратно работаете в проекте, и знаете об этом, потрудитесь восстановить авторскую лицензию, а также другую информацию и больше не ломайте файлы. Или хотя бы извинитесь перед автором, как видно, за ненамеренный вандализм. — Niklitov (talk) 13:46, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Уважаемый Niklitov, повторяю, все претензии к разработчикам утилиты. На странице утилиты COM:VFC есть опция "Just try it without installing". Я аккуратно воспользовался этой опцией для предложения об удалении файлов, а на страницах файлов ничего не делал. Все изменения на страницах файлов автоматически сделаны от моего имени, но не мной. Обратите внимание, у всех пяти файлов стоит одно и то же время изменения - 00:56 (а если посмотреть служебные логи, там наверняка и секунды совпадут). - vvk121 (talk) 14:05, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Уважаемый Niklitov, ответьте, пожалуйста, но вопрос: Как мог участник с обычными правами (каковым являюсь я) одновременно в пяти файлах сделать изменения, которые невозможно отменить? Если бы это была действительно моя редакция, был бы возможен откат. Что скажете? - vvk121 (talk) 14:29, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Comment Коллега Vvk121, досадная проблема с COM:VFC действительно произошла. Так случилось, что все пять вынесенных Вами файлов ранее переименовывались, а утилита по ошибке добавила шаблоны обсуждения возможного удаления на страницы редиректов, оставшихся от старых названий, вместо страниц нужных файлов. См. MediaWiki talk:VisualFileChange.js#Bug: it does not detect renamed files properly. Из всего сказанного здесь участником Niklitov при этом справедливо только то, что за любые последствия сбоев любого программного обеспечения всё равно отвечает использующий его участник. Остальные обвинения (вплоть до вандализма) — это, к сожалению, привычная для упомянутого участника практика делать назидательные и громкие заявления по вопросам, в которых он не разбирается. Ни Вы, ни утилита ничего с целевых страниц не удаляли, и никаких проблем эти действия не создали. Шаблоны я перенёс на нужные страницы, имена вынесенных файлов поправил. По сути вынесения на удаление: пока не погружался в этот вопрос, и — насколько такие файлы соответствуют правилам данного проекта, выскажусь позже. Sealle (talk) 16:19, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Коллега Sealle, спасибо за реабилитацию. - vvk121 (talk) 16:28, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Сейчас вижу, что применение термина вандализм было неправомерным. Приношу извинения. — Niklitov (talk) 19:18, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Коллега Sealle, спасибо за реабилитацию. - vvk121 (talk) 16:28, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Довожу до сведения Vvk121, что форменная одежда Российской империи не нормировалась (за немногими исключениями) исчерпывающими нормативными документами (Правилами), а создавалась путем последовательного многократного введения изменений, утверждённых различными узаконениями. Иногда правила являлись не государственными документами, а плодом творчества частных лиц, например полковника Шенка, которые брали на себя труд свести воедино разрозненные узаконения. Указание всех нормативных актов, определяющих облик не только формы в целом, но и отдельных предметов, как правило, невозможно.
Изготовление форменной одежды офицерского состава русской (Императорской, Красной, Советской) армии в мирное время централизованным порядком вообще не предусматривалось. Только индивидуальный пошив. В царское время вся одежда офицеров и чиновников, равно как и комплектующие и фурнитура изготавливалась мелкими частными предпринимателями и ремесленниками. В таких условиях говорить о полном единообразии вообще невозможно.
Касательно наплечных знаков различия морских инженеров, могу сказать только то, что изготовление их по указанным в узаконении размерам было вообще невозможно, поскольку такие галуны не производились. Граненые кованые звездочки закреплялись только на эполетах. На погонах и воротниковых клапанах (петлицах) всех типов звездочки вышивались канителью и блестками. Только во время I Мировой войны появились металлические погонные звездочки, имирировавшие вышивку (зерненые).
Эполеты генерал-фельдмаршала 85 пехотного Выборгского полка полностью соответствуют нормативному документу. В сети имеются как музейные фото этих эполет, так и фото императора Вильгельма II с этими эполетами.
--Polygon v (talk) 19:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Не приведены причины для удаления файлов. --Anatoliy (talk) 15:22, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused, personal shots, three of same subject, two have been decolorized. No reason to keep all three, and unlikely own work.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:03, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Island.hop (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work, only one image has metadata. They're all promotional in nature, see name of images. Other three images were speedied.
- File:Cruise Whitsundays Reefworld Pontoon.jpg
- File:Cruise Whitsundays Logo.jpg
- File:Cruise Whitsundays Great Barrier Reef Adventures.jpg
- File:Cruise Whitsundays Knuckle Reef Pontoon.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
no indication of user's own work on this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahamedsageerkv (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claims of own work, variable sizes, colors, styles, lead to the suggestion that these were harvested from other sources, and not own work.
- File:Along with Kerala state finance minister Mr. Dr.Thomas Isac.jpg
- File:Paramban Midhuna along with Kerala Chief Minister Sri Pinarayi Vijayan.jpg
- File:Pallikkal panchaayath president along with Prime minister Sri Narendra Modi.jpg
- File:AMUPS Pallikkal മഷിത്തുള്ളി മാഗസിൻ പ്രകാശനം.png
- File:പറ.jpg
- File:ചങ്ങഴി.jpg
- File:മിഥുന സത്യപ്രതിജ്ഞ ചെയ്യുന്നു.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SarahSarah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low-resolution out of scope images which may include copyright infringements.
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:37, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pavlin.Ivanov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Song, album cover and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- The uploader left a comment at the talk page. Sealle (talk) 17:47, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - please contact OTRS to provide evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Uploads by User:Malairisa
[edit]- File:Mam Manivan Phaninvong.jpg
- File:ทวีพร คลังพลอย.jpg
- File:ทวีพรคลังพลอย.jpg
- File:อรอนงค์ ปัญญาวงศ์.jpg
- File:อภิสมัย ศรีรังสรรค์.jpg
- File:ชุติมา นัยนา.jpg
False claims of authorship. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal Photo. Image was used for self promotion article in Bengali Wikipedia. Article has been deleted. ~ Nahid Talk 16:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Petition to Macys Department Stores concerning continued business relationship with Donald Trump.pdf
[edit]No encyclopedic value, and seems quite promotional... TJH2018talk 00:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
There are texts signed by "Mendizorrotz" (Daniel Mugarza Mecolalde, 1912-1977) and Claro Abánades (1879-1974). Not in the public domain (in Spain) probably until 2057 Strakhov (talk) 00:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Not the author's own work, as stated in the file's name. Edjoerv (talk) 01:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
No verification that image is own work of uploader. This was the titleholder's official photo card and as such I'd suggest copyright is held by the photographer and/or Miss Universe Organisation. 124.150.26.248 03:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, I am the nominator, I didn't realise I wasn't logged in. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 03:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I've also nominated the uploader's other uploads at Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by User:Malairisa. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of an apparent hoax article on the English Wikipedia. Safiel (talk) 03:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note Article on the English Wikipedia has been deleted as a blatant hoax. Safiel (talk) 23:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Creator request Mlpearc (open channel) 03:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Low quality duplicate of File:Grammatica David Goliath.jpg; additionally, no useful description, categorization etc. Leyo 07:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
no source, von Wiegand died 1983. Alinea (talk) 10:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Erreur de nommage du fichier Bruno DARRAS (talk) 10:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused, low-quality photograph of "somewhere in the balkan region". Zoupan (talk) 11:18, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 02:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
This is a very confusing map, using modern borders, states, regions, and ancient regions, making no distinction between the two. Also, Banat is terribly misplaced, and Pannonia is a much larger geographical region, to mention a few. It should not be used for educational purposes. Zoupan (talk) 11:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 02:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Private image. Unused. Out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 13:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. According to this page, this is a crop of a photograph taken by Jeanloup Sieff (1933-2000). Certainly not uploader's work as claimed, and there is no evidence of permission either. — Yerpo Eh? 13:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Note: the uploader, Уляна Столярова12, had this picture deleted three times before. Looks like he/she doesn't understand copyright, so it would be useful if someone can explain him/her that it's not ok to upload photos from random websites without permission and attribution. His/her other uploads should be checked too. — Yerpo Eh? 13:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
unexplained possibly copyright violating copy of File:Islam branches and schools.svg Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
As sourced from BT, no indication it's free TherasTaneel (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama's permission to use their images does not apply to photographs of non-Indian events. The 2012 IIFA took place at Singapore. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Houssain ue (talk · contribs)
[edit]All his files are unfree and unhelpful --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:57, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
This appears to be a picture taken of a TV screen. Just like a screenshot, copyright is owned by the broadcaster, so the uploader does not own the rights to this picture. —Andrei S. Talk 16:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Erreur de manipulation. Ruyblas13 (talk) 16:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Part of mass-upload, unused and unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Part of mass upload, unused and unusable, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:32, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Spam only. Savhñ 16:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- File:PHP classifieds script - i-Netsolution - Classifieds Script.jpg
- File:MLM Software - i-Netsolution - MLM Software Company.jpg. Savhñ 20:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Invalid source information. The elements have different representations at the source files. It's well established that representations of a heraldry element, when above COM:TOO, have separate copyright. The elements as used in this file have no source. Compare e.g. the yellow lion with the ones in the indicated source files. Jcb (talk) 16:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Do you read the Gospel of Saint Matthew? Chapter 7... speck of sawdust... This is same thing. There are hundreds files without naming their origin and by for a few details of mine. My work have sources and it's contrasted. Search others upload files indiscriminately. Thanks --Parair (talk) 20:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- I am a theologian, you don't need to lecture me on the Bible. Now back to this file, the fact that others violate copyright does not entitle you to do the same. Jcb (talk) 21:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- False! I didn't break copyright. Everything is taken of Wikimedia commons (user:Heralder or user:Sodacan), or, of course, it make for me. Thanks for take a break in your studies for my case. --Parair (talk) 23:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Till now, I have not seen any sources for those elements. You have to indicate from which files at Commons the elements originate. Till now you have, apart from your own uploads, only refered to files with different representations of those elements. Jcb (talk) 23:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Of course. Next time I have to upload a video tutorial for clear my work. It will be that I read wrong theologians. --Parair (talk) 11:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Till now, I have not seen any sources for those elements. You have to indicate from which files at Commons the elements originate. Till now you have, apart from your own uploads, only refered to files with different representations of those elements. Jcb (talk) 23:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- False! I didn't break copyright. Everything is taken of Wikimedia commons (user:Heralder or user:Sodacan), or, of course, it make for me. Thanks for take a break in your studies for my case. --Parair (talk) 23:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- I am a theologian, you don't need to lecture me on the Bible. Now back to this file, the fact that others violate copyright does not entitle you to do the same. Jcb (talk) 21:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Keep Source provided. DR of a source needn't to be an exact copy of that source. Ankry (talk) 12:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- In this case yes, the sources of the elements need to be the same version as used in these file. It's well established that individual representations of a heraldry element have separate copyright. The elements as currently used in the nominated files are unsourced and there is no indication at all that those representations are under a free license. In fact the uploader is around and refuses to tell us where the used elements come from, which is an indication that these elements are probably copyright violations. Jcb (talk) 15:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 02:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Probably private image. Not used. A bit unclear and dark. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
This file has been superseded by File:Bulgaria ethnic map.svg because it contains misleading data. The percentages are incorrect for any census and no source is provided. Nonemansland (talk) 08:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
I was the "keeping administrator" the last time, but the file is now no longer in use; the information is inaccurate and I request that the map be deleted this time. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Inutile et ajout non voulu Anthony Ilhat (talk) 18:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-free logo. Near-duplicate of file at w:File:Al-Azhar Logo.png. Could be uploaded to English Wikipedia with appropriate declarations. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The photo seems to be signed by lucas guerreiro, different than uploader, yet "own work". Likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 19:09, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Image is watermarked by "imagedealers" - likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 19:09, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Images is watermarked by "imagedealers" - likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 19:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Low resolution, no exif data - likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 19:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Likely copyright violation on logos Themightyquill (talk) 19:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Image is watermarked "imagedealers" - likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 19:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-free file. No evidence that uploader holds the copyright. Appears to have been scanned from a printed image. On the University's website here: http://www.alazhar.edu.ps/eng/About/History-Future.html Verbcatcher (talk) 19:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Low resolution, no exif data. other images by uploader nfd as copyvios. This one is likely a copyvio too. Themightyquill (talk) 19:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-free file. No evidence that uploader holds the copyright. Appears to have been scanned from a printed image. On the University's website here: http://www.alazhar.edu.ps/eng/About/History-Future.html Verbcatcher (talk) 19:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-free file. No evidence that uploader holds the copyright. Appears to have been scanned from a printed image. On the University's website here: http://www.alazhar.edu.ps/eng/About/History-Future.html Verbcatcher (talk) 19:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 19:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
single-file upload and unused file - out of out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Commons:SELFIE Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 20:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Part of mass-upload, unused and unusable low-quality marked-up photo of unremarkable bare trees, no educational value. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused and unusable motion blur image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused and unusable motion blur image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, small-sized and obviously randomly taken from car/bus/train etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:30, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, small-sized and obviously randomly taken from car/bus/train etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:30, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, small-sized and obviously randomly taken from car/bus/train etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
your opinions are asked : imho rather 'profiling' or rather advertisements, but also personality rights isusses, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 21:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 02:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
DR as per File:Sales Emporium,Publications Division,Trivandrum.jpg : imho rather 'profiling' or rather advertisements, but also personality rights isusses, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 21:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 02:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
affected File:Urbantouch products in display.jpg, File:Urbantouch products in display 2.jpg, File:Urbantouch products in display 1.jpg, File:Urbantouch-logo-menswear.png : (obviously) advertisements, but also potentially FOP issues, file(s) not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 21:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
affected File:Urbantouch products in display.jpg, File:Urbantouch products in display 2.jpg, File:Urbantouch products in display 1.jpg, File:Urbantouch-logo-menswear.png : (obviously) advertisements, but also potentially FOP issues, file(s) not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 21:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
affected File:Urbantouch products in display.jpg, File:Urbantouch products in display 2.jpg, File:Urbantouch products in display 1.jpg, File:Urbantouch-logo-menswear.png : (obviously) advertisements, but also potentially FOP issues, file(s) not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 21:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
affected File:Urbantouch products in display.jpg, File:Urbantouch products in display 2.jpg, File:Urbantouch products in display 1.jpg, File:Urbantouch-logo-menswear.png : (obviously) advertisements, but also potentially FOP issues, file(s) not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 21:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
affected File:Urbantouch products in display.jpg, File:Urbantouch products in display 2.jpg, File:Urbantouch products in display 1.jpg, File:Urbantouch-logo-menswear.png : (obviously) advertisements, but also potentially FOP issues, file(s) not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 21:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
as per File:Kinfra Film and Video Park Trivandrum.jpg (et al), but also rather 'advertisements', source/author " KINFRA", Roland zh (talk) 21:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 22:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Sadly, this is rather orphan work. It is likely PD in .pl (70 years after creation, if unpublished; or, if published before 1994 without clear copyright notice), so author may irrelevant for this. But is is rather copyrighted in US. Ankry (talk) 12:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
This file was uploaded by mistake. As I am new to wikimedia commons I would greatly appreciate a courtesy deletion. Thank you. Lv426 (talk) 22:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 02:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright by w:ru:Афанасьева, Елена Александровна (художник). 95.27.139.184 20:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright by w:ru:Афанасьева, Елена Александровна (художник). 95.27.139.184 20:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright by w:ru:Афанасьева, Елена Александровна (художник). 95.27.139.184 20:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. 95.27.139.184 20:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, wrong pd tag. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. 95.27.139.184 20:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, wrong pd tag. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright by w:ru:Молчанова, Галина Петровна. 95.27.139.184 20:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright by w:ru:Молчанова, Галина Петровна. 95.27.139.184 20:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright by w:ru:Молчанова, Галина Петровна. 95.27.139.184 20:06, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright by w:ru:Поварова, Валентина Петровна. 95.27.139.184 20:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright by w:ru:Поварова, Валентина Петровна. 95.27.139.184 20:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright by w:ru:Поварова, Валентина Петровна. 95.27.139.184 20:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright by w:ru:Куценко, Людмила Викторовна. 95.27.139.184 20:09, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Recent artwork in Paris. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 20:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright by w:ru:Левин, Соломон Давидович. 95.27.139.184 20:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Recent artwork in Paris. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 20:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation. 95.27.139.184 20:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BD,_%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD_%D0%94%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Subject matches username, so likely not the uploader's copyright. Further, out of scope - used only in promotional articles/drafts on enwiki. ~ Rob13Talk 02:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, probably derivative [6]. The original image created in 1945 or later so its status is to be clarified. Sealle (talk) 05:18, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low res, much better alternatives inside the same category... Sturm (talk) 05:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative works:
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
It is necesary clarify the copyright status of each photograph. At least one of them was already published on the internet before this image was uploaded to Commons. File:Bubalus depressicornis.png appears here. See File:Panorama Fauna of Borneo.JPG and File:Panorama Borneo flora.JPG, uploaded by the same user. Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 07:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
bessere TIF-Version verfügbar [7] Mehlauge (talk) 10:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-free file. No evidence that uploader holds the copyright. On the University's website here: http://www.alazhar.edu.ps/eng/ Verbcatcher (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
A release by the artist through COM:OTRS seems to be required. JuTa 19:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-free file. No evidence that uploader holds the copyright. Appears to have been scanned from a printed image. On the University's website here: http://www.alazhar.edu.ps/eng/Library/about.html Verbcatcher (talk) 22:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
should not be used on local wikis as a picture for Ibrahim Kaypakkaya, as the flag images are copies of fair use image w:tr:File:Ibrahim+kaypakkaya.jpg Bulgu (talk) 12:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- This image is under cc-by-2.0 and was verified. It's valid. It can be used at it is now only if not cropped of course. And the other image in black and white (the portrait) cannot be used on other wikipedia pages such as wikipedia france which doesn't allow fair use, that's why I'm against your request. --Ylzkhan (talk) 12:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Ylzkhan: , I didn't mean for the fair use image to be used instead of this image. The image by itself should be OK being cc-by-2.0, but aren't we just circumventing fair use laws when we use this image on local Wikipedia's? If I take a photo of any fair use image, I shouldn't be able to make it magically free. Photos of paintings are typically non-free. On the image in question, the fair use material is used predominantly. --Bulgu (talk) 13:06, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Wikimedia is about the validness of an image. This image being valid their is no motif to remove it. How it's used is decided by local wikipedias not by Wikimedia. --Ylzkhan (talk) 16:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Ylzkhan: , I didn't mean for the fair use image to be used instead of this image. The image by itself should be OK being cc-by-2.0, but aren't we just circumventing fair use laws when we use this image on local Wikipedia's? If I take a photo of any fair use image, I shouldn't be able to make it magically free. Photos of paintings are typically non-free. On the image in question, the fair use material is used predominantly. --Bulgu (talk) 13:06, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Clearly the banner photo is derivative of the copyrighted photo of Ibrahim Kaypakkaya and is not de minimis here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Może zostać.--Irena Maczko (talk) 13:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Irena Maczko
- Powinno być napisane źródło: Kolekcja Wojciech Walter (taka notka jest na prawym dolnym rogu fotografii). Radzę autorce to poprawić! Interros (talk) 18:03, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Far too recent to assume the photographer died before 1947. No evidence of prior publication and given the deckle edge, that seems unlikely. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 13:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Автор неизвестен, персона скончалась в 1949 году. Из источника и поиска в Интернете дату обнародования фото установить невозможно. Dogad75 (talk) 14:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- І це причина вилучення? Всі роботи до 1951 року опубліковані в Україні діють згідно законів Україні. До того ж автор невідомий, а людина померла до 1951 року. --Arxivist (talk) 14:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Автор неизвестен, из источника не видно, что файл обнародован до 1951 года и именно на Украине (персона вообще скончалась в Нью-Йорке). С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 22:20, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Frederick III (1415-1493), Holy Roman Emperor (1452-1493), King of the Romans (1440-1493), Duke of Styria, Carinthia and Carniola (1424-1493), Archduke of Austria (1457-1493). 1468.jpg
[edit],_Holy_Roman_Emperor_(1452-1493),_King_of_the_Romans_(1440-1493),_Duke_of_Styria,_Carinthia_and_Carniola_(1424-1493),_Archduke_of_Austria_(1457-1493)._1468.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Holy_Roman_Emperor_(1452-1493),_King_of_the_Romans_(1440-1493),_Duke_of_Styria,_Carinthia_and_Carniola_(1424-1493),_Archduke_of_Austria_(1457-1493)._1468.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate of File:Hans Burgkmair d. Ä. (zugeschr.) - Bildnis Kaiser Friedrich III.jpg from dubious source Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
_-_Bildnis_Kaiser_Friedrich_III.jpg){kind=link}
and also
- File:Philip III (1396-1467), Duke of Burgundy, Count of Artois and Flanders (1419-1467), Duke of Brabant, Limburg and Lothier (1430-1467), Count of Hainaut, Holland and Zeeland (1432-1467), Duke of Luxemburg (1443-1467). 1450.jpg
- File:Charles VII (1403-1461), King of France (1422-1461). 1445.jpg
- File:Ferdinand II (1452-1516), King of Sicily (1468-1516), King of Aragon (1479-1504). As a consequence of his marriage to Isabella I, he was King of Castile (1474-1504).jpg
- File:Wenceslaus I (1337-1383), Duke of Luxembourg (1354-1383), Duke of Brabant (1355-1383).jpg
- File:Richard III (1452-1485), King of England (1483-1485). Duke of Gloucester (1461-1483). Lord High Admiral of England (1462-1470; 1471-1483).jpg
- File:Louis XII (1462-1515), King of France from 1498 to 1515 and King of Naples from 1501 to 1504.jpg
- File:Louis XI (1423-1483), King of France (1461-1483). 1470.jpg
- File:Henry VI (1421-1471), King of England (1422-1461; 1470-1471).jpg
- File:Lorenzo de' Medici (1449-1492) De facto ruler of the Florentine Republic (1469-1492).jpg
- File:Isabella I (1451-1504), Queen of Castile and León (1474-1504) She was married to Ferdinand II of Aragon. Queen consort of Sicily (1469), Queen consort of Aragon (1479), Queen consort of Naples (1504).jpg
- File:Charles VIII (1470-1498), King of France (1483-1498).jpg
,_Duke_of_Burgundy,_Count_of_Artois_and_Flanders_(1419-1467),_Duke_of_Brabant,_Limburg_and_Lothier_(1430-1467),_Count_of_Hainaut,_Holland_and_Zeeland_(1432-1467),_Duke_of_Luxemburg_(1443-1467)._1450.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_King_of_France_(1422-1461)._1445.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_King_of_Sicily_(1468-1516),_King_of_Aragon_(1479-1504)._As_a_consequence_of_his_marriage_to_Isabella_I,_he_was_King_of_Castile_(1474-1504).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Duke_of_Luxembourg_(1354-1383),_Duke_of_Brabant_(1355-1383).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_King_of_England_(1483-1485)._Duke_of_Gloucester_(1461-1483)._Lord_High_Admiral_of_England_(1462-1470;_1471-1483).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_King_of_France_from_1498_to_1515_and_King_of_Naples_from_1501_to_1504.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_King_of_France_(1461-1483)._1470.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_King_of_England_(1422-1461;_1470-1471).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_De_facto_ruler_of_the_Florentine_Republic_(1469-1492).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Queen_of_Castile_and_Le%C3%B3n_(1474-1504)_She_was_married_to_Ferdinand_II_of_Aragon._Queen_consort_of_Sicily_(1469),_Queen_consort_of_Aragon_(1479),_Queen_consort_of_Naples_(1504).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_King_of_France_(1483-1498).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
re-uploaded by User:Gonzales55. See old DR for why these files have been deleted.
Can we add http://portraitsofkings.esy.es to the blacklist? --Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment @Herzi Pinki: I've deleted the first as a duplicate. Can you please insert the {{Duplicate}} in every page, so we can check 1) if it's really a duplicate, 2) what is the image these files are duplicate of. This should be the regular procedure, not the DR for such kcases. Thank you. --Ruthven (msg) 11:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Gemäß Text erstellt "by Arrinera", aber ausgegeben als eigenes Werk unter anderem Namen Schnabeltassentier (talk) 15:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Habe es geändert, ist es so richtig ?
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Сомнения в лицензии: автор неизвестен, а лицензия "срок охраны авторского права равен жизни автора пдюс 70 лет и менее". Тем более даже если автор неизвестен, дату обнародования фото установить невозможно Dogad75 (talk) 16:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Redundant. Superseded by almost similar image, in which the bird is less blurred. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Both of them have no categories, no useful description or file name, bird is very small -- out of scope. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
incorrect spelling ACCassidy (talk) 17:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- use {{Rename}}. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
These files are sourced to the Ohio House of Representatives. {{PD-USGov}} doesn't apply to state governments, and ohiohouse.gov reads "Copyright © 2017 The Ohio House of Representatives. All Rights Reserved." - Eureka Lott 17:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Greece.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- It is simply another much smaller resolution of this file, as it is stated. There are already 10 derivative files for this file. If you don't want it, delete it.
--Dmtrs32 (talk) 19:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Recent artwork in Paris. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 20:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright by w:de:Lew Alexandrowitsch Judin. 95.27.139.184 20:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright by w:de:Lew Alexandrowitsch Judin. 95.27.139.184 20:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: author died more than 70 years ago. Ruthven (msg) 11:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unknown location and people in Paris ; so image without encyclopaedic or photographic value Tangopaso (talk) 20:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is not Yuval Rotem, it's Katriel Schory Neegzistuoja (talk) 12:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Then the question is: Is this Katriel Schory notable? If yes, please use {{Rename}} to request renaming of the file. If no, delete for being out of scope. Jcb (talk) 20:40, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: seems notable: Katriel Schory has been the executive director of the Israel Film Fund. Ruthven (msg) 12:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
DR started as a bit confused by > Date 30. January 2017 (according to Exif data), i.e. today - to verify claimed 'own work', as potentially non-free content: rather small format and imho missing >sic< EXIF data to verify origin - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: may be obsolete ref new version by uploader, Roland zh (talk) 23:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify, as imho potentially non-free content, or personality right issues, although claimed as "Personal Photo Albums" - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': thumbnail format, one-file-upload, missing EXIF data, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Non-free photo here: https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/close-coffee-cup-fresh-raw-beans-108890729?src=N46i_Buh0xAN3SeiXoCBDQ-1-88
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
your opinions are asked: 'profiling', personality rights isusses ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' (thumbnail/EXIF), but also personality rights isusses, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 19:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: found on the internet, published prior to upload date. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' out of a June 2016 serial upload, as imho potentially non-free content: missing EXIF data to verify origin - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: not found on the internet, undue suspicion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' out of a June 2016 serial upload, as imho potentially non-free content: missing EXIF data to verify origin ?
also affected File:Best natural pic taken by me.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 19:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: not found on the internet and part of series taken at same location, undue suspicion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unknown location ; Image without encyclopaedic or photographic value Tangopaso (talk) 20:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: not a great photo, but acceptable addition to Category:Grey hats. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Image file is so big, it's not useful. I keep getting "There have been too many recent failed attempts (4 or more) to render this thumbnail. Please try again later." on the smaller versions. One can download (slowly) the full size, can't reduce in PhotoShop CS - it doesn't like the file. Maybe embedded data? Cannot use google image search for checking for copy - too big (over 20MB) Ronhjones (Talk) 20:18, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment 32-bit PNG: 7,952 × 5,304 × 4 bytes = 160 MiB uncompressed. The file is truncated, so the bottom is cut off and causing thumbnailing issues. Dispenser (talk) 19:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, max file size is 100MB. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: rather thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: missing EXIF data is not a valid reason for deletion, undue suspicion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Not in use, in lower quality, duplication of File:Monitronics building 2 - For Web.jpg. The Commons cannot be a repository for just anything! Ldorfman (talk) 22:18, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:32, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Redundant. Superseded by almost similar image, which is clearer. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh History of Medicine Wikipedia edit-a-thon for Innovative Learning Week 24.jpg
[edit]
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh History of Medicine Wikipedia edit-a-thon for Innovative Learning Week 26.jpg
[edit]
Deleting similar pic (duplicate) - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh History of Medicine Wikipedia edit-a-thon for Innovative Learning Week 23.jpg
[edit]
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh History of Medicine Wikipedia edit-a-thon for Innovative Learning Week 21.jpg
[edit]
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh History of Medicine Wikipedia edit-a-thon for Innovative Learning Week 18.jpg
[edit]
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh History of Medicine Wikipedia edit-a-thon for Innovative Learning Week 17.jpg
[edit]
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh History of Medicine Wikipedia edit-a-thon for Innovative Learning Week 15.jpg
[edit]
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh History of Medicine Wikipedia edit-a-thon for Innovative Learning Week 14.jpg
[edit]
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh History of Medicine Wikipedia edit-a-thon for Innovative Learning Week 13.jpg
[edit]
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh History of Medicine Wikipedia edit-a-thon for Innovative Learning Week 11.jpg
[edit]
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh History of Medicine Wikipedia edit-a-thon for Innovative Learning Week 08.JPG
[edit]
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh History of Medicine Wikipedia edit-a-thon for Innovative Learning Week 06.JPG
[edit]
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh History of Medicine Wikipedia edit-a-thon for Innovative Learning Week 05.JPG
[edit]
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh History of Medicine Wikipedia edit-a-thon for Innovative Learning Week 01.JPG
[edit]
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh History of Medicine Wikipedia edit-a-thon for Innovative Learning Week 03.JPG
[edit]
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh Wikipedia editathon for International Women's Day 2016 - Art and Feminism 01.jpg
[edit]
Deleting similar pic (duplicate) - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
File:University of Edinburgh Wikipedia editathon for International Women's Day 2016 - Art and Feminism 03.jpg
[edit]
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily (Poor quality image too) Stinglehammer (talk) 22:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Almost the same as this one. Should be deleted per COM:Redundant. Mhhossein talk 10:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Not a duplicate, per COM:Redundant, as this are not duplicates and\or redundant images. Tm (talk) 22:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per Tm. Ruthven (msg) 09:55, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Almost the same as this one. Should be deleted per COM:Redundant. Mhhossein talk 10:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Not a duplicate, per COM:Redundant, as this are not duplicates and\or redundant images. Tm (talk) 22:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- I can't figure out why we might need both of the two closely similar images. --Mhhossein talk 11:07, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per Tm. Ruthven (msg) 09:56, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:57, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:57, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:57, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Despite large size, metadata says Picasa. User's other uploads were speedies, COM:PRP. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Picasa always adds that, when you use it to modify files. Haven't you never used this program?
- Uploader is likely the person on the photo. We may assume he has all the rights, but the authors name in incorrect nevertheless and should be fixed (and that also applies to other photos he has uploaded). But this is no reason for deletion. So, @Ellin Beltz: please educate the uploader.
- @E-stonian: Please modify the image descriptions so that it's possible to identify the photographer. I assume you have asked the permission to upload thous photos under CC SA-BY 4.0 licence? Kruusamägi (talk) 14:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete together with his other uploads per the COM:PCP. User has false own work claims and re-uploaded files which had been previously deleted. Savhñ 12:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Copies of the same file under different users. Although the original is CC0, there is no need to keep these copies with different capture dates & authors. See also File talk:Vellach Kapelle Heilige Dreifaltigkeit.jpg.
- File:Bad Vellach Dreifaligkeitskapelle.jpg
- File:Heilige-Dreifaltigkeits-Kapelle Vellach.jpg
- File:Vellach Kapelle Heilige Dreifaltigkeit.jpg
Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment they are not exact duplicates or scaled versions. --Ruthven (msg) 12:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: did you read and understand File talk:Vellach Kapelle Heilige Dreifaltigkeit.jpg (alas German only)? I wrote copies and I did not use {{Duplicate}}. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Herzi Pinki: For what I've understood, 3 files are derived from Johann Jaritz's work. As my German is not that good, can you please explain me why you want to delete the derived works? --Ruthven (msg) 07:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: did you read and understand File talk:Vellach Kapelle Heilige Dreifaltigkeit.jpg (alas German only)? I wrote copies and I did not use {{Duplicate}}. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (the copies are kind of fuzzy from the copyright point of view), and I blocked indefinitely the sockpuppets. Ruthven (msg) 11:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Nach Absprache mit Herrn Kretzer bitte ich um Löschung dieses Fotos, da dieses möglicherweise als rufschädigend angesehen werden könnte. Danke! 9EkieraM1 (talk) 21:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, uploader requests deletion following consultation with the subject. WJBscribe (talk) 22:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Nach Absprache mit Herrn Kretzer bitte ich um Löschung dieses Fotos, da dieses möglicherweise als rufschädigend angesehen werden könnte. Danke! 9EkieraM1 (talk) 21:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, uploader requests deletion following consultation with the subject. WJBscribe (talk) 22:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Nach Absprache mit Herrn Kretzer bitte ich um Löschung dieses Fotos, da dieses möglicherweise als rufschädigend angesehen werden könnte. Danke! 9EkieraM1 (talk) 21:09, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, uploader requests deletion following consultation with the subject. WJBscribe (talk) 22:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aslan Xasiyev (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violations of "all rights reserved" images from panoramio and other websites.
- File:Река Самур2.jpg - uploaded in Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)--Soul Train (talk) 11:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- File:Шалбуздаг гора.jpg - uploaded in Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)--Soul Train (talk) 11:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- File:Самурский лес.jpg - uploaded in Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)--Soul Train (talk) 10:53, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- File:Курахские горы.jpg - uploaded in Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)--Soul Train (talk) 11:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- File:Куруш.jpg
- File:Кьуьхуьр.jpg
- File:СтIур.jpg
- File:Нежефхуьр.JPG
- File:Мучугъ.jpg
- File:КIурхуьр.JPG
- File:Лацар2.jpg
- File:Лацар.jpg
- File:ГъенервацI.jpg
- File:Элих.jpg
- File:Арчал.jpg
- File:Къутургъан.JPG
- File:Гьилерин мискIин.jpg
- File:Гьилерин сурар.jpg
- File:Вини ЦIийихуьруьн кьулан мектеб.jpg
- File:Вини Тигьиржал.jpg
- File:Магьачкъаладин панорама.jpg
- File:Гелхенрин пIир.jpg
- File:Гельхен.jpg
- File:Хъачмаздиз варар.jpg
- File:ТIигьирар хуьр.jpg
Takeaway (talk) 12:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- "from panoramio and other websites" — could you show the specific links in such violations. As per Aslan, he took permissions from the authors of those photos, for example, from Anzor Agamirzoev, and here's his page at the vk.com.--Soul Train (talk) 13:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- OK, I see. The problem is that Aslan really get the permissions from authors for using those files in Wikipedia, but it was just in personal message-mode in social medias. I request to not delete the files for a few weeks, untill authors will change the info at their pages.--Soul Train (talk) 13:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Aslan wrote me that he has the permission from eminalidin via email. But these files are not so valuable in comparison with Anzor Agamirzoev's files.--Soul Train (talk) 14:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Anzor created the new account in Flickr specially for public photos. You can also ask him about the authenticity of this account in vk.com.--Soul Train (talk) 10:53, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Please follow Wikimedia Commons procedure as outlined in COM:OTRS. It is up to the uploader to prove the legitimacy of their uploads. - Takeaway (talk) 12:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- I don't understand such procedure as OTRS, so we are going on the understandable way with Flickr.--Soul Train (talk) 15:11, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Please follow Wikimedia Commons procedure as outlined in COM:OTRS. It is up to the uploader to prove the legitimacy of their uploads. - Takeaway (talk) 12:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:OTRS is really not that hard to understand. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:18, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Robert McCall (artist)
[edit]These are all photographs of paintings by Robert McCall (1919-2010), who was never an employee of NASA. While the photographs of his works in this list were taken by NASA and are therefore PD, the works themselves need a license from McCall's heirs.
- File:Bob McCall with wife.jpg
- File:Celebrating One Hundred Years of Powered Flight.jpg
- File:Expanding the Frontiers of Flight.jpeg
- File:Opening the Space Frontier - The Next Giant Step.jpg
- File:Robert McCall painting.jpg
- File:The Space Mural - A Cosmic View.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Would the appearance in File:Bob McCall with wife.jpg qualify as de minimis? --Paul_012 (talk) 17:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, Bob McCall with wife.jpg and Robert McCall painting.jpg are qualified as de minimis. The painter (and wife) are the main subjects for these pictures. The paintings are "accessories". --Ras67 (talk) 14:15, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep These paintings are commissioned work for NASA and therefore property of the agency. You have forget to make a DR for this files:
- Apollo 17-insignia.png
- S72-49079.jpg
- Sts-1-patch.png
- STS-1 patch.jpg
- STS-133 patch.svg
- STS-133 patch.png
- STS-133 mission patch kopra.PNG
- Moon Landing 1971 Issue-8c.jpg
- Gemini Recovery (8972299923).jpg
- Apollo 8 Coming Home (8973492350).jpg
- Part of mural "The Space Mural
- CAP On the Air Force Team poster.jpg
- Mission Operations Directorate (MOD) emblem.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_emblem.png){kind=link}
Regarding your opinion "commissioned work" is not existent and we have no permission of McCall's heirs. If your opinion is assessed as truth where is the next instance to appeal? Otherwise we have to delete all images from NASA missions with multinational crews. NASA often don't say, who made a photo and alone the possibility that it comes from a Roskosmos/JAXA/ESA/CSA crew member oblige us to delete all. --Ras67 (talk) 14:15, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- First, the two images which Ras67 claims are de minimis are clearly not. The test of DM is whether an average viewer would notice it if the object in question were removed from the image. Since the copyrighted works are the only thing visible other than the person(s), they are clearly not DM.
- As for the second list, I agree that at least some of those should also be deleted. As noted in the DR name, these are only the images in Category:Robert McCall.
- It is completely clear that the fact that NASA commissioned these is irrelevant. The best example of this problem is at Category:Official presidential painted portraits in the White House where portraits of five presidents cannot be included because of copyright. And, although there is no evidence that the copyright for these was transferred to the government, even if it were, the works would still not be PD -- an example of that is the obverse of the Sacagawea dollar. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather thumbnail format, one-file-upload, missing EXIF data, and also personality rights issues, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, small-sized and obviously randomly taken from car/bus/train etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, small-sized and obviously randomly taken from car/bus/train etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, small-sized and obviously randomly taken from car/bus/train etc, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The sculpture was made in 1929, but is tagged as in the public domain because it was published before 1923 CaroleHenson (talk) 21:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. While the PD tag was changed in the meantime, we have no indication whether the copyright was renewed or not. Also, the licenses do not clearly distinguish between the copyright for the sculpture and the copyright for the photograph. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
No permission from Sebastian Schulze Jcb (talk) 22:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Weak keep per COM:GOF. Sealle (talk) 21:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- The claimed permission in the permission field is a 'Wikipedia only' permission, not a release into a compatible license. Jcb (talk) 22:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per Jcb's second comment. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Microsoft Office 2010 logos
[edit]Instance of copyright violation. If the full image was being used, it should/would have de minimis on it, explaining that these are copyrighted.
Elisfkc (talk) 22:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. I think that we Commons Users have to look at discussion pages before opening new deletion request. We discuss about these files less than a month ago. See there. --Pierpao.lo (listening) 23:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- I did. There was no mention of the de minimis principle or anything like it. The argument to keep was because the entire image was licensed as cc-by-2.0, but the part being used is only a small portion of it. That small portion is under copyright. Elisfkc (talk) 00:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- I do not think so. If a artwork is in CC BY SA 2.0 everybody can "Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms." So we can trim a small part and it is still in CC BY SA 2.0. This is a rule. Why do you say that is copyrighted?--Pierpao.lo (listening) 17:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Pierpao: That is actually not true. See Commons:De minimis, specifically Commons:De minimis#Sweden which states "These are
Not OK: Thumbnail-sized photos on a screenshot - copyvio of two of the thumbnail-sized photos". That is exactly what these images are. They are logos that are a tiny part of a large image that was licensed under CC-By-SA-2.0, and if the original image would have been uploaded, it would have probably ended up with the de minimis template. Also, please see Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Microsoft Sweden Flickr Account for the current discussion of this account. Elisfkc (talk) 17:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Images from this account have previously been deleted (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Windows 10 start screen (16337613651).jpg). Elisfkc (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- These files also could not have come from the image listed. Cropping the image from its largest size (2990 x 3854), which is a JPEG, results in a 100 x 86 JPEG. These images are 155 × 151 at the smallest, and in PNG or SVG, meaning that these images come from somewhere other than image listed as their source. Elisfkc (talk) 19:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Images from this account have previously been deleted (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Windows 10 start screen (16337613651).jpg). Elisfkc (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Pierpao: That is actually not true. See Commons:De minimis, specifically Commons:De minimis#Sweden which states "These are
- I do not think so. If a artwork is in CC BY SA 2.0 everybody can "Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms." So we can trim a small part and it is still in CC BY SA 2.0. This is a rule. Why do you say that is copyrighted?--Pierpao.lo (listening) 17:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- I did. There was no mention of the de minimis principle or anything like it. The argument to keep was because the entire image was licensed as cc-by-2.0, but the part being used is only a small portion of it. That small portion is under copyright. Elisfkc (talk) 00:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, source field is clearly bogus. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:30, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Bad SVG file, and very blurry, probably File:Straszyński herb poprawiony.svg is a better choice. In that case, if both are the same coat of arms, please add the categories and add the other file to wikipedia articles UAwiki (talk) 23:18, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment File is still in use. Can not be deleted, while this is the case. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:31, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Discuss with authors of the SVGs and the articles using these images. Nominate for deletion if it is not used. John Vandenberg (chat) 02:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Redirect to Template:De: No ISO 639 code (required per Commons:Language templates). Austrian German is a language variety with terminology generally identical to Standard German (I am an Austrian). See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Pt-br. FDMS 4 15:09, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete As a Prussian I hardly ever understand a word you are saying with your Jänners, your heuers, and your Erdäpfel. In all seriousness, though, looking at a few example pages where this is used, I can not see any justification of using {{De-at}} over just {{De}}. Even in texts where there would be a (small) difference, it does not make much sense to have two descriptions, which only differ in one word. A bot should replace all usages before this is deleted, though. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:27, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hmm, on one hand
it technically doesn’t matter, whether de-AT is part of ISO 639.x, and(OK, the language code will be inserted as HTML element attribute) there are actually some other templates containing a dash. But on the other hand, there is no template{{de-ch}}for the Swiss variety (not speaking of de-LU). More important, English with its partly more differing varieties does not need templates for them. And yes, other than claimed since Special:Diff/196342484/197468409 the template is not heavily used, cf. usage in Commons (I get 600 results). So, I tend, as well, to Delete — Speravir – 02:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hmm, on one hand
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Scanned historical photographs claimed as own works. Authors' permissions needed.
- File:Sergei Alifirenko.jpg
- File:Siyhov Aslan.jpg
- File:Мокшанов Дмитрий Иванович.jpg
- File:Юрий Щепин.jpg
- File:Яновский Рудольф Григорьевич.jpg
- File:Кутенко Н. В. Мемориальная доска на здании МГТУ. Майкоп 2014..jpg
- File:Петрова Татьяна Михайловна.jpg
- File:Тхаркахов Мухарбий Хаджиретович.jpg
- File:Хаджебиёков Руслан Гиссович.jpg
- File:Иванов Анатолий Георгиевич.jpg
- File:Alekseev alexander 3.jpg
- File:Лейтенант Тхагапсов М.М. Выпускник Каспийского ВВМУ. Баку 1950.jpg
- File:Ilia Dorofeev.jpg
- File:Зайцев Николай Кузьмич (1920-1991).jpg
- File:Гуськов Николай Никитович.jpg
- File:Герой Советского Союза Левин Семён Самуилович.jpg
- File:Alekseev alexander.jpg
- File:Семья Эммануила Кривчикова. Горький-1966..jpg
- File:Семья Героя России Дорофеева А.В. Тбилиси 1956..jpg
- File:Семья Конкордии Кривчиковой (Щербаковой). Тильзит 1958..jpg
- File:Дорофеева Ирина Александровна. Урождённая Кривчикова. (1923-1995). Ульяновск 1942..jpg
- File:На границе с Турцией. Генералы 12-го ак Люфи Я. К., Логошин, Дорофеев А. А.. Район учений Ахалкалаки 1989..jpg
- File:Нехаенко Степан Яковлевич Герой Советского Союза. Киев.1995.jpg
- File:Семья Чагунава. Москва 1973 год..JPG
- File:Генерал Дорофеев А.А. и его семья. Майкоп 1989..jpg
- File:Командарм 4 гв. ТА Лелюшенко Д.Д. и комдив 6 гв. мсд Дорофеев А.А..jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A2%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%82_1958..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._%D0%A3%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%8F%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA_1942..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sealle (talk) 10:32, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Уважаемый Sealle!
- 1. Я исправил даты съемки .
- 2.Некоторые мои фото сделаны с оцифрованных слайдов 1970-1985 гг., которые я сделал сам.
- 3. К некоторым фото, сделанным мною, у меня сохранились негативы,
- 4. некоторые мои фото вклеены в альбомы.
- 5. Некоторые фото мне достались по наследсту и я их правореемник.
- 6.Некоторые мои фото уже используютс в книгах и брощюрах, и я их использовал.
- .. Помогите правильно подобрать к ним лицензии... Все файлы важны, необходимы, и используются для иллюстации в соответсвущих статьях... Подскажите, что надо мне сделать?... Спасибо! С уважением, ALDOR46 (talk) 19:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep Delete Images for which you were actually the photographer can be kept, but you must clearly identify them. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - uploader has not specified which pictures have been taken by himself. --Jcb (talk) 22:00, 17 February 2017 (UTC)